Rangel: Clinton should get on with it
ABC News’ Kate Snow Reports: One of Hillary Clinton’s most loyal backers on Capitol Hill is voicing frustration about the position she has put her supporters in.
In an interview with ABC News, Rep. Charles Rangel said he thinks it is time for Clinton to publicly clarify what she is doing and allow her supporters to switch their allegiance to Barack Obama.
“Unless she has some good reasons– which I can’t think of– I really think we ought to get on with endorsements (of Obama) and dealing with what we have to deal with… so we can move forward,” Rangel said.
Rangel last spoke with Senator Clinton privately on Tuesday during the day. On Wednesday he took part in a conference call Clinton had with the NY congressional delegation.
Asked why the Senator told supporters Tuesday night that she needed more time to consider her future, Rangel said: “I have no clue.”
In fact, Rangel said he was surprised by last night’s speech.
“Basically in talking with her I had the idea that, one, she wasn’t going to take the fight to the convention. Two– that she was just calling her friends and supporters in order to share her views and to get our views on what should happen. And it was abundantly clear to me last night that she was going to do all that she could to make sure we have a victory in November. And since we have only one candidate for that victory in November, I had assumed she would be endorsing Obama.”
Since Senator Clinton did not endorse Obama and did not concede the nomination, Rangel said members of the NY delegation were feeling torn about what to do.
“The NY congressional delegation encouraged her to run for President. So we feel some obligation to stay with her as long as we can” to give Clinton some time and space he said.
“We just have to have a better answer as to why it helps her to victory… as to why we’re not endorsing Obama when the only person left to endorse is Obama.”
“It’s awkward for us for us who are known to be her strongest supporters in the NY delegation not to be able to answer the question of how long is it going to take before you can endorse?” he added later.
Rangel also told ABC News that he does not think the path to the vice presidency should involve a negotiation between Clinton supporters and the Obama campaign.
“Common sense would dictate if you want to get on the ticket you don’t do it by leaning heavily on the person who makes the decision. So I don’t think pressure is something that should be used,” he said.
Rangel also dismissed the idea of having the Congressional Black Caucus put pressure on Obama to include Clinton on the ticket.
“I think it’s a dumb policy to do that – to be telling the person who won what he should be doing.”
Rangel also said he’s not sure the vice presidency is what Senator Clinton is after.
“The fact that she said that she would be willing to serve as vice president doesn’t necessarily mean that she’s seeking the vice president’s job.”
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
She should’ve gotten on with it months ago. She has been racking up a huge debt and now what? She wants Obama to pay it off? Wants a VP spot? Maybe she is waiting around to see if there is an RFK repeat. She has made each of these suggestions at some level… I don’t support Obama by any means, but I am tired of even hearing Hillary’s name.
Collin
Posted by: Collin Williams | June 4, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
I wish everybody would leave Hillary alone. This is not easy for her. She has campaigned for 16 months straight and traveled thousands of miles. Let this sink in and let her decide her next move. I believe she will concede this week or next. What is the hurry. I’m a Hillary supporter and if people keep pushing her and disrespecting her, there will be hell to pay in November.
Posted by: Lois, California | June 4, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
As an American, not a candidate, not a politician, just an American like the rest of us– for HRC to not recognize and honor this historic moment in our collective history–when the first African-American became a nominee for President of this great land is– PATHETIC.
She OBVIOUSLY DOESN’T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT ANYTHING OR ANYBODY BUT HERSELF. She doesn’t care about the people of this country, its future, or the Democratic Party. She doesn’t deserve to lead us in any capacity and I’m hoping that Barack Obama DOES NOT CHOOSE HER for Vice President.
A WHITE WOMAN, IN FLORIDA, FOR OBAMA!
Posted by: Gerri | June 4, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
What a historic occasion. For the first time, our nation will have an black man as a presidential candidate. Barack Obama, his family, his supporters and our nation should be able to enjoy and savor the impact of this momentous milestone.
Instead, the main topics of conversation in the MSM on television and online are Hillary Clinton’s speech and her refusal to concede – instead of congratulating Barack Obama on winning the nomination.
Once again, Hillary shows that she is not a team player and that she is totally lacking in dignity, grace and class – qualities that I would like in the leader of our nation that represents us to the rest of the world.
Posted by: Carpe Diem | June 4, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
“Rangel also said he’s not sure the vice
presidency is what Senator Clinton is after.”
I’ve seen some pundits making the claim that Hillary wants to be publicly offered the veep position so that she can publicly reject it. Put that upstart “golden boy” in his place as it were.
And that she wants to wield a veto over his veep selection, prohibiting the selection of another woman, because that would, or might, diminish her carefully self-developed status as chief “aggrieved woman”.
Posted by: Lee C. ― U.S.A. | June 4, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
“for HRC to not recognize and honor this historic moment in our collective history–when the first African-American became a nominee for President of this great land is– PATHETIC. ” Gerri, many of us are voting against Obama because we’re voting no to threats and insults from Obama supporters LIKE YOU! We’re voting no to the media bias and DNC bias against Hillary since the start. We’re voting no to sexist, racist treatment of Hillary supporters! We’re voting no to scare tactics by Obama supporters! We’re voting no to bullying by Obama supporters! We’re voting no to Obama supporter silence when racist, bigoted remarks fly from other Obama supporters. We’re voting no to this cycle of abuse from Obama supporters!! We’ve had enough of abusive Obama supporters and we’re saying NO! We’re rising up, standing up and voting NO!! NO MEANS NO!!!
Posted by: former dem in chicago | June 4, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
Hillary made the most out standing speeh last night and today at Aipec why did it take so long for this AIPEC meeting to reach out to Isreal? a least there going the right direction wake up Oprah it not all about you stop the racism get real
Posted by: gg | June 4, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
rangel-another brother you can trust. not!
Posted by: ron | June 4, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Gerri -
For anyone, any american, any woman, to not recognize what Hillary Clinton just accomplished and to honor this historic moment in our collective history — when the first serious female contender for President forced a 50-state primary and emerged within a margin of winning – PATHETIC.
You obviously don’t have any appreciation or respect for what it takes to reach and maintain the level of candidacy that Hillary presented. You obviously don’t care about the impact on future women candidates, on the girls growing up today knowing that it can happen, on the future of a Democratic party that has historically relied on 50%+ participation of women voters, or on the need to make sure that the core groups supporting Clinton (Hispanics, religious Democrats, white working class) feel they’re being respected and heard and welcomed into the new regime.
Posted by: KLB | June 4, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
i thought he was beyond race…it is a big deal cause he is black; that is racism. judge a person by character not by race you double standard playing people.
Posted by: ron | June 4, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
This democrat and his family will not vote for Obama.
If not Hillary, John McCain all the way!
Posted by: Joe | June 4, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
DON’T vote for radical Obama in November. Just look at all his white-bashing church friends.
If anyone only cares about himself, it’s Obama.
Posted by: Henry | June 4, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
She didn’t have a post-Super Tuesday plan, so I guess it should surprise no one that she doesn’t have a post-Primary plan either. She and her supporters convinced themselves they were “inevitable” and would have the nomination wrapped up by Super Tuesday. And now the Clinton Camp just can’t believe that it’s over. Sounds to me like the exact same mentality Scott McClelland just outlined in his new book about the Bush administration’s stance in Iraq – no plan, ignoring the facts, pressing on as if nothing is wrong…
Posted by: just a thought | June 4, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
How amusing Rangel thinks Hillary should “allow” her supporters to shift their allegiance to Obama. That’s predicated on the notion that we actually want to shift our allegiance. NOT GONNA HAPPEN.
Posted by: Emily | June 4, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
former dem in Chicago – you may be voting no to Obama and his supporters, but in doing so you are voting YES to indefinite war in Iraq, continued tax-cuts to the riches Americans, to overturning Roe V. Wade. If you are truly voting no on Obama and therefore yes to these very important issues, then I don’t know how you could have ever been a Dem.
Posted by: Word | June 4, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
Lois, with all due respect – if Hillary wants to be treated like one of the boys, then she needs to behave like one.
She’s is becoming seemingly delusional (poor reflection on all women)in by not accepting the fact that she has lost.
Sincerely,
An Indiana mom
Posted by: Lynne | June 4, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
former dem in chicago,
Instead of voting against a candidate, why don’t you vote for a candidate?
Posted by: Matt | June 4, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
disgusting voting for mccain
i hope we correct your errors and elect the proper candidate
voting against obama out of spite
sorry but that is just pathetic
Posted by: bhrandon | June 4, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
Charles Rangel says Hillary Clinton should “allow her supporters to switch their allegiance to Barack Obama.”
Oh, really?
Like changing your shirt, Mr. Rangel?
I don’t think so.
This assumption is based on the erroneous idea that there is no difference between Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton. Such an assumption is, of course, ludicrous.
They are both nominally Democrats, but one has been stabbed in the back while the other was finagled into the nomination (an Obamanation).
As a former Hillary Clinton supporter who wasted $300 on her campaign, I have absolutely NO intention of “switching” to BHO. Never.
My vote now goes to John McCain in the only election where I can be sure my vote will be counted, not thrown in the trash by party bosses and power brokers.
Change? Yeah, right! This primary “election” was more corrupt than anything Bush was involved in!
Posted by: Rhys | June 4, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Emily – hi again!!
I really think that if you will support high taxes, loss of work, more jobs sent overseas, more crumbling of our infrastructure and more years in Iraq – just to keep from supporting Obama and the Democratic party, then you need to remember the old saying:
Don’t cut off your nose to spite your face.
Posted by: Lynne | June 4, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
There’s no way he could win the presidency without Hillary on the ticket. Hillary would never accept second place and I dont blame her.
Posted by: brigitte | June 4, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
She should be ashamed of herself. By doing this she is making women look weak. Why should she need”time”? Come on..she is finished and after that speech last night I wouldn’t be surprised of she didn’t get the VP nod. If she were a man she wouldn’t need “time” to concede. It would have been done last night…GET WITH THE PROGRAM HILLARY ..Be a big girl and accept it…
Posted by: grandma | June 4, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
I actually thought the “Dream Ticket” might be a great option until the speeches last night. HRC proved to me she was just in it for herself, I couldn’t believe she took it in that direction. Obama’s speech was truly “Presidential”…
The speeches said it all, I now hope he selects one of the other deserving persons in the running for VP.
Posted by: TC | June 4, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Hillery should abandon the party that treated her like dirt and go independent. If she goes along with the so called “unifying the party”, the 18 million people who voted for her will lose all their respect for her. She does not need people like Pelosi and Dean. He is a loser and her ratings are below Bush’s ratings.
Posted by: Truth | June 4, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
what makes you think the world cannot exit without Hillary? She has been a senator and basically out of the primarys race for some time, and now she is God’s gift and the only way the Dems can win!!!! Get real
Posted by: truthtell | June 4, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Obama, you can not win the hearts of half democrats, how the hell you can win this election? Your idiot fans are still attacking Hillary so I don’t think they want the votes from Hillary’s supporters at all. We will be happy to stay home or go out to vote for John McCain instead!
Posted by: June | June 4, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
Gerri
Well, you can Roe V Wade me until you are blue in the face!!
You are not for Hillary, you just claim that to come in here and plead for ‘unity’. I am on to you!
John McCain is a moderate! He is a known maverick! Joe Lieberman endorses him!
So your pathetic scare tactics are just that, pathetic scare tactics. You know full and well that Obama is doomed in November. No amount of fear mongering is going to get me to vote for that ‘man’.
Hillary ’08 Sticking it out!
Posted by: Krissy K | June 4, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
YEAH, YOURE RIGHT. HILLARY IS GETTING ON, YOURE NOT..
SHE IS NOT CAMPAIGNING TODAY SO YOU THE MEDIA NEED TO GET A LIFE.
THE “NOMINEE” GETS TROUNCED IN SOUTH DAKOTA AND EVERYWHERE ELSE THAT COUNTS. I’M PROUD OF HILLARY
FIRST TIME IN HISTORY NOMINEE IS GETTING TROUNCED..
OBAMA IS DOA..
DNC AND MEDIA STOLE FROM HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON
I HOPE HILARY CLINTON STAYS AWAY FROM THIS GUY… LET HIM FIGHT HIS DEMONS ALONE.
I’D HATE TO HAVE TO VOTE AGAINST HILLARY BUT IF SHE GOES VP WITH THIS DEAD HORSE OBAMA , I MAY VOTE AGAINST HER.
OBAMA SHOULDNY BE HERE.
NOW, IRAN IS UNDER THE BUS!
THE DNC SHOT ITSELF IN THE FOOT IN THEIR ANTI-CLINTON AND SUDDEN LOVE FOR A BLACK MAN GUILT TRIP.
PAYBACK TIME!!!
THE WELL-TIMED ENDORSEMENTS BY RICHARDSON, EDWARDS, MCGOVERN MADE AT THE TIMES HILLARY HAD BIG VICTORIES TO TAKE HER MOMENTUM AWAY.
HOWARD MOOOOOOOO DEAN ASKING SUPERS TO ENDORSE EARLY AFTER THE MEDIA HAD DECALRED OBAMA WINNER–TO FAVOR OBAMA
NANCY BAAAAAH PELOSI LYING ABOUT PARTY RULES … TO FAVOR OBAMA.
WE DO REMEMBER. WE ARE GOING TO HILLARY’S SITE TO TELL HER TO STAY AWAY FROM STUPID OBAMA
THE DEMO PARTY IS A PARTY OF DIRTY OLD MEN,
LOSERS.ORG BACKSTABBERS INC
PAYBACK TIME.
OBAMA IS DOA.
LEAVE HILLARY IN PEACE…
SHE JUST GOT “THEFT” HAPPEN TO HER.
TJ, THE RELENTLESS CLINTONITE,
SAYING TO HELL WITH PARTY UNITY!!
Posted by: TJ | June 4, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Dear Lois from California,
You mean to tell me that this pressure to concede is too overwhelming for Hillary Clinton, and yet she expected to face the pressures of the Oval Office. If she can’t even handle this, what kind of President do you think she would make? We don’t need a victim as Commander-In-Chief.
Posted by: Keep Pushing | June 4, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Doesn’t anyone vote based on the issues anymore?
To decide whether or not to vote for someone based on: a rude blog comment of a candidate’s supporter, what someone’s spouse looks like, whether party nomination rules are fair (they aren’t, so work to reform them, don’t vote for the other party), race, gender, age, astrological sign, birthmarks, etc. seems to me to be a very superficial way to cast a vote.
Posted by: Matt | June 4, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Amazing at the vituperation and denial emanating from HRC supporters (see above posts). GET OVER IT! She lost. End of game. All she’s doing now is embarrassing the Democratic Party and destroying any hope of change in D.C. in November. Thanks a lot Hillary. You’re a real pip.
Posted by: lenny-t | June 4, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
“Unify the party” or “unify the country”? Under Barack Obama, neither will happen anytime soon.
My wife and I supported Obama until around February, when he and his buddies began playing the race card almost daily.
I didn’t care about his race before, but Obama and his friends have turned this into the most divisive campaign in my lifetime (69 years).
Remember when George W. Bush promised to “unify America”? Obama will have even LESS success at doing so.
Posted by: Rhys | June 4, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
Rangel, I respect you. But her 18 million supporters don’t want her concede. I am one of them. She has EARNED the right to wait for the convention to officially nominate him.
Plus, there is more dirt on Obama and he is more like McGovern for the election.
Posted by: knowledgeforreal | June 4, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
Hillary supporters don’t have to rush to support Obama – they are free to take all the time you want in deciding who to support. But as far as other Democratic politicians are concerned, they DO have to rush to support Senator Obama. It is simply a matter of perception. Not immediately supporting the nominee will rightfully be seen as trying to undercut or stick it to him. As Rangel said, there is only one person to endorse – Senator Obama – waiting to do so sends a huge message and it is not beneficial to the party, the nominee, or the political future of the elected official that is holding out. Politicians have long memories. Pretty freakin’ simple.
What is unfortunate is that many of her supporters are not demanding that she be treated like any other politician; rather want her to be treated different to the detriment of the clear nominee. When it is apparant that you cannot win, you get off the stage for the good of the party. Period. Dodd did it. Biden did it. Richardson did it. Edwards did it.
Posted by: GoGreen | June 4, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Gerri -
You’re right, kind of…. I know as much about your motivations/thinking as you do about Hillary’s. So perhaps, “judge not, lest you be judged” would be a better reply.
Posted by: KLB | June 4, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Hillary is a champion for health care!! Oh, but she is 2nd only to Rick Santorum of PA in taking the MOST DRUG LOBBY money in the Senate! hmmmm.
She wants every vote counted!! Oh except the caucus votes…hmmmm
It’s less about a black or a woman candidate – and more about picking the best person for the job to bring about change. Voting for the war, is that about change?
Posted by: Gerri | June 4, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Mccain must be smiling today. He now has a few million new supporters.
Posted by: andrea | June 4, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
Hillary is in actuality just waiting for the opinion polls to come in and tell her what to do, just like when she gets hit with a surprise question and has to poll her way out of it. Arrogant witch!
Posted by: Cueball | June 4, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
My dear Krissy:
“Fear mongering” is when the subject is EXAGGERATED – made to appear worse than it is.
John McCain HIMSELF said he would work to appoint conservatives to the bench with the end goal in mind to at least weaken if not get rid of the Roe v. Wade ruling.
Not making it up, Krissy, sorry.
Posted by: Gerri | June 4, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
I am aghast reading these comments. Hillary lost and it was a blow to women? It was a blow to Bill because the exit polls indicate that she rode his coattails. Are you really going to lose the election out of spite? You are condemning the next generation to right wing policies and legal decisions. It is far more reaching than Roe v Wade. When you cool off I urge you to think about this. If Hillary had been gracious, conceded and called for unity would you still be so bitter and spiteful? Her behavior is what is egging you on because if you are that loyal you would be sending her money. I am not hearing of any great infusion of cash from her loyal supporters.
Posted by: NJBOOMER | June 4, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Gov Rendel of Pa and the Clintons are two of a kind.
Instead of seeking to appeal to the best in Americans, so as to help to moving the country forward, they like to polarize Americans by affirming devilish divisions every opportunity they get.
The lack of magnanimity on the part of the Clintons demonstrates clearly that they are not good leaders of men or of women.
Little wonder the Clintions’ White House legacy ended up being so tarnished: No deep and abiding respect for America and for our ideals exist in the heart of the self-absorbed and self-centered Clintons.
Posted by: In praise of US female | June 4, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Rangel has been talking with Obama for months. Hillary had a weak campaign team made up of hacks and minorities who never won anything outside their own minority districts. Obama went with Axelrod and won by using the ridiculous caucus system.
Posted by: caretaker | June 4, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
This demonstrates her lack of judgment.
You cannot be a good leader by telling people what a great leader you are. You cannot force yourself onto a winning ticket by publicly with holding the endorsement.
It reminds me of our right wing friends who say that our diplomacy should consist of reminding other countries of all we have done for them.
Posted by: fblaze | June 4, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Maybe she’s waiting to see what will happen with the Rezko trial. Let’s face it, if he (Rezko) is indicted on all 26/27 counts he may well want to squeal on his former associates to get a lighter sentence. The Jury was very close to a decision (unanimous on all but one count) a few days ago. Of course, I wouldn’t be shocked if the jury got tainted by outside interference. They should’ve been sequestered. JMO, of course.
Posted by: Marty | June 4, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
All you “feminists” and pro-hillary supporters really need to get a grip!
I love how your threats of voting for McCain is a way to vent your frustration.
If you think McCain is your guy, be my guest. As if McCain and Hillary are one & the same. Such hypocrits!
Don’t let the door hit you on your way out!
OBAMA “08
Posted by: Blackrover | June 4, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
I am not a Democrat.
That being said I find the personal rancor between the Obama and Hillary fans fascinating. What is fascinating is how these two candidates are basically the same on the vast majority of issues, yet the fans think they are somehow different. Think about it, do you vote on issues or the fact that your pet personality isnt in the running?
The Hillary fan rancor is especially vicious, but I presume the cause is that she lost. Yes, she lost. Even I, who could care less about who the Dems trot out can see that it is over for her. This speech she gave just seems desperate and petty. If you cared about Hillary, you would want her to step down in dignity. Not shame herself.
Posted by: James | June 4, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
Hillary supporters go on about how Obama can’t win without her supporters – well she couldn’t win without his either. Time to accept loss, hard as it is, and do the right thing. Vote on issues, not personality…
Posted by: jayhay | June 4, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
McCain you can take 4 months vacation and you will be the president. Do not waste any money. Hillary Supporters are with you.
McCain 08
Posted by: Tony | June 4, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Blackrover, wake up. You’re having a nightmare. Reality bites, yes, but she lost. It’s over.
Posted by: Terri | June 4, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
Lois from California wrote, “I wish everybody would leave Hillary alone. This is not easy for her … Let this sink in and let her decide her next move.”
And we were to believe she would be able to “answer the phone at 3am?” Okay, so lets see her decisive leadership. Its scary to think how she would handle really though decisions; this one is easy. In fact, the decision has already been made for her.
Posted by: Kevin | June 4, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Take a good hard look America, it will be a long time before someone this horrible runs again, This is sheer Lunacy, and I say let her take the yahoos and feminists with her and dump them on the Republicans. That is delicious. Obama will win anyway. In fact, 3 more months ove hard voter registration will fix that.
Put a Richardson as a hispanic vp, and work the latinos, at the same time and its over.
and Quite frankly Scarlet, I don’t give a damn.
Posted by: manny | June 4, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Collin, The Voters in the last several months seem to disagree with you. She has been rolling over Senator Obama for months. Now that he is the nominee she will do what is right for her supporters and the nation. I expect no less of the leader I voted for. I believe if a male candidate had given the same speech last night the media would have considered him a power broker. oy need to get over your irrational hatred of her.
Posted by: Jim | June 4, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
such anger!
I love it!
NHred
Posted by: nhred | June 4, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
The problem here is not with the candidates but with the party!
How completely messed up has this primary been. The convention since 1980 has been all about anointing a leader and nothing about selecting one. The primaries themselves have been completely divisive and seemingly never-ending, and splitting the results instead of a winner take all has been dragging it on foreverrrrrrr. And the way FL and MI voters were treated by the party was undemocratic, and with contempt.
You want fair? Make the primary voting order of the states a lottery each election year. Start in January and end it by April, and have the convention then. Make the the primaries be 3 states a week for 3 months followed by a week long convention where Super Delegates finally can announce their support and vote for a candidate. And finally at all levels of party elections use Ranked-Choice Voting, whereby you select your first, second and third choice for a candidate. Life is about choices and you can’t always get what you want so, if you make it that you can at least have another choice, you empower people and make the process less divisive. What do you think?
Posted by: John Not | June 4, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
He does not ” owe ” her the VP spot.
( He’s not that stupid to give it to her…is he ? )
He should not help pay off her debt.
( She had multi millions of China & Dubai money her scumbag husband got from them for….services ! )
He does not need his church
( But you can bet come Nov 5th win or loose he will rejoin it )
He needs to keep his wife quiet.
( But once the tape of her at the church doing her hate whitie speech is released, he will be swift boated by his own wife )
He will need your vote.
( Do you feel lucky punk, then vote for him )
hillary still clings to the hope that he will self distruct or be Fosterized before the election, then she and bill can step in and save the day.
Posted by: Albino Alligator | June 4, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
She’s through, end of story.
Posted by: Texas Voter | June 4, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Oh please Hillary is owed nothing, she lost, get over it, I realize she and her supporters think she’s owed somehow but remember the school yard, there can only be one winner. She LOST. There won’t be just eighteen ml voting in November, there will be many more millions, so if you want to put yourself and your families well being above all else just to support someone who probably wouldn’t give you the time of day now that the primary is over, go ahead, but don’t bitch if we end up with another four years of Bush, our soldiers are left hanging over in Iraq, were paying seven bucks a gallon for gas, no more jobs and on and on. If that’s what you want so you can make some kind of an illogical point fine! I say Obama is going to win with or without you, there are a good number of Republicans who are fed up with what’s happend to this country also, but they can’t stand Hillary so it’s a good thing she lost, Obama will get cross over votes believe me, she would not!
Posted by: Sue Filutze | June 4, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Say what you want about Clinton but she is the best choice to beat McCain in November. Obama will lose simply because he very unstable and cares only for his own ambitions. When he debates McCain without a script he will be destroyed. I am a Clinton supporter and I am now for McCain and will do everything in my power to convince others to vote for McCain also.
Posted by: s4bo | June 4, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Everybody cool it. Just wait until Obama tears McCain apart in the debates. I’d like to congratulate Hillary on her historic campaign. I’m sure she will do everything she can to get Obama elected.
Whatever happens, the constantly flip-flopping, adulterous, war-mongering, veterans benefits denying Bush buddy McCain will not be elected President of the United States.
I hope everyone realizes that it is not just Obama who will become President, it is the Democratic party that will take back leadership.
Can you imagine what Obama’s cabinet is going to be like? I’m betting on Richardson, Edwards, Clark, Nunn, Gore and hopefully Hillary along with others.
Now’s the time to unite the Democratic Party and prepare for victory in November! Here’s to Obama ’08!!
Posted by: Topher | June 4, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
To Lois,
I don’t understand why Hillary needs more time. Months ago, it was stated that she would not have the numbers to even get close to Obama. She and her campaign certainly could do the math themselves. This is not a surprise to anyone that she lost.
She is ungracious, a sore loser and classless.
I hope her supporters are taking a good look at
this self-absorbed and spoiled candidate who refuses to accept the outcome of the election.
Posted by: S Roberts | June 4, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
GoGreen
Thank you for the links.
What has every single candidate that has ever run for president done? Run to their extremes, then run to the middle.
The first is to win the nomination, the latter is to win the whitehouse.
Posted by: Krissy K | June 4, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
What’s most unfortunate for women looking to HRC as a role model, is that HRC chooses to cry foul, and play the victim card; instead of holding her head high and being proud of all that she’s accomplished as the trailblazer!
Sometimes trailblazers lose – but they can come back and try again.
That’s what would really honor this historic moment for women – a champion, a graceful loser, not a blaming whiner who is whipping those who see themselves as victims into a frenzy, as we see here.
When you’re the victim you don’t have to take responsibility for yourself – it’s always someone else’s’ fault, i.e., the media, Obama, Obama supporters, etc. etc.
Posted by: Gerri | June 4, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Wow, she wrote a thesis on “her interpretation of the black/white race issue”? Well, that certainly proves it. Whatever “it” is. I wrote an essay on the issue of race and education during my undergraduate education. Do you even know what a thesis is BJ?
Posted by: Jackhole | June 4, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
The Democratic party will go down he drain when McCain defeats Obama in the general election. Sensible voters who care for their country will not vote for Obama. Obama will have the country much worse off than Bush ever could.
Posted by: s4bo | June 4, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
It’s just a repeat of 2000 all over again. The Clintons’ selfish actions, lust for power, inability to see their own flaws, inability to put the needs of the country over their own, and in the case of Bill Clinton simply deplorable and illegal activities, led in great part to win of our current “president” George Bush.
They didn’t care about what was good for America in 2000, and they certainly don’t care about what’s good for America now. They only care about what’s good for themselves.
However, this time their tricks and cheating and underhanded activities won’t be enough to hand the 2008 Presidential election to John McCain. Barack Obama is too good, and the Clintons’ self-interest is too apparent, for the American people to let that happen.
I am a Caucasian woman, a lifelong feminist, and I am ashamed of those women out there whose OWN sexism has made it impossible for them to see it is not Hillary the WOMAN but Hillary the PERSON that so many people object to.
Fired Up!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ready to Go!!!!!!!!!!
OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Kat | June 4, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
s4bo, why are/were you a Clinton supporter and what about McCain’s policies can you show me that are the same as Clinton’s. I’m interested to know? Pardon me for saying this but I don’t see any similarities or connection, and anyway as HRC said it herself it ain’t over till the lady in the pant suit sings.
Posted by: John Not | June 4, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
I say let Hill and her 18 million do what ever the heel they want. They lost, she lost. To the winner go the spoils. Let them vote for McCain if they think his policies would better fit them. Maybe they do.. All this folks in WV, Ky and rural PA admitted they were racists in exit polls anyway.
Posted by: Ronnie | June 4, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
The primary is over. There’s no point in arguments for or against Gravel, Kucinich, Biden, Dodd, Edwards, Richardson, Obama, or Clinton (I did that from memory, hope I’m not forgetting anybody!). Arguments like that are aimed at primary and caucus voters, and uncommitted superdelegates, in order to determine who will win. Once somebody has won, the arguments have no purpose, effect, or meaning.
Doesn’t matter if you are still a Dennis Kucinich diehard supporter. He’s not going to be the nominee. So I don’t need to hear all about his virtues (as you see them) and why I should suddenly get behind him. The fact is that he’s out of the race, just like everyone else except our nominee, Barack Obama. And obviously the same goes for Hillary Clinton.
If Hillary Clinton had behaved like a national political figure of stature, she would have acknowledged what happened last night. And she would not be trying to shove her way onto the ticket as though this is about her instead of about the future of the country.
She has let down the women of America, including me, by deciding that normal political rules don’t apply to her because she is a woman and a Clinton so she deserves very very special treatment. She doesn’t. My role model for a woman politician is very different: Nancy Pelosi. She competes on equal ground with the men, wins, and doesn’t expect special treatment.
Another point of comparison: We honor and love Nancy Pelosi for breaking barriers, but we don’t turn it into some disturbing obsessive thing with crypto racist undertones. Or did I misunderstand the woman Clinton supporter at Saturday’s committee with her rant about the “inadequate black man” and Geraldine Ferraro’s similar remarks? No, I didn’t think so.
Posted by: Exasperated | June 4, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
You know what the really sad this is? Hillary is for Hillary, and she really could care less about her supporters. they are just a means to her narcissistic end.
She has a bigger emotional investment in her pantsuit navel lint.
Posted by: Texas Voter | June 4, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
I find it ironic that Hillary’s supporters are upset over her treatment by the mainstream media during the campaign. Hey, welcome to our world…Republicans are bashed all the time by these same pundits. Get a thick skin and quit your whining.
Posted by: Dan | June 4, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
THE “NOMINEE” GETS TROUNCED IN SOUTH DAKOTA AND EVERYWHERE ELSE THAT COUNTS.
That’s hysterical.
Posted by: Larry | June 4, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
If you vote for anyone other than Obama you have to be a racist to do so according to Obama supporters. I live in rural America and I am bitter so I will just cling to my guns, religion and anti-immigration views and vote for McCain. Call me a racist no matter to me I love my country and will not vote for Obama who wants to tear our country down.
Posted by: n9b12 | June 4, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
Run Hillary Run !
Never give up, the Presidency is your birthright and you should never quit !
Posted by: tankfixer | June 4, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Krissy:
I agree that candidates traditionally run to their base in the primary and run to the middle in the general. McCain, however, doesn’t excite the conservative base (supporting your contention that he is more moderate than some Republicans). But at the same time, once a candidate runs on a particular platform (and part of that platform is appointing conservative judges to the federal bench) then it is quite a risk to vote for them on the assumption that they are lying to us all don’t you think? I guess my overall point is that Obama and Hillary are almost identical on the issues. I’ll take the candidate that is in line with my priorities and progressive beliefs over the “sort of moderate Republican” every time. That’s me. I do not presume to speak for you. For waht it is worth, I would have sucked it up and voted for Senator Clinton if she were the nominee. But I am a pretty far left on the political spectrum (left of all of the candidates) so almost any Democrat is more aligned with my personal beliefs, hence, they get my vote.
Posted by: GoGreen | June 4, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Let’s remember ,that of the 17 plus million people who voted for Hillary,many were “regugnicans” who followed Rush Limbaugh. You also have those who are party loyalist,that won’t defect. Then you have those who really are racist and uneducated and gave hillary the vote,because no other choice appealed to them.This group and the Limbaugh will vote mccain,no big deal.Cooler heads know what’s at stake for the country and will see it another way,NO mccain.
Posted by: catty | June 4, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Amazing,
Obama is the presumptive nominee and his supporters are still being jerks.What’s the rush? You people make me ill.
Posted by: J | June 4, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Many of the Clinton supporters continually state that Obama will not win without their support. Well, let me say that Hillary Clinton would not win without the african-American support. If somehow she takes the nomination from Obama I and the other 40 million afrian-Americans in this country will support McCain. Now Hillary supporters tell me how you are going to beat McCain then? As for african-Americans only supporting other african-Americans, which group supported Bill Clinton when you white americans tossed him to the curve after he left office? answr: african-Americans (If I’m not mistaken his office is in Harlem.)
