Jul 13, 2008 7:06pm

Do Visits to Iraq Equal Perspective? Obama Says No

ABC News’ Sunlen Miller reports: Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., argued in San Diego today that just because Sen. John McCain has made multiple visits to Iraq, that does not mean that he has the correct perspective on the region.

"John McCain has been in Congress 25 years, no doubt about that. If this is a longevity measure, then John McCain wins," Obama said to reporters. "I’ll recall the visit he made last year in which he was surrounded by helicopters and SWAT teams and came back and reported how safe everything was in Baghdad. You know, I don’t think that that was indicative of what was actually happening on the ground at that time."

Obama is heading to Iraq later this month for what will be only his second visit to the country -– compared to McCain’s eight trips.

In response, McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds says, ""If Barack Obama believes that visiting Iraq and meeting with commanders will not give him any new perspective, then we can only assume he’s going just to smile for the cameras."

Obama shot down the question that the disproportionate number of visits has left him with a lack of knowledge about the region -– citing past positions he’s taken about the Iraq war.

"Before we went into Iraq, I knew the difference between Shia and Sunni. Before we went into Iraq, I said that this is going to be an extraordinarily costly endeavor," Obama said. "Before we went into Iraq, I said that we would be bogged down, that it would cost us billions of dollars and thousands of lives and that it would fan anti-American sentiment and that it would distract us from the war against Afghanistan."

Obama, along with a congressional delegation of Sen. Chuck Hagel and Sen. Jack Reed — both of whom are veterans — will visit the region later this month.

User Comments

Hunn? I am so confused. If it doesnt offer perspective as to what is going on the ground then why is he going? and why did he suggest that he may refine his policy after visiting and talking to the generals? Somebody explain. Or should I wait for Obama to comeback with another statement to clarify this?

Posted by: rachel | July 13, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Rachel – you have to wait for Obama to come back with his “new” take after only a few hours visit. ONLY OBAMA’s perspective counts. Remember just weeks ago he only talked on the telephone with the head man from Iraq because it interfered with his campaign speaking engagement. He knows what is more important.

Posted by: Ann | July 13, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

In the Nevada debate, Obama specifically said that he will get the US out of Iraq by the end of 2009! Just like that, no “refining”, no talking to ground commanders! And now he says he is “refining” his Iraq plan, and that he never changed his mind. So, not only is he ridiculousl inexperienced and seems to have learned his foreign policy from playing the board game “battleship”, but he has the audacity to lie about his Iraq plan! Why won’t the MSM focus on his lies?

Posted by: doublestandard | July 13, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Obama is going to Iraq only because of McCain’s incessant chiding about visiting there. His visit isn’t going to change anything. His views won’t change, the perceptions from those who are already set in their opinions won’t change, and the war will continue.
More importantly, the Bush administration is planning a drawdown of troops in Iraq in September, probably about 50,000. This demonstrates that Obama was right all along, that the troops should be brought home.

Posted by: JRE | July 13, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

ANN I guess I will have to wait cause its so confusing, and JRE I know they say they are planning on withdrawing troops in septemeber but I have bad feeling they may not be coming home just redirected to Afganastan, hope I am wrong.

Posted by: rachel | July 13, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

mccain is cluless and he did lie mccain is a stubborn old man he wont listen to our military on the ground and why because hes prior military pow he is gonna feel he is much more experienced than gen patreus and his stubbornus will only be a disaster not only with iraq but with all countries!!!

Posted by: angie | July 13, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Of course they DO!!
Only a communist would say no!!
Hmmm.

Posted by: Wedge | July 13, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Rachel
You would have to first understand that Obama is a weathervane. He turns with the wind.
He only wants to pander to everybody. He’s wishy-washy that way. Not a real leader or any qualities for one.
There is a very very fitting and true illistration out about him. He is in the White House, his so called wife by his side. He has redecorated. Osama bin laden’s portrait is over the fireplace. In the fireplace is the American Flag. His wife is sporting a, gasp, AR 15 over her shoulder.

Posted by: Thomas T D | July 13, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

Never cease to be amazed.
THIS article is about Obama!! Yet his kool-aid drinkin sheep are here to trash talk McCain.
You want to stick to the subject at hand???

Posted by: Libs have no clue | July 13, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Obama has said in the past that he had considerable “foreign policy” experience because he lived in Indonesia and abroad. But now he’s saying that visits to Iraq don’t count?? I don’t get it.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | July 13, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

“Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., argued in San Diego today that just because Sen. John McCain has made multiple visits to Iraq, that does not mean that he has the correct perspective on the region.”
I’m noticing a ridiculous number of straw-man arguments from the McCain supporters here. Obama’s point was not that Iraq visits don’t count, it’s that McCain’s visits to Iraq have not helped McCain gain any useful, realistic perspective on Iraq.
John McCain has been wrong on Iraq time and time again. Obama has been consistently correct. Those are the facts.

Posted by: BH | July 13, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

The point is 10 trips to Iraq
under the protection of the
Army is not going to give you
10 times the perspective of
another senator who has visited
Iraq only once.
There is so much information
about what is going on in Iraq
on the Internet and other sources
that the number of trips made
to that country under Army
protection are not indicative
of your grasp of what excatly is
the reality on the ground there.
Unless the tour gives you access
to classified information it
doesn’t amount to a whole lot.

Posted by: anon | July 13, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

Its not like either he nor McCain would be in the real Iraq anyway, so how would it give either of them perspective?
They’re likely to just get their asses kissed and so forth….it’s a photo shoot
no matter how you slice it

Posted by: Ro | July 13, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

“A man who believes in everything believes in nothing”.
That statement clearly defines Obama. He believes everything, one day it it this, the next day it is that.
As far as having lived in Indonesia, read his book: he did coke while living there, had a lot of Muslim friends and lived with his radical Muslim step father. His father visited him over a month there (his father had a Muslim burial.). That is what Obama now says is foreign experience?
Obama mentioned being on food stamps in his youth. Well, he and his family traveled to Indonesia, then traveled extensively on “vacation” throughout the United States. His parents were both highly educated. Where did the travel money come from and why with highly educated parents were they on food stamps?
He’s a liar and not fit to be our leader. He’ll say almost anything to get a vote. Don’t be mislead by this man; he has a silver tongue; too many people are spell bounded and fooled by him.

Posted by: love234america | July 13, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

the pertinent word is “correct” perspective isn’t it Jake???. But you don’t want to distinguish that from what Obama said cause you’d miss an opportunity to slam his unjustifiably. The point he’s making is that their visits are so controlled due to security, they may not get a realistic view, and also if you go with a set view, the facts aren’t gonna change your mind. Common sense is what Obama used to correctly call the result of the war in 2001, and he’D never been to Iraq. Wonder how he knew it’d result in untold cost, lives, and cause more hate towards Americans. That is exactly what happened isnt’ it??

Posted by: nanao | July 13, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

Obama has been right about this war in Iraq right from the beginning. His refinement probably involves just what kind of timeline that can be reached that is agreeable with the Iraqis. I heard 3 to 5 years but the Iraqis have also offered for us to leave right away so who knows. I do not see anything that involves lying. Now if you want to talk about flip flopping then all you have to do is look at the McCain record to find the King of the Flip Floppers. His record on vets issues, women issues, mass transit, torture, taxes, immigration, and his involvement with the Keating 5 scandal along with a few other lobbyist incidents where he was found with his fingers in the pie makes him unfit for any office. In fact the man should be in jail. Then there is his morals where he sets such a fine example cheating on his wives and referring to them with such affectionate names like c***. Then there is his or is its Bush’s economic policies that have left our country in such bad shape. Since there are no differences between the Bush/McCain economic policies we can look forward to 4 more years of the same. I like Obama’s position on many issues so he has got my vote.

Posted by: Jake | July 13, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

Go and live in Iraq like an
average Iraqi. Ask people
what life was like before
Bush and his army showed up.
Meet with some of the two million
Iraqis who have been internally
displaced by the war. And millions
of others who are now refugees in
neighboring countries.
That’ll give you some valuable
perspective.

Posted by: anon | July 13, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

and another thing, i recall after Obama DID travel going to Africa, Russia, Israel and Iraq in 2005, 2006-didn’t the media do a study on HOW MUCH MONEY HE COST THE TAXPAYERS TRAVELING. DIDN’T THEY COMPLAIN ABOUT HIM TRAVELLING?? Of course they did, even though he paid his own family’s expense to the Africa they still complained. Now they say he hasn’t travell ed enough. Can’t win with these people.

Posted by: nanao | July 13, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

you know i often get on these blogs and read these post and i question my self how old are these people posting???? sounds like a bunch of inmature people to me

Posted by: angie | July 13, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

Iraqis want Bush and his troops
out completely – if you have been
following the news.
So what’s up with Bush and McCain
on that offer?

Posted by: anon | July 13, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

Funny how the Iraqi and even Bush policies on Iraq seem to be changing to match Obama’s. Seems he was right all along. For people who say liberals are idiots, please explain why you think so. Intelligent debate is good. Mindless name-calling is not.

Posted by: Luke | July 13, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

The best reason for Obama to go to Iraq is to question the commanders there as well as Iraqi officials without being a public spectacle. He may be able to sort out fact from fancy. The level of violence is down. But the cause may be less clear than the American people think.
By questioning them personally he will be able to change the the underlying assumptions upon which conventional wisdom is predicated. The question is will Obamas perspective be changed or maybe will the army leadership have a different perspective if the mission is redefined.

Posted by: Ronnn | July 13, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

“If Barack Obama believes that visiting Iraq and meeting with commanders will not give him any new perspective, then we can only assume he’s going just to smile for the cameras.”
sums it up right there =/

Posted by: randy | July 13, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

is not the senator from Illinois on the the committee for Afghanistan? but has he attended any of the meetings at all?NO No – he has not – strange and creepy

Posted by: viking | July 13, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

McCain wants to stay in Iraq
without an end in sight.
The Iraqi govt has just stated
that he’s not welcome and
should start packing his bags
now.

Posted by: anon | July 13, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

you poor imbeciles. you can keep on doing the same thing over and over again, but if you don’t have judgment and sound mental abilties, as mccain clearly lacks, doing things over and over won’t help.

Posted by: lupercal | July 13, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

From Leon Panetta’s walnut trees to Barack Obama’s nuts; from 9-11 to the price of gasoline at the pump; from illegal immigration to the mortgage meltdown; from the Central Coast to the Gold Coast; from Monterey to Abu Dhabi. Don’t ask why; ask instead why not? It’s all politics American style, so lets get the show on the road: http://theseedsof9-11.com

Posted by: Peggy McGilligan | July 13, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Interesting comments but very little “listening” going on.
Leaders – Listen, consume information then make an informed decision. Obama has the right idea about listening to commanders. True his position may not change but he needs to listen.
If he changes his position people will call him a flip flopper, Why? Because most people have never lead anyone or anything. They mindlessly follow ideology and will follow the leader off the cliff. Sorry folks I guess I’m a true flip flopper, why, because I listened to my non – commissioned officers who gave me good information which allowed me to make the right decision.
Guess we don’t expect that from our politicians.

Posted by: ArmyVet | July 13, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

It’s interesting that McCain is the one who has spent tens of thousands of tax payer dollars on his macho vacations to Iraq, and yet it’s Obama who has foreseen the outcomes right along. One has to wonder what if anything McCain learned at our expense. Awareness, perception, judgment and getting it RIGHT are apparently not accomplished by the mere act of travel because as McCain says, he’s traveled a lot—-but he always gets it wrong. Last month we had to stay a hundred years and this month he’s with Bush that we have to leave. Seems to me that Obama got it right all along. We shouldn’t have gone. The Iraqis want us out. We need to be in Afghanistan. Apparently we can leave, since we are. My granny has a lot of frequent flier miles too John, but she’s not any better than you are at having the judgment needed to lead this country—–well actually, I do think she could do it better!

Posted by: karela | July 13, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

randy quotes “If Barack Obama believes that visiting Iraq and meeting with commanders will not give him any new perspective, then we can only assume he’s going just to smile for the cameras.”
sums it up right there =/

IF Obama believes – but he doesn’t. He anticipates that he will be getting some perspective on Iraq. So he WON’T just smile for the cameras.

Posted by: letsbepeaceful | July 13, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

In an interview on 60 minutes with Steve Kroft Super Tuesday, “And you pull out according to that time table, regardless of the situation? Even if there’s serious sectarian violence?” Kroft asked.
“No, I always reserve as commander in chief, the right to assess the situation,” Obama replied.
McCain in a 2004 interview said that he would have to respect a sovereign government’s wishes if they wanted us out, now he is saying we will that when we think it is safe for us. Tell me now who is the flip flopper. Both of these facts are on the internet, look it up.
McCain is either confused, does not know that much about foreign policy or has a memory problem when people ask him questions and he says the opposite of what he has said before.

Posted by: Frances L | July 13, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

So Obama is planning a trip to Iraq but he doesn’t plan to develop any perspective out of this. Oh, I forgot, he lacks intellectual depth, he is more of a word processor, and somebody else writes the words. We so look forward to President Axelrod and the Obama Puppet!
=======================================
Obama — just messing with you, man!!!!
=======================================

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | July 13, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

The day I see George W McCain driving through Baghdad in a red Cadillac convertible with the top down…not wearing a bulletproof vest and escorted by a hundred troops and ten helicopter gunships…is the day I’ll believe a word he says about Iraq.

Posted by: wilderrr | July 13, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

I lost all respect for McCain when he said Iraq was safe and he then was shown with a flack jacket and body guards surrounding him as he walked the streets of Baghdad. The guy talks about Iraq in his own little fantasy world. It doesn’t matter how many times he goes to Iraq…McCain is going to say whatever that fits his idea of what should be happening in Iraq. He shouldn’t have wasted the tax payers money going over there because he comes back with inaccurate information anyways.

Posted by: I am right | July 13, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

If Senator Obama wants a true perspective of the safety and security in Iraq, allow him to walk dowm a street for a mile or so (with light security people) in his best presidential pin stripped suit. He could greet and talk to both friendly and unfriendly Iraq citizens. Then he might find out what the “natives” know and think. The US military people will always put any situation in the best light in favor of the USA’s side.

Posted by: Merrit | July 13, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Obama is correct. What overall perspective can either candidate learn from a short visit?

Posted by: Dennis | July 13, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

It’s pretty obvious that McSame doesn’t have a clue to what is going on anywhere. If visiting Iraq 8 times makes you some sort of expert on the situation there (aka the McSame machine), then McSame needs to go there about 40 million more times to know half of what Obama knows from his soon to be two visits there.
McSame tries to argue over the dumbest things on his dumb points of view. The only thing this shows is his Bush policies do not match up with Obama’s.

Posted by: Ken | July 13, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

Hunn? I am so confused. If it doesnt offer perspective as to what is going on the ground then why is he going? and why did he suggest that he may refine his policy after visiting and talking to the generals? Somebody explain. Or should I wait for Obama to comeback with another statement to clarify this?
Posted by: rachel | Jul 13, 2008 7:19:04 PM
———-
Rachel – you have to wait for Obama to come back with his “new” take after only a few hours visit. ONLY OBAMA’s perspective counts. Remember just weeks ago he only talked on the telephone with the head man from Iraq because it interfered with his campaign speaking engagement. He knows what is more important.
Posted by: Ann
————–
Rachael and Ann, really, there is no need for your snide remarks. When our politicians visit Iraq and Afghanistan, they are not taken near the fighting zones. They are taken to safe areas where the fighting isn’t taking place. Since they do NOT see the “war activities first hand”, they really do not get a genuine perspective of the war. McCain said things were fine when he visited Iraq and that General Patreaus was able to drive around in his Humvee without protection, when in fact, the general is well protected. A tape of McCain’s visit proved differently, McCain and the General were wearing protective gear, they were accompanied by two SWAT teams and there was a group of helicopters flying overhead. While there was no fighting where they were, those are the areas where suicide bombers can hit unexpectedly. This is what Senator Obama is talking about. The generals there are only allowed to discuss so much with politicians, so they really do not get a good perspective from there either. Is senator Obama going to get a different perspective, maybe, maybe not. I do know one thing, Senator Obama is a very aware and observant of what is going on around him and he does not miss much. Unfortunately, Senator McCain told a BIG Whopper about not needing protection in Bagdad. Doesn’t sound like “straight talking” to me. It really amazes me when you and people like yourselves make these crazy predictions, based on what?? I’ll tell you, your predictions are based on what you THINK is, and not on facts. Millions upon millions of Americans do not share your cynical views.

Posted by: NinaK | July 13, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

Randy said
“is not the senator from Illinois on the the committee for Afghanistan? but has he attended any of the meetings at all?NO No – he has not – strange and creepy”
I just wanted to do a quick fact check for those that believe that Senator Obama is on a Committee on Afghanistan Affairs and has neglected to attend meetings.
First of all, no committee exists in the Senate that only handles the affairs of Afghanistan so that in and of itself is false. Secondly, Senator Obama serves on the Foreign Relations Committee with 18 other senators where Joe Biden is the chairman. If you can find government information on exactly how many committee meetings Obama has been to/missed and compare that to the other members in the group finding that his attendance is significantly less, then some credibility could be granted to the argument that he does not attend meetings regularly enough. Until this person arguing that Senator Obama has been neglectful in his Senatorial duties, such as committee hearing attendance, presents proof of Obama’s missed meetings, and a comparable investigation of Senator McCain’s committee attendance, that argument simply has no merit. One final point to add is that Senator Obama is the chairman of the Subcommittee of European Affairs. Issues with Afghanistan are sometimes lumped together with the affairs of European countries, but it is not the sole concern of the subcommittee.
My point here is that people need to learn facts before asserting false allegations against someone. This goes for supporters of either candidate.

Posted by: Jessica | July 13, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

In the Nevada debate, Obama specifically said that he will get the US out of Iraq by the end of 2009! Just like that, no “refining”, no talking to ground commanders! And now he says he is “refining” his Iraq plan, and that he never changed his mind. So, not only is he ridiculousl inexperienced and seems to have learned his foreign policy from playing the board game “battleship”, but he has the audacity to lie about his Iraq plan! Why won’t the MSM focus on his lies?
Posted by: doublestandard
————————–
NO doublestandard here. Refining his plans means just that: to improve, to make better. There are those of you that are quick to pounce before you do any real thinking, you seem to enjoy attacking Senator Obama. I can just see you and your ilk smirking evilly in you quests for “I gotcha”. Hilliary and Bill are the King and Queen of lies, distortions, fraud, and slander. And I am guessing you really liked and supported them and now you are going to vote for great grandpa McCain? Have fun, you’ll probably be changing his DEPENDS when he is placed in a nursing home in the not too distant future.

Posted by: NinaK | July 13, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

Oh we will be out of Iraq soon…
and before 16 months are over…
the way we screwed up in that mess will
go down in world history…
and now it looks like we could lose two
wars….. READ the NEWS…
Why does Anyone need Fly to Iraq to
check it out? over and over …
stupid X stupid = is still Stupid …

Posted by: Anita Yova | July 13, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

Rachel
You would have to first understand that Obama is a weathervane. He turns with the wind.
He only wants to pander to everybody. He’s wishy-washy that way. Not a real leader or any qualities for one.
There is a very very fitting and true illistration out about him. He is in the White House, his so called wife by his side. He has redecorated. Osama bin laden’s portrait is over the fireplace. In the fireplace is the American Flag. His wife is sporting a, gasp, AR 15 over her shoulder.
Posted by: Thomas T D
———————-
Just what do you mean by “his so-called wife”? Michelle IS Senator Obama’s wife!! Goes to show your stupidity and ignorance in trying to make it look like Michelle is some hidden mistress he will bring to the White House through the back door. Shame on YOU! Your posting in its entirety is sick and indicative of your negative mindset. Lay of the methamphetamine!! It makes you see and think things that are there, you just don’t know it.

Posted by: NinaK | July 13, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

The only perspective either needs is that the soverign nation of Iraq has asked to US to get out. That, and that our goverment has agreed to get out when asked.

Posted by: Dennis | July 14, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

“A man who believes in everything believes in nothing”.
That statement clearly defines Obama. He believes everything, one day it it this, the next day it is that.
As far as having lived in Indonesia, read his book: he did coke while living there, had a lot of Muslim friends and lived with his radical Muslim step father. His father visited him over a month there (his father had a Muslim burial.). That is what Obama now says is foreign experience?
Obama mentioned being on food stamps in his youth. Well, he and his family traveled to Indonesia, then traveled extensively on “vacation” throughout the United States. His parents were both highly educated. Where did the travel money come from and why with highly educated parents were they on food stamps?
He’s a liar and not fit to be our leader. He’ll say almost anything to get a vote. Don’t be mislead by this man; he has a silver tongue; too many people are spell bounded and fooled by him.
Posted by: love234america
————————-
Umm, love234, Senator Obama lived in Hawaii before his mom moved to Indonesia. He went to live with his WHITE grandparents in Hawaii when he was TEN years old. Are you trying to convince the world he was on coke while a child?? You are absolutely full of BS!! Your entire entry is full of lies and slander!! How can you look at yourself in the mirror?? You must really hate yourselft to hate someone else so much. NOONE believes your crapola, it’s all been debunked some months back. You are a broken record no one is listenting to!! I thought I’d remind you.

Posted by: NinaK | July 14, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

Obama has said in the past that he had considerable “foreign policy” experience because he lived in Indonesia and abroad. But now he’s saying that visits to Iraq don’t count?? I don’t get it.
Posted by: hopesprings52
————————
Actually LIVING in a foreign country is entirely different from VISITING a foreign country. In Iraq and Afghanistan you are shown ONLY a sliver of the war, that is not much of a perspective. LIVING in a foreigh country actually gives you the hands-on experience of how the people live, what they eat, their customs and traditions. BIG difference!! Senator Obama LIVED in Indonesia during the most impressionable years of his life. And NO, he was no a Muslim, and NO, he did not attend a madrassa, he attended a regular school. I find it comical how some of you try to paint Senator Obama as fierce boogyman and yet as an empty suit!! Go figure!! lol. FACT: Senator Obama is a much better person, inside and out, than all of you put together! And you know it!!

Posted by: NinaK | July 14, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

“A man who believes in everything believes in nothing”.
That statement clearly defines Obama. He believes everything, one day it it this, the next day it is that.
As far as having lived in Indonesia, read his book: he did coke while living there, had a lot of Muslim friends and lived with his radical Muslim step father. His father visited him over a month there (his father had a Muslim burial.). That is what Obama now says is foreign experience?
Obama mentioned being on food stamps in his youth. Well, he and his family traveled to Indonesia, then traveled extensively on “vacation” throughout the United States. His parents were both highly educated. Where did the travel money come from and why with highly educated parents were they on food stamps?
He’s a liar and not fit to be our leader. He’ll say almost anything to get a vote. Don’t be mislead by this man; he has a silver tongue; too many people are spell bounded and fooled by him.
Posted by: love234america
————————-
And you will say anything to besmirch a good, decent man! You are a slanderer and a liar!!

Posted by: NinaK | July 14, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

NINAK: Read Obama’s damn book “Dreams From My Father”. He ADMITS he was using coke. I did not lie. I have researched him exclusively, read both his books. HE LIVED WITH HIS MUSLIN STEP FATHER IN INDONESIA WHO WAS A RADICAL. READ THE DAMN BOOK. He lived with his white grandparents in Hawaii. His father from Kenya visited with Obama in Indonesia for over a month and they all visited together, Obama, mother, step father, father. READ the book. I am not a liar; it is in Obama’s own words in his book. You are apparently someone who does not read very much and are young and naive and apparent stupid. Get your facts staight by research and reading and not from the itnernet. Your young people are so convinced that what Obama is saying is true he has you brainwashed; you can’t seem to think or do your own research. What the hell is wrong with you? I do not lie; I am older, a Catholic and believe a man’s word is his true character.

Posted by: love234america | July 14, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

NinaK: Look at the current cover of the New Yorker with Obama in Muslim clothes, hiw wife looks like a terrorist with an assult rifle, a U.S. flag is buring in the fireplace in the Oval Office. Obama finally picked out the right clothes and weapon for his wife.

Posted by: love234america | July 14, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

So what about no visits in 900 days?

Posted by: kiki | July 14, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

Well I see the trolls our to bash Obama. Ok folks, elect McCain and see just how much more blood and treasure we will lose. I cannot believe the low information voters. Obama knows more about the Middle east in his little finger than McCain knows after all his visits. Did you see the interview with Obama on CNN. The man is brilliant. But I guess some of you want another 4 years of stupid.

Posted by: Sabreen60 | July 14, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

Now I can figure out how GW Bush became the president of this once great country.Right wing haters and emotional nuts like some of these bloggers voted for him. The the only chance of America becoming great again ahead of China and India is if they elect visionaries like Obama or even Ron Paul. It one guaranteed fact that a voter for McCain is a vote for America’s final demise. If you don’t think so try it.

Posted by: Ik | July 14, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

So Obama is planning a trip to Iraq but he doesn’t plan to develop any perspective out of this. Oh, I forgot, he lacks intellectual depth, he is more of a word processor, and somebody else writes the words. We so look forward to President Axelrod and the Obama Puppet!
=======================================
Obama — just messing with you, man!!!!
=======================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | Jul 13, 2008 10:45:
———–
What? Senator Obama lacks intellectual depth?? My, my, you are one delusional character!!. Senator Obama is a brilliant and intelligent individual, he had the depth of vision to call what would happen if we went to war with Iraq. He was right on the button!! Listen to his 2002 speech!! EVERYTHING he envisioned has, in fact, happened, down to the destruction of our economy. And you say he has NO intellectual depth??? Go back to sleep Rip VanWinkle, obviously you have been sleeping since 2001!! What woke you up??

Posted by: NinaK | July 14, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

Call me old fashioned, but I remember a time when Generals were given orders by the President rather then the President waiting to hear what his Generals were going to do.
I know Petraeus wants to be President – his primer speech at the Republican Convention was proof of that desire. What I suspect is that McCain would like Patraeus to run this country, now.
The oxymoron “Military Intelligence” is lost on Senator McCain – but perhaps that’s the only intelligence he’s ever really understood.
8 trips or 80 trips to Iraq – his absorption of reality will never improve.

Posted by: Wally Hayman | July 14, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

NinaK: Look at the current cover of the New Yorker with Obama in Muslim clothes, hiw wife looks like a terrorist with an assult rifle, a U.S. flag is buring in the fireplace in the Oval Office. Obama finally picked out the right clothes and weapon for his wife.
———
Love234. That proves absolutely nothing that Obama was muslim and that his wife is a terrorist. In fact, thats only a satire and meant to arouse the b*llshit thats being portrayed by the Obama’s in the media. The cover is offensive and a bit racist. But for someone as biased and naive as yourself, I think it would be best to read the article before spewing hateful garbage and lies concerning the Obamas.
I for one believe that Obama is the better of the candidates. His taken a stance that sometimes are popular to many and have taken stances that aren’t popular to other politicians. Like FISA and the Iraq war.
On the otherhand, McCain has done nothing more than flip flop. He has changed his stance on just about every issue dating back to 2000. McCain is no longer that maverick but a full time pander bear that will say anything to get votes.
McCain is not fit to be president. He can’t use a computer or surf the Internet, can’t manage his own personal expenses, has continuously flip flopped on just about every issue, his running for a Bush 3rd term, and his experience as a POW and a war hero doesn’t translate to being a leader of the United States.
Lets not fool ourselves into voting for a Bush clone. Lets get Obama in office and change and heal our nation.

Posted by: Jordan | July 14, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am

–NinaK–Wake up and smell the coffee and the truth. I too have done much research and everyone is getting it right except you. Both candidates have flaws but Obama’s outranked McCain by 10 to l. He is more talk and expensive PR than actual problem solving and experience.
You said Senator Obama is brilliant–so is fool’s gold. Fool’s gold has absolutely no value except to deceive the goldminer.

Posted by: Mai | July 14, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

“So, not only is he ridiculously inexperienced and seems to have learned his foreign policy from playing the board game “battleship…”
Sorry, doublestandard, but I can’t sit back and let you insult the game Battleship like that.

Posted by: ajmalkov | July 14, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

The funniest posts that I keep reading are , since violence is down by more then 90 percent and the surge troops will be all back by the end if this month and another 20 thousand troops probably start leaving in September, to Obama supporters these facts prove ‘Obama was right on Iraq’… WHAT the same Obama who voted three times against funding the surge troops, voted against sending them and said they would make no difference to the violence in Iraq, that Bush and McCain didn’t understand the conflict, that more American troops would actually elevate the violence, that the American presents was what was keeping the violence going and that Iraq was in a civli war and we couldn’t do anything to stop it, …. Ah right, Obama doesn’t have a clue about Iraq , fighting wars or foreign policy, he follows what’s popular at the moment and then pretends he came to these ideas thru thoughtful consideration. 2006 it was popular to believe Iraq was in a civil war that America had lost Iraq to Iran and Al Qaeda and that the best idea was to pull out and leave Iraq and the region to it’s own devices even if it was detriment to the security of America, so Obama championed those beliefs and it was McCain with military and armed service experience who wanted to change the strategy since 2004, with a new strategy ( a strategy he studied at the War college)and more boots to enact it, that America could still defeat Al Qaeda and not hand over Iraq to Iran. That’s a leader someone who sees what should and can be done for a better future and not one that parrots what’s popular at the moment.

Posted by: sam | July 14, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am

NINAK: Read Obama’s damn book “Dreams From My Father”. He ADMITS he was using coke. I did not lie. I have researched him exclusively, read both his books. HE LIVED WITH HIS MUSLIN STEP FATHER IN INDONESIA WHO WAS A RADICAL. READ THE DAMN BOOK. He lived with his white grandparents in Hawaii. His father from Kenya visited with Obama in Indonesia for over a month and they all visited together, Obama, mother, step father, father. READ the book. I am not a liar; it is in Obama’s own words in his book. You are apparently someone who does not read very much and are young and naive and apparent stupid. Get your facts staight by research and reading and not from the itnernet. Your young people are so convinced that what Obama is saying is true he has you brainwashed; you can’t seem to think or do your own research. What the hell is wrong with you? I do not lie; I am older, a Catholic and believe a man’s word is his true character.
Posted by: love234america
————————-
love234
You ARE lying! You are saying that when Barack Obama was in Indonesia, he was on coke. Obama was a child during that time. He left indonesia at age ten(10)!! At that age you are very much a child!! So, yes, I stand by what I said, you ARE a liar because you are NOT telling the truth. You abviously did not pay attention to what you read in his books; what you have apparently done is interpret those books to fit what YOU want them to read. In other words, you obviously went into the books with a negative perspective so you put YOUR own “truths” into the books to fit your expectations. I see you are very good at namecalling! Is this what your church teaches you?? Umm, perhaps you misinterpret what your priest teahes, as well?? |

Posted by: NinaK | July 14, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am

Oh we will be out of Iraq soon…
and before 16 months are over…
the way we screwed up in that mess will
go down in world history…
and now it looks like we could lose two
wars….. READ the NEWS…
Why does Anyone need Fly to Iraq to
check it out? over and over …
stupid X stupid = is still Stupid …
——————
McCain wants to repeat GWB’s policies; but yet, he keeps switching his positions, it’s like playing musical chairs, except that McCain keeps jumping up and sitting on the same chair over and over again. He keeps going back and forth on the same issue, first he’s for it, then he’s not for it, he’s not for it, then he’s for it. Either way, he still remains very tight with the policies of yesteryear, he is afraid to let go of the old, yet changes his stance only to end up bouncing back to the sameo sameo. McCain is NO Maverick and he is no straight talker, no matter how much he says he is..he is obviously suffering from mental self delusions. You know, like mental depression, mental recession, and mental oildrilling prosperty NOW (when actually we will not see a drop of oil for at least seven years. However, McCain did say that oil drilling will have a psychological impact on people. Truth is it is oil drilling trickery.

Posted by: NinaK | July 14, 2008, 2:08 am 2:08 am

Hunn? I am so confused. If it doesnt offer perspective as to what is going on the ground then why is he going? and why did he suggest that he may refine his policy after visiting and talking to the generals? Somebody explain. Or should I wait for Obama to comeback with another statement to clarify this?
——–
It’s easy, really if you think about it for 2 seconds. How you apply knowledge is more important then the knowledge itself. McCain had the info on Iraq but chose to distort the facts to serve his purpose or false perception of Iraq. When Obama goes to Iraq it is in the perspective of listening to the Iraqi government and the troops and determining the best way to get out of the war safely and how to pivot to focus on Afghanistan. Remember the only people who want to stay in Iraq are Bush/McCain republicans. The Iraqi people want Americans out, the Iraqi government wants Americans out, and the majority of Americans want Americans out, yet John McCain is insisting on permanent bases and staying indefinitely. It would seem based that McCains perspective is out of touch despite his many visits to the region.

Posted by: Mike | July 14, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am

NinaK–you have Obama’s purple KooL Aid drippings on your chin and shirt.
Obama did admit using drugs and was not absolute about the time frame. After reading his books, he seemed like a very confused young person to me. Not sure he is not still confused. So many distortions and flip-flops would indicate confusion and lack of maturity.

Posted by: Mary | July 14, 2008, 2:18 am 2:18 am

Only Republicans could believe that spending six long years in Iraq, losing 4,500 dead and 35,000 wounded US troops, and installing a corrupt governement that’s now controlled by Muslim fundamentalists in Iran is a success.
The “surge” is working?
That’s like bragging about how you saved the cat after burning the house down.
No wonder Republicans haven’t won a war since 1898 (Spanish-American War)…they’re as lousy at war as they are at running the economy.

Posted by: wilderrr | July 14, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am

NinaK: Look at the current cover of the New Yorker with Obama in Muslim clothes, hiw wife looks like a terrorist with an assult rifle, a U.S. flag is buring in the fireplace in the Oval Office. Obama finally picked out the right clothes and weapon for his wife.
Posted by: love234america
————————-
Amd YOU believe this? Interesting, Senaator Obama is NOT in the Oval Office YET. That New York coverpage is strictly propaganda!! And you, being th good little Catholic older woman, beleives this propaganda?? There you go again, interpreting something as fact when it is NOT. You are too, too funny! :) :)

Posted by: NinaK | July 14, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am

the point obama is making is that after multiple trips to iraq, mccain still got his shias and sunnis confused. and then mccain misled everyone about how safe Iraq was during his infamous trip to an Iraqi marketplace under heavy protection of our military. but you obamahaters just don’t want to hear what he has to say.

Posted by: idiots | July 14, 2008, 2:40 am 2:40 am

love234 (should be hate234)
As a white, 55 year old catholic woman I suggest you ask God’s forgiveness for the hatred and lies you like to spread about Sen. Obama and his lovely wife. It is obvious that you never read his books. I hope you confess your lies in confession, you should be ashamed of yourself.
BTW, Obama’s step-father was an executive in the oil indusry.
Obama’s father earned a Phd in economics at Harvard and went back to his country, Kenya and became Finance Minister. He fought against corruption and was driven out and died a broken man.
Obama’s father left when he was 2, he only saw his father 1 time at age 11 before his father died.

Posted by: margoharris | July 14, 2008, 2:42 am 2:42 am

Obama doesn’t even feel that it is necessary to be personally speak to the people that are conducting the war, General Petreus in particular, then why would he care about making any visits to Iraq? Apparently all of the information he needs to make big decisions he can get from the New York Times. Seriously, who needs military brass anyways? It’s like his attitude about the war is “Don’t bother me with the facts.”

Posted by: Stan from Milwaukee | July 14, 2008, 4:05 am 4:05 am

Well, Rachel, let me help with your confusion. What did Obama actually say as opposed to what the blogger has to say? He said that McCain’s visits did not seem to offer McCain the perspective of reality…he walked around protected to the teeth and came back and said how safe it was to walk around. He did not say that visiting Iraq offers no prospective–the blogger said that.

Posted by: David | July 14, 2008, 4:52 am 4:52 am

Obama is going to Iraq because he was shamed into it. Before that he had no intention of going.
Obama only knows what his camp tells him, and many times has been wrong about the information.
Obama The day he talked about military, did not know who led a brigade and basic information. He only knew troop counts.
Obama was an anti war activit, who convinced the american people we were just wasting money over there. He was not interested in what was done, being done, even when the Leaders of Iraq said they needed American longer he did not care.
So Obama’s perspective on iraq is some what flawed. He always has been one to pretend he knows something, when he does not. Evident by all his flip-flops on everything.
Obama only cares about himself and used the war as a political ploy and campaign tactic. As he has done with everything else.
Obama is just trying to pull another snow job on the country. Which he will continue to, as long as the fools believe him.

Posted by: seah | July 14, 2008, 6:57 am 6:57 am

Regarding McCain’s “perspective” on Iraq after visiting:
You can Look but not See.
You can Listen but not Hear.
You only grow in wisdom and gain intelligence if you’re willing and able to incorporate everything you’ve seen and heard and then form a policy based on that knowledge.
McCain can’t gain perpective because the box he’s working in won’t allow him to make a decision based on anything that doesn’t fit in that box.
McCain=Bush
Obama refuses to be placed in a box – and by doing so he can adjust his perspective based on what he sees and hears.
Imagine that… a president who’s capable of deciding policy based on the reality of the situation. It’s been a while since we’ve had one of those.
Obama 08!

Posted by: Amy E Gelinas | July 14, 2008, 7:26 am 7:26 am

It’s really funny all these comments about Obama pandering or supposedly flip flopping. It’s clear many don’t read or listen very well. I wasn’t aware “REFINING” was “CHANGING” a position. Matter of face “CHANGE” is a noun correct and means to change something. “REFINE” is a verb if I am not mistaking and means to improve or perfect. So what exactly is so so horrible about that? People want to harp on a couple of things Obama has “CHANGED” positions on but fail to mention that John McCain basically “CHANGED” his his entire campaign I believe simply to “PANDER” to the republican/conservative base that didn’t like him.

Posted by: Fitz | July 14, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am

The war AGAINST Afghanistan?????

Posted by: Matt | July 14, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am

What, exactly, is a Chicago community organizer?

Posted by: Just Curious | July 14, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am

doublestandard~ You are obviously confusing “refine” with “redefine”…and towing the msm line that Barack Obama has changed his stance….Just to clarify-REFINE: To make something more effective, to improve, REDEFINE:define something again: to interpret the meaning of something, especially a word, differently, or give something a new meaning. There is nothing in what Obama says that would sugggest he has in anyway changed his mind on gettting the troops out of Iraq…the 16 mos. is just a goal, that could be refined….if it would be 18 mos, or 24 months….who cares, the fact that the troops will be getting out, instead of staying permanently for ’100 years” like McCain would want, or what is it now..”50 years”…oh yeah now according to McCain its 2013!!! Gee wonder why that is?

Posted by: Leeda | July 14, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

Wow! I just read the funniest viewpoint! McCain is not fit to be President because he “doesn’t use a computer….doesn’t surf the Internet…”. We have arrived, and intelligence is bliss! Pardon me, on the Iraq perspective, Obama will write his thesis on the history of Iraq, give a little speech, then go to Iraq for a few photo ops with the military, maybe even visit some troops. Then he will come back, more photo ops landing back in the US, give a major spiel on what we need to do, then say that is what he has said from the beginning. Can we live on soundbites for the next four years?
He and others were pushing so hard for Hillary to get out ahead of the timetable so that he would have “time to pivot” to prepare for the GE and John McCain. These charades seem to have been going on forever. Will they never end!

Posted by: georgia | July 14, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.