Obama Camp Explains Bin Laden’s Rights…Again
ABC News’ Sunlen Miller, Teddy Davis, and James Gerber Report: Two more Obama advisers acknowledged Wednesday that Osama Bin Laden would be extended Habeas Corpus rights if the al Qaeda leader were brought to Guantanamo Bay.
The Obama advisers were quick to add, however, that this reading of Bin Laden’s rights, which was established by last week’s Supreme Court ruling and would be binding on the next president no matter who wins in November, does not mean that the man who claims credit for the 9/11 terrorist attacks would be released.
The decision in Boumediene v. Bush would only guarantee Bin Laden and other terrorist suspects held at Guantanamo Bay the right to request a hearing at which the government would have to establish through due process why the detainee should be held.
Speaking on a conference call arranged by the Obama campaign, Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., said that if Bin Laden were granted a Habeas hearing before a federal court "the judge would dismiss it" and rule that the United States has "ample grounds to hold him."
Obama foreign policy adviser Greg Craig argued that the question of the Al Qaeda leader’s rights was unlikely to arise because "there is an outstanding shoot-to-kill order with respect to Osama bin Laden." He added that the hypothetical question would only come up "if he’s captured alive" and "if he’s transported out of wherever he’s been captured and brought to Guantanamo."
"I have no doubt that there would be no problem establishing a basis, an evidentiary basis, to hold him and try him," said Craig, referring to Bin Laden. "And hold him responsible for murdering 3,000 people."
Obama adviser Susan Rice, who joined Smith and Craig on the call, would not engage the hypothetical question of what rights Bin Laden would be afforded. Instead, she invoked the existing authority to use lethal force against Bin Laden. She also pointed to a 2007 speech on Pakistan by Obama in which he promised to use actionable intelligence to go after high-value Al Qaeda targets like Bin Laden even if, in Rice’s words, the "host government is unable or unwilling to act."
Wednesday was the second day in which Obama supporters found themselves explaining what rights Bin Laden would be afforded if he were brought to Guantanamo Bay under last week’s Supreme Court ruling. On Tuesday, Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry (D) and former counterterrorism czar and ABC News consultant Richard Clarke offered a similar reading of Bin Laden’s rights.
On a Wednesday call arranged by the McCain campaign, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani said he was "startled" by Kerry’s acknowledgment that Bin Laden would be given Habeas rights at Guantanamo under last week’s Supreme Court ruling.
Because Obama agreed with last week’s decision and McCain did not, Giuliani said Kerry’s remarks on behalf of Obama were a reminder of "what we would have in store for us if we have a Democratic presidency."
Email
USS Gabrielle Giffords Honors Courage
Mitt Romney's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
God helps us! Where is Hillary?
Posted by: Marie,TX | June 18, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Umm…who is Craig, and who is Smith. I think a quick journalism course would teach these so called “journalists” to introduce the subjects that they are writing about and not call them Smith and Craig out of the blue !!! But of course this is Sunlen Miller !!
Posted by: ncvoter | June 18, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
This is the constitutional response and the sane response to the question. But McCain won’t hesitate to pounce, and voters could get scared when one speaks of Osama’s rights.
http://www.political-buzz.com/
Posted by: matt | June 18, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
So what would Mccain do? Ignore the supreme court? Call him and ask him! You guys are some lazy reporters can’t you put in this story what Mccain would do as well so we can make an informed decision. I’ll just assume that mccain will tell the judges to go to you know were ignore our checks and balances and do whatever he wants. All while he’s lighting the constitution on fire!
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Rudi gets startled by process servers, too. So I don’t know what his point is.
But this ain’t rocket science. There is no reason why there wouldn’t habeas rights for UBL. They’d be denied by a court btw.
So this is largely a non-issue.
Posted by: The Commander Guy | June 18, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Hillary is on a mounth long vacation but she’ll be with Obama on the 26th I think.
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Yes even murdering TERRORISTS have rights. Lets have him move in with Obama and Rev Wright so they can preach to Bin Laden all day
Posted by: Bunyan | June 18, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
I don’t understand why people are so upset about this. Murderers have rights drug dealers have rights. Do you guys really hate our constitution and america that much. I think you really need to be called traitors!
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
apparently some Major news is about to break that either deals with McCain or Obama. Anyone know anything about this???
http://www.realdealreport.com/
Posted by: jjandall | June 18, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Call me old fashioned, but I kind of like our Constitution. I guess Obama does too.
I would certainly prefer that Bin Laden was rotting in jail than running free as he has been for the last 7 years.
In truth, I think this is rubbish. I may not be a McCain fan, but I suspect that he will respect the Constitution (including Habeas Corpus) far more than the current administration.
Posted by: Cornfields | June 18, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
NO Murdering terrorists DO NOT have rights, are you insane?? The only right bin laden has is to death. He murdered over 3000 people and you want to hold his hand, you must be insane. Give him a trial, ha. Just shoot him or hang him, but first “interrogate” the crap out of him to see if he will give up info. Sure go ahead call me the evil one, say I’m just as bad as he is because your too big of an idiot to know the difference.
Posted by: Dennis | June 18, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Even ex-Bush administration flacks have rights too.
Safavian had his conviction for Abramoff related charges overturned yesterday on technicalities. No word on the re-trial, yet.
But there is simply no reason why UBL can’t have some sort of trial before he is executed.
Posted by: The Commander Guy | June 18, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
And dennis what then seprates us from the terrorist? It deffinatly won’t be our laws values or constitution. What is it then? And sir it looks like you should direct that idiot remark to yourself.
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Its the Constitution of the United States, not the world. Last I checked bin laden is not a US citizen and therefor not a granted rights under it.
Posted by: Dennis | June 18, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Well ncvoter obviously didn’t read the piece very carefully as both Rep Adam Smith, D-Mass and Obama foreign policy adviser Greg Craig are mentioned clearly.
On the substance of the piece, I really think the Obama campaign needs to talk about how just holing suspects up in Gitmo does not serve anyones justice and that if and when they do face trial it needs to be seen to be fair.
Posted by: markymark | June 18, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
So now Americans are terrorists? is that what your saying Joe. Because we want to find and execute this man. This man who would gladly execute your and my children without trial and without remorse? You think we would be terrorist for protecting ourselves? I never flew a plane into his house, I don’t want to kill his children. But I’m the bad guy?
Posted by: Dennis | June 18, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
So then we should just ignore it? He isn’t granted rights under it but he is as a pow of the war on terror according to the genvea convention. Hey I don’t like the guy ethier but sacrificing our morals as a socitey makes us no better than them. We just have cooler things to blow people up with. If W wanted just to hold all these people he shouldn’t have declared war on them and if we aren’t going to give them a trial then why don’t we kill them all whats the point in detaining them?
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
why don’t we rename our country into
United States of Islam
Posted by: john | June 18, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
No you sir are unamerican and don’t really belong here. Move to Burma they have a milltary Junta over there sounds more like your style.
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Dennis- you got it exactly right!!! OBL is NOT a US Citizen, and therefore, he has NO rights. He is in a war with us & should be treated as an enemy soldier- shot on sight. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court got it wrong, yet again.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | June 18, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
This is a non-issue.
The wingnuts are presenting a false choice here.
According to Rudi and other wingnuts the question is: either UBL has all the rights and consitutional protections in the world or he has none.
This is bogus. The answer is neither.
Some sort of fair trial can be arranged for UBL before he gets the chair.
But of course he has to be captured first and Bush hasn’t seemed too concerned about this.
Posted by: The Commander Guy | June 18, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Osama Bin Laden and Taliban will have the rights to appeal in court under Barack Hussein Obama’s rules. Yes, all of us have to move into caves somewhere in Pakistan after that!
Posted by: Marie,TX | June 18, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
It looks like even God can not save America. If Americans still choose this Empty fake Obama, get ready for more attack.
Other democracies have law to hold terrorists for years without any trial.
You know why , because they tried what Obama is talking about and failed many times.
Posted by: tim | June 18, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
We are supporting our morals by killing Bin Laden, thats what we do as a society, kill mass murders. Are you calling our Military mass murders? And on your second point I tend to agree, kill them all if they are terrorists that deserve to be killed.
Posted by: Dennis | June 18, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
No they did not what they are saying wasn’t give him all the right. Man you guys need to read. They are saying you can’t fly around the world and just start arresting people without even accusing them of anything! Thats whats going on in gitmo! How do you guys know they ar terrorist ther? Cuz Bush told you? It’s really llike he’s told the truth the whole time! Seriously you guys sound like commies!
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Joe,
Even Hillary appears a thousand time with Obama or goes campaign for him; I still write her name in and vote NO to Obama!
Posted by: Marie,TX | June 18, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Does Obama ready to pay the Court expenses , high dollar lawyer fees and security expenses from his book money.
God Bless America
Posted by: john | June 18, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Good denis we agree on something I don’t want to pay for gitmo anymore so ethier give them a trial and sentance them, let them go, or kill them! Simple as that!
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
It’s cool you just asked were she was.
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Oh ok Joe thats right I forgot, Bush sucks. Your one of those. Bush is sending enemies of Big Oil to gitmo, and everyone knows it but doesn’t do anything because their in on it too. Koo koo, koo koo.
Posted by: Dennis | June 18, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Wingnuts don’t need to read the Post before they type.
Their minds are already made up! Why bother with facts.
Posted by: The Commander Guy | June 18, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
So as I asked Joe do you think our military are mass murders? you said they just have cooler weapons than the terrorist
Posted by: Dennis | June 18, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
OSAMA=OBAMA=FAHAKHAN=WRIGHT
They are connected in someway. They are extremists, racists, and anti-Americans!
Posted by: Marie,TX | June 18, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
What is Mccains plan on gitmo? Anybody? does he have one? I’m really sick of my tax dollars going to a concentration camp.
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Why does FBI’s most wanted poster NOT hold bin Laden accountable for 911. Why should suspects be denied their constitutional right to a fair trial? Remember Republican terror mongers that whatever unchecked power Republicans use against citizens, can and will be used against them if the opposition party comes into power. This is why Bush has already preemptively exonerated himself and his advisors against being brought up on charges in the US for civil rights violations and war crimes. However, all of them can be brought up on international charges, when they leave office. If I was the Republicans right now I’d do all I could to restore the rule of law and take away any unconstitutional power than have been created over the past eight years; Because Pelosi, Obama, Hilliary and the like will be more than happy to use these new tools granted by the exectutive to itself, against ANY and ALL persons who oppose their right to rule… at will. A dangrous precedent has been sent; And this genie isn’t about to be put back in the bottle by the masters. Be afraid, be VERY afraid, indeed.
Posted by: heresy | June 18, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
john this isnt a criminal trial… i dont think there would be high profile attorneys waiting to take on terrorists as a client…
they would be able to ask why tehy are being held prisoner, and in the case of bin laden, that would be… well youve claimed to be the mastermind of this attack, soooo were holding you
why do we need denny crane for that?
you need to get off your soap box and stop thrashing our constitution there johnny boy
Posted by: bhrandon | June 18, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
See what have I told you?? he’ll make a correction again. umm….the…umm…I mean…you know….I actually meant….
Good grief, at least not a whole speech!!!
Posted by: hannah | June 18, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
marie tx
bush=saudi=mccain=halliburton
they are all connected!!!
they are rich power hungry war thirsty humans all tyring to extort iraq for political and legacy gain
Posted by: bhrandon | June 18, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
ellsbells930, read the constitution. citizen or not they have rights. read the geneva convention. just learn how to read. do something, you retard!
Posted by: PK | June 18, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Right now I believe that Bush is useing our military to spread christian terrorisum to muslims. And in return we can expect more attacks as well. What do you call it when someone blows up a house in the middle of the night? Trust me its a big sh** sandwich. I think Bush wants to antagonize muslims in order for them to attack Israel then they will burn down the Mosque on the hill and build a Jewish temple. Then the Christians get there rapture! And the evangelical christan crazys have won!
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
also marie of TX
where is hillary??? taking a vacation, she will be hanging out with obama after that
pathetic marie YOU ARE PATHETIC
vote for mccain i hope your kids dont get sent to war and die terrible deaths because you voted out of scorn and had the forsight and vindictive nature sprinkled with some entitlement issues of a 4th grader GROW UP MARIE
i also hope that your home is payed for that your husband doesnt have a job that will be sent over seas and that you dont live on the beach where you get to instead of staring out at the ocean you get a nice new oil drilling platform!!!
good luck in hell marie good luck
Posted by: bhrandon | June 18, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
hey dennis at least obama wants to do something about bin laden unlike mccain and bush who decided to START a war in iraq….
apparently so bush could have a legacy
some legacy
Posted by: bhrandon | June 18, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Dennis- The hypothetical was IF he was brought to Guantanamo, which the Court said was our jurisdiction. That is why I doubt he will never see this hemisphere. Although habeas corpus should apply everywhere.
But why not try him? Why not show what we do to terrorists? Why not show that we are better than them? For the same reasons as Nuremberg, that is who we are.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 18, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
LOL!!!! I hope you didn’t take that seriously! Just getting a rise out of you! But I do think our military isn’t being used properly.. It’s like trying to kill a fly with a ball bat.
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Barack HUSSEIN Obama
Crackpot liberal.
Posted by: Bubbles | June 18, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
I don’t just think Bush sucks. He is the worst and the dumbest president ever! So I ask you what is Mccains big plan? Anyone? Oh Bush probably hasn’t got it to him yet.
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
This idiot is gonna get us all killed.
He doesn’t have a clue.
Posted by: Gary | June 18, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
tim -
We are not other countries. We are America.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 18, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
Who here is doing better after 8 years of republicans? Thats the real question.
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
Dennis
your right bin laden isnt a citizen of the united states… but we here in the united states, we citizens did decide that we were going to make certain laws and certain rules, and we were not oging to be a tyrany and a terrorist nation, we were going to rise up and be lawful and thoughtful and hold ourselves to a higher standard…
all men are created equal and no matter the crime we would give them a fair trial because that stood out from all those other terrorist and shady governments…
just because you arent at your hosue anymore do you just start crapping on the living room floor of your friends?
i hope not, otherwise you may not have any friends…
no you hold yourself to YOUR standards
thats why you are taught manners… its the same thing, we as americans by keeping peopel held for no reason other then to keep them in limbo means we are sinking to a lower level then what we as american set for ourselves… which is to rise above
taht doesnt mean let hte terrorists go as you and some of your other short sighted repub bots are saying and trying to hammer away at…
no you give them the right to plead their case, and then you pass judgment….
we have a fair legal system, much more so then other countries, if youd like to be another country or if you hate america or the constitution this much… please try somewhere else like burma, or perhaps youd like to go hole up with hamas or hezzballoh,
get out of my country im tired of you repubs spitting on my constitution
YOU MAKE ME SICK
Posted by: bhrandon | June 18, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
Ahh T still not one original thought I see! I’d say its good to see you but it isn’t.
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
The point is that those at Guantanamo (and those who have been there previously) are not terrorists; they are terror suspects. That’s the whole point of this discussion. If you think that anyone who has spent time at Guantanamo is a known and proven terrorist, then you should do some reading.
Posted by: mary | June 18, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
Yes, our military are mass murderers! Collateral damage is a military term for killing innocents. Murder is murder period. It matters not whether it is accomplished through flying a plane into a building, or dropping clusters bombs. The innocent who die are just as dead. Their families mourn just as much. Unfortunately some Americans think that that America has a right to kill hundreds of thousands of innocent Muslims to avenge for the three thousand killed by a small handful of terrorists.
Posted by: Spirit Rebel | June 18, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
Obama’s message “HOPE for some spare CHANGE” when Obama tax the h*ll out of American people. Now we’re going to have to pay for lawyers to defend Osama and his terrorists. Wow and there are a bunch of idiots on here supporting this idea. I wish only obama supporters pay the taxes obama supported not me because I don’t want my small business owner to reduce my hours, my wages or lay me off because he cannot pay the “tax the rich” idea.
“HOPE for spare CHANGE!!”
Posted by: aaron | June 18, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
300 billon over buget so far…
We just barrow more from china I suppose. Mcains economic plan if you can call it that continues this trend.
Now we have investors in China telling American banks how to run it bussiness.
Go ahead cut more taxes start more wars and keep gitmo going. Then China will own america. the repubs have sold us out!
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
aaron stop reading repub tlaking points
mccain wants to extend tax breaks to the top 2% are you in that range?
obama wants to give those that make less then 200k tax breaks and tax teh rich
soooo im guessing you fall in the obama tax cut part
yet… i see you think obama is going to tax you for some reason
i suggest you get your facts straight
im tired of bush and mccain giving the richest of hte rich breaks and loop holes to continually get out of taxes while i and the rest of us lower income people get stuck supporting the economy and making those rich peopel even more rich
NO THANKS MCSAME
Posted by: bhrandon | June 18, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
aaron – Yes, there are people who thinks America still stands for something.
And your “tax” scare is almost as silly as your “terrorists” scare.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 18, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
Bhrandon
Keep talking and cursing, your pipe hole will not shut until your savior Obama get kick like a ball in November. You are one of typical Obama’s supporters who will scream and moan like a wounded animal when someone has opinion on your candidate!
It’s pathetic to see the pure hate from those support this jerk!
My entire family was in the army and we know how war looks like! You don’t speak for me and my family! In addition, you don’t know anything about my background so just shut up and stay where you are!
Go to hell with your Osama and Obama!
Posted by: Marie,TX | June 18, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
Thanks T coming from you just a compliment. So T enlighten me. How do you see it? And how is my last statement lacking anything substantial? Do you know how mccains going to pay for all these wars and detiontion centers and tax cuts? What are we going to do with all the prisoners at Gitmo? Any ideas? any origianl idea?
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
You can critize Obama all you want he beat Hillary so he can take whatever a couple people say about him on these post. T still waiting…. What your barking cat got your tounge?
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
Guy: …..ZOMG!!! Obama is so cool. He is the greatest. He is our new hero. Here to change everything to bliss on a silver platter!!!!
-Observer: Wow. That sounds great. We would all welcome that. How does he plan to do it?
Guy:……HES OBAMA !!!! No way we want ‘Mc Bush’! He is evil now, since Bill and Hillary have been booted out.
Obama will bring peace. Excellent economy. Heath care for all!! No more hunger. No more joblessness!!! No more suffering. No more wars.
Observer: Wow. You sure love the guy. But how do you know he can do all this?
Guy:….CUZ HES OBAMA !!!!! You are obviously a RACIST by asking such questions.
Observer : Holy cow. Settle down . Are you part of the Obama campaign?
Guy: ….no. I am a journalist for the mainstream media.
Posted by: ned | June 18, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Government needs to have a background check on those support Obama. A lot of them have connection with terrorists and some of them are “real” terrorists!
Posted by: Marie,TX | June 18, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Marie,TX – I’m not sure you should be criticizing others’ alleged “hate” while you are throwing your temper tantrums.
And all people in the campaigns get background checks. Sorry, no terrorists under the rocks so far.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 18, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
Spirit Rebel is EXACTLY why we should NOT put bin laden on trial. Spirit apparently doesn’t understand the good and bad or evil. Put enough people like Spirit on a jury and they all get off, time served, because the US is soooo bad we deserved it anyway. If that happens you can invite OBL over for dinner and see what happens, maybe you can play xbox together, work on your MySpace pages together, go to Starbucks, attend a beheading of a journalist doing his job, on shoot some infidel children together. Good Luck with that.
Posted by: Dennis | June 18, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
See Maries comment is what I like to see. Call us “enemy combatants” then you can put us in gitmo and hold us forever! Believe me most of are probaly being warrentless wiretapped now! And thats why we have a supreme court ladies and gentlemen.
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
Obama wants both ways.
On one hand, Osama’s head is wanted for $40 mil.
On the other hand, according to Obama, Osama is presumed innocent.
Posted by: fact check | June 18, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
“[F]ormer New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani said he was
‘startled’ by Kerry’s acknowledgement that Bin Laden
would be given Habeas rights at Guantanamo under last
week’s Supreme Court ruling.”
I think we can all be glad then that Guiliani didn’t progress any further in the primaries than he did. If he can’t figure out what that the Supreme Court decision was all about, then he certainly doesn’t need to be President.
As to the argument being made that “rights” under the Constitution are restricted to American citizens… There is NO SUCH PROVISION in the Constitution. And specifically, Article I, § 9 ¶ 2, which takes up this question, says nothing about restricting the “privilege” of habeas corpus to citizens.
(And just for the record, we have bin Laden on tape claiming at least complicity if not responsibility for 09/11/01. No judge is ever gonna grant him release prior to his trial.)
Posted by: Lee C. ― U.S.A. | June 18, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Here is a lesson for you T: Liberal
1a. Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry. b. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded. c. Of, relating to, or characteristic of liberalism. d. Liberal Of, designating, or characteristic of a political party founded on or associated with principles of social and political liberalism, especially in Great Britain, Canada, and the United States. liberally, liberalness
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
The news of September 11, 2001 shocked the whole world, however, people in Trinity church was dancing, cheering, and laughing with Rev Wright’s slogan “God D America” “Chickens come home to roost” Even though the video clips did not show his face but don’t tell me that Obama was not there!
Posted by: Marie,TX | June 18, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
What if OBL is not brought to Gauantanamo Bay??
Posted by: k murthy | June 18, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
Don’t worry T read slow let it sink in.
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
Another Obama terrorist connection. Do you think Obama’s support of Osama Bin Laden’s right to a trial has anything to do with so many terrorists and their associates supporting Obama?
Jun 16, 2008
Al-Qaeda terrorist’s son an Obama fundraiser
Here’s another ‘associate’ that Democratic Presidential candidate Barack Hussein Obama may want to throw under the bus. This is a Debbie Schlussel exclusive.
Al Churbaji is a Syrian national currently living in Ann Arbor, Michigan, from where he is fighting the Department of Homeland Security’s endeavors to deport him. If successful, this will be the second deportation for Al-Churbaji, after a return to the U.S. that violated federal immigration and deportation policies. More on that later.
But even if Al-Churbaji is deported, at least two of his six children, a son and a daughter, were both born here and are by law U.S. citizens. These terrorist anchor babies can carry on what he started.
One of them is his son, Mohamed Salim Al-Churbaji a/k/a Salim Alchurbaji (heretofore referred to as, “Salim”) [pictured. CiJ]. He is a student at the University of Michigan and serves as a Barack Obama fundraiser and organizer, according to Salim’s own testimony. He testified that he, Salim, has made at least one recent trip to terrorist host state Syria, their father’s native country, but his brother testified that it was actually at least two trips, including one in the last year-and-a-half.
What were they doing in Syria–a country where they could be tortured due to their father’s memberships in the Muslim Brotherhood? We may never find out. A College Democrats activist and political chairman of the U-M Muslim Students Association, Salim also done some modeling and fancies himself as something of a male supermodel. But you can bet, he wasn’t posing or exploring fashion in Syria.
Most of this story is about Salim’s father Mohamed and the sordid state of affairs that is American immigration policy today. I suggest strongly that you read the whole thing. But I want to come back to Obama for a second. Did he not vet Salim? Did he not care? Did he hire him knowing that he’s the son of an al-Qaeda operative who has traveled twice to Syria for unknown purposes?
And what will happen to the Patriot Act and the Department of Homeland Security if – God forbid – Obama becomes President? Will they disappear? If they do, I suggest you stay out of shopping malls, movie theaters and other crowded places….
Cross-posted to Israel Matzav.
Posted by Carl in Jerusalem on Jun 16, 2008 at 03:39 AM | Permalink
Posted by: Tim | June 18, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
Marie did you watch the whole speech? Nevermind that is so played out I care not to adress it.
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Liberal.
1a. Not interested in established tradional or othodox authorarian attittudes, views or dogmas,; free to be bigoted, because we are better than you.
b, Favoring proposals for reform, no matter how stupid or racist as long as it makes me feel good and screws others
d. if its yours and I don’t have on its mine.
oops that last one was from toddler rules, but I think it still applies
Posted by: Dennis | June 18, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
jock59801
Terrorists deserve this kind of attitude! To protect terrorists??? You are one of them!
Obama= Osama
Posted by: Marie,TX | June 18, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Marie,TX – Your implication that the people of Trinity Church were dancing about 9/11 is a lying, mean-spirited slander. If you really believe that, then you need to get out more; if you are just saying it to smear, shame on you.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 18, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Do people not understand that Bin Laden is an enemy combatant, not a civilian accused of a crime? He should NOT have the same rights as a civilian accused of a crime. I cannot believe that this is what America has come to. This is not the America that the founding fathers had in mind when they wrote the constitution. There is a different standard of justice for military combatants than for civilians. As the wife of a career active duty military member, I am appalled. So the enemy combatants who try to kill my husband are then supposed to go to a court with the same standards as a civiliam criminal court? Will they be flying our men home to “testify” against them? Who will be left to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan? This is so ridiculous. In all previous wars we held the enemy POW’s indefinitely until the war was over. Then they were let go. Why should it be different now?
Posted by: susie | June 18, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
Amen Susie Amen!
Posted by: Dennis | June 18, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Typical consevative. Destroy the truth to satifiy your needs. See now you look like bush I bet the WMD’s are in my back yard. Good job dennis proved my point. so do like stalin hitler or bush better?
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
Why doesn’t your husband shoot them? If they are enemy combatants and firing at him.
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
How can OBL have rights? That is the dumbest thing to come out of their mouth. This man killed 3000+ people and they know it. He should not have the same rights as you and I. What are they thinking?
Posted by: J | June 18, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Sorry Joe I don’t know all of Stalins teachings like you, and you would have put all Nazi’s on trial(During the war) so as much as I dont like Bush he’s far far better than either of those, both of who were defeated by who..??? Guess, the evil terrorist Americans right? Right
Posted by: Dennis | June 18, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Who are you kidding? Habeas Corpus is not available to US citizens, why Bin Laden would/could have that right is a farce. The constitution has gone by the wayside long ago.
Posted by: Fred Myers | June 18, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
susie – For one thing, this “war” will never be over. Secondly, not everyone in Guanatanamo is an enemy combatant.
Bin Laden is a special case, of course, and I doubt he would live long enough to see a trial. But the point is that habeas corpus is a fundamental human right with no exceptions.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 18, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Susie you also answered your owm question. Bush has said they are not POW’s but enemy combatants. Being classifide as such the can be held indefinatly. So even if the war is over he would not let them go because then the terrorist problem could start agian. Thats all this is really over bush just wants to imprison people forever I say shoot them if you aint going to let them go or give them a trial. And we should leave Iraq now.
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
jock59801 Transcript from Jeremiah Wright – 9-16-01 – Cut 9 – Faith footnote – chickens coming home to roost.
“The chickens have come home to roost”
“Now I asked the Lord what should our response be in light of such an unthinkable act. But before I share with you what the Lord showed me, I want to give you one of my little faith footnotes. Visitors, I often give faith footnotes so that our members don’t lose sight of the big picture. Let me give you a little faith footnote. Turn to your neighbor and say faith footnote (audience responds). I heard Ambassador Peck on an interview yesterday. Did anybody else see him or hear him? He was on Fox News. This is a white man, and he was upsetting the Fox News commentators to no end. He pointed out, did you see him, John? A white man, and he pointed out, an ambassador that wasn’t Malcolm X saying, when he got silenced by Elijah Muhammad, was in fact true. America’s chickens are coming home to roost. We took this country, by terror, away from the Sioux, the Apache, the Arawak, the Commanche, the Arapaho, the Navajo. Terrorism. We took Africans from their country to build our way of ease, and kept them enslaved and living in fear. Terrorism. We bombed Grenada and killed innocent civilians, babies, non-military personnel. We bombed the black civilian community of Panama with stealth bombers, and killed unarmed teenagers and toddlers, pregnant mothers and hard-working fathers. We bombed Qaddafi’s home and killed his child. Blessed are they who bash your children’s head against a rock. We bombed Iraq. we killed unarmed civilians trying to make a living. We bombed a plant in Sudan to pay back for the attack on our embassy, killed hundreds of hard-working people, mothers and fathers, who left home to go that day, not knowing that they’d never get back home. We bombed Hiroshima, we bombed Nagasaki, and we nuked far more than the thousands in New York and the Pentagon, and we never batted an eye. Kids playing in the playground, mothers picking up children after school, civilian, not soldiers, people just trying to make it day by day. We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back into our own front yards? America’s chickens are coming home to roost. Violence begets violence. Hatred begets hatred. And terrorism begets terrorism. A white ambassador said that, y’all, not a black militant, not a reverend who preaches about racism, an ambassador whose eyes are wide open, and who’s trying to get us to wake up and move away from this dangerous precipice upon which we are now poised. The ambassador said the people that we wounded don’t have the military capability we have. But they do have individuals who are willing to die and take thousands with them, and we need to come to grips with that. Let me stop my faith footnote right there, and ask you to think about that over the next few weeks, if God grants us that many days. Turn back to your neighbor and say footnote is over (audience responds).”
Posted by: Mary | June 18, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
Mccains theme song:
This is the war that never ends It just goes on and on and on.. This is the war that never ends..
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
Transcript from Jeremiah Wright – 4-13-03 – Cut 7 – God damn America, and Condaskeezza Rice.
“The United States of America government, when it came to treating her citizens of Indian descent fairly, she failed. She put them on reservations. When it came to treating her citizens of Japanese descent fairly, she failed. She put them in internment prison camps. When it came to treating its citizens of African descent fairly, America failed. She put them in chains. The government put them on slave quarters, put them on auction blocks, put them in cotton fields, put them in inferior schools, put them in substandard housing, put them in scientific experiments, put them in the lowest-paying jobs, put them outside the equal protection of the law, kept them out of their racist bastions of higher education, and locked them into positions of hopelessness and helplessness. The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three strikes law, and then wants us to sing God bless America? No, no, no, not God bless America, God damn America, that’s in the Bible, for killing innocent people. God damn America for treating her citizens as less than human. God damn America as long as she tries to act like she is God, and she is supreme (applause). The United States government has failed the vast majority of her citizens of African descent. Think about this, think about this, for every one Oprah, a billionaire, you’ve got five million blacks who are out of work. For every one Colin Powell, a millionaire, you’ve got ten million blacks who cannot read. For every one Condoskeezer Rice, you’ve got one million in prison. For every one Tiger Woods, who needs to get beat at the Masters, with his Cablasian hips, playing on a course that discriminates against women, God has His way of bringing you up short when you get too big for your Cablasian britches. For every one Tiger Woods, we’ve got ten thousand black kids who will never see a golf course. The United States government has failed the vast majority of her citizens of African descent. But I’m fitna to help you one last time. Turn to your neighbors, say he’s fitna to help us one last time (audience responds). Turn back and say forgive him for the God damn (audience responds). That’s in the Bible, though. Blessing and curses is in the Bible. It’s in the Bible. (applause) I’m fitna to help you one last time.”
Posted by: Mary | June 18, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Another reason for no trial is that it gives the terrorists a voice, which is bad on many levels. From smuggling terror plans to just plain morale, they should never be heard from and should have no contact with the outside would. Should a special military panel be assigned to assure no “innocent” people are in Gitmo, ok.
Posted by: Dennis | June 18, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
Nice Mary!! I like it now what part isn’t the truth?
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
For transcript of entire Rev. Wright 9/11 sermon go to http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/blog/g/34fedc25-b630-48e8-b2f4-326c5d9d5314
Posted by: Mary | June 18, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
“Do people not understand that Bin Laden
is an enemy combatant, not a civilian accused
of a crime?
He should NOT have the same rights as a
civilian accused of a crime.”
susie | Jun 18, 2008 5:51:29 PM
You are the one who does not understand, susie. “Prisoners of War”, by definition, are considered military (or sufficiently para-military to qualify for the protections provided enemy military under our treaties and under our own laws). Captured “enemy combatants” are either military (POWs) or non-military combatants (not POWs). “Not POWs” are, by definition, civilians. They are subject to being hung, just like spies and civilian saboteurs. If we take him alive, bin Laden is waiting for a rope.
Posted by: Lee C. ― U.S.A. | June 18, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
Obama’s VP pick = Osama?
DON’T VOTE IRAQ HUSSEIN OSAMA!
GO McCAIN!
Posted by: Debra | June 18, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
Which country do we have a treaty with for these terrorists?That we agreed to their rights and protection?
Posted by: Dennis | June 18, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
According to the bible america is not in gods favor. But hey I don’t believe in that stuff. But I’ve read the bible cover to cover 4 times and if you believe in that kind of thing Mr wright is correct.
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
Jimmy Carter all over again. Expect hostages to be taken the first week that he’s in office.
Posted by: Mack | June 18, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
Hey at least our towers won’t fall down like the first 9 months Bush was in office! OH gotcha!
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
“Which country do we have a treaty with for these
terrorists?That we agreed to their rights and protection?”
Dennis | Jun 18, 2008 6:08:59 PM
It’s actually in the Geneva Conventions (to which we are signatory, treaty members) that we have to deal with all prisoners according to the Conventions, whether or not their “country” is a signatory to the Conventions. You should read them. It’s been a while back, but I did read them.
(I think it’s in our Military Code also, but I’ve not read them for myself.)
Posted by: Lee C. ― U.S.A. | June 18, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
Mary – Did you have a point?
Posted by: jock59801 | June 18, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
In response to: apparently some Major news is about to break that either deals with McCain or Obama. Anyone know anything about this???
http://www.realdealreport.com/
Posted by: jjandall | Jun 18, 2008 4:31:07 PM
First of this isnt creditable at all this is why the news and any other reputable medias have entertained it… this information goes back all the way to 1999 and disputed in 2004. TRUST ME if this was creditable Hilary and McCain would have jumped face first to have it aired…
http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008/04/larry-sinclair-obama-accusers-murky-past/
Now look people, if you dont like somebody bc of their policies say that…or whatever your personal opinions are.. but pls keep your lies to yourself.
Posted by: ObamaBama | June 18, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
Joe, Rev. Wright is making America sound like the most evil Nation on Earth. I would challenge you tell me what Nation has a better track record of trying to right the wrongs that have been done in the past in America. As to slavery, a Civil war was fought where thousands of American lost their live to free the slaves. Civil Rights Acts were pasted. As to Rev. Wright’s claim that black people have it so bad in the America of today, the fact is black people in America today have a higher standard of living than any other major population of black people in the world today. If you do not believe me, look at what the standard of living is for black people in Africa. I would also challenge you to name a Nation in the World where you rather live and where the level of freedom is greater.
Again, thousands of people died during the Civil War to free the slaves.
|: John Brown’s body lies a-mouldering in the grave, :|
John Brown’s body lies a-mouldering in the grave,
But his soul goes marching on.
Chorus:
|: Glory, glory, hallelujah, :|
Glory, glory, hallelujah,
His soul goes marching on.
|
|: John Brown died that the slaves might be free, :|
John Brown died that the slaves might be free,
His soul goes marching on.
Chorus:
|: The stars above in Heaven now are looking kindly down, :|
The stars above in Heaven now are looking kindly down,
His soul goes marching on.
Chorus:
Posted by: Tim | June 18, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
Dennis -
The problem of “giving them a voice” is a legitimate concern, but it doesn’t trump human rights. But as you say, there are alternatives. This doesn’t have to be in open court. The reason the Supreme Court said that is because they had given Bush an opportunity to setup military tribunals that would be fair, and he failed. The point is that habeas corpus must be granted. That can be done with moderate secrecy, however.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 18, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
And at lest Obama has a stance on this. Were is Mcsame anyone still waiting on his ideas. Does Bush need to fax them over to him? Oh Mccain doesn’t know how to use the fax machine maybe his wife can get it for him.
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
I wonder if OBL read the Geneva Conventions too. If he did he probably broke them that bad boy.
Posted by: Dennis | June 18, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Why should Osama have Constitutional rights when he’s not a citizen? And further more, why should tax payers pay for him to be on trial here?? The masterminds behind the 1993 World Trade Center bombing (during Slick Willie’s administration) are STILL in jail at taxpayer expense. Osama Obama is absoultely clueless on this and every other issue.
Posted by: Stephanie | June 18, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
United States is the leader of the World. We have held moral leadership of the world since after WWII and at a great price. The rights of men (and women) are basic and no respecter of boundaries. Those are the teachings of our forefathers and founders.
It is easy to just pick OBL or whomever we don’t like, hack them to pieces or do whatever else suits the mob. But that will not be in our national character.
We, as a nation are better than that.
IMO OBL should, if captured alive, be given the same treatment he denied those 3000 people in NY, the hundreds of people in Madrid, London and elsewhere.
Let the world observe our decency as a nation even as the death penalty OBL deserved is handed to him and his ilk in good time.
Our nation will be purged of its ghosts and we can reclaim our leadership of the world (including our moral leadership too).
Posted by: Craig | June 18, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
I done with rev wright I don’t care he pointed out facts people dont like truth so put your head in the sand and pretend america walks on water. I love my country but I know were we come from.
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
Tim – Obama agreed with most of what you are saying in his speech. One of his main points was that Wright does not give enough credit to America’s ability to change. Wright is not running for President, thank God. Obama is, and he seems to understand these things.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 18, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
My point was to get the actual transcript of Rev. Wright’s 9/11 speech out there for all to see. What I find most troubling about the speech is the dripping hatred for America expressed by Rev. Wright on one of the most terrible days in American history. The fact that Obama was a member of a church for twenty years whose Minister held such deep hatred for his Nation, gives me pause about Obama’s true feelings about America and whether Obama has the best interests of America at heart. Maybe that is why so many terrorists sympathizers have been Obama’s friends for so many years and are now supporting him.
Posted by: Mary | June 18, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
McCain has said that he’d like to personally shoot OBL, but then flip flopped to say that he’d get one of his aids to shoot him, then flipped again to say that he’d lead a firing squad. However, later that day he couldn’t remember the subject ever coming up.
Posted by: Javalation | June 18, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Obama said uhmm well present ,,,no I mean …hold on one second baby…what I mean is I been to 57 states and uhm I’m a little tired ….present,,,My typical white grandmother is uhmmm
Posted by: Obamafied | June 18, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
Stephanie – The Constitution applies to anywone being held on U.S. soil, and the Court ruled that that includes Guantanamo. They would know better than I would.
But habeas corpus goes beyond the Constitution. It has been considered a bedrock human right for at least 800 years. Last time I checked, America still believed in human rights. If remaining true to our principles costs a little bit of extra money, so be it.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 18, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
I don’t think you are one to say if he hates his country or not. You should right him a letter and ask him. You have a good point mary I personally thought it was a great speech but should have been givein at a diffrent time. Also yea world trade center was attacked durin slick willies adminstratoin but. When he tryed to bomb Osama into oblivion the republican controlled congress at the time stoped him and the started to investigate him for the famous dress.. So with the cia funding osama during the regan years I say terrorisum Jihad crap is a Bastard baby of the gop!
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
Mary,
You should be honest with yourself and tell the world that everytime someone says or does something you don’t agree with over the years, you just up and left.
I don’t know your background, but no normal and stable human being will succed in life by cutting people off like you expect Obama to. Wright was his pastor. Ok so what?
Wright can speak for himself, and he does a great job of it.
Obama is a different man than Wright and should be credited for his own words and actions not the words of another, much older gentleman.
Keep your bigotry with you and discuss issues here intelligibly.
Posted by: craig | June 18, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
Mary – First of all, that was not the sermon given after 9/11.
Secondly, the hate was for specific things that America had done (allegedly), not for America in genreal,
Thirdly, Jeremiah Wright is an ex-Marine who once helped to save the life of a President of the Untied States.
I don’t think he hates America, but I also don’t think he is running for President (I wouldn’t vote for him either).
Posted by: jock59801 | June 18, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
Spies and terrorists may be subject to civilian law or military tribunal for their acts and in practice have been subjected to torture and/or execution. The laws of war neither approve nor condemn such acts, which fall outside their scope. However, nations that have signed the UN Convention Against Torture have committed themselves not to use torture on anyone for any reason. Citizens and soldiers of nations which have not signed the Fourth Geneva Convention are also not protected by it (Article 4: “Nationals of a State which is not bound by the Convention are not protected by it”.), whether they are spies or terrorists. Also, citizens and soldiers of nations which have not signed and do not abide by the Third and Fourth Geneva Conventions are not protected by them
Posted by: Dennis | June 18, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
jock59801, I agree with Mary, the fact Obama belonged to Rev. Wright’s church for twenty years makes me question whether Obama holds the same views and hatred for America or not. As you know, Obama had Rev. Wright on his campaign team for months, and when the 9/11 sermon came to light, Obama defended Rev. Wright and stayed in his church. It was not until Rev. Wright embarassed Obama in his Press conference by saying that Obama was just another politician who will say anything to get elected, did Obama reject Rev. Wright. Finally, Obama left Rev. Wright’s church, but failed to renounce the core black liberation theology beliefs of the church. So I say again, does Obama buy into the vile hatred of America that dominated the black liberation theology beliefs of his former church and Rev. Wright’s sermons?
Posted by: Tim | June 18, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
But habeas corpus goes beyond the Constitution. It has been considered a bedrock human right for at least 800 years. Last time I checked, America still believed in human rights. If remaining true to our principles costs a little bit of extra money, so be it.
Posted by: jock59801
OBL didn’t give a damn about human rights when they flew those planes into those buildings. What if he is found not guilty? Should he be left go?
Posted by: J | June 18, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Guy: …..ZOMG!!! Obama is so cool. He is the greatest. He is our new hero. Here to change everything to bliss on a silver platter!!!!
-Observer: Wow. That sounds great. We would all welcome that. How does he plan to do it?
Guy:……HES OBAMA !!!! No way we want ‘Mc Bush’! He is evil now, since Bill and Hillary have been booted out.
Obama will bring peace. Excellent economy. Heath care for all!! No more hunger. No more joblessness!!! No more suffering. No more wars.
Observer: Wow. You sure love the guy. But how do you know he can do all this?
Guy:….CUZ HES OBAMA !!!!! You are obviously a RACIST by asking such questions.
Observer : Holy cow. Settle down . Are you part of the Obama campaign?
Guy: ….no. I am a journalist for the mainstream media
Posted by: ned | June 18, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
The bottom line.
You have a choice. Is your life better now after 8 years of republican rule?
Do you want to at least try and figure out how to get out of Iraq and bring this Osama guy to justice?
Do you want to quit borrowing money from china? Do you want your govenment to stand by the constitution?
Ask yourself those then go vote!
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
“Wright is not running for President, thank God. Obama is, and he seems to understand these things.”
Then why didn’t he stand up and stop the misinformation that was coming from his pastor? Why sit there silently? He could have taken the opportunity to educate the congregation. He was a professor at one point, no?
Posted by: Mack | June 18, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
It wasn’t misinformation. We killed alot of people. Some bad some not
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
He was a professor at one point, no?
Posted by: Mack—–
Nope, that was a lie as well :)
Posted by: J | June 18, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
“Do you want your govenment to stand by the constitution?”
Then support Ron Paul.
Posted by: Mack | June 18, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Tim- Obama made it clear in his speech (which you have shown us you haven’t read), that he does not hold with any of that black liberation theology stuff. Not to your satisfaction, I am sure, but you weren’t going to vote for him anyway.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 18, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
I actually am better off than I was 8 years ago, I didn’t want to go into Iraq in the first place, and I figured out along time ago their ain’t now way either side is going to fix this in the short term. Maybe 20 years from now we can get America back if we Elect someone like Ron Paul. Or Mitt Romney, Or Tom Tancredo. Even none of them are near perfect but wayyyyyyyy better than Obama. Maybe in 20 years Obama will be ready but not now.
Posted by: Dennis | June 18, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
Most of the time the ABC sites have some intelligent bloggers – same here – but so many of you are so full of hate and are true racists. Do you not understand the rights American citzens have under haebeus corpus? It is a right for everyone including the prisoners at Gitmo. And someone else made a very good point – the prisoners at Gitmo are SUSPECTS who have been denied the right to consult a lawyer and defend themselves – not all of them are terrorists. They have had no opportunity to prove they are terrorists or that they are not. It is the “nots” that every American should be concerned about. Instead, many of you blindly want them all dead – some Americans you are – because when you throw the Gitmo “detainees” rights away, you are flushing your own rights down the toilet. Instead you spout your own hate and biases in your posts. Some Americans you are – you should be sitting in Gitmo – your behavior is just as destructive to our country. I would love to see people like you arrested, detained, and have no attorney represent you. Maybe that is the only way you will get the message.
Posted by: sandy | June 18, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
jock59801, Timothy McVeigh was also an ex Marine who hated America. So the fact Rev. Wright is an ex Marine tells me nothing about whether Rev. Wright has any love for America. As Obama as famous for saying “words count”. As to the transcripts of Rev. Wright’s sermons, “the chickens have come home to roost” sermon was right after 9/11 on September 16, 2001. The “God D### America” transcript was on April 13, 2003 and was used to illustrate Rev. Wright’s long track record of hatred for America.
Posted by: Mary | June 18, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Yea I used to work for the Ron Paul camp then I quit cuz the GOP suck and pushed him out because he isn’t a war monger and he also doesn’t feed on fear.
One more reason why repubs stink they find a good one and then just crap on him.
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Mack- I don’t know. We don’t know exactly what Obama heard over the years, and we also do not know if he talked to Wright about disagreements. If he missed an opportunity to give another viewpoint to the church, than that is a legitimate criticism. But the fact remains that it is not a hateful church, as anyone who has attended will vouch for.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 18, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Tim- Obama made it clear in his speech (which you have shown us you haven’t read), that he does not hold with any of that black liberation theology stuff. Not to your satisfaction, I am sure, but you weren’t going to vote for him anyway.
Posted by: jock59801——–
You believe him? Why? Just because he says that doesn’t make it true…lol
Posted by: J | June 18, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
On the Laws of War…..Spies and terrorists may be subject to civilian law or military tribunal for their acts and in practice have been subjected to torture and/or execution. The laws of war neither approve nor condemn such acts, which fall outside their scope. However, nations that have signed the UN Convention Against Torture have committed themselves not to use torture on anyone for any reason. Citizens and soldiers of nations which have not signed the Fourth Geneva Convention are also not protected by it (Article 4: “Nationals of a State which is not bound by the Convention are not protected by it”.), whether they are spies or terrorists. Also, citizens and soldiers of nations which have not signed and do not abide by the Third and Fourth Geneva Conventions are not protected by them
Posted by: Dennis | June 18, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
J – Yes, I believe him. I have watcheed him and read him enough to trust him, and most Americans are coming to the same conclusion. You are welcome to hate him all you want, but you only get one vote.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 18, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
I think Obama should pick Osama as his running mate. It’s got some real flow to it. Obama-Osama 2008
Posted by: ruttster | June 18, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
I still like ron paul though I went and saw him here at the university it was cool. But Obama is the next best thing. Mcsame is a war monger who hates me and won’t do a damn thing to help me in life so he don’t get my vote. I wounder how much he’s going to borrow from china if he gets elected. Or how many bases he’ll set up around the world. I guess I don’t see a connection between ron paul and mcsame other than they are both repubs.
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
“J – Yes, I believe him. I have watcheed him and read him enough to trust him, and most Americans are coming to the same conclusion. You are welcome to hate him all you want, but you only get one vote.”
Just out of curiosity, how long have you been following his career?
Posted by: Mack | June 18, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
“Citizens and soldiers of nations which have not signed
the Fourth Geneva Convention are also not protected by
it (Article 4: “Nationals of a State which is not bound by
the Convention are not protected by it”.), whether they
are spies or terrorists. Also, citizens and soldiers of
nations which have not signed and do not abide by the
Third and Fourth Geneva Conventions are not protected
by them.”
Dennis | Jun 18, 2008 6:34:07 PM
You make the common mistake here. Al-Qaeda members are not “nationals” of al-Qaeda. They are “nationals” of Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, etc., all of which are signatory members of the Geneva Conventions, so their citizens taken in Iraq and/or Afghanistan, (which are both signatory parties) and/or anyplace else where the Geneva Conventions apply are “protected” by the Conventions. (One gets covered by the Conventions by being picked up in a place covered by the Conventions too, so they’re twice covered.)
Posted by: Lee C. ― U.S.A. | June 18, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
You agian. Still waiting on your ideas. Thats it your Rush limbaugh comlain about everone else then just pop pills drink scotch and slip back into oblivion T or should I say Rush.
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
sandy, You should be ashamed of yourself calling people racist just because you don’t agree with their viewpoint of being against giving haebeus corpus rights to terrorists caught on the battle field trying to kill Americans. Fact is this is the first time in the history of America haebeus corpus rights have been given to prisoners of war. For example, the prisoners of war during WWII were not given haebeus corpusa rights. The big difference in opinion is between treating the Gitmo detainees in the same way the WWII prisoners of war were treated versus treating them as common criminals. In my view, 9/11 was a direct result of the Clinton Administration treating the War on Terror like it was a criminal action. Expect another 9/11, if Obama gets elected and goes back to the Clinton way of treating terrorists like common criminals instead of prisoners of war.
Posted by: gary | June 18, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
J – Yes, I believe him. I have watcheed him and read him enough to trust him, and most Americans are coming to the same conclusion. You are welcome to hate him all you want, but you only get one vote.—–
I never said I hated him, I just don’t like him and some of the people he associates with. I get one vote and I am yet to decide who will get that.
Most Americans are what got us into this mess in the first place. Putting their trust in somebody like Bush and his cronies. How can you put your trust into somebody you virtually don’t know anything about his past? It’s not like the MSM has been doing their job.
Posted by: J | June 18, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
And how is Bush treating this again? Oh as POWS Which means they are citzens of Afganastan or Sadi Arabi.. Once again Osama is the Bastard child of failed GOP policy.
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
Posted by: Mack | Jun 18, 2008 6:58:42 PM
What the community organizer, a few years in the Illinois Senate and not really anything to speak of in the US Senate? He’s been campaigning for POTUS most of his time in the US Senate.
Posted by: J | June 18, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
jock59801, I agree with you, Obama said he did not agree with Rev. Wright and said his sermons were hateful. However, Rev. Wright, who was Obama’s Pastor, friend and adviser for twenty years said that Obama was just another politician who would say anything to get elected. I suspect, Rev. Wright was telling the truth about Obama and Obama will say anything to get elected and probably would not have stayed in Rev. Wright’s church if Obama did not believe in what Rev. Wright was teaching. Oh maybe you think that Obama was not telling the truth when Obama said Rev. Wright’s sermons were hateful. You can’t have it both ways.
Posted by: Mary | June 18, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
Dennis – I don’t really see it as what we can legally “get away with.” All people should have a right to challenge their detention, regardless of what any conventions say.
And why should this hurt us? If it makes everyone happy to go through all of the steps before we hang him, it doesn’t bother me. I seriously doubt he would be captured a live anyway.
The larger point is that there were some people in Gitmo who turned out to NOT be terrorists. What if we had just killed them all at first? If we execute people without demonstrating their guilt, then we are not America.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 18, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
Mary don’t contradict yourself I thought you said he was a hateful lier then why would you believe that he thinks Obama is a typical politician.
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
There are no easy answers. On the one hand you want to set an example for the rest of the world, on the other hand you are giving a voice to fanatics that refuse to listen to reason.
Posted by: Mack | June 18, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Main street America is scared to death of a B. Hussein Obama presidency, and with good reason.
Now with B. Hussein giving aid and comfort to an enemy who has clearly shown his intent on 9/11 he is just rubbing it in our faces.
Posted by: Jack | June 18, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
Mary – You can parse words all you want about which things Obama did or did not claim to hear. Frankly, I don’t care. I don’t find Obama a hateful person. End of story.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 18, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
T— you have no opinons and can’t form one logical thought on your own.
A perfect GOP slime ball!!!!
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
T— Kind of like the Obama Ayres thing?
Go back to school!
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Jack – Huh?
Posted by: jock59801 | June 18, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
Joe, I was being sarcastic. I believe Obama is not being truthful when Obama said he did not agree with Rev. Wright’s hateful sermons. The fact Obama belonged to Rev. Wright’s church for twenty years should tell you everything you need to know about what Obama believes. Also, yes, I do believe Rev. Wright when he said Obama is just another typical politician and will say anything to get elected.
Posted by: Mary | June 18, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
jock59801, If Obama is not a hateful person, why was Obama a member of Rev. Wright’s church for twenty years whose Pastor spewed such hatred against America? A loving person would have left Rev. Wright’s church a long time ago. Just give me a credible reason why Obama stayed in Rev. Wright’s church for twenty years if he did not believe in the hate Rev. Wright was spewing.
Posted by: Mary | June 18, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
Fact GOP supported Osama bin laudin and his muhadjadeen in the 80′s as a counter force to russian occupation. Fact they left those people high and dry after promising to help build a government. Fact Clinton was boming suspected terrorist sites in Afganastan during his adminstaration. Fact the republican congress vote to make him stop the boming. Fact they then wasted millons of dollars over the now famous dress ordeal.. Fact Clinton left Bush a memo of major threats to the usa wich at the top was osama. Fact Bush took the first 9 months of his presidency off. Then BOOOM!!! 9/11
Once again osama is the bastard child of the GOP!
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
I really don’t care what either candidate thinks, they both have their issues. Where’s Hillary?
Posted by: J | June 18, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
What didn’t you understand? Seems pretty clear.
Posted by: Jack | June 18, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
Habeas Corpus rights for Bin Laden? Bin Laden and his Islamo-fascist brothers deserve the nuclear warhead treatment instead!
Once more, Obama displays a penchant for stupidity that rivals Jimmy Carter, proving that inept political bumblers also come in black. Obama should focus some time on trying to take back the country from his leftist friends who were seeking revolution in the 60s only to have resolved to bring down the country socially, morally, and economically in the present day. Evidently Obama is the new best hope and Amir Ul Momineen of the American version of the Ikhwan. America needs reassurance about where Obama’s loyalties lie, if Obama even knows himself; he evidently hasn’t been told yet by his handlers.
Posted by: Dryden01 | June 18, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
Fact the USA under GOP controll trained Osama! Then let him train these Jihad bastards! So T use your computer and look it up prove me wrong. Then use your head for something besides a hat rack.
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
Come on, even the Nazis got a trial from us at Nuremburg. And we didn’t wait years to give them a trial, either, like Gitmo. If we could do it for people who murdered 6 million, we can do it for those who murdered 3,000.
Posted by: Carl | June 18, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
Mary – Actually, that is not exactly what Wright said, but close enough I suppose. Did Obama change his story in order to get out of a bind? Maybe, although there is no obvious proof of it. So what?
I consider both Obama and McCain to be as honest as politicians can be. The way everything they say is pounced on and twisted around, I’m surprised they are brave enough to open their mouth at all. I find Obama to be at least as honest as any recent presidential candidate, and that is good enough for me. I prefer to vote for President based on what they will do for the country, not on “gotchas.”
Posted by: jock59801 | June 18, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
Man T i’m suprised you can read. You abviously never looked in a history book. You didn’t pay for that education did you? If you did ask for a refund. LOL!! Loser!
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
And the 3rd Rambo movie is dedicated to the Taliban!
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Mary -
Everyone who has ever attended Trinity Church has commented on how open and welcoming it is. Michael Jordan, Tiger Woods, and Oprah Winfrey have all been there. It is a powerhouse charity in south Chicago. It has good people in it. Obviously people are not running around spewing hatred all the time. If people allowed some comments to pass when they shouldn’t have, that is a valid criticism. Nobody’s perfect.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 18, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Jack – It was clear you were accusing Obama of treason. It was just not clear why.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 18, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
Jock, gotta ask ya, just what the hell has B. Hussein ever done that you feel “entitles” him to be president?
“Honest”???
Honest how? He has a history of associating with radical racist “clergy” , not to mention home grown terrorists which he still associates with. This is the “change we can believe in?”
Posted by: Jack | June 18, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
I have never been to church but I wanna go check out that Trinity Church it looks kind of fun.
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
Take no prisoners. Problem solved.
Posted by: Oliver | June 18, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
i’m leaving going fishing hey T kiss my white butt!
Posted by: Joe | June 18, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
Joe, Fact, Roosevelt supported Stalin during WWII as a counter to Hitler Fact, Roosevelt turned Poland over to Stalin after WWII. (Thus your first two examples are pointless) Fact, Clinton, had every chance to kill Osama and would not pull the trigger because of Clinton’s policy of treating Osama like a common criminal as opposed to an enemy at war with us. Fact: If Osama was such a high priority of the Clinton Administration why did the CIA Not Spend All the Funds allocated to catch him? 1997-2001: CIA Counterterrorist Center Does Not Spend All Funds Allocated, Despite Complaining about Resource Shortages
A later review by the CIA’s inspector general will find that the CIA’s counterterrorism resources are not properly administered during this period. The review will comment that “during the same period [CIA counterterrorism managers] were appealing the shortage of resources, senior officials were not effectively managing the Agency’s counterterrorism funds.” In particular:
bullet Although counterterrorism funding increases from 1998, funds are moved from the base budget of the Counterterrorist Center to other CIA units. Some of the funds moved are “used to cover nonspecific corporate ‘taxes’ and for a variety of purposes that… were unrelated to terrorism”;
bullet No funds are moved from other programs to support counterterrorism, even after CIA Director George Tenet issues a “declaration of war” against al-Qaeda in December 1998 and says he wants no resources spared in the fight against terrorism (see December 4, 1998);
bullet Little use of reserve CIA funds is made to fight terrorism;
bullet Counterterrorism managers do not spend all the money they have, even after their funding has been reduced by diversions to other programs. [Central Intelligence Agency, 6/2005, pp. x-xi pdf file]
The CIA’s inspector general will recommend that accountability boards be convened to review the performance of the following officials for these failings:
bullet The executive director (David Carey from July 1997, A.B. “Buzzy” Krongard from March 2001);
Posted by: Jerry | June 18, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
OBL and the CIA have been tight as thieves since the 80′s during the Afgan invasion by (Russia). OBL was treated in the American Hospital In Dubai and met with CIA officials there in July 2001. The fact that executive orders were issued on 9/11/01 allowing the Bin Laden family to flee the US without questioning, and the fact that the unit assigned to capture or kill OBL was told to disband (after we gave him a headstart), would suggest OBL would recieve habeus corpus protection and probably a suite at the St. Regis as well.
Posted by: LAsux | June 18, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
“Giuliani said Kerry’s remarks on behalf of Obama were a reminder of “what we would have in store for us if we have a Democratic presidency.”"
We would have a president that actually abides the rule of law that the current administration has flouted for the last eight years. McCain is essentially just a Bush echo chamber, electing him will just bring more of the same policies and flouting of the law that we’ve seen with the current administrator.
Posted by: Ken | June 18, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
Ken,
Let us know exactly what “rule of law” has be ….flouted?
Be specific please
Thank you
Posted by: Jack | June 18, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
What Obama plans to do for the USA should he be elected:
–Obama wants to lower the standard of living in America.
Obama stated he thinks the $4.00/gal price for gas is just fine with him and refuses to increase the supply, which will lower prices, by drilling for oil here. However, Obama must think supply has something to do with the price of gas as he along with the rest of the Democrats want Saudi Arabia to increase their supply.
Obama wants to raise Social Security taxes,Income taxes, Capital Gains taxes, Death taxes and has no plans to change the AMT tax. Higher taxes have always resulted in higher prices, people losing their jobs, and businesses going out of business. So the very people Obama is claiming he will help, the lower income people, will be greatly hurt by Obama’s economic and tax policies.
OBAMA: “We can’t drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times … and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK,” Obama said.”That’s not leadership. That’s not going to happen,” he added
If you want a lower standard of living, higher gas and food prices and high unemployment, vote Obama.
Posted by: Tim | June 18, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
Ken, you may be praying for a Bush third term if Obama gets elected and implements his economic and foreign policies of waving the white flag of defeat. Look at what happened during the Carter Administration when Carter tried to play nice with the Iran during the hostage crisis. Iran was radicalized and fanatic Islam was awakened to become the threat to America and the West it is today. Gas prices went sky high. Inflation went through the roof and job layoffs were rampant. Obama conomics and foreign policy sounds a lot like Carter’s economic and foreign policies and if you expect any different results you are living in Obama la la land.
Posted by: terry | June 18, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
Tim,
Thats a given for a democrat. Punish initiative, stifle business and entrapaneurs, Tax the hard working and give it to those “less fortunate”
Its failed time and time again.
As a small business owner, it just forces me to shed the jobs of those the Dems are trying to help and of course they go on state aide.
I guess this makes sense to most Dems
Posted by: Jack | June 18, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
Obama is going to melt down in front of mainstream America because his ideas are insane.
We’re talking about Osama, but how about Kalid Sheik Mohammed, the mastermind of 9/11.
If he has the right of Habeas Corpus, shouldn’t he also be extended:
- the right of innocence until proven guilty
- Miranda Rights?
- How about jury of peers?
- How about legal search and seizure?
- The right to appeal?
Obama won the votes of the extreme left liberals and environmental radicals. His nonsense is going to be revealed over the next few months and Hillary will be waiting for the time when the Dems realize they made a horrific mistake.
As dangerous as it is, it’s kind of fun to watch.
Posted by: Kevin Maguire | June 18, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
Tim, you must be a Republican because you misrepresent everything to make you attack. Fact is, it was McCain who admitted that he didn’t know much about economics, and then proved his point by suggesting that one could make the case that the economy has improved under Bush’s leadership. Now he says that drilling offshore will be a great short term energy solution, totally ignoring how long the process takes. Obama may be young and we don’t know how he’ll do as prez, but we do know McCain and he’d be a disaster, just like Bush.
Posted by: Javalation | June 18, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
Javalation, For your information, one of the reasons, in addition to supply, that oil prices are so high is the speculators. Once the speculators know that America is serious about drilling for oil here the speculators will stop driving up the price of oil and it will start to go down. Also, oil engineers have said that they can start getting oil from offshore in about two years, which will be sooner than you think. In addition. if the Democrats eight years ago had gone ahead with drilling for oil in ANWAR and other places, as Bush wanted, we would have much lower prices now. As usual, the Democrats have it wrong on almost everything you can think of and really do want America to have a lower standard of living.
Posted by: ray | June 18, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Java,
And B. Husseins knowledge of economics is ?????? other than to raise taxes.
We know he is clueless and quite dangerous on foreign policy, so what are his qualifications?
Posted by: Jack | June 18, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
Obama says it’s OK to use WMD against Pakistan to kill Osama Bin Laden.
But if our military captures him, he deserves full protection of the US constitution.
What if he isn’t read his miranda rights? Do we let him go?
What if the evidence that we have to demonstrate to the court why he deserves to be held would jeopardize the ongoing intelligence gathering on those terrorists not yet captured?
Do we let him go or do we give a heads up to the enemy.
Obama is cleary a lightweight.
This is heavily damaging stuff. He is a dope.
Posted by: Kevin Maguire | June 18, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
Javalation, Unemployment is at 5 and 1/2 % which is historically pretty low. Inflation has been pretty much under control until now due to high gas and food prices which is in my view the fault of the Democrats. If the Democrats had gone ahead and let Bush drill for oil eight years ago, gas prices would be much lower. Also, it is the Dems who pushed biofuels, which raised food prices. Also, home equity, despite the down turn now, is still 30% higher than it was eight year ago. So a strong case could be made that the economy is not as bad as you think and if it was not for the Democrats, the economy would be much better now.
Posted by: Sara | June 18, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
Yeah well the Supreme Court got it wrong and so does Obama. Let’s not forget we were attacked by foreign terrorists. Hillary has never forgotten 9/11 and would handle this much better than Obama. Hopes the rumors true that Obama offered her the VP spot in the “secret meeting” and that she said “No Thanks” and that she will be keeping her delegates. By the way someone please tell Obama it’s MichiGander not Michiander. Michigan tires of his disregard towards us. We don’t need any more visits. JustSayNoDeal.com
Posted by: MichiganPUMA | June 18, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
Javalation, You must be an Obama supporter because you use name calling as a way of disrespecting people instead of responding to their points. Just the facts please, stop being an Obama name calling robot.
Posted by: Tim | June 18, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
Tim, I’m sorry you got so upset that I called you a Republican. I don’t blame you though because those guys are notorious, deceitful misrepresenters.
Ray, for your information “speculators” are part of the free market system. Historic, they are blamed by govt when govt schemes don’t work out. Besides, I had thought that Iraqi oil was supposed to solve all of our supply problems? At least that’s what BushCo said.
Posted by: Javalation | June 18, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
Nothing is new about Hussein Obama’s change. All his speeches are from past leaders,anyone old enough would know.We dont need old dreams and hopes and old visions in the past as they all failed very miserably.We need real solutions for now and for our future., and we need a good president who can deliver and solve the present economic, health and Iraq problems,and turn our country in the right direction.Hillary is the only one who can bring real prosperity and a better future in our country.
Posted by: Sedecla | June 18, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
What NoTrust? You didn’t know that ol John threw America under the buss his third day as a prisoner in Nam by telling them everything they wanted to know? Then he pitched his first family under the buss so he could get with the young RICH new one. Yep, ol John married Cindy a month after dumping Carol. And then there’s his old religious gang, who probably won’t forgive him. Naaa, ol John has thrown a lot more under the bus than young Barack.
Posted by: Javalation | June 18, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
Sara, unemployment is a guess and inflation, if using the pre Clinton era method, is double digit. Look up hedonics to see how the magic is performed. Bio-fuel was pitched by the Republicans and pushed through a Republican controlled Congress. The housing problems aren’t really over, and most Americans don’t even know about the OTC derivative problem which lies just beneath the mortgage issue.
No we are in deep stuff, and regardless of who is elected the piper must be paid.
Posted by: Javalation | June 18, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
The issue of Habeas corpus is not simply giving “Righs to terrorists”. It’s enacting DUE process where there has so far been almost NO PROCESS.
George F. Will said it best:
“The purpose of a writ of habeas corpus is to cause a government to release a prisoner or show through due process why the prisoner should be held. Of Guantanamo’s approximately 270 detainees, many certainly are dangerous “enemy combatants.” Some probably are not. None will be released by the court’s decision, which does not even guarantee a right to a hearing. Rather, it guarantees only a right to request a hearing. Courts retain considerable discretion regarding such requests.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/16/AR2008061602041.html
tThose who complain about the fact that a terrorist is being given “rights’ seem terribly afraid of a mere legal hearing!
those who think that the Constitution doesn’t protect foreign terrorists should also know that the same document doesn’t protect the Executive branch from invading other nations, taking prisoners on someone’s say-so, detaining them under their authority indefinitely in ANOTHER DIFFERENT foreign country, without ever charging them of anything.
If they are terrorists, then go ahead , try them, and CONVICT THEM!!!! What’s STOPPING THEM??
Posted by: zzazzeefrazzee | June 18, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
Bin Laden has no rights under the Geneva Convention. He is not a soldier of some nation’s army. He is a terrorist. I can hardly believe how ignorant some people are. He has no rights under the Constitution. He is no citizen under it. The Supreme Court may rule any thing they wish but that doesn’t make them right and they are constantly wrong. Wake up people or we will destroy ourselves with all of this idiotic thinking.
Posted by: RazzWV | June 18, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
I would love to ABC’s coverage of the Constitutional Convention: “James Madison Admits Benedict Arnold Would Have Habeas Corpus Rights!!!!” etc. etc.
Where’s the “McCain To Lock Up Innocents for Four More Years With No Hearing” headline? You know, for balance? Unlike this Bin Laden demagoguery it concerns people who are actually at Guantanamo right now.
Posted by: Katherine | June 18, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
I’m one of those rich guys hat makes over 250k per year. I provide over 500 jobs an succeed despite all of the stupid government regulations. I am lucky (over 55), and have the option of liquidating the business. Running the numbers and taking account of the wear, tear and stress it is just not worth it to me that I would be required to pay well over half of my hard earned money in taxes. No worries, our products can and will be made offshore. Because of that, my company has no real value, but the real estate is good so i’m good. Go ahead, tax the beejeebers out of rich folks. You really won’t like what happens.
Posted by: Well Off | June 18, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
For God sake, what is your malfunction Obama?
Posted by: al4mcattack | June 18, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Tim, the rise of Khomeini in Iran was not Carter’s fault- try blaming the Shah’s dictatorship- something that we fully backed for over two decades before Carter.
Posted by: zzazzeefrazzee | June 18, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
Razz- the more important question is not whether OSAMA has rights, but whether the EXECUTIVE BRANCH has the right in our constitution to detain indefinitely.whomever without ever charging them with anything.
IF they are guilty, then CHARGE THEM and CONVICT THEM!!!!
What have they been waiting for????
Posted by: zzazzeefrazzee | June 18, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
“Unlike this Bin Laden demagoguery it concerns people who are actually at Guantanamo right now.”
Yes, and it also concerns a sitting President, right now- you know, the one who REFUSES to CHARGE them with anything, much less actually CONVICT THEM FOR THEIR CRIMES?????
Posted by: zzazzeefrazzee | June 18, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
Amen ZZ…I thought your post was so right on that it needed to be reposted for all those Obama supporters who remain clueless as Constitution and Geneva Convention rights are (we should get rid of the Geneva Convention rights due to lack of interest of our enemies for every behaving humanly with our captured soldiers.)
Bin Laden has no rights under the Geneva Convention. He is not a soldier of some nation’s army. He is a terrorist. I can hardly believe how ignorant some people are. He has no rights under the Constitution. He is no citizen under it. The Supreme Court may rule any thing they wish but that doesn’t make them right and they are constantly wrong. Wake up people or we will destroy ourselves with all of this idiotic thinking
Posted by: creature4444 | June 18, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Oh geez, the Obaminations don’t grasp much. I am so sick of McCains mention of remaining in Iraq as something sinister on McCain parts that I am about to vomit. History lesson children: following the “liberation” of Germany and Japan after WW2 in 1945, we Americans have remained in both places till this day. Common sense dictates that we in all likelyhood would remain in IRAQ just as history indicates. Those that choose to try to bash McCain over this nonsense are showing their lack of knowledge.
Posted by: creature4444 | June 18, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
The Commander Guy:
You don’t get the point!
Allowing Bin Laden to have a
trial would give him a Forum to spout
his anti-american, anti-west, propaganda
and create more recruits for Al Queda!
This was a bad Supreme Court Decision and I’m sure there are other cases that can be taken to the Supremes to get it
Reversed!
Posted by: reaganfan | June 18, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
It’s pitiful to see how many people on this blog fail to understand the concept that we as Americans have for the entire coarse of our history been a light of freedom in a dark world of tyrany precisely because we are a nation which defends the concept of “rule of law”.
Posted by: pete | June 18, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
Osama bin laden does not deserve to go to Gitamo, everyone forgets what happened when those twin towers came down, and the Pentagon, and Shanksville which i live close to, Americans forget the people that died, innocent people.If Obama becomes President, i am moving to Canada. Osama is a hero to the people of Pakistan and the radical muslim world. Wake up people, everyone has scales on their eyes. God help the USA.
Posted by: Becca | June 19, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am
Only Fasists fear a nation that recognizes that justice will best be served when accused persons are guilty only when they have been found to be so by a court of law, not by the court of rabid public opinion. Regarsless of who the accused is we have an obligation to our founding principles to adhere to our constitution. Further, as a couragious nation we should have no fear of losing anything by bringing OBL to justice in our courts. All this mob mentality and theoretical hipe is destroying what little remains of our moral authority around the world and serves to bolster the voices who call us hipocrits. Clearly, the situation in regard to terrorism cannot justify the systemic human rights abuses perpetrated by so many in our zeal. I applaud those with the courage to defend the concept of habius corpus. GWB’s legacy will be that he trampled human rights around the world and used the cover of patriotism to dismantle what has been Americas greatest resource, respect for rule of law and the moral authority that comes with being a country that possesses the patience to wait for the loud shouts of fasist and bullies to quiet before hanging the criminal from the highest tree, like it or not
Posted by: pete | June 19, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am
Didn’t BHO chastise Bush to bomb Bin Laden wherever he may be? Now he and his campaign are talking about Bin Laden’s rights. What a turnabout in a few short months!?!? BHO said before he wants to meet with terrorist leaders and those who hate us, but meeting with Bin Laden is the wrong direction to take. Maybe BHC’s thinking he can negotiate with Bin Laden to pay the clean-up costs of 9/11, and then we can all be friends, but even Saudis fear this guy. It’s becoming clearer by each day that McCain is more prepared to lead in the area of foreign policy and will support the values and concerns of the US voters.
Posted by: Jenn | June 19, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am
By the way Bin Laden will never be caught alive ! He has already assigned his assistants to Martyr( Kill ) him if He is about to get caught . So why in the name of politically hypothetical or hypocrytical are We preoccupied with this notion of Moral High Ground . Habius Corpus is only for the Guilty conscious not for the courageous .Bush is a coward who abuse Humanrights with the slogan “terrorism”and Lions became Lambs for his diabolical Mistakes .
Posted by: Jack Joshua Miller | June 19, 2008, 2:20 am 2:20 am
PK – I am NOT a retard. That was just rude & shows that you are immature if you must resort to name-calling. I actually have a “gifted” IQ. I know how to make a point WITHOUT acting out. I HAVE read the constitution. OBL isn’t even on US soil – therefore, he has NO rights here. You do realize that our constitution has no authority outside of our borders, don’t you? Or don’t you realized that other countries have their own constitutions & their own laws that take precedence in their land? I have studied the Geneva convention – and guess what – he’s NOT in custody. His butt needs to be blown to smithereens BEFORE any of those rights ever go into effect.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | June 19, 2008, 6:40 am 6:40 am
Let’s be clear, if you the reader were the one at gitmo, you wouldn’t get squat. the detainees had oil-money backed lawyers. not a single person here would have been able to afford to fly an army of civil rights attorneys around the hemisphere. hey muslims caught in bomb factorys in borabora have more rights than those christian babys clinton set on fire in waco texas!!!
Posted by: jerry | June 19, 2008, 7:06 am 7:06 am
The terrorists who bombed the World trade Center the first time, was captured, and put on trial, and put in jail, all using our laws, and our Constitution. Everyone knows that!
Barack Obama has said this in an interview yesterday: “First of all, I think there is an executive order out on Osama bin Laden’s head,” Obama said at a news conference. “And if I’m president, and we have the opportunity to capture him, we may not be able to capture him alive.” That means that Barack Obama has no hesitency in killing Bin Laden!
IF for wahtever reason Bin Laden was captured, Bin Laden said that “What would be important would be for us to do it in a way that allows the entire world to understand the murderous acts that he’s engaged in and not to make him into a martyr, and to assure that the United States government is abiding by basic conventions that would strengthen our hand in the broader battle against terrorism,”
The point is that there is ample evidence to convict Bin Laden, and execute him using our laws, and our constitution, and while Barack Obama wants Bin laden Killed rather than captured, if captured there is NO doubt that there is so much eveidence against him that Bin Laden would be convicted, and put in a military prison and even executed.
England has used their own constitution, and laws to successfully prosecute terrorists who have attacked their country, we can do the same thing here.
Posted by: Steven | June 19, 2008, 7:37 am 7:37 am
The terrorists who bombed the World trade Center the first time, was captured, and put on trial, and put in jail, all using our laws, and our Constitution. Everyone knows that!
Barack Obama has said this in an interview yesterday: “First of all, I think there is an executive order out on Osama bin Laden’s head,” Obama said at a news conference. “And if I’m president, and we have the opportunity to capture him, we may not be able to capture him alive.” That means that Barack Obama has no hesitency in killing Bin Laden!
IF for wahtever reason Bin Laden was captured, Barack Obama said that:
“What would be important would be for us to do it in a way that allows the entire world to understand the murderous acts that he’s engaged in and not to make him into a martyr, and to assure that the United States government is abiding by basic conventions that would strengthen our hand in the broader battle against terrorism,”
The point is that there is ample evidence to convict Bin Laden, and execute him using our laws, and our constitution, and while Barack Obama wants Bin laden Killed rather than captured, if captured there is NO doubt that there is so much eveidence against him that Bin Laden would be convicted, and put in a military prison and even executed.
England has used their own constitution, and laws to successfully prosecute terrorists who have attacked their country, we can do the same thing here.
Posted by: Steven | June 19, 2008, 7:40 am 7:40 am
LIKE OBAMA’S ADVISER SAID ABOVE: The Al Qaeda leader’s rights was UNLIKELY to arise because “there is an outstanding shoot-to-kill order with respect to BIN LADEN.”
The Obama advisers ADDED that this reading of Bin Laden’s rights, (which was established by last week’s Supreme Court ruling and would be binding on the next president NO MATTER WHO WINS in November), DOES NOT mean that the man who claims credit for the 9/11 terrorist attacks would be released.
The Fact is: if Bin Laden were granted a Habeas hearing before a federal court “the judge WOULD DISMISS IT” and rule THAT THE UNITED STATES HAS AMPLE GROUNDS TO HOLD HIM.”
“I have NO doubt that there would be NO problem establishing a basis, an evidentiary basis, to hold him and try him,” said Craig, referring to Bin Laden. “And HOLD HIM RESPONSIBLE for murdering 3,000 people.”
IT IS OBVIOUS THAT Barack Obama wants to first “Shoot to Kill”, and then if Bin Laden is not killed but instead captured, USE THE AMPLE AMOUNT OF EVIDENCE THE USA HAS TO CONVICT BIN LADEN, PUT HIM IN A MILITARY JAIL, AND EXECUTE HIM, USING THE LAWS OF THE USA.
England has used their own constitution, and laws to successfully prosecute terrorists who have attacked their country, we can do the same thing here.
Posted by: Steven | June 19, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am
Obama needs to drop this immediately. Its a loser. He cant convince rationale Americans that this is aanywhere close to a good idea. These terrorists need to be held in Iraq and Afghanistan. Let the locals deal with them under their justice system, because we know ours is a joke. The Supreme Court liberals proved that this week. Ginsburg, Stevens, Breyer, Souter, Kennedy are bums. Guess what? Obama is a Liberal lawyer just like them. Imagine what he will do to this country – appoint 3-4 more ACLU Ginsburg types.
Posted by: Dean | June 19, 2008, 8:06 am 8:06 am
And if he’s convicted by a jury of his peers, 50 lashes with a wet noodle.
Posted by: Radar | June 19, 2008, 8:09 am 8:09 am
Bin Ladin, not a USA citizen, no rights
Posted by: joel | June 19, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am
The goal is to “kill or capture” OBL. If we find out where he is and he’s killed in the strike like Zarqawi or Saddam’s sons then oh well. But if we catch him, then there is a trial and then he’s put to death or imprisoned. That’s how things work here and it’s what separates us from third world oppressive regimes where people (good and bad) simply disappear. It worked after WW2 with Nazi war criminals who killed millions of people. Why not now?
Posted by: TSnow27604 | June 19, 2008, 8:36 am 8:36 am
Obama is in over his head, again. He wants to kill him, or if he’s president he will kill him, whichever. Or he wants to give him a trial and release him.
God help us. The public school failure is coming home to roost in this election. To many people who cant think or reason. The death of democracy is an ignorant electorate.
Posted by: Bob | June 19, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am
What the republicans are complaining abot the supreme court gave bin laden rights to habeas corpus. it seem to me you have to be imprisoned to get those rights and under the republicans bin laden will never be captured. So we don’t have to worry about giving bin laden those rights.
Posted by: Lord of war | June 19, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am
It’s a smart position. Personally, I would like to hang Osama’s bloody, severed head on a hook outside the Pentagon. But if Osama is publicly humiliated the way Saddam Hussein was when pulled from his “rat hole”, he will be a martyr. It is the same reason the US and the Soviets strongly opposed execution of Nazi war criminals after WWII, it is why the Nuremberg trials were held. Even Hess and Göring got their day in Court. No one believes that Osama would receive anything other than the death sentence. However, a trial provides a symbolic finality to his reign.
Posted by: Nomen Nescio | June 19, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am
All of you thinking that Osama Bin Laden has no rights because he’s not an American Citizen… I hope you hope you get a taste of this and get thrown into jail with this logic and accused of not being an American Citizen and thus have no rights.
As your rotting in jail and saying “But I’m an American Citizen, I have rights.” Guess what???? You won’t have the right of Habeus Corpus to go to court to prove it!!! So you’ll just rot in jail….
So be careful what you ask for…
Because protecting the rights of non-citizens actually protects our rights!!!
Posted by: Roy | June 19, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am
This conservative has to agree; OBL and even the lowest scum have, and should have, equal treatment (a.k.a. rights) before the law. The shoot to kill order was, I believe, issued on the presumption that circumstances would deny us the opportunity to bring him to trial; circumstances of his own choosing. So lets get on to important issues, such as defining the limits of government, limits which BHO doesn’t seem to understand. He would limit government in this OBL case, as he should, but he would also provide unlimited authority to government agencies to “help” the needy. Hopefully the majority of voters will recognize you don’t get something for nothing; that “help” has in the past and will always in the future come at the cost of the freedom of those helped, as well as of the rest of us.
Posted by: Tom Beebe | June 19, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am
The terrorists who bombed the World trade Center the first time, was captured, and put on trial, and put in jail, all using our laws, and our Constitution. Everyone knows that!
Barack Obama has said this in an interview yesterday: “First of all, I think there is an executive order out on Osama bin Laden’s head,” Barack Obama said at a news conference. “And if I’m president, and we have the opportunity to capture him, WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO CAPTURE HIM ALIVE.” That means that Barack Obama has no hesitency in killing Bin Laden!
IF for whatever reason Bin Laden was captured, Barack Obama said that:
“What would be important would be for us to do it in a way that allows the entire world to understand the murderous acts that he’s engaged in and not to make him into a martyr, and to assure that the United States government is abiding by basic conventions that would strengthen our hand in the broader battle against terrorism,”
The point is that there is AMPLE evidence to CONVICT Bin Laden, and EXECUTE Bin Laden using our laws, and our constitution, and while Barack Obama WANTS Bin laden KILLED rather than captured, if captured there is NO doubt that there is so much evidence against Bin Laden that he would be convicted, and put in a military prison and then executed.
England has used their own constitution, and laws to successfully prosecute terrorists who have attacked their country, we can do the same thing here.
Posted by: Steven | June 19, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
Bush has kept the detainees in Guantanamo Bay for 7 years without any hope of getting a trial. I realize these men are dangerous but they should have their day in court. The US has to bring up real charges on these men and prove what they did. Then they can sentence them to life terms or death based upon that evidence. Some of these men deserve death but others could spend the rest of their life in a US Federal prison.
Posted by: Bob | June 19, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Would someone from the DNC or the media please continue to investigate Senator
Obama. Sentor Obama needs vetting. Senator Clinton was the only candidate ready to serve the post of President of the United States.
If you would think of this as a job interview: Democrats should all run from Obama
His resume has no substance Referrals and past co workers consists of racist, Anti American pastors and criminals such as Rezko. His co worker was William Ayers, a domestic terrorist
Please for the sake of our country, read about this man.
His name alone speaks volumes:
Barack Hussein Obama What do Americans expect to hear from Sen. Obama “Yes I think like Wright. I knew that Ayers was a terrorist. I have Muslims in my family.”
He’ll lie about everything and throw everyone under the bus, including his
church, his white grandmother, his Muslim followers. (check out the Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan. Farrakhan had 20,000 muslims meeting in Chicago a few months ago to support Obama.
It’s scary.
Obama is a deceptive politician, ignoring voices of the voters, practicing unfair voting tactics. He is for Obama only.
Stop with the “he’s cool” ideas and think! Investigate. For the sake of our
country, this is serious.
Posted by: Rick from Pa | June 19, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Will you peolple please read the constitution before saying you believe in it. The constitution gives no rights to non-citizens, especially those that are killing others. But, you know better and you know that these words were in the constitution before McCain erased them.
Posted by: Jackie | June 19, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Giving OBL and his followers a day in court is a matter of principles, that shows the US is a country of law and order and separates us from the lawless and hateful terrorists. That’s why the German generals were on trial after the WW2. The US, of course, could just shoot them at the end of the war for the crimes they committed against humanity. We chose not to do so for very good reasons that make us the free world leader afterward.
Posted by: Pete | June 19, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Evidently there are a whole lot of misguided folks in this discussion who have no understanding of international law.
America is at WAR, whether you agree with that or not; so combatants captured by our troops on the battlefield (who might include their Commander, Osama bin Laden) are treated as captured fighters, not criminals subject to civilian courts.
The Geneva Convention only covers the treatment of combatants who are part of a regular army–they carry identifying insignia, or wear a uniform, etc. And under the Geneva Convention, such captured POWs cannot even be interrogated, much less put on trial. Name, rank and serial number only.
Terrorists, like Osama bin Laden, who wear no uniform or insignia of any national army, were considered “civilian partisans” in all Western wars I’m familiar with, going back to the Franco-Prussian War. And when caught, such partisans were immediately SHOT. No trial, no POW camp, nothing.
During the Battle of the Bulge in World War II, the U.S. Army shot Germans in who were out of German uniform and who were attempting to infiltrate behind American lines, dressed as Americans. When they were caught by U.S. troops, they were NOT sent to a POW camp. They were SHOT, on orders of General Eisenhower.
Osama bin Laden should be caught, interrogated, and then immediately shot. If you like, let’s call in the CNN and al-Jazeera news cameras to record the event. And then let’s do him!
Posted by: SteveL | June 19, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
Seems with all the problems facing the voters this year, that the OBama camp could find something a little closer to home to talk about. ——- Seems to me the Obama people and the DNC don’t quite have their priorities in good order just yet. ——- For Obama to ignore the problems in America and worry about the legal rights of terrorist, should show most everyone Obama’s main worries.
Posted by: David M. Neal | June 19, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
SteveL:
Thank you for finally bringing some sanity to this discussion. I just found the blog myself. It’s interesting that, in the absence of any real abilities for debate, so many are reduced to personal attacks.
I have several, varying thoughts:
*Amazing how many ill-informed ‘citizens’ we have here who are quick to condemn their own country while eager to give away our very freedoms to non-citizens who are hell-bent on our very destruction…but, I suppose they have that very thing in common. I would imagine the cure for this would be to give them a year’s free vacation to someplace like Afghanistan, Iraq or Iran.
*I would imagine if a bloodthirsty killer broke into the home of some of you who believe terrorists should have access to OUR rights and, before your very eyes, skinned & mutilated your entire family (and you somehow escaped the same fate) that your entire opinion about enemy freedoms would swiftly do a 180. If you would like to challenge this notion, see above paragraph. I’m quite sure that if you and your families would drape yourself in that “awful” American flag and walk about the streets of one of these countries, you would quickly manage to prove me right.
*If President Bush is so dumb, so illiterate, so stupid, then how was he able to outsmart all the “brilliants” into voting FOR a war that was “unnecessary?”
*If we truly are in Iraq to steal their oil, then where is it? Why are we paying $4 for a gallon of gas while having committed thievery in their oil fields?
*Why are the liberals screaming louder about the oil prices than anyone else? (Bush’s fault, too.) Have they not blocked and hindered – for decades now – our ability to explore, extract and refine our own natural resources? I’m hearing them scream, even now, that if we return to drilling at this time that it will take far longer to have an affect on prices than we can wait. Really? And just how quickly do you suppose it will take to completely retool this country’s infrastructure AWAY from petroleum? (Yeah, our cars will be able to run on ethanol by, oh, next week at the longest!)
*It was once predicted by a former communist leader that America would rot from within (you flame-throwers can take a break from the name-calling and actually do something productive by researching the specifics) and I think we’ve been seeing it for some time, now.
*I still believe we are the greatest country the world has ever seen – but that didn’t happen by accident. Let me remind everyone reading this that, like it or not (and most here won’t) we exist because of one, single issue: religious freedom. The founders of America weren’t too good or too proud or too liberal to bow to The Almighty and ask Him to lead them in their decisions, decisions that have proven to be timeless despite changes that have occured they could never have imagined. (I doubt anyone called them ‘religious crazies’ in their day.) They KNEW that the strength of the nation could only come from God…and that a nation which paid homage to Him would be blessed…and that the leaders would, even through differences and debates, be guided to the right decisions, so long as they were willing to receive Divine guidance – and so it was and has been. However, we’ve seen a steady departure from those principles for a long, long time now. I truly fear the direction this nation might soon tread.
Posted by: PDeeO | June 19, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Why do some of you people hate the US Constitution so much? Guess you really don’t trust that our founding fathers were right…or that the American system is better than any other on Earth. Know what that makes you? ANTI-AMERICAN. This isn’t a football game, people. Maybe you – and Bush and Cheney and McCain – should all move to North Korea or Myanmar and be happy.
Posted by: wilderrr | June 19, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
All this crowing over how we’ve given the detainees “rights’ is bogus.
The question to ask is if there is some compelling reason to NOT CHARGE and CONVICT them! The Nuremburg Trials were a hell of lot more fast and efficient at convicting a whole lot more people than the administration has managed to do.
The Constitution does not give our Executive branch to hold anyone- whether foreigner or cistizen- indefinitely without ever charging them of anything.
Posted by: zzazzeefrazzee | June 19, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Obama is not a Christian. He is trying to decieve people into thinking he is…. He does not acknowledge Jesus Christ as his Lord and Savior… What does he base his values on??? Abortion, same sex marriage, etc………
Posted by: Think about this..... | June 19, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
Pete said “That’s why the German generals were on trial after the WW2″ – The US did not put them on trial. It was a world-wide court that tried them. They were not arrested under US criminal laws. It really seems as though there are many on here that think the US Constitution applies world-wide – it doesn’t.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | June 19, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
…but, wait…before extending Habeas Corpus rights…can Obama catch Osama?
Posted by: talktalktalk | June 19, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
God help us; where’s Waldo? Bueller? Anyone, anyone, ANYONE?
Posted by: therockofages | June 19, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Did Oprahma ever serve in the military? If not, why not? Odd that issue never seems to surface. After reading some of the posts here; one thing is certain. We are in deep, deep trouble. People think we are on ‘the wrong track’ post Oprahma? If he is elected, I want to be anywhere else…going soft on osama bin laden? That is just plain unAmerican. He is old news, not worthy of martyrdom. Let’s just string him up for what he did and then GIGGLED about it in that ratnest cave of his. That is the vision of that loser I shall never forget. Giggling in that cave after those towers went down….may he burn in hell.
Posted by: therockofages | June 19, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
Terrorist’s rights? Read this story if you have what it takes: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1027891/I-walked-aisle–Ill-meet-coffin-fathers-tribute-soldier-Sarah.html
Posted by: therockofages | June 19, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
Obama’s Career? surely you jest. His vast amount of present votes, when he does show up for work. His running for Office.
Obama’s Poltical work record and career suck to put it mildly.
Black Liberation Theology is Black Panthers using a front as a church.
It was started 30 years ago. Now knowing that is what obama has been drilled into his brain, heart and mind for over 20 years.
http://www.culturekitchen.com/liza/blog/james_cone_on_black_liberation_theology
Posted by: seah | June 20, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am
Sure, he should have rights. He should have the right to face the families of all his victims. Set up a special court in NYC. Let the victim’s families throw what ever rubble can be found from the world trade center buildings. Then place his body in a pool of jet fuel and send him to his maker.
Posted by: Larry Marino | June 24, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm