Jun 20, 2008 9:11am
Obama Tries to Change the Subject
Comes an email into my in-box: Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton announced today that they will campaign together on Friday, June 27th.
That’s all we know right now.
It’s not as blatant as "Look over there!" but it’s just as clearly an attempt to change the subject from his broken promise on campaign financing.
As is, it seems, the announcement of his new TV ad. Or the fact that he might try to advertise during the Olympics!
- jpt
Email
USS Gabrielle Giffords Honors Courage
Mitt Romney's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
I urge all voters of Senator Clinton to have her reconsider her support given Obama’s scandalous breakin gof his public finance pledge.
Posted by: geevill | June 20, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am
Obama also pledged to return the donations when he accpeted public financing. I am sure you all could use the money to pay for gas.
Posted by: GEEVILL | June 20, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am
Jake that is quite a stretch. The only ones that care are McCain and his supporters.
Only 10% of the tax payers click that box, and as everyone knows there are too many loopholes in it to begin with.
Posted by: Thinking | June 20, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
He is an agent of change, there will not be a Republican in the White House.
He is a damn smart politician. We haven’t seen that in sometime.
He is calm and steady and knows what he is doing.
Posted by: Thinking | June 20, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am
Obama: Tell him what you want him to say and he’ll say it! He’ll change it later but at least, hell say it once!
Posted by: Soetoro No! | June 20, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
Is this fear I see…
Republican posing Democrats fearing Obama?
Landslide?
Obama is leading in 4 of the big states Clinton won
Michigan, Ohio, Florida, and PA
Leading in tranditional Democratic states
AND
Leading several Republican states
Virginia, North Carolina, Colorado, New Mexico, Indiana, NH, Wisconsin and Missouri
Posted by: Vanessa | June 20, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
Why doesn’t MSM called Obama for what he is…..just a plain liar….can’t trust him–PERIOD.
He blantantly lies.
How can anyone trust him?
He thinks people are so stupid as not to connect the dots…..but I hope the MSM catch on and stop giving this liar a pass.
If he can throw away his Pastor for 20 years (Uncle Wright), with his “Kansas” grandmother, I doubt that there is anything that is sacred to this Obama Character.
OBAMA = MACHIAVELLIAN ….( a Political philosopher-characterized by cunning, DUPLICITY and Bad Faith….)
Can’t trust him, Can’t trust him with OUR COUNTRY.
Posted by: carpenter.nyc | June 20, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am
Obama is right about one thing …
You can fool some of the people all of the time!
Posted by: Soetoro No! | June 20, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am
Obama had to do something newsworthy to take attention from McCain’s popular decision to drill offshore.
70% of Americans agree with drilling. Obama can’t stand being on the opposite side of a popular decidion.
By November, Hope and Change will look like one big lie.
McCain/Hillary
Posted by: riley | June 20, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am
geevil, you are a republicain who pretends to support Hillary or the democratic party. If you are a Hill’s supporter then stop crying like a baby and get yourself behind her and support the candidate she is supporting i.e. Obama. God bless America and God bless Obama. OBAMA08.
Posted by: BKMC | June 20, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Jake
What about mccain and his public financing gaffes? I dont see a reference to that anywhere. He used the notion of public financing to secure a loan to continue his primary campaign and then waffled on that. Wheres that report?
Posted by: uh-oh | June 20, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am
HILLARY IS CURRENTLY DANCING WITH THE WOLVES …VERY SMART MOVE, HILLARY… WHILE SHE CAN STILL BEAT THEM, JOIN THEM…SHE’LL DO ALL SHE CAN TO HELP OBAMA FOR A SHOW THAT IN THE EVENT HE LOSES, HE AND HIS CAMP WON’T HAVE THE EXCUSE OF BLAMING HER…EVENTUALLY, SHE WILL HAVE THE LAST LAUGH AND SAY, “I TOLD YOU SO….”
Posted by: neil1785 | June 20, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am
Righht now Americans are learning that Obama the campaign finance reformer was just another empty promise.
Posted by: geevill | June 20, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am
VANESSA,
REMEMBER, BEFORE THE 2004 GENERAL ELECTION, THE GALLUP POLLS WERE CONSISTENTLY UP FOR KERRY BY 14% -15% OVER BUSH. AFTER THE ELECTION ITSELF, KERRY HAD DOUBLE-DIGIT (88%) ADVANTAGE ON BLACK VOTES OVER BUSH (11%). GUESS WHO EVENTUALLY WON? DID THE BLACK VOTE MATTERED? WE HAVE 85% WHITES OVER 15% BLACK POPULATION IN US ALONE. THIS 85% HAS NOT COME OUT YET FROM THEIR SHELL AND THIS 85% MAY BRING THE BEST IN MCCAIN COME THIS FALL THEY’RE NOT AS VOCAL ABOUT IT AS THE BLACKS. MAJORITY OF THOSE 85% ARE THINKING…WEIGHING…AND NOT PLAYING THE RACE CARD.
I DON’T BELIEVE THE GALLUP POLLS RIGHT NOW WHERE OBAMA HAS A LEAD. THAT LEAD WILL VANISH SOON BECAUSE WHEREVER I GO, WHOMEVER I MEET PERSONALLY OR ONLINE, I NEVER HEARD GOOD THINGS ABOUT OBAMA OTHER THAN THOSE POSTED BY Bhrandon, Omentum, pt, NoMcSame, Melissa, Sandy, Danny Hussein, etc…ONLY A FEW OF THEM ARE OBAMANOTS IN ALL BLOGS THAT I WENT INTO. THEY ARE FAR OUTNUMBERED BY SO MANY BLOGGERS WHO DON’T JUST SIMPLY FORGET OBAMA SCANDALS AND ISSUES IN THE PAST RECENT MONTHS…WHO DON’T JUST SIMPLY FORGET THE UNDERESTIMATION OF MICHIGAN AND FLORIDA… WHO DON’T JUST SIMPLY FORGET HOW HILLARY WAS DEMORALIZED BY THE OBAMA CAMP, MEDIA, ETC.
Posted by: neil1785 | June 20, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am
It’s about time Dem’s went toe to toe with the Repub’s.
As one of the author’s of the McCain-Fiengold legislature said:
“…it would have been political malpractice for Obama to have accepted Public financing…I would have sued him for such”
I am paraphrasing, so it may not have been an exact quote, but the exact same intent.
Posted by: No Spineless Dem | June 20, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Besides I think he shouldn’t take it I thought it was dumb to say he would. If you can raise 250 millon in a month from small donations from supporters then why take the money from the feds? the should donate the 85 mill to the mid west! Also hes going to need more than that to fight off the swift boat. Captain Flop is scared because he knows he can’t touch that kind of fund raising without going with the shady lobbisty money. Which he is essentually taking anyway because thats were the “public” money comes from.
Posted by: Joe | June 20, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am
Oh Barack you promised me. How can I support you now? I can’t.
Posted by: Vanessa | June 20, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
ea isnt Captain flop getting investigated right now?
Posted by: Joe | June 20, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
Kerry didn’t drive the young vote to the polls. Obama has the AA 95-4%. Making a run for the South. Also, Obama is winning the women votes at a wider margin then Kerry in 2004. Kerry also lost the “men” vote by a wide margin. In a recent poll, McCain has a slight edge… I believe 2-4% advantage. Then we have the Obamacans. Defected republicans and an unenergized Republican based.
What George Bush accomplished in 2004 was rallying and expanding his base.
Obama…rallying and expanding his base.
Posted by: Vanessa | June 20, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
The interesting side note to this entire story is that the RNC has so much more money on hand than the DNC. Obama’s 1.5 million contributors aside, it seems millions of Americans are not too happy with the Democratic party and have ceased donating. Or is that the RNC is pulling in new supporters? Either way, it spells bad news for the Dems in November.
Posted by: HoosierSue | June 20, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
I love the term “parallel public financing system”. It’s such a beautiful turn of political doublespeak. Orwellian, like so much of what Bush has foisted on us.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | June 20, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
I’m more concerned with the fact that Mr.Campaign finance reform McCain himself took himself out of matching funds, then when he had no money took out a loan, then magically allowed himself to go back to matching funds AGAIN, VIOLATING his own pathetic campaign finance laws that he freakin’ wrote! He got ballot access NOT by signatures but by buying ballot access. Then, when he couldn’t raise any money he kept ballot access, while taking out loans against his campaign. He broke a boatload of election law with these illegal tactics, so I don’t think Obama opting out of public finacing is NEARLY as bad. But the neo-CON Hilliary smiters will be out in full force again, I’m sure. How many advantages did she have, and she STILL LOST! She couldn’t even win a fight rigged in her favor, MOVE ON, MOVE ON! Or just vote McCain and start WWIII. Let’s finish off bankrupting the country and blowup health care, unemployment and bring back the draft. After all I’m sure McCain will do plenty for you women right after he takes away abortion from the feds, kills the economy and sends your sons and daughters to fight and die in the middle east for another CENTURY. But what the hey, it’s not like Mccain can be as bad as Bush was during his first term (War, recession, murder, destruction of the constitution and personal liberty) right, RIGHT?!!!
Posted by: pity | June 20, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am
I would assume that they have more money because Obama is getting most of it. Just a thought, He can raise so much money he could write a check and pay for the convention.
Posted by: Joe | June 20, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
it seems millions of Americans are not too happy with the Democratic party and have ceased donating. Or is that the RNC is pulling in new supporters?
———————
Or is it that Dems are just suppoting the candidate, not the party. The money goes to Obama instead of the DNC.
Either way, it’s bad for the Republicans.
Posted by: Curious | June 20, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Obama is not stupid. Why would he give up $250 million to take $85 million in public financing? You Obama-haters wish he was that stupid, don’t you? He needs the money to fight the GOP smear campaign which will be coming at him very soon, unfortunately. Sad state of affairs when a candidate for President has to have every breath he takes and every word he says analyzed, scrutinized, disected, bisected, parsed, spun, twisted, and looked at under a microscope. But that’s the way it is in this country – all because of you fools who just can’t accept the fact that he might actually be our next President.
Posted by: GeeCee | June 20, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
I’m a Clinton supporter and will never vote for Hussein Obama!
McCain wins my vote!
Posted by: Jim | June 20, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am
Obama also pledged to return the donations when he accpeted public financing. I am sure you all could use the money to pay for gas.
——————–
Good point Geevill,
The Republican’s oil buddies have the price jacked up so high, many of are having a hard time paying for it.
Thanks Obama!
Posted by: Sarah in NC | June 20, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
IT’S JUST OK TO BE FOOLED ONCE…LEARN FROM IT…BUT IT’S JUST TOO SILLY AND TOO DUMB TO BE FOOLED TWICE OR MORE…NEVER LEARNED FROM IT…. THAT’S EXACTLY WHAT YOU HAVE BEEN, OBAMA SUPPORTERS… FOOLED AND TRICKED BY OBAMA MORE THAN ONCE….
Posted by: neil1785 | June 20, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Vanessa: Remember to deduct 2 to 7 percentage points from Obama-favorable polls to compensate for the phenomenon seen in Pennsylvania and elsewhere. People are lieing to the pollsters to offset the flood of racism accusations from Obama supporters. Deduct also for the bump given to the AA voters counted as 18% when they are only 13%.
With only two candidates in the field, Obama should be witnessing a major bump after the nomination. It isn’t there. He is particularly in trouble with the married white woman, aka, white soccer moms. As pointed out elsewhere, that’s a warning bell.
A campaign based on ‘inevitability’ tends to fall apart in the fourth quarter. This much is glaringly obvious: Obama needs Hillary Clinton.
Posted by: len | June 20, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
Oh, please. Scandalous breaking of a pledge? Hardly. Everyone with any common sense and half a brain understands his decision to forego public financing and use the money he has raised during his campaign. Don’t try to make this look like a big deal. It isn’t!!!
Posted by: GeeCee | June 20, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
I understand why Obama backtracked on public financing but the bottom line is=
so much for change and new politics.
Posted by: alpaig | June 20, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Grandmare:
Polls are random sample surveys. They do not call the same people repeatedly. And the Obama campaign calls you what, two or three a week do they?
Yah, the polls – ALL OF THEM – are scewed because a few pathic individuals are pretending to be clever. Whatever.
Today’s Rassmussen
OBAMA 48%
McCAIN 44%
Posted by: Grow Up | June 20, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
It’s called “campaigning”, not changing the subject. Should he just talk about this over and over again until November? He made a decision, he explained the decision. Now it’s over.
P.S. Senator Obama promised to work with the McCain campaign to reach an agreement on some fundraising guidlines. That was the promise. Clearly, the McCain campaign gets more mileage out of the story this way – with your help of course. But whatever.
See you at the Inauguration!
Obama/Biden ’08/’12
Posted by: Nobodys fool | June 20, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
And by all rights she should get behind him. I am positive he would for her if the tables were turned.
HIllary people need to get a grip. It was a fair race, he won by the rules, now it is her duty to help him and us move forward. She likes him, there is not much difference in their policies so the think the same, it was just a race and Obama won.
Posted by: Becky | June 20, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am
Obama’s reversal on public financing is actually a prefect example of how an insurgent preaches reform until he gets control of the levers of power. Then he likes the way things are just fine.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | June 20, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Every time Obama is in trouble then his campaign advisors try to change the subject. OBama is a candidate that never keep promise.
Posted by: stephanie | June 20, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Republicans usually win married white women/soccer moms. Bill Clinton lost this group.
Stay at home white women/soccer moms are usually well off and therefore the Obama tax plan would increase their taxes for them. Top 2%
Posted by: Vanessa | June 20, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Really, does anyone care about this public financing thing? I’m so sick of it already and it’s only been one day. I’m a pretty intelligent woman, but I’m utterly confused as to why it’s as huge a deal as McCain and the media are making it out to be. Basically, McCain is crying foul because Obama will raise enough money to destroy him in the general. Pardon me while I feign my outrage sympathy…
Posted by: Jane | June 20, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am
“Oh, please. Scandalous breaking of a pledge? Hardly. … Don’t try to make this look like a big deal. It isn’t!!!”
Actually, it is. It says his character is one of maximum opportunism not leadership. He is in fact, George W. Bush in a better suit.
A CNN commentator said last night that Obama winning is more important than keeping promises.
Tell that to your kids. The great historical event we are said to be witnessing is one in which the values which made the country great are sacrificed to the desperate need to make one generation feel empowered and another to feel enobled when in fact both are impoverishing the generation to come for the blind ambition of a small elite group of Democratic bigwigs and rookie politician with a smooth patter.
Que lastima.
Posted by: len | June 20, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
“A CNN commentator said last night that Obama winning is more important than keeping promises.”
My guess is Roland Martin. I can’t sit through a “newscast” on that station any longer. Reminds of the run up to the Iraq war.
Posted by: Mack | June 20, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
“Really, does anyone care about this public financing thing?”
It matters if you are claiming to be for change. Although if you are already entranced, then it probably won’t matter.
Posted by: Mack | June 20, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
“Republicans usually win married white women/soccer moms…the Obama tax plan would increase their taxes for them. Top 2%”
Yes, that’s a pretty clear reason to vote against Obama, Vanessa. What you are missing is the coupling power of that class of nodes in the network of influence.
Basic game theory: a node that influences 10 voters is more important to win than a node that can only influence two in a game that has only one round of play. They stay at home only in name. The truth is they use that free time to exercise power and influence in their social networks which has multiple levels of indirection. If you win working stiffs who stay on the shop floor, their circle of influence (immediate nodes no indirection) is very limited.
Now you have to determine which node class is most affected by events such as broken promises, radical connections, racist advisors, a wife that needs a million dollar makeover to distract from her otherwise perceived mean personality, and so on.
Obama’s marketing of late has been clearly to patch the deficits created by his own support base. That’s a tightrope and with the announcement of breaking the fund pledge, he slipped and is trying to climb back on the rope from the midpoint. Tricky to do and it ruins the act’s pacing if he does it more than once. The audience gets bored and goes back to watching the tiger act.
Posted by: len | June 20, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
He is trying badly to change the subject, since he needs the money badly. This is how Obama works, he promises results to his rich donors, those elitist, arrogant donors (like him) gave him money, he bought delegates and the press with the money; he spent too much money buying delegates so now he needs more money to keep buying the press. For him, winning the elections is about who have the most money to control publicity and the press. But, no matter what, he will discover the day after the elections that he will be actually the loser. He cannot buy the vote of the Democrats he needs to win and that is his reality.
Posted by: Definitely Common Sense | June 20, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
If votes of Americans can be bought then BO wins. If not, he losses.
Now Americans, are you for sale in the general election
For me,
Nobama, Never BO, anyone but BO and the caustic fanatics.
Posted by: John_Lai | June 20, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am
Since this bursts the change bubble, I guess people will need to create another excuse for supporting him.
Posted by: Mack | June 20, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Senator Clinton should just turn her back on the DNC and Obama campaign. After all, she ran as a moderate Democrat but he is nothing more than a socialist, racist, Marxist, communist and a liar. He will bankrupt America with all his socialist and hand-out programs. Most of his issue policies were copy-catted from the Clinton campaign. He is an empty suit and a dud. This pledge about public funding in just another lie in a list of 48,000,000 Obama Lies.
Posted by: Mary | June 20, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am
“Obama is the first nominee to turn down public financing. THIS IS CHANGE.”
That’s one way to look at it. May not be change for the better, although it is change nonetheless. That’s the real change that some have been waiting for.
Posted by: Mack | June 20, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Hillary should turn her back on Obama and the DNC. Maybe put herself on the ballot as an independent party. No way in hell would I work for let alone help people to vote for Obama. Obama lies,stumbles over everything that comes out of his mouth and frankly the only reason why he won the nominee is because he is African American. Don’t get me wrong, I am not racist but rest assured that there are alot of racist out there no matter what their skin color. There will always be racist because of the media. Hillary should turn and run the other way. I will vote for you Hilliary if you run independent!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: kitojj | June 20, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am
lol
those soccer moms arent in the top 2% you fools, thats your microsoft, tahts your exxon… lol soccer moms
and mccain opted into public finance got a check, then raised money with that money and then turned down public finance..
and now hes back in!
LOL
cmon report on that…
MCCAIN A FISH OUT OF WATER
FLIP FLOP FLIP FLOP FLIP FLOP
the republicans just cant stand that obama can generate such huge amounts of cash and will make it so that the republicans have to compete
lol
you guys hate this because you know this really really really really hurts john mccain
Posted by: bhrandon | June 20, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
An orgy of hypocritical
piety and character
assassination centered
on a non-issue – that’s
what is going on here.
Posted by: anon | June 20, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
The point is there would be no Republican party if they didn’t carry any group. Soccer moms voted Republican in 1992 and beyond. Chances are they’ll vote Republican 2008. Obama will still win.
Posted by: Vanessa | June 20, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
“An orgy of hypocritical
piety and character
assassination centered
on a non-issue – that’s
what is going on here.”
He did it to himself. Get it. He needs to start taking responsibilty for his actions and stop blaming everyone else.
Posted by: mack | June 20, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
The reason Obama turned down public financing is that he think he can get more money and buy out this election…
The question: Obama’s money can really buy the vote of Americans?? Will Americans sell out their vote for money??
Posted by: True Truth | June 20, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
“Soccer moms voted Republican in 1992 and beyond. Chances are they’ll vote Republican 2008. Obama will still win.”
How do you figure that? Soccer moms are said to have put Bush over the top. You must believe the landslide hype for the Democrats. The numbers don’t support that. Things could change but the only real chance I see for that is to put Hillary on the ticket.
Posted by: len | June 20, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
Why do you all complain about Obama’s promise? What’s his campaign’s slogan? CHANGE. How does he change? Depending on you think. He never lies to the voters, just misunderstood. That’s is Mr. Obama.
Sen McCain-08
Posted by: chris | June 20, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
“I am so sad Obama let me down. Now i have to consider someone else to vote for”
Look on the bright side, they made Michelle over and now she loves her country!
Posted by: Mack | June 20, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
The pious and the sanctimonious
please take note:
Only about 10 percent of the
taxpayers supported public
campaign financing in 2006.
Posted by: anon | June 20, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Don’t insult our intelligence Obama’s & Axelrod. Come out and be truthful. You bashed Hillary shamelessly for her untruthfulness. Now you are insulting us thinking we will buy your see through lies. Just tell us – when you made the statement about the public financing you had no idea how much money your supporters were willing to kick in for you to win. and as for Michelle: just tell us what you really feel about this country- do not stop short with “I was a girl from the south side of Chicago and I am proud.” I have to still question – what are you proud of? yourself? your climb from poverty? or this country? You guys are poor liars and worse back pedallers. David Axelrod better start speaking up telling America what you should have said. Where’s the teleprompter???
Posted by: this election counts | June 20, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
No.
Men and Independents placed Bush over the top. I believe Bush won the men vote by a margin of 10-15%.
Amongst men the lastest Rasmuseen poll shows a tied and Obama winning Independents.
Posted by: Vanessa | June 20, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Whoever keeps saying women vote Republican in 1992- it was women who put Clinton in the white house. I am one of those soccer moms you keep stating voted Republican- NEVER! I voted for CLinton twice and never voted for Geo. W or his Daddy! Hillary supporters are not Republicans – Obama has a real chance to lose the women vote.
Posted by: this election counts | June 20, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Hillary supporters – you can write in Hillary or vote Nader. It is not just a choice between McCain & Obama.
Posted by: this election counts | June 20, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
I’d like to say that anyone who votes for someone the likes of Clinton or Obama or McCain deserves what they get. Problem is: we all suffer the consequences. Therefore I’d like to say: just once, just once in your lives try to forget about party politics, do the little bit of research necessary to learn more about these candidates other than what you read or hear in the media and try to have an original thought of your own. If you don’t know what that is, google it. Take this simple test: if you cannot in detail explain your candidate’s policy on fiscal policy, monetary policy, foreign policy and the constitution. If all you can mutter about your candidate is: “he/she will bring change” then you don’t know your candidate and you shouldn’t be voting.
Ron Paul ’08
Posted by: Don | June 20, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
While the Obama campaign
enthusiastically supported
the idea of public campaign
financing it has from the
beginning expressed serious
concerns about 527s.
Under existing laws, there
cannot be any form of contact
or communication between
these groups and the campaigns
they support or oppose.
And there are no limits on
how much they can spend.
Until their activities are
brought under legal restraints,
it doesn’t make much sense for
a campaign such as Obama’s that
is able to raise money through
small donors, to opt in for
public financing.
Posted by: anon | June 20, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
Bless you, Jake Tapper! You are one of the very few MSM analysts that sees through the BS the Obama campaign feeds us.
Poor Hillary! She is forced to campaign for this Plastic Jesus.
Posted by: Juju | June 20, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Yes, anon, but he knew all of that when he signed the pledge. He didn’t change his mind until after eliminating Clinton at a point prior to the fall when he could do it with the least damage.
In other words, he lied. It isn’t about the system. We can all agree it’s flawed. It’s about Obama. He lied.
Obama isn’t about change. He is about Obama.
Posted by: len | June 20, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Astrologers consistently say …But, of all the candidates, including Barack Obama, Hillary has the strongest astrological forces. What a waste. Hillary has the option to run independent …. We don’t know what’s going on in her mind right now but I hope she’s doing the right thing.
Posted by: neil1785 | June 20, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
What’s this signed pledge
many are talking about?
It was no more than: Let’s
explore this idea with the
Republican nominee at the
appropriate time.
Posted by: anon | June 20, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
this election counts,
If you write in Hillary’s name, that vote will technically go for obama.
Posted by: neil1785 | June 20, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
$85 million of tax dollars or $170 million of contributor donations?
With millions backing the GOP 527′s, it an obvious choice. McCain and the Republican cronies don’t like it though. (Go figure) They’re used to being able to use the 527 loophole to gain the financial advantage. Now they can’t keep up with Obama’s fundraising ability.
I dig Obama. He’s a smart politician and has thus far run a brilliant campaign.
Use tax dollars to help flood victims, not Presidential campaigns.
Posted by: Philly Dem | June 20, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
I find it rather hard to believe that Obama and Clinton were in cahoots to wag the dog on June 26th after he reversed on campaign financing. Now isn’t that a stretch and a spin? An exercise, perhaps, to diminish the gain in Democratic unity?
Posted by: kat | June 20, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Astrologers consistently say …But, of all the candidates, including Barack Obama, Hillary has the strongest astrological forces. What a waste.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Your not serious with this post are you?
You’re actually following what ASTROLOGERS say?
Wow. That’s all I can say. Wow.
Posted by: Virgo Rising | June 20, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Following astrology is no more lunatic than following Obama. And it’s a heck of a lot less destructive to our country.
Posted by: HoosierSue | June 20, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Taxpayers’ support to public
financing of presidential
campaigns has declined over
the last thirty years.
In 1976 its inception year
28 percent supported it. In
2006 the support was down
to 10-11 percent.
Posted by: anon | June 20, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
I QUIT THE DNC .
APPROVAL OF CONGRESS 16%. REMEMBER ALL THOSE CAMPAIGN PROMISES?????????
what we got was a sub prime housing mess, higher food and gas prices, lost jobs and wager…
The two party system no longer works.
Posted by: Who Knows So What Who Cares | June 20, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Obama campaign tried to make a deal with McCain not to use 527 organizations and PAC funding, but couldn’t meet an agreement. Therefore, no public financing. Amazing that detail wasn’t mentioned.
Posted by: Brett | June 20, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
McCain’s making a big deal because now he knows the RNC will have a harder time finding third parties to swift boat the hell out of Obama, the ONLY way a Republican wins elections these days.
Posted by: Brett | June 20, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
Obama’s adoring peeps in the MSM will
have a lot of ‘splaining to do for the
four years of his reign. The honey-
moon with Barack will be shorter than
it was with the Clintons. Why? Because
he doesn’t realize that he’s a beginner,
diving into the deep end of the pool.
Those that don’t believe it now most
surely will in early ’09.
Posted by: oddfellow | June 20, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
One down two to go: Mc Cain and Hillary ‘s supporters, like sand between his toes.
Posted by: comicrelief | June 21, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am
I am not very fond of B. Obama, and when I saw this article “Audacity of hype” on ABC this morning, I almost fell off my chair. Is this guy for real??? I see signs of delusion here.. he thinks he is the president already. He is acting and looking more and more like a cult leader type, changing things from inside out (not the good kind of change) and ultimately changing the look of the Presidential Seal.
The smug and arrogant look on his face makes me despise him even more as the days move on toward the GE. I am a dem but will be voting for McCain in Nov. The Democrats really picked a loser this time.
Posted by: MJL | June 21, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
I voted for Obama in my state’s primary. However, I will NOT be voting for him in November. There are 3 other voters in my house that will not be voting for him again either. Subtract FOUR votes from BO’s total and give them to McCain.
Posted by: EyesOpened | June 21, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Obama’s proposal of CHANGE requires sound judgement to determine which things should change, and which things should be kept, cherished and embraced. Unfortunately Obama and his left wing supporters want to throw out the baby with the dirty bath water. They have no appreciation of U.S. history, or the blood, sweat, and sacrifice it’s taken to make America the greatest country in the world. They seem to believe that before you can create change, first you must discredit, or destroy everything that’s come before. Obama relies on young voters apathy and ignorance of American history and tradition, which makes it easier for them to buy into CHANGE, without any sense of what kind of change is needed. Evidence of this, is Obama supporters embracing his disrespectful alteration of the Presidential seal, to further his personal ambition. Or, Obama’s black liberation church discrediting Thomas Jefferson, because of an alleged affair with a black slave. If Obama is elected President, I predict that American history will be gradually revised, and America as we know it will become barely recognizable.
Posted by: Howard | June 21, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Some excellent points, Howard.
A few other observations… Obama and his party have done a masterful job of manipulating the masses and serving up some hope that things are really going to change in this country. Government has grown too large, and it can not be “fixed” only managed. To really change anything would involve a large part of government being fired and tossed out on their ears and looking for jobs. That is not going to happen. Are changes possible? Yes, but nothing like the radical makeover that BO is planning. Of course, we all know that nothing in life is free (well, some of us do), so we know who will pay for changes, don’t we? You got it. We ALL will pay in the form of taxes. I am willing to pay my fair share to get the health care crisis fixed. Insurance companies are out of control. And just who has allowed that to happen again? It sure wouldn’t be Congress, would it? They would never cave in and sell the American people out, would they? My insurance premiums as a small business owner for 2 employees and my family are $2,500.00 per month. For those that can’t do math, that is $30,000.00 per year. That’s insanity! And that is with a large deductible.
I do not believe for a second that our Founding Fathers ever invisioned career politicians either. Is that going to change? Fat chance. They are not going to vote themselves out of a job replete with all those “benefits.” That is why they have not voted for term limits or even seriously suggested it in more than placating kind of way.
As for Obama, the truth is that Americans are gullible and believe only what they want to hear. They don’t want to hear that life is hard, expensive, and that it will remain that way. They don’t want to hear the truth. So, along comes a guy that promises that he’s going to fix everything and all their problems will vanish. Americans buy the “hope” and “change” BS hook, line, and sinker, especially the young, idealistic types. But then, that candidate makes some mistakes that trigger questions about his “change” mantra and really his integrity in general because he changes his mind and goes back on things he stood firmly behind at one time. Those ideals are tossed under the bus, along with a few people (a pastor, Muslims with headscarves on, etc.). A pattern emerges and it looks very familiar. It looks eerily similar to every other politician, and he is no different. Then a large part of the voting public wakes up and sees the candidate for what he really is, an empty suit telling them what they want to hear and nothing more just to get elected.
I have a feeling that a lot of people will be waking up soon and removing their support from Obama. Like my mother always told me, “If it sounds too good to be true, it’s too good to be true.” However, if they don’t wake up, your scenario will come to pass. However, we American people will not let our history be rewritten and stand. Oh hell no! We’ll be looking at the SECOND American Revolution.
Posted by: EyesOpened | June 21, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
@this election count,
I agree with Neil,
I think if you write-in Hillary’s name on the ballot, it will go to Obama.
First, she is with Dems and secondly she endorses Obama.
That’s my opinion.
Posted by: catleya | June 22, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
I guess scrutiny and sarcasm go a long way in making the politicians better people especially when all those flaws are found.
Posted by: Genna | June 23, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Melissa:
As you said,
“Obama is leading in 4 of the big states Clinton won
Michigan, Ohio, Florida, and PA.”
B U T….Hillary won in those states the first time…. and according to the DNC… didn’t win.
SO:
Don’t count your chickens before they hatch…….
AND WATCH OUT FOR SCRAMBLED EGGS!
COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY
Posted by: lend an ear... | June 24, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am