Title – Read McCain’s Lips

This would seem to be a serious breach of conservative principles and an unvarnished flip-flop. Will we see him shift on Iraq next? Oh, wait…

No one has reported on McCain’s flip on car emission standards. Before he said he was for Federally regulated emission standards. But he told a crowd of GM employees that he NOW favors state regulated emission standards. That went over REAL well here in MI, LOL!

He didn’t say he would accept the tax increase he said it was on the table. Saying something is on the table means being open to other ideas, not close minded. Does anyone else see this?
Democrat for McCain, because Obama has no experience

Does this guy have any “core principles” left? If he’s caught flip flopping about, he simply denies that he said what he said!

“Jukebox John keeps changing his tune”
There are 70 documented mcsame flipflops here…your article now raises the total to 71.
GMAB
He is so pathetic. First he supports bush, then he slams Bush, then he takes his fundraising money…GMAB.
More crooks..do not want.

Changes his mind about Taxes.
Changes his mind about Immagration.
Changes his mind about afirmmative action.
changes his mind about getting out of Iraq.
Changes his mind on gas tax holiday.
changes his mind on talking to opposing leaders.
Seems like all his ideas are wrong when he first thinks them up, then after being badgered by other people about his poor ideas, he changes them.
He isn’t a flip-flopper, he just makes bad decisions. He is a trial and error kind of president.

Sometimes you will read comments and see something like, “Obama is an empty suit, he will say whatever it takes to get what he wants.”
I have no problem with that because i belive that what Obama wants is America to be a great country again. And by great I mean, not in debt, regarded highly by other countries, full of successful intellegent people, important in global trade, and energy independent.
If he has to say “whatever it takes” to get this job done, then so be it.
Unfortunity McCain says whatever it takes as well, but all he wants is to pay back the lobbyists that funded his campaign. If that means going further into debt, taxing poor people more without raising rich taxes, further opening the wound we call our reputation with the world, or killing inocent civilians in wars then so be it.
Obama’s lack of experience trumps McCains old style experience anyday.

Ever notice that when Obama has a problem, his supporters try to paint his opponent with that fault?
A flipflop is when a candidate changes their position from week to week and speech to speech.
A shift is when a candidate changes their position due to changing circumstances.
While nothing is absolute, overall Obama has had more flipflops while McCain has had more shifts.

I really think it is sad that most of the people posting on this page have bought into the hype and marketing of Obama. He has done nothing to earn the job of president of the USA.
He was a senator for 1 year before he started running for office. His speeches are written by a 26 year old. He has been mass marketed by the DNC and the media. All of his “powerful words” have been stolen for other people. He is arrogant and talks down to the American people. He acts like he has this amazing judgment and that he will explain Washington to the ignorant masses. I know America has to be smarter than this. Lets hope the media’s love affair with Obama is near its end!
Democrat for McCain!

@ Mayor McCheese,
I love it when you post. You show America exactly what kind of people are Obama supporters. You are so intelligent, keep up the good work.
Mayor McCheese = Obama

How convenient for Obama that he wasn’t in the Senate to vote on Iraq (because he’s since said he doesn’t know for sure how he would have voted). And how opportune for him that he went to an anti-war rally and told a bunch of anti-war protestors what they wanted to hear. Funny, he stopped the anti-war talk when he started running for U.S. Senate and has done nothing to try to end the war as a senator.
Obama has foisted the ultimate snowjob on the American people, but you can’t blame him. A lot of people have fallen for it hook, line, and sinker. No matter how many times it’s proven that Obama is unqualified to be POTUS, they can point to a vote he never had to make a decision on and claim infallible superior judgment. Truth is, he probably would have either voted present or claimed to have hit the wrong button – that’s how he handled the tough decisions in Illinois.

McCain’s own son Andrew is caught up in a banking scandal. LOL! Like father, like son!

As you libs slept, a major Shell oil pipeline was destroyed by terrorists in Nigeria. It won’t likely be the last. The cost of oil is headed up again.
This is reason enough to votr for McCain and not Barack Hussein Obama.
Posted by: Larry Clifton
Don’t you mean because the Oil industry has donated large amounts of money to McClown since he came out for more drilling? By the way, the cover of the NY Times yesterday had an article about the amount of money lobbyist have given to McCain, Obama and Clinton during this years races. Read it and weep!
Obama – $6,000 dollars
Clinton – $84,000
McCain – $181,000. The man is a joke!

Could someone explain to me why Iraq war vets gave John McCain a D when it comes to troop support and Obama a B+ ?
Go ahead….I’ll wait.

len wrote:
Or are you happier to have a Windfall Retirement Tax to pay for the well-being of the illegals and war on global poverty?
*************
Sure, it makes so much more sense to pay Iraqi terrorists $12 billion each month NOT to shoot at American soliders. You are right, it is a better investment to pay Halliburton, CACI, Blackwater, etc. no-bid contracts.

Different pots of money. Budget items aren’t interchangeable.
Still, would you rather they shoot at Americans and we shoot back?
When Rumsfield put the Iraqi military on the street without jobs he put a lot of trained gun-toting family men out of work. Iran gave them jobs. How’d that work out?

Bill C., you wrote: “If you make less than $250,000/yr and you vote for Sen. McCain, you are voting against your own best interest.”
Sen. Obama NOW says that he will raise taxes on those with incomes of at least $250,000. Sen. Obama also says that he will lower taxes on those with incomes of $150,000 or less.
But just a couple of weeks ago, Sen. Obama said that he would raise taxes on the top 5% of wage earners. AND he would CUT taxes for the other 95%. The problem is that in 2006 (the latest statistics) the cutoff for the top 5% was $153,542. (SOURCE: Summary of Federal Individual Income Tax Data, 2006, published by the Tax Foundation on July 18, 2008 — compiled from the latest information from the Internal Revenue Service.)
SO WHICH IS IT???
Before you vote this November you should consider the following:
1) Sen. Obama and the Democrats intend to allow the 2001 & 2003 Bush tax cuts to expire. That will raise the bottom two income tax rates from 10% and 15% back to the pre-2001 rates of 15% and 25%. So when Sen. Obama and the Democrats get around to implementing their own tax cuts, will it in fact be a net tax cut? OR will you actually have a net tax hike?
2) With all of the new entitlements that Sen. Obama is advocating (not to mention any additional entitlements that the Democrats in Congress pass), you could raise the federal income tax rate to ONE HUNDRED PERCENT of income over $250,000, and it will NOT pay for all the new entitlements.
3) Will Sen. Obama VETO all tax hikes passed by a Democratically controlled Congress that EXCEED his current stated limits?

I would argue that it’s a agood thing that he’s finally considering raising taxes. Obviously it’sa major flip-flop, which has problems of its own. But I don’t know where that campaign was getting off thinking that his economic policies would be practicing fiscal discipline.
Tax Policy Center, an independent think tank, estimated that a McCain administration would lead to an additional $3.4 TRILLION to the deficit ovver the next ten years, while an Obama administration would actually reduce the deficit by $700 billion over that span.
You decide what the economy needs.

It’s not ageist [word missing] to call into question McCain’s mental awareness.