By Kelly Moeller

Jun 3, 2008 10:50am

Washington Post Fact-Checker on Clinton Popular Vote Claim: “A Minor Masterpiece in Carefully Parsed Self-Delusion”

The Washington Post’s Fact Checker takes on the "I won the popular vote" claims of Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, writing "You have to admire Hillary Clinton for her ability to reshape reality to her preferred outcome. She seems to assume that if she says something loudly enough, and repeats it often enough, it will become true. Her victory speech in Puerto Rico was a minor masterpiece in carefully parsed self-delusion. Unfortunately for her, it takes more than conviction to win the Democratic nominating contest."

Ouch.

- jpt

User Comments

Obama owes his delegate lead to 12% of Democrats deciding caucuses in his favor, that’s the popular mandate?
Activists, busloads of college students taking advantage of chaos, well-off liberals that can afford to spend 3-4 hours in a caucus, that’s the core constituency of the Democratic party?
Please!

Posted by: danglibrul | June 3, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am

finally!
senator clinton ran a good campaign but senator obama ran a better one plan and simple…
all this conciliatory talk of what does sen. clinton get for winning the popular vote is silly…she gets to say i lost to a better canidate

Posted by: lynn | June 3, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Go Obama!!!!
Please do us right! We trust you!

Posted by: Becky | June 3, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am

The Washington Post writer is in favor of giving delegates to candidates that take their names off ballots … how Un-American is that? Clinton does have the popular vote … NObama can’t have credit for the “uncomitted” in Michigan when Edwards also withdrew his name and was still in the running at that point. The Left-Wing of the Democratic Party is going to force-feed us another Kerry liberal … but McCain will reap the benefit for this!!

Posted by: Jesus Francisco | June 3, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

I guess if you call stealing votes, rigging caucuses with intimidation and fraud a better campaign, then he did. I personally don’t think those tactics translate in to a general election win.
I think he is unelectable and when the general comes around there are no caucuses he can rig, no little old ladies he can intimidate and grab materials from, no overwhelming black vote in any state to save him.
He is unelectable. Women, the working class and rural votes win elections. Obama has none of them. Clinton has all of them.
Guess what folks urban whites with degrees and blacks don’t win elections for Democrats. Never have, never will. Nor do caucuses in red states.
The Dems want the white house or they don’t. About 10% of the democratic vote swings republican with Obama as the nominee. It’s over.

Posted by: s.b. | June 3, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

SB
What country are you from? Obviously not the US. Hillary Clinton had a political machine behind her, a two term President Husband, 109 million of her own cash, 100% name recognition, political connections, corporate sponsors up the butt, 200 delegates before the race even started and still could not defeat a first term Senator.
What “odds and opposition” do you refer?
as a strong Obama supporter I have the utmost respect for Hillary. POLITICS IS A TOUGH GAME. MOST PEOPLE HERE COULDN’T HANDLE 1 DAY OF SCRUITINY

Posted by: jAYjAY | June 3, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Well, Hillary put up the good fight and I am proud of her -
As for you obama cult followers, drink very deeply now – John McCain will be the next president of the USA.
obama will not.
He might get Hillary to champion for him, but there are a lot of voters that see right through the phony B.S. that he spews – Pat yourselves on the back for being the meanest, sleaziest people ever in any election.
To paraphrase Michelle Obama’s (of course your Queen) statement, with a little change:
“the obama followers are just so mean”
Go John McCain

Posted by: Lou | June 3, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

I give Hillary lots of credit, she’s tough, but unfortunately delusional. Please Democrats let’s all get together to stop McCain, who will only help the rich and corporations, drive us into a deep Depression, and creating another war–this time with Iran. We need to take America back for the people!

Posted by: me | June 3, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

I don’t care who gets the high number of delegates, I care who is more capable.
In school, some students who are not top, but they just focuse on taking exams, to get high scores in the exams, they don’t do real things , don’t attend any social activities, they pay attention to every detail on the exam questions, lay out strategy on how not to lose scores on every small questions. But thay are not really capable students.
The exam capability can be improved if you really want to practice, but the real capability is not easy to improve.
That’s the difference between Hillary and Obama.
It’s risky to elect the exam-taker Obama to be the nominee. He should earnestly contribute more to the society, to show his steady achievements for many years, to show his real capability to CHANGE the society, change Illinois state first.

Posted by: golfgirlusa | June 3, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

The Saturday decision by the DNC committee was nothing short of political rape. Obama was not a candidate in Michigan. He voluntarily removed his name. First time in history an non-candidate get the delegates. WOW, such corruption.
McCain will win in November over the socialist/marxist/communist Obama.

Posted by: Maggie | June 3, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

danglibrul
Please learn to think for yourself. It is very refreshing. You like to call people who support Obama names and to call Obama an empty suit. Maybe someone would really care what you had to say if you and others would think for their own and use something orginial. And by the way, according to the rules, Obama is winning. It is very easy to make assumptions about the outcome without understanding that if the rules would have been different Obama would have played the game different and he might have still won, but we will never know. But in this reality, Obama has won. Good-Day.

Posted by: The Unshrub | June 3, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

If you believe that it is true, it does not matter if it is a lie or not.

Posted by: The Commander Guy | June 3, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

So after 17 months and acquiring the most votes Hillary Clinton takes a few days off this week. She has worked hard and this will enable her to proceed with “What is Best for America” plan.
18 million people are solidly behind Hillary.
Statistics do not lie. It is, what it is, she is winning.
Read the statistics. SHHHHHH, the super-delegates had better listen to the people, these are the voters in November. Hillary will beat McCain in November, hands down.

Posted by: Super-Delegate | June 3, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Jay Jay Obama supporters have difficulty with facts.
Go to any website on the electoral vote and it is clear. Obama doesnt win.
He doesnt bring any states into play. Dmes win with Kentucky and West Virginia, Florida, Ohio and one southern state.
Obama has none of these. He can’t win. New Mexico, which I seriously doubt McCain wont win isnt enough.
Also any polls of Viriginai showing a close race aren’t polling service people overseas who vote in Virginia. Virginia is not in play.
Obama does not have the votes or the voting coalition to win. He just doesn’t.
The general isnt a caucus. Blcaks dont make up the majority of voters in any state, women do.
The math is easy. its calle dthe lectoral college and Obama loses.
That’s before the Republican attack machine beginsits assault. It could be a total blow out in McCain’s favour.
Obama is a weak unelectable, inexperienced candidate that does so poorly in debates he haad to stop doing them.
His numbers will only go down in the general and they aren’t high now.
Then again Obama supporters don’t deal in facts or rational thought they deal in vitriole baseless acusations intimidation fraud and delusion.
Nothing has changed with the electoral map in the US. Nothing.

Posted by: s.b. | June 3, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

Nat Turner says”I’m salivating and looking forward to Clinton putting her cynical “emotional” followers in check.
Can’t wait to see the look on their faces when Hillary stands behind Barack Obama. Hmmmm”
IMAGINE WHAT YOUR FACE WILL LOOK LIKE WHEN OBAMA LOSES TO MCCAIN IN NOVEMBER!!.
Hillary supporters will never allow Obama to ruin our nation.
Read the statistics…easy to imagine a victory in November with Hillary beating McCain!

Posted by: WE LOVE AMERICA | June 3, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

I knew from the beginning the Affirmative Action guy was going to get it ahead of Hillary, but the funny thing is, who has the power now, with 17 million voters behind her that Obama is desperate to win?
I don’t remember anyone saying that they’d defect to Bush if Kerry were the nominee and look how that turned out?
Could be millions of us THAT WON’T VOTE OBAMA, EVEN WITH HILLARY ON THE TICKET.
OUCH!

Posted by: Debra | June 3, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Rezko and Obama were bedfellows in the corruption/money laundering scheme. They should be bedfellows in jail. Read the 60 page Pringle report.

Posted by: Marge | June 3, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

NOT SO FAST , THIS RACE IS FAR FROM OVER, NEITHER CANDIDATE WILL RECEIVE THE NOMINATION UNTIL THE DNC CONVENTION IN LATE AUGUST. YOU KNOW THAT. WAIT UNTIL THE NEW TAPES ARE SHOW TOMORROW WITH MICHELLE OBAMA AND FARAKHAAN AND YOU’LL BE EATING CROW FOR BREAKFAST ALONG WITH ALL MEDIA WHO HAVE BEEN IN THE TANK FOR OBAMA. LOL.
Join womenforfairpolitics and sign the petition to encourage Hillary to take it to the convention where she can prevail. No one will be the nominee until late August at the convention where the delegates who are not really “pledged”, they can vote for whomever they wish will vote to nominate the next Pres. candidate for the Dems. Their job is to nominate the most electable candidate for the general election. That candidate is and shall remain Hillary Rodham Clinton. Call them all and demand they support the better candidate, Hillary Clinton. Obama is unelectable.
The failure of the Democratic party to denounce the rampant sexism, racism, classism and voter disenfranchisement practiced by Barack Obama, his campaign and nasty supporters and the entire MEDIA is at their own peril. We will be voting for McCain in November if the Dems foolishly nominate an unqualified and unelectable Obama.
The Democratic party must learn a lesson. We will NOT stand for sexism,classism, racism and voter disenfranchisement. We will not stand for 1/2 vote for Michigan in Florida, 1/2 a person? It calls to mind the old, unacceptable Jim Crow laws when blacks were considered 3/4 a person. THIS 1/2 person/vote rule is even WORSE!
The Democratic party understands two things, money and votes. We have the power to withhold BOTH. DO SO, NOW. Thank you.
BREAKING NEWS WATCH FOR NEW TAPES TOMORROW SHOWING MICHELLE OBAMA AND FARAKHAAN TOGETHER RAILING AGAINST WHITES…..STAY TUNED……THE OBAMA TRAIN IS ABOUT TO DERAIL AGAIN….

Posted by: J | June 3, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

I’m sure she will concede tonight, as Obama has the delegates waiting to announce and he will cross that delegate finish line.
Hillary won’t be offer VP – there’s no trust between the two.
That’s the word from the “insiders”.

Posted by: Lynne | June 3, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

All this BS about one person one vote, popular vote tallies, caucuses vs. primaries…. it’s all pointless. If the Democratic party wants to use popular vote to decide the nomination, then they have to enforce the same rules for all of the contests. Otherwise you disenfranchise the states that used caucuses. The issue here is not to count all the votes, it’s deciding who should not count.

Posted by: LR | June 3, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am

All of you Clinton loosers, you need to get over it and realize Obama won this election fair and square! I understand many of you will vote for McCain, please do…………as if he, by a mircle gets the nomination, next year you will not have internet access because your service will be so high, you will be out trying to fry hamburgers to put gas in your cars. Many of Hillary voters were republicans trying to knock Obama out of the race, but it did not work for them this time. Quite whinning and back the Dems in November or pay $10.00 a gallon for gas to fill the Bush Chenny coffers.

Posted by: SUNMAKER777 | June 3, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

DEBRA…speaking of whores…you are disgracing Hillary by voting for McCain. She hates him worse than Obama.

Posted by: newera | June 3, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

golfgirlusa wrote:

It’s risky to elect the exam-taker Obama to be the nominee. He should earnestly contribute more to the society, to show his steady achievements for many years, to show his real capability to CHANGE the society, change Illinois state first.

You have the right point; I only disagree with you about who is the exam-take here. I believe that the one who stays in politics (Washigton DC) and has good name recognition, he is the exam-taker; and in this case it is Hillary, and not Obama; I am agree he did not have time and experience to prepare himself for this election, than he has a real talent playing politics and achieving his goals.

Posted by: George | June 3, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

As discussed extensively on all the cable news shows last night, the Obama/Clinton ticket is doubtful. The reason? BUBBA…you cannot tell just what he will do or say..he is a time bomb..

Posted by: truthtell | June 3, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

i know anybody with half a brain wont vote for mccain a vote for mcain is insane hey ladies out there who say they will vote for mccain do you have children that are old enough to be drafted if mccain becomes president there is gonna be a draft with 2 wars already a war he wants to continue in iraq and possible war in iran kiss your children GOODBYE thank god my two boys are to young so think ladies think about your children shouldnt they matter to you most even more than hillary

Posted by: angie | June 3, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

DNC and SD meet us at the polls
november 4th.
Family members,relatives,friends
we all vote republican strait
ticket to punish DNC and party leaders.
You can count on it……….

Posted by: Nicholas | June 3, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Mr. Dobbs numbers mean little. There is a large enough gray area that Clinton could be right. The popular vote is certified in FL and MI so it should count and leaving the popular vote in the caucus states out is important, especially since in states that had both caucuses and primaries clinton did very well in primaries – the caucus numbers are skewed.
Additionally, votes in the democratic primaries are in themselves skewed as some votes are worth 1 as in 1 person 1 vote and some are worth less than one. Obama carried inner city urban areas for the most part whose votes are weighted higher than other areas as they are being rewarded for voting Democrat more frequently in the last elections.
I was surprised as a democrat to find this out. According to 1 vote 1 person calculations clinton would win by a long shot.
Personally I hope Arlen Specter carries out his intent and investigates the constitutionality not only of the cutting in half of the MI FL vote value but of the fractional value of votes in the entire primary.
As an american whose family suffered under the Soviet rule and who knows much about rigged elections, it shocked me to find out that the DNP has reduced the value of my vote which is guarateed by the constitution. And this was done without the rank and file’s voice.
This travesty is what all rank and file dem’s should protest against.
I live in a primamrily republican stronghold. Although we were not treated well we voted democrat – tough to do in this area. Only to find out that a city vote counts more.
However, the disdain of the republicans during the last two elections was far more civil than the treatment we received from Obama people when voting for clinton in the primary.

Posted by: cynic465 | June 3, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Obama won his delegates when we knew nothing about him, and people were essentially voting against the Hillary they thought they knew. Once people started learning about Obama, and especially about his closest associates, everyone other than the black community started turning against him. Conversely, once Hillary moved out of the shadow of Bill Clinton, and started to define herself, she gained more and more supporters. Going forward, the prospects are pretty dismal for Obama. The more we know about him the less we like him.
People in this country want to love America the way it is. To hate America is to hate yourself. Many of those in Obama’s closest circle hate America. Obama and his crowd think that we need to change America. What did Father Pfleger, one of Obama’s closest friends say, America is raping people of color over and over again? What did Michelle Obama call America, “mean”? Is this the image of America we want to believe in? I don’t think so. Real Americans will reject this image of America and will reject Obama.
If we cannot have Hillary, then we need to fully support McCain. Nobody questions whether McCain loves this country. Nobody questions his patriotism. This country must have a leader that loves and believes in America, not someone like Obama.

Posted by: David | June 3, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

Hey Angie,
THE DRAFT BILL IS CONTINUOSLY SUBMITTED BY A DEMOCRAT. WE HAVE A DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS SO IF THE DRAFT GETS PASSED IT WILL BE BY DEMOCRATS.

Posted by: cynic465 | June 3, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

Debra…what happened to everyones right to vote??? You mean Hillary hasn’t campaigned to get the prisoners the right to vote for her and send her over? I think she’d get quite a few from her friends…..in lock up

Posted by: newera | June 3, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Hilary Clinton made history by winning a great number of popular votes.We salute her.Barak Obama brought in a lot of young voters .We salute him.John McCain ran a clean campaign,we salute him.
In November ,American’s will make the right choice.We salute all American’s,that love America.America needs to get back in the forefront of breaking into safe alternative energy and move away from fossil fuels that have polluted the atmosphere of this great planet.Time is urgent and there is no time for wishy washy leadership. America must move forward. America must recapture the dream and vision of the pilgrim fathers, knowing that allthings are possible to them that believe. Errol Smythe.

Posted by: Errol Smythe | June 3, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

As Bill Bradley said, “the bigger the lie, the better off the Clintons think they are.”

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | June 3, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Clinton…an adult would put their own personal feelings behind and vote for the good of the country…McCain is a disaster…

Posted by: newera | June 3, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Sweet words….
“Clinton concedes tonite”

Posted by: IslandGirl | June 3, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

@David – I question his patriotism. EADS/Boeing? I wonder how much he got paid to sell out an American company for a French one.

Posted by: LR | June 3, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Well Nat…you can blame a good majority of the mess on Bush and his cronies. They sucked the people dry and are riding off into the sunset wealthy men.

Posted by: newera | June 3, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

AP: “Clinton will concede today”
Another lie, another attempt of voter suppression when the poll numbers are against the Precious One.
Why am I not surprised?
The Chicago Boyz doing their thing…

Posted by: danglibrul | June 3, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

Clinton…Naaa…”H” stand for Having our way…

Posted by: truthtell | June 3, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

As an English major, I’m having trouble again today with all you “loosers” out there. No matter who is being referenced -
Loose is NOT lose.
Loose = unconfined, unbound, free,not tight, relaxed, AND sexually immoral.
Lose = to fail to win
Sheesh, there are kids under 12 who do better than that in spelling.

Posted by: Sara | June 3, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

dang…HRC will never concede…her ego is too big…she has never and will never admit she can or will loose….

Posted by: newvoter | June 3, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

Nat you can put a negative spin on McCain and Cindy all you want. OBAMA IS WRAPPED UP IN BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY WITH WRIGHT/TRINITY/FARRAKHAN even PFLEGER. HATE WHITEY, JEWS, OUR COUNTRY….JUST ISN’T GOING TO FLY WITH MIDDLE AMERICA…THAT GROUP THAT ELECTS A PRESIDENT….NOT THE 14% BLACKS, OR COLLEGE KIDS, OR RADICAL/LIBERALS.

Posted by: Debra | June 3, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Jay jay,
The one who has the big machine behind him is BO.
Hillary had established connections, and helped a lot of people including Pelosi.
But Bill Clinton made enemies because of his leading style. He was the kind of president who had a governing philosophy : he governs in the center. He imposed his style that caused admiration but also angered militants and other leaders in the Party.
As he was successful, the republicans did not want another Clinton (Hillary) because they figure that Bill would be around. So the same with the leaders of the Democratic Party who hate him and who want to put BO instead.
The success BO has in caucuses indicates the support of the partisans (votes were cast mostly by them and in much smaller proportions for much bigger delegates allocation) and that helped him to get momentum.
That became a rallying dynamic which drew more and more delegates out of the closet, some come afterwards.
Hillary who had the support of a number of superdelegates in the beginning started to lose those who switched side.
It became clear that the media helped because they gave her bad coverage.
By the time the negatives came out on him, she started to get more support from people. But this did not give her momentum because the DNC kept pressing her out.
The whole process shows that the chosen nominee is clearly BO.
The machine behind him is the Party, and don’t forget that Hillary’s health care plan is not wanted by the medical lobbies, so deals are worked out left and right to get her out, and with specialists reading to do the jobs on economy issues.
This is very roughly described. It’s far more complex.
In other words, there is a machine inside the Party that has succeeded their coup and the superdelegates who supposedly support Hillary are pressed to support BO.
But yet BO doesn’t have the support of many voters (women, blue-collar workers, working-class etc…)
If the negatives had come out earlier on him, he may not have succeeded like that.
So the argument between his supporters, and her supporters is about the popular votes. But of course , his supporters mention the delegates support, and her supporters mention the big swing states support of voters.
There we are.
The Washington post is a pro-BO paper, according to me. They never say good things about Hillary.
But you are BO supporter, that’s your right.

Posted by: jane | June 3, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

jane…tell your story to all the thousands who attend the rallies for OB…these aren’t caucuses…plus they still kept coming even after Wright and Plhifer issues…Hillary couldn’t do that…

Posted by: newera | June 3, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

The People’s Choice is Clinton. We should not have a winner from The Delegate’s Choice. Obama en rigged.

Posted by: Debra | June 3, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

The problem with the popular vote argument anyway is that it counts a caucus vote in the same way as it counts a primary vote. And then what happens in a state like Texas which has a caucus and a primary. Its not even the same as comparing it to the popular vote in the general election.
The interesting thing now is whether Hillary concedes or just suspends her campaign. My own feeling is that she shoud concede. I don’t see that anything super bad could happen to Obama. I think the Clinton machine would have found it and used it by now. I think Hillary would do herself a lot of credit by stepping aside. Whether or not she wants to be VP may weigh on that decision. If she wants a spot on the ticket she needs concede pretty quickly.

Posted by: markymark | June 3, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

No matter what happens today, just don’t vote for Obama in Nov. Vote for Ron Paul or Nader! If one thinks that all people vote in Demo’s primary will automatically vote for its likely nominee, then one must be dreaming! It’s about the principle, and Obama is not it.

Posted by: Cellisis | June 3, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

While the popular vote metric has given pundits something to write about, it has never been anything of value for the superdelegates to consider since it is a brazenly flawed metric regardless of what lens through which you look at it.
It has done nothing but to drive a wedge into the democratic party. Just another way for which the ardent Clinton supporters can be doped into believing that this election was stolen…WHICH IT WAS NOT!
If anyone wanted to get a true glimpse of how Obama feels about sexism, try reading his first book: Dreams From my Father. In it he describes how he saw sexism first hand by his grandmother being continually shunned in promotions of lesser men in the bank she worked at for over 20 years.
If you wish to get a glimpse of how Obama feels about losing an election, then read “Audacity of Hope”. You can see an excerpt here:
I found it very empathetic.

Posted by: Ted | June 3, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Hey Nat:
I guess that leaves out the majority on these here blogs! LOL.

Posted by: Mark | June 3, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

LOL, Mark!
Thats not your post thats mine!
“In the jungle, The mighty jungle, The Hill CONCEDES tonight!”

Posted by: IslandGirl | June 3, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Well it seems Hillary is not conceding tonight..LOL..I just love this women! I hope she sticks it out thru the convention. I can’t wait to hear and see Mrs. Obama’s speech about “whitey” at the church with Farrekan sitting behind her…OUCH!!

Posted by: Jim | June 3, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

really? Is Real Clear Politics in on her delusion? The WaPo piece was beyond biassed, and so too is this blog entry.

Posted by: cordelia525 | June 3, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

Unfortunately, HRC knew exactly what she was doing continually repeating erroneous facts because most of her supporters, the elderly and the so called working blue collar with high school degrees are not current with the facts nor are they internet surfers for facts so she was trying to deceive them. How do I know, my mom and her friends were ignorant. Being a math major, I politely explained the real facts.

Posted by: JJ | June 3, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Another lie, another attempt of voter suppression when the poll numbers are against the Precious One
——–
REALLY? Today’s Rasmussen 06/03
Obama 46% McCain 46%
Obama 49% Hillary 42%
Unfavorable Opinion
Obama 50% Hillary 52%
Sorry to disappoint you, but it seems like the polls favor Obama over Hillary

Posted by: The answer is.... | June 3, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

No, Hillary has not won ALL VOTES. Count every single Obama win, abroad and nationally and Obama will be on top. Clinton and her cronies only want to not disenfranchise the people when it is to her benefit — Florida and Michigan — but they want to exclude all Obama’s wins everywhere, including all the caucus states he won. As I’ve always said from the beginning, Senator Obama was always the clear winner. He led with the tone of the election, with the slogan, with the fundraising, with the donors, with the speeches, with the policies, with the crowds, with the young people, with the ideas for fundraising. Hillary and all the other candidates who were running followed Obama, right on up to the now John McCain, who has taken Obama’s ‘change’ mantra and is steadily trying to do something with it, but can’t. Mitt Romney even got all his rally cards and everything with the words “change” on them, touting his change, they all did. Even Bill Clinton did a fundraising for Hillary when he called for donors to donate to Hillary’s campaign then come sit down with him and eat popcorn and watch the debate. So I made special note of how Obama has led this train all the way, and he’s still leading. My only prayer now is THAT HE DOES NOT TAKE CLINTON on as his Vice President, OR ANYWHERE IN HIS CABINET! Absolutely not. NO NO NO. Go Obama. Obama ’08!!!

Posted by: RuthieM | June 3, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

I don’t think it’s fair to claim a popular vote victory while giving your opponent zero votes from one of the contests.
The media keep playing her claim over and over without disputing it. That helps people think it’s true.
The DNC should reconsider caucuses for 2012, especially the Texas two-step which I find really bizarre. Although I like caucuses because it’s grassroots politics in action, perhaps they could find a way to get a popular vote count from them.

Posted by: Cindy | June 3, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Nat you can put a negative spin on McCain and Cindy all you want. OBAMA IS WRAPPED UP IN BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY WITH WRIGHT/TRINITY/FARRAKHAN even PFLEGER. HATE WHITEY, JEWS, OUR COUNTRY….JUST ISN’T GOING TO FLY WITH MIDDLE AMERICA…THAT GROUP THAT ELECTS A PRESIDENT….NOT THE 14% BLACKS, OR COLLEGE KIDS, OR RADICAL/LIBERALS.

Posted by: Debra | June 3, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

The washington Post is dead on…. HRC has been misleading from the start of the campaign. She has lost her honor, and she lost the noimination. She only has herself and her poor planning to blame. HRC supporters stop blaming OBAMA, take a look at where he stands on the issues and vote on whats in YOUR best interest. And what’s good for the future of the country.

Posted by: KJ | June 3, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Is Real Clear Politics in on her delusion?
—————-
Real ClearPolitics ALSO shows Obama winning the popular vote.
Unless you’re one of those who says no one in MI would have voted for Obama?
DETROIT? HELLO?

Posted by: The answer is.... | June 3, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Jim…the Michelle “whitey” tape is under lock and key in GOP safe until October.

Posted by: Debra | June 3, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

anyone looking for truth and accuracy should check out Primaries vs. Caucuses Report by P. Cronin. Here are some findings:
Some Findings:
35.6 million people have voted
The 37 primary states account for 97% of the vote.
The 13 caucus states account for 3% of the vote.
Bottom line: Clinton’s lead is from 34.5 million voters (97%) in Primaries. Obama’s lead is from 1.1 million voters (3%) in caucuses.
According to the report: Out of the 50 state elections so far, Clinton has won 20 primaries and Obama has won 17. In comparison, Obama has dominated the Caucus contests by winning 12 of 13, plus the Texas caucus. 42% of his wins are caucus states.
…After 50 election contests to date, Obama leads Clinton by 113 pledged delegates. 97.4% of the difference – 110 delegates – is directly attributable to lopsided victories in caucus contests.
…In the 37 primaries, Hillary Clinton is up 500,000 votes (counting Florida and Michigan and giving Barack Obama 75% of the votes of Michigan’s uncommitted delegates.) This give her a 67 delegate lead in the primaries. In the 13 caucus states, Obama is up 300,000 votes which has resulted in a 205 delegate lead.
Google for the complete report. Jake does not allow a link to the report.

Posted by: countallthevotes | June 3, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Keep it up Nat…you just keep convincing us Hillary supporters to pull the lever for McCain.

Posted by: Debra | June 3, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Hillary supporters will never allow Obama to ruin our nation.
———————–
Only those HRC supporters who live on these websites say that.
My mother is a 66 year old Hillary delegate in Spokane, WA.(It’s a caucus state that Hillary ignores in her “count” ironically.) She knows Republicans blow. And she’s not a part of your militant crusade of spite and sour grapes.
Some of you guys are worse than Patriot fans after the Superbowl.

Posted by: The answer is.... | June 3, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Hillary supporters. Forget about the popular vote. It does not matter. The Democratic leaders have crowned Obama, and that is that. If she led Obama by 3 million votes it would not make any difference. The Democratic leadership hates the Clintons.
You need to get on the McCain bandwagon. If you don’t, and Obama gets elected POTUS, you will not recognize the America you love after Obama and his radical friends are finished with it.

Posted by: David | June 3, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

I wonder what the press will do once they no longer have Hillary to trash all day, every day.

Posted by: Amazed | June 3, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

REZKO IS TALKING
REZKO IS TALKING. NOW WE MAY KNOW WHY HE WAS FORCED TO HELP OBAMA PURCHASE HIS MANSION.
TWO PEAS IN A POD.

Posted by: Marla | June 3, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

Actually Hilary does have the popular vote, even though they gave Obama delagates from MI you can not give him the votes so he got 45% of the delagate in MI but no votes!!
Interesting how the Dems do things, like I really do think you should throw all the dems out and in 2010 put new ones in!!

Posted by: spock | June 3, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

If Clinton cheats at electoral math, she’ll fool you on the economy just like Bush.

Posted by: kravitz | June 3, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

OBAMA GETS:
–House Members: Michigan Rep. Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick*, Massachusetts Rep. John Olver, South Carolina Rep. Clyburn.
–DNC supers: Missouri State Rep. Maria Chappelle-Nadal, Michigan NEA/MEA Boards of Directors member Joyce Lalonde*, Michigan DNC members Debbie Dingell* and Rick Wiener.*
Obama campaign count: 35.5 delegates to go for the nomination.
Today’s Tally: Obama 5, Clinton 0
Posted by: Clinton concedes tonite
========================================
SUPERDELEGATE “endorsements” are not VOTES and CANNOT turn an UNPLEDGED DELEGATE INTO A PLEDGED DELEGATE. SUPERDELEGATES DO NOT MATTER UNTIL THE CONVENTION.
Got it???

Posted by: Yavo Lem | June 3, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

USVET
do you even know who Bob Beckel is…
if you did you would know that he is a professional slanderer…
not kidding…that is what he does and most of the time he makes it up…as is the case here again.
McCain and Clinton now relying on rumors spread by Bob Beckel. lol
You don’t even know who Bob Beckel is… give you a hint…he’s the guy who brings up swift boat lies.
Unfotunately the country is in a much worse situation so he is going to have to back up his lies this time with proof of this crap…which he can’t…he’ll take some video of Michelle obama referencing something someone else is saying and Hillary, McCain and the RNC will dive… into the dust.
Even the media takes the countries future too seriously to let that crap go much further than Hannity …lol

Posted by: dl | June 3, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

geevil
Obama as long as an event like that which Hillary likes to dream hasn’t been injured or worse… Hillary becoming the nominee won’t happen… along primary like this assures that now she probably will never get to be the nominee…
she played a bad hand with this primary.
If something happens to Obama…the party will nominate Gore.
Hillary now has a ceiling around 30%(before this primary she was at about 50% but she has now destroyed even that low ceiling)…that is like GW Bush running … a person with a approval or likability rating that low can’t be elected.
sorry.

Posted by: dl | June 3, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Consider this:
Initial total number of Democratic Delegates
(excluding Florida and Michigan) = 4,048
One half of 4,048 + 1 = 2,025
Superdelegates to vote at convention = -795
Total PLEDGED DELEGATES available
before convention before May 31, 2008 = 3,253
Plus Florida PLEDGED Restored May 31 = +92.5
Plus Michigan PLEDGED Restored May 31 = +64
Total PLEDGED DELEGATES available
Before Convention as of May 31 = 3,409.5
Original number of SUPERDELEGATES = 795
Plus Florida (13) and Michigan (14.5)
Restored SUPER DELEGATES = 27.5
Total SUPERDELEGATES to vote at the
Convention = 822.5
New Total Convention Delegate count
As of May 31, 2008 = 4,232
New “Magic Number” of PLEDGED DELEGATES
TO BECOME NOMINEE = 2,118
Total Obama PLEDGED DELEGATES
As of June 3, 2008 = 1,739 *
*Includes actual and projected PLEDGED
Total Clinton PLEDGED DELEGATES
As of June 3, 2008 = 1,625#
#Includes actual and projected PLEDGED
Obama needs to win before Convention = 379 PLEDGED DELEGATES
Clinton needs to win before Convention = 493 PLEDGED DELEGATES
The above analysis based on numbers from the New York Times of June 3, 2008.
Total number of PLEDGED DELEGATES available in MT AND SD = 31
Latest ARG polls for MT and SD from RealClearPolitics:
Montana – Obama 48% and Clinton 44%
South Dakota – Obama 34% and Clinton 60%
Draw your own conclusion.

Posted by: Yavo Lem | June 3, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

Nat Turner – I think you should look up McCains history again? You are way off!!
He flew for 7 years before he was shot down and taken as a POW and unlike your libs he was given a chance at freedom from the captives but he refused until everyone got out!!
He did not leave his wife until after another 4 years due to both.
Stop with the lies!!
I know all you have is an Anti-American Nominee!! Barrack Hussein Obama!!! the one who wants to bomb our allies and talk with our enemies!!!

Posted by: spock | June 3, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Massachusetts Representative John Olver has endorsed Obama
“I think he gave more of a vision where he wanted to go,” Olver said, in explaining his ultimate decision to back Obama over U.S. Sen. Hillary R. Clinton, D-N.Y. “Hillary was all about competence and experience,” Olver said, but added that he was critical of her vote to allow the U.S. invasion into Iraq and that her experience was largely due to her role as First Lady and not through executive experience.
Ouch(x17mil)!

Posted by: Wake-Up America | June 3, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

The Democratic leaders have crowned Obama, and that is that. If she led Obama by 3 million votes it would not make any difference. The Democratic leadership hates the Clintons.
———————-
You sound like a little kid. The DNC did not decide that Obama would be the nominee.
It was the majority of voters, the majority of states, the majority of super delegates, the majority of pledged delegates.
The delegate system has been around far longer than Hillary’s campaign. So her being in the race had nothing to do with it.
And while some DNC officials may not like the Clintons (don’t you wonder why?), she would have gotten the nomination had she won the primary.
But she simply didn’t win. That’s not a conspiracy, that’s how it is. One person wins, and the others have to lose.

Posted by: The answer is.... | June 3, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

whoever put up the name Bill Clinton comment
shut up.
I’m for Obama and that comment has no place here.

Posted by: dl | June 3, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

SUPERDELEGATE “endorsements” are not VOTES and CANNOT turn an UNPLEDGED DELEGATE INTO A PLEDGED DELEGATE. SUPERDELEGATES DO NOT MATTER UNTIL THE CONVENTION.
Got it???
————————–
We’re moving on to challenge McCain. Obama IS the nominee. Hillary lost. The delegates aren’t going to change their minds just because she says she’s better. She has no grounds to claim victory. Going to the convention will not change that.
Got it????
IF YOU DON’T BELIEVE ME, HOW ABOUT HILLARY:
“It wasn’t until June that my husband won the nomination”
-Hillary Clinton 05/08
It appears Bill won the nomination, according to Hillary’s own words, well before the convention. Or is she just misleading people again?

Posted by: The answer is.... | June 3, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

geevil there is only one candidate that is making the DNC look bad and divisive… the one that did not act like her husbands opponents when they put the issues and the American people ahead of their own candidacy.
Competency means knowing when your candidacy and the fight for it is just wasting your supporters money. or knowing when to get out before your supporters give you money just to pay off your own loan to yuor campaign as you have already stopped campaigning.

Posted by: dl | June 3, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

Popular vote as of June 3, 2008
These figures INCLUDE Florida, Michigan, and Puerto Rico, for both candidates, AND NO CAUCUS “estimate totals” for Iowa, Nevada, Washington and Maine , as they have not been released YET:
Clinton 17,692,976
Obama 17,627,421 (includes “UNCOMMITTED”, which is a mixed vote)
Total Diff. +65,555 (Clinton)
Pct. Diff. +0.2% (Clinton)
Above figures from RealClearPolitics.com
So, why SHOULD Hillary quit NOW? She speaks the truth, she does lead in the Popular Vote.
However, to be very fair, let’s take away BOTH Hillary’s Puerto Rico vote AND Obama’s Puerto Rico and “UNCOMMITTED” vote. Doing that, the new totals are:
Clinton 17,429,856
Obama 17,267,795
Diff. +162,061 (Clinton)
So there you have it, folks. The question is, “Who is leading in the Popular Vote”? Please make your choice.
And then sit back and enjoy an “El Presidente” cerveza fría, courtesy of HRC.

Posted by: Yavo Lem | June 3, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

geevil obama has the majority of pledge delegates… lol he hit that milestone a week ago
anyway
here is a link to a disgusting idea by the swiftboat people
abstinence should i guess be encouraged but we should be teaching our kids about who to protect themselves, and educate them on their bodies.
it is preposterous to claim abstinence is the answer when the kids will be having sex anyway, better to educate then to not.

Posted by: bhrandon | June 3, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

I realize I cannot prevent it, but if even one penny of my contribution to Hillary Clinton is used to elect Obama I will feel betrayed.
I don’t expect to change the minds of Obama’s supporters; what makes you Obama supporters think you can change the minds of those who support Hillary Clinton?
BHO and Hillary are VERY different people with different philosophies. You cannot expect all of us to blindly switch our allegiance from Clinton to Obama just because you and Howard Dean TELL us to.

Posted by: Rhys | June 3, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Melissa Cox was one of the vendors with which Huber had ties. Cox had previously worked for the Medical Institute for Sexual Health, which advocated “curing” gays through “conversion therapy.

Posted by: bhrandon | June 3, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

i hate to tell you this, but hillary has no money, your contribution is going to her to pay off her debts
in fact, more hten likely obama will have to help her raise the money
so dont talk to us about hillary using money to elect obama, that isnt going to happen

Posted by: bhrandon | June 3, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

What’s in the water in D.C.? She sounds as delusional as Bush. They both live in their own little bubble of reality believing their fantasy to be TRUTH. Yikes! Its nice to see that the majority of people have evolved enough not to be sucked into these parallel universes.

Posted by: AC | June 3, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

to bhrandon: I don’t expect to change your mind, but 4 years of a John McCain presidency surely will.

Posted by: rick | June 3, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

I hope they know what they are doing.

Posted by: vanessa | June 3, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

When you post obscenities, the rest of whatever you have to say becomes meaningless.

Posted by: Rhys | June 3, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

RHYS
i agree, and i dont think anyone expects you to just blindly follow,
you have a right to see which candidate you like better, waht upsets me and others is when i hear someone isnt voting for someone because they are bitter… and want to not vote for the person just because their candidate lost.
I know that i am a democrat and i will vote for a democrat 99% of the time..
democrats hold most of my same ideals.
For me i supported clinton at the beginning of this. I didnt like how she went negative, and really liked what i was hearing obama talk about.
I have continued and continue to support him.
If hillary were to win the nomination through super delegates saying, you konw, your right lets go with her..
then i would be upset and i woudl think she stole the election, but in novemeber id vote hillary clinton
so i suggest you make up your own mind, i think you will find obama more then likeable, and i think he has a very good idea on where the country should be headed.

Posted by: bhrandon | June 3, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

To dl: I very seriously hope that the FBI is reading this article “Blog” and traces your post back to your ISP and that they come and drag you in, for what you posted about ‘little boys’. I thought you might have been one of the more reasonable posters, but obviously I was wrong.
I wouldn’t be surprised if, when running, you get hit with a Tazer, too. See you on AMW. You do know how John Walsh feels about people who say things like that, right?

Posted by: Yavo Lem | June 3, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Rick
there is someone posting on here as me, so i dont konw what you read or what you are refering too
are you saying you are voting for mccain? or are you suggesting i am?
i am not voting for mccain, i am voting for the democrat…
end of story.. wake me up when we have a nominee

Posted by: bhrandon | June 3, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Barack Obama effectively clinched the Democratic presidential nomination Tuesday, based on an Associated Press tally of convention delegates, becoming the first black candidate ever to lead his party into a fall campaign for the White House.
Campaigning on an insistent call for change, Obama outlasted former first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton in a historic race that sparked record turnout in primary after primary, yet exposed deep racial divisions within the party.
The AP tally was based on public commitments from delegates as well as more than a dozen private commitments. It also included a minimum number of delegates Obama was guaranteed even if he lost the final two primaries in South Dakota and Montana later in the day.
Finally, we can move on and make small work of McCain!
OBAMA 08

Posted by: Yavo Lem | June 3, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

DNC and SD meet us at the polls
november 4th.
Family members,relatives,friends
WE’RE GOING TO VOTE STRAIT REPUBLICAN to punish DNC and party leaders.
You can count on it……….

Posted by: Nicholas | June 3, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

bhrandon, I don’t think you’re stupid; but we are ALL entitled to our opinions, and I happen to think Obama is TOO far left. The main reason I have supported Hillary Clinton is because I see her as the nearest thing to a moderate currently available.
I’m not sure where McCain stands; he waffles on so many issues, he has only partial support from Republicans.
NO one wants moderation anymore. Everyone wants to “get even” with someone; this year it’s President Bush. Barack Obama is seen as the one who will REALLY get even with Bush AND the American “establishment”.
Today’s politics is only about action and reaction, generously seasoned with revenge.
Consider, if you will, the way some people on this and other forums insult anyone who disagrees with them!

Posted by: Rhys | June 3, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

THIS JUST IN FROM DRUDGE:
OBAMA CLINCHES!
Barack Obama effectively clinched the Democratic presidential nomination Tuesday, based on an Associated Press tally of convention delegates, becoming the first black candidate ever to lead his party into a fall campaign for the White House.
Campaigning on an insistent call for change, Obama outlasted former first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton in a historic race that sparked record turnout in primary after primary, yet exposed deep racial divisions within the party.
The AP tally was based on public commitments from delegates as well as more than a dozen private commitments. It also included a minimum number of delegates Obama was guaranteed even if he lost the final two primaries in South Dakota and Montana later in the day.
Posted by: Nat Turner
========================================
Mr. Turner really Drudged the bottom for this “news”. Mr. Turner, consider the source…

Posted by: Yavo Lem | June 3, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

This is what most Cynical Clinton Supporters don’t understand:
wish I could see the look on your faces when the “Superfighter Annie Oakley” Hillary concedes and stands behind Barack Obama 100% in a couple of weeks.
Not only will she stand with him, but she will give a long, typical Hillary type boring speech on why she’s supporting him, blah, blah blah. All for your personal enjoyment.
Now, won’t that make you look stupid holding your Hillary posters??? Huuuuuuh?

Posted by: Yavo Lemon | June 3, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

The Clintons have always been self-delusional. That is why they don’t know what the truth is….They simply cannot be honest with themselves let alone the American people. I honestly feel sorry for those of you who continue to believe in them….I was one until I was cured this primary season..

Posted by: indy_voter | June 3, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Ask yourselves this question cynical Clinton Sour Grape Groupies: WHAT HAPPENED? Allow me:
Problems at the outset-Assuming she was a lock for POTUS. Never underestimate an opponent. I bet she knows now!
Problems with personnel-Incompetent staff not understanding caucuses. How could you pay Mark Penn 8 mil not to know and understand caucuses?
Problems with execution-Corny speeches; no consistent brand. Changed her campaign theme 8 times!
Problems with the candidate-Blatant lies, resume pumping, boring and fake
Problems in Iowa-Not considering the WHITE VOTE. I’m sure she wished she had have campaigned in Iowa, huh?
Problems with money management- $30+ million in the hole after raising a quarter of a billion? Pathetic. I wouldn’t give her a food stamp to manage from here on out.
Problems with the press-Lying to the press. Did she honestly think they weren’t going to follow up on her fabricated stories? Is she that out of touch?
All of this and you cynics continue to speak out of the side of your heads in jibberish.
Blame Clinton for your woes. It’s clear that she failed you.

Posted by: Yavo Lemon | June 3, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

The popular vote total is the votes cast by individuals in state primaries. Caucus votes don’t count in the popular vote total because they are counted in terms of delegates, not votes, and many states don’t count the number of people attending caucuses. Washington and Texas caucuses (won by Obama) are not included below because these states hold primaries AND caucuses. Caucus state include (Obama won all of them)
• Iowa
• Alaska
• Colorado
• Idaho
• Kansas
• Minnesota
• N Dakota
• Nebraska
• Maine
• Hawaii
• Wyoming
The popular votes being touted by the Clinton Campaign do not take this into account, and are therefore disenfranchising the “real” popular votes from all of these states and does not count the votes cast in the states where Barack Obama won, fair and square, some of them by very wide margins.

Posted by: power2people | June 3, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Yep. I voted in Republican primaries today, June 3rd, for the first time. The Democratic Party has lost me and my wife ( for ever)with their blatant fudging of this Presidential Primary. If it had been run under the same rules as existed in the days of McGovern, Kennedy, Dukakis, etc, she’d have been the nominee months ago. Or if she had been running in the Republican primary,right now, same result. What kind of twisted set of minds can give more net delegates to a candidate for winning a meaningless caucus in Idaho, Utah, etc,than by winning a big swing state by 100,000? This is an election camel designed by a bunch of special interest groups that I no longer wish to be associated with. I hope Hillary runs as a 3rd party candidate; I’d love to see the look on the faces of the DNC as their candidate came in in 3rd place.

Posted by: Marty | June 3, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Whaaa! Whaa ! You guys sound like babies she lost. Knew this 2 months ago. She wasn’t robbed it was fair to the rules she approved.. I don’t think this should be turned into a femminist movement but it probly will…. It’s kinda sad really… Now Mccain is gonna try to court females.. We’ll see if they fall for it. it’ll let me know if I should ever vote for a woman pres..

Posted by: Joe | June 3, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Marty I assume you were a clinton supporter, you don’t want my MT vote to count we’re not important? I thought that was her rally cry. The BS is Purto Rico gets more delegates than MT and SD combined they can’t even vote in the general.

Posted by: joe | June 3, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

thank you poster for the link to women for fair politics-i just signed the petition and i suggest that others do as well. go hillary. and if not, then i can easily settle for john mccain. i like his moderate positions, and i like the fact that he was willing to take a stand against his own party’s racist position on immigration regardless of the fact that racist would rally against him that was courageous this in reference to his often quoted statement that ‘while we need to secure our borders we need to remember that immigrants are children of God’. i like the fact that when john’s own son returning from iraq as the campaign was beginning was not paraded on stage to gain votes from republicans. i like the fact that he and his wife have opened their home to foster children. so for me if and when hillary concedes it will not be as some of you would like to believe (a traumatic event) but rather the obvious next step.

Posted by: sonia trevino | June 3, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

The self appointed political analysts sitting on their tripod thrones of prejudiced opinions continue to nit pick irrelevant issues in the hope that their brand names can alter the impact of the inevitability of the dynamics of change.
What they don’t seem to understand and will find difficult to comprehend is that the polls were wrong more often than they were right because they polled a section of the community and not a cross section of America.
So what else is new?
America wants change.Real change. Not a face lift. Not a gloss over.Not a panel beat job or a surgery operation. No way Hosea. America wants change. Why? Because people know their rights and they know they can vote whoever they want in and vote whoever they want out.The dynamics of change.
So the self appointed political analysts have to fold up their tents,and switch off their Backberries and be out of touch for a while and eat humble pie while they rewrite their scripts of acceptance that reality has won the day and the power of democracy has flexed it’s muscles in the arena of politics and knocked politricks out of the ring with all it’s messy wishy washy tricks of media spin and kitchen sink strategies.
“Yeah man. Right on. Move over old politicks . Step aside. Change is coming through…..”. Errol Smythe.

Posted by: Errol Smythe | June 3, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Sonia, you represent my thoughts and feelings as well. I don’t feel the overwhelming sadness the Obamabats want us to feel, because I will put my energies into McCain’s campaign. They are wonderful Americans and deserving of the WH.
I am hearing buzz about Hillary being offered VP slot, and THAT saddens me, because I could never vote Obama.

Posted by: Debra | June 3, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

McCain is an honorable man and somebody willing to really change Washington lobbyists. If you can’t change washington lobbying, you can’t change anything in washington. Obama can keep talking about change but his reforms won’t help this country. McCain’s will.

Posted by: lois lane | June 3, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Debra: If you know the GOP have a so-called tape, then you must be a very important insider Republican indeed to have that kind of information. Nothing is under lock and key any more in this country which has more leaks than a sieve.
dangliburul: Texas cauces were held after primary voting in the evening. Yes, the Texas Two-Step system is a pain and mostly thanks to Bill Clinton who helped set it up. Worked great for him. You can check the facts on that one. I am nearly 68 years old who went after work and am not the well-off that you are trying to imply.
Also, if voting age college students can be sent off to Iraq to fight and to die, they deserve to vote. What right has Bush or any other leader to tell them we really do not think you are old enough to be voting, but old enough to be cannon fodder! It is the younger age group who are fighting for your freedom while you mock them.

Posted by: KiwiTrici | June 3, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

Where do i get a nice template like yours?

Posted by: GregoryYV | June 13, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Recommend a good adult tracker
where you can download movies via adalt Torrents

Posted by: salma | April 1, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.