Pro-Clinton Group Ad to Superdelegates: “You’re Still Not Listening”
The group "Women Count PAC" has a newspaper ad today that tells superdelegates "You’re Still Not Listening. Our Votes Are Our Voices."
"HEAR THIS: Hillary Clinton won the popular vote. More people voted for her than any primary candidate in American history…"
This claim is only true, by the way, if you award Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-Illinois, more than 300,000 votes from Michigan and give Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, zero votes from that state.
"AND THIS: More than 21 million women voted in this primary. That’s 14 million more than the 7 million who voted in 2004. That’s not only a 200 percent increase — that’s a lot of women…Like Hillary, we do not back down and we do not quit…You are about to make the most important decision of your life. The future of America’s children is at stake. This moment must transcend politics.
"Superdelegates, look at the facts. The voters have spoken. And remember, this is not about you. It’s about us."
- jpt
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
“You are about to make the most important decision of your life…”
WOW – that is a bit melodramatic! I can think of about a billion decisions more important.
Posted by: MIguy | June 3, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am
HILLARY 08!!!
If not McCain 08!!!
Posted by: CRB | June 3, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am
I love the last lines, “And remember, this is not about you. It’s about us.” How about it’s about the country, the Democratic Party, party unity. This wasn’t a feminist rally, it was a presidential race.
Posted by: Rebecca M Incandela | June 3, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am
Yeah
they seem to forget that a lot of women (just about half) voted for Barack.
duh
Posted by: dl | June 3, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am
The only reason for chosing a clearly weaker candidate is sexism.
Woman make up the majority of voters in every state. That’s 50 states.
The Democrats are going to be reminded of this in Nov if they don’t remember it in Denver.
He isn’t qualified or experienced. He doesnt debate well. He has a myriad of radical ties and associations filled with 1970′s socialist and terrorist rhetoric and hatred.
He is a wet tissue against the hurricane that will be the Republican attack ads.
Black voters wont swing the vote in any state. They are concentrated in red or blue states that aren’t changing.
The job of superdelegates is to chose the stronger candidate. That is clearly HIllary Clinton.
Women will have their voices heard. NOw, in Denver or in November. It’s the sperdelegates choice now.
Posted by: s.b. | June 3, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am
This is a result of how Hillary Clinton was treated by her own party and the media who fixed the nomination and by the Obama supporters. When nasty people say and do nasty things it is not forgotten. Am contacting my US Representative today to tell him this. Also there is a backlash in Obama’s home state about Pfleger-particularly downstate.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | June 3, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
Hey Jake,
Clinton is “D-New York”, not Illinois.
Well, she is kinda from Illinois.
And then Arkansas.
And then D.C.
But THEN New York!
Posted by: chris | June 3, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
Jake Hillary Clinton has only won the popular vote if you honor the certified results by the Secretaries of State. ie you believe in democracy.
If you want to decide which voes count and which don’t, you are Robert Mugabe and you should go live in Zimbabwe.
I can talk about how none of the caucuses should count because they disenfranchised millions of voters and there was rampent fraud in at least Texas with intimidation being stndard practice.
But the Secretaries of State decide that not me and not you Jake.
You either honor elections or you are a dictator.
There is no middle ground.
Hillary Cliton has won the popular vote by about 325,000 and that lead will continue to increase tonight.
Dems either want the white house or they don’t. If they don’t enough women will be happy to oblige and vote MC Cain or write in Clinton.
Posted by: s.b. | June 3, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am
They are not listening, and haven’t for a long time. Just like Clyburn, these superdelegates made up their mind a long time ago that they would rather do the popular thing rather than the right thing. Time will tell if their gamble pays off. If he should be elected, I wonder if all of the Obama supporters who voted for him without knowing one thing he did or what he really stands for are still as awe struck a year after he is elected. Of course, they would never admit it if he doesn’t make the changes that he has promised, whatever those may be.
Posted by: dwc | June 3, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am
My new hero is Harriet Kristen-the older woman on video last Saturday going off about all the votes not being counted.
They may have kicked her out of the place, but they didn’t stop her from having her say.
I’ll never vote for Obama–his 20 years in a racist, anti-American church was a deal breaker. He showed poor judgement and no courage or character.
Hillary 08/2012 or McCain08
Posted by: cindy in nc | June 3, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am
Interesting 21 million women voted, but certainly they didn’t all vote for Clinton.
So now they are suppose to line up behind Clinton because women voted? Doesn’t matter who they voted for.
Yea Women count onlly if you count them all for Clinton. Talk about sexism!
Posted by: Thinking | June 3, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am
Are AA’s irrelevant? Well, since Lyndon Johnson democrats have lost the white vote; however, there is a particular group who came out in their rescue, who? Guess, African Americans. They vote 90% for the democrat candidate every election.
Who wins the white vote in Florida? Republicans. How democrats make up the difference? You guess, the very faithful African Americans.
Who wins the white vote in Pennsylvania? Republicans. How democras make up the difference? You gues, the loyal African Americans.
Who wins the white vote in Ohio? Republicans. How democrats make up the difference? You guess, the very same “irrelevant” people that do the trick in Florida and Pennsylvania.
THERE IS A LOT OF IGNORANCE: “Black voters wont swing the vote in any state. They are concentrated in red or blue states that aren’t changing.”
Posted by: carl29 | June 3, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am
I get to vote for my local congressman today. Long time party insider, claims he is undecided, but I know better after calling his office. I will take great pleasure in casting my vote for his competitor today and hopefully ending his 30 year career. He had a chance to speak out and didn’t. Now it’s our turn to speak to him.
Hillary 08′
Posted by: SadStateOfAffairs | June 3, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am
If not Hillary, then McCain.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | June 3, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am
They don’t make the popular votes count availabel in Iwo, Nevada, maine , Washington.
Why? So how do you do?
It’s not Hillary. It’s them.
A blogger said it’s because the proportion of delegate allocation is too far disproportional.
BO gets 1 delegate for 2000 votes. Whereas Hillary gets 1 delegate for 10 000 votes in primaries. Stop repeating like sheep incorrect information.
Posted by: Jane | June 3, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am
Yep, the people have spoken, and their choice is Senator Obama. I wonder when it was decided that the rules didn’t apply to women? As a woman myself you would think I would have gotten a copy. . .
Posted by: Nobodys fool | June 3, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am
This woman thinks the superdelegates are listening. It is about ME too.
Obama ’08
Posted by: Dani girl | June 3, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am
I hope Hillary goes back to Senate to run another day. McCain will be the next president and Obama will lose. And the Democratic Party has lost the trust and respect of women. I will never call myself a Dem again
Posted by: victoria l trenne | June 3, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am
I may just vote my conscience and write in Hillary’s name as my vote this November.
Posted by: Jan | June 3, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am
Hey Thinking-I guess we’ll see won’t we?
Posted by: RL in Illinois | June 3, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am
and guess what…Hillary has fallen again in her favorabilities…
all of you go check what Hillary’s favorability and likeability numbers are …they are now through the floor.
and Obama’s have now started going back up(and is above Mccain again)…from a place that was still well ahead of Hillary.
she started this race with a ceiling of about 52%…that pretty early on went to an average of 48%…to now somewhere in George Bush’s range…
Stop with all of this hogwash… you couldn’t win with likability numbers that low.
That’s as if George Bush was running.
as if you were counting on the 25% of the population that are whakced out loyalists…(just like GW) and relying on the party to carry the candidate to victory.
Go look at the real numbers…and stop this blah blah blah 5th grade anger.
worry about the troops, our staniding in the world, the poor, women’s rights, corporate america keeping us on this road (like someone sdaid this morning McCain’s staff for his campaign is made up of paid lobbyists…why would you think his administration would be different?)
Posted by: dl | June 3, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am
And the media is still treating her unfairly.
The latest polls released prior to today’s primaries, that were conducted over the weekend, show Hillary 20+ in South Dakota, and Obama leading, but not even within the margin of error in Montana.
Yet all of the media outlets this morning are still saying he is favored to win both primaries.
These people hear what they want to hear, and do not listen to the warning bells. Obama has only won two primaries in almost three months, while Hillary has piled on win after win.
He is no longer the shining, golden candidate he was at the beginning of this campaign, and it’s about time the party realized this before they have another disaster on their hands come November.
Posted by: SandyB | June 3, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am
and all of you go look at history…
the primary losers supporters say this everytime…
including Bill Clinton’s primary.
Posted by: dl | June 3, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
How does the Clinton campaign and Hillary supporters get away with these blatant misrepresentations about the popular vote count? The nomination is decided on delegates – period. Even if Hillary were leading the vote total, which she is not, it wouldn’t matter. They’re really all a bunch of Bill-style sore/whiny losers.
Posted by: matt | June 3, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
tony
your kids that you want to say are the women voting for obama…go up to age 50.
Yeah they are actually the ones working.
Posted by: dl | June 3, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
unfortunately Hillary is still trying tio convince people that the rules do not poertain to her. No matter how you add it up, she looses….
Hopefully her supporters will realize that it is about the party winning in Nov and not about Obama and Clinton.
Posted by: newvoter | June 3, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am
21 million women voted. Their voices must be heard . . . um, well clearly, nearly half of those women (including myself) will have voted for Obama . . .
Obviously we women who voted for Obama are not about to lose, so we don’t need to sound so sour.
Posted by: boogieandjive | June 3, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am
The latest polls released prior to today’s primaries, that were conducted over the weekend, show Hillary 20+ in South Dakota, and Obama leading, but not even within the margin of error in Montana.
***************************************
Even the Clinton Campaign dispute this!
Posted by: Thinking | June 3, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am
You’ve got it wrong Naggers!
You’re not listening. Go ahead and vote for your Suga Daddy Pappy McCain. You’ll find that he’s broke with nothing but empty promises for you
Don’t be mad, Be Glad.
OBAMA 08
Posted by: David Duke | June 3, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am
The Dems have set up a ridiculous primary process and they are now reaping what they have sown. Caucuses (in both parties) should be eliminated. They have proven to be undemocratic, shutting out those who can’t get time off from work, are disabled, or who have responsibilities for children or elderly. They were tilted in favor of Obama’s constituency and that’s a fact. Superdelegates are a joke. This is not the democratic system I was always taught we have. Finally, the rule that AWARDS EXTRA DELEGATES to voting districts that have shown loyalty by consistently voting dem. over many years–what the heck is THAT all about? And think about which districts those might be? Minority, college towns, etc. Seems to me that little technicality favors Obama also. When women say this process has been unfair to Hillary, I think they should more properly state that it has been unfair, period. However, it seems that when a lot of the MALE politicians saw Obama had a chance, they gamed the system a bit to force her out. I disagree with Hillary on 100% of her positions, but I do think there are behind-the-scene forces that worked against her. Because she’s a woman? I’m a woman and I’ve been discriminated against….and I smell a rat here.
Posted by: R | June 3, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am
Jake, Isn’t Hillary a democrat from New York? I thought journalists got their facts right…not!
Posted by: Polly | June 3, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am
sandy…both candidates have been tained, Obama by Rev Wright and others, Hillary by her and Bill’s conduct …no one is free from discourse. The only way to prevent this doom of failure is top unite….OMG grow up everyone!!
Posted by: newvoter | June 3, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
Don’t double count all the black females Obama voters. His support is very very narrow and an electoral landslide awaits.
****************************************
Oh I didn’t know it was The “White Women Count PAC”. Sorry
Posted by: Thinking | June 3, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Please women who are voting for Hillary for the gender issue…don’t tear down Barack Obama because Michigan and Florida representatives could not go by the rules. If Michigan and Florida did you would have a case, be upset with those reps. Do you really believe that alot of the discord you are displaying will get you anything positive? I am a women but would never vote for a “Clinton”, my vote is for who would be best for this country – not just for gender. When I hear the discord it just reminds be of hard core feminists. Hillary is a formidable candidate, but the country I believe is done with this dynasty.
Posted by: Robin | June 3, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
I challenge anyone to make a RATIONAL argument detailing how the Democratic Nomination was stolen from Hillary Clinton.
It was not stolen from her, she lost using the rules that have been in effect in the Democratic Party for YEARS, rules that she and her supporters helped to make, rules that they only began to complain about AFTER they needed additional delegates.
And know amount of posturing, complaining, or threatening is going to change that.
Posted by: Nobodys fool | June 3, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
give it a rest hillary supporters its over we have 4 months to beat mccain now if you dont want him as president than enough is enough come together unite support obama and lets beat mccain dont give the republicans another 4 years to really run this country in the ground we have the chance now to try and save our country before its too late i am a obama supporter and i have much respect for hillary and i was ready to vote for her if she won even though i was an obama supporter thats what real democrats do SUPPORT THE DEMOCRAT NOMONIEE
Posted by: angiee | June 3, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Oh, the superdelegates ARE listening, they just aren’t buying your spin–and neither is America. Obama in ’08!
Posted by: Kathleen | June 3, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Thats why this is a delegate race not a popular vote contest due to primaries and caucuses. Hillary new the rules when she entered the contest and her campaign did not prepare for it. Thats not anyone’s fault but her campaign. These people who are making these claims and ads are not making Mrs. Clinton or women look very good.
Posted by: leslie | June 3, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
thinking
Hillary lost in her base. Her campaign has tried to trash Obama to a point where he could come down to her level…it doesn’t work.
the number that has the biggest correlation with the general election…likability and favorability…
Hillary lost in a primary that was made up of the base of her less than 50% that liked her.
That number is down close to 25% (between 25 and 30…and that would drop if she won the nomination…isn’t that unbeleivable for any politician…she would be below Bush) now how does anyone turn that to say …she would be a better candidate? or that she is the best choice for America?
compared to mcCain yeah I would agree because of policies that effect the people that this is about… the soldiers, the war, the weight of wealthy tax cuts on the rest of American and it’s cause to borrowing moneys from China and in essence our kids.
the list goes on.
this is not about Hillary (a candidate with numbers like, unfortunately, like Bush’s) this is about America is sinking…and McCain promises no change. Period.
Posted by: dl | June 3, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
Carl29 there are not enough of the AAs to make up the difference. You must not be paying attention. Even the hispanics out number the AAs now & they be votin’ for Hillary not BO. You need to recalculate.
Posted by: uho | June 3, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
R… get real…Obama is and has been in a minority all his life( AA) Yes women are discriminate aagainst also, but neither one had a advantage over the other. White men and women voted for HRC because of prejudgeous,and blacks voted for Obama because they finally feel that someone can give them a voice.
Posted by: truthtell | June 3, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
@dl
Why are you writing that to me, go back read my posts.
Posted by: Thinking | June 3, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am
hey all you ladies out there that want to vote for mccain out of spite and anger hope you dont have children old enough to be drafted for war because if you do kiss them goodbye with mcain there will probably be a draft with 2 wars he wants to continue and possible a war in iran not to mention with him some of your rights as woman may be taken away since he has not an ounce of respect for woman just look at what he called his wife in public i dont know ladies think real hard think about your children thankgod my children are still to young
Posted by: angiee | June 3, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am
thinking
just reinforcing what you said
sorry…hope it didn’t sound like I was challenging you
Posted by: dl | June 3, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
“This claim is only true, by the way, if you award Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-Illinois, more than 300,000 votes from Michigan and give Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, zero votes from that state.”
The same way Ralph Nader having his name on the ballots in 43 states got ZERO vote in North Carolina where his name was not listed in the 2000 election
Did the media question Gore and Bush popular votes in North Carolina while Nader got zero vote because he was not on the ballot?
Posted by: Angel | June 3, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
I think they are not listening…we will just vote in November and they will hear LOUD AND CLEAR!
NEVER EVER VOTE OBAMA! NEVER!
Posted by: HP Boston | June 3, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
Boogie,
The women that voted for Obama don’t count, when will you realize that?
The voters in caucus states don’t count, either–when will you realize that?
The voters in less populated states don’t count, either. When will you realize that?
Only women can put the Democrats “over the top”–white men, black men (and women), and everyone else are useless–when will you realize that?
A candidate can get less votes, raise less money, win less pledged delegates, get less superdelegates, run a terrible campaign, be the presumed nominee for a year, fail to plan, squander 100% name recognition, be worth 100 million dollars, be married to and be supported by one of the most popular presidents EVER, and STILL come in second SOLELY due to sexism.
The simple truth is that HRC had no plan past February 5th. So once it went past that, she NEVER recovered. And IF Obama had really gone after her, he would have destroyed her. Pretty easy to win the fight, Hillary, when the other guy won’t fight back.
Hillary hasn’t been hanging in there hoping to win. She’s been hanging in there hoping Obama would lose. And time just ran out.
Which is what Obama has been waiting on.
Checkmate.
Posted by: chris | June 3, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am
Will all of you Hillary people stop speaking on behalf of “women”? It is so utterly condescending and arrogant. Speak for yourself, do not claim to speak for me. There is no “women’s vote.” There is a “Hillary vote” and an “Obama vote”. Count this woman on Obama’s side.
If you don’t want to vote for Obama, fine, then stay home or vote for McCain. That’s your right. But don’t complain when McCain appoints Supreme Court judges who will overturn every policy and civil liberty that matter to us. Be bitter if you must, but you and the country will pay an extremely high price. That is a selfishness I cannot understand – letting anger cloud judgement. You will be condemnng our children to a Roberts court majority for the next 30 years – goodbye Roe, goodbye habeaus corpus, goodbye enviromental protections, goodbye social programs…Go ahead, vote for McCain.
Posted by: Louise Spencer | June 3, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am
Popular vote as of June 3, 2008
These figures INCLUDE Florida, Michigan, and Puerto Rico, for both candidates:
Clinton 17,692,976
Obama 17,627,421 (includes “UNCOMMITTED”, which is a mixed vote)
Total Diff. +65,555 (Clinton)
Pct. Diff. +0.2% (Clinton)
Above figures from RealClearPolitics.com
So, why SHOULD Hillary quit NOW? She speaks the truth, she does lead in the Popular Vote.
However, to be very fair, let’s take away BOTH Hillary’s Puerto Rico vote AND Obama’s Puerto Rico and “UNCOMMITTED” vote. Doing that, the new totals are:
Clinton 17,429,856
Obama 17,267,795
Diff. +162,061 (Clinton)
So there you have it, folks. The question is, “Who is leading in the Popular Vote”? Please make your choice.
Posted by: Yavo Lem | June 3, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am
SOURCES:
SOURCES TELL SOURCES THAT SUPE DELEGATES SHOULD NOT BE DETERRED BY THIS UNPATRIOTIC FEMINIST TALK ABOUT ‘WILL OF THE PEOPLE’. SOURCES POINT TO THE EXCELLENT SCREW THE VOTE EXERCISE THAT TOOK PLACE OVER THE WEEKEND. SOURCES SHOW HOW WASY IT WAS TO IGNORE THE ‘VOTES’ AND THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS.
Posted by: Average Joe | June 3, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am
I still say it is a sexist ad. This isn’t asbout womens rights; this is about some women’s demand.
Posted by: Thinking | June 3, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am
To say that Obama is Presidential material because he won more PLEDGED DELEGATES from CAUCUSES is like saying he is the STRONGER candidate because he wins at WIENER AND MARSHMALLOW ROASTS. Please note that there are NO CAUCUSES in the General Election. He is in no way the STRONGER candidate, and any SUPER DELEGATE with any intelligence and politcal savvy at all knows that full well. The Convention should be all action-packed drama, kiddies, with Obama being just a big WIENER. As someone once said of the former baseball slugger Reggie Jackson, “There’s not enough mustard in this world to cover that hot dog.” And the same applies to Obama.
Posted by: Yavo Lem | June 3, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am
I really do not understand it. Their logic is so tortuous it pains me. If Clinton was really interested in having a Democrat win in the fall, she wouldn’t have resorted to such obvious distortions of the truth designed to make people feel like she has been cheated out of the nomination. After all, how does she change her rhetoric and say that she was wrong? All of her hard-core supporters will just say she was forced to say so!
Posted by: Nick B | June 3, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am
HP Boston
You are not original…people say this every election…go look at Bill’s numbers during the primary of “defections” people sooo angry their candidate did not win the primary (with Bill they had a lot worse things to say than they are saying about Obama…if you’ll remember…all the crap duering that primary…only difference is his opponents put the issues over their own candidacy)
but Bill had tons of people saying he was “vermon” and they were going to vote for Bush.
Yeah that didn’t really happen.
and most adults know they are just angry about losing right now…but they vote for the soldiers, the economy, the poor, fixing healthcare, the housing crisis, figuring out our bad energy policy that republican lobbyists have pushed us into (you know the ones that have been working for McCain’s campaign)…
si get out your anger but as an adult …hopefully a sane adult… realize that a Presidential election is about the country not a candidate.
Most Hillary supporters because they are good caring passionate Americans …already are. The few that aren’t are going to be the ones talking on here.
Posted by: dl | June 3, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am
SOURCES:
THE BLACK LEADERS IN INCLUDING JACKSON AND CLYBURN ARE PUSHING AND PULLING TO END THE DEMOCRATIC RACE IN A NON-DEMOCRATIC WAY: BY FORCE!
THESE LEADERS CLAIM THAT THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS SHOULD NOT GO FORWARD BECAUS IF IT DID THEIR LOVELY BOY WOULD BE IN DANGER OF LOSING IN NOVEMBER AND HILLARY SHOULD NOT WANT TO HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THAT.
SOURCES DID NOT DISCLOSE SOURCES AS THEY ARE VERY PROTECTIVE TO SHOW GOOD WILL AND THAT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY WILL UNITE BEHIND THE LEADER.
SOURCES CANNOT CONFIRM IF DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA WILL BE SPOOKED FOREVER IF THE BLACK LEADERS SUCCEED IN THEIR ATTEMPT TO HIJACK THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
Posted by: Average Joe | June 3, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
‘It’s about us’ – Ain’t that the truth?
It’s not about the people in caucus states… It’s not about the rules of the game… It’s not about the reality of the situation… it’s about us getting what we want.
Boo hoo… cry me a river.
Posted by: Deep Release | June 3, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am
Wakeup poeple! They are not that far apart in total vote count. Throw in the margin of error and it’s simply to close to call.
What that really says is that either candidate can win in the GE and it’s up to the delegates and supers to make sure a democrat wins the next election and they like Obama. Hillary’s argument is a good one, but it’s not all that valid.
Either candidate has good chance.
Clinton 1911 – 17,673,329/16,474,034
Obama 2082 – 17,355,652/16,779,438
Posted by: Wake-Up America | June 3, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am
SOURCES:
AN NEW WAVE OF DELEGATES IS EXPECTED TO SHOW THEIR SUPPORT FOR OBAMA. THESE DELEGATES HAVE BEEN WAITING ALL ALONG TO SHOW THIS SUPPORT. THEY CARE NOT ABOUT WHO PEOPLE VOTE FOR BUT FOR OBAMA.
SOURCES CANNOT CONFIRM WHETHER THESE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN BRIBED HANDSOMLY OR THEY ARE JUST INSANE CROOCKS.
SOURCES CLAIM THAT THESE BANDITS HAVE TAKEN THE NAME OF SO CALLED ‘DEMOCRATS’ TO MAKE PEOPLE BELIEVE SOMETHING THAT IT ISN’T. SOURCES WILL REMAIN ANNONYMOUS IN ORDER TO NOT ENDANGER THEIR SOURCES
Posted by: Average Joe | June 3, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am
Hey RL in Illinois,
I absolutely PROMISE you that my vote for Obama in Illinois will trump your vote for McCain in Illinois in every way.
Your vote, my friend, will have NO effect.
But we do promise to count it.
It’ll be just like the primary.
Posted by: chrisc | June 3, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am
Consider this:
Initial total number of Democratic Delegates
(excluding Florida and Michigan) = 4,048
One half of 4,048 + 1 = 2,025
Superdelegates to vote at convention = -795
Total PLEDGED DELEGATES available
before convention before May 31, 2008 = 3,253
Plus Florida PLEDGED Restored May 31 = +92.5
Plus Michigan PLEDGED Restored May 31 = +64
Total PLEDGED DELEGATES available
Before Convention as of May 31 = 3,409.5
Original number of SUPERDELEGATES = 795
Plus Florida (13) and Michigan (14.5)
Restored SUPER DELEGATES = 27.5
Total SUPERDELEGATES to vote at the
Convention = 822.5
New Total Convention Delegate count
As of May 31, 2008 = 4,232
New “Magic Number” of PLEDGED DELEGATES
TO BECOME NOMINEE = 2,118
Total Obama PLEDGED DELEGATES
As of June 3, 2008 = 1,739 *
*Includes actual and projected PLEDGED
Total Clinton PLEDGED DELEGATES
As of June 3, 2008 = 1,625 #
#Includes actual and projected PLEDGED
Obama needs to win before Convention = 379 PLEDGED DELEGATES
Clinton needs to win before Convention = 493 PLEDGED DELEGATES
The above analysis based on numbers from the New York Times of June 3, 2008.
Total number of PLEDGED DELEGATES available in MT AND SD = 31
Latest ARG polls for MT and SD from RealClearPolitics:
Montana – Obama 48% and Clinton 44%
South Dakota – Obama 34% and Clinton 60%
Posted by: Yavo Lem | June 3, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am
There are only a few more days to go.
McCain is clearly the best candidate of the three. He is pretty moderate, and he won’t be as incompetent as GWB in running the wars.
He can also help to cement the conservative majority on the supreme court.
We need to keep making Hillary’s supporters feel cheated so that they will stay home (or vote for our guy).
It’s ironic that Rush’s tactics will be helping to elect the non ultra-con McCain!
Get angry girls! Get VERY angry!
Posted by: AnyWay | June 3, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am
this was stolen from Hillary. The worst was Donna “smirkface” Brazille lecturing everybody about her mommas roolz. I guess she forgot about her mommas roolz between the time she lectured Ickes and she voted to steal 4 delegates from Hillary. Or maybe according to momma brazille’s rules “cheatin is bad but stealin is ok”.
Posted by: MenForHillary | June 3, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am
INCREDIBLE!! I GUESS THEIR ASSUMPTION IS THAT OBAMA HASN’T RECEIVED ANY FEMALE SUPPORT?!!! HOW DOES SHE HAVE THE POPULAR VOTE?? SHE DOESN’T! THE MEDIA TENDS TO NOT CHALLENGE THAT ASSERTION AND THE HILLARY FOLKS ATTEMPT TO RUN WITH IT!! WHAT ABOUT THE CAUCUSES?! PLEASE REFER TO A PREVIOUS”THE NUMBERS” POST ON THIS WEBSITE REGARDING A MORE ACCURATE PICTURE OF THE POPULAR VOTE! YOU KNOW, MORE THAN 1,400 PEOPLE VOTED IN THE IOWA CAUCUS. IT SEEMS THAT EVERYTHING THAT DOESN’T GO HER WAY; IS EITHER UNFAIR OR SHE IGNORES!
Posted by: agbi | June 3, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am
@Yavo Lem
There you go again you left out those darn Caucus States. Thaty Real Clear shows that if one was to figure those in then Obama ahaed by 54,000 votes or so.
It is just the next line down from you were reading. Typical Clinton.
Posted by: Thinking | June 3, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am
Which Democratic candidate is more electable?
Consider this:
This is how the Electoral College stands as of June 3, 2008, (Puerto Rico is not a factor in the Electoral Vote), showing strengths of Clinton vs. Obama, based on their results. For those who have not understood, this is not a head-to-head matchup, but rather a side-by-side comparison.
This assumes a winner-take-all primary/caucus vote takes all Electoral votes for each state
With Florida and Michigan, which Clinton won per the DNC decision:
Clinton 308
Obama 224
Assuming the following victories, based on current polls, with Clinton winning NOTHING ELSE, and Obama winning South Dakota, and Montana, the totals would then be:
Clinton 308
Obama 230 (includes Montana, and South Dakota)
Please note that it takes 270 Electoral College votes to win the General Election.
Whether or not the vote turns out as indicated, I firmly believe the above analysis more than amply demonstrates which of the Democratic candidates is in a better position to be the stronger candidate in the General Election.
P.S. – One last thought about this Electoral College Vote analysis; in it I gave Senator Obama full credit for the state caucuses he won. However, it should be noted that there are not any caucuses to be won in the Big Leagues during the General Election. There are only PRIMARIES, WINNER-TAKE-ALL.
And I am sure the “Super Delegates” are aware of that.
Posted by: Yavo Lem | June 3, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am
There is one way to appease everyone. The Dream Ticket is the only way.
Posted by: A reader in Georgia | June 3, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am
Wakeup poeple! They are not that far apart in total vote count. Throw in the margin of error and it’s simply to close to call.
What that really says is that either candidate can win in the GE and it’s up to the delegates and supers to make sure a democrat wins the next election and they like Obama. Hillary’s argument is a good one, but it’s not all that valid.
Either candidate has good chance.
Clinton 1911 – 17,673,329/16,474,034
Obama 2082 – 17,355,652/16,779,438
Also factor in the loyal democrats that will come over to Obama when the primary is over and his numbers will swell to over 30 mil. I say that all you racist haters will be a minority when all is said and done.
Obama08&12
Posted by: Wake-Up America | June 3, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am
Politics is a simple thing.
The super delegates do what is best for THEMSELVES as they weigh the potential outcomes. Does anybody really believe they give a rip about the citizens. Look at those supers who went for a given candidate in spite of the fact that their state (the people) voted the other way.
Fire them all and hire temps!
Forget party affiliation and get some new blood circulating through the government – especially the impotent congress. If you vote strictly along party lines (either party), you’re a part of the problem and not of the solution. Reclaim the process.
Posted by: Thomas | June 3, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
The great thing about dropping the Dem’s and going independent is I get to pick my ballot in NOV. I will pick the rebub and vote against every DEM running!
I will not bother with the DEM ballot at all, no need to write in Hillary when I can vote Mccain and not vote for any DEM!
NEVER VOTE OBAMA! NEVER! ANYONE BUT OBAMA! ANYONE!
Posted by: HP Boston | June 3, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
Things are NOT as they are made to appear.
For all the talk about “Super Delegates”, there is nothing “Super” about them. Just as everyone of us, they have one vote each. Their endorsement is just that, an endorsement. It is not a vote. They are not supposed to come into play unless there is a deadlocked convention, and in that case, they are expected to exercise their BEST JUDGMENT to cast their votes for that candidate they, in view of their extensive experience and political wisdom, think would be able to WIN the General Election. They are not supposed to be endorsing this or that candidate, BEFORE THEY VOTE AT THE CONVENTION. To do otherwise is to be false to the trust and responsibility that has been placed in and on them.
It would be better at this point if all the bickering supporters of each candidate looked at the number of ACTUAL PLEDGED DELEGATES allocated to their candidate on the basis of primaries and caucuses won. Those figures, as of June 3, 2008 (NY Times web site), for those who truly follow politics are:
Obama 1,624
Clinton 1,568
Diff. +56 (Obama)
Of the “surveyed” “Super Delegates”, of which there are now approx. 822.5, there are at least 202 who have not “endorsed” any candidate, which is as it was intended to be. Again, an “endorsement” does not necessarily translate into a convention vote, since in theory “Super Delegates” are supposed to represent the wisdom of the party and are expected to be above the fray. Those who have endorsed, really should be stripped of their position and replaced by those who will act as intended. However, that is the responsibility of the DNC, which so far, has proven inadequate to discipline its own members.
The bottom line, “Super Delegate” endorsements should not be counted by candidates claiming that such an “endorsement” makes this person into a PLEDGED DELEGATE, for that is NOT THE CASE, and to think otherwise is to delude oneself and one’s followers. It is also wrong for the media to even report what “Super Delegates” are doing now, as they do not even come into play unless and until there is a DEADLOCKED CONVENTION.
However, there is nothing to prevent partisans from ‘counting chickens before they hatch”, nor is there anything to prevent the media from playing games with gullible people to increase interest in these silly stories.
As Yogi Berra once said, “It ain’t over, ’til it’s over”. And this fight is a long way from over.
Posted by: Yavo Lem | June 3, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
IT’S OVER — THE FAT LADY IS SINGING
Hillary is no irrelevant. The attempts toward reconciliation are already on this blog and throughout the country.
Time to join the Obama express!
… Toot toot!
Posted by: S | June 3, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am
There is one way to appease everyone. The Dream Ticket is the only way.
Posted by: A reader in Georgia | Jun 3, 2008 9:53:23 AM
*******************************
You can stuff the dream ticket!
Obama is not fit or qualified to fill the WH, he has the dregs of society as his BFF’S!!
Posted by: HP Boston | June 3, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am
The good thing is that the Democrat party already stirred up all the gender and race animosity.
Our guy can reap the rewards without stooping to that nonsense.
The rants from Obama’s church are also helping to get conservative christians behind McCain!
McCain is a true fiscal conservative
McCain has proven that he can work with moderate Dems
Prediction: McCain takes California!
Posted by: AnyWay | June 3, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am
Irony at it’s finest moment.
3 months ago it was the Clinton’s giving the Super Delegates argument…and how important they are to the Democratic Process.
And now it’s those very same Super Delegates who will turn their backs on their popular vote “argument”.
Posted by: J.R. | June 3, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am
Yavo Lem
it seems Hillary is from wherever she needs votes. so don’t blame him for confusion as to where she is “from” she even said it in New Hampshire.
That was where her political career was “from”
I think she referred to half of the states as her “home”
lol
it’s not a dis…just funny.
Posted by: dl | June 3, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am
How can anyone in their right mind vote for someone who has nothing to say. voters listen to Senator Clinton and know what she is talking about. Obama is a lot of hot air with no substance.
Posted by: Barbara Thomas | June 3, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am
YOU HILLARY SUPPORTERS REALLY DIDN’T THINK SHE EVER HAD A CHANCE. DID YOU?
The deck was stacked and the ultra liberals continue the march to replace traditional democratic principles. Hillary supporters have a choice to make — go along for the ride or get on another train. It’s not just that simple!
Posted by: S | June 3, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am
I haven’t seen a tantrum quite like this one in a long time. Shame on Hillary Clinton for manipulating these women into thinking she is a victim.
Posted by: hang | June 3, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am
We’ve all known since February how this would play out. The last 3 months have just been a sideshow for the media.
Same stuff, different day
YAWN
Posted by: The answer is.... | June 3, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am
barabara
you need to read their policies…Obama has a lot to say…
or do you mean like the healthcare bill where hillary keeps shouting about universal healthcare and covering every american
but no plans how to get it passed when it is statistically way off course to being so…
or that it does not address the problem that is there to having it pased…cost.
just because mroe people are getting covered does not mean costs go down…
the costs that are killing the industry actually go up with a larger group to be covered… (malpractice, primary care physisician and nursing shortage and most of all BILLING)
anyone can promise the world for votes…but the devil is in the omitted details. i.e. gas tax… i.e. mortgage rate suspension
they all sound great when going for votes but are tragic in what they would reap.
go read there policies.
Posted by: dl | June 3, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
I know here in montana last night clinton had people putting signs up at the polling places. They were gone by the time I headed to wwork this morning.
Posted by: Joe | June 3, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Boston don’t vote at all who cares but where you come from( I know people from Mass they are arrogrant and think they own the world so you and Hilly make a good pair) you will be one of the first to CRY if McCain gets in and you are back to the same ole crap
Posted by: me | June 3, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am
So much for rules… From NYT, Obama is granting full rights to Mi and Fla if he is the nominee. That’s not what Wexler asked for on Sat…….sick. (NYT)–First of all, it seems that even though the committee voted to give the delegates from Michigan and Florida only half a vote each at the convention, they will end up getting full votes.And secondly, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton’s folks are still up in arms about the allocation of delegates in Michigan and made the point in force across the Sunday shows. They haven’t decided yet whether to challenge it officially, and it may become a bargaining chip in their endgame.But both these issues could complicate things for the party down the road.First, on the delegates getting full voting strength. That is the prerogative of the nominee. Senator Carl Levin of Michigan says that both Senator Barack Obama and Mrs. Clinton have told him that if they were nominated they would give the delegates full voting strength.“We’re assured we’re going to get a full vote,” Mr. Levin said on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”He added: “And both candidates have said that they want Michigan’s delegation to have a full vote. She said that yesterday and Senator Obama has said that he can guarantee that the Michigan delegation will be seated and they’ll have a full voice at the convention, when he has enough delegates to know that he’s the nominee.”This raises some interesting questions — like whether the rules matter.
Posted by: Misstickly | June 3, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
Hillary supporters need to take a deep breath and think of the consequences of a McCain presidency. There are actual real-world issues at stake outside of today’s horserace. You really want to be in Iraq for 100 years? Iran? Want your great-grandchildren to still be paying for those wars? How about $10/gallon gas? And who needs freedom of choice anyway? And let’s go ahead and have nine Alitos on the Supreme Court. (Have you seen the age of some of the liberals on the Court? I guarantee some of them are itching to retire.)
I have long argued with my fellow Obama supporters who have, at times, expressed similar sentiments as the ones being expressed by Hillary supporters today. We have to have a Democrat in office in 2009. Far too much damage has been done to the country by the GOP and giving them another 4 years just for spite, because your candidate lost, is a really shortsighted and, dare I say it, CHILDISH thing to do. You’ll have to live with yourselves for 4 more years of this nightmare if you put McCain in office. Just think about it. We’re all on the same side, remember?
Posted by: Jenny | June 3, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
OK the Dems under Pelosi and Dean and The Senate told us in 06 vote for the Dems and we will get us out of Iraq, now we find out that through a PA congressman that it was a ply to get elected and they knew they could not do it. Now the DNC is telling us they want an elitist for President and that a woman should not become president. I say lets kick the Dems out of all their offices and start fresh in 2012 with new dems!!
Otherwise they will continue to push who they want and not what the people want!!
Posted by: NoTolies | June 3, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
if McCain gets in and you are back to the same ole crap
Posted by: me | Jun 3, 2008 10:17:46 AM
**************************************
WE WOMEN ARE USED TO THE SAME OLD CRAP!
Vote McCain we like being victims! HA lol lol
Posted by: HP Boston | June 3, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
That’s the thing about Stampeding. It leaves tracks.
News is Supers can not wait to stampede over to Obama.
Those same tracks made by these overzelous pro Obama Supers, will be used by these women -who very seriously mean business- to trace back to them. I’m curious if sexism and hatred of Hillary Clinton is more important to them then their collective careers. Even the money that they are getting from Obama will not last long enough to get these ladies off their spineless backs. HIHI
Posted by: CTJD | June 3, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
Another thing, Hillary supporters. Obama’s and Hillary’s platforms are almost identical. Compare theirs to McCain’s. Do you REALLY want him in charge? What happened to universal healthcare. Hillary and Obama will work hand in hand to get it passed. YOu can forget it if McSame is in office.
You know, a lot of you accuse Obama supporters of being a cult of personality. For you to deliberately vote against the platform you support, against your and your children’s interests, just because your candidate did not win the nomination, is pretty cultish in my book. I know I’d swallow my disappointment and vote for Hillary if she had the nomination. I’m a Democrat who wants progressive policies enacted. Who’s the crazed follower now? You or me?
Posted by: Jenny | June 3, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Trying to blame Obama for sexism is way off the track.Obama was scared of attacking Clinton primarily because of that. We can see the way he is hitting Mccain. With Clinton, he was scared because he knew he was going to need her supporters also. Bill was the one that brought in race. Notwithstanding Bill remains my hero and I know that blacks still view him favorably. all said and done I think we need all Hillary’s supporters. Obama cannot win the white house without their support. Know some of Obama’s supporters will not like to hear this but we must be factual always. Our goal should be to try and win all Hillary supporters back starting with Geraldino Ferraro. Everyone shares a sentiment. It will be our goal to help in easing off those sentiments. The race for the white house between the most viable black candidate eventhough Obama is only half-black and the most viable woman candidate is sure to result into all this. Obama supporters just like me can explain why we went off. Hillary supporters brought in the Somalia garb, Reverend Wright and Hilary herself brought in Ayers all in a means to derail Obama. This election is an election that was decided more on sentiments than on issues but Obama and Hillary nevertheless remain the best candidates. Obama came in with the change phenemenon and reminds me so much of Bill. I could not help but to start liking him.Obama must start today by trying o unite the party. He needs Hillary’s support and nothing will send a better message than having Geraldino Ferraro there with him. If they can forgive each other then I think every other person can forgive and I tell you a Democrat will surely be in the White house in November.
Posted by: vuzous | June 3, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am
Newsflash: no one cares about Bill Clinton and his women. He was a very good president! Let him be judged for his sins by God and his wife. You all need to mind you business and stay out of his private life. If you are so concerned about peoples private lives, you have more to worry about with Obama. But of course you are too blind to see that.
Posted by: CTJD | June 3, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am
I take it Obama might be under some pressure to put Hillary on the ticket?
This is NOT ordinary folks. Dont let anyone try to SPIN this.
I have been thru many elections and there has never been a nomination process this close, ever.
JFK would have never been president if LBJ wasnt on the ticket.
Reagan still would have won. He ran against Obama. I mean , Carter.
Obama is a direct IDIOT if he doesnt stick her on the ticket.
Spin it anyway you want folks. Clinton democrats are just as furious as all you Obama fans THREATENED to be if Clinton ‘stole’ the election.
Posted by: cgeast | June 3, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
Jenny
you bring up a good reason not to vote Democrat – 10$ gas who do you think is pushing that? The Dem, Remember Pelosi promoised to lower the gas when it was 2.75 and since the dems took over it went to over 4$ and now they are trying to pass a bill to add another 1.50 a gallon tax on it using the Fraud of Global Warming!! They think we are spoiled and should pay the same amount as Europe!!
if Obama gets elected he already promised to raise the gas peices again, you will be paying about 8-10 dollars if Obama wins!!
Oh keep in mind by law the oil companies only make 8 cents profit on a gallon of gas, now just think could you run a business on that.
See the libs leave out that the oil companies invest in other things to get their oil, also that Exxon and Mobil combined recently so of course the profits for one company will go up because it use to be 2!!
Right now we pay approx 70 cents in taxs a gallon, they want to raise it to 2.20 in taxes a gallon!!
Thanks to Wrner (D Virginia i think,), a NY Democrat) congressman, and Boxer (D) all have put it the bill going through the Senate now. Thank GOd Pres. Bush vowed to Veto it, and the dems will not be able to override.
But if Obama wins it will go through and he wants 2.5 cents tax on it!!
Posted by: spock | June 3, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
I do find it hilarious that all the super delegates have been ‘trickling’ into Obama’s corner in spite of the fact hillary has beaten Obama pretty good since Ohio .
no matter what the election result, the party insiders had already made up their mind.
So there was no point, and the voters are all starting to realize that the democratic party insiders only wanted more people to REGISTER democrat .
Considering the contest came down to super delegates, the voters NEVER had a say in it.
The vote was split 50/50
This nomination was directly from party insiders.
Posted by: cgeast | June 3, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am
yes obama needs sen. clinton.
but i hope she will not take it.
because when he loses she will be blamed.
let sen. clinton go back to her work,
she does not need him.
michelle obama does not want sen. clinton and sen. clinton should leave them to themselves.
Posted by: america for all | June 3, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
If I am voting McCain if Hillary is not Presidential nominee, even if she is a VP nominee. She deserves that post.
Obama an undecisive – about his pastor and the church – is not capable to take any decision in WH.
All those who Compare McCain to Bush are nothing but FOOLS. He is a war hero, and deserves respect.
Also its Democrates who do not want to drill Oil in our country – not Republicans. McCain might start that and then the oil will be super cheap for us….In meantime – start alternative energy like Solar energy and there is a solution.
Posted by: Namrep | June 3, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
DNC AND SD MEET US IN THE POLLS
NOVEMBER 4TH.
WE WILL VOTE STRAIT REPUBLICAN TICKET.
Posted by: Nicholas | June 3, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am
I hope all you college age kids understand you vote for Obama then DO Not expect jobs, because his plans will cause all blue collar jobs overseas but a majority of white collar (which most likely you fall under)
Hilary is immensely better the Obama, then again so is Karl Marx!!
But the best choice is John McCain if you want to keep your liberty and Freedom!!
Posted by: spock | June 3, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
I want to see the BO fanatics cry.
Never in my life have I hated some group that much. A mockery of democracy. An animal farm and collaborates of the communists party.
Kick out all the democrates and start anew.
The difference between Hillary and BO is their ability to deliver. BO couldn’t even find his way of Washington in 4 years. He would just screw up the whole country and became Jimmy the Carter II.
The democratic party has been hijacked by LEFT-WING liberals. Save the country and vote for McCain in November if the nominee is not Hillary.
Enjoy the show when BO fanatics banged their head against the wall in Nov. and Teddy boy has his head re-examined because he goes nutty.
Hillary or McCain.: No rookie camp in Washington.
Posted by: John_Lai | June 3, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
People saying Obama is going to increase taxes are surely Republicans. Republican party has always be an elitist party. They believe all rich men should be able keep all their money to themselves but that has never been the principles on which the United States was founded. Obama is not going to increase taxes on anybody that is low icome or Middle-income, instead he is going to increase taxes on the higher income earners. Dont let anyone fool you.
Posted by: vuzous | June 3, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Popular vote numbers coming out of the caucuses are suspect. Consider that Hillary won the Texas primary but lost the Texas caucus. I do not know how you fairly count caucus votes. I do know that more people went to a polling place and cast a vote for Hillary Clinton this primary season. You can qualify it any way you want but that is the simple fact!! The media and the Dem leadership will deliver Obama the nomination. He knew that and that is why he stopped campaigning in primaries a few weeks ago. The fix is in, any astute political observer can see that.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | June 3, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
im sick of you little baby kids on this board
you are making a mockery out of a system
you all disgust me
Posted by: bhrandon | June 3, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am
On Taylor Marsh’s blog Montana residents complained about Obama supporters picking up Clinton signs and taking them back to her headquarters, of being seriously harassed by Obama supporters while canvassing, and other such “brownshirt” type activities. If these are representative of what Obama has in store for us, then no thanks.
Posted by: cynic465 | June 3, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
WILL NOT WORK! You Obama supporters calling everyone that disagrees with you and Obama a Republican. If I were a Republican than I would proudly say so. I am a Democrat who is voting for Hillary Clinton but if she is not the nominee than I will do what MOST other Hillary supporters will do and vote for McCain and NEVER Obama. America first and Party second!
Hillary 2008 but if not than McCain.
Posted by: bhrandon | June 3, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am
bhrandon:
Ever occur to you that folks may not want to vote for Obama?
Perhaps folks dont want a liberal senator with no experience and a freaky preacher and angry wife.
That doesnt sit well with multi millions of americans.
Apparently, these reasons arent good enough for you Obama radicals.
This is what makes us laugh.
You make it seems like we MUST vote for Obama …..or we aint ‘no damn good’…
lol
Posted by: cgeast | June 3, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Dear Women Count PAC
Please don’t speak for me.
I totally disagree with your ad and your premise.
Again, please don’t speak for me.
Thanks.
PS I exercise my right to vote every time.
Posted by: lil | June 3, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Lee c
You got a source for the DNC stating for the record the VOTERS in michigan DOESNT COUNT, but then they award delegates ??????
You gotta show me the source for this one.
The popular vote does count in Michigan.
Posted by: cgeast | June 3, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
IF you have read dreams from my father, and are not just using talking points from repubs
please tell me those page numbers, i have the book with me right now and i will look them up and tell you what the paragraph befores that BS mis characterization is
i really really hate you bloggers this morning
Posted by: bhrandon | June 3, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
I do think it is true that the media did the worst hatchet job I have ever seen done on a candidate for president. And clearly Pelosi and Dean decided long ago that Obama was their guy. The rank-and-file Dems who turn out election after election and make up the core of the Dem Party were taken for granted. As one of those, I can tell you that was a big mistake! Young people and African-American voters may be juiced up for this election but their turn-out numbers are candidate driven.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | June 3, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
bhrandon:
Ever occur to you that folks may not want to vote for Obama?
Perhaps folks dont want a liberal senator with no experience and a freaky preacher and angry wife.
That doesnt sit well with multi millions of americans.
Apparently, these reasons arent good enough for you Obama radicals.
This is what makes us laugh.
You make it seems like we MUST vote for Obama …..or we aint ‘no damn good’…
lol
Posted by: cgeast | June 3, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
HP Boston
You do a disservice to women …to use sexism as the reason for HIllary’s loss (tell that to the blue collar people she stiffed for months on payments after raising millions)
she ran a campaign that should have had a walk in the park with all the loyalty from her supporters and the democratic establishment and tons of money.
If you saw how she was in small rallies for the first year…it wasn’t the candidate you saw in PA …
she ran a bad campaign and got the message wrong…her polcies were based in poltical choices (the problems that Scott McLellan has just come out and attributed the mistakes we have seen in the past 8 years to both this operating plan from the Bush and Clinton years)…
It has nothing to do with ehr being a woman…there was sexism racism ageiosm…you name it…but these campaigns won or loss on the basis of their candidates ability to lead people.
Hillary lost and your continual ranting about it being some woman man thing…hurts women who actually have the issue in their lives but can’t prove it because people like you have hurt the argument for them using a bad campaign as a sign of someone being victimized to rally around a losing candidate.
all in the name of 5th grade anger at losing.
Hillary lost because she managed her campaign poorly and she wasn’t the right candidate at the right time…. even with the last nam,e Clinton…worked for Bush but I think America is weary of screwing up a last name for experience again.
Posted by: dl | June 3, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am
This Ad is GREAT!!
As a 48 year old black women for Hillary I will never forget.
Posted by: TO | June 3, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Look, here is the thing… We all need to come together now for our country and our children. We need to get behind Obama and fight this fight together because if we don’t we are going to be in bigger and deeper troubles than what we have now or will have by the time Bush gets out of office.
Stop acting like babies, hold your heads up high and help Obama fight this fight! Grow up, we don’t always get our way, even if we think we are right.
Posted by: Becky | June 3, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
To Angie
THE DRAFT BILL HAS BEEN SUBMITTED BY A DEMOCRAT CONTINUOSLY. WE HAVE A DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS. IF A DRAFT GETS PASSED IT WONT BE MCCAIN WHO WILL HAVE PASSED IT.
Posted by: cynic465 | June 3, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Lee C. you sound like the people who were against Bill Clinton, JFK, Abe Lincoln…FDR…
the same arguments were used against ALL of them.
You don’t mention that if Hillary’s last name wasn’t Clinton…like George W. Bush… chances are …she would not even be in the running.
America has made the mistake before of confusing last names for a quality for President.
The country focused in on recognizing a known quantity before where the republican machine and loyalists backed a candidate who had the same last name and look where it got us.
Huh…kinda funny.
Posted by: dl | June 3, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Hillary will most likely suspend – not end – her campaign tonight in order to leave the door open. Good for her. Obama is woefully lacking as a candidate and anything can still happen, especially as he enters general election mode and the Republicans start pointing out things that Clinton wouldn’t as a Democrat.
As for the Dems taking women for granted, of course they are, just as they’re expecting blue collar workers to fall in line with the party. They won’t make that mistake again after November.
Posted by: HoosierSue | June 3, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am
If not Clinton then McCain. Obama never.
Posted by: Mack | June 3, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
dl | Jun 3, 2008 11:01:53 AM
Your post is a same old, same old…not buying your rhetoric.
I am sure you are a well paid BOT.
I have read your same words verbatim elsewhere.
Not a word you can say will ever sway me to Obama. He is a dud! Pushed by the DNC and they have savaged Hillary.
I have done my homework, I have followed this campaign and I have turned off the talking heads in disgust and I add you among them.
Posted by: HP Boston | June 3, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Obama – Don’t fall for the fear card unless we’re using it against McCain.
Posted by: Mack | June 3, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Clinton concedes tonite: You said that Clinton left on the verge of a recession. My thoughts have always been that the recession was helped along by George W talking the economy down instead of using the bully pulpit of the presidency to talk us out as he’s been tying to do now. But of course back then he wanted the economy to fail so he could get his tax cuts through.
Posted by: tiredtoo | June 3, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
To all women who are threatening to vote for McCain if Hillary is not the Democratic nominee. JUST DO IT. The rest of us are already sick of your whining.
Posted by: moussedc | June 3, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am
We will never forget …
The hatefulness of the Obama supporters. Never!
Country first, party second!
Posted by: T | June 3, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
And there is no dream ticket solution unless it’s Clinton/Obama. I refuse to turn over the keys to my country to Obama.
Posted by: HoosierSue | June 3, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
dl
you say ‘just about half’ of the women voted for Obama.
Got a source for that?
Posted by: cgeast | June 3, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
Krissy K
And Obama means everything he says? Right.
Posted by: S | June 3, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
The point is that there are millions of Democrats, just like HP and myself, that will not vote for Obama. Just deal with it.
Posted by: Mack | June 3, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
Obama’s campaign
First, hatred for Hillary
Second, conciliation attempts — “Hey, we’re all democrats and we were only kidding”
Third, fear tactic’s designed to convince you that the end of the world will surely happen if McCain is elected.
Choose — is this democratic party yours and does it represent it’s traditional values. Or not.
Posted by: S | June 3, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
S
We don’t really know about Obama, do we. Can we look at his voting record? No we can’t. “Present” doesn’t really tell us much. How about “change”? That doesn’t tell me much about him either. How about his experience. Nope, nothing there either. How about what his friends and wife says.
Posted by: Krissy K | June 3, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am
Krissy K: GROW UP!
McCain is another Bush so if you want to vote for him and you in your right mind can vote for him than go right ahead.
When you find yourself in a food lines like the good people in the small towns of Tennessee please remember this message.
Posted by: Becky | June 3, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am
i dont get you people
if you are a true democrat why would you ever vote for someone with the ideals of john mccain?
If hillary stole, and yes to get the nomination now she would in FACT be stealing it
i would still vote for her…
so you peopel want to act like 5 year olds and blame everyone except hillary for her loss,
you want to be spiteful and say that you and her supporters somehow matter more then us
i think what will happen is that most of you will get behind the democrat nominee
not all of you but real true democrats are going to want to elect a democrat
Posted by: bhrandon | June 3, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am
The Michigan primary is the only election in America in which the power-that-be awarded votes to a candidate who voluntarily took his name off the ballot.
We are told we should be grateful that Obama’s forces on the RBC only stole part of Hillary’s delegates — they could have stolen all.
Obama now informs us that when he is the candidate he will give us our delegates back — well after they will have any impact on the nominatoin. It is adding insult to injury that he expects us to see this as a favor.
Welcome to the new unDemocratic Party.
Posted by: Jane | June 3, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Krissy K: No one knew anything about the Kennedy’s either.
My problem is I KNOW TO MUCH ABOUT HILLARY AND MCCAIN to in actually vote for the same washington we have had for 16 years.
We need change, I am not saying Obama will do it or not, What I am saying is compared to my choices he is the one I would trust to go there and try.
Posted by: Becky | June 3, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am
bhrandon
Because McCain (a real man) is a better choice than Obama (a puppet).
Posted by: S | June 3, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am
Hillary supporters: Your candidate lost. It’s been a long, good fight but it’s time to accept who our nominee will be.
Posted by: JoshH | June 3, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
JoshH
Are you saying Hillary supporters should fall in line with the super-felt?
Why should they?
Posted by: S | June 3, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
JANE
so what would have been fair count only hillarys voters
tahts fair, what about hte people that wanted to vote for obama
what about hillarys people voting to strip michigan of its primary in the first place
you cant campaign there,
teh primary is a beauty contest since it is a proven fact that when obama campaigns in a place and voters get to know him his numbers increase significantly, while if he does no campaigning he essentially goes up against a name brand
do you want coke or tab?
whats a tab? ill take a coke
you cant win this argument michigan primary doesnt count
Posted by: bhrandon | June 3, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am
Obama’s not fit to tie McCain’s boots. The Hillary support for McCain will be greater in numbers than Reagan Democrats.
I knew the Dems would give it to the Affirmative Action guy over Hillary. But who holds the power now, huh? HRC has 18 million supporters who Obama is dying for her to turn over to him. HA!
No one said they’d defect to Bush if Kerry were the nominee and look how that turned out. LANDSLIDE McCAIN ’08!
Posted by: Debra | June 3, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
Nate good to see you and Lee on this blog!
Posted by: HP Boston | June 3, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
Hillary Clinton will campaign for and endorse Barack Obama.
Posted by: Mary, MI | June 3, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
Mary, MI
Of course she will. She has to.
No reason for her followers to support the puppet of the far-left though. Is it?
Posted by: S | June 3, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Since you bots possess superior intellect, please explain to me how McCain is going to keep us in Iraq for 100 years, if he will only be President for 4 years?
Posted by: Mack | June 3, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Hillary Clinton will campaign for and endorse Barack Obama.
Posted by: Mary, MI | Jun 3, 2008 11:54:49 AM
————————————–
She is a class act.
We will listen politely.
We will not vote for Obama.
NEVER!!!
Posted by: HP Boston | June 3, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
I’d be embarassed to call myself a Democrat…the way that party behaved was shameful, I am 58 yo and I have never seen anything like it.
I am an INDEPENDENT!
Posted by: Cindy | June 3, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Becky
And just where did that get the Kennedy’s? Dead.
That is another reason. What kind of caos would this country go through if that were to happen to a current President? I don’t want to find out.
Posted by: Krissy K | Jun 3, 2008 12:05:17 PM
——————————-
Wow Becky,
Krissy is really laying on the guilt!
It is so good to have the power of the vote in mass millions!
Why don’t the bots scurry away and pray for the dud bama to reign supreme!
Why waste badgering us, we are not listening!
Posted by: HP Boston | June 3, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Hillary should just leave the party. It’s obvious that they don’t want her or Bill anymore. The extremists have hijacked the party and are steering it to the far left and off the cliff. It’s worked out ok for Lieberman.
Posted by: Mack | June 3, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Hillary and her supporters just haven’t learned. Just because you keep saying it doesn’t make it true. SDs have been listening. Listening to the over 17M voting for Obama.
Posted by: shall | June 3, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
I did not respect the views of these people, they are only afraid of a black man being in office if they took the time to search hillary’s record’s they would view it differently. I did not read it all because its not worth it. they fell sorry for her because their men cheated on them? If they didn’t and they looked at what really went on in the White House and dig into all the things on the Internet that is real they would not feel the same. What happend when the bible was taken out of school,What happen when nobody belive that the Holocaust was going on. If any person name had came to light in so many deaths that person would have been convicted and sent to death.where is her theis its been locked up. you have to pay to see it. who wacthed her church or anybody’s else church this is merly a last chance at the Kanasa City Shuffle. Look were I point you while I go in a different direction. You want McClain good you will get Bush. Ha Ha Ha Boy You a Fool Na Na Na yes you a Fool You turn your heads just becaus you want a women Pres. she was in on the murders to or why would she have a dead mans papers in her possession, paypers they wher looking for in her desk draw,from a dead man.Keep being blind there is nothin as bad as a blind man with glasses,or people who want to cut off their noses to spite their face.
Posted by: Diane | June 3, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
Diane said: “You want McCain, You get Bush.”?
What kind of nonsense is that? Perhaps you’re falling for the puppet’s spin.
Posted by: S | June 3, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
Clinton concedes tonite
Such logic! I’ll bet you mother is proud.
Posted by: S | June 3, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Joe,
Why would anyone believe something that is posted on Clinton’s website?
Because she has been sooo honest so far?
—
BECAUSE THAT IS THE SOURCE AND NOT THE MEDIA, IF YOU WANT TO KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT HILLARY’S CAMPAIGN.
Posted by: Average Joe | June 3, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
s.b. “women will have their voices heard” Until you vote for McCain and he elects judges like Robertson and Alito who roll back abortion. Then you’ll blame Obama and Dean, and not yourself for voting irrationality for the candidate whose views are no where close to Clinton and Obama’s similar views. Then I will be laughing to the bank b/c I don’t care who wins as long as it is not Clinton (squared) the lying, say anything to win couple. So vote McCain and say hello to illegalized abortion. ha ha
Posted by: Johnson | June 3, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
My mother is dead.
Posted by: Clinton concedes tonite | Jun 3, 2008 12:30:40
*************************************
Mine too!
We are both orphans, we have much in common!
Hillary carries on tonight and we will support her.
Posted by: HP Boston | June 3, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Statement from the Clinton Campaign
by Lindsay Levin6/3/2008 12:32:33 PM
The AP story is incorrect. Senator Clinton will not concede the nomination this evening.
Posted by: Average Joe | June 3, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Thank you Average Joe, the media is the worst thing that has happened to our democracy!
The war being the worst and oil being the second and the savaging of Hillary paramount!
Posted by: HP Boston | June 3, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
I don’t understand how they successfully feign such indignation when they know they are not telling the truth. Are they acting, or do they really believe that Clinton got more votes? And even if it’s true, do they think votes beats delegates in a primary election?
Posted by: timbnyc | June 3, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
Clinton supporter comments:
1. only Hillary can beat John McCain!!!
2. if the superdelegates don’t give Hillary the nomination, I will vote for John McCain!!!
You can vote for whoever you want. Most of us just wanted to get a nominee of some sort to take advantage of what is the best opportunity for Democrats in 15 years. But these arguments add up to nothing more than an assertion that Hillary should be president regardless of any actual factor, including her policies or the facts of the nomination process.
The argument made by this ad is no better. If Hillary was installed by the superdelegates at this late date, she would have zero legitimacy among the vast majority of Democrats who know that the pledged delegates are the only relevant metric here (and therefore knew the outcome since March). I know you think that Obama “stole” the election by winning caucuses and will vote for McCain etc., but that’s nothing compared to telling democrats that the primary delegate outcomes are irrelevant.
There is no metric by which Hillary Clinton is closer to John McCain ideologically than she is to Obama. By any objective measure (their Senate votes/their platforms), there is no difference between them on policy. The only major policy agreement between Clinton and McCain was on authorizing war in Iraq. The idea that somehow Obama abandons traditional democratic values, while McCain upholds them is obviously ridiculous.
Posted by: molaske | June 3, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
Average Joe,
Obama will have enough delegates to clinch the nomination today, so what Clinton does will not affect a thing.
————-
THIS IS JUST A PROPAGANDA LINE FROM OBAMA DIRECTLY THAT MEDIA HAS BEEN REPEATING OVER AND OVER AND OVER WITH THE SOLE PURPOSE: TO INTIMIDATE AND PUSH AND PULL AND STOP THE DELEGATES AND SUPER DELEGATES FROM VOTING!!
OBAMA DOES NOT HAVE THE NUMBER, CANNOT HAVE THE NUMBER AND WILL NOT HAVE THE REQUIRED NUMBER TONIGHT AND NOT UNTILL THE DELEGATES ACTUALLY VOTE AT THE CONVENTION.
OBAMA Pledged:1,744
HILLARY Pledged:1,624
NEEDED TO WIN: 2,118
CONVENTION CONVENTION CONVENTION
IS THE ONLY NEXT STEP NO MATTER HOW MUCH THE SLANDER CONTINUES IN THE MEDIA WITH THE SOLE PURPOSE TO STEAL NEARLY 18MILLION VOTES FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!
Posted by: Average Joe | June 3, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
“Are they acting, or do they really believe that Clinton got more votes?”
I think almost all of them really believe it, the exceptions being Wolfson, Ickes, McAuliffe and Penn, who are well aware of what they are doing — trying to convince some people that the election was stolen which is best for the 2012 strategy or the independent 08 strategy.
It seems to be a little bit like the ” I still think Iraq has weapons of mass destruction” phenomenon. They believe the media is against Hillary so they have ignored this information, much as Republicans assumed that the media was lying about Iraq’s various failures. Ironically, the media has actually been extremely generous to the idea that Hillary might somehow pull it off over the last few months, in order to keep the campaign coverage (ratings) alive.
Posted by: molaske | June 3, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
I just saw a super delegate on FOX that DOES NOT want to put his support behind BO. He thinks he might just announce for Hillary….he’s been behind her all the way.
Posted by: Debra | June 3, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Typical.
This is just a female version of the Bush Doctrine. “If you aren’t with us, you are against us”.
Disgusting.
Posted by: Femalevoter | June 3, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
I’ll tell you what any thinking Democrat is contemplating…this party is split…no guarantee of any win in November. Many, many Hillary supporters WILL NEVER VOTE OBAMA.
Did any Democrat jump to Bush when Kerry was the nominee? I think not.
Posted by: Debra | June 3, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
sweeties, your old Hillary girl has NOT, I repeat NOT won the popular vote!
Barack Obama has.
Please read The Washington’s fact checker on your old Hillary’s girl’s latest lie.
And stop whining!!!
This is not a miss America contest!!
Posted by: hank | June 3, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
What most people don’t know is that the majority of uncommitted Supers are in Congressional Districts that Obama won. So talk about the will of the people…
If they declared months ago it would have truly been over. Don’t believe me look it up! That’s not spin!
Posted by: Ericjack | June 3, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
All the Clinton supporters stating that they will vote for McCain against Obama, consider this. The next President will likely appoint at least two Supreme Court justices. McCain is NOT pro-choice, and if he is elected, you can kiss Roe v. Wade goodbye.
Posted by: John | June 3, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Yes, our votes are our voices. As close as this race was Senator Barack Obama has won the most states, the most delegates and even the popular vote. The majority is slight but it is still a majority.
Time for the Democrats to take back the country. For our children. For our grandchildren. It isn’t about you. It is about us.
Just because you think you should have won doesn’t mean you actually did win. So now apply the reasoning to your own situation. Oooops I forgot who I was talking to. No reasoning or logic there.
Posted by: Ohenry | June 3, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
I find it painful to witness how so many women are making such fools of themselves this year.
Obama has won the popular vote, a large majority of states and delegates…
Please return to earth, and leave that silly realm of hysteria.
Posted by: maria | June 3, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
not only does Women Count PAC take out a full page ad trying to blackmail SD’s but they also use staff and volunteers to flood this comments section w inane pro Hillary distortions and lies. You know, the Bosnia routine. Transparent and lame. If the Clinton campaign had recognized the fund raising and communicative powers of the internet sooner than the day before the last primary, they might have had a chance to win this thing.
Posted by: rick | June 3, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
This primary has been very historic in
in scope and I’m glad I was a part of it. My family has been a Clinton supporter since the 1992 election. The reason so many people are so passionate for Hillary is because it’s generational. Both my mother and father are gone now but they would be happy about the primary. I don’t know who they might of voted for but it may have been Hillary. I find Obama supporters don’t understand Hillary supporters at all. It’s not just about whose message is better, it’s about the brand name. Whether Obama supporters want to believe this or not, they brought about a lot of positive changes when they were in the WH. So, the passion for the Clintons will always be there and I’m afraid that Obama will have a hard time convincing people to come over to his side especially the way she has been treated during this campaign.
Posted by: Louise | June 3, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
Obama’s big win were BEFORE FARRAKHAN, WRIGHT, AYERS, PFLEGER, ANGRY MICHELLE…..ALL BEFORE WE LEARNED MORE ABOUT HIM. Does anyone really think he’d be where he is with just his billionaire liberals behind him? It helps they’ve wanted to buy this for him for their own agenda….but Presidency can’t be bought, even if he outspends John McCain 4 to 1 like he did in all those states Hillary won over him.
Posted by: Debra | June 3, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
common sense
And just what is a democrat? Are they all left-wing radicals like your little puppet? I think not. A substantial number of Hillary supporters will not fall for your Democrats ‘über allen’ logic and will vote for the better candidate. I have a feeling you won’t be too pleased by the results.
Posted by: S | June 3, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
I am sickened by the vitriol. Sadly, none of this existed before Hillary Clinton’s chances of winning began to slip seriously. With each successive loss, her rhetoric, and that of her supporters, grew more destructive. Molehills became mountains because Hillary and her crew threw dirt on them.
Ever since she realized she was losing, Hillary’s approach as been “divide and conquer” with the expectation that we could reunite after the nomination. Alas, that reunification doesn’t seem so likely anymore.
Posted by: David | June 3, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
Just heard Whoopi on THE VIEW and they corrected themselves….Clinton campaign called in to correct them on the AP wire. SHE IS NOT CONCEDING TONIGHT. THANK GOD.
Posted by: Debra | June 3, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Major Hillary Clinton supporter Sen. Dianne Feinstein said Tuesday the final primaries mark a “moment of truth” for the New York senator, who should end her campaign.
The California senator also repeated her view that Clinton should be tapped for the vice presidency.
“I think after the campaigns are wrapped up today, it is in fact a moment of truth,” Feinstein told CNN. “I think a decision has to be made about whether keeping this nomination wide open is in the best interest of winning in November. I do not believe that it is, and I’m a very strong supporter of Hillary being placed on ticket as a vice presidential candidate.”
Feinstein, who endorsed Clinton last summer, has resisted calls for her to use her influence to convince the White House hopeful to abandon her presidential bid, although she said last month that the protracted primary contest was making for dangerous friction within the party.
“The reason I say this is because each one of them represents a different constituency. The constituencies are knocking heads at the present time,” said Feinstein.
Posted by: 08demo | June 3, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
David
Please stop with the capital letters.
Posted by: S | June 3, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
Average Joe
Sorry David — wrong poster.
Posted by: S | June 3, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
I noticed that on the MSNBC website too. I couldn’t figure out why on earth they would post results showing 100% when the polls are still open.
This is absolutely ridiculous.
Hillary, as well as the voters in South Dakota and Montana should file lawsuits against the media.
This is just outrageous. Bad enough when the networks used to call presidential elections on the east coast at 7 p.m. EDT after THEIR polls closed, before people in the western states had finished voting, but the polls haven’t even been open half a day yet.
Can’t something be done about this??
Posted by: SandyB | June 3, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Well, my not voting for Obama was already a fact of life.
This just goes beyond outrageous, and it would appear that somewhere it might be illegal.
Take note on what those final vote totals for Montanaon MSNBC say, and see if that’s what they end up saying at the end of the night. If they do, then it would appear something has been FIXED.
How dare the long arm of corrupt Chicago politics extend into the beautiful state of Montana…….
Posted by: SandyB | June 3, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
A, everybody else is “childish” and “juvenile,” yet you’re a grownup even though you lump all Obama voters, men and women alike, into one category. Okay.
Posted by: Johnson | June 3, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
I agree that the news media has been ‘pushing’ a lot of the hype about both candidates. It’s their job. They talk politics. It does NOT make them right or more knowledgable; it simply means they have access to instant media and nothing more.
That having been said, I’m hoping that once the magic number is reached (whenever that may be – tonight or tomorrow or the next day) – that ALL Democrats will unite to defeat Senator McCain in November.
Yes, there are a lot of hurt feelings and anger right now. And yes, a lot of things have been said against both candidates that upset me as well, but the time will be coming in the next fews days to take reaffirm our beliefs and stand unified against the Republicans.
Please, accept my sincere best wishes for those who worked so hard on Senator Clinton’s campaign. Losing doesn’t feel good. I can only imagine how they must feel right now as I’ve worked as hard to support my candidate.
But, please know that I believe both Senator Obama and Senator Clinton believe in the Democratic party and it’s ideals. Take your time to grieve and be sad. But please do not be beaten by the process.
When you’re ready, please come back to the party that believes the Bush legacy has to end with this final term! No third term for the Bush/McCain folks. None of us can survive another four years of such disregard for the very basic of human rights.
With respect and regards to all Democratic Supporters,
Grandma CDA
Posted by: GrandmaCDA | June 3, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
GrandmaCDA
Obama DOES NOT represent the average democrat. Far from it!
Posted by: Just Curious | June 3, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Well, now according to the MSNBC website, the Associated Press has decided Obama has enough delegates.
I guess they’re already counting the future Montana victory they’ve already called.
Posted by: SandyB | June 3, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
This just goes beyond outrageous, and it would appear that somewhere it might be illegal.
Take note on what those final vote totals for Montanaon MSNBC say, and see if that’s what they end up saying at the end of the night. If they do, then it would appear something has been FIXED.
How dare the long arm of corrupt Chicago politics extend into the beautiful state of Montana…….
–
they took it off but i have a screen shot of that.
it IS ILLEGAL and people go to JAIL for doing that!
media gone absolutely MAD MAD MAD
Posted by: Average Joe | June 3, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
I am almost sixty and have been a democrat for my whole life. I can never remember a single democratic campaign where Democrats screamed that they wouldn’t vote for the candidate who won their nomination because … well, pick any one of dozens of reasons, real and imagined. It tells me that there is something else at work here. Obama’s positions and Senator Clinton’s positions are not very different. So if an election is about electing someone to enact policy you support, how could you ever turn your back on the candidate that actually has the positions you supposedly support. What does all this mean?
I used to be a big supporter of Bill Clinton, with all his faults. But what has happened to them here in 2008? What really counts? I think Obama can win, and I have given him money. I guess that makes me a koolaid drinker for people like Debra. I believe in my candidate. How that offends her. How that offends her. Yet, I don’t believe her candidate can win. All my republican friends have been talking about Bill’s little friend Monica Lewinsky all this last year. I was totally dreading that.
And I worry that this is really about racism in america. Hillary won big in the south. Those are not states she would win in the general. So, if she were to win wouldn’t that be letting the endemic longterm racism of the american south dictate that we can’t have someone in office simply because he is mixed blood and they are scared of their own kharma.
This is bad, people. This is very very bad. I only hope those “democrats” who vote for McCain will rejoice when he puts another Alito and Roberts on the Supreme Court and Women’s rights take hit after hit. That is what voting for McCain will actually do.
Posted by: Tim Osburn | June 3, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
I’m a middle-aged woman, and I hope all of your “I’ll vote for McCain” women remember the following:
1) I hope you enjoy sending your children to all of the wars that McCain wants to start, like Iran. Mine are going to stay home, but hey, you vote for him? You fight the war.
2) I hope you can look your daughters in the eye and tell them they can’t get a legal abortion because you thought it was too important to vote for the Republican rather than the candidate who really won the Democratic race, just because it wasn’t your candidate.
3) I hope you have plenty of money to send to victims of hurricanes, tornadoes, wildfires, etc., when global warming worsens all of those weather-related disasters, because McCain’s never going to do anything about them.
True feminism means having the autonomy to make a real choice. Just parroting the lies of the Clinton campaign is not feminism. Look at the definitive vote totals on RealClear politics. Clinton did NOT get a majority of the popular vote. Just because she said so doesn’t make it so.
Posted by: Molly Weasley | June 3, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Tim Osburn
People who vote party regardless of anything else just don’t understand issues. You and yours live in a very simple world indeed!
Posted by: A | June 3, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
The problem is not that the Clinton supporters are being sore losers. The problem is that Obama should have run on an independent socialist ticket, but chose to use the power of the democratic party instead. This has split the party into radicals v. mainstream. From that standpoint, he and Clinton have less in common that Clinton and McCain do. Obama supporters will never be able to wrap their minds around that, which is understandable since apparently the dem party leadership is suffering from the same blindness. We need a new Populist party headed by candidates like Clinton and McCain, the mainstreamers who hug the middle where they can unite the most Americans. Leave the radicals to the dems and the moralists to the right.
Posted by: HoosierSue | June 3, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Molly W, even though I suspect we disagree politics-wise on a number of issues, I give you points for making solid arguments.
Posted by: Johnson | June 3, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Getahun Leta
I guess most democrats don’t share your theory of a woman’s equal rights. Just look at all the cheap hate that her opponents followers has tossed her way.
No respect — no feeling of equal rights. You don’t need tea leaves to figure that one out.
Posted by: A | June 3, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Tww says “Nader”.
Definitely a better choice that the left wing’s favorite puppet!
Posted by: A | June 3, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
What time is HoosierSue due back at the comedy club?
Posted by: Wayne | June 3, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
I haven’t seen TREACHERY on this scale since “Braveheart” was on cable last. Sen.Clinton should RETURN THE FAVOR to Kennedy,Daley,Pelosi,Dean& Brazille ala’ 1980 Convention Redux. To even consider voting Republican after learning they manipulated the open primaries,would be tough (no matter how much I like Sen. McCain )though that remains an option.
Posted by: patrick | June 3, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
I agree with a lot of posters here that are pro-Hillary = this thing was a done deal by insiders. Democrats ate their own to put the next puppet boy Bush V2 (yes I mean Obama – there’s NO difference in these characters – young, affable, men of the people, common man types, full of hope, uniters… what they are is puppets for the real controlling factions who put them there, and who will get what they want in return.)
We won’t forget. Those of us who used to believe in free elections, decided by the people, not by brown-shirt thug tactics (yes, Obama camp, I mean you).
Today I go to the polls to vote against my house rep Lois Capps. After looking my 11 year old daughter in the eye last year, and encouraging her to be president, she endorsed Obama.
I hope she loses today. Those SDs need to realize that they can be voted out when the country wakes up to how they handed this to Obama over our will.
Posted by: sharonevolving | June 3, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
The MATH that the media and Obama supporters ignore is that Clinton got about HALF of the votes of the Democratic Party primary voters.
The delegates get to nominate, that’s how it works. But for the life of me I cannot understand how people dismiss the significance of the votes of half the Democrats.
When has there been a primary where the two candidates were so CLOSE in delegates at this point? When has a candidate dropped out when they were this close!
If the country is ready for a change and will vote Democratic what is the huge worry? McClellan just did the Democrats a huge favor by reinforcing what most Americans already suspected about the integrity of the Bush administration.
I’d be more impressed with the Obama supporters if they had enough confidence in their candidate and his message to be able to acknowledge that he only narrowly got more delegates.
I’d be more impressed if they weren’t so panicky about letting the process work itself out.
Posted by: ClareA | June 3, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
When the half of the Democrats who voted for McCain in November are asked why, they can just explain that they got the idea from Barry Obama … they voted Republican for a Day.
Posted by: beebop | June 3, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Hoosier Sue- I’m glad you feel that we should keep staying in the middle in of the road…but think first about where the middle of the road has placed us. It’s time for some new thought…no more worn out governmental jiberish like we have had the passed twenty years…it’s time ot move forward with ideas for a new generation.
I’m glad Clinton is about to concede…whether tonight or any other night, she’ll concede. And in the end we’ll all be better off knowing that we have a chance to have a president that thinks outside the box for once.
Posted by: Eric | June 3, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
I you Clinton supporters throw your little hissy fit and vote for McCain, then you will have the blood on your hands of all the servicemen and women who will die as a consequence of the continued Occupation of Iraq. Not to mention his threat to, “Bomb, bomb, bomb” Iran.
Agree with Roe V Wade? Kiss that goodbye. Mr. John Sidney McCain III will get to appoint one to three Supreme Court Justices and he has promised to submit Alito/Roberts/Scalia type candidates.
So think long, long and very hard before you cast that ballot for John Sidney McCain III, Republican, out of spite just because your candidate finished a close second instead of first. This is a time to put party and country before personal feelings.
Posted by: Unrepentant Liberal | June 3, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
That isn’t true. Hillary is still the popular vote winner, even if you include those who voted ‘undecided’ in Michigan. The exit polls showed that 170,000 of those people favored Obama, and even if you give Obama those votes, he still comes out behind.
Posted by: rstephen | June 3, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
REMEMBER when Mr. Obama was winning the popular vote and Ms. Clinton said the popular vote does not and should not count?? That only the Super Delegates should count!! It’s always the same with HER, whatever it takes for HER personal gain/accomplishments. Well, another example of why Ms. Clinton’s “pit-bull” tactics are not good for America,Women or the Democrats.
Posted by: TxDem | June 3, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
What’s that? A new poll shows Obama can beat mccain! What’s that – now she want to be VP on the Obama ticket!
On the same day Barack Obama could clinch the Democratic nomination for president, a new poll out Tuesday shows the Illinois senator holds a slight lead over presumptive Republican nominee John McCain among likely voters nationwide.
The new USA Today/Gallup survey shows the Illinois senator with a 5 point advantage over McCain among likely voters, 49 percent to 44 percent. That margin is just outside the poll’s 4 point margin of error, meaning Obama appears to hold a slight advantage over the Arizona senator with five months remaining until voters weigh in at the polls.
The survey shows Hillary Clinton also leads McCain, though with a margin that is just with the poll’s sampling error. According to the survey, the New York senator bests McCain by 4 points, 48 percent to 44 percent.
A similar poll conducted by USA Today/Gallup last month showed John McCain beating both candidates — a potential sign the ongoing Democratic presidential race has not hurt the party’s chances in November.
Sen. Hillary Clinton is willing to take the vice presidential slot on a Barack Obama presidential ticket, New York lawmakers told CNN.
CNN first reported Monday that Clinton was signaling the Obama campaign of her interest.
Two New York lawmakers told CNN’s Candy Crowley that Clinton told them she was open to being Obama’s running mate during a conference call.
One of the lawmakers said that former President Bill Clinton has been pushing the idea privately for several weeks.
Posted by: 08demo | June 3, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
Remember when Obama was leading in the vote and Hillary in the SP’s, and the Obama supporters were saying the delegates don’t count, it’s the popular vote that counts?
And when Donna Brazile threatened to resign the Democratic Part if the superdelegates decided the election, going against the popular will?
Creating huge moral pressure on the SP’s to jump on the “most popular” candidate…
According to RealClearPolitics, even if we give ALL the “uncommitted” from MI to Obama, Hillary leads by 65,555.
Posted by: Deborah | June 3, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
The comments here are pretty darn surreal. Somehow we democrats have decided that liberal is a bad word. Somehow we have decided that those who have played by the rules, are now going to be punished, because our candidate did not play by the rules. One even says that we should vote for a brand called Clinton and the Obama supporters just do not get it. (Remember what voting a brand name got us in 2000.) I have even heard Obama branded as a Socialist. Strange as it may seem to all of you red baiters, Obama is nowhere near being a socialist.
This is where I lose faith in my fellow party members. Don’t be fooled into believing Right wing rhetoric. Take a close look at the candidates records, their message, their campaign. Take the time to research what they are about. Take time to research and debunk the propaganda that is flying around the internet. You have time to rant here, so you have time to use Google to look for reputable sources, not right wing smear sites. It just takes a moment of your time. Then make a rational decision about the future of this country. Calm down, maybe have a drink, it really is that easy. We have a country to take back, not a personality to endorse or a brand to redeem. We are a family of Americans that has been deceived and robbed from for 8 years. We have lost our good name. We need to redeem it for ourselves and our children.
It’s time to beat McCain, not destroy our party.
Posted by: Fortyver | June 3, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
to deborah
Obama did not say the delegates did not matter, it should be the popular vote Hillary said that after she was behind in the delegate count.
Besides, she would have a hard time in the states with caucuses since according to her “they do not matter”.
Noting supporting the nominee is not a vote against Obama but your family.
Posted by: NavyMom | June 3, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Oh my, the Obama supporters and surrogates first insulted us with vile name calling and remarks and now they are trying to put a guilt trip with “blood on your hands” as the war in Iraq will continue with McCain as pres. and fear tactics with roe v wade will be overturned.
Please understand that most of us Hillary supporters have enough political commons sense to know that no candidate will be able to end the war in Iraq as we would like. As for roe v wade, your comments are insulting and childish, women fought that battle long and hard for years, women like Hillary, we owe that one to HER. And , unless you have no concept of the recent political situation, especially during the Reagan years (yes, the same man that Obama so admires) many of us had to carried on the fight to keep our right to choose.
Posted by: roberta | June 3, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
It so disturbs me that the article cites to “21 million women” who came out, and suggests that we all supported Hillary. I’m a 51 year old Caucasian woman who has supported Barack Obama from the outset. I know so many women, some as old as 80, who support Barack Obama. This group is “hijacking” us by pretending that we support their divisive efforts! Women who support Obama need to speak up.
Posted by: Pamela | June 4, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am