Obama Eager to Distance Self from Campaign’s Former Position on DC Handgun Ban
Craig Layne, a reporter from WJET-TV in Erie, Penn., today asked Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, a question on the DC gun ban.
Here’s how the exchange went down.
"In November you mentioned that the DC handgun law was constitutional," Layne said. "Now you’re embracing the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision striking down that law—
"That’s not what I said," Obama interrupted, per ABC News’ Jennifer Duck.
"Your aide said that," Layne clarified.
"I don’t know what my aide said but I’ve been very consistent, I teach constitutional law," Obama said. "What I said was that I believe 2nd Amendment as being an individual right and have said that consistently. I also think that individual right is constrained by the rights of the community to maintain issues with public safety. I don’t think those two principles are contradictory and in fact what I’ve been saying consistently is what the Supreme Court essentially said today."
Obama continued: "The DC law may have been struck down but they also affirmed the right for local communities to engage in background checks and other common sense laws that most lawful gun owners would agree with. So I think we can move beyond some of the conflicts on this issue, make sure law abiding gun owners have their rights respected and at the same time make sure we don’t see the kinds of murder and devastation we’ve seen on the streets of some of our cities."
Watch this portion of the interview HERE.
- jpt
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
So now he has to throw his campaign under the bus? Will it be the bus driver next?
This man is green. He hasn’t had the time or experience to form a firm core set of opinions or beliefs.
When the call comes at 3AM, the President can’t wait for his various inner demons to settle the issue. A President has to be past that particular phase of developmental learning.
Even if this were American Idol, how many of them have a career today? Fame is not wisdom. Ask the last one named BO about that.
Posted by: len | June 26, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Does Obama hold any principle on his own? He seems to refrain himself from making hard decisions and forming strong opinions until he finds out what is more politically beneficial for him to say.
There is a pattern emerging — his 130 present votes, his gun control position, his FISA, his NAFTA, how many more are coming?
Posted by: amy | June 26, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
This is so ridiculous. There were also 4 supreme court justices who felt the ban was constitutional. Are you angry that Obama won’t subvert the ruling of the Supreme Court of the United States (like many state official are vowing to do regarding executing child rapists)?
Posted by: Steve | June 26, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Barack Obama is a lawyer. They can argue pro, con, whatever you want. He wants to be elected President and will be distancing himself from his previous positions from now to November (John McCain is busy doing the same). I’ll vote for Obama anyway, since Senator Hothead terrifies me.
Posted by: Carol Anne | June 26, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Mr. McCain will do very well in the GE. He is fairly popular with Independents and Conservative Democrats, and Republicans have no other choice. The GOP doesn’t deserve to win, but the lack of good a Democrat candidate, and interference by the left wing of the Dem Party will let the GOP hold the WH for the next few years.
Posted by: Independent | June 26, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
The man does not really stand for anything. As far as it can be figured out, he does believe in higher taxes and then sending that money to the United Nations for poverty relief. Those are the only two issues he hasn’t changed on. He thinks Americans have too much money, enjoy too many benefits of “wealth” like our abundance of food and energy expensive lifestyles. He has the audacity to hope to change that without anyone realizing what he believes in.
Posted by: james Lear | June 26, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
I guess we could just take all the positions Obama has taken in the past, then turn them around to see what he really thinks. NO!!! WAIT!!! Can’t do that either bacause after the flipflop we will have to re-flipflop when he perceives public opinion on some issues do not agree…
Posted by: JB | June 26, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
Steve
2nd amendment in the US Constitution says
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
If Obama can not understand what this means he is not smarter than 5th grader.
thouse 4 judges are liberals and want to write their own law.
Posted by: john | June 26, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
And the DNC cheated out Hillary for this flip-flopper !!!
Posted by: Oren | June 26, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
Obama is like the wind, it changes day-to-day. I guess this is the “change”.
Posted by: jeffery | June 26, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
If you don’t stand for something you will fall for anything.
Barack Obama
Change you should probably write down so he can’t change his mind later.
Posted by: anonymous 23 | June 26, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Gee Imagine that !!! Ole Bam Bam changes his position again and again and again on everything from guns, to Nafta , to financing to about 20 other things. Yep this is the change we can believe in for SURE ….Obama will CHANGE his position over and over again..thats the change we r suppose to trust ?? What a fairy tale !!! If America is stupid enough to vote for this snake oil salesman it deserves the downfall it will get. bushie has us teetering on the edge of the cliff and ole Barry will push us off and then support his Midddle Eastern friends and FINANCIAL backers..Wake up america !!
Posted by: jimbo | June 26, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Obama may have taught Constitutional law, but he sure seems to have forgotten quite alot of it. “The right to keep and bear arms shall NOT be infringed…” Barack, are you listening???
Posted by: pity | June 26, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
The 2nd Amendment says nothing of personal security, only the security of a free state. It’s pretty easy to interpret. We now have an army to defend us and we don’t need guns in our houses. Attention people, England is not going to invade us any time soon!!
Posted by: Rex | June 26, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
This man is green. He hasn’t had the time or experience to form a firm core set of opinions or beliefs.
———————
Like his change on tax cuts for the rich? Or his change on abortion? Or his stance on capaign reform?
Oh wait, that’s the other guy…And he’s had over 70 years to form his opinions.
Posted by: Remington | June 26, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Jake Tapper
I have a great respect for you. Can you do some research on Obama’s Birth Certificate. It does not have any signatures.
Posted by: john | June 26, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Just another “flip-flop” as he does his political posturing. He’ll say anything he thinks will get him votes.
Posted by: Barb | June 26, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Steve…..that’s the real thing here. Republicans only want a Constitution and laws when it’s interpretation agrees with their point of view.
Posted by: JR | June 26, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
“Just another “flip-flop” as he does his political posturing. He’ll say anything he thinks will get him votes.”…..barb
You’re talking about McCain, right?
Posted by: JR | June 26, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
We have many freedoms of choices in this country – the freedom to choose to own a gun is one of them. The freedom to choose whether or not to have an abortion is another, so is the freedom to choose a religion. No matter how we personally feel about any of them, the minute one is taken away, it’s only a matter of time before the rest of our freedoms are in jeopardy. Then we’re no longer a Democracy. The Supreme Court could make no other decision.
Posted by: Molly | June 26, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Actually, what Obama said makes a lot of sense. We could argue about whether it is exactly what he has said before, as if people’s opinions should not evolve (although hopefully not 180 degrees like McCain’s).
Obama is a much more thoughtful person than most politicians, and he understands the complexities of most issues. You don’t have to be an extremist in order to “stand for something.” What Bush usually “stands for” is extremist and juvenile. I prefer people who will look at the reality of a situation and then come up with an intelligent and fair solution.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 26, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
Let’s see…what is this really green guy going to distance himself from?
Posted by: Leroy | June 26, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
As usual he will say: ” That’s not what I meant” or ” That’s not what I said”
Throw his staffer under the bus.
That’s easy. No charge.
Posted by: catleya | June 26, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
I hope someone is keeping track of Obama’s morphing. Pretty soon this dangerous wolf in sheeps clothing will be fully exposed.
Posted by: Bill | June 26, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
I love it when Obama gets tough questions. And I love it even more when he’s caught lying from what he said in the past.
Love it, love it, love it.
Jake, you’ve become a daily read for me! Keep up the good work!!
Posted by: Jo | June 26, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Oprahma: The great baloney slicer. He talks; that is about all he does, ad naseum. What does he ‘stand for’? Flip flopping on issues is not an admirable trait. Trying to ‘sound like a President’ before elected is about as pompous as one can get; right after standing behind a ‘fake Oprahma Presidential seal’. I am still laughing about that one. He should fire the ad wizard that came up with that idea.
Posted by: therockofages | June 26, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
JimmyTMac
you called 200 year old document, does that mean it is different. 2nd amendment clearly states that
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
if you can not understand the meaning what can we do
Posted by: john | June 26, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
as someone else pointed out then whats mccains reasoning behind his flip flops if hes 70 years old?
Posted by: bhrandon | June 26, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
Wow the flip flops from Obama are coming down quicker than a summer rain storm. Every day i read some new position on his policies. Will we do well with someone like that in the White House? Next thing you know is that all that his campaign stands for will have changed from what it stood for by November. His dangerously inexperienced cannot be allowed in the White House. SAY NO TO FLIP FLOP OBAMA!
Posted by: persio | June 26, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
Barack Hussein Obama does not hold the African-American dreams and hopes at heart. His father was an African radical who wanted the imperialist countries to suffer for what they had done. Obama will carry on his father’s dreams and the American people will suffer. America, wake up!!!
