Carville: This Convention Has No Message
On CNN this evening, Clintonista James Carville voiced his displeasure with tonight’s proceedings as having no theme, no message.
"James Carville seems the least satisfied Democrat in here right now," noted CNN’s Anderson Cooper. "What’s going on James?"
"Well if this party has a message it has done a hell of a job of hiding it tonight I promise you that," Carville said.
"How do you mean?" asked the anchor. "You haven’t heard about Iraq? You haven’t heard about John McCain?"
"…George W. Bush, you haven’t heard any of this," said Carville. "I mean we are a country that’s borderline recession, 85% 80% wrong track country, people, health care, energy, I haven’t heard anything about gas prices, I mean maybe we are going to look better Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday but right now like I say we are playing hide the message pretty good."
"David Gergen said this a short time ago, that in the first two hours what is the message?" said Cooper.
"And you know what? David didn’t get to where he was in life because he’s stupid He was exactly right. I look at this and I am about to jump out of my chair…There’s no message coming out of here, there is no sense that the party has a sense of urgency, and we’ve only got four nights this is 25% of the whole thing."
Watch it here.
- jpt
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
But, where exactly is David Gergen gotten to? eh?
Yikes.
Posted by: Sammy | August 26, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
I agree, it was a flat night for us Democrats.
I loved Ed Kenedy and it was a heartpull to see him and recall his life and his family’s contributions and sorrows but it was not something to get our party motivated Michelle looked stunning, howevr, it was just a speech. She did not connect, tow cliches about Hillary which fell flat with no follow up and one semi compliment to Biden. I thought her moth rrecieved the shortet shrift. It would have been fitting if one person tonight mentioned the brave men and women fighting this assine war.
It was a night wasted, we onlyhave til Thursday to get this off the ground
Posted by: i am so I can!!!! | August 26, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am
Michelle talks about leaving a powerful job for a “career in public service” — her current job as a $300k per year director of community relations for a hospital? That’s public service? She works for a private entity. How is that public service?
Posted by: james | August 26, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am
James Carville is on the same boat as WJC. He is past his prime, bitter because he’s not in charge anymore and terrified that Obama will win and leave him with nothing to do in 2012. I have always loved what JC did for democrats but he is as power drunk as Bill and Hill and has no perspective. Obama will not win this election because he attacks John McCain and the devastated GOP, he will win when he rises above the junkyard dog politics of the past.
Hey james. Who won the primary? It’s time to head back to the bayou, get a rocking chair and realize that this has all now passed you by.
Posted by: bi | August 26, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am
Carville and Gergen are too close to this. They’ve lost the perspective of the average guy watching at home from 10-11pm. In that hour they got to see a replay of the Kennedy speech and then the Michelle Obama speech with a final endearing moment with his children. He wants red meat because his perspective is inside the beltway. That being said, it is important to go after Bush-McCain as Kerry failed to do for the Democrats four years ago. Tomorrow I think you will see Hillary go after McCain very, very hard. Should be interesting.
Also, on an earlier post. I think McCain is using the “war-hero” card way too often and in response to attacks that are tenuously linked to his service. When Obama goes after his houses and he responds with his time in Hanoi it comes off, to me, as forced, calculated, and intellectual dishonest. He did it again on Leno and it just seemed very fake.
Posted by: ptu | August 26, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am
James Carville is still smarting that Hillary isn’t the president so I take what he says with a grain of salt.
The highlighte of the night was surprisingly NOT Ted Kennedy but Michelle Obama and the kids. Fantastic speech by Michelle and the kids were just perfect.
The first night humanized Obama. The next 3 nights is to tear down Bush/McCain and give red meat to the Democrats.
Posted by: vickie | August 26, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am
Bitter? Party of 1?
Your table is now available.
Posted by: Deep Release | August 26, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am
I heard this comment from other liberal commentators. Looks like a concensus.
Yeeehaw!
Posted by: Jo | August 26, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am
deep release,
LOL.
Posted by: Jo | August 26, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am
The Democratic Party is in total disarray – and I’m not even sure they realize it yet.
And it isn’t Clinton’s fault.
And it isn’t even Obama’s fault.
It’s the fault of the Old Guard Dems who have made their entire living in Washington who wanted a New Kid they could manipulate instead of a Proven Leader they couldn’t.
Shame on them for failing to recognize that the Will Of The People still matters in America.
Posted by: marylou | August 26, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am
Doesn’t matter if Oprah gives them all free cars…..DEMS 4 McCAIN AND HILLARY SUPPORTERS 4 McCAIN will dot them in.
Posted by: Debra | August 26, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am
Nice one Deep Release. Ditto
Posted by: doug | August 26, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am
By all means change the convention to suit Carville.
Posted by: DennisNC | August 26, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am
Carville hyperbolic much? It’s the first freaking day!! How can you make such a broad statement that the convention has no message? I am utterly perplexed because the first day’s theme was reclaiming America’s promise and I thought that Senator Kennedy’s and Michelle’s speech fit perfectly with that theme.
Posted by: Kathryn | August 26, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am
With his butchering of the English language, I’m suprised anyone knows what Carville said.
Posted by: DennisNC | August 26, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am
The Clintons know they have one chance left at fulfilling their rapacious bloodlust for power, and that is for John McCain to win this election, serve one term, and for Hillary to comeback in 2012 and win. They know all too well that if Obama wins they are officially ancient history.
Rendell’s attack this past Sunday against the media’s bias for Obama, and now Carville’s lament detailed here, I think, are not random in anyway but part of their effort to derail any hope of Obama winning in November.
Posted by: Thank God for Karma | August 26, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am
I glad I didn’t spend my money for a trip to Denver to see that crap.
Posted by: Sluggo | August 26, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am
Bill and Hill suporters will never be happy, unless there is a Clinton back in the White House. I think if Jesus himself won the primarys they would still be upset.
The Clinton supporters need to get over themselves and wake up. Bill and Hill are not Democratic GODS.
The Clintons should either “lead, follow and my personal favorite, get the hell out of the way…”
Posted by: Mac | August 26, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am
I switched the channel after listening to Mrs Obama for 1 minute.
Posted by: brigitte | August 26, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am
I listened to mrs obama for a minute then I changed the channel.
Posted by: brigitte | August 26, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am
Carville is stuck in the 90s with the Clintons. A few comments were made tonight about handing the keys over to the next generation and he’s still thinks the Clintons holds the keys. He’s an alien anyways so who cares what he thinks.
Posted by: Jack | August 26, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am
Carville is a very smart analyst, and it would behoove Obama to listen to him.
After all, he is the only Democratic political strategist to engineer 8 years of the Presidency in the last half century.
The Dems need to knock McCain on houses and the economy and talk about their plan to revive the American economy. Anything else is a waste of time.
Posted by: JG | August 26, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am
this reminds me of a speech by the cowboy humorist and philospher Will Rogers in front of both houses of congress. As you with a few gray hairs remember, This was in the 1930′s and he closed his speech with the comment “We’ve got the best politicions money can buy” 70 plus years later nothing has changed except now they cost more!
Posted by: Kelly | August 26, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am
I have to agree it is kind of boring and lacking in excitement, if this is supposed to rock the vote and make people want to come out and support the DNC well sorry something is missing big time.
Posted by: novote | August 26, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am
Calm down James!.. there is plenty of time to get there, you would think the election is this friday .
and lets not forget james give advice to hillary and she proceed to lose 10 states in a row.
If you overkill and drive bush and iraq every other word by November it can fall on deaf ears.
Barack should stay with the number one issue on people mind the economy, hit McCain hard there,the republicans have ZERO issue/platform that address things on the domestic front.
And if Mccain mention iraq , come back with bush/mccain wasting billions of dollar , and we neglect healthcare , schools, our infrastruture.
trillion dollar WAR tag help RUIN our economy.
Posted by: truth-rise | August 26, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am
I think that what is missing from the Democrat convention is a viable candidate. I doubt it can be fixed by the election.
Posted by: Sluggo | August 26, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am
JG: After all, he is the only Democratic political strategist to engineer 8 years of the Presidency in the last half century.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I don’t know about that. Clinton didn’t have much competition to run against at the time. Clinton did a great job, but Carville is just an annoying, loud mouth. He needs to embrace Obama if he really wants to help the dems, but he’s still holding a grudge because Hillary isn’t in the running. Dems need unity, not Carville ranting and raving.
Posted by: Jack | August 26, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am
Carville is a has-been quack. I didn’t notice any presidential candidates lining up for his services.
Posted by: mara | August 26, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am
Well, there wasn’t much of a message on this, the first night of the convention, but it appeared that they had a “theme” for the evening. It was obvious that they were trying to “humanize” Obama and Michelle, but all the efforts seemed so staged as to be blatantly manipulative. There certainly wasn’t any genuine connection made and I’d be surprised if anyone changed their opinion about either of the Obamas.
Ted Kennedy was genuinely moving. In spite of all his personal peccadilloes, there is no denying that he has been one of the finest Democratic senators of all time. He’s a man who needs no “humanizing” or assistance at “connecting.”
Obama still isn’t speaking to me; he’s just too focused on himself. You really don’t warm to a person when you can’t rely on what they say. That line in Michelle’s speech about his word being his bond was kind of a hoot. That’s been one of the biggest disappointments about this guy.
Who knew that was what he meant when he promised change?!
Posted by: RLamb | August 26, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am
If we have to listen to blacks act like they lived through slavery then McCain a real American hero has every right to talk about the real experiences he live through as a POW
Posted by: commie | August 26, 2008, 2:06 am 2:06 am
james advice hillary on her campaign.
i think he should be the one taking lesson from the Obama camp.
james must realise you cant go on for hours on bush .you have to bring something to the table.
I say go after McCain more, bring up pass videos of him flip-flopin on issues. script him as someone who sold his soul to get the republican nomination.
Posted by: riley | August 26, 2008, 2:06 am 2:06 am
There was a message at the convention tonight. Obama and friends don’t know what they are doing.
Posted by: Sluggo | August 26, 2008, 2:06 am 2:06 am
There was a message tonight, Obama and friends do not know what they are doing. Scary to think about that for the country.
Posted by: Sluggo | August 26, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am
Obama and friends do not know what they are doing. Scary to think about that for the country.
Posted by: Sluggo | Aug 26, 2008 2:11:05 AM
_______________________________________
Riiiiight! the Obama camp only brought down the biggest political dynasty in the primary history, and ran a ground campaign for the ages . if Barack plans to run the country the way he ran his campaign, we are in very good hands.
Remember before the primary . many ask why Barack is doing this .. he will suffer a blowout of the ages at the hands of the Clintons…who started out with 146 million.
Posted by: len | August 26, 2008, 2:21 am 2:21 am
Debra: The Mother Teresa story was indeed a lie. Everyone knows this by now. It’s all over the web.
Posted by: Jack | August 26, 2008, 2:32 am 2:32 am
Sammy, maybe you don’t know this, but Gergen has worked for five presidents. He worked for republican presidents, but Clinton turned to him when he needed help to focus his Presidency. Gergen accepted because he said when a President asks for your help, you give it. He is viewed as non partisan.
Posted by: Mary OK | August 26, 2008, 2:37 am 2:37 am
James Carville of the War Room speaking.
Perhaps James is missing the picture?
Those that are always in attack mode often do.
This night was a emotional night.
This was the emotional highlight of the first convention night. The old lion of the Senate roars again. A reminder of why we support Obama. When the Kennedy clan joined Senator Ted Kennedy on stage it became a rally cry. Join us! Yes we can!
Michelle Obama filled in the picture of her husband. America fell in love with their children. We can live with them in the White House. She is a great communicator.
James will love Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday. Lots of action for a warrior like him. But this first night was just as important.
This is for James Carville my inspiration -
McCain is like a Grumpy Elephant with no vision and a flip flopping memory! There is a reason this Elephant is always attacking without a postive message. His trainers are Rove & Schmidt at the circus! We know what to expect at the McCain’s convention a Grumpy Elephant entwining his trunk with 2 Rogue elephants in Bush/Cheney with two cheering trainers in Rove & Schmidt who are trying to sell the American People a 3 rd George Bush Term.
Posted by: Cooday | August 26, 2008, 2:38 am 2:38 am
I have heard the comments about the lack of a message or theme. It just occurs to me that you can have all of the speech writers and all of the consultants plan your convention – but it still is up to the candidates to present themselves. I agree with an earlier post – when Michelle said that Obama’s word is his bond – well – that is already proven to be false. Look under the bus and look at all the changed positions so far.
Posted by: Mary OK | August 26, 2008, 2:41 am 2:41 am
The bad news for Anti Obama people,
Since the gap of degreee of support is 2 to 1 between O & M, even though poll is close, the turnout will be 6-7% different.
Posted by: zen | August 26, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am
it strikes me that obama (supporters) are so anxious to get to the finish line even though they don’t have any idea where the line is or how to get there. reminds me of a hiker who disregards the need to know the trail, read the signs, consult seasoned experienced hikers, and end’s out dead and lost in the wilderness devoured by coyotes.
Posted by: sonia trevino | August 26, 2008, 2:49 am 2:49 am
This coming from a guy who the wife make thousands of dollars demonizing the Democratic Nominee and he did not openly critic the book in question and false issues it raised …am i supposed to believe his sincerity without doubt; …surely “he knows how to run his mouth without knowing what he is talking about”
Posted by: Kelly | August 26, 2008, 2:50 am 2:50 am
Carville is a pit bull who is bored
when fur isn’t flying, kneecaps aren’t
cracked, and blood isn’t spilled.
Gergen is an Airedale, of finer breeding, more tempered, had all his
shots, but seems to have a similar
malaise about The Obama Show. Their
concern at this point intrigues me.
Posted by: Trajan | August 26, 2008, 2:52 am 2:52 am
Maccain supporters vs. Obama supporters
past oriented – future oriented
fear oriented – hope oriented
having a old frame of world view – 21st century globalized world view
where do you belong to?
Posted by: zen | August 26, 2008, 2:55 am 2:55 am
I guess Michelle was to motivate everyone.
She was on Exceptionally well behavior. That could be the reason.
She did not seem herself, Like something has come over her.
Posted by: seah | August 26, 2008, 2:59 am 2:59 am
carville and gergen know exactly what they are talking about. they saw kerry, and gore throw in the towel and play nice, soft, and sweet and they both lost. they know that if obama wants to turn the momentum around the campaign has to come out swinging right out of the starting gate.
the time for the brady bunch comes later.
unfortunately based on the comments by obama supporters it is evident that you are all determined to self-destruct.
hillary supporter from new mexico
Posted by: sonia trevino | August 26, 2008, 3:19 am 3:19 am
New slogan for the Republican Convention: Want more of the same, vote McCain.
Posted by: Doug | August 26, 2008, 3:52 am 3:52 am
this is a sinking ship with an egomaniacal hypocrite at the helm…..
Posted by: chris | August 26, 2008, 3:56 am 3:56 am
Senator Clinton was the only candidate capable of being the best President that our children, our troops and our country needs right now…….supporting a lesser candidate is just compromising the best interests of such loved ones we are supposed to watch out for….
Posted by: chris | August 26, 2008, 3:58 am 3:58 am
I’m not an Obama supporter, but I thought Michelle looked absolutely gorgeous and the close with her children talking to their daddy was very emotional and sweet.
Whether that should have been the message or not is for others to decide, but if the Obama’s wanted to make themselves looked like an all American family, they succeeded.
They have achieved the American dream, and good for them. And I say this as someone who does not like Obama’s politics at all.
Posted by: peach | August 26, 2008, 5:38 am 5:38 am
The message is “Hope and Change”(tm).
Just like “I’m not a doctor but I play one on TV.” or Buy this product and you will be loved and adored.
It is a mass media-driven commercial that looks great, sounds great, and makes you feel great, but is selling a product that has not been vetted or tested.
We have no idea if it works but if it is packaged nicely and endorsed by celebs, how can it be wrong?
Hope and Change… a slogan you can believe in. (cue the inspirational Coke music)
“I’d like to teach the world to sing, in perfect harmony…..”
Fade in picture of Barack on a hilltop with dancing young people from all nations and backgrounds. Add sparkle to smile when he says “I am Barack Obama and I approve this commercial for “Hope and Change(tm)”.
Posted by: diamond lou | August 26, 2008, 6:04 am 6:04 am
Aconcernedbrit: it’s Hillary’s supporters who are doing that, not Hillary herself.
There’s a difference.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 26, 2008, 6:19 am 6:19 am
A lot of people seem to believe that ‘the American Dream’, the believe that you can make it if you work hard, still exists.
Studies show that Western and Nordic Europe, Canada, and the emerging markets in Asia have greater upward social and economic mobility than the US. With the recent economic crisis and especially the health care crisis, it’s far more easier to fall from the social ladder than it is to climb it.
The American Dream still exists, but it’s more and more becoming a dream than a reality.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 26, 2008, 6:40 am 6:40 am
Chris: “this is a sinking ship with an egomaniacal hypocrite at the helm…..”
The man at the helm is Bush and McCain is his replacement.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 26, 2008, 6:43 am 6:43 am
More evidence that the creepy Clintons ran a terrible campaign. They have no control of the sycophants shills they send to the media. One of the better out comes of this election is that we will be rid of Carville, Gergen, Lanny Davis, mcAuliffe – all of those propaganda spewing, the end justifies the means, consultants who are willing to sell out America. I am sure they are all quite upset. Maybe Carville can call us all Judas’s as the “voters stole the nomination”.
Posted by: disambiguates | August 26, 2008, 6:44 am 6:44 am
“My vote goes to the person w/REAL plans”
McCain’s plan=Bush’s failed agenda. McCain is a war monger if he’s elected get your kids ready for the draft.
Posted by: Sam | August 26, 2008, 6:52 am 6:52 am
With due respect to Mr James Carville, I wish to differ on his submission of the first day of the Democratic Convention.
He doesn’t sound like a Democrat to me. He sounds more like a Republican.
The Convention is supposed to be a Democratic Affair where the Party Flag bearers are expected to be elected. It is not a Party for bashing Opposition Candidates even if the GOP has made it look so over the years.
Teddy Kennedy’s appearance despite his fight with brain tumour was soul-lifting; Michelle Obama’s speech was apt and the general atmosphere is like a family get-together.
The first day is supposed to be for exchange of banters and light-hearted speeches.
The remaining three days are for Political Speeches, the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Nominees Speeches and othe addresses by the Key-note Speaker and other Speakers.
GOP bashing and other matters can come in intermittently, but that is definitely not the purpose of Party Conventions.
I am sure if the first day had been devoted to silly acts like opposition bashing, Mr James Carville would have criticized it to high heavens.
It is apt to always remember that despite Political differences, the President is going to preside over all Americans
Posted by: Dare Nigeria | August 26, 2008, 6:52 am 6:52 am
Carville is right… of course.
Posted by: a reader in georgia | August 26, 2008, 6:57 am 6:57 am
There’s no real message because the candidate has no real substance. Obama is all about image. The country needs real governing experience not just feel good platitudes.
Posted by: bct424 | August 26, 2008, 7:12 am 7:12 am
People, James Carville and Paul Bagala have not yet overcome the results of the primaries. They have to understand that the DNC is in new hands and they have to face the reality. That is very important and should support Obama’s perspectives about the party and the convention. They sound like republicans talking without knowing what they are talking about and jumping all otehr the place trumpeting that Hillary and Bill are not involved in this or are not consulted on that. Enough, the republicans are already using Hillary’s talking points against Obama and the DNC. We have enough of the Carvilles and Bagalas. God bless America and God bless Obama. OBAMA/BIDEN08.
Posted by: BKMC | August 26, 2008, 7:24 am 7:24 am
Although I am a Democrat, this convention has not excited me. Yesterday, I watched the convention for about 30 minutes while working out at the gym. I did not bother to watch Michelle nor Kennedy. Instead, I watched some taped business news and net work shows. I am sorry I have already tuned out. I may not watch the Republican convention either. Come November, I will stay home. There is no viable candidate. The choices are lousy.
Posted by: Kris | August 26, 2008, 7:26 am 7:26 am
It was painfull to watch
Posted by: smith | August 26, 2008, 7:27 am 7:27 am
James Carville. Who cares what that creep thinks? I watched and I was glad of the upbeat come together tone of night one. Now the gloves will come off. The DNC knows what needs to be done and unlike the fear mongering, 9/11, 9/11, 9/11, 9/11, 9/11, 9/11, tape up your windows, boggy man under the bad repubs, the Dems will be honest about the sad state of affairs the cheny/bush administration has thrust upon our country but will urge that people work for real change in government, once again of, by, and for the people!
Posted by: Timothy | August 26, 2008, 7:44 am 7:44 am
The less you know, the more you fear.
The more you know, the less you fear.
It’s better to know more than to “no” more.
Have you noticed how fearful most Republicans are?
Posted by: Joel | August 26, 2008, 7:52 am 7:52 am
They message was basically .. “Obama is right for our country” because I said so and believe in “change”! LOL! Yeh – that will go over well ..
Posted by: Jo Jo | August 26, 2008, 7:55 am 7:55 am
“We have enough of the Carvilles and Bagalas.” Leave it to an Obama supporter to sound so partisan. It’s like saying, “if you’re not for us, you’re against us”. The Carvilles and Begalas are seasoned pros in the political game, you shouldn’t just throw away such wisdom because you want (a vaguely defined) “change”. Carville and Bagala in particular want democrats to win, above all.
Posted by: sssh | August 26, 2008, 8:14 am 8:14 am
Carville and Gergen are OLD #####, this country doesn’t want all negative….Positive is nice for a CHANGE, the next 2 days can e more negative…….THE WORLD IS SICK OF NEGATIVE NANCY’S NEGATIVE NEGATIVE, LIES, SMEARS THAT’S THE REPUBLICANS not the Dem – thank goodness and America is SICK OF IT
Posted by: Not everyone wants all Negative | August 26, 2008, 8:15 am 8:15 am
I decide to change my old name (Chris) to new name (Christm) because there is a chris (republican troll) with the same name.
Posted by: Chris | August 26, 2008, 8:16 am 8:16 am
Get em ready Sam – what’s wrong with that? They should ALL be forced to serve 2 years anyway .. “ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country”!! Remember that? You should – he was a Dem .. I don’t think he meant planting flowers on the side of the road!!
Posted by: John | August 26, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am
Now I understand why Obama once said James Carville often opens his mouth and does not know what he is talking about.
Yesterday’s theme was “ONE NATION” and it was meant to present the true Obamas to the American people and NOT the caricature that the GOP and its evil acolytes like Limbaurgh and Hannity of faux news have falsely sold to the American people.
I am sure from today, the “meat and potato issues” people like Carville are looking out for will start to come on board.
A stark difference between “change” and “more of the same” will henceforth be at the centre of this convention.
We cannot afford to have 4 more years of McBush failed policies.
Posted by: Rolland | August 26, 2008, 8:18 am 8:18 am
Why can’t John Edwards speak at the convention? It was known for years that ole Jesse Jackson committed adultry YET he was allowed? Why is that? Hmm!
Posted by: Simpsons | August 26, 2008, 8:21 am 8:21 am
was carville asleep?
i heard iraq, bush, sooo many times…
lol so funny, oh wait maybe he just watched teddys speach…
what a moron
Posted by: bhrandon | August 26, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am
I did not even bother to watch Michelle since I knew she would not tell the truth about her husband, the fraud. :D
PUMA! 9 million voters and counting, coming to a poll with You!
cluck…
Posted by: LeeLee07 | August 26, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am
i hope you do not degrade yourself and vote for mcdummy—-that would be self degradation on a monumental scale—-it is nice to see the obama family—-and not disfunctional mccains.
Posted by: rodney | August 26, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am
It was Michelle’s night. Had the DNC come out too strong, she would have be labeled as angry.
I thought they had the right balance, it was family night, the get together, renew friendships.
Carville removed himself, the loaner, still out there looking for his precious, bitter and resentful, consumed by it. Most of all he is a loser.
Posted by: Thinking | August 26, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am
Of course the speech played well for the many Obama supporters at the convention but to those of us out here in reality- it came up short. Yes, she had to “reintroduce” her husband to us because they should have already done that but as usual no specifics- hopefully the rest of the week will show SPECIFIC contrasts between the republicans and the democrats as well as SPECIFICS ON HIS AGENDA IF PRESIDENT.
Enough of the fluff speeches- 1) whose taxes would be raised under Obama- $100,000.00, $200,000.00 or $250,000.00- I have heard all three numbers 2) aside from an immediate $1,000.00 per family rebate for higher fuel prices what are his long term energy independence plans 3) for those that have good healthcare will that be changed- what is his plan to provide health insurance for those that need it but can’t afford it 4) how would he win the war in Afganistan- the one we really need to win 5) general economy- what is his plan to get over finally this mortgage mess and get the economy moving 6) what penalties for employers who lay off US workers in this country and then move the job out of the country to save money, ETC ETC ETC
this country has real problems- too many to list- we need to know OBAMA’S specific plans and also Mc Cain’s specific plans-
And yes, we will say it one more time- had Obama picked Clinton there would already be a comfort level with many of these issues
Posted by: angela | August 26, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am
Carville is a loudmouth who, thankfully, has been relegated to the sidelines and will eventually be phased out of the picture altogether. He should shut up until the this whole thing plays out, but of course, he won’t.
Posted by: Lou | August 26, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am
I saw a party adrift last night. Teddy was a swing and a miss, and actually reminded everyone that the long run of the Kennedys is coming to an end, the Clintons don’t know they’re not welcome anymore, and the Obamas are not quite ripe yet. Sadly he was more like a lion in winter than the lion of the Senate. I agree with Carville. There was no message that swing voters could identify with, and at the end of the day that’s who will decide this election. Bush, the war, etc., that’s red meat for the base. What about jobs? What about economic growth? It’s still the economy, stupid! The Dems will never have a better chance to grab the White House than right now but they look flacid, rudderless and divided.
Posted by: Woody | August 26, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am
I like Jame but he is toooooo close to the Clintons and sounded like it last night he sounded more like his wife ! James one thing They can’t win every election !!!!
Posted by: Dennis Fort Myers Fl | August 26, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am
listen gang
The problem was not there was too little attack (and if carville had been listening to the actual speakers instead of pontificating with all the other talking heads he would have heard it)
the problem was the attacking came mainly from three sources…
1. Pelosi did a lot of attacking…but she delivers a speech like Mccain. If you were not in the hall (even if you were really lol) there are parts you would have fallen asleep with. I think she was given partly that responsibility (of course she ahd to slip in how proud she was of a congress that has gotten little to nothing done ugh)
2. Jesse Jackson Jr. …oy was this just the wrong speaker to bring out the first night… exactly what Obama does not need in a speech…sounding like Jesse Jackson Sr (sorry not a fan really)
3. Ted Kennedy whose speech if you actually listen was almost ALL attacking…but everyone was so caught up in the tears …that it seemed
well it wasn’t a “charge” moment.
I think outside Kennedy and Michelle…the speakers probably looked good on paper but just …it didn’t roll out like it looked on paper.
having said that…I think Michelle’s and Kennedy’s and the films… were still a really good foot to start out on.
Posted by: dl | August 26, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am
After last nite, I will not watch the rest of the DNC debacle.
The only redeeming factor was Kennedy.
Mrs. Obama can fake it up just like her husband. No surprise there. They both can read a teleprompter quite well, but that’s about it. All puff, no substance. They must really think the democrats are fools.
Posted by: NielPA | August 26, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am
I am a lifelong Democrat but I am not supporting Obama. I have to say that Michele Obama’s speech was very well done and made her seem much more human. However, no matter how great the speeches are, no matter how personable and likeable the Obama’s are, no matter how much they bash Bush and talk about change, I still believe that Barak Obama is completely inexperienced, way too liberal and not ready to lead this country. While Bush has led us into an economic mess, if we can’t defend our borders and our interests in this fluid and dangerour environment, we will have no control over the economics at home
Posted by: Brenda, New York | August 26, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am
iam so i can what speech did you listen to her mom got the short shrift? no one mentioned the brave men and women fighting this war ? either you did not watch the speech or you just want people reading this blog to believe both those thing for a reason !
Posted by: Dennis Fort Myers Fl | August 26, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am
Woody
I would agree on almost all but …I don’t think it is “the Clinton’s” that don’t know they are welcome yet…
I think it is the Clinton’s that don’t know that Bill (and James Carville) is like the ex-class president that came back to his high school two years later to visit his younger girlfriend telling them how good it was when he did his prom… and then trying to plan theirs.
he should just stop at saying a simple statement like
“well here is what worked for us but it is a different time”
You know…it’s not “the Clinton’s” that are not welcome… because I personally and I think the majority of Obama supporters would have been so excited if she was (because she is) our team mate…
but Bill needs to grasp his time has moved on.
Hillary’s time is now with us.
Hillary is part of this new generation and I think (personally as a die hard obama supporter that originally volunteered for Hill) most are hopeful that people will stop referring to them as the Clintons…
it’s not Bill time…
It’s Hill’s time. and She is part of the NEW leadership.
How amazing Hillary would be if there was no such thing as Bill Clinton’s id.
Posted by: dl | August 26, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
I aggreed the convetion speech so far has no value beside seeding for simpathy and brag about their family value. Who knows if what Michelle said are all true or partially true and most of them are all good speech and make up stories. Domocrat party is doing some wrong in here. I am a Hillary supportor and will glad to come out and vote for John McCain for sure. Also i vowed willl pull out as much as women as I could to come out and vot for John McCain on Nov.
Posted by: Lynn Hennessy | August 26, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am
Brenda
Barack is almost exactly as liberal as Hillary Clinton…outside going to war and healthcare (which Hillary is left of him on)
so that’s an excuse…if you read his policies…he has extreme facilities when it comes to his understanding of the logisitcs…FAR MORE than John mccain as anyone who has sat through a questionand answer with both candidates can attest to…
I will also say
he also is far more adept than any of the other candidates at small group communication, management, and project organization on a massive level.
Next to character (which from seeing him in small groups a number of times I can tell you he seems to have in great amount…no matter how they want to spin it)
that is the quality that needs to be in the presidency.
The presidency is a management position.
He is the only Senator who seems to be good at MANAGEMENT.
and he was the Senators who ran …seem to be the only ones who had a full grasp of the issues.
Posted by: dl | August 26, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am
I think Carville just doesn’t get the message……… He and his team failed the first test.
Posted by: Thinking | August 26, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am
“Change”, “Change”, and “Hope” is all they have! Mr. Obama will tell us as we go along because he will have to ponder on the problems, or start something and then change it along the way several times.
Posted by: Mike | August 26, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am
Interesting commentary on the blog today. Usually it’s sniping and flaming. Kudo’s!
I worked until 8PM last night, so didn’t get to see much of the convention. I got home in time to see Teddy walk on stage, then got to watch Michelle wrap up the night.
I’m not sure at all that Carville, who I generally agree with, is correct on this one. I think people realize what a crappy state the economy’s in. How painful energy and food prices are, etc.
All in all, with indicator’s this good for democrats, Obama is still lagging. It’s my sense that there is a fundamental concern among the electorate about how ready he is for the job. This race is very similar, for those who can remember this far, to 1980. You had a B movie star from California, a relative newcomer to the national scene challenging an incumbent President. Even though the country was ready for change, they weren’t ready for Reagan–until the debate. At which point, people say that Reagan could do the job.
I think the same factors are at play. In the end, I think this race will be tight until voters can make a judgment about whether they are comfortable with Obama or not. If they do make that judgment, then you will see a landslide victory.
Posted by: ChrisNBama | August 26, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am
The presidency is a management position.
_________________________________
If that’s the case, you must think George Bush hung the moon. He’s done a fabulous job according to you.
Bush has been a heck of a manager.
Posted by: AmericanWoman | August 26, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am
After I read these messages I have a conclusion:
Unless Obama delivers a great speech on Thursday,they will lose in November and lose big
Posted by: pmyle | August 26, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
My post was getting long, so I ended it, but wanted to make a related point.
Michelle did what needed to be done last night. The American people agree with the democrats on the lion share of the issues that most concern them. What concerns the American people is the seeming “otherness” of the Obama’s.
Michelle humanized herself and her husband. She inoculated herself, and to a large extent, Obama against many of the character attacks regarding values and patriotism. This was extremely important, even more so than a discussion of bread and butter issues–at least on the first night. Once the American people see the Obama’s as just like them, with the same values, hopes, and dreams, then the chips will begin falling Obama’s way.
Great speech by Michelle. I tend to be quite cynical, and I teared up. The back and forth between the kids and Barack at the end was worth its weight in gold. Unscripted and real: a family that is integrated, loving, and real. An American family.
Posted by: ChrisNBama | August 26, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
“After I read these messages I have a conclusion:
Unless Obama delivers a great speech on Thursday,they will lose in November and lose big”
Some of these blogger aren’t Democrats. Their Republicans posers/trolls.
I actually believe Obama will win by a landslide. We’re going through the Reagan “doubt” phase in 1980. After the first debate, Obama will have the presidency wrapped up.
Posted by: Vanessa | August 26, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am
Carville hit the nail on the head….and how about that speech from Nancy Pelosi? WoooooooHooooooo…
Now that was inspiring!
Posted by: AmericanWoman | August 26, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
anyone thinking they are building to a crescendo also…
Make people feel comfortable with memory and what we stand for
then address our loose strings with more unification through challenging the other side…
then Joe Biden (nuff said)
and finally the “Charge!” moment…with Barack…It’s like getting on a bike…
we jump on but if you just slam down on the pedal…you’re not going anywhere…
get on put your foot on the pedal and slowly push… and in one or two cycles…you’re flying…
justa thought.
Posted by: dl | August 26, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
@dl
You have a point about “a Clinton” as opposed to “Clintons” not being welcome anymore. That was a great analogy with the 2-year-removed jock returning to high school! Unfortunately for Hill, Bill comes with the package. Even so, as an independent voter I would have to say if she was the nominee this whole thing would be OVER, even with Bill’s baggage. Both Hill and Bill can withstand the mudslinging but I’m not so sure about Obama. He can come across as a weak whiner and the Republicans haven’t even started playing hardball yet. You know they’ve got a lot of stuff queued up between Rezko, Wright, Ayers, etc. Let’s see how Obama handles it.
@ChrisNBama
Thanks for the reminder about ’80. More recently, Kerry, Gore and even Dukakis had double-digit leads in the polls heading into their conventions and still lost, so maybe you can look at the current Obama-McCain deadlock as a good thing for Obama. The Republicans won’t be able to develop that come from behind momentum that always seems to carry them over the top at the end. On the other hand, maybe there is something fundamental about Obama that will prevent him from ever peaking above 45%. The Warren church thing didn’t help. Without his teleprompter he stammered quite a bit, which leads to your point about the Reagan debates. We shall see.
Posted by: Woody | August 26, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am
and remember people the RNC Convention opens with two great speakers…
D!ck Cheney and George W. Bush.
I am sure that will be REALLY inspiring and full of substance.
lol
Posted by: dl | August 26, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am
I predict that Hillary Clinton will lay it out tonight with the speech of her life. The country has been driven way off track by a miserably failed presidency and McCain promises more of the same Bush wars, tax cuts etc. Never has the choice been more clear. Catastrophic GOP leadership vs. Dem problem solving for a better future. Again, I have a feeling that we are really going to see something with Hillary tonight.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | August 26, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am
I never understand Obama supporters who counter charges of Obama’s inexperience by pointing out Bush’s inexperience when he took office.
Exactly! Haven’t we learned anything from 8 miserable years of an unqualified candidate who was propped up by his VP?
Posted by: marylou | August 26, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am
Carville hit the nail on the head.
Even the crowd at the DNC was so subdued at times, it is truly amazing that this is all the democrats have to offer.
When will the democrats realize that far left liberals just can’t relate to middle America, no matter how hard they try to fake it.
Posted by: NielPA | August 26, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am
Hillary Clinton would have been the better choice to win in November than Joe Biden, and Obama knew it. Michelle was too jelous. Instead of embracing a winner for the party, he chose a loser.
1. Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer. More Clinton supporters are angry. Believe it.
2. The Clintons would have campaigned for him. Whatever you think of him, Bill Clinton is one of the best campaigners of this era. He and she would have made generated great support with mulitple appearances for Obama. Obama needed it. Still needs support, much more than he thinks or the media reports.
3. Hillary would hve picked up the Scranton Vote.
4. Hillary’s had women supporters. They will NEVER vote for Obama because of his and his wife’s rude remarks.
5. Hillary had more name recognition than Biden any day.
6. Biden is a loose cannon with his mouth. He’s a talker and the odds are higher.
7. Picking Hillary would have shown that Obama was sure of himself. By not picking Hillary, Obama demonstrates that he is too insecure to have her and her husband near him. Biden is no threat. Many never even heard of him.
Posted by: Al from NJ | August 26, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Carville’s full of crap. The Democrats still have three nights to define their message and define John McCain. If Hillary had been the nominee, they could’ve skipped the “introduction” night, but a large portion of the electorate still wants to know more about what kind of man Barack Obama is, what makes him tick, whether he and his family are like the rest of Americans.
Michelle Obama’s speech did a wonderful job to address those issues.
Posted by: Pronk | August 26, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
woody
I don’t think so…not to debate old news but
but yeah… there are a couple things you need to think about with that argument…
you really aren’t looking at what Hillary and Bill strike in the heart of most republicans (and they really do)
say what you will about Obama…
Right now…Hillary’s numbers (as are a number of other candidates) are higher against Mccain right now …because they are NOT the nominee…
Everyone needs to take a really good look at what the RNC is using against Obama (almost all rumor and innuendo…and experience …and on if the battle stayed on the field of experience which it would have with a clinton candidacy…Mccain would still win that battle)
and think about all the rumor and innuendo…right or wrong with the Clintons…that no one is talking about…and as much as you say those things have been cleared… they have been cleared in all reality…less than most of obama’s
don’t get mad at me saying that…yes the RNC investigated…but as we have already seen they will throw anything up…
it would be an entire rehashing of all the bad stuff against the good stuff of the Clinton years…
and then McCain could grasp the bipartisan change handle…solely.
The math is on our side with Obama, Biden Clinton on the same team.
I think Hillary is great to be on this new team. The problem is that dangling attachment that needs to be cut off at this point…that she has a husband but she is her own person away from him…
I hope that starts tonight but somehow or other I have a feeling he is going to steal her thunder by bringing up her campaign and making it about him again…if only by the sheer act of speaking second and in past reference to her.
wish he did what Carter did and did it in a video.
Posted by: dl | August 26, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
How dare Obama think that Clinton supporters would jump on board.
They don’t like him.
He’s radical, flip flopper, sexist and has friends I would be scared to death of.
Posted by: Al from NJ | August 26, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am
The reason being is the libs are responsible for the gas prices which is causeing the slowdown!!
Dems took congress and ever since the economy started tanking!!
Posted by: spock | August 26, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am
Who cares what Carville says. This man’s wife put out the latest slime book on Obama and he can be objective? Last night was about family. The fireworks will start soon enough. Watch C-Span and you won’t have to listen to all those talking heads telling us what we should think.
Posted by: linda n carolina | August 26, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am
“I never understand Obama supporters who counter charges of Obama’s inexperience by pointing out Bush’s inexperience when he took office.”
_______________________________________
The debate can not rest on the notion of experience. At least from Obama’s perspective. It must contrast the vaunted experience of McCain with the question of judgment. Judgment trumps experience: ask Hillary Clinton.
Besides, JFK didn’t exactly have a great deal of experience. And the legislative experience he had was lack luster.
Likewise, Lincoln wasn’t all that experienced on the national stage when he won the election.
I’m not suggesting that Obama is the heir to such men, but the question of experience is really a tenuous one. All Obama has to do to win this thing is to contrast McCain’s experience with judgment, and he will win.
Posted by: ChrisNBama | August 26, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am
“Who cares what Carville says. This man’s wife put out the latest slime book on Obama and he can be objective?”
_____________________________________
Carville is a fighter, and a man that worked prominently in the elections of a two term democrat. His words matter. I just think he’s jumping the gun. Michelle had to seat herself and Barack at the center of American life, so he wasn’t forever the exotic one. In my view, that was accomplished last night.
Beginning tonight, the contrasts between Obama and McCain will be drawn.
Posted by: ChrisNBama | August 26, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Obama has performed a miracle!
He has turned millions of lifelong Democrats into Republicans–at least for this election.
Maybe we’ll come back when they get a qualified candidate that has a backbone.
Posted by: riley | August 26, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am
James Carville is only half-right. The convention not only doesn’t have a message, it doesn’t have a viable candidate. I’ve been around a long time, and this is the first time I’ve ever seen a convention where actual Democratic delegates are telling people they will not vote for the candidate. I’m loving this!!!! My republican relatives keep telling me the Democratic Party is just too stupid to be a part of. I don’t believe that. The Democratic Party is the best party for the people. We’ll come together again, just not this election. PUMA!!!!
Posted by: Another McCain Convert | August 26, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Al from NJ
There is a difference in the job of VP and President…yes the person who is VP must be ready to step in to the presidency and that is the first attribute…
but it also should be the person who playing second banana to the President can make that jjob the most effective.
2 different positions…
2 different check lists for who would be most effective
and being most effective is not the same as who most voters would choose as President.
The VP is a tool to use…and Obama is thinking of how can he and his team be most effective gettign us out of this mess that George W. Bush and John mcCain put us in.
and before you start throwing out “jealousy” bologne with michelle etc…
oy
Look at what has happened in congress in the past 7 months …in a (for the most part)fairly broken partisan system…
Joe Biden has gotten unbelievable amounts of policy passed… he has challenged the administration directly on specifics more than anyone including either candidate that was still running…
and he has shown a knowledge of the cr@p that is going down overseas like no one in Washington (especially mcCain who whenever pressed as he was back in 2002 and 2005 shows a fundamental lack of grasp of the social complexities and ramifications of the world social conflicts)
so please stop with the “michelle is jealous bologne”
he picked Biden becasuse it is obvious to anyone looking the country needs the most EFFECTIVE person in the specific role of the Vice Presidency to a Barack Obama Presidency.
and he has a lot to get threw this broken congress.
Posted by: dl | August 26, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am
“My republican relatives keep telling me the Democratic Party is just too stupid to be a part of. I don’t believe that. The Democratic Party is the best party for the people. We’ll come together again, just not this election. PUMA!!!!”
_____________________________________
I truly do not understand such sentiments. How can you forswear the party that represents Hillary’s values for a party that is antithetical to them?
If McCain is elected, he will be in a position to nominate as many as two justices to the Supreme Court. The most likely replacements will be the liberal wing of the court, meaning that an already right leaning court will be cemented there for a generation.
If you respect Roe V. Wade, then realize that one or two more conservative jurists will most certainly overturn Roe.
Moreover, when it comes to the rights of employees compared to employers, you know which side a conservative court with side with.
So you vote McCain if you wish, you will cut off your nose to spite your face.
Posted by: ChrisNBama | August 26, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am
@dl
You’re speaking in such vaguaries that it makes it difficult to respond. Even before Obama wrapped up the nomination Hillary was beating McCain soundly head to head in nearly every national poll. That was my point. Obama’s past will be vetted on the national level by his opponents and he will have to respond. That’s how it works. Same for McCain (S&L scandal, e.g.). As you said, no two people have been vetted more than the Clintons, so in my opinion Americans are always more comfortable with the devil they know than the devil they don’t know.
@ChrisNBama
If the debate comes down to Obama’s judgement vs. McCain’s experience (in my opinion it’s not that simple) how does Obama win over the undecided voters?
Posted by: Woody | August 26, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
“Who cares what Carville says. This man’s wife put out the latest slime book on Obama and he can be objective”
The guy wants obama to win, but this is how many of you Obama supporters talk about anyone who dares criticize the false Messiah. PUMA was born out of this hate.
Posted by: geevill | August 26, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
Obama has actually gone down in the polls this morning!
Posted by: Paul | August 26, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
JAMES CARVILLE IS A ANGRY/BITTER LOUDMOUTH! THE FEMALE HILLARY SUPPORTERS ARE ANGRY/BILLER WOMAN! GET OVER IT, HILLARY LOST THE RACE TO BARRACK, YOU ARE ACTING LIKE A BUNCH OF CRAZED WOMAN WHO HAS JUST LOST THEIR MAN TO THE ANOTHER WOMAN! HILLARY HAS ASKED YOU TO SUPPORT SEN. OBAMA, SHE IS A TRUE DEMOCRATE NOT A WHINEY FEMALE. HILLARY WILL GO ON TO DO GREAT THINGS IN THE SENATE, SHE IS A LEADER. OBAMA WILL BE A GREAT PRESIDENT, HE WILL BRING RESPECT BACK TO THE USA, HE WILL GAIN HIS EXPERIENCE JUST LIKE ANY OTHER NEW PRESIDENT WHO TAKES OFFICE. BARRACK WILL SURROUND HIMSELF WITH VERY A INTELLIGENT, CAPABLE CABINET. KNOCK OFF THE RIDICULOUS BEHAVIOR & BUCK UP, BE A GOOD DEMOCRAT, QUIT TALKING ABOUT SUPPORTING JOHN MCCAIN. GOOD LORD DO YOU REALLY WANT 4 MORE YEARS OF MCBUSH?
NE MOM
Posted by: NE MOM | August 26, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
woody
it’s not the debate that will come down to judgement vs. experience.
and yes Clinton at the height of Obama’s bologne being thrown at him… started to lead in the polls now America had settled on those… but I know everyone is sensitive to this but hillary’s list of crappy innuendo and accusations happens to be a lot longer (whether you think it has been vetted or now…the list is unfortunately ver long for both she and Bill)
I say unfortunately. I want Hillary still around and possibly to run after obama…
but her numbers are a reflection of that she right now does not have a spotlight on her…in fact the RNC is fluffing her up to fight against obama (that’s not spin…we just need to look at the reality of why the numbers are the way they are)
a real flesh and blood candidate in a change election or the party of change…is almost never going to score as high as the generic party… and candidates who are not the focus are going to feel a little more generic because they are not in focus…
I don’t want to debate this on length anymore…but I was saying that with Obama other things are introduced into the election… it is not an election just on experience…right now because he is in the focus they are highlighting that but because he brings other things in …like judgement, future vs. past, non-partisanship, hope vs. anger, independence from party, …
he is perhaps the one candidate put up because of who he is and actual lack of “experience” yes…gives him less record of partisanship and the ability to not be stuck in that mold…
almost every other candidate would have cleared Mccain to go after the reach across the aisle without hindrance…and he beats everyone outside of maybe Buiden on experience.
it is not the debate we are just talking about but the overall campaign.
If the dems lose everyone gets blamed by half the party.
Posted by: dl | August 26, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
You’ve got a Carville admitting the o-bama wagon lost 25% of Convention, that’s already 25% votes they’ve lost.
Posted by: Olbermn3 | August 26, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
Democrats have done the Republican Party favors that we could only pray to have happen. Republicans wanted Hillary to not be on the ticket. HRC was going to clean our clocks in the election this year. Obama did a sucker punch (caucus system) and the Democratic Party is stuck with Obama. Republicans kept saying HRC is the harder person to beat. (It was true, we really were just stating the obvious.) Democrats bit the ploy and knew we really feared Obama – they took the hook, line and sinker!!! Thanks for giving us the only way to win the White House. You put Obama on the ticket as a feel good story and that is now one you are stuck with.
Posted by: hcallaway | August 26, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
He’s right. It was unwatchable.
Posted by: cordelia525 | August 26, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
My two cents worth…
1: “one freaking day” – When you spend millions on a campaign and convention every moment matters. One day lost cannot be reclaimed. One bad day at a convention for a potential president means millions are turned off. One day lost is a lost opportunity to send a message.
2: Michelle Obama’s remarks – Anyone who gives even a thought that her speech means anything has spent too much time watching soap opera’s and insufficient time to watching anything of substance. What do you expect the wife of a candidate to say? He is an idiot, his kids hate him? Come on and stop being so naive and foolish. Candidates wives say nice things, children say nice things. When an enemy says nice things about your character then that will mean something to people of common sense. Michelle is an idiot and a speech in front of millions does not remove previous speeches made on the campaign trail.
Economy: People blame the Bush administration for the economy so let me ask a few questions? Who refuses drilling for oil? Who refuses building of nuclear plants? Who created an environment of low interest rates? Who allowed home loans without verification of income? Who allowed homes without a down payment? Clinton started the mess and Bush continued the stupid economic policies. When people blame one and fail to blame another purely on political party lines then not only are you intellectually dishonest but you lack morality.
When the American people wake up they will realize the two party political system in this country actually seeks to destroy the nation. We need a true Constitutional party, a viable third option. Whilst we argue amongst ourselves the supporters of a one world government who control both parties are moving along achieving their goals. Stop fighting against each other and look to the Constitution to be our guide. We have far more in common that we think. That of course excludes the socialists who prefer the govt to take care of us i.e. social security, welfare and national health care which are all UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Posted by: Mitch van Biljon | August 26, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Carville is an idiot. He still has not gotten over the fact that the Clintons, are not going to be in the whitehouse. She LOST fair and square, get over it!!
Posted by: David Vadoniski | August 26, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am
James is right, not only that, what ever happened to the impeachment of Bush? Are voters so religiously wrapped up into, “D” and “R”‘s only, that they forget that there’s a country to run and congress is suppose to have oversight? Where is the outrage for non-oversight and the do-nothing congress?
Posted by: Ben Padilla | August 26, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Organization is a great thing. The Democratic Party should try it sometime.
Posted by: Don | August 26, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
For all those obama supporters out there, to run on the premise of judgment (and that it trumps experience) is the stupidest platform I’ve ever seen, especially in regard to this dirty chicago hack machine politician. And water runs uphill, the sky is green, rosanne barr is not obese, and madonna has a beautiful smile. See? That all sounds ridiculous too. How can you say that someone who was either knowingly (or unknowingly = incompetent or asleep) absorbing anti-American and anti-white rhetoric for 20 years, and exposing his 2 daughters and “June Cleaver” wife to that for some of that time, shows good judgment? How can you say that of a person who assured everyone that no way in hell would the surge in Iraq work? How about his self-admitted “boneheadedness” when it came to dealing with a convicted felon to obtain through shady deals his Hyde Park mansion? (BTW, the McCains, living the REAL American Dream, sacrificing much for the country and obtaining thier wealth through HARD WORK, at least obtained their properties legally). How could you say all that and still remark with a straight face that obama doesn’t have to run on experience because he’s running on good judgment??!! Well, not to worry because all that will hopefully be highlighted in all its proposterousness in the next several weeks.
Posted by: Hawk | August 26, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
I don’t consider myself republican or democrat but I guess you could say I’m a conservative. Barack Obama will lose in November. Say what you will about Michelles “wonderful” speech and the darling children, reality is people don’t agree with Obama. They may hate Bush but ultimately Obama has too many unknowns or possible issues that scare people off. He is WAY too liberal, all the democrzts voted in favor of the bill protecting babies which manage to survive an abortion and Obama argued against it not once but twice as being a burden on abortion doctors. Whenever a difficult vote got to him he would vote “present” to avoid showing his true opinion. He has flip flopped on all the major issues and the people he has surrounded himself with over the years provide more fodder for the republican cannon shots that we know are coming.
Posted by: Willy | August 26, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Nearly everyone posting here is commenting on ‘personalities’ and there’s nothing wrong with that. However, does it cut to the heart of the bigger differences between McCain and Obama?
I’m an ‘open-minded’ Republican and I have listened as best as I can to both candidates goals and views. And firstly, comparing either to President Bush is unfair as the President is entitled to his strengths and weaknesses. Our current economy’s situation isn’t all on Bush; the Democrats BIG promise hasn’t happened and they’re two+ years doing NOTHING.
Back to my point – the glaring facts are this:
1. Barak Obama is still trying to create an American view. Sitting in an anti-American Church for 20 years is a very long time to ‘tune-out’ unsavory remarks. Michelle, God love her, is trying to gloss over her real feelings (and I really like her). McCain will never be in the presence of an anti-American – NEVER. And he would not have sat in such a church for 20 years to figure that out.
2. Obama is maybe even more liberal than Hillary, if that’s possible. When a Sean Penn says that he’s liberal but Obama has voted inhumanely, that echoes what many others are looking at. He cannot hide public fact that he directly voted against helping surviving infants of botched abortions.
3. Both candidates have made some erroneous choices in their lives. However, Obama has a long line of associations with some terroist-linked individuals. When Obama was first approached about the first few know links, he told several different stories to explain the ‘why’, which ultimately leaves one to question his ability to tell the truth. I don’t think Hillary has baggage large enough to trump some of Obama’s murky life. Any known bad choices that McCain has made brought before a committe. I don’t think we can find any terrorist links in his past.
4. Obama says that he will make sure EVERYONE in America will have health care. That’s is truly wonderful. However, how many Americans are willing to fork over what it will cost to subsidze the 12+million illegals as well because they are part of his package that are living here in America. He also wants to subsidize a large number of third-world countries to give them ‘what Americans enjoy’. If you think it’s costly now, what do you imagine it will cost to live under Obama’s plan?
5. Obama picked a VP that clearly endorsed John McCain four years ago as being the best candidate to run the country! Priceless! Joe Biden was clearly chosen to be the ‘pit bull’ and if Obama should accidentally win, it will be interesting to see how those two will mesh. Joe clearly stated, in front of America while running for the office himself, that he didn’t think Obama was ready to be president. He said that Obama ‘could’ be ready but wasn’t. Biden’s personality and drive won’t necessarily like Obama’s desire to schmooze with the world. McCain and Biden are good friends and understand each other so very well. And both share the same drive. Obama really should have given Hillary the opportunity.
6. McCain had to go before a Senate committee to prove his citizenship and I think Obama would be wise to do the same, especially in light of his mother’s residental choices. There appears to be way more information about his life in Indonesia and that information doesn’t help define his American committment.
This is just a few issues that separate the two candidates. There are many more but this is already longer than it should be. Likeability can’t be the sole determining factor as all the candidates have a good likeability. Look at the real issues and determine if you can live with the goals and directions that each candidate has for you and me.
4.
Posted by: jr | August 26, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
I never ever in my life thought that I would agree with Carville, but he is right their was no message. I would go a step further though and say that their was no message because they have no message. The only thing I have heard out of babbling Barry is that we need change. He never once stated what that change is or how he would accomplish it. Based on his associations that change would be a move toward Communism. An awful lot can be said about a person based on who your friends and supporters are. Why would anyone vote for someone with the supporters that Obama has?? He is an empty suit and the first night of the convention proved it, absolutely no substance. The problem for him is that if he puts out the message he believes in, Marxism, he is dead meat, and if he avoids any message he is wounded meat so he took the lesser of evils.
Posted by: 7papa7 | August 26, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
jr: excellent post.
Posted by: Hawk | August 26, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
“The only thing I have heard out of babbling Barry is that we need change. He never once stated what that change is or how he would accomplish it.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | August 26, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
ChrisNBama, problem with your argument is Obama’s judgment isn’t so great either. That’s revealed more with each passing day.
America has grown tired of Obama with his empty rhetoric of change. They don’t trust his judgment and they don’t trust his past associations.
Game over.
Posted by: marylou | August 26, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
I watched the first day coverage of the Democratic Convention. And I have extensively watched all developments/articles from multiple news media organization in the US throughout this election. I was particularly interested in researching the Obama/Clinton merging to join forces to elect a Democratic President.
DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION – I am particularly discouraged by James Carville, a Hilary Clinton Campaign adviser continuing to discredit the Barack Obama Campaign and the 2008 National Democratic Convention. I find it a particularly interesting question why he is linked to Fox News Network that is a well known Republican ally??? Why and what political purpose is he attempting to develop???
I am concerned:
(1)Hilary Clinton did not release her delegates. She appeared to suggestively encourage her support voters to continue their fight for her even though she lost Primaries. Because of delegates she won she should be entitled to a vote. I sincerely welcome this vote. This must be a Democratic process.
(2)Hilary Clinton Campaign Advisers are the outspoken supporters of enabling this continued division of Obama/Clinton supporters. Democratic Convention her advisers are continuing criticism towards the Obama Campaign, nuturing a division in Democratic Party, and criticism of the actual 2008 Democratic Convention format and activities.
(3)Hilary Clinton is playing good guy saying she is doing all she can. But her campaign advisers continue to publicly create /continue/encourage division. Wofson, Carville, Begalia, McAuliffe. They are keeping news on this subject. News yesterday concentrated on Clinton all day???
(4)President Bill Clinton per news and Hilary Clinton Campaign Advisers claim he is not happy. As a Democrat he has not/will not endorse Barack Obama. Bill Clinton per reports is not happy he can not give a speech on topic he prefers. But this is not his convention sadly. This is Barack Obama convention. Withholding his endorsement for this long definitely is saying he does not support. He said McCains energy bill is better than Barack Obama’s. He says this to residents of Nevada which is a state Democrats are trying to get this election. I ask why he as a past Democratic President is supporting Republicans??
(5)President Clinton is unhappy he was accused of using the race card. I am white and unfortunately I did see some racial issues. Facts do point Clinton was using suggestive reference. News caught. This is all part of political campaigning. Folks racial issues do exist in this campaign. US has come a long way, but this is still a problem.
(6)Hilary Clinton feels she suffered “gender bias” Hilary Clinton herself complained of this.
(7)News Reports out were Clintons wanted to be consulted who Vice President selection would be. Rumors spread and leaked out they were not treated well. Felt Hilary was not vetted for Vice President even though they requested to not be vetted. Clintons factually and actually set their own rules regarding any vetting. They said they did not want to be. They definitely did not want to release names of donors for Presidential Library. So many rules and confrontational roadblock obstacles they personally set. How was this stance viewed by the Barack Obama Vice Presidential vetting committee?? Obama was actually the campaign setting the rules for vetting as he won and this was his right, not the Clintons. Obama Campaign ran into huge roadblocks with the Clintons. Did Hilary really want to be Vice President??
(8)CAMPAIGN DEBT-Clinton Campaign is having difficulty paying off her campaign debt. Hilary Clinton did a wonderful job raising campaign donations. She raised close to what Barack Obama did. I have difficulty understanding where sound financial business management advisers were/existed in making sure her campaign stayed in the black. I will excuse this, and then I look at the amazing and wonderful 18,000,000 votes she got. Yes, she did break the glass ceiling for all of us women. She was a wonderful ambassador for advancing women issues for us. What I can’t understand is why her 18,000,000 voters can’t give just $5 each. Her debt would be wiped out. $18,000,000 x $5 = $90,000,000. Hilary Clinton was raising 20-30+ million each month while campaigning. This would be a great tribute to her. Why aren’t these voters honoring her with a small donation??? It would be so easy!!
(9)News articles state Hilary Clinton Campaign feels Barack Obama should pay off her debt. I don’t understand these accusations. Please refer to above numbered article. I can also see so many innovative and constructive ways these debts can be paid off without criticizing the Obama campaign. His supporters did give $600,000 as a good will gesture even during these difficult times. Fact is people personally are responsible for debts they accumulate. This is sad but so very true for Hilary.
(10)Hilary Clinton Campaign Adviser – James Carville, Wolfson, McAuliffee, etc – Hilary Clinton continues to let them criticize Barack Obama and Democratic Party. Hilary Clinton has not put a stop to this. She continues to silently let her campaign advisers discredit and complain.
(11)Hilary Clinton says she supports Barack Obama. She wants him elected. Her campaign says just the opposite.
BARACK OBAMA AND BARACK OBAMA CAMPAIGN
(1)I have researched and found he has gone to great lengths to welcome and praise Hilary Clinton. I saw one speech here his supporters were trying to “boo” her. He immediately put it down and said this would not be tolerated by his campaign. I seldom see any problems publicly except in internet blogs.
(2)As far as Hilary Clinton – Obama spoke very highly of her accomplishments. I find he would not tolerate any criticism of Hilary Clinton. This was swiftly and quickly dealt with.
(3)Obama Campaign did put site link for his supporters to give to Hilary Clinton to help with her campaign debt. His supporters gave approximately $600,000. This seems to be a nice amount considering the alarming financial problems Americans presently face. Michelle and Barack gave personally to Hilary Clinton to help. His campaign is limited by certain campaign laws. Also it is difficult for his campaign financially as he is currently running for President. Democrats do not have as many super rich support special political nonprofit groups assisting campaign financially. Republicans do. Karl Rove is now a high paid consultant for Republican Freedom Watch. McCain started using “Rove Playbook Attacks” rampantly.
(4)Obama Campaign has not criticized Hilary Cliton Campaign. They have been quite careful and respectful. Obama Campaign has been blasted with criticism for not paying off Hilary Clinton Campaign debt she personally accumulated even more by continuing to campaign heavily even when she knew she could not win the Primary Race. This is not even his debt. He has run a financially sound campaign and actually backed off heavy campaigning at the end to save money. Yes, it may have appeared he gave up, but fact is campaign must be financially sound. Obama has shown tremendous oversight at employing good judgment here. Michelle and Barck Obama do not make alot of money. Yes, he had large royalty revenues from his books these past few years. This will end though, as market does become saturated at a certain point. Obama’s could not personally assume huge financial debts. Obama selected excellent campaign financial management advisers and oversight was quite good.
(5)Obama Campaign welcomed all Hilary Clinton supporters. Campaign still has Hilary Clinton Supporters link on their website.
(6)Any Obama complaints about Clinton and media news attacks lodged against him during primaries?? OBAMA IS NOT CRITICISING NOR IS HE COMPLAINING! He has suffered harm himself too from Clinton Campaign. But is still not complaining. I am white and see race is an issue with some voters. This appears more evident among the older voters. they are from a different generation. Culturally they grew up hearing and learning racial prejudice. I find Obma is not continuing to dwell on these issues. Nor does he try to bring race into contest. And I find from my records Obama did get attacked viciously too.
(7)Obama is getting criticized heavily by Clinton Campaign advisers. I find there is really no real sound reason for this, except for Hilary Clinton Political personal gains. Maybe these advisers are hurt? But the Primary Race is over. The losers although quite disappointed need to set an excellent example of unapproachable good character.
All of you judge as you like. I have just researched and am listing what I have seen and reporting as such. I am attempting to be as objective as I can. I am tentatively leaning – WE VOTERS ARE STILL GETTING USED POLITICALLY BY CLINTONS. Facts seem to support Hilary Clinton Campaign is attempting to create many problems and encouraging division of the Democratic Party. I see too much of Clinton’s being portrayed as good guys and Hilary Clinton Campaign advisers being the bad guys who are fostering a division in Democratic Party. I see Hilary Clinton could put a stop to this pursuit quite easily. She has not taken care of this immediately. The wonderful Hilary Clinton supporters are getting two messages, and they can understand which message to believe. As a professional in medicine I am quite familiar with particular psychological campaign methods used upon the us as voters. Folks I have been college educated here.
If her advisers change then I could change my mind. Since they I haven’t, I feel she is actually endorsing her advisers actions despite what she is saying. I find it very sad.
I truly hope I will see a change. I would love to change my mind.
Posted by: Sharonklim | August 26, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
The reason this Convention appears subdued and flat is because the Party is divided.
If the Democratic Party was unified, rest assured they would be rallying around their agreed upon candidate, or even the “Dream Team,” and the excitement would have been non-stop from day one, and everyone would be focused on one, single enemy…….the Republicans and their candidate.
But as the Party did not agree upon a candidate, nor did the “presumptive” candidate permit the formation of the “Dream Ticket,” I would imagine the rest of this Convention will be just as listless as last night was.
But, of course, they will all be placing the responsbility for rescuing the Convention upon Hillary Clinton’s shoulders tonight………………..
Posted by: SandyB | August 26, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
What ever sharonklim, but James Carville is RIGHT!
Posted by: dugh | August 26, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
James Carvell – a democrat’s best shill. Too bad, he could have become the universe’s wealthiest used car salesman.
Posted by: steve | August 26, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Everyone keeps talking about how bad everything is at home. But you seem to forget that 4 years ago, Pelosi, Reid and all the Dems said elect us and we will change everything. Yes, it has. Since they are the majority the last few years have gone down hill.
Posted by: JAR | August 26, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
The reason the convention is empty and flat is because the party is lead by a bunch of narcissists that only regurgitate what they think people want to hear. They have no real plans to help this country, they will do what ever will get them elected and to hell with the consequences. The only thing that will save this country is if the government gets out of the way of all fuel industries and let them get us the energy we need to get back on track and out of foreign lands where they HATE us. Both parties spend our money worse than we as individuals do and that is BAD! GIVE US BACK OUR MONEY! GIVE US BACK OUR COUNTRY! STOP TAXING US TO DEATH!
Posted by: Elda | August 26, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
The only plan, the only program the Dems have had since 2000 is to whine like infants…complain, criticize..and offer up nothing new in the way of anything except raise, taxes, bankrupt the country with mandatory health insurance…which will limit health care avaiablity…continue blocking any new energy production (while pretending to support it…sound familiar…”I support the troops while undermining the war?)….Same ole same ole….
Yet they don’t in truth offer up anything new….never have, unless one sees undisguised socialism as some sort of solution.
I guess if one is looking for freebees..(at someone elses expense) and some sort of appeasment for the envy, and class warfare they stir up perhaps there is a message there somewhere.
Posted by: Jim | August 26, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
“What half way intelligent person listens to James Carville?”
Well, lets think waaay back to the 1990′s when James Carville was the lead strategist responsible for the Clintons rise to fame. All the Demos listened then, including The Messiah of the 1992 election. Obviously the Democratic sheep listened. So I guess that answers your question.
Posted by: rockman | August 26, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
The characteristically angry, “Hate America”, Michelle Obama experienced a Hollywood makeover that will beguile the “willing dupes” in the electorate. But, her previous well-publicized radical associations; and, her multiple attempts to trash our Nation, will betray her scripted persona. It was a foregone conclusion that the Obama handlers would have Michelle with a smile-cast to cover-up her normally angry countenance, and chain-locked to the teleprompter with their carefully scripted commentary so as to obscure the prospective 1st lady’s deeply angry disposition towards America. What a tragic example for our children; what a disastrous blow to societal cohesion at home; what a disconcerting message to our friends and allies; and, what a comforting message to our fanatical opponents abroad; to see a woman who has expressed her beliefs that: “our souls are broken in this nation”; “blacks must join in solidarity to combat a white oppressor”; “we’re a country that is just downright mean.”; “We’re a nation of cynics, sloths, and complacents.”; “America is guided by fear, and getting worse all the time.”; and, laments that she will face, “further integration and/or assimilation into a white culture and social structure”; to have a potential opportunity to secure the White House itself as the platform for her hate-filled dictum. And, of note to practicing Christians in our society, is Michelle’s pledge that: “Barack will be tireless in keeping legal the practice of partial birth abortions”. All of this from a woman who has benefited enormously from affirmative actions which she conveniently neglected to mention in the convention speech! Along with her husband’s long-term subversive associations, his immersion in seditious anti-American diatribe; and, his recent proclamation: “I don’t want that (referring to America in its current form) for my little girls.”, has indeed revealed the Obamas as the real-life Manchurian Couple. Greg Neubeck
Posted by: Greg Neubeck | August 26, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Carville knows what he’s talking about.
And he has the shoes to prove it!
Nuf said.
Posted by: Stray Yellar Dawg | August 26, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
Carville is full of himself and sour grapes. At least he managed to get in 2-3 minutes of fame during the convention.
Posted by: kat | August 26, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
The Dems look like a bunch of young kids who are trying to figure out a way to start a broken down old rusty vehicle sitting in a field somewhere. They have no clue how to fix the thing, but they’ll make the most of the situation while they’re there. They have absolutely no solutions to any problems, have no moral compass anymore as a party, have nothing but racial division, class envy etc left. They’ve always been the masters at dividing people and keeping people divided and angry, so it’s hilarious to see them all divided and angry at themselves now, trying to figure out how to right the sinking ship.
Posted by: B.A. Madison | August 26, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
plenty of message coming from the Dems:
we have no clue …
but change people change
Posted by: hartley | August 26, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
If Hillary praises Obaman tonight, I will never has a skeck of respect for her again. They both have very different views on everything, now she has sided with evil, that wan’ts to take our country down. Obams is a disaster getting ready to happen. We have to put a stop to it.The changes Obama has in mind are nothing like the the people are expecting.We will be doomed.
If Hillary would get up and tell the truth,that would blow Obama out of the water, now I look at her as being a liar, like Obama. She will not stand a chance in 1012, American’s have had all they can take with being lied to.
Posted by: Missy | August 26, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Carville’s wife has probably been promised a job in a McCain administration — He’s doing his part to keep the Democrats dysfunctional, and raise her job prospects.
Posted by: Iris | August 26, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
The DNC needs to point out specifics and their message with DETAILS!!!. If all they will run on is we are not Bush they will loose again like Kerry did. They need to win the moderate voters and so far they loosing them. One last point, how can you run a Change platform (which, again no details just words) when you are surrounding your self with the old guard.
Posted by: Mike | August 26, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
blah blah blah..Iraq…blah blah blah…Martin Luther King…blah blah blah…Put a man on the moon…blah blah blah i’m black but I achieved anyway. These people have 5 million in the bank. They aren’t middle class! And people are defending the poor and protecting this country…people like firefighters? no,people like policemen? no,people like nurses and doctors?no, People like Hillary Clinton! Policitical hyperbole and claptrap all of it, This type of feel good look at my family and my cute wife crap is why i’m staying home on election night.
Posted by: Pat | August 26, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
Just remember Michelle Obama won’t be taking her kids to any government run heathcare clinic. Its time for a real grassroots candidate !
Posted by: Pat | August 26, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Remember what happens when your allegiance and desire is more for the strength and power of your Political Party than for your Country, you end up with Nazi Germany. If the Democrats continue with this format and attitude, then we are all doomed if they gain back power of both houses and the Presidency.
Posted by: Ann | August 26, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
We are a capitalist society and that is what has made the United States the greatest country the earth has ever seen. Unfortunately most people don’t see what Democrats are really trying to do. They are socialists and or Marxists. They are for big government. They prey on the poor and or the ignorant. They need you to need them; they want you to rely on the government. They tax the hell out of the tax payers and they give the poor a little something for nothing, the rest they keep for themselves. Mind you they don’t give the poor enough to change their lives; they give them just enough to make it. Just enough so that the beneficiaries of this redistribution stay right where they’re at, right where the Democrats want them, where the Democrats need them to be to garner another vote. Democrats aren’t really trying to help people, let alone poor people. They just exploit them for their own greed and gluttony for power.
People would feel a whole lot better about themselves if they did for themselves. We should be paying no more than 10 or 15% of our income to our government, nothing more. I don’t need government to run my life nor do I want them to and you shouldn’t either. And I sure in hell don’t want them running our health care system. (Privatization is what has made this country so great) People need to stop acting like victims and get off their lazy asses! They would feel better about themselves through their accomplishments.
I can’t believe I give half my check to the government! I can’t believe that I have to give them MY money so that they can give it to whom they feel deserves it! I can’t believe that I have to give MY money to people who have made careless and or foolish decisions throughout their lives! I can’t believe that I have to give MY money to people that are too lazy to get off their ass and work! I can’t believe that I have to give MY money to Illegals!!!! And I can’t believe I’m called a racist for opposing this!!!I can’t believe we as Americans put up with this!!!! Where has accountability gone to in this country?!?! Why are we rewarding laziness, crime and immorality?!?! Have we gone mad?????? Where is the logic behind this?????
Has anyone else noticed that we are getting more and more liberal as time goes by? Do you really think it is a coincidence that as this happens, morality in this country keeps dropping to lower standards?
Think about this…Our country was founded on moral, godly values. What party’s core values most closely resemble our fore fathers beliefs?
I can’t believe people would vote for someone because they are too lazy to provide for themselves or because it suits there life style regardless of morality.
It is a shame that Americans are so selfish that we see no wrong doing and are actually eager to take 50% from good, legal productive citizens. Democrats in turn redistibute it to the people that contribute nothing to society. Go figure.
Posted by: Don Schiffgens | August 26, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
I am a Rep this year and proud of it, my candidate did not sit in a racist pew for 20 years, did not have political friends that are being hailed as criminals, has a wife that cares deeply not only for America but the worlds poorest and most war torn people in the world, has sat in congress for 25 years and has experience on how to run our country versus a man that has spent so little time in serving the country and more time running for offices to boost his own agendas, my candidate believes in country first and all its people, Obama selects who he is for and tells it that way. In this election the American people should see a hugh difference in the way politics are played and since we are an educated people, know that to vote with intelligence is to vote for McCain. He is experience, integrity, honesty and loyality for America.
Posted by: Marty in Iowa | August 26, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
I don’t belong to any party
All politicains have skeletons
All of them take bribes.
The Clintons are one of the most power ambitious people I have ever seen in American politics- Don’t like them BUT
Hillary is smart and has more ##### than her hubby-and although she is all about power- she doesn’t have Hamas, Hezbullha, and who knows what other giving doanations to her.
Obama is a trojan horse- dangerous and the public has picked up on it- he is losing support by the hour.
McCain- is well the same policies as Bush -but personality with so much more under his belt. He stayed behind in as a POW with the rest of his troop even though he was freed! This says millions about a man- and this election I am voting for him.
Posted by: Tired of the nonsense | August 26, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Mrs. Obama’s speech, where she said we could create the kind of world we want..paraphrasing…did me in!
I don’t want more Presidents that give more thought, more time, and more of our jobs and tax dollars to foreign countries.
Give me a President that puts this Country first, puts our economy first, ditches the WTO, and keeps our tax dollars here, with one exception if a foreign country is hit with a earth quake, flood, etc.
With issues like illegal immigration, more & more visa workers, giving our jobs away, and the Dems blocking votes of drilling for our own oil…….I may just write in a vote this year, for the first time in my life.
Posted by: Barbara | August 26, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
I believe Carville or aka Snake Head, has a valid point, other than the teary speech given by the ultra lib, aka the man who avoided a major jail sentence, the Blowviator Ted kennedy, M. obama sounded like a stepford trainee and Queen Pelosi was still in la la land.
Posted by: ONTIME | August 26, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
My buddy just heard about Ayers for the first time yesterday (as per recent Obama ad) AND IS DISCUSTED!! I know he was on the fence before, But definitely NOBAMA NOW. The Obama campaign was stupid to bring up Ayers again – I had not forgotten , but I appreciate the reminder!!
Posted by: Manitu | August 26, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
As Howard Dean would say, YEEEEEEAAAAAAAAH!
Posted by: Ken | August 26, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
Looks like the far left has managed to sieze control of the party. Thats not good for future elections.
Most American’s do not agree with the plank advocated by the far left. Be it gay marriage, lack of a national defense, illegal alien amnesty, more social programs, refusal to drill for our own oil, etc…
Thats how Republicans will stay in power using the far left’s positions against them with the mainstream voter.
Posted by: Tony | August 27, 2008, 5:36 am 5:36 am
Serpent Boy, James must have gotten that message from Mary. lmao
Give me my Gumbo!
Obama bin Biden ’08 !
Posted by: claspur | August 27, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am