Republicans Belittling Obama’s Decent, if Overstated, Energy Efficiency Idea
We took a look earlier today at Sen. Barack Obama’s assertion that "we could save all the oil that they’re talking about getting off drilling, if everybody was just inflating their tires and getting regular tune-ups."
That’s not accurate, our expert ruled.
Such moves would save about 800,000 barrels a day, as opposed to the 1.25 million barrels a day from drilling off shore.
Still, that doesn’t mean the idea to is to be mocked, as many Republicans seem to be doing right now.
Unless, of course, you think 800,000 barrels of oil a day is to be sneezed at.
And without getting into all the reasons why we’re in Iraq right now, and all the brave American men and women and Iraqis who have died because of the war, let’s just posit that the more energy the U.S. can save, the better, and it’s a serious issue.
So why is Sean Hannity making fun of it? (Listen here).
“All you need to do is inflate your tires!" Hannity said today. "That’s all you need to do. If every American would join in this effort of inflating one’s tires, then it’s all going to be fine! And we can still import 70% of our oil from Saudi Arabia. Just keep those tires inflated. And just keep that car tuned up of yours. The problem is Americans are not being responsible.’ You know what we need? We need a Department of Tire Inflation. If we would just have a government program designed so that every American can have their tires checked on a regular basis. I’ll tell you, I think we probably would be doing a lot better.”
No one said the energy problem could be solved by this tire issue, Mr. Hannity. And is it really such a horrible thing for public officials to use their bully pulpits to raise such issues. (You’ll notice that Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., didn’t dismiss the moves when he discussed them.)
It was just a few weeks ago when two Republican governors (one of them a potential VP pick for Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz) were talking about Americans keeping their engines tuned and tires inflated.
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, R-Calif., and Charlie Crist, R-Florida, according to the Los Angeles Times "appealed to those with the real power to make change — average citizens — to drive slower, keep engines tuned and tires properly inflated, to buy hybrids and lower overall consumption."
We all know how this works. Within a day or two a bunch of Republican congressmen will be making an issue out of this, twisting Obama’s words and making the idea seem silly.
That’s a shame.
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Crude oil fell more than $2 a barrel, capping the biggest one-month decline since December 2004, as a slowing U.S. economy caused fuel consumption to weaken to the lowest in three years.
Conservation works.
Posted by: HonestAbe | July 31, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
I think the reason it’s being belittled is the way it was presented. Possibly if Obama would have relayed some of those facts, as you do (and is it really 800,000 barrels a day — are there THAT many significantly underinflated tires out there?), his idea/assertion would have been much better received. As it stands, it sounds laughable, which is why Repubs are laughing at it.
Posted by: Beth | July 31, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
It’s not the idea that saving some gas is silly, it’s what Obama actually said according to you…
“Making sure your tires are properly inflated, simple thing, but we could save all the oil that they’re talking about getting off drilling, if everybody was just inflating their tires and getting regular tune-ups. You could actually save just as much.”
800,000 barrels of oil a day is a lot less than you’d get from ANWR, oil shale and off shore drilling.
The silly part is Obama wildly overstating the benefits of his suggestion.
Posted by: Drew | July 31, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
McCain isn’t making fun of it, I saw him say that we should inflate our tires, BUT , we need more , we need to do All of the energy proposals, including domestic drilling, solar, wind,hydro, ect. McCains has a Better Comprehensive energy policy than Obama. That’s the facts, no smoke & mirrors. McCain is just Better for AMERICA, than Obama – that’s the bottom line.
Posted by: Not Fooled | July 31, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
The dems keep saying that drilling now wouldn’t get any results for 10 years.
Well, that’s what they said 10 years ago when the GOP tried to get more offshore drilling through and Bill Clinton vetoed it.
In other words they blocked it 10 years ago and if they hadn’t we would be drowning in the oil right now.
Gee, thanks dems.
Posted by: Jo | July 31, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
When you inflate your tires, your gasmileage goes up, demand in oil goes down, prices go down, saving you money.
What’s stupid about that? Hannity afraid that his stocks in Exxon will be worth less?
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | July 31, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Yes…you mealy mouthed, big name politicians..conservation works. So, mandate fuel efficiency to Detroit and reduce that national speed limit.
And, while you’re at it save the fuel and associated money wasted in parading around the country making campaign promises that won’t be kept.
When you multiply the savings by all the politicians that will be wasting oil and resources from now until November 4, we could probably reduce consumption and the national debt by a signficant amount.
We have seen all the political commercials we need to see on our televisions for the last year or so, too.
Get that garbage off the airwaves and use the money to pay down the spiraling national debt that Congress authorizes to buy votes each year.
McCain, Obama, Schwarzenegger, Crist, all of you…conservation starts at home. Quit talking and set a good example instead of saying one thing and doing another.
Kick’em all out, and start over…
Posted by: Jayhawk | July 31, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
When McShame says something stupid, Democrats don’t jump on it and exagerate it. But when Obama says something that isn’t entirely inaccurate, the Karl Rovean Republican attack machine starts rolling. We the American people need to stop our over-simplicity/stupidity and stop falling for the Republian scare tactics that give the white house to Republicans every election. Obama ’08!
Posted by: M | July 31, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Inflate our tires (put on a sweater — oops that was Carter)… ask the rest of the world’s permission for what we eat, drive and set our thermostats on, learn Spanish…..
Gee, Obama’s just chock full of ideas. He’s full of “change” alright. Not the kind of change I want, thank you very much.
Posted by: Jo | July 31, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
Didn’t Sheryl Crow suggest limiting our toilet paper use to one square to save forests? In theory, she’s right. In theory. Is she also advising Obama on energy issues? Cool.
Posted by: Archer | July 31, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
M,
You’re kidding right? Democrats jumped all over the 100 years stuff. And he didn’t mean it at all the way dems portray it.
Nice try but you lose.
Posted by: Jo | July 31, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Consumers could save more if they would park their gas guzzling SUVs, sports cars and walk or use a bike. Is the Volkswagen Bug still available? It was very popular during the last gas shortage/war.
Besides walking or biking is very good exercise for those enlarged waistline.
Way back when–I loved to walk or even go hiking in the mountains.
Posted by: Mary | July 31, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
I have heard similar suggestions given on my local TV news broadcasts as helpful hints,with their info comimg from some “experts” The important thing is that Senator Obama, was just saying that we, who have the sense that we get what we want, may need to wake up smell the “oil” and look at what we can do in a short term, while long term solutions are found.
What if gas prices never go down? And maybe we should Be Thankful we are not paying the prices that some in Europe are paying.
Posted by: fempharoh08 | July 31, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Is Obama running to be the nation’s daddy or the president?
Cuz he talks like he wants to be our daddy and tell us what to do. Unless of course it’s about our thermostats, what we drive and eat….then he wants us to ask the rest of the world what to do.
Obama gets more ridiculous by the day. Can’t wait till this joke is over in November.
Posted by: Jo | July 31, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Another thing for the political hacks…
Why aren’t politicians working at 100% to get wind farms, solar arrays, geothermal systems, conversion of our vehicles to natural gas (yes, we have plenty right here…and it burns cleaner)up and running right now?
According to statistics, we could reduce the amount of oil imported into the United States by 20% in five years by building wind farms for generation of electricity.
The United States is “the Saudi Arabia of wind power,” and, yet, we hear nothing specific about moving in this direction from Obama or McCain (note the word, specific).
The only one with a real, workable plan is an oil man named T. Boone Pickens. The man is 80 years old, but he has a better energy plan than either presidential candidate.
And, I don’t care what you think about Pickens. At least he HAS a plan which is better than Obama or McCain who don’t have a clue…
Posted by: Jayhawk | July 31, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Tell Obama to ask all the Hollywood celebs and rich fat cats who fly private jet to abandon that habit and get back going green like the rest of us are asked to do.
Oh and the GOP had a long term plan ….10 years ago when they tried to get offshore drilling passed.
Like Jay Leno says…..the dems complain that won’t help for 10 years….but they said that 10 years ago.
Even Jay Leno (liberal) gets it.
Posted by: Jo | July 31, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
@Jo: “Not the kind of change I want, thank you very much.”
You can set your thermostat as high as you want when wearing your lingerie in winter, but stop whining about high gas prices. It’s a free market, you wanted it that way. Americans don’t have the exclusive rights to world oil.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | July 31, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
way to go Jo
why should we Americans change our ways
we have a the rights in this world and should not have to take any efforts to conserve!!. down with any politician who would suggest we inflate our tires and keep our cars in good running order in order to conserve this is America and I’m not taking a bus!!
what’s their sand doing on our oil ?
hooray for McCain and big oil
Posted by: view from the bridge | July 31, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
There’s nothing wrong about being conservative with our natural resources. What some people don’t want to hear, or are too ignorant to pay attention, this planet DOES NOT have an infinite quantity of fossil fuels; it no longer has an infinite quantity of other resources either. We are a wasteful society, many Americans, especially, have a sense of entitlement — turn every light & appliance in the house on, turn the thermostat way up, or way down, depending on the season, and to hell with everyone else.
Posted by: nanameow | July 31, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
NY TIMES KNOCKING MCCAIN? THAT IS NEWS???? OBAMA IS THEIR SWEETHEART – KNOCKING MCCAIN MAKES SENSE. THE TIMES IS STAKING EVERYING ON OBAMA. IF OBAMA LOSSES – GOOD CHANCE THE TIMES GOES UNDER – AS IT IS IN THE PROCESS OF DOING RIGHT NOW!!!
Posted by: Manitu | July 31, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
Your “experts are full of beans. If you make the assumption that every car on the road has under inflated tires and needs a tune-up, the numbers could be fairly close. If you assume that Obama was only talking about a few of the sources we aren’t currently using, your numbers could be close. However, there is no reason to believe either of those two suppositions. Obama was off by a country mile, and deserves a bit of derision.
Posted by: Buford Gooch | July 31, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
Most people today do not have MONEY for frequent tune-ups (do you know what they cost lately?). My tires are inflated and I check them regularly. I guess if Obama becomes President we will have to have our tires checked every 6 months for another $50.00. More Government, more taxes, more regulations forth coming and no real results.
Posted by: Anne | July 31, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
Anyone who thinks that our energy issues are going to be solved through one approach is simply delusional. It will require a national effort involving a combination of approaches and a good deal of time. Gas is now $4.30 per gallon…if inflating your tires helps lower your gas use…do it.
This derision is coming from the same bunch that wanted the federal gas holiday which would have saved people pennies and taken money and jobs away from badly needed infrastructure projects. Give me a break.
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | July 31, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I presume the 1.25 million barrels a day that offshore drilling would produce would be at peak production 20 years from now, right? The 800,000 barrels gained from proper maintenance doesn’t have to take 20 years to kick in.
But this debate misses the point. The point is that compared to our current and future needs 1.25 million barrels in 2030 is a pittance, and has absolutely nothing to do with oil prices now, or in the next 10 years at the least (studies on offshore drilling show it’s effect would be a couple pennies a gallon at the peak).
The absurd claims are the ones that suggest that offshore drilling will have any effect on our foreign oil dependence.
Posted by: Lloyd | July 31, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
“…if everybody was just inflating their tires…”
Such a bold, generic statement shows very poor judgment by Sen. Obama. Over inflated tires can be hazardous. Over inflated tires will ride on just the center of the tread. This means less grip on the road which can result in steering and stopping problems. Not to mention it will result in more wear on the tires.
Sen. Obama should have told the American people to maintain the air pressure that is recommended within the manufacturer’s manual.
Posted by: James Danley | July 31, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
Anne
it doesn’t cost anything to check the air pressure in your tires, you can do it yourself
it takes a minute
air is usually free at service stations if you need to inflate your tires
why such negative knee jerk reaction to a reasonable idea
why is the idea of energy conservation a partisan
bickering point
I guess if you don’t like the guy everything he says must be wrong
Posted by: view from the bridge | July 31, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
“1.25 million barrels a day from drilling off shore”??? What prevents us from drilling 2,3 or 10 times that amount per day? Would Obama’s comment be any less relevant if the comparison was 800,000 barrels a day vs. 12.5 million?
Posted by: ObamasClueless | July 31, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Liberals have been pushing wind and solar for over 30 years. If we followed Jimmy Carter’s plans, we wouldn’t be in this mess today.
Posted by: AkaDad | July 31, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
Here he goes again! Of course, all of us little folks will hear his words and be enlightened (as we were with his speech on race, responsibilities of the black father)! OMG, Obama just solved the energy crisis – forget about solar, wind, nuclear, and the other clean fuels, and don’t worry about all the other uses for oil! Talk about an inflated ego, and a lot of hot air! Maybe we should harness him – could save 8,000 barrels a day! LOL!
Posted by: Beckie | July 31, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
I read the “analysis” from the previous post. It’s riddled with flaws and does damage to the credibility of the “expert” involved.
First, a glaring mathematical error. The expert claims that increasing fuel economy by 18% will save 68 million gallons out of 380 million gallons of fuel consumed daily. Presumably he got this by multiplying 0.18 x 380,000,000. Except that fuel economy is measured (I would assume) in miles per gallon, so the an increase of 18% there would mean only a 15% increase in gallons per mile. That loses 10 million gallons right there.
Also, the idea that on average over half the cars out there can get such amazing fuel consumption improvements needs to be much better justified. Claiming something like that by pulling a number (10%) out of thin air is ridiculous.
Posted by: Steve | July 31, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
I should add, among other things, that the assumption made in the previous post didn’t even try to account for things such as…
What fraction of miles driven are from cars, trucks, etc.? How much gasoline do each class of vehicle consume? Are they uniformly affected by bad air filters, underinflated tires, etc?
Basically, you need to get a real estimate from a person who did real research. This kind of making stuff up gives journalism a bad name. And I say that as someone who opposes offshore drilling and thinks conservation is the best way to go.
Posted by: Steve | July 31, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
Obama just cannot be trusted with any though that pops into his head.
Posted by: Aston | July 31, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
Let’s see –
The democratic congress continues to suppress additional energy sources so the law of supply and demand kicks in and prices rise. Consumption falls.
Now, reduced consumption means less taxation so that same congress want to raise the gasoline tax by 10 to 50 cents per gallon.
Which raises prices and the problems spins out of control.
Anybody see a fallacy in the argument posed by the ruling party in DC
?
Posted by: Surelock Homes | July 31, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
And the networks wonder why 52% of the population distrust the news media? Can you say in the tank? If McCain had said this he would have been ridiculed by all of the alphabet news readers.
Posted by: Rick | July 31, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
why is the GOP really going after offshore drilling the oil companies have leases for millions of acres to do their exploring. they can drill all they want but they wont because it will drive the price down OFFSHORE drilling is just a little game thats being played Oh and by the way check with your manufacturers manual
Posted by: j martin | July 31, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
It’s true that Obama never claimed inflating your tires and getting regular tune-ups is the panacea to fixing our oil problems, he has not put forward any CONCRETE proposals himself. Just saying you’re going to invest in wind, solar, etc technology is not a real plan. It’s the generic line that your average Joe off the street would spit at you if you asked him his solution to the energy problem.
And so we now get a concrete solution from Obama to easing the problem – inflate your tires and tune up your car. While in and of itself a good idea, the real error of the Obama campaign is that THIS IS THE MOST CONCRETE PLAN WE’VE RECEIVED FROM HIM TO DATE.
No doubt, people will say he has a lot planned for energy. In reality, most of his solutions are framed around – let’s invest more in alternative fuels and eventually it will work out. No real solutions. No proof that just throwing money at the problem will fix it. And no backup plan in case things don’t work out as well for alternative energy as many of us HOPE (in reality, NONE of us know).
The best and safest strategy is to push forward alternative energy, but supplement it with PROVEN ways to help ease our energy problem. Those include nuclear and off shore drilling. Both of which Obama opposes. These are concrete and very real options.
The real issue here is that Obama is not giving us CONCRETE and PROVEN ways to help our energy dependency. He is giving us a little speech that any of us can make, providing no real detail beyond what any of us who studies up for a day on the subject could present.
And that is the ultimate failure of this campaign. All talk, no action, no plan for action.
Posted by: JA | July 31, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
Obama is so full of hot gas, he can inflate all tires properly by himself.
Obama for Secretary of Inflation!
Posted by: lamecandidate | July 31, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
One other comment to the general readership:
I’ve seen Obama and others claim that:
1. Oil from offshore drilling will come on tap 10 years from now
And 2. that will not effect prices now
Both of these claims are factually wrong. The first is wrong from an engineering standpoint. We can start to get some of the oil from offshore drilling with 3 years.
The second is wrong from an economic standpoint. The markets will price in a supply spike into current prices NOW. That Obama does not understand this proves he knows absolutely NOTHING about markets.
Had McCain made such an idiotic comment, he would have been beaten to death with it.
Posted by: JA | July 31, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
Inflating your tires does improve your gas mileage a bit, and it improves handling. That said, Hannity is a republican stooge, that wouldn’t give a dem credit even if that dem had the most brilliant idea since sliced bread. The same is true for liberal talk show hosts preaching spin on the other side.
Posted by: Ben Straub | July 31, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
@JA: “I’ve seen Obama and others claim that:
1. Oil from offshore drilling will come on tap 10 years from now
And 2. that will not effect prices now
Both of these claims are factually wrong.”
==================================
Those are not Obama’s claims. Those claims from the United States Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy.
Are you accusing the Bush Administration of lying?
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 1, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am
What’s gotten lost in the discussion of offshore drilling is that the oil produced will not be U.S. property. Cenk Uygur of Young Turks pointed this out:
“The oil that comes from that drilling will not be United States property (Republicans aren’t suggesting we nationalize the oil companies, are they?). It will be the property of whichever oil company got the rights to that contract. They can then sell it to whoever they like — and they will. They will sell it on the world market, so the Chinese will have just as much access to the oil that comes out of the coast of Florida as we will.” (July 23, 2008)
Posted by: cincyr | August 1, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am
willem – is that a joke or a serious question? is there anything the bush administration has NOT lied about? i believe he has a dog and his wife is named laura. other than that… the man wouldn’t even know it if he did tell the truth.
Posted by: mara | August 1, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am
JA- ” . .. but supplement it with proven ways to help our energy problem. Those include nuclear and offshore drilling. Both of which Obama opposes.”
But Obama is actually nuclear energy friendly. He’s received significant contributions from the nuclear industry along with having a pretty cozy relationship with Exelon, which has a nuclear plant in Illinois. There are some of us who wish he were greener, not in experience, of course, but with environmental issues.
Posted by: kat | August 1, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am
When Obama states that inflating our tires would replace ALL the oil that could be gotten by drilling, that’s a ridiculous statement and he deserves to be ridiculed for it.
Worse, it shows a complete misunderstanding of the need for domestic drilling. It isn’t just to bring gas prices down, although it would. It’s to quit funding terrorism by sending American money to countries that hate us. Plus, it averts an impending world war with China and India over oil which there’s no way we can win.
Domestic drilling isn’t just about Energy, it’s also about National Security. And let’s not forget McCain’s ENTIRE policy – Conserve, Produce, Invent. That’s the ticket to Energy Independence.
Posted by: marylou | August 1, 2008, 6:31 am 6:31 am
NEW BOOK OUT ON OBAMA….THE TRUTH ABOUT HIM…GOOD READING!!
Posted by: JED | August 1, 2008, 8:06 am 8:06 am
mary
in the 60s 70s area we had a car volkeswagon rabbit diesel somewhere around 50 mpg where did that one go. if everyone slowed down to 55 to 60 mph we cound cut usage by as much as 20%—the public seems to learn nothing.
Posted by: rodney | August 1, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am
marylou
we cannot be independant with oil alone we have long passed that point—-alternate fuels and energy are a must.
mccain has had 30 years to do something about it—–when he spouts ofshore drilling i know exactly who he is pandering to—BIG OIL and that is disturbing
Posted by: rodney | August 1, 2008, 8:16 am 8:16 am
I heard that Ford overseas has (and for a while) models that get 40+ mpg. But we can’t have the same over here for what reason???
Oh yes, it’s too difficult, and the oil cos wouldn’t like it over here.
Posted by: MaeScott | August 1, 2008, 8:16 am 8:16 am
The Republicans have become such idiots, they know that their days are numbered and they are using everything to throw at the democrats even the kitchen sink. I am really disappointed that I am a republican. I am divorcing myself from the republican party.
Posted by: mary | August 1, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am
hear is what must be done—first we need new style reactors built–the ones that reuse spent rods–that alone can produce the electric we need–and yes it is very safe—why has the past administration started that prodject–BIG OIL PAYOFF WHAT ELSE and mccain has been a part of it.he can spout all he wants now as a coverup.
Posted by: rodney | August 1, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am
i dont consider myself a genius by any means–but if i know the answers. WHAT IS WRONG WITH OUR GOVERNMENT—-like him or not obama may be the best chance we have as mccain will be nothing more than a continuance of present leadership–he has voted with bush 95% of the votes–that tells you something. ofshore drilling will not solve any of our problems -just make billions more for big oil as oil is sold on the world market and is controlled by big oil and opec. you are in for the fight of your lives-to get alternates up and running–too much corruption.
Posted by: rodney | August 1, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am
Hannity and most Republicans (until this election, I was one for 30 years) are either lying or stupid when he says:
With Obama’s view of conservation Hannity whines “we can still import 70% of our oil from Saudi Arabia. ” He ignores the fact that domestic oil is not kept in the USA. It is sold on the world market at world prices. I bet that most of Exxon’s profits come from taking our domestic oit and selling it on the world market–there is not US only price.
If we could set up a productive oil well in Washington, DC that cost $30/per barrel to ship to the customer in Hawaii you know roughly what Exxon would charge us? $120 per barrel because that is the WORLD PRICE.
When we give Exxon cheap leases for US oil rights they make bank selling our oil to the world not to the US.
Obama ’08
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | August 1, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am
+big oil big business china and nafta along with a unjustified war is bankrupting our country and most on here flap their mouth about some of the most silly things–and all the time our country is going down the drain—i dont know if anyone can fix the mess the last 8 years have gotten us into–but you all must insist that somerthing be done and nothing less–dont be sidetracted by kiddy nonsence.
have to go
bye
Posted by: rodney | August 1, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
this is a afterthought
the last i knew it was costing arabs 2,00 yes two dollars a barrel to produce—-DO YOU GET THE PICTURE.
Posted by: rodney | August 1, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am
Rodney, McCain doesn’t say that drilling is enough – but he is willing to include it as PART OF the solution and that’s a good thing.
Nice twist trying to reduce McCain’s 25 years of senatorial experience as he personally controlling every piece of legislation passed or failed. I guess that’s all you’ve got with Obama’s piece-of-fluff resume and record of experience!
McCain – Right for America!
Posted by: marylou | August 1, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am
Sen. Obama just announced his Emergency Economic Plan where he proposes giving families a stimulus check of $1,000 and working individuals $500, paid for, in part, by the proposed windfall profits tax on oil companies.
So Sen. Obama will buy your vote and pay for it by stealing from the oil companies. If he and the Democrats get away with this theft, could the utilities, the record industry, the movie industry and maybe even the NBA, NFL and MLB be next. Is this really the “change” you want? And some of you still deny that Sen. Obama is a Socialist!
Posted by: James Danley | August 1, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
I wish somebody would investigate how Exxon got their huge profits. To me if they were paying increased costs to extract and acquire oil, their profits would be alot smaller.
I believe that they are relatively selling cheap to produce US oil on the world market to foreign countries at the expense of our economic future. We are not wisely managing our oil resources. We should charge more for oil exploration leases and share in profits from runs in oil prices.
I repeat that I believe Exxon makes its money by taking US produced oil and selling it to foreign countries.
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | August 1, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
This is getting ridiculous First of all it will not bring down prices at the pump, drilling will immediately bring down prices – Economics 101 people!
It is a joke!!
Posted by: spock | August 1, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
How many people already have the proper tire inflation?
Does Obama really believe that everyone in the US is driving around on poorly inflated tires?
Obama seems to believe that he invents these just because he says them in a speech. Plenty of people are already doing things to conserve because gas prices are very high.
He is out of touch with practical things. Does Obama even drive himself anywhere? Or does he just ride in the limo? Are his limo tires properly inflated? Has he checked?
This situation is like when he said all Americans should learn Spanish. But he doesn’t speak Spanish.
Posted by: Jon | August 1, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Meanwhile Obama flys to campaign events in a huge jumbo jet 757!!
Are the tires properly inflated on that flying hotel??
Posted by: Jon | August 1, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Jake, you’re wrong to claim that “[n]o one said the energy problem could be solved by this tire issue….”
Obama foolishly said it! As you quote him:
“We could save all the oil that they’re talking about getting off drilling, if everybody was just inflating their tires and getting regular tune-ups.”
The (un)Democratic Party, by foisting this idiotic, uniformed, gaffe-machine of a candidate on us, is letting the right-wing have a field day on the oil issue.
Just when public opinion was turning in favor of seriously addressing energy and climate change issues, the Dean/Brazile/Pelosi/Reid bolsheviks endanger everything with their risky gambit of selecting Barry Dunham-Soetoro.
Wake up and nominate Hillary!
Posted by: tamerlane | August 1, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
When the man opposes extraction of known oil reserves while new energies are discovered, yes he should be mocked for such lightweight talk.
Posted by: Mark | August 1, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
The wheels are falling off the Democrats’ wagon. Watch your news tonight for the ruckus in the house today over the Dems blocking the energy vote. The Dems will lose big in November on this issue. Let’s all go inflate our tires now LOL!! They’ve really lined up behind a loser, and sinking faster by the minute.
Posted by: marylou | August 1, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Please cite your source for “800,000 barrels a day” due to incorrectly inflated tires. Sounds like a lot of hot air to me. If that’s really the case, then why haven’t ‘air’ checkpoints been set up and training classes to teach people who don’t know what a valve stem is? I suspect it’s not nearly as serious a problem as 800,000 barrels of oil a day.
Posted by: Larry Wright | August 3, 2008, 5:04 am 5:04 am
The 800,000 barrels per day is an estimate from Frank Verrastro, the link at the beginning of this article will let you review his methods which include proper tire inflation AND tuning up cars.
As to properly inflated tires:
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) estimates that 27% of cars have underinflated tires, defined by NHTSA as 8 or more psi below the recommended inflation level.
According to the Environmental Protection Agency underinflated tires reduce miles per gallon (MPG) .4% per 1 psi drop in pressure.
27% of cars would see an IMMEDIATE MPG increase of 3.2%, across the nation, a .864% reduction in gasoline consumption, for total savings of 3.28 million gallons of gasoline PER DAY by simply properly inflating the tires.
After refining, a barrel (42 gallons) of oil yields 19.6 gallons of gasoline.
It takes 172,800 barrels of oil to generate 3.28 millions gallons of gasoline.
Posted by: Kris | August 3, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
Seems like Obama has changed his mind again, now he “might” consider drilling if the situation is right. The fact that the Gov. of CA made a speech and said something similar has nothing to do with the stupid statement of Obama. Twisting Obama’s words aren’t necessary, they stand on their own. Your defense of his words and condemnation of the Repbulican for what you expect them to do next is indefensible.
Posted by: 1 dblegl | August 4, 2008, 7:51 am 7:51 am
Hey Jon, you should ask the same question of Crist and Arnold, they mentioned the benefits of proper tire inflation first.
Posted by: dave | August 4, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Time magazine has a piece up about this very issue. A short excerpt:
“The Bush Administration estimates that expanded offshore drilling could increase oil production by 200,000 bbl. per day by 2030. We use about 20 million bbl. per day, so that would meet about 1% of our demand two decades from now. Meanwhile, efficiency experts say that keeping tires inflated can improve gas mileage 3%, and regular maintenance can add another 4%. Many drivers already follow their advice, but if everyone did, we could immediately reduce demand several percentage points. In other words: Obama is right.”
So, how many drivers out there do not properly inflate their tires or get regular tuneups? Well, it’s tough to say, but I’m willing to bet it’s more than one-seventh of the cars on the road, which is the break-even point in this scenario.
In the end, it doesn’t much matter: offshore drilling takes 20 years to get going. Conservation measures help us right away, TOMORROW. The Republicans don’t like conservation, however, because it doesn’t help their buddies in the oil industry a bit. But the fact is, we simply can’t drill our way to energy independence. Honestly, the right really looks foolish when they don’t even get their facts straight before they call something a “gaffe”.
Posted by: AndyM | August 5, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am
1) Are the oil companies really interested in increasing supply and thereby lowering prices? The “drill now” crowd has made the assumption that oil companies will immediately drill and put that on the market. I find that to be a rather idealistic assumption.
2) If 800,000 barrels per day is accurate that is almost 6 trillion in the 20 years it will take to get the first oil out of the ocean.
Posted by: james | August 5, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
Maybe i could become head of the new Department of Inflation?
Posted by: jim dennis | August 7, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
Republicans for Obama??? As far as I’m concerned these people never were Republicans, and obviously aren’t Republicans now. At best, they are simply weak politicians with little conviction. Calling themselves
Republicans for Obama is just a transparent political P.R. ploy to make it look like even Republicans are switching over to Obama. However, as we get closer to November, Obama is sinking in the polls, and McCain is rising. And, we still don’t know how many of the 18 million Clinton supporters are switching over to McCain. And we still don’t know how many people who said they’d vote for Obama, will actually vote for McCain, in the privacy of the voting booth. Obama has a track record with 9 days of foreign policy, and 16 months in government, and with very little to show for it. McCain has 25 years in the military … 20 years in government … tons of foreign policy experience … proven commitment to this country, as a war hero who paid dearly. If you look at the facts, instead of Obama’s smoke and mirrors, it’s obvious that Senator John McCain should be our next President.
Posted by: Howard | August 13, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am