Posted by: Izzy | June 26, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
persio – Then who do you suggest voting for? McCain has many more radical flip-flops than Obama, then you should vote for …. um, I guess I don’t know anyone who has never changed their mind.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 26, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
Good answer Obama.
I really think that Obama got VERY LUCKY with this ruling. This essentially takes this issue off the table for the Fall.
If the Supreme Court had ruled the opposite than that would have gotten gun rights activists UP IN ARMS in swing states ie Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Virginia, etc. That would have rallied that faction. Now that the Supreme Court ruled in their favor, there isn’t anything to rally about.
Furthermore, Scalia’s own wording on the case was used by Obama allowing Obama to straddle the issue that he is for the 2nd amendment but individual communities can restrict gun laws. Thus his “what works in Chicago may not work in Cheyenne” comment.
Obama was able to take a more centrist approach.
Posted by: Stacey | June 26, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
Obama said in the course of the Wisconsin debate with Hillary Clinton that he believes the Second Amendment confers an individual, not just a collective right. How are his comments today inconsistent?
Posted by: Stonecreek | June 26, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Honestly now: Do you think he will change his position on; Abortion,Drilling,Irag,Socialism,etc?
Posted by: Robert in Cleveland | June 26, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
I fail to see a mention of “hand guns” in the 2nd Amendment.
Posted by: Steve | June 26, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
The fact that Barack Hussein Obama made the decision to join a black liberation church as a young adult, and remain there for 20 years,is all I ever needed to know. The rest of his flip flops, broken promises, and contradictions are par for the course. No way Nobama
Posted by: Badger1 | June 26, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Jock there are many other issues with Obama, not just the flip flopping. With Hillary out of the race, i have yet to decide on who to vote for. That is something that i will be looking into for the next few weeks. Obama isn’t looking good at all as a choice for me. The main thing is i hope people keep in mind to VOTE WITH THEIR BRAINS NOT THEIR PASSION.
Posted by: persio | June 26, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
I am not a gun lover or gun fan, but you have to know what the Constitution refers to when it was written. Back then, as Great Britian was starting to see things like the Boston Tea Party and other events, they decided to crack down and put their army in the cities and anyone caught with a gun was imprisoned. The whole part about Due Process (putting someone in jail and not giving a trail, like Gitmo) and gun ownership, is because our founding fathers new that power corrupts. Every president gets smaller and weaker and yet takes more and more. They new that since NO civilization has lasted more than 200 years, eventually our government would need to be thrown out. We might replace it with a democracy, just different fools. Remember this as we are in our last 50 years as a superpower. India, will become the next SuperPowers.
Posted by: Dan Reese | June 26, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Well Obama kinda did change his position once about Iraq i think. I could be wrong, He was against the war at the beginning, but voted to continue funding the war. That to me sounds like a flip flop. Either you are against it and stand firm or flip flop like Obama when it feels needed to do so!
Posted by: persio | June 26, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Stonecreek -
Obama had a paid position on the board of the Joyce Foundation, which is an anti-gun, anti-second amendment organization. What more do you need to know? It doesn’t matter what he has said in the past because he will change, deny or blame his aides for not representing what he has said/believes. It’s very convenient for him to do so. Look at the boards he has served on, look at his voting record and look at the people and organizations he has associated himself with. Do the same for McCain. That is how you learn about a candidate what they truly represent, not by what they say because they will say anything they have to to get elected.
Posted by: Todd | June 26, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
No off shore drilling, We need to drill off shore
We need more rights for our vets, Jim webbs bill gives the vets too much!
The Bush Tax cuts cater to the top 5%, I support the bush tax cuts!
We need to engage in diplomacy, We should not engage in diplomacy.
I would talk to hamas, I wouldnt talk to hamas.
Im not going to run my campaign on the threat of fear or another attack, another attack would greatly help us
I voted for the everglades restoration, i didnt vote for the everglades restoration
I voted for katrina victims time and time again, i voted against katrina victims time and time again
I am against immigration, in private meetings ill tell hispanics im for immigration
I am against same sex marriage, i just had a secret meeting with the log cabin repubs
Im against george bush, i voted with him 95% of the time
I never said the media treated hillary unfairly, theres a tape?
We will bein iraq for 100 years, we will only be there for 4 years, I dont care when the troops come home
I think there is market manipulation going on in oil, i have no stance on this subject anymore
the suni and shia are working with al qaeda, oh no wait nevermind
Iran is training al qaeda to fight us in iraq, oh wait no those are insurgents
I do not know very much about the economy, I have people who know about the economy, phil gramm (cough cough)
I dont know how to use ac omputer, its a google
There are no lobbyists in my campaign, i just fired fifteen lobbyists and have to stop firing people because there will be no one left if i continue this
I voted for bush, i voted against bush
sounds like mccain pretty green too
god and hes had a 30 year head start on obama
i wouldnt trust this guy with a pile of dirt
Posted by: bhrandon | June 26, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Whichever way the wind blows, Senator.
Posted by: tony | June 26, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Persio: Obama was against the war in Iraq. However, since the war was already in place, he couldn’t vote against making sure they were armed. Right? If he was vote no on that issue, what will the headlines be today. The deaths of our soldiers would be Obama’s cross to carry. Don’t you think the Rebublicans would be all over it? Let it marinate for minute.
Posted by: Rational Voter | June 26, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
hey rex, news flash, the bill of rights is all about personal security and freedoms. what part of “shall not be infringed” don’t you understand?
Posted by: allan | June 26, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Jake, I don’t think John McCain should be talking about moral courage on gun control. In 1999, he twice against closing the gun show loophole — only a year later to cut an ad supporting the Colorado and Oregon ballot initiatives to close the gun show loophole.
Posted by: jim | June 26, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Rational voter that’s what the Dem’s have been doing for years now. They’ll put a bunch of their pet projects on a war funding bill so either they get their pork or if Bush vetos it they’ll say he’s against the troops. The democrats are the dirtiest people on earth.
McCain ’08
Posted by: Ryan | June 26, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Well one thing Obama is proving is that in comparison to Kerry, Kerry never flipped-Flopped.
I have never seen a Candidate or person for that matter change positions as much as Obama.
To one group I support it
another group I would never support
Other Countries do listen to what I say it is only politics
Flip-Flop-Flip-Flop-flip-Flop-Flip-Flop-BHO
Posted by: spock | June 26, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Run Obama run
when it meets your needs
we should all be very afraid
of what will come if he is elected
Posted by: JIMMYTHEGREEK | June 26, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
Go, Simon! The Dems have definately shot themselves in the foot with this loose cannon. Thank God for John McCain, the Great American Hero!
Posted by: RR/FL | June 26, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
BHO will do and say anything. Whoever is running BHO, needs to tell him to get his act together. I’m furious about his remarks saying ‘Republicans will try to make you afraid, etc. ……..Did I mention he’s black’ All of this racism, all of this sexism that the Republicans are supposedly guilty of were in full display during the Democratic primary. We haven’t even said anything…and he’s already accusing us??? John McCain is trying to get away from all this, and BHO keeps bringing it up. Who in the Republican party is mentioning this…the only person I hear mentioning it is BHO…. Oh yea…he’s really trying to bring unity to our country. I am a Republican and lots of my friends, and we am not racist, sexist or anything he mentioned. I hate when people categorize by groups. There are a lot of generous, good hearted Republicans out there, and I despise BHO’s comments. I still don’t know what issues BHO stands for….I hope I find out in the future debates. It’s all generalized, and I don’t hear specific points on how he is going to CHANGE things. As far as is political party, he’s brining in old Clinton advisors. Let’s see a new group of politicians. I want to see the CHANGE??
Posted by: Kathy | June 26, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
Obama has a new name Flip Flop Obama. He just does not know which way to go. He for one thing one day and then when it is convenient for him he just goes in the opposite direction. Well maybe he will get settled down before November but that will be to late for the DNCs chosen one. More power to PUMA.
Posted by: s4bo | June 26, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
let me tell you something INDEPENDENT i am independent and JOHN MCCAIN WILL NEVER GET ME MY FAMILY OR MY FRIENDS VOTE so dont get to confident
Posted by: angie | June 26, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
When’s anyone going call Obama out? He’s just a liar and will say whatever to whomever depending on desire for votes or money. He’s just empty and disgusting. He told Jews that Jerusalem should stay unified, then he told Palestinians that Jerusalem should be negotiated.
Posted by: tminu | June 26, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
no argument from anyone about mccains flip flops… just because you ignore them doesnt mean they arent there
Posted by: bhrandon | June 26, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
That flip flop strategy didn’t work out too well for Kerry.
Posted by: Mack | June 26, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
What we need to ask Mr. Obama is if he knows how many of those rampant gun crimes were committed by people using legal and registered firearms.
Ask yourself: If I wanted to kill someone today, would I buy a gun in a store registered to me, and wait to kill my victim, or would I go to the corner and buy one for 1/3 the cost with no numbers, no link back to me, and no waiting period.
The only reason to track information on legal gun owners is to count the number of guns in the hands of the public before passing the next tax increase. All registry tells you is the first owner or last registered owner and if the gun was reported stolen. It tells you nothing about the criminal pulling the trigger.
Posted by: Andy Zeus Anderson | June 26, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Ryan, read your statement to yourself. Now read it again. Think about the war and how it the decision to go to war came into fruition. Read your statement again. Then ask yourself this question: Am I accusing the Democrats of using deceptive practices?
Posted by: Rational Voter | June 26, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
In 2005 Obama vowed on TV that he would not run for President in 08. In 07 he declared his run for the presidency. “Tell them what they wanna hear and do what you’re going to do anyway”
Posted by: tminu | June 26, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Most of the people posting on this site are so partisan or anti-Obama that they can not smell the BS being pushed by themselves and the media. I am an independent and I don’t like either candidate that much. But I wish all you guys would wake up and smell what you are shoveling and what you are eating up.
Obama may very well be a flip-flopper, though this would be the weakest example to demonstrate such a claim because Obama never said anything in regards to the DC gun ban. All the media has is a year old quote form an unnamed source who was apparently affiliated with the campaign. I dare say that this is not the same as if Obama would have said it directly. Also, since Obama repeatedly side-stepped the issue and did not comment on it publicly I am going to give him the benefit of the doubt when he says he never made a public statement on the ban.
I feel like this explosion of flip-flop comments is just a bunch of partisan people who are blinded to the facts by their hatred of the man.
I am not saying you have to vote Obama, and the man has flip-flopped, most notably on public financing, but lets not go into huge tirades about how the man has flip-flopped and is nothing but a lair if you are supporting John McCain. Both men are politicians and both men have and will flip-flop on policy. However, from an objective view point, I feel that Obama’s flip-flops are overblown while McCain is let off the hook on a lot of important issues
I have followed politics for a while and I voted for John McCain in 2000. But that McCain was radically different from the 2008 version and I will not vote McCain in 2008. McCain has flip-flopped on the Bush Tax Cuts, Torture, Off-Shore Drilling, Immigration, and Public Financing to name a few and though some of these changes in position can be justified there are others that can not.
Posted by: Independent Mind | June 26, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
In 2007 Obama vowed to use publicly accountable campaign financing. In 2008 he utterly reversed on his promise. Which means that his promises are a joke, they’re meaningless, and anyone who actually puts any credibility to any of Barack Obama’s words is a fool.
Posted by: tminu | June 26, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Is anyone surprised by Barack Flipflopobama? Really you shouldn’t be!
Posted by: KerryinPA | June 26, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
KerryinPA
BHO’s supporters still haven’t figured that one out!
Posted by: T | June 26, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
This is what we need to say to Obama when he opens his lying mouth: “WHATEVER!”
Posted by: tminu | June 26, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Obama, if the shoe fits…
Posted by: Ray | June 26, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
Obama has never been on any board position against gun rights. Who is paying you for this smear – John McCain?
His position on gun rights has crystal clear and very consistent. I dare any reporter to pull out any tape where Obama is talking about the gun rights, and you will see that his position has been the same.
Posted by: Kensing | June 26, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
Kensing
After you read the ABC blog ‘Legalities’, come back. We’ll accept your apologies.
Posted by: A | June 26, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
When asked last year obama felt the DC ban was constitutional-that means he believed the total ban in DC of handguns was proper-he has now disingenuously stated the opposite. Also, he has stated that he would appoint justices like Ginsburg and Breyer-this is very scary.
Posted by: Tom | June 26, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
That is exactly the point. If you take away the peoples right to defend themselves, their families, and their home, by taking away their right to bare arms, then the criminals have the leg up. Criminals dont buy their guns legally. There is no record of transaction. Criminals will continue to find ways to get weapons while the law abiding citizens who would be without weapons are at the mercy of those criminals. That would be total BS. Does anybody here believe that any gang member who has a criminal record, obtained his gun legally?
Posted by: Badger1 | June 26, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
The man who knows Obama best his pastor of 20 years said this”Obama will say anything a politician has to say”
Posted by: roncraw | June 26, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Maybe Obama should return to the Trinity church and the Rev. Wright for guidance on the subject.
Posted by: Don in FL. | June 26, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Another racist attack on President Obama. So sad.
Posted by: barf simpson | June 26, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Is Obama running for President, or for a job as a stand-up comic? His speeches/press conferences are quite funny! Now, he wants people to believe he’s pro-2nd amendment! That’s the funniest one yet!!! I can’t stop laughing!!!! What’s next? Will he support drilling, and claim to be a long-time supporter?
Posted by: D'Obama | June 26, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Just think, this clown could be the DNC nominee. Bring back Hillary.
Posted by: Emily | June 26, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
“April 3rd 2008 — Obama is embracing anti-gun policies in the run-up to a Democratic presidential debate scheduled on the one-year anniversary of the Virginia Tech shootings.
“I am not in favor of concealed weapons,” Obama told the Pittsburgh Tribune. “I think that creates a potential atmosphere where more innocent people could (get shot during) altercations.”
These remarks break from Obama’s previous moderate rhetoric on gun control.
While campaigning in Idaho in February, Obama promised, “I have no intention of taking away folks’ guns.”"
Gosh he sounds like such a dictator-wannabe (he won’t be ) “taking away folks’ guns” who the hell does he think he is? And WHO in their right mind believes one vowel of one word he utters? He will tell whoever whatever whenever it’s expedient. He LIES (Wright’s sermon would be appropriate here, instead of governments lie it would be BO).
Posted by: tminu | June 26, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Obama is a specialist in constitutional law. Len you are a green greener green, remember that there is good experience and there is bad experience. Washington’s experience is a very bad experience. Good ideas come to Washington to die and we all know that reality. McSame is a pure product of Washington. God save America from McSame. God bless America and God Bless Obama.OBAM08.
Posted by: BKMC | June 26, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Obama is a very smart man who knows the Constitution because he taught it at the University of Chicago law School.
Know that the Constitution will be followed when he is president.
Posted by: kevin | June 26, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
roncraw I agree Obama will say and do anything that he thinks is needed to get him elected. People are coming around to his flip flopping ways and they will wise up and vote for McCain.
Posted by: s4bo | June 26, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
I found the cure for “Obamaism”, turn the channel.
Posted by: Chuck | June 26, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Actually the vast majority of Americans agree with Obama’s position that there is an individual right to bear arms but various communities can regulate guns issues depending upon the individual community.
Thus what works in Chicago may not work in Cheyenne.
Posted by: Stacey | June 26, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Flip-Flop isn’t that name of his game
Posted by: Roger PHILLIPS | June 26, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
“Another racist attack on President Obama. So sad.
Posted by: barf simpson”
Who is bringing up racism here, other than people like you? Conservatives promote all races – it’s you Dems that want to bring up racism all the time. Feeling guilty??
Posted by: D'Obama | June 26, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
“Actually the vast majority of Americans agree with Obama’s position that there is an individual right to bear arms but various communities can regulate guns issues depending upon the individual community.
Thus what works in Chicago may not work in Cheyenne.
Posted by: Stacey”
Not the point, the point is this is his current position. Who knows what his position will be next week, and the next and the next LOL!!
Posted by: D'Obama | June 26, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
tminu
Bravo! Good post.
Posted by: A | June 26, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Just how much Senate experience does Barack Obama have in terms of actual
work days? Not much.
From the time Barack Obama was sworn in as a United State Senator, to the
time he announced he was forming a Presidential exploratory committee, he
logged 143 days of experience in the Senate. That’s how many days the Senate
was actually in session and working.
After 143 days of work experience, Obama believed he was ready to be
Commander In Chief, Leader of the Free World, and fill the shoes of Abraham
Lincoln, FDR, JFK and Ronald Reagan.
143 days — I keep leftovers in my refrigerator longer than that.
In contrast, John McCain’s 26 years in Congress, 22 years of military
service including 1,966 days in captivity as a POW in Hanoi now seem more
impressive than ever. At 71, John McCain may just be hitting his stride.
Think about IT!!!
Posted by: first hand | June 26, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
…why Im I not surprized at this.
“Flipflopobama”
LOL!
