By Natalie Gewargis

Jul 3, 2008 11:02am

Obama: Servicing Service

FROM GUEST-BLOGGER RICK KLEIN, from ABC’s The Note.

Back in May, when Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., filled in for Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., at Wesleyan University’s commencement, he chose public service as his topic.

He spoke expansively about his own choice of service — notably his decision to accept a job as a community organizer instead of going straight to law school out of college. But it’s something he left out that drew more attention.

Here’s what New York Times columnist Bill Kristol wrote last month, in a piece that’s gotten wide circulation among anti-Obama bloggers:

“More striking is Obama’s sin of omission. In the rest of the speech, he goes on to detail — at some length — the ‘so many ways to serve’ that are available ‘at this defining moment in our history.’ There’s the Peace Corps, there’s renewable energy, there’s education, there’s poverty — there are all kinds of causes you can take up ‘should you take the path of service.’ ”

“But there’s one obvious path of service Obama doesn’t recommend — or even mention: military service. He does mention war twice: ‘At a time of war, we need you to work for peace.’ And, we face ‘big challenges like war and recession.’ But there’s nothing about serving your country in uniform.”

Taking up the service mantle again this week — and with the issue of service in the news because of the comments by Wesley Clark — Obama wasn’t about to repeat his omission.

On Wednesday, speaking in front of a veteran-heavy audience in Colorado Springs, he touted his plan for an expanded military, and included this in the context of service:

“We need to ease the burden on our troops while meeting the challenges of the 21st Century,” Obama said. “That is why I will call on a new generation of Americans to join our military.”

Wondering what Obama has said about his own decision not to serve in the military?

“I didn’t serve, as many people my age, because the Vietnam war was over by the time I was of draft age and we went to an all-volunteer Army,” he told reporters in late May.

– Rick Klein

User Comments

This entire issue is nonsense. Serving in the military is not the only way to showcase service to your country or patriotism.
The fact that Obama graduate #1 from Harvard and decided to work as a community organizer for $30,000 rather then wall street shows character.

Posted by: Vanessa | July 3, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

“The fact that Obama graduate #1 from Harvard and decided to work as a community organizer for $30,000 rather then wall street shows character.”
Or extreme ambition, Vanessa.
But I agree that at the time he had that choice to make, many of us were making the same choice. Military service was not an attractive option post-VietNam. The fatigue with the war and the divisions in the country were evident everywhere and a big reason for Carter’s win. Everyone wanted a break from the violent sixties (good music, bad times).
Actually, it is a bit ballsy for Obama to make those remarks encouraging the young to sign up for military service at this time considering his base is beginning to turn on him as predicted over his intransigence regards the telecom bills. My compliments for putting country ahead of party.
It is NEVER wrong to serve.

Posted by: len | July 3, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

“extreme ambition”
I’m confused. Community organizers don’t make much. If he’s choosen Wall Street “extreme ambition” would apply.
How is it that one who graduates at the top of his class in the top school but choses to become a community organizer demonstrates “extreme ambition”?

Posted by: Vanessa | July 3, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

LOL rudy guliani now joins in on the lie that china and cuba are drilling off florida
LOL
why do these people keep jumping on that bandwagon when they know its a lie

Posted by: bhrandon | July 3, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

What is the point of this article…..as a European I hope there is more to America than military, that is why I despair at McCains candidacy. He does not seem to have anything else to offer….and any criticism of him is abominable in the eyes of America. Gen Clark was on the ball with his comments about a guys whose view of the world and America’s role has been skewed by his POW experience

Posted by: kojo | July 3, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Yeah, leaving out military service SPEAKS VOLUMES.
What Obama doesn’t tell you is that most community service folks don’t get sweetheart deals from pals like Tony Rezko.
It’s easy to be for community service when you have money and can secure favors.
What a fraud.

Posted by: Jo | July 3, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

All of the Kennedys promote and seem to work in “community service.”
However, how many of them would be doing community service if they had to LIVE on the salary of community servants? 0.
Obama was just building up his resume, that’s all. Nothing impressive about it.

Posted by: Jo | July 3, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Dear Barry, Enriching yourself as a state and federal senator by having Criminals buy your house for you is NOT
public service.
Attending a hate spewing church is not
public sevice
Pretending to be a law professor when
you subbed a course is not PUblic service.
Having your toadies lie about you graduating #1 is not public service.
signed
a thinking american

Posted by: trettione | July 3, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

OBAMA HONORS SERVICE OF THE ARMED FORCES WITH ACTION
Barack Obama COSPONSORED the new GI BILL, that gives vets returning from Iraq and Afghanistan tuition at the university of their choice.
* * * John McCain OPPOSED the bill. * * *
Barack Obama wants to bring the troops HOME, many of whom have had MULTIPLE and extended (greater than one year) tours of duty.
These troops experienced day after day, month after month of the strss of being in a war zone.
* * * John McCain OPPOSED the bill to guarantee our troops would have equal amount time at home after each tour in Iraq * * *
A VOTE FOR JOHN MCCAIN == DEAF EAR TO VETS NEEDS

Posted by: John's conscience | July 3, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Jo,
“Obama was just building up his resume, that’s all. Nothing impressive about it.”
=> Based on your arguements, you can also conclude that McCaine was only building his resume when he joined the army. I bet you wouldn’t say that though. Just get out of your boxed thinking and atleast give the man respect for going onto the neighborhoods that most people wouldn’t dare and actually helping out people.
“It’s easy to be for community service when you have money and can secure favors.”
=>Obama was not even in politics when he was an organizer. Get your facts straight before you start spraying your hate filled arguements.
Now, as much as I respect McCaine service to his country, his policies are OLD and WEAK. He talks about his ‘strengthes’ in national security, but it’s those ‘strengthes’ that have guided our natinal security decisions in letting Alqueda build its bases back up in Afganistan while we spend all our human and financial resources where they never existed in the first place. His economic policies are not only WEAK, but NON-EXISTENT. McCaine’s candidacy is, again, OLD and WEAK!

Posted by: Yoni | July 3, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

It’s resume padding, Vanessa. He had his sights set on the top job, not being the new Gordon Gecko. The difference is results. The Boston Globe article points out that his reallocation of the public funds for public housing were good for his contributors but disastrous for the community. He skips over the hard work and goes for the top job every time.
We get those kinds of guys in industry a lot. We sideline them until they move on. You’d be surprised how many people are out of work in this country because of Harvard grads doing what they do well: padding resumes and putting stockholders above employees and customers. Number 1 at school doesn’t cut much mustard when the degree is law or business but the business is computer science or car manufacturing.
Results matter.

Posted by: len | July 3, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

Len, you wrote: “Actually, it is a bit ballsy for Obama to make those remarks encouraging the young to sign up for military service at this time considering his base is beginning to turn on him as predicted over his intransigence regards the telecom bills. My compliments for putting country ahead of party.”
I didn’t interpret his statement as encouraging the young to sign up for military service, and neither did Bill Kristol since he wrote about the omission of military service as being an option. I read Sen. Obama’s comment, “At a time of war, we need you to work for peace,” as telling the youth of America to join the antiwar protests.

Posted by: James Danley | July 3, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Of course Obama left out Military service in his speech at Wesleyan, then people would ask” well, why didn’t YOU serve”. Now he is mentioning it because he is talking to veterans. Can you say “political opportunist”? And what does he do for veterans? Obama’s new ad says he helped support a bill that gets care for wounded soldiers, but everyone knows by now that he didn’t even vote on the bill. So, not only did he not take the time to appear for the vote, he has the audacity to LIE about it, using Veterans to his advantage. A fake, a disgrace, a liar….that is “change” by Obama.

Posted by: doublestandard | July 3, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

My mistake, then, James. I can’t disagree with the need to work for peace or the right to protest. Iraq is a blunder. On the other hand, as long as our people are there, we do everything we can to make their mission successful and get them home alive. I firmly disagree with Bush policy but I will not break faith with those who haven’t broken faith with me.

Posted by: len | July 3, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Double Standard,
“Obama’s new ad says he helped support a bill that gets care for wounded soldiers, but everyone knows by now that he didn’t even vote on the bill”
=>As early as February 2005, Senator Obama warned of a shortfall in the VA budget. Four months later, the VA reported that in fact it had more than a $1 billion shortfall. Senator Obama cosponsored a bill that led to a $1.5 billion increase in veterans’ medical care. During the debate on the Fiscal Year 2007 budget, Senator Obama cosponsored measures that would have provided additional funding increases for veterans.
In January 2007, Senator Obama reintroduced the Lane Evans Veterans Health and Benefits Improvement Act to improve the VA’s planning process to avoid budget shortfalls in the future. The bill requires the VA and the Department of Defense to work together and share data so that we know precisely how many troops will be returning home and entering the VA system.
May be you need to get your facts straight first.

Posted by: Yoni | July 3, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

I guess earning little over $30,000 demonstrates extreme ambitions.

Posted by: Vanessa | July 3, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

Let’s be real … making a mountain out of a mole hill. Most people do not think of the military as a form of community service as community generally refers to “local” services.
The Armed Forces are military service, a federal service, the motivations to join the military or to help the homeless or battered women, etc. are typically quite different. No better or worse in any case, just different.
As to military service – I am 50 – a college graduate from the midwest, and joined the Army in 1980. I can tell you that no college students or grads, other than college-aged ROTC / Resevrists were joining the Army back then in the “new” volunteer Army.
I wonder – how many of us commenting on Obama’s service or perspective in the military actually enlisted to serve? I bet few.
Dave in CA

Posted by: Dave | July 3, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

I don’t see how military service falls into the same category as other sorts of community service, when military service constitutes quelling violent insurgencies so that the State-Department can award no-bid contracts for Iraqi oil and also allow their cronies to usurp the authority of the government you are ostensibly trying to uphold (read about Hunt Oil’s contract with the Kurdistan regional government).
Obama has dropped quite far in my estimation for his ambivalence towards the expansion of presidential authority, but he still retains my support because he demonstrates at least a basic perspective on the vapid militarism that has brought this country to its knees.

Posted by: Walker | July 3, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

To all who discount Obama’s experience community organizing as “resume padding”: try doing that yourselves and see how easy it is. Try even stepping foot in those neighborhoods, try communicating with those people. There is nothing trivial with working in economically depressed neighborhoods in the south side of Chicago, and anyone who suggests otherwise needs a reality check. The man has more intelligence and character than McCain has in one finger, and has achieved more on his own merits as well.

Posted by: Bane | July 3, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

forgoting to mention the military is not a “sin” of omission. I object to this frame of thinking, that is rooted in hateful, dogmatic black or white ideology.

Posted by: Jon preston | July 3, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Two things: if Obama thinks people are going to believe he would have willingly signed on for Vietnam, he’s crazy. And the draft? More likely he would have run for Canada before allowing himself to be drafted.
America is going to need way more volunteers to sign up for our military since the Dem Congress passed the bill granting a full education package to vets no matter how long – or little – they’ve served.

Posted by: HoosierSue | July 3, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Len, not really a mistake since Sen. Obama later, in front of veterans did actually mention the military option. But that just goes to prove that Sen. Obama caters his remarks to the audience at hand.

Posted by: James Danley | July 3, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Len, good point.
Obama was resume padding. Knowing that folks like Rezko were in the wings to help him out when he wanted favors and $$$.
Obama is a fraud and people are starting to realize it.

Posted by: Jo | July 3, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Obama is out for himself. He’s the kind who has been plotting and planning since day 1 (actually it was kindergarten?) to be President.
Those are the worst kind. They’ll do and say anything to win (like Rev. Wright admits about Obama).
President McCain – he deserves it and he’ll be great.

Posted by: Jo | July 3, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Hossiersue,
“America is going to need way more volunteers to sign up for our military since the Dem Congress passed the bill granting a full education package to vets no matter how long – or little – they’ve served.”
=> You sound like, you have a problem with the GI bill. Just like McCaine opposed it. It’s the most outrageous decision on Mccaine’s behalf to claim that he understands the soldiers and not even support a bill that would ensure our heroes that their time was not a waste. Your arguement about the time length spent in the army is even worse. Any soldier can actually die on duty nomatter how long he’s been in the army. The bigger picture is that the soldier is willing to put his life in harms way to defend his country. For any one to dicount that is what is UNPATRIOTIC!

Posted by: Yoni | July 3, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

Vanessa – I don’t know where you get that Barack graduated #1 from Harvard. He was a B average.
The guy does not know what he is talking about. He should quit campaigning and go into the field of motivational speaker (which is another word or BS artist)

Posted by: Frank- South Hampton | July 3, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

You may also want to read the article on what else Obama said about an increase military

Posted by: Trev | July 3, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Yoni, Sen. McCain opposed Sen. Webb’s GI Bill because Sen. McCain was a co-sponsor of his own GI Bill. Sen. McCain’s GI Bill would have given more benefits for more time served AND would have allowed unused benefits to be transferred to one’s spouse or children.

Posted by: James Danley | July 3, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

as a democrat i feel perturbed by obama,s lack of honesty and truth. he believes in saying things which have no real meaning except soothing the ears of voters. it is disgusting to hear from his mouth about faith based funding.
would he be willing to support anti american pastors. does he mean only christian faith or will he help minority faiths like judaism, islam , hinduism , sikhism and budhism.
his notion is like old lady that just believe in buying the services she needs.
to cover his lack of military service and doubt on his patriotism he went to gen . clark who in turn proved to be an idiot by questioning servicethe most honourable american hero alive today that is sen. mccain.
to please the center obama stole a leaf from bush,s book about faithbased funding, the same person he derogates all the time and blame mccain to be his shadow. may be tomorrow he will steal another idea from mrs clinton to please women voters, may be he will go and pray in different denomination places of worship to get votes.
THE TRUTH IS THAT HE WAS BORN AS A MUSLIM AND CONVERTED TO CHRIATIANITY JUST TO BE IN LINE TO GET CHRISTIAN VOTES. HE HAS EVERY RIGHT TO CONVERT BUT NOT HIDE HIS PAST. GOV. JINDAL WAS A HINDU AND CONVERTED TO CHRISTIANITY BUT HE DID NOT HIDE HIS PAST.
HE CANNOT MISLEAD AMERICANS FOR LONG BY JUST EMTY HOT AIR RHETORIC.
I AM A PR OUD DEMOCRAT WHO WILL BE PROUD TO VOTE FOR SEN . MCCAIN THE REAL AMERICAN HERO.
bhagwan deol los angeles

Posted by: bhagwandeol | July 3, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

I’m siding with Obama on this one. Its one thing to help out your country with its needs, like the national gaurd does.
Today’s army comes back, gets sent back, comes back and gets sent back – more and more military NOT getting the care they need when they are veterans, more and more military coming home with PTSD, and yeah, our tenured service men turn to companies like Blackwater to get paid big.
It seems to me the me the only patriotism that todays military has is to their checkbooks.
Where are Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction?

Posted by: Alex | July 3, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

All good points but truthfully, none of us know what was on Barack’s mind when he signed up. The point is he did and good on him for that.
The volunteers for america issue is a distraction in some ways.
1. Volunteerism is alive and well in America. Visit the sandbag lines. Look at the church vans still heading for New Orleans over spring break and the summer. We are blessed doubly by our willingness to volunteer.
2. But the big immediate challenges can’t be done by volunteers. I don’t see a line of people with shovels fixing our highways unless we intend to repeat the means by which the first Autobahn was built.
Realistically, many challenges are only met by money to professionals and companies. How we prioritize and set the schedules for these, where we get the money and how we procure the needed services, these are things we need to talk about.
There is a lot that volunteers can do and I do NOT oppose the faith initiatives. Faith and the freedom guaranteed by faith is still our richest heritage. Yet we need to talk about how and where we are going to spend money and how we are going to get that money.

Posted by: len | July 3, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

James Danley,
I don’t have any problem with someone trying to come up with something better for the Veterans. My problem is when someone uses the length of time served as a basis to deny the benefits. That should never matter. I understand there is the issue of retention. But, if we were not just advertising how good it is to join the army and later leave them on their own, then more people would volunteer and there wouldn’t be a problem.

Posted by: Yoni | July 3, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

sounds like reinstating the draft to me

Posted by: smith | July 3, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Obama did not have a B average at Harvard.
A B average student at Harvard could never become the president of the Harvard Law Review.
Obama ranked #1 at Harvard Law School. I’m sure about the entire class.

Posted by: Vanessa | July 3, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

James Danley,
McCain OPPOSED the GI BILL. He said it was too generous to the troops returning from war.
Only AFTER it became clear what a jackass the man was making of himself, his staff put together McCains Do-Nothing-for-the-troops bill.
HE ALSO VOTED AGAINST THE BILL THAT WOULD HAVE GUARANTEED OUR TROOPS A YEAR OUT OF THEATER FOR EVERY YEAR DEPLOYED ON THE BATTLEFIELD.
A vote for McCain == A deaf ear to Vet’s needs.

Posted by: John's conscience | July 3, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

Compared to McCain who graduated 894 out 899… pretty impressive eh?

Posted by: Vanessa | July 3, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Yoni, would you mind explaining your comment: “My problem is when someone uses the length of time served as a basis to deny the benefits.” Unless I missed something somewhere, I don’t see where anyone is denied benefits for length of time served. Sen. McCain’s bill would have increased benefits with additional time served.

Posted by: James Danley | July 3, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Glad to see that Obama talked about serving in the military.

Posted by: Hillary | July 3, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

We’ve had a president with a C average for the past 8 years do we honestly want another who offers the same policies but worst graduated 894 out of 899…not even in an ivy league school.

Posted by: Vanessa | July 3, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

James Delaney,
Sen. McCaine initially opposed Sen. Webb’s GI bill because of retention periiod issue. He was apparently worried that Soldiers might leave the army early. Ofcourse this is until it became politically damaging for him and he later came up with an excuse of a bill.

Posted by: Yoni | July 3, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

There are only two words that accurately describe Sen. McCain’s policies and judgement – OLD and WEAK accordingly!

Posted by: Yoni | July 3, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Webbs bill gave FULL tuition to vets returning from war.
John McCain said: That’s too generous!
Saying that McCain’s bill was “more generous” is lying. Which seems to come easily to Republicans. Witness the proven lies of the “Swift Boat Vets”.

Posted by: John's conscience | July 3, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Has John McCain ever worked with the unemployed, like Barack Obama did with those displaced by the closure of steel plants on Chicago’s south side?
NO.
What does he and his $750,000 credit card wife know about the concerns of hard working, middle class Americans?
NOTHING.

Posted by: John's conscience | July 3, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Just within the last month, Sen McCain opposed the GI bill and Katrina supplemental funding. To Sen. McCain, every funding is “Pork”, except ofcourse when it favours Keating. Again, McCain and his policies = OLD and WEAK!

Posted by: Yoni | July 3, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

obama, is setting the stage of a way to make it more appealing for minorities and poor people to go into the military.
all of this talk about obama and his grades at harvard, so what if he is an a,b,c or d student.
the us education system has FAILED the young people coming of age in this election year, so what will obama have them do, make military service profitable for them, there are no jobs, so go into the military.
with mccain or obama as president,(and you supporters of each of them will stay in denial to the very end.)
the handwriting is on the wall, and becoming clearer each day, with either of these two as president, the american people are going to suffer.
and to say either obama or mccain “have to be better than bush”-is really not saying anything to THEIR CREDIT.
you who use that as a defense of your guy-when you think about it-you should drop using that.
ANYONE would have been better than bush.

Posted by: rummy | July 3, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Be prepare, if obama is elected you
can bet your boots there is going to
be a draft,forget the volunteer army.

Posted by: vinnie | July 3, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

John’s conscience, Sen. Webb’s GI Bill gives lowered benefits to any member, active or reserve, who has served at least 3 months on active duty since 9/11/2001. Between three months and three years service there is a gradual increase in benefits until one has reached three years of service. The MAXIMUM benefits are given for service of a minimum of 3 years. Four years of college for three years of service (and four years of college for 20 years of service). While this may encourage enlistment into the military, it will ALSO discourage re-enlistment. If you have a 10% increase in enlistments only to see 50% of those enlistees NOT re-enlisting after three years, THAT would require additional training costs for boot camp to replace the 50% not re-enlising. The effectiveness of the military will eventually be diminished greatly since the majority of the military personnel will one day be under three years of service. THIS GI Bill could be the death knell of the military.

Posted by: James Danley | July 3, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

James Danley,
It’s great to hear from someone who actually knows Webb’s bill. It’s a disaster. McCain’s is the right one.
He actually cares about the country. Webb cares about god-knows-what.

Posted by: Jo | July 3, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

By John’s conscience basis, I am supposing he was against John Kerry? He had a rich wife too.
John’s conscience loses again.

Posted by: Jo | July 3, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Barack is telling the wrong people to sign up.
These graduates of these elitest schools can’t afford to go into community service because their college tuition rates are so high. Tell these elitest colleges to quit paying their always on sabbatical professors to lower their salaries and start using their endowments and lower their tuition costs. In other words, practice what they preach at these liberal institutions. There is no reason to have college tuition be that high.
Then they can do good works. Until then, they can’t afford it.

Posted by: Jo | July 3, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

This is also nonsense so did all of the people who call obama unpatriotic serve in the millitary? DO I hate my country because I didn’t join the army?
Well some of you will say yes but those folks are stupid…
Once again there are some people who just simpley hate obama. The man could be the perfect canidate and people would still hate him. This works both ways though, but it just seems since Obama is the “new” guy alot more people, at least on this website, drink a full glass of hater-aid before they post.

Posted by: Joe | July 3, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

try again,
lets not bring hillary into this at all,
the last i heard she was hard at work back at her day job.
this is now all about barack and john.
leave hillary out of this.

Posted by: rummy | July 3, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

john’s conscience:
“Has John McCain ever worked with the unemployed, like Barack Obama did with those displaced by the closure of steel plants on Chicago’s south side?”
__________________________
Where DID you come up with the idea that Obama did ANYTHING for the people of Chicago which did not line HIS pockets.. or the pockets of his questionable associates and his wife’s employer…. or compute in his mortgage deductions…. first?
Six years of nothingness out of him for his constituents in Chicago…..until the intervention of Emil JOnes and his kingmaker skills and heavy parcels of pre-worked legislation given him to pass in his name as a push up the political ladder.
… as for B O’s days as a street organizer in Chicago….. have you ever SEEN the streets of Chicago?
Give it up!
B O is just another dirty Chicago politician with a new look!

Posted by: hmmmm | July 3, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

Obama hangs out with too many America haters. And it doesn’t seem to bother him in the least.
Obama is unpatriotic. Obama loathes this country. Obama is a fraud.
And he’s trying to fool you into voting for him. Don’t make that mistake.
President McCain – he’ll whoop Obama’s ass.

Posted by: Jo | July 3, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Obama’s idea of change:
“We can’t just drive our SUVS, eat as much as we want, and have our homes at 72 degrees at all times and expect the rest of the world to be okay with that”
That’s what Obama means by change. Of course he lives in a 6 bedroom/5 bath mansion and he’ll live as he wants, but YOU the masses must change.
If you vote for Obama, you’re a fool.

Posted by: Jo | July 3, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Democrats outspent Republicans in the presidential race by $119.4 million.
AND THEY STILL LOST. Is Obama trying to buy his way into the white house. Its the Democrats that have the liberals fooled that the Republicans are the big money party by spending money on ads that LIE about Republicans

Posted by: bag head | July 3, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

amy don’t worry all these ads will be thrown back at Obama as a flip flopping waffler during the General Election.

Posted by: bag head | July 3, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Jo,
LOL! You question Michelle Obama’s statement about America being downright mean and then show the PROOF in your posts.

Posted by: Fired UP!! | July 3, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Obama has alot more to win on than a “bad mood toward republicans” and if you can’t figure that out I wish you were not allowed to vote. GO compare Mcsames policy with BO and then decide who is better suited. I tell you it IS NOT Mccain, Captain Flop, or Mcsame, Bush 3 whatever you want to call him.

Posted by: Joe | July 3, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

Any of you mccain supporters know were your man stands? I can’t figure it out. I mean the guy has been in congress since Jesus was around and had a fairly consistant standing on his values then he wins the primary and all the sudden I don’t know who the hell I’m looking at. Is he tired old and confused or is he just a pandering moron?

Posted by: Joe | July 3, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

Obama lost me when he backed out of the public campaign financing pact he made with McCain. This makes Obama no different than any other politician. And if he’s the same, then I’ll vote for the one with more experience.

Posted by: Beth | July 3, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

Joe,
I also game McCain some credit during the primaries. But, now you cnt even tell what on earth he stands for. He has no integrity and seems to have cognitive issues – forgets what he said before. That’s one OLD and WEAK politics in the McCain Camp.

Posted by: Yoni | July 3, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Money is not what makes you elitest. It’s attitude.
There is nothing elitest about Bush or McCain.
Obama and his wife and friends & associates are elitests through and through.
Nice try though, but you lose again.

Posted by: Jo | July 3, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Obama has that “new boyfriend” syndrome. Lots of excitement and he looked damn near perfect in those early days. You know, when you get to project on him all those traits you’re looking for beyond cute and smart – character, depth, humor, a moral center.
As time goes on, he’s no longer the shiny new thing. He disses your best friend (behind her back of course), you begin to see his smarminess when he sucks up to your boss and he just doesn’t fit in or get your family’s zany, noisy humor – and he’s stopped trying. The ultimate deal breaker – you learn that he’ll do or say anything to get what he wants.
You know the type – you’ve dated him or perhaps it’s your daughter or a good friend. He just never lived up to the promise of those first, early days. Best to heed the advice you’ve given or gotten – Lose him quick and move on.

Posted by: s. valenti | July 3, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Obama is a marxist. And his college writings prove it.
Nice try though, but you lose again.

Posted by: Jo | July 3, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

Jo
What is a marxist?
Do you know? go ahead look it up right now.

Posted by: Joe | July 3, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

carolyn,
Your so called “research” is nothing more than NeoCon bloggers.
But according to my research, McCain was brainwashed by the Soviets during his time in captivity. That is why he blinks his eyes so much. He is signaling this captors and has been programmed to start WWIII.

Posted by: Fired UP!! | July 3, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Carolyn, there were a few Obama signs in my neighborhood, and slowly but surely, they’ve all come down.
People ARE wising up now that the truth is coming out about this fraud.

Posted by: Jo | July 3, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

Hey Jo,
There are NO McCain signs anywhere here. People are too embarassed to put them up.

Posted by: Fired UP!! | July 3, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

McCain has been in the senate so we know he’s not brainwashed.
However Obama is a newcomer and he’s been brainwashed by Rev. Wright for 20 years.
No thanks, we’ll take McCain.
Nice try though, you lose again.

Posted by: Jo | July 3, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Fired up, they’re just not sign people I guess.
However having a sign up and THEN taking it down is significant.
It shows people are learning about the fraud and changing their minds.
You lose again!
Next.

Posted by: Jo | July 3, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

McCain’s campaign Slogan:
Less Jobs, More War.
McCain’t 08!

Posted by: JoAnne | July 3, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

“I believe when you apply for a job, you need to know what you’re doing”
Obama 2004
When asked if he’d run for president in 2008
We agree Obama. By your own words you’re not ready!
Whooo hooooo! Imagine that admission in a campaign ad! It’s on video!
LOLOL

Posted by: Jo | July 3, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Jo wrote:
However having a sign up and THEN taking it down is significant.
********
How do you KNOW THEY took it down? Maybe someone stole it to up on their OWN lawn.
YOU LOSE!

Posted by: Fired UP!! | July 3, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Other than the military, what are JM’s credentials? What has he really done in all those years in the Senate? Likeable guy I guess but not much substance.

Posted by: jerryc | July 3, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

What does a DEMOCRAT Senator who WAS the VP choice for Al Gore say about Obama??
Nothing good. Lol.
Nice try though, but you Obamabots are no match for me.
LOLOLOLOL.

Posted by: Jo | July 3, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

Jerry, if McCain isn’t qualified than what does that make Obama? REALLY unqualified.
McCain has years of experience on the senate armed force committee.
Obama did what? community service?
Obama would make a good ambassador. President? No thanks. No way.
And military service is NEVER a liability.

Posted by: Jo | July 3, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

>>>>Uninformed Viewer:
Not to worry!
I’m sure there are a couple of Democratic senators who are still not enamored of B O (Barry?) (B H O?).
Nobody’s perfect…..
B U T
Mccain before B O !
COUNTRY BEFORE broken down dnc PARTY!!!

Posted by: hmmmm | July 3, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

We admit it. We’re stupid. We’re as blindly loyal to Obama no matter what – just as the Bush fans are.

Posted by: Obamabots | July 3, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

Joe Lieberman, who had until quite recently been viewed favorably in Connecticut has seen his numbers dive in recent months.
Quinnipiac this week found Lieberman with a 45 percent – 43 percent approval rating, down from 52 percent – 35 percent on March 27 and his lowest score ever.
Enough said about Uncle Joe.

Posted by: Fired UP!! | July 3, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Conservative:
Favoring traditional views and values; tending to oppose change.
Traditional or restrained in style: a conservative dark suit.
Moderate; cautious: a conservative estimate.
Of or relating to the political philosophy of conservatism.
Belonging to a conservative party, group, or movement.
Thats why they hate Obama!

Posted by: Joe | July 3, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Jo,
Not saying the military service is bad, but it’s not enough. JM has been on the Senate for a long time. What do we have to show for it? Isn’t he the McCain in McCain-Kennedy? Did he not support Lieberman-Warner? For true conservatives, this is not good. What are we to expect from him next?

Posted by: jerryc | July 3, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

So what you will get and it is pretty clear just on these posts. Are people who are scared of change= conservatives
and people the relize something has got to give and have the courage and strength to make it happen= Liberal/progressives/brave conservatinves.
So you have scared consevatives that just shout acusations and name calling. It’s ok don’t be scared. LOL!!!
You know that movie poltergist Mcsame looks like the creepy guy that tries to get caroline.. Don’t go to the light!!

Posted by: Joe | July 3, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Jo – Some US Budget Deficit stats for you in billions of $.
Start Finish Peak
Carter – 60 90 90
Reagan – 110 260 290
Bush 1 – 260 410 430
Clinton- 350 10 350
Bush 2 – 140 560 560
Bush data thru 2002. Who is doing all the spending?

Posted by: jerryc | July 3, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Oops I just checked and I have an SUV in the garage, I just ate a great meal and my thermostat is on 72.
Oh nooooo! I forgot to ask the rest of the world for permission!!!
don’t arrest me Obama….PLEASE!!!!
Lol.

Posted by: Jo | July 3, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

Jo, I am not accusing McCain of anything. I am being deleted for pointing out the hypocisy beneath the bias of Mr.Kristol and Klein. Neither served thie country in uniform but they are quick to criticize others who followed their path. And both previous posts lasted less than 10 minutes.

Posted by: ricky | July 3, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

James Danley,
The Webb/Hagel G.I bill which passed the Congress and is currently with Pres. Bush who has not only said he will sign it but has now taken credit for he and McCain on its passage even though neither ever got on board.(He creditted Webb but neglected to credit Hagel)The bill includes educational benefits to G.I with service >= 3 years AND allows transfer of educational benefits to spouse and children of G.I. with increased service.

Posted by: AnotherLaura | July 3, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Jo,
Starting with 1953, republicans president for 36 years, democrats 20 years. Dems controlled the senate for 26 straight years from 55-81. Looks like you lose again. Finally found one that does know something.

Posted by: jerryc | July 3, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

bhagwandeol-
You don’t sound much like a Dem to me lol.
Barack Obama said that the needs to address poverty, and other social needs exceed the government’s ability to address alone and that it is reasonable to leverage faith-based and other NGOs (non-government organizations). He seeks to improve upon the faith-based agenda of Pres. Bush by requiring enhanced accountablility, restricting of any of these federal funds to be used for proselytizing,requiring there to be no litmus test of religious affiliation for hiring or service for any faith-based charities’ activities within this program; This would be a significant improvement over the existing arrangement and would maintain separation of church and state issues.
As there would be no litmus test for religious affilitation, I would presume that there would be no restriction upon
which religious organization (Christian, Hindu, Muslim, Jew etc) was running a particular program as long as it legitimately addressed the needs and fulfilled the restrictions of no proselytizing, no religious litmus test
and was accountable. BTW: It has been established again and again that Barack Obama is not and never was a Muslim so you really need to stop beating that dead horse.

Posted by: AnotherLaura | July 3, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

AnotherLaura, President Bush dropped his opposition to this GI Bill with the addition of transferability which was added by the House. It was not part of the original bill passed by the Senate. Also, the military member would have to have at least 10 years of service in order to be eligible for the transferability of benefits. At least now there is some incentive to remain in the service. But it will still be a very serious problem if large numbers of new enlistees do not re-enlist after their three years of duty.

Posted by: James Danley | July 3, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

smith- Encouraging citizens to voluntarily serve in the military is not the same as reinstating the draft. To my knowledge, no candidate as stated that they would reinstate the draft; The closest any candidate has come is McCain who said when asked if he was concerned about the overextension of the military with maintaining wars in Irag and Afghanistan said that it might be so if we continued with an all-volunteer military.

Posted by: AnotherLaura | July 3, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

James Danley,
Actually I believe I heard that there was
some transferability at 6 years and then an increase at 10 years. And yes this was a compromise between the Senate and the House bills (Compromise of House and Senate bills before they leave the Congress is quite common if not the norm)
And of course th G.I bill was attached to an Iraq appropriation bill as well.

Posted by: AnotherLaura | July 3, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

Dear Hmmmm,
In other words, your response is that NO, John McCain never worked with the unemployed like Barack Obama!
Well, that doesn’t surprise me at all. He and his 750,000 dollar credit card wife have NO IDEA of the challenges faced by the middle class.
BUT JOHN MCCAIN HAS TOTAL EMPATHY FOR CHARLES KEATING!!!
BTW, my original question refered to Obama’s experience as a community activist, before he received his law degree, before he became a state senator.

Posted by: John's conscience | July 5, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am

>>> john”s conscience:
‘In other words, your response is that NO, John McCain never worked with the unemployed like Barack Obama!’
____________________
BUT MCCAIN D I D serve his country both in the military, state-wise and in the senate for a good many years.
And MCCAIN does not have ties to people ANlike REZKO and ODINGO and
RASHID KHALIDI and NACHMI AUCHI and
and BILL AYRES and BERNADINE DOHRN and FERRAKHAN and REV MEEKS …..
As for the $750,000 credit card…. is he overdrawn?
SO WHAT’S YOUR POINT?
HILLARY BEFORE MCCAIN!!!
MCCAIN BEFORE B O(?),B H O(?), BARRY(?)
COUNTRY BEFORE broken down dnc PARTY!!!

Posted by: hmmmm | July 5, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

There are so many sides to Senator Obama’s mouth, the expression, “he speaks out of both sides of his mouth” is inadequate to capture the inexorable political manipulations of this obvious poseur.

Posted by: Thank God for Karma | July 6, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

We admit it. We’re stupid. We’re as blindly loyal to McCain no matter what – just as the Bush fans are.

Posted by: Mccainiacs | July 7, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.