Obama to House Dems: If Sanctions Fail, Israel Will Likely Strike Iran
Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, met with House Democrats yesterday, talking about his trip abroad and his observations.
Obama told the caucus, according to an attendee, "Nobody said this to me directly but I get the feeling from my talks that if the sanctions don’t work Israel is going to strike Iran." Others in the room recall this as well.
The notion that Israel is preparing for such an action against Iran’s myriad nuclear facilities is not new, with conjecture heating up in May after an Israeli military exercise featuring 150 aircraft flying almost a thousand miles over the Mediterranean Sea in what was seen as a dress rehearsal for an air strike. Now that the Bush administration is engaged in diplomatic efforts with Iran, many Israeli officials are worried the US is getting soft on Iran, prompting Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak to travel to the US this week to meet with Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, and National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley. Barak’s office released a statement saying "a policy that consists of keeping all options on the table must be maintained."
Another attendee at the meeting of House Democrats recalls Obama saying that the good news is that Obama got the sense that the Arab states understand just how destabilizing a nuclear Iran would be — a "game changer," Obama said — because they know Israel would probably strike and that would be bad for everyone.
A senior adviser to Obama told ABC News that Obama was heartened to hear Jordan’s King Abdullah share that view with him in their private meeting.
The Obama campaign had no comment.
- jpt
UPDATE: Obama campaign spokesperson Wendy Morigi provided the following statement:
"Senator Obama has always said that Iran must end its illicit nuclear program. He has advocated tough, direct engagement, backed by stronger sanctions to pressure Iran. And, he has made it perfectly clear that Tehran should not wait for a new administration to reach agreement to end its program.”
Email
Santorum Wins Three States: What Does It Mean?
Rick Santorum Wins Minn., Mo. and Colo. Primaries
In other news Obama also said to house dems that he has a feeling the sun may rise tomorrow.
Typical, what ever is the most likely outcome is the one he endorses.
Why would Israel striking Iran be bad for everyone? How much fallout was there when they hit Iraq for the same reason? If he’s right and everyone else in the middle east doesn’t want a nuclear Iran then outside talk there won’t be much “bad” to be had.
His foreign policy inexperience is glaring.
Posted by: Zaggs | July 30, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
Obama fatigue is setting in now, the media has exploited him.. McCain up by 4 over Obama according to latest usatoday/gallup poll o f likely voters
Posted by: Steve | July 30, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am
It’s very clear — Israel’s existence depends on not allowing Iran to go nuclear. And as history as shown, if it can only depend on itself, it will do what needs to be done itself. Hopefully it will not come to that.
Posted by: hopesprings52hopesprings52 | July 30, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am
JB in St. Louis: I just read that he did, and that the leader of the country has told Obama he is very sorry it happened.
Posted by: becky | July 30, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am
JB: Sorry….should have read it over before I sent.
I READ THAT HE DID NOT GIVE THEM OR ANYONE HIS PRAYER.
Posted by: becky | July 30, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am
This is an absolutely irresponsible thing to say. Obama is clearly showing signs of serious mental illness. he thinks he is President.
Posted by: geevill | July 30, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am
“Nobody said this to me directly but I get the feeling from my talks that if the sanctions don’t work Israel is going to strike Iran.”
“feeling”? Way to start WWIII Obama.
Posted by: geevill | July 30, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am
Obama “gets a feeling from my talks”?? What is that?? This guy wants to be the leader of free world and can’t ask a direct question and get a direct answer?? I guess the questions weren’t on cue cards and he didn’t have his script with him.
Posted by: taoofterri | July 30, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am
“A senior adviser to Obama told ABC News that Obama was heartened to hear Jordan’s King Abdullah share that view with him in their private meeting”
So much for “private” meeting. Was Obama there on official Senate business? Is this part of his COmmittee assignment? Is he undermining the State Dept?
Posted by: geevill | July 30, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am
“Obama got the sense”
We need a President who doesn’t rely on feelings and senses
Posted by: geevill | July 30, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am
Based on Obama’s statement, Mccain should pound the Energy Independence of drilling here in the US now !!! If something happens in the middle east, gas prioces will hit $10.00/gallon in no time. McCain should hit the statement now.
Posted by: Mark | July 30, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am
God do I miss Hillary – she is the only candidiate of either party who is smart enough and strong enough to be president!
Posted by: ch | July 30, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Finally, a President with some forsight and intellect. I forgot what it was like to have a whip-smart President dealing with these important issues.
Of course Israel is not going to tell Obama directly that they will strike Iran. THAT would be irresponsible on their part.
As Tapper says, as much has been implied by Israel’s actions.
Only someone like dubya would have to be hit over the head with a brick before he was told something for him to understand it.
Posted by: dave | July 30, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am
way to spill that secret info there mr. obama. good to see you are ready to be predident.
Posted by: easy brown | July 30, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Wow! Obama came to that conclusion on his own? Quite astute, I must say….
Posted by: Nigel Tufnel | July 30, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am
vuzous, diplomacy has really worked well with Iran so far hasn’t it? And it worked really well with sadaam Hussein to eh? and Hitler too for that matter. Its appeasement. If they know its just talk, they will continue to flip us the bird. They need to know that something worse is coming if they don’t cooperate.
Posted by: Dog Faced Boy | July 30, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am
It’s just more Israeli PR. They’re playing poker with Iran, and Obama is the lastest I-raise-you.
Obama is willing to play along, hoping that the bluff will stall Iran’s nukes and he won’t have to deal with it.
At least he didn’t claim to have stared into Barak’s soul. But I guess it amounts to the same thing.
Notice that Jordan isn’t claiming to be worried about Iran getting nukes — they’re worried about the Israeli response. Which will be: Smack your brother when Dad’s not looking and then go run and hide under Mom’s skirts.
Posted by: Tim | July 30, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am
After eight years of the Bush and Rummy show how can anyone have the gall to rail about how bad of a president Obama will be? Bush is worse than Carter as far as I’m concerned and I never thought I would see that in my lifetime.
Posted by: Big Al | July 30, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am
People are just tired of Obama acting like God. I was going to vote for him, but since I can’t escape him, Im going with McCain. It seems, from media exposure, that Obama has been president for the last 8 years. Im tired of him already! Im voting McCain.
Posted by: Staunch Independant | July 30, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
And what will Obama do if Israel starts a third world war?
Posted by: norman ravitch | July 30, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Does anyone think or should, is anyone THAT dumb to think Israel can strike Iran and get away clean? The time for this has PASSED,Israel does not care if the whole region went up in flames she thinks USA will save her. WRONG just 2 missles and there is no ISRAEL so she had better sit down and let US take care of Iran as it is US that will fight not Israel!
Posted by: Carol | July 30, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
A “game changer,” Obama said — because they know Israel would probably strike and that would be bad for everyone.
Why not say it is bad for Iran to get nukes? Why only point out it would be bad for Israel to strike. Obama has already picked sides and it’s not with our allies.
Posted by: zuffy | July 30, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
you republicans are so dedicated to oil, but forget that other resources ARE out there. Ever heard of natural gas? It’s a renewable energy source that can power cars! Amazing right? Do you know that America has more wind than any place on the planet (well I know it’s full of hot air, but…)? Do yourselves a favor – off shore drilling isn’t going to fix oil prices for AT LEAST 10 YEARS!!!! If you think they can drill for oil overnight, then oh boy – YOU believe everything you read…
http://www.pickensplan.com – this guy is a republican and as a democrat, I support him. He realizes that the oil industry in America has literally dried up! We need to break our dependence of foreign oil and start moving into the 21st century people.
Even if there is oil on the continental shelf, it will take at least 10 years to feel at the pump and by that time, gas will have exceeded $10 gallon IF we are still dependent on foreign oil.
It’s time to break the addiction America. We need to either break the addiction of war or foreign oil – YOUR CHOICE! http://www.pickensplan.com
Posted by: I love Foreign Oil | July 30, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
I don’t think the multi-lateral talks with Iran are going to produce any fruitful results. So, would it be better for Israel or the US to destroy Iran’s nuclear facilities?
Either country will face a firestorm of condemnation, but politically, who should do the job?
Posted by: George | July 30, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am
I’m writing in Hillary this November!
Posted by: Bubba | July 30, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am
Who can fault Israel for launching a pre-emptive stike against Iran??? Aferall, if someone was threatening to “destroy” you, and was working feverously towards developing the means to do so, it ONLY makes sense, if for no other reason than self-preservation, to take the initative and “eliminate” the threat. Appeasement has NEVER proved to be a successful approach to antagonistic nations, for, in the end, the price paid is more terrible than taking action in the first instance…
Posted by: DR. John Ivy | July 30, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
Why don’t we ask Obama what this will mean in regards to his troop strategy? Will he support Israel if Iran retaliates? Will that be done by keeping troops in Iraq? Sending more troops to Iraq? Invading Iran? Canceling the redeployment to Afghanistan?
Tell us what you’ll DO!!
Posted by: matt | July 30, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
Why does it seem that everyone eventually brings up the ridiculous “appeasement of hitler” arguement? Why because when you evoke “evil incarnate” then it is impossible to argue any counter-point. Obviously appeasing Hitler was a mistake, but does that mean every single time that we encounter a potentially dangerous situation that war is the only option? Look, Iran recognizes the fact that Israel is a nuclear power, even if Iran attacked Israel with a nuke (which I have seen no evidence that they’re building) Israel would obliterate the entire nation and Iran knows it. Iran would not want mutually assured destruction and therefore wouldnt’ attack. Besides, name the countries in the last 100 years that Iran has attacked offensively? Now compare that number to the U.S. post WW2
Posted by: Closed Eye Visuals | July 30, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
Lets recall Obama’s first though of Iran. There not a threat? Wow… A huge flop from the international house of pancakes?
Posted by: Chase | July 30, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am
We can drill, drill, drill, do it safely, shut the rascals on the left up and have a fruitful life. When circumstances arise that we need to go to war, we go-provided there is someone with a backbone in charge. Otherwise we better learn a new language.
Posted by: Al Sharpton | July 30, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am
Great political coverage, but I have two questions:
1. I realized that the media has started using “arrogance” to describe Obama; is this because McCain blasted the media for too close to Obama? this is sad. Just because somebody is confident does not equate to arrogance.
2. I also realized that anytime McCain says something, it does not stick, but when Obama says something, you guys in the media spend days unend dicing and splicing. Is this fair? McCain just flipflopped on taxes, he lied in his ads, and many more, if it were Obama, you guys would have jumped all over him. This is why a recent study suggest that the media gives 72% negative coverage to Obama–this is conspiracy to bring him down.
Posted by: becky | July 30, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
“Even if there is oil on the continental shelf, it will take at least 10 years to feel at the pump and by that time, gas will have exceeded $10 gallon IF we are still dependent on foreign oil.”
WHEN WILL THE LEFT REALIZE THAT GAS WOULD NOT BE AT $4/gal. NOW IF THEY HAD NOT LIMITED OUR DOMESTIC PRODUCTION IN THE FIRST PLACE?? ALTERNATIVE FUELS? YES. CONSERVATION? SURE. BUT THAT MAY NOT HAPPEN SUFFICIENTLY TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM IN THE NEXT TEN YEARS EITHER, SO LET’S MATCH DEMAND WITH SUPPLY. **SAYING IT WON’T BE READY IN TEN YEARS ONLY UNDERSCORES THE URGENCY.** GET OUT OF THE WAY, PELOSI.
Posted by: David | July 30, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
SO, IT’S OK FOR ISRAEL TO HAVE 300-600 NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND NOT BE ONE OF THE BIG SIX BUT IF A MIDDLE EASTERN COUNTRY WANTS ONE WE HAVE TO BOMB THEM? REALLY? BUNCH OF YAHOOS ON HERE. DO A LITTLE HOMEWORK AND DONT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU READ ABOUT IRANS INTENTIONS ON THEIR NUCLEAR ASPIRATIONS. AS FOR THE MESSIAH
COMPLEX YOU FOLKS THINK OBAMA HAS MANTLED…WOW. NOW WE KNOW HOW BUSH GOT IN TWICE. MORONS…
Posted by: BRYAN | July 30, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Obama is a blabber mouth!
Can’t keep a government secret.
Obama is a SPENDING FOOL!
Posted by: CarDriver | July 30, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Israel has 200 nukes and Iran can’t have one???
Posted by: Book | July 30, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
This whole election just gives me tired head. The 2 party system is a complete failure and neither Obama or McCain are that much different from each other. We need a legit 3rd and 4th party in our system, until then status quo here we come.
Posted by: Andy | July 30, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
geevil said:
“”Obama got the sense”
…We need a President who doesn’t rely on feelings and senses”.
Actually, we have one right now. He doesn’t have any sense whatsoever. Maybe we DO need a change.
Posted by: Mike | July 30, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Carol said in part:”WRONG just 2 missles and there is no ISRAEL so she had better sit down and let US take care of Iran as it is US that will fight not Israel!” ….. No Palestine either and that might solve the whole conflict of the ages.
Posted by: oh my | July 30, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Democrat stupidity –
So when Pelosi and Reed want to pump oil out of our strategic reserve and they want to bar any legislation that will allow us to access USA resources, what is going to happen in the event that Iran is hit and they stop producing oil? (Even if for a matter of weeks?) They blow up Iraqi oil fields. They disrupt Persian Gulf shipping of oil.
I’m all for alternative energy sources, but if you follow the Democrat plan, we will have a crisis that the likes of which the USA has never seen. We could be brought to our knees in a matter of months! The Democrat plan is worse than irresponsible, it is national suicide.
America wake up!!!!!
Posted by: Alan | July 30, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Obama is nothing but somebody’s little puppet. If he manages to win, we’ll find out in short order who’s been orchestrating this scam. The term ‘empty suit’ was created with him in mind.
Posted by: Freedom Above All | July 30, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am
If Iran is allowed to develop nuclear weapons they will use them, their leaders are telling the world what they are going to do. This is a case just like WWII the leaders of the aggressors tells the world what is planned and the west sets still and lets him start a major world war. If the sanctions fail and they will the US needs to bomb Iran, Israel doesn’t have the military capability to do the job properly. The appeasors need to wake up and face reality, if we don’t stop Iran now there will be a war that makes WWII look small.
Posted by: Richard T. Ketchum | July 30, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am
You know, if McCain wanted to win this election, he might work more! This guy rarely works weekends, but he does have silver spoon Cindy in his back pocket, now, doesn’t he? Last week, John McCain worked Tuesday through Friday. The week prior, the same bag. He wonders why he gets no press, but he isn’t out there making headlines. He’s old and he needs his rest. His ideas are as old as the republican party’s misguided beliefs.
Whats funny is most americans are lucky to be lower middle class these days and they think the republican tax cuts truly help them. I can understand fighting for the ideals of conservatism, but truthfully, how are you getting ahead? Most republicans are poor and they vote for higher taxes. Now if it is in exchange for freedoms, I respect, but your freedoms are being taken away by the patriot act, many wire tapping bills and anti-terrorism laws. They can literally arrest you and hold you indefinitely without charging you if someone suspects your terrorist!
Now that being said, I’ve contacted my local authorities and stated that I believe all republicans are terrorists…. Is someone knocking at your door Tom in Littleton, Colorado? DON’T ANSWER IT!
Posted by: Larry | July 30, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Yes, I am ready for a change from President Obama. What? Well it sure seems like Obama has been president for 2 terms already.
Posted by: geevill | July 30, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am
I invented a car that ran on water and got 100 miles to the ounce but the Government bought it and killed the project.
Posted by: kevin brown | July 30, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am
amabo means “I will love”. Te amabo – “I will love you”. — The familiar Latin phrase – Te amabo in aeternum means ” I will love you forever”. So what?
Posted by: mike | July 30, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am
To I Love Foreign Oil:
You clearly have no idea of how economics and especially how the futures markets work. No, we obviously cant drill our way out of the problem, but to say it wont help in the mean time is either naive or you’re just lying.
When Bush talked about removing the presidential block on drilling, the price of oil dropped $9….just during that speech! The price of oil is based on anticipated supply and anticipated demand. In this case, the future supply line was shifted down and left. If congress lifts the ban, it will probably drop another $20, bringing gas back down to the low to mid 3′s.
Back in the early 80′s after the arab oil embargo, the government started a project with the aim of finding alternative fuel. What happened was OPEC flooded the market and brought fuel down to $8 a barrel, making any kind of alternative fuel non-cost effective.
Showing that we are willing to drill, as well as develop alternate sources of energy and transport, is the only way to show we desire to be and then become, energy independent.
Posted by: Phil | July 30, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
WHO is is TRAITOR trying to UNDERMINE Obama?
THAT is what I want to know…!!
Posted by: sue | July 30, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
so ,suppose we start drilling off shore – who will end up owning those rigs in a couple years? Cuz it won’t be americans – and if you cant see that , you are BLIND!
Posted by: mike | July 30, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
…because if Israel had plans to attack Iran, they would certainly first tip their hand to Barack Obama, whose years of foreign policy expertise and highly trained gut are giving him clear signals.
Puh-leeze. What a joke.
Posted by: Marshall | July 30, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Obama warns the Dems that Israel might strike Iran? He is really warning Iran by doing this and then you have the reports the CIA is issuing that Iran is planning a nuclear strike on the USA. We have had a history with Iran and the terrorist that is leading the country. He has struck at the USA in the past and has no reservations about going against the Great Satan again. Shold we be concerned? Yes, but it appears the Dems are more concerned that a nuclear reactor will be blown up in Iran rather than a USA city being blown up by Iran.
Posted by: Stark Granger | July 30, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
Vuzous,
Ur wrong! Republicians HATE war. It’s just that Dems FEAR war.
Islamic fundimentalist have been at war with the rest of the world off on for the last 1400 yrs. Remember “from the halls of Montizuma”?
The only difference is now they have the ability to launch a scud out of a container on a container ship AND now a Pakistian scientist named Khan (the father of Pakistan’s atomic bomb)is under house arrest for selling advanced designs for a nuclear warhead that can fit on a scud.
1st- Carter appeased the Islamic fundimentalist and got burned.
2nd- Clinton treated an act of war as a criminal act.
And now 3rd- Obama doesn’t know how to keep his mouth shut. (or maby he’s on their side)
Can you say “duck and cover”.
Posted by: Revoir | July 30, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
The only president to drop “The Bomb” was a Democrat. Democrats led us to Vietnam – Kennedy started it, and Johnson’s Gulf of Tonken lie pushed more troops to their death. So don’t start with the “Republican Warmongering”. If we elect Obama, the only time we or our allies will get HIT with the bomb will be under a Democrat’s watch as well.
Posted by: Vito | July 30, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
obama is utterly irresponsible yet again.
He needs to go back to just Hope for things. . .
Posted by: myze | July 30, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
I shouldn’t have to explain – look at everything in the US these days – we are holdin a garage sale and foreigners are buying it all up – empire state bldg anyone?
Posted by: mike | July 30, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am
Wow Obama, you just figured out if sanctions don’t work Israel will attack Iran? Hey buddy, did you hear as well, sanctions aren’t working. Utt-ohh, something might happen I guess.
I don’t understand why you didn’t swing by Iran while you were overseas and tell them to stop enriching uranium. Perhaps then this whole thing will be over.
Hey, “if” the Iranians do get attacked you can tell them not to worry, we didn’t do it.
Posted by: Biggums | July 30, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am
Again and again, I see that the comments on articles on corporate news sites are terrifying stupid: “We need a president who doesn’t rely on feelings and senses.” Come on, to “get a sense” is a figure of speech. Politics means working with people, and people’s motives and intentions aren’t necessarily always obvious or even apparent. I would argue that the glowing reception Obama received abroad indicates that foreign leaders have not judged Obama quite so inept as many think.
Posted by: David C. | July 30, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
I think the odds of Israel pulling a false flag op and bombing themselves and blaming Iran are better.
Posted by: Ziggs | July 30, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
This guy is dangerous. He has all these close door meetings while in Israel and then makes this pronouncement?
When we wanted to tell a secret as kids, we’d say, “nobody told me this but I think”…
Who did he just put in danger? Was this his way to warn Iran in advance?
This guy should get NOWHERE near the Oval office.
He is DANGEROUS
Posted by: Winslow | July 30, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
so when did the US government become a vassal for the Israeli parliament? and Who cares if Iran has a nuclear bomb, maybe a balance of power in the region is whats needed. Have you seen Pakistan and India go to war lately. Isn’t high time for our leaders to look after the crumbling American empire first, then some dinky country in the middle east?
Posted by: Jay Fayeweather | July 30, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
“the good news is that Obama got the sense that the Arab states understand just how destabilizing a nuclear Iran would be — a “game changer,” Obama said — because they know Israel would probably strike and that would be bad for everyone.”
That is the good news? Notice how no one is suggesting that a nuclear Iran is inherently destabilizing (at least no more than a nuclear Pakistan, a nuclear India, or a nuclear Israel). There is no reason to think that an economically prosperous, socially stable, and powerful nation is going to suddenly go postal. Imagine if the US (or Israel!) were taken at their word for everything they say.
Posted by: Andrew | July 30, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
If the middle eastern countries are so worried about Iran nukes destablizing the region, why aren’t any of them stepping up to the plate to defuse the tension?
Posted by: Arent | July 30, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Obama, thank you for stating as another poster wrote the “obvious” duhhh. We all know that years ago, Israel had struck Iran for the same reasons and so it will stop at nothing if it feels threated by Iran again.
Posted by: eviee | July 30, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Maybe Cheney and Obama should go hunting together!!!!
Posted by: the answer | July 30, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am
Enough with the US bashing!! The most beautiful thing about our country is that you are FREE TO LEAVE IT ANYIME if you think we are sooooo horrible. Please consider that.
Posted by: Dog Faced Boy | July 30, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am
As devastating as an israeli attack would be on the Persians, everyone in the world with any common sense clearly understands how disastrous this will be for America. Only traitors to America and supporters of the israeli racist apartheid state would even consider allowing the zionists to attack Iran.
It would be horrific to see what such an attack will produce in the deaths of Americans. As an American soldier I’m telling you that we have 160,000 of our people in harms way, and many of them will not come home if we allow the israeli’s to do something so stupid.
The other side of the coin is the definite destruction of the jewish state that such an attack would initiate. No jew will be safe anywhere in the world and Patriotic Americans will do our part to track down and eradicate any traitor that supported the inevitable destruction of the United States that such an attack will produce.
All you arm chair warriors paving the way for the destruction of israel and the United States by even considering such an attack had better reconsider what is best for America and act accordingly. The Persians have had a civilized society for thousands of years and have not attacked anyone in at least 600 years, don’t listen to the zionist traitors that are happy to throw America away in their quest for world hegemony. Support US, your US Soldiers who have sacrificed so much for you already, do not throw our lives away on the whim of the judensau.
Posted by: Effendi | July 30, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
I agree with CarDriver:
Obama is a blabber mouth!
(now that’s funny)
Posted by: Magoo | July 30, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
israel leveled a syrian nuke site a few months back.
30 DAYS LATER, syria claimed it was a brick factory. (easy to photograph the crumbled bricks!)
israels response: “sorry” which is international political-speak for “go pound sand”
syria filed no complaint with the U.N.
Why? BECAUSE IT WAS A NUKE SITE!!!!
Iran has been calling for the destruction of Israel.
Israel will bomb the nuke site moments before the ribbon-cutting ceremony.
Posted by: saltcreekphil | July 30, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
obama is utterly irresponsible yet again.
He needs to go back to just Hope for things. . .
Posted by: myze | Jul 30, 2008 10:40:40 AM
*********************
yes Obama is the irresponsible one, let’s elect mr “bomb, bomb, bomb iran” AKA “cigarettes would hopefully kill them”.
Posted by: johnosahon | July 30, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
If America elects Obama, we deserve him. He is opening up about his plans for us so we have been warned.
Posted by: ab | July 30, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
I wish just for a second more Americans could stand outside their own country and see themselves. WE ARE THE WORLD. You’re not and the hopefully some day a majority will recognize that fact.
In Canada, Britain, France and Germany for example, surveys show less than 9 percent of their respective populations would vote for the Republican nominee. Less than 9 percent! We get it, see it, yet from within the fish bowl that is the only world for Americans, people can’t seem to get a handle on the big picture.
For someone to state Obama will be a bad leader on the heels of what your present leadership has done, is a total FARCE beyond words.
Posted by: JOhn Vickers | July 30, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Arent – Nobody is stepping up to the plate to diffuse the tensions because we live in a culture that’s in love with war and destruction. Even if Iran did everything we told them we would still attack them – You do realize that Jesus will never come (again) unless we battle on the fields of Armageddon, don’t you? The question is: who is the beast?
Posted by: lasux | July 30, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Uhhhhh…Dave…. It’s not like the entire free world (and it’s leaders) didn’t already KNOW that Israel was strongly moving in that direction anyway…
I have no problem with pointing out Obama’s weaknesses – but let’s be intelligent (and factual) about what those weakness really are.
Posted by: Dan | July 30, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Obama – not a good thing to say when gas prices are so volatile. Israel may or may not do it but that’s up to them. We should not be dragged into their insanity and paranoia. They’d better unleash holy heck on Iran because Iran is probably gonna retaliate big time – most likely on our troops in Iraq.
Posted by: Bob | July 30, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Is Obama just now figuring this out, OMG???
Israel will hit Iran there is no other possible solution to this, it is going to happen and we have the assests in the region to take advantage of the confusion once the process starts!!
Posted by: david | July 30, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
All you Republicans amuse me. You had Senate, House of Reps, and Presidency and everything went to hell. Now it’s Obama’s fault I guess.
McCain is going to get crushed in the fall, no one is reading your little internet posts.
Posted by: Awesome | July 30, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
Baaab:
“For the love of God people get to bloody work. You RW morans are costing the economy money by spewing this nonsense from the walls of the cube owned by your company.
You’d think that being good ol’ RW morans you might care about your companies bottom line but I guess not. Pathetic.”
First of all, it’s morons not morans. And second of all, well, never mind…
Posted by: Magoo | July 30, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
Awesome: I guess that makes you a no one…
Posted by: Magoo | July 30, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
I hope all the inexperienced Congressmen heed this warning from the veteran of foreign policy affairs.
Posted by: Tyler | July 30, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
THE UNITED STATES APPROACH:
Why not sit back & allow the Mullahs in Tehran to go nuclear so they can fulfill their grandest ambitions of orchestrating armageddon?
Posted by: david p | July 30, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
Did I miss the election, was Obama elected? What a pile of nonsense!
Posted by: Gary | July 30, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
I am sure the media will run with this and state how Obama has the insight to forecast the future in the middle east
Posted by: tigger | July 30, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
With all the chaos insuing in the middle east with Iran, we had better be very careful who we as Americans choose to put in charge of this country. I do not think Obama has what it takes to make critical military decisions. I think he is a very smart man who is a gifted public speaker. But, this country needs someone who is willing do what ever is necessary to protect this country and Israel. No one wants war, but when a country constantly threatens us, it is time to take action. Iran and others seek to destroy the US and any country like us. We need to take action before it is to late. Wouldn’t it make better sense to start dieting earlier in life instead of waiting until after you have had a heart attack?
Posted by: Chris | July 30, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
A ‘game changer’? Obama, you’re just too cool.
Posted by: Charles | July 30, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
Did I miss the election, was Obama elected? What a pile of nonsense!
Posted by: Gary | July 30, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
This kind of thing should be taken seriously whether or not is it sounds like BS, like a person who says they are thinking about suicide or murder or bombing something. These are strange times we live in and they are getting stranger. Not much surprises me anymore.
Posted by: underdog | July 30, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
Obama really IS the anti-christ, isn’t he. His remarks (this article, for mere starters) appear to be occult.
Posted by: Boobala | July 30, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Yah. John McCain in charge would be better than Obama. Give me a break.
Does he know where Iran is?
Posted by: billy smith | July 30, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
A lot of people on here have called Israel an ally. How are they our ally? And don’t give me any of that “God’s Chosen People” mumbo-jumbo.
I’m a Republican, and I used to be a fervent supporter of Israel. Then it became apparent they do absolutely NOTHING for us in return for the BILLIONS OF DOLLARS we fork over to them. They routinely spy on us (and sell the information to other countries like China). They attacked the USS Liberty, killing over thirty Americans. And on top of that, we act as a proxy for fighting Israel’s wars; it’s long past the point where we can continue to afford to fight their battles for them.
So how is Israel our ally? I don’t see us getting much back from them in this relationship.
Also, people keep calling Ahma-nutjob the next Hitler, but how? Yeah, he hates Israel–but he hasn’t invaded and occupied another country (oops, that’s us…). Enough with the hyperbole already! He poses absolutely no threat to the U.S., as we could erase Iran from existence within minutes (just like Israel could). Some people on here have opined that Republicans love war. I, for one, do not. But too many of my fellow Republicans seem to jump at the chance to attack other countries–even when they know deep down we’re not really being threatened at all. Liberally applying our armed forces around the world is not a tenet of Republicanism.
Anyway, if Israel wants to preemptively attack Iran, then they should go ahead and do it and stop hoping we’ll do the heavy lifting for them again. They definitely have the offensive capabilities. But they should also be prepared to reap the whirlwind for their actions while we sit on the sidelines.
There is no reason for the U.S. to become involved unless Iran retaliates by launching attacks on our troops in Iraq. Sadly, most people would view an Israeli attack as having our tacit approval. And strangely enough, I think that’s exactly what Israel is counting on. What a great ally…
Posted by: gb8898 | July 30, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Repsonse to JOHN VICKERS:
1. Bush is not a true conservative republican so he is a bad example.
2. A republican in the USA is different than one in Britain or France.
3. America was created partly to get away from the socialistic thinking of Europe. The Dems in this country are trying to make us socialists. We do not want that, it is not the governments job to redistribute wealth and call it taxes: it is the same as stealing.
4. You are wrong. In the past 4 years of elections France, Germany, england, Canada and Australia have all gone MORE conservative. They may not have all elected a conservative leader but they have in fact boosted their parliaments or whatever they have in the direction of MORE conservatives.
Get your facts straight.
Posted by: Dave | July 30, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
In the words of one of the greatest military minds of the 20th century; “Surprise, surprise, surprise.” BHO and his team have just taken a look at the real world. He is running for President of the US of A, not the world. There are other people outside the US and they are going to do what they feel that they have to to survive, the US be damned. Welcome to reality.
Posted by: Mac | July 30, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Alrighty then-good luck to you, Israel. Be sure to let us know how this turns out, ‘kay?
Posted by: Connie | July 30, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am
ABC, just soo liberal–on the homepage are four critical Obama stories….balance for McCain? a big zero
Posted by: Ohio | July 30, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am
As “President Obama” takes his victory lap with the support of the slavish media and all the very carefully put together PR,we all must remember that he has NO EXPERIENCE whatsoever. The longest he has of experience is 20 years in Rev. Wright’s church of hate for America. Before you vote THINK!!!!
Posted by: Messine | July 30, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
Israel eliminating Iran’s nuclear program is a good thing – it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to understand that.
Naturally Democrats might have a problem with that, just like they don’t like killing terrorists.
Posted by: Kramer | July 30, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am
To Phil,
I definitely see your point and yes, I do understand that the price of oil is based on speculation and not an actual measurement of how things are. But you have no understanding of geology or the planet upon which you walk. I think that we should drill, but why aren’t oil companies using the leases that they have yet to explore? Something isn’t right… If there isn’t oil, they need to speak up, don’t you think? Secondly, natural gas is a renewable energy source we can use to power autos – why isn’t the govenment mandating more exploration into cars that run on natural gas? Oil Lobbyists maybe?
If we lift the ban, we can’t just drill overnight. Exploration is going to be a huge part of the drilling process, as we don’t know where the oil is! It’s not a magic bubble (as Bush makes it seem) that will produce oil in the first place we drill. We have a much stronger chance of finding oil in the dakotas rather than off the continental shelf.
Lastly, as someone on here earlier spoke, in a couple years, we won’t own the oil rig anyhow. And then we’ll be paying out of pocket for expensive oil once more and at what cost? The cost of american jobs, the cost of speculation and the cost of our country.
Sure, i’m voting for O’Bama. That doesn’t make me a left (or right for that matter) extremists, similar to the suicide bombers in the mid east (and yes, alot of you are the extremists – how do you live with yourselves?). There is a better way, but there is soo much lying out there that we need to focus on what’s going on at home.
To be quite honest, who cares about Iran and Israel? I truthfully don’t at this point. I could also care less about the price of oil. I live in a city with mass public transportation. I live in a green condo. I let the republicans pollute the earth for me :)
Posted by: I love Foreign Oil | July 30, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am
Obamam is very scarey. I know he is not the anti-christ—but he is definitely a fore-runner! And I am so sick of democrats running down the war in Iraq. In case you haven’t noticed–we have won the war. The surge worked–McCain was correct. I know that is hard for democrats to handle. But thats the way it is. They have ran their mouths so much concerning the war–and now they can eat their words. Thank God–we didn’t listen to the dems. We would have left Iraq and lost the war. That is the problems w/the democrats. They were for going into Iraq–but when it got tough, they wanted to run. America does not run! America stays and sees things through. Thank god for George Bush-John McCain–and the wisdom of the Republican party!
Posted by: b4uvote | July 30, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
We sold them bumker buster bombs years ago and unless Iran backs down, which I would say they will not Israel will strike Iran, Iran will strike back and Israel will Nukem. We better have our subs at launch depth and be ready to nuke a couple countries to contain the whole mess. Hopefully this will then be the start of peace in the middle east………..it worked in 1945, we have not gone to war with Japan or Germany since 1945.
Posted by: david | July 30, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
Obama, What don’t you understand about “THE NEED TO KNOW.” Inexperience showing. Statements like that cost more lives if this in fact is carried out sometime in the future. Gee Gilligan, gives the other side heads-up…..AND NO LIBS, WE DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW………..
Posted by: REPUB | July 30, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Israel is going to attack Iran? OMG, why aren’t we drilling here and drilling now. OMG, what are we going to do when Middle Eastern oil isn’t available? Wait, maybe Obama will let us ride on his unicorn after the game changes.
Posted by: DrillHereDrillNow | July 30, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Somebody said on here that Obama would “turn this country upside down if elected”…guess they can’t tell from their upside down view of things—Bush beat him to the punch on the turning our country upside down. Just maybe Obama will turn it back on track like it more nearly was before the Pugs got in the White House! We can hope, YES WE CAN!
Posted by: Dzster | July 30, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Huh? A US Senator running for President goes fact finding and then makes a statement such as that with predictable consequences for oil prices and ratcheting up tensions?
Something is missing in that picture. I wouldn’t think a man in his position would be deliberately irresponsible, but it reinforces the idea that Obama is in way over his head. Where are those 300 advisors?
“The Persians have had a civilized society for thousands of years and have not attacked anyone in at least 600 years”
Right and when the US finished putting in your phone system, you called to tell us that right after you took US citizens hostages and threatened to kill them if the Shah wasn’t given to you for execution.
Posted by: len | July 30, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am
France – Support for Obama 64%
Support for Mccain 4%
Germany – Support for Obama 67%
Support for Mccain 6%
Canada and Britain are not different!
Maybe western nations should pool resources and offer Americans trips outside their own country so can understand exactly the full scope of damage republicans have done to the world.
Posted by: john vickers | July 30, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am
Who can believe this idot. He is not the president and will not be. He is making a complete fool of himself
Posted by: m-antony | July 30, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am
I believe I speak for most Canadians…especially those who heard “obama” say he was going to talk to our president!!!??? (we have a prime minister incidentally), & change NAFTA! We are embarrassed for our USA friends how they have to put up with “obama” arrogantly running around the world purporting already to be president! How can you USA people permit this…. we all wonder??? I saw on the Canadian news how he snubbed USA soldiers who waited in line for hours to shake his hand. How could he just walk by without even looking at them?? Send him & his recent 1000% increase of new “african” immigrants back to africa…eh ! It does not take a rocket scientist to see he already has ruined the USA!
Posted by: Worthy | July 30, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am
So, Jake Tapper, “Barack’s office made the comment. . .”
Since when does the media address political candidates by their first name? Only when the media is in the tank for the candidate.
Posted by: EWK | July 30, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Barry is so smart. He knew the surge wouldn’t work and now he knows that Iran needs to be appeased and not stifled. Bush has given up the ghost, so Israel better understand that they’re on their own… and it will continue if Obama is elected.
All of you screaming that there should be no war with Iran should be well aware that your support of BARRY is the thing that will bring it. Israel cannot wait for this neophyte to be elected. Their hands are tied. Either they do it now while Bush MIGHT help them… or they don’t do it at all because Barry will allow them to perish. If you’re Israel and you don’t want a nuclear Iran… what do you do?
This guy is going to get us all killed BEFORE he’s the president! That’s how good he is. Change. Yeah right… complete global destabilization just as a matter of his being the nominee and a sycophantic American electorate.
Posted by: Coco Lopez | July 30, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Kramer: That yellowcake in Iraq was degraded and unusable. It was also left over from the 1980s. If this were a case of us finding actual evidence of WMDs, Mr. Bush would have been all over television, because he would have been completely vindicated. He would have held a press conference to say, “See? I told you so!”
He didn’t.
Posted by: gb8898 | July 30, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
REPUB and len: Obama was talking to Congress. It was ABC and their anonymous “attendees” that leaked the discussion. Who is irresponsible now? Although I really don’t see that there was anything given out that we didn’t all know already. Give it a rest.
Posted by: jock59801 | July 30, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
You can now take Obama`s foreign policy predictions to the bank, now that he is a foreign policy expert (along with his self-proclaimed status as an expert in Constutional Law and Community Development, the Jesse Jackson School.) He did complete Commander-In-Chief and Foreign Policy camp with his trip to the war zones, Middle East and Europe. In fact, in that magnanimous style of his, he gives good marks to Ms Angela Merkel of Germany for her understanding of the situation in Afghanistan! No accolades to Sarkosy but, well, he is a man, and Sarkosy took up all his time in his adoration of Barack (the kumbaya time of camp?), so substantive stuff was neglected.
Posted by: Luke | July 30, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
looks like Obambush is lookin for a war!
Posted by: stephen | July 30, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
i think this is a gross overreaction to a statement that was obviously intended for a private audience,Obama did not come out and pupport this to be fact.Its proper to be intuitive,i dont think if any leader relied on facts to make decisions anything would ever get done as they would most be reacting to incidents rather than pre-emptive action to prevent them in the first place.Its improper to to take such a vague statement and hammer it to death with the presumption that it was intended to be kept secret.About alternative energy,America should be re-evaluating how we got here more than anything else,a strangling dependence on fossil fuels is the reason why we are here today and any leader seriously considering alternative energy solution would be the one with America’s best interest at heart.Lets learn to be careful in the way we say things and what we say,reading this message board,it could easily have been written in Iran itself from the amount of anti-nationalism verbiage being spewed around.
Posted by: Dan | July 30, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Obama is an idiot. A dangerous, naive idiot. His hubris is beyond comprehension. And, he is not yet the official nominee of the Democratic party. God help us all if he is elected.
Posted by: Wizard | July 30, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Worthy | Jul 30, 2008 11:12:51 AM
You view to much TV..Don’t believe the McStooges propaganda..And please dont feel sorry for US..Most of us find Obama fresh and truthful..
Posted by: JimBo | July 30, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
“Nobody said this to me directly but I get the feeling from my talks that if the sanctions don’t work Israel is going to strike Iran.”
I “hope” his feelings don’t start WWIII but, then just pass the cool aid to your enemies and then they will “fall in line”.
Biggest goof I have heard in foreign policy in years……Letting your adversaries and the world know what your allies MIGHT do. This guy will be dangerous with foreign policy and WE will pay the price for his ineptness.
The Obama arrogance is getting to be too much to handle. This guy is going around acting like he is already president with his transition team and talking policy with house democrats.
This election with his downfall can’t come soon enough for me.
Posted by: Independent minded | July 30, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Welcome to the real World Obama, this is why troops are needed in Iraq, if we want to continue to stave off the Apocolypse.
Posted by: Cringe | July 30, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am
Come on! What does Obama know about war? He’s never been in the military and does not have a military mind! He’s
just a young pup in congress so what does he know? He’s just guessing.
Posted by: Danito | July 30, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am
EWK -
Check that again. I think he was talking about Ehud Barak’s office, not Barack Obama’s. It is even spelled differently.
Posted by: jock59801 | July 30, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am
Luke—sounds like sumbody gettin’ JEALOUS! and I bet McSame McCain sho is (JEALOUS, that is)!!!!
Posted by: Dzster | July 30, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am
Fauxbama goes on a Predidential tour and meets with world leaders to build a resume’. World leaders must meet with him to hedge their bets and avoid snubbing a potential President. The meetings give him credibility that his otherwise empty resume’ lacks. He runs home and gossips with members of his political party and blags about what leaders tell him in private and what he feels they might do even though they didn’t say they would do it undermining the very credibility that was the purpose of the trip in the first place…. what a fool.
Posted by: JimmiP | July 30, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am
Will: “He also thinks there are 57 states in the Union as well…..case in point!”
Yes, that is a case in point – of stupid mud throwing. They all mispeak, unless you think that McCain actually believes that Czechoslovakia still exists.
Posted by: jock59801 | July 30, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
How lucky we are to have two Presidents.
Even Clinton, after being elected, had the grace to say “There is only one President.”
I guess when you’re a god like Obama, you can do as you see fit.
Posted by: drjohn | July 30, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Go hit your head on the wall, Obama will still be elected. No amount of idiotic babbling will deviate CHANGE THAT WE CAN BELIVE IN.
Posted by: johnson | July 30, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Posted by: Jeff H. | Jul 30, 2008 11:28:58 AM
Good question, Jeff.
In light of Russia and China, America is as indispensible as ever, whether Europe likes it or not.
Obama gets the same crowds as does Springsteen or Paris Hilton. Democrats would elect either to President as well.
Posted by: drjohn | July 30, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
How can someone who is apparently so great and the second coming inspire SUCH EXTREME comments and hatred that i have seen through the primary and general election.
Obama’s campaign is about one thing- OBAMA
Ask not what obama can do for you but what you can do for obama!!
Posted by: Kurt | July 30, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Is Obama going to Beijing? Maybe he could compete in every event and bring home the gold too!
Posted by: CocoLopez | July 30, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Go hit your head on the wall, Obama will still be elected. No amount of idiotic babbling will deviate CHANGE THAT WE CAN BELIVE IN.
Posted by: johnson | July 30, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
CocoLopez–You said a MOUTHFUL in your last post and I believe you’re right on the bulls-eye with your assessment of things.
Posted by: Dzster | July 30, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am
Obama tells the truth – and spastic Republicans go nuts. Too funny.
Posted by: anita rao | July 30, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am
RW- we can say “Way to go Israel!”
Posted by: Stark Granger | July 30, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am
What kind of hero is McShame anyway? He crashes 5 jets before he gets caught(never saw that coming) and then makes propoganda films for the enemy(pain was just too much, well yes it’s called torture) and we call that a hero? ‘d hate to see what you all call God. Oh, I forgot, you call him BUSH.
Posted by: mike | July 30, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am
REPUB | Jul 30, 2008 11:33:03 AM
I like it..war will be hard to avoide..so I hope we win it..I want to be on the winning team..We need change..Obama can’t do anything to wrong..Congress and “other Powers”Will Keep him In line..He’s my choice..Good luck to you…
Posted by: JimBo | July 30, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am
So, the general has spoken. And only 4 short years ago, he was voting “present” in the Illinois state legislature. And now, he fails to take Joe Biden, his foreign policy guru, along on his trip to ensure Joe educates him and to keeps him safe from harm. Is this arrogance or simply extreme faulty judgment? The world needs to view this guy with extreme skepticism.
Posted by: benvictor | July 30, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am
RW, The United States backs Israel.
Posted by: killerbee | July 30, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am
anita rao- IF Obama ever does tell the truth then maybe the Republicans will go spastic. So far he has been the leftwing liar he has always been. He tells so many he cant remember from morning to afternoon what he has told.
Posted by: Stark Granger | July 30, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Way to go Mike… go after a guy that lived through hell. Meanwhile what did Barry do in this life? Not much. People are outraged that McCain would assert that Obama wants to lose the war in Iraq… but he’s right. Any good news INCLUDING THE SURGE IS WORKING must be rejected. Why? Barry and the Dems are hoping that the news from Iraq sours because anything else is bad for business.
The Democrats are the disgrace here… not a guy that got shot down in Nam… and you should read your history because our airforce suffered heavy loses over there because pilots and equipment were nothing like today.
Posted by: CocoLopez | July 30, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am
I was going to vote for Obama, but it seems like all he wants to do is be in front of the camera with no substance.
Posted by: RB | July 30, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Rock bottom for Republicans? OK, Hill Republicans, ask yourselves — is this bottom? The indictment of Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK) is a BIG deal. This appears to be a case of a politician who just didn’t think he could get touched. And also, he probably believed the favors he was receiving were favors he deserved (that’s usually how these longtime lawmakers talk themselves into taking these favors). As for his re-election bid, realize that Stevens was in trouble BEFORE the indictment, and his seat was one of the Democrats top pick-up opportunities this cycle. This isn’t a case where he was coasting to re-election, and NOW this indictment makes him vulnerable. By the way, the Stevens indictment is actually a potential opportunity for McCain, who has never been a fan of the pork-barrel senator and has had his share of clashes with the man. But so far, we haven’t heard a peep on this from McCain… And the indictment certainly doesn’t hurt Obama’s quest to put this ruby-red state into play. But Stevens represents everything McCain’s been running against inside the GOP for a decade. He ought to embrace his downfall before the GOP’s tarnished brand stains him with this. Meanwhile, NBC’s Pete Williams and Tony Capra report that Stevens will appear in federal court in Washington on Thursday at 1:00 pm ET for his initial appearance on the federal charges of filing misleading financial disclosure statements.
Posted by: BarackStar | July 30, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Barry,as you called him survived being Black In America.Don’t you think that was enough hell. But, no, if that’s not enough I would love to compare his resume with McCain’s. Really, I think someone should create their resumes and post them side by side.
Posted by: Mike | July 30, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
BarackStar… why would McCain need to state the obvious? He has a RECORD of opposing Stevens while Barry has no record at all. McCain doesn’t need to pile on. Why? So that he can be a petty opportunist like Barry and Michelle? Are you kidding me man?
Posted by: CocoLopez | July 30, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
I think it’s absolutely disgraceful how McCain disparaged the service of our troops in Afghanistan by overlooking their sacrifice when he suggested that Iraq was the first major conflict after 9/11, instead of the conflict in Afghanistan.
This type of historical myopia is yet another clear example of how, despite all his chest thumping and finger pointing, John McCain is unfit to be Commander in Chief. John McCain simply does not understand the importance of the service our troops are providing in that conflict. Taking the fight to Al Queda and to the Taliban was the right course of action which had the overwhelming support of the American people. Unfortunately however, Bush and McCain did not stay focused on pursuing Bin Laden who is still plotting against us. Apparently, McCain believes that our soldiers killed and wounded in Afghanistan after 9/11 were not worth mentioning when it comes to citing the conflicts that he believes are most important – namely the Iraq war that was based entirely upon false intel, sophistry and prevarication.
Posted by: david armendale | July 30, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am
I wish it was November, all of this stuff would be done with.
Posted by: Chris | July 30, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am
Rest assured, if the Obamessiah wins the white house, we’ll talk our way out of war and into more useless, paper-wasting sanctions – What he should have said is what he really thinks, ” If sanctions fail, we’ll just ask the UN for more sanctions. Enough is enough!
Posted by: Kenneth | July 30, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am
Using wounded troops as a political ploy- is disgusting.
McCain is no longer a straight talker- or honorable.
Posted by: DCMata | July 30, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
Calm down everyone, it doesn’t matter what Obama said, the only important thing here is did he look presidential when he said it…..That’s all that matters to his adoring fans(the media).
Posted by: Ex-Dem | July 30, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran. Sounds like McCain was right again. i wonder when Obama is going to get one right.
Posted by: billy bob | July 30, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
In international affairs, there are no secret briefings attended by the press and anyone who leaked such information would be investigated quickly and thoroughly. You are buying into a fiction, Jock. This is a deliberate leak and irresponsible on the face of it although there may be circumstances so far unreported.
It doesn’t matter what we all know. In diplomacy it matters very much precisely what is said down to the last syllable, where it is said, and to whom. Obama is a man the world is watching and cannot make such mistakes if that is what this is. But moreover, he is speaking as if he were the President and that is an unpardonable gaffe in his profession.
Like it or not, the President is George W. Bush and if you can’t respect the man you must respect the office. Obama does not seem to respect either and that is not only arrogant and irresponsible, it mocks our system of government for his own ends.
He is playing with the lives and future of real people in real places who will suffer real consequences while he fist bumps his way into obscurity.
Posted by: len | July 30, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
“Obama told the caucus, according to an attendee, “Nobody said this to me directly but I get the feeling from my talks that if the sanctions don’t work Israel is going to strike Iran.”
No kidding, Obama, you are not President, you are not in the intelligence loop. Just like when you made your meaningless “judgment” about Iraq in 2002, as a back-bench Illinois political hack. Obama is clueless here and in no way qualified to be CIC of the USA.
Posted by: astounded | July 30, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
No one in Congress has any intelligence, no one in the CIA, FBI or any government affiliated office—only Mr. Obama knows the answers and has to announce it to the “press” and to “congress” what he thinks. The good news is he said even with 20,000 or 30,000 troops the surge will not work and he said he thinks it will even have the reverse effect. Well his thinking was wrong. Sanctions are not the only way to stop Iran. I am no longer voting for Obama—this man is dangerous.
Posted by: Susan | July 30, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
The US needs to tell Israel very clearly that if they do something stupid such as attacking Iran unilaterally, then they are on their own. If Iran attacks them first, that is a different story.
Posted by: John Kovacs | July 30, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
len
Who said this was a formal “briefing?” Who said anything classified information was discussed at all? Who said the press attended (they apparently did not, or ABC wouldn;t have to rely on half-quotes by “attendees”).
Obama was very careful to say that it was not something told to him in confidence. It was just his own general feeling. Maybe Jake can clarify this, but I don’t see why you are making such a big deal out of it. Well, I do know why, but that is politics not national security.
Posted by: jock59801 | July 30, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
that mc cain is still considered a viable contender for president after the mess he has made of his campaign so far is a marvel.
the obama have only to flex their muscles and deploy information that proves mc cain’s incompetence, and its all over. mc cain campaign is hopeless, disorganized, dishonest, floundering.
come october if obama is not clearly in the lead, i think the gloves will come off and the obama campaign will cream mc cain with all they have got,.. and they have ammunition enough already.
Posted by: rodger | July 30, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
The BIBLE says Whoever Blesses Abraham (Israel) God will Bless, and Whoever Curses Abraham (Israel) God will Curse, Now wheather you believe this or not does not make it Untrue, it just means that you have Chosen not to accept Gods Truth. Now you make the choice as to who you will believe. THE BIBLE IS STILL GODS WORD FOR THE WHOLE WORLD TO RECEIVE.
Posted by: Wake Up People | July 30, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
If Israel attacks and Iran tries to seal off the Straits of Hormuz… it just means the navy finally gets some action. There is no way we allow that banana republic to stop oil shipments. You want to see the world turn on the middle east, it’ll happen mighty quick if energy is halted. Saudi Arabia’s monarchy could find itself quickly out of a job.
Posted by: CocoLopez | July 30, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
So, the threat and willingness to use military force will make the sactions work? How can that be? I thought war was not the answer? Shouldn’t we just leave Irag right now so we can damage our military credibility so force is not taken seriously?
Posted by: WB | July 30, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
“No kidding, Obama, you are not President, you are not in the intelligence loop.”
Exactly. He’s making statements based on what? It takes 300 advisors to make 1 empty suit.
Posted by: Mack | July 30, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
WOW, I didn’t know this. Thank you Obama for providing us this information. You Obama idiots are voting for a puppet!!!!! This guy has not done a thing to qualifty being President of the free world. He doesn’t even run his own campaign for Christ sake. WAKE UP.
Posted by: Ratdog | July 30, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
Isn’t speculation about foreign affairs helpful? Whoever leaked this conversation is obviously well-intended. :) I think no comment was the right comment in this situation.
Posted by: Sean O'Brien | July 30, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
Good thing McCain is fixin to beat himself. The only thing between Obama and the White House is Obama.
Posted by: JimmyTMac | July 30, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
President Obama does not have to have had miltary experience to be comander in chief, look at all the presidents who didn’t serve in the military. Like Clinton and Bush.
Posted by: jitters | July 30, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Last I checked Iran hadn’t attacked anyone, and the US is the only country to drop the bomb on anyone.
Posted by: Ben Straub | July 30, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Seotoro no, it you were smart you would do research before you state something. Obama wrote that statement in the book before the media knew what it was. A reporter then went to the book, which is veiwable by the public, and copied what he wrote and leaked it to the media. Probably a conservative, but it could have been a lib thinking he was doing Obama a favor.
Posted by: jayandersonjr | July 30, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
RobertX – By rest of the world do you mean US, France, Germany, and England. Quite frankly most countries in the middle east do not want more instability. Countries like China and Russia are against military action on Iran.
Posted by: Ben Straub | July 30, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Len,
There is NOBODY (Obama included) who could make a bigger mess of everything than did our current President…that is, unless it’s John McBush. Not only is he mean spirited, McBush can’t even remember what he SAID.
I DON’T THINK SO! Obama is not only a good candidate, but many of us believe his temperament and judgment suggest he has a chance of becoming a really GREAT president. It’s obvious you don’t like him, but his election is just what this country needs after these last 8 devastating years of Bush. Wouldn’t even you agree we need a CHANGE?
Posted by: sedonakaren | July 30, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Dude posted “If this was real, it would be all over the real news networks.” Gotta tell you, that presumption is completely false!!! Thats the problem. You cant trust the “real” news. Talk to the boots on the ground.
Posted by: Dan | July 30, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
rick I think culture of corruption would be bush and his sick friends.
Posted by: jayandersonjr | July 30, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Wednesday, July 30
National Rasmussen Tracking
Obama 48, McCain 46
Obama +2.0
Michigan PPP (D) Obama 46, McCain 43 Obama +3.0
Tuesday, July 29
Race Poll Results Spread
National Gallup Tracking Obama 47, McCain 41
Obama +6.0
Posted by: BarackStar | July 30, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Hmmmm…Drudge has a post ;
“Olmert to make big announcement..developing”
Could it be something about Iran?
Posted by: Old Woman | July 30, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
Dan, we all know fox supports McCain. If fox even thought they could pass a story like this as true, they would run it. After all, they are “fair and Balanced”. THATS A JOKE IF I EVER HEARD ONE.
Posted by: jayandersonjr | July 30, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Wow, one trip to Israel and a do nothing, done nothing, lead nothing lawyer is telling house democrats what’s happening. Well I guess someone has to…they don’t seem to check the news or their approval ratings.
Posted by: rktsci3127 | July 30, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
rev er – “Obama needs to keep his big mouth shut about foreign affairs that could trigger a war or a bigger problem” – We’ve seen you can write, now can you convince us that you can also read? Israel is already preparing to strike Iran, and they will unless they’re convinced to drop nuclear prospects. Everyone, regardless of political party knows this. They already struck Iraq in ’81 for the same reason, a repeat against Iran could trigger another full-on war against Israel. Obama acknowledging this is an important step in avoiding “a war or a bigger problem”. Duuuuuh…
Posted by: grr | July 30, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
Can we somehow elect Obama’s campaign staff and keep Obama busy doing harmless rock concerts and kissing bobbies?
Could he at least CHECK with his staff’s policies before flicking matches at international fuses?
Posted by: zak | July 30, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
I have read the past hours worth of postings in this thread and the strongest impression it has made on me is level of venomous hatred with which we attack one another. The weakest form of argument is personal insult, it belies ignorance and a lack of credible information in support of your point. Both sides of this issue are spending more time trying to tear the flesh off of their “enemy” than accurately express a valid opinion. If we want to know why our country has been mired in a sesspool of cultural and social stagnation take a look at how we treat each other right here. Our leaders are a reflection of ourselves. We seem to prefer to fail and blame others rather than seek legitimate answers.
Posted by: civil discourse | July 30, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Alex H===”resistance is futile”-YOU GOT THAT PART RIGHT igmo!
Posted by: Dzster | July 30, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Civil Discourse – I could not agree more.
Posted by: Laurie | July 30, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
Civil Discourse – I could not agree more.
Posted by: Laurie | July 30, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
“This quietly alludes to the fact that they don’t want to do your dirty work.”
And you think that they’ll want to do even dirtier work for Barry in Pakistan? An unstable country with many nukes.
Posted by: Mack | July 30, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
I’d gladly give up my gun rights if it meant getting Obama in the Whitehouse.
Posted by: jitters | July 30, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Jitters – why do you have to give up gun rights in order to have BO as Pres?
Posted by: Laurie | July 30, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
This month Israel engaged in war games. Iran engaged in missle launch tests. Israel has been threatening Iran and Iran has been threatening back. None of this is news. Sorry guys. But it isn’t.
Posted by: Scotti | July 30, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Posted by: Stark Granger | Jul 30, 2008 11:54:14 AM
More McToast/Neocon desperation. That story is months old and has been debunked. Hello! The trial was last month.
Just like your grandpa Mayor McCheese, all you wingnuts do is attack Obama. How about talking about what Grandpa’s going to do? Oh wait, He’ll just follow Obama’s lead. “Sixteen months sounds like a good timetable”
Obama=Leader
McSenile=Follower
Posted by: BarackStar | July 30, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
“I’d gladly give up my gun rights if it meant getting Obama in the Whitehouse.”
Giving up your rights for a man. Sounds like love to me.
Posted by: Mack | July 30, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
“Obama=Leader”
Hillary=Leader
Obama=Loser
Posted by: Mack | July 30, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Somebody said something about gun rights. Not sure what it has to do with the price of tea in china. But Obama applauded the court’s decision not to allow guns to be banned in DC. That sounds pretty pro gun to me.
Posted by: Scotti | July 30, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Scotti – That’s why I was confused about jitter’s comments….
Posted by: Laurie | July 30, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
jules dangle july 30 11:20—- The Bible is the inspired word of God. I will pray for you. I would be scared to death to make a comment like that.
Posted by: b4uvote | July 30, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
New York – prices at the pump are actually falling.
Posted by: Laurie | July 30, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
obama an emty vassal, knows nothing. amazing how far we have come. sad sad.
Posted by: rest | July 30, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
There is NOBODY (Obama included) who could make a bigger mess of everything than did our current President…that is, unless it’s John McBush.
———–
John McBush? You do realize how idiotic that sounds don’t you? Did you make that up all by yourself or did your read it from your daily talking points on Kos? You do realize that saying something doesn’t automatically make it so? Bigger mess of everything? Boy I’m impressed by your technical description of all aspects of country and how it relates to the world. Bigger mess? That’s a pretty detailed description. Define exactly what is “a big mess” and how specifically how Bush (by himself) is to blame for each aspect of said “big mess”.
You do realize namecalling and catchwords/phrases like McBush, Halliburton, Facist, Big Oil, etc. doesn’t substitute for intelligent discussion?
I remember when critical thinking was required to graduate HS and college. Apparently that isn’t necessary anymore?
Posted by: Rich | July 30, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Because Jock, wars are serious business. A US Senator making a run for the Oval Office does not make such comments off the cuff or lightly. If he does, he is a fool. If he is not a fool, something as yet to be revealed is going on. But on the surface, that remark is a bad judgement call.
Politics is not simply the will to power. It is the responsible exercise of power.
If Obama is JFK’s heir, he needs to study not only JFK’s writing but also his mistakes. History painted a halo around JFK because he was also a great speechmaker. His policies left much to be desired. Remember he was in Dallas trying to put his adminstration back on the path for reelection after multiple administrative disasters. So when people talk about the unfulfilled promises of the Kennedy administration, they are mostly speculating on how he was going to dig himself out of the hole he had dug himself into.
Posted by: len | July 30, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Staunch Independant said:
After eight years of the Bush and Rummy show how can anyone have the gall to rail about how bad of a president Obama will be? Bush is worse than Carter as far as I’m concerned and I never thought I would see that in my lifetime.
Carter: suppoted the Grand Ayatollah and brought on the Iran hostage crisis Now: Iran is still our enemy. Carter: Inflation rate 12%. Now: inflation rate 5%. Catrer: unemployment rate 7.7%. Now: 5.1% Carter: Intrest rate 20%, Now: 6.25%. Carter: Misery Index scores a 16.27. Now: 7.96. Carter: raised taxes, cut military. Now: lowered taxes, grown military. It just keeps going on and on and on. Your opion is not supported by the facts.
Posted by: Alphaomega | July 30, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
veteran – Maybe your right. Maybe the answer is to put sanctions on nations which only hurt the civilian populations. Maybe the answer is supporting dictatorships for cheap oil. Maybe you are right.
Posted by: Ben Straub | July 30, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
fools. Israel doesnt threaten others. Iran does. Israel beleives in life. Iran doesnt. see a trend or danger???
Posted by: bert | July 30, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Rich, and you would probably say Obama’s an elitist. Seems like your the one to me.
Posted by: jayandersonjr | July 30, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
jandersonjr,
How many years of diplomacy with raving lunatics should there be before a different tack is taken in dealing with those lunatics?
When the mushroom cloud is rising?
Posted by: veteran | July 30, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Any body who is not voting for Obama in my mind is definately ignorant. In my eyes, McCain is in no way, shape or form, qualified to be president. I’d rather have 50 more years of Bush then to have 50 sec of john McCain.
Posted by: jayandersonjr | July 30, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
and I hate bush
Posted by: jayandersonjr | July 30, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
Has Obama assumed the position of President already? Why does he make these statements?
Posted by: Susan | July 30, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
New York – I did not say that I was a McCain supporter, nor did I imply the economy is hunky-dory. I merely pointed out that the price of gas is indeed falling – an 11% decline for a national average. Why would you assume either of the first two?
Posted by: Laurie | July 30, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Duh? No wonder McCain had strongly encouraged Obama to travel to see things first-hand. I’m glad to hear that Obama is finally getting a clue about what is going on in the world. He must not read any newspapers or the internet. At least 2years ago, ABC reported on Iran building their nuclear weapons capacity. For quite some time, Iran’s developing nuclear weapons has been in the news media. That Iran directly threatened to annihilate Israel has also been widely publicized. The EU has been involved in negotiations snd sanctions against Iran to resolve this. Yet Iran continues to build nuclear weapon capacity. Israel understands that any attack against Iran should remain a last resort. Unfortunately Obama has NO success to report after his visits with leaders in helping Jordan to understand that Jordan and the Middle-East need to take immediate proactive steps to support a peaceful negotiation and resolution. It seems that Obama is causing harm to the US foreign policy by his campaign actions.
Posted by: Jane | July 30, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
Alphaomega Does that compare to Reagan ballooning the national debt, Reagan and Rumsfeld giving weapons including WMD’s to Iraq’s Saddam Hussein and all of the lives and the money that has cost since trying to get rid of Saddam and cleaning up the mess he made? Whereas Iran, well Iran hasn’t really bothered us since the hostage crises and has not cost us the lives and billions of dollars that Iraq has. So your logical arguements defeat you completely as our government has 7 years now of record deficets because of Bush, Rumsfeld, and Iraq.
Posted by: Scotti | July 30, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
If the US/UK handle the situation with Iran the same way they handled Iraq, we really have big problems in the world.
Posted by: Bezzina Anthony | July 30, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Perhaps the ‘D’ in “Obama, Il-D” stands for duh? I’m guessing Israel will attack, rather than wait for a possible pacifist administration to take over the world…oops, the White House. Can’t blame them, frankly. Granted, that’s what some in the Iranian leadership want, because it aligns with their eschatology, but even so, it’s not like this is news in any way, shape or form.
Posted by: JoeMac | July 30, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
First all, as a nation they have every right to have a nuke. We have nukes. How can one nation have nukes and tell another nation that they can’t have them. We threaten to attack them and they can’t defend themselves. I certainly disagree with the radical muslim movement. However, that is their way of life. We have our way, they have theirs. If we leave each other alone, they can live theirs, we can live ours.
Posted by: jayandersonjr | July 30, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
New York – sorry, I meant $0.11 decline, not 11% – my bad.
Posted by: Laurie | July 30, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Obama is hype. In the article I read today on his time as a law lecturer:
But it also offers a more unsettling portrayal as a lecturer who did not write a single piece of legal scholarship, was disengaged from other faculty, single-mindedly focused in his political ambition and unwilling to take a stand on any issue–even those that deeply engaged the school and the surrounding South Side community–in order to protect his budding political career.
The most surprising–and revealing–anecdote concerns a gang case that consumed the law school and the poor South Side community that surrounds it. A group of professors in the school–liberal and conservative, black and white–took the lead in defending Chicago’s anti-gang loitering ordinance, which was challenged by the American Civil Liberties Union.
Obama refused to take a stand.
Posted by: young_voter | July 30, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
JoeMac – Read up on 1948. We all know Israel isn’t going anywhere. Time to be diplomatic and make some concessions.
Posted by: Ben Straub | July 30, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
To FlamingLib,
“Trying to get you to vote a certain way out of fear. Much in the same way Bush did in 2001. I guess if it worked then, it might work now.”
Umm, history 101 will confirm the Bush election occurred in the year 2000, not 2001. But details …
Do you have Obama tickets for the 2009 election? Have you received your voting registration card for the 2009 presidential election, yet?
Posted by: Roger | July 30, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Jayandersnjr First all, as a nation they have every right to have a nuke. We have nukes. How can one nation have nukes and tell another nation that they can’t have them. We threaten to attack them and they can’t defend themselves. I certainly disagree with the radical muslim movement. However, that is their way of life. We have our way, they have theirs. If we leave each other alone, they can live theirs, we can live ours. I don’t here them threatening us, why are we threatening them.
Posted by: Dave | July 30, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Mack – I wouldn’t say we are evil or good. There are arguments to say we are both. One thing is certain we do meddle in everyone’s affairs everyday, and it is not always good meddling.
Posted by: Ben Straub | July 30, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Laurie
I didnt mean to imply you were supporting a side its just that there are so many people that talk about McCain this McCain that and you start to realize that these people are brainwashed into picking a side without knowing anything about the person and immedietly they defend them. Im not saying that Obama is perfect, but sh-it if bush lowered the bar this low there no way anyone can do worse (with McCain being an exception, he looks like he has it in him to lower it even further
Posted by: new york | July 30, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
I’ve been trying to figure our what Obama means by change. Now I know: Change his mind on FISA; change his mind on campaign finance; change his mind on Iran; change his mind on troop withdrawal; change the way we handle foreign affairs by telling everything he hears or thinks; change his mind on whatever and whenever he feels like it.
Posted by: Susan | July 30, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
So, Obama takes a trip to Europe and the Middle East which makes him the expert on foreign policy? Sure, I believe that Israel could strike Iran, but most other politicians already know this. This is just another dog and pony show for the country put on by Obama and his fellow dems.
McCain 4 President!!!
Posted by: JZ | July 30, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
So, Jake Tapper, you say “Barack’s office released a statement. . .”
Since when do members of the media address or refer to political candidates by their first names? Only when the media is in the tank for the candidate.
Posted by: EWK | July 30, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
alan – Wow I am so glad I warrant such a response. I totally disagree with you on pretty much all the fearmongering nonsense. When Iran gets nukes, the nukes will be protected as some sort of national treasures. Iran will not use them unless another power uses them on Iran first. An example could be the US using nuclear bunker busters which exist and their use seriously discussed. Your second point is completely rediculous. Iran is merely trying to protect and deter attack. They haven’t attacked anyone outright in, soemone previously wrote, 500 years. The US of course has gone into Vietnam, Korea, and Iraq for the UN. I am well aware that Iran is not a democracy and quite frankly that is their right. They need to determine their destiny. So I pretty much disagree with you on all matters relating to our Iranian foreign policy.
Posted by: Ben Straub | July 30, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
No one has answered my earlier question. How is Israel our ally?
Is it the spying on us? The selling of our national security secrets to countries such as China? The attack against the USS Liberty? The fleecing of billions of dollars from American taxpayers? The reliance on the U.S. to fight proxy wars?
What kind of ally is that? Why do so many on here defend Israel as if Israel is some paragon of virtue? Israel is looking out for exactly one thing: Israel. They don’t give a hoot about our opinions, and I don’t see why we should give a hoot about theirs.
Some of you sound like you’re ready to sacrifice yourselves for Israel (even though we all know you’d send someone else in your place), but why? Is it some misplaced Biblical obligation you feel? What has Israel ever done for America? WHAT?!?
You want to see an ally? Look at Great Britain. You want to see an opportunistic nation that PRETENDS to be an ally? Look no further than Israel.
Posted by: gb8898 | July 30, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
New York – I honestly do not care for either right now. It scares me that these are the two best candidates we can come up with. No harm – no foul. I really wish (especially with the lowest Pres. rating) that we had a unified leader both Dems and Reps would agree with. I kinda think this was the whole thought process of the independent party. Unfortunately, we seem to keep spirling into that same two party system with both sides slinging mud and insults. Somewhere there has to be a worthy candidate that is worthy of our trust and support. I just don’t see that we have that choice this year….
Posted by: Laurie | July 30, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
If he is this irresponsible now, imagine if he were president, how much trouble we’d be in.
Posted by: Lisa | July 30, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Ben Straub: My fellow Republicans no longer care one bit about fiscal conservatism. Don’t you remember what Cheney said? “Deficits don’t matter.” What a smart guy…
For today’s Republicans, it’s just fine to have massive transfers of wealth–essentially SOCIALISM–as long as the transfers are going to foreign nations. And according to Stark Granger, it’s also completely acceptable for foreign nations to spy on us–as long as the nations can justify the spying by saying they’re afraid of “liberals” in the U.S.
Utterly pathetic.
Posted by: gb8898 | July 30, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
gb8898 – Question for you: You seem concerned that foreign nations can spy on us, I am curious about your opinion on FISA?
Posted by: Laurie | July 30, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
We cannot afford another country in an unstable part of the world to develop nukes. Clinton did not do anything to stop India and Pakistan. At least Bush was able to stop North Korea. I hope the next president will not permit Iran to build nukes.
Posted by: al4mcattack | July 30, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Is this presidential?
Posted by: Kim | July 30, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
gb8898 – I have read your post, and you speak a lot of truth. Fiscal conservatism, what’s that the republicans now say. Just pass our military budget and we will slip in some entitlements. Sickening really. And to say I have always been a republican. So sad.
Posted by: Ben Straub | July 30, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
al4mcattack – Can’t afford it eh? Can we afford another war, with Pakistan are you nuts? 160 million people running around with hate in their eyes.
Posted by: Ben Straub | July 30, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Where is Al Gore when you need him?
Posted by: don brown | July 30, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Israel does not have a history of attacking other countries – its conflicts have come from defending itself.
Posted by: Mrs. Tea | July 30, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Mrs. Tea – Israel in that sense sounds a lot like Iran. How about nobody attacks.
Posted by: Ben Straub | July 30, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Israel will do what it needs to do in order to survive, whether Obama likes it or not.
Posted by: ragnar30066 | July 30, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
al4mcattack – I am not voting for Obama for this reason and the fact that he is for massive spending increases. I am going third party. I just like to throw it around with you guys in my off time.
Posted by: Ben Straub | July 30, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
Ben,
Doesn’t matter – my point is almost nobody in this country has read the Freeh report – the seller of military secrets is an amazing document – I will not reveal as I think if there is interest – anyone/everyone should dig out this report and read.
Posted by: Ron Thomas | July 30, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
don brown – Answer: Flying around in his er, ummm, “green jet” to his er, umm, “green home”.
Posted by: Laurie | July 30, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
Ron Thomas – If what you stated is true, it does deserve a lot of concern.
Posted by: Ben Straub | July 30, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Obama has spoken. And to think, only 4 short years ago, he was voting “present” in the Illinois state legislature. And now, a self-declared world leader. Frightening.
Posted by: benvictor | July 30, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Louie Freeh was director of the FBI and Charles was second of 4th under Janrt Reno
pretty well intentioned Americans – I gotta believe they were being truthful.
Posted by: Ron Thomas | July 30, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
ZUFFY….Read your post. Don’t underestimate the IDF.
Posted by: AnnaRN | July 30, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Very Important to understand this: Iran has one of the biggest natural gas reserves in the world. Let’s not give them a golden egg by ergizing our autos with natural gas. Iran is going to end Israel if they get nukes, which they think will cause world nuclear holocaust and the 3rd Imam will come to earth and Islam will rule the world. They are willing to sacrifice their country for this vision. They have stated this for many years. And by the way, Bush scared the crap out of them being next door to them for the last several years. That is the only reason we didn’t find out about their clandestine nuke program of 20 years a different way. By Israel being nuked, and maybe us at the same time, along with the rest of our surprised allies.
Posted by: HT | July 30, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Nevermind that it is obvious but isn’t foreign diplomacy rule number one not to go home and announce to the press what you discussed, particularly matter of this nature?
Posted by: Paul | July 30, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Striking Iran first is playing into their hands. It would be a small sacrifice to pay for the resulting hatred towards Israel (and the US) for breaking the peace treaty, killing civilians, and putting the world into war all because of Iran’s “peaceful nuclear energy exploits”. It would spark a whole lot more terrorism, and give Iran the moral high ground to do with it what they like. No, attacks would not be a good thing – for either side.
Posted by: Warren | July 30, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
Laurie: FISA, at least the new version, sucks. I have a big problem with the latest incarnation of FISA, which essentially erases the warrant provision regarding Americans.
But there’s also a big distinction between FISA “spying” and the kind of stuff Israel has been caught doing to us. In general, I don’t think allies should infiltrate important branches of each other’s national security infrastructure and sell information to China. Call me old-fashioned.
Another point I’d like to make is about this “hidden imam” thing that Ahmadinejad has mentioned. What the folks who bring this up leave out is that Ahmadinejad is subservient to the mullahs in Iran, and they have said they don’t share his weirdo ideas. They’ve even told him to rein in his rhetoric.
And in the end, the mullahs are the ones actually in charge of Iran. Ahmadinejad is the guy they stick out in front of the public to make it look like their votes in elections mean something. When it comes down to it, the mullahs are only interested in staying in power.
And it’s hard to maintain power when you’re dead, which is why Iran won’t attack anyone. The mullahs are in this for themselves, and it’s not easy to rule over a glass parking lot.
Posted by: gb8898 | July 30, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
Why the Obama hate over this? He just stated the situation. He’s not endorsing pushing the button OR preventing it, whatever your crazy take on this is.
Posted by: Warren | July 30, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
Warren- if Iran is trying to get the US or Israel to strike by doing the things they are now then what will they do if they are ineffective? Will the step up the program to get us to attack? Will they attack to get us to respond? It might be a valid question and a response may not be simple but I understand the need for Israel to defend itself from this terrorist leader.
Posted by: Stark Granger | July 30, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Israel has already proven they are willing to hit first. When the bombs start flying Iran will strike Israel back once Israel strikes them first, you are misguided if you think Iran will sit on their hands while Israel takes out 20 or 30 of their nuclear sites!
Posted by: david | July 30, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
To Flaminglib,
Quoting you, “Cons use Fear to sway people.”
I agree, cons, both dems and repubs, aka politicians, use fear & deceit.
That’s why facts and dates matter. So eat this. The Iraq vote also didn’t occur in 2001. It occurred in Oct. 2002.
From Wikepedia. “”Iraq Resolution” and “Iraq War Resolution” are popular names for the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002,[1] a joint resolution (i.e. a law) passed by the United States Congress in October 2002 as Public Law No: 107-243, authorizing the Iraq War.”
Posted by: Roger | July 30, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
It is necessary for Israel to defend itself against the tyranical regime of Tehran. The Mahdi will never return because of a nuclear blast over Tel Aviv. I hope that the Israelis wait until oil dips below $90 a barrel; this way the economic shock won’t be too intense. Good luck IDF, we are with you
JerUSAlem! James
Posted by: James from El Paso | July 30, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
All comments too critical of Israel will self-destruct in 5 minutes. Otherwise, thanks for the open forum.
Posted by: A. Halsey | July 30, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Geez, no big deal. Obama is just doing what the American Media, Democrat politicos like Kennedy, Durbin, Pelosi, Murtha, have done ever since the Iraqi War began….Always ensure that ANY military information, no matter the source, no matter the truth, gets into the media. That way if the “enemy” attacks, we can always say “we told ya so”.
Posted by: Lars | July 30, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
It is better to hit Iran now instead of waiting until they have the means to keep and use the horrible weapons that only we have the capability of stopping. Hezbollah would love to hit us with a nuke.
Posted by: HT | July 30, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
I don’t think Israel is thinking straight. Do they really think the missal only comes in one direction they don’t realize it could also come from the south which they don’t know what they are facing with the underground Hezbollah . Do they really want there country under fire specially from the people that loose one person the country goes knots (Israel)
Posted by: frank | July 30, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Is this supposed to be breaking news? Oh that’s right. He has been out of the country having his picture taken and not visiting our troops.
Posted by: Bonnie | July 30, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Do you really believe Israel would attack Iran not believing that their chance of success was high? I point out that they recently took out a highly defended Syrian reactor suffering no losses. Iran is more bluff then bite. Heck they doctored recent photos of missile lauches to cover up faires. They can’t do as much damage as they try to portray in the media.
Posted by: Pablo222 | July 30, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Who do you think will be put at jeopardy should Israel bomb Iran? A million armed combatants will pour over the Iran/Iraq border and join the Sadr army and attack our troops. That will be the first offensive response and the United States will feel the brunt of it, not Israel.
Posted by: lockes_ghost | July 30, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Obama shut up! We already know this so please stop acting like you’re giving us something new – like you have some inside information because you went to Israel for 15 minutes. This is what shows me how much Obama doesn’t know.
Posted by: dianeremarx | July 30, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Isreal has to do what is best to protect Isreal as ” “wants us to do, what is Iran doing first of all??
Posted by: Jill | July 30, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
What is wrong with this picture? Barack Obama should keep his phony fears to himself on matters of the mideast conflict since he’s not our president. I’m really getting tired of hearing this man try to stir up world trouble just to satisfy his political gain/ego. Words by politicians such as Barack Obama can be inflammatory and should be more carefully measured. He should not try to predict future conflicts for his own gain. Israel can take care of Iran, if necessary. Makes you really wonder about his allegiances.
Posted by: Wild | July 30, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Isreal has to do what is best to protect Isreal as ” “wants us to do, what is Iran doing first of all??
Posted by: Jill | July 30, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
I believe I have a solution to much of this unrest. Obama chastised Pres.
Karzai because he stayed in Kubal much of the time and didn’t get around
Afghanistan as much as he should.
I believe Obama and Karzai should do a
joint bus tour of Afganistan. See
Kandahar, travel Hwy. 4 to Spin Boldak and the Pak. border, then travel north to Jalalabad.
Spreading good will and trust throughout
the region. Also, if the major network
news anchors could follow that bus with
their own bus, I believe the outcome
we be so wonderful. I am very excited
to hear Obamas support for this plan.
Posted by: Doc | July 30, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
lockes_ghost: The whole point of an Israeli attack is to draw Iran into retaliation against our troops in Iraq. Then we can fight the war for Israel. Pretty cunning, huh? So again, I ask, How is Israel an ally?
James (below) illustrates the biggest problem in this whole thing when he writes “JerUSAlem.”
James, the U.S. are not a part of Israel. Israel is not a part of the U.S.
Folks, God is not going to smile upon you because you choose to burn innocent civilians in the name of “Israel.” Many deluded individuals believe that’s the case, though. In holding such beliefs, they make themselves no better than the terrorists who claim Allah’s blessing for their violence.
Posted by: gb8898 | July 30, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
What an ingenue! No one who treats this as an insight worth sharing should be in the White House.
Posted by: John Plunket | July 30, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
When the Hell did we elect Obama as our President…And any good leader would not be telling the media about the talks they had…What an idiot.What is Obama trieing to do start a war between them…Do you think they will be talking with Obama truthfuly now that he’s run his big mouth.
Posted by: PCC | July 30, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
gb8898 – Thank you for your response. I agree 100% with the first two paragraphs! Not sure about the rest of the post, but thank you for sharing your views. I do not blame Obama for letting this info out (not that most of us didn’t already know) but it seems to me a bit irresponsible of the “attendees” to start spouting off at the mouth regarding things that then get either misrepresented or blown out of proportion. Your thoughts?
Posted by: Laurie | July 30, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
The man is an idiot.
Posted by: Clifford | July 30, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Since Israel receives Billions of dollars in Aid from US not to mention equipment and load guarantees, then She needs to listen to whats the best interest for both us and them….they cannot continue with this double Standard of owning over 150 Nuclear Warheads (Carter) and police the region from having any of their own. Those hypocrisies will not end with a happy ending. If Israel would like nuclear free Middle East then they should disarm and let the UN inspect their undeclared arsenal
Posted by: mike | July 30, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Warren: Why the Obama hate over this? He just stated the situation. He’s not endorsing pushing the button OR preventing it, whatever your crazy take on this is.
——————–
No, but Obama is acting as if this information is new. Obama likes to state facts that most people who read the news already know because he knows that he has followers who don’t read the news but believe only what they hear from Obama. For them, it is the first time they’ve heard it, they think that Obama is privy to some inside information that no one else sees. This is what I cannot stand about Obama. He knows his audience and he plays to them.
Posted by: dianeremarx | July 30, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
In any case, I seriously doubt that Israel would brief a President Obama on this sort of thing
Posted by: John Plunket | July 30, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
Bu$hCo is using Isreal to do their bidding. Iran has to much oil for them not to take. Just like Iraq.
Posted by: BlueJersey | July 30, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
I have a minor in Islamic law from Colombia University, and if one to believes that Iran is ruled by Islamic extremist Ayatollahs then how could they ever nuke Israel? Israel controls one of Islams most cherished holly lands…so if they actually do ever get the Bomb, they will no way have the know how to make it small enough to nuke all of Israel and leave out Jerusalem. Think about the logic…nuclear radiation over Islamic holly land?? not possible!
Posted by: mike | July 30, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
I am a centrist and here is what I know.
Bush and the Republicans have had nearly 8 years running the country.
So where did that get us?
We waged war in Iraq for fear of weapons that did not exist there.
North Korea actually built nuclear weapons while we waged a war on Iraq.
Iran is actually enriching uranium right now while our forces are exhausted from Iraq.
Bin Laden is still at large.
Energy prices have never been higher.
Oil companies have been hitting unprecedented profits each quarter.
The US Dollar has never been weaker.
Housing market has never been worse.
Our largest companies are or were on the verge of bankruptcy (GM, FORD, AMERICAN AIRLINES, DELTA)
Our largest banks are on the brink of bankruptcy
Bush started with a surplus and now we have the biggest defecit ever recorded.
America’s reputation as a respectable world leader has been completely comprimised.
American conservatives must swallow their pride and realize, that things couldn’t be much worse under any leadership.
You must have the dignity to admit this, and support a new direction.
So no more name calling and no more animosity against the Democrats.
The entire planet recognizes our leadership has been flawed, except for something like 30-40% of Americans.
It’s time that we start fixing the mess of 8 years going the wrong direction.
Posted by: James G | July 30, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Laurie: The way I see it, everyone already knows Israel is ready to do something if Iran doesn’t give in to the sanctions. Obama stated common knowledge (at least to anyone who’s been following this issue), and it got “leaked” by someone in attendance at the meeting.
I put “leaked” in quotes because it’s no different to me than someone announcing they attended a secret meeting, and they learned the astonishing news that the sky is blue.
I wonder what kind of uproar we’d have if McCain had made these same comments. I doubt there’d be much talk about it at all.
Almost 300 comments because Obama told us something we already knew? Kind of silly really, but some people seize any chance to argue (myself included).
Posted by: gb8898 | July 30, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
James G – thanks for letting us know what a centrist you are becuase your posting doesn’t show it.
Posted by: Stark Granger | July 30, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
For “John Plunket”
YOU DAYS ARE GONE, you are getting weaker and weaker.
WE DO NOT FORGET even if it takes 1000 yrs.
Posted by: sakibov | July 30, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
James G …Bush isn’t running for President …His name is McCain these are two different men…Like Obama and Wright and Farrakhan….
Posted by: PCC | July 30, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Another prophecy from the mighty mind of the Marxist Messaiah, he is truly the Global Magic Man…….Shalom
Posted by: ONTIME | July 30, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
For over a year now, not a day goes by without Israeli press publishing articles on either US or Israel striking Iran. Lately, it’s all about concerns that US is talking to Iran.
Israel wants Iran destroyed, not for comical existential threats but rather because Iran is making too much noise about the treatment of Palestinians, just like Saddam was doing.
Posted by: Nancy | July 30, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
norrinradd: I’m curious… How are “Russia” and “Iran” spelled in Hebrew?
I just love these Bible prophecies.
Do you have any info on Super Bowl picks? Maybe I can get a head-start on my wagering.
Posted by: gb8898 | July 30, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
“The Persians have not attacked anyone for 500 years” ??
Can anyone remember an Iran/Iraq war?
Oh, that must have been self defense!
Who supports the terrorists against Israel? (Iran’s leader recently assured us that Israel will soon be wiped off the face of the Earth). Oh, Israel deserves it and they do not have the same right to self defense like Iran does!
Who supported the 911 terrorists? I don’t know if Iran did but someone did for sure, and, Iran of course does not have a history of supporting terror do they?
If I hire a gangster to kill someone, am I guilty of murder? Only if the victim didn’t deserve it right?
Posted by: Dennis | July 30, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Mr Granger,
Both my parents live in Tel Aviv, so I understand where it is relative to Jerusalem and I assure you that one cannot Nuke Tel Aviv without damaging all of Israel…if you are wondering Tel Aviv is Only 36 MILES away from Jerusalem…so i repeat if we believe that Iran is ruled by Islamic Extremist (which they are) then we must also believe that they will not destroy their holly land. So please stick with this topic rather than women’s rights…because as I recall our great Ally Saudi Arabia give even less rights to women. Iran allows women in government, active military and even to drive…can we say the same about our oil rich desert friends?
Posted by: mike | July 30, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
When Barack speaks, everyone listens!
Hear the words Ahmadenijad,and tremble.
“So it is written- so it shall be done!”
Posted by: daryl | July 30, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
Hard to keep Barack and Barak straight, isn’t it?
Posted by: Alfred E Neuman | July 30, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Hey Mike G Don’t forget that while Slick Willy was lying under oath there was a Republican Congress.
Nancy Pelosi stated back in 2006 that since the democrats have taken control of congress she had a plan to deal with the gas & oil prices.
Little did we know that her plan was to DOUBLE the cost of gas & oil.
The Party of Defeat can’t get out of the socialist oops I mean liberal policies that have failed time after time.
Posted by: bill | July 30, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
HT: If a different poll were conducted among Christians, what percentage do you think would say Christianity should be the world’s religion?
Posted by: gb8898 | July 30, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Israel has a secretive Nuclear weapons program with many warheads.
Israel currently is staging massive human rights abuses against Palestinians.
Israel is threatning to invade a sovereign nation preemptively.
Give these facts shouldn’t we be invading Israel to get rid of the threat to Middle East peace along with freeing the Palestinians from a tyrant?
We did the samething for the Kurds and Shiites in Iraq why not the Palestinians who are living in worse conditions.
Currently Iran has not made any threats to invade Israel, there have been lies and mistranlations to make it appear that is just the opposite, however if you look at facts you will see that it isn’t the case. Iran has a right to pursue peaceful use of Nuclear Power per the NPT treaty that they signed and have not broken.
Rogue nations like Israel should not be allowed to attack other sovereign nations just like Iraq was condemened for attacking Kuwait.
And to a previous poster, if a vote for Obama is a vote for muslim extremism then a vote for McCain is a vote for christian extremism.
Muslim extremism would get no where without a cause. We give them a cause by meddling in the middle east and countries all around the world. It isn’t our freedom that they hate it is our meddling. Meddling that results in whole populations staying below poverty in order for our companies to make money.
The sad thing is that my tax dollars are helping support the genocide of the Palestinian people so I’m directly responsible for it and it makes me very upset that there is nothing I can do here at home. Obama isn’t going to change anything and McCain is just going to make it worse like Bush did. One of my biggests regrets in life will forever be that I voted for Bush his first run for office.
I have come to the conclusion that the only solution is either for the US to fall from the ranks by a collapsing dollar and economy or for a total uprising by the people to start over.
The latter is not going to happen anytime soon as to many of us are couch potatoes that only care about ourselves. However the dollar is collapsing and the economy is going down the drains so that is our only hope.
Living poor is a much better option than supporting Israel and our meddling around the world, meddling that has resulted in millions of millions of innocent deaths in the last 70 years as well as poor living conditions for 3rd world countries.
Posted by: David | July 30, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Well, Israel’s top dude just resigned. Don’t think he’ll pull a prank like bombing Iran before he leaves, do ya?
Posted by: Connie | July 30, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
David- you sound like the same apologists that spoke up for Sadaam Hussein. Poor little Iran just wants to get on the Nuclear program for peaceful electrical uses. They are so innocent and would never do anything to bring world shame on them. What a crock!
Posted by: Stark Granger | July 30, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
You who treat this like it is no big thing are just plain stupid. If Israel attacks Iran it will be a huge military mess for the United States as well. Iran isn’t a push-over like Saddam was. They have a lot of military resources. They haven’t threatened anyone lately and we have a nuclear Pakistan which according to the CIA is actively HELPING the Taliban. Pakistan is a bigger risk for nuclear war than Iran. Even if Iran DID get a nuclear weapon, they wouldn’t dare use it unless they want to vaporize their own country. The only thing they could use if for would be a deterrent to Israel attacking them. They know if they were to use it they would be obliterated by the USA in an instant. So what is the big fuss? Pakistan is already a bigger threat because half their spy service is in active cahoots with the Taliban. They could give the Taliban nukes and the Taliban and Al Qaeda are much more likely to use them in a rogue fashion.
So the USA needs to tell Israel to stop it and let diplomacy have a chance.
Posted by: hageeisahoggie | July 30, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Citizen in FL- are you sure you are a citizen (in FL)? A small nuclear devid\ce planted internally in Tel Avviv would be devastating without hurting the Dome of the Rock. You sir are disingenuous and need to open your eyes.
Posted by: Stark Granger | July 30, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Bush speaks, oil goes down. Obama speaks oil goes up. Brilliant Obama, brilliant.
Posted by: Davy | July 30, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
I am stunned that Obama would say this, given the fact that such a statement is so controversial that it was bound to be leaked. Obama is so inexperienced that any impressions he may have formed regarding Israel’s intentions are simply worthless. He should have kept these impressions to himself; but he is apparently so awed by himself that he had to bring the “truth” to the lesser lights of the Democractic party.
The effect of this kind of statement is to increase the tension between Iran and Israel, and make it more likely that a hot war between the two countries will start.
This is an example of the kind of disaster an Obama presidency would be.
Posted by: David H | July 30, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Iran is becoming too stronger hourly for anyone to attack now, should done it few years ago. If iran is attacked HELL will breake lose. Iran IS NOT IRAQ guys
Posted by: Hamed Abadi | July 30, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
It would be nice if Obama would come back to and do his JOB in Illinois. He is not present to vote for over 80% of the initiatives here.
Posted by: Dan | July 30, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
“I am stunned that Obama would say this, given the fact that such a statement is so controversial that it was bound to be leaked. Obama is so inexperienced that any impressions he may have formed regarding Israel’s intentions are simply worthless. He should have kept these impressions to himself; but he is apparently so awed by himself that he had to bring the “truth” to the lesser lights of the Democractic party.”
Yes, Obama is the little child who learned a new word at school and is trying to impress people by using it.
Posted by: geevill | July 30, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
gb8898 – That is the most honest, and funny post thus far. I agree – if McCain had had this meeting it would be much ado about nothing. Must go finish cleaning now. Thanks for your honesty.
Posted by: Laurie | July 30, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Stupid Comment? Iran is willing and going to (if we let them) sacrifice their entire country and population to get rid of Israel. Don’t think that a muslim religous site in Israel is going to prevent A bomb.
Posted by: HT | July 30, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Let’s remember history folks. Iran was attacked by Iraq at the request of the United States. Iran hates the United States because we overthrew their Democratically elected government and installed the Shah of iran as a leader. We also overthrew Iraq’s Democratically elected government to install Saddam as the leader. If we remember history we will see the mideast in a different light.
Posted by: CJ | July 30, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Stark do you not believe in innocent until proven guilty?
Apoligists for Saddam? As far as I know it took the majority of the US years after our illegal invasion to realize that Saddam was not even a threat to a neighboring country let alone world peace. Maybe you are still one of the few Americans that still believe Saddam had WMDs. You do know that at this moment the US congress is looking at impeachment of Bush for orchrestrating lies about the extent of WMDs that Iraq didn’t have?
However there was plenty of evidence before March 2003, both from the UN Chief Weapons Inspector who stated that Saddam had for the most part complied and had no WMDs and from members of our congress who stated so in speeches to the house floor.
The only apoligists should be the supporters of the Bush Administration and the lazy US Congress that didn’t fully investigate the facts in going to war with Iraq to see that it was unjust.
When we invaded Iraq we turned our back on the war on terror and started a a new war using the war on terror as a catapult. This new war was about control and money.
Instead of invading Iraq we should of had a full scale invasion of Pakistan where we knew Osama bin Laden was. We should of gave Pakistan two ultimatums, let our troops in to find him or be prepared for war.
Instead we borrowed $10 billion from China that we gave to Pakistan to do the job for us so that we can then attack a country that had nothing to do with the war on terror. In the meantime Pakistan hasn’t returned our investment.
By the way, Pakistan went against the NPT and created nuclear weapons and has a dictator that came to power via a coup yet we didn’t even attempt to go to war there?
No wait I forgot to mention that we cooperate and deal with dictators as long as they do our bidding.
In fact we are happy to help overthrow democratically elected governments that don’t support our corporate needs and turn a blind eye to attrocities that the new dictators commit. I only need to give one example, Chile, but there are many more go look them up.
Posted by: David | July 30, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
David-I can resolve this quickly with one question. Do you believe the United States government blew up the WTC? I thought so.
Posted by: Stark Granger | July 30, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
David, at least TRY and be honest.
In 1984 Khomeini declared to the entire world:
“In order to achieve the victory of Islam, we need to provoke repeated crises, restore value to the idea of death and martyrdom. If Iran has to vanish, that is not important. The important thing is to engulf the world in crises. Those, who are called to export revolution, will lose their unhealthy desire for comfort and will attain the maturity needed to fulfill their mission. The road to Jerusalem goes through Kerbala (an Iraqi town)”.
Le Point, no. 599, March 12, 1984, pp. 89-90
Posted by: Steve | July 30, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Mr Granger- a nuclear bomb planted inside Israel is the scenario you are worried about? have been watching too much of the show “24″? if this is your path of logic, then I will propose that if we get to use a small time machine like maybe a Delorian from “Back to The Future” and go kill Hitler so my ancestors that I lost in Austria will live happily…please be realistic in your discussion, this is not the O’Riley Factor. Israel is so good at their internal security system that other countries always hire their experts when beefing up their own security forces, so the silly scenario you mentioned is as likely to happen as the scenario I mentioned above.
Posted by: mike | July 30, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Iran is not too powerful to attack now.
The nuke sites will be blasted, and that’s it. No ground troops needed.
Let Iran acquire nuclear warheads and fit them on the ICBMs she’s been buying from China and the whole world will be in her crosshairs.
Her extra nukes will be sold or given to terrorists. This is the country that says to imagine a world without the U.S.
Posted by: Reality Check | July 30, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
What makes Iran’s intended or allegedly intended progam illegal, and Israel’s, or any other country’s program legal?
Without equity of power of sovereign nations; would not others potentially abuse their ‘power’ for their gains? Since that is capable, should countries also have the right to pre-emptively act; or at least contemplate?
Posted by: 5pillarScribe | July 30, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Yeah, yeah. Iran will NOT be Hell guys. The same thing was said about Iraq. Mass destruction, Mass death, Knee deep blood, 100K dead….Iran will be easier. We already have staging grounds on both sides of them. They have a large coast on the sea (ship, subs, carriers,..). Additionally, we have way plenty of veterans in desert warfare. Their solders stink. They could not beat Iraq in eight years and we took Iraq in days. We don’t need to occupy them. Just destroy a lot of things. It will be in and out with them having to like the whipping they just got.
Posted by: Ted Cory | July 30, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
ABC should modify the headline. When I saw it I assumed Obama really was President of the World and was authorizing a strike on Iran.
First he says we will invade nuclear weapon armed Pakistan and now he indicates a green light for Israel to strike Iran.
He better watch out or he will get a new nickname “O – bomb – another one”.
Posted by: RDH | July 30, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
OBAMA, the chosen one… sent down from God to save the world.
They said Obama was arrogant but this one takes the cake.
Posted by: ylem | July 30, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Obama made this comment to win points with those who consider Iran to be a serious threat. However, Obama’s comment does not say whether or not he would approve of such an Israeli action. Unless he goes further, no one will believe he is serious about stopping the Iranian regime’s nuclear obsession.
Posted by: Reality Check | July 30, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
This is a screw up by OBAMA. You do not say things like this unless you know for a fact and diplomacy has exhausted. In his efforts to show his foreign policy prowess, his rookie-ness and inexperience shows through full bore. This is why I will not vote for OBAMA. I want someone who knows what they are doing, not someone I can have HOPE for
Posted by: Amory Ifill | July 30, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
It’s the end of the world!
And about bloody time, too.
Posted by: Ignatz Horowitz | July 30, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Sanity, what does knowing the wrongs and attrocities that Israel commits have to do with anti-semantism? There are organized groups of Jews that are also against the attrocities committed by Israel. Are they anti-semnatic as well? I don’t think I mentioned anyhing about Jews in my previous posts as well.
My posts were against the government of Israel that has done inhuane things against the Palestinians.
I think what Nazi Germany did to jews is one of the worst crimes ever to be perpretrated. This doesn’t give them the right to do to Palestinians what the Europeans and the US government during it’s move West did to the Native Indians, which by the way is also on the top of my list for worst crimes against humanity.
The funny thing is that everyone says that the land belongs to Jews and that the bible states so as it is fact. Well maybe you should know that Jews and Palestinians are only different by their religion. You see they are actually close cousins and the Palestinians of today have the same Jewish/Hebrew forfathers as the Jews of the bible times.
So does the fact that they converted to a new religion and never left their home remove their right to live there somehow?
When the state of Israel was formed it was originally intended that they live peacefully with the inhabitants that were already there when.
However that wasn’t the case and who knows how everything went down but the fact remains that Palestinians are treated as non humans in Israel and have had their land and life taken away from them. They are murdered (women and children included), imprisoned for no reason, have a lack of food and water, medicine and little education for children while miles away people that are treated as humans by the Israel government live a life with all the basic necessities and more.
Posted by: David | July 30, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
David, Sadaam not a threat? Now you have gone goofy. How many tons of yellow cake did we just take out of his country(now in Canada)?
Alot less homocide bombings in palastine now that Sadaam is not paying the murderer’s family $25,000 U.S.
He tried to develop Nukes in 1981.
Started a war with Iran, then Kuwait.
yes David, Sadaam was not a threat.
Say hi to Neville Chamberlan the appeaser.
Posted by: bill | July 30, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
There is only one reason Israel would strike Iran: War Profits. (Just watch their stock market if/when they strike.)
Posted by: Crow | July 30, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
David, Why don’t I see anything about Hamas or Fata in your note causing problems.Are you blind to the facts.
Israel,the government & the people have a right to defend themselves.The “displaced” people have been given land time after time with no slow down in their aim to eliminate all Jews. Turn around to see that the other side ONLY wants death & destruction.
NAIVE
Posted by: bill | July 30, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
First all, as a nation they have every right to have a nuke. We have nukes. How can one nation have nukes and tell another nation that they can’t have them. We threaten to attack them and they can’t defend themselves. I certainly disagree with the radical muslim movement. However, that is their way of life. We have our way, they have theirs. If we leave each other alone, they can live theirs, we can live ours.
Posted by: jitters | July 30, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Yes, Iran does have a right to have nukes AND any country has the right to defend themselves if they decide they need too. Both sides have very good points, but in this case MIGHT DOES MAKE RIGHT. The strongest will win the fight and their right will prevail.
Posted by: B. Sefranick | July 30, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
I see smoke rising in Iran around Christmas time. Good thing that it’s not Their holiday. That’s not too far away. You won’t have to disbelieve for long. They either change course very very soon, or it’s too late. We are appeasing them for now, but remember, December! Yes, HT guaranteed you so in July 08.
Posted by: HT | July 30, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Keep watching CNN and reading the NY Post and expect to know what’s really going on. I DO understand why alot of you just can’t get it. The extremists have decided that we all need to die. We can’t change that. Their future dangerous toys prohibit that.
Posted by: HT | July 30, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
yeah Witterquick, Obama didn’t say “may” like you said. He said “..is going to strike”. Read it again. A really, really big difference. So yes, OBAMA did do a diplomatic No-No due to inexperience.
Posted by: ziggy | July 30, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
History will be kind to Bush as it was with Truman, for the same reasons. He will be remembered for standing up to Extremists. I feel safer with him at the helm.
Posted by: HT | July 30, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Bostick: Iran lost their right to enrich uranium when they ran their big little mouths. Get over it. It ain’t changing.
Posted by: HT | July 30, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
So, Israel is going to do the old “Shock and Awe” on Iran….if it doesn’t agree to sanctions or nuclear power? Is America Nuts? America did the same thing with Iraq, so Israel can also do it? Israel had better start acting like a small country soon, before it loses support globally. This is outrageous, unwarranted and daring. WW111 here we come. Thankyou Israel, for thinking once again of only yourself, your country and your people. Don’t ever think God will forgive you this time.
Posted by: canadagirl | July 30, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
It really doesn’t matter. If we aren’t dodging a Shiite sword, we’ll be speaking Chinese or dead in the next 10 years if we don’t kick some butt now.
He wants it like that, well, he gets it.
I used to be scared of war, but now I understand that there are bad people that have to be dealt with. There is alot of work to be done. Some of you peple need to wake up, or shut up, or at least change the channel so you are not misinformed.
Posted by: HT | July 30, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Israel does have a right to exist. If they believe their survival is at risk they should do what they can to resist. Unfortunately, Mr. Obama isn’t likely to be a strong supporter if elected President-his likely Sec of State is strongly anti-Israel. Plus, he is extremely weak as a leader, that is, accomplishing stated goals–he has not achieved anything as a US Senator or State Senator. Israel should make their decisions based on their needs not whether Mr. Obama will be President.
Posted by: Geo Washington | July 30, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Canad Girl: Do you think Iran will stop with Israel. They are going after every free person including all infadels and Sunni muslims. I’m not ready for beheadings on my street. Are you?
Posted by: HT | July 30, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
American Soldier: bin Laden also said that Iraq is the main front in the War on Terror (or, from his perspective, the war vs. the West). Do you believe that? Or do you only believe certain things bin Laden says?
Posted by: JB | July 30, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
I don’t care what Bin Laden says. With respect to you, it is irrelevent what he says. His ideology will not work on this planet. The only thing that is going to happen is alot of people are gong to die for no real good reason.
Posted by: HT | July 30, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
Obama will not be elected because
his lack of judgment will become
evident to voters in South Florida rewad or New York. Israel will elect
Netanyahu and as people failed to
see on Obamas trip to Europe ,
leaders in Europe were not the
same socialist appeasers that John
Kerry said he would be sympatico
with. Europe has changed , America’s
ignorant and will have reality
shoved in their faces and not elect
this fraud from Chicago. Isreal will
strike before the elction.
Posted by: noonesfool | July 30, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
That was Israelis land thousands of years ago. You didn’t want it until it was modernized. It was taken from them. If you think it’s worth the end of the world…………….
Posted by: HT | July 30, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Barrack Hussein Obama’s foreign policy expertise is just uncanny! No one knew Israel would defend itself until today.
Henry Kissinger has got nothing on
Obama. Meet the new Mr. Obvious.
Remember in November.
Posted by: Irondog | July 30, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
Sorry for the late reply here:
dianeremarx: Obama didn’t issue some big statement about this. He was talking to fellow Democrats, and this reporter picked it up. It has nothing to do with him addressing his supporters on matters already well known.
Stark Granger: True, something will need to be done. But if it’s done prematurely, it will mean huge concequences in political relations, and spark a lot of hatred that correlates to terrorist attacks. Striking Iran is not beneficial to the US or Israel, in any form. It is a lose-lose situation if they get to that point: Iran is bombed, and Israel/US is hated (and bombed later by a new wave of extremist terrorists, probably).
So if it ever gets to that point, then it probably would be in Israel’s best interest to wait for Iran to act first – and “start it”. Besides, if Iran was to make any attack, they would be obliterated on the return attack. So it’s a standoff between who’s crazier.
Posted by: Warren | July 30, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
Warren: You don’t get it. We screwed up back in the last century when we developed nukes. Oops. I forgot for a moment, we’d be speaking some Asian language if we had not developed nukes. Anyway, they want nukes to control the middle east. If they GET them, everything changes anyway. Ther’s nothing else to say here. Give it up. It’s their way or the rest of the worlds way which is for human kind, mostly.
Posted by: HT | July 30, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
For such a “strong nation”, as we are …it’s amazing to see how afraid of the world it’s people are.
…seems to be mostly Repulcians.
Posted by: Toney | July 30, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
“Oops. I forgot for a moment, we’d be speaking some Asian language if we had not developed nukes.”
Who knows what we’d be speaking. Watching Ken Burns’ The War documentary, they interviewed a WWII vet who had a chilling conversation with a German captive. He knew exactly where Waterbury CT was because he had worked in the administration (before being sent to the front) in a department that was dividing the US into German territories.
Let’s face it. The US is a prime piece of real estate!
Posted by: Magoo | July 30, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
GB9899. LOL.
Posted by: HT | July 30, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Also, I’d like to contend something:
Obama isn’t being soft on this. He’s doing the logical thing: negotiating. We’ve learned from the Iraq war that simply eliminating your enemy isn’t enough. Then you become the enemy to a new group of terrorists. The only “win” situation here comes from negotiations. And that’s exactly what he suggests (“big sticks and big carrots”).
Posted by: Warren | July 30, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Negotiate. Yea, that’ll work.
Posted by: Magoo | July 30, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
Justtellthetruth: That is the most logical, analytical and accurate depiction of the true situation on the ground over there. How dare you! This is where readers are supposed take out all their past angst against the current reigning political leaders.
Posted by: Toney | July 30, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
“I get the feeling from my talks … “
Posted by: Belle Starr | July 30, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
Warren. Our enemies are counting on Obama being exactly like you if and when he gets to the oval office. Negotiations only buy them precious time. Time that we don’t have the luxury of passing to our children. You might say, we are passing debt to our children. Well, I spoke of this earlier. Don’t worry about $10 or $50 gas. Worry about your well being after it starts.
Posted by: HT | July 30, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
Mr. Bush hasn’t played his final hand yet. He’ll sacrifice whatever it takes to ensure his legacy burns on and McCain will be standing there to take the torch. But, the final act will be a massive pardon of all the criminals convicted or heading toward it in his circle of “good and true” patriots.
Posted by: Rick_VT | July 30, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
“Senator Obama has always said…” blah, blah, blah. Actually what Senator Obuma really said was “I would be willing to meet without preconditions with Ahmadinejad, Kim Jong-il, Hugo Chavez, etc. Did anyone hear his newest most arrogant comment to date: “I have become a symbol for a return to America’s great traditions!!!” Are neurological exams required before taking office?
Posted by: Brandon | July 30, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
Mr. Bush hasn’t played his final hand yet. He’ll sacrifice whatever it takes to ensure his legacy burns on and McCain will be standing there to take the torch. But, the final act will be a massive pardon of all the criminals convicted or heading toward it in his circle of “good and true” patriots.
Posted by: Rick_VT | Jul 30, 2008 6:07:15 PM
You are correct! Just like CLINTON did!!
Posted by: Jim | July 30, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
If Isreal decides to attack Iran, they will, no matter what the international community might say about it. Personally, if Isreal wants to kick Iran in the butt, I have zero problem with it.
Posted by: Henderson | July 30, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
Obama probably would be a symbol of great traditiions in a non-violent world with no enemies. But that’s just not the world we are living in. Where’s that guy that used to say “wake up America”. Well, America is everybody that’s for freedom and not being ruled. It will be shown, and documented, and talked about, and analyzed, and………
Posted by: HT | July 30, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Geoff:
I mean they should wait until Iran gives them no other choice but to attack (i.e. if they refuse all negotiations, and it’s fairly clear that they are indeed making weapons). If they attack before that, when Iran is still playing its “we’re just innocents making energy! Nothing wrong with that!” card, then any attack is just suicidal – from the backlash later on, if not immediately.
Besides, it would be interesting to know if Iran responds to reason – of any kind. Surely they know that continuing through the current course means their destruction.
HT: It’s not the nukes in the middle east we’re afraid of, it’s them being in the hands of people who don’t respond to reason, and don’t value their own lives. General consensus is Iran does not. Fine. But we can’t be unreasonable either – or else all we’re doing is perpetuating the problem.
Attacking restarts the process of obtaining peace, only this time a few more years in the future – with nukes even easier to come by. And peace is the goal here, because it is the only option that benefits. Destroying Iran would not – it just sparks new regimes of even more radical people.
Also: Obama and Bush are suggesting the same thing here. I don’t know which is scarier!
Posted by: Warren | July 30, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
The second in command for Al Quida (spelled wrong I am sure) said that we could live in peace with them if we would just give up two things–free speech and women’s rights. Well I am sure half of the people in this stupid country we live in would give those up in an instant. And, that same half probably has no problem with those people having the atom bomb. Americans have no understanding of a people who would die for what they believe in. For Americans, you always weasel out and live. We are cowards and they are stronger–they get the bomb, they win.
Posted by: allen antrim | July 30, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
And the sky is blue! Wow, you’re both geniuses (genii).
“If you’re 20 and not a liberal, you don’t have a heart. If you’re 30 and not a Conservative, you don’t have a brain.”
Posted by: kevin67 | July 30, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
Warren. You are so dangerous and you don’t even see it, and you never will. You are talking about peace and negotiations with an enemy that WILL NOT be logical.
Posted by: HT | July 30, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
in 50 years, when we look back and realize how close sharia courts and institutionalized woman beating we were, we will prolly thank baby bush for being smart enough to start a war he wasn’t smart enough to execute.
Obama is probably not the answer, not that mcain is but at least mcain is what he is. ask bill clinton what that means
Posted by: steve | July 30, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Americans have no understanding of a people who would die for what they believe in?
I am curious. What people do you speak of?
Posted by: HT | July 30, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Here we go again. You are worried about the all mighty dollar. That’s why this country is divided. Some are worried about their pocket book more than they are their fellow Americans, including their own.
Posted by: HT | July 30, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
I gave their name. I speak of people who strap bombs on themselves and walk into crowds of people and blow themselves up and think that is doing some god’s will. They do this for something higher. You hear the news from the middle east or is this new to you? The bomb can be made small, drive it in and set it off–they ran airplanes into buildings–remember? Think if those had the bomb on them. They will do this. If Pakistan falls to them they will come into possession of over 100 of these. The idea that Iran does not want nukes seems strange sense religious zealots run the country.
Posted by: allen antrim | July 30, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
A conventional war with Iraq would only delay their nuclear quest because it is very unlikely that would totally end development. It is also unlikely they would hit all the nuke facilities anyway. If Israel hits it may as well be with nukes now while they still can. Yeah, sounds ugly to me too. Other than that, we better turn up the sanctions to bleed level if there is any chance of that working. I think Iran may prevail. Nice world then huh?
Posted by: Glenn | July 30, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
Does Obama really understand the danger of a nuclear Iran? I do not think so.
Posted by: Kottaras | July 30, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
All we can hope for at this time is stalling the program. Bust stall it we will.
Posted by: HT | July 30, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
This is the best you people can come up with?
Posted by: HT | July 30, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
Steve. Now you are making sense. Yes, we are over there to protect our interests, because there are scary people there that want to ruin your day.
We ARE for peace, but not when we are backed into a corner, and we have a choice.
Posted by: HT | July 30, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
With Obama in charge, there will be no teath in any sanctions. We may be seeing a war in the middle east with Israel and Iran if Obama is president.
Posted by: cbk16 | July 30, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
You people forget one thing that is the most important thing to understand. We can stop. Turn around 180 degrees on policy, and Israel is gone, and so on.
They are just the initial problem. There will always be something. The games have changed. Now the winner takes what’s left, which ain’t going to be much.
Posted by: HT | July 30, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Warren. Same thing. You’re way gives up all of our rights.
Posted by: HT | July 30, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
Be glad that a strong leader will be in charge of Israel. I just really don’t think I could live with my brother being brougt home in a casket when their prisoners were in fairly good shape. I just see something wrong with this that would bring me to sticks.
Posted by: HT | July 30, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
Paskistan is a scary situation, but it is not immediate. It could be an issue fast.
Posted by: I'll be good | July 30, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
Allen. If all of that is true, then it just makes it more important to take care of it now.
Posted by: I'll be good | July 30, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
lol, killerbee – HT is no Michael Moore. Unless he’s the conservative version. That I don’t know. Either way, I think you’re fighting the wrong guy.
I’m gonna start up again here: A lot of criticism for Obama comes from people thinking of him pulling the same traditional Democrat stunts. But just read the article above: “Senator Obama has always said that Iran must end its illicit nuclear program. He has advocated tough, direct engagement, backed by stronger sanctions to pressure Iran. And, he has made it perfectly clear that Tehran should not wait for a new administration to reach agreement to end its program.”
I mean, what more can you realistically want? “Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran”? He has already taken a fairly moderate position on this issue – agreeing on direct engagement and doing whatever is needed to stop Iran from getting a bomb. I don’t see the problem here.
Posted by: Warren | July 30, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
Sadly, I think Obama said these things now thinking when it will happen (as I have been screaming for months here) that he is going to pretend he is all knowing………its a game. Bush has already moved generals into place that support attacking Iran for when Israel attacks, Obama as Senator has certainly been told and now he is abusing his position as Senator so he can pretend he actually has an original thought in his head, when we all know he doesn’t.
Posted by: chattyway | July 30, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
Sadly, I think Obama said these things now thinking when it will happen (as I have been screaming for months here) that he is going to pretend he is all knowing………its a game. Bush has already moved generals into place that support attacking Iran for when Israel attacks, Obama as Senator has certainly been told and now he is abusing his position as Senator so he can pretend he actually has an original thought in his head, when we all know he doesn’t.
Posted by: chattyway | July 30, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
Warren. Obama won’t attack Iran. That is not going to be his priority. He doesn’t see it as a must. That is why Israel is going to have to bravely step up and live, partly. BUT will prevail. At least you better hope so. Your future could really depend on it, soon.
Posted by: I'll be good | July 30, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
I will admit Obama is seemingly changing ever so slightly on courses over the last few weeks. I think he should have spent alot more thought on his middle east trip.
Posted by: I'll be good | July 30, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
red white and blue. You are wrong. You should say “bye”.
Posted by: I'll be good | July 30, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
OBAMA IS ANOTHER JIMMY CARTER. ALL SMILE, NO SUBSTANCE. IF HE WINS, HE’LL SCREW A LOT OF THINGS UP FOR US. JIMMY CARTER PROBABLY IS ROOTING FOR OBAMA TO WIN SO THAT HE CAN DROP OUT OF THE WORST PRESIDENT IN RECENT MEMORY SLOT.
Posted by: JIMMY | July 30, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
Ook Ook Ook OOK OOK OOK!!! OBAMA
Posted by: Ivanna Sack | July 30, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
JIMMY…
If Carter was the worst president ever what does that make Bush. Under Carter the working middle class was still working!
Posted by: oldwhiteguy | July 30, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
John…
at least he’ll GRACE the white house!
Posted by: oldwhiteguy | July 30, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
Dave R…
Tipping your hand in a nuclear war is not a good thing…
wake up dude, unlike the repubs he’s trying to avert a nuclear war!
Posted by: oldwhiteguy | July 30, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
Who ever thinks Carter was OK or better as pres, must be 10 years old.
Posted by: the judge | July 30, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
If Israel pulls U.S. into War with Iran…or the other way round…they deserve to lose everything they’ve got. I’m afraid American Jews are doing exactly why God warned them regarding their inheritance, and opened up the chance of everlasting life to anyone that would follow Jesus ways and thus live to eternity. The Jews had been stripped of this inheritance many centuries ago, although they still believe that is the land God gave them. Obviously many Christians also believe this, but a Bible Historian can see thru this nonsense.
Posted by: canadagirl | July 30, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
I can’t say Bush was great, but he did pull victory off (even though everybody said it was lost) and he will be remembered as a vitorious prez by history. By the Dems saying it was hopeless only made Bush look better when he pulled it off with the surge.
Posted by: The Surge | July 30, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
If OBAMA wins – Israel will strike Iran —- You heard it here……. Ask the Israelis
Posted by: not worthy | July 30, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
A do NOTHING man is speaking of “possibly” doing something. He, he, he… Beyond parody…
Posted by: Bogdan of Australia | July 30, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
The presumption of this junior senator is amazing. He’s never made a tough policy decision or personally enacted anything in his life, yet he wants to whisper to his fellow congressmen what may have been told to him in confidence by the Israeli government. Expect him not to keep his mouth shut about our military as well.
Posted by: Steve Minyard | July 30, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
Obama was so full of BS on Iraq, WRONG ALL THE WAY – HE DOESN’T HAVE A CLUE ABOUT ISRAEL EITHER. Although, I will admit he has a better chance of being right on Israel – BUT FOR THE WRONG REASONS!!
Posted by: Temagami | July 30, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
It amazes me people want to negotiate with terrorist. Have you people not learned anything? The only negotiating these crazy’s want to do is to disrupt our lives and make us live in fear. Iraq and Afghanistan should be over but politics plays into our enemies hands. We can give just enough force to hurt them when what we need to do is clearly go in and kill them all plain and simple. They sure don’t mind cutting off a head to show you they mean business and then post it on the internet but that must be okay with you Democrats…..? I am a formal US Navy vet and National Guard vet and I love my country but damn we have a lot wimps living here now. We need Reagan back bottom line.
Posted by: Say what | July 30, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
Say what. No. These people won’t get it until it literally bleeds them out.
Posted by: I'll be good | July 30, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
Bush was in Cleveland yesterday speaking at a plant across from where I work – major thrust was to encourage congress to allow more drilling. IF ISRAEL ATACKS IRAN SOON, WE HAD BETTER BE IN A WW11 HURRY TO INCREASE OUR DOMESTIC SUPPLY!! Yeah, I know it will take time to crank up – but, WE NEED TO START NOW!! THE DEMS IN CONGRESS ARE HOLDING US HOSTAGE!!!
Posted by: Jimbo | July 30, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
hey now, don’t be bustin’ on jimmy! jimmy’s a good man, he just wasn’t a very effective president. I didn’t vote for him but he certainly has become quite the elder statesman. PLUS, he didn’t have a bitter beotch for a wife either. his wife was proud of her country “all” the time.
I think obama would sign any special interest thing that came across his desk, IF it was aimed at helping blacks.
I will not be voting for obama, as I don’t believe in social programs for people who are capable but choose not to work and contribute to society.
Posted by: high cotton | July 30, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
Remember the Seven Day War of June, 1967? Israel has not lost it’s teeth and will show once again that a preventive strike is the best strike when dealing with rogue countries.
Posted by: Herb Goscha | July 30, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
If high cotton is right, we’re soon to have another set of problems to deal with, and enemies to with it. It’s almost as if the best thing to do is say, sorry, we have bigger guns and YOU are dead. If not, well we MIGHT be dead.
Posted by: I'll be good | July 30, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
Obama.
First, the war is lost and we need to come home – NOW.
Then, the Surge will not only not work, but will dramatically escalate Iraq war.
Next, well, maybe the Surge IS working, but not the political factors.
Then, I never expected the political factors to work.
I GUESS THAT WE CAN CONSIDER OBAMA AN EXPERT ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS???
Posted by: Jimbo | July 30, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
Yes Jimbo. We are in good hands. I think I’ll go out and buy the largest RV available.
Posted by: I'll be good | July 30, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
Come on, DaddyObama, and tell us another bedtime story, PLEEZE? How about the one where you are gonna launch all out war over Pakistan…
…or the one where you push Israel into war with Iran?
Posted by: Jacque Bauer | July 30, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
The Change Advocate now wants the US to be wary of Iran and would like to transfer the troops from Irag to Iran. What a change move for Obama and this is really change. People are asking after his trip.. Has he learned a simple lesson in foreign policy so they can trust their lives to this neophyte or the trip is just a show down for people who doubts him.. NAY… he remains still not capable to handle the US foreign policy. His first action would be attack Iran.. where is the exact opposite of Bush? Now all of you vote Obama if you believe the change he is advocating.
Posted by: darnobama | July 30, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
Carter is again a good leader when harmony is in the air. Hello. Harmony is gone. Forget about it, or not.
Posted by: I'll be good | July 30, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
Hey – GOOD?
Posted by: Jimbo | July 30, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
Darnobama. We’re not sending troops into Iran. It is going to come to radiation in the area and troops don’t do well in radiation whether they have detectors or not.
Posted by: I'll be good | July 30, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
I’ll be good.
Great advice – off to Weber’s Burgers in Orillia, ON, Sat!!
Posted by: Jimbo | July 30, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
With all the conflicts one nano second away from obliteration, it’s actually really horrifying these days. Don’t forget about the big Russian and Chinese-Tiawanese, Middle East, Africa, one third of South America, Cuban, and then a 3rd of what’s left. Don’t forget about how important it is to stay focused and vigilant.
Posted by: I'll be good | July 30, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
LOL to Haywood. Obama has class. You have to give him that. Dude is cool, but that is not necessarily what we need right now.
Posted by: I'll be good | July 30, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
Jimbo. I’d actually be careful telling the world where you’re going. I guarantee you the enemy is in here watching, and reporting, and keeping count. I sensed some earlier. You might look back at some of the rhetoric.
Posted by: I'll be good | July 30, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
I would actually be perfect for the white house, but I am already defending in other ways. There are no gray areas for me.
Posted by: I'll be good | July 30, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
Israel is already at war with Iran, it was just in Syria last year, and now it is on their front lines. They are brave. They have to be. The lion is so close, they can smell them. Hear them roar until they roar no more.
Posted by: I'll be good | July 30, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Obama isn’t real good at connecting the dots. He says we should not be in Iraq, but he supports Israelis right to defend themselves against a nuclear Iran. Well look at a map an you’ll realize if the US wasn’t currently in Iraq with JSTARS flying along the Iran border we wouldn’t have any intel about what Iran was doing and there would be no way for Israel to launch an attack on the Iranian nuclear facilities.
Posted by: BillW51 | July 30, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
Bill, I am just glad that Bush scared Iran enough, by being next to them, that they came clean about the dacades of hidden nuke program. Just imagine the alternative to not finding out about years of nukes. That dumb.
Posted by: I'll be good | July 30, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
Just what is Obama doing leaking high-level conversations he has had with foreign heads of state? Does this not raise red flags with anyone? Are we going to conduct foreign policy now, by caucus? Also, what is he doing discussing policy with foreign heads of state in the first place? Did he win the election, and I didn’t notice? We are supposed to have one president, like him or not, at a time. This bodes ill, for the future foreign policy decisions which will be made under life and death situations.
Posted by: Kevin | July 30, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
Kevin. McCain has talked to Israel. There is nothing new with candidates visiting Israel. Don’t make something out of nothing. That’s what’s wrong with this country. There’s the whatever levels of left, right, and then me and some others that get it, alot of us that are going to be pushed any more.
Posted by: I'll be good | July 30, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
So, the “sense that the Arab states understand just how destabilizing a nuclear Iran would be” is a revelation to Obambi and his caucus? Holy Hannah Montana. These folks really have their fingers on the pulse of the middle east, don’t they.
Posted by: SukieTawdry | July 30, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
Wow, so much Obama hate. He didn’t leak some important secret info. He didn’t announce this “revelation” – it got picked up by the press. He’s supporting Bush’s actions with Iran so far. He’s looking for a peaceful outcome if possible. What more do you want..?
Posted by: RuleNo2 | July 30, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
Imagine Ahmadinijad inviting O’Bama to Iran for a private meeting. Obviously, he would go because he said he would like to sit down with all of the leaders of the terrorist nations. After the meeting is over the Iranian government announces to the world that a deal had been worked out and Iran would cease there nuclear development program if and when O’Bama is elected president. O’Bama and the majority of the American people are dumb enough to believe them. The American people believe that O’Bama is a genius and that his plans to negotiate with the terrorists is the right way to go and he gets elected in a landslide. McCain might as well take his name off the ballot. Then, Iran continues with its nuclear program, just as planned.
Posted by: Greg Goetz | July 31, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
Really??? Let me get this straight: ISRAEL (we destroyed the entire egyptian air force in under 12 hours) will LIKELY attack Iran if Mahmoud (Israel must be wiped off the map) Ahmadinejad gets nukes. Good thing Obama thought of this. Wow. He really is brilliant. Such foresight and geopolitical prowess. In other news, 2 + 2 = 4 and Cheese is actually made from Milk!
At least it sounds like he may be learning a little bit. He definitely isn’t smarter than a 5th grader, BUT he is slightly less terrifying to me having seen that he does at least have the mental faculties to understand causality.
Now if he will apply LOGIC and causality to his tax plans and GASP the economy and the law of supply and demand, he might not be the complete disaster as a president that I’m sure either he or John McCain will be. Definitely writing in.
Decision 2008! It sounds like an Irish remake of a Jim Carrey movie: McDumb and Odumber.
Posted by: Jon | July 31, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am
If Obama doesn’t have the common sense to keep sensitive conversations he has with foreign dignitaries, close to his vest, well it should just give us an insight into his “judgement” of lack thereof. It is the height of foolishness to go into the democratic caucus and relate personal conversations he had with heads of state, given the propensity of congressmen (of either party) to garner publicity by leaking privileged conversations.
>There’s the whatever levels of left, >right, and then me and some others that >get it, alot of us that are going to be >pushed any more.
I see from the above comment that the paid Obama bloggers are out on this thread, attempting to allude that their position is centrist. You might be able to fool some of the people some of the time…etc.
Posted by: Kevin | July 31, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am
Kevin,
Obama revealed nothing. What he said may even help the American negotiators, since Obama said do not delay. Waiting for him will not benefit you. He raised Iranian anxiety about Israel
Your so bitter nothing Obama would say would be correct.
Posted by: Ronnn | July 31, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am
How very perceptive for a geopolitical know-nothing empty suit.
Posted by: BlueMax372 | July 31, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am
Obama’s unlimited arrogance and condescending ways are amazing. Why does he keep acting like he’s the president of the USA? Someone close to him need to let him know that his behavior and his arrogance is a real turn off for voters.
Posted by: ArrogantObama | July 31, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am
Duh! The lightbulb just went off.
There has been strong speculation that Israel and/or the Bush administration would do an aerial attack on Iran for the past couple years before Bush leaves office (and now Olmert). Did Obama also just figure out that not just Israel but other Countries in the Middle East are concerned about Iran going nuclear? I’ve considered myself a Democrat my entire adult life but I have no confidence in Obama in regards to foreign policy. This is a highly intelligent individual who lacks the depth of knowledge that comes with experience and it shows. Just like the bitterness comment felt like someone who’s knowledge of those blue collar voters came out of having read ” What’s the Matter with Kansas?” rather then any hands on experience interacting with such voters. There are those who can teach and those who can do- I think he needs to go back to teaching and writing .
Posted by: alpaig52 | July 31, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am
If Israel attacks Iranian nuclear site reactors, it will be done with the complicity or go-ahead from whatever US administration is in place at the time. The consequences would clearly be destructive beyond the Middle East according to the head of the IAEA and the Joint Chiefs of Staff. May sanity prevail.
Posted by: kat | July 31, 2008, 2:45 am 2:45 am
Mr. Obama’s visit to the Middle East was purely to bolster his image in the USA. The leaked information regarding his conversations with those he met with, were simply a part of his posturing, and very unfortunate that he could not maintain confidence regarding high-level conversations with world leaders. His philosophies are still inline with the democratic socialists in our country. He will be just as weak on defense and terrorism as all the other democrats, who cringe at the idea of spending any money on the military, which they want to spend on social vote-buying programs, and do not understand foreign policy. Do not be deceived by appearance, charisma, great oratory, sound-bite speeches, etc. Look at the philosophy of the democrats. That is what truly defines Mr. Obama. He will tow the party line like all the others, and continue to move us toward being a socialist nation… Gov’t takeover of Healthcare and Energy are the first two pieces in the democratic puzzle to accomplish this.
The Israelis have demonstrated that they are among the most fierce fighters on the planet. And they understand better than anyone, the threats they face, because they live with those threats daily, and they have been told by terrorist nations that they will be “wiped off the map.”
I understand our past philosophy regarding Israel, which was aimed at keeping conflicts to a minimum, and the false belief that a true and lasting peace could be acheived in that region, through negotiations. We now live in a new world climate, with terrorism growing… We cannot expect to negotiate successfully with terrorist nations that have pledged to “wipe Israel off the map.”
The terrorist nations are lying in wait for us to elect a democrat president who will negotiate with them, or at the worst, enact some sort of sanctions upon them. That is the democrat “economy” approach, to save our money for their social programs, rather than military efforts. The terrorist nations understand this very well, better than most average Americans.
The “surge” has worked, to an extent, and was the correct approach. But I have to wonder whether part of the success of the “surge” was simply the terrorists deciding to wait in hopes of a democrat being elected president.
Give Israel the intelligence and support, and then let them decide. Do not hold them back any longer. Unleash them. They do not screw around. They may wipe Iran off the map, if we do not stand in their way, and it would probably not take very long. That goes for the other nations which continually threaten them. Problem solved.
Posted by: fereal2 | July 31, 2008, 2:49 am 2:49 am
Collin, race has never been made an issue in the election between McCain and Obama. Nor will it ever be.
Also, a real leader does what he thinks is right despite what those around him are saying. We elect leaders to make those difficult decisions. When those difficult choices are made it can be expected that it might not be popluar. The US is not trying to win a popularity contest (despite Obama’s galavanting across the country), all we care about is making the world a safer place for everyone.
Posted by: Ryan H | July 31, 2008, 3:59 am 3:59 am
The article states that if there will be a nuclear Iran, “Israel would probably strike and that would be bad for everyone.”
Is everybody stupid? When Israel destroyed the nuclear reactors in Iraq in 1981 & in Syria last year, that was good for everyone!!!
How will removing a nuclear bomb from the crazies in Iran be bad for everyone???
Posted by: David Olensky | July 31, 2008, 4:27 am 4:27 am
to B Sefranick: the difference is that they WANT TO CHANGE OUR WAY OF LIFE and have threatened our very existence.
Posted by: dave | July 31, 2008, 4:28 am 4:28 am
Everyone calm down, Sen. Obama’s going to win this race so get use to it, lol Sen. Obama’s the only one ready to lead this country AT-THIS-MOMENT-IN-TIME so I would suggest to all you neocons sit back and enjoy the ride like I had to do for 8 years of Cheney/Bush (with no stopping for bathroom breaks no matter how ill I felt).
Posted by: WarriorLemming | July 31, 2008, 4:33 am 4:33 am
“…an intelligent candidate in Obama…”
Are you KIDDING me? The man can’t make any sense unless he reads from a prepared speech, his woeful lack of anything intelligent to offer is his one-liner generalities (“we are the ones we are waiting for,” and the rest of these, including the “people of the world” grandiosity).
His “experience” is defined as “a community organizer” and with associations that are anything but intelligently organized or run, and, Obama’s litany of outright LIES run something like a badly written comic book wannabe.
He even can’t practice that “law” he alleges to be an expert of, since he’s currently being sued by a local bar associaton FOR LYING ON HIS APPLICATION FOR A LAW LICENSE (which he does not have, by the way, he’s not licensed to practice law). Even his own “autobiography” by his own admission contains lies (which he fancies to be “distortions” and “exaggerations” — the rest of us recognize those as “lies”).
Obama gets crowds fomenting emotionally when he plays basketball, talks in his Mr. Preacher voice with inanity after inanity, and then intends to raise taxes (no other solutions by Liberals/Democrats exists other than raising taxes) and do away with any improvements that currently exist in the U.S. as to conditions and in the international community elsewhere. He can only get so far on group hugs and crowds fainting and eventually, his “God complex” will be found out to be the utter profanity that it, and he, is.
Posted by: Boobala | July 31, 2008, 5:13 am 5:13 am
Why is everyone so concerned? Whatever takes place is between two countries othr than ourselves. Can’t we just stand back for a change and watch?
Geeze, everytime we jump into it, we are called the villians. Yep, and our own yell the loudest. I wonder who wins
or do they just knock themselves silly.
You can curse me, no problem. But just try my approach at least once. You’ll enjoy it.
Posted by: jethro mayham | July 31, 2008, 5:51 am 5:51 am
obama has no idea what he is talking about. he is about 1 year too late. it is his way of appealing to the middle when we all know he is far far far left
Posted by: danimal123 | July 31, 2008, 6:41 am 6:41 am
Obama is as uninformed as the other american politicians. He talked only to the american clients in the arab world like Jordan’s king and generalizes to state that arab states also share concern about Iran’s nuclear power. He is a tool of the AIPAC and Israelis as much as the members of congrerss. Ask yourselves, why should Israeli minister Barak even dare tell america that “all options SHOULD stay on the table”? Just another example that U.S. foreign policy is made in Israel not in washington. Shame on all Americans who support this.
Posted by: fussygorilla | July 31, 2008, 7:12 am 7:12 am
A one week vacation abroad and now he’s a foreign policy expert? Yah right… If he gets elected, I’m leaving the USA….stat!
Posted by: Christy | July 31, 2008, 7:41 am 7:41 am
This is all we have to choose from? So sorry for our kids. And the next 3 months
will feel like a Coke and Pepsi taste test
election run by a Madison Ave. ad agency.
I’m sure it’s been worse in the past. Nothing has really changed that much in politics kids.Grain of salt.Get lost in a
good book or some great 60′s music.Stay away from the “spirit of CNN” and you’ll
be fine.
Posted by: chris | July 31, 2008, 7:50 am 7:50 am
Israel attacking = US attacking.
Israel has to pass through airspace we control to get there. They can’t do it without our permission.
Posted by: GeorgeH | July 31, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am
Isreal will attack first. US will come to support them after the fact. USA wants Israel to be the first. And they have a right to do it. Is this such a surprise that the book of Revelation is unfolding? Just make sure you know who’s side your on spiritually and let the chips fall where they have to.
Posted by: Teresa | July 31, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
If this dosant prove what a leader, he is,what will? just say no to bo!!!
Posted by: RELD1127 | July 31, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
We are talking about human lives here. War is not a game without terrrible consequences. Therefore anybody attacking anyone else should not be an option. The people who run our country and their counterparts in other countries are playing the game of evil. I believe Obama is trying his best to say/do all the right things in order to get into office–God bless him I hope he does it. I’ve heard so many stories about neocons and how one can’t trust anyone (red or blue) running for office because they are funded by the same people who run our world. THis may be true–? I’ve heard what Ron Paul has to say and he seems the most sane and intelligent one. But I still have a bit of hope left for Obama because I DO have hope. In a world of complete MADNESS we must keep our minds and hearts in the right place…and refuse to “live by the sword”…we DO create our own reality. The way I make change in the world is to go within…and create peace…(Gandi said “be that which you want to see in the world”) no insane and violent “threat” can touch perfect creation..this is the peace of God. (no I’m not “religious”)all i’m trying to say is let’s stop getting wrapped up in these dramas and make some peace.
Posted by: emily | July 31, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Strategically speaking if Israel launches an attack against Iran the USA must intercede and stop the attack. Even as far as engaging the Israel’s. I say this because without a full commitment against Iran by the US and eliminating all of their offensive military forces with a massive air campaign the Iranians can very very easily close the Strait of Hormuz and the US would lose 15%-20% of its current oil supplies. This is just lunacy. Let the Iranians have their nukes, our economy and society needs a safe stable supply of oil more than we need Iran non-nuclear. We need to think about oil stability or all the governments of the world and all the rules and society’s we have in place could come crashing down like a house of cards. American citizens first, Israels second. Thats my 2 cents.
Posted by: Bill | July 31, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
Amen Teresa!! Very well stated!
Posted by: DeeDee | August 1, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
if israel want to attack, they will! they don’t need our permission and even if they did need our permission, if they want to attack, they will. we will do “nothing” to stop them, period. we have become the paper tiger, all word and talk. what we need to do is draw lines, if you will not stop enriching uranium, we will attack. here the deadline and when they haven’t met that deadline, light them up!!! not shock and all (that was 4th of july fireworks), I’m talking relentess attacks that turn that sand into glass. the israeli’s don’t mess around, when you attack them, they strike back harder without mercy.
Posted by: high cotton | August 2, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
I am a vet of 6 years and you people don’t know what your talking about when it comes to Pres. Bush. He is commander and chief and all military personal are VOLINTEERS (got it) VOLINTEERS. They uphold the orders of the Pres. and follow to the letter. What is wrong with you people. Obama will get us all killed, he has no clue what is going on militarly, he knows nothing about what it takes to be a soldier. He got in as Pres. becasue the USA has turned into a bunch of WHIMPS!. I am so tired of hearing these Libs Mommies ( my poor son going to Iraq,. Hey lady, he volinteered, no one push him in. Get over it and be proud of him and be an American for a chance. DAMN..I hate Libls…I really do. They are the ones who will get us all killed.
God Bless America
Posted by: Ron | November 19, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am