Posted by: Daniel J | June 26, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Obama should have stayed with the platform that he took from Hillary. Every time he opens his mouth, all doubt is removed, a true empty suit. I now respect and understand the Hillary supporters for NOT going with Obama.
Posted by: Samuel Polling | June 26, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
D’Obama
Any criticism of BHO in the press is a ‘non story’ to his followers. It’s simply their way of coping with the fact that they’re hooked to an empty suit.
Posted by: A | June 26, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
Flip flop, flip flop, flip flop, do you think we’re seeing so many flip flops because it’s summer time? Or that’s just the normal political I’ll say anything to get your vote Obama?
Posted by: Melanie | June 26, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
Hey Jake, do you remember this one? This from an ABC article in Political Radar in February, am I correct?
Obama said this: “There’s been a long standing argument by constitutional scholars about whether the second amendment referred simply to militias or it spoke to an individual right to possess arms. I think the latter is the better argument. There is an individual right to bear arms, but it is subject to common-sense regulation just like most of our rights are subject to common-sense regulation. So I think there’s a lot of room before you getting bumping against a constitutional barrier for us to institute some of the common-sense gun laws that I just spoke about.”
Posted by: Rational Voter | June 26, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
“I’ve been very consistent, I teach constitutional law,” Obama said. “What I said was that I believe 2nd Amendment as being an individual right and have said that consistently. I also think that individual right is constrained by the rights of the community to maintain issues with public safety. I don’t think those two principles are contradictory and in fact what I’ve been saying consistently is what the Supreme Court essentially said today.” SOMEONE EXPLAIN TO MR. OBAMA THAT THESE ARE TWO DIFFERENT ISSUES. THE CONSTITUTION GIVES THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS
Posted by: Anne | June 26, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Still think that Obama is not tailoring his “views”, including on gun control, to get elected?
Remember the words of (then) Obama campaign advisor Samantha Power in a BBC television interview:
“[Obamah] will, of course, not rely on some plan that he’s crafted as a presidential candidate or a U.S. Senator…”
Translation: Obama will say what needs to be said to win the election, and develop his true policy positions later.
Still not persuaded? Then consider that Obama’s key economic adviser, Austan Goolsbee, was quoted in a Canadian government memo dismissing Obama’s vocal opposition to North American Free Trade Agreement as pure politics:
“Noting anxiety among many U.S. domestic audiences about the U.S.
economic outlook, Goolsbee candidly acknowledged the protectionist sentiment that has emerged, particularly in the Midwest, during the primary campaign. He cautioned that this messaging should not be taken out of context and should be viewed as more about political positioning than a clear articulation of policy plans.”
The handwriting, as they say, is on the wall—at least for those who care to read it.
Posted by: Stephen Gianelli | June 26, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
I’m confused about Obama. What is his position on gun rights today?
Posted by: Tim in Ohio | June 26, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
I wonder what moveon thinks of Obama’s latest position LOL (rolleyes)!
I would think you libs would be disappointed in Obama’s latest flip-flop. I mean, since when do libs appreciate the constitution anyways?
Posted by: D'Obama | June 26, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
“I don’t know what my aide said, but…” These words should be engraved on his forehead or perhaps holographically projected from the halo the media has put over his head. I can’t stand him, but I’m not sure how this decision hurts him. It actually puts the issue beyond the reach of the executive branch for now and may reassure some people that, whatever else he does, he won’t be able to take away their guns.
Posted by: fred gill | June 26, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
I read somewhere recently that flip flops were bad on the feet. At this point Dr Scholls wont be able to pull this guy out of the fire.
Posted by: Daniel J | June 26, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Obama taught constitutional law and he still can’t get it right. Ya, I know, I’m a racist.
Posted by: Terry in Ohio | June 26, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Most of the people posting on this site are so partisan or anti-Obama that they can not smell the BS being pushed by themselves and the media. I am an independent and I don’t like either candidate that much. But I wish all you guys would wake up and smell what you are shoveling and what you are eating up.
Obama may very well be a flip-flopper, though this would be the weakest example to demonstrate such a claim because Obama never said anything in regards to the DC gun ban. All the media has is a year old quote form an unnamed source who was apparently affiliated with the campaign. I dare say that this is not the same as if Obama would have said it directly. Also, since Obama repeatedly side-stepped the issue and did not comment on it publicly I am going to give him the benefit of the doubt when he says he never made a public statement on the ban.
I feel like this explosion of flip-flop comments is just a bunch of partisan people who are blinded to the facts by their hatred of the man.
I am not saying you have to vote Obama, and the man has flip-flopped, most notably on public financing, but lets not go into huge tirades about how the man has flip-flopped and is nothing but a lair if you are supporting John McCain. Both men are politicians and both men have and will flip-flop on policy. However, from an objective view point, I feel that Obama’s flip-flops are overblown while McCain is let off the hook on a lot of important issues
Posted by: Independent Mind | June 26, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
Apparently, Obama has no concrete visions, or convictions, nor does he have a stable mind set. Whichever direction is most favorable, that is where Obama goes. Now he will “disavow” his prior stance on this issue, this guy is PATHETIC. He does not stand by his choices 100%.. he is always backing out, changing his mind, or blaming someone in his midst. He will say anything or do anything to get elected president. What a joke.
Posted by: MJL | June 26, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
Obama should throw his aide under the bus with his grandmother, Resko, rev. wright and fr. Pfleger. It’s getting crowded under the bus.
Posted by: John in D.C. | June 26, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
A lot of us knew that Obama would try to change his positions once he got the nomination as he is way too liberal for the general election. It is unfortunate that so many of his supporters were so naive as to believe his rhetoric. The higher the pedestal, the further the fall.
Posted by: Susan | June 26, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
“Another racist attack on President Obama. So sad.
Posted by: barf simpson”
FlipFlop Obama should be use to it, he’s married to one that’s also anti-american.
She should have to apply for a visa to live here!
Posted by: First Hand | June 26, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Tim in Ohio: Obama’s positions on a single issue are predicated on who’s in the room, how much money they have, and whether they’re trivial or not to him.
Posted by: tminu | June 26, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Pretty soon, they’ll be nobody left for Obama to throw under the bus. I mean, with all these flip flops, he’s even throwing himself-from-last-year under the bus!
Posted by: D'Obama | June 26, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Ralph Nader was right, Obama is addressing the white issues. I’m one of the “Bitter” folks.
Posted by: Jess | June 26, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Rational Voter: Such as?
Posted by: A | June 26, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
Im hardly biased as he was the candidate I had concered early on. But you have to admit. If Obama dosent support whatever views one may have, hang around a while, it will swing back around sooner or later.
Posted by: Daniel J | June 26, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
I wish we could capture the hot air from Obama, it would end our energy crisis.
Posted by: Jill in fl. | June 26, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
And this makes him different from other politicians how?????????
Posted by: Empress of the Northlands | June 26, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Obama: “Change you can count on” more like “You can count on him to change…when it’s politically convenient.”
Posted by: michigander_sandusky | June 26, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Rational Voter, then how come some of his Democrat counterparts still voted against funding the war? I got one answer, Obama will say and do anything to get elected, so like you said, if he would have voted against funding the war, the Republicans would be all over it, that’s because he was much worried about running and winning than anything else. FLIP FLOP Obama would say and do anything as long as he wins. SAY NO TO FLIP FLOP OBAMA! THE DANGEROUSLY INEXPERIENCED OBAMA CANNOT SET FOOT IN THE WHITE HOUSE. NOT EVEN IF HE FLIPS THEM!
Posted by: persio | June 26, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
We will start calling Obama by his new nickname “The Carp” due to all the flip flopping around he is becoming known for.
Posted by: Lorin | June 26, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
Susan – “A lot of us knew that Obama would try to change his positions” – I don’t see how you get this from the article. If anything, all you could blame him for is having an aide say something silly…a problem I think all campaigns have at one time or another.
Posted by: jmengate | June 26, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
“If you cannot produce any such video, then we the Americans people will conclude that you are secretly working for and receiving payments from John McCain for this smear campaign.
Posted by: Kensing”
Seems that FlipFlop Obama needs no help, he provides enough fodder for smearing himself. “We” the American people.. don’t go including all of us in Bama’s nonsense. You’re not speaking for the American people if you’re beleiving all that bull.
Posted by: First Hand | June 26, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Independant mind – Please stop with the condescending , and patronizing rhetoric. Obama is a proven liar, andracial bigot, who has NO GROUND to stand on when it comes to his mantra of “change, sound judgment, and “bringing people together” I dont know where you get your news, but 90% of all media that I have been privvy to, are in the tank for Obama. Consider his 20 year membership to a racist church, and then ask yourself , how is he still in this race? Then look at his broken promises, failure to debate McCain afetr he said he’d be happy to, anytime, anyplace. His discrimination against Muslim supporters at his recent rally. And his bringing race into the equation.
Posted by: Badger1 | June 26, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
another non-story – it’s going to be a long road to november.
Posted by: Ronald | June 26, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
“[I]t can be pointed at a burglar with one hand while the other hand dials the police.”
– United States Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, today, explaining why the handgun is
Americans’ preferred weapon of self-defense.
Posted by: Ronald | June 26, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
Obama said last year he believes that the 2d Amendment was an individual right but some restrictions were Constitutionally OK – exactly what the Supreme Court said today. Hardly a flip-flop. Meanwhile, John McCain got on the primary ballot in some states without a petition drive by promising to use public financing, got a loan using the $5 million in public primary financing as collateral, then after getting the nomination he “opted out” of the public financing after esceeding the $54 million spending limit, without FEC approval. Now, THAT’s a flip-flop (and maybe a crime).
Posted by: D | June 26, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
persio, if your son was at war in Iraq, would you have wanted him to be subjected to underfunding? Would it be okay for him to fight a war, that shouldn’t have been launched, without protective gear, with broken down vehicles and etc? So he’s bipartisan when it comes to common sense. Thank God you’re not a Senator.
Posted by: Rational Voter | June 26, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
Badger1 – “how is he still in this race?” – ummm, maybe it has something to do with the number of people who voted for him in the primaries? Or maybe the number who say they’ll vote for him in the GE? Sorry to tell you the votes count.
Posted by: jmengate | June 26, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Why does Obama always blame everyone for mistakes, associations with uncavory people and lies, except himself. Must be nice to “Think” your perfect.
Posted by: James in Orlando | June 26, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Badger1 – “how is he still in this race?” – Because people have judged those things for themselves and found them to be either untrue or not a significant problem. We all get to decide these things for ourselves.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 26, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Bring back Hillary !!!
Posted by: Edith | June 26, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
You can tell when Obama is flip-flopping, his purple lips are moving.
Posted by: Willian Hannit | June 26, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
jmengate – apparently votes do not count as much as you claim, if they did Hillary would be the nominee. But that wasnt my point about Obama and his 20 year intimate affiliation with a black power church. The point I was making is , why the double standard? No other candidate would still be in this race if they came from that religious backround. It is the majority of the media sweeping Obamas dirt under the carpet.
Posted by: Badger1 | June 26, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Hillary had more votes in the primary and the DNC picked this empty suit. I guess the dems don’t want to win november.
Posted by: Linda | June 26, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
If you really want to know if Obama flip-flopped go here. blogs dot abcnews dot com slash politicalradar slash 2008 slash 02 slash obama dash common dash se dot html. I had to spell out the website. They’re either blocking my posting linking to the article ABC ran on February 15, 2008 or it doesn’t accept website addresses. Otherwise you can stay here and fight with your own demons of “truth”.
Posted by: Rational Voter | June 26, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
President Obama will open all our hearts and minds to hope and change, even you racist nay-sayers will be enlightened by his wisdom.
Posted by: barf simpson | June 26, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
John McCain flip flops even worse than Obama. All you supposedly outraged people need to remember that.
Posted by: James Hoffman | June 26, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
Would rather have flip flopper Obama than flip flopper McCain. No more republicans. They have taken us nowhere in the past 8 years, except to the gutter.
Posted by: d | June 26, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Obama is the result of affirmative action in our colleges.
Posted by: Brian | June 26, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
So where is he TODAY on reinstating the so called FEDERAL “assault weapons” ban? That is the real question here. Just a few months ago in the debate with HRC he said he wants this law reinstated.
Is that proposed law constitutional after today? Nope, not even close. Take a gander at the majority slip opinion at page 55.
Get a clue, Barack. There is a lot more to understanding constitutional law than going to Harvard and making law review. You could not be trusted to fold Scalia’s boxers…
Posted by: Aaron Burr | June 26, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
BRING HILLARY BACK, if this B.H.O. continues to put his foot in his mouth as he has been doing, he will end up giving the election to McCain and we will have another 8 years of Bush economics that will finish bringing this country down. B.H.O. was elected on the primaries based on all the lies and the gullible youngsters and blacks eager to believe in his “change” rethoric. He has already flipped-flopped on NAFTA, after he used that to critize Hillary, then after obtaining the nomination he started to say NAFTA was not too bad, and that during a campaing “rethoric was augmented and inflated”. PEOPLE WAKE UP, HE DID NOT MEAN ANYTHING he said during his campaign for the primaries. He has proven already he does not represent change, but is just another run of the mill politician who is a liar and will say and do anything to get what he wants.
Posted by: roxie2500 | June 26, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Barry Flip flop flip flop. I guess we can recycler those John F. Kerry flip flops for this years convention! I was for it before I was against it. I voted against gun owner rights even though i now say that I agree with the Supreme Court. The scary thing is this is his realm of expertise, Constitutional law and he got it wrong. If he was wrong about what he is supposed to be so knowledgeable about we defiantly cant trust him to be in control of our country. Barry Flip flop flip flop.
Posted by: joey | June 26, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
– barf simpson –
You sound like the republicans 8 years ago. Remember the Bush “change”, now your living in it. I will only trust a proven leader, not a person that has done the opposite of what he preaches.
Posted by: Dennis Trein | June 26, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Badger1 – “why the double standard?” – How come when people decide who they want to vote for this becomes a double standard? I think there’s been more than enough media coverage on the issues you mentioned (though I don’t remember the stinky diaper making the headlines). Why is there such a disdain for the will of the people?
Posted by: jmengate | June 26, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Brian, here’s what you’ve got wrong about Affirmative Action. Minorities have to perform 10 times better just to get in, and 10 times better to reap the same recognition and awards. Don’t be fooled by the politicians claims that others are being discriminated against. Do you remember George W. Wallace and the Univerisity of Alabama. Do you really want to enter into a debate about the truth? I don’t think so. Just stick to bashing Obama on this misleading article on flip flopishness.
Posted by: Rational Voter | June 26, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
Sad sack strkes again. Do whatever it takes to get elected; sick, sick politician. Hillary stands her ground as does John but this lowball changes again. Has anyone told him that change is not good when he cannot be trusted on any issue. No wonder mainstream Americans do not trust him.
Posted by: benvictor | June 26, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
joey – guess you missed all of mccain’s flip flops. torture, offshore driling, etc. mccain has sold out every position he once believed in. nice try. plus mccain’s a thief who was convicted in the keating 5 scandal who dumped his wife to marry a rich junkie who stole drugs from her own charity. you wanna throw mud, be careful where it spatters. lol
Posted by: Kochinator | June 26, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
This is simply contradictory. Only a very arrogant person could state two contradictory sentences, state that they are not contradictory, and expect a person to believe them.
So which is it Mr. Obama? After all the noise can I keep a gun in my DC apartment and not be a felon?
Posted by: matt | June 26, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
If Obama didn’t agree with something his aide said quite some time ago, he should have/would have clarified it then. He knows very little about how to be a leader if he thinks he can continue to get by with this approach.
Posted by: Susan | June 26, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
benvictor – “No wonder mainstream Americans do not trust him.” – pssst, he’s ahead in the poles…..might want to rethink your argument. Sorry to break the news to you.
Posted by: jmengate | June 26, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
john mccain flip flopped on everything he once believed in – remember when he kissed bush’s behind at the gop convention in 2003? remember how he sucked the butts of the religious right after he once called them the agents of intolerance? get real. all politicians are flip floppers. don’t kid yourselves. mccain is no better than obama. i’m voting for ron paul.
Posted by: Kochinator | June 26, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
matt – do you uderstand the difference between something obama said and something one of his aides said?
Posted by: Randal C. | June 26, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
When Hillary and Obama met after their epic battle they met in the home of their mutual friend Senator Feinstein. That should tell you his stance on gun control. Obama and several of his colleagues repeat the same old “hunting and sport shooting” garbage. Those words aren’t in the Second Amendment or anywhere else in the Constitution. It’s all smoke and mirrors. Their goal is to keep guns out of the wrong hands. Guess who has the wrong hands. You and me. Unless you are part of the elite, they think you should be unarmed. How can we trust a president who doesn’t trust us?
Posted by: Royce | June 26, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
jmengate – Youre observation about people dismissing Obamas church affiliation is inaccurate. Since the time the story broke in the MSM Obamas popularity waned, and Hillary destroyed him from March through June. It was only the Washington elite, and liberal media who carried the inexperienced Obama across the finish line at the “57th state”. As for the media picking up on his church and pastor,,, they had no choice, but,,,they went out of their way to quickly neutralize it, starting with their raves over Obamas speech on race,,, you know, the one where he threw granny under the bus? The one where he said he coul dnever disown his pastor? The one where he diverted attention from his own lies about what he knew?
Posted by: Badger1 | June 26, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
B.H.O. is a run of the mill liar, who has no business running for president. He cannot make up his mind on anything, and is proving to not have a solid position on anything. All of you who voted for him will be responsible for this country’s doom if he is elected president, he will take us all down to hell!
Posted by: roxie2500 | June 26, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
Obama can do no wrong. His paster was wrong, his friends; fr. pfleger, resko, ouchi, farrakhan, ayres and dohrn were not the people he knew. Is this a trend with Obama?
Posted by: Joseph in Daytona | June 26, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
badger1 – that’s quite a fanciful picture you paint. Too bad it has nothing to do with reality or what actually happened. I guess that’s what happens when you get your news from the funny pages.
Posted by: monkey mcgee | June 26, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
Obama flip flops more than Kerry! WOW you all need to wake up and vote for a third party nominee. Mcsame is Bush 3 and Obama is Carter 2, They both suck! Elephants and As$eS screwing the masses! Vote Constitution party – Get Out of IRAQ and fix out economy. The Dems & GOP are all corrupt. WAKE UP AND HELP TAKE BACK THIS COUNTRY FROM THESE LIARS.
Posted by: Constitution Party | June 26, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
jmengate – Your observation about people dismissing Obamas church affiliation is inaccurate. Since the time the story broke in the MSM Obamas popularity waned, and Hillary destroyed him from March through June. It was only the Washington elite, and liberal media who carried the inexperienced Obama across the finish line at the “57th state”. As for the media picking up on his church and pastor,,, they had no choice, but,,,they went out of their way to quickly neutralize it, starting with their raves over Obamas speech on race,,, you know, the one where he threw granny under the bus? The one where he said he could never disown his pastor? The one where he diverted attention from his own lies about what he knew?
Posted by: Badger1 | June 26, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
He is starting to sound like Bushwacker, unaccountable for anything!!!
Posted by: rickyt1234 | June 26, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
Susan – I go back to the article. The reporter asked Senator Obama about his stance that the ban was constitutional. His response was that he thought the ban was unconstitutional but that the government should have the ability to implement constraints in order to protect public safety. Not only does this seem reasonable to me, but it’s consistent with what he’s said in the past. I fail to see the issue.
Posted by: jmengate | June 26, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
This guy makes more flip flops than Havaianas. I loathe him more every day. I wish the AP had called ME when they polled Hillary supporters about him this week.
Posted by: Cardsgal | June 26, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
mccain flip flops more than obama, so what’s the big deal?
Posted by: ace of hades | June 26, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
Badger1 – “Youre observation about people dismissing Obamas church affiliation is inaccurate” – I never meant to imply that anyone dismissed this, only that there has been more than enough media coverage on this and people have made their choice one way or another. Some choose to vote against Obama because of this and some didn’t. People may not agree with the decisions one way or another, but I don’t think anyone was hoodwinked.
Posted by: jmengate | June 26, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
Another Flip! Or was that a flop? I’m starting to think he’s no better than the rest of these politicians that really have no firm values or beliefs other than those that fit the current time and/or situation. Come on Obama, show us who you really are. The slick speaking facade is beginning to wear thin. Lets see who you really are!
Posted by: LongT | June 26, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Obama or Mc Cain, it doesn’t matter who will be the next President of the U.S. American soldiers still stay in Irag. NAFTA is still the same. Gas will be above 5 dollars and America is still in debts. American politicians have been bought by big corporations and the media.
Posted by: Crookedpolitician | June 26, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
so now the press is going after obama for things he never said? how sad.
Posted by: Kyle R. | June 26, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
Obama did to every one so far!
Obama is a liar! Like Rev. Wright, Louis Farrakhan, Father Pfleger and all!
Posted by: Carol | June 26, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
Susan – Well, McCain has more than once had to ask his aides what his position even was on an issue. Does this make a better leader?
Posted by: jock59801 | June 26, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
jock59801 – “Well, McCain has more than once had to ask his aides what his position even was on an issue.” – And let’s not forget the apology for one of his aides saying how a terrorist attack would benefit the GOP.
Posted by: jmengate | June 26, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
Jim – when is mccain going to divorce his wife who was convicted of stealing drugs from her own charity. i’ll take michelle obama over that scary trainwreck debutante any day of the week.
Posted by: Nando | June 26, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
Nader was right about Obama.
Posted by: tww | June 26, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
The boys and men getting killed on the streets of DC are getting killed with illegal weapons.
Weapons used in gang violence are almost never legally purchased or registered. Therefore, Obama’s polyanna plan to restrict legal gun ownership will have absolutely no effect on the violence, as the ban has not had an effect until today.
His head is you know where, as usual.
Posted by: ajmalkov | June 26, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
We can NOT aks Obama aie thing!
Posted by: Aks Obama | June 26, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
The reality is nothing will change much except governments cannot make a law that blanket prohibits handguns. They can still make it so much of a hassle that it will be nearly impossible to own one if they don’t want you to. Yearly, or even semi-annually registrations, proficiency tests, peer reviews with government appointed/registered/licenced gun experts, demonstrated need, etc. The list could go on and on. You’ll still have to fight city hall, they just can’t tell you now they won’t listen to you at all.
Posted by: LongT | June 26, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
hey tww,
I am for Ralph Nader too!
Posted by: Suzan | June 26, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
As you can see all the rulings have come down to 5/4 in recent days. This should tells us that the country is divided, that the court is still an activists court no matter what political branch does the appoinment.
No matter what your, mine, Obama’s McCain’s opinion is, what really matters is who will uphold the opinion of all the rulings made recently.
Posted by: Thinking | June 26, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
Badger1 – Nobody who has ever been to Trinity UCC has agreed with your assessment of it. They certainly have their flaws, but they can’t be completely condemned with the little evidence you have.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 26, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
ajmalkov – “Therefore, Obama’s polyanna plan to restrict legal gun ownership will have absolutely no effect..” – So requiring a background check to own a deadly weapon now qualifies as a polyanna plan. Has it ever occurred to you that maybe you’re the radical one and that Senator Obama is the one with the reasonable plan?
Posted by: jmengate | June 26, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
Gun’s are not allowed in prison, and McCain is against Habeas Corpus, so I guess he can have it both ways.
Posted by: Thinking | June 26, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
LongT – People have to register and take proficiency tests to operate cars as well, another possession that can kill people if used improperly. Expecting the same of gun-owners does not seem like that strange a thing.
Posted by: jock59801 | June 26, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
Well, Well, Well, it looks like good old liberal elitist Barack realized that he really NEEDED those white blue collar voters who “Cling to their guns out of bitterness” after all! NOW do you “Barack Bandwagon Followers” see that you have been supporting a phoney baloney empty suit polician? Do you STILL believe his mindless and false mantra of “Change that we can believe in”? Barack and his minions have made a mockery of this presidential race by turning it into a high-school level election. He is not qualified to be President of the United States.
Posted by: PhillyPaul | June 26, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
So what is it Barack? Is a ban on handgun ownership in crime ridden DC Constitutional or not?? YOu said it was in November, now you say that you agree with todays Supreme Court decision! Its tough playing with the “big guys” aint it!
Posted by: PhillyPaul | June 26, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
hey flip-flop,
This is not the only thing he had flip-floped!here are more issues Obama had changed positions even worse and more frequent than John Kerry!
Rev Wright!
Louis Farrakhan
Father Pfleger
Foreign policy on Iran, Cuba and N,Korea
Tax increases percentage,
Health care
His Selma speach
Bill Ayers and being friends with the terrorists
Accepting support from Hamas
Existence of Israel
One Jerusalem
His support for arab Americans
Pulling out of Iraq time table
Posted by: Daniel | June 26, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
” A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free
State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be
infringed.”
Try to find the bit that says individuals have the right to own guns.
Try to find the bit that says a State or municipality can’t pass laws about the kinds and types of arms that an individual can bear.
Try to find the bit that says this applies to women as well as men.
Try to find the part that says a felon can’t bear arms.
Individual vs States rights.
Obama’s statement that this is useful guidance is correct. The Court did its job. Trying to determine if this makes sense in an era of ubiquitous unregistered Uzis and Glocks is an altogether different problem. That is the essence of Obama’s dilemma or really any thinking person with an understanding of the implications of open borders and a society with a wide chasm between haves and have nots.
Understanding constitutional law is not the problem. Understanding the role of the executive in context of the oath of office in real world events is.
Guidance is not always given and there isn’t enough time to ask for it in some situations.
Posted by: len | June 26, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
Way to hold onto those liberal ideals that you cherished so deeply only months ago Barack! What a total BS phoney baloney politican. I still cannot believe that his “followers” did not see through his empty suit politics in the first place.
Posted by: PhillyPaul | June 26, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
McCain’s Campaign said that a terrorist attack would help his Campaign.
Posted by: Thinking | June 26, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
PhillyPaul – “Barack and his minions have made a mockery of this presidential race” – And how’s that exactly? Because he takes a reasonable, non-radical position? Or is it that he treats the electorate as intelligent adults who can make decisions for themselves? Please explain…
Posted by: jmengate | June 26, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
Obama is a better choice than McCain.Period.
Obama 08
Posted by: TV | June 26, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
The only change Obama believes in changing his mind from day to day without being held accountable for it.
Posted by: HoosierSue | June 26, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
To Jmengate” – He makes a mockery of this presidential election by not meaning ANYTHING that he originally stood for. Is that clear enough to you? He SUPPORTED a DC handgun ban, calling it “Constitutional” in November; now that he is running for POTUS, and realizes that he NEEDs more white blue collar votes, he AGREES with the Supreme Court decision calling the proposed ban UNConstitutional! Do you Barack “followers” even bother to read these news articles? I swear, if Barack drowned a puppy, you’d say, “well, he never said that he WOULDNT drown a puppy!” Extremely sad day for America.
Posted by: PhillyPaul | June 26, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Americans want change.McCain and his republican friends have had an almost undilluted effect on our country for countless years and look at the position we are in. Look at it!Are you happy? If you are I wish the rest of America made over 250,000 a year like you because your greed or complete ignorance is an abomination.Abraham Lincoln would be ashamed. Ashamed.
Posted by: TV | June 26, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
I don’t really see the contradiction here. He says he believes in handgun control or gun control whatever.
He is saying he is fine with the Supreme Court which does seem to say two things: first, you can ban ownership of guns and two, gun possession can be regulated from sensitive areas.
Also, I have heard that DC is a special case since it is a federal territory.?
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | June 26, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Senator Obama’s campaign said that the senator supported the DC gun ban, and that in the Senator’s opinion, it was constitutional. Senator Obama teaches Constitutional law. I don’t want Mr. Obama choosing Supreme Court justices, do you?
Posted by: jjsmith6575 | June 26, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Way to hold onto those liberal ideals that you cherished so deeply only months ago Barack! What a total BS phoney baloney politican. I still cannot believe that his “followers” did not see through his empty suit politics in the first place.
**************************************
I have been saying for months that Obama is not a liberal as the GOP has made him out to be. If you would have bothered to listen to his speeches you could pick up on it.
Now you say he is an empty suit, for what? Taking a moderate view of things, is this McCain’s territory? No Obama allowed? He supports your view and now you are angry? Are you opposed to the Supreme Court Ruling or what?
Posted by: Thinking | June 26, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
PhillyPaul – “Do you Barack “followers” even bother to read these news articles?” – Funny you should ask…especially since you didn’t read the article yourself (either that or you don’t have enough capacity to understand it). The article said an aide may have said this. Of course, they didn’t take the time to research whether that even happened. So, to answer your question, yes, we take the time to read the articles. I suggest you try the same.
Posted by: jmengate | June 26, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
There goes Obama again. Caught in another flip flop on gun ownership; and the only thing he could said is; that is not true. This guy has no firm stand on thing. I can’t believe he is the nominee for the Democratic party. All in the name of affirmative action. Our country is doomed if Obama is elected a president. He say one thing today,and when challenged, he denied it and say another.
The same thing when Rev. Wright issue came out; he denied hearing such racist sermons being preached. But during his speech in PA, he admitted hearing such sermons in the church. What again. Are we short of very competent people to lead this country, that we put this naive and phony guy to be a president candidate?
May God save America from Barrack Hussein Obama.
Posted by: Big Joe | June 26, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
jmengate
BHO is a certifiable idiot and compulsive liar. You can paint him any way you’d like but facts are facts. It’s you that’s out of step!!
Posted by: A | June 26, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
Apparently, Barack supporters need to have everything explained to them. Barack supported a handgun BAN calling it “Constitutional”. Now he reverses yet AGAIN on an extremely important issue to America. Regulating handgun ownership with background checks is simply not the same thing as the outright handgun BAN that Barack originally supported only 7 months ago. Apparently, the only “change that we can believe in” to Barack is changing his mind.
Posted by: PhillyPaul | June 26, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
I notice there are more attacks on Obama than there are cheers and support for McCain. Most McCain “supporters” are people against Obama and or angry that Hillary didn’t receive the needed delegates.Will the real supporters of McCain please stand up and go into detail why he is great for our country?………Waiting…….
Posted by: TV | June 26, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
A – “It’s you that’s out of step!!” – And doesn’t it just kill you that Senator Obama is winning in the poles right now?
Posted by: jmengate | June 26, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
A campaign spokesperson speaks for the campaign. Duh. If Senator Obama is going to contradict something a spokesperson said, 1.) Should he wait seven months to do it? and, 2.) Should he maybe speak for himself from now on???
Posted by: jjsmith6575 | June 26, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
He SUPPORTED a DC handgun ban, calling it “Constitutional” in November; now that he is running for POTUS, and realizes that he NEEDs more white blue collar votes, he AGREES with the Supreme Court decision calling the proposed ban UNConstitutional! Do you Barack “followers” even bother to read these news articles?.
***************************************
Yes I read it here it is in Part:
In November you mentioned that the DC handgun law was constitutional,” Layne said. “Now you’re embracing the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision striking down that law—
“That’s not what I said,” Obama interrupted, per ABC News’ Jennifer Duck.
“Your aide said that,” Layne clarified.
Do you see that part where he said I didn’t say and the reporter back tracked and said Your aide said?
Perhaps you should read.
Posted by: Thinking | June 26, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
The Supreme Court got it right, and it’s the same thing that the NRA (of which I’m a Life Member of) has been saying: The “right” of the people to “keep and bear arms”. No one is suggesting that thieves and thugs and murderers be allowed to have weapons of any kind but “law abiding citizens” Shall NOt have these rights infringed. PERIOD !!
Posted by: USCITIZENVETERAN | June 26, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
Um, one more time “Jmengate” [but arguing with you is like arguing with a brainwashed wall] – I read the entire article including the “Barack’s aide” part. It does not matter if his “aide” said it or not, his “aide” was simply stating and repeating what every major news and political organization already was well aware of. Namely, that Barack supported a DC gun BAN, calling it “Constitutional” – So, in reality, it is even MORE pathetic that Barack lied and denied his own ideologic beliefs and blamed them on an “aide”. Further, he acted defensive and elitist yet again when he lamely remarked, “I taught constitutional law!” What a total schmuck this guy is.
Posted by: PhillyPaul | June 26, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
And, the way he looks down his nose at his supporters makes you wonder why they can’t realize the disdain he has for them. Obama supporters are being taken advantage of and seem to enjoy every minute of it!
Posted by: A | June 26, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Flip-flopper is a label which has lost its strength in this election and is because people are trying to use it on Obama when those who have actually paid attention to what Obama has been saying know that he has not flip-flopped. It’s simple, those who read the audacity of hope could easily see that Obama has been consistent, those who simply want to damage his candidacy out of prejudice tend to make strong empty statements against Obama before even trying to take an honest look at what he’s been saying.
Obama/Biden 2008/2012
Posted by: Miguel | June 26, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
It just kills Senator Obama’s supporters when their candidate cannot be honest. It just eats them up inside that they know he cannot be trusted to give a straight, from-the-heart, honest answer. But they’ll keep defending him, because who else have they got?
Posted by: jjsmith6575 | June 26, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
He’s just pretty much all over the place.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | June 26, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
I am so glad Obama is running. He is so inspiring. He brought so many people to the political process.
Listen the man is a lawyer.He knows the truth and the loophole like any other lawyer. I would want him or Hillary fighting my case in court anytime.The problem with most of YOU people I beleive is that you are jealous of him.Admit it.
He has flaws, he has made mistakes ,he admitted his mistakes, he is near your age, and he is black.You ask yourself why wasn’t I able to steer my life in such a way with all the mistakes I’ve made in mine to accomplish what he has accomplished.You are jealous.
Barack Obama is a phenominon that has taken America by storm.he has captured the dreams and hopes of so many and you are jealous that you are not him. So you turn on the inside and spew out garbage from your mouth attacking him.Just like Hillary did at one time and a few in the media, you are trying to halt and destroy his monumental, meteoric, transceding rise and send him crashing to the earth and live in misery like you.
I support Barack Obama and he has my vote. He got my vote here in Virgina and he’ll get it again.There are millions of americans like me and we like him are going to continue to rise to the top.
Obama 08
Change that I beleive in and change that works for me
Hate all you want
McCain NEVER!
Posted by: TV | June 26, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
Miguel
You’re right — flip-flop has lost it’s meaning. In reference to Obama, we should substitute the phrase ‘bold face liar’.
Posted by: A | June 26, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
Oh I think Obama/Biden is a wonderful and excellent idea. I agree Miguel
Posted by: TV | June 26, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
President Obama. Call him Mr. President now and get used to it haters. Sorry to be presumptious but YOU people…
Posted by: TV | June 26, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
I bet the Obama supporters on the left wish they had somewhere else to go. FISA, this gun law, and he probably won’t keep his word on Iraq either.
He has used them, thrown them under the bus, and moved along to try and win the independents now.
Obama knows the left won’t vote for McCain so he’s probably not too worried.
What a complete fraud.
Posted by: riley | June 26, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
Just another flip-flop from this typical politican who says he is different. Hasn’t shown us how different yet. I keep waiting….same old-same old stuff.
Posted by: Jaye | June 26, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
I guess Obama thinks this will help him win over those bitter rural Americans clinging to their guns. Not!
Posted by: cindy in nc | June 26, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Most people are used to see things in absolutes, in opposites, black and white, (+)or(-), and are missing the point on what Obama has been saying about issues such as gun control and death penalty.
Obama talks about how in a lot of cases apparent opposite ideologies could co-exist because we all share same goals. Regarding gun control the guy has been saying that there are loopholes used by Corporations making their money selling weapons without conducting background checks, like when they have gun shows anybody could buy a gun with no problems.
And that is anybody! And I think we all, liberals, moderates and conservatives, agree that not everybody is qualified to carry a gun. This is just one example. If anyone puts prejudice aside and gives a fair trial to Obama, they will understand what the fuss is all about.
The GOP, Gun industry lobbyist, will try to use this absolutes approach to put the label “gun control” on any Democrat, when Obama is simply offering common sense solutions, facing reality without affecting constitutional rights.
Obama/Biden 2008
Posted by: Miguel | June 26, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Miguel – you’re world is so simple!
Posted by: A | June 26, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
Obama is for gun ownership and against it.
Isn’t that clear?
Posted by: drjohn | June 26, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
GUN OWNERS: REMEMBER WHEN SENATOR OBAMA CALLED HILLARY CLINTON ANNIE OAKLEY BECAUSE SHE SUPPORTED THEIR RIGHTS TO HAVE THEIR GUNS? TIME TO RETHINK WHO YOU ARE SUPPORTING IF OBAMA WAS YOUR CANDIDATE OF CHOICE!!! HE WILL SIDESTEP IT AND TALK HIS WAY AROUND IT WITH THAT DOUBLE EDGED TONGUE OF HIS! DON’T BELIEVE HIM FOR A MINUTE! HE IS MORE OF THE SAME POLITICS WE CURRENTLY HAVE THAN HILLARY WAS EVER PART OF. HE IS A JOKE!
Posted by: Mary Anne | June 26, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
This man could be a very good stand-up comedian. This is getting funnier by the day. I can’t believe our country is in this position. McCain is a much better choice than Obama. I’ll take age and wisdom over youth and stupidity any day. How did this man teach Constitutional Law? I have a hard time understanding people being mesmerized by him. Anything he says and does isn’t suppose to be questioned and he’s always right. Come on people we need to wake up and smell the roses. Now they are having polls on MO and CMc. Unreal!!
Posted by: C Good | June 26, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
of course he’s changing course. It’s not cool anymore to be against gun control. Just so people know: anyone who votes for Obama or McCain is a moron.
Posted by: don | June 26, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
C Good – careful. Age does not by default mean wisdom. McCain has the age but that’s about it.
Posted by: don | June 26, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Given Obama’s written support for a total handgun ban going back to ’96, and his 8 years on the board of a nonprofit that spent $2.7 million to advocate the ban of all handguns, his disavowal of staff comments that he supported the DC gun ban is not credible.
Posted by: Stephen Gianelli | June 26, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
Obama promises change we can believe in. Every time he changes his mind, he delivers on that promise. I’ve often wondered what he meant by “change,” now I know. Good show, Obama!
Posted by: DL | June 26, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
What is Obama hiding that he can’t take a stand on anything?
Posted by: Jim | June 27, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am
Obama is against guns and then for them
For public finance then against it
Will debate any time any place–but only on the 4th of July and one other time
Against wire-tapping then for it/FISA
(and the farleft is mad!)
For Rev Wright then against him
This could go on and on..
Hope and Change is becoming the reality that Obama is just another ordinary politician. Not qualified to lead this country.
Posted by: riley | June 27, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am
This guy obama is the biggest fraud my party has ever nominated. I am sorry but my principles forbid me from voting for him despite being a Democrat. I don’t want my kids subjected to such an unprincipled person. Oh by the way Barack, STOP emailing Hollywood starlets….you are married with two kids.
Posted by: mary | June 27, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Senator Obama is for controlled gun control. Guns in the hands of gangs.irresponsible adults are killing people everyday, this is what he says needs to be addressed, as any responsible person would want, I should think. Everyone is for having guns but there has to be some sort of control on who are sellilng and buying. If you want to vote for McSame then do it. You are probably the ones that voted Bush into office twice. So your credibility and judgement sucks anyway. So this time try to do the right things and vote for Obama. You call Obama, adding to his beliefs, flip flopping and McCain’t the master flip flopper is not mentioned. Responsible adults should own guns. How many irresponsible people, gangs, criminals etc. are in American. Any concern about this? I haven’t heard much about that.
Posted by: sally F | June 27, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am
OMG are you Obama supporters amazing. It is simple: in November Obama said “the DC ban IS Constitutional”, then in June the Supreme Court rules it IS NOT Constitutional and Obama follows the decision and says he “agrees with the Court’s ruling.” Obama: Is constitutional, Supreme Court: Is not constitutional, Obama: Supreme court is right.
That is pretty simple so if any supporters here are stupid…
Posted by: tom | June 27, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
I now understand why Sen Obama no longer teaches constituional law.
He wasn’t very good at it….
Posted by: tankfixer | June 27, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
He changes his stance depending who the audience is. Problem is, people from different states do talk and it just exposes what a fraud he is.
BHO is going to need 1 million just to keep him in supply of fresh flip flops!
Posted by: PA_Voter | June 27, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
As a former Democrat, I’d like to apologize on behalf of my former party for nominating such an untrustworthy flip-flopper. I did not vote and will not vote for him.
Posted by: RealChange | June 27, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
Well, well, well, mr. Flip Flopper himself Mr. Obama on gun ban. Go figure! That wrinkled up prune face raisin Kerry must have rubbed off on him! I LOVE IT! The more he irritates people the more people will vote for John McCain and we can rid ourselves of this little pesky insect on the political screen, Obama! He’s nothing special! He’s a motivational speaker and nothing more. Read the articles in the paper about his housing debacle and the sub-standard housind he and his cronies provided for people and the fact that these same cronies are all around him in his campaign. He certainly hangs around with unsavory characters and the Obama zombies worship him like a God! What a joke! We now have over 200 HILLARY SUPPORTERS COUNT TOO! organizations and have surpassed the 3 million member mark. It keeps growing and growing every day by leaps and bounds. We will be blocking Obama from being elected in November! Go McCain!! And, we hope to hit the 5 million member mark by October, so we can block Obama and have McCain elected. SO, ARE WE STILL JUST A RADICAL FEW ON THE OUTER FRINGES OF THE PARTY? Last time I checked several million people could make or break an election! Don’t kid yourselves into thinking that we don’t matter and that we will just go away! We are getting stronger and stronger every day. It is just the beginnining! And, I hope that every Obama supporter feels the same pain that we felt when Hillary was stabbed in the back by the Democratic party. It doesn’t feel so good when you are the recipient, does it? Boo! hoo! No mercy from me for any of you!
Posted by: Mary Anne | June 29, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Obama is so full of crap! He flip flops all the time. It is one thing for a politician to change his policy, but it is entirely another thing for that politician to flat out LIE and say he has been consistent. I would never vote for him!
Posted by: CMM | July 11, 2008, 2:35 am 2:35 am