For Obama at Saddleback, a Tough Crowd on Some Issues
“What does it mean to you to trust in Christ?” Pastor Rick Warren asked Sen.. Barack Obama, D-Ill., Saturday evening. “And what does it mean on a daily basis? I mean, what does that really look like?”
For the crowd of more than 2,000 sitting at Saddleback Church, Obama had the right answer, on this one at least.
“As a starting point, it means I believe that Jesus Christ died for my sins and that I am redeemed through him. That is a source of strength and sustenance on a daily basis. I know that I don’t walk alone, and I know that if I can get myself out of the way, that I can maybe carry out in some small way what he intends. And it means that those sins that I have on a fairly regular basis hopefully will be washed away.” Quoting from the book of Matthew, Obama said it also meant an obligation to “the least of these.”
But where Obama had more trouble with the crowd – which sat politely throughout the forum – was when Warren delved into the social issues that put Obama and his liberal views at odds with the majority of white evangelicals.
“Forty million abortions since Roe v. Wade,” noted Warren. “At what point does a baby get human rights in your view?”
Obama said that “whether you are looking at it from a theological perspective or a scientific perspective, answering that question with specificity, you know, is above my pay grade. “
“I am pro-choice,” the Democratic senator acknowledged. I believe in Roe v. Wade and have come to that conclusion not because I’m pro-abortion, but because ultimately I don’t think women make these decisions casually. They wrestle with these things in profound ways. In consultation with their pastors or spouses or their doctors and their family members.”
He mentioned that everyone could find common ground on the goal of reducing the number of abortions, which he’d put into the Democratic party platform. No one seemed to care much.
Likewise, Obama’s support for research involving embryonic stem cell research was met with the distant sound of crickets.
“Keep in mind the way that stem cell legislation that was vetoed by the president was structured, what it said was you could only use embryos that were about to be discarded, that had been created as a consequence of attempts at in vitro fertilization,” Obama pointed out.
He also suggested that “it’s not like people who are in favor of stem cell research are going around thinking to themselves, ‘Boy let’s go destroy some embryos.’ That’s not the perspective that I think people come to that issue on.”
Asked which existing Supreme Court Justice he, as president, would not have nominated, Obama immediately said he “would not have nominated Clarence Thomas…I don’t think that he was a strong enough jurist or legal thinker at the time for that elevation. Setting aside the fact that I profoundly disagree with his interpretation of a lot of constitution.”
For good measure, he added he would not have nominated Antonin Scalia, “although I don’t think there’s any doubt about his intellectual brilliance.”
Chief Justice John Roberts, whose confirmation Obama voted against, “was a tougher question only because I find him to be a very compelling person.”
Another point of clear difference came when Obama was asked whether faith- based organizations should have to forfeit federal funds if they discriminate in hiring for those federally-funded programs — an issue of importance for religious conservatives who want to be able to hire people of their own faith.
Obama said, “We do have to be careful to make sure that we are not creating a situation where people are being discriminated against using federal money. “
Warren tried to make Obama see the issue from his point of view. Imagine if Saddleback Church wanted to provide aid to Hurricane Katrina victims, he said, “and I wanted to hire some people to do relief…If I took federal money to help in that relief I wouldn’t be able to say, ‘I only want people to believe like we do?’”
“We do want to make sure of is that as a general principal we’re not using federal funding to discriminate,” Obama again said, “but that is only when it comes to the narrow program that is being funded by the federal government. that does not affect any of the other ministries that are taking place.”
Obama found more support when he said, “I believe that marriage is the union between a man and a woman. Now … for me as a Christian it’s also a sacred union. God’s in the mix.”
He received applause for that sentiment and also, interestingly enough, when he said he believed in civil unions for same sex couples, so that “gay partners to want to visit each other in the hospital for the state to say, you know what, that’s all right, I don’t think that in any way inhibits my core beliefs about what marriage is. I think my faith is strong enough and my marriage is strong enough that I can afford those civil rights to others even if I have a different perspective or a different view.”
A lighter moment came when Warren, a best-selling author, asked Obama how he defines rich when it comes to taxes.
“You know, if you’ve got book sales of $25 million…” Obama joked.
“Okay, all right, I’m not asking about me,” Warren laughed.
Obama said that those making more than $250,000 are doing well.
“I’m not suggesting that everybody that is making over $250,000 is living on easy street," he said, "but the question that I think we have to ask ourselves is if we believe in good schools, if we believe in good roads, if we want to make sure that kids can go to college, if we don’t want to leave a mountain of debt for the next generation, then we’ve got to pay for these things. They don’t come for free. And it is irresponsible, I believe it is irresponsible intergenerationally for us to invest or for us to spend $10 billion a month on a war and not having a way to pay for it. That I think is unacceptable.”
The crowd clapped about that, too.
– Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller
Email
Rick Santorum Encircled in Prayer
Boehner Slams Obama on Contraception Controversy
Pandering.
Posted by: Emm | August 16, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
Now those Hillary supporters have a real sense of what a neo-con, anti-choice, anti-gay, McCain is. There you go fools!!!!
Posted by: carl29 | August 16, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
Obama’s performance was compelling, and he did quite well in a hostile setting. McCain gave his standard stump speech.
Posted by: Stephen | August 16, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
“…answering that question with specificity, you know, is above my pay grade“
LOL
That seems to be his real answer to ALL issues!
Posted by: Rick | August 16, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
I am still confused. Where does Obama stand/ stop trying to not offend and give me a definte answer.
Posted by: rachel | August 16, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
America has a clear choice. Do we want a president who will tell you what you want to hear? Or do we want a president who can see issues through various opinions and point of views? We have been fooled by those who tell us what we want to hear before. Is it their fault NOPE! It’s the American voters fault! Nothing gets done when we fall to see life through others point of view. My fear is America is not ready to grow up!
Posted by: Erik | August 16, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
???
I thought BOTH candidates were supposed to speak at this event.
Posted by: mlwheeler | August 16, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
Neither of these guys are Christians, they are pseudo-Christians through political convenience. This Rick Warren forum is one big joke. It’s a discussion around big business “Christianity” between three rich guys.
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | August 16, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
Frankly, a vote for Obama is below my pay grade. I think I’ll reserve my vote for a much better nominee.
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | August 16, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
As a “born-again Christian” myself, I would like to emphasize that not all of us are so-called “cultural conservatives”.
It was good of Pastor Warren to host the Civil Forum on the Presidency at his church.
However, as Pastor Warren’s best-selling book “The Purpose Driven Life” states in its opening: “It’s not about you.”
Thus, this election is NOT about cultural conservatives or evangelical Christians either.
It is about what is good for America and what is good for the world.
We have had two miserable presidential terms which were all about what was good for cultural conservatives and evangelical Christians and these two terms have been a selfish disgrace!
These last two terms were to America what the Pharisaical rule was to the Holy Land.
We must remember that Jesus said: “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”
Let’s do good for American and for the world as well.
Regardless of race, national origin, religion or no religion, please elect Senator Barack Obama President of the United States.
Posted by: Robert Campbell | August 16, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
I loved how McCain kept saying “my friends…..” I thought this was a dicussion about Faith…McCain was full on political mode talking points one after the other and pandered on…while Obama gave thoughtful answers and really opened up left himself totally vunerable.
Posted by: Sam | August 16, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
rachel: I’m not sure what you mean – what specifically did you not understand about Senator Obama’s answers?
If you make over a quarter million dollars a year, you are “doing well,” (rich).
He supports civil unions for same sex couples.
He is pro-choice and is not going to enforce a life begins at conception viewpoint (which would of course result in the banning of IUDs as a birth control device, and potentially some formulations of the birth control pill).
Really, he put enough specifics out there that anyone claiming he gave no definate answers reflects quite poorly on their basic English comprehension.
Posted by: jhw539 | August 16, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
America does have a clear choice, McCain is definitely Bush on steroids, it obvious he will get the country into another dum war. His answer to evrything is the bully approach, military force as a solution to all problems. This forum was suppose to display the canditates more personal side but McCain’s answers were all national security base. A question as to whether evil exist, his entire answer was Osama Bin Laden as if that is the only evil in the world. He is so narrow minded, I guess that is the real McCain.
Posted by: Nicky | August 16, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
Did anyone notice that McCain doesn’t stop and think before he answers? He gave such knee jerk reactions, often without letting Warren even finish the question. World War III will be started by our country if this man is elected.
Posted by: momo4 | August 16, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
mlwheeler: Obama spoke first (McCain just finished). I would assume a write up on McCain’s statements is in progress now.
Posted by: jhw539 | August 16, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
The interviews were pretty good, and Obama did quite well with a hostile audience, who I would was was about 60/40 republican democrat. But McCain basically told the people what they wanted to hear. That if we drill offshore all your problems will be solved. In actuality if McCain is elected he will be beholden to his corporate/republican masters. All that talk about energy straight out the t boone pickens plan isnt going to happen with McCain. Republicns will give leases for oil companies to drill anywhere and that oil (especaily in alaska) will be sold to the world market, not the American people for a discount.
My second point would be abortion, no liberal thinks abortion is a good thing. But to ban abortion would lead to women (mostly teenagers) to go across borderlines to get these procedures done, and then what? Are we going to lock these women up? Honestly its not a cut and dry issue.
My third point would be taxes. Taxing those who make over 250,000 dollars a year a measly sum of possibly 3 percent more is not going to bankrupt them. But if we want to fix our economy and bring the dollar back up to where it should be, we must pay off our national debt. You cant use a credit card to finance your wars and expect the next generation to pay for it. We need fiscal responsibility that doesnt consist of abolishing every social program the US has. Thats not a solution as John McCain suggested, in fact it would be national suicide. We need good roads, good schools, a good military, a good infrastructure etc., etc..
McCain is very good at please the rightwing theologians, but he isnt going to help America at all. Once McCain is in office I promise you he will be the puppet of the same republican power structure we have seen for the last 8 years.
Obama 08!!! We need realy solutions not pandering to evangelicals!!!
Posted by: Darin | August 16, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
McCain clearly was the better candidate tonight. Obama is still trying to define “paygrade”. Obama proved tonite that he can’t think without a teleprompter!
McCain grabbed the heartts of Americans and didn’t let go. John McCain won the Presidency tonite!
Posted by: ObamasNemesis | August 16, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
McCain was terrific.
Obama was a disaster.
I think agreeing to participate in this program might be the second biggest mistake Obama has made during his campaign – 2nd only to how he handled the Reverend Wright fiasco.
Posted by: Cathy Vee | August 16, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
I’ll say it since ABC obviously doesn’t want to: McCain was GREAT– direct, honest, compelling, energetic. Obama was doing his usual equivocating, trying not to let voters see how left-wing he really is. It hobbles his presentation. But the media, who have been in the tank for him from the beginning, will now begin the task of coaching him for the debates…
Posted by: EOS | August 16, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
I think we saw the real McCain tonight, McBush. Four more years of lies and deceits, good luck if McCain gets in.
I am donating to Obama.
Posted by: monica | August 16, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
Abortion and gay marriages, are all red herrings, we need to protect our constitution and educate our children if we don’t we will all suffer in the future. They are our future. Do we want a dumb America or a smart one, you choose?
Posted by: Bobbie | August 16, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
Both candidates were interesting to listen to. Neither surprised me, nor convinced me to vote for either one of them. After a 30 year professional career and attaining a highest annual salary of $52,000, I didn’t make Obama’s list of a ‘typical middle class wage earner of at least $150,000.’ Is it any wonder both candidates have problems with average Americans, many of whom work three jobs to keep their families together? I don’t think they have a clue!
Posted by: mpwynn | August 16, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
McCain was impressive. Obama not so. (I am voting for Hillary anyway.) But McCain brought me to tears. I think Obama likes this country, maybe, but I know McCain loves it. I disagree with him on a host of issues, but he won tonight, hands down.
Posted by: thecandypoem | August 16, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
This was not a debate, it was a conservation. How can someone win a conservation.
Posted by: d | August 16, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
What hostile setting was there? I thought the crowd was very respectful for both candidates.
Obama couldn’t seem to give a solid, straight forward answer. McCain cut out a lot of the standard b.s. and stated his opinion.
I have to say McCain scored big tonight.
(And by the way, when I see or hear someone say “McBush” I immediately write off the speaker as being an outright partisan hack moron. If you want to cost your candidate the election, keep calling McCain, “McBush”)
Posted by: Bob | August 16, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
Obama answered Rick’s questions honestly and thoughtfully.
Mccain gave a stump speech to an evangelical crowd…with very little thought.
exactly how they would lead…
Obama like great presidents have…thoughtful
McCain like Bush…like a rapid fire cowboy…
In fact 2 out of 3 of the answers from mccain I have heard in his speeches.
sad sad sad
Posted by: dl | August 16, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
Oh, one other thought. If Obama thinks $150,000 is “middle class”, I think it’s only because that’s probably what HIS family makes. I’d say “middle class” is quite a bit lower in household income than that, but I liked McCain’s answer of not wanting to promote class warfare.. My family income is $50,000 a year, we still manage to send our kids to private schools at great sacrifice, and I couldn’t be happier. Candidates really need to get away from class, gender and racial “warfare” when campaigning.
Posted by: Bob | August 16, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm
I thought the real telling part of the interview with Obama came when he mentioned Rick Warren’s book sales in response to his question about what constitutes his definition of “rich.” If Obama is as much of a buddy of warren’s as he pretends to be, he would know that Rick warren tithes 90% — YES — 90% — of his royalties to charity.
On the other hand, I came in thinking Obama would appeal to me as a woman who bases her vote on Faith and values MUCH more than McCain. In fact, I have been struggling about who to vote for and was definitely leaning roward Obame. After tonight, I saw Obama dance around all the questions that are important to me while Mccain gave straighforward answers. I nevr thought I’d say this — but I’m now solid for McCain.
Posted by: Cyndy Salzmann | August 16, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
Obama compelling? He actually was close to boring. I’ve never seen McCain better, he was clear, concise, did not mince words and his answers were truthful about his failed first marriage and thoughtful, especially about his experience in Vietnam. I know you libs hate to hear about that but hey, get used to it.
Posted by: Pat W. | August 16, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
Roxanne,
Please see my previous post … calling McCain “McWar” is childish, immature, and the mark of a partisan hack.
Grow up.
Posted by: Bob | August 16, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
I was quite impresed with McCain. Obama obviously was lost without his promter and I got weary of his ahs and hums. He’s obviously radical and if he is radical in this setting, just think how radical he will be when sitting back in that big chair in the white house. I think this guy is about redistribution of wealth and honestly, coming from a person that has a 9th grad education who now owns a home in Ca. and two business, sorry Obama, those people you want to give my small amount of excess money to will just have to work for it like I did. McCain cam across stronger than I’ve ever seen him, but then with the medial with a mic up Obama’s rearend 23/7, I really haven’t had the chance to see much of him anyway.
I liked the venue and the opportunity to see two candidates answer the same questions to one person. Might be the last honest presentation of candidates we will see.
Posted by: Marggie | August 17, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am
I am also wondering where the reporting on McCain is. He moved quite far to the right to please the evangelical crowd. I think that the moderate swing voters deserve at least a token report on what he professed tonight. It would be incredible bias to let McCain’s potentially controversial positions go completely unreported while dissecting Obama down to the last “uh.”
Who did McCain define as “rich”?
Posted by: jhw539 | August 17, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
HAPPY BIRTHDAY MADONNA!!!!
Posted by: NickRhodes | August 17, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am
Their is a large quiet majority that will vote for McCain. No movie star endorsements or roaring crowds
Posted by: von stuben | August 17, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
Obama thinks before he speaks and is concerned about other citizens. He was tactful and diplomatic. McCain, on the other hand sounded like a school-yard bully that smacked of GW Bush. (I’ll go to the gates of hell to kill Bin Laden…)I myself voted for Bush and I deeply regret it so I won’t go there with McCain because he sounds shallow and obviously has his dukes up ready to punch anyone who crosses his path. All McCain stories were “all about himself” to rehash his POW stories so people will pity him. Obama is an intellectual, McCain is a war-monger. I plan to vote for Obama although I was an avid Hillary Clinton supporter.
Posted by: Beth in TX | August 17, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
Erik, You are the man. Please said it one more time. America is not ready to grow up….
Posted by: chris | August 17, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am
Westcoastmessenger, are you a Christian? Don’t judge or you be judge.
Posted by: chris | August 17, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am
You can’t trust a man who cheats on his wife. He’ll say and do anything to hide who he really is. You’ll never really know who he is.
That’s why McCain hides from it…and didn’t answer the question. That also shows you can’t trust him.
Posted by: wilder5121 | August 17, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
This “church” should lose its tax exemption; they are CLEARLY involved in politics. It is a BLATANT example of violation of church-and-state separation.
This would have been a good opportunity for McCain and Obama to simply refuse to participate in this religious exercise.
I don’t care what church a candidate attends or whether he supports gay marriage, or even if he has a lover. What I DO care about is war, the economy, and taxes… things that affect MY life.
Posted by: Rhys | August 17, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
I thought that both candidates did really well. However, I think Obama, once again had better ideas on how to deal with real issues such as abortion and stem cell research in a practical way. He still has the better position on the war and seems to have a better vision of how our energy crisis will play out in the future.
Abortion and stem cell research are not going away. To emphasize preventative care and they means of doing that was very important in my opinion
In addition, McCain’s views to use every source of energy is admirable. However, to emphasize nuclear power as much as he does without having any idea on how it would effect our coastal reefs and still have no where to store the dangerous materials is just plain ignorant.
I think McCain tried to play the sympathy vote the entire time he was speaking and pandered to the crowd.
Obama spoke genuinely on the issues and showed humility.
Posted by: Chris | August 17, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am
Obama supporters will be in overdrive downplaying this forum. It was obvious McCain was more direct and upfront with his answers.
Posted by: marko | August 17, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
I was expecting McCain to say the lowest moral point in his life was when he was involved in the Keating savinga and loan scandal or when he had an adulterous affair that led to his divorce. The evangelical group heard what they wanted to hear from McCain tonight but wait until they see the latest blasphemous religious negative ad he ran against Obama? They are gonna see his evil side. They will see the real McCain.
Yes, we can! Obama ’08
Posted by: Texas for Obama | August 17, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
McCain was impressive. Obama was boring – as usual when it comes to debates or direct Q/A.
Obama only knows how to preach. He should be a Preacher.
Posted by: JKan | August 17, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am
I don’t care which is elected, but how could anyone argue that Obama was better, at least on this particular format tonight, than McCain.
Posted by: independent | August 17, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am
The only thing that was clear tonight is that McCain offers the same knee-jerk, poorly thought out policies that George W. Bush has given us, and Barack Obama is a man of superior intellect who will provide America with sensible solutions to real problems.
Posted by: AmericanPatriot | August 17, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am
Obama may have superior intellect but it is true that in these kinds of forums where being real counts he wasnt and mccain was whatever you think of his policies …. these elitist college professor types that say just trust us Obama will be the best I am trully sick of… the point uis Obama cant do a thing other than read a teleprompter it is the GW Bush model in reverse… so far it goes… take Bushes advice Fool me once dont get fooled again!
Posted by: staniam | August 17, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am
America is not ready to grow up. How can anyone dispute Obama’s performace as anything else than great. His intelligent thoughtful answers showed his true character. McCain was more of a stump speech, adding that “Christian” moment when he was a POW didn’t seem genuine, and his knee jerk reactions was very telling. America needs to grow up, and grow up fast.
Posted by: Alex | August 17, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am
President Obama did a great job!!!
He was very honest with his answers.
I think John McCain was listening to Barack backstage, you could tell he knew something about the questions before even hearing them in his quick pro-war answers.
People wake up. Do not elect the C student again, please, vote for intelligence.
Barack Obama ’08
Posted by: Ann White | August 17, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am
Short sound bites are not concise, honest answers.
Wake up America, or the Republicans will stick it to you agin.
Posted by: Mary | August 17, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am
Obama was the young man endowed with a good intellect who mistakenly thinks he is smarter and more knowledgeable than his elder who is possessed of a wide and varying experience in service of his country.
McCain was the elder.
The contrast was about as stark as it gets.
Posted by: John | August 17, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am
I’m a medium size business owner of 200 employees. If Obama is elected and raises my taxes as he has stated.
I will guarantee layoffs will happen in my business. So if you like your job and like to stay employed. You know who to vote for. Anyone but Obama.
Posted by: Bumbling | August 17, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am
Staniam, I do agree that John McCain was real tonight. I think they both were. But it seemed to me that the way he was launching into his answers before the questions were even finished showed that he is pretty damn quick to judge complicated issues. It is the kind of judgement that Bush has exercised many times over the past 8 years, and frankly, things haven’t gone so well…
Posted by: AmericanPatriot | August 17, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am
WOW Jake … this is the first time I am going to compliment your Article …
Spot On … No Spin …
Sen. Obama is an Intellectual … He will think before he acts as a President …
As an American, That is someone I want representing Me and I hope I have the majority of the populations POV …
Posted by: HC4BO | August 17, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am
Independent wrote: “I don’t care which is elected, but how could anyone argue that Obama was better, at least on this particular format tonight, than McCain.”
It’s called Bush Derangement Syndrome. NIH is working on it as we type.
Posted by: John | August 17, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am
American Patriot:
Obama has had 47 years to ponder when unborn human beings should accrue human rights. How many more years will we have to wait to reasonably expect an answer?
Posted by: John | August 17, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am
McCain is a double talk express, most people don’t realize that he voted for the nomination of the judges that he said at the forum he would not nominate.
He does talk without thinking, he will get this country into another dumb war. WThese quick direct answers are not well thought out. Obama understands the complexity of the issues we face and
for the most part there is no cut and dry answer so he is right in responding in a very thoughtful way as he did regarding his opposition to the war in Iraq. He took the time to analyze the issue at hand. McCain took his knee jerk approach with a quick thoughtless answer which got us in the situation we’re in. That is his style and it will only get the country into deeper trouble. Voters should pay more attention and put the pieces together and not let McCain’s double talk and tough talk blur their vision as to who he really is, Bush on steroids who will continue and amplify the corruption in Washington among other things.
Posted by: Barbara | August 17, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am
Well, McCain went straight into political mode, that entire performance was canned. He actually answered one question with “Drill, Drill, Drill”
McCain is much better giving short to the point answers, but he never explains anything. Obama on the other hand explains and explains, we learn where he’s coming from but it can be boring.
These guys are completely different. McCain was much more entertaining, but gave political answers. Obama, while tedious and boring at times, likes to explain things and goes into great detail, so even if you disagree with him, you know where he’s comming from.
McCain played to the audience, Obama answered Rick Warrens questions. That was the difference.
Posted by: Matt | August 17, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am
John, specifying the precise moment when fetuses acquire human rights is a theological question. It’s tantamount to trying to prove God’s existence, or asking what the meaning of life is. I personally believe that that moment occurs at conception, and it is probably the key disagreement I have with Senator Obama. That said, I don’t believe that anyone could objectively defend that view. His inability to answer that question with specificity is therefore legitimate.
Otherwise his position on abortion is clear: He is pro-choice, but would consider limiting late-term abortions if there were exceptions made for the health of the mother. Again, not a position I agree with, but a legitmate one nonetheless.
Posted by: AmericanPatriot | August 17, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am
Obama is a believer in the “two truths” approach to hard questions of reality, but there is no doubt that pressed to choose, he would reject the idea that religious doctrine describes the world as it exists. Religion is what makes him feel good, not what guides him in his thinking.
Posted by: John Schuh | August 17, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am
Alex
you are not willing to be objective and listen to both candidates answers to the same questions and so who did better:Mccain
Posted by: staniam | August 17, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am
American Patriot:
It’s called having deep conviction and the integrity to stand by those convictions regardless, rather than having a wishy washy, change with the tide, looking over your shoulder type of character flaw that Obama seems to have. His speedy answers only support what we’ve already established, that he’s ready to lead and make decisions based on experience and conviction, rather than hold a round table opinion fest for every little issue due to a lack of decisiveness masking as “open to any ideas” which is what Obama seems to rely on.
Posted by: Emm | August 17, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am
The point of the event was to inform the public of the candidates faith views. McCain didn’t even take it seriously. I heard war stories and policy prescriptions.
Obama actually answers questions. I disagree with the guy on virtually every issue, and could never vote for him, but he’s honest, and spoke his mind, even if it was long winded at times. I have to give him credit for that.
Posted by: John | August 17, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am
The one I trust to keep my family safe, to allow our economy to benefit from opportunity and incentive, and to stand up for the USA is John McCain.
The job of a President is to decide, not to endlessly ponder. Obama’s history is to say a lot but do little.
Posted by: SuziQ | August 17, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am
american patriot
Yes Mccaain maybe have been a little quick on his answers but at the same time it seemed that Obama was folowing a Bush model….you say you dotn want a Bush 3rd term but someone that walks and talks like Bush is bound to be a Bush… the campaign peratives are obviously calculating that doing that is what works and what might get him elected. Clinton on the other hand stake out thoughtful real solutions to things and Pelosi et al still went with what looked good
Posted by: staniam | August 17, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am
Emm,
Although Obama still has my vote…you make a pretty compelling argument ;-)
Posted by: AmericanPatriot | August 17, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am
When I hear Obama speaks he reminds me of politicians and activists during the Civil War and before. No matter the ideological or moral side, they gave detailed arguments for their beliefs. With our advanced technology today, too much of the American public is intellectually lazy and relies on sound bytes for their information and to reinforce a particular set of beliefs. They are not up for the challenge of thoughtful inquiry.
Posted by: YT | August 17, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am
AmericanPatriot:
Yes, but Bush has true convictions, too. Having true convictions about the wrong things can be a disaster.
Posted by: DennisNC | August 17, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am
Why thank you, Am Pat.
Posted by: Emm | August 17, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am
McCain put me to sleep, boring boring boring.
Posted by: mary | August 17, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am
It’s depressing to see that so many of us only saw what we wanted to see and heared what we wanted to hear. People on both sides of the aisle: try to acknowledge your biases when you are making judgements. Why did you even watch this event if you already had your mind made up about what you were going to think about it.
Posted by: Go World! | August 17, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am
Go World
I have implied in my comments tat I looked at both candidates in the forum tonight objectively and there is something to be said against high minded but boring versus decisisve but simple…. I am a centrist democrat but if that aligns me with conservartives or traditional republicans so be it….after all is said and done the master poltician, Bill Clinton said it best…Obama is a roll of the dice!then again we have a gambling and instant gratification culture to which I have never been a part of
Posted by: staniam | August 17, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am
After today’s conversation, one thing is clear – McCain is sincerely patriotic, he will die for this country. Obama can be a world president, if such a title existed, – in fact it may be a good idea to create such a title, make Obama the president and see how good he goes on international issues, if he does great, then make him the US president! I don’t think Obama has convictions about anything – he is still trying to figure things out. And the answer “above my paygrade” is so totally degrading.
Posted by: Sue | August 17, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am
I watched this tonight with a completely open mind, took notes on the answers each gave and then, after the show, looked at my notes. What I saw was a man that would make a decision and a man that would make 50 phone calls to schedule a meeting, talk it over for hours on end and then, when push came to shove, vote Present! Sorry Mr Obama but Mr McCain gets my vote.
Posted by: Jim S | August 17, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am
Sue
thats right. I think what people most remember is Obama going off on a world tour right before the start of a GE season because he couldnt figure out what else to do… the world has become too integrated…. again going back to the notion that Obama is in the same vein as the Bushes and the carlysle group which came up with the “New World Order” one world government type thing… people may dismiss it as conspiracy theory but Obamas base is saying oh hhe really knows whnat hes talking about without discernign it for themselves sortof scary… I could vote for him but he darn well better pick CLinton or a Clinton type politician as VP or he wont win!
Posted by: staniam | August 17, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am
Was Obama keeping his head tilted to the side so that we would notice his new gray highlights? Also…he said “ummm” way to much! I don’t think hostile world leaders will take him seriously. I sure can’t. And his 3 best – granny, wife, and Ted Kennedy??? Really? Tonight sealed my vote for McCain!
Posted by: justme | August 17, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am
Dazoom
exactly there should be the two candidates one modrator and the same questions period… none of this gotcha stuff that got rid of the more knowledgable candidates in the primary campaign… case in point… NBCs commentators that were moderators of some of the debates it looked liek a circus!
Posted by: staniam | August 17, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am
McCain never seemed to answer the question that was asked. It is easy to sound clear thinking when you memorize and regurgitate sound bytes.
On his three influential people question, he started to remind me of Perot. Kinda wacky.
McCain didn’t talk much about his personal faith.
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | August 17, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am
I thought McCain was frightening and I felt that he only thinks of the military and war. I thought Obama was thoughtful and direct. He will get my vote for president!
Posted by: Carol | August 17, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am
justme
there were some traditional right wing answers from Mccain that I wasnt comfortable with but maybe hes trying to keep his base…. Obama once again embarrassed the Democratic party he needs help if he is going to be elected which he might be!
Posted by: Staniam | August 17, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am
I think what is being overlooked by Mccain’s base(the press) is that Mccain showed that he is too quick on the trigger. He doesn’t think about his actions before he engages. This is a very dangerous attribute in a person seeking to be POTUS. I’m afraid that his zeal as witnessed in the faith forum will lead us into WWIII. Obama showed that he processes information before making a decision.
Posted by: James | August 17, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am
What I know for sure is that this country cannot afford a McCain administration. Wesley Clark was right to say that McCain’s POW status does not qualify him to lead this country. People need to understand that because it’s a fact. Just take a close look at his campaign, mismanagement, lobbyist galore, manipulation, corruption, you name it. There’s nothing honorable about that. That’s not the type of leadership this country needs.
Posted by: Nicky | August 17, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am
A Christian must demonstrate his faith in his everyday life. Jesus lashed out at the Pharisees for pretending to be religious while acting in ways that showed no faith and a lack of compassion for others. One man in this presidential race has consistently showed by his life that he follows the precepts of Jesus, in his marriage, in his strong profession that Jesus died for his sins, in his knowledge and use of scripture in his everyday life, in the tenor of his campaign,in his compassionate programs that leave no one behind. That man is Barack Obama.
John McCain says what he wants us to hear. I have no doubt that he prayed at his darkest hour, as many pray when they have no other hope. But I do not see a prayerful or God directed stance in most of John McCain’s actions and decisions in his everyday life. Many of his personal decisions have been blatantly selfish, he is confrontational and petty and has a nasty sense of humor, and his current decisions to smear his opponent at every turn shows an un-Christian mean streak. Be careful Christians, look at deeds and the honest heart, not just words and slapstick humor(my friends).
Posted by: Katharine | August 17, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am
Mr Coffee,Carol
Talk about frightening… Obama gave Michelle as one of the people that he counted on and would be part of his admimistration… though thats a given since shes his wife… she is the reason Obama doesnt have landslide support among democrats,Independants,repubs..the democrats have trief to get intellectual heavyweights into the office of president for years but unfortunately you also have to have real gravitas.. the only one to successfully do that is Pres Bill Clinton and you mock him…when someone isnt ready to be president they arent ready and Obama conseded that point tonight!
Posted by: staniam | August 17, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am
James
those of us beyond draft age dont really care that you make Obama your candidate because he is the one who wont institute the draft…think again, Obama will keep the troops in Iraq as long as mccain will and will so he wont be any different than mccain on the military..guess its time for you to go to canada!
Posted by: staniam | August 17, 2008, 2:06 am 2:06 am
Nicky
Obama has more lobbyists working for him than Mccain and its true that Obama has millions of small donations but the major unending source of money comes from millionaire bundlers….thats not true individual support thats corporate sponsorship which is no good!
Posted by: Staniam | August 17, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am
McCain = Bush on steroids, that’s the reality behind all his double talk.
Posted by: Barbara | August 17, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am
Ann White: Please stop drinking the Kool Aid or you will overdose. First of all he is still and will always be Senator Obama, calling him President just like his rip off of the Presidential seal will never make him President in a million years. Pleas refer to him as Senator until he becomes something else.Thank You.
Posted by: Jay | August 17, 2008, 2:17 am 2:17 am
Dear Fellow Americans – after a good night of sleep, please watch the re-runs tomorrow – with the sound OFF…notice the body language and eye movements of each candidate. Pretend you are a world leader and you have to wait for a translator to understand what has been said. Which guy seems to be in control of the situation? That is the guy you should vote for because he will be the leader of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA! Sleep well my friends!
Posted by: justme | August 17, 2008, 2:31 am 2:31 am
When did Obama’s life start? Why is it those who bully and murder the most innocent of stage of life can’t stand war while allowing genocide? Iraq is a good example — Obama the abortionist would have done nothing to stop the butcher of baghdad from committing genocide. Moral/values do matter. Say what you want about Bush. If Obama had been pres and slap us with higher taxes during our current problems (housing woes, high fuel, food prices, and so forth) we would be in a full blown depression. BTW Did some one mention Separation of Church & State? All 50 State Constitutions honor/acknowledge God but I’m sure the ACLU blame America Liberals are smarter than little ole me or perhaps their better at spreading falsehoods! To them morals/values don’t matter!
Posted by: M.A. | August 17, 2008, 2:33 am 2:33 am
The main things that decide it for me are #1 Obama’s economic policies are basically a repeat of what’s been tried before by Carter. We all know where that got us.
#2 If we don’t get over our political correctness guilt that is constantly being shoved on us by environmentalists and re-inforced by the media and hollywood and start drilling for our oil we will continue down the decline.
Posted by: DanO | August 17, 2008, 2:42 am 2:42 am
Personally I thought that McCain was pandering to the audience….Like an old drunk Uncle, he was set in telling War stories. If you want a WAR and the draft to be reinstated… My Friends… Vote McCain.
Posted by: Ron | August 17, 2008, 2:45 am 2:45 am
Good questions by Warren.
Both men did well.
However, McCain slipped in the race card at the end. Don’t know if McCain always put his country first at Annapolis. He was a real partier and graduated 5th from the bottom. McCain
has a good sense of humor. He summed up walking out on his wife and children for another woman, as the failure of my first marriage.
Obama gave honest answers to questions, even though he knew they might not always please the audience.
He also gave reasons for his answers, which sometimes makes his answers wordy.
Fair and balanced article by Tapper
Good commetary by most of the respondents, except a for a few haters.
Posted by: Mr. Unite Us | August 17, 2008, 2:51 am 2:51 am
McCain was the robot who gave stock answers to everything. I did not learn anything new from him except that he would start a War in a New York Minute. He also was saying everything the audience wanted to hear. What you idiot Republicans don’t understand is that this was a win win situation for Obama. The Religious right votes 75-25 for McCain so if Obama is able to make it 70-30, He has succeeded.
Posted by: Ron | August 17, 2008, 2:57 am 2:57 am
Interesting the reviews so far have this as a win for McCain but 4 out of 6 headlines on these blogs are about Obama. So typical. I could never vote Obama (although I’m with him on pro choice). In fact it was his only answer I got….his manner of speaking is really hard to follow with all the um, ah, ug’s. Why does he look down all the time too? Who says he’s such a good communicator…scripted speech doesn’t count? Gergen says Obama has to lift his game…they all say he has to quit dancing around the specifics, cut to the chase. He seriously loses me and millions of others I’m sure. Maybe he’ll pick a VP who has better debate skills. I MISS HILLARY.
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN!!!!
Posted by: Debra | August 17, 2008, 3:00 am 3:00 am
Regarding a couple of other races.
Congraulations to Michael Phelps on the 8 gold medals, and 7 world records, and “Lightening” Bolt out of Jamaica on his gold medal winning world record breaking 100 meter dash.
9.69 seconds!
Posted by: Mr. Unite Us | August 17, 2008, 3:01 am 3:01 am
Obama stuttered, stammered and equivocated, afraid to answer any question in a straightforward manner. When asked about the existence of evil, he forgot to mention Al Qaeda! The guy is not ready for prime time…
Posted by: P. McCarthy | August 17, 2008, 3:04 am 3:04 am
Quick draw McCain is the one to take the 3 AM call because he will be so droggy that he is sure to press the button.
Posted by: Ron | August 17, 2008, 3:06 am 3:06 am
Friend Ron – we are already AT WAR…the enemy is called “Al-Qaeda” (there are several spellings, but believe me, they ARE THE ENEMY!) And please don’t call me an idiot!
Posted by: justme | August 17, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am
If there was any pandering going on it was Obama. How else could he (an abortionist) convince a Christian audience that he’s a Christian too?
Truly children are a gift from the Lord;
the fruit of the womb is a reward” (Psalm 127:3)
Posted by: M.A. | August 17, 2008, 4:13 am 4:13 am
What does it mean when McCain says that he ” will follow Bin Laden to the gates of Hell to get him ?
If Osama Bin Laden is already at the gates of Hell, shouldn’t we just let him enter? McCain came into this forum with the Evangelicals with a 75-25 advantage. If Obama comes out of this with a 70-30, He did well. I really felt that John McCain was appearing at the Tonight Show….. all talk, no substance. He really dismissed the cruelty to his first wife with the key words ” failed marriage ” Is it just me or does McCain look like he practices in front of a mirror. I felt like I was hearing a McCain’s favorite hits of War Stories.
Posted by: Ron | August 17, 2008, 6:03 am 6:03 am
Hey Debra McCain was in true form tonight,He’s the panderer..I Hope that you don’t have any kids eligible for the draft, because with McCain we will see a war that will make WW2 look like a paintball exercise. Try and get some updated news on the conflict in Georgia and not what FOX is feeding you. Try reading some foreign press accounts of what McCain’s buddy Misha did to Provoke Russia. I voted for Reagan and Bush I and Bush II. I will never ever ever vote Republican again.
Posted by: Ron | August 17, 2008, 6:18 am 6:18 am
McCain’s answers showed that his mindset is a continuation of that of George W. Bush. Clearly, he:
- sees things in black and white
- “doesn’t do nuance”
- favors anecdotal data over statistical analysis in forming his opinions
- fails to realize that decisions are for “what to do” rather than “what is true”
- is decisive about what is true and false regardless of facts and evidence
Posted by: Gil Gamesh | August 17, 2008, 7:41 am 7:41 am
Interesting comments about the draft. McCain has said nothing about bringing it back.
Barack Hussein, however, has talked about having a “civilian security force”, funded as well or better than the military. Why isn’t someone asking him to explain that? What would a civilian security force do, exactly, Senator? Would it be an armed force? We already have local and state police forces, the FBI, Homeland Security, the ATF, the National Guard, and neighborhood watches. Did I miss anything?
The Soviet Union had the KGB, now the SVR, and current Russia has the FSB. Is that what you had in mind, Senator?
Posted by: Jeanne | August 17, 2008, 7:49 am 7:49 am
I’ve watched a lot of the saddleback conference now, and my impression was that for Obama it was a chance to talk about his faith and how it affects his thinking, and for McCAin it was a political event. I thought that especially about the Justices question. Obama took offence to one or two more ‘right wing’ justices, McCain picked out every ‘liberal’ judge. Obama made clear that his opinion on Clarence Thomas was not only based on Thomas’s views but that he wasn’t upto the job, and he even said one or two things positive about Chief Justice Roberts. I thought he gave a balanced and fair answer. McCain then railed against an ‘activist’ court making ‘laws from the bench’. By the way wouldn’t overturning Roe vs Wade being legislating from the bench in a way? Would Senator McCain say that 1954 Brown vs School board of Topeka judgement was ‘legislating from the bench’? Or how about the 2000 ‘Bush v Gore’ Judgement? He then said in a very partisan way that he would not have nominated any of the more liberal judges.
I felt Obama participated more in the spirit of the event, and discussed his faith and how it shapes him more openly and honestly than McCain, even when it put him out of step with the congregation.
I think people mistake Obama thinking for Obama not being able to speak fluently without a teleprompter. I thought he was thoughtful and intelligent. McCAin was just repeating many of his preaaranged talking points without much thought. It did make him in this forum a passionate and eloquent soeaker, but I didn’t get the feeling I learnt much more about him as a person. I felt I got to know Obama a little more. It will be interesting to see them debate side by side on some of these issues.
Posted by: markymark | August 17, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am
“- sees things in black and white
- “doesn’t do nuance”
LOL! That sounds like a description of John Adams. If you watched the HBO series, you know what I mean. John Adams didn’t mince words, nor did he have time for the “diplomacy” of Europe, particularly the French.
Let’s change “black and white” to “right and wrong”.
Posted by: Jeanne | August 17, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am
McAin was ON FIRE!! WOW…This guy is great!
Posted by: Alex | August 17, 2008, 8:00 am 8:00 am
The job they are applying for doesn’t call for a “thoughtful, intropspective, nuanced, morally relative, ambiguous” candidate. This country needs a strong decisive leader with clear core principles and beliefs, and after last night, these characteristics are clearly lacking in Obama.
Posted by: Davecatbone | August 17, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am
Obama lost, McCain won – period. Obama kept stuttering, i.e., I, I, I,, I, think, think, think uh. Makes him appear indecisive and making things up as he goes along – no true core beliefs. Another thing is that I’ll never vote for Obama (not for just this one thing but the horribleness of his actions) because when he was in Chicago legislature, he voted three times to withhold medical care for babies who survive abortions! It is the absolute coldest, evil act I could think of anyone doing. Letting a baby starve to death in spite of having survived an abortion!! There’s cruelty and just plain meaness in that thinking.
Posted by: Tag | August 17, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am
Obama won the night hands down. McCain pandered to his based and likely lost the independent vote with the Supreme Court Justices answer. I can’t wait for the debates. Obama has this in the bag.
Posted by: Christina | August 17, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
McCain gave honest answers and spoke with conviction using his life experiences as reference points. Obama, on the other hand, seemed UMMMM-AHHHH-EHHHH-DUHHHHHH at a loss for words, out of his league, and in sore need of his speech writer and teleprompter so the MSM can continue its 1984-style indoctrination about what a stirring communicator Obama is.
Who pays the people that come on this site and back Obama after his terrible,
sorely-lacking performance? He was thoughtful??? Please, give us a break, Obama is Bush Jr II; he is circling within his mind fog. Obama really doesn’t have a clue and that is very, very scarey.
President John McCain; sounds good…..
Make it happen, America!
Posted by: BRinChicago | August 17, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am
McCain seemed more like a comedian – entertaining the audience with his usual, well rehearsed “drill”. No evidence of thinking ability, no clear analysis of issues. just the same ol short, knee jerk responses. Obama was very thoughtful, explorative and more analytical. He spoke out of conviction -knowing full well some of his ideas will not be well received. He did not pander, did not deceive, did not lie. You dont want a president who is an entertainer, a panderer or someone who makes important decisions without thinking things through!!! I liked Obama. He was very good.
Posted by: Debs | August 17, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am
I found it interesting that taking federal money but not applying federal guidelines in the form of hiring came up. If I am a Christian, don’t i already reach out to all the community? Won’t my congregation be reflective of the community at large? Did I sense some hypocracy with that question? Love thy neighbor, only if I can choose who my neighbor is?
Maybe faith-based is a different distiction from Christian.
Separately, the Bush administration has not mentioned al-queda in several years, invaded a sovereign nation that did not attack the US, and has finally admitted that it lied to the American people and Congress to do so. We are in a war that should never have been entered and we are preaching to Russia. Shame on the GOP and all its supporters. Get out of Iraq. Then you can tell others to get out. Until then, please let you actions speak for you.
Posted by: MrMean | August 17, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am
For all you people out there who keep saying how awful the last two terms have been, and how this war in Iraq is dumb, and how we can’t have anybody who’s like Bush… I just want to point out a few things
- For those of you who are Christians like me, since the US entered Iraq, the number of Iraqi Christians has gone from 5,000 to 100,000!! That is amazing, and as far as I can see the greatest success story in Iraq (and against radical Islam). In addition, finishing this war and leaving a non-extremist government in Iraq when we pull out is SO important for this area. I live in the middle east and I know.
- The last two presidential terms have been fraught with very tough situations: 9/11, Katrina, etc., and I think many people who are saying “we need something different” are acting as if Bush caused all these problems. He may not have made the best choices in every circumstance, but no president could have dealt with all these circumstances without making some mistakes.
- Finally, about this coming election: some of the worst choices people make are those they make based on emotional feelings from the past(anger, hurt, etc.) If we base our choice in this election on who’s “like Bush” and who’s “not like Bush”, we won’t evaluate the candidates from the right perspective – who they themselves are. Voting for a candidate because I think he’s different than Bush or the same as Bush means basically that I’m allowing my feelings on Bush to control my vote for this election, and means that I’m not comparing the candidates to each other based on themselves, but on an imbalanced thought process based on emotion.
Let go of the past and choose the right person for the job.
Posted by: Anthony | August 17, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am
if going to Iraq was about envangelism i will be glad but if christians will use lie to achieve the will of god for god it is a SIN.It is unfortunate how peace could have achieve more than this war,all the so called new christians in Iraq will be like the seed planted on the road side in Mark 4,it will not survive bcos whatever is built on wrong foundation will not suceed
Posted by: toby | August 17, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
“LOL! That sounds like a description of John Adams.”
Do you actually think George W. Bush compares favorably to John Adams? Did Adams, like Bush, suffer from inability to make fine distinctions?
“Let’s change ‘black and white’ to ‘right and wrong’.”
Not when it means “oppressor and oppressed”. Not when it means “those who agree with me, and those with whom I am trigger-happy to wage war”.
Posted by: Gil Gamesh | August 17, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
I have not been a John McCain enthusiast but last night at the Saddleback forum, I came away with the sense that everyone will know where he stands! For those who think he did “talking points” on his beliefs – maybe they are his beliefs – so you state the obvious. Obama was shallow although I did learn a lot from him – and he has neither the depth of convictions or life experiences to preside over this country in these times. He would be rolled in a heartbeat by tough opponents from other countries.
Posted by: Linda | August 17, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
I was highly disappointed by Pastor Rick Warren’s comments that made it “appear” that both candidates were going to be provided surprise questions, when the pastor related that John McCain was being kept in a sound proof
room/booth, so that he would not hear
the question and answer session of Obama. I can tell you that Obama was too quick with the answers, which leads me to believe he was provided these questions before the program, so that his staff could prepare the answers for him that he would memorize, just like he did during the debates in my opinion.
Did anyone ever see Obama without his teleprompter answer an unplanned question? He is terrible at it, which is why he is too “chicken” to debate John McCain in a Town Hall debate, where the questions are free form from the audience. What is preposterous is that Obama agreed to the series of debates in Town Hall settings proposed by John McCain and then he backs out of it!!!! Obama is also afraid of the Lincoln/Douglas style of debates too that John would like instituted.
Look at Obama who says on the Saddleback Church stage that we must guard against Late Term Abortions, but his record in the Illinois Senate says differently!!! This man was all for Late Term Abortions up until the 9th month. DONT MISS the Sean Hannity show on FOX NEWS TONIGHT where Sean will have a nurse on his show, who testified on an Ill. Senate Committee hearing about babies born alive after botched abortions, where Obama refused to vote to provide medical care to such born infants!!! Isn’t this extreme??????? How hypocritcal Obama was on the stage of this church saying that we should guard against late term abortions!!
Posted by: Observer of Illinois Politics | August 17, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
McCain gave his standard stump speech which Rick Warren never called him on.
On the other hand Warren told Obama not to give him stump speech answers. Nope, no bias there.
And by the way why didn’t this article point out that McCain’s answer to what he considers wealth is $5 million dollars. I guess if you wear $500 shoes and own a half dozen homes whats a$5 million.
Posted by: Angela | August 17, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
McCain has an advantage in extemporaneous formats. He doesn’t have to disguise his positions with verbal gymnastics to try to disguise his well-documented socialist/moral-relativist views.
Posted by: notafool | August 17, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
It’s funny that the Bots set the bar so low when they know the golden boy lost. They only expect a 5% gain in the evangelical vote……lol.
He did not gain anything last night and my opinion is that he lost quite a bit. Even though he admitted to having the questions in advance (“I cheated and looked that one up”) he can not give clear concise answers and only speaks well with a written speech and a teleprompter.
Compare that to McCain who speaks very well when it is from the heart, but poorly when it’s a speech written by someone else.
As for Puma’s, if you check out the blogs, we were very impressed with McCain and as usual, disgusted with nobama.
Posted by: redraz9 | August 17, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
Posted by: notafool | Aug 17, 2008 1:29:35 PM
———–
And Obama doesn’t get paid enough to make hard decisions………lol. At least what McCain said was said as a joke, Nobama was serious. That’s pathetic.
Posted by: redraz9 | August 17, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Obama answered his questions just like a good Socialist …or some say Marist. Like his mama and wife taught him. Study your history people!
Posted by: Fire | August 17, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
God help us! When you have someone of Obama’s talent selling, we’re in trouble. Obama says he’s against late term abortions yet on his website he says he will sign the “Freedom of Choice Act” which literally does away with ALL restrictions on abortion and he fought HARD against a law in Illinois that gave NEWBORN survivors of abortion the right to live! But Jesus Christ – Jesus Christ is your Lord? (Lord means “boss” or “master”). Then you say that “marriage is the sacred union of one man and one woman” but again, on your website you say you want to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) which defines marriage as the union of one man and one woman! And you’ve told gay activists that you support same-sex marriage! But, of course, Jesus Christ is your Lord and we know this because you said so, right? WHAT ABOUT ACTIONS? Anyone who calls themself a Christian and votes for Obama is truly deceived.
Posted by: Gary Brown | August 17, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
“Obama answered his questions just like a good Socialist ”
It’s a good point, but I’m beginning to wonder if he isn’t more about big-government, base appeasement and personal aggrandizement.
Some of the 30 or so policy shifts he has made this month must be difficult to justify with his Socialist backers, and will make governing as a Socialist much more difficult. Of course, maybe he just figures he has to do it to get elected.
Posted by: notafool | August 17, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
If McCain gave his stump speech, Obama quoted from his books as usual. The problem is Obama thinks the same literary license extends to the real world.
I particularly liked when Obama said his toughest moral decision was when he voted against the war. Excuse me? In what parallel universe was he not a state senator with no say in the matter?
Boring, laughable and irrelevant. Loser.
Posted by: MJJ | August 17, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Gary Brown: “God help us! ..Obama says …yet on his website he says… Then you say that”
Gary, you are taking this as if Obama were a sincere person with well-thought out positions.
Here’s the truth. He is a Harvard trained lawyer, with a belief system established by Harvard and then modified by Reverend Wright and Chicago ward politics.
Nothing he says has anything to do with anything other than getting elected.
By saying multiple things that are directly opposed to each other, he intends to be able to represent himself as all things to all people. If you had the opportunity to talk to him about your topic, you would come away thinking he agrees with you 100%.
All politicians do this to a certain extent. But Obama is an extreme case, hardened by the experiences I stated above.
But your opening about “God help us” is exactly on-point.
Posted by: notafool | August 17, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
I was for Obama before the Saddleback “debate”…. McCain will be a stronger president under fire… For that is their main job. We elect legislators for making law, we elect a president to protect us and look after our National interest. McCain is better suited for that job.
After last night, I know now that…
Posted by: joe | August 17, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
I thought it quite interesting the way Obama avoided the question of when an unborn child has rights. This abortion issue is a MAJOR concern for all Americans. If he (Obama) can’t make up his mind on this issue because it’s “above my pay scale”, why should I believe he will know what to do when that 3AM phone call comes in?? Come on, Barak, have the GUTS tpo say what you think. Once again, he voted “present.”
Posted by: sdf | August 17, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
BTW, most Republicans are just using this issue to pander for votes. They don’t actually want Roe v. Wade overturned. If so, they would lose it as a wedge issue.
Yes there are some social conservatives in the Republican party that would like Roe overturned, but two thirds of the Reagan coalition are economic conservatives and military hawks, who have tended to treat social conservatives like the poor step child.
Posted by: Gene L | August 17, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
For me there is but one choice… John
McCain. If that offends you then you need to take a deep breath and wait just a minute… “It’s my country too!” Thats why we have a two party system. And even though one prevails over the other, we remain Americans. But from some of the hate, rhetoric and intolerance that I continue to hear and read about, I get the impression that we may at some point in time be headed for another civil war in America!
Posted by: Paul | August 17, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
I was for neither canidate but how can
anyone feel Obama won. I am amazed at what people are looking for to run this country. I am well aware that some will vote for Obama no matter what. All I know is that Obama is not ready or has the experience to be President of the United States.
Posted by: jc | August 17, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Separation of Church and State. Rick Warren and his congregations do not represent the moral majority of America.
I resent the fact that the candidates have to pander to evangelicals.
I wonder if any of the evangelicals pratice what they preach.
Posted by: clarity | August 17, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
John McCain came across as the more seasoned, experienced, and decisive of the two candidates. When it comes to leadership and solving the numerous problems facing this country, John McCain stood head and shoulders above Obama.
Posted by: Howard | August 17, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
“I thought it quite interesting the way Obama avoided the question of when an unborn child has rights… Come on, Barak, have the GUTS tpo say what you think.”
What about the people who have the guts to take a provisional position when there is not enough evidence. That’s the problem with fundamentalism: it is too uncomfortable with mystery and must have an absolute position on everything, no matter how irrational. But even the bible does not prescribe personhood to a fetus until it gets the “breath of life” at birth. Infants are not even counted in censuses either, and the only verse that mentions the death of a fetus requires only a fine, unless the mother is killed. The superimposition of personhood onto blastulas and zygotes and cells in petri dishes is not in any bible verse I’ve ever seen and so Obama does have wiggle room there- sorry. He also brings up the elephant in the room considering Christian’s inharmonious acceptance of IVF and complacency over loss of fertalized eggs, yet aggression over stem cells. Think about it people. Oh, last, fans of Warren’s best seller need to see it get DEMOLISHED by Robert Price’s “The Reason Driven Life.”
Posted by: Gatogreensleeves | August 17, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
I am a Democrat, but after tonight, hearing BHO and JMcCain, I definitely would vote for McCain, he is almost twice as old as BHO and has twice the smarts and does not hesitate to answer. His experience was in full swing tonight. Go, John, Go Hope from Pa.
Posted by: Hope | August 17, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
I just heard that McCain was never in the “cone of silence” referred to by Pastor Warren. When asked by Rick if he was comfortable in that “cone of silence,” McCain joked that he was in an adjacent room “listening through the wall”–when apparently he was not and could have heard all the questions in advance. It was clear to those of us watching impartially that he knew much of the early script in advance. Some of his answers were too pat to be spontaneous responses to tough questions–about moral failings, Supreme Court appointees, etc. Plain and simple, McCain lied to Warren’s first question and probably had a huge unfair advantage. I assume that Pastor Warren was not complicit in this and that he will disavow any link to McCain, and throw his support to the honest candidate–Barack Obama. What is Warren’s response to all this? Jack
Posted by: Jack | August 17, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
I aplaud both of these gentleman for their courage in seeking this office in difficult days. I respect both of them and I acknowledge that I am not God and I don’t know which will be the best president. But, please realize that these postings are saying a lot about our hearts and our true beliefs. Neither gentleman is anywhere near perfect. I will vote my conscience and try not to cast stones.
Posted by: Lovegirl | August 17, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
Barry blew it big time.
Posted by: Nobama | August 17, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
So did Reverend Warren even wonder WHY McCain was thirty minutes late? Did he even wonder IF someone fed him some of the questions as he strolled into the “cone of silence”?
Typical…McCain does not get challenged about his behavior and Obama is scrutinized because he takes the time to actually ponder and reflect on a question instead of shooting back a prepared and facile answer.
This country is hostile to thinkers and friendly to slogan talkers.
Posted by: vanessa Ament | August 17, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
im a true conservative and in no way was going to vote for McCain. i was going to sit this one out…but after last night, John doesn’t seem as bad as i once had thought.
I can’t believe the Messiah(barry) danced around the questions like he danced on the Ellen Degeneres show. I am voting for Mccain…. Obama is not ready to lead. he is great reading off a teleprompter or reciting a speech that someone else wrote, but he is not a non action guy…I am so glad hillary isn’t running..she was definatly the more qualified of the democratic candidates…The only difference between oBama and oSama..is the BS!
Posted by: floridaconservative | August 17, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
I think too many Evangelicals miss the boat when it comes to dealing with abortion. I think it’s sad that hearing a candidate say he wants to work to reduce the number of abortions doesn’t generate a more enthusiastic response.
Do ordinary Evangelicals understand the limited effect if Roe v. Wade were to be overturned? If Roe was reversed, that would not make abortion illegal, it would simply revert abortion back to the states. My total guess is that only about a third of the states would actually significantly outlaw abortion. In that case, women seeking abortions could just drive across state lines to a state where abortion was legal. I predict we would see abortion clinics built right along the borders of anti-abortion states.
All this energy is being spent on the political and legal arena, for an outcome that would change very little. Evangelicals should change their focus to transforming the hearts and minds of Americans to convince them that human life is sacred and abortion is wrong. (BTW, the sanctity of human life is a slightly separate question from whether human life begins at conception. I think the latter is a more problematic argument that doesn’t need to be made to convince people that abortion is wrong.)
Shouldn’t reducing the actual number of abortions be the goal? Not just some empty poltical/legal victory?
Posted by: Gene L | August 17, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
I thought it was mediated fairly although I don’t agree with the views of many Evangenitals.
Posted by: s | August 18, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am
After listening on the radio, I am very Very impressd with who John McCain IS and who B.Obama IS’NT. B.Obama IS NOT Presidential material, plain & simple. McCain’s straightforward honest answers is what connected with me. I think he won the election tonight, he found his voice…
Posted by: `Percy of Los Angeles | August 18, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am
I was sitting front row at the Saddleback hosted event
I am a current member of Saddleback.
I sat in the front row at the forum and it was a experience I will cherish for the rest of my life.
I live within 1/4 mile of Saddleback.
All I can say is that, I have been blessed enough to have visited over 14 countries around the world. The memory I retain from the past weekend is something I will cherish for a lifetime.
And I was one of two people who was able to shake the hand of Obama. Yeah… McCain ignored me.
Posted by: Lisa | August 18, 2008, 6:24 am 6:24 am
I am relieved that there are people out there who are very observant. This was not an impartial forum because it was so clear that McCain was privy to the questions ahead of time. That is the reason he was grinning like a Cheshire cat and answering questions before they were asked. My opinion is that Rick Warren was complicit in the entire fiasco. This makes it crystal clear that evangelicals are not interested in fair play. If this had happened on Obama-supported turf and the tables were turned on McCain, it would have been equally unfair. Of course this behavior makes the USA highly favored among nations of the world. So the casting of other nations, e.g. Russia, in bad light needs to cease until the American government cleans up the filth in its backyard. Elect McCain and you will deserve every modicum of suffering that he and his cronies, including the Supreme Court Justices, will heap upon you. Of course, off-shore drilling will immediately reduce gas and food prices —tee hee, tee hee….Stop being so naive.
Posted by: LaVerne H | August 18, 2008, 7:00 am 7:00 am
Barry
You say you wonder if Evangelicals practice what they preach. How about it if you move away from your sheltered starbucks life and spend some time in a church. You will find that most live the life they talk. The work hard to ensure they are not living a dead faith. Meaning, that if you have faith, but do not do gods work, then your faith without works is dead.
Posted by: Larry | August 18, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am
Monday Out-the-Door Lunch Whip
“’Tis the business of little minds to shrink; but he whose heart is firm, and whose conscience approves his conduct, will pursue his principles unto death.” —Thomas Paine Showdown at SaddlebackWhatever the political outcome of Russia’s invasion of Geor…
Posted by: Liberty Peak Lodge | August 18, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
Irony is obama supporters complaining about McCain sounding prepared and scripted.
Posted by: geevill | August 18, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Obama cannot string four words together without his teleprompter!!Talk about stammering, stuttering, and doubletalk..Jeez!
I never thought I would say this….BUT…
For once Jesse Jackson said ALL THE RIGHT THINGS!!!
Posted by: Jack | August 18, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
One last question; What does it tell you if someone admits he doesn’t know when life begins, BUT can tell everyone it can be terminated when you want it to be. That’s blunt… it looks like someone cares more about an issue than life itself.
Destroy an unborn human and its okay, step on an eagle’s egg and you get fined. What are we thinking?
Posted by: Thom | August 19, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
If Baracko makes you feel safe and confident about the future, you must have missed this forum! He stutters like a child and dances around every question to make it warm and fuzzy. Very scary, America!!
Posted by: Janelle | August 19, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
…”Too often, the issue of LGBT rights is exploited by those seeking to divide us. But at its core, this issue is about who we are as Americans…” Barack Obama
To Barack: While I could not vote for McCain, I am disgusted with your lack of integrity and support when it comes to the LGBTQ community and marriage. Either you want to give the LGBTQ community complete respect or none at all. A little respect is not good enough. Complete dignity and respect is showing support for our equality which obviously includes marriage. Sure, the issue of gay marriage is the ‘third rail’, but then don’t say you’re about “change” because in the end, when you can look the LGBTQ community in the eye, in front of evangelicals, and say boldly and proudly that you do not believe in gay marriage, you have rendered me invisible. You don’t see me, then I won’t see you. You’re no better than the rest of the politicians.
At some point “change I can believe in” has got to include the rights of adult individuals to marry whether gay or straight.
Not that long ago, the marraige between white and black people was illegal too. You wouldn’t exist if the people had not stood up to an inhumane law that had to eventually have the support of government.
Politicians are politicans. They say what they must to get elected. However, you claim to be different. Question: Why do you not believe in gay marriage? Why can’t you say you personally support it? Is it because, deep down, the union of gay people wedded in holy matrimony repulses you? Could you actually befriend a gay married couple and not respect their choice? How is it that you can meet upstsanding, loving and accomplished gay people and not believe that two consenting, non-related adults have the right to marry? Are we less than human to you? Since we don’t choose our gender, how could you not support a natural outgrowth of two consenting adults who want to pledge their lives to one another, gay or straight? What difference is there to you, really?
Because of your popularlity, your lack of respect sets us back.
Too many of us are silent right now because we’re so often beat down but we need to fight you.
No complete recognition to LGBTQ, no vote from me or my friends.
Posted by: Bella | August 19, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
I read the comments and those of you who are Liberals are unbelievable. You think McCain pandered to the audience — like Obama didn’t citing a Bible verse — no he only sat in a church for 20 years listening to a minister who preached hatred of whites, America and Israel along with his friend Flegler. He has never associated with anyone except radicals — Ayers, Frank Marshall (his mentor who was a member of the Communist party in Hawaii). Maybe instead of taking him at face value, you should really investigate as to who this man is.
Posted by: Rene | August 26, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm