Aug 31, 2008 8:32pm

Ferraro Happy About Palin, Won’t Reveal for Whom She’s Voting

Former vice presidential nominee Geraldine Ferraro told National Public Radio’s Jacki Lyden that she was happy to see Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin — who mentioned Ferraro in her remarks Friday — on the GOP ticket.

"For 24 years I’ve been saying, ‘It’s great to be the first, but y’know, I don’t want to be the only,’" Ferraro said. "And so now it is wonderful to see a woman on a national ticket."

Ferraro said "this election to me is important" because "one way or another we’re going to see a historic first."

She said she spoke to Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., to wish him a happy birthday — Ferraro’s birthday was earlier this week, she turned 73 — and she told McCain to give Palin her congratulations.

"He said, ‘Why don’t you speak to her?’" Ferraro recounted. So she did. "She was very, very nice and I do congratulate her."

Ferraro defended Palin from charges that the Alaska governor — who got her first passport last year — doesn’t have enough foreign policy experience.

"What she doesn’t know she will learn very quickly, she seems smart enough," Ferraro said.

As for whom Ferraro will vote, the former congresswoman from Queens, N.Y., said, "I’m like one of you people, I’m sitting here working on my, on my decision. Y’know I’m a Democrat and I am a person who feels very strongly about issues that are facing this country so when I go into the booth I will make my decision."

- jpt

User Comments

Good for you Geraldine.

Posted by: Maria | August 31, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

If Ferraro voted for McCain or Palin, she would being saying that all of the rest of her political career was a lie.
Ferraro had deep seated anger from when she was a VP candidate, which I can understand.

Posted by: Julie | August 31, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

I think the choice of Palin is fantastic. I am glad that Ferraro and Hillary are being relatively positive, why shouldn’t they be? The party has rarely been a party, for them.

Posted by: leighmcv | August 31, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

She probably feels the same as alot of us……she doesn’t like Obama and doesn’t want to vote for him. Nothing to do with race etc. Just plain doesn’t like the guy…
At least, as a democrat, that’s how I feel…
SO sorry, I am sitting this one out or voting for McCain.

Posted by: Mark | August 31, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

“If Ferraro voted for McCain or Palin, she would being saying that all of the rest of her political career was a lie.”
Oh please, Obama doesn’t represent the democratic party. He’s a liar, you need only look at FISA. He promised he wouldn’t vote for it and lied and preyed on people’s HOPE. Obamabot should be embarassed and ashamed for being so gullible. They should be angry at him for making them look so stupid. Voting for Obama is NOT a vote for democrats. It’s a vote for some kind of sick, self-serving, ambition-only agenda we’ve never seen the likes of in this country. Obama is truly, truly evil…and so is his husband, MEshell.

Posted by: misstickly | August 31, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

Geraldine Ferraro will vote the ticket
McCAIN/PALIN……she won’t tell you..
i just did………
She’s Hillary supporter voting republican,just like millions like her.
DEAN,PELOSI don’t get it……
The problem is Obama……
McCAIN/PALIN ’08

Posted by: NICHOLAS | August 31, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

Obama is a just right of a bush third term. Vote how you see fit Geraldine. You have no Democratic options.

Posted by: misstickly | August 31, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

She is not going to vote for Obama. It is clear.

Posted by: Sam | August 31, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Trust me, she ain’t voting for Obama. She loathes him, as many women do.

Posted by: Jo | August 31, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

I agree with Ferraro a thousand times over Obama and the old puppetmasters behind him.

Posted by: irma | August 31, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

In just one classy, grateful thank you by Palin to Geraldine Ferraro in her speech, Geraldine was treated better than the Obama zealots in her own party – even though she has been a loyal, civil rights activist for YEARS.
Talk about throwing someone under the bus, just for your political ambitions. But who is surprised? Look at what Obama did to Alice Palmer, a longtime, well respected black civil rights activist in Chicago, when he challenged her petition signatures in his bullying tactics because he knew he couldn’t beat her on the ballot.
Obama & Co. should be ASHAMED. He’s a lying fraud and anyone who buys his crap is a moron.

Posted by: Jo | August 31, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Well look at that, more women jumping on board the Palin train.
In my family 4 out of 5 of the women have defected from democrat to republican for this election. we were ALL hillary supporters.

Posted by: feliciaJ | August 31, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

As a lifelong Republican, I would never vote for a McCain/Palin ticket. I would not trust a 44 year old woman to run this country

Posted by: Joe Reed | August 31, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

The issue is that of John McCain’s judgment. No one in their right mind thinks that being Governor of Alaska for 1.5 years should be anywhere near being the President of the United States.
Let’s stop implying that John McCain is senile. It is now a fact.
Let’s get one thing clear. Alaska is not like other states. It is a petro-state like Saudi Arabia that rakes in so many Billions of Dollars from oil production that they SEND CHECKS TO EVERY RESIDENT OF THE STATE!
That is quite different from the normal states like for example Ohio that have to actually worry about balancing expenses with income and property taxes.
Being mayor of Nowhere, Alaska does not mean very much to me. We have high-schools with a greater population that Nowhere.
BARACK OBAMA’S SPEECH IN DENVER HAD 10 TIMES AS MANY PEOPLE IN ATTENDANCE AS THE TOWN IN WHICH SHE WAS MAYOR!

Posted by: John's conscience | August 31, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

Year of the WOMAN! Dreamticket would have been AWESOME. But nooooooo; You sexist, holding out with supense only to choose someone with 13% of the Primary vote over the one with 50%+. All the Roman collums, fireworks and theatrics won’t blind us to YOUR bitter, petty jealousy of the Clintons. You know, the ones who won two elections for us, while Ted Kennedy/Kerry/Daschle etc. have won us, ummmm NONE! Losers!

Posted by: irma | August 31, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Joe Reed,
But you would trust a 46yo man?? LOL

Posted by: feliciaJ | August 31, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

“If Ferraro voted for McCain or Palin, she would being saying that all of the rest of her political career was a lie.”
(snipped from Julie)
_____________________
Ferraro should be furious with OBAMA for playing the race card at HER expense!
I was a life long Democrat to.. but feel absolutely NO guilt in turning my back on the party which has force-fed us a “newbie” and turned its back on 18,000,000 of it’s members!
MCCAIN AND PALIN
COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY!

Posted by: america*centric | August 31, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Joe,
It seems that even Dems don’t share your concerns:
Ferraro defended Palin from charges that the Alaska governor — who got her first passport last year — doesn’t have enough foreign policy experience.
“What she doesn’t know she will learn very quickly, she seems smart enough,” Ferraro said.

Posted by: feliciaJ | August 31, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Ferraro is happy and millions of us are. Seems even after the media blitz last week at B’s coronation, no bump in the polls…but hey, it was another free concert!
Even befor Rep. convention which is now off the calander because of Gustav….CNN wolf Blitzer said moments ago….Obama 49/McCain 48…..can’t wait to see those numbers after Reps. have a very different convention….Palin is a great choice for a one term President and they will compliment each other well.
Americans vote top of the ticket and McCain is my man…Palin has more cred than the top of Dem ticket. I’d never vote for someone just because of their skin color or gender…I VOTE THE BEST AMERICAN FOR THIS JOB…..KEYS TO MY WHITE HOUSE.

Posted by: Debra | August 31, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

I have always respected Geraldine Ferraro. She is an intelligent, hard-working, non-insulting individual. While I believe though that she respects Palin and McCain, she is going to vote for the candidate that holds views most similar to her own. This means someone who puts forth policies she believes in and think will help her.
This is what everyone should do. They should not vote for the most charming person whether it is Obama or Palin. People need to learn to vote for those whose policies best reflect their own interests. If everyone learned which candidate they agreed with the most, then America would be better off. After all if you end up voting for someone just because they say they will change something, you may not like the consequences.
They may actually change policies in such a way that you and ohers like you are adversely effected. After all, Hitler and Castro brought about change. Doesn’t mean that it was good.
But anyway, I think Ferraro will vote for Obama.

Posted by: Female | August 31, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

I find it amusing people are comparing the resumes of Obama and Palin. In many respects, Palin comes out stronger (actually has accomplished things, actually has been a Commander in Chief, albeit at a state level, actually has gone to work rather than spent her time campaigning).
Yet, we overlook the fact…….PALIN IS RUNNING FOR VP, 0BAMA FOR PRESIDENT.

Posted by: JA | August 31, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

Ferraro does not have to say who she is voting for…..just as Colin and Condi don’t….but they are all alone in the booth……and they will vote like 98% of blacks….despite their careers in the Republican spotlight.
You go Geraldine….I’m with you…..
McCain/Palin
new polls Obama 49/McCain 48

Posted by: Debra | August 31, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

I love when women unite…Don’t you ladies? It feels GOOD!

Posted by: irma | August 31, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

“BARACK OBAMA’S SPEECH IN DENVER HAD 10 TIMES AS MANY PEOPLE IN ATTENDANCE AS THE TOWN IN WHICH SHE WAS MAYOR! ”
_____________-
… and you feel that the ability to show off your enormous ego and big ears in an enormous arena at an expense of millions of dollars during a time when most of our population is beset one way or another by money problems… is a reason to elect an inexperienced Chicago Charlatan as our President?
Well then, perhaps you should change the nominee’s name to “AXELROD”!
the best solution would have been Hillary but:
MCCAIN AND PALIN
COUNTRY BEFORE BROKEN DOWN DNC!

Posted by: america*centric | August 31, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

If the Republican convention ever does convene fully, you’ll see McCain bounce ahead of Obama in the polls. I predict McCain by +3 by the end of the convention.

Posted by: JA | August 31, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

I especially love men strong enough to back WOMEN. Now those are MEN.

Posted by: irma | August 31, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Irma….it DOES feel good and will feel better next week when I start working for McCain/Palin….and in the booth when I pull the lever for my dream team.

Posted by: Debra | August 31, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Obama has preached change, change, change – then selected a 36-year Washington partisan instead of the woman who got 18,000,000 votes.
The Republicans now have two mavericks running on their ticket with a proven record of making change – one of which just happens to be a woman.
Promised Change -or- Proven Change?
Change We Can Believe In -or- Change We Can See?
Yes We Can -or- Yes We Did?
McCain/Palin’s reform ticket is a winner!

Posted by: marylou | August 31, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

I think it would be something, if in celebrating the 88th year of women voting, men celebrated women of all races and their accomplishments leading up to Palin. From protest to voting booth to office. What a slap it will be to the DEMS who are more about screaming of abortion rights to hold us hostage, yet also defend the rights of Penthouse and pornography that indulge men in the mutilation of women as a turn on. I have never understood that part of the DEMS effort. The Penthouse man’s name escapes me for the moment, but he’s a big DEM donor.

Posted by: irma | August 31, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

As Doris kearns Goodwin said “Pailen is the least qualified VP candidate in modern history.’ this nomination is a joke.

Posted by: michaelinphilly | August 31, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

Doris Kearns is a sweet woman, who is very savvy and amazing. However, there are many times when she is wrong. Also, she said it was a joke because it was a obvious move. Yet, an effective one. SO…..

Posted by: irma | August 31, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Do your research.
Google images of WASILLA CITY HALL
Does that look your city hall?
She won the election with less than 1,000 votes.

Posted by: doug | August 31, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

Who believes DKG anymore? She has been discredited.

Posted by: Kitty | August 31, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

Wow, the McCain team must really be worried about this choice. They have all you people working overtime on the boards and then you are praising an endorsement from Geraldine Ferraro.
My my how your positions change with the direction of the wind.
So Debra, now you know who Colin Powell and Condi Rice are going to vote for?
Since you have supernatural powers, why didn’t you warn the Republicans about scheduling their convention during a hurricane?

Posted by: TXMom | August 31, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

Can someone explain to me how it was a “maverick” decision to put someone on the ticket who satisfied all the demographic groups (at least in theory) where McCain was hoping to pick up votes (that sounds like a politically calculated move to me, pandering, not a maverick).
Oh and how is it a maverick decision to choose someone Limbaugh has been pushing, some endorsed prior to the choice by Bill Kristol?
A governor who is a right-winger, endorsed by the neo-cons, not prepared for the job and knows next to nothing about foreign policy, or much of anything besides oil.
That really sounds very very familiar to me.
Sarah Palin, brought to you by the makers of George W. Bush.

Posted by: TXMom | August 31, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Okay, please cut the bull.
The problem with all these masquerading as Hillary supporters is the people who are Democrats know Hillary supporters (lots of them).
If there were the kind of mass support among Hillary supporters that the volume on this board suggests, why is it that neither I nor anyone I know knows a single Hillary supporter who is excited about this?
Okay, we will count Geraldine out. She feels personally slighted by the party, and this little announcement of hers is her way of trying to get her own back.
I note she did NOT say who she would vote for.

Posted by: TXMom | August 31, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

Great comments on this blog, and I agree with many of them. I admire Ferraro now more than ever. And I have to congratulate the DNC on its supreme idiocy. By forcing Obama down my throat, they have made the RNC’s ticket — two mavericks with a history or reform, who aren’t afraid to take on their own party — seem like by far the best choice. Hillary was the best candidate, but since they’ve foisted Obama on us, I can’t wait until the DNC is looking at President McCain. My mom is in the swing-state of MO, and she’s a Democrat who is definitely voting for McCain/Palin.

Posted by: TNGal | August 31, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Ferrarro…oh yeah she was one of the many Obama threw under the bus! It must be getting crowded under there with Rev Wright, Rezko, Hillary and Bill, and of course his own grandmother!

Posted by: Ed | August 31, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

SARAH PALIN IS A GREAT CHOICE….
SHE HAS GREAT PERSONALITY AND SHE’S
DOWN TO EARTH AMERICAN MOTHER….
SHE HAS LEADERSHIP QUALITIES AND
SHE’S READY TO LEAD….
SHE HAS MY SUPPORT….
COUNTRY FIRST
McCAIN/PALIN ’08

Posted by: NICHOLAS | August 31, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Uhhhh you do realize more people voted for Obama??? He had a better ground plan and won states she didn’t think about campaigning hard in, to put him ahead in delegates. He was never ONCE behind in delegates, HRC trailed him the entire time. So STFU.
Posted by: Barb | Aug 31, 2008 9:38:34 PM
In truth, the media covered up/failed to cover the John Edwards affair which had they have done thier jobs, HRC would have taken OHIO and not BHO. But the media was sooooo against Hillary, they got BHO appointed. She won ALL the BIG states that w/o the dems have no chance. SHE WAS ROBBED. So Barb, you’re delusional, and in order for Hillary to stay alive in the party, BHO MUST lose so she will be the presumptive Dem. nominee in 2012. VOTE MCCAIN?PALIN 08
Keep Hill’s hopes alive. 2012

Posted by: LisaS | August 31, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

THIS IS NOT ABOUT SARA PALIN. IT IS ABOUT THE SENILE, WRINKLY OLD MAN WHO CHOSE HER!!!!
1. No one here has contradicted my charge that John McCain is senile.
2. No one here can say that John McCain was thinking about the welfare of the nation or chose someone based on any qualification other than her gender.
3. No one here can say that being the mayor of Nowhere, Alaska — with a population smaller than some high schools — has any relevance whatsoever to being prepared to be president.
4. No one here can contradict my point that being Governor of Alaska (for 1.5 years!) requires the painful choices of other states which don’t have BILLIONS of dollars in petro-dollars at their disposal have to make.

Posted by: John's conscience | August 31, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

“A governor who is a right-winger, endorsed by the neo-cons, not prepared for the job and knows next to nothing about foreign policy, or much of anything besides oil.”
Palin a lot more executive experience than Obama. Obama has no foreign policy experience and has no more experience than becoming a senator with no accomplishment to speak of. He could not even reveal who he is.

Posted by: Joe | August 31, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

Palin stood up to the “good ole boys” and corrupt politicians who were in her own party. She put her State FIRST.
Obama can’t even stand up to Nutty Nancy Pelosi and Hapless wimpy Harry Reid. He is owned by a crooked political machine and never has an original thought.
Bush’s approval rating is low, but it is 3 time higher than the Congress that is run by Reid and Pelosi.

Posted by: susie | August 31, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

Tex Mom; I was a Hillary volunteer and I am continuing to donate to pay her debt. I will not lift a finger for the DEMS now, neither will ALL the Hillary supporters I know.

Posted by: irma | August 31, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

Sarah Palin.. destroying liberals just by showing up

Posted by: Julian | August 31, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Ms. Palin is from the extreme right of the Republican party. Say with me: GOOD BYE SUPREME COURT!!!! I am for one very happy since I don’t agree with abortion and crazy feminists. It is very ironic that abortion and sexual misbehavior were brought by radical women, and it will end by crazy, radical women as well.
GOOD BLESS A MORAL AMERICA!!!!

Posted by: carl29 | August 31, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Who is Obama? Does any of his supporters know?

Posted by: Joe | August 31, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Its really amazing that people believe McCain puts Country first!! He had at least some credibility on this before Palin pick. Whoever thinks the same now is either too drunk or a troll.

Posted by: sandy | August 31, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

obama has only been sen obama for part of one term. so if your going to talk about GOV’R PALIN’S JOB BEFORE SHE UPSET THE ESTABLIMENT IN ALASKA TO BECOME GOV’R.
maybe you should talk about obama state house job the one he got when he had everybody else tossed off the balliot?

Posted by: yochanan | August 31, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

Barb | Aug 31, 2008 9:38:34 PM
______________
Actually, I felt the COUNTING of the votes (leaving out most of Michigan and Florida for that time being), and the SELLING/BUYING of delegates, and the cramming of ONE candidate down our collective throat was a flagrant example of a broken, UNDemocratic Party!
But even if Hillary hadn’t won…. why would anyone except a megalomaniacal and pompous personality dismiss this relatively high (HALF???) portion of voters with the disdain and lack of respect clearly demonstrated by Obama?

Posted by: america*centric | August 31, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

While I would never vote for Palin since we disagree on several major issues – we do agree on a couple.
Good for her, the republicans need all the help they can get. Unfortunately when McCain loses, she’ll take the hit for the right wing forgetting the moderates in the party.

Posted by: Citizen Voter | August 31, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

TxMom,
Sorry, but there are many hillary supporters, myself included, who have moved from Hillary to McCain. Face reality. Democrats usually take a much larger % of the female vote than Obama is projected to get right now.

Posted by: Fluffy | August 31, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

The left wing of the democratic party holds women hostage with the Supreme court nomination issue; “McCain is going to overturn Roe v Wade” how? when everyone predicts the dems will have control of both houses. it’s a ploy to get HRC’s supporters; after treating them like crap during the primaries and not saying anything to stop the massive sexism exhibited by the MSM.

Posted by: Julian | August 31, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

In truth, the media covered up/failed to cover the John Edwards affair which had they have done thier jobs, HRC would have taken OHIO and not BHO. But the media was sooooo against Hillary, they got BHO appointed. She won ALL the BIG states that w/o the dems have no chance. SHE WAS ROBBED. So Barb, you’re delusional, and in order for Hillary to stay alive in the party, BHO MUST lose so she will be the presumptive Dem. nominee in 2012. VOTE MCCAIN?PALIN 08
Keep Hill’s hopes alive. 2012
lol, you have no clue. You have no idea what you’re even talking about. You just proved you’re a Republican in disguise… If you were a true HRC supporter you’d know she won Ohio.
She won the states that always goto the Dems. So, you’re going to vote against EVERYTHING she believes including having Roe vs. Wade turned over, womens rights, stem cells… The only reason you voted for her is because she has the same body parts… your mind can’t even see the REAL issues at hand. Obama had a much better ground game put together and had a plan after super tuesday. BTW, if she won Iowa it still wouldnt have made a difference… and she got third not second, so edwards wouldnt have even mattered. Quit trying to blame it on everyone else…. excuses.

Posted by: Chad | August 31, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

Since when did it become a sin to carefully consider for whom one was voting? I always thought it was a hallmark of intelligence to think about one’s electoral choices. The state where I live does not have party registrations, which is great. You can vote in the primary you consider more important. And unlike places where registering as an independent disenfranchises one for the primary, everyone in our state in essence is a registered independent.

Posted by: katmandu | August 31, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Don’t make a mountain out of a molehill – we women can support Palin as another woman putting herself on the front line for her belief in good government and vehemently disagree with her politics.
Eight IS enough.

Posted by: Sisterhood of the travelling Pantsuit | August 31, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Even the African American male political talking heads were complimenting Sarah Palen yesterday and today on TV. And McCain/Palen polls are going UP.
Democrats are worried. They have been out-foxed. Maybe we need to send Obama’s people a truck load of tissues for their tears.

Posted by: Martin | August 31, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

Classy women.
Compare Geraldine Ferraro to what Barack Obama revealed of himself in that New Hampshire debate.

Posted by: Arlen | August 31, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

“maybe you should talk about obama state house job the one he got when he had everybody else tossed off the ballot?”
Posted by: yochanan | Aug 31, 2008 9:59:39 PM
_____________________________-
Exactly!
How come this kind of fact-checked information always manages to disappear just under the radar rays of what once was the great American FREE PRESS?
If you close your eyes and think hard, you might remember what that was….
It existed not that long ago, during the time of the Fourth Estate and FREEDOM OF THE PRESS!
It was something our forefathers fought for…..I’d like to see it come alive again… or is this one of those (unwanted) CHANGES we’ve been hearing so much about?
Let’s hope not!

Posted by: america*centric | August 31, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

It doesnt take away the fact that McCain excercised poor judgment in selecting her running mate. This has already backfired.
For the past 18 months, Obama has been elected by the people, tried and tested with tough questions and tough debates. This is enough experience over inexperienced Palin.
Poor judgment McCain.

Posted by: Keith | August 31, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Polls???
Do they poll younger people who use cellphones?
After 8 horrible years of Bush and McCain promising the same policies, anyone that thinks McCain will win has been drinking Kool-aide.

Posted by: Keith | August 31, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

One should vote for who they believe is the best candidate, not because they have a (D) or (R) behind their name. That’s why I am an independent. I won’t goose step with the Dems or Repups. Obama, in his short time as a US Senator, has only once voted against the Dems. Yet, he pretends to be the uniter or the “bipartisan” candidate. It is McCain that has repeat idly risked his political career.

Posted by: JuanM | August 31, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

WOW, Keith:
“For the past 18 months, Obama has been elected by the people, tried and tested with tough questions and tough debates.
This is enough experience over inexperienced Palin.
Poor judgment McCain.”
_____________
So B O was elected by the people a year and a half ago?
OH! I get it!
This is for POTUS of those extra seven states he’s always talking about!
And you also feel that his poor showing in the debates is further proof of his prowess as president.
hmmmmmm
very interesting!

Posted by: beween the ears. | August 31, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

Ferraro knows that Obama is a fraud!
And so do most Democrats that support Hillary Clinton.
Tell Obama and the DNC elites to take a hike!
McCain-Palin ’08
Hillary ’12

Posted by: US Vet | August 31, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

I know how she’s voting. She’s a demacrat. No brainer. I don’t blame her for not saying. It’s really no one’s business. I’m surprised her words weren’t twisted into something derogatory like during the primary.Which all turned out to be true and repeated by many other men who didn’t get raked over the coals and made out to be a racist.

Posted by: Miki | August 31, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

As Ferraro went, so will Palin!! Ferraro should really come out and declare that she is nothing more than a wolf in sheep’s clothing, and then go get a life instead of trying to poisom more of the atmosphere than she has already. The bitterness of some women is highlighted even more with what is coming out of her. Go get a life Geraldine instead of making yourself more unacceptable.

Posted by: Sareena Jones | August 31, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

Geraldine I support you 100%.

Posted by: Amy | August 31, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Who needs her miserable vote? Afterall she is always on the losing side.

Posted by: jayboz | August 31, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Palin is shamelessly using HRC. She is no HRC and she is trying to wrest the feminist movement from her by posing as her. This is the main reason which made me shift back to Obama from Mccain.

Posted by: sassy | August 31, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

No party will bully me.

Posted by: Amy | August 31, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

Payback is hell, Senator Obama. You shouldn’t have pulled the race card on Ferraro. Growing up with all those women around you, you think you would have learned not to mess with them.
Halli Casser-Jayne
http://www.thecjpolitcalreport.com

Posted by: Halli Casser-Jayne | August 31, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

The same people that disrespected Hillary and Geraldine are disrespecting Sarah Palin now.

Posted by: Amy | August 31, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

I still think Palin would make a good Wilma Flintstone. I mean she’s a primitive; she likes that caribou meat along with hunting and fishing. And she appears to use minimal family planning.

Posted by: kat | August 31, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Palin strongly believes that Washington is in Texas, Iran is in Alabama, Chinatown in San Francisco is the capital of China, Guantanamo is in California, New Mexico is in Mexico, Irak is a suburb of Nord Korea not too far from Arkansas.

Posted by: Linda J | August 31, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

Ferraro still can’t see how her remarks about Obama in the spring were offensive. She thinks she has been treated unfairly, thrown under the bus, whatever.
I think she needs to take a good, hard look in the mirror. She has done more than anyone to make this election a choise between gender and race. That is the Republican agenda, the only thing that might save them in this, their worst year in decades.
Until she realizes that equality on one doesn’t rule out equality on the other and that women’s rights is a universal issue and not simply about her, she can stay in her Fox News refuge for all that I care.
She has been Rush Limbaugh’s favorite person for months now. Sad, truly sad.

Posted by: El_Pajaro | August 31, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

I’d never thought I’d ever be voting Republican. But, thank you very much, NO OBAMA FOR ME!!
I think Sarah Palin is fabulous.

Posted by: Melissa | August 31, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

I thought Feraro was against Obama for lack of experience. What experience does Palin have? BTW, who cares about Feraro? She has always been on the wrong side…should be bad news for McSame.

Posted by: ferari | August 31, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

Shows just how dumb she is, Geraldine would rather cut off her nose than help her Country! I am waiting for Hillary to say something that sends a strong message to Annie Oakley.
Gerry is old an bitter, she is ad her time has come and gone. If her husband was not envolved with the Mafia she woud have made out better!Oh, Palin is under indictment!

Posted by: lions2tigers | August 31, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

If Palin does well on the campaign trail and in the VP debate, then she was a good pick.
If Palin does poorly, then she was a lousy pick.
Anyone pronouncing the bottom line now is just playing spin doctor. No one knows yet.

Posted by: Frederick Michael | August 31, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

I don’t understand why people are being so negative to strong women like Geraldine, Hillary and Palin. I don’t agree with Hillary’s views but why people bash her strengths, I don’t get it. She would had been a strong liberal candidate for the republicans. It’s time for women to lead who can make changes to our government. I think Palin’s very smart. I admire her. It will be terrible to see these radical groups demeaning her.

Posted by: Christie | August 31, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

Looking at the lefties’ comments, it is obvious they can not offer anything except idiotic, nonsensical, personal attacks on Sarah. Any normal person can see that woman is just awesome in every respect.
Guess what? Your vicious demeanor only makes you look dumb and laughable. Just keep at it. The defeat of that candidate of yours in November is guaranteed, and you’re definitely helping to make that happen.

Posted by: Regi | August 31, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

lions2tigers: It’s okay that Hillary Clinton and Ferraro are being good sports with Annie Oakley. They know what they’re doing. Clinton especially is a good sharp shooter.

Posted by: kat | August 31, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Re: Gerry is old an bitter, she is ad her time has come and gone.
She sounds very grounded to me even when I disagree with her.

Posted by: Christie | August 31, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

Any normal person can see that she’s awesome in every respect . . .
But the question is: Is Palin normal? This lady orders a mass killing of wolves, she gets on a ten hour flight with a high risk pregnancy after the water breaks, she denies the existence of global warming, she’s a die hard NRA member, she wants creationism taught n school . . . .She’s awesome alright, an awesome fright of a person.

Posted by: kat | August 31, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

Ferraro was unimpressive then, and she still is now. She was bad for the Democratic Party then and she is now. She acted like a bitter fool then, and she does now. Her time was passed then, and it is now.

Posted by: Thinking | August 31, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Kat’s for Obama, I think.

Posted by: Christie | August 31, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

The obamatons are demeaning sexist pigs and that is why they will lose in November. This is the kind of “politics of hope” the Freshman Senator fron Illinois has brought. What a FRAUD.

Posted by: Emily | August 31, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

Sarah Palin is loved by those who are not bitter and cling to guns and religion….her election too, will be historical…..it’s not just about putting any black guy into the highest offfice of our country, without deserving it, earning it with more experience than your VP, Biden. True American grown ups will vote…..John Sydney and not Barack Hussein.
Palin is the perfect compliment and I bet her husband is a great Mr. Mom.
McCain/Palin

Posted by: Debra | August 31, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

I don’t vote for people who take away my vote and then act like they did a wonderful thing 7-8 months later.
Should have thought about your issues then.

Posted by: John | August 31, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

I love Geraldine Ferraro.
She is a strong woman who is not afraid to speak her mind.
Personally, I think she knows Obama is a fraud and she is disgusted with the DNC for propping him up.
I am quite sure she will be voting for McCain/Palin – like many sane Democratics will be doing.

Posted by: Catherine | August 31, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

Palin = Eva Peron in Alaska version
Certainly she must have been great President in Argentina in 1950.
She has guts and charisma…. but also She is the type of person who misuses power.
It’s ok to put her in Alaska, but never in the Oval office.

Posted by: zen | August 31, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

Catherine,
you say SANE democrat?
OK, then Hillary is insane, too.

Posted by: zen | August 31, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

Happy about Palin?
Words and praises used to describe her: awesome, beauty queen, moose killer, doesn’t believe in equal pay for equal work, just got her passport a year ago.
The world is still asking itself
Q. WHO IS SHE?
A. NOBODY!
With regards to all of this chatter about Hillary being snubbed for the VP spot…Mac snubbed Jindal who has all eyes focused on him this evening, Romney was snubbed—for Palin.
McCain has extremely POOR JUDGEMENT.

Posted by: clarity | August 31, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

I think this is why good people do not seek elected offices. It’s such a shame and a waste of our lives that people cannot work together and solve problems.

Posted by: Christie | August 31, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

Scared people…she was a better choice than I thought. :D

Posted by: John | August 31, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

What she doesn’t know she will learn very quickly, she seems smart enough,” Ferraro said.
Being the VP for the Presdient of USA is not a on the job training job. Russia is trying to star a war and she have no clue on Foreign policy.
Ferraro is a nut case and we don’t need her vote.

Posted by: gl | August 31, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

Christie, I think the Democrats are showing themselves to be better at problem resolution and are also taking a more ethical approach to campaigning. Though the party does leave something to be desired.

Posted by: kat | August 31, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

Obama is the nobody, what did he ever accomplish?

Posted by: Amy | August 31, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

Clarity: Have you even given Palin a chance? It doesn’t seem like it.

Posted by: MB | August 31, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

To the first person who posted–
Won’t Barack Obama be learning on the job on Day 1? I would rather have a VP learning on the first day than the President. You might wish to re-think.
But Palin learning curve and learning time will be quick I am sure–she sounds like she has already done what is humanly impossible in Alaska in a relatively short period of time.

Posted by: Carmen Purser | August 31, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

I think the Republicans are showing more class. Obama and his campaign have made more personal hits against McCain than McCain or his party has. In fact McCain is always the first to show respect for the democrat candidates, not the other way around. Therefore it seems like McCain is more along the line of a new politician that is willing to cross party boundaries than Obama.

Posted by: MB | August 31, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

Palin is no Hilliary Clinton and her supporters no this and will not vote for her. She is pro-life, but her career before her kids. Most women with kids are very mad about this. There is a time for everything even passing up a great job opportunity like the VP of the USA. She and Mccain have proving to put a win before their good judgement. Bad judgement on Palin choice to accept this type of job over taking care of her sick child. Any body that is a mother no this to be true!

Posted by: gl | August 31, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

Re: Mac snubbed Jindal
Jindal said that he would rather finish his work as a governor in the state of Louisiana. I think he was strong to tell McCain that. Romney doesn’t seem upset.

Posted by: Christie | August 31, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

Re: but her career before her kids
Are you under a rock?

Posted by: Christie | August 31, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Also Re Mac Snubbed Jindal:
Jindal didn’t even run in the primary.

Posted by: Heather | August 31, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

I’m a Republican so I followed the Republican primary. Jindal wasn’t even there, and Mitt Romney dropped out early because he didn’t have the votes.

Posted by: Heather | September 1, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

The adage that a chain (or country) is as strong as its weakest link truly applies to this situation. Until Americans start embracing their differences, they will never achieve greatness.
Geraldine Ferraro said earlier that Obama benefitted from affirmative action, yet she sees nothing wrong with Palin’s selection over the likes of Romney and the others with a great wealth of experience. Ferraro is happy only because a white female was selected. That’s not progress; it is a continuation of the vulgar practice that permeates many organizations. Yet, to Ferraro, it is an acceptable and required practice for her to be happy. Sadly, the same prejudice is reflected in the comments and attitudes on this site.

Posted by: Ferraro Who | September 1, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

I really do not need any more stories on Ms.Geraldine. She seems desperate for attention though.

Posted by: Carole R Williams | September 1, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Sarah Palin has run for office and been elected to it. Obama was SELECTED. once by the Daley machine and the other by superdelegates. That makes HUGE difference. ELECTED NOT SELECTED!
McCain/Palin08

Posted by: Rhonda | September 1, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

To Ferraro Who:
Why is it not ok for Geraldine to be proud that a woman is running for VP, if it’s ok for African Americans to be proud of Obama?

Posted by: Amy | September 1, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Ferraro has gone off the deep end if she is honestly happy about this pick. Palin a governor of a state 1/5 the population of Chicago for less than 2 years, and a mayor of a small town before that is really ready to lead. Palin is no Hillary Clinton, she isn’t a Kathleen Sebelius, she is barely on the national radar. This pick shows that John McCain is only concerned about winning this Election and not the mess after the victory party, Obama picked a person ready to step in if something was to happen to him day one. McCain chose someone who isn’t qualified to be Mayor of NYC, let alone leader of the free world. This Vice president pick shows a complete lapse in judgement by McCain. Is this man ready to lead when he has questionable ability to choose talent to help him govern.

Posted by: William | September 1, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

I get concerned when MCCain starts referring to Palin as “Oh, yeah. She’s a partner and a soulmate.” Why soulmate? Cindy is supposed to his soul mate. Is this man in love with Palin that he makes this insane choice just to be around her.

Posted by: Pete | September 1, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

I really do not need any more stories on Ms.Geraldine. She seems desperate for attention though. Posted by: Carole R Williams
….. Carole … Ann Coulter doesn’t like competition so quit trying to clone her!!

Posted by: francisco de cardenas | September 1, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Pete get over yourself. I have called co workers soulmates when we totally connected in a great project. Quit looking for trouble
Puma for McCAin

Posted by: Fae | September 1, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

who cares what this old lady says? she’s a trator on faux news.

Posted by: tk | September 1, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

Pete – He actually did say that Palin is his soulmate and partner on Fox News Saturday. Maybe he’s neither Baptist nor Episcopalian , but Mormon.

Posted by: kat | September 1, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

Are you libs going to be this cruel to Obama when he’s an old man? The way you’re insulting McCain and Ferraro leads me to believe that. BTW, don’t forget that Hillary will be 68 in 2012…can we insult her wrinkled self then?
I like Ferraro a lot more now than decades ago. She speaks her mind and doesn’t just spout the party line. She’s shown that’s she’s matured in her views and sees things more philosophically and critically than being just another party-affiliated politico spewing double talk.

Posted by: Grand Old Party | September 1, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

My Harvard educated butt will never vote for McCain.
It’s downright patronizing that he would choose a VP just because she’s a woman.
I was a Hillary Democrat and I remain a Hillary Democrat. Palin is anti-choice and anti-fair pay.
No way. No how. NO MCCAIN.

Posted by: Roxanne | September 1, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am

“Suppose for example you’re a voter and you have candidate X and you have candidate Y,” Clinton said. “Candidate X agrees with you on everything but you don’t think that person can deliver on anything. Candidate Y disagrees with you on half the issues but you believe that on the other half, the candidate will be able to deliver. For whom will you vote? – Bill Clinton, Aug. 27
McCain/Palin 08

Posted by: Stephanie | September 1, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am

Palin has the voice of a Ihop waitress…like fingernails on a chalkboard

Posted by: eeewww | September 1, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am

What she doesn’t know she will learn very quickly, she seems smart enough,” Ferraro said.
Being the VP for the Presdient of USA is not a on the job training job. Russia is trying to star a war and she have no clue on Foreign policy.
You hypocrite!! You think being President is on the job training though? Obama has no experience in anything, but hitting the switch wrong 6 times as Senator. A week’s trip overseas does not qualify for foreign experience! That’s as stupid a statement as I’ve heard in a long time!!

Posted by: dragonfly777 | September 1, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am

Roxanne–Your butt may have been educated at Harvard but your bain/mind certainly was not.
Please go out and get a real e3ducation on honesty and decency. OK

Posted by: Martin | September 1, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am

We’ll see if squeeky can assume the attack huskie role.
It will be fun to hear her say…Obama is not ready…well I’m not either, but that’s not the point

Posted by: Amatuer | September 1, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am

“Being the VP for the Presdient of USA is not a on the job training job.”
I’d be more comfortable with the VP learning on the job, than with the President having to learn on the job, which is what we will have with Barry.

Posted by: Mack | September 1, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am

‘Palin has the voice of a Ihop waitress…like fingernails on a chalkboard”
Easy solution; don’t listen to her. Just keep replaying Barry’s greatest hits like a good little bot.

Posted by: Mack | September 1, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am

well this proves it. Ferraro is not a feminist, she’s a sexist. Gender first, convictions second.

Posted by: Goon | September 1, 2008, 2:21 am 2:21 am

Geraldine Ferraro has disappointed me time and again during this election cycle. Totally lost my respect.

Posted by: Female Dem | September 1, 2008, 2:22 am 2:22 am

Ferraro’s a life long democrat, with strong liberal convictions. The only reason she would vote for McCain is if she knows some things. from her work on the Clinton campaign, about Senator Obama, that we don’t know (yet), or if she is just very much representative of the disaffected Hillary supporters who feel Obama’s actions toward Senator Clinton during the primary were sexist, and she simply hasn’t or won’t forgive him for it.

Posted by: thank God for Karma | September 1, 2008, 2:43 am 2:43 am

Almost 6 in 10 Americans say Palin’s selection as McCain’s running mate will have no effect on their vote. One in five say it makes them more likely to vote for McCain; one in five say it makes them less likely.
“If McCain was hoping to boost his share of the women’s vote, it didn’t work”

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | September 1, 2008, 3:05 am 3:05 am

sassy wrote, “Palin is shamelessly using HRC. She is no HRC and she is trying to wrest the feminist movement from her by posing as her.”
Sarah Palin has not tried to pose as HRC. They are both strong women. I support McCain/Palin but I think HRC was more experienced. Palin is pro-life and for many HRC supporters that is unacceptable. I have had to go posting on these forums arguing with many democrats who say that Sarah Palin should be home watching children rather than also pursuing a political career. Were she a man, would this argument be made? It seems there is a lot of sexism here. What is unusual is how many republicans admire Hillary’s tenacity and grit (and not just for prolonging the democratic primary – I truly came to admire her fortitude and her logic), but how many democrats think that Sarah Palin should be a housewife with no career. This seems to be opposite of conventional stereotypes. I think that Ferraro didn’t appreciate the hatchet job pulled on both herself and on HRC by the Obama campaign, and in Sarah Palin she sees someone to admire for character and gumption if not for political ideology.

Posted by: HawkTheSlayer | September 1, 2008, 3:14 am 3:14 am

“As for B O’s attitude towards Michele, she MAKES him toe the line with her and
she’s the bigger and stronger of the two…..”
I think he has Mommy issues. That’s probably why he didn’t want Hillary for VP.

Posted by: Mack | September 1, 2008, 3:35 am 3:35 am

One can count on Ferraro jumping at the opportunity for any publicity. She is running for office again. Since her voters are Democrats, expect her to lose AGAIN.

Posted by: susan | September 1, 2008, 4:10 am 4:10 am

Geraldine Ferraro is a nattering, neurotic clown.
Thank God the nation was spared from ever having her in as critical a position as VP.

Posted by: FilmMD | September 1, 2008, 4:42 am 4:42 am

SAraClintorn neither Joe Biden. But she is Sarah Palin. She had proven her worth to fight against big oil companies and the corrupt members of her own Party. Barack, just disowned Rezko, his financial mentor for 16 years; with Biden, heaven knows, how clean he is.

Posted by: FRank Magno | September 1, 2008, 4:48 am 4:48 am

Ferraro proved to me during the primary that she is an idiot along the lines of Lieberman…I could care less who she will vote for.

Posted by: indy_voter | September 1, 2008, 7:26 am 7:26 am

FRank Magno,
“She had proven her worth to fight against big oil companies and the corrupt members of her own Party”
Really? She has such a long track record of doing this in her 8 years of public service, two as mayor of a town of 9000 and governor of a state a tenth the size of NYC? She is small time player in a sparsely populated state. But yet McCain this woman is qualified? Give me a break! I don’t think she has enough track record to say she is a successful governor. After all, many thought GWB was a great president 2 years into his term…

Posted by: indy_voter | September 1, 2008, 7:32 am 7:32 am

Geralidine Ferraro leaves a lot to be desired.
I’m not sure why she continues to show up on the news circuit. She does not have much to say. I hope one day a woman is a winner on a ticket. But the right woman. Palin is not that woman.
She reminds me of just being a “socker mom”. Not sure whom that is suppose to appeal to. It certainly does not appeal to me.
Palin came on the scene, nobody knows anything about her, and the Republicans go wild!!? That tells me a lot about Republicans. It doesn’t matter what she knows, but the fact that she “looks” like them.

Posted by: Shay | September 1, 2008, 7:33 am 7:33 am

The Obama supporters are so brainwashed that they will not even consider the option of someone else, whether they are qualified or not. It is disappointing that they run like mice following a Pied Piper off the pier together, without knowing what awaits them. You are supporting a product of the Chicago Political Mob, a creation of a lot of money and thugs who have ruined a great city and now want to expand their empire to the country. Look around Chicago and find what the entrenched political machine has done to that once fine city, ruined it.

Posted by: jim 234 | September 1, 2008, 7:34 am 7:34 am

Shay,
As opposed to all those conservatives that say so many nice things about Obama? I don’t agree with name calling anyone but to imply it is one-sided is ridiculous.

Posted by: indy_voter | September 1, 2008, 7:35 am 7:35 am

Shay,
“Palin came on the scene, nobody knows anything about her, and the Republicans go wild!!? That tells me a lot about Republicans. It doesn’t matter what she knows, but the fact that she “looks” like them.”
You got that right! In fact, I think a large part of the reason she was chosen is that she looks better than them. McCain chose style over substance.

Posted by: indy_voter | September 1, 2008, 7:41 am 7:41 am

indy_voter:
I appreciate your comments. However, I have been reading these blogs for a long time, and I am saddened by the responses I have read against Obama. I have read what has been said regarding McCain. But the venom, the operative word is venom, has been directed to Senator Obama. The name calling, the total disrespect is very evident against Democrats. I don’t agree with Republicans at all, but I don’t have to call McCain out of his name, or be disrespectful as it relates to the person himself. I have seen less of that towards McCain. As I said, I know why!

Posted by: Shay | September 1, 2008, 7:42 am 7:42 am

I really don’t think Geraldine Ferraro would vote for a Republican. They are anti-choice, against equal pay for women, don’t want to raise the minimum wage, are against unions, don’t want to provide affordable healthcare, and don’t want to help people get an education. She may not like Obama but she is not stupid. She will vote on the issues that are important to women.

Posted by: Mike | September 1, 2008, 7:52 am 7:52 am

Good to know that good old fashioned act first think later femminism exists still. I hope Walter Mondale is embarrased by Geraldine Ferrarro, because I sure as hell am.
Yeah lets vote for the woman who stands against everything I have ever stood for, just because she is a woman! I think maybe its easy to understand why the Democratic Party was in a mess in the 1980s with these kinds of people as its leaders.

Posted by: markymark | September 1, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am

Mikey: why don’t we just raise the minimum wage to 100k an hour, then we’ll all be rich!! the minimum wage is the dumbest thing going. try econ 101, it hurts the very people you say you want to help. but the truth is you want them unemployed and dependent upon the government. so they’ll vote democrat.
you want healthcare? why don’t you buy your own for you and your family, and stop asking other people to pay for it. same with education, why don’t you pay for your kids, instead of hoping I’ll do it for you?
why are you for abortion? who’s going to be left to pay for all the things you want?

Posted by: t | September 1, 2008, 8:06 am 8:06 am

t…you sound like the typical Republican. All you care about is your bottom line. Why should you help out anyone else? And the Rep;ublicans call themselves Christians. They are just hypocrites.
And we pay one way or the other. I’d rather pay to give children and families a better life than pay for more and more prisons.

Posted by: Mike | September 1, 2008, 8:16 am 8:16 am

mikey: you’re a typical dem, real liberal with other people’s money, but unwilling to donate your own. you know like obama, who lets his brother live in a hut, and doesn’t help at all. doesn’t want to send his money, but will be glad to take ours to send!
you’re the greedy one, wanting other people to pay for your needs, and unwilling to be responsible for your own needs and those of your family.
As far as prisons, I thought abortion would fix all that, you know there wouldn’t be any unwanted children around…that was the lie told at the time. its like that other lie, you know about a fetus not being human.

Posted by: t | September 1, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am

oh and mikey, since you’re the expert on christianity, post the bible verse where Jesus talks about setting up government welfare programs…you know where he asked Pilate for medicare and social security….don’t worry, I won’t hold my breath.

Posted by: t | September 1, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am

t…you are mistaken. First I’m not a Democrat. I’m an Independent and I voted for McCain in the primary in 2000. I not only donate, I volunter regularly. I’ve never taken government money for anything and I made too much to qualify for the latest government rebate. I am Catholic. So don’t be so quick to judge. I just happen to believe that the Democrats this time have the best interest of the American people at heart. The Republicans are just interested in keeping power so that they can continue their right wing agenda.

Posted by: Mike | September 1, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am

mikey: they sure don’t have the best interests of unborn babies at heart. you tell me not to judge, but you sure are quick to judge me, you liberal hypocrite.
oh yeah your liberal agenda has done wonders for people, look at Michigan, detroit, new orleans…all democratic liberal strongholds, all a mess. Socialized medicine doesn’t work, we have examples in canada, britain, elsewhere. actually people die and sufffer because they have to wait for service, and are denied treatments because of cost. but you think it ‘helps’ but all it really helps is democrats stay in power. your ‘compassion’ is a lie that conceals a lust for power over other people’s lives.

Posted by: t | September 1, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am

t..I think you have a touch of amnesia. The Republicans have been running this country for the last 8 years. The first 6 years of George Bush’s presidency he had a Republican Congress. The Republicans are responsible for the horrendous state this country is in. 80% of Americans agree that we’re on the wrong track. The people in charge of the train wreck are the Republicans.

Posted by: Mike | September 1, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am

The Democratic party today is anything but democratic and certainly doesn’t believe in freedom of speech. Witness the way the mean spirited way they’ve treated Ralph Nader and Geraldine Ferraro for speaking their minds. Voters would be smart to elect a Republican to the White House because no one party can be trusted when it has control of the Senate, House and Executive Branch.

Posted by: Asia2PA | September 1, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am

mikey: the GDP grew by over 3% last quarter, oh yeah thats like the great depressin…only to people who have to lie to take power. you can’t explain any of your positions, or go beyond talking points, as is typical for a liberal democrat. Since you are for abortion, why do you call yourself catholic, when the position of the church is clear?
the democrats have been running congress the last 2 years, and they promised to bring gas prices down, and instead they’ve doubled! thats democratic results for you. and obama is only sorry they didn’t go up a little slower, so people wouldn’t be upset…thats democrat ‘compassion’ for ya!!

Posted by: t | September 1, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am

The Democrats have controlled both houses of Congress for almost three years. The economic downturn occurred during their watch so they need to take some ownership of the current state of affairs. If the Democratic leadership is truly as brilliant as they keep telling everyone they are, they have had ample opportunity to do some of the wonderful things they’ve been promising in this campaign. All words, no action.

Posted by: Asia2PA | September 1, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am

Sadly, it looks like sexism is alive and well and well received by many in this country. Even Biden said yesterday at a campaign stop how ” good looking she is.” It’s not acceptable to bring this up- racial comments along the same lines would not be tolerated yet many seem to think it’s ok to talk about Palin’s looks. It’s not!! This is the future of our country -she may have participated in beauty contest before , but this is not a beauty contest. It is very serious business- you should base your voting decision on the issues and which candidate shares your values.
Still waiting for Howard Dean to be a real leader of the Democratic Party and stop this nonsense. It was not ok to treat Hillary in that manner and it’s not ok to say such against Palin.

Posted by: Angela | September 1, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

It’s strange that when a democrat actually thinks about who and why they are voting for someone, instead of just pulling a lever without any regard as to what damage they are causing. They get attacked.
This leads me to believe that if you are a democrat you are prohibited from doing any creative thinking on your own for fear of being kicked out of the party.

Posted by: Bruce Boswell | September 1, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am

Leiberman (2000)and now Ferraro (1984), both VP candidates for Democrats supporting McCain. Where is the new AD coming ??
- A McCain Democrat from MA

Posted by: vs | September 1, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am

Obama sends a chill up Chris Matthews leg and Palin sends a chill among the general american public. The race between the corrupt MSM media (NBC,MSNBC and CNN) against the people has begun….
- A McCain Democrat from MA

Posted by: vs | September 1, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

vs —it’s hard to beleive you are a Democrat. First, have you ever watched Fox? I don’t think the Democrats have a hold on the mainstream media. MSNBC actually has real Republicans like Joe Scarborough and Pat Buchanan as pundits.
And if you were a true Democrat you wouldn’t feel comfortable voting for a party that is anti-union, against equal pay for women, against healthcare for children, against benefits for our veterans, and is happy to give corporations big tax breaks, even if they take their good paying jobs out of this country.

Posted by: Joan | September 1, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am

Fellow Americans – VOTE Sarah IN…..we need a woman to clean things up. She has proven that already.
I am sick of this Obama nonsense

Posted by: TOOTSIE | September 1, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

my grandfathers built this country.
Sarah is the only one who can get us back on track.
Go Sarah Go!
my family and all my friends will vote for you and John

Posted by: Tootsie | September 1, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am

Who cares about how she will vote, all I know is that, maccain is out of his mind, is like when Bush sr pick Thamos thinking that will please blacks, he got it wrong.

Posted by: dennis | September 1, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am

There are a number of issues that keep me from voting McCain/Palin but these are a top three – a woman’s right to choose, creationism taught in public schools, and a military draft. If they get elected, I’m packed and ready to move to Canada and I’ll be happy to leave you fools to deal with the disaster of a “free” country in the hands of the republicans.

Posted by: nomore, no more | September 1, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

Ferraro represents the worst of American politics. She has a stiflingly narrow agenda and an obvious ax to grind. Strikingly similar to John McCain who is still trying somehow to win in VietNam. It’s no coincidence that they are both in their 70′s. It’s called hardening of the categories.

Posted by: J Robinson | September 1, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

LOL, Palin is about as ready to fill the presidents shoes as I am to fill Mike Tysons shoes.
Jiff Woods

Posted by: Josh Reilly | September 1, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

O JOAN:
Yes, I am a McCain Democrat from MA who regrets voting for Kennedy,Kerry and Duval. These traitors mistreated Hillary and should be punished for promoting an inexperienced uncle tom called Obama who is now shamelessly being promoted by the likes of Chris Matthews and the MSM biased media (NBC, MSNBC and CNN). Yes I have watched FOXNews. They really seem more fair and balanced. I am also happy with ABCNews and CBSNews. It is MSNBC that make me PUKE big time.
Watch out for MA going for McCain. That is the water cooler discussion here in the suburbs.
Yesterday , on “THis Week” I heard Kerry say Obama is more qualified than Palin on foreign policy because he made a trip thi ssummer to Europe. He was ranting like a mad dog and I felt sorry for my ex democratic friends

Posted by: vs | September 1, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

What’s the best way to honor Hillary’s historic run for President?
Appoint a pretty young beauty queen with a thin resume.
No offense, but I doubt McCain’s abilities. I cannot tell you how many times I have seen hard-working, intelligent, and tough women get passed up for promotion, usually by a gross old boss.
Pretty women get graded more sympathetically, get more job offers, get more second chances, people treat them more gently, are promoted more quickly, etc. (This fact is proven time and time again, in study after study.)
Looks aren’t an indicator of smarts or character… but if I am looking to hire someone, the last thing you want is someone who hasn’t had to prove their competence. And a heavier person with humble looks usually has to fight a lot harder or have a lot more raw talent to get beyond the first interview.

Posted by: blip | September 1, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am

This primary has revealed DNC “leadership” to be corrupt, mean-spirited, and lacking respect for basic democratic principles.
They have completely and effectively ceded the moral high ground to Republicans at this point.
1. We have seen the race card played, with assistance from both Dean and Brazile.
2. We have seen rampant sexism with no objection by the DNC.
3. We have seen the superdelegates endorse as quid-pro-quo for campaign contributions.
4. We have seen arm-twisting of the congressional delegates by “neutral” Nancy Pelosi to declare for Obama.
5. We have seen an unabashed ageism campaign against John McCain, calling him “confused”, and that he has “lost his bearings”.
6. We’ve seen a softening of support for the gay and lesbian community.
7. We’ve seen caucus cheating.
8. We’ve seen intimidation of Hillary supporters, hack attacks and coordinated threats against voters and media that dare to dissent.
9. We’ve seen manipulation of the party nominating system and media to favor one candidate over another and the outright redistribution of votes cast for one Hillary and given to Obama.
This is now a democratic party in name only.
Thank God for McCain’s choice…………..

Posted by: Al from NJ | September 1, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

I am a dem voting for McCain/Palin — I know this drives the sexist dems on the orange site crazy — but it’s true. And oh by the way, Joe Biden — what a dolt — what a dunce.

Posted by: dazey | September 1, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am

Just a bit of early evidence of my theory….
Palin fudged three big points in her acceptance speech… but the press gave her a pass.
#1: She claimed that she opposed the Bridge to Nowhere. In fact, she was upset about it… but only because she didn’t get enough money from the feds. And, she sure didn’t give the money back once she had it.
#2: She claims to have extensive “commander-in-chief” experience as governor of Alaska. It’s basically like being an “Assistant Manager” at Wendy’s and telling everyone that you have a white collar job.
#3: She referenced Hillary’s fight to break through the glass ceiling. Months ago she called Hillary a “whiner” for fighting so hard.
Any other candidate would have to answer these… but the press treats her with kid gloves because she’s cute. And that is not a step forward for women… it’s a step backward. Women in politics are called to be every bit as smart and accountable as men.

Posted by: blip | September 1, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Geraldine is suddenly relevant?

Posted by: gjkotw01 | September 1, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

Don’t you love it? This woman, who hasn’t spent ONE day in Washington will be one 72 year old heartbeat away from the Presidency of the United States. (LOL) A small town mayor. A first term governor. The entire world is laughing at us.

Posted by: Dems | September 1, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

She’s from the second wave of feminists… she’s angry. She’s got an axe to grind. Anyone can see as much.
People like her give feminism a bad name. She gives the appearance that we are against men. When really we want women to be treated fairly.

Posted by: blip | September 1, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am

…”Geraldine is suddenly relevant?”
Of course she’s going to be asked what she thinks. She was the first woman on a major party’s ticket, and here comes the second.
Just like Mark Spitz was asked what he thought about Michael Phelps, of course Ferraro will be asked about Sarah Palin. That’s normal.

Posted by: Jane | September 1, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

When McCain picked Palin I was amazed at first. However, after studing her record and seeing just what kind of a woman this is, I could not be happier. She is a true independent just like McCain. He picked her because she is a woman of character. She and McCain stand strong on what they believe and they don’t make their decisions based on what the poles say will get them more votes. Even if you don’t agree with their policys you must at lease agree that the character of a person is seen when they stand for what they believe in even at great cost to them. Mccain proved that in Hanoi. Palin proved it by giving birth to her son four months ago. She believes in the value of all human life and because she does she has given a child life when others might choose to kill him. Both McCain and Palin are people of true character. Something that has been missing in most campaignes for many years now. It is time for a change. From no character to strong character. The value of a man and a woman is found in character.

Posted by: becky | September 1, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

“There are a number of issues that keep me from voting McCain/Palin but these are a top three – a woman’s right to choose, creationism taught in public schools, and a military draft.”
Two of those are not McCain or Pailin’s positions, they’re distortions of comments made by Palin and McCain and twisted. See LGF has the full story on Pailin’s beliefs and she is against teaching creationism in schools. McCain draft rumor came in a misunderstanding of a response he made in a Town Hall. He has stated repeatedly against a draft.

Posted by: FactCheck | September 1, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

“What’s the best way to honor Hillary’s historic run for President?
Appoint a pretty young beauty queen with a thin resume.”
1. Female politicians are always judged by their looks whether positively or negatively, and men are given a free pass. It does not matter what she looks like.
2. McCain’s motivation in picking Palin was to pick a like minded reformer. In the process he also solidified the Conservative base because Conservatives love Palin. It is also hoped some of that Hillary’s voters could be attracted to. But that is not the sole reason for Palin’s appointment for any reason.
3. Thin resume? It’s thicker than Obama’s. She’s more experienced than Barack Obama and he’s running for the top of thre ticket. Seeing Obama supporters use this line of attack is laughable.
4. Although I’m a woman I am not a huge Palin fan, nor was I a Hillary or Obama fan, but I do feel good to see women and African Americans rise to the top. I’ve been supporting McCain ever since Giulini dropped out and I vote for the top of the ticket.

Posted by: FactCheck | September 1, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

To those Hillary supporters on this thread who are switching to McCain, thank you for helping my Candidate. My mom is a Hillary supporter (lifelong democrat) who switched to McCain, and I’m a Republican, and we have finally bonded over politics, neither of us can stand BO.

Posted by: FactCheck | September 1, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Whatever credibility she once had, Ferraro has lost it. Honestly, folks, who gives a damn what she thinks!

Posted by: Jim | September 1, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Can somebody please explain to me how they can conclude that Mrs. Palin has MORE experience than Mr. Obama? Obama has been a US Senator for 4 years and was an IL state senator for 8 years prior to that. Mrs. Palin has been governor of the 47th most populace state in the union for less than 2 years, and served on the town council and mayor’s office of a town of less than 10,000 for ten years before that. How is that more experience than Obama?

Posted by: Blaine | September 1, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Who cares what Geraldine has to say? She has already said she doesn’t like Obama because she beat Hillary and didn’t bow down to her demanding that he give up!! This is America, she can voye for whom ever she wants!!
Obama 08 anyway!!

Posted by: Terry | September 1, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

Blaine here is how I see it. Sarah Palin has executive experience as 10 year Mayor of Wasila and 2 years as Governor of Alaska. Obama has zero executive experience. He has spent almost his entire career as senator running for president. So I think there is an argument to be made that Palin is more experienced than Obama.

Posted by: JL | September 1, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

Here’s to Geraldine Ferraro. She was the first to run the gauntlet and understands the ugly nature of politics as it pertains to women. And to Sarah Palin? Hang in there, governor. It is pretty obvious the press fears you. Independent, self-sufficient female governors as charismatic as you are a real media target. And one who can hunt, fish, and survive on the frontier scares them all the more! Keep hammering away at big oil, corrupt party members, and wasteful spending. You have a lot of support out here.

Posted by: LucyLu | September 1, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

She does not have to say – she already did! She said she would always vote country first and party last! That sounds like the theme of the Republican convention – so Geraldine is voting for President Elect McCain and Vice President Elect Palin. You go girl! You are voting for the winning ticket in November and so am I!

Posted by: Eileen | September 1, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

For those of you who question Ms Ferraro’s relevance ponder this. Ms Ferraro was obviously a Hillary supporter, and as a former Democratic candidate, she is under tremendous pressure to support the Obama / Biden ticket. Yet with all of that pressure, she refuses to endorse Obama. And now many of the Obama supporters claim that “No women are going to be fooled by the choice of Palin as the VP contender”. Well just in case you aren’t listening, the FIRST woman to try and break the glass ceiling is obviously tempted at least to support Palin in her bid to be the first to break the glass ceiling. And I suppose that the 95% support Obama is garnering among Blacks is not due in some part because he himself is black? I think the Democrats are fools to underestimate the impact Governor Palin will have. Their attempt to degrade all achievements and accomplishments of women, JUST AS THEY DID HILLARY will come at a cost for them.

Posted by: GeraldD | September 1, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

I am a 63 year-old white woman and I support Obama 100% As for Geraldine Ferraro, she is obviously no longer a Democrat. We all need to remember the fiasco that developed during her campaign, it had to with improper financial reporting I think.

Posted by: Rita@Goldivas | September 1, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

Well if Ferraro is going to vote according to the issues, then she’ll be voting for Obama for sure.
But as to the other matter: Palin’s so-called executive experience. Being mayor of a town of less than 7000 people simply doesn’t count. If you use that definition of experience, she’s more qualified than ALL of the candidates, including McCain, who doesn’t have any executive experience either. That means she’s also more qualified than were JFK and Lincoln, neither of whom had prior executive experience before becoming president. Why not put Palin at the head of the ticket if executive experience is so vital? The lack of logic on the part of the right is astoundingly idiotic.
Let’s face it, Palin wasn’t picked for her experience; she was selected (on the spur of the moment it seems) to help shore up McCain’s flagging support among the extreme right wing of his party, and to try and steal former Hillary supporters (at least the dumb ones anyway). Short term politics just to win an election. It’s not about the country at all.
The choice was reckless and a possible sign of McCain’s decision making process if he ever became president. In short, wacky.

Posted by: Mark O | September 2, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

I don’t care who the President or VP is as long as they can pass the “William Wallace Test”.
Dude there’s a reason William Wallace was chosen by Mel Gibson it wasn’t because he had a cool sword, it was because the movie portrayed ordinary people being lead by someone who Inspired them to do extra ordinary things…
A leader needs to speak well in public at a level where people are standing in a state of positive shocked euphoria… can John McCain do this? No… The man can barley read off a teleprompter?
I’m not down playing the issue or trying to insult anyone, I guess I just don’t get it, I’ve read all the Anti Obama posts, and it seems to me that everyone against Obama just needs to open their eyes, listen with their ears, and believe in their heart of hearts, you have a guy with a proven track record who has organized one the best political movements in the last century and has a VP picked that has age old experience… It’s not even contestable, have you seen the excitement languishing around the GOP national convention… it’s like a bunch of people in a room grabbing at what once was…

Posted by: Damon | September 3, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

I don’t care who the President or VP is as long as they can pass the “William Wallace Test”.
Dude there’s a reason William Wallace was chosen by Mel Gibson it wasn’t because he had a cool sword, it was because the movie portrayed ordinary people being lead by someone who Inspired them to do extra ordinary things…
A leader needs to speak well in public at a level where people are standing in a state of positive shocked euphoria… can John McCain do this? No… The man can barley read off a teleprompter?
I’m not down playing the issue or trying to insult anyone, I guess I just don’t get it, I’ve read all the Anti Obama posts, and it seems to me that everyone against Obama just needs to open their eyes, listen with their ears, and believe in their heart of hearts, you have a guy with a proven track record who has organized one the best political movements in the last century and has a VP picked that has age old experience… It’s not even contestable, have you seen the excitement languishing around the GOP national convention… it’s like a bunch of people in a room grabbing at what once was…

Posted by: Damon | September 3, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am

I love Geraldine Ferraro and believe we need more women in politics! Therefore, I supported Hillary in the primary and believe her to be the best qualified of all candidates. But, I cannot support Obama, so I am voting for McCain Palin. Now THAT is change we can believe in!

Posted by: Leo | September 3, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.