Jul 7, 2008 10:11pm

McCain Rips Obama’s ‘Pay or Play’ Health Plan

ABC News’ Teddy Davis, Bret Hovell, and Gregory Wallace report: Republican John McCain launched a new line of attack against Barack Obama today, portraying the Democrat’s health-care plan as an unaffordable job-killer.

"Small businesses are the job engine of America, and I will make it easier for them to grow and create more jobs," McCain said. "My opponent wants to make it harder by imposing a ‘pay or play’ health mandate on small business."

McCain refers to Obama’s plan as "pay or play" because employers would either have to "play" by making an unspecified "meaningful contribution" to the cost of their employees’ health coverage or else they would be forced to "pay" a "percentage of payroll" toward the costs of a national plan.

While unveiling his "Jobs for America" economic plan in Denver, McCain charged that Obama’s health plan would add "$12,000 to the cost of employing anyone with a family."

"That means new jobs will not be created," McCain said. "It means existing employees will have their wages cut to pay for this mandate."

The $12,000 figure cited by McCain is the current average annual cost of a family health insurance policy.

While the "pay or play" attack identifies a basic feature of his rival’s health-care plan, the Arizona senator is omitting key details about Obama’s plan to mitigate costs on struggling small businesses.

"This is a real distortion of reality," Obama health-care adviser Stuart Altman, who is also the dean of Brandeis University’s Heller School for Social Policy and Management, told ABC News. The employer’s contribution is "never going to be 100 percent of $12,000."

Obama’s plan includes an exemption for small businesses that meet unspecified "revenue thresholds." He proposes reimbursing employers for catastrophic health-care costs to lower the premiums faced by individuals. In addition, Obama would consider less than 100 percent to be a "meaningful contribution."

"It could be 50 percent. It could be 60 percent," Altman said. "It varies depending on how the Obama people set the percentage up."

Businesses with low revenues would contribute to the cost of their workers’ health care on a "sliding scale" with some fully exempt.

Obama spokesman Nick Shapiro said the candidate will leave it to the legislative process to define what constitutes a "meaningful contribution" from employers, as well as the scope of the small business exemption and the threshold at which government picks up catastrophic expenses.

"Those are all details that will be worked out with Congress," Shapiro said.

Altman said requiring employers to make a contribution toward their workers’ health-care costs is always "controversial" with those who don’t currently "pay for it and don’t want to pay for it."

"You have a number of companies that essentially are freeloading off of those that are covered," Altman said. "The Obama plan is an attempt to level the playing field. Not to create an undue tax. … Just because you’re small doesn’t mean you’re not profitable."

User Comments

Under McCains plan the total health care costs would be transferred to the individual. While he promises a tax credit, how many of you pay 12,000/year in taxes?
His plan again is to pay for health care for those who have at the expense of those who have not. Redistribution of what little wealth wealth we have into the hands of those who have. Government services for those most in need, the wealthy.

Posted by: Thinking | July 7, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

The news organizations are basically lazy. McCain says Obama changed his opinion. A halfway competent organization could have looked up the hours and hours of video they have on Obama to see if his position has changed. That would reek of effort.

Posted by: remarks | July 7, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Will…
Losing supporters left and right? Hmmm,that is exactly why Senator Obama is ever increasing his margin over my senior Senator…who cannot even maintain his base of support in his/my own state.

Posted by: rps1023 | July 7, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

McCain’s health care plan would give everyone a $2500 tax credit (or a check if they are too poor to pay income taxes) for the purchase of health insurance. A family would get $5000. He says that the problem starts with overly costly health care. he says that we need to slash these costs, to make room to cover those who have no health care. He would prioritize efforts to cut smoking and encourage healthy habits and would also focus on reducing health costs by efficiency and productivity. Then he would reinvest those savings in expanded care.

Posted by: Will | July 7, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

What’s unspecified? Sounds like Obama doesn’t want to be nailed down on the issues before the election as usual. It’s not unspecified; otherwise businesses would have a huge loophole not to pay much at all. Rather, complicated language allows for business to pay a percentage, or more, if they wish.

Posted by: Patrick | July 7, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

“While he promises a tax credit, how many of you pay 12,000/year in taxes?” Right on!!! Having paid well over $50K in taxes last year, I think that it is more than time for reason. Those people who want it need to actually go out and earn it for themselves. Those who earn it certainly didn’t work as hard as they have to give more and more to people they don’t know who continue to insist on doing less and less and less, and receive more handouts. Thanks for a great post! This country is not about socialism. It is about pride, self worth, and responsibiity.

Posted by: Skyebeader | July 7, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Will: where do you think the government gets those healthcare tax credits? By taxing us somewhere/somehow else.

Posted by: remarks | July 7, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Health care cost rosewith the demise of the family practice, replaced by the insurer’s HMO and its offspring. Lawsuits have little effect on health care costs. And what pray tell sort of health insurance can be purchased for $2500 per person? Some of you folks either are minors or still believe diner coffee is a dime…and tip accordingly.

Posted by: rps1023 | July 7, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

Obama wants to set up a “National Health Insurance Exchange” to serve as a watchdog concerning who and who would not receive insurance coverage. Under Obama’s plan, 10 million illegal aliens would become covered and the health care would be “rationed” between them and American citizens. Obama’s plan would not give credit to healthy insureds, but the plans would cost the same whether you are healthy or not. Obama’s plan wold drive up the cost of helath care and force rationing on us for tghe firest time.

Posted by: Will | July 7, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

when it comes to healh insurance and a person’s income and supporing a family think about the x amount of dollars that person earns and the amount he has to pay to put a roof over their heads and foodon the table and now to pay for the gas to get to that job what is left for health insurance unless your forunate enough to have an employer willing to pay for 90% of it. If a person could afford it he would have it.

Posted by: Rose Szymanski | July 7, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

Under the McCain health plan, American women have fewer reproductive-health options because McCain is too conservative. McCain still adheres to Bush’s ultra-conservative system where – basically – McCain expects women to abstain from sex. And you know, that’s not helping women – that’s restricting women! McCain is not an ally to women. McCain will not lead us into the new centry – he’ll take us back to the 1900s. We can’t let McCain’s health care program become reality – because McCain is too harsh on women.

Posted by: Allen | July 7, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

barack is acting more like george bush than ever. He is also acting like john kerry with his flip flopping. who is this man? Democrat? Republican? Both? What a disaster barack has become. Loser.

Posted by: Barack Bush Obama | July 7, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

Allen, where and how can you prove that McCain is harsh on women? I don’t see that at all. I think McCain is trying to bring down the cost of health care so that ALL Americans can afford it. On the other hand, I DO have a problem with Obama in that he wants to give credence and coverage to 10 million illiegal aliens, as well as give them drivers license. By doing this, Obama will diminish the quality of care our American citizens could and should receive.

Posted by: Will | July 7, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

I’m still trying to figure out why it is the government’s reponsibiity to pay for everyone’s health care too. Don’t any of you people take care of or want to take care of your own business? I say cut my taxes and let me decide where and what I need to spend my money on instead of redistributing my pay to those that are looking for a nanny at a grossly marked up margin price seeing as everytime the government gets involved fraud, waste, and abuse of systems especially concerning health care run rampant.

Posted by: chattyway | July 7, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

I think government regulation is needed. When you are paying over $700 per month for family coverage with a $1000 deductible, regulation is needed. I’m glad, Chattyway that you support McCain. Thats what he’s trying to do…..cut taxes or give the citizen the money to help out in paying for healthcare. Under Obama’s plan, he seems more interested in insuring the illegals than he is of insuring Americans.

Posted by: Will | July 7, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Yes I am supporting McCain over Obama…Obama must go for a large number of reasons.

Posted by: chattyway | July 7, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

just love when McCain supporters beg for government intervention & regulation….yet chat away about free markets…

Posted by: rps1023 | July 7, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

McCain supporter here as well. I can’t trust Obama. I see now how many news organizations are vetting him and the “true” Obama is coming out, and he isn’t what America needs.
McCain 08!

Posted by: Will | July 7, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

Welfare and warfare. Those are the choices you folks are arguing over. I just checked out Barr on Glenn Beck. He sounds pretty good. Think differently for a change.

Posted by: Huh | July 7, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

rps1023 – there’s the matter of working for an employer, additionally owning one’s own companies for years, having other income properties and investments, and making the money do most of the work. We subscribed to “feed the pig” long before it was a cute ad campaign that we wish more people would look into. I need to fund no one other than myself and my family. That is the entire point. I’m not funding a McCain campaign and I certainly do not want to fund the masses that support Obama and want more of ours. Those premises are called “lose-lose”. I didn’t work this hard to lose.

Posted by: Skyebeader | July 7, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

mccain is attacking because he is backed ina corner, his health care policy lame… of course obama explained his policy and may even tweak it to be more like clintons which was actually the best… but mccain has NO business attacking obama on this or any issue, what a loser… a career politician who’s had the BEST health care of any american and NEVER paid for it!! Why are republicans the BIGGEST hypocrites in the world?

Posted by: earthisnotflat | July 7, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

Obama is better than McCain on foreign policy. McCain is better on spending. Why can’t either one get it right on both?

Posted by: Huh | July 7, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

So you say McCain has never paid for his health care. Can you prove it? Has NoBama paid for his since he’s been in the senate? When did Obama explain his health care plan and how to achieve it? He did try to emulate Clintons, however, she nailed his butt for doing so. I remember in the debates, as Obama stammered and stumbled and couldn’t answer questions without a speech written by Axelrod or a teleprompter. He would respond, “…uhh…ummm…uuhhhh…I agree with Mrs. Clinton.” I agree, Hillary had the best health care plan, however, I don’t see Obama’s plan aligned with hers. The problem is, you can’t BELIEVE Obama! He will say one thing today, and then something else tomorrow. Please, tell me, what are the benefits of an Obama universal health care plan?

Posted by: Will | July 7, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

Not all company owners or execs are in it for just their families. I suppose if your business was solely a family run and operated but that would mean you are a farmer and farmers blog oh so differently. If you have employees you then have an extended family with inherent obligations which transcend your immediate family.
Sorry but I am not buying as I have been there, succeeded and turned my good fortune to those who never had the opportunities I was exposed to…And taxes are like death, both will not be evaded or avoided.

Posted by: rps1023 | July 7, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

This is so farcical. The news media again sucks up to McCain and shows no ability to challenge inconsistencies in the McCain positions.
All around the world countries provide health care for their citizens in some fashion.
Refusing to examine what works around the world and incorporating it into our US model is dragging us down into 3rd world status.
McCain wants to outsource jobs to other countries, and we who are left here have limited health care options if we lose our jobs.
McCain is so out of touch.
so is the news media, for sucking up to the McCain/Rove camp and refusing to do the job expected of a free press.

Posted by: Leo Cassidy | July 7, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

earthisnotflat – Obama policies will result in a $250 billion dollar increase on the budget over what it is now. I believe I saw this on abcnews or cnn several months ago. By comparison Hillary was $240 billion, McCain was $60 billion, and Ron Paul was -$150 billion. Since we need to greatly reduce spending, it doesn’t take a genius to see who is best here. Obama is worse. However since McCain wants to bomb Iran, I will take Obama over McCain. You Obama supporters really need to tell your candidate to reign in the spending. It will eventually sink us.

Posted by: Huh | July 7, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

Will – Anyone that gleefully sings bomb, bomb, bomb Iran should not be taken seriously on foreign policy. McCain is reckless at best.

Posted by: Huh | July 7, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

obama has only enjoyed his senate health care for a few short years, while supporting policies to get the same coverage for ALL americans, not just the corporate bought politicians like mccain… obama has a website that debunks all false accusations about him flip flopping…. but it’s not my job to refute every lie the republicans blog here or elsewhere… if you choose to believe the lies you’ve been fed, that’s your right as a typical american… luckily, most americans are not buying the BS any longer… that’s why mccain is behind in the polls and has an uphill fight to win… honestly, i believe his only chance of winning in november is if there is more voter fraud… but you go right ahead and vote for mccain, who is just another loser in the mold of george bush, you are way in the minority and if you choose to believe the false accusations you post here, that is your choice… the rest of the country is moving past that mentality

Posted by: earthisnotflat | July 7, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

I’m not happy with McCain’s health plan proposals in comparison to the Democrats
but the Democratic proposals won’t be happening within this first Presidential term . The Senate, no matter how many Democrats are there, have no intention of pushing through universal health care in the near future.

Posted by: alpaig52 | July 7, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

earthisnotflat – We can’t afford to give all Americans this coverage without borrowing from oversees. Ron Paul taught most people this. You need to get everyone on the bike to loose all the flub. That would be attacking the health crisis. The only candidate even to mention this in earnest was Huckabee.

Posted by: Huh | July 7, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

Will – I must admit Obama will take this election. I was part of the Ron Paul movement that took on folks like yourself who have made a mockery of my party. I will go with Barr this go around, but you republicans better get your act together if you want to win elections in the future.

Posted by: Huh | July 7, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

Huh…I agree, McCain singing bomb bomb bomb, bomb Iran is lame and was a mistake. However, I think McCain is superior over Obama when it comes to foregn policy. Look at the escalation right now between Israel and Iran. This is going to get very ugly very quickly. America will need a President who is well versed in foreign policy to help diffuse this situation. If Obama were to be President, sitting down with the President of Iran, without preconditions, is the worse thing that could be done. Obama’s resume’ on foreign affairs, among many other things, is waaaaay to thin.

Posted by: Will | July 7, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

huh – just because one candidates health insurance policy is ‘cheaper’, doesn’t mean it is “obviously better”… bad logic there… but i do agree with your other posts… in fact, i liked ron paul intensely… he is one of the VERY FEW true republicans left… sound fiscal spending, keeping the government small and out of our private lives, using defense for, well, defense (as opposed to the ‘new republifacists’ goal to turn every country into god fearing capitalists)… but please, spare me the spending comparisons because nothing can compare to the bush/mccain policy of giving the rich huge tax cuts while spending the rest of our taxes on illegal wars and wiretapping

Posted by: earthisnotflat | July 7, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

The escalation is between Iran and Israel. We need to tell each side to stand down much like we did with India and Pakistan. If not, we will watch missiles fly over our heads in Iraq. I totally disagree with you. Sitting down is the only thing to do.

Posted by: Huh | July 7, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

earthisnotflat The only thing keeping Obama’s head above water against McCain right now is that there are more Democrats in this Country then Republicans. That’s good, because an estimated 46% of the Clinton supporters haven’t jumped on board the Obama ship.
Obama’s comments in regards to Roe vs. Wade recently was like a gift to McCain-
McCain didn’t have to reassure women he’d mess with Roe vs. Wade instead Obama made comments that put into question his committment to Roe vs. Wade as is. McCain is sleepwalking through this campaign while Obama is wandering around playing rockstar or like he’s already been elected, outspending McCain and is still less then 5 points ahead of McCain. Heaven forbid McCain ever wakes up and gets in the race. McCain doesn’t have to do anything really, it’s Obama race to lose. The only one who will bring Obama down or cost him the Presidency will be Obama himself and he doesn’t seem to be off to a good start since locking the nomination.

Posted by: alpaig52 | July 7, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

Obama needs HRC to take care of healthcare. Well, come to think of it, he needs her to take care of EVERYTHING.

Posted by: Bea | July 7, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

huh – i agree, the republicans need to get back to what made their party great.. and ron paul was/is one of their last hopes… ron paul is a true republican with dignity and integrity and sound logic, unlike those who have taken over the republican party like karl rove, rush limbaugh, george bush, the oil industry and corporate america… todays republicans are bullys, mean, and angry old white men… yes it’s a stereotype but when the shoe fits wear it!

Posted by: earthisnotflat | July 7, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

Iran’s president is not permitted to engage in international diplomacy, the presidency of Iran is a domestic office. Please name any accomplisment made by my senior senator from AZ. While you are researching that one perhaps you can look into his military record.

Posted by: rps1023 | July 7, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

earthisnotflat – I didn’t say one was better. I merely stated that paying for much of what Obama promises is unrealistic. Get people to eat non-GMO, no-hormone pumped, high antioxidant, etc. foods is a start. Get people to excersize. Get McCain to bomb soft drinks. That would be a start to fixing the healthcare crisis.

Posted by: Huh | July 7, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

Huh, I disagree with you. McCain will take this election. The Obama camp is beginning to implode. They can’t handle criticism and vetting. Obama, is losing supporters because he’s becoming a centrist. His change in position has caused the “lefties” to become very nervous. He is even losing Hillary donor support now. Obama, who has accused McCain of pandering all along, is now doing just that…he’s pandering for votes. McCain is separating himself from Bush and Bush policies, while Obama is beginning to look more and more everyday like a clone of Bush. Obama has lost his identity and because he is not that well known, will lose the election. Americans want substance, something they are realizing they will not get with Obama.
However, I do appreciate your comments, I like talking to you. Thank you for your insight. I do agree, Huckabee has a lot going for him in his polictical analysis. Would be nice if he were McCain’s VP.

Posted by: Will | July 8, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

rps1023 – One reason Iran’s president is against diplomacy is that we have been screwing around in his country for 50 years. He has every right to be in our face and defensive. Remember the golden rule folks. It applies everywhere.

Posted by: Huh | July 8, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Neither candidate addresses fundamental problems like poor health choices and ever-increasing medical costs. Obama’s plan is most useful for capping big business losses on health premiums and McCain’s idiotic plan is most helpful for persisting the gluttonous hold insurance companies have over us.
As for the mideast, the proper way to “defuse” the issue is by being an honest broker; not by providing weapons and bombs that are used to kill civilians. Yes, Israel is our ally and needs to be defended, but they act like our kid brother throwing stones at the neighbor while hiding behind us. Time for them to grow up.

Posted by: doc | July 8, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

there’s not reason why we should not sit down and talk to ANY government leader… and if you think that israel is not going to expect our backing for instigating more war with iran, you’re sadly mistaken… bush has already vowed his support if israel is attacked, and of course, the war propoganda maching (in cahoots with the mainstream media) will turn any attack on iran into an attack on israel

Posted by: earthisnotflat | July 8, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

alpaig52 – you keep convincing yourself of all your rhetoric… personally i can’t wait for the debates and november… mccain is toast

Posted by: earthisnotflat | July 8, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

This might be the one fight McCain shouldn’t have. On the one side we have a tax credit for Healthcare, on the other we have UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE. I’m sorry despite people attacking it, it’s highly appealing to everyone.

Posted by: Chris | July 8, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

Will – Well we will see come November. Whoever wins, I pray they do well by the people. I do believe our foreign adventure spending and entitlement spending are getting way out of control. Even if you believe in the Iraq war, the truth is that we are fighting it with borrowed money. This to me is suicidal policy.

Posted by: Huh | July 8, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

I’m pretty sure McCain has never had to balance a checkbook his entire life; the man has no sense of fiscal conservatism whatsoever. Obama, of course, is the typical spend-now, save-later Democrat but I expect more out of a Republican.

Posted by: 1percenter | July 8, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

Huh…huh? The point was directed to “Will” who fears that which he cannot comprehend therefore dumbing the entire blog with other’s talking points.

Posted by: rps1023 | July 8, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

doc – Well said. I believe Israel should be dealt with on friendly terms. The settlements and land demarcation of the territories do bug me though. That is why Hamas has legitimacy among other things.

Posted by: Huh | July 8, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

“if you have employees you then have an extended family”. No, I do not. I have employees. I pay salaries. I offer plans that I can get through the fact of having employees that they do not have access to without their employer. Same with the other types of insurance that I have access to through hard work, licenses, and the other things that go with owning businesses. And no, I am not a farmer.

Posted by: Skyebeader | July 8, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

rps1023 – Sorry about that….must be getting late!

Posted by: Huh | July 8, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

alpaig52 : I agree, I think McCain has been sleepwalking, however, I think he’s awake now. With the hiring of Schmidt, McCain will be more proactive and will go after Obama. It’s going to be a different race in the next four months. I also agree, Obama thinks he’s a “rock star” and has the election already won. We want him to keep thinking like that! McCain 08!

Posted by: Will | July 8, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Will – Your right about “Rock Star” status. I am going to sleep. Enjoyed it.

Posted by: Huh | July 8, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Huh, ditto.

Posted by: Will | July 8, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Not a farmer…perhaps you should take a long look at the products. services and the sense of community they deliver. If you look at employees as solely that you have much to learn and little time to do so…You might give thought to a government grant based upon your 50k contribution or attend a seminar on what business is all about

Posted by: rps1023 | July 8, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

“perhaps you should take a long look at the products. services and the sense of community they deliver.” I grew up decades ago on reservations. There was and is no such thing as sense of community, there are the senses of survival and betterment or the sense of using the system. I have never had a complaint from either my own employer or any of those who work for me. I even teach seminars on how to get off the res, whether yours be an inner-city ghetto, a working man’s neighborhood, or a trailer park, or your parents’ basement. It is what you choose. I chose very differently after experiencing “government generosity” firsthand. As my father said, “Take care of yourself, no one else will.” I wish more people would adopt that plan.

Posted by: Skyebeader | July 8, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

MCCAIN IS NUTS IF THE TAX PAYERS ARE GOING TO SUPPORT HIS HEALTH INSURANCE PLAN. EMPLOYERS GIVE HEALTH INSURANCE AS INCENTIVE TO WORK FOR THEIR COMPANY, AND WHY SHOULD WE HAVE TO PAY TAXES ON INSURANCE AS EARNED INCOME. MCCAIN RECEIVES HEALTH INSURANCE FREE AND SO DOES THE PRESIDENT AND HIS FAMILY ,SO WHY DOES THE WORKING AMERICANS HAVE TO PAY THE PAIN. MOST PEOPLE CANNOT AFFORD TO GO TO A DOCTOR EVEN WITH INSURANCE. THAT IS WHY HEALTH CARE IS SO HIGH BECAUSE PEOPLE DON’T GO TO A DOCTOR UNTIL THEIR ARE SICK. DOES MCCAIN REALLY THINK IT GOING TO HELP TO MAKE PEOPLE PAY TAXES ON HEALTH INSURANCE AND MAKE THE EMPLOYER PAY EXTRA TO CARRY INSURANCE TO EACH EMPLOYEE. THIS WILL MAKE IT WORSE BECAUSE THE WORKERS WHO CAN AFFORD IT NOW WILL NOT AFFORD WITH HIS PLAN. MCCAIN REALLY WANTS TO PUT AMERICANS IN THE POOR HOUSE. MCCAIN WAS ONLY PUT IN HIS POSITION, SO, OBAMA WILL GET ELECTED.

Posted by: BEAGLE24 | July 8, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

First time here. Enjoyed reading the posts, except for the bash of Senator McCain personally. John McCain suffered terrible torture at the hands of the North Vietnamese. I’m amazed he’s alive. He’s one tough guy. Anybody that can endure torture like he endured is a strong person mentallly and emotionally and a true patriot. He loves this country. He may not always be as conservative as we would like, but he has earned the title of an American hero. B.O. is the opposite of John McCain. I can’t believe that Americans are even considering this novice nobody as the leader of the free world. Here is my question. When you work hard to succeed, and you make it, why do you get punished for that by the government? “You made it..now we want it, so hand it over for all the lazies and illegals who want it.” So where is the incentive anymore? Who wants to work their rears off just to get most of what they have taken away? On the other end, who wants to work when they know that the government is going to hand it over to them anyway for doing nothing? Isn’t this the end of capitalism? Isn’t this the beginning of socialism? Why do we think that’s better? It hasn’t worked for other countries. It won’t work for this country either. I might not be as smart as some of you political eggheads, but it doesn’t take a genius to see where this country is headed if the Dems have their way.

Posted by: clas1 | July 8, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

Does McCain really think that giving a family a tax credit that that is going to lower health care insurance. I am fortunate, I have coverage. But for a time i had to buy my own and it was alot for a little. The only way that health care will be affordable for people to buy is if the Goverment steps in a sets prices with insurance companies and with the health care providers.

Posted by: Iam4thiscountry | July 8, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

clas1…I would rather give more of what I earn to Uncle Sam than to give him any more of my freedoms. Think before you trash Senator Obama just stick to praising my senior Senator

Posted by: rps1023 | July 8, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

rps – I must admit that I have no idea what you just said. I lived on the reservation inside the fence at the school and we didn’t know a conservative from a capuchin monkey. I wasn’t a visitor, guest, or casual feel-good volunteer with an attitued. Conservatives didn’t come visit us. But, then, neither did liberals. I also do not know what a ‘Zonie is. Our Confederated Tribes now have a state-of the-art hospital with physicians and surgeons whose educations were paid for by the tribes from the funds we put in place by doing things “differently”. I hope that everyone has that opportunity for such “uninformed hope and certainty”. It has worked perfectly for a great many of us. Other people should try it. I’m sorry that you didn’t have a good experience in the military in the ’70s. My brother didn’t have one either, a bit earlier. He is just a name on a black wall and not blogging with us, tonight or any other night.

Posted by: Skyebeader | July 8, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

clas1: And Bush has done a wonderful job!!! And Just because McCain is a War Hero then that qualifies him to be president? I seem to remember something about him breaking? Not that I would not have. it is just that lots of other soldiers were POW’s. He also graduated 4th or 6th to last in his class. He is really smart!!! And at 71 are we sure his is really the one that will run the country? This is the 3rd time he has had to reorganize his campaign. And what about the Public Funding he took during the primaries? He actually took a loan out using the public funding as colateral and then Turned around and changed his mind!!! I would not trust him to keep is word on public funding. First he is for No Drilling and now he is for drilling. The list goes on and on.

Posted by: Iam4thiscountry | July 8, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

Hillary’s health plan was/ still is the best!….. and when it comes to our health C A R E ……the United States is N O T near the top of the list world wide!
Health care and the encouragement of preventive health care is an excellent investment for us.. and in the long run will save us money because it will
keep our citizenry self sufficient rather than dependent on our charity… welfare… some other kind of dole!
BUT EVERYONE MUST BE INCLUDED AND NO ONE CAN BE DENIED.
Perhaps we could be included in the health plan utilized by Congress…..
Hmmmmm…..
As I recall, Obama’s plan left more than 15,000,000 citizens unprotected.
Back to the drawing board…. or give a holler for Hillary!

Posted by: In retrospect: | July 8, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

A lot of things have been said about Barack Obama in the past, and I’m not sure I agree with all of them, but one thing is beyond question: the man is a socialist. There is no argument there. Everything in his life up to this point has involved the advancement of socialism. The problem is, the US cannot afford to have a socialist president at this time. Our country is 9 trillion dollars in debt and the last thing we can afford to do is elect a president that is promising trillions in new spending. We have to go in the opposite direction. We have to cut back on spending so we can start paying down the enormous debt. It is also unfair to saddle future generations with debt to pay for social welfare programs for people today. If we continue down the path to full socialism at this time by implementing Obama’s socialist healthcare system, we will destroy any chance the nation has to balance the budget and pay down the debt. If we enact the oppressive tax increases that Obama is proposing, we will bring the economy to a screeching halt and people’s retirement funds will plummet in value. We just can’t afford any more socialism in America at this time.

Posted by: Saul | July 8, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am

Saul: Excellent. Thank you, and you are correct.

Posted by: clas1 | July 8, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am

Saul: have you even checked out Obama’s tax plan? I have! I am a small business owner and I prefer Obama’s Plan to McCain’s plan. There was a great article in the Wall Street Journal and on CNN:Money. They just gave you the particulars of each plan. But cutting corp taxes will not stimulate the economy. Nor will a 18cents a gallon gas tax holiday. All McCains stuff is more a gimmick than anything else. But, do! Check out the info. There is so much half info out there you need to beware!!

Posted by: Iam4thiscountry | July 8, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

We just can’t afford any more socialism in America at this time.
Posted by: Saul | Jul 8, 2008 12:57:00 AM
###########################
What socialism have we had in this country? Bush has not done anything for us.
Obama’s tax cuts are to the Middle and Lower incomes. So, you must be one of the fortunate few who Makes over $250 thousand a year. Lucky you

Posted by: Iam4thiscountry | July 8, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

Iam4thiscountry, you must not live near many blacks. In every major US city where blacks have been elected to run the government, thriving downtown real estate has become burned-out, condemned buildings, good schools have become riddled with drugs and violence, and once-beautiful neighborhoods have become ganglands dotted with crack houses. Name for me ONE PLACE in the USA where blacks have improved the quality of life or modern civilization. As I stated before, any white American who votes for Obama is a cuckoo bird.

Posted by: S_Temper | July 8, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am

Each of you are laughable. Regardless how this shakes out, WE WILL pay as individuals.
You fools that say the Federal Governmet will pay, where do you think the money comes from? US you idiots.
Either we will pay with premiums from ourselves and/or our bosses, or we will pay higher taxes to fund this. Or our grandchildren and great grandchildren will pay just as they are now saddled with paying for this illegal war Bush put us in.
How much can future generations pay?
Lets solve one problem at a time. First put Bush and his cronies in front of a world court to be tried for war crimes. Then we can take those trillions of war dollars and start spending them on fixing our country instead of world domination.

Posted by: roadstar | July 8, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am

Iam4 – As a small businessperson, you should be scared that Obama is proposing to eliminate the limits on self employment tax. I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to pay all that additional tax (it’s enormous). In addition, he is going to double the tax on capital gains. Wall Street is already getting ready for the huge sell off at the end of the year if Obama is elected. I don’t know who wrote the articles you are referencing, but they don’t know much about the economy. Obama will break us.

Posted by: Saul | July 8, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am

Will the real John McCain please step forward. Is this the honest John McCain, or is this press release sent out my Karl Rove under John McCain’s name?
It is so obviously part of the strategy to fool the American voters AGAIN! Like the Columbians saying american had nothing to do with the daring rescue mission. Like John Mccain’s visit to Columbia at the same time of the rescue was just a mere co-incidence. Like believing that the american voters are not turned on to what’s going on and believing that they will only tune in after Labor Day. NOT THIS TIME! Like John McCain graciously stepping aside in 2004 to give way to Bush for a second term. Like Jeb Bush going out to campaign with John McCain, when he knows damn well that he is really jump starting his 2012 campaign for himself. Like all of us amd them knowing that John McCain will never win this election by any fair means, so Karl Rove and all the others intend to use every nasty trick in their books to get what they want. Ha! Ha! ha! I hope the media is unbiased.

Posted by: exatlantic | July 8, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am

Hi. This is my first comment, hope I’m not interupting anything important. I think its not neccessary to insult one candidate to support another. McCain is a good man I beleive, although I don’t support his political party. Obama is also a good man. Enough said.
One observation I would like to make and see your response to is this: Why is it that people (like myself) who have done well in America and live a comfortable life seem to feel like they accomplished this solo? Why is there no recognition that it is the society we live in that has made this possible, not our individual superiority? Do CEO’s of major corporations really believe that if they were yanked out of this country and plopped down in East Timor they could earn millions so easily? The answer is obvious. So why is it so difficult to accept that if the society has made your wealth possible you are obligated to contribute proportionately to the betterment or your fellow citizens? This is very strange behaviour in my opinion.
One other point: isn’t the idea of “giving” thousands of dollars in tax revenue to people to be transferred to middleman insurance companies just another form of socialism?
Anyway, thats all I have. Cheers.

Posted by: Sandworm | July 8, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am

Iam4 – By the way, 250K is not what it used to be, and it will be even less in the future. Obama’s continuous use of the figure 250K is deceiving. This is similar to the alternative minimum tax of yesteryear. When enacted, it only covered the very well off. Over time, it sucked more and more people into it’s grasp until it covered a large portion of the middle class. Obama’s 250K figure is starting off in the middle class. Just imagine who it will cover a few years down the line.

Posted by: Saul | July 8, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am

Saul: I am considered “Middle Class” I a pay alot in taxes already. But, Between my Husband and I we don’t even come close to 250 Thousand. That is upper upper middle class.

Posted by: Iam4thiscountry | July 8, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am

Hey Will:
Where do you get the information that Barack Obama will give coverage to 10 million illegal aliens, as well as, give them drivers licenses? You are making this stuff up as you go along. You know good and well that Barack Obama has proposed no such policies.

Posted by: pdyoung | July 8, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am

And, of course, it will be less in the future. But when that changes so will the limites change. Every year that you pay tax, you cannot use the tax guide from the previous year. Why is that? It is because they adjust the taxes every year. But that is like every thing else. The house I bought ten years ago is doubled in price. The loaf of bread i paid $2 last year is $4 this year.

Posted by: Iam4thiscountry | July 8, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am

Sandworm: Like your comment. It doesn’t matter who you are for. It is nice to hear from a civil person.

Posted by: Iam4thiscountry | July 8, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am

Saul: 2 of the articles I read was in CNN:money and The Wall Street Journal. And I am not worried as a Small business owner. When I say small I mean small. Neither my employees or I make enough to have any changes in our taxes. And, since Obama is giving tax breaks to the Lower and Middle income people I will probably be paying less. I already pay both sides of Social Security and Medicare on my Paycheck and the Company side for my employees. What Obama is raising is the Cap(the amount were you stop paying)on Social Security and Medicare. Since None of us hit that cap to begin with it doesn’t worry me in the least.

Posted by: Iam4thiscountry | July 8, 2008, 2:17 am 2:17 am

we already pay 3 percent of every dollar in wages paid to every taxable employee in the country for medicare. medicare is supposed to be medical insurance for people with no insurance.

Posted by: AbleToCount | July 8, 2008, 2:21 am 2:21 am

Saul: Where or where do you get your info from: Double taxes on capital gain? No, he is raising them but not doubling them. Sorry, I was more interested in payroll taxes than I was in capital gains tax. But, I hope I have this right. Capital gain Tax cap is at 2mil next year no cap. following year back to 1 mil. Obama wants to make it 3mil. Short term investments taxed at your rate (i think) and Long term investments taxed at a higher rate (though not doubled) But, the bottom line is; unless you have lots of money you don’t need to worry about your taxes going up!!! I will try to find those articles again. They are bookmarked on my Laptop

Posted by: Iam4thiscountry | July 8, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am

Abletocount: You can only use medicare when you are over 62? or is it older. When you collect Social Security you get Medicare. Not before.

Posted by: Iam4thiscountry | July 8, 2008, 2:30 am 2:30 am

Well the changes may sound expensive but remember it will mean health care for those who have nothing. So our youth don’t have to die because they didn’t get 100 dollar antibiotic they needed!

Posted by: Grebo | July 8, 2008, 2:44 am 2:44 am

it doesnt change the fact we pay 3% of all wages for medical for those who dont have the money. just because the govt limits who can get it doesnt mean we dont pay it. if you just gave free medical to everyone who asked for it the total cost would be far less than the 3 % that we pay. all the more reason to not let the govt get their hands into the medical establishment. it doesnt matter anyway, they already give free medical to illegals and any homeless or poverty stricken person, they mandate thousands of dollars in tests for every drunk dragged in off the street, it doesnt matter. they take a little and create a need, the need demands more money and so on. this is what they do. to vote for more of it is just to vote for the layer that comes before the next.

Posted by: AbleToCount | July 8, 2008, 3:35 am 3:35 am

at the begining of this election I was so excited, now not so much. I am debating either staying home or holding my nose and voting for obama. I am so tired of this guy. Obama loves the sound of his voice. He loves his speeches were he just gets to talk at people. When he has small venues where people arent stitting down just listening to him he stammers worse than mccain. When will Obama grow a pair and actually debate mccain? I know that he hates debates cause he is no good at them but he needs to do it.

Posted by: rachel | July 8, 2008, 4:14 am 4:14 am

I wonder how many years of free healthcare all those bombs and military expenditures would pay for? Anyone notice that the last military budget for the US was more than every other nation in the world combined? Yet they have no problem providing health care. Same BS. Nothing will change no matter who they elect with concern to that. Funny they dont offer free college to those who choose not to enlist in the military…

Posted by: Peter | July 8, 2008, 4:16 am 4:16 am

The smart thing to do on heath care would be to turn the entire governemnt heath care management activity, over to MEDEX. Tricare pays 75% of the medical bill overseas, but has no emergency evacuation plan. Getting the government out of heath insurance management, would save a lot of money and at the same time cut-out bureaucratic jobs and bureaucratic policy. I’m convinced, MEDEX would provide outstanding heath insuranc for everyone. Of course, all those able to do so, would have to pay into the plan.

Posted by: pointman | July 8, 2008, 4:29 am 4:29 am

Sorry for the mis-spells on previous post. My keyboard is sticking. Must be the humidity. I’m very pleased with MEDEX travel/heath insurance. One things for sure. We need a health care plan that includes 40 Million children not covered by heath insurance. If we could come up with a plan that covers our children, I would gladly pay a little more to see this happen.

Posted by: Pointman | July 8, 2008, 4:40 am 4:40 am

If we were not paying for the health care for foreign nationals who are here illegally, the costs needed to be paid by the taxpayer would be much less. As for Obama’s “plan”, it isn’t really one. Just wait for congress to do something good.

Posted by: DougBH | July 8, 2008, 4:43 am 4:43 am

Why don’t they do something about the doctors who butcher people and then get rightfully sued?!!! It sure makes all the sense in the world to me to take away a patients rights and still permit hospitals to kill people by infections and doctors to cut off the wrong breast……….

Posted by: dk | July 8, 2008, 5:07 am 5:07 am

John Kerry is more of a war hero than McCain? First sign of Marxism – LOSS OF THE TRUTH!! JOHN MCCAIN IS NOT IN THE N.VIETNAM HALL OF FAME – KERRY IS!!

Posted by: Temagami | July 8, 2008, 6:15 am 6:15 am

Temagami: Your comment about Lt Kerry surprised me. So I checked “snopes” for more detailed information. This is what they have. Quote:
Since the photograph dates from a time when President Clinton was taking steps towards establishing formal diplomatic relations between the U.S. and the Communist government of Vietnam (a cause for which Senator Kerry and Senator John McCain were leading proponents), its significance to the Vietnamese is probably more that it conveys a sense of official U.S. “recognition” of the post-war Vietnamese government I’m interested to know what your source is for the claim that John Kerry is in the NV hall of fame? By the way, there is no North Vietnam (just Vietnam)
Since your post is false I am curious where you got your information? (BTW, not to be nit-picky but the is no North Vietnam, only Vietnam.)

Posted by: Sandworm | July 8, 2008, 6:38 am 6:38 am

I now know why I am VOTING McCain!
Proposed changes in taxes after 2008 General election:
CAPITAL GAINS TAX
MCCAIN
0% on home sales up to $500,000
per home (couples) McCain does not
propose any change in existing
home sales income tax.
OBAMA
28% on profit from ALL home sales
How does this affect you?
If you sell your home and make a profit, you
will pay 28% of your gain on taxes.
If you are heading toward retirement
and would like to down-size your
home or move into a retirement
community, 28% of the money you
make from your home will go to taxes. This
proposal will adversely affect the
elderly who are counting on the income
from their homes as part of their retirement income.
DIVIDEND TAX
MCCAIN 15% (no change)
OBAMA 39.6%
How will this affect you?
If you have any money invested in stock
market, IRA, mutual funds,
college funds, life insurance, retirement
accounts, or anything that pays
or reinvests dividends, you will now
be paying nearly 40% of the money
earned on taxes if Obama become president.
The experts predict that ‘higher
tax rates on dividends and capital gains
would crash the stock market yet
do absolutely nothing to cut the deficit.
INCOME TAX
MCCAIN (no changes)
Single making 30K – tax $4,500
Single making 50K – tax $12,500
Single making 75K – tax $18,750
Married making 60K- tax $9,000
Married making 75K – tax $18,750
Married making 125K – tax $31,250
OBAMA
(reversion to pre-Bush tax cuts)
Single making 30K – tax $8,400
Single making 50K – tax $14,000
Single making 75K – tax $23,250
Married making 60K – tax $16,800
Married making 75K – tax $21,000
Married making 125K – tax $38,750
Under Obama your taxes will
more than double!
How does this affect you? No explanation
needed. This is pretty
straight forward.
INHERITANCE TAX
MCCAIN 0% (No change, Bush repealed this tax)
OBAMA Restore the inheritance tax
How does this affect you? Many families
have lost businesses,
farms and ranches, and homes
that have
been in their families
for generations because they could not
afford the inheritance tax.
Those willing their assets to loved
ones will not only lose them to
these taxes.
NEW TAXES BEING PROPOSED BY OBAMA
* New government taxes proposed on
homes that are more than
2400 square feet
* New gasoline taxes (as if
gas weren’t high enough already)
* New taxes on natural resources
consumption (heating
gas, water, electricity)
AVOID THE PAIN VOTE MCCAIN!

Posted by: HP Boston | July 8, 2008, 7:12 am 7:12 am

People need to apply common sense.
Universal Heatlt care is going to cause totel havoc.
1st the poor and the low income – get welfare medical card and so they have health care.
The wealth buy what they want.
The working class are the ones who run in to the problem with health care.
some employers do not provided any, and the employees have to get their own.
Some employers make it available at discount rates, that employees can purchase. Employee’s gamble with it, not wanting to spend their earnings on health care. Their choice and big gamble. They never think of it unless they or their families get sick
Many business supply health care as a benifit, many in a benifit package, or they pay so much and employee pays so much. Many of these are where unions made sure the people were taken care of.
________
Affordble Health care is ont thing.
Universal Health care where the Government is in charge of you health and your life is vastly different.
You become a dependant of the Government.
Your Health care will be mandated by the government. Your freedom to choose will be gone.
You will pay for it in some way, shape or form.
Do kid yourself into thinking you will be getting something good for nothing.
I beleive it would be far better for th egovernment to regulate the lawyers, health care insurers, Pharma compancutical companies. Thank take one of my freedom of choices away.
We do not want a socialist state.

Posted by: seah | July 8, 2008, 7:46 am 7:46 am

Someone correct me in my way of thinking here if I’m wrong, but I’ve always thought of healthcare that was provided by employers as a perk. Just like retirement accounts, vacation time, employee shared profits, etc. It was provided as a way to entice and keep employees. I can think of several small business here in my community where the owners make a modest income, but I can’t see them being able to afford $6,000 to 12,000 x 5 employees a year extra. Will all employers be required to provide healthcare?

Posted by: Terry | July 8, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am

best get one thing straight—–repubs are for the wealthy and big business—–democratic party is for the working man and we the working are the majority—a no brainer with his one

Posted by: rodney | July 8, 2008, 8:14 am 8:14 am

seah–get the lawyers out of healthcare and the cost will drop dramaticly—i am truly sick of the ambulance chasers on tv.— and the dummies running to them are making them rich and at our expense

Posted by: rodney | July 8, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am

jj
thanks for saying that hard to get that across to these people—–some of us were around at that time

Posted by: rodney | July 8, 2008, 8:24 am 8:24 am

I am a small business owner and i pay for my employees health care but the cost just keep going up and i may not be able to do it much longer. That being said, I know dozens of small business that cannot afford it for the owners much less their employees. If this form of socilised healthcare happens it would absoutly devestate the economy and put a lot of people out of business. In addition everyone else had better get ready to pay a lot more for everything you buy that is made in this country.

Posted by: billy bob | July 8, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am

Why can’t we have the simple solution of exempting from taxes that portion of our income that goes for any necessary healthcare, medical, dental, pharmeceutical, optical, hearing, etc? Same for educational expense, tuitions, books, state and local taxes going to schools, you name it. Favor the rich by exempting income which is more heavily taxe? OK, how about a flat tax (listen up well enough to really understand that idea)? After a generous personal exemption, say $12,000 for every member of your household, and health care and educational, THEN you pay the tax, For many, that’s no tax at all. Sure, the rate would be 20%+. but only on this “disposable” income. That’s a real program for solving health care and education costs, not re-cycling the money through Washington and seeing what gets siphoned off to payt the lobbyists and special interests.
Comments, anyone????

Posted by: Tom Beebe | July 8, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am

billy bob
i own a small business 5 employees —family- and there is no way we can afford health insurance—even liability insurance has gone thru the ceiling—-all insurance has gone crazy–but my agent is buliding his second big building—

Posted by: rodney | July 8, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am

tombeebe
how about a small sales tax—that way those with more to spend will pay a little more—-

Posted by: rodney | July 8, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am

Instead of the government taxing to subsidize outrageous medical expenses, they should fix the root cause.

Posted by: Mark | July 8, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am

rodney, between liability ins., workmans comp, auto, and health care I pay over $100,000 per year. I have eight to ten employees. It is very simple, I cannot afford to pay any more for insurance and survive. Many of my sub-contractors have no insurance at all which is wrong but many of them choose not to spend their money on Insurance. That should be their choice and not mandated by a socialist goverment.

Posted by: billy bob | July 8, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am

Say what you want about the lawyers causing healthcare to go up, they aren’t the problem. There are too many caps on settlements anyway. This is the problem:
1. Insurance companies themselves. Theya re as rotten and greedy as it comes. They would be much happier if you died than if they had to pay for healthcare. It is a rotten system that is built on greed and profit only. There are a million stories to back this up.
2. The physicians themselves. Another very greedy group, that protects it’s almighty dollar above all. 500K/year is not enough for them, they want Bill Gaits kinda money. 98% of them care way more about how much they can make off of you than your well being. They will hang their hat on, “I have to do this test, or I will get sued”. Total stool, millions of unnecessary procedures done for one reason only. THey charge for them.
3. Hospitals- Another group that compete with each other and drive the cost of care through the roof. THey are constantly looking at how to do more procedures, even if unnecessary. It’s sick people. I live in it daily.
We need a major overhaul of another corrupt system that is run by lobbyists in Washington.

Posted by: reformnow | July 8, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am

reformnow
look at tv these guys are paying millions advertising —to do this can you imagine the amount these ambulance chasers are making.–put an end to or severely cap these suits. would be a good start.

Posted by: rodney | July 8, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am

an after thought—LAWS ARE MADE BY LAWERS AND FOR LAWYERS—-JUST THAT SIMPLE

Posted by: rodney | July 8, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am

I ACTUALLY KNOW A FEW DOCTORS—AND I CAN ASSURE THEY ARE NOT RICH—-OUR LOCAL VET MAKES FAR MORE. AND DONT HAVE TO PUT OUT 50 TO 100 THOUSAND A YEAR FOR INSURANCE.YOU WILL HAVE A PROBLEM SUING A VET.

Posted by: rodney | July 8, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am

I’ll be the first to admit that both candidates could use a course in health care finance 101.
But to slam your opponent for something you know is lying, is a joke.
The problem with health care is nothing to do with what is mentioned in the article or in any of the reponses listed here.
Until politics and the politicians mature enough to examine the situation clearly, without the back stabbing, childishness that politics is noted for, we’ll never improve the problem or the bottom line.
In some ways I truly believe that politics has retarded the advancement of America as a whole.

Posted by: DAVID NH | July 8, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am

I live in healthcare daily. I can assure you that 95%+ of the physicians out there are greedy and would give up their practice in a heartbeat, to make more money.

Posted by: reformnow | July 8, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am

SOME BUM OFF THE STREET THAT WOULD NEVER MAKE MORE THAN A FEW THOUSAND IN HIS LIFE can go to hospital –and for any silly mistake could end up getting millions—and of course his attorney will get a great portion of it—–AND GUESS WHAT YOU AND I CAN PAY THE BILL IN HIGHER RATES—SOMEONE BETTER STOP THE AMBULANCE CHASERS.THESE GUYS ARE MAKING MILLIONS AT OUR EXPENSE

Posted by: rodney | July 8, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am

Obama’s hard-left, socialist agenda will weaken America, but strengthen himself and government by encouraging dependency and punishing individual success through significantly higher taxes.
For example, Obama will cover 15 million illegal immigrants with federally subsidized health insurance, dramatically driving up costs and forcing federal rationing of healthcare. As in the U.K. and Canada, you will not be permitted certain medical procedures if the bureaucrats decide you are not worth it.
Obama will legislate a 60 percent tax bracket for upper-income Americans, killing all initiative and innovation. He will raise the top bracket to 40 percent. He will apply FICA taxes to all income, not just that under $100,000 as at present. So add 40 percent plus FICA’s 12.5 percent plus Medicare’s 2 percent plus state and local taxes averaging, after deduction, at 5-6 percent, and you have a 60 percent bracket.
Obama will double the capital gains tax, saddling the 50 percent of Americans who own stock with dramatically higher taxes.
Obama will double the dividend tax, hitting elderly coupon-clippers now retired and depending on fixed incomes.
Obama wants Homeland Security operatives to be required to notify terror suspects that they are under investigation within seven days of starting the investigation.
Obama is bad, bad news.

Posted by: Tom Five | July 8, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am

I have grown to really, really despise Obama and his deceitful pandering.
He’s for public campaign financing…..no wait, he’s against it. He’s against nuclear energy…no wait, he’s for it. He supports the DC gun ban, but wait, he commends the Supreme Court for voting it down. He’s against gay marriage yesterday, and for it today when speaking to a gay rights group. Obama is one of the most contrived and deceitful candidates to slide down the garbage chute in years.
Obama is hollow. He stands for nothing.

Posted by: Derrick | July 8, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Tom Five wrote
“Obama will double the capital gains tax, saddling the 50 percent of Americans who own stock with dramatically higher taxes.
Obama will double the dividend tax, hitting elderly coupon-clippers now retired and depending on fixed incomes.”
Pure BS those 50% of Americans own stock through a 401k or IRA type of account. All income from those accounts are counted as ordinary income, not as capital gains.

Posted by: Thinking | July 8, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

MCCAIN: OBAMACARE IS A JOB KILLER

John McCain has finally pointed out what should be obvious to anyone with a rudimentary understanding of economics:
Small businesses are the job engine of America, and I will make it easier for them to grow and create more jobs my opponent want…

Posted by: Health Care BS | July 8, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

If you think about it, the doctors (many of whom no longer will accept new Medicare patients now) will only go underground and give the best treatment to those that will pay them the most and on time if this universal healthcare debacle is passed. It will be more of the same (whoever has the most money will get the best treatment) only with significantly higher taxes for EVERYONE. Get real people!!!!

Posted by: fairelection2008 | July 8, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am

Obama was for public financing and now he is against it. He was for removing troops from Iraq now he is wait and see. How can I believe anything he says on health care? I’d like to see Hillary Clinton back in the race.
========================================
What does Obama stand for? Who knows?
========================================

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | July 8, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Obama is not wanting change. He is change. Changes his mind, his visions and his friends. He just wants to win.
The new Barack Obama has abandoned his vow to filibuster an electronic wiretapping bill if it includes an immunity clause for telecommunications companies that amounts to a sanctioned cover-up of Mr. Bush’s unlawful eavesdropping after 9/11.
“The Barack Obama of the primary season used to brag that he would stand before interest groups and tell them tough truths.
The new Mr. Obama tells evangelical Christians that he wants to expand President Bush’s policy of funneling public money for social spending to religious-based organizations — a policy that violates the separation of church and state and turns a government function into a charitable donation. …”
“On top of these perplexing shifts in position, we find ourselves disagreeing powerfully with Mr. Obama on two other issues: the death penalty and gun control.”
We are not shocked when a candidate moves to the center for the general election.
But Mr. Obama’s shifts are striking because he was the candidate who proposed to change the face of politics, the man of passionate convictions who did not play old political games.
There are still vital differences between Mr. Obama and Senator John McCain on issues like the war in Iraq, taxes, health care and Supreme Court nominations.
We don’t want any “redefining” on these big questions. This country needs change it can believe in.
Look. The only “change” anyone can believe that Barack Obama will act on is any finger-to-the-wind “change” that helps him achieve his SOLE goal: Winning.

Posted by: Rick from Pa | July 8, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

LOL
mccain complained about congress taking a july 4th recess
LOL
he has been absent for 367 votes LOL!!!!
he is the most absent member of congress….
how pathetic

Posted by: bhrandon | July 8, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Same old GOP scare tactic. Except this time it’s being told by grandpa!
LOL!!! this guy is a senile joke!

Posted by: Joe | July 8, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Do you all know what kind of country we will have if Obama becomes President?
An Obamanation!!!

Posted by: LeRoy | July 8, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

How can anyone who makes $40,000/year, 50,0000 or $60.0000/yaer afford to subsided the health insurance for the guy making 100,0000 o0f 500000 or I millon year. not afford to purchase his own.

Posted by: Thinkin | July 8, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

Universal healthcare is going to bankrupt this country, and who will be hurt the most? The ones in the middle as usual. If people think they are paying a lot now for their premiums now, hang on they are going to soar if Obama’s plan goes through.
I’m tired of working three jobs so others don’t have to.

Posted by: McCain Dem | July 8, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

Good for Obama. I live in Florida which is a “right to work” state and you cannot make a decent living to save your life with small business owners. They know they have you over a barrell and can fire you with no reason. I know a business owner who has made millions off of his workers and manages to take trips to Cancun, buy a boat, pay for his kids gas and mercedes etc but can’t pay the bonus’s owed employees, won’t pay for their health care (just takes their raise and pockets it so that it covers the half he’s Suppose to pay) and then let all but a skeleton crew go so he wouldn’t have such a big payroll. Means one person does the work of 4. Stressed out and lacking any recourse these workers have to shut up or they are on the street with minimum unemployment. You’ve heard of slum lords, well some small business owners are worse than that and the worker suffers.

Posted by: Brenda | July 8, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

I think I might be confused. How on Gods’ green earth is the federal government going to pay for all the things promised if we can’t take care of it ourselves. I for one don’t want the government taking care of my personal business. That’s what I work for. Taxes would skyrocket and then what. Sounds like Obama wants total control of our lives. I don’t call that freedom or hope. Sounds like mindless change and hopelessness.

Posted by: C Good | July 8, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Does grandpa even remember what health care is? OH yea he must, he needs it I wonder if his wife steals his meds? lol!!

Posted by: Joe | July 8, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

What ever happen to the good ole days when you went to work, paid your taxes, social security, and health insurance. Government needs to get control of insurance companies and health professionals and hospitals. That’s what is out of control. All employers should offer health insurance with the employee and the employer paying their part. I worked a one company for 6 years and every year the insurance company was changed due to large increases. That meant finding a new doctor and meds would be changed due to not being covered. I’m no longer working and am paying a large amount for state funded insurance. Can’t find a doctor who accepts it, none of my meds are covered and allowed a few visits a year with a maximum allowance of 25m a year. So federal funded health insurance doesn’t sound too appealing to me. Everything is out of control so who has the solution. I don’t think it is Obama. I’m not concerned for myself so much as I am for my kids and grandkids.

Posted by: C Good | July 8, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

What exactly is obama’s health plan – or – any plan????? Seems to CHANGE daily to suit his political needs.
Obama is a FRAUD – the DNC sure picked the Wrong guy.
His whole campaign is a stage show – all plans are vague – so he can CHANGE to suit his audience at the time.
What a Joke this guy is.

Posted by: Molly | July 8, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

People need to get a grip on health care.
There is no free lunch as the Socialist Democrats would have you believe.
If health care is provided, then someone will have to pay for it.
If health care is provided under the Obama plan, taxpayers will pay for it.
But, that is the Obama plan for almost everything–MORE AND/OR HIGHER TAXES FOR EVERYONE.

Posted by: Jayhawk | July 8, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

Why should business be responsible for anybody’s health insurance? I have a novel idea: How about taxing money that companies give to employees for health insurance. That way everybody would be responsible for buying their own health insurance. I’m sure all you Socialists will hate the idea. Socialism didn’t work for Hitler, Stalin, Mao, or Pol Pot. But, hey, you never know. Maybe we can make it work!
“Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else.” – Bastiat

Posted by: Hayek | July 8, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

i believe if they start rasing tarrifffs to all goods comming in and double tarriff any company leaving the usa that will help the job situation maybe employers will think twice about outsourcing to other countries. so they can ruin there water pollute another country because of epa standards , and greedy ceos that think they need billions more and turn your backs on the usa and last but not least say you are going to outsource take your wholre company and move how many ceos would want to move too china , the large companies can provide ins since they take jobs out of their own country

Posted by: robin | July 10, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Isn’t “contribution” defined as voluntary? I’m really tired of being told that our taxes are “contributions,” that the half of your money taken out for Social InSecurity and Medicare that wage earned never sees to begin with is an employer’s “contribution.” That money all comes out of our own pockets, since an employer has to look at the total cost of hiring someone, regardless of how much of that cost the employee actually sees.
If an employer does the math and comes up with being able to afford $10/hr to hire a new employee, it doesn’t matter to the bottom line as to how much of that total $10/hr actually shows up in the paycheck you receive and how much of it they are forced to pay to government, health insurance, unemployment insurance, etc. It really does all come out of our pockets – Oh, and the money to cover new costs has to come out of cut expenses or increased revenue (i.e. job cuts and higher prices).

Posted by: LadyOfLiberty | July 10, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

It is difficult to have an intelligent conversation with anyone who does not read the issues and stop believing everything the McCain puts out; one thing is certain most Obama supporters are informed voters

Posted by: ObamaforPresident | July 10, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.