A Perfect Way to End McCain’s Week: The LA Times Probes His Divorce
What better way for Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., to end what must have been one of his least enjoyable weeks as a candidate than with a major newspaper combing through his divorce records in a story that not only airs dirty laundry but exposes tensions between the senator and the iconic Reagans?
The story starts with Nancy Reagan offering a terse endorsement of McCain, then explains why there may be tension — their "friendship was strained in the late 1970s by McCain’s decision to divorce his first wife, Carol, who was particularly close to the Reagans, and within weeks marry Cindy Hensley, the young heiress to a lucrative Arizona beer distributorship."
The story also states that McCain has "made several statements about how he divorced Carol and married Hensley that conflict with the public record….
"In a recent interview, McCain said he did not want to revisit the breakup of his marriage. ‘I have a very good relationship with my first wife,’ he said."
In McCain’s 1999 autobiography, "Faith of My Fathers," McCain accepted blame for the collapse of his first marriage and its impact on his friendship with the Reagans.
"My marriage’s collapse was attributable to my own selfishness and immaturity," he wrote. "The blame was entirely mine." He also wrote that his "divorce from Carol, whom the Reagans loved, caused a change in our relationship. Nancy…was particularly upset with me and treated me on the few occasions we encountered each other after I came to Congress with a cool correctness that made her displeasure clear. I had, of course, deserved the change in our relationship."
Defenders of Bill Clinton have long argued that this kind of peek into a politician’s personal lives is nobody’s business. I wonder if they feel that way about McCain’s story as well.
- jpt
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
Who cares. This will probably make more people vote for McCain since over 90 percent of all marriages do end in divorce.
Posted by: john bonehead | July 11, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
ITS ABOUT TIME THE TRUTH ABOUT JOHN MCCAIN IS COMING OUT WAKE UP WOMAN SEE THIS MAN FOR WHAT HE IS NO RESPECT FOR WOMAN OPPOSES EVERYTHING FOR WOMAN EQUAL PAY BIRTH CONTROL ROE V WADE LEFT HIS WIFE AND CHILDREN THE MAN IS A DISGRACE WAKE UP !!!!
Posted by: ANGIE | July 11, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am
If McCain was the Democratic candidate, the Republican attack machine would be calling him adulterous, reckless, impetuous, untrustworthy, lazy (bottom 5 of his Navy class), irresponsible, and generally full of too many character flaws to be president. The Republican attack machine would say that he his full of himself and likes the image of being a maverick, and the concept of honor, more than he has actually displayed it in any area of his life outside of his POW experience.
Posted by: Gene L. | July 11, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
There are plenty of other criticisms to be made of McCain on actual issues that it’s not necessary to go back that many years to a private matter. (Yes, I’m an Obama supporter. No, I’m not interested in using Lee Atwater/Karl Rove tricks and distractions to get him elected.)
I accept that after five years in a prison camp McCain wanted to turn the clock back and re-do those years. He wanted to have fun and be carefree. Carol understands that, John understands that, their children understand that, and it’s no one else’s business.
Posted by: Tom J | July 11, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Tom…he could have been carefree and had fun with the women he chose to marry, who waited 5 years for him…he is a disgrace. I wouldn’t vote for him for dog catcher
Posted by: newvoter | July 11, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
john bonehead – 90% of all marriages end in divorce?
Are you just making up your facts? try 50%
of course I can always make up numbers too.. did you know that 83% of all people who make comments on abcnews.com are above average in looks.
Or that 10% of the 83% mentioned above are really illegal aliens that come to this website to learn American English.
of course there is another 69% of Americans who enjoy visiting adult websites while chewing mentos (the freshmaker candy/gum)
Posted by: mike in TX | July 11, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Funny if he was a Dem he would be called a hero, and it would not even be reported!!
If the dems use this they are hypocrits, but since they are hypocrits they will.
But since it is a personal thing the people will ignore it, at least he did not sit in a pew with a racist minister and wrote about him in his book – White mans greed runs a world!!!
Posted by: spock | July 11, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
about time, Mr. Media Darling, is being vetted. The free ride is over.
Posted by: watching | July 11, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
republican chickens have come home to roast.
Jake failed to mention the best part, mccain took out marriage licence with cindy while STILL married to the first wife.
Mr. Defence of Marriage between a man and a woman is NOT Mr. Defence of Marriage between one man and one woman, apparently it is between one man and two women.
Posted by: johnosahon | July 11, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Of course it’s fair game. After all Newt Gingrich once said if a man’s wife cannot trust him that he cannot be trusted to run the country.
They need to ask John and Cindy if they were having an affair when he was married to his first wife.
If they were married in that short of time it’s obvious they did. Let’s just get either a lie or the truth on record. Why is it all the repubs don’t want to know when it comes to a repub but couldn’t get enough of that stuff on Clinton? Payback’s a be0tch!!
Posted by: Scalliwag | July 11, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Why is your concluding question posed from the GOP point of view? You could have easily asked whether Bill Clinton’s detractors, who argued his sex life was fair game, feel the same way now. Of course, we already know that answer after Livingston, Gingrich, Foley, Vitter, Fosella, Craig, and all the other hypocrites on the right: Pay no attention!
Posted by: Seamus | July 11, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am
I recall reading or hearing recently that McCain’s children by his first wife don’t speak to him. That says it all for me.
Posted by: Caribel | July 11, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
jpt asks: “Defenders of Bill Clinton have long argued that this kind of peek into a politician’s personal lives is nobody’s business. I wonder if they feel that way about McCain’s story as well. ”
====
Another good question is whether Obama supporters would welcome a new look into his drug use or dating habits during the same time period (late 70′s, early 80′s)?
It seems just as relevant.
Posted by: MayBee | July 11, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
MayBee | Jul 11, 2008 11:26:34 AM
just so we are clear, mccain was 44 in 1980, and Obama was 20 years. so we can also go back to when mccain was 20 years and find out all his cheating details must have been worse then.
Posted by: johnosahon | July 11, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Nice points Tom J and yes I am a McCain supporter.
Perhaps no matter what candidate wins reasonable people can get together and work out some issues for the betterment of all.
A good start is when reasonable folks stand up and speak reasonably
Posted by: Tom B | July 11, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am
Maybee says
“I wonder if Obama supporters would take so likely to looking into his drug use or dating habits”
I would say that Obama supporters will scream bloody murder if it is just for the purpose of rehashing something Obama says he was stupid about and quit and learned.
His drug use hurt himself.
McCain’s marriage issue hurt somebody else.
It’s personal…but a mistake that you learned and talk about is one thing.
The Clinton’s had their lives torn apart during the 92 campaign regarding his infadelities…
this is not infidelities (as he claims) but the LEAVING of his wife for a younger, hotter , richer heiress he was chasing.
That’s not good.
having said that yes…I think this is a distraction from an economy that is failing (and not in our minds)
Posted by: dl | July 11, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am
johnosahon — So you think a major article about Obama’s drug use and dating habits would be fair game, just as long as McCain’s antics at 20 are also covered?
Posted by: MayBee | July 11, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am
it matters not, about anything negative about mccain or obama’ personal life,
ANYTHING negative that comes out about obama or mccain cannot make either of them any less qualified to be POTUS than they are right now.
the more mccain or obama opens their mouth without a script, the more we see just what poor choices we have for president.
Posted by: Rk | July 11, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am
McCain had a slim chance before, now he is toast. Let’s see: he’s old, sounds old, looks old, thinks old, act old, no message and no following to think of, and no money to spend. And, he has great advisors (not) like Gramm. It is not if Obama will win, but by how big a margin Obama will win that is the question. Will McCain concede the election before the California poles close or wait until it is 10:00 PM East Coast? How about an Obama 60% of the popular vote? Yeah, sounds about right.
Posted by: Paul X | July 11, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
I am a die-hard Obama supporter AND I firmly believe that such private matters should not be brought into the national dialogue. Let us stick to the issues at hand and not be distracted by such personal trivia.
Posted by: M Marino | July 11, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am
MayBee | Jul 11, 2008 11:40:52 AM
if i have learnt anything from you guys (republicans) is that ANYTHING is fair game, i did not see you guys complaining when you were spreading the muslim lies and going to indonisia to find out if Obama went to a muslim school when he was 5, or if he was a terrorist because of Ayers even though Obama was 5 when Ayers was doing whatever he was doing.
Posted by: johnosahon | July 11, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
I don’t care too much about Mccain’s marriages, but I do think Mccain is just too old to be aware of what our country’s current needs are.
Posted by: Reason | July 11, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
when applying for the most powerful job on earth–you better not have any MAJOR mental flaws—–could be a very bad situation later—-this goes for anyone.
Posted by: rodney | July 11, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
sonia
his ex-wife came out with the interview last week
what are you talkign about?
Posted by: dl | July 11, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
dl- “I would say that Obama supporters will scream bloody murder if it is just for the purpose of rehashing something Obama says he was stupid about and quit and learned.
His drug use hurt himself.”
====
Well, we don’t really know that he only hurt himself unless we explore it, do we?
Come on, let’s not try to justify one story over another. It is all completely irrelevant, and neither side likes to see their guy have stories like this written about him. Unfortunately, both sides seem quite able to justify it when it comes to the other guy, and perhaps even take a little glee from it.
Posted by: MayBee | July 11, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
sonia
his ex-wife came out with the interview sorry two weeks ago or so?
what are you talkign about?
Posted by: dl | July 11, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
and maybee
Obama’s drug use was explored already…questions asked…
I had never heard any of this about McCain…
and anyone will tell you I am a junkie on this election.
no pun intended
Posted by: dl | July 11, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
It was inevitable this would be rehashed. Anything that can be found out about the Obama marriage will be hashed as well. Are there any affairs lurking there? Inquiring minds want to know.
It isn’t right. It is expected. And yes, it’s gross. Let those without sin cast the first stone, etc.
Posted by: len | July 11, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
And yet current Rasmussen and Gallup tracking polls show Obama with only 2 and 3 point leads. Why isn’t he way ahead of McCain like the congressional democrat polls? This won’t be over till the last vote is counted!
Posted by: maryintampa | July 11, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
mccains worst week ever LOL
what a terrible candidate this guy is
Posted by: bhrandon | July 11, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
McCain’s first wife: talk about UNDER THE BUS!!!
Posted by: Snarxon | July 11, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
This stuff is so tawdry. I have enough issues with McCain without adding this to the pile.
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | July 11, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
there is nothing worse than telling lies,as they are the ones you can never trust—mccain was totally irresponsible with his first marriage—and we have the right to hold him responsible for that—to be president the standards should be very high in every respect—-we know the consequenses.
Posted by: rodney | July 11, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
with all the great people in repub party i cannot believe that he is the best they can come up with—or perhaps he is being thrown under the obama train.
Posted by: rodney | July 11, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
dl carol has refused other interviews. in this interview she only refers to the facts.
Posted by: sonia trevino | July 11, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
jfk/mlk/clinton etc… all renowned womanizers. at least mccain married the woman he left for his first wife. and then adopted her children as well.
Posted by: sonia trevino | July 11, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
Now everybody knows why McBushs’ first wife, and children hate him. This is an example of the kind of character and wisdom that we do not need in the White House…..rock on
Posted by: dr1321 | July 11, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
i just think john has a little too much baggage and the closet is openirg wider and wider—and it has not realy started yet. wait until the big guns come out–probably a little closer to election–
Posted by: rodney | July 11, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
People are going to disagree with whether or not McCain’s personal life is of issue. The question should be “whether or not the Media thinks it important”. Clinton’s personal problems would have been a non-issue except for the Media having it on the news every hour on the hour. Considering McCain was a POW, my guess is that they will ignore this also. He has misspoke several times whether mixing up Sunni and Shia and the Packer’s and the Steelers or forgetting his vote that would require birth control pills to be paid by insurance companies, but I’m sure that considering he was a POW, this should be ignored too. It has nothing to do with his age.
Posted by: JL | July 11, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
dl- the article says Carol refused an interview, and the only time she discussed this was with McCain’s biographer.
Nancy Reagan similarly refused to comment to the LA Times.
Is there some other interview you are referring to?
Posted by: MayBee | July 11, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
with all the great people in repub party i cannot believe that he is the best they can come up with—or perhaps he is being thrown under the obama train.
Posted by: rodney
*******************************************
Great point, Rodney. I think so many Republicans want Obama to win that they nominated a sure loser for themselves.
Posted by: Truth Matters | July 11, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Newt Gingrich was so anti Clinton about his affair only to find out he was having one too. Pot calling the kettle black!
Posted by: cissy55 | July 11, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
Sleezy, but almost irrelevant.
There are many other reasons to vote against McCain or stay home on election day if you are Republican or really care about America.
Obama/Biden – don’t be a traitor by voting Republican.
Posted by: billy smith | July 11, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
And yet current Rasmussen and Gallup tracking polls show Obama with only 2 and 3 point leads. Why isn’t he way ahead of McCain like the congressional democrat polls? This won’t be over till the last vote is counted!
Posted by: maryintampa
*******************************************
I’m sure you meant to say the correct number which has Obama leading by 8 points.
And that is in spite of the pummeling he has taken from the corporate media.
Posted by: Truth Matters | July 11, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
i posted approx 1 month ago—that sooner or later you will know the truth–as lies are just that and change from day to day—there are some of us that were around when nam was the issue—and were aware of johns antics–when young i was a lot like him –a little on the wild side—but guess what–some of us grew up and got more concerned with doing what is right–but a few were left behind–not presidental material…this coming from another old geser
Posted by: rodney | July 11, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
i hear the gop are looking to replace mccain and their gonna say its due to mccain because of health reasons yeah they know the gop knows mccain is an embaressement to their party cant wait to see who they find under a rock now
Posted by: angie | July 11, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
I believe the interview was in in june in “the Mail” huffington post reported.
She talks highly of John but also states exactly the quote above and that quote is followed by the acknowledgement that the people that surrounded them during this time believe it was …well, bad.
Posted by: dl | July 11, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
so my mistake she gave the interview to bolster McCain because she was asked to…and then said the “he wanted to be 20 not 46 line”
Posted by: dl | July 11, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
di
that would make him very imature at 46-not to mention irresponsible
Posted by: rodney | July 11, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
and sorry now I am done with this topic it’s gross.
Posted by: dl | July 11, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
di i gotta go, but the point is that a man, any man, who adopts his ex wife’s children and then adopts a female child from bangladesh, speaks volumes to me about his character, and respect for women. bye for now.
Posted by: sonia trevino | July 11, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
And since the 2000 primary, McCain has “Flip/Flopped” on a billion more issues than John Kerry ever did, yet the mainstream media has apparently decided to give him a total pass on all of that…
To the “Liberal Media” (yeah, right!!!!) he’s still the straight-talking “Maverick” he was in 2000. Have you figured out who the corporate controlled mainstream media wants in the White House next?
It shouldn’t be hard!
Posted by: Ewan Mee | July 11, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
i think this kind of story is disgusting. why the hell is this in the la times? looks like it belongs in star.
all that personal information we know about both clintons and now mccain as well, does it really help us? it’s a little salacious and it’s fun to talk about around the water cooler but seriously it’s pretty gross that we are all so interested SO much in the lives of our public officials.
Posted by: rachel | July 11, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
As a big supporter of the Clintons – both President and Senator Clinton – McCain’s personal business is none of ours.
If BO is the nominee, this former Democrat will confidently vote for McCain. He’s principled, experienced and unlike so many other republicans, not sanctimonious. Many of us think he’s great!
Posted by: s. valenti | July 11, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
p.s., I’m pro-choice too.
I won’t be shamed or bullied into voting for an “empty suit”. Our overwhelmingly Democratic congress won’t tolerate radical changes to the Supreme Court or women’s rights.
Come to think about it, a republican or true centrist, like Hillary Clinton, will be the best thing to temper the more radical elements of the Democratic majority. Think about the opportunity for mischief that a Democratic congress emboldened by the (highly unlikely) victory of this leftist, BO.
Posted by: s. valenti | July 11, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Don’t you just love the sock puppet GOP trolls who claim that: “I used to be a Democrat but I am going to vote for McCain”. The GOP folks aren’t the sharper tools in the box.
And now cheating on your wife and disowning your own children for a prettier, richer, younger wife is now labeled principled? Only a GOP hack would make that claim.
Posted by: Phungus Amongus | July 11, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
This happened like thirty years ago and McCain has publicly admitted his fault. He has said that when he came home from North Vietnam he drank too much and acted badly. His first wife says she has no bitterness to him, and he has a good relationship with all his children. So what’s the point of this exercise?
When, oh when will the media give us some substantive reporting instead of this drivel?
Posted by: PatB | July 11, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
John McCain got his marriage license to marry Cindy on March 6, 1980. His divorce from his first wife was not final until April 2, 1980.
Isn’t this the issue?
Posted by: LilyNW | July 11, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
don’t you all see what is happening,
and you have fallen for it.
reread some of the post listed below and see what you are talking about.
no wonder gas is up, and the economy is going into the toilet. and no one is doing anything about it.
you all must be doing pretty well, middle of the day and you are sitting around arguring about mccain’ divorce, and what if obama divorced michelle,.
while you are are carrying on like this.
newsflash,
bozo the clown just threw his wig in the ring, he is running for POTUS.
and immediately, cnn ran a story speculating if his nose is real, and if it is really red.
Posted by: Rk | July 11, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Jake wrote: “Defenders of Bill Clinton have long argued that this kind of peek into a politician’s personal lives is nobody’s business. I wonder if they feel that way about McCain’s story as well.”
The converse is also true. Republicans pushing themselves as the “family values” party have long argued that this is EXACTLY the type of information that reveals the candidate’s “values”.
These are the types of tawdry personal stories that speak to what type of person the candidate is. With Bill Clinton, the stories helped fill-in the narrative of him as a skirt-chasing morally ambiguous person.
I supported Bill Clinton. I don’t argue with that narrative. I also didn’t worry about his womanizing as long as it didn’t effect how he governed to country.
But you can’t have it both ways. It has primarily the REPUBLICAN PARTY that has pushed the narrative that we need to examine these candidates’ personal lives. John McCain’s treatment of his first wife and reported womanizing wouldn’t keep me from voting for him. I have enough reasons to not vote for him BASED ON HIS POLICIES.
However, if you’re the type of voter that believes how the candidate conducts their private life directly influences what type of candidate they are, then you cannot be happy with this type of story, which reflects very poorly on John McCain and strikes many, myself included, as tawdry and ruthless political opportunism.
Sen. McCain might want to remember that the next time he’s pushing himself as the ‘Straight-Talker’ that’s the ‘last honest man in politics’.
Posted by: Steve | July 11, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
To answer your question, this Clinton defender indeed feels McCain’s marital situation is — short of there being domestic abuse or the like, or a history of hypocritical moralizing as other Republicans have engaged in (I don’t recall McCain ever doing it) — should be nobody’s business. HTH.
Posted by: Mister Papercut | July 11, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
I agree,Mccain divorce was decades ago, probably about the same time Obama was doing cocaine,BUT I can’t wait until someone FINALLY vets Obama. Heck lets start with seeing a real birth certificate, with a seal and signature and then go from there.
Posted by: comet | July 11, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
The circumstances of his first marriage speak to the issue of McCain’s character. If we are going to portray him as a hero for being a Pow in Vietnam and defending his country, then you have to wonder about his devotion to his family and raising his children. Who would sacrifice service for thier own family?
His first wife HAS to say she supports him because she has two sons that he adopted, one of whom works for Cindy’s company, and a biological daughter. Would he spurn these children if she said unflattering things? Would he not put them in his will? Do you think Cindy leaves them anything in her will?
Let’s face it – McCain has been an absentee spouse and parent to both wives and he likes it that way. He married both within one year of meeting them. So he knew what he wanted then but got bored. We know he is very ambitious and wants to prove to the world and himself that he is more successful than his Admiral father and grandfather. He himself admitted that in his Navy psychological follow ups to his being released as a POW. He saw that experience as an opportunity to be more famous than his father.
HOW MANY PEOPLE KNOW HE IS FATHER TO 7 CHILDREN? DON’T THINK WE WILL EVER SEE THAT PHOTO OP, DO YOU??????
Posted by: sunshine | July 11, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
sunshine
I am a dem. but who cares if mccain has 7 children or more?
What I do know about mccain, is whatever the number of children he has he can feed, educate, and clothe them.
all I want to know about john mccain is not how many children he has to do a photo op with.
but what he is going to do to help me and mine.
please stop with this bs.
if you all didn’t get so caught up in this mess, and rejected this kind of stuff, and demanded more from the news, you would be able to make an educated decision on who should lead this country for the next four years.
Posted by: Rk | July 11, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
This blog and postings are nothing more than sleaze from Obama supporters.
OIver half of all marriages end in divorce and there may be many reasons for a marriage to end.
Posted by: Mary | July 11, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
McCAIN. THE TRUE FAMILY VALUES CANDIDATE – NOT.
Posted by: rhbate | July 11, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
>>Defenders of Bill Clinton have long argued that this kind of peek into a politician’s personal lives is nobody’s business. I wonder if they feel that way about McCain’s story as well.>>
Actually, yes, I completely do. I don’t agree with John McCain on politics at all, but his divorce is nobody’s business. So it should not be an issue, this is in the past and has nothing to do with what he’d do as president. I know Obama’s opposition researchers have a special talent at digging through divorce records, though! Ask Blair Hull or Jack Ryan.
Posted by: Anna B | July 11, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
“…know the gop knows mccain is an embaressement to their party cant wait to see who they find under a rock now”
_________
….. and I hear that Democrats have a new cartoon by the name of Mickey Mouse which has familiar ears and a large (for a mouse ) head that they’re going to use in ieu of Barky….
Posted by: EGADS! | July 11, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
“John McCain got his marriage license to marry Cindy on March 6, 1980. His divorce from his first wife was not final until April 2, 1980.
Isn’t this the issue?
Posted by: LilyNW | Jul 11, 2008 3:24:00 PM
________________________
THEY’VE BEEN MARRIED MORE THAN A QUARTER OF A CENTURY!!!!
Is this still an issue?????
Posted by: eyes open | July 11, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
There is nothing worse than telling lies, as they are the ones you can never trust–OBAMA has been totally irresponsible with his background vetting and his long list of questionable associates (Ayers, Rezko Sinclair, Rev. Wright, etc.) and we have the right to hold him responsible for that–to be president the standards should be high in every respect–we know the consequences.
(*Part of this statement was borrowed from rodney. Thanks rodney.)
Posted by: Mary | July 11, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
eyes open,
“THEY’VE BEEN MARRIED MORE THAN A QUARTER OF A CENTURY!!!!”
Absolutely! Once a cheat, always a cheat. It is about time the media held McCain accountable for his lack of character and lack of family values.
Obama 08
Posted by: Common Sense | July 12, 2008, 7:02 am 7:02 am
totally predictable. Obama did the same thing in Illinois-twice. Looking into divorce records. remember Ryan? The Rasmussen poll shows a tie. Obama getting worried.
Posted by: geevill | July 12, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
I’m a Democrat, I will not vote for McCain and I am still a Hillary for Pres person, however I don’t believe someones personal marriage issues are any of our business unless he was physically abusive or something toward his wife. Our concern should solely be based on his ability to run the country. Discussing him as a husband is something for morning talk shows and gossip.
Posted by: irma | July 12, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
>>(lack of )COMMON SENSE:
“THEY’VE BEEN MARRIED MORE THAN A QUARTER OF A CENTURY!!!!”
Get over it!
If you’re looking for cheating… check Obama’s elections in Illinois!
Check the legislation passed as “his” which was actually gifted to him by Emil Jones , Illinoisian “King Maker” in return for appropriate recognition and plenty of pork bellies.
THIS IS THE KIND OF CHEATING YOU SHOULD BE WATCHING……
HILLARY OR MCCAIN!
COUNTRY BEFORE BROKEN DOWN DNC PARTY!!
Save the rest for the Enquirer!
Posted by: EYES OPEN.. | July 12, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
“cut it out with the “AGE” thing.
The Dalai Lama was born in 1931.
Should we “diss’ him?
Jesus is older than anyone but “G-D”.
Should we call him on his age and accuse HIM of having senior moments?
Where I work, we have men and women who
are still high ranking leaders in their 80′s.
I know doctors in their 80′s who while not still practicing are providing valuable leadership to national medical groups .
McCain is a worthy,experienced candidate for the office of POTUS!
He is NOT suffering from Alzheimers… and he is NO WORSE without a teleprompter than BOZO!
I like a man of substance.
We NEED a man of substance!
McCain may be plain….but he’s been tried, and HE CAN BE TRUSTED!
HILLARY OR MCCAIN
BUT ALWAYS:
COUNTRY BEFORE BROKEN DOWN DNC PARTY!!!
Posted by: EYES OPEN.. | July 12, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
Tosonia trevino….MCcain left his first wife because she had no money..and married second wife because she had a lot of it….comprende.
Posted by: orange cat | July 13, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am
Hmmmm . . . I may have just changed my mind on this.
McCain voted “Guilty” on Clinton’s impeachment.
Posted by: Teri B. | July 13, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
JOhn McBush’s first marriage is how he will treat the US. This is about judgement the biggest lifetime judgement. GETTING MARRIED. If it does work out that is tough but DON’T LEAVE YOUR WIFE FOR ANOTHER WOMAN. THAT IS JUDGEMENT! JUDGEMENT! This will tank McCain’s campaign he should be very worried about this. As Obama should have been about Jermiah Wright. This will be McCain’s Jermiah Wright. It will hit him in October when he least expect it. There is some real dirt out there. Photos! It’s coming. Trust.
Posted by: His Marriage represents his judgement | July 13, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm