Aug 4, 2008 8:30pm

Factcheck.org Says Obama Ad Uses Incorrect Figure on Oil Donors

In his new TV ad in which he accuses Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., of being "in the pocket of big oil," Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, said that McCain’s campaign took $2 million from "Big Oil."

"The truth is that McCain’s campaign has received $1.33 million from individuals employed in the oil and gas industry, not $2 million," rules Factcheck.org. "We find the $2 million figure is based on a mistaken calculation."

The Obama campaign says it got its figures from the Center For Responsive Politics.

But CRP today said "It appears the Obama campaign is adding our data from January 2007 through May 2008 (our total then was about $1 million) to a total for June fundraising from oil/gas interests that was reported in the Washington Post on July 27. The Post reported that McCain and the Republican National Committee’s Victory Fund raised $1.1 million in June alone from oil and gas executives."

The Victory Fund is a joint fundraising committee some of which goes to McCain, some to the Republican National Committee, and some to state parties. "Not all of the money the Victory Fund collects ends up in McCain’s campaign account, although it’s all intended to support his candidacy," says CRP. "So what’s the bottom line? According to the Center for Responsive Politics — that’s us — John McCain’s campaign had collected $1.3 million from oil and gas interests through June. If you add in the money being collected by the Republican Party to support McCain’s candidacy, the total figure could be $2 million, as Obama’s campaign claims, or it could be a little less or a little more. But until the accounting is sorted out between the McCain campaign and the Victory Fund, we can’t put a precise dollar figure on it."

So, in other words, that $2 million figure is hardly authoritative. Some might even call it bogus.

- jpt

User Comments

I think Obama himself came out and said the smaller figure today didn’t he?

Posted by: dl | August 4, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

Like always, he has to back-track on some statement he made, and come out himself later in order to correct himself! Wonder what international incident he could cause, if God forbids, he becomes POTUS! Wake up, America!

Posted by: Beckie | August 4, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

McCain and the RNC are one. Just as Obama and the DNC are one.
Easy to change ad to McCain plus the RNC to make it factcheck accurate.
Factcheck hasn’t stopped McCain ads either. McCain had a bogus ad about Obama didn’t want to visit the troops because he didn’t want to bring press with im. That has been disputed.
But the bottom line is that McCain got $1.1 million from the Big Oil companies AFTER he flipped on off-shore oil drilling.
McCain is in the tank of big oil.

Posted by: Stacey | August 4, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Bogus ? A little tough.
Exagerated because not entirely proven is more like it.
I know you are desperate to draw a moral equivalency between the outright lies the McCain campaign is telling about Obama and something *anything* the Obama campaign can say and do but this goes into the category “traditional but shameful campaign ad exageration”.
And as you said in the end, it could very well be the right number
And it doesn’t change the point as the Hess story proves

Posted by: benjamin | August 4, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

This is very interesting – the CRP is saying that the figure will probably be much higher than 2 million.
The question that the press should be asking is why did over a million dollars go from Big Oil into the McCain victory fund in June? I believe it had something to do with him changing his position on some issue related to the oil companies?

Posted by: Mike | August 4, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Wasn’t McCain campaigning for President since January 2007?
So if you add when McCain started the primary season of campaigning (Jan 07-May 08=$1 million) to the general election campaigning (received $1.3 million from Big Oil after McCain flip flopped on off-shore oil drilling) that adds up to $2 million.
Totally ACCURATE ad.

Posted by: Sandy | August 4, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

The question that you Jake should be asking is why did McCain get $1 million plus to his “Victory Fund” after he flip flopped on off-shore drilling.
Again, this is starting to smell very fishy.
Dems need to hit McCain HARD on being in the tank with big oil.

Posted by: Chrissy | August 4, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

Obama voted for Bush’s energy bill that gave HUGE TAX BREAKS to the oil companies!
McCain and Hillary opposed the bill.

Posted by: JoseyJ | August 4, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

alex: “How about 50 million last month for Obama? Where did that money come from?”
99% of it came from individual donors versus McCain’s 83% from individual donors. Of course, the majority of PAC and industry money is being routed through slush funds such as the Victory Fund and the RNC – as the author of campaign finance reform, Senator McCain has proven he knows exactly how to flout the intent.
As a world-record fundraising with a base of over a million people giving small donations, Senator Obama has proven he doesn’t need to flout campaign finance reform.

Posted by: jhw539 | August 4, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

You say tomato, I say tomato. The victory fund and McCain are one and the same. Give me a break!

Posted by: wlw100 | August 4, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Why can’t individuals who happen to work for oil companies donate to anyone’s campaign? I’m sure Obama has gotten some donations from employees of companies that would surprise many of us. Also, I wonder how many people who aren’t Americans (i.e. Europeans) are donating to Obama’s campaign?

Posted by: Susan | August 4, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

Well, the fact still remains that he took oil money.

Posted by: Tim | August 4, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

The BIG Question, why was Big Oil suddenly in the tank for McCain….
They smelled money when McCain flipflopped. BIG money.
Big Money has no interest in regular Americans, only in their stockholders.
Remember when you hear the pundits on tv all speak on tax cuts and blablabla.
These pundits all make more than $250,000. They are watching out for their own wallet.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 4, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Why do so many people hate big oil? Aren’t they all part of what is making the world go round. We have all benefitted from the oil business. Is there a problem because they’re making too much money. What about insurance companies or medical care? Why pick on one industry and say anyone who works for them is bad. Why the divisive, incendiary talk? I don’t understand the outcry.

Posted by: Susan | August 4, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

Obama accepts oil money, McCain accepts oil money, but according to Obama, McCain is “in the pocket of big oil,”. Obama don’t realize, this comment makes him look a real hypocrite. Well, if the shoe fits…

Posted by: John W. in FL | August 4, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

That really makes sense. Obama wants to charge big oil companies a windfall profits tax (which in and of itself is absurd), so the big oil companies should support Obama. If I were them, I’d support McCain too. Who are some of Obama’s major supporters? That would be newsworthy.

Posted by: Susan | August 4, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

Very true that the McCain “Victory Fund” and McCain are one in the same.
Accurate ad.

Posted by: Brandon | August 4, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Do we really care who gets what from whom as long as we get a president who will solve some of our problems. Get your heads out of the sand and start looking at who can get results that help all the American people. To hell with worrying about where they get their money.

Posted by: jim 234 | August 4, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Gosh – you mean he only took $1.33 million from Oil interests just before he flip flopped about off shore drilling – why then golly what is the big deal? Why it was way back in May of ’08 that McCain was against off shore drilling – ancient history.

Posted by: nh bob | August 4, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Even the WSJ admits that the Victory Fund is designed to circumvent the $2,300 spending limit. Here’s there report from April 19, 2008:
To help ease their fund-raising woes, John McCain’s campaign has devised a new system to increase the maximum amount an individual can donate to the unofficial Republican nominee’s election efforts.
Campaign manager Rick Davis released the details of the “McCain Victory 08” fund on Friday. He said the entity is a joint committee, combining the McCain campaign, the Republican National Committee and four key states under a “hybrid legal structure.”
The idea is to tap donors for more than the $2,300 limit set by campaign finance laws.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 4, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

… and how come, according to this blog… Obama NEVER took any money from Oil or Gas companies.
Right!
BUT:
“He voted for the Bush/Cheney energy bill which gave $27 billion in subsidies to the oil companies after declaring that corporations and the wealthy should be taxed. He has already flip-flopped numerous times on energy issues. The fact is that he just doesn’t grasp the issues and doesn’t know what to think. Both Clinton and McCain voted against the Bush energy bill because both have an understanding of energy issues far superior to that of Obama”

Posted by: when in doubt,,,, | August 4, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

It is no surprise that Obama is now wiggling around supporting drilling for oil off American shores. He usually tries to have it both ways, after other people have taken the initial bold stand. My question is what kind of a leader does that make him? How will he act in an emergency?

Posted by: Susan | August 4, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

@Susan: “Why do so many people hate big oil?”
The proper question would be: “Why does Big Oil hate you”?

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 4, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

The question that you Jake should be asking is why did McCain get $1 million plus to his “Victory Fund” after he flip flopped on off-shore drilling.
Again, this is starting to smell very fishy.
Dems need to hit McCain HARD on being in the tank with big oil.
Posted by: Chrissy | Aug 4, 2008 8:50:47 PM
This will smell very fishy once Obama gets some oil money after flipflopping on offshore drilling over the weekend.

Posted by: bullyforhim | August 4, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Maybe this is the “change” obama promised, lies and half-truths.

Posted by: Baron | August 4, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

They both take money from any company that will give it to them. Who cares, liberals quit whining about “Big Oil”. What a joke. Drill for oil so we can get away from $4 a gal. The only thing i can see standing in the way is Speaker Pelosi and her band of thugs. If you can’t see that then you are showing how completely ignorant or how left wing you are. McCain has always been agains drilling in ANWR, but so what if he changes his mind. I think the situation calls for it. I hope Obama is smart enough to change his stance also.

Posted by: Doug | August 4, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

Part of Obama’s campaign, no more “politics of old”. I guess, Obama’s “new politics” are worse. John McCain looks more like the president that will earn my vote.

Posted by: Bart | August 4, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

So Beckie – who is worried that Obama had the wrong figures on oil lobby donations – wonders if it would be a problem on the international scene? Well then what of this, in April – on Fox News McCain made the admittedly false claim that Iranian operatives were training Al Qaeda for fighting in Iraq three times over the course of two days. Would that count as a problem for you?

Posted by: nh bob | August 4, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

We just keep going on about big oil. The truth is not about big oil, but about what the GOP and special interest groups like big oil have done to this country. A vote for McCain is a vote for a third Bush term, and we see what a “great job” that he and the GOP have done. Right! :/ Tell ya what, I will ask you a really good one. Are you better off since Bush/McCain took Office? If you are honest, the answer is NO. By the way, Big Oil just posted the bigest profit for any US company ever in history. I don’t think they need anyone’s help, and what ever you do don’t vote for Senator Obama, He just may really help this Country. We would not want that would we.

Posted by: Brian | August 4, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

Only 1.33 million? ABC makes it sound like it were nothing. I wonder what Big Oil wants Mcsame to do for that 1.33 million? Make them richer at our expense I would be willing to bet.

Posted by: dewy | August 4, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

I can see obama’s idea, let gas go to $12 gal and this will curb oil imports. The only problem, this country will be in a depression. The liberal left is doing their best to ruin our country.

Posted by: Ben in VA | August 4, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

Thank you Jake for looking into these figures… people often take everything they hear as fact, so its nice to have these things examined

Posted by: Tyler | August 4, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Obama voted for the Bush energy Bill, that gave 27 billion to Big oil. Clinton and McCain opposed the bill. The 1.33 million looks very small compared to Obama’s 27 billion dollar gift to big oil. Look like Big Oil has Obama in their “pocket”.

Posted by: Sherry | August 4, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

Why don’t you check out the matching $28,500 donations from that couple in Queens to the RNC (oh, yeah, that money winds up supporting the McCain campaign)? She works as an office manager for Hess, he is an Amtrak track foreman, and they live in a rented house in a zip where the median household income is less than $60,000. Now if you can just let us know how a couple in that demographic can afford to drop $47k in political donations, the rest of us could use the lesson. That kind of budgeting could sure help consumer confidence. The whole story’s at http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com — where they do marvelous investigative journalism.

Posted by: mk | August 4, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

It took Obama 20 years to figure out Rev. Wright, how long will it be until he figures out Big oil?

Posted by: John W. | August 4, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

####dewy | Aug 4, 2008 9:42:35 PM#####
..and how much of this bundled oilmoney… found it’s way to Obama’s war chest?
Or did that teflon vest of his make it all go away!

Posted by: just thinking | August 4, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

It is no surprise that Obama is now wiggling around supporting drilling for oil off American shores. He usually tries to have it both ways, after other people have taken the initial bold stand. My question is what kind of a leader does that make him? How will he act in an emergency?
How will he act in an emergency? Obama will act with prudence because he listens to suggestions. He leaves his mind open to better ideas, unlike McCain who thinks he is so smart, he doesn’t need ideas other than his. That makes McCain very much like George W. Bush … the same both in mind and in principles!

Posted by: susie | August 4, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

It is no surprise that Obama is now wiggling around supporting drilling for oil off American shores. He usually tries to have it both ways, after other people have taken the initial bold stand. My question is what kind of a leader does that make him? How will he act in an emergency?
How will he act in an emergency? Obama will act with prudence because he listens to suggestions. He leaves his mind open to better ideas, unlike McCain who thinks he is so smart, he doesn’t need ideas other than his. That makes McCain very much like George W. Bush … the same both in mind and in principles!

Posted by: susie | August 4, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

It is no surprise that Obama is now wiggling around supporting drilling for oil off American shores. He usually tries to have it both ways, after other people have taken the initial bold stand. My question is what kind of a leader does that make him? How will he act in an emergency?
How will he act in an emergency? Obama will act with prudence because he listens to suggestions. He leaves his mind open to better ideas, unlike McCain who thinks he is so smart, he doesn’t need ideas other than his. That makes McCain very much like George W. Bush … the same both in mind and in principles!

Posted by: susie | August 4, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

It is no surprise that Obama is now wiggling around supporting drilling for oil off American shores. He usually tries to have it both ways, after other people have taken the initial bold stand. My question is what kind of a leader does that make him? How will he act in an emergency?
How will he act in an emergency? Obama will act with prudence because he listens to suggestions. He leaves his mind open to better ideas, unlike McCain who thinks he is so smart, he doesn’t need ideas other than his. That makes McCain very much like George W. Bush … the same both in mind and in principles!

Posted by: susie | August 4, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

>>>>Part of Obama’s campaign, no more “politics of old”. I guess, Obama’s “new politics” are worse. John McCain looks more like the president that will earn my vote.
Exactly!!
Obama is flip flopping all over the place. Better to monitor a stable target than a moving target like Obama.

Posted by: JoseyJ | August 4, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

Obama wants to fast-track alternate energy, what ever that is. McCain wants to drill, build nuclear plants, increase wind power and other green energies. Now, who is the celeb and who is the real leader.
>>>>>>>>> McCain in ’08 & ’12 <<<<<<<<

Posted by: Art in FL. | August 4, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

>>>>It is no surprise that Obama is now wiggling around supporting drilling for oil off American shores. He usually tries to have it both ways, after other people have taken the initial bold stand.
Obama did this all during the primary! copying Hillary’s proposals and solutions.
And when Hillary suspended her campaign, Obama lost his way on the issues.
PUMA

Posted by: JoseyJ | August 4, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

Since Obama has taken $400,000 in similar campaign donations I suppose he is only 1/3 as in the pocket of big oil? And perhaps Jen can offer us evidence of 10-12 lies ‘McSleeze’ offered up last week? I mean seriously, if you had evidence of such I’m pretty sure you could offer us an exact count. I’m pretty sure even a democrat can count to 12. Your estimate makes me dubious of your claim.

Posted by: Dan | August 4, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

Well, damn with faint praise, lol. It was only specific to 1.3 million but could be as much as 2 million… but since we dont have specifics the extra money is ??? still in McCain’s campaign chest. McCain has abandoned his ethics to try and win.
He has flip flopped on the off shore drilling because big oil wanted him to and now he is parroting their party line. Yes, everything is GREAT and fine – nothing going on here, keep on going by, don’t mind those billions in profit…yep, we got it all right

Posted by: Citizen Voter | August 4, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

Obama will throw somebody under the bus for this blunder. Remember “the one” does not make mistakes and was not aware. He hasn’t been aware for about 46 years.

Posted by: Sylvia B. | August 4, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

And Brian a vote for Obama is a vote for Carter’s second term. The guy who brought us the COMPLETE FAILURE that was the first windfall profit tax on ‘Big Oil’ (which incidentally isn’t a company. It is an industry. The company you refer to is Exxon/Mobil.) Does it concern you that the Marxist Obama wants to see even more tax money from Big Oil? Do you realize that over the last 25 years or so Big Oil has given over 3 times its profits during those exact same years to the government in the way of taxes? That’s right, the government has made more money off of you at the pump for the last 1/4 century than the big, bad oil monster. Do some research, educate yourself and then vote.

Posted by: Dan | August 4, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

I read an article where the writer used an old Indian saying and compared it to Barack Obama and it struck me to be really accurate – “High wind, big thunder, no rain.” Mr. Obama is young, with an inexperienced record but he really can talk convincingly using teleprompters. Will the words he uses over and over “hope” and “change” net a lot of voters? Probably.
During the debates between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama it because exhaustively clear to all that Ms. Clintons depth of knowledge was superior to that of Obama. Even I who was not a Clinton supporter was really blown away at this woman’s knowledge and ability to talk directly to people with clarity and understanding. But Mr. Obama’s rhetoric of “we are the chosen ones” over and over, likened to a gospel misters bent on fire and brimstone won over the super delegate’s votes but not America’s votes.
Now Mr. Obama is trying to play the same game again. He will not debate with John McCain in the Town Hall Meetings because he would have to speak without a prearranged speech or teleprompters. Here John McCain would show not only a depth of knowledge on important crucial issues facing our country but John McCain’s character as someone you can trust would shine. Obama needs images, backdrops with his “sermons on the mount”. “High wind, big thunder, no rain”.
Perhaps it is way too late for the Democratic Party “to wake up”. Obama cannot get the job done. They tossed aside the best candidate “Hillary Clinton” that could have closed the deal and by now she would have been 20 points ahead. Americans want a serious, experienced, knowledgeable person as President—and truthfully, it is almost a disgrace that the Democrats would support someone so unprepared to run this nation.

Posted by: Mike | August 4, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

And where were you news mavens when, instead of a possible 600,000 discrepancy John McCain proved that he didn’t even know the basic geography of Iraq and Afghanistan?

Posted by: dell haley | August 4, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

Obama voted for the Bush energy Bill, that gave 27 billion to Big oil. Clinton and McCain opposed the bill. The 1.33 million looks very small compared to Obama’s 27 billion dollar gift to big oil. Look like Big Oil has Obama in their “pocket”.
Posted by: Sherry | Aug 4, 2008 9:51:22 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Blog of the day!
This shows Obama as a true HYPOCRITE.
— RIGHT ON —

Posted by: Roger R. in Jacksonville | August 4, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

KEY WORDS IN THIS ARTICAL:
“…although it’s all intended to support his candidacy,”
Hey boys and girls! That is game, set and match. ALL of the 2 MILLION DOLLARS from the gas and oil companies is “intended to support his candidacy!”
===================
McCain said Obama “couldn’t find the time” to visit wounded troops. Yet the FACT is that Obama visited wounded troops in Iraq.
Does McCain lie every day? Or does it just seem that way?

Posted by: John's conscience | August 4, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Mama Hilton was whining because she couldn’t buy off McCain.

Posted by: geevill | August 4, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

I would really love some investigative reporting into the alleged FEC violations by the Obama campaign accepting donations from foreigners (such as the two men in Palestine). I think the public would be very interested in knowing where exactly Obama’s high-fund raising numbers come from, instead of just trusting his press releases stating they are from ‘small donations from first time contributors’. I wonder how Americans would feel if it is true that Obama is accepting much of his money from terrorists or American-hating foreigners?

Posted by: Drea | August 4, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

EVER heard of Fort Myers, Florida? Well Bush, McCain, Obama, Bill Nelson and Mel Martinez have and they allowed one week ago, an illegal with a large rap sheet and outstanding warrants to kill a cop with three kids there. The cop was a great guy but now is in his grave due to Immigration letting this thug go instead of deporting him. Thanks Bush, McCain, Obama, Nelson, Reid, Pelosi and Martinez and all the rest of the gutless bums who allowed innocent Americans to suffer from illegals that ICE will not deport. How much longer will America last with these stupid people leading our country and providing cheap labor to their buddies in agro and construction? Stand up folks and call these people for what they are—-traitors!!!

Posted by: rockychance | August 4, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

Obama = Great COPIER = Better than a Xerox machine.
Obama = No Presidential material

Posted by: Jkan | August 4, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

Hey John’s conscience. McCain was referring to troops in GERMANY!! You might want to get your story straight before you claim someone else is lying. McCain never said he didn’t visit troops in Iraq. He did, however, rightly point out that Obama cancelled plans to visit troops in Germany even though he found time for a workout. What a guy!

Posted by: Dan | August 4, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

He was just rounding up. Same result. McCain is in bed with big oil.

Posted by: Omentum | August 4, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

I don’t understand why anyone thinks $1 – 2 million in various Presidential campaign contributions is important in the American setting. The Americans have something like a $14,000,000,000,000 annual GDP and probably have $1 – 2 million in change under their sofa cushions. I’m surprised to learn the candidates have received such trifling contributions from “Big Oil.”

Posted by: Kralizec | August 4, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

someone kissing oil co. butt —that is a new stretch.

Posted by: rodney | August 4, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Obama=untested,untrusted,unfit for
commander in chief…….

Posted by: ROBERT | August 4, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Here’s another issue which shows the weakness and lack of attention to detail that is Obama’s research Dept:
The Ctr. for Responsive Politics, also known as OpenSecrets, is a wondewrful and highly useful, but not authoritative resource. Campaign finance figures from that org come from the FEC, but they are not always correct.
In order to properly substantiate their ad, the Obama campaign should have gone straight to the Federal Elections Commission had every single oil/gas contribution printed out from McCain’s actual FEC reports, placed into a binder for all to see, to avoid exactly the kind of embarassing rookie mistake they have now made.
This move shows that the Obama campaign, from the Research Dept. to the Media Production team right up to Mssrs Plouffe and Axelrod are a) appallingly lazy, b)arrogant to think no one would check the ACTUAL FEC #’s and c) quite obviously unconcerned with whether their ads are true and verifiable.
This is a totally avoidable rookie mistake by a rookie campaign led by a rookie candidate. ANY campaign worth its salt would already know how to properly document their paid advertising. The fact that the Obamans went to Open Secrets to short-cut their homework shows a glaring and laughable lack of professionalism. Yes, Open Secrets is an outstanding resource and a credit to truth in politics. No doubt.
But now, the Obama campaign have to answer questions about their basic competency, and that impact of the ad goes away.
If I was McCain I’d start sending letters to TV stations demanding that the ad be taken down…a commonly-used practice when one’s opponent puts up false advertising.
If the Obama campaign cannot even be counted on to do their homework in the process of substantiating their own ads, how can they be trusted to run the country?
A joke of a maneuver by amateur Hour in South Chicago. Whoever is in charge of vetting Obama’s ads shold be fired immediately.

Posted by: mike d | August 4, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

Also, according to Factcheck, the 2005 Energy Bill was not a “pinata of perks”.
“the Congressional Research Service later calculated that the oil and gas industry lost more tax breaks than it gained in the 2005 legislation, resulting in a net tax increase that CRS put at $300 million over an 11-year period.” And, “the $14.3 billion in tax breaks in the bill included large incentives for alternative fuels research and subsidies for energy-efficient cars, homes and buildings.”

Posted by: cincyr | August 4, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

Oh, Oh, Oh…that’s right. McCain hasn’t made a mistake yet!!!

Posted by: foxisms | August 4, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Maybe it’s about time that Obama starts to have a little fun and not have McCain have it all to himself. A woman asks Obama ” What can we do to conserve gas ?” He responds with what is generally a very good thing to do which is check your tire pressure and keep your car tuned up. It didn’t take long for sleaze bag McCain to start making fun of it saying that this is Obama’s solution to the oil crisis. McCain is a real JOKER who can’t even read . How is he supposed to lead our country.

Posted by: Ron | August 4, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Obama shifts, drifts, swings hard to center…or to the right on anything he thinks will get him votes. He is a liberal trying to act like a conservative to get into office. He thinks Americans can’t see through his smokescreens. I hope and pray he is wrong. I hope and pray that Americans can see that what he offers…and it isn’t hope….but lots of change….not change for the good either.

Posted by: Betsy | August 4, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

I dare say a lot of people on this site don’t know which countries share a border with Iraq. But even my 4 year old knows there are 50 states not 57 as well as the difference between memorial day and veterans day. Not to mention that you can’t see dead people in a crowd at a memorial day celebration. How many people think you give a child a breathalyzer when they have a asthma atack. Oh that’s right Obama did correct himself on that one it’s a inhalator. Oh no that’s still wrong and he hasn’t got it right yet.

Posted by: churchkl | August 4, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

When did the truth ever matter to McCain ?
Maybe Obama is having a little fun…. What’s a million more or less between friends. McCain and oil go together, they are both slimy.

Posted by: Ron | August 4, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

Obama = Celebrity in Chief……yeah, just what America needs.

Posted by: Mike | August 4, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

So Ron as I have asked repeatedly, what does Big Oil get for the $400,000 it gave to Obama? Is the cutoff for corruption somewhere between $400,000 and $1.3 million? Where exactly is the corruption threshold?

Posted by: Dan | August 4, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

dan
prove your alegation.

Posted by: rodney | August 4, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

Obama wasn’t just stating that you could get better service from your car if you inflated your tires properly and got a tune up. This guy actually believes we can save as much oil by doing these things as we could pump from Anwr, the continental shelf, oil shale etc. That is just absurd. Plus most cars now days don’t require tune ups. He should stick to the basketball court, since he is so fond of being photographed sinking three pointers. He is an intellectual lightweight. Oh, yeah and I guess the basketball comment is racist.

Posted by: churchkl | August 4, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

Rodney exactly where do you get those figures that claim proper tire pressure (which would be assumed as already the case for the wide majority of cars which makes it a fallacious theory from the get go) would do more than drilling offshore? Methinks you may have made that one up.

Posted by: Dan | August 4, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

Rodney you have made the claim again rather than offering the supporting evidence. Three times more? According to whom?

Posted by: Dan | August 4, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

dan
methinks you need to learn something–or just simply watch tv. it is all over the news today—mccain screwed up big time today—-actually handing out tire guages with obamas name on them—MAN WHAT AN IDIOT HE IS.

Posted by: rodney | August 4, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

There goes Obama making up “facts” again. Oh, and how much did Obama get from oil employees? Here’s a hint. It isn’t zero.

Posted by: Cory | August 4, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

And Rodney I know exactly what McCain did today. For a $25 campaign donation or higher you get an ‘Obama Energy Policy’ tire gauge. A brilliant political ploy. I didn’t question that McCain jumped on the gaffe Obama made. I questioned you on your comment that it ‘blew up in his face’. How so?

Posted by: Dan | August 4, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

McCain is a real JOKER….. AH AH AH

Posted by: Ron | August 4, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

Obama wants to free the US of oil during our life time while the rest of the world is going gang busters trying to get all the oil they can get their hands on. Is Obama insane stupid or both? Or is Obama’s real agenda to destroy the US economy and lower everyone’s standard of living. If Obama gets elected and gets a chance to implement his crazy energy ideas of no oil than good by to a prosperous America and hello to an America in rapid decline.

Posted by: terry | August 4, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

dan–IT SIMPLY SHOWS THAT OBAMA WAS 100% RIGHT ON HIS STATEMENT ON TIRE PRESSURE

Posted by: rodney | August 4, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

It was also revealed on World News that Obams received $400,000 from these oil executives. OBAMA IS A HYPOCRITE!!!!!

Posted by: tom | August 4, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

Hey Dan and the rest of you McSame supporters I have one question and maybe it has been asked already but if its 2 million or 1.3 million McSame is still Big Oil’s Bought and paid for BITCH right I mean 1.3 gets you as much as 2.0 when it comes down to it like I said hes a kept man as far as big oil goes You want another W you got him in McSame what did he vote 94% with the President I would say he’s W’s B too !!!!!!!

Posted by: Dennis Fort Myers Fl | August 4, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

DAN
HOW MANY GUAGES ARE YOU BUYING FOR 25.00

Posted by: rodney | August 4, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

dmac, your post was nonsensical and once you start to use profanity you show your lack of intelligence as well as your limited grasp of the English language. I have no time for people who spew filth.

Posted by: churchkl | August 4, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

Rodney that is the most pitiful assessment possibly ever put in print. Obama was right about proper tire pressure because McCain is making fun of the claim? What kind of methodology are you using on that logic?

Posted by: Dan | August 4, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

Nancy Pfotenhauer, McCain’s senior policy adviser, speaks for him on energy. She is the former top lobbyist for Koch Industries, an oil, chemical and mining mega-corporation which is the largest privately-held company in the U.S.
Until joining McCain’s campaign in 2007, she was president of Americans for Prosperity, founded by Koch, which is currently doing a “Hot Air Tour” to expose the costs of global warming hysteria.
Former U.S. Energy Secretary Federico Pena is Obama’s surrogate on energy.
I think I’m going with Obama.

Posted by: cincyr | August 4, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

DMAC1
i think that is too much for some of these people to comprehend.

Posted by: rodney | August 4, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

As if it were related to the discussion at hand Rodney, I’m not buying any tire gauges. I don’t make donations to politicians. (Although I was tempted this time for the collectible value)

Posted by: Dan | August 4, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

The DNC chated Hillary out of the nomination, for this airhead celeb. Let’s hope the democrats hold onto congress, as the white House will be Republican.

Posted by: Art in FL. | August 4, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

Oh yeah, and it will take 20 years to get any commercial oil from new digging. That’s NOT an answer to the energy problem or the horrible economy from the GOP rule. Second, there are 66million acres of land already permitted for drilling. Why does the GOP want to ruin the environment? Why do they want to drill in wildlife refuges when there is 66 MILLION acres availiable already?????

Posted by: sl | August 4, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

Ok, wait a second …
So a little more than a million were collected by the McCain campaign, and nearly a million more went to the Victory Fund, which is “all intended to support his candidacy.”
For pity’s sake. That’s about 2 million that big oil gave to help John McCain become president.
What is wrong with you people? McCain is the biggest hypocritical flip-flopper in recent memory, and you’re ripping on Obama for bringing the story to our attention?
By the way, has the US Attorney started investigating HESSgate yet?

Posted by: eliot | August 4, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

Rodney again you can insult me all you want but you STILL HAVE NOT given ANY supporting evidence that Obama was right. So I urge you AGAIN, please show evidence of this idea that properly inflated tires is ’3 times’ more effective than offshore drilling.

Posted by: Dan | August 4, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

I refuse to vote for obama since hillary is not the nominee. My vote is for mccain.

Posted by: jenny | August 4, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Hillary,why would you support OBAMA?I pray your people will stick to their word if you are not on the ticket,,and how could you accept if he asked you? We love you and Bill and we are angry the way they have treated you..Bill was 1 of the best presdent we ever had.and they have treated him so bad it not funny..We are angry,now he wan,t to seat the del. in flo. and mic.what a joke he is,,he don,t kno anything but to flipflop how can we let someone like him into the white house?never..He has lost my vote and all my family and friends

Posted by: sue | August 4, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

Obama received money himself how can he attack someone else when he is guilty himself.
The man has no Honor.
He lies, misleads, tells half truths, is dishonest with the american people.

Posted by: seah | August 4, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

I have never understood why so many people think the oil industry is evil. Oil powers our cars, heats our homes, provides energy to our homes and places of work and allows us to travel and keep in touch with our family and friends. Oil is the engine that keeps our economy running and growing. The fact is, despite what Obama says, there is no viable alternative to oil in our life time, maybe never. That is why all of the rest of the world is doing all they can to get all the oil they can get their hands on. That is why I am for McCain who appears to have a little common sense about the fact the oil is the life blood of our economy and makes our standard of living possible. If you want higher gas prices, higher food prices, a failing economy and a lower standard of living, I guess Obama is your guy.

Posted by: Jerry | August 4, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

si
the repubs want big oil to get the ok to drill as the democrats wont allow it—the fact that oil is sold on the world market will not change anything here–all the repubs know this and just want another big oil payoff–and quite simply screw us over

Posted by: rodney | August 4, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

McFeeble, McFlopper, McBush…..

Posted by: sl | August 4, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Dan answer this question where did the 400,000 figure come from? because some guy from this bunch of idiots says it that makes it true show me the facts ! I could spew a bunch of lies with false figures like Rush or BillO does that doesn’t make ‘em right or true I mean where on world news does it say that I looked maybe I missed it

Posted by: Dennis Fort Myers Fl | August 4, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Just in case anyone is interested. The oil companies are not obliged to provide us with one drop of oil that they drill for offshore. They can sell it to the highest bidder. Why is no one telling us that ?

Posted by: Ron | August 4, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Betsy, your description of Obama’s moves wasn’t the total put down as you intended it to be. You basically described what’s called ring generalship and a keen understanding of strategy. What does McCain have besides a constant, complaining whine?

Posted by: foxisms | August 4, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Is there anybody out here who still remembers the Exxon Valdez oil spill? 10.8 million U.S. gallons of crude oil were spilled in Prince William Sound, Alaska, on March 24, 1989
A so-called “double hull vessel” would have prevented a lot of that oil to spill into the ocean.
Congress wanted to act on it. But when an amendment was introduced to allow only double hull vessels to Alaska, McCain voted against it. To this day, Exxon is the *only* company that still uses single-hulled tankers to carry oil in and out of Alaska.
McCain was in the tank for Exxon in 1989, McCain will remain in the tank for Exxon his entire life.
It’s an accident waiting to happen.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 4, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

si
i do not see aproblem with a solar pannel on car roof—-car is parked for 8 to 9 hours a day at work and in southern states would go a long way toward charging the batterys on a hybred car.

Posted by: rodney | August 4, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

Dennis check the Center for Responsive Politics for further confirmation. (and note that is exactly where the figure above came from)

Posted by: Dan | August 4, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

I love the Obama energy policy tire gauge. Obama, with his hot air, can self-inflate his tires and use this tire gauge to check his progress. Thanks John, you make this campaign very interesting.

Posted by: Sal | August 4, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

“The oil companies are not obliged to provide us with one drop of oil that they drill for offshore. They can sell it to the highest bidder.” That’s because they hate America, Ron.

Posted by: foxisms | August 4, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

To all of you who are going on about the drilling off shore and in other protected areas well the Oil co’s have leases on 68 million acres th3ey do nothing with places they know there is oil but don’t bother so with that why should we do anymore for them ? Esp. when it would be so LOOOOOOONG to see results ?

Posted by: Dennis Fort Myers Fl | August 4, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Wow there are a lot of comments here calling people who don’t agree with them evil. I mean stupid, liar etc. I can understand, but evil. Can’t both parties want what is best for the country but have honest disagreements about how to achieve the goal? Neither of these candidates is free from special interest money and neither will destroy the country intentionally. Why do they have to be evil? Oh, yeah and Dennis I mean evil with a small e not the religious capitol e. Wouldn’t want you to jump to another conclusion

Posted by: churchkl | August 4, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

Ron they are more than willing to tell you that it will be sold to the highest bidder. That is EXACTLY how the free market works which is what you fail to understand. When you add more product-read:SUPPLY- to the world market (which is the ONLY market for oil and where ALL oil is sold)the price will go down. If this American oil market exists as you think it does, can you tell me the current price for a barrel of sweet crude on this market?

Posted by: Dan | August 4, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

If Obama puts a windmill on top of a car with a 125 foot propeller. How can you get a 125 foot propeller under a 13 foot bridge.
Obama says he will make the bridges taller to fit those Darn windmills under the bridge.
Then Obama flip flopped and decided to let the air out of the tires when he gets to a bridge.

Posted by: DemocratNoMore2 | August 4, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

hey dan—-the supply and demand thing is over –where is the competition—-big oil and opec have it very under controll—-and offshore drilling is just mccain stupidity—-we produce more and opec produces less—see the controll thing.

Posted by: rodney | August 4, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

“I have never understood why so many people think the oil industry is evil.”
Let me explain it to you with an analogy: oil companies have acted in the last 30 years as ‘crack dealers’. They have made sure to get you addicted to their stuff, and their stuff only; they’ve made sure that you would buy as much as possible from their stuff.
They have made sure through massive lobbying that no incentives were given to invest in alternative fuels (R&D) in the last 30 years ánd they have made sure that cars would not be made more efficient.
Oil-dependancy isn’t something new, it was already recognized as a huge problem in the 70′s. Yet nothing was done because oil companies didn’t like it.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 4, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

dmac1 the problem is it is a fallacious argument at its base as it assumes a large number of cars on the road to be improperly maintained and their tires to be underinflated or overinflated. How can we possible estimate oil savings without an accurate number of actual vehicles that could be improved? That is less than a stab in the dark.

Posted by: Dan | August 4, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

57 state Obama is the stupid one or just plain lying. The fact is that there is little or no oil available on the current land leases or the oil available on these leases are very difficult to get to. That is why it is so critical to go after known untapped oil reserves off shore and in Anwar. Not to mention the 400 years of oil available from oil shale in the deposits beneath federal land in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming according to the Rand corporation which is three times that of all the oil in Saudi Arabia. My question is why not go after all the oil, coal and natural gas that is available to us? Why are the Democrats and Obama standing in the way of letting the energy and oil companies do what they do best, provide energy to the people? With greater supply on the horizon, the speculators would stop buying future energy contracts at high prices and prices would start to come down immediately. I just wonder if Saudi Arabia is one of Obama’s and the Democrats contributers? That is the only reason I can think of at least as to why Obama and the Democrats are blocking the oil companies from getting the oil the people need to keep their jobs and make their lives better.

Posted by: kerry | August 4, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

Willem nothing could be further from the truth. While solar and wind power make up a combined one percent of our annual energy usage they are some of the most subsidized energy options on the market. No incentives? You would have to be crazy to make that assessment counting the amount of government backing for these two energy streams.

Posted by: Dan | August 4, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

The ad doesn’t mention Obama has accepted campaign donations of some $400,000 from oil company executives.

Posted by: Buford Gooch | August 4, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

The Alaska pipeline was constructed in less than three years, start to finish. Oil companies estimate two to three years to get oil pumping in off shore areas. McCain has suggested: drilling, wind, water, solar, just to name a few. Obama will fast-track, whatever that is. McCain has demonstrated leadership in this crisis. Obama will follow.

Posted by: Art in FL. | August 4, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

After reading all these posts, including my own, it is no wonder nothing ever gets done. Everybody here is so busy insulting each other there is no possible way to ever find out if we have any common ground to build on for the future. Nobody on either side can admit when their candidate is wrong or when the other guy has a good point. If the community here is any indication of what the politicians are like in action we are doomed.

Posted by: churchkl | August 4, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

“I think Obama himself came out and said the smaller figure today didn’t he?
: dl | Aug 4, 2008 8:36:50 PM”
The game in politics is to run the bogus information in an ad and then back away from it. Many people will remember the bogus information in the ad and never hear the corrections.
Right now too few people are listening to the ads anyway. Obama acted too soon. He can’t run those numbers again later in the canpaign because he has been called on it.
He wasted the game when few were listening. Now there are recordings of the ad, and copies of him using the smaller figures after the fact, which can be used to make a very good political ad by his opponents, later in the game.
Amateurs beware
Jake Tapper is doing some great reporting.

Posted by: ewem | August 4, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

Thanks Buford because I didn’t see it either but thats what they do make crap up and hope someone doesn’t check !!! just like FNC and the GOP

Posted by: Dennis Fort Myers Fl | August 4, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Willem van Oranje, If you think oil is like crack than leave your home, sell your car, quit your job and go live in a tent and please don’t heat your tent by burning wood, that would just spew more carbon in the air.

Posted by: jim | August 4, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Rodney supply and demand is never over. Yes OPEC strictly controls much of the supply to the market but just to clue you in…Big Oil ain’t OPEC. Two completely different entities. Do you realize that for the last 25 years or so the oil companies have given our government more than three times the profits they kept in the way of taxes? Yet you are angry at the oil companies and not Big Government? Explain.

Posted by: Dan | August 4, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

hey kerry –if allowed how much will big oilmake perhaps billions—and what will you gain exactly nothing—-we now have to make the change—the arabs gave us the works in the 70s and we were in far better shape as to imports–and you better believe that they are in controll along with domestic oil

Posted by: rodney | August 4, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Unless McCain is proposing to nationalize the oil companies à la Chavez, the oil produced from offshore drilling will belong to the oil companies to sell on the world market.

Posted by: cincyr | August 4, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

Why are conservatives unable to present any coherent argument why offshore drilling would make any difference on oil prices in the short, and in the long term?
Increasing supply -even in the future – doesn’t even cut it because two years ago, we opened most of the Gulf of Mexico — with its estimated 41 billion barrels of oil — and *oil prices since then have doubled*. The remaining prohibited coastal areas have only 18 billion barrels.
It’s the biggest hoax the Republicans are pulling on you.
The oil companies already have access to some 34 billion barrels of offshore oil they haven’t even developed yet. Ending the federal moratorium on offshore drilling would probably add only another 8 billion barrels (assuming California will block drilling off its coast which is very likely).
Who thinks adding under 100,000 barrels a day in supply sometime after 2020 — some *one-thousandth* of total supply — would be more than the proverbial drop in the ocean? Remember the Saudis couldn’t stop prices from rising now by announcing that they will add 500,000 barrels of oil a day by the end of this year!

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 4, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

The only time McCain says something is if he heard it somewhere else first. He is such a JOKER.

Posted by: Ron | August 4, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

Willem we actually have enough oil in shale alone to supply our needs at present levels for 100 years but the left refuses to let us pursue it.

Posted by: Dan | August 4, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

I am thrilled that John McCain recognizes the pain Americans are feeling at the pump and has decided to support offshore drilling. Clearly a reasonable decision for 2008. His past opposition to offshore drilling was in a $1.75 gas market. Huge difference. Not a Flip Flop.

Posted by: Dennis D | August 4, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

Willem van Oranje, The question the Democrats and Obama has not answered is why not go after to oil if it is there. fyi,China is about to drill side ways off the coast of Florida to get to the oil Pelosi and the rest of the Democrats are blocking us from going after, so China must know something you don’t know about how much oil there is off the coast of Florida. As to a credible argument in favor of lowering prices, again, once the speculators know the US is serious about going after the oil available off shore and else where, the price of oil will start to go down.
As to the amount of oil available off shore please go a little better research please. According to Offshore Energy & Minerals Management (OEMM) “The offshore areas of the United States are estimated to contain significant quantities of resources in yet-to-be-discovered fields. MMS estimates of oil and gas resources in undiscovered fields on the OCS (2006, mean estimates) total 86 billion barrels of oil and 420 trillion cubic feet of gas. These volumes represent about 60 percent of the oil and 40 percent of the natural gas resources estimated to be contained in remaining undiscovered fields in the United States.”

Posted by: terry | August 5, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

Oh well…time for bed. Good night all!

Posted by: Dan | August 5, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Dan: “Willem we actually have enough oil in shale alone to supply our needs at present levels for 100 years but the left refuses to let us pursue it.”
You obviously know nothing about shale. A lot of oil shale reserves are already available to oil companies. You should press them to use it.
You will learn very soon that it will do nothing to lower oil prices because shale oil extraction is very costly. And that’s even without factoring in the environmental costs.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 5, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

I read the Factcheck.org article. The question that arises from this article is why oil and gas company surrogates donate to both candidates in the first place. Why not just donate to McCain, or just donate to Obama? An undecided will see that there are some oil company surrogates who want Obama, and some that want McCain, so how can the whole issue of who is more in bed with the oil companies make any difference to an undecided? To me, the matter isn’t which candidate is more in bed with the oil companies. It’s WHICH oil companies the candidates are in bed with. Because the whole issue of the production and control of this valuable commodity is loaded with complicated interrelationships involving public consumption and changing market conditions including the constant threat of market speculation, I think an undecided voter will have a hard time knowing which candidate to choose on this issue. So I think an undecided voter should look at how the Republican administration under George W. Bush may have been influenced by the oil industry in taking the USA into the pre-emptive war in Iraq, which many Americans believe is an immoral war, and which many people believe the oil industry surrogates and military industrial complex wanted for their own monetary benefit at the expense of 100,000 dead Iraqis and over 4,000 dead American soldiers, and then ask themselves: who supported that war? And who supports that war now? An undecided may see that this candidate is John McCain, who continues to support the pre-emptive war in Iraq, and a connection between John McCain and George W. Bush and the oil company surrogates that support them. For this reason I wouldn’t be concerned about the matter of who gets more money from the oil company surrogates. I would be more concerned about what these oil company surrogates hope their candidate would do, once elected.
I believe what our government did in Iraq at the apparent behest of the oil company surrogates, whether pressured directly or indirectly, was wrong. It was a terrible choice made by George W. Bush, and it was supported by the Republican Administration, including Senator John McCain. I think America will have a hard time recovering from this historically immoral attack. Barack Obama, forasmuch as he may be wrong or right about what to do with strategic oil reserves, has indicated that he does not support blood for oil. In that respect I’m with those oil company surrogates that support him, and so I believe Barack Obama is the right choice. The Republicans have had their chance when it comes to the commodity of oil. I think it’s time to let the Democratic Party have a crack at it.
Because of this issue I will vote for Barack Obama in November, and I encourage undecided voters to consider my reasons for supporting him.
Cheers!

Posted by: Dan Rains | August 5, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Terry, China and Cuban drilling is a lie, it has already been debunked ages ago. Keep up.
And are you really calling US scientists stupid?
Two years ago, we opened most of the Gulf of Mexico — with its estimated 41 billion barrels of oil — and *oil prices since then have doubled*.
So much for your ‘speculation’ argument. It doesn’t hold any water nor oil.
And the OEMM-report? Hahaha. Did you read it? “*estimates* of oil and gas resources *in undiscovered fields*”
There is not one business that’s going to do business with you when you advertise with that.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 5, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

Dan,
1. McCain said Obama didn’t “have time” to visit the troops.
2. McCain knew this was FALSE.
3. Therefore, McCain is a liar.
If McCain isn’t comfortable about LYING about Obama, maybe he should just stop.
McCain knows that the Iraq war has increased Iran’s power in the middle east. And yet he refuses to acknowledge that it was a mistake.
McCain knew that the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11 were in Afghanistan. Yet he endorsed the plan to take the military resources out of Afghanistan and into Iran.
McCain knows that Lilly Ledbetter, and all working women deserve justice. Yet he opposed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay act.
McCain knows that having health insurance companies be regulated by the state of their own choosing (by reincorporating in a friendly state) guarantees the end of all consumer protections (do you want every dispute to go to an industry sponsored “arbitration” system?). Yet that is a key part of his health plan.
McCain knows that a “gas tax holiday” is a stupid, pointless idea (When do you end the holiday? What is the point of cutting off $0.30 per tank of gas?) Yet he is willing to highlight that pander.
McCain knows that the U.S. middle class has faced stagnant wages for most of the last 25 years (but not during the Clinton years!) and the wealth of those making over $250 have increased. Yet he favors eliminating all taxes paid by the the wealthy. How is it that he came to support the Bush tax cuts that he once called UNCONSCIENCEABLE?
You don’t need Obama to point out that McCain has received $2 Mil from the gas and oil industries. Just follow his actions!

Posted by: John's conscience | August 5, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

Terry, some info for you to get you up to speed.
Do you know how many of that supposedly 86 billion of OCS-oil is currently off limits?
18.17 billion barrels
So what’s the hurry?
Roughly 67 billions is already up for grabs. 41 billion of that became availabe two years ago. Where’s the drop in oil prices since then? Why has it doubled?

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 5, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

My brother has designed offshore oil platforms for the past 17 years. If you knew the amount of effort and risk it takes to get that stuff out of the ground, thought just for a minute about how many everyday products are made from petroleum, and considered how many billions of dollars in taxes those companies pay, you might not be so quick to bash “Big Oil.”
Those guys know what they’re doing. The reason why they’re not drilling on the land where they have leases is because it isn’t worth the cost for the amount of oil they could extract. And, like it or not, they’re out to make money. It’s called BUSINESS and CAPITALISM.
As for the amount of time it would take to get the oil from the OCS to the market, it is about TWO YEARS.
Here is just a small sample of the hundreds of products made from petroleum:
Plastics, Ink, Paint, Shoe Polish, Nylons, Roof shingles, Novelty Candy, Cosmetics, Candles, Vaseline, Bug Killer, Ammonia, Tires, Asphalt, Crayons, Paper cups, Wax paper.
Just how is wind power or inflating your tires supposed to create these things?

Posted by: John | August 5, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am

John -
As to your comment:
“The reason why they’re not drilling on the land where they have leases is because it isn’t worth the cost for the amount of oil they could extract. And, like it or not, they’re out to make money. It’s called BUSINESS and CAPITALISM.”
Your argument is good. But then, an undecided voter may accept this as the very reason oil should be treated as a business utility and controlled by government. It is just too precious of a commodity. Capitalism, left to its own devices, results in exploitation of natural resources. Oil by your own argument is the most valuable of resources: it keeps our economy alive. It should belong to the people while we explore other alternative energy sources.
But absent that, an undecided voter would have to ask him/herself whether they could trust McCain or Obama, both of whom are supported by oil company interests, to make the right choices when it comes to this very difficult issue of what to do about this precious oil commodity. With respect to the effect the arguments of the oil company interests have had upon the Republican Party, an undecided voter only needs to look at the war in Iraq, supported by John McCain, which most Americans believe was an immoral war based upon, among other things, the financial interest of the oil companies in the vast oil fields of Iraq. This war, as we know, resulted in the deaths of 100,000 Iraqis and 4,000 American soldiers, and now it appears that the oil America thought it was going to get could perhaps instead be sold by the Iraqi government to outside oil interests not beholden to American interests. So this has been a terrible tragedy for America.
The Republican Party and John McCain have had their shot when it comes to issues of oil and energy. The Democratic Party should be given a shot.
I will be voting for Barack Obama in November. Forasmuch as he may be idealistic about air pressure in tires, or what to do about the strategic oil reserves, he has indicated that he will not support blood for oil. There is, simply, no blood on his hands.
Cheers!

Posted by: Dan Rains | August 5, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am

People wake up, Obama has recieved $400,000 dollars from the same process. The money they both get are not from the oil company owners but the employees. If you worked there who would you support.

Posted by: john | August 5, 2008, 3:10 am 3:10 am

Dan,
Two responses:
1) The Joint Resolution of Congress which authorized the Iraq war listed 10 “legal” reasons for the invasion. Oil was not one of them, and I really find it hard to believe that anyone would think it was – especially with the price of it so high now. (Do you know that leading Democrats, including John Kerry and Al Gore, urged President Clinton to invade Iraq in 1999 for the VERY SAME REASONS that President Bush gave?)
2) My brother’s company has done business with Pemex, Mexico’s state-run oil industry. And believe me, we don’t want the government controlling our natural resources.

Posted by: John | August 5, 2008, 3:10 am 3:10 am

Why does Obama want to increase the cost of fuel by putting a new tax on it

Posted by: wlee | August 5, 2008, 3:11 am 3:11 am

McCain did not receive 2 million, it was 1.3 million. Obama recieved 1/3rd that, $400,000 from the same oil industry employees as well. Please my fellow Americans, not the citizens of the world, do not get blinded by the smoke and mirrors.

Posted by: john | August 5, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am

You people don’t get it. It don’t matter where the money comes from. What matters is the favors you promise to do for it. Right after McCain got that 1.1 million he jumped right in bed with Bush on drilling. And that money did come from executives. Obama may have gotten 400,000 but you don’t see him pushing to drill all over the United States. This whole thing is so stupid. Pelosi introduced a bill last week that would’ve taken the speculation out of the market and the republicans shot it down. As soon as she mentioned it oil started to sink and went down 20 bucks. McCain says it’s Obama’s fault gas prices are high. But when Obama says go drill on the 68 million acres you have access to, the oil companies say no. They won’t even take oil out of the petroleum reserve. This whole thing is about Bush getting his hands on as much oil as he can before he leaves office. If it was about the American people paying 4 dollars a gallon for gas it would’ve been fixed along time ago.

Posted by: HemiHead | August 5, 2008, 5:33 am 5:33 am

Obama is insane to talk about windfall profit taxes on oil companies. Corporations don’t pay taxes, period. We pay corporate taxes and so do corporate employees. We all pay because corporations must recover ALL of their costs AT MINIMUM to make any kind of a profit. Taxing corporations means taxing all of US.

Posted by: EC | August 5, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am

Since Obama notes that he has a funny name, I can suggest that he take out the legal papers to change it.
Let’s see…he can call himself
P.T. BARNUM
…seems to fit in more ways than one!

Posted by: justjoey | August 5, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

Aside to
‘dl’
…of course, Obama “came out and said the smaller figure today didn’t he?”
Isn’t that his pattern……somebody does something…says something…and he decides to jump on board. He speaks well (…but only in a crowd), and doesn’t have an original thought in his head to tell us about…….hope in hell he takes Ms. Clinton as his Veep or this guy…if elected…is a definite one term-er in Washington. He needs some brains in his organization besides the Mad Ave guys running his campaign.

Posted by: justjoe | August 5, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

These are the same lies Obama used in the runup to the Pennsylvania primary against Hillary Clinton.

Posted by: SalG | August 5, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

OF COURSE THE FIGURE IS BOGUS. I’M STILL WAITING FOR THE OBAMA CAMPAIGN TO RUN AN AD THAT HAS ANY TRUTH IN IT. THIS AD WAS YET ANOTHER DESPERATE ATTEMPT TO PUMP UP HIS TANKING POLL NUMBERS.
THEY MSUT BE RUNNING OUT OF MONEY AND IDEAS, THOUGH, BECAUSE IT ENDED UP BEING NOTHING MORE THAN A RERUN OF THE ONE HE RAN AGAINST HILLARY IN THE PRIMARIES. ALL HE DID WAS PUT MCCAIN’S PICTURE IN IT INSTEAD OF HILLARY’S.
TALK ABOUT OLD POLITICS.
BARACK DUKAKIS IS GOING TO LOSE.

Posted by: Foodforthought | August 5, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Read the article: it says that McCain will end up getting around $2 million after the contributions to the Victory Committee are split between the RNC and McCain.
BTW, McCain changed his position on offshore drilling only in June, while gas prices had already been above $3 for more than six months.
The question is: if gas prices fall back near $3 before the election, will he change his position again?

Posted by: AJ | August 5, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am

So, I guess, what the commentator here is saying – is that McCain is bought by the Oil Companies, but just not to the extent that others thought.

Posted by: wolf | August 5, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Hey Obama what about the millions you receive from union bosses so they can stay in charge and live in mansions while the people they represent suffer
What about the millions from groups with ties to Terrorist ie William Ayers
What about the oil company funding the DNC Convention!!
Obama what about the 1 million dollars you received from the tax payers through your wives job!!

Posted by: spock | August 5, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Quibbling over whether Mccain has received 2 million or 1.3-maybe 2 million-possibly more, is a silly waste of time.
The Point is that he has taken the money, and then changed his position.
Stop splitting useless hairs.

Posted by: Selena | August 5, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.