The Note: Obama Poised for High-Profile Trip
ABC News’ Rick Klein Reports in Friday’s Note: As we await the start of the most-watched road trip by a Chicagoan this side of the Griswolds, five things we might learn from Sen. Barack Obama’s foreign trip:
1. How good is this vaunted foreign-policy team really?
2. How’s the new McCain message machine handling its first big test? (Having one message from the campaign per hour would be a start.)
3. How does an anti-incumbent candidate deliver a foreign-policy address that doesn’t criticize the president while on foreign soil? (And how big a crowd of adoring Europeans is too big a crowd of adoring Europeans?)
4. Can the Clintons stay out of the news the whole time that the presumptive Democratic nominee is out of the country?
5. Can the presumptive Democratic nominee survive with as few as one workout a day?
For Obama, the trip’s stakes are huge, and will make themselves known daily with every handshake, photo-op, and whispered aside. It’s “a campaign-season audition of sorts for a presidential hopeful pledging a new era in diplomacy and an end to the U.S. combat role in Iraq,” per AP’s David Espo.
Every detail counts: “The trip is planned to put Obama into settings often occupied by presidents, including formal meetings with foreign leaders, public speeches and visits to historical sites,” he writes.
Read the rest of The Note — and get all the latest on the 2008 election, Congress, the White House and the wide world of politics every day — from Rick Klein by bookmarking this link.
For the highest-profile speech of his trip, he’s not getting Brandenburg Gate itself next Thursday, but German media reports that he’ll get it as a backdrop, with the speech itself at the famous Victory Column.
“If it comes off as the campaign hopes, with a steady flow of images of Obama looking thoughtful, diplomatic, and commanding on the world stage, the trip helps Obama address his key weakness, perhaps permanently,” Slate’s John Dickerson writes. “At the same time, the trip poses big risks.”
“Obama knows that many Americans still have a tough time picturing him as commander in chief, and this trip could be make or break,” ABC’s Jake Tapper reported on “Good Morning America” Friday. “The trip has real risks.”
“He’s got to show he can do the job, and above all . . . not make any mistakes on this trip — a gaffe could be a killer for Barack Obama,” ABC’s George Stephanopoulos added.
Obama’s 300-strong foreign-policy team “is on the spot this week as Mr. Obama is planning to make his first overseas foray as the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, with voters at home and leaders abroad watching closely to see how he handles himself on the global stage,” Elisabeth Bumiller writes in The New York Times.
Continue reading today’s Note by clicking HERE.
ABC News’ John Santucci and Alexa Ainsworth contributed to this report.
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
Most foreign people, leaders included, will weigh Obama on a different scale than we do in the US. Perhaps we’d be wise wo watch and see what it is that they see in him as a potential world leader.
Posted by: DAVID NH | July 18, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am
This is why I do not watch network news. To send every anchor to follow him now that he has finally decided to go shows how one sided the press really is. It is a disgrace how much attention he will get from the networks. How many trips to Europe and Middle East that McCain made. Fair and Balance!
Posted by: susan ellington | July 18, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am
Why do the clintons hae to stay out of the news? They could be campaigning for Obama, McCain just called Obama’s healthcare plan Hillarycare(obama did take part of her healthcare plan). It would be more than resonable for Hillary to defend her healthcare plan.
Posted by: rachel | July 18, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am
The clintons are going to be in the news more now Bill is going to campaign for Barack, I think its good he is going on this trip gives them a chance to meet our future president go obama 08
Posted by: angie | July 18, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
I do not understand those who are saying why Obama is getting a bigger coverage than McCain.
If you understand the meaning of the word “news” you do not need to ask.
News are something which is new and people are not aware of it.
Obama is new, not only here but to the entire world. We are all excited and eager to know everything about him.
Posted by: Peace | July 18, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am
Gallup Tracking 07/14 – 07/16 2652 RV 46 44 Obama +2.0
Rasmussen Tracking 07/14 – 07/16 3000 LV 46 46 Tie
Given the huge media coverage of Obama vs McCain, Obama’s fundraising advantage and 8 yrs of an unpopular Republican president, those numbers show serious weakness in Obama’s ability to move beyond his core base.
Posted by: em | July 18, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am
Obama is a super star, bought and paid for by the poor and the rich.
Made by a marketing team and a PR team.
How to make a presidential candidate out of nothing at all.
Obama is out to rule the world. Will his mind conditioning speeches, his hynotic mind manipulation work on foreign lands and people. Will their governments let him have that chance.
The Oscar, Emmey, Acadamey awards all go to Obama. For a performance out of this world.
Posted by: seah | July 18, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am
THE REAL OBAMA SAID: “We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”
IS HE PROPOSING A POLICE STATE OR WHAT?
Posted by: Soetoro No! | July 18, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Susan: I don’t think McCain should begrudge his lighter travel on overseas trips – from not knowing the difference between Sunni and Shia, to getting wrong what terrorists Iran is backing to needing Lieberman whispering in his ear to get other basic facts right, McCain has made many of the sort of “gaffes” that Obama is now trying to avoid while under the microscope. McCain is lucky he has such friendly media coverage that has not made an issue of his consistent inability to keep critical facts straight and tendency to look like a kindly grandfather more than the future leader of a nation at war.
Posted by: jhw539 | July 18, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am
BHO’s trip: A boondoggle funded by taxpayers. Nothing more.
Posted by: Soetoro No! | July 18, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am
em: Presidents are elected by the electoral college system, otherwise President Gore would be finishing up his second term about now (and we would not be Iraq). Currently, based on the most recent state-by-state tracking polls, Senator Obama leads Senator McCain 325 electoral votes to 199 (with 14 votes, Missouri, a dead tie). That seems like a pretty convincing lead to me – if it holds until election day it will be a landslide of the sort not seen since Reagan.
Posted by: jhw539 | July 18, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am
jane dane: You say that “Obama would not even be able to make this trip if it were not due to success of the SURGE” yet his last trip to Iraq was well before the surge and conditions were even worse. I hate to inject facts and reality into your world, but the short term tactical success of the surge (so glad the Republicans only took 6 years to hit on the idea of listening to their generals and send more troops) has provably zero effect on Senator Obama’s ability to “make this trip.”
And if the Iraqi government doesn’t step up – beyond demanding the US sets a timetable for their withdrawal – the surge will have failed to meet it’s objective, which was clearly and publicly stated to be to provide breathing room for a reconciliation government to be established.
Posted by: jhw539 | July 18, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Obama is a junior senator from Illinois. He had a passive involvement in government to date. He’s not going to pick up any credentials by taking his first trip to Iraq. This will be seen as political opportunism at best. I guarantee he will screw it up, though, and then give another speech to cover up his screw-up, and the press will say ooooooh, aaaaaaaaah.
—————————————-
Ohhhhhhh,baaaaaaa,mahhhhhh — just messin’ with you, man!!
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | July 18, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am
rachel,
why should hillary defend her plan, if obama now takes it? After all, it is her plan that Obama banged during the primary – that defeated her. He should be kicked out of the race for adopting all the plans of Hillary and others. And democratic party (super delegates) of all the blues states, who ditched the popular mandate to hillary should be kicked out of democratic party.
As a matter of fact, this is the very reason why dems supporters should not vote for OBAMA, since he is double toungue, has no plans except for the gift of speeches. That will teach Super Delegates some lessions for ignoring the popular choice of the blue states.
We do not want a nominee selected by red states and corrupt, idiotic super delegates.
Posted by: Namrep | July 18, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
I like the fact that a lot of people do not know how popular Obama is other than this country. He is going to do great.
Posted by: Teresa | July 18, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
Obama wants to speak at the Brandenburg Gate so he will have a BACKDROP to bolster his foreign policy credentials—you know a picture sends a thousand words. No need for skills or experience. Why is he going to Europe, did he learn French or German? Oh, they probably speak English there because it is the universal language—you know the language that Obama voted NO to make it the official language of America. I thought this was a visit to Iraq and Afghanistan to learn as much as he can to make the decisions necessary to protect America. This is a show, a spectacle with an ego to match. The American public is being driven like sheep. Usually a man or woman is known by their deeds, work, effort and the company they keep. Obama has no deeds yet, and the company he has kept over the past 20 years is a clear indication of his character — convicted political fixer Tony Rezko, Nadhmi Auchi, William Ayers, Bernadine Dohrn, Rashid Khalidi, and Rev. Wright, Rev. Meeks, Rev. Otis, Father Pfleger, friend to Fouis Farraklan, Aiham Alsammarae and the list goes on and on.
Posted by: Ann | July 18, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
em: He’s ahead in the popular vote polls too, and has been consistently for two months. It is unlikely we’ll have another president without a popular mandate (or at least a plurality, which is not that uncommon). To stay on point, I was replying to your assertion that he should be *more* ahead. His campaign is focussed on winning the election and therefore communicating and campaigning with a view to inform the people he needs to win the election. If he was elected by popular vote, he would focus on getting his policy positions out to the population centers first and you would see a different result in the national polls.
Posted by: jhw539 | July 18, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Namrep: Regarding Obama “taking Hillary’s plan,” you may be surprised to hear that both Senators Clinton and Obama are Democrats and, as was widely reported during the primaries, hold very similar policy positions (almost as if they were members of the same party – wow!). Their main difference was Senator Obama preached a more bipartisan approach (which makes it odd people think it’s a flip-flop that he has many long-held moderate positions, such as on faith based organizations and consulting with the military on the orderly pullout from Iraq). And – don’t let this blow your mind – there is even a likelyhood Senator Clinton would be tapped to serve in an Obama administration cabinet position (some wacky theories even have her in the running for VP!).
Posted by: jhw539 | July 18, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
“The trip is planned to put Obama into settings often occupied by presidents, including formal meetings with foreign leaders, public speeches…”
Plus we will get over-the-top fawning, breathless coverage by the top three TV anchors as well. Sure, they will try to appear objective and fair in their reporting as they travel with the senator, but they needn’t try to hide their strong support for Obama.
No wonder the mainstream news bureaus have become increasingly irrelevant.
Posted by: Marine Dad Too | July 18, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
jhw539
Of course their plans were similar, he copied them all from other candidates, including Clinton. Obama doesn’t have an original idea in his head. He may have talked about “bi-partisanship”, but Hillary Clinton has practised it for years. Obama is all-talk, no action. Just ask his constituents in Illinois how happy they are with their Senator. They’ll vote him out of that job because then they might get someone who gives a damn about them.
Why on earth would Hillary Clinton give up her Senate seat to be in an Obama administration? If Obama becomes the nominee-he’s not yet-he’ll have to grow up and take responsibility for his own actions. As that’s not something he’s yet done in his entire life, I’m not holding my breath.
Posted by: Keith | July 18, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Senator Clinton did not win the popular vote by any measure that does not have a half dozen caveats and special-case exclusions – this is an easily verified fact. And the Republican’s leader, slavishly supported for years by a compliant GOP controlled Congress and still protected by a record number of filibuster threats, President Bush, is more than adequate rebuttal regarding where the Republican candidate’s “road” leads America.
Posted by: jhw539 | July 18, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Kieth: Is the fact that Senator Obama accepts good ideas, approaches that are good for America and will make the life of my family better, regardless of who comes up with them first a bad thing? That is the cliche’ standard of a good and effective leader. Would you prefer the Republican model of stubborn denial of reality and Titanic-like refusal to change course epitomized in President Bush? This isn’t a football game where we wave our foam fingers and hope the other side loses; at the end of the day both sides want the best for America (unless you believe the “Bush and his Republican cronies are looting America for Enron/oil speculators/Saudis/telecos/the aliens from Roswell…”).
Posted by: jhw539 | July 18, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Please stop praising Obama.
This isn’t American Idol.
We really need experience
Posted by: Rick from Pa | July 18, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
From an article by NY Times yesterday:
Saad Sultan, an official in an Iraqi government ministry, contended that Mr. Obama could give a fresh start to relations between the Arab world and the United States.
Mr. Obama has never practiced Islam; his father, whom he barely knew, was born Muslim, but became a nonbeliever. Mr. Sultan, however, like many Iraqis, feels instinctively close to the senator because he heard that he had Muslim roots.
“Every time I see Obama I say: ‘He’s close to us. Maybe he’ll see us in a different way,’ ” Mr. Sultan said. “I find Obama very close to my heart
Posted by: Al from NJ | July 18, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am
It’s always fun to see a Republican talk about what Senator Clinton’s supporters want, and none of the items are things like a Supreme court that won’t overturn Roe v Wade, equal pay rights, a rational healthcare system, a plan to address endemic poverty, help for the unemployeed refugees of offshoring – you know, all the actual policy points that Senator Clinton campaigned up and still strongly supports and fights an obstructionist Republican filibustering block to advance.
Posted by: jhw539 | July 18, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am
jhw – my point is yes, Obama should be farther ahead given this year’s political climate but also to dispel the idea that Obama is a strong candidate, that his election is ‘inevitable’ and will be a ‘landslide’ as some have commented. Those are irrational expectations. Everything about Obama needs to be brought back down to reality before the election. The man needs to be demystified otherwise, win or lose, too many people are being set up for a rude awakening. That’s my concern.
Posted by: em | July 18, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am
jhw539
So what you’re saying is that how a candidate is marketed to the electorate is more important than their policy positions and ideas for the future of our country?
Well, yes, Obama is all marketing and no substance. I just don’t think it’s the most important factor.
Borrowing ideas from others is fine-once he’s elected to somthing, but doesn’t he have anything at all of his own? And, of course, he doesn’t. Nada. Nothing. Empty space. All he knows about is how to get elected, and he does that by getting his opponents kicked of the ballot. That strategy has worked in every election he’s so far “won”. I can’t wait to see how he gets John McCain kicked off the ballot!
But he’ll only have to worry about McCain if he gets past Denver, and he may not. He hasn’t managed to get rid of Hillary Clinton completely yet.
Posted by: Keith | July 18, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
Keith: No, that is not at all what I’m saying. Not much point in my saying the same thing over and over if you’re just not going to get it. If you actually cared about his substance, you would go and read some of the detailed, specific policy papers he has developed and posted publicly on his site. You don’t even bother reading the example I tossed out here (his development and eventual implementation with bipartisan support of videotaping rules in Illinois). There *are* rational disagreements on the substance of his positions (returning to the Clinton-Gingrich era upper tax marginal rates to fund infrastructure and other programs) that are worth debating, but I don’t see a reason to waste time arguing if you are just going to mindlessly parrot a talking point ungrounded in reality.
Posted by: jhw539 | July 18, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am
McCain should be glad he’s not getting the supposed media coverage that Obama is. Then his many gaffes would be exposed and properly repeated throughout the media every day.
The guy is a walking plunder but the media gives him a pass every time. If Obama said the stuff he says, you’d never hear the end of it.
Posted by: greg deVeer | July 18, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am
If Obama is such an intellectual moron as “reason” claims, then why is it that policies and diplomatic strategies that Obama proposed over a year ago now Bush and McCain are trying to claim as there own??
“Reason” is one of those low information voters who voted for Bush because he wanted to have a beer with him!
Posted by: Jennifer | July 18, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Why does Obama need a 300-person foreign policy campaign bureaucracy?
After all, last year he said himself,
“Well, actually, my experience in foreign policy is probably more diverse than most others in the field. I mean, I’m somebody who has actually lived overseas, somebody who has studied overseas. You know, I majored in international relations.”
Or as Ron Burgundy said,
“I don’t know how to put this, but I’m kind of a big deal.”
Posted by: carl | July 18, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Can the Clintons stay out of the news the whole time that the presumptive Democratic nominee is out of the country?
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -
The Clintons are in the news not beacuse they ask or want to be but because they are both larger-than-life politicians who are idolized and revered in this country and around the world.
Posted by: ch | July 18, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
This trip by Senator Obama and his entourage is a complete waste of taxpayers money. It is for political pandering and PR only. He has already come up with his positions on Iraq and other foreign countries. He is just show-boating again. Such a dud.
Posted by: Mary | July 18, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Poor Mary. She was critizing Obama for not going, now she is doing the same when he does go. You really have to feel sorry for someone who is just this mixed up! Or confused!!
Posted by: Jane Hussein | July 18, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
This trip is probably paid for from contirbutions to his campaign as for the rich and poor getting him where he is you can’t have it both ways I never new a rich person that wasn’t republican down to theior last drop of blood look and Liz Hassellhouf, she would vote for the devil if he was on the republican ticket and if the surge was working why are people getting killed in record numbers everyday?????
Posted by: Rose Szymanski | July 21, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
JHW and KEIth Right Al Gore was and should have been if Flordia had been an honest state highway patrol rosdblocks on the streets that lead to the polls. the whole nine yards of crookedness. Obama can’t get rid of Hillary without her he has nothing all of her solutions he stole and called them change
Posted by: Rose Szymanski | July 21, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
Rick from PA are yoy working, do you have healthcare for yourself and family, are you making your house payments if you can answer yrs to all these questions you are one of the fortunate ones and like more war and vote for MCBUSH
Posted by: Rose Szymanski | July 21, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm