Jul 20, 2008 9:02am

What’s Arabic for ‘Spin’?

The Iraqi government has sent out a statement to push back against Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s interview in Der Spiegel, in which he seemed to endorse Sen. Barack Obama’s 16-month U.S. troop withdrawal plan — accidentally blast-e-mailed out by the White House to reporters yesterday.

The Sunday statement that was blast-e-mailed to its press list by Multi-National Force-Iraq — which the New York Times says was also sent out by CENTCOM — reads as follows.

"Al-Dabbagh: Mr. Maliki’s statements to the German magazine Der Spiegel have been misunderstood

"The official spokesman for the Iraqi government, Dr. Ali al-Dabbagh, announced that Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki confirmed that his statements to the German magazine Der Spiegel have been misunderstood and mistranslated and was not conveyed accurately regarding the vision of Senator Barack Obama, U.S. presidential candidate, on the timeframe for U.S. forces withdrawal from Iraq.

"Al-Dabbagh explained that Mr. al-Maliki confirmed the existence of an Iraqi vision stems from the reality with regard to Iraq security needs, as the positive developments of the security situation and the improvement witnessed in Iraqi cities makes the subject of U.S. forces’ withdrawal within prospects, horizons and timetables agreed upon and in the light of the continuing positive developments on the ground, and security that came within the Strategic Plan for Cooperation which was laid and developed by Mr. Maliki and President George Bush. The Iraqi government appreciates and values the efforts of all the friends who continue to support and supporting Iraqi security forces.

"Al-Dabbagh underscored that the statements made by the head of the ministerial council (Prime Minister al-Maliki) or any of the members of the Iraqi government should not be understood as support to any U.S. presidential candidates "

Neither the Iraqi government nor MNF-I nor CENTCOM explained exactly what had been mistranslated or misunderstood.

- jpt

UPDATE: I’m told that Arabic for "spin" is "faraa." I’m also told that Der Spiegel bleibt bei seiner Version (Der Spiegel is standing by its story).

User Comments

How the world changes! The arabs and muslims too now believe in the second coming of the messiah, the chosen one.

Posted by: nij | July 20, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am

Because nothing was misunderstood.
“U.S. presidential candidate Barack Obama talks about 16 months. That, we think, would be the right timeframe for a withdrawal, with the possibility of slight changes”
What misunderstood about that?
Maliki probably regrets what he said because he doesn’t want it to seem as if he’s endorsing a candidate. But it to late. He said what he said and majority of America is in line with him.

Posted by: Vanessa | July 20, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

nij,
No, they hear the McCain “Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran” song and see what a danger McCain is.

Posted by: Jane Hussein | July 20, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am

Hmmm…The hand writing is, how do you say, being scribed on the wall like so many 1st graders…..Many world leaders you will find are ‘not openly endorsing Obama’s policies’ (wink nod) … why? 1. They don’t want to appear as skewing our election 2. heaven forbid the other guy (what’s his name) with the hair trigger and shaky hands may get his hands on the ‘button’, their maybe be hard feelings. And as we all know there will be blood.

Posted by: Mother Goose | July 20, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am

I don’t know what’s the Arabic for spin. But I do know the English words, liar and hypocrite, which Obama is both.

Posted by: young_voter | July 20, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

again – for those that missed it and for the news agencies that try to create their own news, rather than tell the truth:
Iraq PM did not back Obama troop exit plan
Sun Jul 20, 2008 1:46am EDT
BAGHDAD (Reuters) – Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki did not back the plan of Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq and his comments to a German magazine on the issue were misunderstood, the government’s spokesman said on Sunday.
[...]Maliki’s remarks were published a day after the White House said he and President George W. Bush had agreed that a security agreement currently being negotiated between them should include a “time horizon” for withdrawal of U.S. troops.
Bush has long opposed setting a timetable for withdrawal, and the White House said the time horizon agreed by the two leaders was not as specific as a time frame pushed by Democrats and could be adjusted based on conditions on the ground.

Posted by: 2009 | July 20, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

too late he said it and after yesterdays accident at the white house this is probably a lie the fact is america wants us out of iraq iraq wants us out so lets begin!!!!

Posted by: angie | July 20, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

I really wonder what the press will choose as the narrative coming out of this week.
(1) Negotiations which in the primary EVERY democrat including Sen. Obama backed and EVERY republican including Sen. McCain did not support WORKED in North Korea.
(2) Sen. Obama has been calling for not only withdrawing in Iraq but ramping up troops in Afghanistan and the military on the ground SAYS we need more troops in Afghanistan something McCain has denied until he reveresed himself to come closer to Sen. Obama’s position.
(3) IRAN: The Europeans have been begging us to join the negotions and the Bush adminstration is thinking of opening offices in Tehran! Something Obama has supported.
In the broad strokes it seems to me that the shifts in foreign policy have nearly all been on McCain’s side and Bush as well has been moving closer to Sen. Obama.
Now we have talk of “time horizons” for withdrawal instead of “time lines”.
Spin away, but facts are stubborn things and I hope they come out over time. Sen. Obama has been largely right.

Posted by: Rhoda | July 20, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Does Maliki really believe his forces can prevent Al Sadr or the Iranians from renewing their desire for power? If he does, he’s a complete nut-case. There’s no way his army will be ready for anything more than policing the streets in the next sixteen months.

Posted by: S | July 20, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am

lol
The Bush-McCain Adminsitration is TOAST. More lies to prop up their failed Iraq policy.
General Shinseki was right – we needed more troops. The much lauded “surge” is 5 years and 4000+ dead soldiers too late. George Bush and Donald Rumsfeld ignored the commanders at the start of the war, and now they want credit – what a crock!
The only “shock and awe” felt by the world is at how unrepentent the architects of the disaster have been.

Posted by: Nobodys fool | July 20, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am

Dear 2009,
Senator Obama is a liar?
lol
If that’s all you got, then I will leave you to your rantings.
Where are the weopons of mass destruction?
Is John McCain for or against: immigration reform,
Social Security,
the Bush tax cuts,
more troops in Afghanistan,
national emissions standards,
off-shore oil drilling,
gay adoption, and
insurance covered birth control?
Or does he remember?

Posted by: Nobodys fool | July 20, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

2009
Snap out of it!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: angie | July 20, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am

Maliki may have a preference in candidates, but his endorsement may be less than helpful. It will be interesting to see how it plays out in the tracking polls. Rasmussen has it 47-46 as of 07/13.
It’s hard to understand how a 71 year-old man, running on the damaged Republican brand, can be so close in the tracking polls.

Posted by: Independent | July 20, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

Mr. Obama doing his job. He’s confusing Iraqis people as the same as he already confused the American voters.

Posted by: allison | July 20, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

It’s funny 2009 should have the name 2004
lol
“don’t look at facts …quick…
9/11!!! Liar!!! Flip-flop!!! UNpatriotic!!! Boo!!!! Terrorists are coming!!! 9/11!!! …don’t look at the facts look over here at these scary words I can throw out… Flip…flop….!!?!!
lol
America is kinds saying foll me once with that bologne…shame on you…
fool me twice…won’t happen.
throw the bums out and relight the beacon that we use to be.

Posted by: dl | July 20, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Obama, 1st it was I will get them out day one. Which is what you Dems want to hear regardless of the consequences. Now after he sees the troop surge is working, (which he was against)he changes his tune. How else will he change. You can call it flip flop or his LOGO Change, but that is what he does. He tells you what you want to hear and has no conviction. He will CHANGE his mind on this at least three more times.

Posted by: PLEASENODEM | July 20, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

2009
I just wonder if you have had to go and fight these wars that the Bush Administration has pushed on the American People. I have fought in both Iraq and Afghanistan and I know there was corrupted intelligence before we invaded Iraq. GW Bush Manipulated intelligence to ensure he got the response he wanted.
What most people don’t understand is how easy a command can do this. Just because you hold a pen in your hand, does not mean I can assess it to be a pin. I can go overboard and assess it to be a nuclear trigger. The Administration has lied and now over 4000 of my brothers and sisters are dead and I will spend the rest of my life living of a small VA Pension. Will anyone in Bush’s Administration have that problem? Will you have that problem? Did you serve during these troubled times? I would love to know.

Posted by: Doug | July 20, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

The current administration if following OBAMA’S blue book. Just look at the IRAN negotiations, The reinforcement of troops in Afganistan, The time table (Time horizon as they want to call it) withdrawal in IRAK. My question to you is: WHO HAS THE BEST JUDGEMENT TO LEAD?????
BARACK OBAMA OF COURSE

Posted by: zzzzzzzizi | July 20, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

If you withdraw your troops from Iraq, you are asking for another national war trauma (think another national Vietnam war trauma).
And those good and brave U.S. soldiers in Iraq, who have paid the highest price for freedom? For what?
And will Iraq become a true democracy if you withdraw your troops? Will the Iraqi people ever enjoy a good living standard? Will they ever enjoy peace? Btw, why dont you think about your experiences from Germany and Japan after World War II? And why dont you think about these great countries today?
Moreover, you were under attack on September 11 2001 AND YOU STILL IS. But now also in a “silent way”. But you might not be aware of the magnitude of the movement – “Destroy the American Nation”.
If you believe in freedom and democracy, do never surrender.
Andreas Kollmuss
Sweden

Posted by: Andreas Kollmuss | July 20, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

Independent,
Continue fooling yourself with rasmussen poll that is never credible. There are so many polls out there that shows obama leading mcsame by as much as 8 digits. All the msm recently published various poll results showing obama leading by at the least 7 points. Obama is now turning states that has hitherto been red states into blue ones. So the sooner you stopped fooling yourself with rasmussen poll the better for you. Obama will win by a land slide come november. MARK MY WORD.
As for mcsame running on republican party, have you ever taken a moment to consider what obama is running against?
Would there be anything more difficult as an obstacle to a presidential candidate, than being black? For those of us that are whites, we may not fully appreciate that fact. But it is real. While mcsame is running about campaigning, obama is busy trying to dispel so many falacious rumors that are being spread against him. Believe you me, if mcsame were to face the odds obama is contending with, he would not be able go above 20% in opinion polls.
So many recent events are now consolidating the fact that obama has better judgement than mcsame. Even the president has now recognized that by favouring those arguments obama has been making towards our foreign relations. May God bless America.

Posted by: Dew5050 | July 20, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Obama is already the de facto President.
His policies are being followed with Iran and Iraq now.
Make clear the way!
President Obama coming through.

Posted by: Jack | July 20, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am

angie ” to late he said it” lol
i agree!!
plus who believes anything that comes out of the white house?? i think the credibility of what they say is pretty well shot.

Posted by: melissa | July 20, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

No one is surrendering when the war you are fighting is unjust. How many more wounded and dead does it take to realize that getting out and letting the Iraqi’s run their own country is the best course of action. I have been on the ground there, and if we leave tomorrow or in a hundred years the end result will be the same. I wish everyone could at least once set foot there and really find out what it is like.

Posted by: Doug | July 20, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

This is frightening. With less than 4 months until the election, Obama hopes to gain foreign policy/national security experience and to show some semblance of being a commander. Now, this screwup. Worse, we are told Obama has 300 foreign policy advisers, and no two of these advisers can agree on anything. Thus, the Obama flip flops and these screwups. Pray for America.

Posted by: benvictor | July 20, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

Why wsn’t the misquote challenged when the magazine first came out?

Posted by: nerakami | July 20, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

This is just more evidence against anyone thinking Obama is qualified for the job of President of the USA. I like the fact he wants Universal Health Care – but I would just like to see Medicare extended to age 50 and up with heavy fraud penalties enforced – but that is all Obama has that I would agree with. Obama is just wrong so many times it is embarassing.

Posted by: Bill | July 20, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Too late!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ha! (I believe) the Whitehouse, the political hacks that they are, in a desperate attempt to repair the damage done, attempted to use its influence to get an Iraqi official to state the misquote theory. Yeh, it would have worked if they used this right after he said it, but the 2 day wait is a sign it’s probably a fabrication. Nice try, but if you’re going to play dirty tough politics, you really need to bring your A-game. Sort of like Obama’s 3-point swoosh . . . I believe the proper word to describe the Whitehouse is “loser.”

Posted by: Charles | July 20, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

Ha ha. I cant stop laughing whenever he tries to look and act presidential. He’s so comical.

Posted by: brigitte | July 20, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Maybe he meant “Support Horizon”

Posted by: cortezpjr | July 20, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

So much for the 100 Year man…

Posted by: Anita Yova | July 20, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Ha ha. I cant stop laughing whenever he tries to look and act presidential. He’s so comical…………….. How dare you type such about G.W. Bush ..

Posted by: Anita Yova | July 20, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

I can remember watching the little O specifically stating that he was going to bring all the troops home when gets elected…now he wants to send 2 brigades to Afghanistan. What a flip flopper

Posted by: darnell | July 20, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Obama: Definitely not ready for prime time!

Posted by: Soetoro No! | July 20, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

oh yeah and you REALLY want your socks knocked off?
Remember that mysterious passport breakin by Obama’s Foreign Policy advisor?
Remember that McCaskill put up a Bill that ‘allowed’ McCain to run for office, despite not needing such a bill, because he was born on a military base, in a U.S. Territory, to 2 U.S. citizens?
Remember that Birth Certificate that Obama put up as proof?
Well surprise – take all these things together and you get an idea of just what the RNC has in store for our little friend.
Oh yeah – and PS:
9 month pregnant women cannot make 31 hour flights to Kenya and back in 72 hours – they are not allowed to fly now and certainly were not allowed to fly in 1961. Also – don’t talk about the DC8/707 Jet option – there were no flights to Kenya using the new jet to get his mother there a bit faster.
There is a HUGE scandal waiting for this fraud and his supporters still won’t blink.

Posted by: 2009 | July 20, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

Send troop out (Afghanistan)
Bring troop home (Iraq)
Yes, we can.
Obama 08

Posted by: Kevin P | July 20, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

Poor Obama, yet another embarrassing moment for him.

Posted by: Jo | July 20, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

It’s amazing!
The bush administration is being given every opportunity to save itself; yet the vision-less bush is intent on self-destruction and taking down America with him.
It’s incompetence prior to 911 being replayed over and over, only in different from.
The people of Babylon have been building societies while Europeans were still wearing animal skin and living in caves.
The very competent and experienced Babylonians can rebuild their society. They just need to be left alone!
With Obama, US will have a highly intelligent and highly educated President with VISION & GOOD JUDGMENT for a change.

Posted by: Patriot | July 20, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Obama’s policies are being followed through on? Oh Please. George W haters are being real naive here.
We’ve worked out something with North Korea (“see, we worked out something with NK so it’s not us who’s the problem
it’s Iran). We’re talking to Iran (“we tried diplomacy and have worn out eevery option we can and we have only one option left”). Israel is talking to Syria and every other one of their enemies and just caved in to Hezzbollah
and released on of their prisoners. Something fishy is going on. There are no mistakes coming out of George W’s White House- they’ve got the drill down
for putting out garbage that serves their purposes. This is all still a lead up to Israel attacking Iran before the end of this year. Both Obama and McCain have been clear that option is on the table but last I recall neither were advocating for it by the end of this year. Also, if the right wing hates McCain he can’t be that bad.
In fact he’s doing less schmoozing towards the far right then Obama is.
If George W hates McCain and vice versa
then McCain can’t be that bad. I think Bush has his own agenda he wants to finish in the next 6 months and that he could care less if McCain gets in- there’s no love between those two.

Posted by: alpaig52 | July 20, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

The Bush Oil Corp. needs a McSame administration after the last 8 years to keep the shredders running, to issue the pardons, to obfuscate any investigations, etc., etc., etc.

Posted by: cover ups R us | July 20, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Maybe Maliki is remembering it is not noce to bite the hand that has keep you alive. If Bush had listen to Obama and the Democ’RATS” he would now be”DEAD”
and not giving interviews to Der Spiegel

Posted by: VJ Machiavelli | July 20, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Maliki believed already that it would take about 16 months for a drawdown. When asked about Obamas plan, 16 months, he simply agreed that yes that’s the proper timeframe necessary. The sun will rise tomorrow because Obama said so. If I agree does that mean Obama should get the credit?

Posted by: fred lienhard | July 20, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

“yes that’s the proper timeframe” So Obama was right all along. And McRove’s 100-year-plan was WRONG ALL ALONG.
Truth hurts, don’t it?

Posted by: Snarxon | July 20, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Obama: Still proving you can fool some of the people all of the time!

Posted by: Soetoro No! | July 20, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Why won’t Obama provide a VALID birth certificate?

Posted by: Just Curious | July 20, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

Maliki’s statement to the press is only one proof that Obama has a better grasp of foreign policy than McCain or Bush. Bush’s agreement with the Maliki government on a “time horizon” sounds a lot like the timetable both McCain and Bush have long opposed, but Obama has supported all along. And the recent decision to attend face-to-face talks with Iran is exactly in line with the prescription Obama has advocated for defusing Iran’s nuclear ambitions.
In other words: Obama leads, McCain follows, and the BUsh Administration works with McCain to close the gap with Obama’s positions. I’ll take Obama as commander-in-chief any day over the GOP idiots who rely on ideology over common sense and who have left us fighting the wrong war while al Qaeda and bin Laden laugh their behinds off at American incompetence and frayed alliances.

Posted by: Chris | July 20, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Obama’s like the goober you work with in the office that over hears you talking about an idea you have for the company to a co-worker, takes your idea and then starts spouting off what he’s heard you say like it’s HIS idea to the superiors….they like it and HE get’s the credit!

Posted by: obamasbeenlyin | July 20, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

just curious,
because so far, there have been two statements made by the Obama family that provide the name of two different hospitals.

Posted by: clinging rural provincials | July 20, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Obama has a better grasp of foreign policy than McCain – now that’s funny.
I wouldn’t trust Obama to run a Cub Scouts troop, let alone be Commander-in-Chief.

Posted by: ja | July 20, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

….they like it and HE get’s the credit!
Posted by: obamasbeenlyin | Jul 20, 2008 1:06:53 PM
*********
What? That has been his position for TWO YEARS!! So who is taking whose ideas?

Posted by: Jane Hussein | July 20, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

The Media should really be careful with the pictures they’re putting out of Obama. He looks like a little kid at an adult’s discussion. Completely out of place.

Posted by: ja | July 20, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Jane Hussein,
Obama’s position for years has been to pull out immediately.
Lucky for Iraq, McCain supported the surge which has left the country in much better shape.
Had Obama pulled out troops when he wanted to years ago, you’d have genocide and civil war on your hands.
Chalk one up for McCain – he called it right, and you can’t take that away from him. Obama just took the popular line and now will suffer the consequences of being wrong. Obviously, he’s not ready to run anything, not even his own household

Posted by: ja | July 20, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

O’boy, Obama is leading this. On the one hand I am a Democrate and think the Republicans and McCain are inferior alternatives.
At the same time I truly dislike Obama, thinks he lacks substance. Obama symbolises everything that is wrong with America, a brash Ivy-league politician who wins the price on style and apparance. In short: He’s Bush. I too would have voted Bush on the likeability factor, but I would be wrong.

Posted by: Sylvia Johnsen | July 20, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Next, we are now in a position to pull out of Iraq thanks to John McCain supporting a very unpopular troop surge, which succeeded. Had Obama made the call, he would have pulled out years ago, leaving civil war and genocide in its wake. Face it, Obama blew it, he made the wrong call, showing once again he’s not ready (and probably never will be) to be Commander-in-Chief.
lastly, McCain lost to Bush in 2000 for the same reasons Clinton lost to Obama. People vote for “likability”, even when that person is a total incompetent, arrogant, know-nothing – both of which Obama and Bush are.

Posted by: ja | July 20, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

ja wrote:
Lucky for Iraq, McCain supported the surge which has left the country in much better shape.
**********
Um, NO! The point of the “surge” was to give breathing room to allow the Iraqi Government to write a Constitution. That has not happened. It was also supposed to allow all sides to have equal respresentation in the Government. The Kurds have been left out due to politics and have left the talks last Tuesday and have yet to return.
So the “surge” is not working. The intent was never to decrease violence, but to foster the Government.
Secondly, we are giving hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars to the insurgents NOT to shoot at our soldiers. What happens when we STOP giving them OUR money? Can you say “Spike in violence”?

Posted by: Jane Hussein | July 20, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

“Mailiki was misunderstood” … sure.

Posted by: beaupritchard | July 20, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

It doesn’t really matter whether he said it or not at this point. A sovereign nation CLEARLY wants US Forces out of Iraq. Even the false excuses for going to war have been addressed. Saddam is deceased. There are no weapons of mass destruction. Iraq is not a threat to its neighbors. So why are we there? So we can say we won at the expense of more lives? So we can leave on what the Bush Administration defines as favorable rules and conditions. No condition will restore the respect that the US has lost around the world. Our troops have no reason to be ashamed. That belongs to elected officials. It is their own reputations that they are concerned about; not the country’s
I just love all the brave souls who want more unnecessary war, but can’t seem to delve into their patriotic hearts and join the armed forces. The current administration took the privilege of defining the reasons to go to war and botched that. So what if the Iraqi parliament is in shambles. So is the US Congress. Too bad people are without basic needs in a country where oil revenues alone are blinding. America needs to fix its own problems in America.

Posted by: Gblane | July 20, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Obama does not look presidential.
He looks like a middle-aged man trying to impress brave young soldiers with his basketball skills.
Will Obama look them in the eye and tell them the surge hasn’t worked?

Posted by: cindy in nc | July 20, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Everyone keeps talking about the surge. The surge was politics and at best, what should have taken place when the decision was made to go to war. I’m glad it worked, now lets go home. On the other hand, the SURGE does not define the war. The collective miscues, wasted lives and capital, deceit, and loss of international standing is the bigger and complete picture. The surge lasted a few months. this war still continues.

Posted by: Gblane | July 20, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

We cannot allow a freshman senator to be the president: —————————————-1. On OJT (On the Job Training). 2. arrogant not to admit he was wrong on the surge but lack the experience 3. who aspires to be the Commander In Chief but voted against funding our troops. 4. who turns politics into business and has $92M pork barrels, including $1M for his wife’s work. 5. who does not have the right judgement who to associate with 6. on political expediency

Posted by: al4mcattack | July 20, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

Boy oh boy isnt it funny Obama was quick to thank Iraqs Prime Minister only to find out that is not what he said!!

Posted by: stephen | July 20, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

Ja and Johnsen you both under estimate the American people. Both of you may go with the superfical aspects of a candidate but a lot of us actually look at the issues. McCain wanted to “stay the course in Iraq” when it’s Afganistan that the “terroists” have mirgrated to and Obama recognised this months in advance of McCain. McCain was one of the Keating Five, our economy isn’t fairing so well and I don’t want him involved in any banking/saving loans enterprises. So much for your judge in character.

Posted by: Heidi Preston | July 20, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

Yeah your right Obama looked like a clown jumping on Nuri al-Maliki comment, which was a lie. Bozo is what he is i say!!

Posted by: Vanessa | July 20, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

I really am at a loss as to why Obama supporters (bloggers?) are trying to deny the obvious.
Barack Obama opposed the surge. Barack Obama said the surge would not succeed. He said it would make no “significant difference on the ground” of Iraq.
He has been proven wrong. We are now in a position to draw down in Iraq, shift focus to Afghanistan and win once again.
McCain was right all along as it turns out, despite taking an unpopular position. He put his neck on the line, and made the right call – much to my surprise even.
Obama, on the contrary, denied the possibility of success and would have recommended immediate withdrawal years ago, leaving civil warn and genocide in its wake.
Obama was wrong, McCain was right on this issue. There is simply no disputing it.

Posted by: ja | July 20, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

Well, Barack said he was going to visit and listen only. Now we see he listened so well he has given a 16 month plan by thought alone. He is good. Doesn’t know how he does it. Flip-Flop and Listen and Talk about his Plans. Only one President at a time LOL

Posted by: washbasin | July 20, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

Oh yea… Maliki didn’t say he supported a timeline. The Bush Administration convinced him to call it a “Horizon”. Gimme a break!

Posted by: Gblane | July 20, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

Think about this the surge has worked and the enemy is going to Afghanistan, once we start kicking their but there where do you think they are going to run back to? Im sure the commanders know as its logic sence.

Posted by: Vanessa | July 20, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

He looks so unpresidential I feel bad for our country.

Posted by: JULIE | July 20, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Maliqi responding to Bush’s presure to get out and deny the truth…
This only shows how far the republicans will go in order to manipulate the news media.
We need some honesty.
We need Obama.
Republicans would love to have Obama…but thanks God, he is a democrat.

Posted by: Andy | July 20, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

What’s taking him so long to see us here in Iraq? Is he going to tell us that the surge was or is a failure? Come Obama were waiting, and by the way loose the suit!

Posted by: Solider in Iraq! | July 20, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

What if McCain was correct on the surge? Does that erase his support of the WAR which birthed the idea of a surge in the first place? Please state just “1″ indisputable advantage that has been gained by the US having gone to war in Iraq. Just 1! Personally, I don’t think the SURGE has worked. It just forced the terrorists to relocate to Afghanistan. Addressing terrorism must be an international effort.

Posted by: Gblane | July 20, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

I realize you can only know what you read and the USA papers “Faraa” pretty good. The FACT is that Iraq has to play politics with IRAN too (you can disagree all you want, but it’s true) and being a part of the “Islam” community they have to tread lightly too, they like their “brothers” don’t want American occupation for 99-100years (ie:McCain talk). Face it if it weren’t for the oil we wouldn’t be in the kitty litter place in the first place. The pipe line is on contract for India, Russia signed with Tehran all is going according to plan and a lot of under the table stuff goes on that we don’t know about..end of story…

Posted by: heidi Preston | July 20, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

The surge worked. I saw an American TV reporter last night walk down a street in Baghdad that was bordered by ten foot concrete walls. It’s traffic of American humvees flowed nicely. The heavy pedestrian traffic of American soldiers were easily able to carry their bundles of arms needed to protect the reporter and the commander she was interviewing.
If the mission was accomplished five years ago, why shouldn’t we believe the Bush administration when it corrects Iraqi officials? Who ya gonna believe,
Bush or your lying eyes.

Posted by: Ricky | July 20, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

The coverage of Obama is making me sick. This guy is barely qualified to be in the Senate. How the hell did he make it this far????

Posted by: Ryan | July 20, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

What good does it serve to LOOK Presidential and make poor decisions? You criticize Obama for lacking substance, but at the same time you want him to fulfill and address these criticisms which in themselves lack substance. I’m confused. Define looking Presidential because I’m lost.

Posted by: Gblane | July 20, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Can anyone tell me a single notable accomplishment that BHO made as a ‘community organizer’, an Illinois Senator or a US Senator? A single one will do.

Posted by: Just Curious | July 20, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Maliki’s comments were only meant to have a psychological impact. The horizons of our aspirational goals are, like the impact of off shore drilling, ephemeral. Quit yer whining.

Posted by: Ricky | July 20, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

The thing about the surge working is that it worked so well that we can never leave Iraq, HOW MUCH SENSE DOES THAT MAKE !!!!! If we had succeed in helping them form their Democracy shouldn’t we be able to leave. Sounds like mission unaccomplished to me.

Posted by: dem for the white house | July 20, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

The surge is working. We now have success at our fingertips.
Our nation is facing threats in many parts of the world. We need a leader who can guide us to SUCCESS, not someone (Obama) whose only foreign policy entails cutting and running.
Obama opposed the surge, he was WRONG. We have no other policy on which to judge him (keep in mind that Obama said, and even had posted on his website, that had he been able to vote for war in Iraq at the time he is unsure what he would have done; later, he said that he and Bush saw eye to eye on Iraq; only later, when it become policitically unpopular to support the Iraq war did Obama become so against it).
Obama just isn’t cut out to lead this country in these dangerous times.

Posted by: ja | July 20, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

If Maliki really felt he had been misinterpreted dont you think he would have come out and said so himself. Not to mention the press briefing didn’t even say what had been misinterpreted and was put out by centcom. Any reasonable person would interpret this to mean the Iraqi govt only put out the misquote statement after pressure from the Bush Administration.
While there are some of you out there that claim Obama is scary, if that were the case why has the Bush pursued many of the policies that Obama has pushed. (Bombing terrorists in Pakistan, Iran Diplomacy, North Korean dipolomacy)
We need a President who has the respect of world leaders and Obama has clearly shown himself to be up the task!
Obama 08

Posted by: Brandon | July 20, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

McCain supporters now jump up an endorse a non-denial denial from an Iraqi “spokesperson” about the meaning of the tape recorded words coming out of the mouth of Maliki. “Baghdad Bob” wishes you were there for him too.

Posted by: Ricky | July 20, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

Brandon,
Don’t you see through the Iran agenda here. The diplomacy will fail without a doubt – Iran has already stated they will not cease developing nuclear capability (though of course they claim for peaceful purposes). McCain will then be able to say, “See, I told you diplomacy will NOT work in Iran, and Obama was wrong – and we now know that for fact as bush has tried it.”
You are being set up. Obama is being set up. Are you really this blind? Did you not see how nothing was accomplished with these talks??

Posted by: ja | July 20, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

The surge is working. We have been able to accomplish the mission five years after it was already pronouced to have been accomoplished. The 4,000 dead thank you for your support.

Posted by: Ricky | July 20, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

Ricky,
No one is going to deny that Bush’s plan, prior to the surge, was wrongheaded – even McCain said so at the time, and continues to say so now.
However, given the circumstances John McCain recommended and pushed a surge strategy. This was a very unpopular position to take. Had it failed, McCain’s political future would be dead.
But as it turns out, the old man was right – much to all of our surprise. That’s the mark of a true leader – wiser than his consituents and willing to put his neck on the line rather than pander to public perception, all for the sake of their own good.
Obama, meanwhile, lets his policy be dictated by what the polls tell him is favorable to him.

Posted by: ja | July 20, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

The surge is working people, this is my second tour over here and things are getting better by the day. Let’s just hope we can continue to build going forward and not fall back where we were at one time. God Bless My fellow Soliders and Civilians that have died over here.

Posted by: Solider in Iraq! | July 20, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

Is time horizon the same as time line? McCain will never get out of Iraq even to start war on Iran, he would just start the draft back had have America in three wars like a fool !!!!!!

Posted by: dems for the white house | July 20, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

It is interesting that within two days after the recent news that polls give McCain lopsided support over Obama in the fields of foreign policy and national defense, that major news sources declare that it is “Obama” who is the “expert” telling Bush and McCain what to do in middle – east. THIS IS BEFORE OBAMA IS ON THE SCENE.

Posted by: Manitu | July 20, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Obama does not look Presidential. He is not wearing a flight harness. He did not stand up in front of a banner saying “Mission Accomplished.”
The only thing Obama can point to is that the Iraqi Prime Minister agrees with his timetable for withdrawal, the Republican President is now calling for a withdrawal “horizon” and McCain scrambled to endorse his plan to send more troops to Afghanistan.

Posted by: Ricky | July 20, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

while I am a Obama supporter I am puzzled at the recent turn of events on Obama’s stance, I thought that we were trying to get our troops out of Iraq and bring them HOME! but the talk now seems to be to transfer them to Afganisthan I am confused can some one explain?

Posted by: wsuperman | July 20, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

wsuperman,
The answer is quite clear. Obama was for pulling all troops out and bringing them HOME when it was politically favorable to say so.
Now that the surge is working, and the public is becoming a little more confident in our ability to succeed, he is saying lets send troops to Afghanistan.
But rest assured, if things get worse and the public again gets skeptical of our ability to succeed in our missions in the middle east, Obama will once again propose bringing the troops home.
That’s Obama for you. His foreign policy is dictated by what the polls tell him he needs to say in order to win.
What he’d actually do if elected no one knows – not even Obama himself, as he hasn’t thought that far ahead.

Posted by: ja | July 20, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Eight years ago the press misled people into thinking Al Gore claimed he invented the Internet. Now McCain is trying to midlead us into thinking he invented the surge. I think his wholehearted support for everything Bush
did in Iraq is clear, including becoming an early cheerleader for the surge, and a current an apologist for why we can’t leave a country in which our mission was accomplished five years ago.

Posted by: Ricky | July 20, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Presidential to me is having a complete agenda. The POTUS is more than the head of the military. If that is all you can focus on, then that’s a problem. This administration was so focused on war that they just forgot other threats to national security….like banking, energy, education and healthcare. Many great empires have collapsed, we need to stop thinking it can not happen here.

Posted by: Gblane | July 20, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

How much pressure did the Bush Administration place on this guy to get him to recant his statement?

Posted by: dan | July 20, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Ricky
You forgot to mention that BHO claims he has ‘experience’. Doing what, is anybodies guess.

Posted by: Aston | July 20, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Obama has never changed on his idea to get all American troops out of Iraq within 16 months. He hopes to bring home 1-2 brigades a month. He wants to send 2 brigades to Afghanistan, but out of about 25 brigades, almost all of our soldiers would be home within 16 months. He has said all along that our war on terrorism is in Afghanistan, not in Iraq. I also thank our soldiers that have gone in harms’ way to do what our President has asked of them. I also respect the fact that we have lost over 4000 of them in Iraq. We made our objective, the Iraqi government is in place, they want us to leave, and its time to go. Just be careful of the last one there, turning out the light.

Posted by: Willow | July 20, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Gblane
I think you’re confusing Bush with the democratic congress.

Posted by: Aston | July 20, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Willow
Do you like having wool pulled over your eyes? BHO was emphatic that he’d get the troops out NOW. That was then.

Posted by: Aston | July 20, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

I think Obama just wants to save money.
Pull the troops out of Iraq and send 2 only 2 brigades to Afghanistan about 7,000 troops WOW!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: steve | July 20, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Ja, I wouldn’t stop at describing the “Bush plan prior to the surge as wrongheaded.” His policies were naive in their understanding of Iraq and the region. As a result Al Qaeda is reconstituted and the power of Iran is enhanced. His reasons for war were false. That, regardless of the spin you put on it, is at best incompetence.
McCain endorsed every stpe he took along the way.

Posted by: Ricky | July 20, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

No fears people. Obama will do whatever we tell him. That’s how his policy is dictated – by what the pollsters tell him is needed to stay popular.
Why don’t we all vote for him to start smoking crack again – I’m sure he’d oblige if he thinks it’d get him a few more % points lead over McCain

Posted by: ja | July 20, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

wsuperman Obama was not opposed necessarily to military action after 9/11 but he felt it should be directed at the appropriate source , Bin Laden,
which would have put the focus on Afghanistan. He did not feel there should have been a war waged in Iraq,
that war he felt was misdirected for Bush’s own agenda Obama has no issue with military intervention, he has indicated he would keep that option on the table with Iran, so if you are under the assumption that Obama would never use military force then you are wrong. He has been clear about going after Bin Laden and Al Quida which is why he supports using the military in Afghanistan and has even advocated for unilateral strikes against Pakistan in seeking out terrorists and/or Bin Laden.
So you’re right, the military is just being diverted to another area in the Middle East.

Posted by: alpaig52 | July 20, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

I am not surprised at this story. During the planning for the Surge, Obama was one of those who said that not only will the Surge NOT work, but the Surge would cause legions of terrorists to spring up in Iraq and cause major chaos. Results – SURGE IS A MAJOR SUCCESS… MORE CHAOS DID NOT HAPPEN – JUST THE OPPOSITE!! Good example of how unprepared Obama is in the fields of foreign affairs and national defense. AND… as Manitu suggsted – one of the many reasons recent polls showing lopsided support for McCain over Obama in fields of foreign policy and national defense.

Posted by: Temagami | July 20, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

Only last week, Obama scrubbed his website of all matter pertaining to the surge and it’s failings. That’s what the man himself has done to once again prove he’s a complete fraud.

Posted by: Aston | July 20, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

aston – fair is fair. I have no problem being quite honest in stating I am not impressed with either party. The problem is the nature of politics itself. I want straight answers (not the same as straight TALK). There is no accountability and the entire process is smoke and mirrors. I will not vote for McCain for a number of reasons, but there is one thing I DO LIKE about him and that is his stance on PORK BARREL projects. There has never been a candidate which I was in 100% agreement with their policies. My vote will be cast based on what I feel is a need to change the rules and accountability of politics. Currently – it sucks. Too many lobbyists. Too many political appointees. Too much waste. Too much deregualtion in key industries – energy, banking, insurance, healthcare and communications – which are feeding on the masses.

Posted by: Gblane | July 20, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Iraq seems to be in much better control that it was. Those soldiers didn’t put their lives in danger and some of them didn’t give up their lives so that now we walk away from finishing up the job the US started. It’s very irresponsible to just walk away and leave the Iraqis to take care for themselves at the time the country looks like is turning the corner. Remember what happened in Afghanistan in the 80′s after the Russians left and the Americans left, it turned into a terrorist heaven that we are now fighting. Let’s finished up the job in Iraq and make sure that the Iraqi people are prepare to deal problems on their own. But we must not forget Afghanistan either, our soldiers need more help there. Obama sholdn’t be calling for troops to be removed from Iraq in a time framed. He is showing that he is not prepared to run the country or its military. We all know Obama is doing this so he can look as an experienced guy in foreign policies. Its all to the deceive the voters. Obama is too dangerously inexperienced to run the White House.

Posted by: NoToObama | July 20, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

If the surge has worked, then why are we staying in Iraq? SO we can finish working on their electrical grid? At the rate these contractors’ work is electrocuting US soldiers, I would take a pass. So what are the true measures for leaving Iraq at this point? If you’re a politician in this dilemma, then what is worse? Voluntarily leaving or getting kicked out?

Posted by: Gblane | July 20, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Ryan – you’re full of it. With McCain, taxes will go up for the middle class. With Obama, they’ll go down for the middle class and up for the wealthiest americans who can afford it. You’re full of —-, dude.

Posted by: Persio | July 20, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

ja – sounds good to me. Imagine that – a President who actually cared what Americans think. Why that sounds suspiciously like… DEMOCRACY! Imagine that. LOL

Posted by: nate g. | July 20, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Ryan – since when does experience always equate with wisdom? That damn fool Bush has had 8 years of experience in the most demanding job in the world and he isn’t one whit wiser than when he went in. And, frankly, John McCain doesn’t strike me as a very wise man either – he comes off like a thin-skinned hothead to me. Besides, Obama was against this failed war in Iraq from the start, while McSame has been waving the flag and beating the drum since day one. Looks to me like Obama is the wise one, here – maybe that’s why Bush and McCain are scrambling to keep up with his policy positions. LOL

Posted by: Seth | July 20, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

Ryan – real easy. I either like a position of a candidate or I do not. I’m flexible like that. And I also do my research. Yes – Obama will raise taxes for those making over 250k a year. Guess what – most of us DO NOT. That gets lost in the all the shouting. I don’t have a problem per se with government spending as long as you have the resources to do so. Unlike Bush, who has supported this war by borrowing from other nations (especially china) and especially in an economy where the dollar is WEAK. As far as pork barrel spending, let me clarify a bit further. Some of the causes are clearly legitimate. A lot of it is wasteful because the process is invisible. Much of this money is attached to other pieces of legislation and politicians are forced to choose between achieving a larger goal. Look at the FISA legislation – what was really included in the legislation? What was the vote really about? Obama voted as he did (immunity to the telecom companies) because the greater good was securing national security. Pork barrel requests would be a separate line item if I had my way.

Posted by: Gblane | July 20, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

Ryan – again, you’re full of it. Obama’s budget is not “10 times” as big as McCain’s – you’re just making up nonsense. Also, will McCain’s budget include the $10 mil/ per DAY that Iraq costs us, or will he bury those costs in “supplemental spending” like Bush does and continue to run up our national debt by borrowing the money from China? Republican fiscal competence is a myth – I would much rather have a tax and spend Dem than a borrow and waste Republican any day of the week.

Posted by: Karl Fungus | July 20, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

Temagami – no it doesn’t – it very accurately and succinctly sums up the fact that McCain’s positions are just a re-run of Bush’s already failed policies. Sucks for you guys that it’s so catchy. Now stop whining and take your medicine. LOL

Posted by: maryanne lutz | July 20, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

Gblane.
IRAN – even Obama recognizes that, but would not admit that to his followers.

Posted by: Temagami | July 20, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Maliki loves Obama, America loves Obama, the whole world loves Obama. Poor old McSame… he’s the Republicans’ sacrificial lamb. LOL

Posted by: yes we can | July 20, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Ryan – unfortunately the only people who think Obama is a fake are the same gullible wingnuts who still think Saddam had WMDs and that think Bush is doing a good job. Rest assured your complete dissassociation from reality will continue to result in your further irrelevance and marginalization from the political mainstream. And maybe that’s a good thing.

Posted by: RayJay | July 20, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Obama is looking more and more Presidential every day – even Bush’s handpicked puppet in Iraq agrees. Poor John McCain can’t catch a break – maybe he should retire?

Posted by: kate ashland | July 20, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Ryan.
TD – the crazies think that the rich fat cats are going to pay for the middle class tax cuts. I am not a fat cat, but if I were I would just put my bucks on offshore investments or into tax free munis – JUST LIKE THE LAST TIME WHEN THE LAST FOOL TRIED TO PLAY THE CLASS CARD. And.. you’re right on about Obama’s taxes – way up – FOR ALL OF US!!!

Posted by: Temagami | July 20, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Perusing – through
MCSAME? DESPERATION? LOGIC? INDUCTIVE AND DEDUCTIVE REASONING?

Posted by: Temagami | July 20, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Mr. al-Maliki a loser, a wimp -
one in a long series in many
different countries our govt
has backed over the decades and
lost.

Posted by: anon | July 20, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

Ryan – wth are you talking about? Welfare was reformed over 10 years ago under Cinton and a Republican Congress? Meanwhile, millions of Americans can’t afford health insurance because our healthcare system is broken. You need to come up to speed on the issues of the current decade and stop whining about welfare already. It’s already been dealt with.

Posted by: nimbus | July 20, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

Ryan – So does McCain. The difference is that Obama wants to create welfare programs that benefit Americans, not Iraqis. Do you know that American taxpayers currently subsidize free universal healthcare for all Iraqis, but we can’t get this same level of care here at home? And McCain supports that. Sorry, but I’m all for spending more money on healthcare – and best of all, Obama isn’t going to increase my taxes to pay for it. He’s going to do the sensible thing and tax the rich – people making over 250,000/year – unlike McSame who wants to make Bush’s disasterous tax breaks for the rich permanent and continue placing the bulk of the tax burden on the backs of the middle class.

Posted by: nimbus | July 20, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

It will take someone like al-Sadr to bring sovereignty to the Iraqis. Maliki is just a puppet.

Posted by: Dennis | July 20, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Ryan – if Obama is proposing $200 million more in healthcare spending than McCain, then that’s one more reason to vote for Obama. Clearly McCain doesn’t care about the healthcare crisis that Americans are facing. Thanks for giving me another reason to vote for Obama.

Posted by: PA Voter | July 20, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

$200,000,000? That is less than the cost of ONE DAY in Iraq.

Posted by: Dennis | July 20, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Frightening. With less than 4 months until the election,Obama decides to try in ONE week to get some foreign policy/national security experience and to try to show some semblance of being a commander. Immediately, he has a major screwup, and at what cost to the safety of our troops and the progress that has been made. And to think, the party and super delegates discarded Hillary in favor of him.
It is said that he has 300 foreign policy advisers, and no two of them can agree on anything. Thus, the Obama screwups and flip flops.
Pray for America.

Posted by: benvictor | July 20, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Obama: If you don’t like what he says today, maybe you’ll like what he says tomorrow when it’s entirely different.

Posted by: Soetoro No! | July 20, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

If Obama is elected President, G-d forbid, he is going to owe a LOT of people a LOT of favors. He’s dirty and he is no different from any other sleazebag politician in this country. He is a puppet. I don’t know how so many people can be so foolish to follow him.

Posted by: no | July 20, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

In a land faraa, farra away….

Posted by: wassup | July 20, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Indeed, this is clearly an effort on President Bush’s part to minimize damage to his party’s candidate, Senator McCain. However, this and other good calls by Senator Obama in the area of foreign affairs will negate Senator McCain’s reputation in this area. Without a strong advantage among moderate voter’s perception of an advantage in foreign affairs, expect McCain to capture the conservative vote only. That will give him a chance of serving in the Senate minority to fillibuster President Obama’s agenda as much as he can.

Posted by: Edward | July 20, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Seems Obama is going to continue the same old Bush policies! WAR WAR WAR!

Posted by: cindy | July 20, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Sorry people.. you can try to spin it all you want but the reality is that the arrogant, smug obama does not know what he is doing.. PERIOD. Now he is over there two days into it and he is already screwing things up. This trip is a circus act and is parallel to that riduculous presidential seal he made up for himself. He loves himself.. and loves to see photos of himself looking presidential, with his nose in the air. He is making a complete fool out of himself and this country. He thinks he is a rock star on tour with his little media groupies following like puppy dogs. Obama is a joke.
JOHN MCCAIN IS THE REAL DEAL.

Posted by: ML | July 20, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

SPIN, of course! It is so obvious that the Iraqi government of Malaki is being manipulated to dance the tune of the Bush administraion on this issue, having been embarrassed by Malaki’s statement on withdrawal of US troops. Do we need to say anything more? The Malaki government will surely follow-up by publicly trying to turn the table on Obama during his visit, just to please the Bush-Cheney-McCain alliance. They will try again to make a drama of their new spin on troop withdrawal, emphasizing this time “time horizon”–whatever that means–to comply with directives from the White House and pentagon.

Posted by: Dr. Sam | July 20, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

the misunderstanding is as follows:the original quote from al-maliki was,” as soon as possible as far as we are concerned, us pres. candidate obama is right when he talks about 16 months, assuming that positive developments continue, this is about the same time period which corresponds to our wishes”. this quote was altered to the one quoted above in later editions of the story. the difference in meaning is quite clear. the original quote seems consistent with al-maliki’s statements of fri and sat with both bush and brown. the latter version does not have a contextual basis. hence the official correction.

Posted by: michael hogan | July 20, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

Karl.
Now look whose calling the kettle black – don’t you know that especially in the lib world that “FACTS” are in the eye of the beholder. Libs (THINK?) with their feelings and then make up scenarios to justify those feelings. Take a good look at your leader, OBAMA, SAME TRACK!!

Posted by: Jimbo | July 20, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

Karl…WHAT?? First of all this isn’t the 1860′s. Second of all 3 years in the Senate isn’t anything. McCain has 25 years in Congress, 4 House, 21 Senate. I also haven’t heard much about Obama building coalitions across the aisle. Anybody can build a coalition in there own party. McCain on the other hand has a vast history of crossing party lines. In other words you didn’t come up with anything.

Posted by: Ryan | July 20, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

ja – wow – that’s really grasping at straws there. nice try.

Posted by: klinger | July 20, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

It is said that the truly educated individual is aware of the possible and probable consequences of his acts and non-acts and responds accordingly. Considering that, Obama is continually putting himelf in compromising situations as in predicting total failure of the SURGE. I’d give a million bucks to be present when Obama talks with General Petraeus in Iraq. Maybe Obama will offer the General Sec of Defense?

Posted by: Manitu | July 20, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Klinger,
What’s grasping at straws? Proving that Obama himself said at the time that he doesn’t know how he would have voted for the Iraq war, and then later actually identifying his policy with Bush????
Are you kidding me saying this is grasping at straws? Obama has been priding himself on being opposed to the war since the beginning, but he was NOT opposed to it until it became unpopular.
Quite a weak response on your part. Guess that shows you have no comeback.

Posted by: ja | July 20, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

ja – that quote doesn’t prove anything except that you never fully understood Obama’s policy in the first place. You basically set up a strawman based on your own misunderstanding of Obama’s Iraq policy – which you misattributed to Obama’s supporters – and then cherrypicked some quotes to knock them down. Are you too dense to see this or are you just being disingenous? That tactic is tired and played out, kid, Get some new material.

Posted by: klinger | July 20, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Obama – Still fooling some of the people all of the time!

Posted by: Aston | July 20, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

you’re right ja, obama flip flopped. clearly from your post he was one of the war supporters early on and then turned later as it became less popular.
i didn’t realize this. this really hurts. i though obama was different. obviously he’s more of the same old.
going to sit out this election i think

Posted by: klinger | July 20, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

One of my first comments of the day talked about the two main Obama support groups, College kids and Blacks. It sure looks like that’s all that’s in here now. Keep thinking your Golden Child will win. I’ll see you all in November. And no Karl/Klinger, this is not a surrender, it’s become a waste of time.
McCain ’08

Posted by: Ryan | July 20, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

To wsuperman
Obama is NOT proposing to remove the troops from Iraq and sending them all to Afghanistan.
If my recollection of the figures are correct, he wants to remove the 180,000 troops from Iraq and send 10,000 extra troops to Afghanistan. That would reduce America’s overall troop commitment by 170,000 while at the say time strengthening the fight against the Taliban.
I hope that clarifies the issue.

Posted by: Geeza | July 20, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

“Republicans love to portray Obama as naïve when it comes to foreign policy. Let’s go to the scorecard. Iraq: Prime Minister Maliki just announced he supports Obama’s troop withdrawal plan. Afghanistan: Obama has long argued that Iraq has been a dangerous distraction from what should be the real focus of the war on terror, Afghanistan, and has recommended sending additional troops there. McCain, who has opposed sending additional troops, did an about-face on Tuesday, all but yelling “Me too!” Iran: Obama has taken a lot of GOP fire for his willingness to negotiate with Tehran. This week, we learned the Bush administration has decided to send a top diplomat to a meeting with Iran’s top nuclear negotiator, and is planning to open an “interests section” in Tehran. Score three for naiveté.”

Posted by: Newsrook | July 20, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

semms like Obama is reading into everyone elses plans and using them for his bennefit!

Posted by: steve | July 20, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

I went back on Ryan’s posts and I couldn’t find much racist stuff. The N word is probably fair for anyone now. My first year of teaching at an all black high school many years ago confirmred that. If it wasn’t for the crazy Wright stuff, racism might not have even been an Issue in this campaign anyway.

Posted by: Temagami | July 20, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

WOW!!!! Was it not this week commander’s were saying we need more troops in Afghanistan? Now Obama is saying we need more troops in Afghanistan. Truely amazing isnt it!

Posted by: carl | July 20, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

Klinger,
Once again, let me repeat.
If you are accepting that Obama originally wasn’t sure how he would have voted on the war, and then actually supported it before flip flopping then PLEASE go tell your candidate Obama to ADMIT IT.
He is still in denial if you haven’t checked. Even in that interview he claimed he said it for political reasons.
You are faced with two choices:
1. Say Obama flip flopped, that he supported the war at one point, and so lacks good judgment just as all othe other politicians did. Except, it gets even worse, he opposed a surge strategy that has succeeded.
2. Admit Obama is a liar and phony.
Your choice

Posted by: ja | July 20, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

ja – so what? That quote is four years old. Things have changed and the majority of Americans who once supported the war don’t support it any more. Try to keep up…

Posted by: Anne C. | July 20, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

I’m relatively new at reading and commenting on web sites like this one. The experience has answered a question that’s gnawed at me for some time. Given the nature, temperament and substance of the comments I frequently see here, I now understand why an idiot has twice been elected President of the United States.

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | July 20, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Americans were stupid to elect Bush not once but twice.
Makes you wonder what that means if they elect Obama! LMFAO

Posted by: james | July 20, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Newsrook, did you even read the blog your commenting on?? Maliki was “misquoted” apparently. It doesn’t matter, Obama has also stated that he will listen to Petraus. Not exactly something new. Bush has only been saying that for 5 years now. Obama is nothing but a fake who changes his mind daily. So much for “Change”

Posted by: Ryan | July 20, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

ja – um, no. But I do think that, in a Democracy, our leaders should be responsive to the people’s wishes.
Or do you think that leaders should be inflexible zealots and never have the option to change their opinion?
That seems absurd to me.

Posted by: Anne C. | July 20, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Anne C.,
I see then. So you admit that Obama did not oppose the war originally? And that he later supported it, before later “changing” his position as it became unpopular?
Please just answer it’s yes or no. You people are all over the place and refuse to take a stand.

Posted by: ja | July 20, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

ja – if that is the way you choose to falsely frame the question, then my answer is no.
Do you really think you’re going to catch anybody out with your simpleminded game of gotcha?
Grow up.

Posted by: Anne C. | July 20, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

Klinger,
Once again, you are refusing to answer two very simple questions. What is so hard about taking a stance? You remind me of the vagueness that comes from the Obama campaign.
Please just answer the questions so we can have a concrete debate. Your constant attempt to avoid the issues is frustrating, and yet comical.

Posted by: ja | July 20, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

Hey ja – why are you so obsessed with a four year old quote from Obama when McCain has flipflopped on his torture, offshore drilling, tax cuts. roe v. wade, the confederate flag, etc, etc, etc – all much more recently. How come you don’t mention that McFlipFlop won’t even vote for his own legistlation anymore? Hypocrite.

Posted by: Big Dan | July 20, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

ja – wrong. you are not asking “straightforward questions” – you are offering simpleminded false dichotomies and are frustrated that we’re not stupid enough to fall for them. We are miles ahead of you, ja, and we’re laughing as you struggle to catch up.

Posted by: Anne C. | July 20, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

MadMike,
As I have said repeatedly, if you are willing to acknowledge that Obama once supported the war but has now changed his mind, great – I am happy you are an honest person.
The only thing is, Obama himself refuses to acknowledge this. Maybe you can go convince him to stop being a liar.

Posted by: ja | July 20, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Anne C.,
Well at least you TRIED to rebut the argument, however lame it was.
Unfortunately, it was not taken out of context. Obama himself did not try to claim such. The explanation he offered was that it would not have been politically wise for him to state his opposition to the war from the beginning, given that Kerry supported the war at first.
So, then, if you accept his explanation you are left with a man who will say things he does not mean. Basically, he’s a liar.

Posted by: ja | July 20, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

ja – then provide the full context, please.

Posted by: Anne C. | July 20, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

ja – so what? McCain is even worse. At least Obama is on the right side of the war now. Why are people like you so obsessed with playing “gotcha”? Have you never changed your mind about anything? What a silly line of argument.

Posted by: bosco | July 20, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Bosco,
Well, that’s the thing now, isn’t it. Obama actually was WRONG about the surge, so he isn’t on the right side now either. He stated the surge would fail, that it would lead to more sectarian violence, and that it would lead to civil war – all increasing the blood spilled.
But the opposite happened. Nice try though, I commend you on your lame but honest effort to make a contribution

Posted by: ja | July 20, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Bosco.
McCain and Bush trying to catch up on Obama’s position on Iraq? A couple of days late. Recent polls tell of overwhelming support of McCain’s foreign policy and national defense policy over that of Obama’s. A couple of days later suddenly Obama his become an “EXPERT?” A little strange don’t you think?

Posted by: Jimbo | July 20, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

Jimbo – FOX News is not represented on the Obama trip for the same reason that the Dems would not agree to a debate on FOX News – FOX is not a legitimate news organization and the majority of moderate and non-partisan Americans do not take them seriously. Everyone knows they are just the propaganda arm of the Republican party.

Posted by: jeremy | July 20, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

JIMBO – what poll are you talkng about? got a link? thanks!

Posted by: shana in nashville | July 20, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Temagami – and in England, there’s a move underway to privatize the nation’s socialized insurance. People with money flock to France for surgery.
You can look it up! Socialized medicine DOES NOT WORK. Where it’s in effect, people either have private insurance or go somewhere else if they can afford to.

Posted by: Aston | July 20, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Shana.
Foreign policy/national defense poll is almost a week old. Can’t remenmber source. Will look some more – it was all over the news. Like McCain 73% – Obama 20% something. Very lopsided. but, like I said, a couple of days later suddenly Obama became the EXPERT. Talk about the power of the PRESS!! Luck – you will find it.

Posted by: Jimbo | July 20, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Orlando.
Sorry, “McSame,” gave you away. Lots of words, but are you prepared to argue tax cuts for corporations (our corps have the 2nd most highest tax rates in the world). Or how about, What are the ways we can increase our oil supplies? Obama seems not capable of rational thought on these subjects… are you up to the task?

Posted by: Manitu | July 20, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Why?

Posted by: Geeza | July 20, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Maliki is Obama’s Iraqi twin – he also flip-flops and wants to be all things to all people. Maliki wants to please the Sunnis, the Shiites, Al-Queda, the Taliban – you name it! He also speaks out of both sides of his mouth. I am amazed how some people here are praising Maliki now that he appears to agrees with their idol – before Maliki was accused of not stepping up to the plate, not taking control of Iraq. Lol! Hope Obama does not start throwing money to the throngs in the street! Oh, I forgot – it is the reverse – they tithe their hard earned money to him!

Posted by: Beckie | July 20, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Geeza.
Not many are blaming Obama for someone else’s beliefs or rants. It’s just that Obama has chosen to surround himself and family with a lot of bad or questionable people. It is a question of judgment, not of Wright, Ayers, etc. But a question of Obama’s judgement.

Posted by: Manitu | July 20, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

What remains is this: McCain had good judgment and Obama had poor judgment.
Done

Posted by: drjohn | July 20, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

Manitu
One can be strongly opposed to gay marriages but still work positively on a business project with someone who is in such a relationship. You therefore cannot justifiably judge a person by the words or actions of someone else whom he happens to know or associate with. Guilt based purely on association is another injustice.
So, if you can show me where and when Obama has himself damned America or said anything that even remotely approaches that, then and only then will I consider the point as being a reasonable one worth raising. But please don’t point me to the words or deeds of someone else. If anything, it only re-enforces the view that Obama is someone who is always prepared to set aside differences between him and others and instead work positively on what they have in common for the common good. This seems to be totally consistent with everything he says and does. Remember, he had a strong and loving relationship with his grandmother whom he nevertheless saw as having racist attitudes. Such open-heartedness is difficult for some people to understand.

Posted by: Geeza | July 20, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

‘FOX is not a legitimate news organization and the majority of moderate and non-partisan Americans do not take them seriously. Everyone knows they are just the propaganda arm of the Republican party”
Frankly Jeremy… the fourth estate is dead!
But statements beginning ,”Everyone knows…..” are no less facetious than the information offered by these semi-news sources.
HILLARY OR MCCAIN
but always:
COUNTRY OVER PARTY!!!!!

Posted by: BETWEEN THE EARS: | July 20, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

Manitu
I am not an Obama guy. I am not even an American. I am simply someone who has a regard for Truth and who is trying to inject some proper rationality into the discussions.

Posted by: Geeza | July 20, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

Geeza, I forgot tht I also posted on – I don’t hold Obama responsible for others,but I do question his judgement re association with so many bad or questionable mentors.

Posted by: Manitu | July 20, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

drjohn,
mccain has good judgment? ha
as in what saying on tv that he doesnt know economy, then saying i have no idea where you got that idea from? yes very smart oh and how about bragging how your best issue is foreign affairs and then acting like a 4 year old and making rash and childish jokes about another country- also very smart! good judgment real presidential material!!!!

Posted by: melissa | July 20, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

Jeremy, Fox news is the only channel where you can get fair and balanced news..not to mention they came insixth place nation wide for cable news…not like MSNBC which came in 46th…tells you something…people don’t like to watch a grown man like Matthews smile and say Obama gives him a tingle up his leg every time he sees him…or Olbermann who thinks he knows everything and makes fun of everyone who HE doesn’t like! At least at Fox you get both sides of a story…not just a biased one as on all other channels!

Posted by: mfmros | July 20, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

fair and balanced – terrorist fist jabs? who even says that if they are a real news channel?

Posted by: melissa | July 20, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Aston
I live in the UK and I try to keep well abreast of domestic and international politics. That’s why – even though I am a foreigner and it is 2 am – I am engaging with this blog about the American presidential election.
I must know say that I have no knowledge of this move to “privatize the nation’s socialized insurance” to which you refer.

Posted by: Geeza | July 20, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

Aston
By the way, I am not trying to totally dismiss what you said. Private health insurance is already available here and those who can afford to use it can choose to do so.
The service such individuals receive might be better and more personalized than one gets from the National Health Service (the NHS). But health insurance remains available to all and I know of no plans to privatize the NHS which is the pride of the British Labour government.
Reform and improve the NHS – yes. But getting rid of it – no. That would be unthinkable for any British political party in the foreseeable future.

Posted by: Geeza | July 20, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Geeza.
For an update on the Canadian health system, Punch in Claude Gastonguay “Canadian Health Care We So Envy Lies in Ruins, It’s Architect Admits.” (6/25/08). Claude Gastonguay is considered the founder of the current Canadian health care system – interesting stuff.

Posted by: Manitu | July 20, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Mr. al-Maliki of Iraq and
Mr. Karzai of Afghanistan
- both are worthless lackeys.
Neither has any abilities
to lead their respective
cuntries.

Posted by: anon | July 20, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

i dont understand this administratiom the iraq wants us out period, they are also smart people they now no that this war was not supposed to be there in the first place,after bush spokesman testified the iraq people were also watching, what he was saying, i think they is no need to keep on lying to ourselves we should have not ivaded iraq period, part of this problem is the media being told what to say sbout this administration, the media need to work up and mend their mistakes, iraq wants us out let them reconsile its a good thing this world need peace, and good diplomacy, sit down and talk with those you dont like also thats what we need in this world now stop wars and fighting

Posted by: tabitha | July 20, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

Mr. al-Maliki of Iraq and
Mr. Karzai of Afghanistan
- both are worthless lackeys.
Neither has any abilities
to lead their respective
countries.

Posted by: anon | July 20, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

Manitu
Thanks for the reference.
The British National Health Service is a subject of intense political debate and everyone seems to agree that it is not working as good as everyone would like.
But in my view, the shortcomings of this service in Britain, in Canada and anywhere else is not good reason to reject the principle of free national health service. Often good ideas fail or flounder because of bad implementation and management.
We can look at other countries where the principle is a shining example of good practice. France for example. There are British citizen who travel to France to avail themselves of the country’s healthcare services. Recent changes mean that individuals from other EU countries can no longer get immediate and free access to this service but it remain an important element of the French social order.
In any case, I think an individual’s health is so foundamental to Life that it should not be based on the ability to pay. It is almost like having to pay for the air we breathe.

Posted by: Geeza | July 20, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Some fifteen thousand or
more elderly people died
of heatstroke in France
during summer a few years
ago.
French health care system?
Does it exist?

Posted by: anon | July 20, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

Orlando.
You people? I am a retired Catholic school teacher on a very low fixed income. I own some stock – not much. I get some income from it. One of the first things Obama will do as pres is let the current break on capital gains tax expire – this will cost me and it is dumb anyway because history has shown every time the capital gains tax is lowered, the fed gets more income in taxes. Obama probably knows this, but will not let you know that he knows. Business creates economic value – ALL business. Government does not and can not create economic value. Bite business and you hurt every American. When I think of the entitlement crowd I think of the exact opposite – the Amish, who have to be getting a good laugh from all this political gobbledygook. The Amish even lobbied congress (successfully) to be exempt from the Social Security system. THE LAST OF THE TRUE AMERICANS. What exactly does going green mean and how can we run our cars on it? Just where is all the Oil from Iraq, anyway? Illegal war? When was the last time we had a terrorist attack on our soil? That has been no accident and Iraq has forced the bad guys to put almost all of there efforts, in IRAQ – AND THEY HAVE LOST THERE. Thank you to the American, British and Israeli intel services who have foiled planned attacks against the west. Vote for Obama – you will get what you deserve, but a lot of us know what is in store for us and WE DO NOT DESERVE HIM!!

Posted by: Manitu | July 20, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

I will vote for McCain even if he has to be carried into the oval office with his O2 cart and alzheimers Doc in tow. the alternative (Obama) is unthinkable.

Posted by: Jimbo | July 20, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

OBAMA.
NOT MUCH EXPERIENCE
NO MILITARY
BAD JUDGEMENT
BAD BAGGAGE
AND……. BAD IDEAS!!

Posted by: Temagami | July 20, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

Jeremy.
Obama will not interview with FOX news because everyone knows that FOX is NOT a legitimate news source? What kind of gobbledygook is that? McCain will go into the lion’s den for an interview. Obama IS JUST CHICKEN – THAT’S IT. Bill o’Reilly will be respectful, but will tear Obama apart – ON THE ISSUES!! OBAMA SHOULD BE SCARED!!

Posted by: Temagami | July 20, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Jeremy.
Obama will not debate on FOX because everyone knows that FOX is not a legitimate news source? What kind of gobbledygook is that? McCain will go into the lion’s den for an interview. Obama is CHICHEN – THAT’S IT!! Bill O’Reilly would be respectful, but would tear Obama apart – on the issues!!
Obama should be scared – he has no real depth and is out of his league

Posted by: Temagami | July 20, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Walkback
by hilzoy
After Nouri al-Maliki endorsed Barack Obama’s timetable for withdrawal, one of his spokesmen issued a clarification stating that Maliki’s remarks had been “misunderstood and mistranslated” (though, as the Times notes, “it did not address a specific error.”) The clarification was issued by Centcom, oddly enough, and turned out to have been made after the US contacted the Maliki government. Meanwhile, Der Speigel stands by its story, and says that it will post the full interview in English tomorrow.
Meanwhile, the New York Times has gotten hold of the original tape, and translated the relevant bits for itself:
“The interpreter for the interview works for Mr. Maliki’s office, not the magazine. And in an audio recording of Mr. Maliki’s interview that Der Spiegel provided to The New York Times, Mr. Maliki seemed to state a clear affinity for Mr. Obama’s position, bringing it up on his own in an answer to a general question on troop presence.
The following is a direct translation from the Arabic of Mr. Maliki’s comments by The Times: “Obama’s remarks that — if he takes office — in 16 months he would withdraw the forces, we think that this period could increase or decrease a little, but that it could be suitable to end the presence of the forces in Iraq.”
He continued: “Who wants to exit in a quicker way has a better assessment of the situation in Iraq.””
That seems to settle that question.

Posted by: paul mall | July 20, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

Send the troop in (Afghanistan)
Send the troop home (from Iraq)
Change the Afghanistan war from Iraq war
That is the change we can belive in.
Yes, we can.
Obama 08,

Posted by: Kevin P | July 20, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

Two days after the recent polls came out showing lopsided support for McCain over Obama in the fields of foreign policy and national defense, OBAMA SUDDENLY BECOMES AN EXPERT – TALK ABOUT THE POWER OF THE PRESS!!!

Posted by: Temagami | July 20, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

Like Vietnam, the Iraq
invasion will end in
failure.

Posted by: anon | July 21, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

Some fifteen thousand or
more elderly people died
of heatstroke in France
during summer a few years
ago.
French health care system?
Does it exist? ‘
Posted by: anon | Jul 20, 2008 10:28:
Yes, anon, it does.
You can’t blame the French Health Care System for an electrical snafu which cause long outages through out the country.
Stuff like that happens in Illinois also…. but we don’t blame the doctors!

Posted by: questioner | July 21, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

Tamaoragami – I think it is more indicative of an ignorant public than a powerful press.

Posted by: Boob | July 21, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am

Manatee,
Obama will be eliminating all income tax for retirees making less than 50K. That should take care of your woes.

Posted by: boob | July 21, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am

I feel that all this talk of flip flop on either side of the aisle is pure rubbish. McCain has changed his stances on issues many times, despite the fact that his supporters only want you to think Obama changes his mind as time passes.
REALITY CHECK: If a politician doesn’t change his opinions as new facts come to light and situations both here and abroad change they have no business being elected for anything. It is the mark of a worthy politician to be able to stick to his beliefs and alter his opinions and stances on issues. Have you always thought exactly the same way about everything your whole life? I HIGHLY doubt it.

Posted by: Salpula | July 21, 2008, 2:18 am 2:18 am

Geeza: Socialized health care doesn’t mean “Free health care at the current quality of service” it means if you are 75 and need a knee or hip replacement surgery, its likely you still wont get it if you cant afford it because most systems use public and private care, thus confining you to a wheelchair or walker if you don’t have the cash. We have excellent healthcare in this country, some of the best available, partly because we do pay for it. The problem with the current system is that we don’t have a backup plan for people who can’t afford it at all.
In reality we will all die someday. I know thats a shocker. 50 years ago we couldn’t do 75% of what we can do medically today – and that has come at an extremely high cost of research and development. We want to (and do) live longer. We also want progress to continue – more $$$.
The newly implemented (or yet to be implemented) plan of forcing hospitals to pay for extended hospital stays due to infections that a patient contracts during stays, errors during a routine procedure, or neglect enforces more accountability and should help bring costs down if hospitals hold themselves to a higher standard. If we stop putting high fructose corn syrup and all the other crap we put into our food in this country we would have less obesity/overweight people, and in general a more healthy population.
Once we have taken preliminary steps to improve health care and reduce costs then think about socializing the health care, but merely deeming free health care for the country is not only prohibitively expensive, also naive.

Posted by: Salpula | July 21, 2008, 2:34 am 2:34 am

Who is paying for this trip, is what I want to know? And why are the other senators never shown?
I say, Obama better be “wasting” his own money, cause this is definitely a “campaign trip” just as his speech before the UCC SYNOD CONF was!
IRS — get it right! UCC should be taxed for allowing that travesty!

Posted by: anon | July 21, 2008, 4:34 am 4:34 am

I know it, Obama was right all along!

Posted by: JD | July 21, 2008, 5:24 am 5:24 am

Why should we be surprised that the IRAQ people want us out of their country? Bush and McBush have waged war on a country and killed over a million IRAQIES, Men Women and Children in the name of the American people for the big oil companies that have a strangle hold on us. The first time I heard John McBush tell the truth about this whole made up war in Iraq was when he was in a town hall meeting and told the American people that he did not want to have to send American troops back into IRAQ for oil. That was the first and the last time he told the truth about this Bush/ McNut war. When McSame was asked about that statement, he told reporters that he was talking about George H. Bush Senior and the first war in IRAQ to liberate IRAN. What a coward! It’s time to bring our troops home, they have done what their government has ask them to do. Their families are waiting for them at home Mr. McCain, the IRAQIE people no longer want us their. Obama has said he will end this since less war, that has took so many lives of our family members away, for what? So Bush and McBush and their crooked friends can continue getting rich while we sit here and lose our homes. Bush and McSame don’t have to worry about paying a mortgage, softball, swimming lessons and food. Weather you dislike Obama or love him, we can not afford 4 or 8 years of the same Bush policies hat are destroying the middle class and their families. People wise up, don’t vote this year own wedge issues, such as race and gender. We can’t afford it!

Posted by: ORLANDO B. FROM FREMONT OHIO | July 21, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am

manitu,
fear n love are the only two emotions thar gorvern us.this is not the time for fear.even christ had not very good followers but brought them to the fold,will u accuse him of bad judgement,if u tell urself the truth there is notting wrong wit diz guy.obama u just dont want to see it n prefer to jive in fear.

Posted by: pius | July 21, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am

if mccain was black would he have been standing eye to eye with obama.diz guy is one of the greatest politician ive seen in our time.vote 4 a leader not 4 color

Posted by: pius | July 21, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am

Hey Salpula, while you are correct in that you expect people to change their minds as new facts arise, what new facts arose to make Obama change his mind about taking public funds for the campaign. What new facts arose after he said he would do the 10 public forum debates that McCain requested, and then said “No”. There is a big difference between changing your mind because facts change, or you learn more about the issue and changing your mind for political gain or expediency. Obama has actually given different answers to the same questions – based on who his audience was at the time.

Posted by: BizBag | July 21, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

The American, people want OUT of Bush’s illegal, criminal, Iraqui, war. The elected President of Iraq, Nouri Al-Maliki,want’s the U.S. OUT of Iraq.The Iraqui people want the U.S.OUT of Iraq. Senator Obama, wants the U.S.OUT of Iraq.Bush,has murdered over 1 million Iraquies, and 4200+ American service people and wounded 31,000 military people,18,000 seriously. But NOW BUSH, and McBUSH, say we will leave Iraq, sometime in the next 100 years after General PETRAEUS,and THEY decide to do so.WHO and WHEN was PETRAEUS, elected President of Iraq????

Posted by: Repubsout | July 21, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

What is arabic for spin?
Faraa means ‘cheery, animated child’ as a name. farra-id is a divided inheritance. There is also a camp by that name.
You might use ‘Taqiyya’. Also, dissimulation or “hypocrisy in the pursuit of a greater purpose.”
In the west, we call it ‘lieing to someone’s face to cover one’s a**’.
Wasn’t it Der Spiegel that published the hoax Hitler diaries?

Posted by: len | July 21, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.