By Natalie Gewargis

Jul 10, 2008 4:35pm

My Candidate Spent $225 Million Dollars and Went $30 Million In Debt and All I Got Was This Lousy T-Shirt (Plus a Weakened Nominee!)

In Sen. Hillary Clinton’s latest attempt to repay her millions of dollars of campaign debt, she has sent out an email to her supporters saying that if they contribute $50, they can get their very own T-shirt — from a T-shirt contest Chelsea Clinton started. Sizes Small to XXXL are available. In her email to supporters, Clinton suggested that by helping her campaign to pay down its debt, supporters would be “making a real difference today for all our future efforts.” The message reinforces the former candidate’s hope that the daunting sum will be repaid, not to mention possibly underlining her long-argued (though publicly recanted) belief that Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, will lose to Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., in the Fall. Thus setting up a possible Clinton 2012 run. At this point, Clinton will need to hope, audaciously or not, that her former rival will do a better job pleading her case to his supporters than he did last night. After delivering, and concluding, a 32-minute speech at a fundraiser in New York City Wednesday, Obama realized he had made no appeal to the audience on Clinton’s behalf, whereupon he rushed back on stage to make a request on her behalf. – jpt

User Comments

No, we also got the priceless experience of voting against Obama in November.

Posted by: geevill | July 10, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Hillary and her outraged base are steadily moving outside the control of the Obama campaign. Obama botched any chance to soothe Clinton supporters with missteps like last night, while Hillary has done the bare minimum to appear supportive of Obama. This is becoming a serious thorn in the campaign’s side.

Posted by: matt | July 10, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

How about they just have Bill pay it off with all of that cash he’s getting from his buisness deals in the middle east? I mean, why can’t SHE pay her own DAMN bills? WE have to? Hell with the t-shirt, write the check Hilliary, or find Bill, wherever he’s staying that night, drag him out, and get HIM to write it. To quote Bill:”How DARE they”, expect US to pay for their failures. It’s called accountability. Although I’m sure Bill and Hillary haven’t been held accountable for anything since high school. It must be a culture SHOCK for ‘em!

Posted by: pity | July 10, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

I
Where’s the support for Hillary from that demographic? What happened?
I guess overeating crow can stifle the pockets.
OBAMA 08

Posted by: Nat Turner | July 10, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Nice job Hillary – the “win at all costs” is really costing you now isn’t it? Let’s hope it doesn’t cost all of us in November.
Someone so stubborn and foolish would make a dangerous leader…
Oops! We already have one of those!

Posted by: GS | July 10, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

I get sick and tired of Obama supporters that continually bash Hillary. I am a Hillary supporter and I will give to her campaign to help retire her debt. But until Obama supporters pay a little respect to the fact that Sen. Clinton decided to give things over to Obama and help him raise money for his campaign, I will not give a dime to his campaign. He still disrepects her and tries to clean it up. With the latest disrespect, I will sit on the fence until I see him be more respectful to her. Obama supporters stop whinning and be glad your candidate won the primary race. This is why he still may loose the election because a whole lot of Hillary supporters are still very upset at his lack of respect for her. Words mean nothing. It’s actions that really count.

Posted by: Lois, California | July 10, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

Matt – If Hillary’s “outraged base” was big enough and devoted enough to matter, they would have all kicked in $20 and eliminated her full debt. The fact of the matter is that most Hillary supporters are disappointed that the person they saw as the best candidate lost, but are ready to support Senator Obama in November.
Some Republicans have seized on pretending to be irrational ‘wingnut’ Hillary supporters to try to sow dissension (they may have shown up while I typed this up), but the unavoidable fact is that if she had even a million pissed off devotees right now, she would have zero debt.
FACT: IF SENATOR CLINTON HAD EVEN ONE MILLION ‘CLINTON OR NO-ONE’ DEVOTEES, SHE WOULD HAVE ZERO DEBT.
She is admired by many, but Democrats, including her justifiably dispirited supporters, are moving on to November. That’s reality, not more Republican lies (checkout the site VP Cheney recommended during the ’04 VP debates for reality, factcheck.org, and you’ll see McCain is the clear winner in documented lies this season).

Posted by: jhw539 | July 10, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

Lois,
Did you expect any other outcome with the mismanagement she displayed?
You reap what you sew. You do know that one, don’t you?

Posted by: Nat Turner | July 10, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Fiscal conservatism and personal responsibilty at its finest.

Posted by: Ben Straub | July 10, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Hillary supporters would or would not vote for Obama on the basis of how he treats Hillary rather than on whether he would make a good POTUS??? You hve to wonder about such people.

Posted by: Dennis | July 10, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

Lois – Senator Obama has shown a great deal of respect to Senator Clinton throughout the campaign. He did not dredge up the mud stacked up during President Clinton’s term (and there was a great deal), nor did he take shots at her gender, not did he fan scurrulous rumors.
Allowing McCain to enact a third Bush term because you feel that Senator Clinton is not given enough respect from Senator Obama is a tremendous insult to what Senator Clinton ran for. She did not run to put a trophy on the mantle, as the right wing media would have you believe, but to do all she can to help her country return to a prosperous path. You show tremendous disrespect to her and her legacy if you reduce her historic campaign to a playground spat over respect.

Posted by: jhw539 | July 10, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

A good demonstration that Hillary is fiscally irresponsible.

Posted by: Dennis | July 10, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

Right on JHW!
She exhibited far more disrespect, poor judgement and mis-management in her campaign.
Now she expects a man to bail her out–how does that square with the “strong woman/feminist” thing? What kind of message is that? Take your lumps like the strong woman you proported to be Hillary, and fix it yourself.
Stop being the victim, and enabling other women to justify being victims, too!

Posted by: GS | July 10, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

Will Bower, her PUMA supporter was on the Fox news earlier saying they did fund raiser for her and get about 6-10 millions during July 4 and the last 48 hours. Don’t understand her supporters. Obama and DNC need HIllary’s help to raise cash for them last night and she was able to rase 8-15 millions according Newsweek. I don’t think Obama is willing to help her at all because she got only 100,000 from Obama’s supporters.

Posted by: Laura | July 10, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

John – President Bush was endorsed by Senator McCain in 2004. President Bush is the leader of the Republican party. President Bush received unprecedented, no-vetos-necessary support from the Republican-controlled Congress. Senator McCain supports President Bush’s tax policy. Senator McCain supports President Bush’s energy (oil drilling) policy. Senator McCain supports President Bush’s open-ended Iraq policy (opposed even by the democratically elected Iraqi government). Senator McCain has presented no changes in economic policy (and has echoed President Bush’s talking point of the economy is doing just fine).
Those are hard, documented facts, not a slick mantra, and it is NOT sleazy politics to point out the fact that Republicans, led and supporting President Bush, are responsible for the results of his presidency. That’s called accountability.
If you wish to argue that McCain is not equivalent to a third term of President Bush, feel free to present FACTS on where they differ.

Posted by: jhw529 | July 10, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Sorry, but I already contributed $300 (which I could barely afford) to Hillary Clinton only to watch her steam-rollered by the Dean Machine.
Hillary never had a chance; the selection (not election) was a done-deal from the get-go. It’s too bad we didn’t see it coming before shelling out Money for Nothing.
Hillary is far from perfect, but was clearly the best choice (of the three candidates) for America’s future, but now we’re back to our usual choice: the lesser of two evils (instead of three).

Posted by: Rhys | July 10, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

The media has nothing better to do than keep up tension between Clinton and Obama supporters

Posted by: Kardasia_Prime | July 10, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

GS – I’m not sure I want you in my tent. Senator Clinton was and is a great candidate, better than many Democratic nominees we’ve had in the past. I do not intend to disparage her at all; she’ll be a great asset to the party and the country.
Something most people miss is that Senator Clinton now needs Obama to win too. If he loses, it either shows her primary tactics to be too strong or her post-primary teamwork too weak. Politicians don’t go far arguing that they lost to the weaker candidate, that they couldn’t raise enough money, or that they couldn’t handle slanted press. Politicians do go far by losing to strong candidates that were just a better fit to the times and earning the respect of the party by showing themselves an asset to advancing the shared platform agenda (that is a Democratic Whitehouse that won’t veto Senator Clinton’s health care bills).

Posted by: jhw539 | July 10, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Kardasia, you have a point, except the media (in general) is SO behind Obama that they wouldn’t deliberately do anything to derail his runaway train.
Even Bill O’Reilly is exceptionally kind to Obama; Obama is untouchable.
We who supported Hillary Clinton don’t need to be reminded (1) that she lost, and (2) HOW she lost.

Posted by: Rhys | July 10, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Rhys,
Senator Clinton had every advantage going in, and her enormous early lead in declared superdelgates, an order of magnitude more than Senator Obama started with, shows the fact that the Democratic “machine” started out (justifiably) supporting her. She basically lost because her message of experience and fixing the Republican mess did not sell with the fickle electorate while Senator Obama’s change and reconciliation did.
I fully expect to be giving her money in 2016 (it’s not sexism to point out the statistically documented fact that women handle aging far better than men – I don’t think her age will be a McCain-caliber issue for her in 2016).

Posted by: jhw539 | July 10, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

jhw, your reasoning is pretty good, but the economy has emerged as the Number One concern of most Americans, especially as Bush’s War (in Iraq) seems to be winding down. We still have some serious foreign policy issues to figure out, such as Afghanistan and (especially) Iran. Ahmadinejad seems determined to start a “new” war, and his bellicose attitude is ramping-up the price of oil again, just as it looked like the speculators were losing their enthusiasm. Hillary Clinton has the best background in handling the economy and our domestic problems, but I’m not sure Obama OR McCain has the savvy to handle either the domestic or mid-East crises.
Of course, it’s a moot question now… Obama is only waiting for his coronation.

Posted by: Rhys | July 10, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Where are the Hillary supporters? Right here, ready to vote for McCain in 08 and Hillary in 2012. And by the way, we are buying up the t-shirts.

Posted by: Mark | July 10, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Considering Obama as president is about the same as considering him as coach of the Pittsburgh Steelers. NO BACKGROUND FOR EITHER JOB! Oh, I forgot – he was a community organizer. WELL?

Posted by: Jimbo | July 10, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

OK, here is your big chance. Please explain how Obama would increase business and create more jobs?

Posted by: Manitu | July 10, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

To retire the 23 M dollars debt, HRC supporters as of July 4th contributed 10 M+ while Obama supporters contributed 100 K. And now he needs Hillary supporters to contribute to his campaign — Yeah Right. I will contribute to HRC to bring down her debt but not a dime to the Obama campaign or vote for him.

Posted by: Indus | July 10, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Manitu,
Don’t be lazy go to his website and start reading. His economic plan, including the well proven approach of funding research to develop new technology (as Silicon Valley got started) and investment in infrastructure is a well-proven method of stimulating the economy by investing in the foundations needed for future growth. Not some short-cut vote buying stimulus check ploy (anyone remember the Republican’s first give away, the ‘refund’ of the surplus they sent out when the economy was doing fine and they’d yet to double the national debt?).

Posted by: jhw539 | July 10, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

jhw539
It not that I am lazy. I HAVE read the same stuff you are reciting and am not impressed. I’ll be more specific. Lets say I have a business making widgets, what exactly will Obama do to help me expand my business and hire more workers. The US has the second highest corporate tax rate in the world – ANY HELP HERE? Ireland has cut the corporate tax rate down to bare bones and the country is rockin with new business and high employment. AND……. MORE REVENUE TO THEIR GOVERNMENT!!! Obams plans with research and foundations are fine – BUT WHERE IS THE PROFIT INCENTIVE?

Posted by: Manitu | July 10, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

Great headline. Thanks.

Posted by: Steve | July 10, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

All you Obama supporters keep saying Hillary mismanaged her campaign causing the shortfall in revenue. Hillary raised record amounts of money, it’s just that Obama raised ungodly amounts. She had to spend to keep up. And just as a note, I still don’t believe that money came from mom and pop donors. Time will tell.

Posted by: Ron | July 10, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

If Hillary cannot find a way to pay off her debts w/o Obama’s help. I doubt seriously she was quailified to be POTUS. Is she that incompetent.
Why would anyone expect ctizens who detest her to bail her out? What kind of fantasy world do you live in? And don’t come back with your juvenile threats. Vote for whomever you choose. IT’S WHAT WE ALL ARE SUPPOSED TO DO

Posted by: Dennis | July 10, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Hillary Clinton’s supporters ARE contributing money towards her debt. I don’t understand the attitude wherein it is fitting and proper that she join in campaigning for him, exhort her 18 million supporters to do the same but to ask for help in retiring her debt is beyond the pale. Even IF Obama asks for this, hmm…maybe he does lead by example.
He and Michelle each donated the maximum, but that doesn’t mean his supporters will follow his example. You’d think people had their own minds, or something. You know, like those Hillary Clinton supporters who have no intention of voting for Obama.

Posted by: ClareA | July 10, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Claire, we don’t care whether she campaigns for him or not. She does so because it helps her. Makes her look like a team player. Keeps her high profile.
Voters will vote for whom they choose regardless of what their candidate tells them. She cannot convince anyone who dislikes Obama to vote for him.

Posted by: Dennis | July 10, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

If Obama didn’t think he needed Hillary’s help to get elected, then he certainly wouldn’t want her campaigning with him. Nor would he care about her debt. With the negativity of the primary looming over his head, he could still be in jeopardy of losing the White House. I hope people start to think for themselves. There is no way I will ever believe Hillary does not want Obama elected. The media needs to be held accountable for some of the crap they put out there.

Posted by: Bea | July 10, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Manitu,
If you have an established business making widgets you will benefit greatly from a nationalized health care plan – health care costs are an asymmetric burden on US employers since every other first world country has universal healthcare. Improved infrastructure is also a major benefit – as a small example, corporations have relocated solely to escape traffic congestion (Boeing certainly felt the financial pain of poor infrastructure in Seattle).
And what is your point in citing the US’s 2nd highest corporate tax rate – to mislead or to display your ignorance of the full tax burden placed upon corporations? The corporate tax rate is more than compensated for by the flexibility in employment regulations, infrastructure support, local tax incentives, depreciation schedules, superb level of workforce education, federally funded research (the public research University system is the uncontested envy of the world), minimal regulation, minimal required paid vacation, etc. If you care about the reality of where the US stands internationally with regards to corporate taxation, the CBO report “Corporate Income Tax Rates: International Comparisons” is an excellent primer. An interesting summary tidbit: “Although the United States’ statutory corporate tax rates are among the highest of those in OECD countries, they are comparable with the statutory rates imposed by other members of the Group of
Seven.” If you don’t care, well that soundbite only really matters to business owners and most of the successful ones realize how misleading it is.

Posted by: jhw539 | July 10, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Bea,
You are right on that Hillary honestly wants Obama elected. If Obama loses, it WILL be blamed on her “going negative” in the primary. Her political career will be dead – every McCain veto on a Democratic Congress’s health care bill will be her fault, every extra year in Iraq, the overturning of Roe V. Wade her fault. She’ll be lucky to keep her Senate seat and have no chance at the higher Senate leadership role and 2016 nomination that’s her due.

Posted by: jhw539 | July 10, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Hillary Clinton is the best qualified to lead our country – obama is NOT – and I will NOT vote for him.
Obama is an Arrogant, Radical, FRAUD.
The Millions of Hillary supporters will unite with the Millions of GOP’s to make sure obama NEVER wins the White House – AND that will be PRICELESS!

Posted by: Molly | July 10, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

“You are right on that Hillary honestly wants Obama elected. If Obama loses, it WILL be blamed on her “going negative” in the primary. ….”
Posted by: jhw539 | Jul 10, 2008 8:44:13 PM
If Obama does not get elected, I think the Democratic voters, who might already feel disenfranchised, are going to look to other individuals to blame for the party’s failure to get the Democratic nominee elected; i.e. Harry Reid, Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi, Donna Brazille, etc… Those individuals were very involved in dividing the Democratic party. Those same individuals will have a hard time justifying their divisive actions to their voting constituents when they are having to campaign for the offices they currently occupy.
And, let’s be honest, over the last month Obama has not adhered to the ideology that he espoused during the primaries; FISA, NAFTA, Iraq, public campaign financing, healthcare, faith-based initiatives, his church, etc.. If he continues to move further away from his primary electoral base, some of the blame will belong entirely to himself (and his advisors).
So, in the end, I think Hillary will weather the storm. This election has proven that she’s a fighter!

Posted by: Virginia Independent | July 10, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Hillary Clinton is the best qualified to lead our country – obama is NOT – and I will NOT vote for him.
Obama is an Arrogant, Radical, FRAUD.
The Millions of Hillary supporters will unite with the Millions of GOP’s to make sure obama NEVER wins the White House – AND that will be PRICELESS!
Posted by: Molly |
________________________———————-
I certainly hope Obama is arrogant, I doubt he will be able to run the White house otherwise.

Posted by: Truth Matters | July 10, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

jhw539.
Did you know that the Canadians conduct lotteries to decide which persons will go to the top of the health recipient ladder? The founder of their system now regrets ever promoting such a plan. You are typical lib with no knowledge of how our economic system works. Business creates economic wealth – GOVERNMENT, PARTICULARLY BIG GOVERNMENT DETRACTS FROM IT!!

Posted by: Manitu | July 10, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Can you imagine, a woman who is worth over 100 million has a Website asking “hard-working American – white Americans.” to bail her out with donations as small as $10.00. What nerve! She wouldn’t have this big debt if she had not kept up her campaign after everyone and his brother knew Obama had won. She just wouldn’t give up – wore it as a badge of honor. And now this millionaire even wants Obama supporters to help pay for her failed campaign. But this is one Obama supporter who will not give her one thin dime.
Obama doesn’t even need the malcontents that supported her in order to win. Let these losers vote for McCain, or anyone else they choose. Who cares.

Posted by: rhbate | July 10, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

rhbate…you should care because there are 18 million Hillary supporters and at least 25% of them are not going to vote for your candidate. John Sydney McCain will be our 44th President not Barack Hussein Obama. I am a Hillary supporter and wish she would just pay off her own debt as the Clintons have the $$. I don’t like them beholding to BO in any way, although he needs her big time to get some of those 18 million votes. They both want something from each other…personally Obama needs here more than she needs him. I did hear Obama has the worst fundraising month in May….not surprising…I would guess all the college kids and blacks are tapped out at $2,300…and the liberal billionaires have given to the max by now too. Maybe he shouldn’t have opted out of the 87 million for campaigning that he originally said he would accept. But he’s the king of flip-flop, and we will see much more of that before November.
HILLARY SUPPORTER VOTING McCAIN!

Posted by: Debra | July 11, 2008, 4:28 am 4:28 am

and I actually bought a t-shirt

Posted by: dl | July 11, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am

I’ll gladly help Hillary with her debt and support McCain.
But not a dime to Obama.
Obama’s arrogance, inability to take a stand, buckling under pressure, and his past with Rev Wright are enough for me to not trust him.

Posted by: riley | July 11, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am

Despite the media proclaiming Obama the victor…in state after state Democrats overwhelmingly voted for Senator Clinton. Obama cannot win…a significant portion of the Democratic base that voted for Senator Clinton does not trust him. Now Obama is backing away from the positions that won him his biggest support in the primaries. He is telling his supporters..those that staunchly supported him in the primaries…that “they weren’t listening to him”. Obama will lose because he has no core beliefs. He will say anything to get elected.

Posted by: Kathy | July 11, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Whether they’ll admit it or not, with each passing day of Obama’s campaign, most Democrats are seeing that they let the best candidate get away.

Posted by: HoosierSue | July 11, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

JHW-
I didn’t start out disliking Hillary at all, BUT–”If he loses, it either shows her primary tactics to be too strong or her post-primary teamwork too weak”–my point exactly.

Posted by: GS | July 11, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

If Hillary cannot find a way to pay off her debts w/o Obama’s help. I doubt seriously she was quailified to be POTUS. Is she that incompetent.
Why would anyone expect ctizens who detest her to bail her out? What kind of fantasy world do you live in? And don’t come back with your juvenile threats. Vote for whomever you choose. IT’S WHAT WE ALL ARE SUPPOSED TO DO
Posted by: Dennis | Jul 10, 2008 8:11:47 PM
Don’t worry WE HAVE already raised over 6 million to pay off Hillary’s debt. WE Don’t want money from Obama supporters who detest her, just like all the Hillary supporters that detest Obama will not give him a dime OR vote for him. HE NEEDS US more than we need him.
it is not a threat that we will not vote for a man we do not trust, it is just stating a fact

Posted by: comet | July 11, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.