<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pfleger Back At Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/06/pfleger-back-at/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/06/pfleger-back-at/</link>
	<description>The latest Politics news and blog posts from ABC News contributors and bloggers including Jake Tapper, George Stephanopoulos and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 22:30:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kat</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/06/pfleger-back-at/#comment-107386</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 00:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/06/pfleger-back-at/#comment-107386</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s face it, the Catholic church has had far more serious problems than Pfleger.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s face it, the Catholic church has had far more serious problems than Pfleger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debra</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/06/pfleger-back-at/#comment-107383</link>
		<dc:creator>Debra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/06/pfleger-back-at/#comment-107383</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t care about Pfleger as much as the good Reverend Wright.....hasn&#039;t someone uncuffed him and taken the gag out of this mouth yet.  They must have thugs at his door 24/7.  Same with Jessie and Sharpton.....Axlerod&#039;s memo...&quot;to all controversial angry high profile black men (and Michelle) - please stay out of the news until AFTER Nov. 3&quot;  - Thanks, the Obama campaign.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t care about Pfleger as much as the good Reverend Wright&#8230;..hasn&#8217;t someone uncuffed him and taken the gag out of this mouth yet.  They must have thugs at his door 24/7.  Same with Jessie and Sharpton&#8230;..Axlerod&#8217;s memo&#8230;&#8221;to all controversial angry high profile black men (and Michelle) &#8211; please stay out of the news until AFTER Nov. 3&#8243;  &#8211; Thanks, the Obama campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Genna</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/06/pfleger-back-at/#comment-107379</link>
		<dc:creator>Genna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/06/pfleger-back-at/#comment-107379</guid>
		<description>If he continues to be himself, yes.
If he preaches the way the public finds most suitable, no.
I don&#039;t think the public&#039;s opinion should matter to him if he stands for what he has for the last 30 years.  I think the real question is will his parish be able to take the heat of the public&#039;s scrutiny.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he continues to be himself, yes.<br />
If he preaches the way the public finds most suitable, no.<br />
I don&#8217;t think the public&#8217;s opinion should matter to him if he stands for what he has for the last 30 years.  I think the real question is will his parish be able to take the heat of the public&#8217;s scrutiny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/06/pfleger-back-at/#comment-107376</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/06/pfleger-back-at/#comment-107376</guid>
		<description>I bet Barry had to pull some strings to make that happen.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet Barry had to pull some strings to make that happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/06/pfleger-back-at/#comment-107373</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/06/pfleger-back-at/#comment-107373</guid>
		<description>I assume he will lie low and stay busy spending the &quot;pork barrel&quot; money that Obama sent him.
By the way don&#039;t you think it&#039;s relevant that Obama directed taxpayer money to the hospital his wife worked at and she received a pay raise of triple her salary...quid pro quo?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume he will lie low and stay busy spending the &#8220;pork barrel&#8221; money that Obama sent him.<br />
By the way don&#8217;t you think it&#8217;s relevant that Obama directed taxpayer money to the hospital his wife worked at and she received a pay raise of triple her salary&#8230;quid pro quo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: what</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/06/pfleger-back-at/#comment-107370</link>
		<dc:creator>what</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/06/pfleger-back-at/#comment-107370</guid>
		<description>if you obama supporters really have to resort to questioning mccain&#039;s patriotism, than you obviously have nothing to show for your own candidate.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you obama supporters really have to resort to questioning mccain&#8217;s patriotism, than you obviously have nothing to show for your own candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/06/pfleger-back-at/#comment-107367</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/06/pfleger-back-at/#comment-107367</guid>
		<description>Hasselblad:
How dare you mention Tim Russert while asking us to back off of Obama. Russert would be the first one to pin him down on his long time associations, his voting record, and his past statements.
Prayers to Tim Russert&#039;s family in this tragic time.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hasselblad:<br />
How dare you mention Tim Russert while asking us to back off of Obama. Russert would be the first one to pin him down on his long time associations, his voting record, and his past statements.<br />
Prayers to Tim Russert&#8217;s family in this tragic time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Danley</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/06/pfleger-back-at/#comment-107365</link>
		<dc:creator>James Danley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/06/pfleger-back-at/#comment-107365</guid>
		<description>Rhys, you wrote:  &quot;I cannot imagine a sane person paying ANY attention to this crazy man (Father Pfleger).&quot;  Yet Sen. Obama paid attenton to him on numerous occasions in the past two decades!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rhys, you wrote:  &#8220;I cannot imagine a sane person paying ANY attention to this crazy man (Father Pfleger).&#8221;  Yet Sen. Obama paid attenton to him on numerous occasions in the past two decades!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/06/pfleger-back-at/#comment-107363</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/06/pfleger-back-at/#comment-107363</guid>
		<description>dl:
You can spin, divert, and minimize the truth, but millions of us know what we&#039;ve seen and heard from Obama and his wifw aqnd their most frequent and close associates over the last few years. We are so deeply offended and outraged we find it useless to debate the issue. Most of us are living real lives anyway, not debating with blind fanatics on the net, but we heard, we remember, and we vote.
Obama girl:
Words fail me. Is this satire? A parody of brain-dead, blind fanaticism?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dl:<br />
You can spin, divert, and minimize the truth, but millions of us know what we&#8217;ve seen and heard from Obama and his wifw aqnd their most frequent and close associates over the last few years. We are so deeply offended and outraged we find it useless to debate the issue. Most of us are living real lives anyway, not debating with blind fanatics on the net, but we heard, we remember, and we vote.<br />
Obama girl:<br />
Words fail me. Is this satire? A parody of brain-dead, blind fanaticism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: obama girl</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/06/pfleger-back-at/#comment-107361</link>
		<dc:creator>obama girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/06/pfleger-back-at/#comment-107361</guid>
		<description>john,
what does that have to do with the fact that he beat hillary, and is now the dem. party&#039; pick for president?
obama is going to be president, inspite of the things you try to introduce into the mix. the dnc knew all of this, and they decided he is to be president, the voters decided,
so all of the past stuff is moot now.
obama will be president
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>john,<br />
what does that have to do with the fact that he beat hillary, and is now the dem. party&#8217; pick for president?<br />
obama is going to be president, inspite of the things you try to introduce into the mix. the dnc knew all of this, and they decided he is to be president, the voters decided,<br />
so all of the past stuff is moot now.<br />
obama will be president</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>