Obama Friend Wants Abortion Reduction Plank
ABC News’ Teddy Davis and Gregory Wallace Report: Before the Democrats convene in Denver, the Rev. Jim Wallis plans to urge Barack Obama to go along with adding an “abortion reduction” plank to the party platform.
“Abortion reduction should be a central Democratic Party plank in this election,” Wallis told ABC News. “I’ll just say that flat out.”
Wallis, who hosted a Democratic candidates’ forum on CNN last year, discussed his plans after defending Obama against Dr. James Dobson’s charge that the Illinois Democrat distorted the traditional understanding of the Bible when he spoke to Wallis’s Sojourners group in 2006.
Beyond his plans to make a personal plea to Obama, Wallis said that he pitched the idea last week to DNC Chairman Howard Dean. The Rev. Tony Campolo, who sits on the party’s platform committee, also supports the plank and plans to push it, according to Wallis.
“This is going to be a big Denver conversation,” said Wallis. “You don’t have to call for criminalizing anyone. You don’t have to take a different stance about a woman’s right to choose. But you begin with the need for reducing abortion dramatically.”
The abortion reduction plank that Wallis envisions would call for making adoption easier, supporting low-income women, and stepping up pregnancy prevention efforts.
Without calling for restrictions such as parental consent laws, Wallis believes that if the Democrats were to alter their abortion platform, it could help them make inroads among young evangelicals and Catholics.
“Taking abortion seriously as a moral issue would help Democrats a great deal with a constituency that is already leaning in their direction on poverty and the environment,” said Wallis. “There are literally millions of votes at stake.”
Obama spokesman Bill Burton reacted to the concept of an abortion reduction plank by saying, "Sen. Obama has said repeatedly he wants to reduce unintended pregnancies, and has
sponsored legislation to do just that. We welcome and listen to all voices in
our platform process."
Obama backs two bills pertaining to preventing unintended pregnancies, according to Burton.
The Prevention First Act would increase funding for family planning and comprehensive sex education that teaches both abstinence and safe-sex methods. The Act would also expand insurance coverage of contraception, improve awareness about emergency contraception, and provide assistance to rape victims.
To combat unintended pregnancies in communities of color, Obama supports the Communities of Color Teach Prevention Act of 2007. The bill would provide grants to promote community-based services regarding teen pregnancy. It also would support research on teen pregnancy in communities of color.
Email
Santorum Wins Three States: What Does It Mean?
Rick Santorum Wins Minn., Mo. and Colo. Primaries
As though it wasn’t arrogant enough that Obama lounges around in his multi million dollar massion while re-designing the presidentail seal…he now wants to tell americans how they should interpret the bible.
Posted by: Richard | June 25, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am
I wish him luck.
Obama is pro abortion. One of the few in this country who was pro-infanticide. He sat on the bill in Illinois that would of stop Infanticide.
He wants a Democratic President so they can appoint a Supreme court justice who will not over turn rowe vs wade.
He even made comments that he would favor his own daughters having abortions than to have to suffer with a unwanted baby.
For Obama to take a major swing in the opposite side of abortion. It would make him look like a fool, since he is a major supported of abortion, and nothing has made him ease his decision on it at all.
Posted by: seah | June 25, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Obama told us to ‘consume’ less, told us to drive smaller cars and give up the SUVs, told us to set the thermostat higher, told us to ‘share our slice of pie’, to pay more taxes and now he adds abortion control. If this is not socialism/comunist platform then I don’t know what is. Enough already with all this governement imposed control.
Posted by: ex-democrat | June 25, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am
seah
Obama is for a woman’s personal right to choose in a horrible situation. Not “for” abortion…
do you ever come out with a statment using a fact…ever.
Posted by: dl | June 25, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Who does Jane Roe support?
Posted by: Sally | June 25, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
Richard you also have to speak to those who do not follow the bible as closely and do not use it to base their decisions.
Posted by: marie | June 25, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
seah your an idiot…To be pro choice and also be pro education / reduction is not a contradiction
Posted by: Jim | June 25, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
Richard,
That’s not what Obama is doing. I bet you didn’t even hear his speech.
McCain has EIGHT houses. And you want to rip Obama for his house? Lounging around his house? Where the hell have you been? he spent only 10 full days at home last year. Back away from the glue…
Posted by: Craig | June 25, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am
ex-democrat….there is nothing about abortion control. it is about improving the factors that lead to it.
Posted by: marie | June 25, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am
‘Richard’ and the rest of the Dobsoniacs are misled by their ‘spiritual leader’. James Dobson is a false prophet who uses his forked tongue to say that he may not vote for John McCain although everyone knows Dobson is a GOP straight-ticket all the way. He condemns all Democrats with generalizations that are misinterpreted, non-contextual, and flat out falsifications. He knowingly and willingly condemns all Democrats… yet sits on his hands and turns a blind eye to the crimes and sins of the GOP leadership. Go ahead, Dr. Dobson, toss another stone… but don’t forget to pick up another case of Windex for your house.
Posted by: Champ | June 25, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am
The lawmakers who voted to allow for partial birth abortions should experience the procedure.
Posted by: Jamie | June 25, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Seah…I was unaware that Christianity was a new and emerging religion.
Posted by: marie | June 25, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
marie – it’s about the fact that I am tired of beeing told what I should and should not do. I am a free person I am free to make my decisions I am free to drive whatever car I want, I am free to eat whatever I want. I don’t want to be controlled like I am a stupid child – I don’t want to be told I can not smoke, I can not eat saturated fats, I can not drive my Hummer I can not have an abortion if I choose to have one. This is about the freedom principle – this is aboit the principles America was founded on. Obama does not respect them.
Posted by: ex-democrat | June 25, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am
Ex-democrat…he is not telling you you can’t do anything. Where are you getting this crap?
Posted by: marie | June 25, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
ex-democrat- What about the babies rights to life and liberty. Are you for legalizing partial birth abortions? If so, it should be open season on everybody.
Posted by: abortionsucks | June 25, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am
Guys check out these great article:
“The Country I Lie To”
Obama LIES on his first general election ad! Also, a short background check on Obama’s VP adviser; Eric Holder.
http://savagepolitics.com/?p=800
“Tyrants or Children”
Kim Jong Il and his North Korean murderers endorse Barack Obama. Also, a short profile of Cindy McCain and her charity work.
http://savagepolitics.com/?p=805
Posted by: chloe | June 25, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
Far too many girls/women used abortion as simple birth control instead of just saying NO. I am for pro-choice when the pg is the result of rape, incest, etc but not because two people chose to HAVE FUN on Saturday night. Abortion should not be impossible to get but much harder to get. Just saying NO is a lot less painful and expensive.
Posted by: Mary | June 25, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Mary – Good argument. I am conflicted on this issue, and of course there will never be concensus. If people just followed some set of moral standards we might reduce the number of these killings, but I think the moral fabric of our nation is too far gone.
Posted by: Huh | June 25, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
Wow, 1.5 million babies a year. These abortion docs must be soleless sociopaths. How much do they get paid for ripping a baby apart anyway?
Posted by: Pal | June 25, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
But again. everyone is missing the point. This is platform would provide prevention and hopefully reduction in abortions.
Posted by: marie | June 25, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
abortion is legal in the UK and they are having HUGE problems with the rates of abortions, especially amongst teens. You know what, if you can keep it illegal for a few more years and teach kids to be safe, then i think its a much better option.
I am disgusted that Obama voted for partial birth abortion….
Posted by: Louise | June 25, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Abortion reduction plank makes sense. It will show those of us who are against abortions but supporting Obama that the Democratic party is serious. They tell us they are interested in opening the dialogue and fixing the causes instead of the symptom. So put it in writing and make me smile.
Posted by: Republican supporting Obama 08 | June 25, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
If someone told Obama it would get him all the votes he needed to get elected, He would change his stand on Aborition.
Looking back at all the times Obama flip-flopped on issues. What is one more. LOL
Obama’s interest is getting elected. What he says to do that does not matter to him, one way or another.
His track record shows that much about him.
Posted by: Sharon | June 25, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
A reduction in abortions. Finally something everyone can agree on. Obama has dissapointed me lately, but finally something in the right direction. I would still recommend going with Ron Paul or 3rd party. These power hungry bufoons in DC need to go.
Posted by: antenian | June 25, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
@Sharon – are you sure you aren’t talking about McCain? Immigration, torture, oil drilling? The flip-flopper label just isn’t working for you guys. Ask Gordon Smith (R-OR). He is one of the few Republicans with a clue about how to win right now.
Posted by: Republican supporting Obama 08 | June 25, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
PREVENTION–Just say NO is the best prevention money can’t buy when we talk about abortion. Really, we should use the “N” word more often in lots of areas of our lives like drug use, petty crimes, spending money we don’t have, etc.
Posted by: Mary | June 25, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Republican supporting Obama 08 – You are correct McCain is a flipflopper. I am also a lifelong republican who will not be voting for McCain because of his belligerence towards other nations among other things. I will vote 3rd party probably Paul, Nader, McKinney or that constitutional party guy. Obama is too much for welfare entitlements.
Posted by: antenian | June 25, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
How so many of you can miss such a simple point…
First of all, Obama is on record stating that he personally is against abortion but he respects other people’s right to make that decision for themselves (hence his Pro-Choice record).
Secondly, nobody is trying to get anything mandated. They are simply recognizing that many people don’t have abortions b/c they think that its fun, but b/c of strenous factors, some within and some extrinsic of their control and seeking to mitigate these factors would curb the abortion rate while maintaining a woman’s right to choose.
As stated in the article, this can be done by improving daycare availability, sex education, increasing availablity of contraceptives, access to abortion and even reducing poverty levels (as it is usually correlates with a high abortion rate).
Posted by: Jua | June 25, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
Chloe…this whole article is ridiculous. Cindy M is an alcoholic, thief and abused wife. Instead of working in Vietnam and other third world countries she should be using her money to help American children. Some of these kids are in shelters because their parents cannot afford housing. Some are sick and don’t have health insurance. And many are abused and neglected. Put your money where your mouth is Cindy and help America first.
Posted by: militarymom | June 25, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
Wow, 1.5 million babies a year. These abortion docs must be soleless sociopaths. How much do they get paid for ripping a baby apart anyway?
Posted by: Pal | Jun 25, 2008 12:15:42 PM
_________________________________-
Yup those people do not have shoes…soleless! LOL
Abortion is of course none of your business and neither is it mine.
A personal decision and can be made ONLY by the pregnant woman.
Women with money can always take their personal business wherever they please. It is always the young and poor who suffer under arcane government religious misguidance.
Posted by: HP Boston | June 25, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
i dont understand the people who are against abortion but you support war and blowing up babies and children that are already living and breathing not to mention pregnant woman please people explain how that is any better now i dont like abortion but i belive its necessary in some circumstances
Posted by: angie | June 25, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
Republicans claim to be pro-life, but then they support wars and death penalties will no problem at all. How about caring for the living AS WELL AS the unborn?
I think it’s great that the Dems will consider policies that reduce abortions, including sex ed and not the abstinance-only “education” that has been shown to increase abortions rates and sexually transmitted diseases.
Posted by: Reason | June 25, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Obama is trying to be even with women voters who voted to Hillary and now switching to McCain. Wow! he is so revengeful – And he preaches Bible!
Posted by: Idiotic View Point | June 25, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
hey jack what good work is mccain keeping up the only good work is his daily and weekly filp flopping i support this oh no i mean i oppose that i dont think that man knows what he supports and what he opposes because i sure dont i wish the man would stick to something already all his flip flopping is making me DIZZY
Posted by: angie | June 25, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
angie, HP Boston – Abortion should also be up to the baby as well. Keep it in your pants, and keep the legs shut. Stop the killing, whether it be in wars or the womb.
Posted by: arbortionsucks | June 25, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Jack – other polls:
Michigan – Obama 48, McCain 39 (Public Policy Polling, 6/22, +/- 4.1)
Indiana – Obama 48, McCain 47 (Survey USA, 6/23, +/- 4.0)
New Mexico – Obama 49, McCain 46 (Survey USA, 6/19, +/- 4.3)
Electrol votes :Wednesday, June 25 – Obama 335-203
So your point is?
Posted by: sandy | June 25, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
hey aboration sucks hp boston what if the woman was raped or it was incest or life threating you know the comments you made are disgusting dont you have a little class???
Posted by: angie | June 25, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
Less than 1% is due to rape or incest. This is according to planned parenthood’s statistic makers. Almost all abortions are due to irresponsibility. Your comments disgust me as well. Legitimizing murder is disgusting.
Posted by: abortionsucks | June 25, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
OBAMA is just campaign rhetoric that is so old. Obama tells his audience that John McCain “opposed legislation to fund levees and flood control programs, which he considers pork”. How far can someone go to CHANGE THE TRUTH without so much a comment from the press? Talk about people in Obama’s pockets and in America of all places where the “press” was truthful and informative but are now letting the people down. The bill was to cost the tax payers some $23 billion dollars and was nothing more than a waste of taxpayer’s money because it was full of earmarks and very little for flood control. You know that wasteful spending that Obama himself wants says he is trying to get rid of. What Obama did not tell you is that John McCain and other senators tried to fix the water bill, and get rid of the “pork” and make it a bill that would not waste the taxpayer’s money and get the job done. What Obama did not tell you is that Obama voted against taking the “pork” out of the bill—he voted “nay”. Obama stands for politics-as-usual, more lies and corruption. It is John McCain who stands for change. The amendment steered the money and efforts toward stronger levees and not putting money into politician’s earmarks….like the huge earmark of 17 million that Obama’s church received.
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=299200516372689
Posted by: Ann | June 25, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
angie – In a situation suck as rape, incest, or in the case you describe, careful consideration must be given to the situation at hand. This is an extremely small number statistically speaking. What I rail against is the abortion on demand that people like you believe is a woman’s given right. What about the right’s of the baby. Abortion is merely society’s answer to an immoral people not being able to practice any moral disipline when it comes to their dealings with the opposite sex.
Posted by: abortionsucks | June 25, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Obama is a liar and is the BIGGEST flip-flop of the year. Even his associations are questioning him in which he answers “no comment”. This guy is a fraud and America is waking up to realize it ! Obama reminds me of his mentor, Jimmy Carter……same style, same liar, same empty suit with no substance! Way to go America! Keep it up! America does not want this liar and fake!
Posted by: Carpe' Diem | June 25, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
President John McCain!
Posted by: Angie | June 25, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Let me list a few measures that Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. backs.
He sponsored S.CON.RES.53: A concurrent resolution expressing the sense of Congress that any effort to impose photo identification requirements for voting should be rejected.
In 1999 he was the only Illinois State Senator to vote against a bill barring early release for (criminal) sex offenders.
He voted against filtering pornography on school and library computers and he voted for sex education for kindergarten children through the 5th grade.
Also, in 2001, he voted “present” on a bill to keep pornographic book and video stores and strip clubs from setting up within 1,000 feet of schools and churches.
Just as unsettling is his voting record on abortion.
Twice, Obama voted against bills prohibiting tax funding of abortions.
In February 2004, his wife, Michelle, sent out a fundraising letter, which actually stated her concern over the rise of conservatism in the Country, and that the ‘so-called’ partial-birth abortion was a legitimate medical procedure that should be protected.
Posted by: Jack, Chicago, IL | June 25, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
angie – agreed.
Posted by: arbortionsucks | June 25, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Far too many girls/women used abortion as simple birth control instead of just saying NO. I am for pro-choice when the pg is the result of rape, incest, etc but not because two people chose to HAVE FUN on Saturday night. Abortion should not be impossible to get but much harder to get. Just saying NO is a lot less painful and expensive.
Just saying no is not the end all and be all of birth control it is barely the first step.
Posted by: Mary | Jun 25, 2008 12:05:36 PM
————————–
Well ya Mary in a perfect world all children born will be loved and wanted..
Just b/c you get pregnant does not make a woman the ward of the state to be told what she MUST do.
Do we want the religious Taliban in America telling us our choices?
Posted by: HP Boston | June 25, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
HP Boston – Can we also kill adults and children? Why stop at the womb? I am a woman, but I do feel the baby has some rights. Abortion maybe in some cases, but not on demand. 1.3 million is too many, most of which is birth control.
Posted by: Mary | June 25, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
wow a lot of lame posts its funny that the only thing the repubs can attempt to do to obama is label him a flip flop or an elitist
LOL
too bad mccain is a fish out of water
and his wife has how much money?
who just payed off their student loans?
lol yea obama that elitist, he payed his way through harvard and graduated and worked hard… and didnt inherit any money, and had the gall to write two books that is what made him the money he currently has….
LOL what an elitist
meanwhile mccain flys over head in his wifes private jet
Posted by: bhrandon | June 25, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
I think Obama’s refusal to listen to his friend will hurt him. Obama is waaaayyy out on a limb on the abortion issue:
Senator Obama comes to Rick Warren’s church believing that abortion should be kept, “safe and legal”. When Barack Obama campaigned for the U.S. Senate in 2004, his wife wrote a fundraising letter for him that revealed his support of partial-birth abortion. She said Obama’s position is that the “partial-birth abortion ban . . . is clearly unconstitutional and must be overturned.” Support of partial-birth abortion goes a lot farther than the politicians who want abortion to be “safe and legal.” Senator Obama actually supports the barbaric practice of allowing abortionists to kill babies by allowing them to be partially, born, their skulls punctured and their brains sucked out. Further, he repeatedly opposed an anti-infanticide bill in the state of Illinois that only passed after he left. Killing a child at any stage of life is a violation of God’s clear command, “Thou Shall Do No Murder”. In addition,Obama’s solution to the growing AIDS crisis has been and continues to be the widespread distribution of condoms, not chaste behavior as directed by the Bible.
Posted by: Carpe' Diem | June 25, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
angie, HP Boston – Abortion should also be up to the baby as well. Keep it in your pants, and keep the legs shut. Stop the killing, whether it be in wars or the womb.
Posted by: arbortionsucks | Jun 25, 2008 1:48:57 PM
-=—————–
You are truly a person who should take every unwanted child under your wing and save them for your brainwashing. Go ask those tiny cells what they want, put on you Luna tin hat and check bellies…lol!
Posted by: HP Boston | June 25, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
@ Sandy:
John McCain has expanded his lead in Nebraska, the latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey in the state found. The Republican nominee leads Barack Obama 52% to 36% in the Cornhusker State. Last month, McCain led 50% to 39%.
Posted by: Jack | June 25, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
OK, so much of the time the bloggers are trying to get Hillary’s supporters by saying Roe vs Wade will be overturned and women’s reproductive rights will be set back eons. What gives here? A subtle erosion, something that is really nothing in the proposer’s eyes, but which is the first step down that slippery slope by the party that long has supported individual liberty. Why? To make inroads with Catholics. A Pew poll before the pope visted showed the same amount of support for abortion among Catholics as among the general public, 51% support and 44% oppose. Let’s see where this is going.
Posted by: lordy lordy | June 25, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
HP Boston – Can we also kill adults and children? Why stop at the womb? I am a woman, but I do feel the baby has some rights. Abortion maybe in some cases, but not on demand. 1.3 million is too many, most of which is birth control.
Posted by: Mary | Jun 25, 2008 2:17:44 PM
———————
what ever you say Mary. It is none of my business. So you take care of all those unwanted and be happy.
Posted by: HP Boston | June 25, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
McCain camp and his suporters making such a big deal over Obama opting out of campaign financing as someone noted here. McCain has done worse – he breaks the law every day with his flip-flop on campaign financing: What’s actually disturbing is the Swift Boat Media’s complete indifference to McCain’s bald-faced hypocrisy on the same issue. Amidst all the attacks on Obama’s “flip-flop,” how much have you read in the MSM about the fact that McCain has “completely reversed himself” on public financing — and is currently breaking the law on a daily basis, making a mockery out of a campaign finance system he helped create?
In the fall of 2007, McCain opted into the public financing system for the GOP primaries, which meant he’d later receive just over $5 million in public funds in exchange for agreeing to a fundraising limit of around $54 million for the entire primary process, which ends when he accepts the nomination at the Republican National Convention in September.
By late November, his campaign was practically broke, so McCain took out a pair of $1 million loans, using the public funds he would receive as collateral.
Cut to Super Tuesday, when McCain had the Republican nomination all but wrapped up. Suddenly, he didn’t want to be bound by that $54 million limit, so his campaign did a 180 and opted back out of the public financing system.
But as David Mason, the Republican-appointed chair of the FEC, has pointed out, you can’t just unilaterally opt out — especially after securing a loan based on having opted in. The response of the McCain campaign is quite simply to ignore Mason. And because the FEC currently lacks a quorum (thanks to stalling tactics by that human roadblock to reform, Mitch McConnell) that’s where things stand, pending a ruling on a lawsuit filed by the DNC.
And then there is this – This is the man we should trust to run our country – a lawbreaker? Amidst all the attacks on Obama’s “flip-flop,” how about the fact that McCain has “completely reversed himself” on public financing — and is currently breaking the law on a daily basis, making a mockery out of a campaign finance system he helped create?
Posted by: sandy | June 25, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Gallup Daily: Obama, McCain Tied at 45%
Posted by: Jack | June 25, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
John McCain’s life experience has earned him a solid national reputation as someone who can serve as the nation’s commander in chief, with 80% saying he can handle the responsibilities of this important role.
Posted by: Jack | June 25, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
The true christian knows that god is perfect and god loves us. As such he could not make us to sin. If there is sin then god is not god. obviously. Therefore since there is no sin, God allows abortion.
Posted by: DemocratNoMore | June 25, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
I guess I can shell out some of my tax dollars to buy condoms for those that lack self-control to avoid more abortions. What an immoral mess
abortionsucks |
________________________________-
Well now you are talking a good solution!’ BIRTH CONTROL! Great concept, let us go forth and EDUCATE, start in third grade and make it a required subject!
Let us teach sex is not Immoral, Sex is a responsibly BECAUSE it can CAUSE an abortion!
Posted by: HP Boston | June 25, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
@HP Boston: Where I work people have looked at adoption. Many have gone oversees because of the expense of US adoption. Another issue is closed versus adoptions. This is not garbage. It cost big money to adopt. I even know someone adopting from Russia. That will cost them $60,000 after all is said and done. China seems to be the more affordable route at the moment.
Posted by: antenian | June 25, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
@ Sandy:
At least be truthful. From surveyUSA:
The Presidential race in Indiana is tied, according to this latest SurveyUSA poll conducted exclusively for WHAS-TV Louisville and WCPO-TV Cincinnati.
Today, Barack Obama takes 48% of the vote; John McCain takes 47%.
Obama’s 1-point lead is within the survey’s 4 percentage point margin of sampling error, and these results should be reported as a tie.
http://www.270towin.com/2008_polls/mccain_obama/
Posted by: Jack | June 25, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Republican supporting Obama 08 – If Obama can get people on the same page to make progress so be it. It is my opinion that he will win the presidency. I myself support Ron Paul, but I pray that Obama does well if elected.
Posted by: antenian | June 25, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
@ Sandy:
You sure are quiet! Not nice to post facts without support. Again, just like Obama and his obamabots….you spew lies for facts, “empty suits with no substance”!
Posted by: Jack | June 25, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Republican supporting Obama 08 – Agreed.
Posted by: abortionsucks | June 25, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Jack – sorry – the mistruths come from your side – those are today’s figures.electoral-vote.com gives Obama 328 electoral votes, McCain 183. Those numbers have been very steady for Obama. Additionally, buoyed by enthusiasm among Democrats and public concern over the economy, Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) has captured a sizable lead over Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) at the opening of the general election campaign for president, the Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg Poll has found.
In a two-man race between the major party candidates, registered voters chose Obama over McCain by 49% to 37% in the national poll conducted last weekend.
On a four-man ballot including independent candidate Ralph Nader and Libertarian Bob Barr, voters chose Obama over McCain by an even larger margin, 48% to 33%.
Obama’s advantage, bigger in this poll than in most other national surveys, appears to stem in large part from his positions on domestic issues. Both Democrats and independent voters say Obama would do a better job than McCain at handling the nation’s economic problems, the public’s top concern.
In contrast, many voters give McCain credit as the more experienced candidate and the one best equipped to protect the nation against terrorism — but they rank those concerns below their worries about the economy.
Moreover, McCain suffers from a pronounced “enthusiasm gap,” especially among the conservatives who usually give Republican candidates a reliable base of support. Among voters who describe themselves as conservative, only 58% say they will vote for McCain; 15% say they will vote for Obama, 14% say they will vote for someone else, and 13% say they are undecided.
By contrast, 79% of voters who describe themselves as liberal say they plan to vote for Obama.
Even among voters who say they do plan to vote for McCain, more than half say they are “not enthusiastic” about their chosen candidate; only 45% say they are enthusiastic. By contrast, 81% of Obama voters say they are enthusiastic, and almost half call themselves “very enthusiastic,” a level of zeal that only 13% of McCain’s supporters display.
(LA Times, Washington Post).
Posted by: sandy | June 25, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
Liberals are by far the dumbest people on the planet. You say how can people not support abortion, but they send troops out there to die. First off, the troops are adults who make up their own decision whether or not they want to take part in the armed services. We send them in order to protect this great country we live in. Where you can speak your mind even though some people shouldn’t because all that comes out is complete garbage. Also you say how could you support the death penalty? Yea we shouldn’t give people the death penalty who are major threats to society and have killed people themselves. Yea lets have these people around, well obama would probably hang out with these people since he is friends with terrorists, but may I proceed. Abortion is killing an innocent baby that has not done anything to warrant death. All the people that are defending obama about he is not pro abortion, just pro choice. When he says he wants his children to have them so they don’t get punished for making a dumb/stupid/idiotic decision. Yea that really is a non abortion preacher. When he votes against the ban on partial birth abortion. Yea that is a guy who is anti abortion. O yea he was the only person in the illinois state senate who voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act. So he would more than enjoy watching an innocent baby die on a table than save its life, so the dumb parents are not left with a “punishment”. The guy is a monster. Liberalism continues to kill more people than anything else on this planet. Congragulations, you are really stand up people.
Posted by: Ryan | June 25, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Ryan – “We send them in order to protect this great country we live in.” Since when? Bush sent our soldiers to war with lies – no WMD, no nothing! – just glorify his legacy. Terrorism is your great ploy – it will no longer work – Americans have become too smart to fall for that crap, again!
Posted by: sandy | June 25, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Yeah, who does Henry Wade support? Women demand complete control of their bodies in abortion cases, but when it comes to unwanted preganancies that result in a live birth, expect society to pay for their mess and then hammer the father for payment, insurance, and more. Women are more culpable than men in a preganancy, wanted or not. It is THEIR body; they have shoved that idea down our collective throats for 50 years. Take full and complete responsibility for it, sweet pea. Women are not God and should not be allowed to play the part of God, giving the thumbs up or thumbs down to life after life has been concieved voluntarily. To make matters worse, women don’t even have to advise the father she is getting an abortion. But if she opts to go ahead with the birth, the father is automatically ON THE HOOK to pay child support for the next 18 or more years. He doesn’t have a say one way or the other. Men better wake up, the gears of male manipulation are well entrenched by the woman’s movement. Birth control on the part of the man is advised; trusting a woman to dictate or plan your future is stupid, insofar as pregnancy is concerned. It seems women only agree with men that pander to their views; go ahead and bash me, it does not hurt one bit.
Posted by: therockofages | June 25, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Sandy, you don’t think there is terrorism in the world? Really. Every major intelligence agency said there were WMDs, it wasn’t Bush that created the information. How come there hasn’t been an attack since 9/11? However, the troops are sent out to make this country safe? Funny, you didn’t rebuke that obama is a monster for being okay with watching a baby die on a table. Remember, liberalism kills more than anything in this world.
Posted by: Ryan | June 25, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
Ryan – you do need to get a life without delusions. Of course there is terroism in the world but you are denying reality when you say “every intelligence agency said there were WMDs.’ That statement has been proven over and over again to be a fabrication.
Posted by: sandy | June 25, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
Everyday the platform for the Obama campaign has a change, in the beginning it was don’t vote for McCain because he will overturn Roe v. Wade; now this Rev is asking for Obama to work to decrease the # of abortions, what exactly is this campaign all about exception utter confusion. Is this nation becoming China where you are allowed to have a certain # of children, will we lose our freedoms with this democratic president, sounds a bit scary. This will be a harsh change for a Senator who approves of partial birth abortions. Everyone wants a piece of the action and seems to be getting it except the voters. What next?
Posted by: cmt | June 25, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Sandy, the British intelligence and the CIA both said there were WMDs. You need to stop listening to the delusional olbermann and matthews. Guess what the CIA was led by a director who was appointed by Clinton. Everybody had the same intelligence. So take your bumper sticker put it in your mouth so you can stop giving the lay person false information. Now you are informed. Also you didn’t alert me to your reason why we haven’t been attacked since 9/11. According to you its not because of our brave men and women that defend this country. So why is it? Remember Liberalism continues to kill more people than anything in this world.
Posted by: Ryan | June 25, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
I hate the term “pro-abortion”…just because someone believes in the right to choose does not mean that they think abortion is a terrible thing, it is. BUT banning it outright only benefits the rich and connected who can get a safe abortion anyway. I am a democrate who does believe in abortion restrictions i.e. 1st trimester only unless mothers physical life at stake, no partial birth abortion. Anyway, I still have a problem voting for Obama..the two choices we have really SUCK. I am so pissed at the DNC and the media who, in my mind, are resonsible for the empty suit presumptive nominee.
Posted by: BABS | June 25, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
In 1995, the woman who was “Jane Roe” filed suit in Federal Court trying to overturn Roe v Wade on her own, but the case went nowhere as the Court of Appeals ruled she had no legal standing upon which to file. She said at the time that she became part of Roe v Wade, she had in mind all of the girls or women in this country who were victims of rape or incest and had no legal way to terminate the pregnancy. She changed her mind about the situation when in the years since, she had women coming up to her and thanking her for making a stand and telling her they had obtained five or six abortions each in some cases. She never meant it to be treated as birth control.
The Democrats use abortion every four years as a threat to get the women’s vote. I don’t see Obama agreeing to this plank, as NOW and the abortion right groups will claim it is the first step towards endng abortions. If teenagers tried leaving sex to the grownups, where it belongs, and then the grownups who are having sex tried acting like responsible adults and used birth control, then there would be very little excuse for abortion in the first place. There is no birth control product that is 100 percent but if the woman is using some form of birth control and the man is using a condom, then your chances of having sex without pregnancy are doubled. If you don’t want to use birth control, then don’t have sex. It’s that easy.
Posted by: Melanie | June 25, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Wow, this is bound to make the liberals very unhappy.
Posted by: Lisa Again | June 25, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
Ryan,
I agree with all your thoughts and comments. You have a least one supporter out there!
Posted by: Lisa Again | June 25, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
While I would agree with one of our surgeons general who said abortion should be, “Safe, legal and rare”, it’s really sad to see cases where abortion is used as a form of birth control, an unfortunate reality among careless, stupid women. With so many birth control methods available today, not to use any but abortion really says something about the people doing it. I don’t know how they live with themselves.
Posted by: Lisa Again | June 25, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Richard wrote:
“Obama is pro abortion. One of the few in this country who was pro-infanticide.”
You right-wing fanatics really don’t get it, do you?! No-one is in favor of killing babies. Some of us simply do not choose to make criminals out of those faced with a very difficult choice in life. Ironically, most of you so-called PRO-LIFE folks are also infavor of killing htousands of people in an unjust war. Ironically, also, you are not in favor of providing prevention education that will ultimately reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies. Many of you, unfortunately, are hypocrites, who prefer to cast stones at others rahter rthan to exorcise your own demons.
Posted by: truthteller | June 25, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
I like Obama more and more each day. He is the only one running who can see both sides and come up with a compromise. John McCain sees only his own point of view, and frankly just can’t be trusted. McCain changes with the winds depending upon which way the polls are floating that day.
Posted by: seanm | June 25, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
Obama changing on the abortion issue is a real “stretch”. He voted in 2002 as an Illinois state senator against a bill to define as a “person” a fully born baby who survived an abortion. The bill was intended to make it clear that if an abortion were botched, an infant born alive would not be killed and would receive medical care. Twice, Obama voted against various versions of the bill and twice voted “present.” The Illinois bill did not pass. In 1997, while serving in the Illinois State Legislature, Obama voted against SB 230, a bill which would have banned partial birth abortion. In 2000 Obama voted against a bill banning state funding. —- Obama never met an abortion bill he didn’t like! Remember his statement about his daughters, he said “I’m going to teach them first of all about values and morals but if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.” Nice guy!!!
Posted by: Mark | June 25, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
If I didnt realize that all presidents approve of abortions, I would have dropped Obama just because of his pro abortion stand.
But politics are what they are, and NO president will approve of banning abortions.
Posted by: BeSmartVoteObama | June 25, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
How does Barack Hussein Obama feel about abortion TODAY? Has he flip-flopped again???
He “changes” his mind on a regular basis. I think his “hope” is “hopeless”. This man cannot be trusted.
As though it wasn’t arrogant enough that Obama lounges around in his multi million dollar massion while re-designing the presidentail seal…he now wants to tell americans how they should interpret the bible.
Posted by: ANYBODY BUT OBAMA | June 26, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am
Wow…I came on this site looking for intelligent discourse and I find hate spewing illiterates.
Anybody but Obama – Clearly, the height of hypocrisy is calling Obama “arrogant”. Look at McCain. He flips an issue as soon as it polls well (off-shore drilling), states he is going to run a positive campaign (yet his web ads have been anything but), outright lies about the plans his opponent is running (taxes, energy), all the while engaging in perhaps an illegally financed campaign (and states Obama broke his word).
This is to be expected from the same guy who brought us classics as “The Keating Five”, and “100 Years in Iraq”. But honestly, if you think Obama is “arrogant” in lounging around one house while McCain owns 8 (maybe more) than you are absolutely delusional. McCain, who dumped his wife to marry a younger woman for her wealth is nowhere near “arrogant”.
As far as this abortion limiting strategy goes. It’s appealing, and it makes Obama more of a centrist. It would be a good way to peel off some of those “pro life” voters.
Posted by: Chris | June 26, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am
No one is pro abortion, except perhaps for some greedy doctors. By this I mean that most abortion doctors believe in a woman’s right to choose, and are providing a medical service to their patients. But greed is everywhere. Some doctors don’t care about their patients, being in it only for the money, and some of these are abortion doctors.
With that exception in mind, no one is pro abortion. We would all love to see the number of abortions performed dramatically decreased. But working against birth control and real sex education, providing limited or no services or support to new single mothers, applying no pressure or requiring responsibility from the fathers (many of whom are older married men), then working to make abortion illegal is NOT the way to go.
The Rev. Jim Wallis has made the most sense of any religious figure. Reduce the abortion rate by reducing the need for abortion. I don’t know if his plan would go far enough, but he’s got the right idea.
Posted by: Diane | June 26, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am
No, I would not want my daughter to have an abortion. Nor would I want my father to have open heart surgery. Banning abortions makes as much sense as banning open heart surgery. In both cases, prevention is key.
Prevention in my daughter’s case means educating her about her body, her developing sexual desires, the medical and emotional dangers, and making it easy for her to talk to me. It means teacher her self respect from an early age. And if needed, it means providing her with birth control. Some self defense lessons wouldn’t hurt either.
Posted by: FreeSpeaker | June 26, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
cmt and others: you need to develop some critical thinking skills. You’re confused because you’ve been trained to focus on and predictably react to a few key words and not to think anything through.
Roe vs Wade allows us the right to an abortion. Pro choice advocates want that right to remain intact. Abortion should remain an option for women facing an unwanted or dangerous pregnancy.
Reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies, and you reduce the abortion rate. Remove the shame of having the baby and encouraging adoptions would also help.
BTW: teaching and advocating abstinence hasn’t helped at all. Birth control is key to reducing the abortion rate. But the same fools who rail against abortion have also been working hard to interfere with our birth control options. Go figure. Pharmacists have even refused to fill birth control prescriptions, and some have even refused to return the prescription to the woman, forcing her to go back to her doctor.
I haven’t read all the comments, but from what I have read, I’ve yet to see it mentioned that oral birth control is now available for men.
Posted by: Andrea | June 26, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am
@Andrea,
It is you who needs to develop “some critical thinking” and not have a Pavlovian reaction based on keywords.
If you noticed Rev.Wallis wants Obama to adopt a “abortion reduction” platform.Not an “abortion elimnation” platform. Unfortunately this will never sit well with the Democratic party because, you know a woman has the Constitutional right to choose. Its not only in cases of rape, incest etc, but a woman has a blanket right to choose no matter what.
We all know that this right has been blatantly abused.Forget women who have an abortion – the number of people who have two or more abortions is pretty high. Obviously it has now become a form of birth control.
I do agree that men need to take an active role in preventing abortions. But i would be STUNNED if the Democrat party unites behind a platform of ” REDUCE ABORTIONS”.
As far as I understand, this is what Liberals have to say about abortion reductions
“why should we reduce abortions ? Its after all a constitutional right, according to Roe v Wade ruling. Why should we exercise restraint in exercising the constitutional right to choose.”
In fact this policy of abortion reductions is EXACTLY what the GOP needs to adopt – instead of being rigid about Roe V Wade, if the GOP adopted a platform that said ” We dont like abortions but given that it is the law of the land and that almost 40 years have passed since the Roe v Wade ruling, our immediate goals should be reduce abortions – may be one day we can imagine Roe v Wade being redundant if not illegal”
But that would take some guts to do – and no one has it in the GOP today.
As far as the Democrats go, if they even go near a platform of abortion reduction, it will cause such a furor among women’s groups and people like HP Boston that they may even quit the party.
The solution to this problem lies with the people of this country and not politicians.
Unfortunately the good Reverend Wallis does not seem to understand that.
Posted by: NS | June 26, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
I hope they do this. It’s the classic mistake that pro-aborts make. I would then ask them “why does abortion need to be reduced? What’s negative about it?” They won’t have an answer because they’re damned either way;
If they give a reason that abortion is a negative, then they have to admit why it’s morally inferior to adoption and parenting; because it kills a human being. It hurts mothers and fathers. It damages psyches in an irrevocable way in the many forms of Post Abortion Stress Syndrome.
If they refuse to give a reason that abortion is a negative, then they’re back to the old drawing board of seeming indifferent to human life. They simply have to admit that, if something needs to be reduced, then it must be inherently bad. No way ’round that.
They’re so screwed. Science is changing public opinion and it won’t be long before Roe is GONE.
Posted by: Michelle | June 26, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
Now, Back to the actual article, What is wrong with a 4 stage program that teaches First, Abstinence, Second, Birth Control, Third, Adoption, and Fourth, Abortion. If we teach this type of program It teachs Kids that the Only sure prevention is Abstinence BUT if you “choose” to have sex then birth control is the the nest step and IF that fails then there are programs in place to assist with pregnancy and adoption, Then and ONLY then teach that IF a young mother for her OWN reasons prefers to abort she then has that INFORMED option.
Posted by: Get Real | June 26, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
I’m sorry NS, but you really don’t have the slightest idea of what you’re talking about.
I know that there are some women who do use abortion like birth control. But for the majority of women, it’s a very difficult decision to make. Your rhetoric doesn’t change that.
You say “We all know that this right has been blatantly abused.Forget women who have an abortion – the number of people who have two or more abortions is pretty high. Obviously it has now become a form of birth control.” These are some pretty strong and somewhat damning statements. What is the source for your stats? Or does it just make you feel good to blather on about what you think “everyone knows”?
And as far as your understanding of what Liberals have to say, it’s minimal to non-existent. Just because I have the right to do something, it doesn’t mean I have to do it or want to do it. Having the right to an abortion doesn’t mean most women will be irresponsible. Most sexually active women who don’t want a pregnancy use birth control. That is, when someone isn’t interfering with their right to it.
You also state “In fact this policy of abortion reductions is EXACTLY what the GOP needs to adopt – instead of being rigid about Roe V Wade, if the GOP adopted a platform that said ” We don’t like abortions but given that it is the law of the land and that almost 40 years have passed since the Roe v Wade ruling, our immediate goals should be reduce abortions – may be one day we can imagine Roe v Wade being redundant if not illegal”. You would be shocked at how many of the people you dismiss as liberals would be ecstatic if this were the case. At least if the GOP were serius and will8ing to go beyond “just say no”.
Get Real said it perfectly. We need to educate our kids, and teach them to love and respect themselves. We need access to safe, reliable birth control. We need to hold the fathers accountable. We need to offer other options, such as adoption, but to do that, we also need to emotionally and sometimes financially support the mother, and allow her to go through her pregnancy without shame or stigma. Abortion must remain an option, but it is only one of many.
Posted by: Andrea | June 26, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Come on, if there were a law that let’s anyone murder so many people before it is a crime…well you do the math! If it was legal to murder, than how many people who hates someone for the moment, would use that right to kill them? Get real! Does it matter how many you murder? Or that you do at all? All those babies would grow up someday, how you going to know which one might save YOUR life? If a woman is raped, put the rapest to death, not the innocent child! These women that have the right to choose! Well, they are already born now aren’t they! How easily they take another’s life, a precious life at that! Hah! If the children had a voice what do you think they would say? What if someone chooses to chop you in half? What pain it is to those children that are suppose to be protected in the mother’s womb! A Leader of this America is suppose to speak for the speachless and protect them as a future American citizen! It is against our Constitution to do otherwise! Why, even illegal immigrants have life, liberty (freedom) and the pursuit of happeness! As far as Womens lib and planned parenthood, I don’t want my tax money going to them!! They were started by a nazi athiest who wanted to get rid of the Black babies, and the Jews! They believed they were apes, like evolution teaches! Oh yes, look up the history! They still are killing babies in the name of selfish mothers that live for the moment! They should be held accountable, it might catch on, don’t you think? As far as welfare….you don’t want to work, you don’t eat! That would fix 99% that abuse that! Why do you think the immigrants come here? And why there is so much poverty? They would rather live scantily than work! That creates more crime! Think about it! This government is screwed up and wants to control you, so that you will depend on them, whether they are right or not! That’s how they get votes! By the way, if Obama were a Christian as he claims, he would label this abortion issue as an abomination and work to stop it altogether! He would not compromise!
Posted by: Get Real America! | June 30, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
…I know most of us cannot control ourselves and be wise with integrity, and virtuousness, but just think how it would be if lust and adultry were against the law instead of handing out contoms to our underaged teens, who wasn’t educated for the real world in the first place! We have taken away these values in our children, then we expect no problems? Look at teen suicide! They can’t be happy without moral values! Ever!
Posted by: Get Real America | June 30, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm