Foreign Media Critical of U.S. Edwards Coverage
ABC News’ Mike Lee reports: In London, the Observer online, which is part of The Guardian, is criticizing the mainstream American media for its handling of the John Edwards story. The Guardian’s Paul Harris files an analysis from New York that includes the following criticisms:
-The mainstream American media did not report on the story even as it became a national talking point on the Internet and U.S. late-night television.
-During that long (pre-ABC interview) period, the scandal was covered by many foreign newspapers, leading to the bizarre situation in which many Americans were reading detailed accounts of the allegations (in the foreign media) long before their mainstream U.S. news organizations were reporting on it.
What do you think? Should the American mainstream media have done more reporting on the Edwards rumored affair before it was confirmed? Or do you think it is more responsible to wait until you have the story confirmed? Where should journalism end and rumor begin?
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
Liberal American media fails to report the news. They’re pro-Obama and pro-Edward. I don’t trust NBC,MSNBC, CNN and ABC anymore except Fox news. Fox news investigated this affair two weeks ago.
Posted by: ss | August 10, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Foxnews has not reported on McSame’s scandal with his previous wife. He has a plygamous affair marring Cindy when still married and Foxnews has said and continue not to say anything about McSame’s scandalous behaviour. Fox news is a rightwing conspirator and has pushed so hard on Edward and forgot McSame.
Posted by: BKMC | August 10, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
Yes the MSM has failed miserably and proven that it is definatley liberal biased to hide this from the public. This type of “conspiracy of silence” with the MSM is going to have alot of people questioning what else the MSM is keeping quiet about. They have now confirmed to the public that reports in the National Enquirer can be true. So people will now begin to wonder if all the rumors about Obama might be true and the MSM is just not reporting it. I am so thankful that I am not dependent on the MSM here in America for my news.
Posted by: RL | August 10, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Coverage of Edward’s story so late made a lot of people look funny while discussing it.
They were feeling sorry for his wife Elizabeth while she had passed over it long time ago (back 2006)!
Posted by: Peace | August 10, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
The Edwards’ trashy story is GOSSIP!
It is personal and private.
It affects only the families concerned.
And they have handled it.
The mainstream media was correct to leave the personal story to the bottom feeders in the gossip media.
The mainstream media is now INCORRECT to just on the ‘gossip media kill’ and pretend that it is relevant to American lives in general.
Government has to trust citizens to handle PRIVATE-PERSONAL affairs without the whole nosy nation getting consumed in people’s PRIVATE AFFAIRS!
The Edwards and the other ‘wife’ already dealt with the issue.
All Americans are doing now is to further burden Elizabeth Edwards, who is already being burdened by her cancer!
Posted by: Patriot | August 10, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
On the other hand, a person who is running for the highest office in the land should not start out by lying! I guess the Enquirer was right! And, patriot, if as you say this was a private matter…then why was Edwards hiding in the bathroom? Why the need to lie? Just be a man and admit it! Right???
Posted by: Ed | August 10, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Only naive youngsters and liberal academics trust CNN, NBC, and the NY Times.
Posted by: Jane | August 10, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Edwards got what he deserved — disgrace as a national leader. Just like Clinton.
Posted by: Val | August 10, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
The question is not whether or not it needed to be reported before it was confirmed by others, but that there was smoke, ergo a potential story and the MSM failed to follow up on it and thus was scooped by the National Enquirer.
So you didn’t even ask the correct question, which is “why didn’t you all investigate this more thoroughly yourselves?”
The MSM can report the rumour of ‘concern’ by unnamed staffers about a theoretical affair by McCain and splash a story in the NYTs, but they totally blow off Edwards, where speculation has been running rampant in this area basically forever and he actually was having one. Yet no one is reporting on it.
To me, this isn’t about reporting gossip, but the lack of investigation on the part of the MSM. I take it as one of those ‘we really don’t want to know’ situations.
My next question is, are you going to follow the money and find out who was really paying off Hunter and where that money really came from? Does it take a total layperson to mention the possible violation of laws if campaign monies were used?
I think that it’s hilarious that this is even being offered up as a question. The MSM can hyperbolically fantasize that McCain used Antichrist imagery in a campaign ad mocking Obama’s messianic attitude and following, but Edwards somehow is off limits?
It’s all ridiculous, the average person knows it, and we can’t stop shaking our heads. Never ask why we look for our news from other sources. The American MSM is constantly censoring itself and we’re frankly tired of it. Thank God for the interent.
Posted by: JR | August 10, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
Why is it that some people believes that they have a right/obligation to the PRIVATE AFFAIRS of other? NOSINESS!
No one owes a NOSY public the ‘truth’ about one’s PRIVATE LIFE!
Edwards did not ‘lie’ for those who did not seek to mind the Edwards’ PRIVATE AFFAIRS!
Those NOSY Americans, who claim Edwards’ ‘lied’, DESERVED to be ‘lied’ to. lol
Posted by: Patriot | August 10, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
Edwards was told by the DNC to “come clean” or he would not have a place to speak at the convention! Since he has sort of confessed….does he now have something relevant to say? For that matter, do either of the Clinton’s have anything relevant to add?
Posted by: Ed | August 10, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
This is not a news story. Not only is he not the nominee, it is/was unlikely that he would be the VP pick. I can’t believe that with all of the “sex scandals” on both sides of the aisle we have not gotten over this preoccupation with the sex lives of politicians. If we quit asking and making a big deal of it they would not have to lie and it is the lie most people point to (although it is really the sex they want to discuss). It seems pretty clear that people, generally men more than women but women nonetheless, cheat. For lots of reasons, all of which are none of our business. Please…. let’s get on to real news.
Posted by: Sharon | August 10, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Media coverage in the U.S. has been inconsistent. One wonders why; is it the Corporate Board influence in the news room? Is it the newer class of journalist who place comfort above sustenance? The slippage in my view has been in a lessor demanding and risk taking generation of news room editors. TV & Cable news reporting has become an entertainment industry rather than an in-depth reports, nearly all tend to be shallow and raise more questions then providing complete information. Time is money thinking and the customer is left wanting.
Posted by: Lou R | August 10, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Kind of circular argument there.
Wait til the story is confirmed before reporting it.
But what exactly was the media doing TO CONFIRM it?
I think the criticism is justified. The media rarely investigates stories anymore. They sit back and wait for it to land on their laps.
That’s how we ended up in a war on Iraq based on lies. The media didn’t do their job and contributed.
The media, like so many politicians, are more interested in keeping their jobs and the money flowing than in doing their job. There are more lies in the Pres campaign than I can count and where is the media in reporting facts?
The media is as lazy and incompetent as our government officials.
Posted by: korey | August 10, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
The media showed their true colors and failed to do their jobs. They remain biased and it shows in their reporting.Look how they pounced on the Senator from Idaho for tapping his foot in a bathroom but let this story lie fallow for 7 months until the world media forced them to report it. ABC means A always B be C covering your ass just like CBS means C can’t B be S sure.
Posted by: jim 234 | August 10, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
The media is definitely biased! Can’t believe a word that’s printed. Still, some people get their intelligence from reading such rags!
Posted by: Aston | August 10, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Fox would have covered this story because they are pro McCain ,but they do not mention that McCain did the very same thing and worse to his first wife.Maybe that should be fodder for the news media especially as McCain is running for president and John wasn’t.McCains my friends is getting real old everyone knows he is no ones friend unless they have money or power or can help him in his quest for the whitehouse.I believe I read he ran twice and lost during the primaries,what does that make him???
Posted by: jojobo1 | August 10, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
The US Media is a joke. There are so many more stories being covered up. Like why is the purported Barack Obama birth certificate posted on DailyKos just a shoddy photoshop job? Why doesn’t the campaign release his real birth certificate? Why won’t the US Media investigate?
ABC is the only one left with a modicum of integrity. But they are slow to jump too.
Posted by: mememe | August 10, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
No they did not do their jobs. Media better redeam its self and do their homework on barack before its too late.
Posted by: rachel | August 10, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
FOX NEWS IS FAKE FRAUD AND TWISTED!!!!
Posted by: angie | August 10, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
What do they expect? IT’S CALLED DEM DAMAGE CONTROL. MOST OF THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA IS BUT AN ARM OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY. MEDIA HAS TO APPEAR IMPARTIAL, BUT SLANTS EVERY TIME IT CAN TOWARD THE DEMS. It’s amazing that the GOP does as well as it is doing with those kinds of odds to buck. Credit goes to the American people for seeing through the media gobbledygook!!
Posted by: Manitu | August 10, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
This WOULD of been a private matter – IF Edwards was not currently running for President of the USA while sleeping around – AND using MY Dem Donation money to pay his girlfriend cover-up. I feel totally Cheated out of my campaign donations – I have always donated to the DNC – BUT – they have seen my last Dollar$$$$. What a Liar & FRAUD – just like obama!
Posted by: Molly | August 10, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
The MSM hasnt been doing its job for about a year, when most intelligent people in other countries knew all about Rev. Wright for example and Trinity’s conections to Mohamar Ghadafi, but the MSm didn’t report on them and mysteriously Barracl Obama didn’t know about them either. So funny when lots of people in Canada and oversees knew all about it. We’re all waiting for the MSM to either lose their credentials and just officially take money from the Obama campaign, or to do their jobs. Well the 527′s will start doing their jobs soon anyways.
Posted by: s.b. | August 10, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
Story not over. People being paid to disappear or look the other way? More to follow.
Posted by: Jimbo | August 10, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
The MSM had absolutely no problem whatsoever plastering stories everywhere about an invented McCain affair based completely on rumor and anonymous sources. But that’s a nice double standard the MSM has where they get to slander Republicans and cover for Democrats. Do they honestly think that Americans are so stupid as to not even notice this?!?
Posted by: Cory | August 10, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Keith Olberman can use this in his top ten…or worse, worser, worst thing!
Posted by: Ed | August 10, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Angie.
As they say, money talks and BS walks. FOX IS DWARFING THE REST OF TV MEDIA IN RATINGS. REST OF MEDIA IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LATTER HALF OF THE EQUATION – WHICH IS WHY MOST ARE LITERALLY GOING BELLY UP – LIKE NY TIMES!!!
Posted by: Jimbo | August 10, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Fox News mentioned the National Enquirer story on Edwards, but was careful to point out that the story was still rumor (at that time) and could not be verified. They ran Edwards’ denial of the story with almost no comment. In this instance, Fox seemed to remain neutral.
Besides, it doesn’t make a whole lot of difference now; at least we won’t have to worry about this modern-day Robin Hood becoming Vice President. ONE Socialist (BHO) will be enough!
Posted by: Rhys | August 10, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Nice way to frame the question.
You want Edwards to confirm it before reporting on it? Or are you saying journalistically confirmed??
Get real. This story should have been reported at LEAST as a point of interest. Investigation should have been done into the people beforehand. They would easily have found Edwards supporting Rielle.
The mainstream media FAILED on this. They didn’t investigate. They let the National Enquirer for god’s sake break the story.
PS Jake Tapper, excellent interview with Richardson. One point that you let him get away with though – he said oil prices will not drop now since oil will not come online until 7-10 years. Democrats seem to universally misunderstand the markets and economics. The price impact of offshore drilling will be IMMEDIATE (arguably, already has affected prices) since markets price in future expectations NOW.
Posted by: JA | August 10, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Our media is in Obama mode.
Where they put everyone under a microscope, Where they analyze them, try to find reason, and motive and pulverize their public life.
Since Edwards was one Obama wanted Eliminated.
Opps they forgot Edwards is not in the race any more, he is not even a senator anymore. They are stuck in attack mode on him.
Making it more Obivious They gave Obama a free ride, Did not do the same with him. When The Major Lies he has publicly told to the American People.
Maybe it is time The Media Reviews the Lies of Obama, See That they were and are more Serious than Edwards private life today.
That is what they should be investigating and examining and sensationized instead of a man in the private sector now. They also will have Greater impact, on this country if he is elected in the fall.
Yes, What About Obama Lies.
Posted by: seah | August 10, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
lEE LEE O7
so fox news is fair and balanced real funny first off they are in the tank for mccain, spew racisim about obama,and his wife fails to report the truth on bush and the list goes on and on worst news on tv not that im saying msnbc is any better but fox news is far from fair and balanced!!!!
Posted by: angie | August 10, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
FOX FAKE NEWS RUSH LIMBAUGH IN BED TOGETHER THEIR ALL SLIMEBALLS
Posted by: angie | August 10, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Yes, the media ended up looking like fools. Some of them also look like bullies intelling their people not to even blog about it (LA Times)…
Yes, so let’s do an old story about McCain and some lobbyist with a bunch of unnamed sources, (blah, blah, blah) and put it on the FRONT PAGE right after he wins the nomination….
…but DON’T DARE cover any of this story which included cover ups, names, dates, places, witnesses, a baby, payments, etc.
Mainstream media when it comes to democrats: “Nothing to see here, let’s move along.”
Busted.
Posted by: Jo | August 10, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
JA
Good post – Dems in general to not understand economics because most are not business oriented. That is not a criticism, just a fact. US business pays the SECOND HIGHEST TAX RATE IN WORLD – IS IT ANY WONDER WHY THEY LOOK FOR OVERSEAS OPPORTUNITIES?? IRELAND RECENTLY SLICED CORPORATE TAX ATES TO BONE AND THE PLACE IS ROCKIN – LOTS OF BUNINESS MOVING IN, FULL EMPLOYMENT AND MORE REVENUE TO FED!!! BUT THE DEMS SAY THAT IS IMPOSSIBLE!!! GO FIGURE??
Posted by: Temagami | August 10, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
And for everyone to say that this isn’t a story because John isn’t running for anything…
Let me remind you that this story was “surfacing” last year when he WAS running for president.
So enough of that crappy excuse.
Posted by: Jo | August 10, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
I am disappointed to hear about the Edwards affair and his initial denials. We hold our leaders and representatives to higher standards than we really should. Unfortunately, they like us are human and are capable of errors in personal judgment. I have to tip my hat to the National Enquirer and Fox News for sticking to their guns. We shouldn’t blame the messenger on this front. They are merely doing what their job requires i.e. break a national news story.
However, most politicians who commit adultery lie about it till they’re confronted with hard evidence. President Bill Clinton, Senator Larry Craig, Senator Vitter, Governor Spitzer … the list is long and comprehensive. But they’re not that different from the public in general. Very rarely does someone commit adultery and decide to confess out of guilt. The guilt usually makes you want to cover up the misdeed. From the reporting out there, at least Sen. Edwards had the decency to confess to his wife two years ago and not wait for the story to break publicly.
I’m sure Senator Edwards will have a lot of work to do to repair his relationship with his family. Mrs. Edwards has known about this for 2 years before the story broke and it seems like they’re trying to work it out. At this point, how they decide to move forward is none of my business (or yours). That is a personal matter. And personally, I think this story should have no political relevance. Unless we discover that Edwards was a hypocrite and claimed to be a holier-than-thou paragon of virtue (David Vitter, Larry Craig) or was leading a crusade against prostitution (Gov. Spitzer). In that case, his political career is probably over.
Posted by: RC-Toledo | August 10, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
This Edwards/Media “scandal” (and yes, I consider it a media scandal too because it’s a scandal the media ignored it on purpose for partisan reasons) is a PERFECT example of just one reason I’d rather vote for republicans. Because if republicans mess up, the mainstream media is quick to investigate and expose them, so we know who is corrupt, etc. BUT if democrats mess up, the media covers for them, and God only knows which democrats are corrupt that the media won’t tell us about. Then they remain in power.
Just something to think about.
Posted by: Jo | August 10, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Angie
Profound!! Didn’t your language teachers teach you that there are other parts of speech besides colorful adjectives?
Posted by: Temagami | August 10, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
RC-Toledo,
The reason why the Edwards story is different than, say, Clinton’s is because:
1. There is a child involved, and it seems that Edwards MIGHT have been supporting that child and her mother with campaign money.
2. Edwards paid the mistress, Rielle, over 100k for a 2 minute video. Campaign contributors have the RIGHT to know if their money is being used to support a lover.
3. Edwards ran his campaign on FAMILY VALUES. With this kind of knowledge, his moral superiority is gone and he is exposed as a hypocrite (since he was so critical of Clinton’s affair).
4. He didn’t simply cheat, he cheated on his terminally ill wife. That, to me, makes him not simply a cheater – many pols are – but a despicable person.
Posted by: JA | August 10, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
These things happen everyday to
people of every walk of life.
In a few weeks it will be forgotten..
Posted by: Anita Yova | August 10, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
TO: Seah- “What about Obama Lies/”
RESPONSE: What about McCain’s adultery?
Posted by: B. Wood | August 10, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
“For lots of reasons, all of which are none of our business. Please…. let’s get on to real news.” Edwards lied straight to the media about this affair and claims not to know that his staffers PAID hush money to the mistress. This is news about character and ethics! Karma is a bitch. What goes around, comes around.
Posted by: Jeff | August 10, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
It would be the right thing to do if Obama was in sync with OUR RUSSIAN NEIGHBOR for a change!
Let Don Quixote McCaint to fight the old Cold War. lol
Russia was always invaded from the West.
The French did it!
The Germans did it!
Now a bungling bush is trying to use NATO to do encircle Russia!
Why? Why? Why? FOLLY!
Russia has ALWAYS return home after turning back European attacks against Russia.
That is a good hint that Russia would rather be left alone.
IS THAT TOO MUCH TO ASK?
Georgians follow their extremely foolish leader in a vicious CRIMINAL attack on Ossetians.
Georgian criminals need to be brought to justice.
If the ‘ancient’ people of Abkhazia and Ossetia want to go their own way, like the Czechs and Slovaks, then they should be allowed.
If dictatorial Georgians want more territory, then they should be incorporated into the Russian Federation.
Posted by: Patriot | August 10, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
leelee o7
What about the michelle and obama TERRIOST FIST BUMP STORY,Not to mention the false rumor that fox started with the whole whitey michelle tape and what about michelle baracks baby mama story fox news are very RACISIT AND THEY ARE FAKE JOURNALIST!! WHY DO THEY PROTECT BUSH SO WELL???????????
Posted by: angie | August 10, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
The truth about the matter is simply that the media is terribly biased. The situation is so bad that it has almost become something of an abomination to criticize Obama almost anywhere. No wonder i felt a connection with that The One Ad by McCain. I am a Nigerian, living in Nigeria. And it’s like the media here just follows anything the media over in the U.S says when it’s talking about America. I know Obama is a black man, but even in the 2004 presidential election the support for Kerry was almost religious-like. I tried to understand it by watching your media, and i now understand. Your media is pro-democrat, pro-liberal, and completely anti-conservative and anti-republican.
Posted by: Eigbadon | August 10, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Edwards is a spineless jerk. Also, now a known liar. What a scumbag! Funny thing is that he is still a better candidate than Obama or Clinton. Democrats are a strange bunch!
Posted by: Ed | August 10, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
Who cares!!! I want to know about our candidates policies..policies will affect me and my family..this is just gossip and will not affect me
Posted by: REPUB | August 10, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
JR outside one story by the NYtimes
that like the Edwards story was dismissed because both parties denied it (and we now see doesn’t always make it so)…
the MSM has overwhelmingly looked the other way at ALL of the stories that are about Mccain.
He has three huge stories around affairs…
the actress in the 80′s…
leaving his first wife (who was disfigured and had put on weight) for a millionairess blonde young thing (quite literally the Paris Hilton of her day) that he flew back and forth with while he was still married to his ex-wife… it IS the reason the Reagans (specifically Nancy) distanced herself from him.
and then the story about the lobbyist who also flew with him often and spent enormous amounts of time with him.
Yet no one did the kind of research on ANY of these stories that you all say the MSM should have done on Edwards…sooo
do you think they should do that now with mcCain…especially with all the denials?
Posted by: dl | August 10, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
You all need to answer the question if you think the media is so biased and that they should be more critical
why have none of you brought up ALL of the Mccain issues that have not been investigated like you say they should have with Edwards…(and a bunch of the bologne with Obama…that actually has had researchers ruinning around back alleys who have found nothing on him).
WHY NOT MCCAIN? hypocrites who want to spin this…the truthis Mccain has more unanswered questions and denials about those questions than obama could create in 20 years.
Posted by: dl | August 10, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
The Edwards story is just another example of how the US MSM is incompetent and in the tank for left wing politicians.
Posted by: Sluggo | August 10, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
Sluggo
correction seems the MSM is in the tank for bush and his lies and criminal acts as well AS THE TRUTH ABOUT MCCAIN IF THE MEDIA FOCUSED ON MCCAIN AS MUCH AS OBAMA MCCAIN WOULD HAVE TO DROP OUT OF THE RACE!!!
Posted by: angie | August 10, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
The American Media has turned into Entertainment Media. And yes the stories should be confirmed before they are reported. That’s the difference between tabloid writers and actual journalists. It amazes me how judgemental people are. And how we seem so shocked and appalled by someone’s infidelity. And many that jump on the band wagon are the most hypocritical. I wish for the days when we could judge people by their job performance and not their personal life. If he were lying to me about weapons of mass destruction, then I would care. He’s only human. His wife is the only person with the right to forgive. I, for one, am tired of the story already.
Posted by: Bea | August 10, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
Sluggo is absolutely correct, “The Edwards story is just another example of how the US MSM is incompetent and in the tank for left wing politicians.”
Well said! The MSM has slapped itself in the face by trying to ignore/cover up for another scumbag politician. I don’t care if John Edwards is Democrat or Republican. Wrong is wrong. End of story.
Posted by: Angie | August 10, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
Drew,
Irma has been ignored here for the longest time because she doesn’t have commen sense or courtesy. She pretends to be a teacher but her writing proves that she couldn’t even have finished elementary education. Ignore what she has to say and save yourself some heartache. ;-)
Posted by: Mike | August 10, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
Is the MSM not investigating the $200/hr. male prostitute, John Gannon, who was posing as a press agent and throwing softball questions to Bush at his news conferences, for the same reasons? Who gave this guy clearance? Why are records sealed?
Posted by: whazup | August 10, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
I’d like to see less coverage myself – especially now, when the guy isn’t even a candidate or office holder.
This kind of personal crap should remain unreported before verified, and not dwelled on too much after.
Think about it is this way. In 2000, the Republicans supporting Bush were e-mailing around how McCain wasn’t mentally stable. Should those “mental disorders” have been mainstream news prior to medical verification?
I think we all would say no. So what’s the difference? Oh yeah, sex.
We must be the most frustrated nation in the world, because we’re obsessed with hearing about other peoples’ sex.
Posted by: Paul | August 11, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am
I really don’t think the “story” deserved coverage at all. Fidelity to one’s marriage vows (or the lack thereof) is a private matter between a husband and wife. It is not something to be thrown around in the press. As for Mr Edwards being a public figure, at the time of the incident, Mr. Edwards was not running for anything nor was he holding office. At this time he is not running for anything, nor is he holding office. He is effectively a private citizen again. Therefore, the incident should have been left between him and his wife.
Posted by: Katherine | August 12, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
The American news media’s political reportage is indistinguishable from its entertainment shows. Personality, the horse-race angle, and gossip, all outweigh analyses of what little policy differences exist. This will not change unless the quality of the education afforded the working class improves. But, the bosses wouldn’t want that . . .
Posted by: Knave | August 12, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Interesting that Drew didn’t like me calling the media TRASH TALK TIMES. Wrote as though I insulted her, when I never call the bloggers any names. Weird….
Posted by: irma | August 12, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
To RC-Toledo, your comment “And personally, I think this story should have no political relevance,” simply makes no sense. Edwards violated public trust by taking many $$, asking people to trust him, was asked about the affair allegations repeatedly and gave bold-faced lie answers. Another point of relevance? Do we want to elect a President with no integrity who is hell-bent on keeping personal secrets, thereby subjecting himself and our country to possible blackmail? How far would this have gone? This is too frightening a scenerio to imagine. Personal intergrity and sense of honesty and public trust has EVERYTHING TO DO with POLITICS. At least, it should. For those who it doesn’t, they should not apply in the first place, or the voters should show them the door.
Posted by: givingthanks | August 14, 2008, 2:33 am 2:33 am