Jun 11, 2008 10:24pm
Obama Girl Creators Present: The Incredible McCain Girl
EmailBen Relles and the team at Barely Political bring you a new campaign icon: The Incredible McCain Girl.
Watch HERE.
- jpt
Ben Relles and the team at Barely Political bring you a new campaign icon: The Incredible McCain Girl.
Watch HERE.
- jpt
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters 
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
Go Greenie, go!
Posted by: A | June 11, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
This isn’t politics, it’s soft porn.
Posted by: jean | June 11, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
Now, THIS is funny (from the guest on Jon Stewart):
“War is God’s way of teaching Americans geography.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | June 11, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
len writes:
“Now if they can just get her to go work over Joe Lieberman . . . ”
The bow-legged Senator in the camo tutu.
(Don’t forget: Obama endorsed Lieberman — his mentor in the Senate — over anti-war challenger Ned Lamont in Connecticut.)
Posted by: Belle Starr | June 11, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
The media’s infatuation with all of the soft-porn Obama Girl videos is one of the reasons I won’t vote for Obama. I think Obama should have distanced himself from all the Obama girl videos for the sake of his daughters.
Posted by: jean | June 11, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
Jean,
I think he did it because he thought it’s cool for young voters.
But it’s too much.
Posted by: catleya | June 11, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
I watched “Inside Edition” tonight.
They said Scarlett Johanson keeps intouch with Obama by e mail.
What was that?
We know that she is crazy about him.
She acts like Marilyn Monroe with her hair and everything.
Posted by: catleya | June 12, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am
I’m tired of Obama Girl. Time for her to get lost. And I’m even a huge Obama fan! She didn’t even bother to vote in the primary. Phony.
Posted by: dem in chicago | June 12, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am
Obama had nothing to do with the production of “Obama Girl”
Obama appeals to the youth vote b/c he’s right on the issues, positive, and sense of humor.
If Obama ran the campiagn Hillary ran and Hillary ran the campaign Obama has run (I hope this makes sense) Hillary would have recieved the youth vote.
Ex. ABC debate. She was so negative while Obama gave her the benefit of doubt. Old politics.
The youth vote will easily go to Obama rather then McCain. Possibly Obama 70% McCain 30%
Posted by: Vanessa | June 12, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
She voted in the PA primary I believe. Not on Super Tuesday.
Posted by: Vanessa | June 12, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
Lame.
Posted by: jeremy | June 12, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am
Vanessa: “If Obama ran the campiagn Hillary ran and Hillary ran the campaign Obama has run (I hope this makes sense) Hillary would have recieved the youth vote.”
First of all, Hillary actually did get the youth vote in MA, CA and there are many young people across the nation who did not fall for the Obama hype. But you might have a point about the ones that did vote Obama. If Hillary had run a better text message campaign for those who don’t socialize outside the millenial network and just used empty slogans appealing to earnest, but impressionable youthful voters — maybe she would have gotten those votes. Too bad. As much as Obama is credited for getting the well-educated voters, Hillary was the thinking person’s candidate.
Posted by: cappamore | June 12, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am
Typical Obama backer….Anything for a buck. What’s he done for you lately?
Oh Gosh. So sorry. He’s sold you “HOPE” & “CHANGE. Sold as is…. No refunds granted…….
PUMA! NO DEAL! PUMA! NO DEAL! PUMA! NO DEAL!
Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | June 12, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am
Vanessa,
How many pieces of legislation has Obambi written and passed? I know this is hard, it’s a trick question.
Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | June 12, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am
That’s just what I thought sweetie. No response.
As empty as ObamaGirl…..or McCainGirl. Better put a little more “change” into that “hope” meter.
****************************************
PUMA! NO DEAL! PUMA! NO DEAL! PUMA! NO DEAL! PUMA!
Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | June 12, 2008, 2:36 am 2:36 am
Obama girl beats McCain girl by a mile.
Posted by: Lenny | June 12, 2008, 4:24 am 4:24 am
PS
Have you noticed that the active Hillary bloggers on this site (a moderate media abuser) are energized and connecting? Interesting phenomonon…Most certainly a story that will not get told …kind of like Rezko.
PUMA PUMA JUST SAY NO DEAL
Posted by: Jackie | June 12, 2008, 4:56 am 4:56 am
The people that put out Obama Girl claim to be equal opportunity bashers….they are actors that specialize in satire. i doubt Obama had anything to do with it.
Posted by: Jackie | June 12, 2008, 4:59 am 4:59 am
Obama Girl’s Dad is definitely not an Obama voter and he indicated that his daughters appearance as Obama Girl did not reflect her politics.
Posted by: Jackie | June 12, 2008, 5:01 am 5:01 am
Just one more observation that won’t be seen….
Has anyone noticed the CNN website’s political page is proudly displaying a huge Obama ad? Just wondering if this was inappropriate as a background for supposedly unbiased campaign coverage?
Although my new candidate is John McCain all Hillary supporters please click on Obama’s ad…he has money to burn and some left over to buy superdelegates so he won’t mind.
Posted by: Jackie | June 12, 2008, 5:07 am 5:07 am
That video was almost as realistic and “fair and balanced” as Hannity and Fox news.
Posted by: Jim | June 12, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am
NOBAMA,
New poll last night..Obama leads McCain by 19% among women and over 50% of women are yet to know about McCains voting record regarding womens rights. In this respect he is opposite of a maverick.
Posted by: Jen | June 12, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am
Actually I just saw a new poll where Obama is losing womens support. Just came out this morning.
There is rumours that the non smoking league is up in arms about his addiction problems.
Posted by: same old | June 12, 2008, 8:21 am 8:21 am
same old,
what poll was that? link?
WSJ poll released yesterday
“Obama leads McCain among African Americans (83-7 percent), Hispanics (62-28), women (52-33), Catholics (47-40), independents (41-36) and even blue-collar workers (47-42). Obama is also ahead among those who said they voted for Clinton in the Democratic primaries (61-19)”
The only group Obama’s losing is white men. He trails by 20.
Posted by: Vanessa | June 12, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am
Vanessa?
WJS poll?
That pollster has been discredited for years. But you probably got it off ‘huffington post’ or some kind of radical left .
Rasmussen and Gallup show a far different tale. Obama should have got a far bigger bounce than he did when he locked the nomination.
Stop showing us tap danced LIBERAL polls. You have no credibility.
Obama is trailling Mc Cain with latinos and white men by wide margins.
He trails with seniors by a large margin, which we both know is the most reliable voter group to actually hit the polls in November.
Posted by: same old | June 12, 2008, 8:36 am 8:36 am
same old
Are you sure your not really Hannity..Your talking points are equally flawed.
Posted by: Jim | June 12, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am
same old
It is the WSJ poll not the WJS Poll. The Wall Street Journal is hardly known as left wing.
Posted by: Jim | June 12, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am
There is rumours that the non smoking league is up in arms about his addiction problems.
Posted by: same old | Jun 12, 2008 8:21:26 AM
**********
OMG! That made me laugh so hard I snorted! THE NON SMOKING LEAGUE? Are you kidding me?
This blog is better than the Comdey Central shows!
Posted by: jmc663 | June 12, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am
Yestardays Rasmussen Poll:
General Election: McCain vs. Obama Gallup Tracking Obama 48, McCain 42 Obama +6.0
Posted by: jmc663 | June 12, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am
same old
Bush beat Kerry (you remember that tight race) in white men by 25%.
These polls (all the polls) show the republicans need to be very worried…
they have a huge uphill battle.
the only reason they came this close is without America having yet to focus on McCain… they don’t realize Mccain is not the Mccain of 2000. and besides that …they don’t know his policies.
They don’t.
50% of women don’t know his stance on judges and Roe vs. wade when asked.
65% of all americans don’t know what his economic stances are…still.
This does not bring in huge issues that we are just barely starting to see what his policy stances are…and they are BAD.
REALLY BAD.
For these numbers to have come out of Hillary stepping down with all the anger that has been held onto…and they are growing almost every day…
that is a really bad sign for John McCain.
They were counting on Hispanics and women veering away from Obama.
and the margin has to be much larger in white men…(because he does not have the other constituencies that Bush had)
McCain needs a bigger portion of white men than Bush had…and right now he is worse than Bush had.
Partly because for the time…he and especially his policies are really BAD for the country…and the country knows it.
Posted by: dl | June 12, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
I don’t know much about these polls that say Obama is leading what I do know is that sites that are against OBama are so full at times it is unbelievable with servers crashing, the sites that are pro Obama well they are low in numbers.
I know this is not a yardstick to judge anything but it sure does not look as if many people have gotten over the Hillary fiasco and jumped on the Obama train, seems like some in the media is once again trying to distort what is really going on.
All this bump they are giving Obama since Hillary has dropped out seems to be another lie being placed out there to boost Obama numbers once again, if anyone doubts it is easy to check just do some surfing on the net and see for yourselves.
Posted by: SJ | June 12, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am
SJ wrote:
I don’t know much about these polls that say Obama is leading what I do know is that sites that are against OBama are so full at times it is unbelievable with servers crashing, the sites that are pro Obama well they are low in numbers
***********
REally?? Prove it, provide a link to sites that are overloaded and ones that are underactive. I would love to see you bakc up your claims with some real proof.
Posted by: jmc663 | June 12, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am
So the millenials are replacing mud slinging with mud wrestling?
That’s a change we can believe in.
Posted by: len | June 12, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am