By Ed O'Keefe

Jun 19, 2008 8:58am

Obama to Break Promise, Opt Out of Public Financing for General Election

In a web video to supporters — "the people who built this movement from the bottom up" — Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, announced this morning that he will not enter into the public financing system, despite a previous pledge to do so.

"We’ve made the decision not to participate in the public financing system for the general election," Obama says in the video, blaming it on the need to combat Republicans, saying "we face opponents who’ve become masters at gaming this broken system. John McCain’s campaign and the Republican National Committee are fueled by contributions from Washington lobbyists and special interest PACs. And we’ve already seen that he’s not going to stop the smears and attacks from his allies running so-called 527 groups, who will spend millions and millions of dollars in unlimited donations."

In November 2007, Obama answered "Yes" to Common Cause when asked "If you are nominated for President in 2008 and your major opponents agree to forgo private funding in the general election campaign, will you participate in the presidential public financing system?"

Obama wrote: "In February 2007, I proposed a novel way to preserve the strength of the public financing system in the 2008 election. My plan requires both major party candidates to agree on a fundraising truce, return excess money from donors, and stay within the public financing system for the general election. My proposal followed announcements by some presidential candidates that they would forgo public financing so they could raise unlimited funds in the general election. The Federal Election Commission ruled the proposal legal, and Senator John McCain (R-AZ) has already pledged to accept this fundraising pledge. If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election."

Not so "aggressively," according to the McCain campaign, which argues that Obama did not discuss this or try to negotiate at all with the McCain campaign, despite writing that he would "aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election."

The Obama campaign disputes this. Obama campaign counsel Bob Bauer met with McCain campaign counsel Trevor Potter and, according to Obama spox Bill Burton, Potter "immediately made it clear there was no basis for further discussion," that they weren’t interested in any sort of agreement. "McCain and the RNC had spent months raising and spending money for the general election, and their basic attitude was ‘You’ll catch up,’" Burton says, suggesting that the Republicans were also turning a blind eye to the activities of 527s.

In April Obama seemed to be preparing an argument to opt out, as we noted at the time.

"We have created a parallel public financing system where the American people decide if they want to support a campaign they can get on the Internet and finance it, and they will have as much access and influence over the course and direction of our campaign that has traditionally been reserved for the wealthy and the powerful," Obama said at the time.

Today he said something similar, telling supporters, "Instead of forcing us to rely on millions from Washington lobbyists and special interest PACs, you’ve fueled this campaign with donations of $5, $10, $20, whatever you can afford. And because you did, we’ve built a grassroots movement of over 1.5 million Americans. …You’ve already changed the way campaigns are funded because you know that’s the only way we can truly change how Washington works."

Obama said, "I’m asking you to try to do something that’s never been done before. Declare our independence from a broken system, and run the type of campaign that reflects the grassroots values that have already changed our politics and brought us this far."

Declaring independence from a "broken system"  by breaking a promise. Obama hopes you’ll care more about the former than the latter.

- jpt

UPDATE: McCain campaign communications director Jill Hazelbaker emails: “Today, Barack Obama has revealed himself to be just another typical politician who will do and say whatever is most expedient for Barack Obama. The true test of a candidate for President is whether he will stand on principle and keep his word to the American people.  Barack Obama has failed that test today, and his reversal of his promise to participate in the public finance system undermines his call for a new type of politics. Barack Obama is now the first presidential candidate since Watergate to run a campaign entirely on private funds. This decision will have far-reaching and extraordinary consequences that will weaken and undermine the public financing system.”

User Comments

Wow, a politician who says what he thinks people want to hear and then goes back on his word. Amazing. I thought Obama touted himself as being above all this. More empty rhetoric.

Posted by: Stewart | June 19, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am

Flip Flop. Don’t listen to what he says; watch what he does. I ahve said this for months. There is often a disconnect between Obama’s words and deeds.

Posted by: countallthevotes | June 19, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am

I guess the “candidate of change” means to change his mind whenever he wants.

Posted by: Keith | June 19, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am

Typical.

Posted by: P_Bruce | June 19, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am

Could this then be considered the “Illinios two-step?”

Posted by: Tom in Indiana | June 19, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am

I told you so?!?!?!

Posted by: ctjd | June 19, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

The fact is, once McCain said that he would do NOTHING to police the 527s and the RNC, he lost this battle. At that point, there was NOTHING to negotiate.

Posted by: Keith | June 19, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am

Can’t blame them. If you look at all the possible 527′s out there funded by a bunch of right wing nut cases, he’s right to protect himself. Kerry got “Swiftboated” and why should Obama sit still for it again.
Agreed that after this election, we need a bi-partisan commission to draft a meaningful campaign financing statute that outlaws 527′s and other “slight of hand” organizations.
Nice to see the usual Obama bashers out this morning. I’d say he’s got it about right looking at the posts.

Posted by: Show Me the Money | June 19, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am

Ironic, isn’t it? Sen. McCain is co-author of the campaign “finance reform” bill (McCain Feingold) that will allow Obama to beat him?
Sounds like justice to me.

Posted by: lihansen | June 19, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am

He DIDN’T “break his pledge” since McCain has already stated that he will opt out of public financing. He said that BOTH major party candidates would “agree on a fundraising truce.” McCain never did this. No pledge broken.
To say that he “broke his pledge” is disingenuous at best.

Posted by: Ethan Smith | June 19, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am

I’m shocked, SHOCKED that Obama would forgo a half a billion dollars for 85 million in public financing. This is a seriously smart move. Yeah, it’s a “broken promise” or however you want to frame it, but it’s too “inside baseball” to do any damage to him politically. There’s simply no downside and all the upside in the world.

Posted by: ChrisNBama | June 19, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am

Why is the headline on the McCain post on drilling not “McCain Breaks Pledge on Drilling”?

Posted by: top6 | June 19, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

Is this a surprise to anyone? You can judge people by their friends and associates, Barack Hussein Obama seems to only have friends who are terrorists, racists, radical communists, Muslim extremists, corrupt politicians, black separatists, slumlords, foreigners, or just plain crazy. Why should we not expect him to flip-flop and raise private money. I just wonder how much of this money is coming from fundamentalist Islamic groups, foreign governments, corrupt politicians/businessmen/lobbyists, and communist agitators? I hope the election commission is investigating the sources of Barack Hussein Obama’s millions of financial contributions.

Posted by: Al | June 19, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

As long as companies can sponsor presidents we will be going to war and watching our young soldiers die just to increase a random company’s profits. Until this happens America will remain the laughing stock of the democratic world.

Posted by: Mark Johnson | June 19, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

BO’s average donation is $100 from the public, not big business or corporations…that’s public financing, right?
This is a smart move, and I would welcome a President who is smart, is open to adapting to the circumstances and seizes on opportunities.
So are you angry that he’s smarter today than he was yesterday?

Posted by: the race in the race | June 19, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am

I guess everyone has forgooten that CLinton and Bush the youonger both ran on a platform of change in washington. Clinton was just a pathological liar, and proved it everyday. Bush tried to ‘change the tone’ in washington and look how the media and the washington establishment treated him. Now Barry wants us to forget the human nature thing and believe he will really change D.C. God save us from the changes he envisions. Barry is so ignorant of how the world works, it amazes me everyday how he can reinvent history for his own nefarious purposes, which I believe are to make this country a socialist/marxist state. Read his policies, people…don’t be fooled by this charlatan.

Posted by: Tom | June 19, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am

This way he doesn’t have to be accountable to the Federal Government and he can go on accepting money from wherever it comes from–you name it!!

Posted by: virginia | June 19, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

If this is an example of his best negotiation attempt, I don’t want this guy across the table from Iran, Russia, North Korea or even people that like the US…..He can’t even work w/someone that is NOT out to kill us.

Posted by: govern4yourgrandkids | June 19, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

This is but the first promise Obama will fail to keep. Expect many more to come.

Posted by: Patrick C. | June 19, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

That power of persuasion is working well, Obama! Can’t wait to see how it works with the Iranians.

Posted by: Roger | June 19, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

What a great headline Jake Tapper. McCain won’t adhere to the agreement, so neither will Obama. How’s that “breaking” a pledge. Last I checked, if one party backs out of a proposed agreement (McCain), the other party (Obama) has no moral, ideological, or reasonable cause to uphold the agreement. Duuuuh….

Posted by: richwonderfull | June 19, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am

lol
oh you silly republicans, you guys have messed with the system so badly and for the first time your seeing your own candidate who cant raise money like the dems are usually in, and now your scared…
obama has such a massive donor list and i doubt more then 5% of those people are capped out.
This is exactly what the republicans would and DO do everytime they make the same proposals…
the only reason this is an issue for you people is that the only donor list mccain has is the one hes on in hopes for a new body and mind
i hope youve greased up good for us… finally get to take you repubs out with the money we cna raise

Posted by: bhrandon | June 19, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am

Speaking of hypocrisy, why don’t some of you McCain lovers do a little research on this subject and not accept as the gospel truth the drivel from this McCain shill posing as a reporter. McCain only took public financing because his campaign was broke. He then used this public money as collateral for loans, and then tried to back out of public financing once those loans were secured. The guy has broken his own campaign finance laws. The FEC, or whatever’s left of it, either can’t or won’t do anything about it. The problem with many conservatives these days is that they don’t adhere to any actual conservative principles; they just hate democrats. The party of Goldwater is dead – it has been invaded by neocons and religious nut-jobs. Thanks for ruining it for me. I had no choice but to join the other side.

Posted by: Pete | June 19, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am

Thank you, Jake, for the proper headline. I looked at other sites and they seem to be missing a HUGE part of the story, which is that he’s breaking his promise.
Good reporting on your part!

Posted by: Vnd | June 19, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am

Candidate of Change–
yeah–change his mind whenever it suits him.
What a flip flopper!
How could anyone believe him or his self-serving campaign.
As a democrat–once again the DNC managed to put another loser as their candidate.

Posted by: NielfromPA | June 19, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am

Obama breaking a promise and going against his theme of “change”. Wow, what a surprise. Didnt see that coming.
Obama is nothing but a pathetic loser who is the afirmative action candidate.

Posted by: Steve | June 19, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am

Is anyone really surprised?? No one in the media confronts him on anything. He touts he wants to change Washington, but he hasn’t really shown that.
And his secretiveness is really getting on my nerves. Private fund-raisers, private meetings with religious leaders, photo-ops filling sandbags, etc. Who knows what else, because the media is telling, they are just protecting.
And for “being real” Michelle is getting a “makeover” for the public. I’m still not sure that Barak isn’t the Manchurian Candidate.

Posted by: Susan I | June 19, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am

Barack’s polish is wearing off, quick!
I thought I would vote for change in Washington. I was wrong!!!

Posted by: Jbaby | June 19, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am

Wow, here is yet another one we can add to his “honorable” list of traits. This is a blatant flip-flop. Guess rules are good for everyone else to follow except him. No way, absolutely no way will I vote for this guy. I’ve had a slight reservation of let’s see who he picks to run with him, but that won’t matter now. I’m 100% behind McCain now. I’m calling the DNC and my state democrat committe today and getting off their lists. The repubs are going to get my money this year.

Posted by: New Indie | June 19, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am

Obama has a point, he is new to all this, and its a smart move to count Mccain and his 527 supporters. Mccain has done this campaign thing before and knows why he is accepting public funding. I bet he was hoping to get one over Obama.
Flip Flop by who, This is not a policy position, he is responding to his ability to get support from ordinary americans. Flip flop is Mccain switching his policy position on Not Drilling to Drilling in America’s reserves for a less than 1% gain in oil production that will come good in 10yrs and have absolutely not impact on rising oil prices.
Go Dems

Posted by: robert ga | June 19, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

Gee….a politician that breaks a promise. That almost never happens, right?

Posted by: Rick R. | June 19, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Obama version of “read my lips” I guess.

Posted by: Lisa S | June 19, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Give me a break Pete. You never were a republican. I am so tired of democrats saying they used to be republicans. That could be believed if you were not supporting the most liberal candidate to ever seek the office with Obama. No real republican with any hint of fiscal responsibility or morals would vote for Obama.

Posted by: Gene | June 19, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

I am a diehard Democrat I voted for Clinton, Gore, and Kerry. But Obama scares me with his naivity and ignorance. As upsetting as it is to say, I would rather risk “4 more years” with McCain, than 4 terrible years with Obama.

Posted by: Mark | June 19, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Does this surprise anyone? Obama is just another lying politician. If you are dumb enough to vote for him you deserve what you get.

Posted by: Charles | June 19, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

This should come as a huge surprise to all those who think Obama is the candidate of “change.” What a joke. I can’t imagine this great country electing this guy into office – a speech maker with no substance, no character, and certainly not guts enough to hold the office of Presidency in these great United States. God help us through this election because the people have been wickedly deceived.

Posted by: Skip | June 19, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Good move Obama……here comes another check

Posted by: obama08 | June 19, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

You are distractions. Republicans are distractions. My words are distractions. My lies are distractions. Please vote for me, I am honest.

Posted by: Barack H. Obama | June 19, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

lol im loving this the republicans freaking out… they were soooo hoping obama would be stupid enough to stay with public financing. lol it was one of their last hopes for mccain
obama can raise taht much money in his sleep… by ordinary americans in a week…
while mccain will have to be polishing rich oilmens knobs to get the same amount of cash.
LOL
hahahahahaahaha repubs be scared!

Posted by: bhrandon | June 19, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

The shine’s off the kid. He’s just an ordinary pol. And if he’s not the Kennedy everyone pretends that he is, then he’s really just a junior senator with no substantial business, legislative or military leadership credentials…and who’s in favor of raising taxes in the face of a recession that could last thru the entire next term. No thanks.

Posted by: jim | June 19, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

Remove the campaign from public financing and he removes his financing from public scrutiny.
Who is he protecting? He is protecting Nancy Pelosi’s Amazing Money Machine to preserve it for the candidates to follow.
Public good or private politics?
At least this one is easy. Hide the hijabs, hide the hedge funders, claim to be historical and let your surrogates whack away at your opponents while you stick your chin in the air and chant a slogan ripped off from another candidate now under Federal indictment.
Yeah, I can believe that.

Posted by: len | June 19, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

It doesn’t matter what the 527 is doing. When a person makes a promise they make a promise. Is he this dumb to think that earlier last year when he claimed not take Private finacing that the 527 wouldn’t use smear tatics. This is an excuse to break a promise. I thought his whole campaign was built on change. What a jerk. I am so sorry I voted for this boob. He appears to be very naive and not of good judgement like he touts himself to be. One good call on the war and the rest is all bad judgement.. This country is doomed.

Posted by: Frank- South Hampton | June 19, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

Bob Barr

Posted by: mike | June 19, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

From one concerned citizen of U.S.A,
Dear American Voters, reporters, media. professionals, political parties, and presidential Nominees,
Hon. Senator McCain and Obama, besides each having many attributes and characteristics.
The critical differences between the two of these presidential presumptive nominees in my opinion are as under:
1. Presidential “Temperament and Caliber”.
2. Little Washington “insider Versus outsider” experience.
3. “Vision and mission” for our nation future rather than past.
4. American policies, ” first U.S.A Centric” than any other country [ ies ] centric.
In my professional opinion Senator Obama leads in all above qualities and attributes.
Senator Obama and his administration along with congress will address all the critical current and future domestic and foreign issues, challenges, and opportunities in coming years.
Let us remember and recite following concepts:
” Family, Friends, Fellows, Faith, Funds, Foundation [s], Fun, with Freedom & Fairness and without Fear, Favor, & Failure” . It applies to every citizen of our Greatgrand Nation.
Please stay involved, stay engaged, and stay informed. Please do not allow any seduction, deception, and or confusion by some partisan media and leaders effect your vote [ Psychological Terrorism ]..
Yours truly,
COL. [retd] A.M.Khajawall
Disabled American Veteran
Forensic psychiatrist, Las Vegas
PS: Please talk about the ” Presidential Temperament And Caliber ” of our presumptive presidential Nominees. We do talk about the “Judicial Temperament” of our Supreme Court Justices nominees and so far we have failed to talk about the ” Presidential Temperament ” of our presumptive presidential nominees. The ” Presidential Temperament ” is the ultimate and in my opinion only requirement of our president as that effects every living soul here and around the world.
Thanks again.

Posted by: COL.[retd]A.M.Khajawall | June 19, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

First of all, McCain is accepting public financing, just as he promised. So those of you who are saying that he isn’t are too uninformed to help choose the next commander in chief.
New Kind of politics? Post-partisan? Bull. Mccains not perfect either, but at least he keeps his word

Posted by: JH | June 19, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

The veneer on Obama is peeling rapidly but the yellow dog Democrats could care less whether Obama has a clue to the issues, is honest, forthright, capable, or can even fog a mirror when breathing. He IS their “hope” and that is all that matters.

Posted by: Bill | June 19, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

Why is the headline on the McCain post on drilling not “McCain Breaks Pledge on Drilling”?
Because McCain has PROPERLY changed his position to fit the reality of what is happening. What is happening is that ALL AMERICANS are being affected by the high price of oil and gasoline. It is the height of stupidity for anyone to maintain a position when that position is detrimental to 300 MILLION people.
In the case of Hussein, he is showing his massive hypocrisy and has changed his position, in other words become a LIAR, to suit his own personal needs in fulfilling a desire to become president. It’s all about him and nothing to do with the citizens of America. Add to that his ultra LAME excuse that he is somehow FORCED to do this because he needs the money to defend himself against the Rep 527′s. As if the likes of moveon and Daily Kos won’t be spending 100′s of millions against McCain.

Posted by: JjV | June 19, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

Take note – Obama will say anything to get elected.

Posted by: Obama Lies | June 19, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am

$85 million in public financing isn’t enough for the general election? are you kidding me? what does he plan to do with $200 million that can’t be done with $85? he talks about his opponentS but he only has 1. if you need more than $85 in 2 months, then it is the campaign that is broken, not the system. 527s swing both ways. for every swiftboat, there’s a moveon.org. all i have to say about obama is that he is no different than other politicians. there is no change here.

Posted by: jay | June 19, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am

Notice the Obama supporters are attacking the messenger and blaming Republicans for their own candidates lies? Revealing.

Posted by: Jogo | June 19, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am

Obama may be “inexperienced”, but he’s learning… to be a politician!

Posted by: Rhys | June 19, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

Told you so. The ONLY person of character that we can trust in this whole process is Ron Paul. What planet are the people from who thought Obama wasn’t the slick, politically polished salesman that would cast old friends aside, make new ones as convenient and do anything to get into the white house?
It takes all of about one speech to see his act.

Posted by: Don | June 19, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

The change is coming in waves these days, starting with foreign policy, where in his speech at the AIPAC conference he took a tough stand on Iran as opposed to his earlier stand of unconditional meetings with disputed world leaders. Then we had his embracing of NAFTA which he used to batter the Clintons’ political standing, change in stand on funding of social security which could lead to a shortfall to the tune of $800B, and now we have the change in his stand on public finance during the general election campaign. The change is all over these days but, in all probability, leave the old politics of Washington ntouched, devastating people’s dream of a sweeping change in the system, the way they are dreaming it today.

Posted by: George | June 19, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

Obama complains about the 527s – what exactly does he think moveon.org is?
And those awful PACs he’s always railing against due to influence bought and paid for – they seem not to include his own Hopefund PAC which contributed to his endorsers’ and supporters’ campaign funds.
It’s laughable that he – who has raised more money than any candidate ever in the history of our elections – claims to have to “catch up” to the Republican fundraising.
The One Who Would Change Washington wanted to use public financing before his own fundraising proved to be a gusher. The idea behind public financing is that the candidates compete on a level playing field. Obviously, Obama only wanted to hold this election to that standard when he thought he’d be the underdog.
Is this change we can believe in? No thanks!

Posted by: HoosierSue | June 19, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

Obama is (W)Right.
His campaign theme is CHANGE.
He changed his position, that’s all. As long as this young internet addicted kids realize this real Barry,
No one could save this Country

Posted by: john | June 19, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

countallthevotes – that’s just as bad. “There is often a disconnect between his words and his deeds”. Then how do we know wether this disconnect exists on which issues. How can one possibly know which is which and what he stands for. Waiting for him to act may be too late. What kind of broken logic is that? That doesn’t make any more sense then he does.

Posted by: don | June 19, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

It would be insane for him to play the game, but get beaten by 527 players outside the game. He’s smart.

Posted by: Walter | June 19, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

“I think we should start planning the Obama impeachment proceedings now since all of you Obamalovers are blinded by the truth and your hatred of President Bush.”
Obama’s decision didn’t get 4000 americans killed in Iraq.
Next.

Posted by: Paul | June 19, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE, OH, so this is what he meant bt CHANGE, now it all makes sense to me.

Posted by: Billy Bob | June 19, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

The man for change, hope, and a different kind of politics is nothing more than another waffling politician.

Posted by: stop2think | June 19, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Well, this would be politics as usual to me. Tell the public what they want to hear to get elected and then break you promises. An when it comes to 527′s I am pretty sure there are those who supports Obama that aren’t going to stop and he doesn’t want them to stop, one comes to mind right away MoveOn.org. Doesn’t sound like change to me, just more lies. I try to judge people based on their actions, this is not one I would vote for at all.

Posted by: Dan | June 19, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Mccain 3 weeks ago was opposed to drilling off the coast
now he is for it…
hmmm looks like when obama and mccains camp got together and couldnt get eachother to opt into public financing mccain realized he was going to have to get in bed with the oil tycoons!!!!!
LOL

Posted by: bhrandon | June 19, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Of course on the other hand, he outspent Hillary 4 to 1 and barely limped across the finish line. So from his point of view he does need to raise every dollar he can to go up against McCain.

Posted by: HoosierSue | June 19, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

This has been a strange election cycle where the news media has taken sides. ABC was pro-Clinton during the primaries once it became clear MSNBC carved a niche for itself being pro-Obama. CNN was a little better but tilted Obama with Cafferty and their political team. CBS News – no one watches them anyways so they don’t really matter.
It must be driving some segments of our country crazy to realize that there is much more than a 50% chance that Obama will win. He has tapped into the correct youth networks (people under 30) to mobilize them over the next 5 months. African Americans will register the highest levels of voter participation in our nation’s history. Democrats will be voting in record numbers for Obama despite the claims and activities of PUMA and other pro-Hillary groups. (They really need to consider what theyh are giving up by voting Republican). Obama isn’t a shoe-in but he is doing everything necessary to position himself to be the next president. It is amazing that political competence would trump name recognition and attack machines. The RNC must be afraid when even Huckabee publicly states the demonization of Barack will lead to certain defeat. If Republicans want to win they have to present a better message and get their base energized. Tearing down Barack on blogs won’t work. Before the first vote was cast in Iowa Terry McAuliffe said their challenge was going to be getting people excited enough to come out and vote in the primaries. He acknowledged that Barack’s supporters needed no prodding to donate, turn out the vote and heavily promote their candidate. That has now spread to all 50 states. He won’t win all states but the House will probably see defeats in places where the Republicans had no clue they were at risk of losing a seat.
What a great year for politics! Don’t hate – Investigate!

Posted by: Elliot | June 19, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

Obama is a charismatic dictator—who has just tightening his access to the press and exposure. You see this in foreign countries but I never thought I would see this in America.

Posted by: Anne | June 19, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

Another reason why I do not trust Obama. Already he is doing the opposite of statements already made. His claim of “change” already shows that change will not necessarily be good – it will be his change and not the will of the people he represents. McCain will get this Democrat’s vote. Broken promises, broken dreams. Time for me to switch party after 40 years believing in the Democrats.

Posted by: dixiecharms | June 19, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

I cannot believe some of the posts, some of you are mad because he WONT take money from the lobbyists and PACs, something McCain is more than willing to do, both ways are legal under McCains own reform bill, would you all prefer a candidate who will walk into the WH owing the general public or one who owes the lobbyists and PACs. Leave it to MSM to run this as a bad thing.

Posted by: Get Real | June 19, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

As long as he keeps his pledge regarding lobbyists and PACs, then I don’t really care. McCain could do the same thing, and it wouldn’t bother me.
All politicians are liars, and its funny how folks cherry pick issues to justify their choice of a horse. Obama is a racist and McCain is a bigot, right?
Point is this, Obama found a way to get millions more then normal system, and do it legally and with some modicum of honor, and people are decrying him of that? Politicians break pledges all the time, but why is just as important as the what.

Posted by: TheStormofwar | June 19, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

As an Obama supporter, I am greatly troubled by this latest developement. Has the Senator really been hiding behind the mantra of change when he could be just like the other Washinton Liars. America cannot nor should endure anymore of this lying and garbage as usual. As an independent who will never vote for McCain, I now will look at third party alternatives if this mess continues for I stand on principle unlike Washington Liars!

Posted by: rockychance | June 19, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am

And the great disapointment continues…
Wiat until after his coronation and Obama doesn’t remove forces from Iraq as he appears to have promised.. Oh the wrath.. it will be fun to watch.

Posted by: tankfixer | June 19, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am

But Pandering Bear is soooo cuddly!
He’s imploding before the convention and he is not Presidential material. It’s a big bad world and Big Mac is gonna stomp him a new one.
Change of mind you can count on.

Posted by: Nobel | June 19, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

THAT’S NOT change we can believe in!

Posted by: Harry | June 19, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

It’s only a fool that would expect obama to keep to his promise when the republicans are not playing by the rule.
Meanwhile, abc, i never saw you guys report the fact that obama now lead mcsame in three swing states: pennsylvania, ohio and florida. Every other media outlet reported that. This has buttressed the fact that you guys are now very partisan in favor of mcsame.
Anyway, come november, obama is going to beat mcsame by a landslide. MARK MY WORDS!

Posted by: dew5050 | June 19, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

It was never a promise.

Posted by: Frank | June 19, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

dont be mistaken you repubs have always opted out of public financing even while saying you would take it
you no longer get to go unchecked
thank god obama did this, your outside groups running their BS 527′s 24/7 arent going to go unanswered

Posted by: bhrandon | June 19, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

Now that Obama’s sucked off individual donors by selling “one set of ethics,” so to speak, he’s switching to tweak a system he’s already said he didn’t believe was ethical (thus, he’s “joined the dark side,” and made it official).

Posted by: Barker | June 19, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

Yawn. What else is NEW?

Posted by: obamasbeenlyin | June 19, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

I also notice the “growing makeup” on Michelle Obama (VIEW theatrics recently). These two Obamas are increasingly showing themselvse to be real phonies.

Posted by: Barker | June 19, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Obama had no choice here. If he accepts public financing he will not have the funds to hit back when all the Republican 527′s start striking back at him.

Posted by: CM | June 19, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Most of you have got to be kidding me. You all have tough talk regarding this mans decision to fight from the same level as Mc-idiot. you all should do one of thoes pros and cons lists and count the amount of fli-flops cheesey-mac has done. Get you heads out of the sand and come into the real world.

Posted by: TrueAmerican | June 19, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Mccain is trying hard to drag Obama down to his level in fund-raising.
The Mccain people are simply scared of Obama’s success in raising money.
This time is like no other !!! The GOP old tricks won’t work this time because they ‘ve got an opponent who is simply too hot for them to handle.
That’s Obama – Yes we can !!!

Posted by: Independent | June 19, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

The candidate of change. Anybody get it yet?

Posted by: obamasbeenlyin | June 19, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Yes, Frank, it was a promise – he made a “pledge” – that is a promise. Obama touts fairness and changes…..already his politician ways are oozing out… welcome to the beginning of lies and more lies from Obama’s lips.

Posted by: dixiecharms | June 19, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

McSame already broke it using his wife’s jet, signing on for loans etc. And McSame and the republicians will use PAC and 527′s
Waaaa waaaa waaaaa waaaaa waaaaaa ……..The VOTER’s/SUPPORTERs will support Obama at 3 to 4 times the money McSame could ever raise

Posted by: Mcsame=BUSH III | June 19, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

I am a democrat but it worries me that the plans Obama puts into place don’t work so he has to change it. Obama’s really good with words; he makes the “new plan” look like he’s doing the honorable thing but in reality his original plan would set him on a course of failure. Is he as inconsistent at John McCain? How can we trust his decision making? Shouldn’t he have known that we face opponents who’ve become masters at gaming this broken system when he constructed his first plan? Everybody else knew! I give him credit for making adjustments as needed but how could he have been so ignorant of the process in the first place????????????????? He is showing how his lack of experience is resulting in poor decision making. I don’t think I will vote for Obama unless he has a more experienced VP like Mrs. Clinton.

Posted by: Vera | June 19, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

But, oh, ha, yeah, this is “CHANGE you can BELIEVE in”: Obama will change and change and change and if left to run his course, who knows just what he’ll spring on a gullible nation (as to anyone who’d vote for him). It’s amazing how some people will still buy snake oil from snake oil salesmen, just amazing.

Posted by: Barker | June 19, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN.
like Nuclear electric and more oil drilling and more refineries. Oops that is McCain. Change we can believe in from McCain.

Posted by: DemocratForever | June 19, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Wake up people, A liar,is always a liar, BO, does and says what is convenient for him at the time. He is a suculent sponge who is being molded and shaped by his liberal A..advisors. Think!!! He has the most negative background, I have ever seen as a candidate, and I have been voting for many, years,since Kennedy. He can be as racist and bias as he wants, but heaven help any other conservative say and do the things he does, he is such a privilage fellow. But all those who are put on pedestals are being set up to fall. He will not allow drilling off our coasts, but other countries, China,India,Velensuela,ETC. are all out their salivating and working with Cuba, to start drilling 50 miles off our shores. That is not fair to the American people who are struggling to put food on the table to fill their gas tanks just to go to work, they work one day for the Govt. and one day for oil. that leaves the American people with 3 days for surviving. While foreign countries are drilling oil from underneath us. THAT IS NOT FAIR TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE….GO MCCAIN DO WHAT IS FAIR, AT LEAST YOU HAVE THE GUTS. BO, is so impotent when it comes to foreign affairs and terrorism.

Posted by: CMhinsley | June 19, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Dont blame the poor thing. He says and does what his bosses tell him just like an obedient little puppet.

Posted by: JULIE | June 19, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

I started off a Obama supporter as well as most of my friends, over the last few weeks we have become nervous with his rhetoric and actions. We are moderates and McCain is appearing more and more appealing. THis break of the pledge does not help at all.
Neither did yesterday when I read McCain is putting out ideas for energy for all of us who need to pay bills and actually get to work and all I heard from Obama was “auction off carbon credits”. Hmmm, I’m green, but come on!

Posted by: jon | June 19, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

I am NOT a fan of Barak Obama but there is a real difference between changing your mind and flip floping. When the facts change, minds change. To not do so is just being stubborn. However, the facts of campaign financing have NOT changed and Obama made a pledge to the voters to take public funds. He has broken that pledge and now wants to blame McCain for his decision. Yes, McCain-Fiengold created the 527′s however it was mainly a Democrat sponsored bill created by, and created for the liberal Democrats with the help of “BI-PARTISAN” (ha)John McCain. This is just another case of a politician saying whatever the voters want to hear then doing whatever is politically beneficial rather than doing what is right for the voters. Do you really want a President who will disregard the wishes of the people who elected him in order to do what will get him elected or reelected? I don’t and I would hope that you don’t either.

Posted by: FrustratedRepublican | June 19, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

I guess Obama’s got his eye on another jet from George Soros.

Posted by: Barker | June 19, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

Although he has mostly shunned the president since becoming the party’s nominee, Mr McCain now needs all the help he can get. Barely a day passes where he does not attend fundraising events, in addition to placing calls to the Bush campaign’s former “pioneers” and “rangers” – categories of big donors – to persuade them to join the bandwagon.
Having raised a total of just $96m (€62m, £49m) since January 2007, against Barack Obama’s $265m, Mr McCain was always going to be at a disadvantage against the Democratic nominee. But Republican donors worry that the gap could be getting wider – in spite of the three-month head start Mr McCain had over Mr Obama in being named as his party’s nominee.
For example, at the end of April Mr McCain had raised just $6.4m in Texas, a cash-rich Republican state, against $6.5m by Mr Obama.
Tomorrow the two candidates will publish their numbers for May. Mr Obama is likely to have clocked up another $40m or so without having broken a sweat, if previous months are anything to go by. Mr McCain will have devoted precious days to raising $21.5m in the same period, according to an early release by his campaign.

Posted by: bhrandon | June 19, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

Obama is the same old rusty bucket with a new coat of paint.
Elections tend to power-wash the bucket though, and that new paint is chipping away, revealing the old rust beneath.

Posted by: Andrew | June 19, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

I’m perfectly fine with this decision. All you need to do is look at all the funding that will come from the RNC and 527s to know that Obama needs to use his donor base (including many small donors) to avoid being at a disadvantage. He couldn’t have known what the climate would be like back in February 2007. He’s changed his mind, but he has explained the reason for the change. Unlike McCain, who is changing his positions on majory policy issues on a daily basis.

Posted by: mary | June 19, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

It’s amazing that people cannot see through Obama. He and McCain are equally narcissistic, but Obama’s primary motivation is self-aggrandizement, while McCain believes he has the vision to lead the country. Neither man is a true leader, but McCain comes much closer. A true leader would never succeed in American politics because the American people (regardless of party affiliation) are really just looking for someone who tells them what they want to hear.

Posted by: Jim | June 19, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

The Mccain people are simply scared of Obama’s success in raising money.
Mccain is trying hard to drag Obama down to his level in fund-raising.
This time is like no other !!! The GOP old tricks won’t work this time because they ‘ve got an opponent who is simply too hot for them to handle.
That’s Obama – Yes we can !!!

Posted by: Independent | June 19, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

People put this into perspective; changing your financial strategy (mind) on campaign financing as compared to sending American’s to war and/or agreeing to continue this senseless occupation, and even disagreeing then agreeing with the Bush’s Tax breaks, a wash for both Presidential Candidates. Next Subject…

Posted by: FYI | June 19, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

And the flips keep coming.

Posted by: JH2 | June 19, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

“Speaking of hypocrisy, why don’t some of you McCain lovers do a little research on this subject and not accept as the gospel truth the drivel from this McCain shill posing as a reporter. McCain only took public financing because his campaign was broke. He then used this public money as collateral for loans, and then tried to back out of public financing once those loans were secured. The guy has broken his own campaign finance laws. The FEC, or whatever’s left of it, either can’t or won’t do anything about it. The problem with many conservatives these days is that they don’t adhere to any actual conservative principles; they just hate democrats. The party of Goldwater is dead – it has been invaded by neocons and religious nut-jobs. Thanks for ruining it for me. I had no choice but to join the other side.
Posted by: Pete | Jun 19, 2008 9:27:28 AM”
The best post of the day…hands down! I’m not a “party” guy like Pete, but I echo his sentiments. Even if Obama did “break his promise” how does this affect the average American if he’s leaving EIGHTY-FOUR MILLION DOLLARS of TAXPAYER money on the table, not taking the money from PACs/Lobbyists, who btw have more access to your Government than you do, and accepting it from average Americans who GIVE OF THEIR OWN FREE WILL?!?
I’d rather you just say “I hate Obama” for no good reason and have a nice day than to try an propogate this weak argument of promise breaking.
“We’ll be greeted as liberators.” Cheney, Bush, McCain-how’d that promise work out?

Posted by: PHCDR Herm | June 19, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

Can someone please tell me how doing the same thing every presidential candidate since public financing was put in place in 1970, is a form of change? I would imagine that being the first candidate to accept public funding would have actually been a change from normal declining of public financing. And if you want to get into 527′s, how about we start with Moveon.org. The largest 527 out there. What a hypocrite.

Posted by: Bill | June 19, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

It all comes down to whether or not you think we should still be spending $10,000,000,000 a month in Iraq or you think that money could be better spent here helping the average Americans that have taken a huge hit over the past 8 years. Do you think the bush-league has done well with the economy or do you feel they have benefited only the top 5%, because mc-more-war would certainly be a bush 3rd term. Obama 2008!!!

Posted by: pt | June 19, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

Obama is such a fraud.
There is nothing else to say.

Posted by: ah, the clown's makeup is beginning to melt | June 19, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

I find it shocking to hear all these Republicans whinging on about good old capitalism at work. If McCain is the great dear leader you all think he is then pony up. That’s what all your tax breaks for millionaires were for, remember. Feel free to spend your dollars on your grandpa.

Posted by: Rapture Helper | June 19, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

Obama is the biggest myth in American Political history. The media has given him carte blanche to say anything at anytime without any threat of being challenged. How many bottles of snake oil have you bought from him?

Posted by: W.J.Clinton | June 19, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

$360mil raised to date? disgusting. Both candidates should accept public funds and then apply these funds to a social program they support, healthcare, education, child welfare, infrastructure, investing in ‘green energy’, Iowa flood, rebuild new orleans etc. i can’t belief americans donate to politicians rather than the truly needy. disgusting.

Posted by: Jay | June 19, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am

OBAMA Says nothing will help on the oil mess we are in so he wants to do nothing. He is like Clinton in 1996 did not allow drilling because we would not have oil for 10 years and he said we might not need oil in 10 years. what a stupid statement. We need all the oil we can get. a big oil or a little oil. We need to get ENERGY for this country. Nuclear is energy and saves oil. We can use wind and other things but they are tiny compared to our need for energy. We must stop buying energy from other countries. we are going bankrupt buying oil. we need all the energy we can get in this country. McCain has the right path to change. Change away from the democratic blocks to progress. Did I ever make a mistake in the past supporting these democrats now I see more clearly. Lets get this country moving with McCain. OBAMA is full of excuses to do NOTHING On energy. Forget Gore who is dead wrong here. We must get clean energy but right now we are desperate for energy. Nuclear is the fastest clean energy also our own clean oil will keep away bankruptcy of the entire country. We are losing our houses. Poor people will freeze to death this winter at $5 heating oil. And how many will freeze if heating oil gets higher priced. Look out it is summer now so Obama is not talking about people freezing. The guy is corrupt to the core like all Chicago politicians. I know I grew up in Chicago.

Posted by: DemocratForever | June 19, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

MCCAIN PEOPLE ARE SIMPLY SCARED OF OBAMA’S FUND-RAISING. PERIOD !!!

Posted by: Commonsense | June 19, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

I just read in THE HILL that “a third” of the donors to Obama (so far) have been by individuals giving “over $2,000. each.”
That means he’s leaning heavily not on the working class but wealthy donors. “Over $2,000. each” can mean upward to anything.

Posted by: Barker | June 19, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

A more accurate headline would be McCain and Obama break promises. They had both months ago agreed not to accept 527′s. Since McCain was the first one to reneg, Obama responded with an adequate political survival response. In the previous posting, Obama was presented as a softie for his adherence, like the Supreme Court , to Habeas Corpus. Now in this morning’s post, he’s supposed to back down from McCain’s instigating a broken promise to 527′s. Thank you, Mr. Tapper, this former Clinton supporter is gaining a further appreciation of Mr. Obama.

Posted by: kat | June 19, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

Could this then be considered the “Illinios two-step?” — Posted by: Tom in Indiana

One of Obama’s donors who escaped from a Chicago jail (is on the lamb, pictured recently hugging Obama) describes it as “the Chicago way.” Organized crime.

Posted by: Barker | June 19, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

This has nothing to do with McCain, political positions or the like. It has everything to do with Obama’s INTERGRITY. He has, once again, gone back on his word. Then again, according to him they are “Just words”. So much for him being a new type of politician. He crawled up from the Chicago political muck leaving a slime trail all the way.

Posted by: obiewan | June 19, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

The Mccain lovers are just scared of Obama’s success in raising money.
Mccain is trying hard to drag Obama down to his level in fund-raising.
This time is like no other !!! The GOP old tricks won’t work this time because they ‘ve got an opponent who is simply too hot for them to handle.
That’s Obama – Yes we can !!!

Posted by: Independent | June 19, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

Did you really believe that he would keep his promise. Obama will say/do whatever is popular at the time he is asked. If he needs to change his mind when the time comes, he will. He is not a man of character or conviction. He just found out he is in a high stakes race for the presidency and money is important. Too bad he was too naive the time he was asked the question about federal funds in Nov 2007. Wait until he starts making promises about protecting the middle class with tax cuts (oh, he already did). He will break those once he gets elected. I don’t think he even knows what middle class means.

Posted by: Steve | June 19, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

why are you reporting the law suit filed by the DNC against Mccain for BREAKING the finance rules?

Posted by: johnosahon | June 19, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

THE SOONER THE DEMS TAKE TOTAL CONTROL OF MAKING LAW (CONGRESS) ENFORCING LAW (EXECUTIVE BRANCH) AND INTERTPRETING LAW(THE COURT) THE SOONER THE COUNTRY WILL GO BROKE FINANCILLY AND MORALLY, AND THEN THE REVOLUTION CAN START. PEOPLE OF PEOPLE WHO FOUNDED THIS COUNTRY WILL TAKE OVER AND GO BACK TO BASICS. YOU THINK IT WONT HAPPEN. HOW DID RON REAGAN BEAT THE SOVIETS? CAUSED THEM TO SPEND THEMSELVES INTO OBLIVION. THEY SPENT IT ON THE MILITARY, WE WILL SPEND IT ON WELFARE PROGRAMS. WHICH DO YOU BELIEVE WILL RESULT IN THE MORE APPROPRIATE OUTCOME?

Posted by: BILLYBLOG | June 19, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

MCCAIN PEOPLE ARE SIMPLY SCARED OF OBAMA’S FUND-RAISING. PERIOD !!!

Posted by: CommonSense | June 19, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

Obama must think that the American people are stupid. This is a straight up lie. Not a flip-flop, not changing of his mind, but a bold faced lie. Haven’t we had a enough lying over the last 16 years?

Posted by: Ryan | June 19, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

This also means that Obama can accept more money from Hugo Chavez and ‘other friends.’ Castro’s got a lot of millios stashed away, he’ll probably poney-up a bundle.

Posted by: Barker | June 19, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

I love how conveniently democrats notice only republicans not playing by the so called “rules”. As much as I hate to burst your bubble both sides are corrupt almost beyond imagination. Regarding the 527s this again is not exclusive domain of the republican party who have only had one notable 527 group “The Swift Boat Veterans for Truth” while the democrats have a littany of groups doing their dirty work; moveon.org, dailykos, code pink, center for media research, brookings institute. The list goes on and on and this isn’t even delving into the deep corruption and complicity of the main stream media who have forgone any semblance of impartiality to absolutely worship Barrack Obama.
With that said I do not disagree with what Obama is doing here as there is a certain nobility to being funded by the voters as they choose. However you and I both know it will be funding from hollywood, George Soros, and other marxist / anti-capitalist groups that will provide the bulk of the funding. With the restrictions removed I am curious to see what sort of foreign funding he gets as well from nations who want to see America move toward socialism and therefore lose our economic power. Remember when the Chinese donated millions to the Clinton campaign in the 90s and were rewarded with the trade agreement in 98 that has cost us millions of manufacturing jobs and greatly damaged our economic clout.
You should all quit being sheep and basing your vote on the animal on their party button and base it on actual issues. Declare your independence and move away from this cancerous two party partisanship that is destroying our country and re-register yourself as an independent voter. Don’t let the mainstream media cast your vote for you!

Posted by: JB | June 19, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

For a person who done nothing since he has been in congress but run for president he has so much to say about everyone else. Break his word “No surprise” is it? Obama is not ready to lead our country and we all know it. He gives a great speech, but becoming president is more than giving a great speech. It’s who are and who your friends are. We all have seen Obamas friends who now he disowns but would never had if it were not for the pressure. Such a waste of our time and money on a person who is not qualified for the Job. Enough is enough send this kid back to where ever he came from.

Posted by: a citizen | June 19, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

And they call this change? Yet another example that Obama is no different from every other politician in Washington, DC, except perhaps a bit more dishonest by casting himself as somehow different and above the fray. What a hypocrite!

Posted by: David Lampo | June 19, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

MCCAIN PEOPLE ARE SIMPLY SCARED OF OBAMA’S FUND-RAISING. PERIOD !!!

Posted by: CommonSense | June 19, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

Obama is just another political hack and doesn’t care about anything except winning. He lied about campaign finance and will lie about anything to get elected. He has never served in the military and is a pseudo-intellect without morals. Elect someone with character, elect John McCain!!!

Posted by: waynesworld2008 | June 19, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

Obama breaks his pledge (vow, oath a promise, word of honor)and he is not even the nominee yet, let alone the President. So I guess we can assume that after he is elected we can anticipate the same—a man’s is no longer honorable.

Posted by: Anne | June 19, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

IT’S ABOUT TIME! REPUBLICANS ARE SHOCKED THAT SOMEONE NOT ONLY UNDERSTANDS THE SYSTEM BUT CAN OUTSMART THE SYSTEM. BARACK OBAMA IS SMARTER.

Posted by: Jacqueline Ray | June 19, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

This amsuing, but he did it first, but he needs to stop the smear campaign, but he can raise more money, but, but. but. Before Novemeber we should count the but and hope comments. The list will be endless.

Posted by: Ehop | June 19, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

TO FRANK:
YES HE DID MAKE A PROMISE. HE PLEDGED ON AT LEAST 2 OCCASSIONS – A PLEDGE IS A PROMISE.
IS HE THAT NAIVE THAT HE THOUGHT THE 527 AND THE RNC WOULD NOT RUN A SMEAR CAMPAIGN. HIS DECISIONS ARE NOT OF GOOD JUDGEMENT AS HE TOUTS.
I TRULY FEAR FOR THE FUTURE OF THIS COUNTRY. I HAVE NEVER BEEN A BIG SUPPORTER OF MCCAIN OR OBAMA BUT I THINK MCCAIN WILL SCREW UP THE COUNTRY LESS.

Posted by: Dina | June 19, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

This man, along with the DNC, Reid and Pelosi are destroying the democratic party. They no longer represent that average working American. This is yet another example of Obama’s “elite” thinking. He’s too good for for public financing – that’s for the “little guy.” I refuse to move to the far left of the party, I’m in the middle and there I will stay – and that is where John McCain is.

Posted by: Dem for McCain | June 19, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

What a liar.

Posted by: Chris | June 19, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

Obama is just another political hack and doesn’t care about anything except winning. He lied about campaign finance and will lie about anything to get elected. He has never served in the military and is a pseudo-intellect without morals. Elect someone with character, elect John McCain!!!

Posted by: waynesworld2008 | June 19, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

Obama never said he would opt out of public financing. That was a low level staffer who said that, who has since been let go by the campaign.
Newkindpolitics, ftw!
“Chane you can believe in!”
“Hope” no one notices!

Posted by: OxyCon | June 19, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

Isn’t refusing taxpayer money to fund a campaign a good thing?
Who cares if he said he might do it in the past. He obviously realized he doesn’t need to that money now.

Posted by: Noonereally | June 19, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

This election is like no other. I have never seen the republicans this scared.
They are so scared of Obama that it shows.

Posted by: CommonSense | June 19, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

So once again Obama blames Republicans for something so he can turn around and NOT doe something. Hmmmmmm, Republicans are up to “dirty tricks” so I don’t have to tell you what I will do as President. Republicans are waging a “smear campaign” so I don’t have to answer for Wright or Ayers. Obama is correct on one thing, it is the same old playbook, the same liberal whine and moan so you dont’ actually tell the American people what you intend to do as president mantra because, who would by his big government tax and spend message in this environment?

Posted by: Vince | June 19, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

TO ALL OF YOU WHO THINK OBAMA IS SMART BECAUSE HE OPTED OUT OF PUBLIC FINANCE. THE RNC DID THIS IN HOPES HE WOULD BREAK HIS PLEDGE. SO NOW THEY WILL HAVE THIS TO FEED ON. A BROKEN PROMISE AND YES “CHANGE” AND NOT FOR THE BETTER. WHAT A FOOL HE IS.

Posted by: Brian -CHICAGO | June 19, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

John McCain is afraid of Barack Obama because he’s honest and straight forward. The Republicans are upset because Barack won’t stand for their crap and go along with whatever they say. The Republicans have been running Washington for too long and they know all of that is about to change once Barack is President.

Posted by: Obamagirlinbama | June 19, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

I’m dissapointed in Obama. You expected it from McCain/any Republican….I dont think either candidate has the courage to really take on the sytem. Vote for someone besides McCain or Obama or just dont vote.

Posted by: Eric Griesheimer | June 19, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

Funny how everything Saint O does is someone else’s problem. He talks about a broken system and the republican smear campaign and then heads over to AFL-CIO to collect their money. They are dropping in 53 million. The SEIU is looking to drop another 88million. Soros is already dropping millions into the race and yet he says the republican smear campaign. I think he has already joined up with the democrat smear campaign. The man is out right liar but the obamabots will defend anything he does. Well it will be nice seeing him waste millions in the general and lose. Money well spent by the left.

Posted by: Kabookey | June 19, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

Damn right the republicans are scared and the democrats better be scared also if Obama gets into the White House. He is an image that is being sold and shoved down the American’s throats. He has no substance, just someone running a good campaign on fluffy rhetoric. He is a mirage to Americans thirsting for something better, unfortunately, they will end up getting nothing but a handful of useless sand.

Posted by: Dem for McCain | June 19, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Here goes Obama again. To make a promise and break it just because it is not convinient for you now, is so amazing. For someone who claimed he only has the judgement to lead, why can’t he have the good judgement on this in 2007, when he promised to adhere to public financing. Obama is breaking his promise now, because he could raise more money than McCain. Frankly speaking, if Obama were behind in fund raising, he’ll have stick to his promise.
Yes, that is politics of convenient, not of truth and sticking to your words. Obama does not want a level paying field, because he would lose. He wanted to use his fund raising advantage to win election not on any substantive issue.
Just us his first entry into politics was to use volunteers and fellow lawyers to challenge and prevented his opponent names from appearing on the ballot box in Chicago, he is doing the same here. Can we trust Obama? He seems to be making it up as he goes, and unfortunately, the press is giving him a free pass. Let the press knows that being the president of America is not an affirmative action. America, beware of this flip flopper.

Posted by: Big Joe | June 19, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Can’t blame them. If you look at all the possible 527′s out there funded by a bunch of right wing nut cases, he’s right to protect himself. Kerry got “Swiftboated” and why should Obama sit still for it again.
Agreed that after this election, we need a bi-partisan commission to draft a meaningful campaign financing statute that outlaws 527′s and other “slight of hand” organizations.
Nice to see the usual Obama bashers out this morning. I’d say he’s got it about right looking at the posts.
Posted by: Show Me the Money | Jun 19, 2008 9:14:37 AM
————————————–
Show me, can you tell us how much is coming from the left? I guess AFL-CIO, SEIU, Teachers Unions, Soros and others are not pumping in way more money then the right. At least people on the right are donating their money by their own free will and not having it taken from them like the Unions do and they use it to only help dims. That is the kind of free America the dims like.

Posted by: Kabookey | June 19, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

I wonder if Obama will take contrinbutiosn from peole in all “57 states.” The guy breaks his promise and his supporters in the comments above follow the company line like sheep. Wake up, democrats, and smell the coffee.

Posted by: SuziQQ | June 19, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Glad Obama made the right decision. It would be stupid to turn away such large contributions. Woudn’t want a stupid president. If I did I’d vote for McCain.

Posted by: JR | June 19, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

Mr. Tapper – why do you allow the Dems to characterize Republicans as not stopping the 527s? Isn’t the whole POINT of 527 groups supposed to be that they’re separate from the party system? If they were coordinating with their candidate, they’d violate McCain-Feingold.
Which is a piece of legislation from John McCain; name 1 piece of legislation from Obama.

Posted by: Matt Dooley | June 19, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

If Obama was raising $10 million each month, I don’t think the republican would mind if he opted out of public financing. Hmmm

Posted by: CommonSense | June 19, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Anyone who believes Obama now deserves what we get if he was president a communist dictatorship. Obama continues to blatantly lie and deceive the american people. DO you supporters actually know what he stands for?

Posted by: Christopher | June 19, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

This isn’t much of a story and I don’t take it is Obama breaking an oath or anything. When he made this promise, he was hoping he would be matched with someone who had a decent amount of civility. This is before people started blindsiding him about being a muslim, his church, his wife, etc. I also think that this is a big turn for the worse for the Republicans. The man can fundraise like nobody’s business. He has got to give himself the best chance to win and this is it. Obviously, the right winged, paranoid propaganda laden conservative Republicans and a few still bitter at the world Hillary supporters will take this ball and run with it but at the end of the day it was the right move. I am a moderate Republican who hasn’t had a viable presidential candidate to vote for since 1996. I love how we put up a man who wasn’t good enough in 2000 and 2004. I’m going Obama on this one because this country has to change its though process accross the board and McCain will not do that.

Posted by: Tim | June 19, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

What did BO do for Hillary when they were smearing her? Nothing. That’s right. Anyone who cares for civil rights (for everyone) will not vote for this hypocrite.
What shocks me is that ABC is reporting a negatory for OB.

Posted by: Debra | June 19, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

One of the traits of a strong leader, in business or politics, is being open to admit that a choice made 12 months ago may not be the best choice for right now. This man is attempting to free himself of money influence in the act of getting elected because it will enab le him to more easily achieve his goal. This is only a “bad thing” if his goal is not your goal.
This man is going to be our next president. Deal with it.

Posted by: Dave | June 19, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

About what I expected from Waffles 2.0. Breaks his pledge and can’t take responsibility for it. Classic Obama, its always someone else’s fault.
If the system was so broken why did he make the pledge in the first place?
If he doesn’t like 527′s why doesn’t he ask moveon.org, progressive media USA, the fund for america and the Fund for America to stop their attacks on John McCain? Because he’s perfectly fine with 527′s taking in unregulated money so long as it helps him. A typical Daly politician.

Posted by: Zaggs | June 19, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am

The only reason McSame and his camp are upset, is because they know they can’t get a quarter of the donations from the general public that Obama will.
Obama will be the next president.
Deal with it.
Wednesday, June 18
Race Poll Results Spread
Maine: McCain vs. Obama Rasmussen Obama 55, McCain 33
Obama +22.0
General Election: McCain vs. Obama Gallup Tracking Obama 47, McCain 42 Obama +5.0
Virginia: McCain vs. Obama PPP (D) McCain 45, Obama 47
Obama +2.0
Wisconsin: McCain vs. Obama SurveyUSA Obama 52, McCain 43
Obama +9.0
General Election: McCain vs. Obama Reuters/Zogby Obama 47, McCain 42
Obama +5.0
Pennsylvania: McCain vs. Obama Quinnipiac Obama 52, McCain 40
Obama +12.0
Ohio: McCain vs. Obama Quinnipiac Obama 48, McCain 42
Obama +6.0
Florida: McCain vs. Obama Quinnipiac McCain 43, Obama 47
Obama +4.0

Posted by: JP | June 19, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

Hey, Barak, my donation to your campaign is in the mail. No need to take taxpayer money or filthy PAC and lobby lucre’. We’ve got a people driven movement. And John, how ’bout that loan you collateralized with public financing, before you decided you wanted to opt out? McCain’s the one with the bigger problem here, he’s already overspent the limits without the FEC releasing him from public financing, a breach of the LAW. Barak’s got a few vague mentions to the press of possibly accepting publec funds. Not even close.

Posted by: Bill D. | June 19, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Change we can believe in, indeed. It appears that Senator Obama believes in change only if it suits his own ambition. He changed his mind only because he believes he can raise more money from special interests (unions, trial lawyers, Hollywood, George Soros to name a few). This is not I person I can trust to do what’s best for the American people. This is not a person I want in the white House.

Posted by: jjsmith6575 | June 19, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Along with his flip on NAFTA Obama shows that he is a true liar.

Posted by: Tom | June 19, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

The voter’s desire for shared power will translate into a McCain win. People will simply be more comfortable voting for the older white guy. It really is that simple.

Posted by: Paul | June 19, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

To Frank- South Hampton;
Personal attacks won’t work this time. Sorry !!!
You should have known that by now. Have you been following?
If you hate Obama so much, the worst you can do is just stay home and weep !!! You can’t help it.

Posted by: CommonSense | June 19, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Well, he did say it but it was like the Celtics saying we promise not to shoot baskets too well if the other team doesn’t. And the DNC does not raise funds as well as RNC and its support groups so that playing field would never be level.
What it does do is cast a spotlight on who donates to the campaign. If the money is all relatively small contributions then all is basically well and good. If not he is more of a hypocrite.

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | June 19, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Peoples_prez spouts the same old socialist bull about the oil companies, but it’s very revealing that the hard left is so enthusiastic about Obama. That Obama’s advisers are nearly all conventional, big money establishment types shows how he speaks with many tongues and fools a lot of people. He’s lying to someone!

Posted by: David | June 19, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Exxon Mobil, Shell, Total and BP — the original partners in the Iraq Petroleum Company — along with Chevron and a number of smaller oil companies, are in talks with Iraq’s Oil Ministry for no-bid contracts to service Iraq’s largest fields, according to ministry officials, oil company officials and an American diplomat.
The deals, expected to be announced on June 30, will lay the foundation for the first commercial work for the major companies in Iraq since the American invasion, and open a new and potentially lucrative country for their operations.
The no-bid contracts are unusual for the industry, and the offers prevailed over others by more than 40 companies, including companies in Russia, China and India.
LOL
looks like since the war wont bring bush the legacy he thought he could get from starting this war, hell go after the oil for all his buddies anyway
no contract deals lol wow
thanks republicans
thanks george bush
thanks john mclame

Posted by: bhrandon | June 19, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

I’m not an Obama fan, but those republicans on this site who are criticizing him for this move show that they are cynics and liars. Obama said that he would forgo private funding if his opponent (now, McCain) did the same. McCain didn’t so Obama won’t. End of story. Obama never promised to forgo private funds if McCain didn’t. Understand?

Posted by: Kelly in Boston | June 19, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

Unbelievable Obama worried about Republican 527s???? The only group running negative ads Move On and they are for Obama.
Obama is freeing himself of big Money ???? Instead of taking tax payer money to finance his campaign he will take it from any one and is most likely selling himself to get it Obama is no new style Politician Just another slick willy trying to get everything he can talking out both sides of his mouth and hoping the majority of us will buy into his Bulls—.

Posted by: W | June 19, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

I can’t find even one Obama supporter where I live. I expect the biggest landslide victory for McCain in our history and I am not really a McCain supporter.

Posted by: gary | June 19, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

A reply to some of the other posts–non citizens can’t contribute to campaigns nor can corporations. There are 57 contests in the Democratic nomination contest–50 states plus DC,Guam, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Democrats Abroad, Virgins Islands and an Unassigned Category. Obama has set a record for number of contributors and is not for unilateral disarmament as McCain is also opting out of public financing. The Republicans are upset with him the most because he is beating them badly at raising the most money for election. A lot of small folks spare change will bring change.

Posted by: bhciapol | June 19, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am

LeAnn – Obama made a pledge …. a pledge is a promise. No need to sign a statement. However, since Obama is a politician we should not be surprised at anything he does – or does not do.

Posted by: dixiecharms | June 19, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am

So he’s already changed his mind on changing “the way Washington works”. Not a surprise. What other changes (changes that we can BELIEVE IN) are in the works. Just another liar and corrupt politician who is in this for himself. The only difference between he and the others iS experience (of which he has none). THIS IS THE CHANGE I CAN BELIEVE IN! You had your chance with Hillary and a few of you democrats (about 1/2) blew it.

Posted by: ibfay | June 19, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am

Oh and just for those who think a “questionare” is a promisary note….
Well, sorry to break it to you but it’s NOT!
Barack has said that he wants the American people to fund his campaign because he wants to be accountable to them.
Not Lobbyist, and fat cats like the ones working on John McCain’s camp.
McCain’s camp calls him a typical politican.. but the funny thing is that this is coming from a camp who advisors LOBBIED for ERON!!! That’s a TYPICAL POLITICAN! Getting lobbyist to pull your strings!

Posted by: LeAnn | June 19, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am

Yes David – he (Obama) is lying to someone – The hardworking proud American Citizens. Meanwhile, the wealthy left liberal democrats are licking their chops in anticipation of RULING America exactly how they want to – they picked the perfect puppet to accomplish their mission.

Posted by: Dem for McCain | June 19, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am

The voter’s desire for shared power will translate into a McCain win. People will simply be more comfortable voting for the older white guy. It really is that simple.
Posted by: Paul | Jun 19, 2008 10:42:10 AM
When you wake up from your dream, Obama will be your POTUS!
McSame is falling farther behind in the polls everyday.

Posted by: JP | June 19, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Ok, we know Obama lies, thats a given. But whats the difference if he takes “public” financing or “private” donations? Its all the peoples money! He would just be limiting himself to what he can spend. Hopefully McCain does not fall into Obamas trap, and he also refuses to accept limited “public” financing.

Posted by: Mike | June 19, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Gary
If you can’t find one obama supporter where you live…you either …haven’t left your house…or live in an area that is WAY off the beaten path…
with some really really reallly smart people…lol

Posted by: dl | June 19, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

If Obama was raising $10 million each month, I don’t think the republicans would mind if he opted out of public financing. Hmmm

Posted by: Independent | June 19, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

He never broke a promise. Man, some of you people really need to wake the hell up.

Posted by: Chris | June 19, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am

Oh and just for those who think a “questionare” is a promisary note….
Well, sorry to break it to you but it’s NOT!
Barack has said that he wants the American people to fund his campaign because he wants to be accountable to them.
Not Lobbyist, and fat cats like the ones working on John McCain’s camp.
McCain’s camp calls him a typical politican.. but the funny thing is that this is coming from a camp who advisors LOBBIED for ERON!!! That’s a TYPICAL POLITICAN! Getting lobbyist to pull your strings!
Posted by: LeAnn | Jun 19, 2008 10:46:31 AM
————————————
So LeAnn, can you tell us where public financing comes from then since Saint O is saying not from the public? What a load of crock. Where do you think his money is coming from? Your cookie jar? He has the same crowd that has always donated, so they don’t go through lobbyists. They go right to the head of these company’s and have them bundle the money directly. Yea coming from the people, yea right LeAnn. Public financing comes from the public not wealthy donors. Just thought I would clear that up for you.

Posted by: Kabookey | June 19, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am

dixiecharms-
A questionare is NOT a pledge… It is what it is… A QUESTIONARE.
I want to know where he signed a PLEDGE, or said I PLEDGE, or PROMISE to take public financing…
So far no one has been able to answer that. I’m not talking about this speculation crap, or something where it has to be interpreted that he is pledging or promising… I want clear proof.

Posted by: LeAnn | June 19, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

yeah…this may not be the greatest statement of something that was inevitable once obama saw he could raise money from small donors and a wide array of the country in a fashion that would dwarf the “democracy’ of the public financing situation…
but between the fact that “who knew” you copuld raise money from the real peoples of the country and McCain switcharoo with the whole falsified loan thing… this is a non issue.
America wants the bums out… …thats why he was able to raise so many small donors and McCain can’t.

Posted by: dl | June 19, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

I AM a Hillary supporter, what the media did to her was inexcusable. MSN/NBC was the worst! Unfortunately I won’t be voting this year. However I must admit, when asked I say I’m voting for Obama, but I’m not, I’m staying home.

Posted by: SAS | June 19, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Obama is the king of lying politicians. He completely changed his position regarding Jerusalem just hours after he made a commitment to a Jewish Jerusalem, and not he has been found to have straight up lied to the American people regarding campaign funding. Obama’s actions are disgraceful!

Posted by: Cory | June 19, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Who really cares.
The GOP 527s will be spending millions upon millions of dollars to smear Obama.
Obama has to fight back.

Posted by: Reba | June 19, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Obama has already Won this thing…
The rest just have to Live the History!

Posted by: Anita Yova | June 19, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Hey Commonsense:
Like Obama hasn’t made negative comments to McCain. Get over yourself and apparantely you feel for Obama’s speeches and empty and inexperiences. I don’t hate Obama – I am just smart and haven’t fallen for his pretty rhetoric. I can bear and afford 4 years of this tax and spend president – can you?
You can eat your own words once your candidate of choice wins the general election but don’t go crying once Obama begins breaking more of his promises.
KELLY IN BOSTON:
Obama in 2007 when he first began his campaign about change – before McCain has even won the nomination – Obama stated that if won the nomination he would use public financing. Now he wants to change his pledge because he can’t play with the big boys – especially if it is not scipted.
ummm uumm oohhh I meant – uh ohhh Ummm I am not sure – I already answered 8 questions.

Posted by: Frank- South Hampton | June 19, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

This comes as no suprise to me. As a Hillary supporter, I paid attention, did my research, and saw through Sen. Barack Obama’s “new politics of change” BS. I just wish more voters had as well. Sen. John McCain may not share the same ideas on the issues that I care about; but a Presidential election is more than just voting for what YOU want, its about voting for what is BEST for the USA. Barack is not the best man for the job.

Posted by: PhillyPaul | June 19, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

I am an Obama supporter and still am but this decision disappoints me.

Posted by: marie | June 19, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am

A promise is a promise! Unless you figure you can raise more money by breaking your promise. Watch the spin on this one. It will somehow be because McCain and the Republicans forced him to do it. Change? I think not!

Posted by: joepoidog | June 19, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

kabooeky-
It is really said that you and everyone else on this board cannot.. will not provide me with what I requested.
ACTUALLY PROOF WHERE HE SAID I PROMISE, OR I PLEDGE TO TAKE PUBLIC FINANCING!
And on a second note, if money to his campaign wasn’t coming from the american people… then tell me how is it that he raised over $250,000 in one minute on Apr. 21 from ONLINE DONORS???!! And that wasn’t somethig run by the campaign… it was done by a freaking blogger on his website!
Once again… I want proof of him breaking a “promise” or “pledge” for public financing.

Posted by: LeAnn | June 19, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

I LOVE how all these young Barack “followers” suddenly rail against “Big Oil” as the root of all evil in America; then, then fill up the tanks of the new V8 Mustang that their rich daddy bought them for graduation, and gun it down the highway. Too funny.

Posted by: PhillyPaul | June 19, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am

Liberals complaining about 527s?! Has anyone heard of moveon.org? … or George Soros?

Posted by: Carl | June 19, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Why is the GOP so scared. Allowing government invest tax payers money into something else aside election is a good thing. Obama is setting standards. Hate him or not ,McCain will be so angry because if he does not accept the funds that means he equally believes in Obama’s principles of playing straight and if does, my God Americans are going to eat him raw. Check mate. People this is politics at its peak. Stop being scared.

Posted by: Check mate | June 19, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

If Led Zepplin did “Stairway to Heaven” in 69 or so-with song “When the Levee Breaks”,,,,,did somebody know the chem trails in da sky made a mess? Big surprise folks-nobody told me I would have 57 jets over the house spraying my farm into the ground-even those cool long hair folkies.I pray on my hands and knees that Obama, McCain,,,somebody can clean up our corrupt government. I wouldn’t want to be one of those sandbagging citizens next to the nearest “breech” about to give-awayyyyy..

Posted by: Suzannaquanashawn | June 19, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Remember the campaign finance reform that McCain sponsored and many Republicans opposed? Opponents argued that all that money going to candidates was free speech.
So Obama, without even getting the big donor money from lobbyists and such, is setting financing records by getting small donations from over 1.5 million individual supporters. That’s democracy in action. Republicans should be all about this type of fundraising.
They’re obviously just mad because it’s not their guy getting the most cash.

Posted by: Patrick | June 19, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am

If you ask me, this is not a time for waste, this is a time for prudence in government spending. Obama is setting good example. McCain should be bold enough to declare that the system is collapsed just like Obama. The fact he promised to use public funding does not make the promise right. He is talking straight with you and your candidates. Hate the man but you cannot take his onus from him.

Posted by: Check mate | June 19, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Wait, I’m confused. Is this “Change” or “Nuance”? Which of those should I “Hope” for and which should I “Believe” in?

Posted by: Matt | June 19, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

This has nothing to do with McCain this has to do with Big Business and now Obama is on their payroll. Change? Give me a break, this is just more of the same old c*ap!

Posted by: Dorel | June 19, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

marie,
IT’S JUST OK TO BE FOOLED ONCE…LEARN FROM IT…BUT IT’S JUST TOO SILLY AND TOO DUMB TO BE FOOLED TWICE OR MORE…NEVER LEARNED FROM IT…. THAT’S EXACTLY WHAT YOU HAVE BEEN, OBAMA SUPPORTERS… FOOLED AND TRICKED BY OBAMA MORE THAN ONCE….

Posted by: neil1785 | June 19, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Disgusting. As a Hillary Democrat, this guy will never get my vote. When we file our tax returns, we designate funds for this purpose. As a hard-working American, I expect that this money is going to be used by these people. We need to ensure that the source and the amount of the funding he receives is reported to the American people.

Posted by: benvictor | June 19, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Notice how all the supporters of Sen. Barack Obama [esp. the really young naive ones] are reacting to his blatent breaking of a steadfast and moralistic promise are defending him by simply says, “Who cares!” and “Its not a big deal!”. WOW. GREAT arguments guys! Well-intentioned Barack is about to find out what it takes to play hardball politics and he is going to crumble. Hillary was compassionate, well-intentioned, AND TOUGH. She would have made an excellent “Madam President”

Posted by: PhillyPaul | June 19, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Another Obama Lie and BROKEN promise. His word is no good, dont trust this elitist. Maybe us BITTER Americans are just out of touch with his socialist attitude. He is a danger to this Country. Dont’ fall for this slick talking Lawyer.

Posted by: Dean | June 19, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

You know what’s really sick. The fact that everyone is making a big deal out of this, and you have Republicans posing as Hillary supporters, and so-called Barack Supporters to say they are “deeply dissapointed” and will not vote for him.
Let me tell you all something…. Barack not taking public financing is not what put you out of your homes, or cost you your jobs, or placed you in an endless war where we spend $12 BOLLION DOOLARS A MONTH!
McCain has said on numerously that he doesnt’ understand the economy. And so who does he get to run his campaign? Phil Gramm.. the same man who Lobbied for ERON, and who many economists have labeled as the part of the cause of the mortgage crisis.
Charlie Black, another Eron Lobbyist, and a lobbyist for foreign tyrants!
These are the people who is running his camp, and these are the people who’d tabs YOU will be paying if McCain wins.

Posted by: LeAnn | June 19, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

While answering a questionaire isn’t a binding agreement, he shouldn’t have said it. I don’t blame him at all for making this move but it looks bad for the moment. He is raising an incredible amount of money from average citizens and has the opportunity to make this a true nationwide general election campaign. Why concede Georgia and NC due to lack of funds when you have the chance to win? There will be massive amounts of money raised by the RNC and PAC groups on the Republican side. And as they say, “Don’t bring a knife to a gun fight.”

Posted by: TSnow27604 | June 19, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

Dean, you sound pretty bitter to me.

Posted by: TSnow27604 | June 19, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

LeAnn -
Just remember, don’t strive to achieve too much, don’t work in the private sector, work for the gov-ment
Michelle Obama

Posted by: Obama Supporter | June 19, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

How long have presidential candidates been using public financing. Have others opted out? Seems to me that all candidates in recent memory have used public financing attempting to play on a level playing field

Posted by: smith | June 19, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

People have actually lost their moral standards. Obama should be applauded for his unquivering stands for truth most of the time and willingness to admit to your faults. It is not a weakness to look people in the eyes and tell them the truth even when you may have been wrong in judgment rather it is strenght of character that helps people make decisions no matter the consequences. Talking tough on war issues and bla bla blah on iraq is am outright display of weakness on McCains side, he need some learning to do at his age.

Posted by: Check mate | June 19, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

Perhaps this wouldn’t have been necessary if McCain had been stronger on denouncing the 527s that were helping his campaign. And I think the very fact that he’s taken a strong pledge to not accept money from Lobbyists and PACs is a great change. So who cares of 2 million more American’s finance his campaign.

Posted by: Irishspacemonk | June 19, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

So just where is this 200 million plus that Obama has supposedly raised coming from ? Its not from the average American family for sure !! Who is bankrolling this media wonder ? Lets find out now before he actually is the nominee. The results may surprise quite a few of you with the stars in your eyes

Posted by: junglejim123 | June 19, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

It doesn’t matter how many promises he broke the fact that he isn’t taking tax payer money for his campaign is a breath of fresh air. But if you think he or McCain will make ANY difference once in office you haven’t begun to understand the source of the problems.

Posted by: Uncle Sam | June 19, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

MCCAIN BROKE HIS WORD TO OBAMA TO REFORM THE BROKEN CAMPAIGN FINANCE SYSTEM. What was Obama supposed to do? Let the republicans play their rope a dope PAC, LOBBYIST,527 moves. Remember the 527 money, that Obama condemns? McCain is surviving on it! That is what brought down every Dem candidate since Dukakis, especially the “swift boat” moves on Kerry. Obama is being the ethical and honest one. McCain and his supporters are using typical right wing manipulation and lies again.

Posted by: bob10001 | June 19, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

I feel sorry for all the people who were sucked in by his promises.

Posted by: Melissa | June 19, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Some folks like TSnow above claim that FEC reports show Sen. Obama taking corporate money because they can’t properly read the data. If they looked closer they would see that those are the listed companies of the INDIVIDUALS who donated. It is a little hard to imagine people without jobs donating a lot of money. It is also interesting that a Republican slams someone for NOT using government money. Too funny.

Posted by: Eric | June 19, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

If McCain does not make similar decison, I will vote obama who has the ability to stand up for truth. We republicans should be ashamed of ourselves. What do we stand for anyway? Bush and his cronies including McCain has messed up all standard the American people look up to us with. McCain should take the same step or Obama has my vote. White elderly man.

Posted by: G.O.P Has to change | June 19, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am

Wow, this will truely be a publicly funded campaign, supported by donors like me who send in $20-$30 at a time. A campaign funded by We the people, what could be better?
Why should he tie his hands behind his back when everybody knows the millions upon millions of dollars raised by the Republicons in order to Swift Boat the Democratic candidate, is all run by the Republicon National Committe and is all a part of their campaign anyway. I’m glad Obama is not falling for that.

Posted by: Eileen From Maine | June 19, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am

nightthief, first of all your link is to Senate campaign financing, not the Presidential race. Secondly, I don’t think that’s showing industry contributions at all.
When you donate to a campaign, you have to list your occupation. Your link clearly shows that most of his money in the 2003-2008 Senate cycle came from individual contributions:
Individual Contributions $14,816,448 (91%)
PAC Contributions $1,301,378 (8%)
Candidate self-financing $0 (0%)
Other $248,011 (2%)
I’m not clear on what the “industry” chart is showing as the numbers add up to far more than the $16,365,837 raised by Obama in 2003-2008.
From your own link though, here’s Obama’s career fundraising:
Individual Contributions $280,843,385 (97%)
PAC Contributions $1,324,618 (0%)
Candidate self-financing $10,500 (0%)
Other $6,822,608 (2%)

Posted by: Patrick | June 19, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

“TSnow27604″ just wrote, “Why conceded Georgia and NC due to a lack of funds?”- Um, maybe to prove good on your earlier promises of “change we can belive in” and “a new type of politics”? With that statement, wide-eyed Barack follower “TSnow27604″ just turned into a Republican.

Posted by: PhillyPaul | June 19, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

kabooeky-
It is really said that you and everyone else on this board cannot.. will not provide me with what I requested.
ACTUALLY PROOF WHERE HE SAID I PROMISE, OR I PLEDGE TO TAKE PUBLIC FINANCING!
And on a second note, if money to his campaign wasn’t coming from the american people… then tell me how is it that he raised over $250,000 in one minute on Apr. 21 from ONLINE DONORS???!! And that wasn’t somethig run by the campaign… it was done by a freaking blogger on his website!
Once again… I want proof of him breaking a “promise” or “pledge” for public financing.
HERE IS YOUR PROOF
This is from a Washington Post interview.
If you are nominated for President in 2008 and your major opponents agree to forgo private funding in the general election campaign, will you participate in the presidential public financing system?
OBAMA: Yes. I have been a long-time advocate for public financing of campaigns combined with free television and radio time as a way to reduce the influence of moneyed special interests. I introduced public financing legislation in the Illinois State Senate, and am the only 2008 candidate to have sponsored Senator Russ Feingold’s (D-WI) bill to reform the presidential public financing system. In February 2007, I proposed a novel way to preserve the strength of the public financing system in the 2008 election. My plan requires both major party candidates to agree on a fundraising truce, return excess money from donors, and stay within the public financing system for the general election. My proposal followed announcements by some presidential candidates that they would forgo public financing so they could raise unlimited funds in the general election. The Federal Election Commission ruled the proposal legal, and Senator John McCain (R-AZ) has already pledged to accept this fundraising pledge. If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election.
Once again:
If you are nominated for President in 2008 and your major opponents agree to forgo private funding in the general election campaign, will you participate in the presidential public financing system?
OBAMA: Yes.
“Yes.” Not “Yes, but” or “Yes, with a caveat” or “We’ll have to wait and see.” The answer is “yes.” Period. Full stop.
Well, we have ourselves another Bill Clinton. I guess it depends on what the meaning of “yes” is.

Posted by: Mike M | June 19, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

An inflammatory headline with a mocking picture placed in front view can’t change the direction of the prevailing political winds. You simply can’t stop the wind.
Obama 08!

Posted by: Katrina | June 19, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Are you kidding? Who cares? Beat Bush and the Republicans!

Posted by: Homer | June 19, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am

I will cast my vote for Obama. He understand’s me and a lot of Ameircan people. Thank you. White elderly man for your remarks, well said, if McCain can’t hold the same standard with Obama on Finance, then he should count my vote out! This election is about American people and not business as usual

Posted by: Stewart | June 19, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am

“So just where is this 200 million plus that Obama has supposedly raised coming from ? Its not from the average American family for sure !! ”
Umm… that’s exactly who supplied the money. Obama was over 1.5 million individual donaters so far.

Posted by: Patrick | June 19, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

I am shocked… Shocked to find that a politician would make a promise and then not keep it.

Posted by: Richard | June 19, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Barack’s “followers” are talking as if Democrats backing Sen. Barack Obama are also not going to create “swift-boating” 527s against Sen. John McCain as well! They still seem to feel the need to hide their heads in the sand and not admit that Democrats use the exact same smear tactics that Republicans use to be elected. Barack just does it in a more subtle manner. [btw, this was written by a Democrat]

Posted by: PhillyPaul | June 19, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

As I read the comments, one thing is evident… our system is severely broken and some of its populist are even worst! The thoughts or lack of thought… anger… lies… and partisan nonsense is killing this nation and the thinking & rationalization is less (<) than my 9 year old.
McCain is a relic of the "Old Cold War" era… as is Cheney, Rumsfeld and the entire Bush national security team. He is equally old in his economic thinking and his "Reagonite" ideas. It is high time for the "Conservative Right" to adopt a new theme other than less taxes… less government! A trillion+ debt and the lack of a Katrina response in the last seven years ought to explain that there is no way to dress up the word “Less” because it will always equal = “Less” government response to the things Americans need in time of crisis!
Obama is a visionary, a once in a lifetime leader, whose destiny is to try to move forward an "Addicted" nation who has at times had a sick past… a nation while bursting at the seams with many problems… is still in denial that there is a substantial problem. He faces a massive chore of moving a sick addict forward, out of its comfort zone… into a new era… all the while with a plethora of interference in his wake!

Posted by: Cary Jeurould | June 19, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

It is shame that we can not even recognize that this Obama man mean well for common Americans. It is a good thing. I am republican but I will vote Obama not because of his party but because of the future of my kids, my kids do not have no future with war mongering BUSH/McCAIN. My love for America begins with common reasoning not party lines. God bless America

Posted by: Lewis | June 19, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

I guess candidate of “change” is really candidate of “large bills.”

Posted by: Lisa S | June 19, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

He’s already setting the tone for “Worse Precedent In U.S. History!”

Posted by: Pocono Joe | June 19, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Some folks like TSnow above claim that FEC reports show Sen. Obama taking corporate money because they can’t properly read the data. If they looked closer they would see that those are the listed companies of the INDIVIDUALS who donated. It is a little hard to imagine people without jobs donating a lot of money. It is also interesting that a Republican slams someone for NOT using government money. Too funny.
Posted by: Eric | Jun 19, 2008 11:10:42 AM
————————————-
Yes all that corporate money is being bundled by the big cheeses there. That is how they get out from under the lobbyist label. Instead of using lobbyists to pass the money through they simply get together and bundle the money. Come on you know the game he is playing. No matter how you slice it, it still shows the big money is coming from the usual suspects and not little donors. The big guys are still getting their piece just doing it a different way. No one individual can give more then 2k to a campaign so that 600k was not from one person but a bundled group from the big corps and they did not bundle the money because they like Saint O but because they want access if he wins and several of them have access already by being bundlers for Saint O.

Posted by: Kabookey | June 19, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

This isn’t the first or last promise this man will break before it’s all over. He is a shrewd opportunist who knows how to manipulate his way through the political maze. HE thinks he’s smarter than everyone else and has come to redeem and save us all from those bad men in Washington. PLEASE – give me a break. He’s just like they are and will prove to be another failure like his idol, Jimmy Carter. When we we learn????

Posted by: Bethy | June 19, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Obama; words matter, so do commitments. Well, I don’t live in either New York or LA so when the lawyers don’t prevent another 9-11 so be it. Then there is Iran and Israel, well Obama has promised to deal with them too. OK when Obama become President, and he surely will, so be it too.
Able

Posted by: Able | June 19, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

I TOLD YOU SO!!!!
this guy is all about talk, misrable liar, he is so fake!

Posted by: nancy sabet | June 19, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

= Obama, enough said.

Posted by: Billy Bob | June 19, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Politicians break promises all the time. If McCain gets elected, he’ll break some promises too. But he’ll do it slyly by claiming something to do with National Security or some other form of an excuse. People this is nothing new. And for that update from the McCain Campaign, if that is not the pot calling the kettle black (no pun intended with the word “black”) I don’t know what is.

Posted by: bspia2 | June 19, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Hey, but this is Change. Flip flopping is change. I designate that part of my taxes go to public financing, but flip-flopping makes a mockery of our system. Hillary would have accepted public financing, and Al Gore did. Can this be attributed to a lack of faith in the American people?

Posted by: benvictor | June 19, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

As time goes on, we see more and more of the real O’bama, a liar that can’t speak with a script or a teleprompter. He panders more the Hillary and Bill ever did. He changes with the wind, a chameleon. Change? How is this change?
He is a puppet and Soros and the far left are pulling his strings.

Posted by: ricardo maxwell | June 19, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Correction: He can’t speak WITHOUT a script or a teleprompter!

Posted by: Ricardo Maxwell | June 19, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

So if he said one thing; but did another, then when he says he is ONLY going to raise taxes on the RICH, what will he really do?

Posted by: Confused | June 19, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Jake Tapper hasn’t mischaracterized anything. Obama promised to take public financing. Now, he’s broken the promise using weak excuses like the RNC has more money and those evil 527′s will come after him as if there are no 527′s on the Democratic side. I don’t remember hearing that Obama told MoveOn.org to cool it. I guess those 527′s are good 527′s. So much for the reformer, the new politician. What a hypocrite and so are his supporters who are willing to overlook Obama’s broken promise to win.

Posted by: possumv | June 19, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Let us see if McCain will respect the American people and take the same line with Obama on this. This is all about management. I am a Republican but gosh, our party stinks with double standards. Obama is outsmarting powers that be. Gosh! if McCain do not take his line on this then I will vote Obama because what he is doing right now is for the good of Americans and not politicians. That is how it ought to be!

Posted by: shirley | June 19, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Um, “LeAnn”? Demanding for Barack’s signature to prove a belief, promise, or pledge [that he stated MANY times, & NOT just on a questionarre] just comes across as desperate & pathetic. Sort of like the man himself looks now.

Posted by: PhillyPaul | June 19, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

To Lewis:
You are a great american and a man of commonsense.
It’s good to know that some of us are still able to rise above our sentiments. That’s maturity !!!

Posted by: Independent | June 19, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

This won’t be the first or last promise this man will break before it’s all over. This man vows to save us all from those bad men in Washington which is joke since he’s as bad, or worse than they are because he’s a con man. He’s all style and no substance and a very shrewd manipulator to have gotten this far on pure fluff. He’s an opportunist like all the rest of Washington and nothing more than a clone of Jimmy Carter and we all remember what a disaster he was – all you idealists out there who are so impressed with him are in for some big disappointments!!! God help our country – the last thing we need is another Jimmy Carter!!!

Posted by: BethyBumble | June 19, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

It’s no surprise that Obama is breaking his pledge – with Democrats we learned long ago that yes means no and it depends what the meaning of ‘is’ is. Some may chalk this up to just another sleazy politician taking us all for fools. Obama fanatics prove they’re no different than their messiah by mindlessly parroting his illusions.
And that’s the real story here – Obama supporters are some of the most shallow voters I have ever met. Clinton supporters knew what their candidate stood for and could explain details about her plans for America. Obama speaks in platitudes, reveals an astonishing ignorance that belies his inexperience, and as we have seen today – is as dishonest as any other politician he pillories. But his supporters, seduced by HOPE and high on CHANGE, praise their savior without any sense of what it is they are actually voting for. I expect that America will see this clown for what he truly is – a charismatic far-left activist who’s avarice is as bitter as his voice is golden.
You’re just another shyster politician. Thanks for showing us that today Obama…

Posted by: Evrviglnt | June 19, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

felder, your right, business is the problem in this country, we need to just do away with business.

Posted by: Billy Bob | June 19, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

don’t blame me I supported Hillary….as do the majority of the people in the U.S…this is just one of the first of his broken promises with many more to come.

Posted by: bharper | June 19, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

LeAnn,
The link to the Common Cause questionaire where he made the pledge is right there in the story for goodness sake!
Don’t get mad when the facts disillusion you. Obama isn’t what you believe him to be, he breaks his word.
If he had any principle, he would have answered “No” (which I would’ve preferred) to the question, or not broken his pledge when it favored him to do so.
I wish Obama supporters would look at him at least a little critically.

Posted by: Andy | June 19, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

If Obama was raising just $5 million monthly, would you mccain lovers be bothered at all if he opted out of public funding?

Posted by: Independent | June 19, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

“If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,” Obama said at a fundraiser in Philadelphia Friday, according to pool reports.”
Obama’s recent rhetoric now makes more sense. McCain will play him like a banjo.

Posted by: PG | June 19, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Mr. Clean loves that green. It’s a “parallel public financing system”, yeah that’s it. It operates this way, Sen. Obama solicits donations and backers send in checks. That’s not public financing!

Posted by: hopesprings52 | June 19, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Rev Wright said it best ….he is a politician and will say what a politician has to say. You guys all think that Obama is pure as the driven snow….Better think again. He will not remember any of you guys once he is in office. None of them do. It is all about what they are going to get and how good their life will become.
The USA is going down the tubes fast and Obama can’t stop it.

Posted by: Barb | June 19, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

To Independent;
Well said.

Posted by: CommonSense | June 19, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

Hey Pete if you think John McCain is conservitive just because he is a republican then you need to go back to school or something. He is a RINO republican in name only. His voting record is more liberal than some Democrats. He is a POSER, but unfortunately Mr. ICAN CHANGE THE WORLD is starting to look like a bigger poser. I cant believe that in this day and age America can only come up with these two as candidates. Why can’t we have a really SMART pres?
I don’t give a ____ if he/she is a gay,straight,black,white,hispanic,asian,kinda old,kinda young,dem,rep,etc… as long as they are exceptionally smart,have common sense and a little bit of vision we should be on the right track. This country is in way to big a hole to nominate idiots like the two we have running. When will the BIG party’s get a clue and nominate some true intellectuals that could actually do this country some good?

Posted by: typical-old-white-person | June 19, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

“The fact is, once McCain said that he would do NOTHING to police the 527s and the RNC, he lost this battle. At that point, there was NOTHING to negotiate.”
Exactly, the republicans care little about fairness. They will try to cheat lie and steal away this election like they have done the last 8 years. I commend Obama for this.

Posted by: Jim | June 19, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

PG – Thanks for the news on Obama’s comments – I hadn’t heard them.
This is further proof that Obama is nothing more than a marionette of Chicago’s Mayor Daley and Organized Crime.

Posted by: Obama Supporter | June 19, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Wait, I’m confused. It clearly states in the article that he said he would forego the soft money if McCain also agreed to do so. That didn’t happen. How is this “breaking a promise?”

Posted by: firedmyass | June 19, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

True Colors-
His true colors are starting to come out. I blame the national media for becoming part of the story instead of reporting on it. While Hillary was bashed to no end, the MSM was swooning over Obama- not showing his true colors. What are his true colors? He is a seasoned politician from Chicago. He is part of the establishment he talks against. New Politics? Same old Same Old.
Then why did the DNC push superdelegates to choose him over Hillary in breaking the virtual tie?
Money.

Posted by: Evelyn | June 19, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

Obama actually found a way to break a promise BEFORE being elected! Way to go chimp, you are the new record holder for the earliest broken campaign promise. What is next to be broken? Your sudden patriotism?

Posted by: Confused | June 19, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am

I am very disappointed in Obama for doing this, but what am I to do? I disagree so strongly with McCain on the issues that I can’t vote for him.

Posted by: James | June 19, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

America should get used to the broken promises. The fairy tale of Hope and Change is quickly becoming a reality–Obama is just another dirty politician.

Posted by: cindy in nc | June 19, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Seeing how Obama’s average contribution is less than $100.00, I’d say he already is publicly financed.

Posted by: geirgo | June 19, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Another broken pledge. Obama can’t buy the election if there are federal regulation looking over his shoulder, putting a cap on what he can spend. There will be no debates but a bare minimum, because Obama and Obama lobbyists are trying to buy election outright.
Dems were wrong when they let this fox inside, and it won’t help them in the long run. Obama outspend Clinton 3-1 and still lost elections, and when he looses the Dems are finished for a long time. No lobbyists will touch them. Win or loose, 352 superdelegates and Al Gore are wrong.

Posted by: Sylvia Johnsen | June 19, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am

For those of you who think we’ve been doing the right thing in IRAQ and feel you’re safer from the Terrorist Boogeyman halfway around the world, walk down a street around midnight in South Central Los Angeles, NW Washington DC or North St. Louis, MO and tell me what you think, if you survive Better yet, ask those in Minnesota who survived the I-35W bridge collapse or the families of those who didnt…
Is the continued “Democratization” of Iraq worth running up the credit card from the National Bank of China to the tune of 12 BILLION DOLLARS PER MONTH for a bunch of people who may not be able to run their democracy anyway? The troops have done their jobs DESPITE being put in a horrible situation by it’s leadership. The Iraqis are squandering it, but McSame wants to come home with victory. I say my brothers and sisters in arms have already won.

Posted by: PHCDR Herm | June 19, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

Depends what your definition of “promise” is. The bottom line is he said what people wanted to hear, then did what was best for himself. Very early in the race to show yourself as a liar.

Posted by: Mr. Slick | June 19, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

Wow – Obama lied. He lied about wanting to ban handguns, he lied about not knowing about Wright’s racist sermons, he lied, he lied, he lied.
The big story should be what he didn’t lie about. Are we sure about anything he says?
That’s why we should not entrust this country to a man with less tenure in the US Senate than Dan Quayle. Obama makes Quayle look like a nuclear scientist.

Posted by: James Marsden | June 19, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

That was not the promise he knew!!!

Posted by: spock | June 19, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Changing the rules in the middle of the game?
Maybe we should count those FLORIDA and MICHIGAN votes after all, eh?
Notice how this LAWYER BOZO waited until after the primary, to announce his use of 527′s, er, private funds?
Typical liberal loon lawyer.
Can’t be taught.
Can’t be trusted.
Can’t be anything but a traitor, when unaccountable $$$ comes rolling down the pew.
Oh well.
HILLARY HAPPENS.

Posted by: obamish | June 19, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

The DNC is sham–they bullied the superdelegates into endorsing a weak, inexperienced candidate with poor judgement and questionable character.
The DNC should fit in nicely with the dirty politics in Chicago.

Posted by: riley | June 19, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

I’m not for Obama, but it seems strange to me that the bad guy is the one who WON’T accept public money.
I know the issue is more complicated than that, but it still seems weird.
Private money is how both of them got to where they are now. It’s not like we’ve every had a serious candidate with a net worth of $10K.

Posted by: GlobalObserver | June 19, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

So much for Obama being a different kind of politician like he promised. Face it, he’s just like all the rest. I can’t believe that he is blaming it on the Republicans that he “must” do this. I’ve never trusted people who blame their actions on others.

Posted by: Missy M | June 19, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

What Obama really meant was….
It’s sad how desperate people are that they would cling so tightly to this empty-suit. He’s not who you think he is.

Posted by: Mack | June 19, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

My last comment made no sense I forgot that McCain did not refuse to stop accepting public financing. That kind of kills my argument, sorry Jake.

Posted by: dufarge | June 19, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

Sadly obama supporters know little about him… the fact that he and his chief of staff are products of the ‘Corrupt Democratic Chicago Machine’… where multiple federal investigations are underway, where obama’s friend and fundraiser was just found guilty, where he attended a racist hate church, etc. etc. etc. Not to mention his complete lack of experience and his pathetic voting record (voting cowardly present over 100 times).

Posted by: curtis | June 19, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

ONE POINT FIVE MILLION AMERICANS deciding to donate to Obama’s campaign = REAL CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM.

Posted by: Count All the Votes--Even the caucus states | June 19, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Obama’s nickel and dime contributions mean nothing. Gore, Kerry, Ron Paul all had them.
Just proves Republicans are smarter by saving $100 and just pulling a lever.

Posted by: Nobel | June 19, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

If he did not opt-out in the face of the Rove-politics campaign MC Bush is mounting, I would have to wonder if he has the sense to run the country.
I am happy……. I hope with my help and a couple million other small doners like me he will bankrupt the RNC and their 527′s in a 50 state campaign.
Go get’em Barak

Posted by: SDindependent | June 19, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Our current no nothing president had to rely on Cheney, Rove and Rumsfeld. Who will this no nothing candidate have to rely on for his on the job training?

Posted by: Mack | June 19, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

President McCain will veto Obama’s second piece of legislation.
The Obama Contributor Relief Act.

Posted by: Nobel | June 19, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

Flip
Flop
Flip
Flop
Wow, the DNC really picked a winner this time…
VOTE FOR HILLARY

Posted by: Kim in Texas | June 19, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

How foolish of Sen Obama. Whether or not it was actually a pledge between Obama and McCain is a minor issue at this point. By going for private funding, he will open himself up to full scrutiny of each and every private contributor to his campaign. The media will find out who the ringers are and they will pounce on them. He could have avoid that if he stayed with public funds. Now, he better pray that one of these private donations isn’t somehow linked to some notorious entity.

Posted by: Robert | June 19, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Obama kept his promise. McCain made it clear the answer was “no.” I thought Republicans believed in the “power of the people,” not government. So why are they so threatened by the power of 1.5 million small contributors? Very telling, don’t you think?

Posted by: spudmctater | June 19, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

I love how Obama acts like he has no 527 groups when his campaign accounts are flooded with MoveOn.org money and Soros funded groups that run smear ads. Obama is nothing new. He is playing the same democratic playbook from 2000 and 2004. Hopefully history repeats itself another extreme left candidate is sent back to the Senate to finish his term…or perhaps Obama can get a job working for Al Gore.

Posted by: Kevin K | June 19, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

CommonSense, Obamas fundraising just went out the window with $4.00/gl gas. His supporters have to make a choice, support Obama or hitchike.

Posted by: billy bob | June 19, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

The whole point of gov’t financed campaigns was to keep big money donors out of the process – well Obama has small money donors making up the vast majority of his donations.
AND – if Obama said no to private financing that would prohibit me from being able to exercise my right to donate to his campaign and surely the Right Wing folks would not want to try and block my RIGHT as an American to donate to the candidate of my choice.

Posted by: Rob | June 19, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

OpenYour Eyes ==========================
You could be blind with eyes wide open.

Posted by: CommonSense | June 19, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

politician THEY ALL LIE AND LOOK AFTER THEMSELFS AND THERE FRIENDS. SO YOUR GOING TO VOTE FOR THE PERSON WITH ALL THE MONEY??? SO WERE VOTING FOR MONEY.
SO YOU NEED TO BR RICH??? I THNK EACH SHOULD GET 10MIL AND THATS IT AND TAKE THE REST OF THE MONEY AND GIVE IT TO THE POOR LIKE ME

Posted by: Fishbone | June 19, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

I’m sure all Obama had to do was mention the word SUE (the oil companies)…to get his fellow lawyers contributions.

Posted by: rktsci3127 | June 19, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Yhanks for answering the question!

Posted by: OpenYourEyes | June 19, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

vote money.

Posted by: Fishbone | June 19, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

I wonder if Barack committed a felony such as Nixon did back in the days if his supporters would justify it. As far as Barack is concerned. It is all about winning. The fact that he complains that Bush has no integrity is different when it comes to Barack. Keep on drinking.

Posted by: Jackie | June 19, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

This just in….Obama is a liar and a fake!
Hype! Hype! Hype!

Posted by: hillarygirl | June 19, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Media….Call him out on this. Call him out on lying about not taking lobby money. Educate people that he is, he is taking state lobby money. The fed lobbyists are sending it to the states and he’s taking it.
Obama is manipulative. He is a sexist.
Remember…in Iowa he played Jay-Z’s “Got 99 problems, but a Bitch Ain’t One.’ Stop giving this elitist free rides.

Posted by: BostonRules | June 19, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

I expected this to happen. I said it before and I’ll say it again, WE’RE SCREWED FOR THE NEXT 4 YEARS.

Posted by: That Figures | June 19, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Openyoureyes, They support him because he has nice posters that say CHANGE on them, and he can read from a teleprompter well. That is about as deep as it goes.

Posted by: billy bob | June 19, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

OpenYour Eyes ==========================
You could be blind with eyes wide open.
How do you justify voting for someone who has absolutely no economic policy, wants us in iraq till the end of time, flip flops on every issue from tax cuts to energy policy, admits he knows absolutely nothing about the economy.
How do you justify that? Go ahead and vote your sentiment and you will be sorry in the end.

Posted by: CommonSense | June 19, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

Obama sure seems to exemplify that famous quote “Politicians and diapers should both be changed regularly and for the same reason.”

Posted by: Pocono Joe | June 19, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

If Obama was going to do this, he should have done the right thing and never promised otherwise. ALL HIS PROMISES ARE NOW WORTHLESS. I am aghast at the Obama koolaid drinkers who lap up this dishonest typical political pose-one-way do-another-way garbage and act like its a wonderful thing. This is just the FIRST of MANY broken Barack promises and flip-flops. Not surprised – he is weak weak weak, and seems expert only at political expediency.
The arguments for why he flipflopped are not news – gee, politics is rough and he will have opponents, he didnt know that in 2007?!? – they are so lame only a diehard partisan could swallow them – Republican donors freeley giving to McCain and RNC is the ‘bad old system’ but millionaires like Soros and the Hollywood libs freely giving to Obama is something new and wonderful and a reason to chuck his promise!?! Nice try. Obama bashes 527s but *his supporters set up a pro-Obama 527 in Cali* during the primary! There is far more pro-Obama 527 money than any other! (check it out, John Edwards was onto Obama on this long ago). Obama is the biggest and most blatant hypocrite in politics in a long time, and there’s stiff competition on that!

Posted by: PJ | June 19, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

I guess the only “change” Obama is bringing is his change of morals.

Posted by: Ted | June 19, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

I don’t believe that Obama is getting all his money $5 at a time from little people. Why haven’t we seen a complete list of where he is getting his money? He is the one making such a big deal out of it- let him put his money where his mouth is and prove it.
I will have my calculator out to make sure it adds up.

Posted by: teri | June 19, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

OpenYourEyes =========================
Have you had time to study Obama’s policies?

Posted by: CommonSense | June 19, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

In the first place the system is broken and will stay broken until ‘We the People’ get up off our butts and tell our so called ‘Public Servants’ that it is OUR way or the highway; and you cannot do that while worrying which party to vote for.
The present mess we stand in is our fault for letting it happen. The politicians act the way they do because we have in so many words told them it is okay. For once we need to flip flop and change our minds.

Posted by: True American | June 19, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Obama promised to bring Change. What everybody is missing is the point that he has to be elected first before he changes anything. Therefore, for anyone to suggest that he has to sit there and play nice while RNC and McBush are raising record amount of cash is simply unacceptable. Doing that would rather be giving in. I say raise as much money as you can, and fight as hard as you can to win this election. Then the real Change starts.

Posted by: tony | June 19, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

commonsense, only a dumb fool votes for someone because of which party they belong too. A smart person, which I dont think you fit the bill, votes for the canidate that is best for the country.

Posted by: billy bob | June 19, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Tony -
So the end justifies the means?

Posted by: Obama Supporter | June 19, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Real change begins??
Isn’t that what Clinton said?

Posted by: Nobel | June 19, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

When are you people going to open your eyes – he has flip flopped on nearly everything he said in the primary on the money, on NAFTA, on terrorism – oh yeah and he thinks that we should give terrorists due process and spend taxpayer money to prove that they are terrorists and then more taxpayer money to incarcerate them for the rest of their lives. If Obama manages to get elected we are in big trouble

Posted by: Democrat for McCain | June 19, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Here we go again. Another flip-flopping Democrat. And the GE has only begun. More than 4 more months to witness the flip-flop art of Dems.

Posted by: ablanche08 | June 19, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Barack Obama knows the tricks of the enemy and now the enemy (Republicans) are running scared. Obama can raise hundreds of millions from simple 5 & 10 dollar Average USA Citizens WHO ARE FED UP!!! with the Republican Charade !!! And so the Republicans Are Cryn Foul,,,
Bye Bye John & Cindy McCain

Posted by: Buddy In Pa | June 19, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

What ever that needs to be done to que rid of the people responsible for bankrupting the US!!! For the rest of the world the US does not represent to be the most powerful country anymore (that’s only wishful thinking in part of some american minds)… you can’t be the most powerful when you don’t even have any money (china practically owns us) nor do the citizens!!! The dolar is not worth much any more… everybody has seen the mess that the US has gotten into with Irak they all say “we told you so” tell me again why the republicans should stay???

Posted by: goforit | June 19, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

billy bob =========================
So who is that best candidate ?

Posted by: CommonSense | June 19, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Obama proposes this pledge to use public financing then goes back on his word. This guy’s words are worthless. He cannot be trusted. He is a liar. The issue is Obama’s integrity or lack of it.

Posted by: geevill | June 19, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Obama has proven to be the very thing he says he is not. A typical Washington Politician. Just like every candidate running for office. The only difference between then are their visions for the future. They all just different flavored sh*t sandwiches. But what flavor will keep our enemies from over taking our country? Can’t say Obama is the man for that. As much as I don’t want a 3rd Bush term, it’s a better choice than a 2nd Carter term.

Posted by: Jim | June 19, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

BILLY BOB,
BASED ON OBAMA’S STATEMENTS LAST YEAR, HE HAS TO BE A LIAR NOW. IF HE LIES ABOUT THIS ISSUE HE WILL LIE ABOUT EVERY ISSUE. I WAS GOING TO VOTE FOR OBAMA IF HE PICKED HILLARY BUT NOW I WILL NOT – I WILL PROBABLY SIT OUT OR SWALLOW HARD AND VOTE MCCAIN.

Posted by: JIM | June 19, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

I’m tired of Obama’s flip-flop.
Sen McCain-08

Posted by: allison | June 19, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

So what? Obama found a much better and more democratic way to raise money. I’ve sent him two installments of $50 each during the primary. I’ll happily send him more. I’ve never given to a candidate before and I’ll lick dirt off the floor before I ever give money to either of the cesspools that pass for political parties. The only thing that would make Obama’s victory sweeter for me would be for him to be running as an independent… oh well, there’s always his second term in ’12 to wish for…

Posted by: tim | June 19, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

Good job Obama. McCain has been skirting the laws and raising as much money as he can. McCain even has a sceme where he takes money from the national GOP where donors can donate up to $73,000.00 per individual. McCain also uses his wife’s private jet to fly around to events. Thatmoney spent should count as a donation but it does not. Go Obama! I am giving you my $2,300.

Posted by: Jim | June 19, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Why is this NOT a good deal for Barack Obama and us Tax payers that he doesn’t want to use Tax payers money to run for office?
If Obama declines to feed at the public trough for his campaign, why is that NOT a good thing, as long as special interests are NOT funding his campaign?
And has that NOT being the case, since a VAST majority of his campaign money comes from little folks donating a few dollars at a time on the internet?
It sounds to me like John McCain, and others who are taking Obama to task for refusing to limit himself to public money are DEATHLY AFRAID of what his fundraising PROWESS will do to them in the campaign money chase.
Give me a break, already!

Posted by: KYJurisDoctor | June 19, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Who was it that had over 900 unpaid parking tickets and then paid them when he decided to run for President? Who was it that couldn’t disown his pastor until the public outcry was so loud he threw him under the bus? Who is it that counts among his friends those who would bomb other Americans? Who is it that got a sweet-heart loan to buy property from a shady embezzler? Whi is it that professes change and then changes his promise?

Posted by: Bruce | June 19, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

commonsense, that really goes with out saying, just do your homework and research, who is the most qualified to lead. Who has the experience? Who has been there and done that? Its a very simple choice.

Posted by: billy bob | June 19, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Where is the change, Senator Obama? Like John Kerry, you flip-flopped. Like Bill & Hillary Clinton, you went against your words. WHERE ARE THE CHANGES?

Posted by: ablanch08 | June 19, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

OBAMA IS CHANGE….
He’s CHANGED his MIND!!!!!

Posted by: Obama Supporter | June 19, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

This is what I have been saying all along… Obama is a fraud, a liar, a typical politician I saw through him on day 1. He did NOT FOOL ME. Neither did Bush. I hope now the Democrats loose big time… they deserve it now… I will go independent or maybe McCain. I will never vote for this vorciferous liar and his liar anti american wife. They are both frauds. He has no backbone to be the president.. and unfortunately all the SUPERDELEGATES made sure a very qualified woman would NOT BECOME THE FIRST PRESIDENT. Insted they chose a crooked politician that is out the drawer with steak knives to support his own ambitions. Do you really think he wears the flag pin now just because of change of heart? It was cause the Super Dees told him he better if he wanted their vote. Rev Wright has done this man and his wife well. Now they have to give her a make over… lol! why? cause she is so unlikeable and so un first lady like… they were scared to let her run with it.
This is going to be a nightmare American will not soon forget…. he will be worse than Bush. You people want him? You people will probably, sadly get him!@!!
Our only hope was Senator Clinton.
Hopefully the women will stick together and vote against him.. either independent or McCain… at least he is an American we can count on.

Posted by: jojo | June 19, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

So what? Guess a man’s word does not mean anythig to some people anymore. The moral compass of this country has gone to hell. That is so many people do not respect each other or themselves.

Posted by: Jim | June 19, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

OpenYourEyes ========================
Well, since you have not looked at Obama’s policies as compared to Mccain’s, it looks to me like you’ve got other things against Obama.

Posted by: CommonSense | June 19, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Glad to hear that you have seen through Obamas shallowness Jim.

Posted by: billy bob | June 19, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

Izzy, the lead in the movie “Liar, Liar” compulsively spoke the truth no matter how much it hurt him through the majority of the movie. I agree, Barack Obama would have been perfect.

Posted by: John | June 19, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

How many lies do you have to hear before you hear the lie?

Posted by: Bret | June 19, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Another “flip-flop” for Obama. First, he was against NAFTA, now he’s for it. He was for public financing, now he’s against it. I see what his campaign of “change” is all about….the right to change your mind at any given time. He doesn’t want public financing, because that would put a cap on his campaign expenditures…without it, he can still get all the money he wants from James Sorrels (anti semitic) and other questionable donors. I see this as a way that Obama will be setting up favors for them if he gets elected President. Obama is dangerous and his true character is slowly being revealed. He has a hidden agenda.

Posted by: david from texas | June 19, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

So what? He decided to “opt out” not break a promise. Your bias is showing.

Posted by: Paul W. - Houston, TX | June 19, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Where has Obama’s money been coming from??? $5-$10 on line contribution? I don’t buy it. Has any news media really looked into this?

Posted by: James | June 19, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Obama, a politician for sale. To the highest bidder.

Posted by: Packrat | June 19, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

Different Jim’s. Fomr now on I will be Jim #1

Posted by: Jim #1 | June 19, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

John:
That was only AFTER he was forced to tell the truth. So far Obama has not been forced to truth up on anything. So, he is the perfect guy for the role of an incessant LIAR. I’m not sure all his kool-aid drinkers could handle the truth if he were forced to tell it about himself.

Posted by: Izzy | June 19, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Republicans are double-talking,
double-dealing, double-faced
deceivers. Obama campaign did
the right thing. That’s exactly
how you drub those double-crossers
and their dirty doings.

Posted by: anon | June 19, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

News flash anon. Damn near ALL politicians are double-talking,
double-dealing, double-faced
deceivers. On ALL sides. That includes every candidate running for POTUS. Can you not accept that fact??

Posted by: Jim #1 | June 19, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

I can not find where Obama “promised” to participate in the public financing system for the general election. I see where he thought he might, I see where he proposed to “if”……..but I can’t find where he actually commited to use the public finance system.
And for those idiots out there who are trying to stir up s@#t by asking why we will support Obama in November here is my answer.
I will vote Obama in Nov. because he has committed to changing our Foreign Policy. ie getting us our of Iraq and keeping us out of any other sham wars. He has committed to fixing our crumbling infrastructure. ie bridges, levees, roads etc.
And because he has committed to changing our current economic system. ie. the outsourcing good American jobs to foreign countries, stopping corporations from raping and pillaging our blessed country to line their CEO’s pockets with gold and giving the American middle class a real chance to prosper and flourish.
Buray98
Pasadena Tx.

Posted by: Jewel Gray | June 19, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

I was an Obama supporter, but now I feel being cheated. I have not seen any evidence that he will bring this country together. All I have witnessed is the opposite, at least from this website.

Posted by: Pat | June 19, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

After 8 years of Dubya in the White House, and all the irreparable damage he’s done to this country, and the world, the Democratic Party needs a Presidential win like never before.
And so, in this time of extreme pressure and absolute necessity for a Democratic Victory in November, what do we do? Common sense would dictate that we choose a candidate who’s absolutely sure to win the White House in November, right?
Nooooo…
We instead decide to “take a chance” and make ourselves some history by placing Hillary and Barack out as our two frontrunners for the Democratic Party nomination. Hillary’s a great woman, and a smart lady; she’s got a few political skeletons in her closet, but who doesn’t? Still, I fear there are lots of people in this country who aren’t yet comfy with the idea of woman in the White House, no matter how smart, confident or qualified she is to be there.
And Barack… good guy, I think. Smart guy. Visionary, many say. He’s my age, and how cool would it be to have somebody that young in the White House?
But, his middle name is “Hussein” and his last name rhymes with “Osama”. You do the math, and tell me how that sits with the millions of Walmart Shoppers buying “Git-R-Done!” t-shirts on Saturday afternoon.
I’m not sexist, and I’m not racist. I’d elect Oprah in half a heartbeat. And I’d love to think the good people of this country are smart and progressive enough to elect a black man or a woman President, and do something positive to lift this awful veil of gloom and depression that seems to have engulfed our country.
My fear is that they’re not.
God, I hope I’m wrong.

Posted by: Scott | June 19, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

anon
So, Obama lies once again and you’re OK with that? Wow!

Posted by: A | June 19, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Obama = Just words, not action!
Obama = Flip flop politician!
Obama = Another swift boat of Democrat!
Obama = Mr. “Hope”. Will “Change” his mind on any issue that is suitable for his political career!

Posted by: NoObama in Dallas, TX | June 19, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

Obama: Another word for shallow!

Posted by: Soetoro No! | June 19, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

To BillyBob – it’s been my experience that all Jims are confused.

Posted by: Scott | June 19, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

At least we have not had another attack since 9-11. Not to give Bush credit for that shows your ignorance. Bush has let me down on many levels after I voted for him twice. But glad he was in office then and not a lieral that would have apologized to the terrorists for last 7 years while kissing their behinds.

Posted by: Jim #1 | June 19, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

kmw0382: Do you really think Obama supporters understand facts? They’re all too busy with undefined hope and unspecified direction.

Posted by: A | June 19, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Good information from redfish below. In reality, he’s not getting the bulk of his financing from grassroots support as the campaign likes to claim. The money is coming from corporations and rich, elite liberals.

Posted by: Juju | June 19, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

This is not a flip flop, this is called winning an election on private donations. That means individuals, not corporations. Exactly the opposite that you are trying to imply. I’ve sent him four installments of $25.
That’s where his money is coming from, people like us.
McCain flip flopped on torture, tax cuts for the wealthy, and changing our foreign policy.
And you guys try to compare that to changing your campaign to run off of citizen donations?
For shame.

Posted by: Jason | June 19, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

Sorry, that should have been “shows one’s ignorance”, not “shows your”

Posted by: Jim #1 | June 19, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

I just read Jim #1′s post toward the top. He’s an idiot… brainwashed into thinking that Dubya has been “protecting” him. Jim #1… you’re not even bright enough to call yourself a Republican. LOL

Posted by: scott | June 19, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

Andrew -
Your suffering from a “Shoot the messenger” mentality. If Obama wins you’ll swear that Rupert Murdoch bought all the news organizations, for the attacks will come swift and often.

Posted by: Obama Supporter | June 19, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

If you want to elect a 21st century president who will again make America the most powerful and the most loved country in the world then vote for Obama.
John Mccain is certainly an American hero but he does not have intellectual capacity to lead this powerful nation.
John Mcain can be given a position of great responsibility in a Obama administration for his great service to this nation.

Posted by: Optimistic American | June 19, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

We don’t need change, we need dollars.
At least McCain probably already has a slot for Romney or Mitt wouldn’t have given up on the White House so easily for the sake of REAL UNITY.
After Bush/Cheney, Obama will have to pick someone even weaker than him, and that’s pretty weak. Carter Maybe? Is he too old? Bet he wouldn’t be for Obots.

Posted by: Nobel | June 19, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

…and he goes laughing to the bank as all you FOOLS donate your money. Wait, I think I can hear him laughing right now! Yes, give him your money. DO IT! All politicans are LIARS..

Posted by: ObamaFOOLS | June 19, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

We’ve always known that politicians will do anything to get elected … but it seems like every day there Barack Obama has “changed” his mind or “shifted” his view. But all the ignorant voter needs to remember is that he will bring you change that you can believe in.

Posted by: Jim #1 | June 19, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

So much for the “Change” candidate. His true colors are coming out…just another Washington politician. Get ready for the same old tired story. Blame everything on the GOP. Instead of trying to fix the “broken system” he is just going to do as others do. This guy is a real phony. GO BACK TO CHICAGO AND UNITED TRINITY CHURCH BARAK!!
Can we find someone with some guts in this country?

Posted by: Nick | June 19, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Hey, wait a minute…THAT’S what Obama meant, when he called himself the “candidate of change!”

Posted by: Wolf73B | June 19, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

McCain met with Bush and cronies in Phoenix Arizona, and walked out with 23 million in donations from the elite and corporate. He is bought and paid for. Obama works for the people, not corporations.
This change reflects this.
We cannot afford 4 more years of bought and paid for candidates.

Posted by: Jason | June 19, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Jason: What does that have to do with the fact that Obama is a stinking liar? Has he ever kept to his word for more than a week?

Posted by: A | June 19, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Well Scoot, educate me. Who is responsible?

Posted by: Jim #1 | June 19, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Can you guys even read?
Obama explicitly said he wanted to work with McCain on this. McCain’s campaign said “no.”
How is that breaking a pledge, when one party (McCain) didn’t live up to it themselves? McCain broke the “pledge” by not working with Obama, not the other way around.

Posted by: VM | June 19, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

Let me see am I surprised!!! No..not at all. I can’t believe I will be voting for a Republican.

Posted by: Meagansmon | June 19, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

Obama: Full of sound and fury. Signifying nothing

Posted by: Soetoro No! | June 19, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

Honestly, funny word to start a post on politicians, but for anyone to act shocked that a politician will do whatever it takes to get elected and to live the life of the “Do as I say, not as I do” parental figure to we the sheep, is comical. Vote based on what is important to you locally, but realize that the decisions made by the POTUS reach globally. Change for the sake of change is change. And not necessarily for the better.

Posted by: NHRaider | June 19, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

VM read the whole article, McCain camp said they were never contacted by Obama.

Posted by: billy bob | June 19, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

VM: You’re full of it!

Posted by: A | June 19, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Ok this is for all you who think Obama is “committed to changing our Foreign Policy. ie getting us out of Iraq” Please wake up.
Obama’s military adviser Gen. Tony McPeak’s response when asked:
Is Iraq the last country we confront in the Middle East?
Response: Who wants to volunteer to get cross-ways with us? We’ll be there a century, hopefully. If it works right.
Isn’t this the exact argument McCain has made repeatedly, and which Obama derides as “a hundred-years war”? Of course it is.
This should raise some eyebrows on the Obama campaign’s willful deception on this point. Didn’t McPeak bother to explain to Obama the exact same reasoning he had in March 2003, at the start of the war? Did Obama not bother to listen? Or did Obama just decide to demagogue on McCain’s point while gaining credibility by associating himself with a military adviser that publicly endorsed the exact policy as McCain?

Posted by: Izzy | June 19, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

OBAMA SUPPORTERS, this is a FLIP FLOP! THIS IS BREAKING A PROMISE! DO YOU GET IT????? I am an Obama supporter and I am very upset with this approach Obama has taken, because to me, its about winning, but under the pretenses that I had believed in. When you support OBAMA no matter what, you look silly, you like Bush supporters, you look like someone in love who could care less what these celebrity politicians do or become. They are here to serve YOU not the other way around, so do not delude yourself that Obama will be the answer to all your prayers and policy hopes, even if you do support him, please!

Posted by: jared | June 19, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Liar, liar, pants on fire!

Posted by: MikeB | June 19, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Obama bought his support of the young by giving away free concert tickets and promissing the world and now wants to be able to raise as much money as it will take to buy the election. He is just like fools gold but you people aren’t bright enough to tell the difference. It will be a very sad day for this country if he gets elected.

Posted by: rab5700 | June 19, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

After reading some posts from this website, I want to know who are Obama’s biggest donors. Is he receiving any money from any terrorist groups, since they like him a lot. The news media should do their job to look into this.

Posted by: James | June 19, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

I can’t blame Obama for changing his mind. (We are allowed to do that). Hell, McCain has done it more often than anyone else wants to remember.
If the RNC is going to turn a blind eye to the 527s (or whatever they are), then Obama and the DNC need to counter it.

Posted by: ThunderMonkey | June 19, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

I have to say that I was on the fence with who I was going to vote for. This has moved me to a solid McCain supporter. How can a candidate who is running on not being a typical politician say one thing and do another?

Posted by: Jeff | June 19, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

Izzy, Obama is just telling Obamanots what they want to hear to get elected. He has completly changed his position on Iraq since he started running. He knows we cannot just pull out of Iraq when he gets elected, he is slowly adjusting his position so his voters wont notice.

Posted by: billy bob | June 19, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

OBAMA…People in my workplace are not taking him seriously…He’s a laughing stock in wallstreet…They are either McCain or Hillary… Wherever I may be, be it at home or office, with friends, neighbors or relatives… whenever I meet people personally or online, a great majority is not taking him seriously because he’s not a serious candidate…barely 4 or 5 people out of a hundred believe in him… I guess, Obama’s gonna be a Toast in November….

Posted by: neil1785 | June 19, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Obama has said that “if there would be a Democratic administration, it will not take any irresponsible, reckless, sudden decisions or action to endanger the gains in Iraq, the achievements, the stability or security. Whatever decision he will reach will be made through close consultation with the Iraqi government and U.S. military commanders in the field.”
Ok ……. so what are we supposed to make of that? The most important issue for this country is terrorism, and our efforts in Iraq are our greatest front in that fight. So here we have a Democrat candidate who is promising his voters a speedy withdrawal … then we have a foreign minister who says a speedy withdrawal would be disastrous … then we have a Democrat candidate who says he is willing to consult with the Iraqi government on how to handle the situation … and then we have an Iraqi government that doesn’t want us to withdraw immediately.
Again, saying anythoing to get elected. Typical Politician.

Posted by: Jim #1 | June 19, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Empty rhetoric from an empty suit. Liberals will play dumb for Obama just as they played dumb for the Clintons…believe everything they say. Does anyone have any respect for their own common sense?

Posted by: Bobjob | June 19, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Jim, because he’s not a liar. The “pledge ” said “you would forego private funding if your opponent agreed.”
McCain did not agree. So Obama is going private funding ALSO.
You see there are loopholes, called 527′s. They are “independent” advertisements that have unlimited funding. So while they won’t say “Vote McCain”, they will just attack Obama with unlimited funding. See also: Swift Boat Liars for truth.
He did not break his pledge, he pledged to forego private funding if his competitor did. His competitor (bought and paid for McCain), naturally refused.

Posted by: Jason | June 19, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

an unfortunate reality

Posted by: Ronald | June 19, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

OBAMA supporters, stop defending him, by all accounts he broke a pledge; have you even been following this story at all???? McCain has nothing to do with this, come on! You look so foolish not to challenge your candidate at all, and it is a testament to why so many Dems are longing for Hillary to return — they were never delusional to believe she was squeaky clean, but damn was she fesity and smart, and less of a hypocrite than our adorned Presidential Messiah.

Posted by: Jeremey | June 19, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

So in a time of recession, in a time where citizens are struggling to pay for gas and groceries, he is going to take money from these people, and yes there will be low and middle income people who cannot afford to send any but will on the pretense of “hope” (I say buy a lottery ticket your odds are better.) He is such an elitist – “Send me money” and “Let them eat cake!” This dem, and yes I am, don’t accuse me of being a republican in disguise, is going to vote for McCain. He’s actually trying to get something done about the oil/gas, Obama is just sitting back letting the little people and media do his work for him.

Posted by: Jules | June 19, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

And now, Obama is even more beholding the those corporate dollars he falsy says he isn’t taking!

Posted by: Soetoro No! | June 19, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

Flip-flop Obama. What a typical politican he is. Hey all your sweeties who are in love with this guy, you need to wake up and see the real Obama. He and Michelle are programmed and primped by the press. They are not being themselves as they say they are true to their word. Obama and his Chicago cronies need to be shown that they cannot control everything about him. The public needs to know who this guy really is. What I now see I do not like.

Posted by: SeeingRed | June 19, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

Personal opinions are just what they are. It’s always easy to coach the game standing on the sidelines but try playing the game you’ll find your comments are limited. Portentous and ignorant remarks only shows the change this country needs to incur.

Posted by: Shelby | June 19, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

I was on the fence, but after reading the comments from McCain supporters who can’t even be bothered to read the article, I can’t vote for McCain. I will be voting for Obama.
The pledge was to forego private funding if McCain agreed, which he did not. So there was no pledge broken. If McCain supporters have such poor reading comprehension I cannot support him.
Also, I think he’s a flip flopper.

Posted by: John Smith | June 19, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Obama,you have learned a lot from the Clintons…LOL
Promise anything they want to hear,get the votes,then do as you please!

Posted by: CHAKA | June 19, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

What’s wrong with this? He doesn’t accept taxpayer money and his campaign success is determined by whoever decides to contribute. His contributors are pretty poor, including me, but don’t mind giving to the till with the stakes the way they are. McCain should do this too, but he needs to enliven his base a lot more for that to make difference.

Posted by: Richard | June 19, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

Obama continues to “flip-flop”. First he was totally against NAFTA, now he thinks its not a “bad idea”. He attacked Hillary because of her support of NAFTA, now he feels the same way. Now, he has opted out of Public Financing for the GE. Could it be that one of his biggest donors, James Sorels (proven anti-semitic) is contributing a lot of money to Obama, along with other questionable donors? Sounds like Obama is setting up promises to these people for when and if he gets into the White House. I’ve always felt Obama has a hidden agenda, and it seems daily now, with his flip-flopping, that he thinks he’s beyond reproach and the “real” Obama is beginning to show its true colors.

Posted by: david from texas | June 19, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

After this and Obama’s Machiavellian approach to the Iraq war, I am done; what has gotten into this guy other than being so crafty to win. The sad thing is, he’s got this in the bag, because I am not sure McCain can rise to the occassion. What a disappointment!

Posted by: Gerald | June 19, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

John Smith: Then vote for a guy who wouldn’t know the truth if it set on his lap and called him daddy!

Posted by: A | June 19, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

He’s like the bratty little brother. “Waaah, the REPUBLICANS made me do it!”

Posted by: No to Obamarxist | June 19, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

Dems should have kept Hilary. I can’t believe how foolish this party is. After the Bush years this election should have been a slam dunk for us.

Posted by: OpenYourEyes | June 19, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

I personally think that micro-donors to campaigns like Obama’s is the way to go. We are investing in a future administration, if he wins, and his obligations will be to us, the American people, instead of special interests, PACs and 527s.

Posted by: cincyr | June 19, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Republicans get money from corporations, Democrats get money from individuals. That’s why 527′s are unfair. Republicans will get unlimited funding for 527′s.

Posted by: Jason | June 19, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

What’s wrong with this? He doesn’t accept taxpayer money and his campaign success is determined by whoever decides to contribute. His contributors are pretty poor, including me, but don’t mind giving to the till with the stakes the way they are. McCain should do this too, but he needs to enliven his base a lot more for that to make difference.
Comment

Posted by: Ron | June 19, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Jason: How can you possible be so poorly informed?

Posted by: A | June 19, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

John Smith, you have written like three times that Obama has foregone the pledge because of McCain: NO NO, and another NO. Read up on this, not just this article. Again, this has NOTHING TO DO WITH McCAIN, you would have to be honest to God delusional to think Obama did not back out this promise, without a morsel of a doubt. JUST DEAL WITH IT!

Posted by: Sarah | June 19, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

JOhn Smith, are you blind, go back and read the article again, Obama never talked to the McCain camp before making this decision.

Posted by: billy bob | June 19, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

I guess I’m confused, why is rejecting public funding and paying your way a terrible thing? Why can’t a politician change his/her mind without being jeered at for flip flopping? Situations change, more information emerges, deeper thinking takes place. As for flip flopping, how many of us fully supported the invasion of Iraq based mainly on propaganda and then changed our minds based on more and better information. Call many of us flip floppers then. Such a terrible thing to use your best judgment AT THE TIME.

Posted by: 3dogmom | June 19, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Obama: “I ain’t flip-flopping. I just CHANGED my mind. Ya’ll want CHANGE, ain’t ya? I CHANGE but i don’t flip-flop.”

Posted by: ablanch08 | June 19, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Openyoureyes,
I support Sen. Obama because of his stance on tax reform and healthcare. His ability to praise other party’s ideals without alienating his own. Also, his ability to make the issues inclusive of all citizens, not those who believe the Bible and the consititution are written on the same cloth.
Sincerely,
R.

Posted by: Ron | June 19, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Jason, Rush wanted to divide the democratic party and have Obama the nominee, dont you know anything

Posted by: billy bob | June 19, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Friends, Republicans, McCain supporters.
You failed to read this paragraph:
“If you are nominated for President in 2008 and your major opponents agree to forgo private funding in the general election campaign, will you participate in the presidential public financing system?”
Did McCain agree to forgo private funding? I seriously, seriously doubt it. But if he did, show me proof and I’ll switch my vote today.

Posted by: Jason | June 19, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Ron: Obama has downright lied so man times, how can a rational person possible believe he’d deliver on any of his promises?

Posted by: A | June 19, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Jason: Yes McCain did. You should get out more often!

Posted by: A | June 19, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Obama said… “Senator John McCain (R-AZ) has already pledged to accept this fundraising pledge. If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election.”
McCain pledged to accept and Obama had a more nuanced approach. Let’s all be candid about this… his word is subject to the exigencies of a changing campaign.
This is the same candidate that said of NAFTA: “devastating” and “a big mistake” when he was going after the white-collar vote.
BUT NOW in an interview with FORTUNE he said in response to those statements: “Sometimes during campaigns the rhetoric gets overheated and amplified”. He is now backing off of those statements.
In other words – taking him at his word would just be naive on your part.
Now that’s “change you can believe in!”

Posted by: smartprimate | June 19, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Obama:
Tax reform = income redistribution
Ntl Health Care = nightmare
Has anyone even read about Canada and the UK who have national healthcare??

Posted by: Jim #1 | June 19, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Flip-Flop Obama… one of many to come. He’s dishonest…look at the people he hangs with, racist Wright, crooked Tony, Ares the terrorist, Jimmy the Mortgage Johnson..Obama is a sham, con artist, an empty suit.

Posted by: PKahnPie | June 19, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

“The Federal Election Commission ruled the proposal legal, and Senator John McCain (R-AZ) has already pledged to accept this fundraising pledge.”
To the post that claims John McCain did not accept public funding, here are Obama’s own words confirming that McCain in fact DID! Do your homework before spilling lies!

Posted by: clarkohrepub | June 19, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

hey jason, why not you go back a couple months when McCain made it clear he would take public financing and Obama began swirling away. McCain called him out on it and knew from inside his camp that they were backpedeling. You have to be 100 percent crazy if you think McCain would not agree to this, especially with all of his work on campaign finance reform and repeatedely in the press challenging Obama to accept his pledge. I mean just CRAZY!

Posted by: Hope | June 19, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

Since 2006 and the Democratic Congress, gas has gone up over $1.50 per gallon, and over $79.00 per barrel. Democrats will not change, thanks to Pelosi, who made a committment that when she took over as Speaker of the House, that America would be on the rebound. I have always been a Democrat, but not this year. I will change my party affiliation to Republican. Obama is Pelosi’s and Dean’s puppet and along with the media have presented him as a candidate of “change”. Well, now, with his flip-flopping and actions, I don’t see change, but a candidate who is full of himself and will only bring more turmoil and harm for America. He thinks he’s beyond reproach…and even the media feel the same way. C’mon Americans, wake up and realize what kind of liar we are dealing here with Obama…lets put an end to him in November. His backstreet, shady, Chicago politics will not work in the White House!

Posted by: david from texas | June 19, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

Billybob, Rush changed his story to wanting Obama to be the candidate when it was clear that Hillary had no chance to win. Until then he supported Hillary.
Essentially no matter who won he would claim that he “wanted them to win.” But his support for Hillary from the get go wavered only when it was obvious she could not win. It’s called saving face.
His story is no more reliable than a psychic who read the news and claimed to have predicted it.

Posted by: Jason | June 19, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

There is nothing more real than a man’s character and word. The track record of what he has actually done is far more important than anything he says, however elegantly he says it. He gave his word and then broke it just as he assured Tim Russert on Meet the Press that he would not run for president but serve out he term. Two weeks later he announced his running for president. Obama has no character; he’s a liar.

Posted by: Russ | June 19, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Obama makes Nixon look like a saint!

Posted by: Soetoro No! | June 19, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Flip flop…lololololol no ones has flip flop as much as mccain. are you people for real. lololo

Posted by: Becky | June 19, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

More flip floppers include those terrible politicians from many southern (and other) states. Many in the ’50s and ’60 were rabid segregationalists, shame on them for flip flopping their political positions under the logic represented in this chat line. What about their poor betrayed constituants? Tsk, tsk more empty rhetoric by politicians.

Posted by: 3dogmom | June 19, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Jason — yeah, sure.

Posted by: A | June 19, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Same old same old. not even at the convention yet and he’s already breaking one of his first campaign promises.

Posted by: Jim | June 19, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Jason,”The federal Election Commission ruled the proposal legal and Senator John McCain has already agreed to accept this fundraising pledge” This is spoken by Obama, welcome to the McCain Camp.

Posted by: billy bob | June 19, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

You Righters and Hillary cry babies are all alike. never read the fine print. Obama did NOT just answer yes. He qualified it in his narrative response. His yes was conditional upon McSameasbush agreeing to his proposition. McSameasbushnearlynothillary chose to go with the GOP327 approach. he now must live with obama’s fundraising ability and suffer the consequences.

Posted by: Al O | June 19, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

ASoIf is exactly right. No promise was broken by Obama.

Posted by: nixonland | June 19, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

This is an editorial article. Not an official story. I think that’s why McCain supporters are so confused.
The “broken pledge” headline is an opinion and not fact. He would’ve only broken the pledge if McCain agreed to forego private funding and he retained it. McCain, forego private funding? Nope. Obama would have, but without both on public funding that is an uneven playing field.
And some simpleton is saying Obama is bad for asking for donations from his supporters? What a laughing stock. You think McCain’s supporters won’t donate? What are you thinking?

Posted by: Jason | June 19, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Obama proves that you really can fool some of the people all of the time!

Posted by: Soetoro No! | June 19, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Ron-
1. Obama’s stance on tax reform: Increase the amount of tax that Businesses and families earning over $75,000 per year pay. You call that fair – it’s a recipe for HIGH INFLATION AND UNEMPLOYMENT – Sound a lot like the Carter Administration. Obama would be wise to follow John F. Kennedy’s tax reform : Lower taxes increases Revenue
2. Make healthcare available to everyone: Have you ever been to one of those “QuickCare” see a doctor with no appointment needed places? You pay about $40 and don’t need insurance. It sounds great if you have about 5 or 6 hours to wait to be seen. If Obama gives free healthcare it’ll be CHAOS.
3. Bible and Constitution written on the “Same Cloth”? Now your comming to the table with some left-wing talking points. No Republican or Conservative believes that.

Posted by: Obama Supporter | June 19, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

There IS NO so-called ‘breaking of pledge’!
A Harvard graduated LAWYER CANNOT be as stupid and naive as foolish opponents tried to deceive Americans he is!
Obama wisely stated a long time ago that it would be foolish to ‘unilaterally disarm’!
If WEALTHY outside groups are able to influence the campaign on behalf of McCain, then it would be foolish for Obama to not ALSO use his LEADERSHIP SKILLS to become as wealthy as he can, in order to successfully campaign!

Posted by: Patriot | June 19, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Jason, are you going to change to the Republican Party or are you going to pull an Obama and flip flop?

Posted by: billy bob | June 19, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

SPIN IT OBAMA LOVERS, SPIN IT

Posted by: ned | June 19, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Jason: What exactly is an ‘official story’?

Posted by: A | June 19, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

We are waiting Jason?

Posted by: billy bob | June 19, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

Tax reform are you kidding me. A dyed in the wool Socialist and he is for TAX REFORM. Inclusive of all citizens unless you happen to be a muslim standing near me while I’m running for president. Face it you don’t know this man. Have you even looked at his voting record. Is there really anything there that you take comfort from.
Admit it we should have kept Hilary and actually it’s not to late.

Posted by: OpenYourEyes | June 19, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

I believe politicians can change their minds on issues, however, breaking a pledge is not changing your mind, it’s being a coward taking the easy way out. It reiterates your honesty and trustworthiness.

Posted by: Cap | June 19, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

The Obama campaign is smart.
Knows how to fight fire with
fire. Dirty tricks with dirty
tricks. Republicans are getting
beaten to the punch.

Posted by: anon | June 19, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

This entire issue is silly.
Obama says one thing and does another. Are we really surprised. He is a polotician after all. McCain would most likely do the same thing. He is a polotician too.
But here is the crux of the matter imo. IF Obama is a polotician just like, or mostly like, all the others. Then what does he run on????
Cant use experience,
Cant use Tax and Spend,
I think i know why obamabots are so blinded in their defense.
If you remove his “Different kind of Polotician” message, your only left with the words of “hope” and “change”, with a stated policy of tax and spend.
Not exactly a winning formula.
The dems best candidate was John Edwards (not that i would support him). If you combined him with an obama VP spot.
Game over, the republican lock on the South is loosened and the electorial maps changes.

Posted by: Libertarian | June 19, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

“Republicans get money from corporations, Democrats get money from individuals.”
Wow, was this naive. The top three Democrat contenders this year were heavily funded by hedge funds. Hedge funds making a ton off the falling dollar. A falling dollar caused by higher oil prices. Higher oil prices cause by blocking production. Production of 68 million lease acres. Leased acres of mineral rights, not surface rights.
And the hedge funds get richer and the Democrat nominee now announces he will gladly accept every dollar they throw at him.

Posted by: Nobel | June 19, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

There IS NO so-called ‘breaking of pledge’!
A Harvard graduated LAWYER CANNOT be as stupid and naive as foolish opponents tried to deceive Americans he is!
Obama wisely stated a long time ago that it would be foolish to ‘unilaterally disarm’!
If WEALTHY outside groups are able to influence the campaign on behalf of McCain, then it would be foolish for Obama to not ALSO use his LEADERSHIP SKILLS to become as wealthy as he can, in order to successfully campaign!
Posted by: Patriot | Jun 19, 2008 1:49:46 PM
————————————
Well that wealthy Harvard Educated Lawyer was taken by Rev Wright, Rev Phleger, Tony Resko, William Ayers and the list goes one, so how educated is that wealthy Harvard Grad? Fact number two the dims and the unions and Soros will be spending way more smearing McCain and republican then any 527 group on the right will be spending so save the protection clause on that one. We already see the dirty ads coming from Soros now.

Posted by: Kabookey | June 19, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

I was always thought when you pledged something you were giving your Word. ————– How can you change a pledge? ———- Oh that is the change Obama has been talking about ———– Obamas Change = My word is no good

Posted by: David M. Neal | June 19, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Jason: What facts? You haven’t mentioned one once — just name calling and unfounded assertions.

Posted by: A | June 19, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Jason, if you are nominated for president in 2008, why would funding be an Issue???

Posted by: billy bob | June 19, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Why is anybody surprised that Obama broke his promise.This man is a liar and has always been a liar.This is a man who claimed that he never heard his preacher rant and later changed his story.His preacher knew he was a liar and said so.

Posted by: Iffymens | June 19, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

obama said in oct 2007 that he would accept public financing if he were teh nominee. mccain said he would do the same
obama is such a liar and hypocrite.
nobama

Posted by: kurt | June 19, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

When are the Debates ? Or is Obama too chicken now ?

Posted by: FloridaVotes | June 19, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

Count the lies and con tricks
McCain and the Republicans
have fooled you with.

Posted by: anon | June 19, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

Ned—The only ones spinning are those who refuse to read what Obama wrote. Tell me where he promised to accept public financing.
When you edit his remark or “spin” what you want to hear, I’ll be happy to provide the whole quote.

Posted by: nixonland | June 19, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

patriot—-all good points but then we are dealing with those who won’t see reason.
Fear makes people soooo irrational. 1.6 million samll donors must make the McSame Camp very, very afraid.

Posted by: nixonland | June 19, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

Obama will have so much special interests and lobbyists because of this opting out and will have so many promises to fulfill. I can’t believe this guy! He is a liar and a crook, if you ask me. He talked about Hillary always moving the goal posts, well now, look at what he is doing. It’s not about the Presidency, its about Obama. I’ve tried very long and hard not to let public opinion influence me and now I can see that its not public opinion, its the candidates themselves. Obama, in my eyes, has just lost the election. Let him get all the money he wants….what he did today has damaged his character, he broke a pledge, his word and this will weigh heavy on many American’s hearts. Obama is a traitor and a liar. I think its plain to see his agenda now.

Posted by: david from texas | June 19, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

A, this is a blog. Read the captions on the left hand side. It’s an editorial, an opinion piece. It’s signed as an individual “-jpt”
Are you seriously that clueless?

Posted by: Jason | June 19, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

This is getting out of control. Obama surpassing himself once more as the most hyprocritical candidate in American history. And the thing is in his family, it’s not just him that is given us this feeling, it’s Michelle also. We would be so proud of a black candidate, but not this one, not this time.

Posted by: hypocritist | June 19, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Obama lacks experience, judgment and integrity. Open your eyes. He is no agent of real change.

Posted by: Mack | June 19, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

Bill Clinton: “I smoke but I didn’t inhale.” Barack Obama: “I changed my mind but I didn’t flip-flop.”

Posted by: ablanch08 | June 19, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

It is interesting to read all these comments from half way around the world and as an observer of all the stupidity that both group of supporters dish out at each other.
-Mr. Obama is a smart man, no denying is necessary. Isn’t he a politician? Yes
Will he change America? Yet to be seen
Supporters will love him no matter what? It looks that way.
Is Mr. McCain a good American? To most of us the man has had a decent and heroic life, yet we read all sorts of insults being hurled at him by Obama supporters. It seems odd to propose civility while hurling insults. Is McCain a politician: Yes, he’s been for aa long time. Will he fix America: Yet to be seen.

Posted by: Jame Henri | June 19, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

It’s simple. He said he would do public funding if the opposition agreed to it. McCain agreed and he said he would make a deal with him. However, the Obama camp did not negotiate with McCain as “aggressively” (this is the word Obama used) as they could have. McCain and his team are actually behind in fund raising compared to the democrats. That alone gives McCain a reason to agree to it. Obama blames it on the private financing corruption but he’s getting most of that money. (Someone pointed out earlier: hedge funds!) I don’t know why people keep buying this Republican spending machine, when the Dems have theirs as well.
He had ONE meeting (between advisers and not between candidates) so he could save face, but if you really want to reform a system, then you have to be true to your word. Obama could have brokered out a deal with McCain, if he actually tried.
But it’s the old Obama strategy: say one thing, put in minimal effort and then when it falls through blame it on the other person.
There a 10 year olds that take more responsibility than him.

Posted by: xax | June 19, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

This is merely another ‘case and point’ of Obama and his deceitfulness.

Posted by: Earl | June 19, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

I don’t understand you Americans. After 8 years of Bill Clinton and the lies he threw onto the public, you go crazy for this black American despite his already known lies and drug use. Is there no one in you country that has not used drugs that would be a good leader? Is this really the best you have from a population of over three hundred million? Your greatness is an echo of the past and we weep for you.

Posted by: jpierre | June 19, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

Hillary is smiling big time. The “Glen Close of 2008 Election” ain’t dead yet.

Posted by: ablanch08 | June 19, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

@ Jason:
Believe what you want to believe. Obama has hurt himself with this “broken pledge” and will pay for it. McCain has not made one “PLEDGE” and then broke it, no matter how hard you look. Obama has lied about campaign financing now, along with NAFTA, Wright, and the Iraq war, just to name a few. He’s definitely a proponent of “change”…..the problem is, its a “change” that Americans CAN’T believe in! NoBama 08!

Posted by: david from texas | June 19, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

xax, Most of McCain’s money comes from corporate lobbyists and PACS. He has not decided to go public money. Could have/would have/should have. He isn’t. That’s the bottom line.
What is there to negotiate about? It’s fairly simple, will you go public money or private? McCain chose private. How can you possibly blame a decision McCain made on Obama not pressuring him enough? That’s just indicative of our nation’s problem with not having personal responsibility.

Posted by: Jason | June 19, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Curious why the post makes no mention of McCain’s flip-flop on accepting public financing?
Wouldn’t a fair, responsible journalist point out that McCain previously accepted the financing and used it to secure a loan when he was struggling to raise cash, then decided to opt out when he began to be able to raise money after becoming the front runner.
This blatant omission is inexcusable.

Posted by: Curious George | June 19, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

.
Another item to add to hussein”s one paragraph resume: LIAR.
That can go just just after “twenty-year disciple of rev. “God D@#! America” wright, pal to weathermen terrorists, experienced drug user, partner-in crime to convicted felon Tony Rezko and hijacked the Dem nomination with FEWER votes than Hillary received.”
/

Posted by: ALEX H. | June 19, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

@ ablanch08 :
I agree, I bet Hillary is well PLEASED with Obamas decision today. She’s been waiting for something like this. Remember, she only “suspended” her campaign, she can still win, even though Obamabots don’t want to realize this fact. She’s sitting back and letting Obama do the hard work for her……he’s destroying himself and his campaign seems to be imploding. Wow, this is better than a soap opera!

Posted by: david from texas | June 19, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

Hey, this is change and he is the agent of change. Unfortunately for him, flip-flop is bad change, or does he not know? When I vote this November, I will have no problem with the flip-flop. John, you are the man. We Americans who designated on our tax returns to have tax dollars contributed to public finance expect this guy to use such funds. For transparency purposes therefore, it is incumbemt upon the government, watchdog, and oversight groups to identify the source and amount of funds he will receive.

Posted by: benvictor | June 19, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Hey Homer….If you crashed you jet in the jungles of VietNam, spent 5 years in a Hanoi prison being beat and tortured…you’d probably be on sedatives too! Respect your betters. Like him or not..but he’s earned our respect.

Posted by: Bobjob | June 19, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Ouch – I’d be embarrassed to call myself an Obama follower today. Maybe tomorrow will be better…..we can HOPE anyway……

Posted by: Jane | June 19, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

“Republicans only know how to wrck things. It then takes the reality based community to fix their messes.”
Hope and change is reality based? There is nothing real about him. He doesn’t write his own speeches, he is constantly changing his policies, he needs a full staff of correctionists and applogists. He is the creation of Axelrod, the DNC and the MSM. Wake up.

Posted by: Mack | June 19, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Agree with Curious George: Why no mention of McCain’s flip flop on public financing in the primary?? He’s in no position to be lecturing others.

Posted by: John | June 19, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

You can really see the lawyer influence in the dem party. He didn’t “sign” any thing. Just so I’m clear, you can say what ever the hell you want as long as you don’t sign anything? Should every pledge be signed and notarized before we can hold Mr.Obama accountable?

Posted by: Russ | June 19, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

Jon -
GREAT POST!!!

Posted by: Obama Supporter | June 19, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

OBAMA is a stranger to the truth.
get him away from his telepropmpter and his axelrod receycled speeches. the same ones that he sold to deval patrick for MA gov run.
what precisely is the “HOPE” and what is the “CHANGE”? there is no definition.
all of these lying politicians said they want public financing.
how about limiting the campaign to SIX weeks. obama actually signed the papers tto run for president before he was sworn in for the senate in JAN ’05.

Posted by: deroy | June 19, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

McCain IS participating in the public financing system. Obama unequivocally pledged to do likewise if his opponent did. Broken pledge.
Ah, but it’s okay because everyone knows Republican are dirty scheming little bastards who must be defeated by any means possible. Ends justifies the means.

Posted by: Dan | June 19, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Typical Obama…

Posted by: al4mcattack | June 19, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Mike, you may want to peddle your excuses somewhere else, because no one is buying them.

Posted by: Mack | June 19, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

“If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election.”
Doesn’t sound like a pledge to use public financing to me, does it to you?

Posted by: JR | June 19, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

obama supporter—–Did you read the article you linked to? If so, you must be in a alternate universe.
Obama’s pledge was conditional. Call it “flip flopping” if it hits your talking points but most intellectually honest types would say it was hedging.

Posted by: nixonland | June 19, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

So what is new????

Posted by: louiedog | June 19, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

Typical McCain, criticize someone for doing the same thing as himself.

Posted by: 2791c | June 19, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

he said he would use the public financing if his opponent did so, McCain has made it clear he was not, so what is the problem? Why the double standard. where is the follow up on McCain’s finances? The hundreds of thousands of illegal dollars in credits given by his wife’s company and others. the highly questionable loan he got based on financing he then opted out of?

Posted by: Louis | June 19, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Dan—-You seletively read what you want. It’s called “spinning” and it’s all your candidate has.

Posted by: nixonland | June 19, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

My point is McCain is accepting public funds but is also accepting private funds from lobbyists and corporations through 527′s. It’s dirty and dispicable and represents a broken system. This is what Barack wishes to change. And this is why he decided to forego public financing so that he wouldn’t be double dipping like McCain is and still be able to compete.

Posted by: Mike | June 19, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

Thank you, Mike.
People don’t like flip flopping, or a change in opinion, but sometimes it is necessary. And you only look incredibly dumb if you don’t change your mind.
What if our goverment still believed that Iraq attacked us, and that they did have weapons? What if they never accepted the fact that they were wrong . . . and the gov’t kept telling us they were right. What if?!
Haha, it’s reality folks!
Keep in mind, flip flopping isn’t always a bad thing. It takes a strong person to admit you were wrong.

Posted by: Lauren S | June 19, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Well here he is flip floping get ready he will keep this up.. God help us if he gets in.

Posted by: Robert | June 19, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

obama supporter—–round and round you go. Read the whole pledge and return with an honest answer.

Posted by: nixonland | June 19, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

So its ok for one person to opt out, but not the other? Am I missing something? He admits that he’s breaking the promise, is he not. It is apparent that he want’s to ensure that he can raise money the same way McCain is. Is there something wrong with that?

Posted by: Jason | June 19, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

We NEED a ‘flip flopper’.
Look what happened when Bush was in office, refusing to change his bad decisions or admit he was wrong.
Bush is the proof that changing your mind and being open about the reasons is a good thing.

Posted by: Rachel Smithe | June 19, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

I’m shocked Obama lied again? Who would have thought.
I find it funny that once again he blames someone else for his poor actions and lies. His Granny must not have been around this time, so he blames the republicans.

Posted by: creature4444 | June 19, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

This seals it. Obama can lie as much as he wants and the faithful will still believe. It’s a cult. Obama is not for the thoughtful voter.

Posted by: gladRocks | June 19, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Actually to all of those people who think McCain turned down public financing there are two things here. The controversy with McCain and public financing was for the primary season. He has consistently said he would take it for the general election. These are two different things. Obama clearly did not take it for the primaries and the quote was for the general election. McCain has always said he would take it for the general election and Obama said he would too. While he made an escape route by saying agressivly pursue and agreement, by not actually sitting down and discussing specifically for this issue, i dont count that as aggressive. Besides what did he want, impossible promises of not allowing pac money or lobbiests or 527′s to work. That is specualtion but this all seems very political from the Obama side and he is showing his true colors lately on many issues.

Posted by: Peter | June 19, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

The 527 groups are the special interests that barack is always talking about. He hasn’t accepted anything from them. And he wants to change the laws as far as their political stance. Like seperation of church and state I also believe in seperation of special interests and state

Posted by: Mike | June 19, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Bottom line is that this guy spent most of 2007 arguing in favor of the public financing system and promising to support it should he become the party’s nominee.
McCain, Bush, the UN, NOTHING else matters. NOTHING else can justify someone breaking their promise. You can blame it on what ever you want, but breaking a promise is exactly that, breaking your promise. And I don’t care who you are, if you break a promise, that shows your character.

Posted by: Dudeman | June 19, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

Bankrupt in real idea to offer, McBush is tripping over a non issue. Obama promised to go with public financing provided that McBush did the same. The republicans refused to even enter into agreement. Therefore,he has to go on with what works for him and stay competitive. Good job, Obama.

Posted by: tony | June 19, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

The right-wing media bias has got to stop! Barack did not break his promise. He said he’d take public money IF the campaigns could agree on a plan. Very different than this headline!!!

Posted by: Richard | June 19, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

dudeman—–A conditional promise where the conditions were not met is not breaking a promise.

Posted by: nixonland | June 19, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

shelgirl—-yep. Here the crickets?
McSamers won’t touch what you are saying with a 10′ pole.

Posted by: nixonland | June 19, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

I am tired of listening to you whiners complaing about why we invaded Iraq. How about humane rights for women. We shouldn’t stop killing these middle east POS until they get the point that this is the 21st century.

Posted by: Dave | June 19, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Obama is too busy to honor a promise, but not too busy making sure muslim terrorists get a fair trial. But, Obama is not a muslim, ya right…

Posted by: abe | June 19, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

I said vote for “change”. I never said what the change was. Welcome to my banana republic, suckers. You got to pay to play, baby.

Posted by: B.Obama | June 19, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

“shelgirl—-yep. Here the crickets?
McSamers won’t touch what you are saying with a 10′ pole.”
You’re only fooling yourselves. Whether you are part of his campaign or just blind, who knows or really cares.

Posted by: Mack | June 19, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

nixonland, so because one’s wife became old, fat and boring, one can go cheat on her even though they made a vow not to? But she told me she would take care of herself. A promise is a promise, no matter thejustification. Typical bs and semantics from today’s society.

Posted by: Dudeman | June 19, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

THE CORPORATE MEDIA AND THE POLITICS OF FEAR! It is fear-mongering that brought us to Iraq; it is happening again with the corporate media cheering on–:McCain blasted Obama today!” The Republicans are mounting negative attacks paid for by big lobbyists–and all the media could say is, “it works.” The media have not bordered to ask McCain about his promise to run a polite and respectful campaign even while everyday he calls Obama names. That is the extent of the morale malaise of this time. Therefore, Obama is right in foregoing public finance. He needs to raise enough money to stave off negative and false attacks coming form McCain, Republicans and lobbyists who want to maintain the status quo and are most threatened by his candidacy. That is the least he can do, since Republicans don’t want to run on issues but on insults and misinformation which the media have failed to point out and challenge.

Posted by: Dr. Sam | June 19, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Joe from 2:39:15
NICE SPIN JOE.

Posted by: JF | June 19, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

“dudeman—–A conditional promise where the conditions were not met is not breaking a promise.”
The survey said “will you participate” if your opponent does. Obama answered “yes.” That’s the promise. Response?
Obama ALSO said that he’d aggressively pursue an arrangement. This does not overturn the arrangement, and also apparently has not actually happened. Looks like me like his supporters are parsing the living daylights out of this second statement while completely ignoring the first. Nice try.

Posted by: Punditish | June 19, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

I guess Obama has the Wright answer. Lie, Lie and Lie, until you get it Wright.

Posted by: Lynn | June 19, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Shelgirl So what with your legalities. We aren’t talking contract law here rather we’re talking about a candidate who promises “new politics” and “change”. In that 2007 questionnaire
he says “If I am the Democratic nominee I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election”.
At the February debate he said “if I am the nominee then I will sit down with McCain and make sure that we have a system that is fair for both sides”. And he sat down with McCain when? It must be real hard to see that the “change” and “new politics” candidate is nothing but the same old, same dirty and old politics. He backed off public financing and NAFTA just in the past 24 hours, he caved in to AIPAC and backtracked on Iran and he recently made sure his economic policy committee was filled with representatives from Wall Street. Of course who would expect less, he took way more money from Hedge Fund managers then McCain did. It must be hard to have to take your principles and beliefs and have to twist them to defend and justify your candidate’s failings or to keep defending the reality that is becoming clearer everyday and that is that Obama is no more then “old politics”. I guess it’s so hard for you to have to defend your candidate that out of frustration you need to accuse Jake of being racist. I don’t know how old you are but get with the program and do your homework and quit believing false promises.

Posted by: alpaig | June 19, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Obama said… “Senator John McCain (R-AZ) has already pledged to accept this fundraising pledge. If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election.”
Aggressively pursuing means getting a low level spox to meet with another low level guy and then say “no deal” because the 527’s (which no candidate can control) are running amok… how convenient.
McCain called Obama on it last month and the month before, when Obama was sounding soft on the idea. Mr. Hope and Change has had two months to come up with a good excuse and this is what he’s got… stunning!

Posted by: smartprimate | June 19, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

Ah, here we go! Barack O’Carter’s people are doing what the Dems do best, parsing words! “Well, he agreed if they could agree if I I I didn’t get a lot of donations if if…..” What I like even better was his quote about how he didn’t mind the gas prices going up, just not that fast! This is what we’re in for folks!

Posted by: Skeptic | June 19, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

Since mc cain has flip flopped on every other conceivable issue, why shouldn’t obama flip on this one. I dare say he had no idea that he could raise this much money

Posted by: lord of war | June 19, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

Shelgirl-
McCain opted out of Public Financing?
MY GOD! This is BREAKING NEWS!! Please, forward me the video/audio. You’ll be bigger than DRUDGE!!
Oh! don’t have proof huh? Ahh, just more lies; HEY! you and Obama have something in common!
By the way, I thought all you Demigods liked public funds and hated big business

Posted by: Obama Supporter | June 19, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Both candidates are self righteous and grandstanding. What McCain did here was call Obama out knowing this would happen. I suspect world leaders will do the same thing to Obama if he is to be elected.
McCain/Feingold was one of the dumbest ideas put into law. Fortunately for McCain, Obama agrees with it.

Posted by: Tom | June 19, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Obama lied! Obama lied!

Posted by: tony | June 19, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

“Since mc cain has flip flopped on every other conceivable issue, why shouldn’t obama flip on this one”
Typical logic of today’s society.

Posted by: Dudeman | June 19, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Obama: Out for himself and no one else!

Posted by: Soetoro No! | June 19, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Both republicans and democrats love to spend your money. The difference is Repubs love to spend it on wars and rebuilding of some faraway lands, while dems love to spend it here at home helping out struggling Americans. it is your choice.

Posted by: tony | June 19, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

“Since mc cain has flip flopped on every other conceivable issue, why shouldn’t obama flip on this one”
Typical logic of today’s society.

Posted by: Dudeman | June 19, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

You can tell when Obama lies, his purple lips are moving.

Posted by: Gene | June 19, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

“What kind of jerk are you? McCain HAS NOT OPTED OUT. Don’t you read or do you just buy into Obama lies?”
You’re confused. I know McCain hasn’t opted out. That’s exactly what I’m saying; McCain’s keeping up his end, Obama’s failing to do the same.

Posted by: Punditish | June 19, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Sen. Obama is right. The ultra-right and their henchmen will take every opportunity to “Swift Boat” this candidacy. Thanks to large loopholes in the McCain-Feingold systemt, the 527′s are not restrained and are still able to smear their opponents with impunity. The 1.4 million everyday people who have been supportiung Sen. Obama deserve an even playing field.
This time, this campaign will be fair -for a change.

Posted by: David F. McBride | June 19, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

It was Senator Obama, actually working as a senator one day, who filed a protest against one of the FEC appointments to HOLD UP Senator McCains case with the commission. More dirty Chicago politics and tricks from Obama. That’s how Obama wins elections. Maybe Obama will have McCain’s name removed from the ballots next. Or better yet, Obama can take his name off the ballot and then claim all the “uncommitted” and write-in votes for himself and then declare himself the winner.

Posted by: calli | June 19, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

But Obama LIED. Impeach!

Posted by: tony | June 19, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

Unlike senator kerry, Obama is taking the gloves off. The smear campaign of the right is all too obvious. McCain is doing absolutely nothing to stop the lies coming from the mouths, keyboards, and pens of his supporters. Obama is 100% right to do this. and I believe I’ll send him another donation.

Posted by: cturple | June 19, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

A: Just another way for the democrats to get their hands on EVERYONE’S money.

Posted by: Thomas | June 19, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

Let me correct myself, Obama is an affirmative action nominee that lies. I guess, that free college education is worthless. Your tax dollars at work.

Posted by: June | June 19, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

It’s very suspective how Obama can raise such big money. Blacks and students cannot contribute that much to him. Mccain and Hillary should hire best detective lawyer to probe anything illegal and fire lawsuits on it.
The best way to win election is to make your rivals disquilify on the competetion. It’s they way how Obama won before. Why don’t Mccain or Hillary buy it?

Posted by: Max | June 19, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Bobjob: No, they definitely don’t understand. Definitely!

Posted by: A | June 19, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Rev. Wright was correct, Obama is a “typical” politician.

Posted by: Jess | June 19, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

Obama said one thing, then did the exact opposite. Obama lied!

Posted by: tony | June 19, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

Of course Obama rejects the money, because Rezko has set aside enough with Soros and all his liberal friends to allow him to spend as much as needed to cover his lies and his background. They have already bought off the mainstream press and now they will make offers that no one can refuse to put a man with a shady past linked to terrorists, criminals, communists, racists, etc. in the White house so they can constinue to destroy this country.

Posted by: Ozark_Sunshine | June 19, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Not using the taxpayer’s money is a good thing. Don’t let main stream media lead you to believe otherwise. Ah, but there always must be a spin, an angle, a hook, doesn’t there?

Posted by: foxisms | June 19, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Typical of any and all politicians whether they be democrat, republican or some other fringe group.
Say one thing to get the votes, do another once you have them. This should make you sick – if it doesn’t you are almost as guilty as the politician.
Sadly, they are all pieces of garbage.

Posted by: G Kasten | June 19, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

Obama’s lies and gaffes are becomming too numerous too count. If McCain had made the same number of lies and gaffes the media would be covering it 24/7. Not only has Obama reneged on his promise to use public campaign funds, Obama has also made a number of mistatments and out right lies over the weekend that the media is not reporting.
Obama claimed over the weekend that it would take five years to drive down the cost of gas 3 or 4 cents, but that an investment of 250 billion dollars five years ago would have produced an engine that didn’t require fossil fuels. What abunch of B.S. and if you believe this I have a bridge in brooklyn you might be interested in buying.

Posted by: Terry | June 19, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

foxisms
Taking large corporate donations obligates a candidate. And Obama has many very large corporate income streams heading his way. Selling his soul isn’t surprising.

Posted by: A | June 19, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

Obama is a Loser

Posted by: m | June 19, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

Poor GOP. Upset because Obama wouldn’t fall for the old Bait and Switch. Obama would have had to been insane to buy into public financing at this point and the GOP knows it. So they try to present a lose lose situation: Take public financing and we drown you with 527 support and our RNC deep pockets or Don’t take public financing and we smear you and call you a flip flopper and say how opting out will ” have far-reaching and extraordinary consequences that will weaken and undermine the public financing system” What spin. What a sucker deal.

Posted by: The Digital Politic | June 19, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

How can he do this? Break a campaign pledge? OBAMA LIED!!!

Posted by: tony | June 19, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

I was just starting to think Obama was not such a bad guy but this just pushed me firmly behind McCain.
This is despicable.

Posted by: Eric, California | June 19, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

I don’t care where Obama gets his campaign money. At least, he’s not raising taxes to get it.

Posted by: roger king | June 19, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Don’t expect the mainstream media to cover this one fairly.
All reports I’ve read so far focus on Obama’s “groundbreaking” fundraising efforts, not his lying.
And when the media does point out the contradiction, they only frame it as “McCain says Obama lied”.
It’s not “McCain says”. It IS a lie.
Obama is just another typical politican. And the swooning media will not cover this gross reversal fairly.

Posted by: Tom | June 19, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

“I don’t care where Obama gets his campaign money. At least, he’s not raising taxes to get it.”
No, that will come after if he gets elected.

Posted by: Dudeman | June 19, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

Obama supporting organizations such as Moveonorg. and Code Pink are classified as 527′s, so it is a LIE to say that Obama is not taking help from 527′s. Obama is BUYING this election. Who is in charge of the voting machines in VA and other highly contested states? They better check and make sure they are not “fixed” to all vote Obama in November.

Posted by: calli | June 19, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

This article has definitely hit a nerve. Perhaps it is too scary for some that Obama is supported by so many of the ‘little people’. Yes, those of us who haven’t had much of a voice in how this government has been mismanaging our taxes and foreign policy are standing up to support Obama with our hard-earned dollars.
I don’t blame Obama for not taking the public financing route when it is obvious those well-funded 527 Repub smear machines are alive and active. I wouldn’t be surprised they are paying some of these commentors. How else do you explain the same people repeating themselves hour after hour? Obama is doing the smart thing. And to those misinformed who think only the young or black are behind Obama, I’m a white, middle-aged, married woman who along with my husband and three teens will donate and help Obama’s campaign. And there are plenty more like us. It doesn’t take a genius to see that greed and mismanagement is running this country into the ground. We need a strong majority in Congress of intelligent, honest politicians as well as Obama as president. Too many middle-income and poor and our brave armed service men and women are suffering for this to continue.

Posted by: Lydia | June 19, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

When will Obama rein in the lefty 527′s like MoveOn.org or the unions? Those 527′s are ok because they support Obama, 527′s that support McCain are bad. Obama good, McCain bad. Pretty simple reasoning from the Obama camp. The dem party has become such a personality cult that I had to leave. And then to have Obama be just another phony baloney was the last straw. I’m registering as an independant.

Posted by: chicosez | June 19, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Jodi -
You better get back to DailyKOS, the real world may frighten you.

Posted by: Obama Supporter | June 19, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

What astonishes me about this is that Obama will go back on his promise because of a need to combat Republicans, “…opponents who’ve become masters at gaming the broken system.”
He had to know the system was broken when he made his pledge, but it seems he was unaware that his opponent would be a Republican.
FlipFlop!!!

Posted by: Spiritof76 | June 19, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

Obama is “The Second Coming”
…..of Bill Clinton

Posted by: Whatever | June 19, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

At least Osama doesn’t continually change his mind. With him, we at least know what to expect. With Obama, it’s whatever way the dollars flow.
What a wooden puppet!

Posted by: A | June 19, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

Daily KOS, now there is a reputable source on info.

Posted by: Dudeman | June 19, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Politics went bad (again) under bill clinton and his endless lies ignored by liberals and the media.

Posted by: atrf | June 19, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Max, I don’t by the 2nd coming of Clinton. Now 2nd coming of Carter, that is more like it.

Posted by: Jimbo | June 19, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Jimbo: I agree that Obama would be a 2nd Jimmy Carter with one big exception. Carter was an honorable politician with integrity. Obama is corrupt.

Posted by: Juju | June 19, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

What is so hard to understand? Obama agreed to go with the public financing IF McCain would also. McCain wouldn’t so Obama decided not to as well. Big whup. Obama DID NOT go back on his word. Obviously people cannot find a legitimate reason to criticize Obama, so they have to make stuff up.

Posted by: Sean | June 19, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

If McCain won’t why should Obama? This isn’t news worthy at all actually. Obama should play fair while McCains neocons flood airwaves with lies?

Posted by: ? | June 19, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

To Obamarxist, I love you guys spouting off figures as if they are real. 400 paid bloggers for Obama, indeed! Why would his campaign need to pay anyone when so many consider him and a majority Dem Congress to be our country’s only chance to get out of the many messes it’s in?
Perhaps it is confusing that Obama made a decision, (rely on public financing), got new information, (the 527′s were attacking with a vengeance and McCain wasn’t going to denounce their actions) so he did the intelligent thing and backed out of a bad deal. Maybe the stubbornness of Bush, sticking with a decision, (invading Iraq, putting unqualified people in positions of power, allowing the oil companies to write our energy policy, giving out no-bid contracts to companies that had been fined numerous times for padding the bill, etc.) despite evidence it is a bad idea, has made you admire this kind of stubbornness over intelligent reassessment of plans going awry from the original goals. Can you imagine any business or family succeeding with that kind of leadership?

Posted by: Lydia | June 19, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Sean -
McCain has not stated that he would forego public funds in the General Election. What don’t you understand? This is the first time since 1976 a candidate has said no to public funds.
Wake-Up and stop spewing what you hear and start learning for yourself.

Posted by: Obama Supporter | June 19, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Talk about hypocrisy. McCain broke his own campaign finance laws and where is the outrage there? There was never a promise. Deal with the facts of what he said. McCain also backs him up saying that at least the lawyers talked. What was said is anyones guess. Neither campaign gives any details. So Obama is very justified in not taking public financing based on what we all know. McCain, on the other hand, has done an illegal act from what we all know. Im sorry, but who is being the hypocrite?

Posted by: Unbelievable | June 19, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Obama Supporter——Keep up with the same nonsense. McSame broke his own financing law and now says Obama is a typical politician?
Keep trying though. There’s some nice consolation prizes when you finally give up.

Posted by: nixNNonland | June 19, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

Lydia -
My misguided and misinformed little Obamanite. No one can control the 527′s.
Has Obama come out a disavowed MoveOn.org? – No.
Has McCain said he would forego public funds in the General election? – No.
Obama has given us “CHANGE”. – He’s Changed his mind.

Posted by: Obama Supporter | June 19, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

Obama Supporter—–If you do not understand a conditional pledge you should stop commenting.

Posted by: nixNNonland | June 19, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

I can’t believe there are so many of you who actually think there is a difference between electing a Democrat or a Republican.

Posted by: Abe | June 19, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

nixNNonland-
McCain broke his own financing law? Really? A court found him guilty of this? Is that why it’s front page news? NO!
Your boy has done what no politician has done since the system was created in 1976 – Decided to go private; After he said only if McCain did.
News Alert: McCain has not said he wouldn’t participate in public financing.
THANKS FOR PLAYING; PLEASE TRY AGAIN

Posted by: Obama Supporter | June 19, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

nixNNonland -
Please, I do want so badly to know how a liberal justifies breaking a “Conditional Pledge” and not calling it a “Lie”. Please, do tell; especially since all the news headlines talk about Obama forgoing public funds and NOT McCain.

Posted by: Obama Supporter | June 19, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

OBama Supporter—–Your beloved maverick accepted a loan against public financing when his campaign coffers were empty. This was in violation of McCain-Feingold. He’s now being sued and the FEC will decide soon enough.

Posted by: nixNNonland | June 19, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

Ron Paul for President and down with silencing him!!!

Posted by: ReDemOcan | June 19, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

nixNNonland -
At BEST, McCain will have to pay it back. NO CRIME THERE. And he still is going with Public Funds.

Posted by: Obama Supporter | June 19, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

CHANGE — It’s what you’ll be left with.

Posted by: Dave | June 19, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

Obama Supporter—–You are one a one trick pony aren’t you? What part of this don’t you get?
In February 2007, I proposed a novel way to preserve the strength of the public financing system in the 2008 election. My plan requires both major party candidates to agree on a fundraising truce, return excess money from donors, and stay within the public financing system for the general election. My proposal followed announcements by some presidential candidates that they would forgo public financing so they could raise unlimited funds in the general election. The Federal Election Commission ruled the proposal legal, and Senator John McCain (R-AZ) has already pledged to accept this fundraising pledge. If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election.”

Posted by: nixNNonland | June 19, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

nixNNonland-
Just remember how your candidate got started in public office.
Hell, even you must admit that Bush’s win in 2000 had the ruling of the Supreme Court.

Posted by: Obama Supporter | June 19, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Obama Supporter—-At best? It’s not a matter of paying it back. That’s a given.
It’s his playing both sides of the fence with his own law. It. is. illegal. YOur maverick knew this but did it anyway.

Posted by: nixNNonland | June 19, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Well lets check out this track record:
Old Obama: We will get out of Iraq withing three months.
New Obama: We must follow the will of the Iraqi people and have a much longer more careful timetable.
Old Obama: I will run an open transparent new campaign.
New Obama: No townhalls, not open access by the press.
Old Obama: Jeremiah Wright was misunderstood.
New Obama: I didn’t know he was such a bigot.
Old Obama: We must negotiate Nafta
New Obama: Clearly this has been a treaty with much good for America.
Old Obama: Will meet with Iran, North Korea etc.
New Obama: I love Israel yes I do.
Old Obama: Campaign finance reform
New Obama: Forgetttabit.
Obama supporters what is it that you actually support about this guy. I have found almost no issue where he has not backtracked, changed his mind, misspoke, or just outright lied. Tell me an issue where Obama has been steadfast. The campaign finance issue would not be a big deal alone, but it is part of an increasably disturbing pattern.

Posted by: cb | June 19, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Obama Supporter—-The Tribune article sound a lot like bitter Clintonites.
Obama is a politician. I never said otherwise. Getting ahead in that snakepit requires throwing some elbows.

Posted by: nixNNonlandn | June 19, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

So he Flip-flopped again?
AND he blamed it on the Republicans?
Do anything to win. Thats Obama – he has hope… he hopes to be President.
And to hell with what he said before, what he promised, what he pledged to do.
Fraud!

Posted by: Robert NYC | June 19, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

nixnNNonland-
Obama said:”If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election.”
Again, McCain has not opted out. He had his lawyers show up with McCains lawyers, and Obama’s team said the meeting was fruitless. So are we to expect this type of negotiations when it comes to foriegn policy?
Sounds like another political stunt that got him into public life in the first place.
Again, what’s your argument; McCain has not opted out of public funds.

Posted by: Obama Supporter | June 19, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

This election is too important for Obama to allow himself to be “swift-boated” by the unlimited spending of 527 groups. Obama already called upon Democratic-leaning 527 groups to only contribute money to his campaign or the Democratic Party. McCain pretty much gave 527s the green light to go after Obama.
This is a briliant move by the Obama campaign. The funding edge will force McCain to spend more time fundraising and also will push Bush into fundraising for McCain. This allows Obama to paint Bush and McCain as “McBush”!
This entire 2008 campaign has made and will continually make history!

Posted by: Linda | June 19, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

Wow a politician changed his mind on something that says he will not uncessesarily spend our tax money, because he raised money on his own? Besides a partisan www (wrong wing wacko) – who the heck would have a problem with that!

Posted by: Peter | June 19, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

Please look at the recent AP.
The only organizations running ads against a candidate at this point, support Obama not McCain.
I am a Democrat, and I am really hating my party. We are all about winning and being a liberal version of the Republicans.
We don’t really care about change or bipartisanship.
Whether you like it or not Obama has NO REAL effort of change, and even when ne is celebrated for his rhetoric, i.e. public financing, he has backtracked.
Newsflash: public financing is funded by the American people, so what does he mean when he says “let’s build the first general election campaign that is truly fueled by the general public,” oh wait, that mean more and more money will win this race.
More money will take me, the frontrunner, to a more solid finish.
Democrats always used to get angry and candidates buying elections, and this is just out of control.
With 500 million in funds by election end, Obama, you better win this election 80 percent to 20, but then again, I am not so sure a majority of this country is buying your fake and packaged message anymore.

Posted by: gerald | June 19, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

Good for OBAMA – We have to get the TRAITOR ELITES out of power now.
The system has been so gamed and exploited by the Republican elites that it is effectively broken.
John McCain, the Republican National Committee, and their allies in so-called 527 groups that raise and spend unlimited contributions are dedicated to manipulating this broken system to raise as much money as possible — and they’ve proven that they’re very good at it.
A top McCain adviser told MSNBC earlier this month, “now that we’re in the general election, the RNC money counts, the DNC money counts. So the truth is today, John McCain has more cash on hand and more money than Barack Obama does.”
In April alone, they raised nearly $45 million. That’s more than our campaign and the Democratic National Committee combined. And that doesn’t include the plans of 527 groups like the one called “Freedom’s Watch,” which has said it will spend as much as $250 million under Karl Rove’s direction to attack and defeat Barack Obama.
To compete, Barack has MADE A SMART CHOICE and will let the AMERICAN PEOPLE JOIN TOGETHER and give what they can afford. That’s been the strategy of his campaign from the beginning…. and it is working.
We have to get the TRAITOR ELITES out of power now.

Posted by: rjpe | June 19, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

Peter -
“Besides a partisan www (wrong wing wacko) – who the heck would have a problem with that”
A country that does not want our Presidents decided by the likes of either George Soros or Rupert Murdoch

Posted by: Obama Supporter | June 19, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Oh, misnamed Obama Supporter, there is a world of difference between some Repub 527′s (think swiftboating of Kerry) and moveon who tends to show actual video clips and give real news sources.

Posted by: Lydia | June 19, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Lydia-
C’mon, I know you didn’t type that with a straight face.
There is no difference in 527′s. They are all as passionate about getting their candidate into office as you or me.

Posted by: Obama Supporter | June 19, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Good for OBAMA – We have to get the TRAITOR ELITES out of power now.
McCain SOLD OUT long ago — just because your a military family and you get tortured – does not make you a GOOD person. He left the crippled mother of his children for MONEY MONEY MONEY and POWER.
He is a smooth talking TRAITOR.

Posted by: RJP5 | June 19, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Did anyone expect anything different from Obama the Opportunist? He’s raising millions more than McCain and doesn’t want any limits on his internet income.
Obama the Marxist is playing by the Rules of Alinsky the Marxist. Do Anything To Win–even make temporary alliances with opponents you can later “liquidate”.

Posted by: RPhillips | June 19, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

(not) Obama Supporter, I wasn’t born yesterday. Just as there is a huge difference in news organizations, (Wall Street Journal vs. The Daily Star) there is a huge difference is the integrity and honesty of 527′s.

Posted by: Lydia | June 19, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

I don’t care how Obama funds his campaign. He has to woo Hilarycrats, independents and despondent republicans and that takes a lot of money because he has to battle a SMEAR campaign as well (Terrorist fist jab!… etc). MCCain only agrees to do things that are advantageous to himself, for instance, his Town hall debates idea. I’m confident Obama will definitely bring change to Washington when he is elected president. THAT IS CHANGE I CAN BELIEVE IN! What the heck is MCCain gonna bring? Come on! Really?

Posted by: Obama4Prez | June 19, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

So the race-baiting obamination has lied once again, and gone back on a promise…
what’s new?
chicago politics, is not new.
It’s the dirtiest kind there is.

Posted by: destardi | June 19, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Who are these people that are trying to scare monger us into thinking OBAMA will ruin the economy … NEWS FLASH … DOLLAR IS WORTHLESS …. GAS IS $4 a GALLON and OFF SHORE DRILLING WILL NOT BRING DOWN THE PRICE OF GAS … DEFICIT AT ALL TIME HIGH …
DEFICITS ARE *FOR* REPUBLICAN BANKERS TO PROFIT FROM … they want to wreck the econony.

Posted by: RJP3 | June 19, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

This is great, if those politicians will not spend our tax money just for campaign that will be great for our country. That means we can use this money for the victims of the flood in the Midwest and Louisiana. So for all the people that whines about this stop whining and be greatful we have some money to spend for the needy.

Posted by: Mike | June 19, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Just words….. What’s really disgusting is listening to the spin. This will save taxpayers $ 80 million. Look what this guy spent in the primaries. The amount of money expended during this election season is obscene – and Obama is responsible. Voters should be outraged by what he has spent and will spend.
And in the end, for nothing. He’s unelectable.

Posted by: reagan democrat | June 19, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

This will not hurt Democrats, only Republicans! Go Obama!

Posted by: Obamaallday! | June 19, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

Obama did NOT lie.
He said he would agree to explore with the other candidate and agreement.
If there is NO Agreement between the parties, people, there is NOT a foundation for you accusing Obama to be a liar.
Verdict, No lie, no flip flop.
Obama is letting the American People fund his campaign, but only in a way that allows him to be competitive in his OWN way.
In his OWN way means controlling his message and NOT reyling on the 527′s to spread his message.
Folks, you should be impressed by this, not offended.
Look up his podcasts made in 2006. You can look up exactly what he as said on policy and what he thinks about the issues.
Somewhere in these comments have to be some thoughtful people who are willing to at least listen.
I have been following Obama for years and would NOT be behind him if I didn’t feel fully confident in his decisions being in full compliance and in context with what he has been talking about for years.
This is more than can be said for McCain, who started out as a Maverick and then went straight down the party line.
Completely shifting and as we say, flip-Flopping his views from Taxes to Religion.
I honestly do NOT know how to believe what McCain says any more and when he speaks now, he sounds like an extension of the Republican Rove destroyer line.
I wish I didn’t feel this way about McCain. He had so much promise. But to no avail. And, being a Democrat, I’m more inclined to vote for a Democrat anyway, and as such as John completely lost me coupled with the fact that I am very factually current with Obama, John is not on the list, at all.

Posted by: Exasperated | June 19, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Barack Obama is an absolute godsend for the Republicans. If anybody (and I mean anybody) else had been nominated by the Democrats, McCain would already be defeated…

Posted by: Jack | June 19, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Wow, Obama lied? No way? Hope and change. This guy is THE least qualified nominee in American history. At least Carter was a governor and had accomlishments. This moron shouldn’t have made it above city councilman.
Amazing how stupid Americans are that they fall for this snake oil salesmen’s song and dance. If we as a nation are dumb enough to elect this clown, we deserve everything we get.
Remember, we’re still paying for Carter’s mistakes (ask the 3000 dead from 9/11).

Posted by: Obama is not Qualified | June 19, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

McOld is unelectable, not Obama, get your facts right! Let’s not get caught up in technicalities, it’s either a hundred year war or Obama…I pick Obama!

Posted by: McPain | June 19, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

I support Obama!
McCheney is the campaign finance hypocrite.McCheney has lied and flip flopped on every issue.
Obama for the people!
Obama by the people!
Obama of the people!
Yes we can!!!!

Posted by: uuforyou | June 19, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Lydia-
You know sites like DailyKos and Democratic Underground don’t support free speech; what’s your thoughts on that?

Posted by: Obama Supporter | June 19, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

If you can’t trust the man when he says he’ll finance with public money how can you trust him on anything else?
And the sort of moral relativism exhibited by the demoblats is breath-taking.
Bush lied about getting us into a war (at worst possible interpretation). So this somehow makes it OK for Obama to LIE about financing his campaign?
PULEEEEEZE. I don’t care if he lied about his favorite color. To lead you must at least believe you’re honest (even if untrue). Poor GWB is learning that lesson now. And once the lie is caught, it’s over. The difference is Obama is being caught NOW.

Posted by: Aaron | June 19, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

Vote Socialist, Vote Obama.
Prepare for a tax reaming like you’ve never experienced before if these Socialists get complete control. Yes Democrats you are Socialists.

Posted by: kmpk | June 19, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

The funny thing is he is funding his run by the people not special interest but for some reason people seem to ignore this.
Where does John get his money? Don’t be easily misled

Posted by: tired of politics | June 19, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

kmpk,
They aren’t socialists, they’re communists. If these jokers get in, it’s time for anybody gainfully employed to immediately retire, move to ecuador, take up citizenship there, renounce US citizenship & then say come try & take my money if you can (US citizens are liable for income taxes for 10 years even after renouncing citizenship…). America, what a country.
We defeated communism once. Why do we need to fight it again on our own shores?

Posted by: Aaron | June 19, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

November 2007;
In February 2007, I proposed a novel way to preserve the strength of the public financing system in the 2008 election. My plan requires both major party candidates to agree on a fundraising truce, return excess money from donors, and stay within the public financing system for the general election….Senator John McCain..has already pledged to accept this fundraising pledge. If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election.”
obama’s a typical politician, just as sure as I’m a “typical white person” (per Obama)

Posted by: destardi | June 19, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

Obama has met privately with the NAACP and ACLU and promised slavery reparations to African-Americans! He plans on using the funds saved from the Iraq war, the windfall tax to oil companies, and a tax on all hard working Americans to fund this slavery reparations program.

Posted by: larry | June 19, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

He said,
….who will spend millions and millions of dollars in unlimited donations….
Was he talking about him?

Posted by: catleya | June 19, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Is this his habit or he doesn’t know what to do?

Posted by: catleya | June 19, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

“And we’ve already seen that he’s not going to stop the smears and attacks from his allies running so-called 527 groups, who will spend millions and millions of dollars in unlimited donations.”
Since it is illegal for a candidate to coordinate with a 527 group, Obama is simply whining because McCain will not break the law (which leads one to suspect that Obama is coordinating with 527s in violation of the law).

Posted by: Tim | June 19, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

“Since mc cain has flip flopped on every other conceivable issue, why shouldn’t obama flip on this one. I dare say he had no idea that he could raise this much money” – Lord of War
Is the type of standards you teach your children? Someone else’s misdeeds make mine ok? Try that if you get pulled over for speeding, or run a stop light. The problem here is that Barry portrays himself as a new type of politician when he is really just the same old kind of politician. Your statement that “he had no idea that he could raise this much money” proves that point. He does what is the best political move, just like every other politician.
Being good at being an underhanded politician isn’t a good thing.

Posted by: Jon | June 19, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

Hypocrite… my vote was up for grabs, but Obama has just proven to me he is far from a man of his word. He promises change and then reverts to old politics.

Posted by: FB from NJ | June 19, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

ANYONE WHO HAS BOUGHT THIS SNAKE-CHARMER’S PITHY SLOGANS AND B.S. RHETORIC, CONSIDER YOURSELF A COMPLETE IDIOT!
HIS LIES AND ALWAYS CHOOSING THE SUPPOSED POPULAR CHOICES ARE DOWNRIGHT SCARY AND DANGEROUS.
*CAPITAL GAINS TAXES AROUND 28%!!!????
*PULL TROOPS OUT OF IRAQ IMMEDIATELY!!!???
OH MY GOD!!!! WAKE UP, THIS GUY IS A HORRIBLE REINCARNATION OF JIMMY CARTER, ONLY WORSE!!!!!!

Posted by: Robby-Boy | June 19, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

Who here thinks 527′s won’t be airing ads for Obama? Has anyone ever heard of George Soros, Media Matters, moveon.org? How about big labor? NAACP? Trial Lawyers? Teachers Unions? AARP? Are they not special interests? Maybe not if you’re liberal.
McCain made a simple promise to stay in the public finance system as all candidates for president have done since Watergate.
Is this the kind of CHANGE Obama promises. Broken pledges and a partisan, unilateral hammer to the campaign finance system? Whereas McCain took a lot of heat from his own party to get corporate money out of politics?
And for all of you apostles to St. Obama who tout his web finances, he’s got the big money bundlers as well and is courting Hillary’s big money bundlers. You know, people like Rezko.

Posted by: gladRocks | June 19, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

Obama would have been crazy not to change his mind. We already have an idiot for a President.
I like the fact that Obama realized that he had a huge edge over McCain. This is smart. Even Republicans are using the way he raised money as a blue print for future campaigns. This guy has come out of nowhere to out organize and fund raise over so-called “more experienced” candidates.
McSame was out of money before the primaries started. And he’s running around talking about fiscal responsibility.

Posted by: mzdolphin | June 19, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

Another lie from Obama. I’ve come to expect it but the sad thing is there is still a group of people who are so brainwashed they can’t get it through their thick skulls.

Posted by: Nobama | June 19, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Hypocrite… my vote was up for grabs, but Obama has just proven to me he is far from a man of his word. He promises change and then reverts to old politics……..
Stop lying. Anyone who would be so easily misled by spin could not have been an Obama supporter. His supporters are smarter than that.

Posted by: mzdolphin | June 19, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

When this hurts him in the polls he’ll say: What I meant to say is that I want public financing, I just pushed the wrong button.

Posted by: Steve | June 19, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

FB from NJ,
I don’t even know anymore what the meaning of his “Change”
Maybe because ” Change you can believe in”
He can change it anytime he wants.
Or,,,Change from Rep to Dem?

Posted by: catleya | June 19, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Hooray Obama! Way to stand true to what you believe in. The people will contribute to your campaign so you will be elected by the people. Then you, with the help of a democratic congressional majority, will change the rules that let rich lobbyists buy off politicians and screw the public.

Posted by: Julie | June 19, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Ted Sampley, one of the founders of Swiftboat Veterans For Truth has even said of John McCain (quote): “THERE IS SOMETHING WRONG WITH THIS GUY,AND LET ME TELL YOU WHAT IT IS:___ DECEIT.” (end quote) And even billionaire H Ross Perot believes the American people have been TAKEN IN by a man who is unusually slick and cruel – even by modern standards OF POLITICS.

Posted by: johnhageeisahoggie | June 19, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

The only reason Obama is not accepting the money is because then he is bound to an $84 million spending limit. How can be buy the election (like he did the democratic nomination) with a spending limit?
He can certainly raise more with his terrorist fundraisers, who solicit money from American hating countries and organizations. That’s where Obama gets his money. Research it.
He may be getting some from America, as he tell poor people to “pony up $5″, but most is coming from people who want to see American destroyed and are willing to pay for Obama to get in office, so he will do as they want.
Save America! Vote McCain 2008!

Posted by: enough already | June 19, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

On the eve of Obama’s first public office election he had his lawyer friends go to the board of elections office and challenge the signatures gathered by his two opposition candidates (one of which was the incumbent). A minimal number of signatures were required to allow their names to be on the ballot. Obama’s lawyers had enough signatures removed so that both opposing candidates were removed from the ballot and Obama was allowed to run, and win, unopposed. What a champion of democracy!!! This guy was a slippery snake from the very beginning, and so many of you lemmings are buying into him because he comes in a shiny package. (Look up the story on CNN if you doubt me.)

Posted by: danny | June 19, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Obama for the people!
Obama smoked out by the people!
Obama voted out by the people!

Posted by: Logic | June 19, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

Obama appears to be an impostor proped up by biased news media personalties thet can’t exercise a modicum of professionalism. Obama is an Islamic apostate according to the excellent journalism embobied in a March 16, 2007 investigative report by Paul Watson of the Los Angeles Times that should be read by all who claim that Obama has always been a Christian.
Obama has lied about many things besides campaign finance. He lied by saying he was conceived in 1965 following the Selma march, but he was born on August 4, 1961. He lied to AIPAC in his recent speech. He lied that he never practiced Islam, when the Watso report is bristled with eye-witnesses accounts that belie Obama’s false claim to the American people. Obama appears to lack any integrity. How can we trust a person who change religions and lied about it to gain office when we a threatened by radical Islam and radical Black Liberation Theology, which is a racist ideology masquerading as theology. Obama is adisciple of Louis Farrakhan, who like Obama’s first cousin Raila Odinga, is being bankrolled by Libyan madman Muammar Gaddafi.

Posted by: TruthfulLiberal | June 19, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Obama: An empty suit held up by an enormous amount of hot air!

Posted by: Soetoro No! | June 19, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Julie Give it a break. Obama takes way more money from Hedge Fund managers then McCain. Obama has taken money from Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase, UBS,
Exelon. British Petroleum, Exxon Mobil and so on. The Dems are the Wall Street darlings this year, not the Republicans. Even those candidates who take money directly from lobbyists only make up about 1% of their campaign funds- so it was no big sacrifice on Obama’s part. Obama fails to mention though that he takes money from “advisors” and “consultants” to lobbyists ( a nice slick way to get around taking “lobbyist” money) and “bundled” money from friends and family of lobbyists. Gee, Obama just pulled out of public financing- so much for change and new politics- and backed off NAFTA all within 24 hours. He appointed a bunch of representatives from Wall Street on his Economic Policy group and caved to AIPAC on Iran. I wouldn’t get your hopes up too much for that big change to come.

Posted by: alpaig | June 19, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

“I like the fact that Obama realized that he had a huge edge over McCain. This is smart.” – mzdolphin
So it’s smart for the candidate of honesty and change to break his promises for political advantage. How you would scream if it was someone on the other “team” doing it.
“Stop lying. Anyone who would be so easily misled by spin could not have been an Obama supporter. His supporters are smarter than that.” – mzdolphin
So, if someone doesn’t agree with you they are either lying or stupid? Again, this is the problem with politics today. It’s not about what is best for all of us, it’s about how to have “our team” win.
“Way to stand true to what you believe in. ” Julie
If it was what he believed in, he should have never made the promise in the first place. He made the promise because it sounded good at the time and now because it is politically expediant, he changes his mind. Same old stuff, new guy.

Posted by: Jon | June 19, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

Yeah but let’s not forget whatever money he does raise it’s still America’s voice being heard as Obama is not accepting money from lobbyists or political action committees.

Posted by: Mike_B | June 19, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

As a Democrat, I have tried again and again to give Sen. Barack Obama the benefit of the doubt; from issues ranging from his racist pastor, shady financial dealings, lies about his Muslim background, questionable political tactics in Chicago, changing churces, “bitter/cling to” comments, etc. etc. etc. I have tried to have an open mind with this guy, but today was ENOUGH. The man rode a near fanatical wave based on anti-Hillary media sexism and bias to be selected as the Dem nominee when he never really deserved it. Now, his weaknesses just keep shining through. I dont CARE anymore if Sen. John McCain and I do not see eye to eye on every single issue. Sometimes, it comes down, not to what I want, but what is best for the Country. Barack is a weak candidate who would make a weak President. Therefore, this Hillary supporter is casting his vote for Sen. John McCain, a strong and rational moderate Republican come November. And casting that vote proudly!

Posted by: PhillyPaul | June 19, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

after release of the statement, obama was quoted to say “wow, that doesn’t sound like the barack obama i have known the last 47 years, pulling something like that….”
maybe with all that NON-public money, he can purchase an idea that isn’t a retread from the carter administration. THAT would be a change.

Posted by: fred | June 19, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

If he’s comfortable telling lies now – just wait if he’s elected president. It’ll be all lies. Same old, same old. What ever happened to the “change” candidate? Just more phoney lines to please the people.

Posted by: Mary | June 19, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

So this is the “Change We Can Believe In”.
With Wall Street in the tank for him, why am I SO not surprised.

Posted by: 12SpeakOut | June 19, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

I do not want a President who lies to the public. Obviously Obama intends to change his mind on anything and everything. His word is worthless. This Democrat who supports Hillary will vote McCain this election. I favor more drilling and more nuclear electric and more refineries. Maybe Republicans have the better answer right now.

Posted by: DemocratForever | June 19, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Mike_B: Not taking money from lobbyists and PACS? Where in the world have you been? He takes money from both and half his staff are lobbyists.

Posted by: A | June 19, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Boy…..THAT change did not last long.
It depends on what your definition of public funding is, I guess. Maybe he is getting advice from that Hillary broad. Here we go again. Man, way to go Obama.

Posted by: foxbat40 | June 19, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Wow the right wing folks out on this blog in full force. Truthfully who cares if he opts in or out of Public Financing? He tried to make an agreement with McCain to ban 527s and other groups, but was rebuffed. So he did what he had to do.
OBAMA 08!!

Posted by: Nick | June 19, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

it looks like Washington is already controlling Obama.

Posted by: Thumb | June 19, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Foxbat40,
There is nothing to do with Hillary.
Pls Don’t blame Hillary for his decision.

Posted by: catleya | June 19, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Nick: Try getting your facts straight!

Posted by: A | June 19, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Obama’s reasoning is sound. Obama has always said he would only do public financing if it was fair. McCain and RNC have already shown that they will not agree to a fair playing field so Obama has no choice.

Posted by: William | June 19, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Phoney!!! Obama is a big PHONEYYYYYYYY!!!

Posted by: Thumb | June 19, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Mike,
You said that offshore drilling won’t lower prices. If not what will and why have they gone up?
The answer is that an increase in the amount of oil will lower the price of gas. It’s called supply and demand. We also need to drill in ANWR which would lower the price of gas and lessen our need for middle east oil.
Also, do you know that the total “above ground foot print” in ANWR will only be 3 square miles and they will only drive in and out of ANWR during the winter when the roads are frozen and no damage will be done do the landscape.
In the world we live in today, how can you not support the drilling of U.S oil. It will lower the cost and we will be more self reliant and it may give us a 15 year window to develope alternative energy.

Posted by: Curt | June 19, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Any right minded person cannot support an Obama presidency. He is not the right way forward.

Posted by: Mark | June 19, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Obama is a puppet. When someone isn’t pulling his strings, he flops. When the ventriloquist stops whispering, he flops.
That makes him a flop-flop!

Posted by: Soetoro No! | June 19, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Another thing that is bothering me about this discussion. I’ve heard everything from McCain’s speech patterns to his divorce brought up on this thread. What do they have to do with Obama not using the public funds?
Nothing.
They are attempts to justify Barry’s misdeeds by pointing to someone else’s. Let me ask you this. If your child cheats on a test at school and gets caught but then says that other’s did it too, does that justify it? Of course it doesn’t. The misdeeds of others (including those of 527s) does not excuse your own. That’s what it comes down to.
Barry is either the type of man he says he is, or he’s not. Based on what I’ve seen him do (not what he says) he is not.

Posted by: Jon | June 19, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Good point.
“Don’t listen to what he says; watch what he does.”
Turns out Obama is a moderate that works well within a broken system, turning the system for the benefit of the people.
Bravo, Obama.
It’s so funny how so many people trash Obama for being too “liberal,” yet he’s willing to pass up a government hand-out to empower the little guy. This move is about as Libertarian as you can expect from a statist-democrat. In fact, it’s WAY MORE Libertarian than anything going on in either of the big two political parties.
Obama certainly is no Libertarian, but he’s one of the best friends the Libertarians have in either major party.
Why aren’t people pointing out that Obama just saved the US Taxpayers over 80 million dollars? Yes, it’s just a drop in the bucket, but it’s the first drop of many he will support in filling the bucket that Bush emptied.
I find it amusing how the Democrat-bashers fail to notice that this “liberal” just turned down a government hand-out, and it’s the Republican that is funding his campaign on the backs of the US Taxpayers. If seeing a liberal leaning toward Libertarian ideals isn’t real CHANGE, then I don’t know what is.

Posted by: Bennett | June 19, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

At first, I had an open mind about Obama, but then I saw what would happen to my taxes if he was elected. (Mind, you, I am lower middle class and my taxes would still sky rocket). Ever since then, he has said and done things that make me trust him less and less each day.
John McCain seems to be the only one of the two whom I trust. He will be getting my vote in November. McCain 2008!!!!!!!

Posted by: Lisa Again | June 19, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

I feel that Obama did just the right thing. He is playing the Republican game. Republicans are the enemy – Hillary was a friend who was bitter. There is earth and sky difference in that. I also believe that Obama should tone down his anger a bit. He is shouting to the point of losing his pich and rhythm, and that can turn some voters away. I do not want republicans to vote for him. There is a large mass of African-Americans who will drove en-mass that will ensure Obama win by 57% to 41% margin, 2% liberterian /Nader/ Paul fringe. Note my words June-19-2008 6:13pm.

Posted by: say_something | June 19, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

Bennett: Obama isn’t liberal. He’s ultra-liberal.

Posted by: A | June 19, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

People please wake up and see that Obama is wrong for our country.

Posted by: Samantha | June 19, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Everything Obama says is right and true and good. By definition. So say we all.

Posted by: Bill | June 19, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Change is good. Change allows you to adapt to the forever changing environment, survive, thrive, and grow. And if something in the environment is broken, it’s reasonable to fix it before you use it. That’s just plain common sense. But if you sit still, or do the same thing over and over in a changing environment, then most likely you’ll be passed by and left behind. You have to move and adapt to live. Most sensible, reasonable people know that.

Posted by: KC | June 19, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

Curt: I think you are directing you question to me…not sure. Although the environment does concern me, it’s not my primary reason for objected to off-shore drilling / ANWR. The reason why more drilling will have little impact at the price at the pump is simply…it will barely make a dent in the total world oil supply as it is. I’ve said this time and time again and assume this is your thinking as well, but the oil pulled out of additional off-shore / ANWR wells will NOT be reserved for the good ‘ol U.S.A. and simply would go up for sale on the global oil market (like all oil does). Unless our government makes some stipulation to this practice then this stands true.

Posted by: Mike_B | June 19, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Bennet,
Obama didn’t turn down government funds based on principle, he turned them down because he can get more form private funding.
If you think he is a lebratarian you have a big shock comming. He is going to increase the size of government faster then we have ever seen, and he will do that by increasing taxes.

Posted by: Curt | June 19, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

“Turns out Obama is a moderate that works well within a broken system, turning the system for the benefit of the people.”
That’s funny. The “moderate” who wants to raise taxes, spend more, and socialize private industry. That doesn’t sound moderate to me. No wonder people think that the “never saw a government expense I didn’t like” Bush is an arch conservative when think that Barry is a moderate.

Posted by: Jon | June 19, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

Curious…So where is Obama getting all his money? And from whom? Please don’t push the “grassroots effort” line. Politicians don’t raise millions upon millions of dollars from average folks who are just getting by themselves. It appears the only “Change” Obama is going to give us is “Spare Change.”

Posted by: Rene'e | June 19, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

so does this turning down of public financing “in the interest of fairness” mean Obama-the-racist will also tell the mainstream media to stop supporting his campaign with free coverage
no, I think not
the republican candidates should be given an extra 5 billion dollars in public financing to counter that amount of free publicity the media and Hollywood give the leftist candidates

Posted by: Adrenalyn | June 19, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

What so pathetic is the Kool-aid drinkers will likely keep making excuses for his lying, back-tracking, no-policy behind IF he gets elected because…
‘He’s So Well-Spoken!And So Handsome!And Makes Us Feel Happy!

Posted by: 12SpeakOut | June 19, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Mike, I agree that just offshore drilling or ANWAR alone won’t dramatically lower the price at the pump, however there is not a single silver bullet. Increasing the amount of oil we pull from the ground along with nuclear power plants, more effeciant use of energy. etc. is the short and mid term solution.
Even if some one developed an alternative to oil tonight it would take 20 years to refit the world to use that alternative. WE are in this for our life time and we have to start being realistec about it.
Curt

Posted by: Curt | June 19, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Obama is a jerk! That sums it up.

Posted by: Soetoro No! | June 19, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

People seem to miss the point that Bush (this so-called conservative) is the SPENDINGEST president in the history of this country, a couple times over.
Once again, check out Obama’s voting record. He votes both directions (spending and cutting spending). What you find is he votes on effectiveness, not pork or special interests.
Like I said before, he works within a system for the benefit of the people. Sure he’s a statist, but McCain far outpaces him in this area. “Defense” amounts to nearly 50% of the US Federal Budget. Do you really think putting a war hero in office is going to reduce spending? Reduce taxes? Bush only reduced taxes for the wealthy elite, while systematically transferring AS MUCH of your tax dollars into the hands of his buddies as he can. Not only did they make money hand-over-fist from the government, they had to pay much less tax on it.
Bush has built a system of a downward spiral. Obama will have to raise taxes simply to prevent our entire economy from collapsing under the weight of the deficit Bush has run.
Bush has spent more than $10,000 PER HOUSEHOLD just on the war in Iraq. Get it? Bush has made every American household $10,000 poorer, and each of us is going to be paying off that debt for a long time.
Yeah, Bush didn’t “raise taxes,” he just maxed out the credit cards, and expects someone else to pay them off.
Bloody pirate!
I know, after 8 years of being plundered, let’s vote McCain, a fellow buccaneer, into office. That makes a whole lot of sense.
Wow.

Posted by: Bennett | June 19, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Curt: Agreed..no silver bullet. It would have to be a culmonation of changes included changing our energy consumption habits as well. But even if off-Shore / ANWR were approved today…we wouldn’t see any oil begin to hit the world market for at least another 5 to 8 years.
You might find this site interesting..it is were I get the majority of my information: http://www.eia.doe.gov/

Posted by: Mike_B | June 19, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

Curt: Agreed..no silver bullet. It would have to be a culmination of changes included changing our energy consumption habits as well. But even if off-Shore / ANWR were approved today…we wouldn’t see any oil begin to hit the world market for at least another 5 to 8 years.

Posted by: Mike_B | June 19, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

“Republicans are the enemy ” -say_something
You are exactly the problem with our political system. There should be no “enemy” there should be opposing points of view. I’d be willing to bet you actually harbor hatred for anyone with a R by their name. I don’t hate Obama, I just don’t trust him.
His associations speak for who he is. I don’t know if he agrees with Ayers, or Wright but I do know he was willing to look past their political views and use them for political advantage. And to discard them when it was politically advantagous to do so.
I don’t particularly like McCain either. But given the choice between a flawed politician and a conniving, oportunistic one, I’ll take the flawed one.

Posted by: Jon | June 19, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

To all you cynics and I told you so’s out there: you want Obama to be president or not? to be the next president, you gotta do what you gotta do and that’s it!

Posted by: len | June 19, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

Can anyone say liar? Once again he shows he can be trusted to do what he says.

Posted by: J | June 19, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Obama seems like someone you can trust…o wait…nope.

Posted by: Thumb | June 19, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Any fool can lie to the American people. Any fool can be bought , like obama.
Any fool can say , I was against the war.
Any fool can deny the war is working .
obama sure looks like a FOOL. He is just missing the Jesters hat

Posted by: m-antony | June 19, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

What Obama actually said was, “If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to
preserve a publicly financed general election.”
No agreement was able to be reached, therefore, he went to plan B.
I know a lot of Republicans. Unfortunately most of them still believe that CCN and Fox actually broadcast real news and take the information they receive there at face value. It’s sad, but it must strain a few brains to attempt to understand the difference between pledging to negotiate an agreement and establishing an agreement. It is also difficult to actually do one’s own research and formulate one’s own opinion…. especially when needing to interpret the meaning out of content longer than one short sentence.

Posted by: Plunger | June 19, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

I hope there is a strict accounting for all the money he is raising and make sure he is not going to pocket it for himself. Imagine how so much money can (turn ones head)money can be hidden here and there. He is such a liar, says whatever, How can anyone trust OBama.

Posted by: CMhinsley | June 19, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

The first job of any wannabe POTUS is to get elected. Right now, Obama is the best in the world at accomplishing this.
He can turn on a dime and leave you “haters” in the dust. He doesn’t lie, he doesn’t flip flop and he doesn’t break promises: he just changes his mind.
He is the anointed one. He gets no tough questioning in the press. A few attack articles from the right wing are quickly dismissed as racist rants.
He is going to be the next POTUS.

Posted by: OneAmericanCitizen | June 19, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Come on Bennett,
I don’t like defencing McCain but you have to be kidding. THe only people that can get a tax reduction are the upper middle class and the rich. The bottum 50% of income earners pay NO taxes. The top 10% of tax payers pay jsut over 70% of all income taxes.
Incase you have forgot, Jimmy carter was the lst President that substantially increased income taxes and that helped creat the one of the worst economies in modern history. Also, every time we have a president come into office and lower the tax rate the economy is stimulated. So, doesn’t it makes sense that raising the tax rate will slow the economy. When Regan lowered the tax rate the amount of money the government received in tax revenue increased. Why, because the U.S. economy improved substantially. Why can’t you Lib’s look at history and learn?

Posted by: Curt | June 19, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

I can hear the band Chicago singing “Only the beginning!”

Posted by: Chan | June 19, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Oh, I see. The “change” Obama talks about is his change of mind. He just “hopes” he’ll continue to get a pass and a free ride. What a fraud!

Posted by: Unashamed_Independent | June 19, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Obama is right. The intensity of Right and the Republican corporate machine along with the Bush-Cheney special attack squads and greed masters reveal that Obama can get elected by appealing to the average citizen.
Lets face it’s either Integrity or Bush 3. The high road or the low road!
Obama is the right choice for the time!

Posted by: savoymt | June 19, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Obama will not get elected..by November all the skeletons will be out of the closet and he will have worn his flip flop sandals so much that McCain will look like a saint!! McCain gets my vote! And I have never heard anyone say that would vote for him! And the polls are measured by 1000 people questioned…who knows what color they are, or what area they polled! The polls mean nothing!!!

Posted by: Carolyn | June 19, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

Both Kerry and Bush opted out of public financing in 2004. According to CommonCause.com, the presidential public financing system is outmoded and in need of reform–hence candidates opt out of it. Before Obama’s announcement, it was already predicted that both candidates would choose to fund their own races.
In case it’s not obvious, candidates would make a “big, big deal” out of their opponent’s decision to put cream in their coffee. The rhetoric is one-size-fits all. Do you research, people.

Posted by: Sarah | June 19, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

OneAmericanCitizen,
“He can turn on a dime and leave you “haters” in the dust. He doesn’t lie, he doesn’t flip flop and he doesn’t break promises: he just changes his mind.”
It’s ok for him to do that but as soon as his opponents do he cries foul. No other politician would get away with it.

Posted by: J | June 19, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

REV Wright said it best he’s a TYPICAL POLITICIAN.
THIS WILL BE THE FIRST OF A LONG LIST OF BROKEN PROMISES IF OBAMA IS ELECTED.

Posted by: Who Knows So What Who Cares | June 19, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

Remember when we said we had the technology to produce synthetic oil from coal, the price of oil dropped from $30 to $8 dollars a barrel. We have the Chinese and Vietnam drilling off our coast and we all know how environmentally conscience they are. It seems like Americans and Congress are suicidal. Next we will have Obama raise taxes on companies and either send them off-shore or out of business, kow-tow to the Al Gore nut jobs, give us rationed healthcare, give all terrorist in the world who have never step foot in this country rights to our court system (guess who gets to pay), illegals will be given SSI, healthcare, education (guess who gets to pay). When the lunatics take over the asylum.

Posted by: Patti | June 19, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Who are this “we” he mentions…..is “we”going to make promises and then break them if he becomes President…..scary. How will other nations trust him if he does this kind of thing already…go McCain Ex Hillary supporter

Posted by: Donna F | June 19, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

Hey Obama,
There are no Super delegates to buy off this time!

Posted by: J | June 19, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Flip Flop Flip Flop. Obama’s former pastor said it better, “he’s just another politician that would say anything to win” is that the kind of guy we can trust? Change and hope? Don’t get fooled.

Posted by: persio | June 19, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

“Lets face it’s either Integrity or Bush 3. The high road or the low road!”
This is a typical tactic. Name call and demonize the opponent. Also, this has nothing to do with the article, but you just can’t stand someone saying something bad about your beloved. It’s all emotion and no logic. Saying the man who throws his pastor under the bus for political gain (let’s be honest, he’s always known what Wright thought) is not a halmark of integrity.
Also, he should probably run against McCain and not Bush (another popular tactic. It’s called the straw man argument).

Posted by: Jon | June 19, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

We had 8 years of the Clinton’s endless lying, let’s not elect another liar. We were right in not believing his lies about the not knowing what his pastor was saying for 20 years from the pulpit of Trinity Church. Obama is just another political liar. He’s has shown his true colors. There’s nothing special about this liar.

Posted by: Obama, The Liar | June 19, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

The problem is the Political Class. While it usually takes many years for a politician to become corrupted, Obama has achieved it more quickly than most. Term Limits. In Obama’s case no more terms.

Posted by: Rasputin3.14 | June 19, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

What a complete, worthless liar. I will never vote for Obama. And if he becomes president, I will never recognize him as such.

Posted by: Jeremy | June 19, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

I am not excited about Senator Obama reversing himself. Please do not worry the news media will give him another pass. Remember he out spent Senator Clinton 2 to 1 in Ohio, Texas, South Dakota, Indina shall I keep going. In short Sheator Obama loss all the above primaries. The above just proves that no matter how much you spend you cannot buy an election.

Posted by: Bill | June 19, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

As one of the 1.5 million plus individuals that have given small amounts to the Obama campaign, I’m glad he’s backed out of public financing. That is change, and it’s closer to true public financing than the current system has been in years.
Besides – we do not need another president that will “stay the course” no matter how stupid that particular course may have become, or how much proof has piled up that he was wrong. 8 years of that was enough.

Posted by: Sarah | June 19, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Obama is everything that is wrong with our politicians today. Say one thing when it is convenient to do so and then flip flop. Rev. Wright was right on one thing, he will say what he has to say as a politician. This man is no better than any other politician.

Posted by: J | June 19, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Obama is a FRAUD!!! – ZERO morals -he cannot be trusted – he is NOT qualified to lead our country. Typical Dirty Political Chicago Tricks.
The MILLIONS of Hillary supporters together with the MILLIONS of GOP’s will make sure obama never wins the white house. OBama is a Radical Fraud!

Posted by: Molly | June 19, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

“As one of the 1.5 million plus individuals that have given small amounts to the Obama campaign, I’m glad he’s backed out of public financing. That is change, and it’s closer to true public financing than the current system has been in years.
Besides – we do not need another president that will “stay the course” no matter how stupid that particular course may have become, or how much proof has piled up that he was wrong. 8 years of that was enough.” – Sarah
Again, you’re making excuses for his breaking of promises to you. His promise was not to McCain, it was to you (since McCain wasn’t the nominee when he made the promise). I understand the impulse to want to give him a pass as you are already invested in him personally and his failure, in your mind will be your own (this goes back to the whole team mentality that has developed in American politics). But facts are facts. He has no problem doing whatever is necessary to get elected, and that should bother you.
Also, Bush is irrelvant to this discussion (except as a diversionary “straw man”). And Bush didn’t “stay the course” because he didn’t want to change his mind. He believes that Iraq can be a functioning democracy and that it becoming one is in our best interests. You can disagree, but he isn’t just sticking with his poisition because he doesn’t want to change his mind.

Posted by: Jon | June 19, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

This “bonehead” move will cost him the Whitehouse. Not only do people see him going against his word they think he is trying to “buy” his way into the Whitehouse. Won’t work.

Posted by: jim | June 19, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

Given Obama’s incessant changes of mind, how can any rational person believe he’ll keep his campaign promises. ANSWER: No rational person believes he’d keep his campaign promises.

Posted by: Soetoro No! | June 19, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Jon: Stat the course? Which course would that be?

Posted by: A | June 19, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

a flip-flop?
when will the media do AT LEAST 1 story on McCain’s flip-flops? why is the media giving McCain a free ride?
AND…why is Stephanopoulus carrying the water for Republicans?

Posted by: mb | June 19, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

“Change you can believe in” – I think not. He lost my vote!

Posted by: Ruth | June 19, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Obama: “Change we can believe in”. Change after change after change!

Posted by: Soetoro No! | June 19, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

A whole lot of self-righteous
indignation about nothing by
Obama detractors.
There was no pledge, no
contract, only an indication
of interest to pursue public
financing which levels the
playing field and saves
taxpayers money. Also the
fact that any agreement
should deal with the impact
of 527s and their unbridled
activities supporting the
Republican candidate.

Posted by: anon | June 19, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

anon: WRONG!

Posted by: A | June 19, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

I will vote of Obama. McCain is too much of a war hawk he makes Cheney look and a dove.

Posted by: tony garcia | June 19, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

tony garcia
Why so?

Posted by: A | June 19, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

OBAMA- JUST WORDS!!
HOPE=HOPE NO ONE NOTICES THE LIES I TELL.
CHANGE=FLIP-FLOP EVERY CHANCE I GET
YES YOU CAN=CON THE PEOPLE
BELIEVE IN=PLEASE BELIEVE ALL THE LIES THAT ARE STILL TO COME..
NEW POLITICS=SAME OLD POLTICIAN,SAY ONE THING DO ANOTHER.
I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT PAGE OBAMA WANTS US TO TURN TOO.

Posted by: Obama the gig is up | June 19, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Bush destroyed US economy of 340 billion SURPLUS, and will hand us $4,900,000,000,000 of debt created in less than 8 years. I bet Obama wins and the whole neocon-led industry dumps the Wall street market, leading to the so-prophecysed apocalypse. That is the game underway.

Posted by: say_somehing | June 19, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

anon,
There was no pledge, no
contract, only an indication
of interest to pursue public
financing which levels the
playing field and saves
taxpayers money.
He signed a piece of paper. That to me is as good as a contract. Yet another lie out of Obama’s mouth.

Posted by: J | June 19, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

McCain has been elected by people of Arizona for 25 years for delivering nothing..so says John McCain himself. He delivers no bridges, roads, parks, water system to the Arizona. But was involved in rescuing his buddy from Saving & Loans disaster of 1989. I know he is not fit to take on the stress of presidency at age of 72. It will be too convenient for him to say I forgot. America does not deserve another lying SOB, sometimes termed flip-flopper by his republican colleagues.

Posted by: Question Every Motives | June 19, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

I agree with “Enough Already” below. Obama is trying to buy the election and that’s why he doesn’t want the limitations of public financing. He can get so much more money from his shady friends and corporations. Don’t buy his BS about getting a few bucks from his grassroots support.
“Change” = Chicago-style corruption

Posted by: Juju | June 19, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

America does not deserve another lying SOB, sometimes termed flip-flopper by his republican colleagues.
Posted by: Question Every Motives
Well then I guess we shouldn’t vote Obama either. Neither candidate is anything we should want running our country.

Posted by: J | June 19, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

Posted by: Juju
Love the name. That’s what my niece calls me. :)

Posted by: J | June 19, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

Obama is a hypocrite, charlatan and a con artist. Nothing surprising here.

Posted by: Ex-democrat | June 19, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

To J: :o)
Glad we see eye to eye!

Posted by: Juju | June 19, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

“McCain has been elected by people of Arizona for 25 years for delivering nothing.”
Hmmmm … If he’s really delivered nothing, how is it that he’s managed to get re-elected so often? I guess maybe it’s because the people of Arizona are just a bunch of ignorant hicks like the people of Pennsylvania who are “clinging to their guns & religion”, huh?

Posted by: Danram | June 19, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

Obama’s supporter’s comments here are troubling. They are willing to completely ignore the fact he broke his promise. A PROMISE! Because they believe the end justifies the means they overlook the fact he broke his word. What did they expect him to say, “I broke my word please forgive me?” Of course he is going to spin it like he is doing it for the people. That is the same line socialists always give before revealing themselves for who they really are. Gaming the system indeed!

Posted by: Kelly | June 19, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

So no one bothered to read the so-called pledge? “If you are nominated for President in 2008 and your MAJOR OPPONENTS AGREE TO FOREGO private funding in the general election campaign, will you participate in the presidential public financing system?” McCain did not pledge to forego private funding, so there was no pledge for Obama to “go back on.” You’re either intellectually dishonest or illiterate. Grow up.

Posted by: Freebird | June 19, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

I will not vote for this racist named Barack Obama.
He can go back to his racist friends like Rev Jeremiah Wright, Rev Moss, and Father Pfleger.

Posted by: McCain in 08'/Hillary in 12' | June 19, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

freebird,
What don’t you understand? The McCain campaign has alreadt agreed to forgo private funding.
Obama is going to get hammered on this issue at every debate.

Posted by: John | June 19, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

Proof again Obama is nothing but a Democrat party spoiler.

Posted by: kelly | June 19, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

Why should we expect Obama to keep his word on campaign financing? The kid is a liar, his friends are racists or anti-American, when they are exposed he disowns them, but only when they are exposed.
Obama talks the talk but when it comes to walking the walk he falls short every time. We finally get a candidate that can talk, but that’s all, such a shame. For these reasons and more McCain will win the election and the democrats will do what they do best hate, instead of Mr. Bush it will be Mr. McCain. They will come up with many reasons for their loss, none of them true mind you, but something to justify spending millions of dollars on 16 month senator with no management experience. Obama’s excels at quarter backing others, no one does it better, but that is not enough to become president of the United States. A loser is a loser.

Posted by: a citizen | June 19, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

what does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but suffers the loss of his soul???…Obama take note of these words..you could be the next Tim Russert

Posted by: dumdems | June 19, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

I love the fact that your smart Dem elect has paid attention to the negative press he has placed on himself. I’ll bet when the smoke clears, you will find most of his advisors are Republican. This is pretty much over.

Posted by: denver republic mole | June 19, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

Looks as though a lot of people aren’t aware of what’s really going on. If anyone read the April 19th Washington Wire the headline read like this: “New McCain Fund Gets Around Donation Limit” Here’s the story: “To help ease their fund-raising woes, John McCain’s campaign has devised a new system to increase the maximum amount an individual can donate to the unofficial Republican nominee’s efforts.
Campaign manager Rick Davis (lobbyist) released the details of the “McCain Victory 08″ fund on Friday. He said the entity is a joint committee, combining the McCain campaign, the Republican National Committee and four key states under a “hybrid legal structure.”
The idea is to tap donors for more than the $2300 limit set by campaign finance laws. Under legislation pushed by McCain in his role as a Senator from Arizona, an individual can donate a maximum of $2300 to a presidential primary campaign and the same amount to the general election campaign. Although McCain received the number of delegates necessary to secure the nomination in March, he will not be the party’s official nominee until the convention in September–so he is still running a primary campaign.
The new structure allows up to $70,000 in individual contributions by channeling the money into different McCain-centric funds. The first $2300 of that would go to McCain’s primary campaign. The Republican National Committee would receive $28,500 of the donation. The remaining funds would be divided equally, up to $10,000 a piece, among four states the campaign has designated as battleground for November. Wisconsin, Minnesota, Colorado, and New Mexico.
Davis said those four states were selected because they “probably don’t have the capacity to fund directly out of their own organic resources in state.” He added. “They will benefit from a national fund raising effort that will help funnel money to those state Victory programs.
The campaign also has individual Victory Fund programs in California, Ohio and Florida. Each of those states can receive a maximum of $10,000 from an individual, Davis said.
Still in question is whether or not the McCain campaign will accept public financing for his general election campaign. In order to receive the money, McCain would have to abide by spending limits-roughly $85 million from the time he receives the nomination at the convention through Nov. 4. One of his Democratic opponent,s Barack Obama, has expressed doubts about taking public financing and abiding by the spending limits. The McCain campaign said they will reserve judgment on their participation until the general election competition becomes clearer.” End quote:
If I were a candidate and had to face an opponent like McCain who looks for every devious way, means and method to get around his own laws, I’d damn sure make the same decision Senator Obama made as well

Posted by: devilkev | June 19, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

It’s too funny listening to repubs whine cause they know McLame can’t possibly raise near the amt of money Obama can. HAHAHAHA!! Keep Whining Repubs –I can’t get enough!!!This is GREAT!!

Posted by: John | June 19, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

Does anyone remember McCain’s fight against special interest groups and for campaign reform????? I agree that Obama is a hypocrite – we’ve known that for awhile now but to say McCain is an innocent victim in this is ludicrous and for him to call Obama a hyporcrite when it come to anything related to flip flopping on campaign reform (or limits in this case) is the epitome of hypocrisy.

Posted by: al | June 19, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

A suggestion to both Democrats and Repulicans who love America. Arm yourselves now. The announcement yesterday (from a Dem representative) that we need sieze the refineries (he used the word nationalize) have in mind. Marxism, socialism, communism, whatever you want to call it has been synonymous with “Democrat” for as long as I can recall.
It looks like McCain has thrown in the towel and will let the Democrats purchase the presidency (with the “subjects” that will be ruled paying for it).
While I am proudly “Unaffiliated”, I am certain that those that buy Barrack Hussein Obama’s presidency and/or vote for him will be VERY VERY sorry about the results. It’s not rocket scientry to realize what his adgenda is.
ARM YOURSELVES TO THE TEETH so we can take America back from the “Comrades”

Posted by: Marky | June 20, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

So this is the “Change” Obama has been
talking about! The right to change his
mind! So when he says he will only
increase taxes on Americans earning
over $250,000 a year it’s possible he will “Change” his mind(after the election of course) and decide to increase taxes for the rest of us!
If Obama gets elected the only thing we will have in our pockets will be
“Change”! No Thanks!
I’ll take McCain!

Posted by: reaganfan | June 20, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

Wonder how Edwards feels about Obama’s decision.

Posted by: Deb10 | June 20, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

I agree with a citizen, Obama talks the talk but has never in his life walked the walk. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain, the Great Oz has spoken. How many more times is he going to flip flop before the election and don’t his surrogates ever tire of having to defend his every word and action. If he was half of what he says he is he wouldn’t need defending every five minutes.

Posted by: pennsylvaniavoter | June 20, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Um hello, Obama is accepting Public funds; he’s just accepting FEDERAL public funds. Meaning he’s not taking public money that is gathered by the federal government and is instead using the small donor system he used during the primary season. If the system he used during the primary season, where he asked his supporters to donate what they could anywhere from 5.00 to 10.00 dollars or more, pretty much whatever they could afford to give. If money like that gathered from everyday people like you and me isn’t public funding I don’t know what is, and if people who criticize him for back out of the federal system would just sit down and think they’d realize that he hasn’t really backed away from public funding he’s just taking a different approach to getting it.

Posted by: Logical Thinker | June 20, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

Denver Republican Mole: If you don’t think Senator Obama’s decision didn’t have anything to do with McCain’s new “hybrid legal structure” Victory 08 fund, you’re very shallow. If you were a candidate who found yourself all of a sudden having to battle your opponent financed by millions of dollars worth of “hybrid legal structure” donations in the state of New Mexico, and you yourself were now limited by law to $989,000 and not able to pull funds from anywhere else, just what would you do? $989,000 won’t even buy a weeks worth of TV ads. It has everything in the world to do with the fact that McCain is having a hard time with fund raising, (latest $18M to Obama’s $31M as filed with the FEC,) and the fact the RNC is raising funds left and right compared to McCain. The RNC is not limited by law,and can pour money into states.

Posted by: devilkev | June 20, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Um hello Logical Thinker. Have you read what you just wrote? That is the difference! The money Obama is recieving ISN’T from the same source.

Posted by: denver republic mole | June 20, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

“Obama’s supporter’s comments here are troubling. They are willing to completely ignore the fact he broke his promise.”
Freebird, they’re liberals. What did you expect?

Posted by: Mike | June 20, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

Through the bundlers set up by oil corporations, and subprime lenders, they bought Obama and Obama pretends to buy the elections. DNC, August is not here yet, obama is nothing but the worst kind of politician a liar and a sold out.

Posted by: libre | June 20, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

I am neither black nor white but I did my research before I’ve decided to vote for McCain. I hope people would do their homework first rather than blindly voting for a candidate regardless of his or her experience, character and background.

Posted by: al4mcattack | June 20, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

And if Obama is elected:
I know I said I was going to lower taxes, but the tax system is broken.
I know I said National Health Care, but the health care system is broken.
I know I said I would end the war and bring the troops home, but the war-ending system is broken.
You know, like the public financing system is broken. If he has it all together, why do I get emails begging money from his campaign everyday? It’s nice to know that he cares so much about us, but he would prefer to take our hard scraped together dollars than take public financing that is available to him. About the last thing we need is to see more political ads on tv in the first place. If Americans don’t already know who they are voting for, they haven’t been paying attention.

Posted by: Melanie | June 20, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

Don’t blame him, whoever voted for him should know he is too Liberal.
You’got what you expected.

Posted by: catleya | June 20, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

I have a question here.
It’s real.
Somebody knocked my door and asked for donation.
He said he was from Obama campaign.
Is this a fraud or real?
I only know we can donate thru online.
Who should I contact?
Thanks

Posted by: catleya | June 20, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am

Obama is an unprincipled hypocrite. He can’t be trusted to tell the truth about anything. The DNC has a lawsuit against McCain to keep him from doing exactly what Obama is doing now, not accepting public financing. This is how Obama always runs his campaigns: using the rules to trip up his opponents.

Posted by: rckinglets | June 20, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am

I think people are acting voraciously specious in this situation. Obama saw that the disadvantages to his campaign because of public financing outweighed his troth or previous position. The Republicans have been sheepishly cozened with the system. So Obama has prudently decided to manumit himself from that cumbersome situation.

Posted by: bspia2 | June 20, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am

This protest cry from McCain’s group reminds me of a scene from Star Wars episode-4, where Princess Leia in desperation sends the following distress message: “Help us Obi-wan Kenobi; you’re our ONLY HOPE!” It appears McCain was holding out in hope that Obama would forego the benefits of his record setting campaign machine. Maybe McCain was hoping Obama would throttle back and take public tax money. When you look at McCain’s disappointment that Obama has optioned out, you get the impression McCain felt his “ONLY HOPE” in stopping Obama wss to tie him down to taxpayer funded financing. Yeah, , , , right! Fat chance!
From McCain’s perspective his ONLY HOPE in beating Obama is to level the playing field. McCain can do this by asking Obama to give up his advantages while McCain gives up nothing of similar weight and value. Obama would have to be an idiot to go that route. Unfortunately for McCain, Obama is wise beyond his years, and a real Ivy-Leaguer with Chicago street-smarts to boot. Here are a couple simple and honest answers as to why Senator Barack Obama’s response to option-out is appropriate and correct.
(1.) From the beginning Obama’s promise was conditional. Obama made it perfectly clear that his promise to go public was dependent on whether McCain would also agree to stringent campaign finance rules and they both would remain open and public with their campaign numbers. Clearly, Obama with his principles can be trusted to follow the rules. Not sure whether the same can be said of McCain with all his flip-flops on high-profile issues over the past two years.
(2.) As long as Cindy McCain is sitting atop $100-million dollars of accessible assets and not beholden to anyone including the IRS, the Obama team would be well advised not to enter any agreements with the McCain’s. For Obama to enter an agreement with McCain and his supporters with regards to this matter, is like taking out an insurance policy from a desperately unemployed coffin maker. It would be like contracting to play black-jack at a casino for the next 4-months and having cheating Louie the card shark deal all your hands. Let’s face it, if Cindy slips her husband a few extra million, allowing McCain an unfair advantage, who would know about it. No one!
Senator Barack Obama was not only correct, but his decision was wise and righteous

Posted by: Perusing-through | June 20, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am

For a long time we have known that Obama is a liar! He has no track record to back his promises he made through the primaries; and when not reading the script, he has shown that he knows nothing about American history, foreign policy, the tax, and the war; now he broke another word he promised. It’s no surprise at all. Do we really want a president like Obama??? Affirmative Action has given Obama the chance to get into Harvard and Columbia Univ., but is the Presidency the place for Affirmative Action at such a tough time for this nation???

Posted by: JJ | June 20, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am

And we are surprised by this because??? Oh, yes. That’s right, Barack Obama promised us he was different from the rest of them. What a joke.

Posted by: Michael | June 20, 2008, 2:12 am 2:12 am

Where in the world is Michelle Obama, and what does she hate about America today? Isn’t “change” wonderful? Obama changes positions, promisses, allegiances and principles as a baby changes diapers. Obama is the worst kind of politician, a two faces cynic and corrupt. DNC made a big mistake with this “affirmative Action” experiment. Write Hillary on the ballot and wait for 2012, we are dommed for the next 4 years.

Posted by: libre | June 20, 2008, 2:13 am 2:13 am

Why Obama didn’t let muslim women seat in the area of the TV shot behind him? Is he above discrimination? no he is a racist, just like Michelle.

Posted by: libre | June 20, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am

Write Hillary on the ballot and wait for 2012, we are dommed for the next 4 years.

Posted by: libre | June 20, 2008, 2:17 am 2:17 am

Keith Olberman tonight reported that some ill-informed media gossips accused Barack Obama of “flip-flopping” on public finance; you are both wrong.
It is distressing that you, along with others, offer baseless opinions and fail miserably to check out the facts before making pronouncements on dis-information, much of which, it would seem, comes to you from individuals with vested interests.
This is a deterioration of your profession; you are starting to be reminiscent of theRove/ Bush/Cheney mindset that subscribes to the dictum that perception is reality. No, reality is reality, and that’s what the “news” should be about.
Please.

Posted by: Mensa | June 20, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am

Is it not the duty of journalist to sift through the rhetoric and provide the context for the statement made by officals and news worhy sources? The was not been clearly done in this story about Obama. You insult me and all rational people by not doing your job properly. This is what made Tim Russert a beacon in his profession.
If this is too dffcult for you to understand then here it is. It seems that the whole Obama statement was a condional promise. If the Republican candidate did this then he would do this as well. The Republican candidate went back and forth on the issue and only has now said that he would take public finance after Obama made his anouncement at the eleventh hour. Is there not a case pending there this same republican said that the would take public finance and then changed his mind when private finance became more available?
ABC news is clearly anti Obama biased.

Posted by: Guy Goring | June 20, 2008, 4:23 am 4:23 am

The Obamabots on here need to get a grip: This piece is NOT about McCain, or Bush or Cheney, it is about Obama.
And it IS important as Obama promised to run a different type of campaign, to eschew politics as usual, to run as the candidate of change.
Neither Hillary or McCain ran on any platform of change. But Obama did. And this backtracking on his part does not support the rhetoric of his campaign.
Bash Hillary, McCain, Bush all you want, it simply makes you look more desperate. Deflection is NOT an effective debate tool.

Posted by: None of the Above 08 | June 20, 2008, 4:50 am 4:50 am

McCain is playing the system. He has organized a way for individual donors to give up to $73,000.00 each by giving to the Republican National Committee. McCain then uses the RNC money to attack Obama. So McCain takes the taxpayers’ money ($84,000,000.00) then uses extra funds in the RNC, as much as he can collect, to attack Obama.
Obama just nullified this plan by the GOP and McCain.
The news media never explains this situation and McCain’s plan in a very simple manner.

Posted by: Jack | June 20, 2008, 4:59 am 4:59 am

The fact that Obama changed his mind when the facts changed is GOOD. It shows GOOD JUDGMENT. He found out that the Republicans, in using public funding, is accepting OIL MONEY AND BIG BUSINESS funding. He wants to do the opposite. When he said he was for public funding, he didn’t want it to be inclusive of lobby money. Now, it is. So, he changed. Good job, Barack!

Posted by: johnnyappleseed61 | June 20, 2008, 5:03 am 5:03 am

Why should Obama Limit himself to the 80 million dollars when he could get 500 Million? You have to remember obama wont just be fighting mccain but the entire RNC and their 527 groups, now obama will have to money to play in all 50 states and respond to lies from the 527′s Go!! Obama !!!

Posted by: Maeine | June 20, 2008, 5:54 am 5:54 am

I’m voting Democrat because I believe that the best strategy in war is defeat. It broadens the mind to learn Japanese, German and Arabic. Talk about multiculturalism!
I’m voting Democrat because I’m mad that George W. Bush hasn’t caught Bin Laden. That’s because Bin Laden is the only Islamic terrorist in the world.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe that if I don’t have enough money, the solution is for the government to take more of my money. Who needs money when gas is $5 per gallon?
I’m voting Democrat because I believe that the ideal family is two homosexual bonobos, a goat and a parrot raising a human baby. Love and compassion is all it takes to make a successful family!
I’m voting Democrat because it’s my body, and if I want to kill my baby, I’ll do it, even if its head is in the birth canal. If I want to cut out my intestines and feed them to the crocodiles, I’ll do that too. That’s the freedom our forefathers enshrined in the Constitution.
I’m voting Democrat because our enemies on the battlefield deserve comfy hotel rooms, Pay-Per-View, prostitutes and all the benefits of American citizenship.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe we need other countries’ permission for me to turn down my thermostat.
I’m voting Democrat because the real cure for racism includes preferential policies based on race — particularly in presidential voting. If you believe that a black candidate ought to be qualified, as well as black, you’re worse than Bull Conner.

Posted by: Maxify55 | June 20, 2008, 5:58 am 5:58 am

I’m voting Democrat because I care about the real victims of crime — criminals.
I’m voting Democrat because everyone deserves crappy healthcare. Sure, you’ll have to wait years for that life-saving cancer surgery. But it’s first come, first served at the cemetery!
I’m voting Democrat because I believe in minority rights (except in Muslim countries), free speech (with regard to pornography but not conservative talk radio), environmentalism (unless we’re talking about Al Gore’s house) and diplomacy (but never backed by the threat of military force).
I’m voting Democrat because I like the words “hope” and “change.” Also “kazoo.” That’s a funny word.
I’m voting Democrat because I believe that America’s founders were rich, white, greedy xenophobes, and that America’s founding principles are hogwash requiring periodic editing from an unelected group of liberal judges.
Most of all, I’m voting Democrat because I like the ideas they have over in France, but I don’t feel like moving there. I’ll threaten to move, but I really won’t. After all, I have a good job, healthcare, lower taxes, free speech and a social framework that promotes family structure. And all of it is defended by the most effective fighting force on the planet.
If only the institution of far-left values resulted in a great country. Oh, well. That won’t stop me from voting Democrat, though. After all, I’m voting Democrat because thought isn’t one of my strong suits.

Posted by: Maxify55 | June 20, 2008, 5:59 am 5:59 am

Just more of the same from typical politicians. Expect more of this from both camps, especially Obama.
You can expect more “CHANGE” on Obama’s positions as this campaign continues.

Posted by: Be Independent | June 20, 2008, 7:11 am 7:11 am

“Barack Obama has attended Wright’s sermons for over twenty years. By his own admission, Obama consults with Wright before making any “bold political decisions.” Obama calls Wright his “spiritual advisor.” He calls Wright one of his prime mentors. Obama got the title of his book, “The Audacity of Hope,” from a Wright sermon of the same name. He says that Wright was extremely important in shaping his life and his views. Obama and his wife were married by Rev. Wright. Reverend Wright baptized Obama’s daughters. Barack Obama donated over $20,000 to Wright’s church in 2006. He continues attending services in Wright’s church.”- antiprotester.blogspot.com
Barack H.Obama wrote these words in “‘Dreams of My Father,” — “I found solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother’s race.” His mother is white.
Hillary has her Bosnia lie and Obama has….
( From “newsbusters.org”)
1). Will Obama get the same media treatment with his lies? Don’t hold your breath. In a speech to a Selma, Alabama crowd meant to pump up his civil-rights movement authenticity and his Kennedy Camelot image, Barack Obama claimed that the Kennedy administration paid for his Kenyan father to travel to America on a student scholarship and therefore was responsible for his “very existence”. However, the first march on Selma took place on March 7, 1965. Obama would have been about three and half years old at that time. For some reason the media never did the math on this.
2). Obama’s Selma speech offers a very confused chronology of both the Kenya student program and the civil rights movement. Relating the story of how his parents met, Obama said: “There was something stirring across the country because of what happened in Selma, Alabama, because some folks are willing to march across a bridge. So they got together and Barack Obama Junior was born. So don’t tell me I don’t have a claim on Selma, Alabama.”
…. bloggers pointed out that the Selma bridge protest occurred four years after Obama’s birth.
3). (From “freedomsenemies.com”) In his memoir, Obama writes of one of the watershed moments of his racial awareness — time and again in remarkable detail. It is a story about a Life magazine article that influenced him. The report was about a black man who tried to bleach his skin white. When Obama was told no such article could be found in Life, he says “it might have been Ebony.
He is 9 years old, living in Indonesia, where he and his mother moved with her new husband, Lolo Soetoro, a few years earlier. One day while visiting his mother, who was working at the U.S. Embassy in Jakarta, Obama passed time by looking through several issues of Life magazine. He came across an article that he later would describe as feeling like an “ambush attack.”
The article included photos of a black man who had destroyed his skin with powerful chemical lighteners that promised to make him white. Instead, the chemicals had peeled off much of his skin, leaving him sad and scarred, Obama recalled.
“I imagine other black children, then and now, undergoing similar moments of revelation,” Obama wrote of the magazine photos in “Dreams.”
Yet no such photo exists, according to historians at the magazine. No such photos, no such article. When asked about the discrepancy, Obama said in a recent interview, “It might have been an Ebony or it might have been … who knows what it was?” (At the request of the Tribune, archivists at Ebony searched their catalogue of past articles, none of which matched what Obama recalled.)
In fact, it is surprising, based on interviews with more than two dozen people who knew Obama during his nearly four years in Indonesia, that it would take a photograph in a magazine to make him conscious of the fact that some people might treat him differently in part because of the color of his skin.
4). Barack Obama in 2003, talking to the AFL/CIO:
“I happen to be a proponent of single-payer universal healthcare coverage. That’s what I’d like to see.”
In January, 2008, Obama claimed in a nationally televised debate:
“I never said that we should try to go ahead and get single-payer.”
5). Responding to questions about his intent to serve out the six year senate term, Obama says, in this video, (link removed), that he will not run for the presidency in four years.
Notice: The video has disappeared. Using WayBackMachine, I found two links — both played empty videos — a lot of stuff is being scrubbed from the web.
Here is what he said in the video:
“I think I’ve been very clear. Ah-ah-mumble-mumble, there’s a presidential election in four years. I’m not running for president in four years.”
Here is a backup story — during a meeting with reporters at his Illinois campaign headquarters after his election to the U.S. Senate, he ridiculed as “a silly question” whether he would run for president or vice president before his term ends in 2011. “I’ve never worked in Washington,” he said. “I can unequivocally say I will not be running for national office in four years, and my entire focus is making sure that I’m the best possible senator on behalf of the people of Illinois.”
6). On July 28th, the day after his speech at the Democratic convention catapulted him into the national spotlight, Barack Obama told a group of reporters in Boston that the United States had an “absolute obligation” to remain in Iraq long enough to make it a success.
“The failure of the Iraqi state would be a disaster,” he said at a lunch sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor, according to an audiotape of the session. “It would dishonor the 900-plus men and women who have already died. . . . It would be a betrayal of the promise that we made to the Iraqi people, and it would be hugely destabilizing from a national security perspective.”
In late winter, 2008, on the campaign trail, Obama says he wants to bring the troops home yesterday — you decide — was he lying then or is he lying now?
7). On the January 22nd edition of “Meet the Press,” Tim Russert and Obama had the following exchange:
Russert: “When we talked back in November of ’04 after your election, I said, ‘There’s been enormous speculation about your political future. Will you serve your six-year term as United States senator from Illinois?’”
Obama: “I will serve out my full six-year term. You know, Tim, if you get asked enough, sooner or later you get weary and you start looking for new ways of saying things. But my thinking has not changed.”
Russert: “So you will not run for president or vice president in 2008?”
Obama: “I will not.”
8). On January 24, the Obama campaign released a statement, saying, “To be clear, Senator Obama has never been a Muslim, was not raised a Muslim, and is a committed Christian who attends the United Church of Christ in Chicago.
On March 14th, in a statement to The Times, the Obama campaign offered this statement to correct their previous statement, that appears to be a bold-faced lie:
“Obama has never been a practicing Muslim. The statement added that as a child, Obama had spent time in the neighborhood’s Islamic center.”
And, the original statement began, “To be clear …”
So, in three months, Barrack’s campaign has gone from describing the U.S. presidential hopeful as never having been a Muslim and never having been raised as a Muslim to now never having been a practicing Muslim.
9). On May 8th, Obama, caught up in the fervor of a campaign speech Tuesday, drastically overstated the Kansas tornadoes death toll, saying 10,000 had died.
“In case you missed it, this week, there was a tragedy in Kansas. Ten thousand people died — an entire town destroyed,” the Democratic presidential candidate said in a speech to 500 people packed into a sweltering Richmond art studio for a fundraiser.
The death toll was 12.
10). On May 10th, Obama botched his facts in a speech criticizing the U.S. auto industry for “investing in bigger and faster cars while foreign competitors invested in more fuel-efficient technology.”
Obama stated that “while our fuel standards haven’t moved from 27.5 miles per gallon in two decades, both China and Japan have surpassed us, with Japanese cars now getting an average of 45 miles to the gallon.” But Toyota, which should know, has responded, “No carmaker gets 45 mpg; ours is closer to 30 mpg.”
Well, we’re glad to see Obama’s shifting the blame from the consumer to the automakers. That must explain why the Illinois Senator and Presidential candidate owns a HEMI-powered V8 Chrysler 300C.
Obviously it’s Chrysler’s fault Obama bought a big 5.7-liter engine from them — he just didn’t have a choice.
11). During his 12 years in politics, Sen. Barack Obama has received nearly three times more campaign cash from indicted businessman, Tony Rezko and his associates, than he has publicly acknowledged, the Chicago Sun-Times has found.
Seven months ago, Obama told the Sun-Times his “best estimate” was that Rezko raised “between $50,000 and $60,000″ during Obama’s political career.
However, Obama has collected at least $168,308 from Rezko and his circle. Additionally, Obama also has taken in an unknown amount of money from people who attended fund-raising events hosted by Rezko since the mid-1990s.
Everything you ever wanted to know about Obama and Rezko.
12). On October 6th, Obama accused his fellow American citizens of the indiscriminate murder of Iraqi civilians, saying, “And these private (Blackwater USA) contractors, they go out and they’re spraying bullets and hitting civilians and that makes it more dangerous for our troops.”
(According to newsmax.com; “Blackwater USA, the private contractor that provides heavily armed security for U.S. diplomats serving in Baghdad, has been under intense scrutiny in recent weeks. Security forces employed by the company are accused of killing 13 Iraqi civilians in a violent incident in central Baghdad last month. North Carolina-based Blackwater _ which Obama did not mention by name _ contends its employees came under fire first,…”)
13). Last fall during a nationally televised presidential debate, Obama hesitantly raised his hand and joined with most of his Democratic rivals to declare that he opposed decriminalizing marijuana. (first video).
But as a candidate for the U.S. Senate four years ago, Mr. Obama told Illinois college students that he supported eliminating criminal penalties for marijuana use or possession, according to a videotape of a little noticed debate that was obtained by The Washington Times.
“I think we need to rethink and decriminalize our marijuana laws,” Mr. Obama told an audience during a debate at Northwestern University in 2004. “But I’m not somebody who believes in legalization of marijuana.” (second video).
Asked about the two different answers, Mr. Obama’s presidential campaign said he in fact has “always” supported decriminalizing marijuana as he answered in 2004, meaning the candidate mistakenly raised his hand during the presidential debate last fall.
14). On December 22nd, in a small-town café in Pleasantville, Omaha, Obama was asked a question that typically only circulates on the Internet.
As he sat down to have a slice of pie with a small group of potential voters and an elderly woman asked him about being Muslim.
“I’ve always been a Christian,” the Illinois Democrat responded. “I have never practiced [Islam].”
Note: The newspaper editors had to add the word, “Islam.”
In his autobiography, “Dreams From My Father,” Obama mentions studying the Quran.
He was enrolled in two Jakarta schools as a Muslim. His teacher Tine Hahiyary said that she remembered that he had studied “mengaji” (recitation of the Quran).” Classmate Rony Amiris described Obama as being a very devout Muslim, saying, “Barry was previously quite religious in Islam.” Another classmate, Emirsyah Satar, now the CEO of Garuda Indonesia, was quoted as saying, “He (Obama) was often in the prayer room wearing a ‘sarong.’” (See Obama’s Education.)
Yet, on his official campaign website, Obama has posted this statement, “Barack has never been a Muslim or practiced any other faith besides Christianity.”
Obama’s grandfather was a Muslim. Obama’s father was a Muslim. Obama’s stepfather was a Muslim. His African relatives are Muslims. What was he for the 27 years before his alleged conversion if he wasn’t a Muslim?
If Obama has always been a Christian, why was he enrolled in two Jakarta schools as a Muslim, and why did he study the Quran?
And note his Clintonesque defense, “I have never practiced.”
This is Obama’s biggest problem — his dissimulation.
Saying, “I’ve always been a Christian,” is a bold-faced lie.
15). February — As Sen. McCain has pointed out, Obama promised to use public funding in the general election if the Republican candidate would do so also. Well, McCain has agreed to it, but now Obama wants to back out of the deal. After all, when he made the promise, he didn’t have a chance of raising more than the public’s $85 million stipend. But now that he can raise $300 million, well, what’s a little untruth between the waited-for one and his people? Yes, he can.
16). March 7th — Obama’s courage: Contrary to a recent hyperbolic campaign ad, it wasn’t “courageous” to give his 2002 anti-war speech, primarily because he delivered it at an anti-Iraq war rally.
At the last debate, America’s former co-president claimed that it was easy to give that speech, and it wasn’t a gamble for him because he wasn’t in the US Senate and therefore wasn’t in a position of responsibility. Obama’s impassioned reply was, “I was in the midst of a U.S. Senate campaign. It was a high-stakes campaign.”
Wrong. In reality, Obama did not announce his intentions to run for the US Senate until January 2003.

Posted by: Sam Minervino | June 20, 2008, 7:15 am 7:15 am

Obama is the Truth, the Light of a new era in our history. We are his children and must follow this gift from above.

Posted by: MaryH | June 20, 2008, 7:21 am 7:21 am

Obama’s not a phony. Really, he’s not. Really.

Posted by: K.F. Miller | June 20, 2008, 7:23 am 7:23 am

MaryH – You are joking; right? Please say that is sarcasm.

Posted by: Jane | June 20, 2008, 7:24 am 7:24 am

I truly believe he is the Black Messiah foretold centuries ago. Just look at the way he speaks and moves. How he came from nowhere to now-here! He has the answers we so badly need. His lies are forgiveable because he must be the leader of a free and open world, without borders. Lets join our hearts and minds and see the Light.

Posted by: MaryH | June 20, 2008, 7:34 am 7:34 am

I don’t have a political affiliation. I want someone in the white house who will make this country better and stronger. I don’t care his age, color, nationality. As long as he is American, stands up for the American people and our country. We need a kick a** person in there who does what he says he’s going to do. Too bad Stone Cold can’t run for office.

Posted by: Angie | June 20, 2008, 7:57 am 7:57 am

Well I for one am glad that the sweet talking, hypocrite who got his “experience” in old school Chicago politics is finally starting to show his true colors. I can’t speak for the rest of my disgraceful party but as a registered democrat for the last 25 years, I have just done the unthinkable and made a donation to the Republican candidate. I hope the Democratic leadership truly realizes how many of us they are chasing away with their support of the ultra liberal, inexperienced, dishonest, excuse making candidate.

Posted by: Anyone but Obama | June 20, 2008, 8:09 am 8:09 am

I see Flip Flopper is Fip Flopping again…..Will Obama ever keep his word on anything…..The only change we have seen in Obama is him changing his mind on everything he says he’ll do and on everything he says….What will be next…..What will he change his mind on IF he gets to the white house……This Country can not have someone like Obama chanding his mind all the time …..Obama’s word will not be trusted by people around the world ….I really do think America is waking up to this man and his No im not a man of my word…….

Posted by: PCC | June 20, 2008, 8:11 am 8:11 am

Thank you Obama for proving that you’re a politician at heart, just like the rest of them. Promises mean nothing if you think that you’ll gain some advantage of going back on your word. This just reaffirms why I will vote for him (simply because my chosen candidate didn’t win the nomination and voting Republican is not a possible option for me) but I will not work for the campaign or support it financially as I have past Democratic candidates.

Posted by: Ravnwing | June 20, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am

“When the poor vote Republican, the devil laughs.” That’s what my friend kept saying while we walked the festival registering voters. I asked a tall thin white lady if I could register her to vote and she said, “Hell no! I wouldn’t vote for that n-word”
Because of people like that, we need Obama to help us with race relations. We need him to help us with heath care. My daughter has sickle cell anemia. Most white people don’t even know what that is. We need him to help us change the way special interest groups run Washington.
Really, what has the republican party done for you lately? It’s sad to me that you don’t see that.
You act like you have never changed your mind about anything. I feel sorry for you if even after receiving all the intelligence on a subject, you never change your mind. AND, you cannot convince me that you agree with your Pastor about everything. Well, unless you don’t go to church. If you do go, I bet you support your Pastor when he asks you to even when you disagree with him.
Democrats are not missing the point. Republicans are when you vote for someone just because he looks more like you.

Posted by: Rena | June 20, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am

Now we know what is going on. Obama is trying to get the women’s vote… We all know that a women reserves the right to change her mind anytime she wants.

Posted by: mich mike | June 20, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am

What happened to being the change guy, the outside of Washington guy, the hypocrisy of Obama is amazing.We now know that Obama is nothing more then a high price prostitute and liar. Obama’s price, somewhere north of 84,000,000.

Posted by: Dracula | June 20, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am

I think there’s more blacks that need help with the race card being played all the time….Some blacks think they are owed everything without working for it…And to me there’s more racist blacks then there are racist whites in this country…And this election has proven it….Look how nasty and mean some of Obama supporters have been to people that are not voting for Obama…Not everyone likes him for the person that he is not that he’s black ….Its who Obama has all his life associated himself with…These people are not who most American’s would associated themselves with…The people that Obama has chosen to be friends with are knowen to hate all America stands for….Bad Bad people they are….

Posted by: PCC | June 20, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am

Rena-
If 96% of white voters voted for McCain in November, Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson would be marching on Washington screaming that RACISM is alive and well in this country.
However, 96% of black voters can vote for Obama and NO ONE WHISPERS A WORD! Not the Media, not Republicans, not McCain, not even Hillary. Please tell me more about how Obama is going to help race relations.

Posted by: NObama | June 20, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

with each flip flop the superdelegates are getting more nervous. maybe they will flip flop too… Hillary, don’t put your election material away yet.

Posted by: mich mike | June 20, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am

His association with Ayers, Wright and Rezko where what was neccessary to ascend in the chicago political machine. Now that they don’t fit into his new political mantra, he kicks them to the curb. He is exactly like every other politican. He says he never meet Farrakhan but there’s piture of his wife with Farrakhan wife…So one would think Obama did meet him….Obama said he didn’t but who now can believe anything he says to be true….He’s done alot of flip flopping that doesn’t look to good on him and people are really starting to see this…..

Posted by: PCC | June 20, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

Why does Obama assume that all women are pro-choice? Many are very pro-life, many women are anti-welfare, anti-gun control and pro-military. A lot of American women want closed borders and don’t like NAFTA one little bit. A lot of women want to send illegal aliens back home and certainly don’t want to provide medical care for them at taxpayer expense. I am insulted that Sen. Obama has such a simplistic opinion of my wife, daughter and other women in my family.
Sorry Senator, women are multi-faceted, and I like them that way. Each is unique. Not all women want abortions, not all men watch football, not all black people draw welfare and go to prison, not all whites belong to the KKK. Not all Californians are surfers and not all Texans own cattle and oil wells. Not all Indians live in a tee-pee full of whiskey bottles. Your stereotyping would be funny in stand up comedy, not in a serious context.

Posted by: Royce | June 20, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

Like they say a man is as good as his word…And Obama has shown time and times over he is not a man of his word..

Posted by: PCC | June 20, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

Hey Maeine , You said Nobama needs to fight the 527, You mean like the stuff MOVEON.org and its TV spots going after Mccain. The teamsters are also making ads that benifit Nobama. I would say its a pretty much a special interest group.

Posted by: scot | June 20, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

Just another warning bell that Obama is not “change” at all. He lies, changes his position and does whatever is politically expedient. If that isn’t “politics as usual,” I don’t know what is.

Posted by: Traci | June 20, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

He didn’t break a promise. He answered yes to the question ” “If you are nominated for President in 2008 and your major opponents agree to forgo private funding in the general election campaign, will you participate in the presidential public financing system?”
McCain did not agree to a publicly financed campaign, Barak’s campaign tried to get him to do so and he would not. So Barak isn’t taking public financing either, just as he said he wouldn’t if his opponent didn’t either. How can anyone call that a lie? He did exactly what he said he would do.

Posted by: You're All Idiots | June 20, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

Obama did not broke a promise especially since he didn’t make one. And I see nothing wrong if he doesn’t want to go ahead with public financing at least thats one thing we are glad about he is looking out for our interest at heart imagine when he becomes elected..

Posted by: Kathryn Forbes | June 20, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Obama never “promised” anything.It is amazing to me how people will latch onto others words and represent them as fact. Answering “yes” on a Common Cause questionaire with a follow up elaboration of the answer with conditions does not a promise make. It became clear to Obama that McCain had every intention of gaming the system (including borrowing money by using public financing as collateral). It is about time a Democrat doesn’t cave into the hypocritical rantings of the Republicans. Go get ‘em Barack!

Posted by: dan in scottsdale | June 20, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

McCain is currently on sleeping pills. Common side effect of sleeping pills is amnesia (short term memory loss). We have an on going sluaghter in Iraq. He remembers nothing…gosh something is going on but I do not rememeber.
Obama on the other hand is sharp as Bill Clinton, the most loved American president of modern political era. McCain is an old fart whose speech is a lullaby. McCain is trying to curb the anger by taking sleeping / anti-anxiety pills…but watch his fowl mouth starting to stink…in few short weeks after July 4th

Posted by: say_something | June 21, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

I see the hired Obama bloggers are out tonight all over the blogs trying to defend their flip-flopper. Obama more than once supported public financing. He even talked about it on his web site until it was erased off the other day. He has changed his mind on 3 issues just this week, public financing, NAFTA and the FISA. He starts to feel a little pressure and he throws out the race card.

Posted by: PJH | June 21, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

We don’t have the luxury for John McCain to be sleeping in meetings like Ronald Reagan. We have to much work to do after the Bush regime of criminal treators. John McCain is unstable, and will increase the hatred for this country, if elected. I can tell you with absolute accuracy this man will lead us to a nuclear war. Why would you vote for this Bush like prisoner of war sell out. He may have some good qualities, but not president.

Posted by: Jordan | June 22, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

When John McCain speaks he sounds tired. Its like he has trouble getting the energy to talk. If Joe is not around he is lost in corrective speech help. Can you emagine John McCain and Joe Lieberman running the white house. Please lets not be Republican for Republican sack. Lets vote Obama this time we can always go back.

Posted by: Jordan | June 22, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

Hey! Do you think Barack would be interested in a new bumper sticker I am having made up: CHANGE….IF CONVENIENT FOR ME. Hell, I will even split the proceeds with him.

Posted by: justjoe | June 23, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am

Obama’s Rev knows him better than anyone and he said”Obama will say what a politian has to say” Enough said.

Posted by: roncraw | June 23, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

The Obama camp loves to make statements and say ‘vote Obama, we can always go back.’ Which is very misleading and false, it’s a pressure tactic. Can we go back on 8 years of Bush? Never. Things are much different then they were 8 years ago. 9-11, Iraq war, huge losses of life both American and other nationalities. These people can’t come back. EPA has been gutted of the knowledgeable and unbiased Scientists (i.e. the deck has been stacked with “Yes” men and Neocons). Environmental protections have been rolled back and there is drilling in Alaska’s last wilderness (public owned land, mind you) in a huge unprecedented way. In a similar way to the Environmental Protection Agency, new laws, staff and Supreme Court justices actions will last long into the future and dictate policy for years to come. On every possibly front, Life in the USA has been permanently altered.
Even attempted changes to this lasting impact (i.e. fanatics urging you to vote Obama) are impacted by Bush’s policy, because voters tend to over-react and swing for some other ideas just because they ‘might be’ different. Different can actually mean worse.

Posted by: yuri | June 24, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Barak Obama broke what is known as a campaign promise. It is a promise and when you are running for President of the most powerful country on earth, who and what you agree to support has huge implications and consequences. This wasn’t some little postcard in the mail, this is a massive issue.
Wake up Democrats! You are being sold the same way Republicans were sold Bush. With pressure tactics to vote along party lines, just because. Or “he’s better than the other guy”.
Obama represents a dictatorship because you don’t even know what you are voting for. A huge unknown. And Obama wants it that way. Because then he has unrestricted power. He doesn’t have to do what he said, because A. he rarely says anything specific and B. he can just ‘change his mind’ and the sheep will believe the wolf. He has been given every opportunity to give specifics and has been urged with many, many questions and yet, he gives the vaguest of answers. Obama is taking a page straight out of Dubya’s playbook, the page on dodging accountability.
Obama sold out his congregation, his pastor, and now Common Cause and the American People.
It’s not that Obama doesn’t need funding, he does he would just rather not touch the public pot because then he would be subject to disclosure laws about who gives to his campaign and how much.
It’s massive spin (and totally untrue) to say he is doing it to save the American people money. At best he is gambling that he will make more money (though the money won’t be clean or he could get it in addition to the public fund) by private (dirty) means than by accepting into a legit system.
The system is in place to entice candidates to run a clean campaign. If Obama had character, he would stick to his campaign promise, regardless of what McCain does. His words to McCain were simply a bluff to “appear” better than McCain. He isn’t fooling me. Truth be told he is a dirty politician like the bunch, but a sociopath as well.

Posted by: malik | June 24, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Seems that a lot of people supporting BO,are his campaign workers, who are assigned to rebuttle, comments on the internet made against Obomination. BO,cannot be trusted because he consistently lies and goes back on his words. He seems to do and say anything to win the election, no matter what it takes. That is called desperation. There are a lot of hard working people who do not want high taxes, because BO wants a lot of Government handouts, for people who don’t want to really work hard and make it own their own, like most of us. They are young and imatured have no idea on living on their own, making their own way in this world. They feel that the GOv. and their parents owe them a living, shame on those young people who want these handouts. So they are out there clinging to their false illusion about Borak.

Posted by: cecimor | June 25, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

“Obama on the other hand is sharp as Bill Clinton … “

Posted by: Belle Starr | September 16, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Obama is not “sharp”. He is very charismatic and “slick”. So are many people who are sociopaths and serial killers. People should vote for someone who has character and experience, not just charisma. This is a Presidential election, not a high school popularity contest…we are not voting on the Homecoming King. Furthermore, people say that Palin does not have enough experience to be president. So what? She is not running for president. But, Obabma is and he has much less experience that Palin. He has only served as a senator. And, he has missed 23% of his voting opportunities in the senate meetings since 2005. Missing in action 23% of the time in just under 3 years is not a very good track record. Most people would be fired for that! Vote for someone who wants to serve others, not just himself. Vote McCain!

Posted by: Michelle | October 30, 2008, 3:25 am 3:25 am

Wow that trash that I am reading in these comments. “We don’t know who Barack Obama is” because three books is not enough. OMG he broke his promise to not except tax payer money to finance his campaign, the horror. “Palin is more experienced than Barack Obama.” Sure so is my four year old little sister. This on cracks me up. More experienced because she was city mayor of 7,000 people? Rookie governor of Alaska population 670,000? Columbus Ohio has a greater population. You really want four more years of Bush? McCain is no maverick. If he was he would not have chosen an inexperienced hack to be his running mate. You can’t see the publicity stunt? If he was a maverick he would have asked Joe Lieberman to be on his ticket or one of the countless republican women that have better qualifications than Palin.

Posted by: republicans are | October 30, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

OB is now president and i was reading through this but from keeping up with all the politics i feel OB is a dreamer not a do-er. Lets see if he is just a good talker or not

Posted by: Christine | November 5, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

thanks for this post quite good

Posted by: sur mesure pas cher | October 14, 2011, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

hello every one – hope yous had a realy nice one – just back from tenerefe weather crap , all the best for new year –
michael

Posted by: mickbuely | January 1, 2012, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

hi – is it just me !! can any one explain why when i type in the bing browser “abcnews.go.com” i get a different site yet whe i type it in google its ok? could this be a bug in my system or is any one else having same probs ?
sadensy

Posted by: alfiesaden | January 4, 2012, 4:19 am 4:19 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.