Posted by: Monroe | June 4, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
Matt,
You don’t believe people should vote out of spite, but it’s OK to vote on the basis of gender or color? Are all Democrats hypocrites?
Posted by: rich | June 4, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
Obama would be dumb as a box of hammers to take Hillary as his VP. Can you imagine her, Bill, her staff and all the Clinton hangers-on polluting his staff while he tries to build his own administration? Not to mention the constant press, black leaders and guilt saturated whites forever asking him what it’s like to be the first half black president. I would almost feel sorry for him, almost.
Posted by: Steve | June 4, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
I’m an independent. I vote for who I believe is the best candidate to represent me, my views, and this country. I can tell you that after witnessing the Democratic Party’s schizophrenic behavior with regard to FL & MI, Hillary’s behavior throughout the primary, and now all of the juvenile squabbling between Democratic supporters (like on this blog), I’m wondering how I could possibly vote for a Democrat this fall. They can’t even run their own party, let alone a country. I do like Obama though so will be listening closely to the debate between him and McCain. To you Dems – grow up! If Hillary Clinton wants to be President then she needs to act like a REAL woman and stop being a crybaby.
Posted by: Kerri | June 4, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
n9b12,
I live in rural America, too … South Dakota ironically. And I’m Black – you’re not bitter and if you don’t vote for Obama, that doesn’t mean you’re racist. I have no problem with you having guns, it’s your Constitutional Right. But I’d invite you to look deeper into him as a candidate and not just listen to talk radio or cable news show talking points. They are agenda driven, also. He’s a good man, just like you are I’m sure. And I think he’s gonna work his tail off for the American people and finally be a President who COMMUNICATES with all of us. Just listen to him with an open mind … it really is time for a new path in Washington.
Posted by: Regina | June 4, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
OK, here’s the deal. The Democrat party prefers Obama as the nominee, but they don’t really care if he wins or loses because he will bring voters who will punch a straight Dem ticket and improve their chances of increasing their margins in the house and senate.
Posted by: miller | June 4, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
I am 73, contributed more than I could afford to Hillary, and will sit this one out. White male, 100% Bush basher,
voted for one republican ever (Marge Roukema) an will not vote for another soon. I give up.
Bob
Posted by: bob rice | June 4, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
Her speech last night sounded more like an acceptance/victory speech rather than a valedictory, seriously. Then after, it’s Obama calling her and leaving a voice message congratulating her on winning S.D. No congratulation or acknowledging that he got the nomination from her. She is in denial and should get some help, as in seeing a shrink.
Posted by: bud | June 4, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
hillary will be happy to accept defeat
and embrace obama’s win: all obama has
to do is cover her $10 million out-
of-pocket campaign expenses.
Posted by: ironpumper | June 4, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
tankfixer,
The American Presidency is no one’s “birthright” … it is a priviledge and is bestowed to a candidate by the American people and our electoral process. She lost and she lost according to our system. She is now obligated to bow out. She embarrassed herself and our country last night. A very selfish woman, indeed.
Posted by: Regina | June 4, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
Hey, Maryanne
“Therefore, she presumed she would win like we owed her something.”
Who is “we”? Could that be the summary of Mr. Obama’s popularity? HMMMMM!!!
Posted by: Mikie | June 4, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
Charlie, Charlie, Charlie….Miss Hillary is doing what she’s always done: everything it takes, no matter what, no matter how embarrassing, no matter how spiteful, no matter….what it does to you and your buds…..to maintain as much power as possible for as long as possible. What is this puzzling to you? It’s no mystery to us simpletons out here in flyover country. Hillary’s just being Hillary, Chuck! Clear your throat and get in touch with reality.
This is going to be such a fun summer. I’ve told our son in Denver to stock up on popcorn and have the lawnchairs ready, because there is going to be a show! … courtesy of these brilliant democrats who have nominated a guy with 3 years experience and no results of any kind to show for it. As a conservative, I can’t stand John McCain, but he actually DOES have a record that is observable.
Posted by: Ann | June 4, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
Exasperated,
Yeah but it’s not the same. The delegate number is as you’ve seen already flexible. The party shat on the people of FL and MI. They really did. Representation is part of the democratic process and the people of FL and MI have the right, no the duty to stand up and make sure that all their votes count. The voters of those states did not change the date of the primary!!! If you want to ignore that many people that’s completely ridiculous. That’s almost the same population as the entire country of Canada. They have a right to have their votes count, and the DNC screwed up. Maybe every Super-delegate from the state of Florida and Michigan should have lost their vote but NOT the people. BTW I like both HRC and BOH, and see their policies as similar as compared to GOP.
Posted by: John Not | June 4, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
Regina I have spent a lot of hours on the Internet researching Obama. What I have found out is utterly shocking. Obama has not shown that he is the one so far to be President. I take what I hear on the mainstream media and talk shows with a grain of salt because as you know they report what they want us to know. If Obama would come out and answer a lot of questions that Americans have about him I think that it would be different. So far he refuses to do that and where I live this is hurting him terribly.
Posted by: n9b12 | June 4, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
bob rice,
Mr. Rice – I’m 37, black, live in Rural America (South Dakota), female, hard working, 100% INDEPENDENT thinker, voted for Bush 2 times (but in the last 3 years have become totally disgusted with him)… and I’m TIRED of dynasty politics. That goes for the Bushes AND the Clintons. I’m voting for Obama because he seems like a good man, he communicates as well as the likes of Roosevelt, Kennedy and Reagan. He’s a man of the people. I don’t care if he’s black – like I said, I voted for Bush, so I’m not bound to party lines OR skin tone. I simply think he’s the best choice – I ask that you in your 73 years of wisdom and contemplation, listen to Obama a bit closer and with an open mind. Thank you.
Posted by: Regina | June 4, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
Bob rice I understand you completely. More people need to listen to your wisdom.
Posted by: s4bo | June 4, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
Wait till Bill tries to divorce her. This is a classic mega codependent, uber entitled brat. It’s important for Obama to put her in her place quickly and reject her nonsense. Fact is..she lost.
Posted by: VA | June 4, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
Rangel is right on. Who the hell does she think she is pushing her way on the ticket like that?! She needs to go away already.
Posted by: Suedehead | June 4, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Rich … when has Obama ever said he dislikes white people? Because he’s associated with people who speak negatively about white people? Well, I know there are a whole slew of good and kind white people who have had friends, family members, associates speak ill or stereotypical of non-white people. That doesn’t make them themselves a part of that mentality. Obama is an INDIVIDUAL … sure he’s a bit of a lefty and I take umbrage with that. But I sense a good heart in this man and I sense a true concern for the citizenry of this country. I think this country will be shocked at what a uniter he will be – perhaps we are all so jaded to that with how divided things have been for almost 20 years. But WE MUST as a country elect someone who can bridge us together … politically, racially, etc. A house divided never stands – and in these times we just can risk being so polarized anymore.
Posted by: Regina | June 4, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
Obama has also achieved what no woman has ever achieved before. He has won the nomination for President of the United States for a major political party.
Posted by: CC | June 4, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
CC With the MSM, DNC and superdelegates backing Obama is the nominee. Not on his own merits.
Posted by: n9b12 | June 4, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Regina,
I suggest again that you read his first book. That’s where his individual racism comes through loud and clear.
As for his being a uniter, why was he the only member of the Illinois legislature to vote AGAINST a measure seeking to assure that child molesters did not get out of jail early? Not a mainstream guy, and I don’t believe change is necessarily good unless you have some idea where it’s taking you.
Posted by: rich | June 4, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
To those of you who Hillary supporters who claim that you will not vote for Obama, I have a question. What are the substantive differences between Obama’s and H. Clinton’s platforms? In my opinion, it’s not much. For the most part, their plans are almost identical. As for experience, Hillary has only a bit more time as a Senator- she is still a junior Senator and was not the previous President of the United States. Additionally, both of them have a huge following. Along with your support, the chosen Democratic nominee (Barack Obama) would win and we would finally have a Democrat in office. With all of the policy similarities between Obama and Clinton, as well as the fact that each of them have huge support, why would you cast your vote for McCain? I would really like to know the answer to this question.
Posted by: NickJ | June 4, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
I was a huge fan HRC and Bill, but if they are encouraging or inviting some of the remarks I have read…then it is time to turn the page. There is no such thing as a Reagan Dem…there is such a thing as a person who votes against the wallet they can’t feed their family from. The WV, KY and Alabama in the middle of PA and OH votes belong to McCain. Poor people of this country black and white have always been split. Any woman who decides that Obama is too much or not worthy should consider the Supreme Court nominee or how about the FACT that there are always more poor people when a Republican leaves office than when they came in…about me…I am black, proud gun owner, a vet of the USMC, non degreed(GED), I am an options trading specialist, my household earnings put me in the top 10%. I am living the American dream. I win no matter who is elected, I always have and always will!(can you say the same?) I would rather see the middle class get help that no GOP member is interested in. With that said…if somebody in a trailer somewhere wants me to get more money because they are mad, cool…Thanks
Posted by: Richard | June 4, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
LO IF U SO CALLED DEMOCRATES ARE WILLING TO VOTE FOR MCAIN U BETTER BE READY TO BURY YOUR SONS IN A DESERT BECUASE THAT EXACTLY WHATS GOING TO HAPPEN IF sENATOR OBMA LOSES HE WILL BE OK BUT UR ECONOMY AND YOUR CHILDEN WILL BE BURIED IN IRAN OR WORSE BURMA SO GO AHEAD U CANT HOLD MY GENRATION HOSTAGE BUT U CAN KISS SOCIAL SECUIRTY GOOD BY. wE DONT WANT PEOPLE WHO DONT WANT A BETTER AMERICA NOR DO WE WANT PEIOPLE WHO DISLIKE SOME ONE FOR WHAT THEY HAVE SAID. hILARY LIED AND HER HUSBAND LIED “sINPER FIRE” SO GO AHEAD AND VOTE rEP BUT UBETTER GET YOUR POPCORN READY BECUASE YOUR SONS WILL BE DRAFTED TO IRAN AND THERE THEY WILL BE BURIED THERE AND U WILL HAVE A NICE CRISPY US FLAG BEUCASE UYOU WERE RACIST OR WORSE JUST PLANE SUTPID
Posted by: KG | June 4, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
Hey Bryce some of the Hillary supporters may have a high school education but most of the older are educated with masters degrees unlike the uniformed pseudo intellects Obama is attracting. You people don’t have a clue. Come November we as democrats will be trounced by McSame because the strongest candidate wasn’t picked. You Obama supporters are in for a rude awakening. “God help us”.
Posted by: MR | June 4, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
As a 32 year old woman, I am proud of the fact that I will never allow a decision to be based solely on whether someone stands up or sits down when they urinate. Obama’s policies are so close to Clinton’s that, other than the whole peeing thing, I don’t really understand the issue? I believe the Rev Wright controversy made it fairly clear to all that the media was not biased. Clinton fought a good fight, but she lost.
My grandfather used to say that it isn’t just the winner who should be gracious, but also the loser. I guess Clinton never met my grandpa. Too bad.
Posted by: Jackie | June 4, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
Wake up people, Hillary doesn’t have 18million supporters anymore. Take your heads out of the sand. God bless Obama and family. OBAMA 08
Posted by: Jocelyn | June 4, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
It would give me the greatest pleasure if all 18 million of you Hillary supported voted for McCain. The only thing I hate is that I would have to suffer with you the consequences of that OLD MAN being in charge and the damages he would do to this country. Go 18 mil please go for it.
Posted by: JCN | June 4, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
Hey MR- I assume you are a Democrat supporting Hillary. If so, who are you voting for? I read your message to indicate total dislike for both McCain as well as Obama. So who are you choosing? Just Curious.
Posted by: NickJ | June 4, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
PHCDRHERM I have watched the primaries closely and I can not deny the facts. I said without the MSM, DNC and super-delegates Obama did not win on his own merits. You know as well as millions of others that the media was for Obama as well as the DNC. Look how Florida and Michigan turned out. It does seem to me that the DNC gave Obama a big push over the finish line. As far as being an idiot I have been called worse. Deal with facts not your own selfish reasoning.
Posted by: n9b12 | June 4, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
Hey MR,
Wasn’t she the strongest candidate coming in to this race? How’d that work out for her? How did the strongest Democratic candidate known to all of mankind let a first term Senator clean her clock? Remember, this was supposed to be over with after 5 FEB? Her words, not Obama’s
Posted by: PHCDR Herm | June 4, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
I don’t know how some people can say she’s the stronger candidate against McCain. After all, she was supposed to be the stronger candidate by far over Obama, and look what happened.
Posted by: xray | June 4, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
Also, i think it is interesting that people think the DNC helped Obama. If you look at it carefully, they actually hurt Obama. They moved the delegate line further away from him, and did not allow him to campaign in FL or MI. By bending their rules, they actually helped the Clinton campaign, not his.
Posted by: jackie | June 4, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
“MR “You just proved my point about hillary supporters. Her demographic isn’t the college educated,Let me educate you. she has a majority of the following: uneducated “white “middle class,older white women,and hispanics.
SHE ALSO HAS ALL THE BIGGOTS,ONE TOOTH AND ALL!!
Posted by: bryce | June 4, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
Jackie Obama did campaign in Florida. The DNC was the one that helped Obama get the nomination. They pushed the delegate count up to 2118 but they also gave Obama the delegates to cover the increase in delegates needed to get the nomination.
Posted by: n9b12 | June 4, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
HRC is showing her true colors.
She doesnt care about working people or the party.
It is all about her.
She has had weeks upon weeks to prepare for this loss.
She does not need another day.
GET OUT OF THE WAY AND SUPPORT YOUR PARTY!
Posted by: Reality | June 4, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
People this is not about votes.
You cant count votes in a caucus state.
It is about delegates and he has the number.
GET REAL!
Posted by: Reality | June 4, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
People forget Ted Kennedy took it to the convention and he was further behind than Hillary was.
Posted by: J | June 4, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
I was listening to a progressive talk show host on a SF station last night and I couldn’t believe what she and the callers were saying about how Hillary’s supporters are all “uneducated” so they were ignorant, and hate talk like that. It really angered me. While I am a Hillary supporter and have a college education, I know that just because a person has a degree doesn’t make them any smarter. I know that people who don’t have college educations have an education and knowledge and insight that doesn’t always come from a degree. Also, considering the fact that a lot of Obama supporters don’t have college degrees and a lot of Hillary supporters do, I don’t understand why people would say things like that as it is so mean-spirited and divisive. I had been thinking about it for awhile, but after hearing that, I went to the elections office this morning and left the democratic party. There are cruel people everywhere I am afraid, but right now it seems to be the Obama supporters who take the prize.
Posted by: susan | June 4, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
PDCHR HERM I do agree that cheap shots were taken by both sides. Whether or not we agree is besides the point. Obama did run a good campaign but Clinton had a much bigger challenge. She had to run against the MSM, DNC and Superdelegates. All that is in the past now no need to argue over it. Who ever wins in November will be the next President. If voters do not change their minds I do believe that it will be McCain.
Posted by: n9b12 | June 4, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
n9b12- Chris Matthews? Are you basing your assessment on only 1 media figure? Had Hillary chosen to make many of her ridiculous remarks through surrogates instead of making them herself, she might have become the nominee. You can’t blame the media for that.
Posted by: NickJ | June 4, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
John Not – the DNC didn’t screw up, Florida and Michigan did, by breaking the rules AFTER being told that their votes would be invalidated if they moved up their elections. They’re lucky they got any votes counted at all! If the voters in those states want to be angry, let them be angry at the geniuses who decided they just couldn’t wait to get voting – no matter what the consequences were.
They were told what would happen if they broke the rules. But rules are only good if they’re only for everyone else, I suppose.
Posted by: Jesse | June 4, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
Hillary didn’t start out running a good campaign, but she sure finished strong. Unfortunately, in this day and age, money and media seem to determine what happens in America. I kind of admire McCain for that reason as he was able to win the nomination without buying it or having the support of the media. He really is a different kind of politician.
Posted by: Susan | June 4, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
NickJ Chris Matthews was just an example. There is CNN, CBS,ABC and many other news agencies. I am not arguing about this it just isn’t worth it. I do think that Obama has damaged himself beyond repair with a lot of voters that would otherwise have voted for him. Makes no difference to me I am voting for Mccain anyway.
Posted by: n9b12 | June 4, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
n9b12,
And, I guess that’s where we disagree. Obama was getting killed about the Rev. Wright issue and she helped with the pile on. I think she had every advantage and simply squandered it because she didn’t plan for the long haul. By the time she figured out what was happening, it was too late. As far as NOV, I think if he can get Hillary out of his hair, he can get it going on McCain. Admittedly Obama’s got a lot of work to do, but Hillary’s faux-Republican attacks should help him with what he’ll face in the GE.
Posted by: PHCDR Herm | June 4, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
PDCHR Herm I do think that if Hillary is given the time she needs she will do the right thing. To many people are pushing and trying to dictate to her on what to do. As far as Wright is concerned Obama should have left the first time he heard Wright make the first comments that were off base. No use of saying what could have been. We can only go by what is now.
Posted by: n9b12 | June 4, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
I met both Bill and Hill and have been an avid supporter and cheerleader for both. But this has tarnished their reputations. Hillary, the boys all knew when to give up. You are making a mockery of elderly white, women (such as myself). Both Bill and Hill need to get out of politics and get a life. Hillary YOU ARE NOT a uniter but a divider. Go Obama
Posted by: diana | June 4, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
To those of you who support HRC for the issues she wishes to represent, then understand the primaries are over, she did not receive enough delegates to be the presumptive nominee and that it’s now time to move into the general election mode and switch your alliance to the other democratic candidate whose platform is the most closely aligned with HRC’s, Barack Obama. I apologize to all of supporters for the mean things you’ve read or heard from those who did not support your candidate. I also accept HRC’s supporters apology for all the mean things they too have written or said about Barack Obama. Come on, why can’t we act the grown-ups we are and not let our petty grievances destroy the prize at the end of this race, a democratic white house. A vote for McCain only ensures another 4 years of what we’ve already been experiencing. And we all know how we feel about Bush, he has the lowest approval rating of any president. A write-in vote for Hillary (that some of you are suggesting) is only another vote for McCain. We all remember what casting votes for Perot did. It won’t get HRC in the white house and it won’t get Obama in the white house either. Changing your vote to McCain is an insult to HRC. You will have voted for beliefs she is against and it’s time she tells you this herself.
Posted by: marinemom07 | June 4, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
“many of us are voting against Obama because we’re voting no to threats and insults from Obama supporters LIKE YOU! We’re voting no to the media bias and DNC bias against Hillary since the start.” – former dem in chicago
How about instead of voting “against” Obama because of perceived personal attacks by his supporters, vote “for” universal healthcare, livable wages, endind the war in Iraq, finding an alternative to foriegn oil dependancy.
Vote “for” the greater good, its time to take our personal feelings off the table and do what’s best for this nation.
Fyi, silence is consent, not voting at all is just as bad as voting for McCain and his 4 more years of Bush Agenda.
Posted by: bkgirl007 | June 4, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
bkgirl,
“How about instead of voting “against” Obama because of perceived personal attacks by his supporters, vote “for” universal healthcare, livable wages, endind the war in Iraq, finding an alternative to foriegn oil dependancy.
Vote “for” the greater good, its time to take our personal feelings off the table and do what’s best for this nation. “—————————–
We did by voting for Hillary. Without her on the ticket I am thinking long and hard what I will do in November. Right now it’s McCain or not vote.
Posted by: J | June 4, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
It is funny and unbeleivable to see how the end democratic primary is being played out in a country that stand at the fore front of democracy in the world. The ongoing scenerio playing out at the end of democratic party primary is what make demoncracy so difficulty to achieve in many troubling countries of the world. Democracy is based on rules agreed upon by all and must be kept by all irrespective of Age, Gender , color, Race and association. After the long fight haul of electoral process the whole party is agreed to come together and support who ever emerge at the top. This is no lesson to be taught nor be reminded of in America. It is surprising to find all sort of comment written by different people in the blog based on their association with one person or the other and not solely on the principle of democracy. Each step from the beginning of this primary process has clearly showned the imperfection in practice of Democracy in America. This imperfection rear its head now because we have supporters that affiliated so much to a person than to the priciple of democracy. This little aberration is like a hole punctured in a canoe that if not attended to could drown the rider. The difficulty of actualising a peaceful democratic practise in some countries today is due to passionate support for a front runner that in most cases take advantage this position to lead the supporters in direction suited by the front runner. For democratic process to exist with no acrimony and to further the trust and beleive in the process the front runner must come out to accept the defeat and pledge his or her support to whoever emerge the winner. Failure to do this create doubt and disbeleive in the process which could degenerate into unintending chaose. This primary should be clear to all that it is an electoral process that can go either way depending on how you play it as long as everyone adhere to the rule and regulation of the process.The process is to elect and support whoever emerge the leader. Any objective beside this should be address under different platform.
Posted by: rola | June 4, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
Yeah Bryce I remember the Clinton years with the greatest economy ever. Yeah we need change all right we need to change back to the Clinton years.
Posted by: MR | June 4, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
I too wish that everyone would just shut up and leave her alone. Many other candidates have met with their supporters after a defeat and then a few days later endorsed the front-runner. This is unusual…since on the night in question…she was still winning primaries. I don’t believe that she wants the V/P position. Why would she? Every person who is promoting this is saying that she is only interested if it is perceived as the only way that the Democrats can win the WH in November. Her supporters who are pushing this are doing her a disservice. The media is turning this into a circus…as they are want to do. I have no doubt that Senator Clinton will endorse Obama this week. How can she say, and by the way, I don’t want to be V/P and will only take it if is the only way the democrats can win the election in the fall. I can imagine the media and Obama reaction to that. I hope when this is over that she takes a vacation before going back to the Senate. Many of my friends responded to Hillary’s website with one word 2012.
Posted by: Kathy Corey | June 4, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
I wish the Obama supporters would shut up also. She’s conceding, you got what you wanted, now deal with the consequences in November.
Posted by: J | June 4, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
I have been watching this primary season non-stop and remember clearly Clinton’s speech about ‘magic numbers’. Now when Obama has crossed this line instead of giving a speech that acknowledges his accomplishments she holds her supporters ransom while she figures out what she wants?? For all her supporters talk about sulking and not participanting in November because she didn’t win… this makes me sick. Hillary is behaving like a spoiled child… and all of you that support this behavior continue to enable her tantrums!
Posted by: june | June 4, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
It is sad that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton’s supporters are being manipulated by the Republicans. They know John McCain is going to lose so they are posing as Hillary and Barack’s supporters to cause division. I know the Democrats are smarter than that.
Posted by: Sexy | June 4, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Hillary didn’t want to be Vice President before when she was asked, but all of a sudden since she is not going to get the nomination she wants to be it. She should of taken her lying butt out of the race before. She will be the reason the democratic party loses in November. She hasn’t done anything for the state of NY but let jobs go out of the state.
Posted by: kb | June 4, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
btyce,
She is conceding on Friday.
When the AP call it for Obama, I was at work. My co-worker came over to tell me and my reply was, “Never count on Hillary to do the right thing”. She proved me right, I wish I would have bet my co-worker a tank of gas.
Posted by: Rita | June 4, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
Emily, if you beliefe that pulling our military out of Iraq at this point will make the terrorists “go away”, I want to know what you’ve been smoking, because that’s some really good stuff!!! Posted by: Mike in San Antonio | Jun 4, 2008 7:35:47 PM
No, but they weren’t killing each other in Iraq before, because Saddam would have dug some more mass graves for them.
Posted by: Rita | June 4, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
I read the Left Behind series and yes it is relevant to what’s happening today.
Posted by: J | June 4, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
j
I seen both sexism and racism but that’s not what decided the primary,it was ~delegates~get that through your head,and 4 delegates wasn’t going to help her win a race that she agreed before the race wouldn’t count.
Children name call,adults discuss.
All the republican media radio and tv went out of their way to speak positive glowing everthing Clinton. I knew something was up when,Billy Kristol,Brit Hume,Bill O’reiley,Rush Limbaugh and Hannity and Colmes couldn’t gush enough about Hillary,again children call names,adults discuss in a mature fasihion!
Posted by: bryce | June 4, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
Rita,
We’ll see what the Republicans do to Obama by November. Once again we will lose and lose pathetically.
Posted by: J | June 4, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
I’m a Hillary Clinton supporter who will now vote for McCain. We cannot afford another President who needs on the job training and we still do not know what Obama stands for except change….which means what? As bad as the Bush years have been it could get a whole lot worse. I’d like to more choices but between the two….I’ll take the known…which is McCain. It’s a huge risk to give this kind of power to someone you know so little about with such “radical” ties. Look at history.
Posted by: Cindy | June 4, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
Rita,
They all lie. Where have you been? Obama is no different.
Posted by: J | June 4, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
Posted by: J | Jun 4, 2008 8:52:53 PM
I don’t care if they lie. I just want government to leave me alone to either succeed or fail on my own. No MANDATED health insurance (I like what I have and can pay for it), no tax breaks for the wealthy (my taxes is making up the difference), no send my kid to Iraq because of … whatever lie it is this month.
Posted by: Rita | June 4, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
Hillary had the chance to exit with grace and dignity. She blew it. I don’t understand first why she claimed SD as the last primary when it was Montana, and second, and most important, why she could not admit that Obama had sewn up the nomination. I know it must be painful as she has planned this moment for eight years: finding a state where she could become senator, moving toward the conservative wing of the party to appeal to independents, building a war chest of 250 million, campaigning endlessly for 18 months, smiling so much she probably has terminal dry mouth, shaking hands so often she must have developed carpal tunnel syndrome. Still, by failing to be a gracious loser, she undermined the rest of her speech. She has now been forced by her most loyal supporters in Congress to finally concede on Friday (so the reports), instead of making it appear on her own initiative. So many people already believe the Clintons have only been in this thing for themselves, no matter what they accomplish. She gave them an excellent reason to nod to themselves in satisfaction, thinking “I knew it. Just like I expected. It’s all about her.”
Posted by: Lisa Marie | June 4, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
Tina: I see the brain/deads have entered the room. I am willing to bet you a trip to your local Chucky Cheese restaurant and my truck, gun rack and my favorite pastor Rod Parsley that Obama wins in one of the greast landslides in the history of Presidential elections.
Posted by: JB | June 4, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
Mike in SA,
What no pithy comeback?
Can you defend your silence about the trampling of the Constitution? Do you remember the oath you took before you served 24 years in the Air Force?
What about McCain’s vote against the Webb GI Bill?
I’m still waiting…
Posted by: neoconman | June 4, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
When the primary season began we had debates. LOTS of debates. For those that are crying foul for any public negativity directed at Hillary in the main stream news, may I remind you; every one of those early debates were like watching “The Hillary Clinton Show” with her special guests; Dennis Kucinich, Bill Richardson, Chris Dodd, Joe Biden, What’s his name?, AND Barack Obama!!! (With enthusiastic applause responses inserted in between each). Everyone else on stage was the presumed runner-up and/or loser. She was repeatedly given the most airtime to voice her positions on every subject imaginable. The others were treated like second class citizens time after time. It was a sham. She was the heir apparent…the entitled one. (Ok…another entitled one. We already have one of those and we all know what a disaster THAT turned out to be). If Hillary couldn’t win in a landslide with all the advantages that she was given early on, then she doesn’t deserve to win. Period.
I gave her a pass on the lies she told about the landing on the tarmac in Bosnia but when she started referencing the assassination of Bobby Kennedy, more than once, I might add…she went too far in my opinion. And NO! Obama should Not consider her for veep after that. As another blogger wrote a couple of weeks ago…”if Obama selects Hillary as his running mate, he’ll need a food taster for the next 4 years.” No truer words were ever spoken.
And another thing. Do you really want another president that can’t control some of his or her spending?
She was drowning in money a year ago…including a little help from Rupert Murdoch. (That’s the one thing that turned me off to her). And now she’s 20mil in debt. I’m sure all of her supporters feel Obama owes her a refund. Not!
Her behavior now is one of a leech who’s trying to drain the life from its’ host.
Posted by: sagopalm | June 4, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
If you examine this administration’s words carefully you will see that they have never denied gathering electronic submissions from all Americans, not just suspected terrorists.
What the Clinton administration did outside of Waco was wrong, but it didn’t rise to the level of what this admin. has done.
They tried to suspend HC on two citizens. Albeit, suspected terrorists, but LEGAL CITIZENS none the less.
Say what you will about how the previous admin., but they never used the DOJ to win elections or to punish political foes.
Posted by: neoconman | June 4, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
To all the people with the negative comments about Obama, get over it!!
Hillary lost because Obama is the better candidate. We all have a personal opinion and the majority ruled.
Posted by: Denise, Chicagol | June 4, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
It’s no wonder we have become a joke to the world!!! These comments are appalling from both sides. I realize I am blessed to still have a six figure household in this econonmy. Yet I am deeply concerned about the deterioration of life of my fellow americans. Everyday on the news, companies are either closing or downsizing. This means that families and innocent children are losing their homes, not able to put food on the table, vehicles are being reposessed, and the overall quality of life continues to deteriorate for fellow americans who don’t deserve it. Let’s search our hearts based on THE NEEDS OF OUR COUNTRY our candidates. Four more years of another REPUBLICAN will further dig us in a bigger hole. The bigger the hole, the longer it will take us to climb out!! Let’s be smarter than the REPUBLICANS GIVE US CREDIT FOR BEING!!!!
Posted by: MGC | June 4, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
TO HILLARY
The bigger they are, the harder they fall.
Pride comes before crash!
Posted by: piers | June 4, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
Clinton supporters who choose McCain over Obama prove that they did not support Hillary because of her policies but out of some tribel sense of loyalty. If you want universal health care and and end to the war you cannot vote for McCain. Think policy, not personality.
Posted by: jrp | June 4, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
God, the people threatening to vote McCain or stay home out of spite sound hilarious. You’re willing to vote for a 3rd bush term with regards to tax breaks for the rich, no end in sight for the Iraq war, conservative judges like Scalia and Alito, restrictions on Roe-v-Wade, etc, all because you perceive some type of slight against you and your candidate… It’s no wonder this country has headed downhill recently, people have stopped voting in their interests and will vote on wedge issues and emotion instead. We’re all doomed…
Posted by: T. | June 4, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
Voters never controlled the party nomination, delegates always did.Surely you knew that?
OBama needed a few delegates,Hillary needed hundreds.She lost this back in feb and couldn’t recover.
This inexperienced person beat the Clinton machine all the way ti it’s bankruptcy
Posted by: piers | June 4, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
it was always only about hillary. only the equally selfish don’t see that. and yeah, I won’t be voting for her next senate run and will gladly campaign for whoever opposes her…on the democratic ticket.
Posted by: kravitz | June 5, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am
I’m an Independant voter. I like Obama.
But I have to say when I hear those sound clips of Flager and Wright it turns my stomach. Those clips are going to get some real air time soon. Thats some really lousy baggage and after being very pleased with his views and communication skills I have to say that those issues are very disappointing.Not very uniting at a time in America when we need a uniter.
On the plus side Bill Clinton will not be given free reign of the White House for another 8 years. He looks a bit desperate like a guy who has sold alot favors and might not be in a position to pay them back now. Bill please buy a house on the beach in the Bahamas and enjoy your life..
Posted by: Smitty | June 5, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am
Smitty
Who’s pastor runs the whitehouse? Separation of church and state,remember.
Never on the stump does he reflect that point of view,never.
Posted by: ian | June 5, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am
17 million voters,name recognition,20 plus points ahead in the polls,lots of money in the bank,and confident the race would be over in feb…it was for her.she never caught up.
Posted by: bryce | June 5, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am
You may or may not be right.
This is no time to continue with your backstabbing ways. You need to be right or is it better to be kind? Are you American? Is your soul so hateful that you can’t stop foaming at the mouth?
Have a heart. let it go..move on.
Let these people heal. Have some reverence.
Posted by: Kali | June 5, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am
18 million people absolutely adore her.
Please move on and let them alone in their grief. Hillary is handling it.
She will concede when the base is no longer in shock and sobbing.
Let it go.
Posted by: Kali | June 5, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am
Kali
I must disagree. Hillary didn’t have a message until Pa,she started to hit her stride the second half of the race.The first half she was all over the place,(Obama was consistant with his message from the start,)even the political analyst said she made a mistake running as an incumbent with experience of which she had none,(when she didn’t have an executive position in Bill administration,) in a yeat of change.She allowed 11 straight victories to pass that yielded an insurmountable delegate lead, Obama held all the way.Mark Penn did’nt understand delegate allocation (he thought it was winner take all)
I beleive her followers are sincere,but emotional and can’t see the forest for the trees right Now!!
Posted by: bryce | June 5, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am
Kali
You are aware the 18 million”voters who love and adore her,” has Rush Limbaugh voters in there? Believe me,They don’t “love and adore her”
If you need healing THIS ISN’T THE PLACE
Obama supporters need to vent about her disrespectful, non conceding talk that’s the thread.
Posted by: bronson | June 5, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am
Typical Hillary supporter,name caller disrespectful,uninformed of issues’and EMOTIONAL,IRRATIONAL,just like their leader.
What does being Americans have to do with not being for Hillary,please.We call it smart enough not tobe confused.
This is a blog some fing it enjoyable to discuss topics.some don’t
Posted by: bob | June 5, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am
As a woman, a Democrat and a firm supporter of Democracy, this has been the worst media coverage of a candidate ever.
i have never seen anyghing like it. 20 million Clinton supporters have had it with the media and injustice of this whole nominating system.
I am for the first ime in my life, completely embarrassed to be a Democrat.
I also cannot understand how Obama could not be embarrassed.
How dare he ask us to defend his beliefs from his church, his friends and his deceptions and crooked tactics to the American people.
There are also a bloc of voters that Democrats need to win that Senator Obama is having a major problem with:
White Male Voters
White Women Voters
Catholic
Rust Belt Voters
Latino Voters
Cuban Voters
Swing State Voters
Jewish Voters
Big states
Lunch Bucket Voters
Older voters
Catholic Voters
Ohio, Michigan, Florida, California, NY, NJ, Pennsylvania, Indian, West Virginia, Texas and Kentucky are out of his reach
Obama has African Americans and elitist in his pocket. Doesn’t sound like a winning ticket to me.
Obama kept Michigan and Florida in his pocket the whole time to sway voters and superdelgates, to give himself bragging rights. “I have the most delegates. I am the winner! Look at me.”
He lost this primary because the fourth largest state has never been heard properly. The popular vote was ignored and the delegates were never added in full.
For Senator Obama to accept this decision about not seating Florida and Michigan is especially troubling.
How can a leader whose message is one of “unity” agree to support a decision that strips Senator Clinton of delegates and Florida voters of their voices.
I wonder whether the price he will ultimately pay was worth this very poor decision. Millions don’t think so.
This is the first time my enitire community will be voting for a Republican or as an independent.
Posted by: Al from NJ | June 5, 2008, 5:08 am 5:08 am
Senator Clinton should keep fighting until the convention.
I wouldn’t give up if I were her.
Let the media and the Democrats go nuts.
African Americans should be ashamed of themselves for not defending the Clintons.
President Clinton and Senator Clinton have fought for civil rights their whole life.
President Clinton chose to have his office in Harlem NY rather than on 5th Avenue overlooking Central Park to keep helping “African Americans”
I am a white American and discusted with African American’s treatment towards the Clintons.
Posted by: Al from NJ | June 5, 2008, 5:14 am 5:14 am
I just want to remark to my fellow Democrats about this whole primary fiasco:
The Democrats should have won this election.
People wanted them to win.
Senator Obama is too scary to be nominated and will lose this general election to McCain. McCain is a safe bet regardless if he is a Republicans.
They would have won, if Hillary was on the top of the ticket.
Now that Obama has blocked votes from Michigan and Florida and taken delegates from Senator Clinton he might win the primary.
But was it really worth it for him to win the ruling at the DNC for two states to lose in November?
Americans are not stupid. Obama fought for the government. Hillary fought for the people.
Who would want a President to not stand up for them?
I will be voting for McCain this year as I am discusted with the media coveragte for all candidates,even President Bush, but especially for the relentless daily attacks on whites and Senator Clinton.
I am totally embarrassed to have to stand up for Obama and his wife and radical friends and pastors. I will never be proud of his treating Michigan and Florida voters with such disrespect either.
If Obama becomes the winner, all Democrats will have to defend his patriotism, his radical left views, his Pastor and Church and God knows what else will turn up until the General election.
This is the first time in my life that I am NOT proud to be a Democrat. I am totally embarrassed of our candidate.
Posted by: Rick from Pa | June 5, 2008, 5:27 am 5:27 am
Let us all congratulate Senator Obama on a campaign well run and well executed. A year and a half ago everyone was running away from the juggernaut Clinton machine.
He took them on and won.
He deserves the world of credit. Frankly many in the country is tired of the Clintons but didnt have the chutzpat to tell them to step aside. Evan Bahy for one would have been a good candidate for the Dems this year but he let the Clintons sideline him.This trading of the presidency between two families over the last two decades needed to be interrupted. Especially since Jeb is coming in 2012.
Obama and his supporters have accomplished what everyone thought was impossible a year ago. They deserve to run the country they have demostrated it.
Congratulations and thank you for relieving the Clinton burden.
Posted by: mal | June 5, 2008, 5:49 am 5:49 am
I love HRC im young black, college educated and from TN, and my party has bascially cost my state a US Senate seat Alexander will hold it and now we have a major problem in the works our Gov. leaves in 2010 and no senate seats will be available our state senate is tied 16-16-1 independent and our state house is not a big majority and the Lt. Gov is a Republican, we will be drawing maps after the 2010 census i could less about the future of my party because i have no say in the fight so in my state it looks like the DNC says we dont TN in nov give it to MCCain. Super D’s overlook the importance of my state once again.
Posted by: Quintell | June 5, 2008, 5:51 am 5:51 am
Ha!
Rangle (One of the Clintons biggest mouthpieces) is at it again. He is a shining example of the hipocracy that overflows the Democrats cup!
He knows as well as anyone with half a brain that the delegates have not officially cast any votes yet. Alot can happen in the upcomming days…And at this point the race is way to close to call.
What a pathetic group the Dim-o-crats are.
Posted by: Chris | June 5, 2008, 5:58 am 5:58 am
Obama needs to make a decision fast who he wants for Vice President
I think he should pick
1. Mayor of Detorit
2. Al Sharpton
3. NAACP President
That would bring more history to the bool of this chapter wow
that would make Obama’s candiates all happy.
Posted by: Mike | June 5, 2008, 6:02 am 6:02 am
I’ve heard it said before…the extreme right and the extreme left have so much in common, they end up being pretty much the same.
The Democratic Party is now the racist party who beats up on women and doesn’t think it’s a big deal to take money from someone who has just been found guilty of 16 counts of fraud. Are we suppose to believe Obama didn’t/wasn’t going to give this guy anything in return?
And NOW we have Caroline Kennedy as an advisor on the VP slot with Maria Shriver’s name being bantered about.
The Democratic Party is just a party headed by a bunch of rich people who exploit certain segments of the American population so they can be in power, stroke their own egos, make a lot of money at our expense, get jobs for their friends, and indulge in a lot of myth making so they have a “place” in history.
Posted by: Diane | June 5, 2008, 7:06 am 7:06 am
Hillary should not be the VP. After this primary race and all the hateful Obama supporters, just let it go.
Let Obama make it on his own, besides his supporters don’t want her or the votes of her supporters. All this unity crap by Obama and the DNC is just lip service. Alot of us don’t want Obama and they don’t want us.
It is time to move on from this primary and start thinking about electing McCain, the moderate we should have had.
Let the DNC live with what they have sown.
Posted by: EXDEMO | June 5, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am
McCain
isn’t the only one trying to get the Hillary supporters,they are surrounded and being courted, by the hate groups that wnat to prey on them and use their hatred,to further their agenda.Don’t forget the republicans are stirring things up too,they want rhe dems divided
Posted by: piers | June 5, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am
piers
THE DIVIDE AND CONQUER RULE
Posted by: rodney | June 5, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am
OK WOMENget it out of your systems–and then unite and kick some republican butt—get even dont get mad
Posted by: rodney | June 5, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am
I think it is normal to feel let down after working very hard for a dream, but there is a graceful way out when the whole world is watching. Obama did his best to win and deserves to be acknowledged w/o any preconditions. The Clinton camp have only themselves to blame if they were outsmarted by a guy they disrespected and punched to the end. The presidency is not inherited, it is earned. The BEST person won. Period. HRC supporters get on with it and give the MAN his due. The VP is for the winner to decide and not to be dictated.
Posted by: seth methaw | June 5, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am
Obama didn’t make the rules he followed them.
This isn’t a black white issue.
All the hate you feel is misdirecred,hate the fact Soldiers are dying in a made up war for oil,hate that people are losing their homes in record numbers,hate that the health care system isn’t available for all,hate all the lies spoon fed to all Americans from this administration,hate the amount of money the U.S. is borrowing from China to fight this war,Hate the debt we owe to China and hope they don’t own America if we can’t pay back the loans,,hate things not people,or Satan wins,but never give in to evil and hate just for the sake of hating…you look weak and scared!
Posted by: ian | June 5, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am
After looking at some of the reasons Hillary supporters are giving for not voting for Obama, no fear, they willl be back. If they vote for the man who is now saying he will spy on americans, continue the Iraq war and the Bomb, Bomb Iran policy, cut more taxes for the rich at the expense of the poor, vote no on universal health insurance, spike SCHIPS, appoint Thomas and Scalia ollk alikes to the Supreme Court, and other right wing atrocities that have pointedly not worked for 8 years of Bush, they will have exactly the stupid, spiteful government they opposed by suppporting Hillary. Are they going to fall into the same trap the GOP has been getting conservative and poor whites to jump into for decades, and vote against their own self interests. Hillary supporters will not be able to handle the stench of voting for a 3rd Bush term, no matter whether Hillary is on the ticket or not.
Posted by: billy | June 5, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am
Even Hillary admits her differences with Obama are small,compared to Mccain. She has party loyalty,something her supporters seem to lack. She loves her party and watch,she’ll fight hard for the democrats,watch.
Charlie Rangle didn’t flip flop,he faced reality,it’s over time to unite.
Posted by: bryce | June 5, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am
health care for all–better watch that one as there is no free lunch.
first put a end to the countless ambulanse chasers, as the lawers are making billions on the public ignorance and you are paying the bill in the end.stateofmass.has mandated insurance and those who have problems paying are being fined on top of it all—attorny lobby in washington is most powerful.
Posted by: rodney | June 5, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am
Where are we?
About the same number of people voted for
each candidate. Your 18 million are not more noble or sincere than the other 18 million. Somebody loses in a close election. There are hurt feelings. Nobody likes to be on the side that didn’t win.
There is a load of reason for all to be upset. Sexism was pretty evident, and so was racism. Press coverage was sloppy and not objective. That cut both ways, with some so-called news reporters slanting things for each candidate.
We have a flawed system. Voters voted.
Republican trolls voted in Democratic primaries. Some votes counted more than others. Rush Limbaugh tried to fiddle the outcome. Fanatics on both sides threw ridiculous insults at the other candidate and at supporters of the other candidate. Pretty childish, and not at all useful.
Where are we? McCain will continue
Bush policies. That needs to be prevented. If we yield to our self-righteous anger, and don’t vote, or vote for McCain, we will deserve the horrendous mess that brings our country.
Do we really believe that Hillary wants
us to help McCain? I don’t think so.
Posted by: Rhonda W | June 5, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
These people talk about sexism, Obama has tried his best to be polite and respectful of Hillary, and she has been nothing but disrespectful, nobody cares about that, so when Obama gets tough, or Media gets tough on her its called sexism lol, but when fox degrades Obama everyday, its ok DOUBLE STANDARDS
Posted by: ONEIL | June 5, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
RHONDA W is agree with you 100% i wish all the women supporters of Hillary were as rational as you.Obviously they were voting based on gender, because if u were listening to all the debates there is not much difference between the policies between O and H , while Mccain is opposite, WAKE UP U IGNORANT PEOPLE A VOTE AGAINST OBAMA IS A VOTE AGAINST THE WISHES OF HILLARY LOL
Posted by: ONEIL | June 5, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
If hillary were to see some of these post from her supporters,she would be angry.Hillary has worked for civil rights for all people and ,children issues.She isn’t being represented well in this hostile environment of post.
Posted by: raquel | June 5, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am
Billy, you gotta stop drinking the HATERADE!!!
McCain’s not Bush, and for you to compare the two is like comparing Hillary to Barack.
You want universal health care? Better look at England, Canada, and Cuba’s systems. They don’t work so well. Yes, everyone has health care, but when you get diagnosed with cancer and have to wait 6 months-2 years to see an oncologist (sp?), you might just as well have no health care at all, because you’ll be just as dead. See, government interference in business does not mix well. Government does not like free enterprise, except when it comes to tax time.
As for Thomas, Roberts, Alito and Scalia, I’d actually like to see MORE of those “originalist” type judges, who do their best to uphold the constitution as the founding fathers visualized instead of legislating from the bench like your more liberal judges do (Brayer, Souter, Ginsberg and Kennedy). The job of the Supreme Court is not to legislate from the bench, it to simply uphold the constitution of the United States. Now, if you consider THAT an atrocity, you have some serious personal issues.
You whine about cutting taxes from the “rich” at the expense of the “poor”, but fail to realize that the top 10 percent of money earners pay 70 percent of the annual tax bill. The bottom 50 percent only pay 3 percent of the tax bill. So, don’t sit there and accuse the “rich” of getting all the breaks. The government has NO BUSINESS playing Robin Hood with our tax dollars.
And SCHIPS would have passed if the DEMS had not stuck in legislation that would have allowed thousands of ADULTS (most of which are capable of working and getting their own insurance) access to the medical care that was SUPPOSED to be for the CHILDREN of low-income families.
And say what you will about the war, but if we pull out of Iraq and Afghanistan now, within 6-12 months we will see another attack on the United States. You say we can’t afford to be there, and we’ve lost 4,000 servicemen. I say we can’t afford NOT to be there! The 4,000 servicemen we’ve lost pales in comparison to the number of troops lost in Vietnam, and that pales in comparison to the hundreds of thousands lost in WWII. While I mourn the loss of each servicemember (I was one myself, for 24 years), know that WE servicemen and women fully understand what we’re getting ourselves in to, and are prepared to give our lives in defense of our country. Are you prepared to do the same?
You want to blame someone for the economy? Blame CONGRESS! Same goes for high gas prices. CONGRESS was the entity that refused to allow American oil companies more access to ANWR, the Gulf Coast and other recent massive oil finds INSIDE the US. Your fellow Dems decided that we shouldn’t use our own oil to drive down prices worldwide. No, that decision falls directly on YOUR party’s shoulders.
Do we need less dependence on oil? Yes, but it’s not gonna happen unless CONGRESS gets off their duffs and starts allowing the use of nuclear power (and I don’t mean nuclear weapons!) as a long-term alternative, and starts looking ahead at other fuels, like hydrogen. Short term (10-20 years), we’re still going to need the oil. No way around it, as Congress and the environmental whacko corps has us backed in to a corner.
Oh, and get rid of all those payments to the UN. Bunch of corrupt, ineffective politicians who use OUR money to fill their own coffers in other countries.
So, Billy, stop bashing conservatives and start looking at your own party.
Posted by: Mike in San Antonio | June 5, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am
The Obama is an harvard graduate,that is exactly half white and african.He’s intelligent and very smart.
To lump him and any blacks that ever did anything wrong together in your eyes is ludicris.
Hate is like cancer,IT WILL EATYOU UP ON THE INSIDE AND KILL YOU.
Posted by: PIERS | June 5, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
mr
why do you think we are in iraq—disgusting is it not—-same crap as vietnam
Posted by: rodney | June 5, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
andy
rothchilds—-rockafeller-and a coulle others—wealthiest people on earth–beyond reproach
Posted by: rodney | June 5, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Andy newsflash the reason for all this is the war. The exact same thing happened in the last Gulf War if you remember. Opec see’s a reason jack up the prices and also I agree with you on International Bankers. But they see an opening to do this because of this illegal war plain and simple. We’re actually lucky prices aren’t 6 to 7 dollars a gallon because the price of a barrel of crude has more than tripled since a couple of years ago.
Posted by: MR | June 5, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Hey Mike Bush lied plain and simple. Even Colin Powell admitted that the intelligence to go to war was cooked up by the Bush administration. LOL at you defending this regime with its dismal record of failure. History will be very harsh on him. And yes we are in a recession because the gas prices are through the roof. Just look around restaurants are closing right and left because people aren’t going out. Car dealerships are closing because no cars are being sold. Hello
Posted by: MR | June 5, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
It was strange behavior-again very much defiant-The Clintons owned the street corner for many years and I suppose it is hard to let go-but we are in a new generation-lets time to move on! Hillary needs to find the grace to let you—I have always said-The Clintons don’t play well with other in the sandbox-
Posted by: Sophia | June 5, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Lois, in California:
Save your idle threats!
The Clintons have been disrespecting
Sen. Obama throughout the campaign!
Hillary said his campaign could be summed up by one speech!
Bill Clinton implied that he won
the South Carolina primary because he was black! Geraldine Ferraro stated and continues to state that Obama “would not be where he is if he were not black”!
You Clinton supporters have the nerve to talk about disrespect?
Your Candidate doesn’t have the dignity or class to congratulate Obama on his
victory! Saturday will be Too Late!
The Ship Has Sailed!
Posted by: reaganfan | June 5, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Don’t care about election because I don’t vote, But in my opinion, the Dem or Rep never did anything to help me. But I think most of us out there should leave Hillary alone. She is going through a lot right now. I think the reason why she lost is because she followed the old style. She should have paid more attention to the media and compete more in smaller states instead of ignoring it. She is not saint also, She said one thing, then changed and say something else. My opinion of Obama is all he is good at is holding big rallies and try to speak like JFK and MLK. But he sounds more like the people at his church. Well he is a veteran when it comes to big rally because if you look at the tape of his church it looks like they are holding rallies instead of preaching the words of god and what’s in the bible.
Posted by: shanti | June 5, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Former Dem in Chicago-
You sound ridiculous saying that you aren’t voting for Obabma because his supporters did this and said that and thought this and reacted that way. Your vote should be cast based on the candidate and what they stand for. You are obviously searching for ANY reason not to vote for Obama. If you don’t want to vote for him becuase of who he is, then say that, but don’t reach for a reason by blaming his supporters.
Posted by: j | June 5, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
I can’t believe the nonsense being spewed out by the Clinton supporters. Get it through your heads that Obama won this primary fair and square. Hillary had every advantage in the book, but ran a disorganized chaotic campaign. She changed her message about as often as her hairstyle back when she was a first lady – “35 years of experience”, “ready on day one”, “3 am phone call”, “working class whites (hint, hint)”, “won the popular vote (if you just count the states she won…)”. Along the way, she was caught lying about Bosnia, offending needlessly the leaders and people of Russia, China, and Iran. The list of gaffes go on and on. What is it about “lose” that you don’t understand? At this point, I wouldn’t even vote for Hillary for dogcatcher of Central Park!
Posted by: Joe | June 5, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Who are these 18 million Hillary supporters. They include Indiana REPUBLICANS who voted in the Dem primary to stop a balck man. Same as Ohio and Pennsylvania. Hillary has reminded us of everything bad about the Clinton years.
Posted by: elle | June 5, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
DON’T WORRY ALL THESE ANGRY HILLARY VOTERS WILL MAKE HER THE LAUGHING STOCK
OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
Her legacy and ploitical future is at stake. If her supporters ,want her to lose her position in the democratic party,VOTE Mccain
Her NY seat is threatened by her behavior in the primary. If Obama lose she is done…and her people took her down,by thinking they were supporting her.GREAT NEWS,it will sting more!
Posted by: christal | June 6, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am
Novella
Spot on. They aren’t about issues it’s just the person. The republicans love non thinkers they can control.
These fake democrats will be forgotten after the republicans get their vote.
What person ever makes the most important decision of their life, in an emotional stupor?
She said it herself they were uneducated
This is Hillary’s legacy now…division
Posted by: cate | June 6, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am
Novella, I believe the process WAS unfair to the people of both Michigan and Florida, but it’s more the fault of the states’ Democratic parties and legislatures for not following the Democratic party’s rules. It’s also the fault of both candidates for agreeing to those rules in the first place. If they thought there were going to be problems, they should have been addressed by the candidates LONG before they agreed to the DNC rules.
Posted by: Mike in San Antonio | June 6, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am
It is also great that the very supporters of Hillary are the very ones that will stain her legacy by voting for Mccain. If Obama loses because of her “white uneducated, and women vote.”
SHE WILL BE FOREVER HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR DIVIDING THE PARTY.She will never hold any important position in the democratic party. Her supporters will make her or break her legacy.
I’ve read her Senate (NY) seat is threatened,because of her negative divisive primary behavior.
Posted by: madison | June 6, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
Hillary Clinton is a narcissistic woman. Her self obsession puts into question whether she is fit to be a leader, let alone a president. This theatre of Rep. Rangel convincing her to change her mind is a farce. It’s one of her ploys and he is her operative. Thank god she is off the scene. Barack Obama should stay far away from her. There are talented, decent women in politics. Indeed we have to have a woman president some day. As for this campaign, Mr. Obama is a victor fair and square. Hillary, like anyone else, has to understand that the presidency is not owed to her. Although some of the sexism during this campaign was reprehensible, it is not because of sexism that she lost. Barack Obama’s campaign has not been sexist; if anything it appears that they were careful in dealing with some of the low down tactics that Hillary was throwing at them. It is demeaning for women to use ‘gender card’ to explain away her loss. As for her character, some of us now see why she was demonized by the some–it is quite deserved. Finally, being a US senator of New York is an honorable position. She got that position without ever holding any elected office. In fact, she got a leg up through her marriage. So, this latter day feminist is riling up women to the detriment of her own party and to be vindictive against the victor. One can easily say her self entitlement, conniving and the ‘fairy tale’ of her having 30+ years experience caught up with her. Now, she wants to be treated like a royalty. We have a Clinton fatigue now.
Posted by: Tedegsa1 | June 6, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm