Prominent Liberal Blogger Says Britney Ad Implies Obama Has a “Taste for Young White Women”
"I note with interest today, John McCain’s new tactic of associating Barack Obama with oversexed and/or promiscuous young white women," writes liberal blogger Josh Marshall. "Presumably, a la Harold Ford 2006, this will be one of those strategies that will be a matter of deep dispute during the campaign and later treated as transparent and obvious once the campaign is concluded."
Continues Marshall: "the McCain campaign is now pushing the caricature of Obama as a uppity young black man whose presumptuousness is displayed not only in taking on airs above his station but also in a taste for young white women."
Others pushing this meme note that the notorious Harold Ford ad — which featured an attractive young white woman looking at the camera and asking Ford to call her — was put together by a group once headed by Terry Nelson, who was McCain’s campaign manager for a time, though he left in the Summer 2007 purge.
The McCain campaign says that Nelson had nothing to do with this Britney/Paris ad, that it was put together by their normal team of Mike Hudome, Fred Davis, and Chris Mottolla.
And they say this interpretation is "ridiculous."
What say you?
- jpt
Email
Rick Santorum Encircled in Prayer
Boehner Slams Obama on Contraception Controversy
I say he is running scard,dirty politics as it always goes.Hee is some one to talk leaving his wife crippled for a druggie…
Posted by: indp voter | July 31, 2008, 7:12 am 7:12 am
Sounds like Swift-Boat II…
Posted by: pt | July 31, 2008, 7:26 am 7:26 am
After viewing the ad several times and reading some of the commmentary, I believe the subtext is intended. After the treason meme, I am persuaded that McCain’s new campaign staff is willing to go to any length, restrained only by the fear of going too far and causing a backlash. I see no evidence to the contrary.
Posted by: jack hoffman | July 31, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am
Senator Obama is extremely popular with his supporters and thats the way it is supposed to be. The fact that John McCain’s supporters find it hard to get enthusiastic about him is simply a sad reality.
Posted by: Coato | July 31, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am
It’s nonsense.
It’s also nonsense that Obama calls this ad racist. He can criticize the ad on its main arguments…but it’s not racist!
Obama is not who he says he is.
Posted by: Lezident | July 31, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am
Wow, I am so sick of Obama playing the race card. Why does he think he is the one the world has been waiting for when he is down in the polls?
Posted by: Sarah | July 31, 2008, 8:06 am 8:06 am
I see Obama has once again made himself the black candidate!
Posted by: Tony | July 31, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am
Fact: In the latest round of polls, Mccain is polling stronger with the republican traditional base, than Obama is with the democratic traditional base.
Vote Mccain 08
Vote Hillary 2012!
Posted by: John in Cape May | July 31, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am
Marshall’s interpretation is right on target. The McCain campaign could have picked numerous other celebs (Brad Pitt, George Clooney, international human rights campaigner Angelina Jolie, Tiger Woods, etc.), but they didn’t.
Hilton and Spears serve two purposes. They play into a theme of shallowness and immorality that the McCain campaign loves to flog, and they also subtly exploit long-held racist fears amongst many who oppose inter-racial relationships to this day.
If you think that professional attack ad developers don’t think about these things, you either think that they are incredibly incompetent or you are ridiculously naive.
Posted by: BH | July 31, 2008, 8:14 am 8:14 am
No Jake, it is perfectly typical and respectable to use images of Paris Hilton and Britney Spears in political campaigns…what subtext?
Posted by: Bryce | July 31, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am
Also I forgot, Obama supporters have said he is just like Kennedy, well, maybe Brit and Paris is Obama’s Marilyn Monroe!!
Posted by: SA1950 | July 31, 2008, 8:22 am 8:22 am
You know, for all of the talk about Obama, what about Britney? Trust me, I’m no great fan, BUT, the girl has issues and has been working to get herself back on track —and then to be portrayed in such a demeaning way? What was McCain thinking? Why do this? She’s young and clueless (despite being a celeb) Kicking her while she’s done is just mean. Unseemly; has that ick factor to it and is paparrazi and tabloidish to boot. We are at war, people are losing their homes, jobs, investments; gas and milk prices are at record levels and THIS is what we get?
Posted by: np | July 31, 2008, 8:23 am 8:23 am
mccain and his camp are looking more and more like a group of halfwitted cartoon characters—–just what we need in government—and i thought bush was nuts.
Posted by: rodney | July 31, 2008, 8:23 am 8:23 am
What purpose would the ad serve if the “sexy white girls” were not in it?
Calling him a celebrity? That’s a fault? Out of the millions of available celebrities why these two? And then they throw something in there about gas prices just to make it look legitimate.
It’s so obvious what whole purpose of the ad is.
Then the McCain team knows that reliable MSM will reinforce these images by playing the ad a million times.
Welcome to Swiftboating 2008.
Posted by: rkrider | July 31, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am
would it be possible to show “black” celebrities and still be racist since Obama is himself half white? It is only because Obama insists on referring to himself as “African-American” that it becomes and issue for some people.
Posted by: doug | July 31, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am
Any criticism of Sen. Obama has to racist? Right? Having staff or staff paid by others (aka MSM) cry racist every other day is NOT a good strategy for winning this election.
Posted by: Stevereno | July 31, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am
Gee, why doesn’t the media just declare any criticism of Obama illegal? The Harold Ford ad was about him going to a playboy party, which many in Tennessee might have a problem with. Just because a white guy runs an ad against a black guy, it doesn’t always amount to racism. Obama has been smearing McCain, scaring seniors and abortion-seekers, but the media has now declared any white people ineligible to be in a commercial that mocks Obama. Wow, the list just keeps getting longer.
It is Ludicrious. Oh, wait that would be racist.
Posted by: Karen | July 31, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am
NEWS FLASH To all of you John McCain supporters….he is not going to win.
Obama/Hagel ’08
Posted by: Epstein | July 31, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am
The ad is about overrated celebrities who have accomplished nothing but get alot of press. Sound familiar?
The media is getting defensive because their bias is becoming apparent. Why give a campaign speech to adoring crowds in Germany? Why not leave your campaign adviser home so you can visit the troops? Why not admit you were wrong about the surge? Why do you want to outsource our realistic energy needs to middle east countries — we can drill here with tough regulations and US workers. Obama would rather put money in Hugo Chavez’s pocket than the US worker.
Posted by: Cornell | July 31, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am
Why do the liberals and Obama always bring up the race of their candidate?
Posted by: Sally J. | July 31, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am
Lord, I feel like I’ve stepped into an endless episode of The Real World/
“You’re a racist!”
“No, you’re a racist!”
“This hamburger tastes racist!”
“Does this dress make me look racist?”
Give it a freaking rest already!
Posted by: Baggem | July 31, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am
i guess if he were that low obama could put out a few winner adds about mccain——however he is proving to be the better man.—–i could put out a few good cartoons about mccain and they would be true–he keeps trying to scare the older women.
Posted by: rodney | July 31, 2008, 8:48 am 8:48 am
mccain in his effort to win will try to divide the country and not win a campaign on what he can do for the mess he has been a part of—–keep in mind that a country so divided cannot stand—does that sound familiar—mccain iun his dumbness is quite dangerous.
Posted by: rodney | July 31, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am
So if there are any white people in an anti-Obama ad, it’s racism?
When all else fails, accuse McCain or his supporters (and I’m not even one of them!) of being racist.
It worked in the primaries, so why not?
Posted by: beth | July 31, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am
I was watching Obama’s new ad about McCain and “OLD” politics. The I was listening to some of Obama’s talking heads and I think every 5th word they used was “OLD”. Is it really a good stategy for Obama to make that getting “OLD” is a negative. I’ve been voting Democrate since Humphrey and nobody has every insulted an age group like Obama is.
Posted by: OLD | July 31, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am
as a big Obama supporter
I say this “liberal blogger” and I am a liberal…
is an idiot.
I studied “feminist rhetorical critique” at Ithaca…
this hurts people who are really trying to fight racism and sexism where it really exists…
this blogger who said this should shut up
I see this similar to other signs that the Obama campaign needs to get a hold of its direction…
bring in more humility (like the VP choice being one that recognizes what the candidates weaknesses are rather than trying to ignore them)
and try to make sure they have a little humble voice in the back of their head telling them…”if you act bigger than the election…or bigger than the voters…you will be brought down hard.”
having said that McCain campaign is acting …like snide stupid jokester of a High school football hero at the 20th reunion where the nerdy loser has suddenly become the wealthy success story.
Mccain is the weaker candidate and not smart or modern enough to handle all these issues we are facing…again unless OBama shows with his VP choice that he is not who he says he is…and then Mccain could step in with his choice and show he is the maverick.
Obama needs to be VERY careful with this first Presidential decision.
Posted by: dl | July 31, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am
beth
i hope you are taking a good look at mccain and his supporters —as they just tricked you===get the picture
Posted by: rodney | July 31, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am
old
it is moreso the old ideas–like in the 50s—–as far as old what else could you call mccain—no dont say it
Posted by: rodney | July 31, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am
McCain is spending an awful lot of time talking about Barack Obama. Where are the ads outlining his economic plan? His health care plan?
So guess the only way to win this election is to scare the public of Barack Obama. Worked for Bush — remember the critical call to end gay marriage right before th 2004 election. Scared all those red states in “Staying the Course.”
Posted by: Dixie | July 31, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am
Josh Marshall is totally off base here. The ad equates Obama with the most vacuous of the vacuous and implies celebrity and drawing large crowds (with rock concerts by the way) does not a leader make. It is a good ad and turns a strength into a liability. How on earth does a white woman saying call me equate with this? And uppity -those are Josh’s words. Just another example of the Obama campaign and Obama supporters playing the race card yet again. Any criticism of Obama is racist -yup hope that works for them.
As for me I think I shall rely on those same voters who, in their wisdom put George Bush back in the white house when he was losing a war, trashing the economy and while bringing huge windfall profits to Arab countries that hate us to rise up and vote in overwhelming numbers against Barack Hussein Obama.
Posted by: bornagaindem | July 31, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am
maria got it right
Posted by: rodney | July 31, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am
Harold Ford, the most intelligent and qualified candidate for the senate in 2006 was a shoe-in as our next Tennessee Senator. The excitement and support was overwhelming UNTIL the blonde bimbo “Harold, call me” ad. The minute it played, my husband said “That’s it. The ‘conservative’ vote has been mobilized.”
Tennessee is for the most part a great place with many kind, sweet and intelligent people. It is also the home of Nathan Bedford Forrest. So look for Barack to do well in West and parts of Middle Tennessee. He’ll be week the northern and southern borders and of the state and a no show in East Tennessee. The Paris/Britney ad will mobilize the O’Reilly/Limbaugh crowd who are always a jittery herd on the verge of stampeding anyway. Let’s hope that the rest of the country can see through the McCain fear mongering.
Posted by: pb | July 31, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am
So much for the ad backfiring. It looks like it hit the mark dead center and is saying what some number of people are thinking.
As for the racism card being played once again by Obama, how many of these have you stacked the deck with?
I agree with dl on this point: the use of this and other isms is reducing the sensitivity of people to the real problems behind them. If this keeps up, the rap community will be the laughing stock of the music industry and Hollyweird will have to find something other than insipid party girls to profit by. Which might not be all bad except there will still be problems or race, gender and other forms of discrimination. In short, the agent of change will have retarded the changes for a generation.
Great show. Can we have our money back?
Posted by: len | July 31, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am
I am so tired of all the isms. Sexism Racism Ageism…..does anyone know what these things really mean???
McCain add is NOT racist….if you try you can see racism in everything
Can we STOP With the isms and get on with what is really really important Like taxes, the cost of gas ( Which is slowly making it very difficult for me to get to work each day)The price of food. The issues in Iran and Iraq and Afghanistan
What happened to NOT making this about race. Seems to me every time I turn around someone is calling someone a racist. Lets move on from the crap and talk about something important like HOW were are going to fix what is really wrong and WHO will be the best person for that job. And WHO CARES taht McCain is no longer with his first life…she is ok with it so move on Obama is not a Radical Islamist so move on from that too
Ignore the foolishness taht the media is pushing to confuse you READ the candidates records Read the sites Read what they have donbe not just the speeches they give They are speaking hoping to win. LOOK WHAT THEY DO AND HAVE DONE Dont let the media decide for you who you should vote for.
Posted by: Gina | July 31, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am
McCain 2008
Democratic Congress 2008 with Senate 60+
Hillary 2012
Posted by: Still for Hil | July 31, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am
I find it interesting that Obama constantly throws out the race card while pretending to be above that sort of thing. The democrats are the party that judges a person on the color of his skin his religon, etc. rather than the content of his character.
No wonder that Martin Luther King was a republican.
Posted by: G Horner | July 31, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am
Did the McCain campaign get the permission of Ms Hilton and Ms Spears to use their images? If not, I hope they both sue the campaign for misappropriation of their likeness.
Posted by: Katherine | July 31, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
and “Obama Girl” is what?
Posted by: geevill | July 31, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
Have you all watched the ad? I just did on McCain’s website. Anyone looking for controversy over the use of celebrities in the ad is desperately looking for an excuse to pull attention away from the message it delivers: Obama is celebrity material, but not presidential material. This is eons away from the Harold Ford ad, which I’m sure you can find somewhere in cyberspace for a side-by-side comparison of the two.
Posted by: marylou | July 31, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am
It’s not just Josh Marshall. James Wolcott of Vanity Fair had an interesting blog quote yesterday on McCain’s celebrity ad (which assumes a racial-sexual subtext to McCain’s ad):
“Regardless of the racial-sexual subtext being purveyed, referencing Britney Spears and Paris Hilton seems a bit tired and dated, the older generation scolding the younger. Picking on Spears in a political ad seems like poor sportsmanship (she’s hardly done the harm to the culture that Ann Coulter has)…”
Posted by: Danny | July 31, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
Oh for heaven’s sake- The ad does NOT portray Obama as being SEXUALLY INTERESTED in them! It portrays him as BEING THEM!!!
He IS acting like a SPOILED CELEBRITY!
STOP WHINING LIBERALS!
Dukakis whined about Willie Horton- Obama whines about Britney Spears????
You gotta be kiddin’ me. Act like a MAN.
Posted by: ExTex | July 31, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am
Wrong. The message is that the Obama is an airhead chased by the papparazi. If the Obama cannot defeat that message, which is of no political value, then the Obama does not deserve to be President. I say the Obama is inevitable. Stop vetting the Obama, it does not good. Accept it. Get your affairs in order so you can pay the Obama.
=======================================
Visualize the Obama!
=======================================
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | July 31, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am
“…and “Obama Girl” is what?
Posted by: geevill”
WELL SAID, geevill!
Posted by: ExTex | July 31, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am
With this in mind, how do we analyze Obama girl?
Posted by: MayBee | July 31, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am
Typical Obama camp tactic, when dipping in the polls bring out the race card. Seems we have seen this before, first time right after Hillary’s (unexpected by the complacent, complicit MSM), big win in New Hampshire….and right before the S. Caroline primary.
Posted by: hype bites | July 31, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Obama’s comment that he is the one that the world has been waiting for kind of reminds me of something Britney or Paris would say.
Posted by: Susan | July 31, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
All of the commenters who are accusing Obama of “playing the race card” need to learn to read. Josh Marshall, *not* the Obama campaign, made these comments about the ad. Marshall, who is white, inferred the racial-sexual subtext (which is obvious to anyone with half a brain), and posted his commentary on it. This was not an official campaign reaction, people.
Posted by: Jacquie | July 31, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am
I think Josh Marshall overstepped. I think that the McCain campaign is loving the attention. What does McCain actually believe in?
Posted by: benintn | July 31, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am
It is America vs. the rest of the world. You are free to take you pick. But I assure you McCain’s win will nail the coffin of the once Supper Power called the USA. Obama’s win will only delay a decline that has already begun. It is inevitable!
Posted by: pete | July 31, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
Juxtaposing photos of Senator Obama with two insane white women with sexual, drug and alcohol issues? The ad speaks for itself and doesn’t require any interpretation.
So much for McSame’s promise of “a civil campaign” that doesn’t stoop to “personal attacks”…just one more flip flop to add to the ever growing list.
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | July 31, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am
Thanks, Jon, you summed it up perfectly!
“Obama is a lightweight who is famous for being famous.”
Posted by: marylou | July 31, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am
Bottom line: however the ad is interpreted, it’s still ridiculous and far below the level one would expect in a presidential campaign.
Team McCain is desperate, grasping at straws, and trying anything and everything, hoping something will work. Which of course has the opposite effect to what they intended.
Posted by: Tom J | July 31, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Oh, you poor, deluded kool-aid drinkers. The ad is not supposed to suggest anything is going on with Paris or Britney and Barack. It’s intended to connect how his voting demographic made him famous just as they made Paris and Britney famous. His voting demographic is obsessed with vacuuous celebrities: they launched Paris’ career just because she made a sex tape and they launched Britney to number 1 on the billboards despite the fact that she could not sing. In other words, Barack’s voting demographic should not be trusted with the fate of our country. Which, frankly, I completely agree with!
Posted by: Sandra | July 31, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
The ad must of been very effective given the number of kool-aid drinkers whing about it.
Posted by: geevill | July 31, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
I have to say that the ad is effective. At least viscerally. He’s pitching this ad at those much bally-hooed “Reagan democrats”. Low information voters who distrust anything Hollywood and the values it represents. So, on that level, this ad is effective.
That said, the ad is disgusting. I’m not so sure of the so-called racial elements, but it is telling that the McCain campaign equates celebrity with the notoriously reckless, oversexed, starlets instead of celebrities that actually have some air of respectability. So, there’s the smear: Obama’s celebrity is being equated to immorality, recklessness and overindulgence. Good job team McCain, this ad is a twofer.
Posted by: ChrisNBama | July 31, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
This ad has really freaked ‘em out!
Reminds me when the libs ran around all day screeming HALLIBURTON!! HALLIBURTON!!
I love it…
Posted by: Magoo | July 31, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
If it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck …
Obviously, the message is not as overt as the ad against Harold Ford.
The McCain camp is too smart for that.
But why else feature these 2 particular white women?
Why not juxtapose Obama to Tom Cruise or Brad Pitt? They’re vacuous celebrities, too.
John McCain might not be a racist himself, but he’s clearly not winning the popularity contest, so his campaign’s got to find some way to bring the other guy down.
(Remember, John McCain doesn’t necessarily speak for the McCain campaign.)
Posted by: eliot | July 31, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am
Regardless of their intent, the ad just made Obama look better, “a world celebrity”, and made McCain look like a childish whiner.
Posted by: cincyr | July 31, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am
Marshall is correct again.
Posted by: reino | July 31, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
What does McCain actually believe in?
Whatever is most expedient in the situation.
Posted by: Dr. Squid | July 31, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am
I don’t blame McCain for being desperate. If I was running for President on a platform that agreed with Bush/Cheney, I would be desperate too.
Posted by: reino | July 31, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
The ad is fantastic.
Hits at the heart of why so many of us will never vote for the empty Obama and why we think his followers are idiots.
It hits home and that’s why the Obama idiots are melting down.
Posted by: Sol | July 31, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
It’s a stupid juvenile ad…it’s not racist…or sexist or any of those things…bit it IS a stupid juvenile ad with memories and reflections of George BUsh.
You can see John McCain chuckling just like Georgie would…
this ad is so sophomoric…that it is scary to think that a tabloid intelligence campaign like the one McCain is running is actually this close to running for President…
oy this is totally the same intelligence that is in the white house now.
Posted by: dl | July 31, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
You may expect better from the McCain campaign and McCain himself. Unfortunately, McCain’s mind has been taken over by the disciples of Karl Rove [maybe even Rove, himself]. Hopefully, the American people will not fall for the same deceptive tactics that brought us eight years of George W. Bush. So far McCain is demonstrating that he has the same stride, leaves the same footsteps as the Nation’s worst president, ever. Pity. At one time he [McCain] seemed an honorable man.
Posted by: TheRef | July 31, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am
Barack Obama is the IT girl of 2008.
He might deserve a 7-page Jay McInerney article in the New Yorker but we don’t need him anywhere near the presidency.
Posted by: Chaz | July 31, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am
This is ridiculous. I hope the McCain campaign runs an ad with the rapper lyrics-talk about offensive and RACIST. Where is the DNC outrage about the part about Hillary?
Posted by: RL in Illinois | July 31, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am
Most politicians would be overjoyed to be able to pull in the huge crowds that Obama does. To see this as some sort of weakness is truly bizarre and I would say willfully ignorant. This is a classic swift-boating, attack a candidates strengths.
Posted by: Stooleo | July 31, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Are you kidding? Republicans running a racist campaign ad? Inconceivable! [Excuse me but I do not thing that word means what you thing it means....]
Posted by: Ducksworthy | July 31, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
I love the whole Britney/Paris/Obama comparison. It hit home for me.
Posted by: Wendy | July 31, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
The people Obama needs to be concerned about when considering the impact of the ad are independent voters like me.
It struck at something that I couldn’t quite put my finger on before about why I am wary of voting for Obama.
Quite simply, I’m a little nauseated by his hardcore fans and the adoration he seems to bestow on himself (a convention speech in a stadium instead of the regular hall).
I’ve tried not to hold it against the candidate, and to see it as a minor annoyance. But this ad made me think about it more deeply and ask exactly what Obama has done or credibly can claim he will do that merits a vote for the presidency.
I haven’t come up with anything. Not one thing. Not one cause he has demonstrated commitment to or success in his few short years in office.
And so, indirectly as a result of this ad and what it caused me to consider, I will likely be holding my nose and voting McCain. I’m nearly positive now that I would not vote for Obama.
He really IS just a celebrity famous for being famous, in the mold of a Paris Hilton.
Posted by: Sandy | July 31, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
This is politics — it ain’t beanbag. Anything goes and nothing either campaign should surprise anybody.
This is only the opening salvo. We have a lot more to come.
Posted by: purpleraider53 | July 31, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
It is difficult for me to reconcile what this McCain campaign ad says about Barack Obama, and the fact that Barack Obama used to be a senior lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago.
Obama is drawing crowds because people who desire better representation not only think he can represent them, they think there’s a strong chance he’ll be able to get things done. There are a lot of people in the US as well as worldwide who have been disenfranchised for years from the federal government and from decent international relations with the US. What McCain is trying to call mere “celebrity” is an attempt to damn with faint praise what people are actually feeling about the Obama candidacy.
Posted by: MIke | July 31, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am
People are asking what Obama has DONE that would justify the large crowds.
The answer becomes clearer by the minute. NOT A THING.
The crowds and hype are typical manifestations of a bored celebrity culture.
Obama is an empty candidate and his adoring fans are empty headed.
Posted by: Oliver | July 31, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
It is the reaction of Obama, his campaign and supporters that is far more damaging to him than the actual ad.
Same with the New Yorker cover.
Posted by: GEEVILL | July 31, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
Just once I would like to see John McCain address real issues in his ads, rather than personal smears against Obama. The obvious reason he doesn’t do this is he’s the candidate who lacks substance.
Try and prove me wrong, McCain. Obama would love to go head-to-head with you on the issues.
Posted by: fiat pax | July 31, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
No. This ad doesn’t play the race card. It is, however, as vapid as the starlets it employs.
Posted by: Lauren | July 31, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
This ad doesn’t have any arguments – it notes that Obama is popular, then compares him to two highly sexualized (sleazy?), white, female celebrities. If McCain wasn’t going for a racist sub-text, he could have used male, or even black male, celebrities (Brad Pitt, Will Smith) or a cartoon character (IMickey Mouse or Bart Simpson are probably better known than Paris). It’s either more incoherence from McCain, or sleaziness.
Posted by: paul martin | July 31, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Current chief McCain strategist Steve Schmidt has a longstanding working relationship with Terry Nelson.
Mr. Tapper, why did the Rick Davis memo supporting the celebrity ad include a reference to Tom Cruise, as well as Spears and Hilton, but he did not appear on screen? Because he was deemed by the McCain campaign as being too serious (!), or because he is not a twenty something white woman of questionable morals? Even if their intent was not to use images with racist undertones, they put out a frivolous, gratuitously condescending ad with the hope of creating as much buzz as possible, with much to be interpreted and/or misinterpreted by the viewer.
Does Mr. Davis still think this is the most entertaining thing he’s seen in quite a while?
Posted by: kbill | July 31, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
the celebrities in the ad were chosen for their vacuity, akin to obama’s, not their skin color, not quite so different from obama’s either, for that matter, unless you are highly color sensitive.
Posted by: Tim Norling | July 31, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
For all his much-vaunted principles, John McCain makes it clearer and clearer by the day that he will do and say anything to become President.
He wants it like people say Hillary wanted it: too much. Nothing out of bounds. Real, real bad.
No thanks, John McCain.
Posted by: indie | July 31, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Isn’t it wonderfully ironic that Paris Hilton today is just like Cindy McCain was when John McCain met HER: rich, blond, vapid? Didn’t bother him then, methinks.
Posted by: theod | July 31, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
Marshall hits the nail on the head. This the is same old politics from a Rove minion. It’s a shame McCain is cheapening the public discourse (and his own image) with silliness like this. But the press keeps giving him a pass because they’re his base. The media loves McCain.
Posted by: am4 | July 31, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
I think the ad is effective in its message. Barack Obama, like Paris, is famous for being famous. Name something, anything of substance, that he has done in his career in the Senate. I’m waiting……
Posted by: Lynne | July 31, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Well, Lynne, I’m neither a scholar nor a fan of Barack Obama, but if you ask me, his greatest accomplishment is 1) not being George W. Bush and 2) not being John McCain.
Good enough for me—and a whole lot of other voters, I might add.
Posted by: indie | July 31, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
I think its sad that John McCain thinks that he himself is less famous than Paris Hilton. But he certainly is aware that worldwide GW Bush is a bigger celebrity than Obama and Hilton put together. Why doesn’t he just get that picture of himself hugging Bush autographed and made into a poster.
Posted by: Matt | July 31, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
McCain and Bush were both at the bottom of their college class and make fun of their lack of accomplishment. McCain at least served our country honorably. McCain has an honorable record in the Senate. Obama is at the top of his class and a Senior Lecturer at the U of Chicago. Obama was offered full professor with tenure and turned it down to serve his country. Being smart and able to do the job of President matters and Obama is clearly more qualified on this basis that either Bush or McCain.
But McCain’s campaign spots are not about qualifications or ability or ideas or policies. McCain is pushing sex/race innuendo to make us miss the important points and be uncomfortable with Obama based on stuff that doesn’t really matter.
In my view, McCain is just shooting himself in the foot with his sleaze.
Posted by: Rich | July 31, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
What’s all the fuss about? Harold Ford actually has married a white woman!
Another thing: Don’t even imagine that Ford is intelligent. By his own admission (in a speech to college administrators carried on CSPAN Radio), he gained admission to the Univ. of Michigan Law School only because of his race, and he has taken — but never passed — the Tennessee bar examination.
Posted by: Myron | July 31, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
“Sounds like Swift-Boat II…”
Damn, I hope so!
Posted by: daryl | July 31, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Mr. Marshall has clearly lost his mind.
Posted by: mesquito | July 31, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Today we learn that Exxon reported the largest profit in corporate history–$11.66 billion. Just a little reminder that McCain promises to allow Exxon to continue making our energy policy.
As soon as they start drilling, our energy problems will be history and Americans will once again be riding high in Hummers and Cadillac Escalades–
according to McCain.
Posted by: Tim | July 31, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
Obama is running for the Presidency of the US and McCain is criticizing him for world wide name recognition? Silly isn’t it. Dottering old fool versus young guy who can still sink a three point shot, and talk intelligently to world leaders. Hmmm. Tough choice in ’08.
Posted by: tired | July 31, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
Josh Marshall has proven himself to be an unbalanced flake during the primaries. He actually played the race card alot sooner than I thought he would.
Posted by: OxyCon | July 31, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
Josh Marshall pounded the race card in the primaries and it turned me off his blog forever. It was vile then, now he’s just gone nuts. Absurd.
Posted by: Ford | July 31, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
Ford,
The GOP has been using the “Southern Strategy” for 40 years. Do you actually think they are going to give up on something that has worked for them?
Seriously?
Posted by: Pogyak | July 31, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
Since when does McCain have a problem with young blond heiresses?
Posted by: someone | July 31, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Obama didn’t play the race card. John Marshall didn’t play the race card.
McCain did (Marshall and others called him on it), and looks like he will keep doing so because it works.
Posted by: bob5540 | July 31, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Ted, why would you suggest Julia Roberts, who evidently is even stupider than Spears or Hilton?
This “subtext” notion is nothing short of ridiculous. But it’s what’s to be expected of Democrats and their apologists. How many times have all of us read or heard that some Republican’s statement or ad “failed to tell the whole story” or “omitted to mention” something?
Isn’t that the point?: One side tells its story, and the other tells its. It’s not up to McCain to flesh out leftist talking points in his own ads. Certainly Obama’s people don’t make McCain’s points for him.
Posted by: Myron | July 31, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
I believe the Republicans are very good at running nasty, negative, smear campaigns.
Posted by: susan | July 31, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
hey Sandy
well bless the independent voters out there
but don’t you think this ad was calculated by McCains team to get just that response from you ?
and don’t you find that manipulative?
just a suggestion
listen to the debates before you “plug your nose”
and decide to vote for the guy who is going to make permanent the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, has no economic policy, has no health care plan and whose foreign policy programs would likely be shaped by his expansionist vision
just saying
Posted by: view from the bridge | July 31, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Of course the racist subtext is intentional. McCain’s new political team is comprised entirely of karl Rove alumni, and they’re doing their thing.
And of course the McCain camp calls accusations of racial politics “ridiculous.” It’s just part of the cynical game they’re playing.
This is exactly the “tired old politics” that Obama wants to defeat –the politics of division, fear, ignorance, xenophobia, and sectarian hatred.
Posted by: Sam Russo | July 31, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
John McCain is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I’ve ever known in my life.
Posted by: Bennett Marco | July 31, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
I’m a voter who is doing well financially, benefits from the Bush tax cuts and GOP fiscal policy in general. I have problems with both candidates on the Iraq issue.
I am also a professional woman who is pro choice and generally socially liberal.
I am a swing voter for those reasons, and usually a late decider. More often than not I vote Democratic.
In my mind these two candidates are currently tied. I was, however, offended by the sexism against Hillary Clinton during the primary and the determining factor this time around will be whether Obama picks a woman Vice President.
If he does, he gets my vote. If not, it goes to McCain. That is the dealmaker or dealbreaker for a voter like me right now.
Posted by: Lil | July 31, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
Josh Marshall got it right here. Why would McCain’s camp use Brittany and Paris in the ad? He could have used Brad Pitt, Kevin Federline or Tom Cruise to represent celebrity. McCain’s going for the racist vote. Sickening!
Posted by: breakneck69 | July 31, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Sounds like Swift-Boat II…
Posted by: pt | Jul 31, 2008 7:26:58 AM
———————————
OH IF ONLY!!!
Posted by: HP Boston | July 31, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
Josh Marshall accurately points out the subtext of the ad, and the pattern of behavior of the cretins now running McCain’s campaign. They’re desparately dusting off the tactics that worked so well during the Rove era, because McCain provides so little on which to run a positive campaign.
Sorry Repubs, but if you keep going down this kind of despicable path, those who care enough to pay attention will keep calling you on it.
Posted by: chrism | July 31, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Britney and Paris are famous for being famous right now, even if Britney had a past career. That’s why Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise wouldn’t work, or Lindsay Lohan for that matter.
The Paris and Britney celebrity is particularly ridiculous because they are vapid and narcissistic.
The producers of this ad know Obama has precisely the same problem. Self-glorifying for no real reason.
Posted by: Marcus | July 31, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Anything is in the eye and mind of the beholder.
Posted by: tiredtoo | July 31, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
Obama only leads McCain by one point in today’s Gallup.
This brilliant ad has brought the truth home to people, and it has nothing to do with seeing racial subtexts
Posted by: Chris | July 31, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
The John McCain most Americans think they know is nothing more than a media construct.
Posted by: Ken in Tucson | July 31, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
Josh Marshall is a partisan ideologue who wouldn’t know the truth if it bit him and has suddenly developed the ability to read minds.
Posted by: Bill M | July 31, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
I assume every conservative who has decided that Obama has done nothing to deserve the presidency has read his policy statements, researched his legislative history, and held Bush up to the same judgment: What did he do as governor of Texas that qualified him to be president? Why isn’t McCain bothering to tell us in HIS ads what he intends for America? What makes him qualified–besides being a POW? I read his policies and pay attention to his statements. That’s how I can tell he has no idea what to do–he changes his positions and blurts out inconsistencies so often that his own aides disavow his statements as not representing his own campaign. If McCain could draw 200,000 people, would that automatically make him an “empty suit”?
Posted by: bluedog | July 31, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Obama will win this thing in a walk and the dems will pick up 20 House seats and 10 in the Senate, thus allowing them to cut Lieberman loose.
Posted by: Mick | July 31, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Josh Marshall, and bloggers like him, provide a source of information to people who are unwilling to subject their news to the profit targets of America’s largest corporations.
Posted by: Jonathan | July 31, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
What’s wrong with a political candidate drawing crowds? Isn’t it refreshing that so many people have become interested in finding the right person to run our country? Seems to me that a political candidate being a “celebrity” is a positive thing.
Posted by: rgb | July 31, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
For all of OBAMA’s Brew Ha-ha, he has nothing locked up. In fact, McCain’s gaining on him accoring to the polls and stories out lately. OBAMA needs to get away from the “I’m great” mode and turn to the substance mode before he loses. This technique he is using was Hillary’s too remember. She got crushed by substance. If McCain keeps pressing, OBAMA will lose and look like a fool.
Posted by: MC | July 31, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
“They didn’t, because Britney and Paris better epitomize vapid and immoral.”
So explain the racist angle. Poptarts are poptarts. The press calls him a rock star so why not use that?
Of course, so many of BHO’s supporters claim racism about ANY criticism no one should be surprised this time.
Posted by: Bill M | July 31, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
“IF OBAMA WINS, WE’LL JUST HAVE ANOTHER JIMMY CARTER IN THE WHITE HOUSE…”
And if McCain wins, we’ll have another George Bush in the White House, and the rich will continue drowning the middleclass in the black water of their greed; the United States will never again raise its head above water.
Posted by: Jonathan | July 31, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
I love it when people bash Jimmy Carter, the same man who as President made an executive order that from 1980 on the United States could no longer increase their dependance on foreign oil but the order was overturned the moment Reagan came to power, who really had the long term strategic interests in mind? I also love hearing McCain supporters whine about how Obama won’t debate him in a town hall, just keep whinning it’s great, it’s mcCain’s new slogan there nothing I won’t whine about.
Posted by: charles | July 31, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
I’m very curious to know whether we will ever be told what John McCain plans to as President. So far, it seems his primary plan is to not be Barack Obama. It worked for George Bush in 2004, who ran on a platform of not being John Kerry and won that election. Still, I wonder how long the GOP can continue to run campaigns like this.
Posted by: paul | July 31, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Anyone surprised that this is just another typical Republican campaign? The last thing they want to do is talk about the issues effecting the American public.
Will they get away with again? Will we get another 4 years of Republican control of the WH, DoJ, EPA, GAO, FCC,et al? Will they get to nominate their RW activists for the Supreme Court? Those are the real issues and that’s why the Republicans are happy to make Obama the object of their smears. It deflects the conversation from the real issues why we need a Democrat elected as President.
Posted by: Innocent Bystander | July 31, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
“Will they get to nominate their RW activists for the Supreme Court?”
As opposed to the LW activists BHO will nominate? Republicans are trying to get Pelosi and Reid to do something about gas prices and they run away. They claimed Iraq was lost too. BHO was with them all the way so why do we need a Dem Prez?
Posted by: Bill M | July 31, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
John Sidney McCain is stuck in the past and will do anything he can to deflect attention from his tired and pathetic non-record of legislation.
The Republican base, as always, foams at the mouth and at the corporate trough.
Look at the photo of him grasping George W. Bush like Bush was his savior and Bush’s arms are raised to heaven. You talk about presumptuous.
McCain has no solutions and no dreams, at least not ones that aren’t colored by whatever sedatives they are giving him.
Posted by: BWD | July 31, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
McCain’s campaign is playing dogwhistle politics. Code words, subliminal images, and misleading characterizations.
How can anyone consider him a “straight talker”?
Posted by: athena | July 31, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
I was a McCain volunteer in 2000. A fact that I currently find embarrassing. Turns out that John McCain is not half the man I thought him to be. This Navy Vet is for Obama.
Posted by: Walt Forest | July 31, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
A “dog whistle” is a whistle that cannot be heard by humans but is easily heard by dogs. An ad such as this which pairs two sexy, etc. young white women with a young, powerful black man is simply a political ad to most of us, with no racial subtext. To a racist, however, it’s a flashing red beacon light, reminding them of the very strong, emotional reasons they do not want Obama to be president. —- So it is … and it isn’t … racist, depending on what is already in the mind of the person seeing it. Was it intended to serve as a dog-whistle to those racists who can be motivated to vote against Obama? There is no way to know for sure – I guess that depends on what was in the mind of the person putting the ad together … and the level of that person’s knowledge about subliminal cues and such things. ———— And for the record, Obama did not say that McCain or his campaign was racist. He was speaking about Republicans opposed to his candidacy, and you don’t have to go any further than the TN GOP to see the accuracy of that.
Posted by: E | July 31, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
I’m an air force veteran. I used to respect John McCain.
I no longer do. I’m sick of the bait and switch political ad campaigns, and the snide insinuations.
This veteran is enthusiastically voting for Barack Obama. It is indeed time for a change.
Posted by: TheOldSchool | July 31, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
The endless passive agression of liberals finds its apex in Obama. “How dare you say that!” “How dare you mock him!” How DARE YOU!!”
If you criticize him, you’re a racist. If you’re skeptical about global warming, you’re a “denier” (With obvious connotations about other sorts of deniers.)
Liberals need to have the equivalent of human shields in front of their candidates and their ideas. This of course to make debate on the merits thereof off limits.
Because their people and their ideas don’t generally withstand the withering of scrutiny.
Just as the cult of global warming is starting to melt due to exposure to the bright light of skepticism, so too must we take a damn good look at Obambi.
I will say this about him though: No one ever said nothing-at-all quite as well as he has.
But a true warrior vs. a dapper metrosexual?
No contest. Of course, he will absolutely garner the dapper metrosexual vote in huge numbers.
Posted by: Tom | July 31, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
I hear a bit of protestething too much from the Obama fans.
This ad will be the turning point in the campaign. Bye BamBam.
Posted by: Brad | July 31, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
I suspect next week will have a MAJOR McSame campaign shake down, and anyone who has their fingerprints on the stupid Britney ad will be long gone. They will linger in the backwater limbo of Haglee and Phil Graham. This commercial was like manna from heaven for Obama, he played it as a joke (at McSame’s expense), and the audiences howled with laughter at several campaign stops.
wait until Late Night comics rip into MCNasty…yikes, they’ll have weeks of material to toss at him.
Posted by: mark | July 31, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
Yeah try to play it off as “backfiring.”
The nervous laughter from the Obritney camp isn’t convincing anyone. The commercial is devastatingly effective.
McCain has pulled within a point of Obritney in national polling. That translates to bad, bad news for The One.
Posted by: Andre | July 31, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
McCain’s ONLY asset was he was thought of as better than other republicans they HATE this year.
With the stupid blaming Obama for gas prices,then the FALSE crud about not visiting wounded troops,(it came out today McNasty had two ads prepared whether Obama visited the troops or didn’t he would be smeared) and now Britney and Paris.
McCain is not different from Cheney, DeLay, Limbaugh, Coulter…
Posted by: mark | July 31, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
The point of the commercial is that Obama refuses to drill for oil. The only association that should be made with Obama and Spears or Hilton is that they are all no nothing airheads who live in some fantasy world…
Posted by: blackswan2008 | July 31, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
The point of the commercial is that Obama refuses to drill for oil. The only association that should be made with Obama and Spears or Hilton is that they are all no nothing airheads who live in some fantasy world…
Posted by: blackswan2008 | July 31, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
“To a racist, however, it’s a flashing red beacon light, reminding them of the very strong, emotional reasons they do not want Obama to be president”
The flaw in your logic is a racist would already be against him. Try some common sense.
So many of the lefties here can’t lay off the ad hominem attacks. I wonder why?
Posted by: Bill M | July 31, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
If the American people had a brain and any sense of fairness at all, McCain’s slander would have already caused a backlash. McCain is counting on the essentially unfair, prejudiced nature of the American public. Bush counted on it and won by dirt and slime. McSlander wants to use the same tried-and-tested defamation of character approach to sloganeering. Never mind fixing the problems our country is in. The Republicans don’t care if we all go down the toilet. That’s obvious.
Posted by: allen_osuno | July 31, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
Oh please…he is calling Obama a light weight. It has nothing to do with race.
It has to do with 143 days in the Senate!
Geez…get some perspective!
Obama diminishes true racism every time he tosses the race card out. It is disgusting!
Posted by: caligirl | July 31, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
Gee… ya think this sleazy ad *coincidentally* showed as their only “celebrities” two young, blond females infamous for their promiscuity? Not Tom Hanks, Oprah, Angelina Jolie or Jack Nicholson –Britney and Paris are America’s biggest celebrities…
Posted by: Salvatore C. | July 31, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
you guys are FUNNY! Ranting and raving about how awful Obama is or will be. Same crap they threw at….lets see, Roosevelt, Kennedy, Carter, Clinton, etc. You kids should study some history. You kids should study some ANYTHING, the stupidity on here is like a virus. Meanwhile, the poster earlier got it right. Obama wins in a walk, as he should, and the dems get 20 more in the house and 10 more in the senate. Finally, maybe the grown-ups will be in charge for a while.
Posted by: Don | August 1, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
Looks like you’ve got a good handle on writing the “deep dispute” angle.
Way to get on top of that.
Posted by: Paul Camp | August 1, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am
I think the blogger is correct. I thought the same thing the minute I saw the ad. It seems to go with the Rove theme about a month ago. “He’s the one at the country club with a pretty girl, etc….” Story line continued and I promise you more to come. I know Rove was not thinking of Michelle as the girl.
Posted by: Win | August 1, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am
Win – I also associated the ad with the Karl Rove description of Obama at the country club with a martini in one hand and his arm around a pretty girl. Both Rove’s description and the very beginning of the ad give Obama that debonair kind of image. It’s a strange kind of a coincidence.
Posted by: kat | August 1, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am
Newsday’s Political Punch blog nails it:
“The problem: Anyone with even a vague sense of pop culture knows that Britney and Paris are yesterday’s news. Here’s a link to Forbes’ Celebrity 100. Paris and Britney don’t even make the list any more.
Instead, the top 10, in order: Oprah Winfrey, Tiger Woods, Angelina Jolie, Beyonce Knowles, David Beckham, Johnny Depp, Jay-Z, The Police, JK Rowling, Brad Pitt.
So, they didn’t pick other big celebrities, who were either men, or black, or married.
What they picked was two sexually available white women.
But it must have been a coincidence, because we know John McCain wants to run an elevated campaign focusing on the serious issues that America faces.”
Posted by: Jim | August 1, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am
Britney and Paris symbolize too-young naïve vacuous superficial glitz, along with fleeting fame that collapses. The only one missing was Lindsey Lohan. That these are sex celebs as well certainly does nothing to hurt the effectiveness of the ad but it doesn’t have to be its main intention. Obama built up his rock star image and now he doesn’t like being dinged because of it.
Posted by: Desider | August 1, 2008, 2:22 am 2:22 am
Up thread Susan says:
“Obama’s comment that he is the one that the world has been waiting for kind of reminds me of something Britney or Paris would say. ”
Actually it is a phrase that Ghandi said! So that we all would take responsibility for “becoming the change we wish to see i the world!”
As for the ad… it is clearly RACIST and intended to link Obama with young available white women so you would be scared of the “uppity” black man.
It links Obama with two vapid celebrities, but Obama is famous for his actions, his words, and vision of hope he offers to us and the world!!
So go suck an egg, you whining neocons! Whine, whine whine … away because McSame is as exciting as cottage cheese and has about as many new ideas as lime green jello!!
Obama responded just right: “McCain has nothing to say about McCain.. all he does is whine about Obama!”
Waaaaaa! Waaaaaaa!
Posted by: Dreamkacher | August 1, 2008, 3:39 am 3:39 am
It’s a brilliant ad, striking right at the heart of the matter. He has been raised to an iconic level as a result of flash, no substance, just flash. It’s turning a lot of people away, as I hoped he, in general, would from the start. He is not qualified to steer the nation, as we learn more with each passing day, ad, speech and tour. The debates are going to be the final blow to this campaign. Unless they have his brain wired ahead of time to prevent all original thought processses. In public speeches, he slows to an unbearable crawl while he evaluates every word, checking each word’s correctness. Someone so calculated is not the real deal. A truly intelligent leader doesn’t have to do that. He just says it like it is and takes the heat. That which is right is not always popular and that which is popular is not always right (as in his case).
Posted by: Beth | August 1, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
It’s interesting to read the vapid comments that don’t see the subliminal racism in McCain’s ad or they attempt to trollishly negate it as being eclipsed by the vapidity of the initial association.
… but it’s clear to honest people, that the pettiness of trying to associate 2 young white women with a black man is RACIST.
Just like the HArold Ford ad is obviously sleazy and false, so will this ad become obvious down the road.
Obama handled the response just fine. He Nailed the Republicans right between the eyes and let them squirm!
The attempt to associate Obama with 2 vapid celebities won’t work because Obama is not a vapid celebrity!
Obama is a constitutional law professor and his command of history and language and message of hope drew 200,000 Europeans to a speech that Republicans didn’t even recognize restated Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Four Freedoms!!
Memorable. World Shaking. And Flawless!!
And all neocons have to offer is he is an empty suit??!!
LOL!!
McCain is the empty suit, Manchurian/Rove brained candidate who will crumble on stage when the two finally debate!!
Bring. It. ON!!
Posted by: Dreamkacher | August 1, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
I am a white woman, the first thing I though of were the Harold Ford ads, this goes one step beyond in that this is a double entendre(??) type ad that had to be explained to death by many. The people it targetd will take it in the vein the Ford ads were. To Paraphrase here — ‘One does not use irony in underdeveloped countries’ — The race card was played to deflect from all the “bad press” over ad.
Posted by: Paulet | August 1, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
the ad portrayed Obama as being similar to Brit and Paris, call it mean.low or racist- whatever
at least it’s not portraying him as being similar to Bush and Cheney – that would be scary
Posted by: view from the bridge | August 1, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
From Webster’s
Main Entry: racism
Pronunciation: \ˈrā-ˌsi-zəm also -ˌshi-\
Function: noun
Date: 1933
1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
2 : racial prejudice or discrimination
Does the ad portray Obama’s rise to that of to two ditzy white celebs? Yes.
Does Obama have more experience in the Senate than those two celebs? Yes. About a year.
Does it imply “racial prejudice or discrimination”. No.
Does it display a “belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race”?
No. Words have meanings. Make sure you know the meaning before you use it.
Posted by: Pat D | August 4, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
the McCain VS McCain debate would be too embarrassing to watch – the O VS McC debates will just be awful to watch – and Repubs will have more proof that O is being disrespectful to his elders!
Posted by: Lucious Lips | August 6, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm