By Jennifer Parker

Aug 11, 2008 12:23pm

Did Edwards’ Lies Hurt Biden and Richardson?

Some former Clinton aides are suggesting that by remaining in the race despite having had a recent affair, former Sen. John Edwards, D-NC, hurt the candidacy of Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY.

I’m not so sure.

New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson came in 4th in Iowa, maybe Edwards’ voters would have gone to him.

Or perhaps they would have flocked to two other white men in the race, Sens. Joe Biden, D-Del, or Chris Dodd, D-Conn.

Clinton folks say their polls showed Clinton would have gotten about 2/3rds of Edwards’ Iowa voters.

But as I recall, Clinton’s Iowa polling was pretty God-awful.

The bottom line is gaming such a thing out is futile.

But, for those Clinton supporters who are increasingly like the Imperial Japanese Army soldiers found in the Philippines, Thailand and elsewhere decades after World War II ended, I guess it fits in with the general mindset.

- jpt

User Comments

You also never know how the tide of votes would of went if Florida and Michigan votes were counted

Posted by: tomahawk | August 11, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Let’s have somebody do some research into what the Press was saying about Edwards and rumors of his infidelity during the primaries.
Was there a slanting of the news to hide or shove this aside to help Edwards and Obama? And even trying to blame the Clinton campaign for bringing this Edward’s issue up?
Without Edwards in the race (or any candidate) it would have been a different race.
Did the press sideline this Edward’s story in order to make an effect the primaries?

Posted by: Sally J. | August 11, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Yeah. It would have been great for Hillary that marital infidelities become a storyline before Iowa. Terrific for her message-wise. And it would have been super-helpful for the media to start covering those kinds of stories. I am sure the Clintons want sex stories to be at the forefront of the political debate. Totally reminding people of what they loved about them.

Posted by: Benjamin | August 11, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

The blame goes to anyone but Clinton for these Hillary supporters. It was Obama, it was the media, it was Edwards, it was sexism, it was Mark Penn. Face it, if she had the skills to be President she would have won the nomination. It’s time to put the blame where it belongs.

Posted by: Jeremy | August 11, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

The real story is that the media knew most of Edwards votes would go to Hillary and they intentionally either supressed the story or didn’t cover it knowing they were de facto helping Obama.

Posted by: Cory | August 11, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

Sally
it is sad and revolting when people are using Elizabeth Edwards’ tragedy to further their own candidate.
John Edwards if he had not run would have had almost no effect on Clinton’s numbers…
…it is revisionist history to say they would. If anything Biden and Dodd being stronger would have taken away more from Clinton.
It is sad when Howard Wolfson is still so slimey he will use something like this to further a client who probably lost because of him (Wolfson) using tactics like this.
It is so self-serving at another persons tragedy to use this as has been done in the past 24 hours. It speaks to and reminds people of the worst side of this campaign and makes people like Clinton even less.
which is sad.
wolfson should shut his mouth.

Posted by: dl | August 11, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

I would point out that Edwards cut into two KEY Joe Biden areas of support – unions (boots on the ground) and trial lawyers (money in the bank).

Posted by: tate | August 11, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

C’mon, Jake. We all know NOTHING would have made a dramatic difference for Biden or Richardson. Biden is a good man but was overshadowed by Obama and Clinton (and Edwards too but that’s beside the point). Richardson performed abyssmally during the debates. No way either of them would have gotten the nomination.

Posted by: marylou | August 11, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Being from Iowa I can say that Edwards lie did NOT hurt Clinton one bit. His supporters backed Obama as their 2nd choice. This was evident at the District Convention where delegates were free to align with Clinton or Obama. 3/4 of Edwards delegates chose Obama. This is just another case of Clinton supporters crying wolf. If this had come out before Iowa Obama would have won by a larger margin.

Posted by: Hippemom | August 11, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

The Clintons had to answer on 60 minutes to the Enquirer-led story about Gennifer Flowers. I’m not sure Wolfson’s conjecture holds up, but I can absolutely understand the Clintons feeling that Edwards was protected in a way they were not. And that did have some effect on the primaries.
It’s like a bad call from the ref against their team. It’s natural to ask “what if?”.
I can’t blame the Hillary camp for being upset over the protection Edwards got, and feeling that it might have changed the game.

Posted by: MayBee | August 11, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

It’s more likely that Bill Clinton’s lies about his affair with an intern prevented Al Gore from becoming President.
Is there anything uglier or more pathetic than a losing campaign’s desperate attempts to blame their loss on something other than themselves?

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | August 11, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

I can only go by fact and since my family were edwards supporters and switched to Obama when Edwards dropped out plus the fact that the election was always Hillary’s to win or lose since she had such a huge advantage, someone is barking up the wrong tree to think Edwards’ affair would have helped Hillary one bit. In fact, it may have hurt her more since she didn’t do anything while Bill was running around having affairs left and right.

Posted by: CMSgt Preston | August 11, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

“by remaining in the race despite having had a recent affair, former Sen. John Edwards, D-NC, hurt the candidacy of Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 11, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

The media totally protected john edwards. Why they did this is beyond me.
Quite frankly it points to the liberal bias in the media. But this same liberal bias does not protect the Clintons… remember Bill and how the press loved to shame him about extramarital affairs?

Posted by: mccain 08 | August 11, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

Hillary needs to put her name in at the convention. Edwards is out of the way and a majority of his delagates will go for Hillary.
Oh by the way Edwards is slime.

Posted by: Vote Hillary | August 11, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

If the mainstream media had followed up on the story, would Edwards have been able to endorse Obama at the critical point in the primaries thus influencing both the superdelegates and the late State voters?
Is the mainstream media deflecting criticism to the Clintons to avoid questions about why they were beaten to the story by a tabloid?
It seems the people who are getting hurt are the Edwards’ family. He really screwed up, but there is a lot of fancy footwork going on in the media. CNN covered it for 12 solid hours while Georgia was being bombed into submission.

Posted by: len | August 11, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Idea for a best-seller book on the 2008 Presidential Election:
If Obama wins:
“How the Media Rigged the 2008 Presidential Election”.
If McCain wins:
“How the Media Tried to Rig the 2008 Presidential Election”.

Posted by: Sally J. | August 11, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

“The media totally protected john edwards. Why they did this is beyond me.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 11, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

“It seems the people who are getting hurt are the Edwards’ family. He really screwed up … “

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 11, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Edwards-Gate and the media non-response to it. This is a good conspiracy theory on how the media tried to protect Obama by not defusing Edwards so that Edwards could throw his support to Obama during a critical part in the nomination campaign.

Posted by: mccain 08 | August 11, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

“Why are we not hearing more about experienced and tough John McCain would do about Georgia (the one near Russia)?”
You might want to look at NATO fleet movements in the last week after that exercise.
Putin won’t back down because he knows no one is coming to Georgia’s rescue. He might want to be careful just how far this goes. His own fortunes are tied to those oil pipelines and there is no end of untraceable assets ready to blow them up. Winter is coming in Russia.
Read George Will. He has a sober assessment.

Posted by: len | August 11, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

“so that Edwards could throw his support to Obama”

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 11, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

“Hillary Clinton should take on Obama in Denver on the convention floor.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 11, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

He screwed up, Belle. Men in his profession don’t go near that kind of action precisely because it can be a setup. I don’t think it is. I think he bit down on the candy and it bit back.
Bernie Mac died of pneumonia. Issac Hayes is gone too. It’s a sad day really. Don’t try to make political hay out of genuine grief. I’m not a Mac fan but I appreciate his talent. On the other hand, Issac was genius incarnate and left a phenomenal catalog of work. I’ll miss the Chef AND Stax’s Black Moses. He was the real deal.

Posted by: len | August 11, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

Comparatively, the Clinton supporters are fresh and topical.

Posted by: MayBee | August 11, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

It is real funny that people are talking in hypotheticals…If, If, If…Guess what, Clinton WILL NOT BE ON THE TICKET! I wonder if the people who’ll vote McCain, or vote Anti-Obama will move out of the country, or still be crying when he inevitably wins the White House.

Posted by: TrueAmerican | August 11, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

“I think he bit down on the candy and it bit back.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 11, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

It’s a moot question.

Posted by: BBpd | August 11, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

The debate may be moot, but we now know that there are Two Americas, the one that Norman Rockwell painted, and the one where liars like Edwards reside.

Posted by: Neo | August 11, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

“Bernie Mac died of pneumonia.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 11, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

I never really understood what happened to Biden or Richardson, but I doubt it was Edwards’ fault. Although he was certainly the most qualified, Richardson turned out to be really bad as a candidate.
Biden just had the same problem all of the other candidates did, including Edwards: Obama and Clinton just sucked all the air out of the room (with the media’s help).

Posted by: jock59801 | August 11, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

What are the main stream media hiding still? That is the question. I know there is a slew of stuff on Obama, but they just refuse to even consider it. They are determined that he will be our next POTUS, just like they were with George Bush and then the Iraq war. (How’s that working for you?) They insist on creating our reality and we are the ones who take the consequences.

Posted by: newtreena | August 11, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

The only thing ugle is Bob Shrum himself.

Posted by: newtreena | August 11, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

“Richardson turned out to be really bad as a candidate.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 11, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

“I know there is a slew of stuff on Obama, but they just refuse to even consider it.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 11, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

If the democrates don’t nominate Hillary they are going to lose. Obama isn’t half the man McCain is, but Hillary is.

Posted by: Vote Hillary | August 11, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Is everybody swallowing this “he strayed” story whole? It’s fishy to the max.
Posted by: Belle Starr | Aug 11, 2008 1:21:24 PM
————————————–
Anyone with half a brain could not possibly swallow the “story.”
Belle we have everything shoved down our throats, spit it out and look at the garbage! I do.
Hey people question, question, question! Question everything, question everybody. No one and nothing are what they seem!

Posted by: HP Boston | August 11, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

“Question everything, question everybody.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 11, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

“Question everything, question everybody.”

Posted by: HP Boston | August 11, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

I would still like an explanation about the comment policy at this blog.
My comment 2:08:59 was edited, which is your prerogative. However, it no longer makes the point I was making.
Why not just delete it?
Jake is such a great reporter, but the comment policy here is quite puzzling.

Posted by: MayBee | August 11, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

“the news that Edwards had the NERVE to run for President knowing that he had this affair in his closet … “

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 11, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

Jake is such a great reporter, but the comment policy here is quite puzzling.
Posted by: MayBee | Aug 11, 2008 3:06:36 PM
———————————
Yeah I got EDITED also, must be a slow posting day for the site. Most days it is delete, delete. delete!!!!

Posted by: HP Boston | August 11, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Jake,
Regarding bringing it to the UN Security Council remarks.
I loved the way you made Richardson chew on his shoe sandwich.
BTW Alice is a doll.

Posted by: Robert P | August 11, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

Yeah I got EDITED also, must be a slow posting day for the site. Most days it is delete, delete. delete!!!!

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 11, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

But, for those Clinton supporters who are increasingly like the Imperial Japanese Army soldiers found in the Philippines, Thailand and elsewhere decades after World War II ended, I guess it fits in with the general mindset.
- jpt
In every corner of America we are hunkered down.
PUMA will be here long after the dust settles. We are planning a third party, the cats are on the prowl..
THE IMPERIAL PUMA PARTY!

Posted by: HP Boston | August 11, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

Belle, I hear your black helicopters coming over the hill…
The NE will be releasing verified stuff on Edwards in dribs and drabs in the coming weeks, exposing even more lies.
It’s a sad, sad day when the NE has more credibility than the main networks!
I, for one, am looking forward to the entertainment of it all.

Posted by: merle | August 11, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Lets make our list so we don’t forget who not to vote for:
Bill Clinton, Adultery
Edwards, Adultery
McCain, Adultery!
I see a pattern here….

Posted by: beck | August 11, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

“We are planning a third party,”

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 11, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

“I, for one, am looking forward to the entertainment of it all.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 11, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

With Obama we will have 2 Peloci’s and a Harry running the country. They will be more liberal than Karl Marx.

Posted by: Vote Hillary | August 11, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

I would like to see news media stop printing these stories about John Edwards. Hilary Clinton campaign aide stating she would have gotten the votes, is all a maybe. One news article statistical info released states more of these votes would gone for Barack Obama. Hilary Clinton got some. None of these statistics actually mean anything at present.
We are all trying to come together as a united Democratic Party. We can all heal our wounds if we try. I am Republican and just can not see another four years of Republican policies. Hope we can let bygones be bygones and move on to win this election as a united force.

Posted by: Sharonklim | August 11, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

My take: Edwards has hurt the cantidate he endorsed: Obama.

Posted by: Stephen Gianelli | August 11, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

Is ABC suffering some kind of server weirdness?

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 11, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

My take: Edwards has hurt the cantidate he endorsed: Obama.

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 11, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Obama spokesman Bill Burton says “McCain offers nothing but the status quo.” Do the Democrats think if they utter variations of the Bush = McCain theme enough times, it will somehow become true? I’m a 54 year old Democrat, never voted Republican in my life, and I don’t think McCain is George Bush. For a Republican, McCain is not that bad. On the other hand, Obama continually shows me he’s not ready for prime-time. What kind of idiot tells a little schoolkid that “America is not what it used to be, not what it could be. . .. “ Even if that were true, which it’s not, is it really appropriate to say something like to a young child? This is a small thing, of course, but it reveals so much about his judgement, his vision of America, and his underlying cynicism. His remarks in Springfield, MO, in which he claimed McCain and the Republicans were going to portray him as “different” was clearly an insinuation that the Repubs are racist. Shouldn’t he have waited until they actually did play the race card before attacking them on it? Didn’t he play this same game against the Clintons? I’m a lifelong Democrat, but I’m not buying into Obama-mania. I’ll vote Democratic down ticket, but for President, it’s Nader or stay home. (Or McCain, if the race is close).

Posted by: Nina Ruth | August 11, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Obama won this nomination fair and square. Hillary lost this nomination for several reasons: 1) Hillary and her campaign didn’t realize this was a change election and ran her campaign as if she were a successful incumbent running for re-election, 2) Hillary’s campaign ran the same 16 state stategy (big states versus small states) during the primaries that has failed the dems in the last 2 national elections. A strategy that basically ignores two-thirds of America and only campaigns in a handful of states. Her campaign didn’t for example really focus on the caucus states. Out of several caucus states, Hillary only won 1 of those states. That strategy really hurt her campaign, and 3) Hillary assumed that the primary would be over with by Super Tuesday and did not budget financially for the race to go further should that had been neccessary. Hillary herself was interviewed during the primaries by one of the major networks and said that the primaries would be over with by Super Tuesday. To PUMAS and the rest that will not except that she fairly lost this primary, you need to go to therapy treatments now. There was no conspiracy against Hillary. Her campaign’s strategy was wrong. That is what cost her this nomination period.

Posted by: Newswatcher | August 11, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

As I recall, Iowa was a caucus state and Obama campaign had that all covered with manipulating and controlling caucus outcomes (nasty stories along the campaign trail….should eliminate caucus process, as far as I’m concerned and do vote only in voting booth).
Hillary fell behind because Americans were feeling so desperate for a change, any face yelling “change” would do, so he won 11 straight primaries, all his negatives came out too late….Hillary came back stronger than ever and won 9 out of the last 14.
Or maybe Obama had those lucky 11 wins becase AMERICAN IDOL wasn’t on yet.

Posted by: Deb | August 11, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Obama won this nomination fair and square. Hillary lost this nomination for several reasons: 1) Hillary and her campaign didn’t realize this was a change election and ran her campaign as if she were a successful incumbent running for re-election, 2) Hillary’s campaign ran the same 16 state stategy (big states versus small states) during the primaries that has failed the dems in the last 2 national elections. A strategy that basically ignores two-thirds of America and only campaigns in a handful of states. Her campaign didn’t for example really focus on the caucus states. Out of several caucus states, Hillary only won 1 of those states. That strategy really hurt her campaign, and 3) Hillary assumed that the primary would be over with by Super Tuesday and did not budget financially for the race to go further should that had been neccessary. Hillary herself was interviewed during the primaries by one of the major networks and said that the primaries would be over with by Super Tuesday. To PUMAS and the rest that will not except that she fairly lost this primary, you need to go to therapy treatments now. There was no conspiracy against Hillary. Her campaign’s strategy was wrong. That is what cost her this nomination period.
Posted by: Newswatcher | Aug 11, 2008 3:54:45
————————————–
This is and has always been the Obama and DNC RETORIC!!
It is hogwash and does not past the smell test. You are probably an EDWARDS fan too!

Posted by: HP Boston | August 11, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

Could of, Would of, Should of…. enough with the excuses. It’s over. Move on.

Posted by: Vanessa | August 11, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

“Obama won this nomination fair and square.”
Absolutely NOT. Clinton lost because Obama was not well vetted until after the first 11 primaries. It was nip and tuck for Obama after that. The early primaries he won were before his scandals (Wright, Rezko, Ayers, etc hit the news. Many who voted for him have regretted it.

Posted by: Al Johnson | August 11, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

Newswatcher
Hillary can beat McCain
Obama can’t
Do you really want 4 more years of Republican rule?

Posted by: Vote Hillary | August 11, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

“Obama isn’t half the man McCain is, but Hillary is.”
Agreed. Obama refused to debate Clinton. He is just not a stand-up person.

Posted by: Al Johnson | August 11, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

“Many who voted for him have regretted it.”
NOT. Check your facts. Once Hillary started throwing the kitchen sink, there were a ton more people regretting their vote for Hillary, just as people are hating McCain’s nastiness. Recent polls have shown 86% of the people who voted for Hillary are happy to support Obama now.

Posted by: sharon | August 11, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

“Recent polls have shown 86% of the people who voted for Hillary are happy to support Obama now.”
Did they use word “happy”?

Posted by: Al Johnson | August 11, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

VoteHillary
‘They will be more liberal than Karl Marx’. Not very hard given that Marx wasn’t actually really at all liberal. (Religion is the opiate of the masses and all that.) Now you could have said ‘More liberal than Jefferson’ or ‘more liberal than the founding fathers’ but I guess that wasn’t the point you were going for.
And besides isn’t Hillary supposed to be a liberal? Are you freudianly giving away your true political leanings?

Posted by: markymark | August 11, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

I think we all need to move on past the primaries. They’re over!
As regards former Senator Edwards, can anyone put themselves in the mind of a man who has lost a child in a car wreck and is losing his wife to cancer?
Let’s not be too hasty in judging his actions which he has admitted were wrong and deeply hurtful to his family.
It is a pity that this episode will detract from his message which was focusing media attention on the issue of poverty in America in a way that it has not done since the Johnson administration.
Des
IRELAND

Posted by: Des | August 11, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

Hmmmmmm, where is the touted unity among Democrats! It doesn’t take much for you Obama supporters to eject your claws at the mention of a Hillary win! That is why Hillary supporters will not vote for Bammy! Do you want to know what really would have hurt Bammy’s chances – if the media had done their job and reported on such issues as Wright, Rezco, Ayres . . . and the list goes on! Why would you want to put another slicker in the WH?

Posted by: Beckie | August 11, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Howard Wolfson doesn’t exactly sound like he’ll be winning any good sportsmanship awards.

Posted by: Danny | August 11, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

vote hillary
you have your numbers wrong…it is all about a general election
a lot different than a primary
and in the primary it is Hillary who with her low ceiling would be with the bigger uphill battle
I know I know…
spin it spin it
but again a start of a 51%approval/likability before primaries
not she has a lot less than that
especially in independents.
so please
Obama’s numbers for the general are incredibly good. No matter how anyone wants to spin it.

Posted by: dl | August 11, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

I was present at the Iowa caucus. This majority-White state punished Hillary Rodham Clinton specifically for her vote to authorize the Iraq War and her refusal to acknowledge that her vote of authorization may have been a mistake in judgement. Likely because apologizing didn’t work for Kerry four years prior. But… that was four years ago. HRCs vote for war is why Obama was the first choice for Iowans and Edwards was the second choice for Iowans with Clinton last. EVEN AFTER EDWARDS SUSPENDED HIS CAMPAIGN… Iowa reaffirmed its decision at the next convention and nearly all of Edwards’ delegates decided to align themselves with Obama’s campaign, NOT CLINTON’s. Why? It was always the Iraq War. Hillary lost the Iowa caucus years ago. If she had ignored the bad triangulation advice from Bill Clinton to vote for the war, she probably would have won Iowa. If she had ignored the bad campaign advice she got from Penn (or likely Wolfson, since he seems eager to deflect blame) to refuse to apologize or back down during the campaign, she would have won Iowa. She was given many, many opportunities to open her mouth and say the words in debate after debate. She either would not or could not. And now, her campaign advisers continue to blame everyone except Hillary Clinton for Hillary Clinton’s lost. Doesn’t look good now. Won’t look good in 2012 when Hillary has to ask Iowa for support again. Just a few moments of bad strategy and judgement in a long line of bad strategy and judgement this past primary season.

Posted by: Sandy | August 11, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

First of all, Richardson isn’t white, he’s Hispanic. Second of all, Hillary polled at 30% in a seven-way race, only 1% below Edwards — not exactly “god-awful”. Even if Edwards voters had simply decided to stay home (rather than vote for Hillary or whomever), she still would have finished a solid second and been in a much stronger position heading into New Hampshire.

Posted by: Alex | August 11, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

In every corner of America we are hunkered down.
PUMA will be here long after the dust settles. We are planning a third party, the cats are on the prowl..
THE IMPERIAL PUMA PARTY!
Posted by: HP Boston | Aug 11, 2008 3:24:44 PM
*********************************
YEH Lets do a new party. the old one is dead and rotten carrion. the new leader has proven to be totally corrupt. what can be expected from a Chicago politician.
Democrat No More
Looking for a place to park
Voting for McCain this election.
Punish the Dems for their arrogance and abuse of the voters.
People should have fought against the other great orator Hitler and we would have a better world. Our Democratic Constitution demands we fight to the bitter end. NO MORE ABUSE from Obama and DNC.

Posted by: DemocratNoMore2 | August 12, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am

Ok lets say Edwards had withdrawn in disgrace before Iowa. Lets assume for a moment that Clinton narrowly wins the caucus, ahead of Obama, she then goes to New Hampshire without great momentum, as the media assumes she should have won Iowa by more. But she isn’t humbled enough by the result to resort to the crying moment. Obama then wins New Hampshire, reaasonably narrowly but has a narrow second, in a state where Huckabee won the GOP caucus after all, and a win in the NH Primary. All of a sudden moving forward Obama has the big mo coming out of New Hampshire, wins Nevada and South Carolina, and all Hillary has to show for the pre Super Tuesday states is a narrow win in the first caucus state, Obama then does significantly better in the Super Tuesday states than he actually did and takes that momentum into his 11 state run through feb. He is by now, effectively the nominee, and seen as such, and Clinton withdraws early enough not to cause fissures in the party.
All of this is not to say that that would have happened, but Wolfson cannot possibly know all of the ripples that would have happened without Edwards in the contest.

Posted by: markymark | August 12, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Hillary was repeatedly abused, scorned and lied to during the course of the so-called Political Campaign.
Sexism oozed from every pore of the mainstrem media’s so-called correspondents. they cheered her failure. they laughed at her woe.
Woe is all of us. WE have lost.
Hillary will stay strong. She will overcome. This woman is remarkable.
But will we overcome?
god bless america.

Posted by: Nija | August 12, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.