Aug 29, 2008 3:08pm

How Palin Came to the Top of the List

ABC’s Jan Crawford Greenburg reports: It wasn’t until Sunday night that John McCain, after meeting with his four top advisers, finally decided he could not tap independent Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut to be his running mate. One adviser, tasked with taking the temperature of the conservative base, had strongly made the case to McCain that it would be a disaster for the party and that the base would revolt. McCain concluded he could not go that route.

The next day, McCain studied the three men at the top of his shortlist: Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge. All had different strengths and negatives, but McCain was not satisfied. None of them had what McCain believed he needed to do — and would have done — with Lieberman.

McCain wanted to shake up the ticket.

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s name was in the mix as an unconventional choice for months, but she had not been considered a front-runner. So, over the next few days, with McCain continuing to believe he needed someone who had more of a maverick streak than his other choices, lawyers reviewed her vetting information. They kept their activities from even some in McCain’s most senior inner circle.

Pawlenty had been the youthful pick advisers believed would represent a fresh direction — and one they could use to argue the Republican VP pick was more experienced than the Democratic presidential nominee. But Pawlenty’s flaw — what cost him the VP — was that he would not have stirred things up. He was safe, and McCain was not inclined to take the safe route.

The campaign secretly flew Palin into Dayton last night. She and McCain met privately for a couple of hours. McCain concluded she would "shake up the system" and was "a maverick," qualities he believed Lieberman would have brought to the ticket. But she also would appeal to conservatives — which Lieberman most certainly would not have done.

After their meeting, McCain concluded he was comfortable with his choice. He notified Pawlenty this morning that he was going in a different direction.

User Comments

So in other words, it was another knee-jerk decision on McCain’s part. Big surprise.
This is a guy who shots from the hip, and who has temperment issues. Bad combination.

Posted by: Paul | August 29, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

Oops, shots should have been shoots.

Posted by: Paul | August 29, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

Temperament.
He picks a woman under investigation for abuse of power by firing her ex brother in law because he divorced her sister. Vindictive, coupled with John McCain’s temper… not a good thing.
And her Big Oil ties..
His pick says a lot about how he would run the country.

Posted by: temper temper temper | August 29, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

More pandering to the Hilliary crowd. 3rd party for me!

Posted by: argh! | August 29, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

The Obamabots sound angry. On second thought, they just sound worried.

Posted by: Carrie | August 29, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Super judgement there McCain. Made the decsion in a couple of hours, on his own. And went for someone that has not been vetted by anyone in the public sector. Please don’t compare her experience to Obama’s.. He has gobne through 2 years of public vetting and 26 debates. There is no comparison. Let’s see judgement? Biden or Palin.. One breath away from the presidency.

Posted by: Steve | August 29, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Carrie – who sounds angry?
Or was that just one of those drive-by postings that really has nothing to do with anything posted before it?

Posted by: Paul | August 29, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Andrea said in another story, “In choosing Sarah Palin, McCain showed a willingness to make a bold move. In choosing Biden, Obama showed us a willingness to cut off his nose to spite his face.” Couldnt’ agree more. As one of the 10-12% hardcore Hillary supporters, I’m laughing out loud! John McCain, you’re the man!!!!!!!

Posted by: Carrie | August 29, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

McCain’s choice of running mate is astounding on two levels. One, it’s extremely insulting to women that he thinks he can trot out a female and we will become so giddy that we’ll leap at the chance to get a woman —ANY woman— into the White House. I trust we’re smarter than that. Two, I’m appalled that the evangelicals and fundamentalists are such zealots about running our country their way that they are absolutely orgasmic over a candidate who is stupefyingly unqualified to step into the presidency. They are willing to sacrifice national security, the national economy, and national credibility for a right-to-life candidate. McCain is undeniably quite elderly and I cannot imagine Sarah Palin, who has briefly run a state with a population of Memphis, Tennessee, taking over leadership of a country with a population of more than 300,000,000 and a myriad of staggering problems. McCain has pandered to women and kissed the aspirations of the religious right. BAH!

Posted by: beck | August 29, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Well the dem leaders have wasted no time in trying to beat down yet another woman. I have a feeling the republican party won’t stand by and let that happen like the democratic party did. McCain will step up with a forceful “knock it off,” quite the opposite of Obama’s consenting silence when it was happing to Hillary.

Posted by: Mcain Will Win | August 29, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

“John McCain, you’re the man!!!!!!!”
I’m offended by this sexist language! Lol, just kidding.

Posted by: Paul | August 29, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

All he wants is the woman vote cares nothing about this nation,if he dies wowowowowow she is the pres…..Think about it people.Any one puts winning before the safety of all of us Americns iin my book is an a–hole….

Posted by: indp voter | August 29, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

This is a political move that has nothing to do with taking care of the economy, our foreign and domestic policies, nor any political issue that our country is now facing. For John McCain this is about winning votes. Its sad that the Gov. of Alaska has allowed herself to become a pawn in Mr. McCain’s little vote strategy. He has definately taken the one card he’s being playing repeatedly against Obama away. For the during of the campaing his accusations of inexperience and readiness to lead the nation is no longer viable.

Posted by: beck | August 29, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Sarah Palin—Love it!!!!!!!!!!!! I’m a democrat who will be voting Republican this year!

Posted by: katherine | August 29, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Exactly
this shows judgment
yeah good to go with your gut John…
3 of her 5 and a half years (really 4 and a half but whose counting) are as mayor of a town of 9000 people..
I was President of my student council and we had 5000 students…and President of my college student body we had 12.000 people…
can I be on the list?

Posted by: dl | August 29, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

Great work John, you just wasted the next seven news cycles trying to explain/defend your v.p

Posted by: Romney Fan | August 29, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

I guess Palin really woke up Obama and his supporters. I guess all this time Obama thought he had already won the election… and the European trip was his self congratulatory trip.
There is a good chance Obama will have to pack up and move to Europe for good after November, after having spent so much money and gone nowhere.
Perhaps he’ll take his speeches to Europe and find some new tricks there. Many losers here have found good names there. It’s a good idea Mr. Obama rings up some of them and get their advice also.

Posted by: Independent for McCain/Palin | August 29, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Her executive experience makes her just as equal to Obama’s experience. She actually has accomplishments to show for her years in office. She is just as ready to lead the country as Obama is. McCain hit a home run with this one.

Posted by: McCain Dem | August 29, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

beck: “I’m appalled that the evangelicals and fundamentalists are such zealots about running our country their way that they are absolutely orgasmic over a candidate…”
I’m not sure the orgasmic reaction has anything to do with her credentials or likelihood to govern in a way that appeals to evangelicals. I think she’s a knockout.
And you can bet that aspect isn’t lost on the McCain campaign. Like I was hinting at above, I’m not sure this pick was aimed at pleasing women as much as men.
Either way, its a terrible reason to pick a running mate. But she is easy on the eyes.

Posted by: Paul | August 29, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

Katherine
so Putin comes in and …does she break into her vast knowledge of govrnment histories…
her knowledge of our constitutiion of uN agreements
and when we are trying to negotiate China and India to back off on carbon…
becasue of global warming …does she bring up her vast knowledge of trade agreements…
oh forget that she does not believe in global warming…
or when she is chasing down OBL to the gates of he!! is she going to keep her hair up like that?
c’mon it’s not a sexist thing it’s a “she is absolutely ill-equipped knowldege wise or other to be the leader of the free world” if heaven forbid the oh sooo unlikely case that a 72 year old who has had a cancer that reoccurs exponentially the more you have it and he has had it twice.
this is stupid…
not to mention she thinks you should get paid less than me and i should have control of my body anytiome anywhere…
you …not so much.

Posted by: dl | August 29, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

John McCain chose Sarah Palin because he’s a man who knows how to make a bold decision. Barack Obama chose Joe Biden because Michelle told him not to choose Hillary. Thank you, Michelle!!!!!

Posted by: Carrie | August 29, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

Mccain dem
she has been governor less than these guys have all been running in primaries…
her executive experience is a joke.
a year…it took her half that time just to get up to speed.

Posted by: dl | August 29, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

Congrats to McCain – this is the funniest and smartest thing I have seen in years.
1) turn the dems argument about judgment/experience on their head — if Palin is too inexperienced to be VP, how can Obama be Pres?
2) keep the conservative base from trickling away
3) create a pull for centrist women (Dem or Repub) who might have gone either way. ** All this talk about being demeaning to HRC supporters is short-sighted … there are Repub/Indep women who’s vote will make a difference this year
4) deliver what was promised – change and reform
5) get the media attention … who’s talking about Obama’s acceptance speech now?
Clever clever clever

Posted by: NDO | August 29, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

I have to say that every guy I know was like “yeah a woman”
are they going to vote for her…no.
not because she is a woman…because she is absolutely positively incredibly overwhelmingly ill equipped to be an aging heartbeat away from being the Leader of the free World…

Posted by: dl | August 29, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

I am so excited about voting for McCain/Palin 08. I can’t take the smile off my face. I have to go look at it!

Posted by: Kitty | August 29, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

dl – you clearly think you know the intricacies of government/foreign relations since you’re ALWAYS commenting on what’s best, who’s right, etc. Unless you have specialised training that makes you so expert, why should we think Palin can’t know/think about these things too?

Posted by: Bud | August 29, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

McSame has miscalculated this time as he miscalutated when during the early hours of the Vietname’s war he was captured as POW and remained there until the end of that uggly war. This is a demonstration that McSame doesnot understand values women are fighting for. This choice is an anti-choice who will bring down all the fondamental women’s aspirations for freedom and liberty. This is not a Hilary Clinton, this is not a Geraldine Ferraro, this is not a Nancy Policy, chosing Miss Alaska is just a demonstration of lack of judgement from McSame. God save America from McSame.

Posted by: BKMC | August 29, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

NDO
No one thinks Obama’s knowledge that he has shown for a year and a half is even close to Palin
what they did was made obama look incredibly experienced… by picking Ms Wear my Glasses so I can look as smart as Hillary and Kay Bailey hutchinson.
McCain hates women like Kay Bailey Hutchinson etc…the only reason he likes this one…is BECAUSE she is anti woman…young and attractive.
and that is the truth.

Posted by: dl | August 29, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Bud
I was not just picked to be an aging heart beat away from being the Leader of the Free World.
Palin was…. and shouldn’t be.
…scary precipice Mccain wants to put us on playing tactical election stunts to get himself elected.

Posted by: dl | August 29, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

This is clearly an insult to women everywhere, and especially Hillary. What he’s doing in effect is expecting all those who wanted Hillary as Obama’s VP to come flocking to his side now. He’s effectively saying that ANY woman will do, any woman can replace Hillary.

Posted by: samurai | August 29, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

It took John McCain and the Republican Party to give Hillary and all her supporters the respect we all deserve.
Gov. Palin is not Hillary but she seems awesome and many of us will embrace her. My respect for John McCain just grows and grows. Tomorrow, as the newness of his pick begins to fade, the story will be how he – not BO – understood the depth of our hopes and dreams. For that, McCain has my vote.
McCain/Palin will be working with a solidly Democratic majority. No one has anything to worry about as far as Roe v. Wade or the Supreme Court is concerned. In fact, there’s a lot to be said about having a Republican President in 2008 (if it can’t be a centrist like Hillary). They will put the brakes on the more leftist leanings of Reid and Pelosi et. al.
This is a good day.

Posted by: s. valenti | August 29, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

samurai
the sad thing is that the women on here saying they will vote for her on the ticket proves his point.
sad

Posted by: dl | August 29, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

McCain/Palin 08. The maverick did it again! Woohoo.

Posted by: Kitty | August 29, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Not only does it seem trite, it also looks like he’s beholden to the party core and not to his own sense of what is right for the country.
If he really wanted Lieberman, he shoulda took Lieberman. What would the party do – vote Democrat?
If he wanted to the the “I’ll pick a lady YEAH!”, he could have chosen Condi Rice – noone could say she’s inexperienced, even though she’s about the same age as Obama.
Also, what’s wrong with “Safe”? He’s not picking someone for American Idol, he’s picking someone to RUN THE UNITED STATES if something happens.
My respect for McCain’s ability to chose the right path is diminishing day by day…

Posted by: Ladyvoter | August 29, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

dl – Ah, the last refuge of the desparate, start with the personality attacks. Stick to facts you can prove (you’re much better there).
* There are people who aren’t impressed by Obama’s knowledge and vision – it’s not a universal truth that he’s right. And, there are people open-minded enough to wait to see what Palin is like before jumping to conclusions.
* Women do wear glasses to see – especially those who have a busy life and don’t have the patience to worry about contacts.
* Unless you’re a close personal friend, you don’t know who McCain likes (apart from Lieberman) or dislikes or why.
Think what you want, but don’t expect everyone to believe it’s gospel.

Posted by: NDO | August 29, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

I am woman hear me roar. McCain/Palin 08. Yes, she can!!!

Posted by: Kitty | August 29, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Sarah Palin went after the unhappy Hillary voters today but last March said she could not vote for her because she did not like Hillary’s whining. Hillary’s experience is ten times what Palin’s is.

Posted by: JL | August 29, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

s. valentis again
if you like being put one step below me…
it’s great for you.
Palin is a trojen horse for women
My first job was working on the film “Boxing Helena” a film about a woman who has her legs and arms removed and put in a box who falls in love with the man who idnapped and did it to her.
It is completey a misogynistic and violent film toward women and the two producers (men) were self congratulatory when they were able to get a young female director, Jennifer Lynch who thought the freaky storyline was cool…to make it for them… because she had a famous director father …
They got their really truly misogynistic film done…and used her as the way to sell it as something more than it was.
Palin is the Mccain’s young female director.

Posted by: dl | August 29, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

I love the spin OBama people are giving Palin’s selection – pointing out how Kay Bailey Hutchinson professes not to know her. Well, Hutchinson is in the Senate – just like the three men in this race. Why don’t they ask one of the 49 other governors in the US about her. Our governors are the ones with executive experience – front lines, meeting daily challenges.
Also, what’s the statistic? Mostly governors get elected to the White House – far fewer senators get elevated to the Presidency – and she’s the vice presidential nominee. She looks like a fast learner.

Posted by: s. valenti | August 29, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Its just amazing how two-faced the Republicans can be. They critcize a man who has been a state and US senator who has shown very good judgement and can unify people. Yet they are ok with with some small town mayor who hasn’t even come close to having any national experience or exposure. It must be genetic birthright for Republicans to follow the stupid, do what they are told without question and follow the same lame script.

Posted by: George | August 29, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

I can’t help but think Hillary is smirking just a lil bit today. I might even send her another $43.60 in honor of McCain’s dynamic pick.

Posted by: Kitty | August 29, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Can we all agree the man is old? Can we all agree he had (has) cancer? There is a reasonable chance she will be President.
Romney would’ve won it for him, but he couldn’t get over personal differences.

Posted by: 1percenter | August 29, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

Kitty
Hillary AND Ferraro are going to trash this pick.
You see Hillary and Ferraro LIKE women…and would like to see them do better.
This woman obviously from her stances …does not.

Posted by: dl | August 29, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

to dl @ 3:58 p.m.;
You’re truly a freak. Get some help!

Posted by: s. valenti | August 29, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

SO many Independents are happy today. We finally know the complete ticket we are voting for, and it’s a great one!!! Mccain/Palin 08 In all fairness, I’d like to thank Senator Obama for of his work to get a woman on the ticket. We’ll never forget you. Now go back to Chicago and leave the governoing to us.

Posted by: Kitty | August 29, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

It’s okay for black people to vote strictly on race becuase it is “a pride thing, a first thing,” but it is not okay for a woman to vote strictly on gender because it is “a pride thing, a first thing?” What’s up with the double standard.

Posted by: Jazz | August 29, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

“so Putin comes in and …does she break into her vast knowledge of govrnment histories…her knowledge of our constitutiion of uN agreements” DL, we must be talking about Obama!!! lol

Posted by: Jim | August 29, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

s.valenti
I think the freak is you.
boxing Helena is a real film …and it really was directed by Jennifer Lynch.
and the producers if you met them Carl mazzocone and Phillipe Callande are what you would say…not the most female friendly …obviously from the story they wanted to tell…
When they hired Jennifer Lynch she wanted so badly to be a director and live up to her dad (David lynch) she did the film…
and she brought credibility to a horrific story that shouldn’t have had credibility…
again it what McCain is doing by picking a woman who agrees with his anti-women’s rights votes and using her to get women to vote for him.
that’s not freaky…that’s the truth
and Boxing Helena was sadly and offensively (in my opinion)about a woman (Sherilyn Finn) who a man/surgeon (Julian sands) became obsessed with …kidnaps her removes her limbs puts her in a box and she then proceeds to fall in love with him.
it is twisted and they used a young ambitious woman to tell it and to again gain credibility.
I am not saying Mccain is the guy/surgeon obviously but this move with Palin certainly brings up memories and shadows of what the Producers did with Jennifer Lynch.

Posted by: dl | August 29, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Maybe all the women who wanted Hillary for president are jumping on the McCain/Palin bandwagon because they expect him to croak during his first term (entirely possible). That way they get their woman president, no matter who it is. A Palin presidency would be a far cry from a Hillary presidency. But no matter, at least it would be a woman.

Posted by: samurai | August 29, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

“because she is absolutely positively incredibly overwhelmingly ill equipped to be an aging heartbeat away from being the Leader of the free World…” We’re describing Obama? Of course, we are! lol

Posted by: Jim | August 29, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Oh happy day. Oh happy day. McCain/Palin08. In the words of that weirdo DNC chairman Dean, “yee haw”!

Posted by: Kitty | August 29, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Good Luck to McCain/Palin ticket!

Posted by: allison | August 29, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

This has the republican party motivated and rallying. Next week’s convention is going to be simply outstanding!

Posted by: cron | August 29, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Seeing as how her state has such a small population, it’s apparent that most of the people blogging about her have never lived there, nor heard anything about her beyond what they’re reading in the press now or being told by the parties.
Before everyone sees this as just a stunt, why don’t you just friggn wait until she gets some air time, makes some speechs, and people get to actually see and hear what she’s about?
Geez, most of the anti-McCain people on here would be hating on whomever he chose, no matter how qualified they were. Let’s at least hear more from HER and then make up your own mind, don’t let the RNC or DNC or the fact you’re a lifelong liberal automatically make you think she’s terrible? After all, Obama just shows up and makes a good speech in 2004 and suddenly he’s groomed for President, but he’s an okay choice because he’s not Bush, and certainly not a gimmick being a black man.

Posted by: CS | August 29, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

The one who made a sad decision here is the Gov. Her judgement does not seem to be the best. As a grandmother of a special needs baby, I do not see her first priority to the country, or Mcain but to the special needs baby. I cannot see a woman or a man who had a newborn special needs baby as having the time or energy to run a country. Their first commitment is to that baby and the immense time and energy required to provide it with the best of themselves. I see this decision as a very selfish one in light of the cir cumstances. Also would not trust McCain to have a lot of understanding as he voted against the funding for autism.

Posted by: aw | August 29, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

What seals it for me? These two things:
I have followed Palin’s career since her election as AK governor. She is a brilliant choice–she is as charismatic as Obama, and easily more glib. Palin does not struggle the way Obama inevitably does when he is off the teleprompter.
Sarah Palin has more experience in governance than does Obama, who in his brief political life has only run small senate staffs.

Posted by: McCain Has Won Me Over | August 29, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Jim
the difference is
Obama does have a vast knowledge of government histories… knowledge of our constitution and of UN agreements…
duh…
he has on numerous occasions been quizzed up and down on things that most would not even come close to knowing…
remember he was a freakin constituional law instructor remember…
she…a beauty queen who was mayor of a town of 9000 for 3 years and a governor for less then the length of these primaries…
and no experience or education with national, governmental, legal, military, trade…structure or history.
none.

Posted by: dl | August 29, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

McCain could not have demonstrated his utter contempt for women more clearly.
He thinks that all Democratic women (can’t speak for Republican women!) are so stupid that they will drop everything and say “Oh look, ovaries!”?

Posted by: Susan | August 29, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Experience is less important when you have vision, intellect, and years of planning and preparation. People like Abraham Lincoln, John F. Kennedy, and Ronald Reagan had little experience in one way or another — but they had years to to plan and think about what kind of presidency they wanted to have. Barack Obama has had a long time to think about the issues facing the nation, and what he plans to accomplish in the presidency.
Meanwhile Sarah Palin most likely genuinely didn’t have any expectation to selected vice president. I seriously question whether she has spent a serious amount of time thinking about the many complex issues facing America.

Posted by: Gene L | August 29, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

To dl,
Do your former classmates who elected you know that you’re now spending time in your mom’s basement? Looks like you could use some air.
You’re the misogynist for relating the specifics of this disgusting film on a board that has nothing to do with film or sick fetishes.
Take your sick fantasies somewhere else. You’re pathetic.

Posted by: s. valenti | August 29, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

Now we know McCain does not really put country first, he just wants to get female votes. The vice president is a heart beat away from the presidency if McCain is elected. He chose a governor with even less FP experience tha Obama. Either the republicans have been lying about this war on terror or McCain cares nothing about the safety of this nation. I guess McCain feels if America can get excited about a young AA politician who has not been on the polictial scene that long’ they can get excited about Palin, even though the agenda for both polical parties are so different. Let see if this works for McCain !!!!!!!

Posted by: merle7 | August 29, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

SARAH PALIN???
McCain just showed all America that he not only doesn’t have the judgment to lead, he has NO judgment at all!!!!!!!!!
All over the internet and the TV his choice is being called Pathetic, Desperate, foolish!!!! A “green horn” with less experience than Obama (in fact NO EXPERIENCE), John McCain wants to put a heart beat away from the Presidency!!
As of this morning the game just ended…
GAME OVER FOR McSENILE!!!!!!!!!!
Everybody say hello to President Obama!!!

Posted by: Davis | August 29, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

CS
How long should we wait?
do you think there was time waiting on Biden?
the difference is Biden could take over adeptly…
Palin would be like asking a student driver to go up in the space shuttle with an aging astronaut and if he suddenly has a heart attack she has to fly and land the ship with out any knowledge of space or how to fly.
You can say all you want about obama but his knowledge of the issues is far and away vast.

Posted by: dl | August 29, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

Exactly Susan. After all, he did say about women “they’ll come around.” Yep, they’ll come around all right and realize the democratic party will stab a woman in the back and beat her down without missing a beat. By this example of change by McCAin, the republicans have demonstrated they want to empower woman and let them rise!

Posted by: McCain Dem | August 29, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

Congratulations to the Republicans — better 24 years late than never.
Only the Republicans would consider the mere act of nominating a woman to the vice-presidency a sign of “change” and a “shake-up”.

Posted by: Gene L | August 29, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

s.valenti
I actually am lucky enough and successful enough in what I do to have a staff.
and they know this is my addiction because it is that important to me. I bought a home in NH just to be in the middle of this and see all the candidates.

Posted by: dl | August 29, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

She’ll best Biden in a wet t-shirt contest or whatever else they run for!
Beware: Obama bin Biden

Posted by: Fred C Dobbs | August 29, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

I think he was watching a little too much Commander in Chief on ABC. He should’ve chosen Gina Davis – she did a good job on the show.

Posted by: 1percenter | August 29, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

CS – get a grip. Especially if I had a special needs child, I’d certainly jump at the chance to be VP, with more money, medical care, greater support resources, and a spouse who’s perfectly able to help. Children need love & care, not 24×7 attachment.

Posted by: Max | August 29, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

fredd c dobbs couldn’t wrap up the resoning behinfd this choice by McCain more adeptly if not purposefully.

Posted by: dl | August 29, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Good News! The sale of underwear skyrocketed today as thousands of Republicans crapped their pants when John McCain announced his VP pick! Proof he can stimulate the economy and the bowels!

Posted by: Blindhowlin | August 29, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

Brilliant pick by John McCain. Very much his maverick style. He picked a women maverick too. Only people with this quality can bring change to Washington, which we desperately need. I just can’t trust Obama who has the most liberal voting record to end the partisan politics in Washington.

Posted by: george | August 29, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

Excellent choice!
Palin is more qualified than Obama. As a governor, Palin runs everything. Obama is a Senator from Illinois which is just a Representative and all he does is vote on things that other people have put together. And most of the time Obama just votes “present.”

Posted by: FrankG | August 29, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Max
I don’t have special needs kids…but you obviously don’t either.

Posted by: dl | August 29, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

I wasn’t impressed by Palin this afternoon. She will have to do a fabulous job on Wednesday when she addresses the RNC. Will she be able to? I am not sure. I think the experience thing is an issue, either because McCain has been making an attack he really doesn’t believe in over the last few months, or his judgement is once again found lacking.
And I am not kidding. He could be putting a woman with such a thin resume within months of being President. Yeah McCain’s health doesn’t mean he will die, but lets face it its not unheard of for a President to be assasinated. Either experience is important, or it isn’t. Can’t have it both ways.

Posted by: markymark | August 29, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Great pick! Gov. Palin would make a much better President then the socialist Sen. Obama and she’s SECOND on the ticket. If experience is an issue, look at the experience of the person the liberals have running for PRESIDENT. Gov. Palin actually has more executive experience then all of them.
Senator McCain did not pick Gov. Palin because she’s a woman. Sorry to disappoint you. He picked her because it would unite and excite the conservative base. It has succeeded.

Posted by: mmichaels | August 29, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

CS/AW – sorry, addressed my “Get a grip” to CS, but should have been AW

Posted by: Max | August 29, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

aw,
I’m glad you’re not MY mother-in-law. Who made you Chief of the Parent Police? No parent – of a typically developing child or one with challenges needs your condescending, sanctimonious drivel about where a parent belongs.
I could go on and on about how parents of children with challenges have the important role of manager of their child’s various therapies(and I’ll bet Palin will do an outstanding job) but, you know something, unlike you, I’m not comfortable judging another’s competence as a parent.

Posted by: s. valenti | August 29, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

dl
Of course there was time waiting on Biden…he’s been in the Senate 30 years, and was on the campaign trail (telling everyone in the primaries that Obama wasn’t ready).
As for flying the space shuttle, that’s not really a fair assessment. The president would be more like the flight commander, not the pilot. And frankly, all politicians are ultimately only as good as their advisors and staff. Bush as had terrible ones, and rarely showed a pair in realizing that and getting good ones. If a president is a truly the “pilot”, he/she’s going to have a lot of flight crew handling most of the real work.
But also using your example, with Obama the space shuttle is going up with the student driver at the helm and the old senior guy ready to take over. I’d really be hoping that the senior did take the controls.

Posted by: CS | August 29, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Those of you Obama Zombies who are trying to equate Obama’s lack of experience are all wet!
First of all Obama is at the top of the ticket and his lack of experience will
influence all of his decisions!
Palin may be a little thin on foreign
policy but she has far more executive experience than Obama the community
organizer!
Also Palin will learn from watching
President McCain respond to a foreign policy crisis while President Obama would have to go running to Joe Biden
and ask him what to do! Nuff Said!
McCain/Palin/08

Posted by: reaganfan | August 29, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

dll, you, Obama, Biden, and the rest of the Democratic party have to deal with your misogyny and reactionary hatred of women. Until then, we fully intend to vote for progressive thinking men like McCain.

Posted by: Julie | August 29, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

Carrie, I like your thinking! Another smart and capable woman! The Dems could have had Hillary, but Obama said she was “untrustworthy”. Now, we know that McCain really does think for himself, and believes that intelligent, experienced and knowledgeable women can also do the job. Someone outside of Washington? Imagine that! “Change” we can really believe in!
McCain/Palin-08

Posted by: georgia | August 29, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

How can anybody be concerned that Palin can’t protect America, when there is no evidence that Obama can, or will. Obama has less experience running anything than the mayor of Wasilla AK has, not to mention running a state.
Running a Chicago neighborhood with federal money offers me no hope the guy can do anything, and Obama’s legislative experience is really weak.
I can’t wait until Biden tries his smarminess in the VP debates. Biden’s legislative experience consists of cashing government checks. Palin will not be a pushover by any stretch.

Posted by: pickled herring | August 29, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

I wonder if MaCain remembers what he says about Obama when he chooses his VP candidate (would-be president if who could not perform the duty). Is he that old?? It really worries me.

Posted by: JT | August 29, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

SARAH PALIN????
A “green horn” governor of one of the least populous states for less than 2 years, with NO foreign policy experience??
A heartbeat away from the presidency???
When McBush’s heart might stop at any time??
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!!!!!!!
John McCain has just shown he has NO JUDGMENT AT ALL!!!!!
Between Palin, Obama’s fantastic speech last night and hurricane Gustov sucking all the Oxygen out of the Republican convention and reminding everyone of the failure of Katrina, it’s over for the evil doers….
GAME OVER REPUBLICANS!!!!
Obama/Biden ’08!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Davis | August 29, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

I wonder if MaCain remembers what he says about Obama when he chooses his VP candidate (would-be president if who could not perform the duty). Is he that old?? It really worries me.

Posted by: JT | August 29, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Don’t you know Hillary is pissed? She’s worked her whole life to be where Palin (if elected) may end up and Palin is two years removed from being a mayor of a small town.

Posted by: Art | August 29, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

I wonder if Obama remembers why he HAD to pick Biden – oh,yes, he wasn’t winning people over because of HIS thin resume and HIS lack of foreign policy. I’m thinking the two tickets are evenly balanced.

Posted by: McCain Dem | August 29, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

to Valenti and Max,
Just hope you are just as liberal at Pro Choice issues.

Posted by: aw | August 29, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Posted by Davis: “A ‘green horn’ governor of one of the least populous states for less than 2 years, with NO foreign policy experience??”
Sounds like Obama, don’t it. How many days has Obama actually “worked” as a senator?

Posted by: Art | August 29, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

pickled herring,
I think your right, Palin can protect America. I mean did you see her in that one picture holding that assault rifle?
That one picture alone will be enough to turn this election….
I mean it is better than the picture of Dukais riding in that tank? Remember that one???
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!!!!!!!!!
Obama/Biden ’08!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Davis | August 29, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Experience? You libs are barking up the wrong tree. Maybe the No 2. on the GOP ticket does not have as much experience as we would like, but look at your No. 1. What experience does he have? Being a “community organizer”? 143 total days in the Senate? And BTW, Palin has more executive experience than both Obama and Biden, COMBINED!

Posted by: Bob Kaye | August 29, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Art, I have no doubt Hillary is pissed, her own party sold her down the river. The republicans acknowledged and embraced a woman, the democratic party ridiculed and beat their woman down.

Posted by: McCain Dem | August 29, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Alaska has like 13 people and some caribou. Thanks John, we’ll keep your seat warm in the Senate!

Posted by: eddie | August 29, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Put it this way, if Palin was a man…would she have been tapped?
DON’T THINK SO!

Posted by: eddie | August 29, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

dl – all children are special needs children, including mine.

Posted by: Max | August 29, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

Can you imagine this woman standing up there next to Joe Biden at the VP debate? Biden will shred her on foreign policy and everything else. It will at best be an embarrassment for her and the Republicans!
This “green horn” would truly be just a “heartbeat” away from being president and the American people won’t stand for it. Very, very bad judgment on John McSenile’s part!
Say hello to President OBAMA!!!!!

Posted by: Davis | August 29, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

That bit about Sarah Palin firing somebody because he would not fire her sister’s ex-husband does not sound credible. For one, unless the sister is both vindictive and moronic (well, I concede that’s possible – just look at MY ex-wife), it is in the sister’s interest that her ex-husband have a job, for purposes of alimony, child support and role modeling for the kids.

Posted by: Frank | August 29, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

It’s a bold move, but is it really justified? People should be voting for the party that mirrors their own principles and sense of community. If you believe in the Democratic platform, you vote for Obama. If you tout the Republican virtues, then you vote McCain. It’s not a personality contest. That’s where Americans always screw it up!

Posted by: Scot | August 29, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Oh Eddie – if Obama wasn’t part black, would he be the nominee? DON’T THINK SO!

Posted by: SG | August 29, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

SG, Obama was NOMINATED by the voters. Palin was APPOINTED by John Mccain.
Moreover, being black didn’t help Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton, did it?

Posted by: eddie | August 29, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

Hey Davis:
Dan Quayle was the worst possible
VP candidate ever and he lost his
debate Big Time to Lloyd Bengsten!
Guess who won the election! Bush Sr!
The only way Obama gets to the
Whitehouse is if he takes a tour!
Just Say No to Obama! No You Can’t!

Posted by: reaganfan | August 29, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

Governor Palin will bring more experience and credibility to the McCain/Palin ticket than Obama can ever hope for with his own thin resume and questionable character traits. America is simply not ready for a socialist president who refused to be fully vetted.
NO WAY, NO HOW, NO OBAMA, NOT NOW, NOT EVER.
I lived in Alaska for 25 years and love to still be there during the summertime. My family members are still there and say Mrs Palin is highly respected.

Posted by: Mary | August 29, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

Governor Palin doesn’t have a clue where she even stands on the NATIONAL issues that we’re going to debate in the fall. This isn’t governing Alaska or any other state but the nation, the United States. This is an awful ticket and a blatant and insulting pander to Hillary’s supporters. Being from NY, you better believe I’m one of them.
Futhermore, we’re not electing a VP. We’re electing a president. And John Mccain stands with George Bush 90% of the time.
THANKS BUT NO THANKS!

Posted by: eddie | August 29, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Senators can hide behind the votes of 99 others. Governors make decisions that cannot be passed to anyone else. That’s why “executive experience” is vastly superior to “representative experience.”
Gov. Palin has managed a state and full staff of thousands – all while raising 5 kids. Her oldest son is going to serve in Iraq, just as McCain’s son is already doing.
Those who assume she isn’t able to handle a national stage/national issues forget that a fancy college transcript doesn’t mean anything in the real world. Your achievements in the real world do.

Posted by: Chris | August 29, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Eddie–Where have you been. Obama was not nominated by the voters through the popular vote process. He was selected through the corrupt means of the DNC, MSM and BIG Money. Senator Clinton actually received over 500,000 more popular votes than Obama. Obama was a affirmative action selective. Almost 50% of the delegates selected were from minority groups. That number does not tally well with the actual number of AAs, Hispanics, Homos, etc. It was a rigged selection and most well informed voters know that.

Posted by: Mary | August 29, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

Hmmm, who was the last Governor we had as president?
Wait a minute…George W. Bush was governor of Texas!! He had “executive experience” too. He even pledged “compassionate conservatism” during his campaign. He was also going to “shake up Washington”.
Ah…8 years later, how do we feel about Georgie?
Yeah, another Republican governor…
THANKS BUT NO THANKS.

Posted by: eddie | August 29, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

Let’s see, wasn’t Reagan a former governor? Good memories, that was when the Reagan democrats made the difference in him winning.

Posted by: Mcain Will Win | August 29, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Mary, a black man’s vote is worth the same as a white man, a woman, latino, or a gay. The state of Iowa would sharply disagree with your assessment of being an “affirmative action” nominee.
Your bigotry is disgraceful and disgusting. Everyone in this country is an immigrant, unless you can claim you are a native american, so take your racist rant elsewhere.

Posted by: eddie | August 29, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

This is a historic day for the republican party – way to go. Women, fathers, husbands, sons and brothers thank you.

Posted by: Jim | August 29, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

PALIN IS NOW ON C-SPAN RIGHT NOW GIVING AN INTERVIEW!
Wow what a policy WONK! She knows all about the PTA and the current events in Juno! Dog sled races and everything!
She is telling us all about in her words “her backwards state with no infrastructure.” Also how the only industry there is the raping and pillaging of Natural Resources, like timber and oil…
Also she is just like McBush, she wants to drill here, drill there, drill everywhere!! Now I see why he chose her!!!
You know when she looks straight into the camera, you can see that she has really beautiful eyes as well, too bad they are kind of crossed like that…
She is certainly a FOX, I will give you that McCain – you do have an eye for the ladies!
GAME OVER REPUBLICANS!!!
Obama/Biden 2008!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Davis | August 29, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

He shoots. He scores!
Great selection – Sara Palin has Reagan qualities – something America desparately needs.

Posted by: freeperjim | August 29, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

I’m still waiting for McCain to say this was a joke.
20 months as governor of Alaska is qualified for VP? There are MAYORS with more executive experience and bigger portfolios.
Country first my ass.

Posted by: Brian | August 29, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

This is a historic day for the republican party – way to go. Women, fathers, husbands, sons and brothers thank you.
Posted by: Jim | Aug 29, 2008 5:52:45 PM
=======================================
Jim
You forgot to thank the PTA and the city counsel of Juno Alaska (pop 9,000 during the summer when all the cruise ships are rolling in), Where Palin got most of her executive experience from.
She also says she was a journalist to, a sportscaster! More executive experience!
Great pick McBush! Way better than Romney, Ridge or Lieberman!!!!!!!
She is a real FOX to, I always knew you had an eye for the ladies!!!!
GAME OVER REPUBLICANS!!
Obama/Biden 2008!!!!!!

Posted by: Davis | August 29, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Congrats, Reps, for finally choosing a woman. We did that about 20 years ago.

Posted by: obamamama | August 29, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

PALIN FOR VP = REPUBLICAN FREEFALL IN THE POLLS STARTING TODAY!!
ROMNEY SAYS “IS THIS A JOKE??”"
GAME OVER REPUBLICANS, TAKE YOU BALL AND GO HOME!!!
CAN YOU SAY PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA!!!!!

Posted by: Davis | August 29, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Eddie– Your bigotry rant is disgraceful and disgusting. Ignoring the facts does not change the facts even for Obama supporters. My family has DNA from a half dozen different nations including native American. So you are off track to say I am a racist. I am a person who believes that the truth and honesty is more important than someone’s political whims. The Obama people do not. OK. I also have worked in the political arena for years before I retired.

Posted by: Mary | August 29, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Im proud of our country now that we will have black leadership, black govenment,black power in the White House, and the whites, the spanish and indians will not count any more.Americais a black nation now.

Posted by: Tom | August 29, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Of course the LIBS don’t like Sarah Palin: She’s smart, pro-life, pro-low taxes, pro-gun rights, pro-military, hates pork barrel spending and is beautiful to boot! And she has actually has a list of identifiable accomplishments as the Executive of a state for nearly two years. The LIBS would rather extol the virtues of a Chicago street thug with a forged Hawaiian birth certificate ( Barack HUSSEIN Obama was born in Kenya) who spent just 4.5 months as a junior Senator (most liberal Senator in history) before deciding to run for President. Among his closest confidents, spiritual advisors and friends are the freakiest anti-Americans ever featured on National TV seen and heard cursing our country, spewing their hate of “whitey” and believing that 3000 innocent Americans deserved to be incinerated on September 11, 2001. And that was his preacher! His friends, Bill Ayers and wife, set off bombs in our Pentagon and in police stations and to this day admit they “wish he did more damage and killed more people”. But, Ayers and his wife also published papers advocating for children to kill their parents and for the rights of parents to kill their babies until the age of one. This is the sewage that you LIBS want to stain our White House with?

Posted by: Kimberly | August 29, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Now that everyone tries to make comparisons:
Obama has NO foreign policy experience, unless you want to count the rock concert in Germany.
Obama has no executive experience. Palin has been a mayor and a governor of a state.
Obama has no claim to standing up to corruption. In fact, he has a 17-year relationship with convicted Rezko who influenced governmental corruption and even funded Obama. Palin is a fighter, even standing up to her own Party.
The Obama camp tries to belittle the Republican VP experience to that of Democrat VP, then says that she does not have enough experience to be President. That is so laughable. She has more experience than Obama! Obama’s people say the Presidential nominee is what matters most. Indeed, it does.
Experience and integrity do matter.
McCain/Palin ’08

Posted by: georgia | August 29, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

I love the case that was made for Obama’s experience: he’s been in 26 debates. That cracks me up. Meanwhile, Palin’s run a business, a city, a state, she’s commander of her state’s National Guard, she’s negotiated with foreign governments, stood up to the oil companies while working with them and fought corruption in her state and party. She’s everything Obama pretends to be and more. People are right… there is no comparison.

Posted by: Heywood U. Reedmore | August 29, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

Put it this way, if Palin was a man…would she have been tapped?
If Obama was white?????????????

Posted by: geevill | August 29, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Palin defeated two Alaska political institutions without resorting to having them thrown off the ballot like Chicago thug Obama.

Posted by: geevill | August 29, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

Sarah have a short neck,so she will be an extraordinary good VP.

Posted by: Moe | August 29, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Palin has as much experience as Obama. In other words to lightweights do NOT make a potiental President, no matter they have D or R next to their name. Better hope John is fit, and Obama has good security for the next four years or we are ALL screwed!!!

Posted by: argh! | August 29, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

SARAH PALIN, WHO IS SHE?
Well folks hang on to your hats because the research is already coming in!!!!
Former Beauty Queen, just like Cindy McCain!
Former Sports Caster, who’s dream was to work for ESPN.
Former PTA member and “hockey mom.”
Former City counsel member (4 years) and small town Mayor (2 years)
Governor of the most backwards and least populous state in the nation for a whole 20 months. The Alaskan state government meets 90 days a year!
In 2006, get this… SHE WAS FOR THE BRIDGE TO NOWHERE!!! But today she said in her acceptance speech she was against it!
Against polar bears on the endangered species list…
Believes there is NO SUCH THING AS GLOBAL WARMING!!
Is firmly anti-abortion and want to repeal Roe v Wade!
And last but not least she called Hillary a “Whinner” during the primaries!!!!!!!
She now wants all the Hillary PUMA fans to support her and McBush!!
So how about it PUMA gals? Hillary is a WHINER right? Sarah Palin says so!!!
Stay tuned, the research is going 100 mph on Palin right now – certainly there will be a lot more details coming in the next few days!
Obama/Biden ’08!!!!!!!

Posted by: Davis | August 29, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

Are the Republicans kidding me, with the nod to Sarah Palin as McCain’s VP choice? If the GOP had qualms about the one-term Senator Obama from a well-populated State (IL) and one of the countries largest cities (Chicago area), then the RNC has got to be kidding about a one-term Governor Palin of a “remote” state (AK) from the continental U.S. with no large cities, relatively. This election is a sham, (I just lament the possibility that it could’ve been a Clinton/Biden ticket, alas…).

Posted by: Democrat | August 29, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

What? Another Vice Presidential choice (McCain’s Palin) with ties to Big Oil (in Alaska)? As Obama mentioned in his DNC nomination acceptance speech, this just proves that the GOP does not get it: the World economies–starting with America–need to end the Oil Era and usher in the Clean Renewable Energy Era of locally obtained sources. the GOP is not Grand, but it is old, let’s not invite the Republicans back to the “party” in Nov ’08….

Posted by: Netizen19380 | August 29, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

OK, do American voters really think that a Presidential candidate who’s grandfather, father, himself and his son have military background will end the Military Industrial Complex’s policy of America in Endless War(s), and end the GHB/GWB Iraqi war(s) (that’s McCain…)? Do voters really think that a Vice Presidential choice who’s husband is in the Oil Industry and who’s state citizens get governmental payouts from Oil revenues in Alaska will support the complete move to clean, renewal, homegrown energy sources such as Wind, Solar, Wave, Geothermal, Biomass, cellulosic ethanol and others (that’s Palin…)? Well, I don’t think McCain/Palin will. They will support the status quo. So, if you feel the country is doing well and should continue on as usual, they’re your pair.

Posted by: PA | August 29, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Palin wants women raped made to keep their baby by the rapist….
WOW!!!

Posted by: MCCAIN IS SO FLAWED | August 29, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

She was a Mayor of 348 people..
200 of them Women…
Bwaaaaaaa!~!~!!
GOP are very desperate, very…

Posted by: MCCAIN IS SO FLAWED | August 29, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

True Conservatives will all stay home this election…
Only Racist will be at the polls voting for McCain..
Veterans and Women are voting for Obama..
SHAME ON YOU MCCAIN!!

Posted by: MCCAIN IS SO FLAWED | August 29, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty,
former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge
all called McCain a TRAITOR TO THE GOP…
They are Pee’d at McCain…
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!

Posted by: MCCAIN IS SO FLAWED | August 29, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Personally, I’ll vote for anything with a vagina.

Posted by: HST | August 29, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

As a moderate Republican and vet, I appalled that McCain would choose this inexperienced Gov of a state with all of 700,000, who doesn’t even know anything about Iraq or Iran.
That is not putting country first
Mitt Romney was the best a most obvious choice. This is someone who is ready to step in should, God forbid, something happens to McCain, He is 72 after all.

Posted by: KM | August 29, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

One thing to remember here. Everybody thinks that McCain is going after the disgruntled Hillary voters. One thing that everyone seems to be ignoring is something much bigger. Not only will he make headway with some of the HRC voters, he’ll make a big dent in the women’s vote, the independent vote, Reagan democrats, and last that uncommitted but significant percentage of the conservative base who was going to sit out this election because of McCain’s moderate stance on some of the issues. This is going to play big in states like Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. Obama-Biden will have a very difficult time trying to overcome this. I wouldn’t be shocked to see a big McCain win in November by 300+ EV.

Posted by: realquiet | August 29, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Palin speaks!
“The GOP agenda to ramp up domestic supplies of energy is the only way that we’re going to become energy independent, the only way that we are going to become a more secure nation — and I say this, of course, looking at the situation we are in right now, at war, not knowing what the plan is to ever end the war that we’re engaged in, understanding that Americans are seeking solutions, and they are seeking resolution in this war effort, so energy supplies, being able to produce and supply domestically, is going to be a big part of that.”
Brilliant AND articulate!

Posted by: lampwick | August 29, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

This is how McCain decided his running mate – “The campaign secretly flew Palin into Dayton last night. She and McCain met privately for a couple of hours.”
Maybe he thinks he has lots experience on his belt, therefore, can make a decision based on his instinct without consulting with his resources from all places. Is this the leadership he offers? Can I trust him to lead the country? I wonder.

Posted by: A Voter | August 29, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

Two words.
Harriet Myers.

Posted by: lr | August 29, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

She’ll withdraw very shortly. She evidently wasn’t vetted at all. Or very poorly.

Posted by: lr | August 29, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

“… McCain hit a home run with this one. …”
Heh. More like he scored an own goal.

Posted by: synykyl | August 29, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

He pulled her name out of a hat?

Posted by: Dave | August 29, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

Hey Davis:
Our No.2 has more experience than
your No.1!
You’re right. Game Over for Obama!
No one will be able to say
PRESIDENT OBAMA after the election since the title of president-elect
goes to the WINNER! That will be McCain!

Posted by: reaganfan | August 29, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

What a crazy year! The Dems almost chose the smartest candidate, but Obama won with the help of the caucuses, the MSM bias, and so-called “wise” Dem Superdelegates. Obama chose Biden because he has no experience in foreign affairs, much less anything else. One of the best governors to become President was Bill Clinton. It took both Bill and Hillary Clinton to save the Democrat Convention and Obama’s hide. Now, people question the experience of Governor Palin and compare her experience to Biden as VP? Compare her to Obama as President. How much do you think Biden can prop up Obama? Obama is woefully lacking in experience in governing. He has spent most of his time as a new Senator campaigning for the Presidency, while Palin has been working hard as Governor and an ardent reformer of a state.
McCain has made a great choice, and women will support the McCain/Palin ticket. This choice just solidifies the switch to McCain. He is the strongest, most experienced, and most knowledgeable candidate for President.
McCain/Palin ’08

Posted by: georgia | August 29, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

lol. The democrats beat down another female candidate.
That’s rich.
What the freak were you Republicans going to do with Hilary…greet her as a liberator? You’re still pissed we didn’t nominate her.

Posted by: Jay Severin Has A Small Pen1s | August 30, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

How does this loser John McCain think he has the TEMPERAMENT and JUDGMENT to lead in a time of crisis? He completely panicked and picked some novelty candidate who pleases the far right.
Ignore the BS trolls above, moderate and Independent women are insulted by this blatant pander.
Oh, and Sarah Palin is under an abuse of power investigation in Alaska right now. Her reform credentials are vastly overblown (she supported the Bridge to Nowhere until Congress nixed it), and she left the City of Wasilla in a huge debt when she left office.
By tomorrow the sheen will have worn off and Republicans will be asking McCain to pick somebody else.

Posted by: Elrod | August 30, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Come on, it’s obvious that these two are a comically bad ticket being sacrified by the GOP, since they don’t want to waste their viable candidates on a Dem landslide year like 2008.

Posted by: chiefscribe | August 30, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

I love watching the GOPers try to justify this to themselves, as if Dems were making the experience argument. McCain just admitted that he thinks Obama, who is vastly better educated and more experienced than a small-town mayor who got a B.A. in journalism from the U. of Idaho, is qualified for the Oval Office. Thanks, John!
And all the Republicans pretending to be Democrats… nobody’s fooled.

Posted by: Klaus | August 30, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am

Haha! I love the line “Palin has run a city.” Keep trying to make that “experience” argument, guys. Watching you guys flail is f’n hilarious!

Posted by: Klaus | August 30, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

I really dont want to start a rumor but
I found a pic from Feb 2008 of Palin….she doesn’t look pregnant
http://www.adn.com/politics/v-gallery/story/339576.html?/politics/v-enlarge/story/339576-a339575-t3.html

Posted by: CyberWarFighter | August 30, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

Sure are a lot of GOP shills in this comment box… Try to be less transparent.

Posted by: wooo | August 30, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am

Why don’t you democrats just admit you’re freaking out. McCain made a wise choice and you know it.
Another point.. You can’t slam him for picking a woman to appeal to women.Though, that wasn’t the only reason. She also appeals to the conservative base he was struggling with.
And besides,Obamas whole campaign has been “Vote for me, I’m black and that brings “change”

Posted by: JD | August 30, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am

Anyone who thinks this is great is more qualified to run for VP than McCain’s choice…which goes from negative to 0 chance…And anyone who is a so called Hilary supporter now going to vote for the Republican ticket because McCain made a “bold” move go jump in the ocean because we don’t need you dragging the country down in deeper into the crapper than we already are…It’s insulting to all Americans for this guy to put the greatest office on Earth one heartbeat or colonoscopy away to someone not even qualified to President of my College…Anyone who calls her a state executive has a very high degree of respect for the cutthroat politics of “Alaska”…Geez what a dumb turd

Posted by: JA | August 30, 2008, 2:21 am 2:21 am

I’m sorry, but does anyone think being a mayor of a town the size of a small college and a governor for a few months prepares someone for the V.P?
She has a BACHELOR’s Degree in communications from U of Idaho for heaven’s sake!
Obama = magna cum laude from Harvard law school….professor of law….state senate in 1996 + U.S. senate in 2004
That’s huge, folks. She doesn’t have the first clue how the federal government works, and why should she?

Posted by: Nate | August 30, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am

As a registered independent, the defense of Palin as the supposed next Vice President of the United States makes me laugh. What the heck, are you guys Republican operative paid to post tripe? Or are you really that stupid?
The Republicans have a very deep bench of women with great experience. Senator Hutchinson of TX; former EPA administrator Whitman; Secretary of Labor Chao; Secretary of State Condi Rice.
Palin has been a councilwoman and mayor of a city 3x smaller than my college and Governor of Alaska for 18 months.
THAT makes her qualified to be President should something unforseen happen to John McCain, who’s just turned 72 with a history of cancer?
That’s laughable.
If you’ve posted to this blog in support of Palin, drop the crack pipe and stay off of the internet for a while.
P.S. Mitt Romney would have been the better choice for McCain.

Posted by: Harvey | August 30, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am

If this is how he would make decisions on matters of peace and war, we should all be worried if John McCain wins.
I am sorry, but as a Republican I must admit that Thad Cochrane is right, this man is unfit for President and I cannot support this. Not one bit.
A 72 year old man picks the most unqualified person for VP in the history of our nation. Amazing.

Posted by: debrazza | August 30, 2008, 2:54 am 2:54 am

I think Joe Biden was correct. B.O. is not qualified to be President. B.O. stinks.

Posted by: Jim | August 30, 2008, 3:25 am 3:25 am

I guess Anita Bryant wasn’t available.

Posted by: Wilsonian | August 30, 2008, 3:45 am 3:45 am

Palin doesn’t have a lot of expereince but she does have more than Obama and she has 4 years to learn as VP.
She will mobilize the conservative vote because of her stands on theissues and her willingness to do what is right even if it goes against the Reublican base.
Hopefully in 4 years we will have our first woman President!!!!!

Posted by: keith | August 30, 2008, 5:27 am 5:27 am

Reading the posts here has conclusively proved one thing to me: Hillary’s supporters were just sexist who didn’t really care about her policies. All they cared about was her gender.
Hillary Clinton blew a 25 point lead that she held for almost four years with a horrid campaign strategy that left her financially bankrupt by Super Tuesday, yet Barack Obama was somehow responsible for her missteps. When the primary is over and Hillary comes up short, many of her feminist supporters decide that just won’t do and decide to punish the Democrats by jumping ship to a Republican candidate who has actually voted for legislation that allows employers to discriminate against women in regards to pay. Unbelievable!
Then, when McCain names a far right-wing conservative woman to his ticket, who has absolutely nothing in common with the politics of Hillary Clinton, her former supporters cheer the selection because they share the same chromosome. If this isn’t an example of blatant sexism, I don’t know what is.

Posted by: TJ | August 30, 2008, 5:49 am 5:49 am

paul – how is this a kneejerk decision? lol. she was always on the list, but not considered a frontrunner. also, this “article” is based on rumor and innuendo. there are no official statements in the story from the campaign. i think the logic on lieberman is correct – although he would have attracted tons of moderates and democrats. i thought pawlenty was great but mccain wanted verve. i give him credit for this.

Posted by: tony | August 30, 2008, 7:04 am 7:04 am

beck – if mccain wanted “any” woman, don’t you think more women would have been finalists? i actually think it’s her going against the party, being pro-life, being a woman, among other things that led him to her. according to the “article,” lieberman was the first choice until the very end. he is sooooo not a woman! clearly he wanted something “different” and unusual. picking lieberman would have been. so he went with her after lieberman was nixed by conservatives.
my initial reaction was the same as yours. but the longer i think about the strategy, i realize the decision was far more complex. i’m sure they looked at other women too. but many of the republican women lawmakers are either too old or pro-choice.

Posted by: tony | August 30, 2008, 7:08 am 7:08 am

It is clear that virtually all the women who claim they are going to vote for McCain because of this are McCain supporters who would have voted for him no matter who he picked.

Posted by: CaptainVideo | August 30, 2008, 7:33 am 7:33 am

I guess Osama better call in his 300 advisors to find out what to do next…… or check with the guy that has his arm up his butt, George Soros.

Posted by: Neil | August 30, 2008, 7:40 am 7:40 am

Here are the facts:
1) Sarah Palin used her power as Governor to try to get her (former) brother-in-law fired as a state trooper because he was in a messy divorce with her sister.
2) She is against abortion for any reason, even to save the life of the mother.
3) She wants to teach creationism in the public schools.
4) She has said (on tape)that she doesn’t know what the vice president does. She has also said (on tape) that she knows nothing about the Iraq war.
5) Other, more qualified, Republican women (e.g. Olympia Snowe) were not considered for the VP slot only because of their views on abortion.
6) As a 72-year-old male cancer survivor, John McCain’s chances of making it through four years as President are fairly slim.
7) John McCain has shown that he does not have the judgment to be President.

Posted by: billinvirginia | August 30, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

You have no one to blame but Hillary and Barry. She doesn’t want him to win and he didn’t want to be upstaged by the Clintons. So he didn’t pick her and went with the Washington insider who steals other peoples speeches….brilliant!
Go McCain/Palin!

Posted by: UDrunkTheKoolAid | August 30, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

But Pawlenty’s flaw — what cost him the VP — was that he would not have stirred things up. He was safe, and McCain was not inclined to take the safe route.
“Safe”? In what way? Safe from a campaign strategy perspective or safe from a qualifed to be a heart beat away from the presidency perspective – unfortunately both. But, McCain apparently doesn’t give a hoot about the second issue – which is why he finally has pushed this former Hillary supporter finally into the Obama camp.

Posted by: Suzie | August 30, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

Its astounding the number of “democratic” women on this comment thread who are “thrilled” with the choice of Palin, a pro-life, underqualified, creationist loving Repub. For these women to blindly support Palin because of a single chromosome and nothing else is simply hard to believe.
Come on ladies the Lord jesus does not appreciate liars

Posted by: Lib4 | August 30, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

The idea that many Republicans are comparing Palin to Obama is laughable. Let’s review: a former beauty pageant queen with a degree in communications from the University of Idaho, 1.5 years of experience as governor of a state with fewer people than Dayton, Ohio, and prior experience as Mayor of a village of 6,500 vs. a former community organizer with a law degree from Harvard who has worked as a constitutional law professor, a productive state senator in one of the largest states in the country for 8 years, and a U.S. Senator for 4 years is laughable. And, just for the record, “no experience” Obama has done the following:
Illinois State Senate:
a) Led sweeping, bipartisan ethics reform;
b) Led an effort to expand health care to 150,000 people (that’s 1/5 the size of Alaska);
c) Led an effort to pass the Earned Income Tax Credit;
Senate (and, to those who say Senator Obama has spent all of his time running for President, somehow he has also achieved the following):
a) Passed the most sweeping Congressional ethics reform in history;
b) Led a successful effort to improve the medical care provided to our noble veterans
c) Fought against so-called loyal-vet McCain to EXPAND the GI Bill so that our brave vets have a chance at a better future through education when they return home;
d) Led the fight for legislation to reduce the number of nuclear weapons in the hands of rogue states and actors (somehow more impressive than commanding the Alaska National Guard as governor of Alaska where, at best, she’s authorized to deploy them to dig Anchorage out of a big snow storm)
e) has traveled extensively internationally PRIOR to this campaign, and, at this point, has met with the leaders of most of our major allies in Europe and the Middle East;
f) Spoke out against the Iraq War when it was unpopular to challenge the Bush administration (and when Sarah Palin was still presiding over a village smaller than my high school);
h) Challenged Bush and McCain to focus on real threats to our security in Afghanistan and Al-Queda instead of costly, Bush-created threats in Iraq;
i) Developed a nuanced foreign policy based on engagement as a first principle, and force as a last option. After mocking him for arguing for the importance of engaging Iran to reduce their nuclear threat, the Bush administration is now doing just that!
Not only do Obama’s achievements stand up to those of McSame, who voted with Bush 90% of the time, they dwarf those of Palin.
Let’s review here: Former Mayor of a town of 6500 who has been Governor for 1.5 years being compared to Senator Obama, who has been in state and national office for 12 years. Senator Obama has already influenced and helped to shape domestic and international dialogue on U.S. foreign policy, and his positions have been proven right on Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iran. Laughable comparison.
The Republicans are shocking in their bravado, which is why they nominated Dubya twice! People voted for Hillary Clinton because she had REAL experience and credibility, and McCain insults them by picking this neophyte. Her record of independence from the corruption of her party is admirable; her abuse of her authority to punish her ex-brother-in-law was not, and sounds awfully Karl Roveian.
Ladies and Gentleman, Sarah Palin is NO Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama has my vote. He has a better record on women’s issues than this feaux-feminist, “Trophy VP” nominee, who opposes a woman’s right to chose and saddled up with a candidate who voted against equal pay for women and the Family Leave Act. McCain picked her after meeting/SEEING her ONCE over much more experienced women like Kay Bailey Hutchinson in Texas and Elizabeth Dole in North Carolina. Those two must feel like the disabled wife whom McCain left for his current trophy wife (whom he recently offered to enter in a nude beauty contest in exchange for the the votes of some biker dudes). Women of America, this is a slap in the face. I’d rather wait until Claire McCaskill, Kathleen Sebelius, or a number of other MUCH more qualified Democratic women have their chance (and think Obama will pick one of them as his VP for his second term).

Posted by: Anna | August 30, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

The speculation that Gov. Palin will not be fit to be President if God forbid something should happen to Senator McCain should not be a major issue..Fact is if she did have to take over the office,she would have to pick a V.P. that would need to be approved by the majority of the Senate and House. This was written in the Constitution to protect the checks and balances.
As for Mr. Obama’s campaign attacking her on experience shows an admittance by them that experience in leading the Presidency is crucial. So if the shoe fits!!

Posted by: Pee Vee, Long Island | August 30, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

Sarah Palin is a hick. She’s a 44 year old grandmother with a daughter named Bristol. Need we say more? She’s a non-issue and we will never hear her name again after McCain loses the election.
John

Posted by: John | August 30, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Over and over again I keep reading about Palin’s lack of experience. The hypocrisy is staggering. First, Obama is at the top of the ticket, she’s number two. Even still, it’s not about “quantity” of experience, but “quality.” What exactly has Obama done in his career that stacks up against what she has accomplished in the time leading up to and during her Governorship? Community organizer? What’s that? State legislator…name a major accomplishment. US Senator? I say again, name a significant accomplishment other than making great speeches. And Change? What change will Obama and Biden bring other than a change to far left, liberal policies? It’s just another kind of business-as-usual. Both McCain and Palin have actual accomplishments that DEMONSTRATE they are agents of change and anything but business-as-usual. The Obama campaign is all talk…and frankly it’s utterly amazing that so many people are buying it.

Posted by: usnagu | August 30, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

John McCain’s first executive Decision, Sarah Palin. shows he cares nothing for this Country, is incompetent, and is not ready to lead. With all our economic problems, threats of terrorism, he picks someone with much less executive experience than Barack Obama, who by the way was 10 years in the state senate before being elected to the U.S. Senate (a bio very similar to Lincoln who is considered one of our greatest if not the greatest President we have ever had), and which takes away McCain’s most ardent argument to date that Barack is an empty suit! Is this another Alan Keyes moment when GOP put up Mr. Keyes to run against Barack in Illinois just because he was Black?
In her speech on Friday, they already have Gov. Palin “lying” to the American people that she was always against the Bridge to Nowhere, however recorded information will prove that this is not accurate and that she was for the Bridge to Nowhere, before she was against it!
“According to the Ketchikan Daily News edition on August 8, 2006, this is what Sarah Palin rushed over to tell the voters of Ketchikan during the primary election campaign:
‘People across the nation struggle with the idea of building a bridge because they’ve been under these misperceptions about the bridge and the purpose,’ said Palin, who described the link as the Ketchikan area’s potential for expansion and growth. Palin said Alaska’s congressional delegation worked hard to obtain funding for the bridge as part of a package deal and that she ‘would not stand in the way of the progress toward that bridge.’” AND
according to the Ketchikan Daily News on September 29, 2006 this is what Sarah Palin rushed over to tell the voters of Ketchikan during the general election campaign:
‘Part of my agenda is making sure that Southeast is heard. That your projects are important. That we go to bat for Southeast when we’re up against federal influences that aren’t in the best interest of Southeast.’ She cited the widespread negative attention focused on the Gravina Island crossing project. ‘We need to come to the defense of Southeast Alaska when proposals are on the table like the bridge and not allow the spinmeisters to turn this project or any other into something that’s so negative,’ Palin says”
Taken from Blogger AndrewHalcro.com
Not only is Palin less experienced and less qualified than Barack, she seems to lack the intellectual curiosity, or unwillingness, and depth to probe and understand the important and complexing problems/issues knocking at our door today. For example, “What is it exactly that the vice president does all day?” Palin offhandedly asked CNBC anchor Larry Kudlow in July. And when asked about her stance on Iraq by Alaskan Daily Palin answers “I’ve been so focused on state government, I haven’t really focused much on the war in Iraq. I heard on the news about the new deployments”! Does this show someone who is ready for Prime Time! And, was she truly vetted? Sarah/McCain get ready for she is about to come under the “media” microscope!
McCain’s VP pick also shows a disdain for this country because if something were to unfortunately happen to McCain, Sarah Palin would be our next President of the United States. Can you imagine in her that role? This proves two things in my mind, McCain’s lack of love for this country and that he does not have the judgment to lead this country at this most profound time.
Some in the media call it Historic but in reality Is this decision Historic or Hysterical and a mockery to our political system? Some in the media label it a game changer but is it really a roll of the dice? And should a Presidential candidate play Russian roulette with the people’s business? It is telling of McCain’s character and judgment that with all the problems we face here today, he did not have the People’s interest at heart in this V.P. pick but rather a desire to win for winnings sake and did not think of the consequences of his actions or maybe did not care what it would mean for this country if she were to be sworn in as President of the United States! And, ironically, the very things he accused Barack of being (which he is not) — empty suit, no experience — he got in his own V.P. Pick, Sarah Palin!
In McCain’s/GOP’s calculated ploy to pull Hillary women from Barack without consideration as to whether or not this woman has the ability and experience to lead the United States here and on a world scale shows a lack of sound judgment and it also shows that McCain is NOT READY TO LEAD in the 21st Centruy and is not serious about solving the monumental problems which must be faced — problems which need serious thinking and not strategic games.
McCain’s pick of Sarah Palin, a woman with very little executive experience, a woman who has approved a 26 billion dollar oil pipeline to a Canadian business instead of a business here in the United States, a woman who the Alaskan legislature approved a $100,000 investigation into her motivations in firing Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan, on the allegations that Monegan’s firing was the result of his refusal to fire Mike Wooten, a trooper who is Palin’s former brother-in-law.” has proven to the world how really pathetic the Republican party has become that they will try any trick in the book to keep the power in the hands of big oil and special interest and out of the hands of the people where it belongs.

Posted by: Angellight | August 30, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Let me get this straight. McCaim picks Palin to make the ticket look younger and prettier. Uh…
Obammy picks Hairplug Joe to make his ticket look more mature and experienced.
Anyone see any difference? It’s all politics.
To me Sarah Palin looks good enough to eat. On the issues, on the issues.

Posted by: LarryMan | August 30, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Word on some blogs from alaska writers is Palin can leave a down syndrome baby after three days( and a pregnancy that never “showed” in the seventh month and was a sursprise to co-workers, and water that broke in CA but never saw a hospital until one speech and hours later after stopovers in Seattle, which surely have better hospitals for a high risk child.)…because she also has a teenage daughter who left high school for several months during the same period. Mono, her fellow students were told. Same daughter holding baby in photo ops. Holding baby in a quite maternal embrace, actually.
The child is fact, regardless of parentage, but leaving any new born, particularly a vulnerable special needs child, if there is any way to prevent it, after three days to go back to work, suggests a level of ambition,and greed only matched by McCain, and a lack of concern for “family values.”
The first months after childbirth, hormonally compromised as they are with a normal baby, are particularly challenging for adjusting to a special needs child. Something doen’t jibe, here.
Also, Parents don’t necessarily know that their baby has down’s syndrome unless they test through blood or amniocentesis–and tests are usually done on older parents in order to create the option of not having a child. Have to wonder how, and more to the point, WHY they knew or when. Of course an unexpected teen age pregnancy could be high enough risk to warrant it….

Posted by: Lynne | August 30, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

This smells like a powder keg with the fuse lit.
McCain turned in his biggest gun he had against Obama, inexperience. People need to realize that it was McCain’s gun, not Obama’s.
Palin falls in line with McCain, so Obama gets to keep his biggest gun, which is the comparison to Bush and the past 8 years. The fact that Palin cleaned house in her state only means that she punished wrong-doers or people who didn’t fall in line with her. That’s not a political direction.
The whole story with the Down Syndrome Baby, I am not sure what to say there. No evidence points to Gov. Palin having been pregnant, and the Mono story smells to high heaven. I think it’d be best to air out the room and break the news that the teen daughter got pregnant and they’re pro-life. If they don’t do that and the truth comes out, Palin will be instantly discredited as being a liar. She can’t afford that.
If she continues her story that she’s the mom, I’m sorry you have a very special needs child, and you’re saying it’s yours.. what are you doing planning to be mostly away from that child for the next 4 to 8 years?!? “Good mom”? No.
Also, Palin was barely vetted. There could well be dirt that gets dug up in the coming weeks.
Just looking at all players and circumstances, my gut says bad mix.

Posted by: Hans Meiser | August 30, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Are you libs ever going to give up? This ain’t “Desperate Housewives”. This is real life. Have you no shame?
Palin had to have visited a doctor. Don’t you think that if anyone, anyone believed that this baby wasn’t hers that they would have spoken up.
What about the baby in the hospital? Don’t you think her daughter would have been in the hospital.
Good grief!!!
You people are SICK!!!

Posted by: LarryMan | August 30, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

A a student in Alaska i want to point out some things about Governor Sarah Palin:
1) As to the ‘shady’ circumstances of Palin firing the guy who wouldn’t fire her sisters ex-husband. That is true. Whether or not she should have just fired the ex-husband herself is up for you to decide. Just remember that he supposedly abused Palin’s sister.
2) This state (Alaska) is run by oil. We don’t have a deficit, instead we have a surplus.

Posted by: BigMItch | August 30, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

McCain miscalculated. Women are quite intelligent to realize when someone is ready or not ready to be president. In a recent poll, more women than men are skeptical of Palin’s qualifications to be commander-in-chief:
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/08/women-more-skeptical-of-palin-than-men.html
McCain also revealed something less than reassuring about his judgment and decision-making processes.
He is a high-stakes gambler who decides based on his “gut” and likes to roll the dice with the future of our country.
Haven’t 8 years of someone with that exact same temperament taught us anything?

Posted by: katerina | August 30, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Dear Big Mitch. The question is NOT whether the officer is an abuser. That issue belongs in the courts. The issue is that Palin used her powers as governor to serve revenge. Inappropriate and illegal. Do you want this individual in the white house? Try critical thinking skills.

Posted by: medimattie | August 30, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Oh, now we are back to the Bush Derangement Syndrome. Bush bad, bad, bad.
For your information, the last 8 years have been the most profitable that I have ever had. I paid less taxes than ever last year, this April got more back than ever before.
Those of you who drink the left wing media kool aid – I pity you.
Back to McCain. Why on earth would he pick a Romney, likely not to get the christian vote, or anyone else who could bring about fodder for the demos? Demos chant “Change, Change, Change”.
McCain is giving us change. Change in the right direction, not the socialism direction.

Posted by: LarryMan | August 30, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Yea McCain.. this shows us how you make a decision.. thank God we can see.. before you are elected President… You have show us how little you think of the office of President of the United States…
Talk about on the job trainig… WOW.

Posted by: Harpy | August 30, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

McCain made a very bad decision by selecting Palin. That’s like selecting a mail room clerk who recently was promoted to a department head; and then promote that person to become the Vice President of a large corporation that is engaged in very sophisticated and comprehensive products, legal matters, research, investors, and development by highly intelligent PhD’s. Can you imagine that mail room clerk sitting in a meeting with these folks making important decisions?
Businesses don’t operate this way.

Posted by: tom | August 30, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

For every woman who switches to McBlame, a dozen men who would never vote for a woman for prez will drop his sorry ass.
Since a higher percentage of sexists live in the same places that racists live (and in most cases are one & the same individuals) McSexist will likely lose a hugh chunk of his McRacist vote.

Posted by: olo | August 30, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

With this pick McCain has demonstrated he understands how the American electorate view elections. We seem to think elections are a contact sport where everyone is passionately rooting for their favourite team and your team wins the championship on Nov 4 and then it’s all over.
So, I have no doubt the “hurt” Hillary supporters will flock to McCain because they can’t actually conceive the consequences beyond Nov 4th. McCain will be elected (in the same Bush got a second term). And so after Nov 4th America will continue its nascent decline.
Maybe some day things will be bad enough that people like those Hillary supporters will have to think beyond Nov 4th. But, we are not there yet. We will vote for and get the ticket we deserve.
PS. I feel badly for Hillary. This has just made a mockery of her 35 years of public service. It appears all you have to do is just be a woman afterall.

Posted by: zorse | August 30, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

Amusing that McSame fans would talk about Democrats being “worried?” This pick is clearly going to turn into a circus– and the Obama camp is reported to have been “delighted.”
Palin is already being caught in a series of lies, including (get this) the lie that her last baby is hers. The evidence is pretty clear that Trig is her grandSON, and she lied about it:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/8/30/121350/137/486/580223

Posted by: Lipby | August 30, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Zorse: Couldnt be the Democratic Congress and Senate as the problem now could it – I suppose you would rather have Pelosi as VP?

Posted by: jlbitter | August 30, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Can the Republican delegates switch their allegiance at the convention? Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee should join forces and call for a unity ticket of them to replace McCain-Palin.
McCain’s choice is not ready, not vetted, and unprepared for a long campaign. The fact he made the choice so impulsively shows he is unfit for the Presidency. McCain-Palin will hand Obama-Biden a complete LANDSLIDE, and might cost the Republicans their filibuster ability in the Senate.

Posted by: Edward | August 30, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Man, Oh Man. I find the Dems comments on Palin hilarious. First, Palin has more executive experience than anyone else on either ticket. Obama has NONE, in addition to having little experience at all. In addition, McCain selected a woman who appears to be a VERY quick study. I think everyone will be surprised by her as this campaign unfolds. In the pocket of the oil companies? Think again. She supported a LARGE increase in taxes on the oil companies in Alaska. People do your homework!! This lady is not a lighweight. Let’s please move on and discuss issues, not personalities.

Posted by: harvey karisma | August 30, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

I was a Hillary supporter from the beginning of the primaries, and sadly watched her shoved to the side for Mr. HopeChange. BAH!
McCain/Palin will have my vote, my husband’s vote, and I am even going to make sure and get my mother out to the polls to vote for McCain/Palin as well. It looks like my home state (Virginia) will be a crucial one, so I will ferry anyone and everyone to the polls to help McCain/Palin.

Posted by: Jennifer | August 30, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

My goodness!!! A quote from, uh, daily kos? The martians have truly landed.
If she doesn’t have the experience and is not “vetted”, then neither is Bill Clinton. It’s time to negate his whole presidency.
You will be saluting this lady one day.
Palin rocks!

Posted by: LarryMan | August 30, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

This ticket extends through the full gamut from “far right” to “further right” and I’m not sure which one is which.
.
Out of touch, completely, with the majority of American women.

Posted by: Carol | August 30, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

Well, Palin seems like a good, competent person with MORE experience than Obama. Two years in Dec as Governor, after years of service as Mayor vs. State Sen. and less than two years as US Sen for Obama. Unfortunately, she’s Repuglican. Also, as a woman I don’t vote just because someone is a woman. I also wanted Hillary to be that first woman because I believe in Hillary’s desire to do what is best for Nation and Party, but mostly people. Since I cannot vote for Obama, because of the injustice in the Primaries, I will vote for NADAR. At least I know Nadar didn’t brass knuckle his way to be Prez.

Posted by: irma | August 30, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Nadar – is he the Area 51 candidate?
So, no one is going to vote for Palin just because she is a woman.
During the primaries, how many of them women chimed up saying “I am voting for Hitlery because I always wanted to vote for a woman”???
Or, how many blacks are saying “Ahhhm voting for one of my kind”???
Let’s see. Palin, Number 45.

Posted by: LarryMan | August 30, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Clinton , Number 46.

Posted by: irma | August 30, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Yeah, well the Palin pick is going to implode, when it comes out that Palin’s youngest child isn’t actually hers at all, but her 16 year old daughters.

Posted by: Manny Jake | August 30, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

Obambi talks about change…then picks a dinosaur of the Senate.
McCain actually DID the change!
No more “McSame”…it’s “McChange”!

Posted by: DaveinCali | August 30, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Just to clarify, Governor Palin is on the record for having fired the director of public safety because of overall poor performance. The calls to the former director regarding Palin’s former brother-in-law were reportedly made by staffers without direction from her and without her direct knowledge.
Specifics will come out during an independent investigation that Palin has been fully cooperating with, including providing requested documents without asking for a subpoena.
Palin should be given the same pass that Obama is getting from the mainstream media regarding his dealings with Tony Resco, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, and self-admitted domestic terrorist William Ayers until the investigation is complete.
The trooper in question, by the way, had reportedly threatened to kill his wife’s (and Palin’s) father, among other things. That alone merits more than the five-day suspension the trooper ultimately served.
See this link for more details:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaska_Public_Safety_Commissioner_dismissal

Posted by: snoris | August 30, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

>>>Let’s see judgement? Biden or Palin.. One breath away from the presidency.<<<
If elected, Obama would be ZERO breaths away from the presidency, and I would rather have Palin's policies than Obama's.

Posted by: Kurtiss | August 30, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

>>>He picks a woman under investigation for abuse of power by firing her ex brother in law because he divorced her sister.<<<
Say it loud & often, because this is the only thing you've got. As governor, she fired one person. I will take that in a VP over having my president launch his political career in the home of a convicted terrorist.

Posted by: Kurtiss | August 30, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

>>>Yeah, well the Palin pick is going to implode, when it comes out that Palin’s youngest child isn’t actually hers at all, but her 16 year old daughters.<<<
This is how you liberals do it! What do you mean, "when it comes out"? If you know it, it's out. Why isn't the drive-by media all over this? Because it's a crock! You made it up! And you posted it here just so your Arianna Huffingtons and similar wonks can now splatter all over the networks, "Some are saying blah blah blah…." Which will be true–a bunch of socialist ideologues making up lies (i.e., you) are saying it. Are you listening, independents? Is this the type of people you want to help elect the next president? Or would you rather go with integrity, with honesty, and perhaps a touch of capitalism thrown in?

Posted by: Kurtiss | August 30, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

>>>PS. I feel badly for Hillary. This has just made a mockery of her 35 years of public service. It appears all you have to do is just be a woman afterall.<<<
Um, if that were true–wouldn't Hillary be the nominee? And by the way, it's not "public service" if you make $110 million doing it, and also by the way, I don't even consider it "service" if everything you do takes this country further down the road toward socialism. But I'm sure you disagree. I'm sure you're disappointed that we haven't amended the Constitution to say "from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs."
Yet.

Posted by: Kurtiss | August 30, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

>>>Since a higher percentage of sexists live in the same places that racists live (and in most cases are one & the same individuals) McSexist will likely lose a hugh chunk of his McRacist vote.<<<
Olo: If McCain shocks you and wins, will you admit that America is not as racist and sexist as you believe (or perhaps wish) it is? You would have to do that, to be intellectually honest and consistent, wouldn't you?

Posted by: Kurtiss | August 30, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

>>>tests are usually done on older parents in order to create the option of not having a child.<<<
Well, Lynne, there are some of us (and I hear Palin is one of them) who just don't see that as an option. But you won't give her credit for adhering to her own principles, religious believes, or however you want to categorize it. She is pro-life and she gave birth. Lambaste her for that.

Posted by: Kurtiss | August 30, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

>>>John McCain’s first executive Decision, Sarah Palin. shows he cares nothing for this Country, is incompetent, and is not ready to lead. <<<
Whereas your vote for Obama shows that you want the government to give you even more of my money. When are we going to stop euphemising Obama as merely socialist, and start calling a Communist a Communist?

Posted by: Kurtiss | August 30, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

>>>Word on some blogs from alaska writers is Palin can leave a down syndrome baby after three days<<<
OK, you changed my mind. Palin is evil.
No, wait, I just realized: "word on some blogs"? Oh, that's a solid source! You know, word on some blogs is that Obama was not born in the U.S. and uses a fake birth certificate so he's actually ineligible. Word on some blogs is that Obama launched his political career in the home of a convicted terrorist. Word on some blogs is that Obama wants to raise taxes……oh, wait, that wasn't a blog, that was straight from an Obama speech.
Sorry about that.

Posted by: Kurtiss | August 30, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

>>>What exactly has Obama done in his career that stacks up against what she has accomplished in the time leading up to and during her Governorship? Community organizer? What’s that? State legislator…name a major accomplishment. <<<
OK, here's your answers.
1. "Community organizer" is a euphemism for "rabble rouser.
2. His biggest accomplishment as a state legislator (his answer to an interview question) was oppose the war in Iraq. Of course, the Illinois legislature had squat to say about the war in Iraq, so you may have a point that his accomplishments there may have been somewhat…er…limited.

Posted by: Kurtiss | August 30, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

>>>GAME OVER REPUBLICANS!!!!
Obama/Biden ’08!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<<<
Palin 2012.

Posted by: Kurtiss | August 30, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

>>>How can anybody be concerned that Palin can’t protect America, when there is no evidence that Obama can, or will.<<<
They don't need evidence that Obama can protect America. All they need is his promise to make America a socialist country. It's all about redistribution of wealth. Most (not all) people who envy Palin's success are incapable of success themselves, so they want the government to take more of my money and give it to them.

Posted by: Kurtiss | August 30, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

If the pregancy rumour proves to be true then it will clearly signal the end of John McCain’s campaign.
But if it is false, will all the people on here spreading the rumour publicly apologize for trying to smear a candidate’s child, let alone the candidate herself? If not, does that mean you’re advocating similar smear tactics be used on Barack Obama’s two daughters?
I’m most curious.

Posted by: Robert W. | August 30, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

>>>Hillary’s experience is ten times what Palin’s is.<<<
But it's all BAD experience. It is experience in trying to make this a socialist country. It is an "I loathe the military" experience. It is dishonest experience. It is power for power's sake, now she has $110 million "sticking up for the little guy," and you yourself wanted 8 more years of Clinton exactly why–so they would take more of my money and give it to you?

Posted by: Kurtiss | August 30, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Obamabots are worried, their dream is coming to an end. I cannot wait for this guy, who is nothing but an empty suit, to fade away. If he wasn’t BLACK and yes Isaid black, he would not be the nominee. Hillary is laughing her ass off.

Posted by: Jack | August 30, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Senator McCain had a Medical Evaluation that was released, my question is, was there a Psychiatric Evaluation also, and was it released? The Public needs to Know Now!

Posted by: Ellen | August 30, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

Palin had been in the mix from day one, just kept off the radar by the drive by media, She is a brath of fresh air, & the libs are upset that the GOP has the a woman on the ticket, let’s jsut see Biden bully her

Posted by: Annieleigh | August 30, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

I was “lukewarm” over McCain, but he hit a home run in my book. The dems are now shaking in their boots….a woman governor with a 90 percent approval rating, vs. “their” congress, who has dipped down to less than 10 percent! Go McCain/Palin!!!!!!!

Posted by: Nick | August 30, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

John McCain, with his pick of Sarah Palin, has once again exhibited strength, confidence, vision and LEADERSHIP. He has chosen a strong, successful, tough as nails, reform minded, TRUE LEADER as his VP nominee. The contrast between McCain and Palin and Obama and Biden when it comes to LEADERSHIP qualities and abilities could not be more striking! Neither Obama nor Biden have ever managed or led a muncipality, a city, a state, a company, a business, or any other type of organization—they have given many speeches, and pontificated for years. As a 20 year Democrat who just recently became a Republican I am incredibly impressed and excited about this pick. From what I have seen and studied about Governor Palin, I would feel much more confident in her staring down Vladimir Putin, Hu Jintao, Hugo Chavez and all the other despots and dictators in this world than I would Obama or Biden—not even close ladies and gentlemen, not even close.

Posted by: GatorGuy | August 30, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

Sorry. You people who say Palin has experience are deluding yourself. She’s been part-time mayor of a town with a population smaller than that of the place I work for, and she’s now governor of a state that has a population 1/3 the size of the metro area I live in. McCain should have picked our mayor. He’s a Republican and I know plenty of Democrats who cross party lines to vote for him.

Posted by: kismet | August 30, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

All I can think back to now is McCain’s memoir where he said:
“I didn’t decide to run for president to start a national crusade for the political reforms I believed in or to run a campaign as if it were some grand act of patriotism. In truth, I wanted to be president because it had become my ambition to be president. I was sixty-two years old when I made the decision and I thought it was my one shot at the prize.”
And by looking at his actions throughout this campaign – from the adoption of the Karl Rove-ian campaigning tactics that he once denounced and caused his loss to Bush in 2000, to the motivations for the selection of his running mate (http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/08/how-palin-came.html), and to his outright lies about the myth of offshore oil drilling drastically lowering the price of oil (http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1815884,00.html), John McCain shows to me, that his sole motivation for being president is once again not because of running for the political reforms that he believes in, but rather, for the ambition he has always held at a shot “at the prize.”

Posted by: Anthony p | August 30, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

This is great! The Dems are absolutely apoplectic about the Palin pick because she embodies exactly what Obama speaks about (speaks about, but has never shown in anyway that he has ever, or could ever, walk his talk)—change, reform, vision, a commitment to the greatness that is America, as opposed to the doom, gloom and dread that the 21st Century Democratic Party espouses—that Dem Convention was awful, and Obama is way too angry when speaking of America. Here’s the scary thing—Palin embodies the qualities and potential greatness of 2 of the 3 greatest Dem Presidents in the past 100 years—Truman and Kennedy. By contrast, nothing in Obama’s past comes close to putting him in the same breath as those two, except one factor, his oratory, which I would say is even debatable. The oratory of Bill Clinton and Ronald Reagan is in another league as Obama’s. Guys and gals, go cold turkey on the Kool-Aid. We should be focusing on one thing, and one thing only—LEADERSHIP QUALITIES. Mac and Palin have that market cornered. Like I wrote to my Dem friends when Palin was picked—”Checkmate.”

Posted by: GatorGuy | August 30, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

KURTISS >>But it’s all BAD experience. It is experience in trying to make this a socialist country. It is an “I loathe the military” experience. It is dishonest experience. It is power for power’s sake, now she has $110 million “sticking up for the little guy,” and you yourself wanted 8 more years of Clinton exactly why–so they would take more of my money and give it to you?<<
Reagan, Bush, and Bush Jr all created huge deficits. Clinton created a huge SURPLUS and the economy boomed. Shouldn't you be screaming and running from anyone who wants to follow the Bush example?

Posted by: Shii | August 30, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

If I am McCain, I keep on the offense. I challenge the Obama campaign to 4 or 5 town hall debates with Palin and Biden. Let’s see them turn it down—if she is so green, unqualified, inexperienced, out-of-her league, they should jump at the opportunity. But they wouldn’t, I guarantee you, if McCain did throw down that gauntlet—Palin’s a buzzsaw. After digesting her speech yesterday, one thought kept going through my mind—the movie “Rocky”—Rocky is beating the crap out of that slab of meat and being interviewed at the same time—Creed’s trainer is watching it, and it looks like death is coming over him as he r ealizes what they’re in for—he says to Creed “hey Champ, you better come look at this”—Creed brushes him off—the trainer realizes that his Champ is in serious trouble with this “nobody.” And yes, I do know that Rocky lost that fight!

Posted by: GatorGuy | August 30, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

Deficits? Reagan, Bush and Bush 2 deficits?
Sure, Slick Willie kept deficits down. He decimated the military, he allowed terrorists to hit us dozens of times and did diddly squat. How many times did we see him come before the cameras, shed that fake tear, and say “We will leave no stone unturned ….”.
Bush went after terrorists and he delivered. They are on the run and our troops are fixing to come home with their heads held high.

Posted by: LarryMan | August 30, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

McCain may still win this thing, but it won’t have anything to do with his choice for VP. Palin is likely to draw as much support from women as Clarence Thomas gets from fellow Blacks.
If the pregnancy rumor is true, she won’t even be on the ticket by November. Harriet Myers, redux.

Posted by: barry | August 30, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

HaHa, all you whiny Dimms, remember this, burn it into your brain, Palin has more years executive experience than Obama has. McCain says drill,drill,drill for oil, stop sending $700 billion overseas, use ALL sources of energy. Dimms say inflate your tires and we’ll tax you out of this energy crises.

Posted by: lv4921391 | August 30, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

I’m completely baffled at some of the comments here. To those who keep insisting Palin has equal or more experience to Obama; PLEASE explain to me how the hell does a few years as a mayor to a small town and less than 20 months as a state governor has more experience over someone who has worked at the STATE AND NATIONAL LEVEL FOR 12 YEARS? Please, explain in a way I can understand.
No matter how much you try to insist to the contrary: 5 years of experience that doesn’t include ANY national or world involvement trumps 12 years of experience on the state, national, and international levels. I’m sorry, but just saying it over and over again in face of the facts right in front of you WON’T make it true. It will just make you look stupid and ignorant to me.
IF you’re going to vote for McCain/Palin no matter what, it is your vote. It is just appalling about how far people choose to spread lies and insult Obama because they don’t have anything substantial to say.

Posted by: rainlv | August 30, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Palin, Former Beauty Pageant Queen/Part-Time Mayor turned Governor becomes Vice Presidential Candidate. She’s a prolifer, uber-conservative, with no foreign policy experience . Some women will now vote for her just because she’s a woman. As a woman, it baffles me. We’re proving the male chauvinists right — we’re stupid enough to vote based on our emotions rather than using our brains to see McCain’s ploy for what it is.
Women, if you want to let John McCain use you as pawns, you’re welcome to do so. McCain isn’t being a Maverick, he’s being patronizing and is using you to get the presidency. If Palin’s gender was so damn important, then we should have seen a rush to vote for Dukakis when Ferraro was the first female v.p. candidate.
Women who support Palin are like Black people who supported conservative Clarence Thomas’s petition for the Supreme Court — just because he was black. Everyone knows how well that turned out, don’t we? Race and gender mean little if the person doesn’t stand for anything we believe in.
Palin’s about good for a photo op — nothing else. To say she’s an equal replacement for Hillary is an insult to women everywhere.
And on a side note — I see so many people claiming to be independent on this site just because they’re a dem or republican who decides to vote for another party — i.e. the “Lou Dobbs” independents. It’s a joke, imo. You’re not independent just because you switch your vote from Republicans to Dems or vice versa. That’s not “power.” Both parties are run and funded by corporate America and not the people.
If you’re truly independent, you would have supported the candidacy of someone like Ron Paul — who cares about our constitutional rights — or a true third-party candidate.

Posted by: CoralOrange | August 30, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Wow! Lots of hype and out right made up stuff on both sides. I am a Conservative. Here is how I see it: Obama’s character after all the dust settles; I don’t like. He just doesn’t even like America. McCain, he loves America, but is still an f-ing RINO. Biden, old school DC, I don’t care what train he takes home. McCain is also old school DC. Palin is the first fresh breeze in a long time. I, perceive, on one speech and her published background, that I LIKE Her. She sounds like Superwoman with a screw-you attitude.
I need a McCain/Palin Hat.
Tuck

Posted by: Biased Observer | August 31, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

Palin good for just a photo op?? Wow an anti-woman sexist woman! I guess raising 5 kids, while running (or we can use the term managing, or even LEADING) one of the greatest energy-producing entities in the world, while having taken down and dismantled (and continuing to do so) a powerful, entrenced, corrupt, good ole boy network from her own party…all that just equals a photo op? CoralOrange, this is the 21st Century, you’ve got to just let go of all those sexist hang ups. It’s not easy, I know that as the sexist man that I am—I am married to a beautiful, successful, professional woman who also does alot more around the house than I do. I strive every day to be a better husband and dad, but it’s not easy—as men, we are selfish, self-centered, and self-absorbed—it’s in our genes, and we want to keep being sexist and “in control” of the fairer sex. But Coral, those days are over. As I get older, and wiser, I admire my wife’s strength and her unique LEADERSHIP qualities and abilities. So let’s cut the sexist code-word crap and acknowledge strength, vision, and LEADERSHIP in a woman when we see it and when it’s right in front of us—-like it was on every TV station, cable outlet, news website, etc yesterday. Did Obama give a speech Thursday night, because I didn’t see it anywhere yesterday.

Posted by: GatorGuy | August 31, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

How does Palin have more experience thatn Obama? That’s an easy one. This election should be about experience and LEADERSHIP. In Palin’s short speech yesterday,she went through a laundry list of all that she has accomplished in terms of LEADERSHIP. No one, not one person, who supports or has spoken in favor of Obama on any news outlet, etc., has been able to articulate ONE ACCOMPLISHMENT. Just 1. Uno. Mike Dukakis couldn’t name one. Cory Booker, Mayor of Newark, couldn’t name one. Kirsten Powers can’t name one. Olberman? Nope. Maddow? Not a chance. James Carville (love that guy!)? Nope. Beckel? Tiki Barber? McCaskill? NO NO NO. J u s t ONE A c c o m p l i s h m e n t.
If you saw the still pics and the video of her in Kuwait a couple of months ago with the troops, she was a NATURAL—in her demeanor, in her confidence, when firing M16 rounds! Contrast those images with Obama when he visited the troops—he didn’t look as bad or out of place as did Dukakis in the tank, but close, very close. McCain saw great LEADERSHIP qualities and experience in Palin. I don’t need my presidential candidates talking about teacher salaries and pandering to every single interest group and victim-identity demographic in his or her party (Interesting–Bubba Clinton didn’t pander to all in his party, and he had a pretty successful 8-year run, other than his soft power diplomacy).

Posted by: GatorGuy | August 31, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Palin is a great choice, she’ll do anything for political gain. That includes covering up her teenage daughters pregnancy by claiming she herself was pregnant.
A cut throat politician.

Posted by: Joe | August 31, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

Typical famale bashing just like Hillary. If Palin was a male people would be treating her differently and with more respect. How many governors really have foreign policy experience, none. I never hear anyone saying Biden is from a small tiny state Delaware home of the credit card companies that he helped author bankruptcy reform against its card holders. Palin is getting s*****d by the media and Obama Democrats just like Hillary. Hillary had more experience than Obama but he tossed her aside like many strong females.

Posted by: abel | August 31, 2008, 2:52 am 2:52 am

Really makes me distrust McCain’s judgement

Posted by: Susan L | August 31, 2008, 3:03 am 3:03 am

Can any of the Hillary supporters please tell me, what exactly did Obama do to Hillary for them to dislike him. I followed the primaries quite closely and Obama showed total respect to Hillary and he won fair and square. I would have supported Hillary had she won the Democratic primaries. Barack had enough delegates to win. He won fair and square. As I recall, Hillary used negative campaigning against Obama (to the Repubs glee), and Obama never- theless continued with positive campaigning. If anyone did Hillary in, it was her husband and the news media, not Obama. So why all the resentment against Obama from Hillary women? Especially since Obama and Hillary hold the same positions on issues.

Posted by: Richard | August 31, 2008, 4:00 am 4:00 am

The Republican commentary here is quite expected. her experience comes from good timing in defeating a candidate whom was despised by everyone in alaska.
it is unclear what the conditions she left her supposedly cleaned up town in—it sounds like they may be deep in debt after she got rid of significant taxes.
Barack Obama may not have direct experience in an executive position, but he CERTAINLY has more experience in politics and public service. He has knowledge, creativity, charisma and has put these attributes to hard work getting where he is today. He is extremely aware of national and international politics, economics, and other social issues,
while Sarah Palin seems to be attractive to McCain mostly because she’s a socially conservative woman. He is completely insulting women AND Hillary Clinton, who is amazing and has WORKED and fought hard to do what she did this year. She still has a chance to run for President in the future, and if she plays her cards right she will get my vote when she does. I was, unfortunately, disappointed with her win-at-all costs attitude this time around. John McCain’s choice of Sarah Palin is RECKLESS, not MAVERICK, and mimics the disappointment I had with some of Clinton’s decisions. Sarah Palin didn’t even know what the VP does…how can she be expected to be next in line for the Presidency???
So, Republicans, you can keep repeating yourselves, thinking no one notices it’s the same few of you who keep saying empty slogans in order to fill space and make yourselves seem less desperate, but that’s what’s going on. You see what McCain has done, and while you claim Dems are scared, you are obviously projecting.

Posted by: ryandunn | August 31, 2008, 4:51 am 4:51 am

Since Palin is fresh to the national scene, it will take some time to fully vett her. If McCain wanted to pick a woman, why didn’t he pick Elizabeth Dole? She is a senator, has experience running the domestic branch of the Red Cross and is married to a certified war hero and who has a lifetime of experience. As of right now, I wouldn’t feel comftorble having a complete national neophyte being one heartbeat from controlling the nukes. Think About it. Do you want this person in this day and age of global turmoil to possibly end up being the President? If she can spell potato, she would at least be a couple of notches above Dan Quayle (who had 12 years of national ‘experience’).
Another issue is that some evangelical groups believe that it is a wife’s duty to be secondary in a marriage and obey their husbands. I doubt Palin would prescribe to that philosophy, but it shows how woman are viewed by Republicans that when it is their turn to be historic, this is the best they can do!

Posted by: Wayne | August 31, 2008, 5:07 am 5:07 am

Folks, allow me to throw this out there. Looking at Ms. Palin’s credentials, achievements and records, if she was running as a Presidential Candidate in the Republican Primaries, would you have vote for her then?

Posted by: badmola | August 31, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am

Vetting the Bush Way

Shorter John McCain’s deliberations in choosing Sarah Palin: I looked the woman in the eye. I was able to get a sense of her soul.

Posted by: Strange Doctrines | August 31, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am

What’s sad is that this election should be about issues, vision and capability, not gender or scandal or ethnicity. If the Sarah Palin baby story turns into a scandal then it’s McCain’s fault for not vetting her, and Palin’s fault for not seeing Obama’s example and knowing that ALL personal matters become public at this political level.

Posted by: Helvor | August 31, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

How true, the election SHOULD be about issues, vision, and capability, not gender, scandal, or ethnicity.
It should also NOT be about picking a dried up 30 year senator just because the top of the ticket has no foreign experience and barely 100 days in national office.
Now, which party has more effectively addressed their top ticket weaknesses?
That is for YOU and I to decide.

Posted by: LarryMan | August 31, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Another thing this might do for McCain is get him a lot more campaign funding from Big Sleezy Oil.

Posted by: Alaskan4Obama | August 31, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Check out: Dailykos.com

Posted by: yoli | August 31, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Can any of the Hillary supporters please tell me, what exactly did Obama do to Hillary for them to dislike him. I followed the primaries quite closely and Obama showed total respect to Hillary and he won fair and square. I would have supported Hillary had she won the Democratic primaries. Barack had enough delegates to win. He won fair and square. As I recall, Hillary used negative campaigning against Obama (to the Repubs glee), and Obama nevertheless continued with positive campaigning. If anyone did Hillary in, it was her husband and the news media, not Obama. So why all the resentment against Obama from Hillary women? Especially since Obama and Hillary hold the same positions on issues.

Posted by: Richard | August 31, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/8/30/121350/137 has some interesting points to make about Palin and her ‘eye popping integrity’ that makes Troopergate pale by comparison..

Posted by: Endif | August 31, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

mccain blew it with his vp pick, well at least we still have bob barr or ron paul

Posted by: jake | August 31, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Let me see, dailykos —- total integrity???
I think not. More like Aljazeraa.
McCain blew his pick? Oh, he should have picked an aged wishy washy repug who had bad-mouthed him before.
He should never, never, never picked someone fresh, not from Washington, who supports the Constitution and 2nd Amendment, who supports the right to life, and who will be able to smash Hitlery in 2012.
Right.

Posted by: LarryMan | August 31, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

I was and am a hillary voter. A voter who will vote for Obama, because I vote for the issues, not for who has the same parts as I do. Anyone who does was NOT a real Hillary supporter anyways. I like her take on issues. Republicans have given us 8 years of disaster, I want none of the same. McCain is stupid for picking Palin, not just because of her inexperience, but because of the insult he gave to every woman in the world. Democrats are not anti-woman, Republicans are. I am seriously concerned about the ability if McCain gets into office, he will have to overturn roe vs wade. It gives us women every right we have, and he can take that from us. Vote for Obama.

Posted by: ohioforobama | August 31, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

He made the decision under pressure, because he didn’t think his top five choices could help him in the election. It speaks volumes about the Republican Party and McCain’s decisionmaking inability.
Of course, he was in a hurry because the campaign set his birthday as the announcement date and said he’d already chosen someone to try to step on Obama’s huge bounce. He chose out of desperation, because the American people don’t like Republicans and Obama was roaring back.

Posted by: HawkeyeD | August 31, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

that little baby bump McCrazy got from Grandma Failin wasn’t in the polls…

Posted by: A is for Abstinence? | August 31, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

For me as an educated Republican, I was happy to learn McCain spent a few hours with her for the first time before announcing that Bush had selected her as McCain’s running mate. It was a proud moment for me to see McCain following commands so, so, Maverickly…My son said in his last letter to me from Iraq – RESPECT. And that’s what I have for McCain.
And seriously who can argue with me? Just look at the last 8 years. DAMN good years to be an American. Hey I might not be able to afford going to the hospital BUT AT LEAST I HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE IN DEBT! Now where ELSE can you say THAT? And I am comfortable knowing that with McCain at the helm I would be guaranteed that for another four years. So I’m staying with what I know!
Thank goodness Palin is pro-life – because I believe its better to save them in the womb and send them off by the thousands to be murdered for our freedom from that big tyrant Iraq.
And yes its true Palin got 900 votes to win as Mayor of Nowhere, I am hoping she can get that many votes for the good old GOP! But knowing the GOP, they will find a way to add a few zero’s to that number after the real votes are counted.
Passion? Who needs passion in politics? Them Democrats with the silly idea that there is anything to hope for, and believing in unity. Just stay off my yard is all I’m sayin.
McCain = Familiar Pain 08!

Posted by: For me as an educated Republican... | September 1, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am

As a woman, I’m ashamed to the “bandwagon” response of other women here (if they really are women). Just because McCain picked Palin as a running mate, means an automatic vote?
I was excited to hear this at first, until I read more about her. It’s nothing more than a gimmick because there are women much more qualified for a VP position. This would have been a smart move, but it was just a terrible execution of a good idea and will certainly back fire once everyone starts to ask “who is she really?”.

Posted by: Michelle | September 1, 2008, 6:22 am 6:22 am

Now this is my kinda ticket! MacCain is gonna give that Obama a good ole fashined asswhoopin! I’m a republican from the good ole days and it’s good to see somebody with some commen sense. Palin is the new butt kicker and these Dems are gonna be on the run. This obama fool is no different than that osama running around the middle east with the blood of america on his hands. We gotta get some heros in office MacCain is a HERO! Palin is a HERO and even if she wasn’t locked in a tiger cage back in Nam at least she knows how to fire guns. MacCain and Pallin have BACKBONE people. They have the backbone that the Dems wish they had. The Dems with their song and dance about not drilling in Alaska are full of hot air. We have more oil sitting in Alaska than those OPEC train robbers do the middle east. I say just drill the damn thing. We have the tecknolegy to replace animals with cloning. So what are you worried about people? We are AMERICANS damn it! Stop boo hooing about roe and wade and wipe that starry eyed look of obama off your faces and lets get to work! freedom and liberty is at steak here.

Posted by: True American | September 1, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

By picking Palin, McCain is telling us that he doesn’t give a @#$% about the environment. That’s reprehensible.

Posted by: boofenheim | September 1, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Rethuglicans are now saying, “Thank GOD for Gustav!!” What an utter trainwreck you guys are…yeah, you keep invoking Rotten Ronnie’s “legacy” in the same sentence with Mrs. Palin! Indeed, Mrs. Palin is nothing but James Watt on STEROIDS!! Remember? “We are not concerned with the environment because JESUS is coming soon”?? THIS is how to run the USofA??!!

Posted by: St Paul-y Girl | September 1, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

Dem/Rep either way there are no good choices here.

Posted by: Ahhh Crap | September 1, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

Who is doing all the smoking around here? McCain doesn’t care about the environment? Sarah Palin is a total environemntalist, she is being called the female Teddy Roosevelt.
Just because someone shoots animals for food, it don’t make them anti-environment. If no one shot them, they would be breaking into your houses for food.
There is so much anti-Palin pain going around, I wonder why?
Palin/McCain – 08!!!

Posted by: LarryMan | September 1, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

WOW! WOW! WOW!
First I’d like to address the women who supported and vowed to elect Hillary Clinton. To say you are voting for McCain because he picked a female VP and because you believe Hillary got the shaft. Shame on you. Hillary herself has backed Obama and asked that YOU, her supporter, do the same. Of course she may not be happy with the outcome, but she recognizes the importance of putting her own feelings aside.
Second, to be insulted by the Republican idea that because Palin has a vagina and I have one too, I will vote for her. What? Are you kidding me? I have a brain and have actually extensively researched EVERYONE running and happy to make up my own mind based on what is important to me. I respect anyone who does the same and makes a well-educated vote. I don’t care if you vote the same way I do, but make sure you know who you are putting into the most important position in the world. Don’t let someone else tell you what you should think.
It’s not about being Democrat or Republican; Red or Blue; Man or Woman; Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Buddhists; Black, white, yellow, purple… etc. It’s about being a human being, loving one another and respect.
Stop drawing a line in the sand… haven’t you ever heard of, “Divide and Conquer”? All great empires have come to an end and history ALWAYS repeats itself. Think about it. BE HUMAN.
Thank you.

Posted by: Barbara | September 1, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

I am an elderly white woman who is voting for Obama.
Why am I not voting for McCain/Palin? Because I don’t agree with her politics.
I applaud her decision to have her last child but I also believe that every woman should have the right to make their own decision on this.
She and a 72-year old man should not be able to tell woman what they can and cannot do with their own bodies.
Plus, she has so little experience. Would you vote for her for president???

Posted by: JH | September 1, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

Pawlenty, the better choice for the ticket and the country was overlooked because Palin is a woman and as such could “shake things up.” In McCain’s mind it all came down to one’s genitalia over their capability and experience. Sexism whether used in a woman’s favor or against her is equally wrong and repugnant. McCain deserves to lose.

Posted by: Joy M. | September 1, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

Let’s say what it really is people. If you can honestly say that you are a diehard Hillary supporter/democrat, how can you flip-flop for McCain? If you believed in Hillary’s cause that is close to Barack Obama not McCain. The true Democrat it voting for the issues not the individual. The primaries is more so of a time where two or more represent similar causes and try to convince supporters that they are more likely to deliver. This is bigger than Hillary. It is time to get our country back on track.
If you are saying that you rather bet your chips on Palin because she is a woman and you’re a democrat what you are really saying is that you can’t see a black man in the “white house”. You don’t just give up your beliefs because someone who looks different than you agrees with you. That’s not logical.
That’s not politics its hypocrits.

Posted by: America Logic | September 2, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

It’s ridiculous that Palin believes she is in a position to break the “18 million cracks” Hilary Clinton has put in the glass ceiling. McCain’s selection of Palin further perpetuates the stereotype of women. Palin has no experience, but she’s pretty; so we will use her to get women to vote for the McCain ticket. As if women are dumb enough to vote for a person merely because they share the same chromosomes. When you look closely at Palin’s credentials and experience without her personal views, she makes no sense for the country.

Posted by: Keisha | September 2, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Sarah Palin claims that she is pro-family, yet, she rushed back to work one month after giving birth to a special needs baby. Where was the concern for the baby? What does she know about taking care of a special needs baby. This baby is only 4 months old and she is running for VP! It makes no sense. When will she have time for her 7 year old or her newborn baby. I guess her 17 year old pregnant daugther will also be responsible for the care of her siblings. At the convention, I never see her husband holding the baby. The daughter always has the baby. Sarah Palin’s judgement already seems questionable to me. Bad choice McCain!!

Posted by: Teryn | September 2, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Did McCain pick her or did Bush & Chaney?

Posted by: Jack | September 2, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

To all the nay-sayers … We’ll see … but I’m TOTALLY STOKED about PALIN.

Posted by: MikeG | September 2, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

palin is perfect. if elected, within a year sarah palin will resign “to spend more time with her family”. she is a bonus coupon being cashed in for votes, nothing more. the plan is to wait a seemly amount of time then appoint an experienced, qualified, undistracted centrist replacement to help run the country for real. those wondering why no one in the entire state of alaska was consulted, interviewed or investigated concerning her can relax – she is not really going to be vice president anyway, just a cheerleader/vote getter.
— phillyvision, philadelphia pa

Posted by: PhillyVision | September 3, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

Palin’s selection is turning out to be almost as a great a debacle in terms of leadership and judgment as the current administration, but she is fine to look at.

Posted by: Palinhotty | September 3, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Having spent the previous 20 minutes reading (scanning) the wisdom of the ages, as revealed in the above, I can only conclude that the drunken monkeys have broken out and are at their keyboards. We are so far past “God Bless America”. It should now be “Pass the opiate, I’m feeling patriotic”…

Posted by: pat clark | September 3, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

I have read through all these posts and for the life of me, how can everyone be so focused on Palin’s qualifications not being good enough for the VP when Obama’s are no better.
Just explain to me how a Senator has more responsibility, more power to be honest than a Govenor.
Is there something about our set-up in regards to goverment I am not aware of?

Posted by: Becky Bailey | September 4, 2008, 8:48 am 8:48 am

God America has no class left. McCain picks this piece
of white trash for his running mate? I cannot believe it. But then they say our leaders are a reflection of the people who put them in power, so what does that say about Americans?

Posted by: michae | September 7, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Glib and incompetent.. just another Bush/ Rove nominee, but wearing lipstick.
Vote Bush/Palin: ’cause Iraq & the housing/credit collapse, were so much fun.

Posted by: Thomas W | September 21, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.