What About Social Security Was McCain Calling a “Disgrace?”
At a town hall meeting in Denver, Colo., on July 7, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., responded to a question about young people not anticipating ever receiving Social Security, and his remarks have invited Democratic salvos.
"Many of the proposals that are being created for people of my generation no longer include Social Security because of the belief it will not be there," the questioner asked. "Tell me how you plan to fix it."
"I’d like to start out by giving you a little straight talk," McCain responded. Under the present set-up, because we’ve mortgaged our children’s futures, you will not have Social Security benefits that present-day retirees have unless we fix it. And Americans have got to understand that. Americans have got to understand that we are paying present-day retirees with the taxes paid by young workers in America today. And that’s a disgrace. It’s an absolute disgrace, and it’s got to be fixed."
Continued McCain: "Now, how do you fix it? Now, how do you fix it? You fix it by reaching across the aisle, and you say to the Democrats, ‘Sit down with me at the table. Sit down with me, the way Ronald Reagan and Tip O’Neill did the last time that Social Security was in deep trouble, and that was way back in 1983.’"
You can watch some of the exchange HERE.
**
So…what exactly was McCain calling a disgrace?
The sentence immediately preceding what McCain called a "disgrace" referred to the fact that "we are paying present-day retirees with the taxes paid by young workers in America today."
The liberal muck-raking website Talking Points Memo has taken McCain’s remarks at face value, with Josh Marshall writing: "It’s really a disgrace? That’s how the system was designed to operate. And it’s served as financial bedrock of retirement security in this country for going on a century."
Others have weighed in. Former Federal Communications Commission chairman (and McCain nemesis) Reed Hundt writes in a blog posting titled "Why Isn’t This News?" that "If Senator McCain doesn’t want payroll taxes to fund Social Security (as has long been the case), then how does he propose to pay for it?"
Adds Todd Gitlin: "Let’s be generous to McCain and assume that the ‘that’ which is an ‘absolute disgrace’ is the impending zero point toward which Social Security is purportedly tending. (If he really means that the disgrace is young workers subsidizing retired workers, he really is an economic idiot. The subsidy is the very bedrock, the principle, the logic, the elementary idea of all insurance. Period.) But still, even then, where is scrutiny of the claim that Social Security is in jeopardy? When Bush made such ridiculous claims in 2005, he spent all his political capital and then some. Why is McCain getting this pass? When the Straight Talk Express makes so many such stops, when does it become the Straight Talk Local? Why isn’t this A Story? The Gaffe of the Week? Breaking News? A Clip to Be Rebroadcast Endlessly?"
Today the Democratic National Committee will host a conference call to, in the words of the DNC press release, "blast John McCain for saying the way Social Security is funded, the very essence of the program, is a disgrace."
Those doing the blasting will be AFSCME International President Gerald McEntee, the Center for Economic and Policy Research co-director Dean Baker, the DNC’s Brad Woodhouse and other Social Security experts and advocates.
**
I asked the McCain campaign what Sen. McCain was referring to with the word "disgrace."
McCain spox Brian Rogers says that "the disgrace is our failure to fix the long-run imbalance in Social Security — a failure of leadership evidenced by our willingness to kick to problem to the next generation of leaders. He’s also describing the looming and increasing demographic pressures confronting the Social Security system and Washington’s utter failure to address it."
Rogers points out that in an April 2007 speech in Memphis, McCain said:
"I’ll fight to save the future of Social Security and Medicare. I won’t leave office without doing everything I can to fix the fiscal problem that, more than any other, threatens our future prosperity and power. No problem is in more need of honesty than the looming insolvency of our entitlement programs. No government program is the object of more political posturing and spin than Social Security and Medicare. Americans have the right to know the truth, no matter how bad it is. So here’s a little straight talk: the current Social Security system is unsustainable. Period. A half century ago, sixteen American workers supported every retiree. Today, it’s just three. Soon, it will be only two. If we don’t make some tough choices, Social Security and Medicare either won’t be there for our children and grandchildren or we will have had to raise taxes so dramatically to support them that we will have crushed the prosperity of average Americans."
So, according to the McCain campaign, the senator was trying to explain how the system works but cut it short before describing the demographic pressures – as he did in the August 2007 speech.
That long-term imbalance and Washington’s failure to fix it is the disgrace, he meant to say, the McCain campaign suggests.
What say you?
- jpt
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
It’s a disgrace nothing is being done to fix it just like the oil drilling situation. The liberals always say how the fix won’t take place until 10 years down the road. 10 years later nothing has been done and they use the same excuse.
Posted by: geevill | July 9, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
“you will not have Social Security benefits that present-day retirees have unless we fix it”
It is a disgrace. What’s the problem with this straight talk?
Posted by: geevill | July 9, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
I say this. If it is a disgrace why has John Mc Cain served in Congress for 26 years without trying to “fix” it before. He did run for President in 2000.
I ask this. Why is ABC so quick to point out things not included in say, Obama websites or TV spots, then ignore an outrageous comment from MCain then cover him by letting his staff fill in the gaps 2 days later when the blogosphere calls your hand on it?
Posted by: ricky | July 9, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
McCain spoke the truth, it was not originally set up for people working now to pay for currecnt retirees, the money each person put in was to go to that person!
But anyhow libs are trying to scare people by distorting what McCain said.
Libs are disgraceful, where is Obama who pledged clean politics, oh thats right he flip-flopped on that too!!
Posted by: spock | July 9, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
The Washington Post had a long article on Social Security two days ago. They noted Obama has some specific solutions, and that McCain’s staff could come up with none. Hiding behind the Tip and Ronny show on Social Security is like saying we will leave Iraq when we have won. It’s not a fix its a dodge.
Posted by: ricky | July 9, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
“So…what exactly was McCain calling a disgrace?”
By my reading, McCain is criticizing the fact that SS is a pay as you go system that–given the aging of America–is going to collapse under its own weight.
It is a disgrace that for decades American’s have been lead to believe that they have been “paying into” Social Security, when in fact they have simply been paying to fund those currently receiving benefits.
It is more or less a Ponzi scheme, but long deemed the “third rail of politics,” none of our Washington representatives have spoken honestly about it, let alone tried to do anything about it. Except for John McCain.
Posted by: Stephen Gianelli | July 9, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Of course it is a disgrace, Republicans biggest worry is that one of their dimes might end up being used to invest in this country and its people.
Doesn’t matter that they got where they are by fleecing the taxpayers to begin with. Republicans aren’t known for their logic or intellect.
Posted by: Eileen From Maine | July 9, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
spock: actually the system was set up for present day workers to pay for present day retirees. Think about the first day it started. If it was set up for a workers contribution to come back to themselves their wouldn’t have been payments for years.
The problems for many of us younger and middle aged people is that there are too many older voters who will only benefit by postponing the problems. Simple fixes are:
1.) raise the retirement age for everyone now (may limit to everyone under 60)
2.) change the system to allow people to postpone benefits to work longer (if they choose) for the economic benefit of both the worker and the ss system
3.) purge waste from the system – currently inefficient
4.) lower ss tax rate but remove the cap for a net increase in receipts but making workers below $100k more cost competitive to the rest of the world. This leads to increased number of workers.
5.) increase the number of highly educated young professionals who legally immigrate into the u.s. They are net benefit to the system.
Posted by: X marks the spot | July 9, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
We all know what the disgrace is. It’s that McCain knows so little about the economy.
Posted by: obamamama | July 9, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
Reagan “fixed” social security by doubling the payroll tax – which Reps and Dems alike then spent to finance everything BUT the Social Security Trust Fund. So there’s plenty of blame to go around. (In fact Reagan raided the fund to “balance” the budget upon the advice of none other than Alan Greenspan.)
How do we fix it? I think Obama is probably right with his plan to raise the payroll tax on higher income earners, but unless that money goes into the famous Gore-proposed lockbox, Washington will just spend it frivolously. I don’t agree with his plan that seniors earning under $50,000 pay zero income tax as those lost taxes are just more money to be made up by other taxpayers or cuts in services.
I also disagree with plans to privatize SS. The proposed 2% invested in personal accounts won’t amount to much considering the need to finance ever-increasing lifespans – plus the plans I’ve heard guarantee a minimum rate of return regardless of how stocks perform. If we can’t afford the current system, then how can we afford to finance failed investments? At any rate, McCain with a Dem Congress will never get privatization passed, so I’m not too worried about it.
It’s a mess, that’s for sure!
Posted by: HoosierSue | July 9, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
What a joke. John McCain’s tax release states that HE RECEIVES SOCIAL SECURITY !
NOW THAT IS A DISGRACE!! OLD FOOL!
Posted by: Carolyn Cunningham | July 9, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
OK, here’s the best example of a massive problem with a McCain “reach across the aisle” fix. Immigration.
How’s that working out for ya?
Wouldn’t even vote for his own bill now, he says. Flip. Flop. Hippity. Hop.
Posted by: ricky | July 9, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Obamamama above outlined the easy fixes for social security that have been knocking around for several years. I’ve read the same in news publications and blogs for awhile. Shame on the current administration for not providing leadership on this issue by not taking congress to task for not fixing this already.
Posted by: truetuft | July 9, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
oh and jake love how you drag talking points memo through the dirt
lol
at least they report,
i see stories for obama i see stories against obama,
i see stories for mccain i see stories against mccain on TPM
on here i see stories against obama
i see stories against mccain but also against obama, and i see stories that could go further and dig deaper and actually go after mccain, but they stop short with stupid question like your last line
do some stuff on mccain and maybe youll be elevated to the spot of muck raking blog
Posted by: bhrandon | July 9, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
What I say?
I say that Social Security need not be in peril in the United States. The demographics favour your system, whereas they run counter to the systems in Europe.
Reason: the US will witness strong demographic growth. Many workers will be added to the working people’s column, and there will be enough of them to keep paying for Social Security.
UNLESS, of course, you allow crooks to grasp into the cookie jar. Crooks like George W. Bush, and his Republican cronies.
Leave the system the hell alone and start acting responsibly.
Posted by: Kaj | July 9, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
Why don’t you politicians quit raiding the fund for your pet projects, otherwise get rid of it.
Posted by: Ben Straub | July 9, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
BO will tag his health care to the pot of social security.
Posted by: skinny dog | July 9, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
geevil, that is not straight talk, but crude misunderstanding, straight ignorance of how social security works. Old McSame does not know economy.
Posted by: BKMC | July 9, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Hey Carolyn– doubt Sen. McCain receives SS benefits as he has worked his entire life in gov’t service which is exempt from paying into and receiving fron the fud.
Posted by: Robert in Cleveland | July 9, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Iran is a “grave threat”, according to BO today, after it tested long range missiles. Let it be recalled: Iran is not a threat because its size is much smaller than USSR, according to BO just one month ago.
According to BO, his position on anything, everything has been the same, only you less-educated people are cynical about what he says.
Posted by: skinny dog | July 9, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Don’t believe what I actually said, but rather, my campaign’s rear-end covering explanation.
God forbid anyone in the fawning media ever questioned Sen. McCain about the words that actually consistently come out of his mouth.
Why question John McCain’s specific proposals? It’s not like this election is important at all. The country is in economic shambles and the stock market just had the worst month SINCE THE GREAT DEPRESSION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why bother? McCain’s a hero–POW–honor–maverick–straight-talk, blah blah blah.
Posted by: Jeff C. | July 9, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Oh, I’m sorry. Did I say McCain proposed no solutions to the demographic problem he calls a “disgrace.” Then I mentioned immigration? Maybe that is why he favored amnesty for all those payroll taxable aliens with their many children.
Maybe once he is done dropping cartons of Marlboro’s on Tehran, Mc Cain can send a pack of smokes a day to seniors to solve Social Security.
Hope v. Hapless
Posted by: ricky | July 9, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
RE: Jesse Jackson apologizes for comments critical of Obama
Obama thinks he is the political Jesus, and it is only natural for him to lecture the black community on his morals learned in the past 20 years from his good reverend Wright.
Jesse? Jesse should go back to school, attending trinity.
Posted by: skinny dog | July 9, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
trust me McCain doesn’t know what he is saying when it comes to this stuff.
Jake you know that early in the campaign he was HORRIBLE at economics questions…
and he is still horrible…
I’ll have a beer with him…but I don’t want him in the white house.
Posted by: dl | July 9, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
What I find interesting is that conservative McCain had absolutely nothing of substance to say when asked how he would fix the problem. Just the same old “straight talk” and “reaching across the aisle” line. No substance at all. And this man is running for President. Incredible.
Posted by: Bill | July 9, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Again, all we get from MSM is minor coverage on the failings of John McCain. Has anyone lost their seat on the McCain plane yet? Has anyone in MSM got kahoonies enough to speak up at a level strong enough to get the attention of the country? We have another incompetent running for president, and he’s getting a pass!!
Posted by: hang | July 9, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
Let me remind everyone — George Bush got the same MSM PASS. How scary is that?!
Posted by: hang | July 9, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
The disgrace is that this Ponzi scheme wasn’t dismantled years ago and totally privatized.
The municipal workers in Tx who found a way out of it retired with twice what anyone else gets and you young folks will be totally screwed thanks to the dems..not the republicans, the dems..LBJ put SS trust funds under general revenues so he could fund his “war on poverty”. That’s where the blame lies from day one and continues today.
This sytem can STILL be privatized, turned into the type of system the congress and all the Fed employees enjoy, it can be done with an age indexed turn over over a 20 year time span,but again, the dems won’t do it because they will lose control of you, you won’t be dependant on their nanny state…I hope you kids wake up and send these democrat bums packing. You will save everything they worked for.
Ask a pol if he’d run by saying he will take 13% of every dime you earn and give you some back if you make it to 70, but keep it if you don’t, I dare them to answer.
Posted by: Seawolf | July 9, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
So I have been putting into the system for the last 45 years, to help those who came before me, and now I find out that I have been doing a disgraceful act. So let’s privitise it and create another whole industry of taking my money and hand it to a large corporation, for a small fee of course, not related to performance, naturaly, with out any risk on their part you understand.
The disgrace is paying for Mccain’s life tiem congressional retirement,and healthcare.
Posted by: Thinking | July 9, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
The real disgrace is how the federal government continues to raid the SS funds to fund itself. The other disgrace is he is pandering. McCain and his rich wife couldn’t care less about how average americans made ends meet. They have never experienced needing government assistance so they have absolutely no connection to average americans. However, he will gladly pander to you today for a vote on Tuesday 11/4/08.
Posted by: brigitte | July 9, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
The very name of Social Security implies thats it’s all of us helping each other. McCain is appealing like so many Republicans to individual greed over community need. We have a lot more to fear from the Reactionary Republican Guard in Washington than the Revolutionary Guard in Tehran. McCain doesn’t need to worry abut it for himself since he’s been a government employee either in the military or Congress since he was 18. And by the way, with his 26 years in Congress what has he done to fix the situation?
Posted by: bhciapol | July 9, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
We’re not even funding Social Security anymore. We’re borrowing against it to pay for a war that McCain has no hesitation of continuing.
Posted by: Topher | July 9, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
So a good chunk of your SS taxes that come out of your paycheck are being used to send our best and brightest overseas to get maimed and killed. They don’t actually go to SS like they used to and McCain will continue down this path.
Posted by: Topher | July 9, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
Why does McCain care anyway. He has no interest in keeping SS strong after he’s gone. The whole Republican mindset is to amass as much wealth as they can for themselves, leave everybody else out to dry and justify it by saying GOD wants them to be rich and prosperous.
Yeah, tell that to Jesus.
Posted by: Topher | July 9, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
One reason Social Security is in trouble is that all the monies taken out of paychecks for SS over the years did not stay in the SS account but was “borrowed” and never paid back. This happened during the Reagan years after his big tax cuts and the coffers were too low. It has happened other times too, but Big Brother does not want taxpayers to know the truth.
Posted by: Marty | July 9, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
I think Gitlin’s response is the most important one in the article. Why don’t the major networks [ALL of them] consider this amazing and frighteneing criticism of our Social Security system by a presidential candidate a major story? Somehow — probably without even being aware of it — it’s been decided that a McCain presidency will be more rewarding for media than would an Obama presidency, so they are giving McCain a free ride, slack from a rope that isn’t anchored anywhere. {It’s the same self-interest that had them egregiously favoring Obama over Clinton a few months back. Their irresponsibility cuts all ways.) Makes me want to puke.
Posted by: Roget | July 9, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
If this is such a “disgrace” then why does he accept his Social Security Check and why does he approve the Bush Adinistration tapping into the excess to fund the war in Iraq. When President Clinton left office there was an $87 Billion surplus in Social Secruity, Dubya used all that money up for his stupid war. Blame him and his extension cord Mc Cain for it and not the Democrats.
Posted by: Kathy | July 9, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
There is no disgrace. There is only rank political opportunism by McCain. The Social Security crisis does not exist. Right now, the trust fund is growing, building up a surplus that will be used, as planned, for funding boomers’ retirements. Based on current, conservative projections (for example, they use economic growth rates over the next 40 years that are lower than any 40 year period in US history), this money is fully adequate until around 2044, and they are fully adequate FOREVER if 1) our economic growth rate is only .5% higher than projected, or 2) the payin is increased by, for example, the extra payin by people making more than $250,000/year, as Obama has (responsibly) proposed.
So there is no need for a big solution, and there is no benefit for private accounts. Of course, McCain wants to undermine Social Security and create private accounts, so $1Trillion can be diverted to his buddies on Wall Street. So he yells and yells about a “crisis.”
McCain. Just like Bush. Maybe just a bit less honest.
Posted by: Dollared | July 9, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
The yearly surplus from SS always goes into the Treasury General Fund where it is hidden in with other tax revenue.
This has been done ever since inception of SS.
There is no provision to ever pay it pack into SS.
So far the amount owed by the Treasury to SS is in excess of two trillion ($2,000,000,000,000.00).
Thank our Congressmen and Senators for this thievery.
Posted by: Jay | July 9, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
McCain, like most wealthy conservative Republicans, hates Social Security.
Maybe, one of these days, the media will report that basic fact.
Posted by: devtob | July 9, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
What we get from the media is open mike accidental releases of off hand remarks, and the issue of contrasting approaches to Social Security by the candidates is ignored. Hey, how about treating the American voter like an adult. Give us an article with contrasts between the public proposals of each candidate and their past records on the issues. McCain’s statement is highly consistent with his conservative, right-wing approach to Social Security.
Posted by: Edward | July 9, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
The disgrace to which McCain refers is that younger workers, who do their part for society today, will, unfairly, not be rewarded with those very same benefits, themselves, as seniors later in life, which they currently help provide to retirees.
Posted by: Aron | July 10, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
Seawolf has been slurping up too much salt water. Texas municipal retirees are also in the Social Security system.
Texas Teachers are not. The trustees of the Teacher Retirement System have done so well in the stock market system McCain wants to unleash on Social Security, that some Texas retired teachers haven’t had a benefit increase in seven years.
Posted by: Ricky | July 10, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am
McCain, by his own admission, knows little about the economy. (How he can justify not learning about it sooner, after all his years in Congress voting on many issues that affect the economy, is another question.) Here he has glaringly shown his ignorance of how Social Security was designed to operate.
Posted by: Lydia | July 10, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am
I think the only logical conclusion you can draw from this is that McCain literally does not know what he’s talking about. Give him a speech on Social Security privatization and he can read it just fine, but ask him to speak extemporaneously on it and he’s just lost.
Unfortunately, that also applies to just about every other topic in the world.
Face it Republicans: You’ve picked another idiot as your candidate. An appropriate choice for your party, given your collective IQ, but not good for the country.
Posted by: Peter Principle | July 10, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Part of the SS problem is Senator Mccain and others like him – who collect SS benefits to the tune of 24,000.00 a year and who most assuredly do NOT need it.
Posted by: Sarah | July 10, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am
So – McCain proposes increasing payroll taxes? or decreasing social security / medicare payments?
which is it? what a weasel he is – blah blah blah , he is for truth justice and the american way, blah blah blah. all this while he adds nothing to the debate. he doesn’t have any of the kind of smarts we need to work our way thru some of the problems facing our nation.
Posted by: Citizen Voter | July 10, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
It’s a disgrace nothing is being done to fix it just like the oil drilling situation. The liberals always say how the fix won’t take place until 10 years down the road. 10 years later nothing has been done and they use the same excuse.
Posted by: geevill | Jul 9, 2008 3:31:04 PM
The republicans controlled all branches of government house, senate and presidency for years prior to 2006. So why didn’t they do it then? Because they are pandering hypocrites.
I’m John McCain and I approve this message.
Posted by: Insane McCain Weights Heavy On The Brain | July 10, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
What could you buy for 16% of your gross wages? (8% worker 8% employer)
A great 401K
Posted by: waynebum | July 12, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am