By Julia Hoppock

Jul 30, 2008 4:28pm

Romney: “I Don’t Expect to be a Part of It”

ABC New’s Matt Stuart Reports: It’s all about expectations. At least, many political strategists would argue campaigning depends on just that: expectations.  And after perfecting the art in a yearlong primary campaign, former Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney is again trying to manage expectations, only this time, it’s the veepstakes. Appearing on Denver Radio station 850 KOA Wednesday, Romney claimed he didn’t expect to join presumptive Republican nominee Sen. John McCain’s ticket.  "I think there’s some great people he could choose from," Romney said, "and I expect he will do that.   But I don’t plan on being part of the ticket." Romney, in fact, has said as much for some time.  Appearing on CNN earlier this month, Romney said "I expect to support the administration and the McCain team.  I don’t expect to be part of it."  Of course, in the speculation-filled world that is the vice presidential process, even no news can be news. Lest you think Romney is truly out of the running, the former MA. Gov. also stated today that "any Republican who was offered the chance to be VP would certainly serve their party and serve our nominee." But today’s interview also displayed the pitfalls of Romney-as-McCain-surrogate following their bitter primary battle.  Today, Romney argued that the election will boil down to John McCain’s experience as a person who "knows what it takes to strengthen the economy." In January, as Romney and McCain fought for votes in Florida, Romney was singing a very different tune.  At that time, Romney focused his attacks on McCain statement that he "still need[ed] to be educated" on the economy. On the day of the Florida primary, Romney argued with only a hint of subtly, "One of the candidates out there running for president said that the economy is not his strong suit; well, it’s my strong suit."

User Comments

McCain already campaigns with the enthusiasm of a turnip, and if he fails to pick Romney, it simply means he doesn’t WANT to win in November.
McCain acts like he’s given up; he looks and sounds tired, and yet remains a candidate for one of the most stressful jobs in the world… at 72 years old!
The RNC is just as crazy as the DNC; they’ve presented us with a “heads you lose, tails you lose” election.
If I were religious, I’d say “God help America.”

Posted by: Rhys | July 30, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

The GOP ticket will be a losing ticket anyway …

Posted by: John Doe | July 30, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Romney has good positions on abortion and on The Federal Marriage Amendment (banning homosexual marriage), so for the most part he would be acceptable to most of the social conservatives. But there is a difference between being acceptable to the social conservatives and getting them excited enough to go out and vote for the ticket in massive numbers. That’s what has to happen for McCain to win. Social conservatives have to get excited and vote in massive numbers in the border swing states (Ohio, Missouri, West Virginia) as well as in Florida. That’s how Bush won. It’s the only way McCain will win.
The best way to get the social conservatives excited enought to go out and vote in massive numbers is to put Huckabee on the ticket as VP.

Posted by: Jake Long | July 30, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

My vote is for Romney!
If he is not on the ticket, I may not vote, which is unusual for me.
Not trying to be spoiled, just authentic.

Posted by: Jed | July 30, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

No other VP candidate particularly moves me, and McCain surely doesn’t. Ironically, it could be Obama that motivates me to vote for McCain, if I do.

Posted by: Jed | July 30, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

I have been waiting to donate to the McCain campaign…until he DOES pick Romney. Go Romney!

Posted by: Greenworm | July 30, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

And not so much Obama as the forces that are behind him.

Posted by: Jed | July 30, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

Whom I distrust enough to spam this page with incomplete thoughts.

Posted by: Jed | July 30, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

Why are we all so bent on taking things out of context? Did Romney mean what he said about McCain on the economy? YES. But it was in the context of comparing Romney to McCain. If you take McCain and compare him to Obama he comes out looking like a genius. It’s still not his ‘strong suit’ but he’s a powerhouse when compared to Obama on the economy. Romney’s not stupid and he’s not flip flopping. It’s called viable politics in America. We speak in relative terms because so many in the electorate are not sufficiently nuanced to handle much beyond a few sound bites a day.
But things can be painted however the presenter wants them painted, be it the media or a rival campaign.

Posted by: HiveRadical | July 30, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Obama scares me.

Posted by: Greenworm | July 30, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Jake… On another ABC blog is a story about rappers Ludacris and Jay-Z writing so-called “songs” in support of Obama. If the “social conservatives” get hold of this, it will do more damage to BHO than Jeremiah Wright’s craziness.
But before McCain can energize voters he must energize HIMSELF. He comes across as bored, acting like every time he steps in front of a microphone is a tedious chore.

Posted by: Rhys | July 30, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

Romney’s idea of running the economy like a business means outsourcing your jobs overseas while moving tax shelters in the cayman islands so his corporation won’t have to pay taxes. That’s what got us in this mess and it won’t get us out. Good riddance Mitt, go back to the DNC and take “Hanoi jane Juan McCain” with you…”

Posted by: ick! | July 30, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

Unlike Tim Kaine, Romney has the political savvy and self control to reign in his emotions on whatever it is he knows about his Veep status. And I’d bet that it’s pretty good news for him…
http://www.political-buzz.com/

Posted by: matt | July 30, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

matt, Romney was GOP candidate during primaries and has lost to McSame the senator who has said that he does not understand Economy. What political savvy you are talking about re MRomney? If he has one it is to say NO to McSame VP post, because he is a loser with big ego and a wild temper. God save America from mcSame the Panamian. God bless America and God bless Obama. OBAMA08.

Posted by: BKMC | July 30, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Romney’s an interesting guy.. Lots of polish.. McCain could use a bit more passion.. But, remember he “Beat” Romney.. Just don’t see the magic there.. Basically, McCain’s gonna need a bunch more slip-ups by Obama, increase his Geritol usage, and get a “Looker” for a Veep.. Then he might win.

Posted by: Jerry | July 30, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

I just read that GM is cutting over 5,000 in the US and Canada… I hope they start in Canada. McCain sucks right along with Bush!

Posted by: becky | July 30, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

With reference to Jake Long’s comments, why is it that every internet article regarding Mitt Romney as a possible VP results in an endless barrage of comments from Huckabee fans suggesting that he is the better choice?
Mike Huckabee offers McCain nothing. McCain needs to balance his skills and abilities with a VP who is strong where he is not.
McCain has strong military and foreign policy abilities but needs help with economic credentials which Romney has. McCain needs important swing states like Colorado and Nevada and Michigan which Romney can help him win in. McCain needs help raising money to counter the fortune amassed by Obama which Romney has proven he can do.
Huckabee does none of the things McCain needs. He couldn’t even raise money for his own campaign which did remarkably well on a shoe-string budget. He didn’t win anywhere in the West. And for all the talk of needing evangelical voters, none of those voters is going to vote for Obama and they are not now, nor have they even been a block of voters that Huckabee has a lock on. Read the exit polls. Evangelicals supported McCain, Romney, Thompson and Huckabee in the primary.
The economy is the number issue with voters and McCain admits he knows nothing about it so he must pick someone who balances out this weaknesses or he has no chance of getting elected. Republicans everywhere need to put personal preferences aside and realize that the guy you like most may not fit the bill. Whether Huck’s Army likes it or not, their guy would be a terrible choice and almost every political strategist agrees. So the Huck fans need to stop attacking Romney and accept the fact that he may be the only VP choice who can keep Obama from ascending to the throne he thinks he has already won and imposing a very liberal agenda on all of America.

Posted by: Ci2Eye | July 30, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Romney is the only hope for McCain to become the 44th President. Romney will bring the majority of the base with him. Romney will be an asset with the economy. Remember “it’s the economy stupid”? Plus Romney is prepared to be President in regard to McCain’s age. Without Romney, Obama will become the 44th potus.

Posted by: Mike | July 30, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Romney is one of the few who understands economics, such as the REASON GM has just cut more jobs: because so many Americans think it’s “cool” to always buy foreign.
And Romney’s religion is controversial enough that he will keep quiet about it, because he KNOWS it’s controversial.
It’s questionable whether ANYONE can save McCain’s lackluster campaign, but Romney has a chance.

Posted by: Rhys | July 30, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

As far as Romney goes … I agree with many of the commenters here. If he’s McCain’s VP, I work for McCain to win this November.
If not, I just vote for McCain — that’s it.

Posted by: Beth Barnat | July 30, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Beth… I don’t listen to Rush anymore, but that’s SCARY! Even READING the lyrics is scary; they are full of obscenities and not-very-well concealed suggestions of violence.
Remember when Henry Kissinger got mad at the Captain and Tenille for performing a “dirty song” (Muskrat Love, which isn’t dirty) in the White House while Nixon was President? I wonder what he’d think of the kind of “entertainment” that will be in the White House after January.

Posted by: Rhys | July 30, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

If it is Romney…McCain will have my vote. if not I may opt out. If it is Huckabee…I WILL opt out!

Posted by: srm | July 30, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

mitt gives Mccain his chances to appoint any person he needs, but Huckabee seems that he want the VP post and then he can help Mccain to win the south.

Posted by: tirikai | July 30, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

mitt gives Mccain his chances to appoint any person he needs, but Huckabee seems that he want the VP post and then he can help Mccain to win the south.

Posted by: tirikai | July 30, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Mitt for VP! Executive experience, leadership outside of politics, and a strong knowledge of the economy.

Posted by: Cory | July 30, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Mitt Romney is by far the best choice for VP. He is the only one of the contenders qualified to step in as president at a moment’s notice, should the need arise. Plus he is an excellent attack dog. No one can verbally decimate Obama like Mitt Romney can. Let’s hope McCain does the smart thing and picks him. M & M ’08!

Posted by: JA | July 30, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

The McCain camp has been relentlessly hounding us for a campaign contribution. The ONLY way that will happen is if and when he adds Mitt Romney to the ticket. Then our family will contribute the maximum and work our behinds off to get McCain/Romney elected.

Posted by: Kirsten | July 30, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Romney should be at the top of the ticket! I imagine if McCain picks him and is elected, it wouldn’t be long before Romney takes over as President! ROMNEY 2012!

Posted by: one4romney | July 30, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

There is so much excitement built up over Mitt Romney as VP. Can you imagine the disappointment if McCain doesn’t choose Mitt? It’s gonna be ugly! C’mon, McCain, pick up the phone and invite Mitt to be VP! Go Mitt!

Posted by: Kate | July 30, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

obama spells disaster for this country

Posted by: neil1785 | July 30, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

Mitt Romney is the right VP choice for McCain. The duo would be unbeatable….
Mitt Romney ==> economy
John McCain ==> Foreign Policy and National Security
Barrack Obama ==> zero
Hillary Clinton ==> economy, foreign policy and national security

Posted by: neil1785 | July 30, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

Hillary, if picked as VP, would definitely be overworked….

Posted by: neil1785 | July 30, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Mitt is the only classy pick for McCain. If the Huckites can get over their hate, I think the Republicans can win. WE need smarts, and Mitt has got plenty. McCain is a great man, but he sometimes needs a communicator to drive home the point.
Nobody fears the Democrats more than Gov Mitt Romney….Wake up, America!

Posted by: RALPH, J | July 30, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

I exepect Mccain to select a qualify person to fix the economy and the best person for VP to fix that problem facing USA is Mitt.

Posted by: TT | July 30, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Jake… On another ABC blog is a story about rappers Ludacris and Jay-Z writing so-called “songs” in support of Obama. If the “social conservatives” get hold of this, it will do more damage to BHO than Jeremiah Wright’s craziness
—————————————
Whoa. These lyrics are explosive. Obama said the man was talented and his campaign did condemn the lyrics. But, this will ignite all those hard working white folks that Hillary won over. I am offended by this type of junk, and I don’t consider myself easily offended. It will infuriate a lot of people to know that Obama likes this artist and has called him talented. Can you imagine this type of music in the Oval Office?

Posted by: Mike | July 30, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

Huckabee and his sheeps have to love Mitt and according to the Bible says “Love one another”. I think Huckabee is a former priest and easy for him to comply wiht what the Bible says.

Posted by: TT | July 30, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

As Republican presidential candidate John McCain weighs his running-mate options, political experts say Mitt Romney would energize fundraising and generate the most enthusiasm in the Rocky Mountain West.
Speculation that Romney, who dropped out of the presidential primaries in February, tops McCain’s vice-presidential list has burgeoned in recent weeks as voters rated the economy their No. 1 concern.
A Washington outsider who co-founded a private-equity firm and served as Massachusetts’ governor, Romney is viewed as balancing the perceived shortcomings of McCain, who has been an Arizona senator for 22 years and has admitted that economic issues aren’t his strength. Prior to dropping out of the campaign, Romney was substantially vetted, and he knows how to throw — and take — a punch.
Those factors alone might help a McCain-Romney ticket in the West. But Romney’s ties to the region, which include attending Brigham Young University in Utah and rescuing the 2002 Winter Olympics, could reap big political gains for McCain.
It was Romney, after all, who beat McCain in five Western primaries.
“Romney knows the mountain West, he knows how to talk to people there and he had a strong ground troop of volunteers,” said Dan Schnur, director of the Jesse M. Unruh Institute of Politics at the University of Southern California and communications director for McCain’s 2000 presidential campaign.
Not that Romney doesn’t have negatives. Though he may help McCain in Michigan, where Romney’s father was governor, he could be a liability in the South.
He is a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, considered a cult by some evangelical Christians and Southern Baptists. Despite his central-casting good looks, he often comes across as aloof. And he and McCain taunted each other in the primaries, which could be exploited by Democrats.
But in the West, those problems are molehills, not mountains. Romney raised millions of dollars in the region — not known as a fundraising hot spot — and Arizona, Colorado and Nevada have large Mormon populations. In GOP strongholds such as Utah and Idaho, many LDS members are expected to help in get-out-the-vote efforts in surrounding states.
“They are a group that is situated in tight social groups, . . . and many see him as a pioneer ” said David Campbell, a University of Notre Dame professor. “They may mobilize to act in other important states like New Mexico, California and Colorado.”
In Colorado, for instance, where Romney beat McCain by 42 percentage points, El Paso County overwhelmingly backed Romney. The county is home to Colorado Springs, a conservative epicenter for evangelical Christian organizations.
Even Focus on the Family leader James Dobson — who has softened his stance on McCain, a candidate he had said he would never vote for — doesn’t think Romney would be a bad VP choice.
“Dr. Dobson liked his speech about faith very much,” said spokesman Gary Schneeberger, referring to Romney’s December address, where he spoke about the importance of religion in American society but that it should be separate from public responsibilities. “He wants a pro-life running mate, and Romney qualifies for that.”
McCain’s campaign declined to comment for this story. Romney spokesman Eric Fehrnstrom said Romney “expects to be campaigning for John McCain as a supporter and not as a member of the ticket.”
Others whom McCain is reportedly considering for VP include Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty and Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal — although last week, Jindal pulled himself out of contention.
Western primary voters favored Romney and his conservative, core party values over McCain, who often is viewed as a maverick by his own party. And Romney was the only GOP candidate to build a strong presence in those states.
“The organization is in place, but it would be fully energized if Romney was the VP,” said Ryan Erwin, a Las Vegas Republican consultant who served as a Romney adviser during the primary.
The enthusiasm factor should not be underrated. For instance, even the McCain campaign added his home state of Arizona to the list of “battleground” states. Presidential rival Barack Obama, who has no real organization in the state, outraised McCain in Arizona in June, and a recent Zogby poll showed McCain trailing Obama by 3 percentage points there. Pollster John Zogby said: “Picking Romney would probably solidify Arizona behind McCain.”

Posted by: dem89074 | July 31, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

Evangelicals for MITT!
I will vote for McCain-Mitt, because Mitt is a very good choice and based on how he has lived his life and the character of his family he values what I value, even if I don’t got to the same church.
I CAN NOT SAY THAT FOR OBAMA and his hate filled anti-american spouse.

Posted by: dem89074 | July 31, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am

Just listened to McCain on Lars Larson and that man sounds like dead man walking. No zest, tired, boring and to be honest I think his memory is iffie. If McCain chooses Huckabee I will not vote for him. Crist of FL would really be a bad choice, to old men. Mitt is needed to help with the economy, he’s a Washington outsider, he’s passionate in his speech and very intelligent. Plus what really should interest McCain is the $$ he can raised.
I use to be a GOP but left when the religious right got a leash around the party. I just left the Dem party in May and went Independent, I’m thankful that I live in an open primary state.

Posted by: Denise | July 31, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am

Romney has a problem, at least from where I stand: He comes off as arrogant and smug. Think Obama has an “elitism” problem? That’s nothing compared to what Romney would have.
Speaking of Obama, he condemned those lyrics. You can’t control what people who aren’t even a part of your campaign do.
His religion is a lot more controversial than Obama’s btw.

Posted by: plus4kid | July 31, 2008, 5:27 am 5:27 am

I agree with many of the other comments here. I will vote for a McCancer/Romney ticket, but only because I think there’s a chance that useless old man will croak in office. Obama seems nice enough, but his base includes the two most dangerous groups in America:
(1)Wealthy liberals who mean well but have not based their world views in reality
(2)Undereducated minorities who’ve bought into the idea that they’re owed something
It sure didn’t work for South Africa, though old Nelson was nice, and it won’t work for us.

Posted by: Rytchyunder | July 31, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

McCain would be very wise to pick Romney. Romney is an intelligent and engaging speaker. He has brought positive change to the organizations he has been involved with. He knows the economy and can help with states like Nevada, Colorado and Michigan. I can’t imagine a better VP choice!

Posted by: Dave | July 31, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Here’s one reason, among many, why Huckabee couldn’t hack the V.P. positsion:
From Politico,com by Jonathon Martin
http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmartin/0708/Huck_compares_McCain_to_Dole_.html
July 29, 2008
Categories: Huckabee
Huck compares McCain to Dole
[Mike Huckabee, speaking a bit more freely in his new capacity as a Fox News contributor, used a "Hannity & Colmes" appearance last night to offer a candid assessment of McCain's performance last week.
Huck used two words that dare not speak their name in McCainworld: "Dole" and "anger:"
ESTRICH: He went to a German restaurant that didn't go very well. He had the time at the cheese counter at the grocery store. I mean, I have to tell you, if I were John McCain I would be glad I didn't get a lot of press last week.
What is wrong with the McCain campaign?
HUCKABEE: Well, I think he missed an opportunity. Instead of having some fun with it and showing sort of a buoyant 'hey, do what you've got to do, let Obama go play basketball, I'm solving problems.' Do it with tongue and cheek.
Frankly, I thought he looked more like Bob Dole in the last days of the 1996 campaign saying 'look at the record, look at the record,' and there was some anger and sense of frustration there.
He shouldn't show that. He needs to show that nothing is getting to him, it's rolling off his back, and I think he missed an opportunity to do that last week.]
Huckabee can’t control his squirrel-eating mouth.

Posted by: 2thePoint | July 31, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

For me, it’s either Romney or I’m sitting this one out. I can think of few others that would get this conservative motivated to go to the polls on election day. Sarah Palin is one, I will say.

Posted by: Gary | July 31, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Either it is MITT-McCain or I will NOT vote.

Posted by: Bryan | July 31, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

It is a shame that the Democratic party has been taken over by the Anti-American Left. My parents for gernations back are turning over in their graves, because of the low class individuals that have slivered into their beloved party. They have to be defeated. Evangelicals, bite the bullet, and support McCain and Mitt. This combination is the only one that can defeat these Snakes, and bring “Class”, back to the White House.

Posted by: Charles R. Bennett | July 31, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Reagan Republican here. The prospect of having Romney on the ticket rekindles my desire to be a Republican in spite of the mismanagement of the party in recent years. gov. romney’s desire to reach a broad based majority of Americans reminds me of a former governor of California that sought and won office in ’80. Evangelicals would be wise to put aside religious differences and vote for a ticket that would have a much broader outreach than any other mccain vp running mate could muster.

Posted by: david cowley | August 1, 2008, 2:22 am 2:22 am

Here’s a thought for the McCain advisors:
In 2002, Mitt Romney led the Winter Olympics out of scandal and debt to success and surplus revenue. And, I understand that he plans to attend the Summer Olympics in China. What better time for McCain to announce Romney as his Vice Presidential choice. Media will push for interviews that, if granted, Romney will probably acknowledge the nod and, with grace, turn the focus back to the importance of the Games that he knows all too well.
It would be a correlating announcement with worldwide interest and a very appropriate answer to Obama’s Public Relations tour.

Posted by: Kelly Warnick | August 1, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Interesting thought, Kelly.
I’m hearing Pawlenty’s name a lot now but an announcement of Romney as the VP choice just prior to his departure for China would ensure a lot of media coverage of his every move at Olympic events and likely a lot of interviews by Mitt from the venues he attends.
He’d be followed around and anything he says or any interviews he grants could potentially be seen by much broader audience that those viewers who normally watch political TV shows. The tie-in would reinforce his past role, cast him positively as an on-the-ground cheerleader for Team USA and help burnish the new McCain team’s international credentials.
Sounds brilliant to me but McCain’s campaign hasn’t exactly exuded brilliance so far so I wonder…

Posted by: Ci2Eye | August 2, 2008, 2:42 am 2:42 am

“It’s the Economy Stupid!” We all remember that one right? Luckily for Republicans this year they have the VP candidate with the most economical credentials….It baffles me as to why McCain is taking his time to pick up Romney. To me it appears to be a homerun, but as time ticks on you have to wonder if McCain really doesn’t want Romney or is he just “strategically” waiting for the right moment to pick Romney as his VP.

Posted by: nomad27 | August 2, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

the only issue is economics
chinese rmb went from 8.5 t0 6.5 in one year
only romney can attact the many angles wrecking the economy
can obama hell no
mcain gets excited about tooo many other issues missing the point
so romney for vp can help and to blast obama on economy

Posted by: dan faust | August 3, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

One more reason that we can’t vote for a democrat this fall is the Bar Association. There long standing relationship with the democratic party should scare us enough… and tort lawyers are chomping at the bit to get Obama elected. Tort law is one of the main reasons that jobs are being sent overseas. It’s not just about profitability, it’s about liability. And when a bunch of liberal tort lawyers (who all want Obama elected) help settle lawsuits against corporations for “spilled coffee” on customers, WE ALL LOSE! And then Insurance premiums go up, Corporate profits go down, Corporate taxable income is lost to deductions and we start shopping around for a workforce that doesn’t pose such a liability. And don’t even get me started about corporate taxes… Obama would be HELL to corporate America and small businesses.

Posted by: CP | August 12, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am

One more thing. Look at the numbers. Obama is NOT looking out for American’s best interests. He’ll be taxing us to death:
Proposed changes in taxes after the 2008 General election:
CAPITAL GAINS TAX
MCCAIN
0% on home sales up to $500,000 per home (couples). McCain does not propose any change in existing home sales income tax.
OBAMA
28% on profit from ALL home sales
How does this affect you? If you sell your home and make a profit, you will pay 28% of your gain on taxes. If you are heading toward retirement and would like to down-size your home or move into a retirement community, 28% of the money you make from your home will go to taxes. This proposal will adversely affect the elderly who are counting on the income from their homes as part of their retirement income.
DIVIDEND TAX
MCCAIN 15% (no change)
OBAMA 39.6%
If you have any money invested in stock market, IRA, mutual funds, college funds, life insurance, retirement accounts, or anything that pays or reinvests dividends, you will now be paying nearly 40% of the money earned on taxes if Obama becomes president. The experts predict that ‘Higher tax rates on dividends and capital gains would crash the stock market, yet do absolutely nothing to cut the deficit.’
INCOME TAX
MCCAIN (no changes)
Single making 30K – tax $4,500
Single making 50K – tax $12,500
Single making 75K – tax $18,750
Married making 60K- tax $9,000
Married making 75K – tax $18,750
Married making 125K – tax $31,250
OBAMA (reversion to pre-Bush tax cuts)
Single making 30K – tax $8,400
Single making 50K – tax $14,000
Single making 75K – tax $23,250
Married making 60K – tax $16,800
Married making 75K – tax $21,000
Married making 125K – tax $38,750
Under Obama, your taxes could almost double!
INHERITANCE TAX
MCCAIN 0% (No change, Bush repealed this tax)
OBAMA Restore the inheritance tax
Many families have lost businesses, farms, ranches, and homes that have been in their families for generations because they could not afford the inheritance tax. Those willing their assets to loved ones will only lose them to these taxes.
NEW TAXES PROPOSED BY OBAMA
New government taxes proposed on homes that are more than 2400 square feet.
New gasoline taxes (as if gas weren’t high enough already)
New taxes on natural resources consumption (heating gas, water, electricity)
New taxes on retirement accounts, and last but not least….
New taxes to pay for socialized medicine so we can receive the same level of medical care as other third-world countries!!!

Posted by: CP | August 12, 2008, 8:36 am 8:36 am

If I was one of those evangelicals I would not vote for a McCain/Romney ticket. Evangelicals cannot phantom a religious cult known as Mormonism. It goes against Bible principles and its no where close to what is known as Christianity.
I would say that Mormonism has some very demonic rituals and I can see it going into the mainstream if and when Romney is elected and takes over for McCain.
Evangelicals will have to weigh their odds. Do they give America ownership to the devil? Or do they sit this one out. I think Huckabee is right. Most will sit this one out and the majority of the evangelicals won’t be voting for McCain/Romney.

Posted by: Jordan | August 24, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.