By Jennifer Parker

Jul 17, 2008 6:13pm

Hearing-Gate Exposed! McCain Has Worse Afghanistan Hearing Record Than Obama

ABC News’ Z. Byron Wolf reports from Capitol Hill: The McCain campaign criticism of Sen. Barack Obama’s hearing record on Capitol Hill led us to put the shoe on the other foot.

It turns out that presumptive Republican nominee Sen. John McCain has attended even fewer Afghanistan-related Senate hearings over the past two years than Obama’s one. Which is a nice way of saying, McCain, R-Ariz., the top Republican on the Senate Armed Service Committee, has attended zero of his committee’s six hearings on Afghanistan over the last two years.

Meanwhile, Obama attended the full Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Afghanistan in March 2007, although he used the opportunity to ask Gen. James L. Jones, then the commander of NATO, about Pakistan.

Jones also came before the Senate Armed Services Committee that week. But McCain was a no-show.

The findings are surprising given the fact that the McCain campaign loudly criticized Obama this week for failing to schedule any hearings on Afghanistan in the last year and a half.  Obama chairs the European Affairs Subcommittee of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which has oversight of military operations in Afghanistan.

“As the situation in Afghanistan grows more tense, it is time for us to hold a hearing on the mission there,” Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., a McCain surrogate and ranking member of Obama’s subcommittee wrote in a letter to the Illinois senator. “The success of Afghanistan is critical to the future of NATO and vital to our efforts to defeat Al Qaeda and the Taliban.”

Of the three Afghanistan-related hearings that the Senate Foreign Relations Committee has had over the past 22 months, Obama, the presumptive Democratic candidate, has only attended one.

Meanwhile, DeMint, who most recently attacked Obama over Afghanistan, didn’t attend any. Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware, the Democratic chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, missed one of the Afghanistan hearings too — while he was in the midst of his own presidential campaign.

A review of the Senate Armed Services Committee hearings as listed on the committee Web site for the past two years reveals that McCain’s committee has held six hearings that included the word "Afghanistan" in the title or Central Command — which overseas U.S. troops in Afghanistan.

McCain missed them all.

He missed the hearings with Adm. William Fallon, then the CentCom commander, with authority over Afghanistan, on March 4, 2008, and May 3, 2007.

There was also hearing on June 7, 2007, on the nomination of Gen. Douglas Lute to be the White House war czar with oversight over Afghanistan.

Gen. Jones testified before the Armed Services Committee on Sept. 6, 2007, but that hearing was on Iraq and while McCain showed up late for his opening statement, he was there.

But he missed the hearing on Afghanistan strategy Feb. 14 with representatives from the State Department and Marine Lt. Gen. John Sattler.

He also missed the hearing April, 10, 2008 on the war in Iraq and the "situation in Afghanistan" where Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Joint Chiefs Chairman Michael Mullen both testified.

McCain also missed the Feb. 6, 2008 hearing where the committee considered the fiscal year request for authorizations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

But McCain gets a pass for the most egregious Afghanistan-related hearing we could find. In February, 2006 when Republicans were in charge of Congress, Gen. Jones testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and only two senators — both Republicans — showed up.

Sens. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., and Richard Lugar, R-Ind., were the only senators who spoke at the hearing. No Biden. No Dodd. No Obama. No DeMint, although to be fair he was not on the committee at that time.

The finger pointing about who attended what hearing when seems besides the point anyways.

Both men have been AWOL from their day jobs for most of the past two years while they are running for president.

Update: McCain campaign spokesman Brian Rogers, in a statement to ABC News, argued that McCain’s years of previous foreign policy experience make up for his recent lack of attendance at hearings.

"The point is that Obama claims to be a leader on Afghanistan, but had the power to hold hearings on our NATO operations there and failed to do so," wrote Rogers in an e-mail, although he did not say why McCain missed his own Armed Services Committee hearings over the past two years.

"John McCain has visited Afghanistan four times, spent 22 years in the military, served for years on the Armed Services Committee, and is a recognized international leader on national security policy," he said. "Obama has never visited Afghanistan once before this week and has no other foreign policy or national security experience to speak of. It isn’t even close."

User Comments

Obama was supposed to be chairing a committee on Afghanistan.
He never held a hearing.
McCain from 2001 till he was running for President attended dozens of hearings on Afghanistan.
Obama wasn’t even in the senate then.
Way to expose how liberal you are Jake Tapper.

Posted by: Michael | July 17, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

McCain has gone to nato security conferences every year on afghanistan to talk about the nato relationship with Afghanistan.
Obama has never gone to those conferences Jake Tapper.
Obama has only been to western europe once on a stopover.
This is what happens when the MSM is dominated by east coast liberals who went to liberal schools.
This is what happens when 85 percent of the media are registered as democrats.
The coverage of this election is like we are in Russia.

Posted by: Michael | July 17, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

You don’t mention how Biden went after Obama for never mentioning Afghanistan at any hearing. MSNBC is reporting this.
The big difference is McCain has a record.
McCain went to Nato security conferences every year to talk about the relationship with afghanistan.
McCain attended numerous hearings about afghanistan after 9/11 when Obama was in the senate.
The key is Obama has no experience and didn’t use the oppurtunity to hold a hearing or ask a question about afgnistan in the hearings.
Obama has been to western europe once on a stopover. He never went to nato security conference annually like McCain.

Posted by: Jeff | July 17, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

McCain has visited Pakistan many times.
McCain has visited the tribal areas of Pakistan.
McCain knows the leaders of pakistan.
McCain knows the leaders of Afgnanistan.
Obama has never been to Afgnaistan.
Obama talks how weak Karzai is without ever going there.
Jake Tapper please look at the full record as hard as it is to do because it goes against your political leanings.

Posted by: Sam | July 17, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

As usual, scratch a republican find a hypocrite. Why are republicans always guilty of the same sins they renounce? Hypocrites.

Posted by: JR | July 17, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

McCain lacked judgement and everything he says is a lie. This old man is a big joke. He lies about his veteran records, he lies about voting to desinate iran revolution guard as terrorist, he lies about supportings women pay increase. He lies about everything.

Posted by: D.Johnson | July 17, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Another example of McCain being a 1/4 deep and a mile wide—no depth whatsoever, only attack, attack. Its already become boring. Pelosi say Bush has no new ideas; McCain-Bush same o, same o. Yawn!!!

Posted by: Lou R | July 17, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Can someone name me 1 war that John Mcain directed or was in charge of?? He was in the Sissy Navy and was a POW for 5 years so what?? How does that make you a great president?? Explain it to me like i am a 5 year old…

Posted by: dan p | July 17, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

No birth control for you if John mcain is president. Hey anyone google John Mcains military record. Its been sealed and even some republicans have been saying there is evidence he did collaborate with the enemy. Whats to hide?? Release his records.

Posted by: dan p | July 17, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

McCain’s campaign chose to make hearing attendance a proxy for foreign policy experience, not the media. It’s a bit disingenuous to whine about bias when the media is just using the benchmark McCain coined to measure McCain himself. After the full support and cover the media gave President Bush in selling the Iraq war, I thought claims of a liberal media were dead and buried. Guess much like McCain selling Bush’s economic policy as a great idea for growth, there is a certain audience who ignores facts and reality in favor of a cherished (if absurd) talking point.

Posted by: jhw539 | July 17, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

McCain also has the worst voting record in the Senate. The last time McCain cast a Senate vote was on April 8. I guess he is too old and tired to travel back and forth to DC.

Posted by: HonestAbe | July 17, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

dan p- This election can be won without pandering to Republican muck racking tactics. McCain should be judged on his stated policy and proven record, not whether he “collaborated” under horrific torture suffered while a prisoner of war. Leave the Swift Boating to the Republicans, Obama – and America – has nothing to gain from allowing McCain to shift focus from the important policy differences (I’m not talking the vapid soundbite wars, I’m referring to the detailed and specific policy laid out on Obama’s website).

Posted by: jhw539 | July 17, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Let’s be real on attendance at these hearings. What do you think these wealthy senators (paid by your tax dollar) have as a staff representing the senators at various meetings. Attendance is not the issue, it’s what they believe and support. OOPs, I meant to say what they profess (don’t have to believe, just say what will get votes) and present what the issue of the day is (will change several times).

Posted by: Don | July 17, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Michael Please do your research. Sen Biden the Foreign Relations Committee chairman, held those meetings. Sen Obama’s sub committee overseas NATO.
Sen. Biden said “On the particular issue of NATO’s mission in Afghanistan, we have held three full committee hearings in the last 22 months… At all three of these hearings, we were fortunate enough to have the expert testimony … of former NATO commander and Supreme Allied Commander-Europe, Gen. James R. Jones (USMC, ret.). At my request, Sen. Obama chaired the confirmation hearing for our next ambassador to NATO, which he focused on NATO’s mission in Afghanistan.”

Posted by: try the truth | July 17, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

Oh I didnt know that Bush will be meeting personally with Ahmadinijad?Normally, I wouldnt stand up for a man that i dont think was qualified to be president. But in this case, Bush isnt meeting them. Obama in three debates pretty directly answered he would personally meet with conditions. I think Bush is really stealing from hillary since she would do what Bush appears to be doing..i dont know who i am going to vote for since I need some experince with all the crap that is coming..I may not agree with some McCain ideals but i know that he loves this country and has shown it! Country before party!

Posted by: linchristi | July 17, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

Bush and McCain ignored Afghanistan all the while Obama was arguing for more troops and resources. The clueless warmongers Bush/McCain kept insisting on focusing on Iraq which, of course, had nothing to do with the attacks on 9/11. Now they have changed their tune as violence has peaked in Afghanistan and are now admitting Obama was right all along.

Posted by: HonestAbe | July 17, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

linchristi – Are you saying Sen McCain loves his country because he was a POW? That is preparation for office, how? While he did serve his country, that is not a pre curser to being a good POTUS! You need to know when to be diplomatic. Have not learned from the shoot first get correct intelligence later that in not the way to go? It’s obvious that your HRC supporter. Bush is not stealing from her, he’s stealing from Sen Obama. If you remember they tried skewering him about meeting with out conditions.

Posted by: try the truth | July 17, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

McCain is all over the place on his new and revised Afghanistan policy. First McCain countered Obama’s original proposal to put 2 more brigades in Afghanistan by saying he’ll put 3 more and that those brigades would be coming from Iraq. Then realizing there aren’t 3 brigades available from Iraq, McCain said they would come from NATO, but then later a spokesman said McCain thinks it could be a mixture of U.S. and NATO troops. So what is McCain’s plan now?? What a confused lunatic McCain has become. I cannot imagine anyone voting for this guy.

Posted by: HonestAbe | July 17, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

Who needs a stinkin’ committee? McCain gets his own “facts.” He goes to Baghdad, is surrounded by hundreds of our soldiers and protected by BlackHawk helicopters overhead, and then comes away from that experience saying, “everything is GREAT. everything is NORMAL.”

Posted by: American Patriot | July 17, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

Jeff, right. You must be joking. The NATO conference? That’s called an excuse to fly Cindy’s plane to Europe for a week. Really. How pathetic a defense.

Posted by: American Patriot | July 17, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Sam, if what you say is true about all Johnny McBush’s travels to Pakistan/Afghanistan, why has McCain IGNORED Afghanistan the past 2 years while the situation has been getting worse? If he was there, it’s even WORSE that he had to have Obama point out to him the other day that we need more brigades to FINALLY catch the guy who attacked us on 9/11. Remember him you Bush boot-licker?

Posted by: Reality Check | July 17, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

Comparing apples to organges cannot make the case in comparing Obama to McCain. Two different Committees, and different people on the committees. Of course, “to be fair”, DeMint was not on the committee at the time. Imagine that? Obama was on the main committee, and is/was chair of the subcommittee looking into more NATO troops for Afghanistan. Biden can help cover his behind if he wants, but the real truth is that Obama is all about speeches and little substance or work. McCain has been on the leadership process for success in Iraq and Afghanistan for some time. The Armed Services Committee has another mission, even though you say Afghanistan was mentioned. In what meaningful comparisons? Your comparisons are skewed apples to oranges. McCain has worked hard, he is experienced, and he knows and understands the big issues.
By calling it a hearing-gate, you hope to make it so. It certainly is not.

Posted by: georgia | July 17, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

More confusion in the already confused McConfused camp.
McCain should really quit

Posted by: Facts | July 17, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

What happened to McWar?

Posted by: Facts | July 17, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Every single one of the McCain excuse-makers on this page: get real. I don’t have a problem with McCain skipping these hearings per se; they’re dog-and-pony shows. But for him to make one of his campaign’s MAJOR talking points this week the utterly LAME charge when he’s even MORE guilty of missing them? There’s one word: HYPOCRITE. Before you throw stones Johnny, check if you’re in a glass house. And if you are, check if Cindy has paid the taxes since she apparently likes to skip that if the California homes are any indication.

Posted by: REality Check | July 17, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

Another breathtaking attempt by the msm to save Obama’s butt. This piece is a pathetic attempt to try to neutralize Obama’s no-show, even on issues he now champions. Obama was in the Senate 2 years before running for president. He has since championed the need to put more emphasis on Afghanistan. But he held no subcommittee hearings on it even though he was chairman, and only showed up once when it came up before the main committee. I will vote for Obama, but this is really a shameless attempt to shill for Obama. Be fair!!

Posted by: hopesprings52 | July 17, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

A quote about what Obama spoke about at the Afghanistan hearing (the one he attended and McCain didn’t): “… although he used the opportunity to ask [the General] about Pakistan.” The “although” seems to imply that this is a bad thing? Does anybody remember 9/11? We are in Afghanistan because the al Qaeda members who attacked us lived there. Because Bush ignored the war there and focused on Iraq, they slipped into Pakistan. Sounds to me like this is perfectly logical. And by the way, the committee oversees troops in Afghanistan, it doesn’t “oversea” them. Who the hell wrote this garbage?

Posted by: Bob Scofield | July 17, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

Why don’t you ask McCain or McCain’s campaign to respond? I’m sure they would. This is a red herring, because I’m sure you would have defended Obama with either he’s response, or by using this very attack piece vice asking either of them to respond. People know where John McCain stands…people know his expertise on this issue. He most certainly has dealt with Afghanistan in committee and in various forums many times over the last two years. He’s not like Obama, wagering to escape Iraq in 16 months and retreat to Afghanistan while wishing to meet with Iraq’s President in the first year of his own Presidency. Ridiculously!

Posted by: Patrick | July 17, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

1) mccain’s chicken has come home to roast
2) those who live in glass houses should NOT throw stones.
3) the hunter has become the hunted.
feel FREE to add your own.

Posted by: johnosahon | July 17, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

1) mccain’s chicken has come home to roast
2) those who live in glass houses should NOT throw stones.
3) the hunter has become the hunted.
feel FREE to add your own.

Posted by: johnosahon | July 17, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

The wingnuts are in full spin mode tonight. McCain flip-flops on sending more troops to Afghanistan. Obama has been saying this for months. Obama has been saying that we need to go into Northern Pakistan if needed. A few weeks later, Bush bombs northern Pakistan.
These wingnuts can’t even get their facts right. Just read the first few posts. They’re mad at Jake Tapper and the didn’t even post this.
I love the smell of desparation in the morning!

Posted by: KenM | July 17, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

What else would you expect from McRove’s campaign? Throwing stones from a glass house is par for the course. McRove attacked Kerry’s valor when he never saw combat himself. You can’t trust him.

Posted by: Snarxon | July 17, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

trythetruth….HRC spoke about Afghanistan during the debates in OH. She brought up the issue. Now Obama is following her lead.OK by me.I’ve left my bag of bitterness at the station and I’m now on the Obama train. Let’s quit bashing Hillary and persuade the rest of her supporters to roll McCain out of the way.

Posted by: Bea | July 17, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Obama was right about Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan – complete opposite from Bush and McCain but yet they have the better judgement? I think not. We need a President who actually does have good judgement. Not another blustering idiot who doesn’t know Sunni from Shia. America has been embarrassed long enough.
Obama ’08

Posted by: Liz in Texas | July 17, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Listen this Community organizer has not done a damn thing in his life. He is a empty suit trying to get by with speaches that promise the moon but really are a bunch of bull. We cannot afford nor do we need this phony

Posted by: John A | July 17, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

And by the way, the committee oversees troops in Afghanistan, it doesn’t “oversea” them. Who the hell wrote this garbage?
Posted by: Bob Scofield
Laughing so hard I almost forget that Jesse told me today it is okay to call Obama a nig***.

Posted by: bullyforhim | July 17, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

Ok…You Obama supporters…why don’t you OWN your crappy candidate, rather than spout off the same ol same ol about McCain.
So…let’s have a list of Obama’s foreign policy experience and what makes him more knowledgable on these matters. I will be checking back. It seems when his supporters are called out, they have nothing to say.
Oh…except…Obama is all about change…hope…a new kind of politics. Funny how you guys don’t spout off that nonsense anymore. It is just about attacking…making fun of McCain’s age. Fight the Smears!!

Posted by: Raleigh Voter | July 17, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

McCain has been looking more and more tired and defeated on the campaign trail lately. Today he appeared annoyed and disinterested about commments by one of his aides that Obama’s upcoming trip to Europe and Iraq is just a big campaign tour. Kind of a dumb thing to say especially since McCain has been complaining about Obama not having gone to Iraq in such a long time.

Posted by: HonestAbe | July 17, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

McCain is so old that he cant remember that Czechoslovakia doesn’t exist, he’s said its name as if it existed like 5 times. This brings very serious concerns about his ability to be commander in chief. He was wrong about how he thought Iraq would be easy cheese, he was wrong about the invasion, he flip flopped on Taxes, immigration, and everything else.
Most of all, he is a Bush republican, who agrees with him on everything. A republican surrogate on CNN recently couldn’t come up with one difference he has with Bush on the economy. Folks, America’s economy and survival is at stake in this election, and that’s why our media is starting to be a little more fair in their coverage.

Posted by: John | July 17, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

If Americans look into McCain’s background, no doubt about his patriot.
McCain-08

Posted by: Alex | July 17, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

McCain has been for and against so many things we don’t know what he’s about. The longer he campaigns the more often he changes. Will the real McCain please stand up.

Posted by: Liz in Texas | July 17, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

Raleigh Voter:
Well, one really good argument is that your candidate is “crappier” than my candidate.
We are not looking for someone with a “laundry list” of inside the beltway experience. Many of us Obama supporters think that is precisely the problem with Washington. Obama has a new approach to solving problems — reach across the aisle, compromise where appropriate, involve the American people more, remove the impact of lobbyists and special interests as much as possible, and make the process open and transparent. Obama has good judgement, good character, good vision, is inspiring and is very smart. That’s what we need in the next POTUS.

Posted by: HonestAbe | July 17, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

McCain’s patriotism is not at issue. The issue is would he be a good POTUS and I think he would be embarrassingly equal to Bush. Another bully who thinks he knows everything…who refuses to listen, learn and study. And most importantly, his judgement and temperment is highly questionable.

Posted by: Liz in Texas | July 17, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

LIZ
even mccain does not know what he is about–it is called senile.

Posted by: rodney | July 17, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

McCain being a patriot, war hero and POW does not make him qualified to be President. McCain has some serious character flaws and judgement issues and his advanced age that cause many to have concern about his ability to be an effective President. Plus his connections to lobbyists and to Bush also are problematic. Bottom line: McCain is an awful candidate.

Posted by: HonestAbe | July 17, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

If John McCain thinks foreign policy experience is so important, let’s look at which candidate he supported in 2000. He supported George W. Bush, who had only travelled outside the U.S. twice in his life and had ZERO foreign policy experience. ZERO.
Clearly, McCain is putting politics above all else and is willing to say anything to get elected.
Barack Obama has a degree in foreign relations and can run cirlcles around John McCain on any foreign policy topic. Watch his interview with Fareed Zakaria from this past Sunday.

Posted by: BH | July 17, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

honest
mccain was never very good at anything—-i take the hero crap with a grain of salt—–some of the idiots i come in contact with are now trying to tell me he had steel rods drove thru hin and was hung up on the wall—it justs gets better and better—-however i have been around nearly as long as he has–and aware of the bullcrap—-he certainly is not very intelligent and that is a fact.

Posted by: rodney | July 17, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

John McCain is just not that smart. He and his pal W suffer from the same affliction.

Posted by: BILL | July 17, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

McCain ranks (1) in missing over 62.6% votes in the 110th Congress. Side note: McCain missed the GI Bill vote, which he opposed, and then had the nerve to try and take some credit for it along with Bush actually giving him credit. Why any veteran would vote for this guy baffles me.

Posted by: Liz in Texas | July 17, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

HonestAbe said “McCain being a patriot, war hero and POW does not make him qualified to be President”
I agreed with you that a patriot war hero does not make him/her to be President. How do you think a person who associated with “God damn America” group in 20 years? Does he qualify to be the USA President?
Give me a break.

Posted by: Alex | July 17, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

FACT: McCain currently has the worst attendance record in the senate.

Posted by: Spiderwick | July 17, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

mccain has NOT been in the senate for years, he did not vote for the GI bill, FISA bill, medicare bill the list goes on, yet he has the nerve to attack obama for being missing when he has not shown up in the senate since he started running for office
HYPOCRITE.
it is not his fault though, the press has been allowing him to do this crap, attacking obama and leaving him alone to talk about his “straight-talk-express-plane” he probably thought they would not talk about this too.
can’t blame him for trying.

Posted by: johnosahon | July 17, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

When Republicans can’t argue real issues they resort to Rev. Wright. I could go through a litany of characters McCain has been and is associated with. Rev. Wright is a passionate pastor who is from another age and another time. A time when Blacks were beaten, jailed, firehosed, bitten by dogs, lynched, refused service, forced to drink from different fountains. I could go on and on. Because he holds some cynical views based on his experiences does not make him a bad person. You’re judging him on one minute of a passionate sermon where he was quoting what U.S. diplomat Ambassador Edward Peck had said on Fox News.

Posted by: Liz in Texas | July 17, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

JAMES WE COULD JUST CALL HIM the old goat

Posted by: rodney | July 17, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Michael
way to expose how off you are…
Obama was the head of a subcommittee whose larger committtee was having hearings on the issue… that is what the chair keeps telling you…6 larger full meetings on the issue… demint didn’t attend the NATO meeting that he criticized obama on.
It’s not Jake that is exposed it is your ignorance of the committees.

Posted by: dl | July 17, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

LewisLake…Sen. Obama has been to Iraq, in 2006.

Posted by: Liz in Texas | July 17, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

Alex: Obama said he never heard those ugliest of remarks by Rev Wright. I believe him. I am sure the right wing wackos have been trying desperately to tie Obama to attending one of Wright’s worst sermons but apparently they have not been able to or it would have been all over the news. The Wright issue is dead.

Posted by: HonestAbe | July 17, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

Obama is currently supported by a huge 300-person foreign policy adviser bureaucracy, organized like a mini State Department. NYT has an article about it tonight. That is how Obama with limited foreign policy experience can be totally up to speed on every single issue. I am sure that is how he will run the WH as well and even more so. This guy is brilliant and knows exactly what he is doing and is running rings around McCain just as he did Hillary.

Posted by: HonestAbe | July 17, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

Clarification: He said he was “NOT” there for that particular sermon

Posted by: Liz in Texas | July 17, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

Obama has Wright, McBush has Hagel who said:
1) hitler was sent by god to kill the jews
2) gays were the cause of katrina
3) catholics are whores.
so if you want to go there let’s do this thing.

Posted by: johnosahon | July 17, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

now slick willy wants to get on board for obama—–he wants to do obama in like he did hillary—–chase him with a stick

Posted by: rodney | July 17, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

HonestAbe,
You make me remember about former President Clinton said he smoked marijuana but he did not inhale. I don’t think about race. I wish Mr. Collin Powell will run for White House in the future.

Posted by: Alex | July 17, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

New Nevada Rasmussen poll has Obama up by 2:
McCain 45, Obama 47 Obama +2.0
Not statisticlly significant but politically significant in that McCain should be leading this traditinally red state. What is wrong with McCain?

Posted by: HonestAbe | July 17, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

Obama was supposed to be chairing a committee on Afghanistan.
He never held a hearing.
McCain from 2001 till he was running for President attended dozens of hearings on Afghanistan.
Obama wasn’t even in the senate then.
Way to expose how liberal you are Jake Tapper.
Posted by: Michael | Jul 17, 2008 6:31:38 PM
*********************************
Um…fellas. Jake Tapper here. I didn’t write the above, Z. Byron Wolf did.
The blog I wrote on the matter is here:
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/07/thanks-for-noth.html
******************************************
WELL MICHAEL, THERE GOES YOUR CREDIBILITY,
….NEXT PERSON IN LINE…..
Posted by: Jake Tapper | Jul 17, 2008 6:49:18 PM

Posted by: spacerook1 | July 17, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

It seems it is not only Mcain who is going senile, his all campaign is suffuring from memory loss. Alzeimer is in the house.

Posted by: Helen | July 17, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

If Americans look into McCain’s background, no doubt about his patriot.
McCain-08
Posted by: Alex | Jul 17, 2008 9:45:58 PM
*******************************
NOBODY IS QUESTIONING THIS. WHAT THEY
ARE REALLY WONDERING IS IF HE ONE OF THE
ORIGINAL PATRIOTS

Posted by: spacerook1 | July 17, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

The moment the spotlight is turned around on McCain the right-wingers come out defending a no-show attendence record. If Obama parted his hair different it’s on the 24/7 news cycle!!
Here’s something of actual relevance that gets reported and the right-wingers are up in arms!!

Posted by: Jennifer | July 17, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

McCain doesn’t seem to check his facts before he goes on the attack – the sign of a desperate campaign. He did the same type of attack a couple of weeks ago over a Supreme Court ruling that he said would be typical of an Obama appointed court. Three of the majority of 5 justices on that ruling were appointed by Reagan, Ford and Geo H.W. Bush. Senator McCain should consider hiring a fact checker or at least learn how to use a search engine.

Posted by: SickofGOPcorruption | July 17, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

danp wrote: “…John McCains military record. Its been sealed and even some republicans have been saying there is evidence he did collaborate with the enemy. Whats to hide?? Release his records.
——————–
I’m voting for Obama but this is a despicable post. The only GOP people who said McCain collaborated were the same Bush backers who paid people to slander Kerry’s record as well. Bush’s who operation smells and so does that post. McCain talked under torture and gave them the names of the other pilots in his squad: the names of the Green Bay Packers O-line. And if he did give anything up under torture, it obviously had not effect on things.

Posted by: Mickey | July 18, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

mickey, what’s good for kerry, is good for mccain.

Posted by: johnosahon | July 18, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

John McCain is a phony, and a hypocrite, and a fool, because it was John McCain who supported the Iraq war in the first place! A war which John McCain could have opposed, which he should have been able to see like many other did, was a BIG MISTAKE, but instead John McCain stupidly supported the invading of Iraq!!
AND the fact is that even BEFORE the Iraq war even started, Obama was saying that we should NOT invade, and that invading Iraq would be a huge mistake, that it would distract us from the war in Afghnaistan against AlQueada, and the Taliban, the people who are responsible for 9/11.
The fact is JOHN MCCAIN has NEVER ever been focused on Afghanistan, and JOHN McCAIN has NEVER recognized that more soldiers were needed in Afghnaistan. And even when everyone was being told by Top Military Commanders that the number of soldiers dying in Afghanistan was because of a SHORTAGE of the number of soldiers on the ground in Afghnaistan, and that more soldiers were needed, EVEN THEN, John McCain DID NOT want to respond to the need by realizing that soldiers needed to be sent from Afghnaistan to Iraq.
John McCain has been obsessed with Iraq, it is like he CAN NOT think of more than one thing at a time, and that is just pathetic! We cannot have a president who cannot deal with more than one issue at a time, and John McCain has shown OVER, AND OVER that he has NO plans for getting out of Iraq, (even when MONTHS, AND MONTHS AGO, Top Military said that because of the amount of soldiers we now have in Iraq, we have a SHORTAGE of soldiers to send to Afghanistan, and that, this is resulting in Afghanistan starting to descend into chaos, EVEN THEN, John McCain still had no plans for Afghanistan.
Until, yesterday BOTH George Bush and John McCain have been ignoring the Afghanistan war, and ignoring our soldiers there, and that has resulted in it descending into choas, and disaster.
SO John McCain’s argument that he the foreign policy experience is TOTAL BULLSH*T, because of every decision he has made including supporting invading Iraq, and NOT recognizing that instead of invading Iraq our focus should have been on Afghanistan, and the Taliban, and AlQueada, who are the people who are responsible for 9/11. Add to that, John McCain has a TOTAL LACK of any plan at all to get out of Iraq, (even after we have already been in Iraq for 5 years), and because of this we DO NOT have enough soldiers to fight the Taliban, and AlQueada in Afghnanistan.

Posted by: shiela | July 18, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

If you had lived in a Communist country, you would see the US presidential election today just like the election in the Communist country. Damn if you do and damn if you don’t

Posted by: crookedpolitician | July 18, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

The article is accurate. Period. As far as “experience” is concerned, Sydney is exactly like Bush. Low moral standing and lower intellect, 4th from the bottom of a 850 man class. Obama first in his, with a degree in Constitutional Law.
Sydney made over 30 anti America propaganda films. Thats not leadership we can believe in.

Posted by: SydneyMcFlipflop | July 18, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am

Wow! What a hypocrite!

Posted by: sue | July 18, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

Both candidates seem to get all twisted up when it comes tacking these serious yet tricky subjects. At this time both seem quite incompetent to be President of the US. America is in a precarious position with now incompetent, bungling, confused and hop skipping candidates.

Posted by: dsubbaiah | July 18, 2008, 3:03 am 3:03 am

Nothing surprising. The McCain campaign is an identical clone of the Bush team. They will lie, cheat, and steal to get to the White House. Victory at all costs. That’s why they are trying to lie their way out of the last 8 years of hell w/ the war and economy. Obama is the only one with a vision to end the conflict in Iraq, get our troops home, and start spending the money (or saving) at home instead of abroad.

Posted by: David | July 18, 2008, 3:07 am 3:07 am

When McCain tries ti dis Obama by bringing up his record on meetings of a committee they both sit on then it’s fine to check McCain’s record also. They made it an issue and now they get their just desserts.
People who are dumb enough to start something like this that easily falls back in their own lap are people you want running the country? Not me!!!

Posted by: dk | July 18, 2008, 3:12 am 3:12 am

I don’t understand how Mccain has worked in the senate for 26 years and doesn’t understand economics. What was Mccain doing in the senate for 26 years?
Thats why my bet is on Obama because I found out that Mccain doesn’t know much on a range of issues. When I hear about Mccain if its not Iraq or attacking Obama its usually another gaffe or flip flop. Obama 08

Posted by: Susan | July 18, 2008, 5:25 am 5:25 am

Who cares? McCain told the NYT that he doesn’t even know how to log onto the Internet! C’mon now, the President should know the basics. Life is a constant education process and if McCain is so uninquisitive that he has never sought to learn how to use a computer, that tells me enough about his personality. That is just unacceptable. He’s not right for the job.

Posted by: Erik | July 18, 2008, 5:29 am 5:29 am

McCain is always making some sort of mistake. Do we really want another president that always seems to get important matters wrong? I think McCain always makes giant mistakes while campaigning then McCain will always make giant mistakes as president. Just like someone else we all know.
McCain = Bush!

Posted by: Jan | July 18, 2008, 5:42 am 5:42 am

To the genous of saying McCain knows the leader of Pakistan and friends.
Parvez Mushareef became President of Pakinstan on a military coup d’eta, to the people who don’t know that that is, is that Mushareef became President on a military overthrow of the government. He was not elected. (maybe some McCain supporter would like that in the US).
The second this is that since 2001, we have given Pakistan $10 Billion a year to fight Taliban and Al-Quada, but he has done nothing and stood by. His own people hate him, and consider him a military dictator.
So to the McBush supportors, maybe you would want military dictator as president of the United States, b/c that is who McCain surrounds himself with.

Posted by: Tony | July 18, 2008, 6:02 am 6:02 am

Maybe I’m missing something, but when people tout all of McCain’s experience on how to handle military decisions and Afghanistan and having served in the Senate for so long, WHY ARE THINGS SO SCREWED UP OVER THERE? Where was John McCain yelling at the top of his lungs years ago we are making a mistake in all these foreign policy disasters.
He’s part of the problem believing that the title of The United States was enough to get all other nations and civilians to fall in line. Maybe he watches too many of those 50′s and 60′s movies that show how non-white foreigners love serving Americans.

Posted by: bazokbros | July 18, 2008, 6:27 am 6:27 am

No doubt senator McCain has more experience than Senator Obama. He is old.
But experience is not the same as judgement. Senator McCain has been worng about the most important strategic issue of our lifetimes.
President Bush has infinite more experience than both candidates.. Does that mean we should prefer him to be President?

Posted by: AJS | July 18, 2008, 6:41 am 6:41 am

Obama chairs the European Affairs Subcommittee of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which has oversight of military operations in Afghanistan.
And he went to one of the six hearings.
Sens. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., and Richard Lugar, R-Ind., were the only senators who spoke at the hearing. No Biden. No Dodd. No Obama. No DeMint

Posted by: waggdogg | July 18, 2008, 7:15 am 7:15 am

AJS – You learn judgement from experience. Obama has no experience.

Posted by: RegisteredDemocrat | July 18, 2008, 7:27 am 7:27 am

I think this is worth repeating, McFraud “has attended zero of his committee’s six hearings on Afghanistan over the last two years.”

Posted by: Drew Hoffman | July 18, 2008, 8:18 am 8:18 am

Great…neither candidate is informed on Afghanistan or worse yet, cares enough to show up for hearings on it!
Voters, you’ve given us another great choice of candidates.

Posted by: lp | July 18, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am

People please! I don’t care one bit that John McCain served this country…that DOES NOT MAKE HIM PRESIDENTIAL MATERIAL! He’s an old loser with plenty of money and could CARE LESS about you and me. Believe me, his policies will hurt us not help. He and Carle Fiorina (HP) are just fine with the outsourcing of our jobs, he’ll hurt womens rights (he’s ok with telling rape jokes about women), he’ll give big oil huge tax breaks and will most certainly get us into WAR WITH IRAN with all his threat rhetoric. PLEASE PEOPLE GET OVER THIS PATRIOTIC CRAP…it’s not a reason to vote for someone! If you don’t GET THAT then LORD HELP YOU.

Posted by: Kim of Arizona | July 18, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

All you people talking about how much experience McCain has voted for Bush over Gore, right?
That’s what I thought. It’s not experience that matters, it’s that he’s got an R next to his name.

Posted by: Evil | July 18, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Bottom line is no corporation in America would give Barak Obama the time of day if he applied to be an officer of thier company. He is a community organizer. Why in the world do we think he is remotely qualified to be President? He does not have the resume to lead. Get real and get real soon. th eonly chioce we have is to vote for MCCain and let Hilary win in 2012. Barak will destroy this country.

Posted by: RegisteredDemocrat | July 18, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

You folks can’t be that ignorant. The article is about hypocrisy. It simply shows that McCain is the ultimate Washington political insider that says whatever, whenever to distract from the truth. Wisen up folks. Don’t be drinking the purple kool aid again. You did it for the last eight years and now look where we are as a Nation. It’s embarassing. Our brave men and women of the military deserve one hell of a lot more than what they have gotten over the last eight years.

Posted by: CMSgt Preston | July 18, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

To whoever mentioned the fact that the liberal news media support of the war is justification that the liberal news media was/is dead:
The staunchest supporters of war in the past have been Liberal Democrats, from Wilson and WWI to Roosevelt and WWII all the way through Kennedy and his bogus handling of our situation in the Cuban Missile Crisis and escalation of the Vietnam War. War is a way for the government to stick its nose into private enterprise and have justification to control the economy. If you look back to the congressional voting records, we were overwelmingly approved by both republicans and democrats to start the war, regardless of what people currently believe.
Global Warming is another “war” that is wholly supported by Democrats as a way to bash republican (and classically liberal ideals upheld by our founders)support of free enterprise and the government staying out of private affairs.

Posted by: Brandon | July 18, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

People who live in glass houses should not be throwing rocks!
The Rovian “attack first” never think strategy is outdated. The Republican playbook is empty as are many of their candidates.

Posted by: Lou R | July 18, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

“Hearings” that are just opportunities for Dems to attack the military.

Posted by: Neo Politicus | July 18, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

Evil, you make a huge assumption that because many of us are supporting McCain that we also voted for Bush. Wrong, both times! We voted for Gore, then for Kerry. Now we support the Republican candidate in 2008, because we believe that he has the knowledge, the experience, and the wisdom to lead, qualities your candidate is lacking. We always do try to choose the most knowledgeable, experienced and wisest candidate.
McCain ’08

Posted by: georgia | July 18, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

Wow, y’all, Musharraf is still President-by-coup in Pakistan, but he is now just a figurehead, for a few months now. As much as Musharraf tried to subvert the elections, firing court justices (sound familiar?), Pakistan’s newly-elected anti-Musharraf Parliament selected Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani, who spent more than four years in jail under Mr. Musharraf’s rule. In Pakistan, the President is a figurehead, when it has successful elections, the Prime Minister is the boss. Musharraf’s only claim-to-fame was hurling our tax dollars by the millions at his army to keep them loyal, when many of them had, under his orders, supported Al Qaeda – and guess what? Some of them still support Bin Laden, only now armed with U.S. weapons.

Posted by: VCubed | July 19, 2008, 4:36 am 4:36 am

Oh, I must give Musharraf his due – he survived more assassination attempts than I’ve ever seen any leader avoid.

Posted by: VCubed | July 19, 2008, 4:39 am 4:39 am

Most of the comments above are like little children saying “my dad can beat up your dad” Both presidential contenders will say or do what ever they can to be president. One is no better then the other because they are both in the pocket of the wealth elite. End the cycle and vote 3rd party.

Posted by: Brad54 | July 19, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

It doesn’t surprise me. McCain doesn’t even work on weekends. He can’t. I don’t think he has the energy.
As for people answering this article with Obama’s record…I’m done with even listening to anything negative about Barack Obama. He already has my vote. He’s clearly the best man for the job. I will not vote for another George Bush, which is exactly what I’d be doing if I voted McCain. Why in the world would we want to vote for another republican who voted the same way Bush did 95% of the time. I can’t even find identical twins who think that much alike. If McCain is in the White House, we will go down even faster. I’d rather vote for change. I don’t want to be on the same direction. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. I’m voting Obama!

Posted by: Vegas | July 19, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

And you know what? I don’t care how many times McCain has been overseas. What has his visiting these other countries done? It hasn’t done anything. It hasn’t changed anything. I don’t care about his airline miles or his passport stamps. He’s been to Afghanistan. OK. What’s changed? Gas is still high. Banks have failed. People are losing homes. Food’s going up. It’s a bunch of political bs. I don’t care about his stupid record. His record hasn’t done anything to change America. He’s just an old guy who has visited lots of places and he comes home like the rest of us to the same old situation. No thanks.
Obama 08!!!!!!!

Posted by: Vegas | July 19, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

It’s sad to see McCain resort to the same divisive campaign strategies that have lead to a lack of intelligent debate, but to see him shoot himself in the foot like this…tsk tsk tsk. What saddens me more is the ignorance that some people display in trying to defend him. What does it feel like to abandon reason for the sake of defending a flawed ideal? People really need to stop getting all their news from Fox.

Posted by: zer0ne | July 20, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Right – McCain has all this supposed “experience”. It’s just that Obama is smarter and ummm, right…

Posted by: Janet | July 20, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Oh and by the way, did you know that McCain was a POW (yes that equals President)

Posted by: Janet | July 20, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

Yes Die-hard McCain supporters. I’ll say this for you when you support you support all the way and blindly too.
And No POW is not equal to being president. In fact in McCain’s case for this reason alone you should not be president. His experiences have made him biased to starting up a good war, any war as long as there is a war going on somewhere. Give me a gun, let me shoot someone. Create me a war. Yes!!

Posted by: Terri | July 21, 2008, 4:32 am 4:32 am

I was a Taxi Driver so that qualifys me to drive in NASCAR and Formula 1, right?

Posted by: Taxi Driver | July 21, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Honest Abe Wrote:
New Nevada Rasmussen poll has Obama up by 2:
McCain 45, Obama 47 Obama +2.0
Not statisticlly significant but politically significant in that McCain should be leading this traditinally red state. What is wrong with McCain?
Abe there is Nothing Wrong with
McCain It is the Dishonest and Corrupt
Liberal News Media You Should be Looking
at!
Pew, Quinnipiac, PPD, ABC, NBC, CBS,
The New York Times etc Almost Never
Show the Republican Candidate For
President Ahead Until Election Day!
Then When They Are Proven Wrong and The
Republican Wins They Claim There Was a
Last Minute Shift By the Undecideds!
Remember The “Exit Polls” On Election
Day 2004 Supposedly Indicated That
John Kerry Was Going To Be Elected
President!
The Only Poll That Counts is On Election
Day!

Posted by: reaganfan | July 21, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

Z. Byron Wolf, Good catch on McBush not even bothering to attend Senate Armed Services Committee meetings re: Afghanistan, and like anyone is surprised. But you made an understandable spelling error: the Senate Armed Services Committee does not oversea US troops in Afghanistan; it oversees them.

Posted by: Aibi | July 27, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

How could it be possible that Sen. McCain has missed those hearings for two solid years?
Surely a Republican wouldn’t engage in such hypocrisy.

Posted by: kevinbgoode | July 27, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

ahhh willfull ignorance never helps anyone. here is is a story in black and white and people still want to decalre McKeatingFive strong on the issue of the war…intresting

Posted by: Nia | July 30, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

In my experience, the first thing to go when one becomes weak in the mind–is GOOD JUDGEMENT. The next thing is short term memory. We cannot afford another weak minded person at the helm of our ship of state. With all his faults, I’ll bet on the young, vigorous Obama with no reservations!

Posted by: Lily | August 24, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Thanks, Mr. Tapper.
Thanks for the detailed investigation of this spurious and duplicitous attack.
Overall, McCain has missed about 65% of the votes in the Senate, the highest of any Senator. He is the Do-Nothingest Member of the Do-Nothing Congress. Congratulations, John.
Obama is a distant third, with 45% missed. You’d think he’d have missed more than McCain since the Democratic primary lasted so much longer than the GOPers’. Then again, maybe Barack simply has a bit more energy than McCain. Fewer doctors’ appointments too. It shouldn’t matter though. President Bush has shown that it doesn’t really matter how many days the President actually works. He spends half his time on the ranch and look how well he’s done!
As for “experience”, Obama has been an astute observer of international affairs for years and has traveled widely both as a Senator and before. George Bush has more “experience” of the type McCain likes to cite than either candidate, so it’s safe to say the amount of time one has spent “hanging around the shop” should not be the chief consideration. If so why not bring Rummy back? No, even McCain knows it must also be paired with judgment. Judgment as in sensing you are being sold a bill of goods on Iraq and opposing it when many, including the Clintons, saw it as political suicide to do so. Judgment as in calling for a shift back to Afghanistan two years ago, when McCain and Bush were telling us it was “out of the news” because “we’re winning”. Well, we’re not winning, and now even Bush supports Barack’s suggestion. McCain fell for Bush’s lies on Iraq hook, line and sinker. Hell, McCain made up half of them himself. McCain’s been minding the store during the most precipitous plunge in America’s standing among the world of nation in over a hundred years. McCain needs to own his part in that failure, such as his support for the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden as allies against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan, an entirely Republican project involving every major figure in the GOP, from Reagan to Bush to Cheney and McCain to Fox News’ Oliver North. As a New Yorker who saw the planes hit the Towers with my own eyes, I thank you, Republicans, for helping these folks get a leg up in the terrorism business.
Not to worry though, everyone.
John McCain is learning how to use a computer.
Barack, you’ve been warned!

Posted by: Don | September 9, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

SERIOUSLY
So if McCain has so much foreign affairs experience, why then did he vote with Bush all the time?
To me that means that the guy is dumb, and after all the experience he’s got, he couldn’t come up with real solutions. What’s good about that type of judgment? You have all the experience in the world, but you suck at using it.
The war is a total failure and to believe that there could be winners is total ignorance.

Posted by: Gabo | September 27, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am

don’t feed the trolls guys. McCain is a LIAR. We all know it.
The point is — don’t throw stones when you live in 8 glass houses.

Posted by: dotheresearch | September 27, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

well i think Obama should win becase it is time for a change and McCain like he said clearly is like another bush and do we need another bush look how things are turninig out now we dont need that any more we need a change and dats what i think personally

Posted by: laqwesha smith | October 28, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.