By Natalie Gewargis

Aug 22, 2008 10:14am

Independent Group With Links to McCain Campaign Assails Obama on Ayers

"Beyond the speeches, how much do you know about Barack Obama?" asks the new TV ad from a non-profit conservative group called the Americans Issues Project. "What does he really believe?"

The ad then tries to tie 9/11 to the Weather Underground and William Ayers, and Ayers to Obama.

"United 93 never hit the Capitol on 9/11," says the ad, "But the Capitol was bombed thirty years before – by an American terrorist group called Weather Underground…that declared ‘war’ on the U.S. – targeting the Capitol, the Pentagon, Police Stations, and more. One of the group’s leaders, William Ayers, admits to the bombings, proudly saying later: ‘We didn’t do enough.’ Some members of the group Ayers founded even went on to kill police.

"Obama’s political career was launched in Ayers’ home," the ad continues, "And the two served together on a left-wing board. Why would Barack Obama be friends with someone who bombed the Capitol… and is proud of it? Do you know enough to elect Barack Obama?"

Asked by ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos about his relationship with Ayers, Obama said,"This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood, who’s a professor of English in Chicago who I know and who I have not received some official endorsement from. He’s not somebody who I exchange ideas from on a regular basis. And the notion that somehow as a consequence of me knowing somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago, when I was 8 years old, somehow reflects on me and my values doesn’t make much sense…The fact is that I’m also friendly with Tom Coburn, one of the most conservative Republicans in the United States Senate, who, during his campaign, once said that it might be appropriate to apply the death penalty to those who carried out abortions. Do I need to apologize for Mr. Coburn’s statements? Because I certainly don’t agree with those, either."

Obama said the Ayers argument is a "kind of game in which anybody who I know, regardless of how flimsy the relationship is, that somehow their ideas could be attributed to me, I think the American people are smarter than that. They’re not going to suggest somehow that that is reflective of my views, because it obviously isn’t."

Ed Failor, Jr. sits on the board of American Issues Project. The executive vice president of Iowans for Tax Relief, Failor was a senior adviser to the campaign of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz, as this cached press release shows.

The press release was only taken down from the McCain website in the last few weeks — the Google cached version shows it being on the McCain website as recently as June 29, 2008 — though the McCain campaign says Failor hasn’t had anything to do with their campaign in months.

The spokesman for the American Issues Project, which says it intends to spend $2.8 million on the initial ad buy, is Christian Pinkston, who also worked for the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.

Eight years ago, Pinkston gave McCain’s presidential campaign $250. Seven years ago Ayers gave Obama state senate campaign $200.

- jpt

User Comments

Do Charles Keating, junk bonds, Lincoln Savings & Loan mean anything to these people?

Posted by: Deep Release | August 22, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

If McCain picks Romney watch that little lead mccain has disappear. Romney will Hurt McCain with the evengelicals and christian base of the Party, they will turn and Run. Put Huckabee on the ticket and get the Base excited all ready, Then you can win this thing. No one is going to “Not” vote for McCain if he picks Huckabee., If he Picks Romney There will be a ton of People that Wont Vote for McCain. Whats really going on is Romney belongs to the RNC. The RNC wants to make sure that they stay in power. By putting bush 4 in office ie (Romney) after McCains term is over. The RNC dont like Huckabee because he is more for the working class. That is blasphemy in the GOP. Y McCain will lose if he picks Romney

Posted by: Peter | August 22, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

I cant believe McCain doesnt know how many houses he owns, not counting the fact that he thinks you have to make 5 mill a year to be wealthy? McCain is a PRO WAR> the commenter is right above. McCain only has stories., in the forum he didnt even answer questions. Instead he told stories which he has memorized and repeated at everytown hall meeting he has ever had. Obama might lead to the great depression. But McCain will probably lead to the Great Depression with a side of WWIII. We should probably elect someone who has to at least live with the choices they make in the white house. McCain will be checking out soon, What does he care if he leaves this country in a mess. The US presidency is just a prize to him. I hate the two party system. Obama is right to say McCain is out of touch and a hot head. John McCain does have a temper, I saw the video of him blowing up on a former senator and dropping the f bomb. McCain will lose if he picks Romney I guess someone is making a movie about Obama’s teenage years.

Posted by: Peter | August 22, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Interesting note is that FOX News refused to run the Ad.

Posted by: Thinking | August 22, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

It ain’t just Ayers…but how bout Rev. Wrong? Ludacris? That is something to think about! How can you support a person with connections to an America hating reverend and an America hating, known and admitted terrorist? No thanks! I’ll vote for mcCain!

Posted by: Ed | August 22, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

I cannot wait for the debates between John McCain and Barack Obama. McCain says what he thinks. Obama says what he thinks people want to hear. John McCain changes his mind on an issue when circumstances change. Barack Obama changes his mind when he thinks it will benefit him politically. John McCain and his wife own seven houses, all of which were legally paid for. Barack Obama owns one house, and bought it with the help of a sleazy crook on his way to prison. John McCain served the country. Barack Obama whines and criticizes his own country. John McCain is married to a woman who respects her own country. Barack Obama is married to a woman who thinks Americans can fix their broken souls by voting for her husband. John McCain is a man who has sense enough to realize there is a time and a place to criticize conditions in your own country. Barack Obama is a man who tells a 7 year old that America is not what it was, not what it could be. John McCain attends a church that respects all people. Barack Obama attends a church where the minister condemns white people, Italians, Jews, and the United States of America. John McCain has been conscious for the past twenty years. Barack Obama has either been in a coma, or on another planet, since he sat in a church for 20 years and had absolutely idea no idea what his minister was preaching or his fellow parishoners were cheering. For this moderate Democrat the choice is simple: John McCain, war hero, patriot, fine American.

Posted by: Carrie | August 22, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

McCain couldnt manage the local Mcdonalds. The RNC wants him for his puppet abilitys., Oh yeah Mitt Romney is a puppet too. I was a republican until my party got hijacked bought and paid for by the RNC. I am an independant now. I liked Huckabee because he seem to care about the working class, and fixing the economy with real issues. But I dobt I will vote for McCain. I will vote for Obama or Barr. McCain is too old, he will just be a puppet. No more puppets. We need a president that actually will lead by his convictions. McCain changed on every position, just so the RNC would prop him up.

Posted by: Peter | August 22, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

The co-host of a recent top-dollar fundraiser for Sen. John McCain, Carl H. Lindner Jr, oversaw the payment of roughly $1.7 million to a Colombian paramilitary group that is today designated a terrorist organization by the United States.
McCain has done favors on Lindner’s behalf. Last May, the Washington Post reported that in the late 1990s, McCain “promoted a deal in Arizona’s Tonto National Forest involving property part-owned by Great American Life Insurance, a company run by billionaire Carl H. Lindner Jr., a prolific contributor to national political parties and presidential candidates.”

Posted by: Thinking | August 22, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Take note people: the same people who rammed Bush down your throat, are now ramming McBush down your throat.
How did that work out for you in the last 8 years?

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 22, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

McCain can you say Keating 5

Posted by: jim | August 22, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Thanks for driving home ny point, Carrie!

Posted by: Ed | August 22, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

At the convention, Obama will, as usual, talk a lot but say very little. His followers will not notice the lack of substance but the vast majority of viewers will.

Posted by: Martin Slueg, jr | August 22, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

If there is nothing to the relationship why doesn’t Obama demand that the records of his joint committeeship with Ayers be released from the UC library?

Posted by: cardinal | August 22, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

Prediction: the MSM spends more time discussing the ties to McCain of the group that did the advert than they spend digging for information on how close Ayers and Obama have been.

Posted by: Bud Norton | August 22, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

The relationship between Obama and Ayers resulted in charity and lifting America up. That’s how you deal with terrorists: you change them to do good instead of bad.
The relationship between McCain and Keating resulted in people in jail; billions of taxpayer money down the drain; and 21,000 mostly *elderly* investers losing their pensions worth almost $300,000,000.00

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 22, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

cardinal, you’re late to the game. Obama has already requested those records released. The UIC is working with the donor of the recorcs to get the records released as soon as possible.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 22, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

What the heck do choosing Mitt Romney and McCain’s houses have to do with Ayers and the Weather Underground??
Stay on topic, folks, or find one of the other blogs to post your remarks on.
Thanks!!

Posted by: SandyB | August 22, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

Release the UC records without redaction.

Posted by: cardinal | August 22, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

People defending Ayers. PRICELESS.

Posted by: Martin Slueg, jr | August 22, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

I guess the re education of America to exactly who John mccain is…
and that big vacuum we have had about his flights and vacations and senatorial introductions…and contracts granted by in laws…and donations…etc. etc…
with His literal “best friend” Charles Keating…
while Charles Keating was fleecing America…
needs to start.
Rezko, Wright Ayres….etc
nothing compared to the billy club that is JohnMccain’s relationship with Charles Keating…
and before you all go on about ethics committee clearing him…
yeah the committee that “reprimanded” Larry Craig?
Just because McCain didn’t go to jail and people say “well he shouldn’t have been charged…
doesn’t mean the details don’t stink like a giant pile of dead fish to high heaven”
they want to talk about Rezko…bring it on…
Keating and his crimes against America (amnd his subsequent “best friendship with mccain during that time and all the favors) makes rezko look like a 12 year old stealing Binaca.

Posted by: dl | August 22, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Fair game. Obama’s associations are even more critical to examine because he has almost no political accomplishments to justify seeking the Presidency.
I hope that the media will wake up from its Obama stupor and give the American people information rather than adoration. The press has really let America down.

Posted by: Martin | August 22, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Accusing Obama of being linked to terrorism is like assaulting a teddy bear. Obama is a nice, normal guy, who speaks very respectfully and truthfully at his events. I don’t care about what the spin says. Nothing about him is scary.

Posted by: Reason | August 22, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

McCain only started to talk campaign reform to cover his tracks after being one of the infamous Keating 5 that shook down regulators on behalf of the most corrupt Savings and Loan crook. Keating bought and paid for McCain’s help and bilked taxpayers and investors out of billions. How dare McCain mention Rezko.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | August 22, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

This hould be a wake up call to everyone . DO NOT VOTEE FOR OBAMA.

Posted by: BARBANEL | August 22, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

US Capitol BOMBED by Obama friends… convicted felon Rezko and Obama in massive scandal housing deal…. Obama, A Imminent Danger to America. Noted on the Web yesterday, but NOT reported by ABC.. Clinton supporters adn Hillarys Brother meeting with McCain campaign,

Posted by: Hilly-Billy | August 22, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

Johm Mccain’S Fund raiser
Carl H. Lindner Jr., the billionaire Cincinnati businessman, was CEO of Chiquita Brands International from 1984 to 2001, and remained on the company’s board of directors until May 2002. Beginning under his tenure, Chiquita executives paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (known by the Spanish acronym AUC), which is described by George Washington University’s National Security Archive as an “illegal right-wing anti-guerrilla group tied to many of the country’s most notorious civilian massacres.”
Following a Justice Department indictment last year, Chiquita admitted to illegally funding the paramilitaries and agreed to pay a $25 million fine. Chiquita’s payments to the AUC began in 1997 and lasted seven years; roughly half of the funds came after the group was designated a Foreign Terrorist Organization by the U.S. State Department in 2001.

Posted by: Thinking | August 22, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am

Just remember Pelosi’s words. Obama was sent by god!

Posted by: Martin Slueg, jr | August 22, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Martin says
“Fair game. Obama’s associations are even more critical to examine because he has almost no political accomplishments to justify seeking the Presidency.”
I think it is the relationships that have made Mccain successful including and especially his closest relationship with Charles Keating when he started as a Senator for years… flying on jets and Bahamaina vacations and contracts rewarded and donations…
etc…
that America actually really does not know…that we should discuss.
How about the guy whose political achievements are littered with people like Keating…and Gramm…and Black…and Scheunneman…
How about knowing the details behind his history in the Senate…
and why Nancy reagan would not speak to him for years…
and why he had introductions and parties where Charles Keating seemed to be a constant figure in his life…sipping martinis and introducing him to committee heads…
all the while the guy was committing crimes that effected ALL of America.
if it’s fair game then lets get the details out…
Obama’s details have been out for months.
Mccain’s have not.
You want to play on that field sure…
go ahead this big billy club called “the best friendship between Charles Keating and John mccain” : alson known as “the building years”

Posted by: dl | August 22, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

Martin Slueg: the only people McCain ‘won’ last Saturday were single-issue evangelicals. He thinks he now has room to select a pro-choice VP because he has the single-issue evangelicals in the bag.
And sure, he has got you in the bag.
McCain was an Episcopalian, who thought it would help him to become a Southern Baptist.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 22, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am

This isn’t a suprise this is the type of thing the crazy rifht wingers do over and over. But what I want to see is obama start running adds on how Mccain got in a fight with some guys in panama, the keating five, then I want to see his wife tore down for being on hieress like they did edwards wife. But Obama will probably take the high road and not mention it. I don’t know why he’s giving Mccain a ride on these there are WAY more skeletons in his closet. But who wants to pick on a tired old man.

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am

McCain sounds like Al Gore !

Posted by: p0s3r | August 22, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

I can no longer support Obama even my parents who were leaning to voting for him now call him Mr Dopey.

Posted by: Mark | August 22, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Thinking: “Carl H. Lindner Jr., the billionaire Cincinnati, was CEO of Chiquita Brands International”
I have been boycotting Chiquita bananas for years, exactly because of that man and his company. Thanks for pointing out that he was a fundraiser for McCain.
McCain as Chairman of IRI, the International Republican Institute, was also involved in a lot of highly suspect activities. Especially in Latin America and the Caribbean.
Expose that and McCain’s chances in Florida will be toast too.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 22, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

This is the most ridiculous thing the McCain camp could try to paint Obama with. It is thoroughly laughable.
McCain is bereft of ideas and morally bankrupt, and the veil of his infidelity, his growing senility of even the most basic aspects of his own life, and his dangerous Georgia/Russia foreign policy blunder, is going to be lifted in short order for the United States voting public to see in all its dishonorable vainglory.
Sorry John, you really screwed yourself going after Obama for economic issues when you yourself are totally out of touch with what really is on most American’s minds these days.

Posted by: crackerjack | August 22, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

facts are ugly things -
William Ayers was a founding member of the Weather Underground – The group was a violent anti war organization who’s charter was the overthrow of the United States government. They bombed the Pentagon, the US Capitol and a number of NY City police stations.
William Ayers own girlfriend and 2 other members of the group were killed by a bomb they were building to use against military recruiters at Fort Dix. The group also killed 2 police officers and a security guard during a botched bank robbery-the purpose of which was to gain funds to further their terrorist activities.
William Ayers has never renounced his actions and to this day defends them and laments that the group had not done more. Look it up.
Obama knew exactly who this man was and yet chose to nurture a personal and professional relationship with him. I’m sorry, but someone aspiring to the Presidency of the US does not do that.

Posted by: oldspice | August 22, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

Now I think Hillary is great but isn’t this what she tried to do to Obama as well and it failed. I mean don’t get me wrong Obama does know Ayers but this is insinuating that when Obama was 8 he was building bombs with Ayers. Also isn’t this Ayers guy a well known colledge professor now? I think people are takeing this way too serious. But what ever right wingers this line of ataack is played out so waste your money it’ll be good fun. Call a man everything but a man and see were our country winds up.

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am

And why is an anti war group unamerican? I know it’s not right to bomb thigs but Vietnam was a stupid war and now some what 30 years later a draft doger put us right back into it. Awsome lets vote for another war monger it makes sense. Jeez I give up I can’t wait for Obama to start calling mccain the sleeze bag he really is.

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

If Obama’s “relationship” with Bill Ayers is relevant, let’s start asking McCain about his friendship with Gordon Liddy.

Posted by: Stella | August 22, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am

The Republicans have no more dirt. Everyone knows about Ayers and Wright.
I’m just glad Obama is finally hitting back. If Obama can maintains his lead by early September through mid september he will win the presidency

Posted by: Vanessa | August 22, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

@oldspice:
At 8 years old? Give me a break. Nice vitriolic hyperbole, but it is completely stupid. If you think the American public can’t see this for what it is — a baseless smear — then you must like Jerome Corsi and Karl Rove.

Posted by: crackerjack | August 22, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

McCAIN is RIGHT:
_______
I am not questioning Obama’s Patriotism
I am questioning Obama’s JUDGEMENT !!
_________
Obama has displayed, and, in some cases actually ADMITTED extremely POOR JUDGEMENT over the span of 15-20+ yrs wrt – Rezko, CAC, Ayers, Wright, Farrakahn, Pfleger, Dohrnezko, and the list goes ON and ON – as being investigated / vetted by Dr. Corsi, Freddoso, Penn, Morris, Barnes, Hannity, and MANY MANY others!
McCAIN or Hillary in ’08 !!

Posted by: CJB in CA | August 22, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Well, Obama says he has a professional association with Ayers, in whose home Obama launched his political career, Ayers, who to this days is unrepentant and believes the Weatherman did not create enough destruction, and with whom Obama has associations with through CAC. And he has the audacity to compare Ayers to a US Rep. Senator. To associate with and work with Coburn is his friggin job!
How gullible does Obama think the Am. public is. His statement is like Ken Starr saying his association with the Christian right and his position as dean at Pepperdine U. is only relative to his a flimsy association with the conservative right. Does anybody believe Starr really doesn’t hold those Christian right beliefs?

Posted by: pls go away | August 22, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

“He did not share ideas on a regular basis”– how irregular were these “basis”?

Posted by: cardinal | August 22, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Funny how this attack ad was launched by a new, conservative non-profit group. Isn’t ‘conservative non-profit group’ an oxymoron? Then again, non-profit doesn’t mean non-agenda, non-hateful, non-spin, non-intelligence, or non-lying. Their profit may not be monetary but if their guy wins you can damn sure bet they will profit from it!

Posted by: SearamblerOne | August 22, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

It is only August and the Mccain camp have played all their game jokers. The only thing remaining is Reverend Wright and doubt the effects again because everyone supporting Obama already knows about Wright. But Obama has the Keating 5, Mccains adultery, Reverend Parshly and Reverend Hagee’s, Mccains social security disgrace, Gramm’s whining, and the Draft issue yet to be used. Will Obama go there? Still watching. But if Obama is still ahead in polls by september ending, then he is going to win the elections. At this stage, the undecided are all Hillary Clinton supporters and are all Democrats. We are watching how Hillary Clinton will play this out.

Posted by: vuzous | August 22, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

Thank you Stella. I’ll spread the word on this association. After the Republican convention Obama should air a Gordan Libby ad. Maybe in between a commercial break.

Posted by: Vanessa | August 22, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Isn’t it illegal to coordinate with a 527?
Then why does the headline say “Independent Group”? It should be “Alleged Independent Group”

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 22, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

and the NRA will point out Obama’s association with the Joyce foundation

Posted by: geevill | August 22, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

@Zaggs:
I think your argument is disingenuous simply for the fact that supporters of Obama, whether they were teacher/student at one time or pastor/congregation, is idiotic in its assumption that people are influenced by these relationships in ways that are dangerous and untenable. Didn’t your mom ever say to you, “if everyone was jumping off the bridge would you follow them?” The answer is a life lesson. No, you wouldn’t because it doesn’t pass the most basic tests of LOGIC and REASON, which you subsume Obama has neither. There’s nothing in Obama’s past or present, in his actions, his words, policy/doctrine that indicates any tendency toward violence and/or terrorism. None.
Sorry, pal. Try again.
I could say, on the other hand, the same is not true of John McCain, as he has shown even in the past week (!) his judgment fails those same tests of LOGIC and REASON vis a vis his involvement in the Georgia/Russia debacle. He has shown time and again a propensity for violence to solve problems via warfare instead of diplomacy. He was totally on the wrong side of that one, and still is.
Obama was very clear about choosing diplomacy over violence in Iraq and this latest episode with Russia and Georgia.

Posted by: crackerjack | August 22, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

“Obama knew exactly who this man was and yet chose to nurture a personal and professional relationship with him.”
That’s ridiculous, do you do background checks on the people in you neighborhood and the people you work on charities with? And if you did find out that they had done something illegal 40 years ago but were now contributing members of the community would you refuse to work on the charities that you believed in because those people were also involved?
What a ridiculous concept.

Posted by: The Other Ed | August 22, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Deciding whether or not to be friends with a domestic terrorist is above Barry’s pay grade.

Posted by: Mack | August 22, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am

Obama has displayed, and, in some cases actually ADMITTED extremely POOR JUDGEMENT over the span of 15-20+ yrs wrt – Rezko, CAC, Ayers, Wright, Farrakahn, Pfleger, Dohrnezko, and the list goes ON and ON – as being investigated / vetted by Dr. Corsi, Freddoso, Penn, Morris, Barnes, Hannity, and MANY MANY others!
McCAIN or Hillary in ’08 !!
Posted by: CJB in CA | Aug 22, 2008 11:25:09 AM
______
That is just so sad. None of your “experts” are in any way reliable.Lame just like your candidate, McCain. Next?

Posted by: MaeScott | August 22, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

Release the UC papers un-redacted and then lets see the extent of the relationship.

Posted by: Clevelander as in Ohio | August 22, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

-”Obama knew exactly who this man was and yet chose to nurture a personal and professional relationship with him.”
That’s ridiculous, do you do background checks on the people in you neighborhood and the people you work on charities with?-
OK, you not serious with that question are you? Have you ever done any political work? Do you know how board members are chosen? pls go away with your nonsense.

Posted by: pls go away | August 22, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

It’s about time the media look into Obama’s connectino to Ayers. It is well past due.
The argument that Ayers did this when Obama was 8 years old carries no weight. If Ayers had admitted wrongdoing and regretted those actions, then fine. You can’t hold it against Obama. But, in fact, Ayers flaunts the fact he didn’t do enough and doesn’t regret the bombings. Obama wass (until very recently) a friend of his and let him kick off his campaign.
So, one has to ask, how is it that Obama is so close to such a radical? Not someone who spouts off radical political theory, but someone who carried through terrorist acts.
If there’s nothing there, then let’s put it behind us. But it NEEDS to be explored.

Posted by: JA | August 22, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

If maccain wants to deal with the past of obama, one of pro obama group has to make an ad regarding Maccain’s betrayal of first wife.
fair is fair.

Posted by: zen | August 22, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

“That’s ridiculous, do you do background checks on the people in you neighborhood and the people you work on charities with? ”
Wrong answer. If he didn’t know who he was dealing with then he is either an idiot or a fool.

Posted by: Mack | August 22, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

Pls Go Away,
Yes, Obama knew about the bombings. If you’re a political figure and don’t know a close supporter was a terrorist….then you should be passed up on that alone.

Posted by: JA | August 22, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

“If maccain wants to deal with the past of obama, one of pro obama group has to make an ad regarding Maccain’s betrayal of first wife.
fair is fair.”
McCain betrayed his wife and Barry betrayed America by becoming friends with a domestic terrorist.

Posted by: Mack | August 22, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

sorry it was 1 DOLLAR A MONTH !!

Posted by: carpenter.nyc | August 22, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

From Annenberg Political Fact Check (factcheck.org):
In June, the Obama campaign released a digitally scanned image of his birth certificate to quell speculative charges that he might not be a natural-born citizen. But the image prompted more blog-based skepticism about the document’s authenticity. And recently, author Jerome Corsi, whose book attacks Obama, said in a TV interview that the birth certificate the campaign has is “fake.”
We beg to differ. FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship. Claims that the document lacks a raised seal or a signature are false. We have posted high-resolution photographs of the document as “supporting documents” to this article. Our conclusion: Obama was born in the U.S.A. just as he has always said.

Posted by: crackerjack | August 22, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

If maccain wants to deal with the past of obama, one of pro obama group has to make an ad regarding Maccain’s betrayal of first wife.-
Yeah Zen, get Ken Starr to do the moralizing for you progressive left wingers.

Posted by: pls go away | August 22, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Mack wrote:
McCain betrayed his wife and Barry betrayed America by becoming friends with a domestic terrorist.
***********
Ok, then let’s deal with the whole Charlie Black issue. He’s gets paid MILLIONS of dollars!!! So WHY, oh WHY is it Ok for McCain have THIS slimeball working on his campaign??

Posted by: Llama in Pajama's | August 22, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

Ads that attack Obama have a very large impact because criticizing Obama is new.
The press doesn’t say negative things about Obama, so when a new ad against Obama runs it has a big, attention-getting impact.
On the other side, an attack ad against McCain has little impact. For months the press has droned on and on and on daily with negative attacks on McCain. We are now all immune to critiques of McCain.
Obama’s negative advertising has little impact, whereas when McCain hits Obama it works – as shown by the drop in the ratings for Obama.

Posted by: Sally J. | August 22, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Carpenter wrote:
“obama believes America sucks and we should send all our tax dollars to Africa and all other 3rd world nations…. (which we do already—but it’s not enough for obama)’
Oh like Iraq?

Posted by: Thinking | August 22, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

“Mack wrote:
McCain betrayed his wife and Barry betrayed America by becoming friends with a domestic terrorist.
***********
Ok, then let’s deal with the whole Charlie Black issue. He’s gets paid MILLIONS of dollars to lobby!!! So WHY, oh WHY is it Ok for McCain have THIS slimeball working on his campaign??”
Not sure. Did he ever actually build a bomb and then plant it in a building hoping to kill and maim innocent people?

Posted by: Mack | August 22, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

@Sally J.:
Hey Sally, let me clue you in on something. The press NEVER and I mean NEVER says anything bad about John McCain. They excuse his terribly despicable, morally repugnant behavior time and again.
The media give McCain a free pass, not Obama.

Posted by: crackerjack | August 22, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Not sure. Did he ever actually build a bomb and then plant it in a building hoping to kill and maim innocent people?
Posted by: Mack | Aug 22, 2008 11:43:08 AM
*********
Great NON ANSWER!! McCain’s associations have MORE impact than any of Obamas. The Keating scandals caused thousands of senior citizens their life savings. Enron (and Phil Gramm) costs hundreds of thousands of people to lose their retirement and investors MILLIONS of dollars. These are REAL!!!

Posted by: Llama in Pajama's | August 22, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

pls go away:
Pls give me a break!!
I doubt seriously that anyone with Obama’s much touted liberal arts/legal/constitutional education would have needed to conduct a background check in order to figure out who William Ayers or the Weather Underground are.
If name recognition on Ayers behalf wasn’t enough for Obama, then Obama certainly wasted all that hard-earned money he had to pay back on his infamous student loans……………..

Posted by: SandyB | August 22, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

Why would someone that loves America as much as Obama claims he does–even want to associate at all with a known terrorist that shows no remorse?
Kind of makes owning 7 houses look petty in comparison.
And where is Obama’s distibution of wealth idea when it comes to helping out his own brother?

Posted by: riley | August 22, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am

McCain cannot, and will not represent the average person in this country. He didn’t even know the price of a gallon of gas! He wants more wars….he will consider reinstating the draft to promote his wars! He depended on his father’s position when he was in the Navy! He’s also a Bush Republican!
What has happened to the Reagan Republicans…remember them…those who represented decency, respect, values, and morals. Who are these new Republicans that resort to slimy, disgusting and nauseous approach to anyone who disagrees with them. The Rush Limbaugh mentality…how can anyone approve of someone that would suggest that John Edward’s wife talks too much. I really don’t care for the McCain and Bush or Rush Republicans, and will not vote the ticket until it changes!

Posted by: DeefromTexas | August 22, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Cracker, and you fall into the trap. You aregue like obama. Did I say Obama was a terrorist because Ayers is? Nope.
But you cannot reason why obama has lied about his relationship with Bill Ayers. Why has Obama lied about it? Why is the university of Chicago blocking PUBLIC records detailing their workings on the Anneberg challenge? How many random people from your hood have you worked on 3 public projects with? Try answering those questions if your capable of independent thought instead of trying to act like I’m saying something I did not.
Also now I’ve got you applying double standards. if McCain comes off tough on Russia its bad, if obama does the same its good. What the Russian invasion of Georgia showed is just how far gone obama is when it comes to world affairs. he first reaction was to tell the invadee not to fight back against invasion. Yeah its always the victim that needs to calm down. Not to mention the only idea Obama could come up with is to use the UN security council….which Russia holds veto power…brilliant! But the next day Barry changed his tone to “I condemn Russia’s aggressive actions and reiterate my call for an immediate ceasefire,” Obama said in a statement.
“Russia must stop its bombing campaign, cease flights of Russian aircraft in Georgian airspace, and withdraw its ground forces from Georgia.”. How was that different then what McCain said except McCain said it the day before? It isn’t. This was McCain’s statement that the Obama campaign railed against (before of course flip flopping) “Today news reports indicate that Russian military forces crossed an internationally-recognized border into the sovereign territory of Georgia. Russia should immediately and unconditionally cease its military operations and withdraw all forces from sovereign Georgian territory. What is most critical now is to avoid further confrontation between Russian and Georgian military forces.”. Oh yeah I forgot McCain also wanted to involve EU and OSCE. So cracker why is Obama fine for saying the same thing as McCain, especially when it was well after McCain’s statement which Barry complained about? Could it be Barry found himself completely unprepared, realized McCain knew what he was doing and did what he’s done all campaign…copy from someone else.
Riddle me this cracker, how did the obama campaign’s claim that he produced peace in our time work out with Georgia and Russia (“Today news reports indicate that Russian military forces crossed an internationally-recognized border into the sovereign territory of Georgia. Russia should immediately and unconditionally cease its military operations and withdraw all forces from sovereign Georgian territory. What is most critical now is to avoid further confrontation between Russian and Georgian military forces.”)? I mean Russia is still there, outside the autonmous regions of Georgia, blocking the port city of Topi, capturing Georgian troops, destroying Georgian infrastructure, having chechen mercenaries run rampant over Gori, how has that all worked out?
To help you with that question here is an excerpt from independent journalist Michael Totten filed from Tbilisi ““The West saved the capital. They were moving to Tbilisi. There was one night that was very dangerous. The Russian tanks were very close to the capital. I don’t know what happened, but they moved the tanks back.” And my translator, whose husband works for Georgia’s ministry of foreign affairs, made a similar guess that the West helped save the capital. “The night they came close to Tbilisi,” she said, “Bush and McCain made their strongest speeches yet. The Russians seemed to back down. Bush and McCain have been very good for us.”

Posted by: Zaggs | August 22, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Ok, then let’s deal with the whole Charlie Black issue. -
Was it Johnson who had to resign form Obama’s VP committee because he had cozy associations with, who was, the Countrywide pres, the same company with a reputation for predatory mortgage practices toward the working class but who gave sweet-heart deals to Obama supporters, one being Dodd (who got 3? nice deals).

Posted by: pls go away | August 22, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Again. Did any of them ever actually build a bomb and then plant it in a building hoping to kill and maim innocent Americans?
Which image has more of an impact; a bunch of guys walking out of a court house, or images of the aftermath of bombings on American soil of American buildings?

Posted by: Mack | August 22, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

This whole topic is above my pay grade.

Posted by: p0s3r | August 22, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

“Not someone who spouts off radical political theory, but someone who carried through terrorist acts.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 22, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

I would like the public to be reminded of the Keating Five fiasco involving McCain, which is especially poignant given our current housing/mortgage loan crisis. Let’s get it all out in the open – and let’s not forget his still close friend (and behind the scenes advisor) Phil Gramm – he speaks what is truly in McCain’s mind about our economic problems.

Posted by: bernadette | August 22, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Which image has more of an impact; a bunch of guys walking out of a court house, or images of the aftermath of bombings on American soil of American buildings?
Posted by: Mack | Aug 22, 2008 11:50:36 AM
***********
The Weather Underground never blew up anyone but themselves. So the “image” of an unsucessful group and the “image” of penniless senior’s is stark. Ayers group never hurt anyone but themselves and Keating and Gramm HURT thousands!!!

Posted by: Llama in Pajama's | August 22, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

“that’s not the Bill Ayers I knew”
“he’s just a typical white person”
“they are lying”

Posted by: pls go away | August 22, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Llama,
Just because the Weathermen were incompetent doesn’t forgive them of their intentions:
“Three Weathermen had blown themselves up while building a bomb in a Greenwich Village townhouse, no more than a mile from where Rudd is sitting today. To the group’s everlasting shame, that bomb was intended for an officers’ dance at Fort Dix, N.J., where it presumably could have killed not only military personnel but their civilian dates and whoever else might have been in the building.”

Posted by: JA | August 22, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

Obama has radical pastors, a radical church, a radical wife, radical friends, a radical abortion record, and radical ideals.
The DNC and the MSM has chosen to ignore it. I hope America is finally waking up to the real Obama.
No one wants a third Bush term but do we really want Obama, Dean and Pelosi controlling this country?

Posted by: cindy in nc | August 22, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

pls go away,
The whole mortgage thing with Johnson was stupid. I got a better rate than Johnson from Countrywide on my mortgage!!

Posted by: Llama in Pajama's | August 22, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

“Ayers group never hurt anyone but themselves and Keating and Gramm HURT thousands!!!”
Just a bunch of lovable, bumbling domestic terrorists. The kind of people that you seek out to help kick off your career in politics.

Posted by: Mack | August 22, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

“Did any of them ever actually build a bomb and then plant it in a building hoping to kill and maim innocent Americans?”

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 22, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

“Did any of them ever actually build a bomb and then plant it in a building hoping to kill and maim innocent Americans?”

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 22, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

McCAIN is like IMELDA MARCOS. The difference is – They collect HOUSES instead of SHOES.
Oh, I forgot, he wears the $520 FERRAGAMO shoes as well.

Posted by: T | August 22, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

One bombing attributed to the Weatherman killed a police officer in san Fran and the bomb that went off in the townhouse was meant for a dance at Fort Dix. So the idea they never meant to kill anyone is BS, stupidity is unintentional.

Posted by: Zaggs | August 22, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

Ok, lemme get this straight:
Barack Obama graduates from Harvard Law, with honors; President of the Harvard Law Review. He’s a hot commodity. He’s aggressively recruited and could get a fancy job at a big name law firm with a big salary anywhere he wants. He could go to clerk for the Supreme Court, if he wanted. Instead he goes to Chicago, takes a job with a small civil rights firm and starts teaching constitutional law. He is accepts positions on the boards of local charitable, community development organizations. He decides to run for a seat in the Illinois State Senate, which is being vacated by Alice Palmer (who has decided to run for Congress).
To do this, Obama has to meet all the necessary political people in the neighborhood, among them, the (in)famous Bill Ayers, who had by then become a highly-respected professor at UIC, a luminary in the field of urban education reform. In fact, Alice Palmer arranges to introduce Obama to the neighborhood as her successor at a meet & greet house party in the Ayers’ home in the small, liberal enclave of Chicago’s Hyde Park.
Now a State Senator, Obama is asked to be President of the Board of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, a $49.2 million effort to strengthen public education and the quality of teaching in Chicago’s schools – part of the national Annenberg Challenge, the largest public-private partnership to improve public education in U. S. history. (Bill Ayers, by the way, was one of the founding members of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge).
So what’s the point? a bunch of liberal do-gooders trying to improve the wrecked Chicago Publics School system — Wow. Sounds really radical.
John McCain needs to get a life.

Posted by: eliot | August 22, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

@Zaggs:
It’s simple: Georgia shouldn’t have started something they couldn’t finish without western help. I know that sound black and white but there are millions of hues of gray in complexity. No comment on an ABC blog is going to be a sufficient forum for its discussion.
Furthermore, it’s ridiculous to assume we’re going to come to the aid of every 2nd or 3rd tier ally when we’re already fighting two wars, unless of course the attack was coordinated with us. It wasn’t. Sorry to say, Georgia gets what Georgia deserves for messing with Russia. That Russian enclave had Russian passports, which makes them Russian citizens. If the Chinese invaded Guam or the Philippines, would we just sit idly by and watch it happen? No. You can’t fault Russia for protecting it’s citizens.
The UN Security Council is and was an adequate response from Obama. It shows a penchant for the U.S. not needing to act unilaterally, and in fact I could turn that table around and ask why weren’t the Europeans or Eurasians coming to the aid of their neighbor Georgia before the United States? In the days before Bush the UN is how international matters were resolved. Relegating or circumventing its authority is unwise (see: Iraq). It’s not perfect but calling Russia out at the UN would have unequivocally more support than if we were to aid Georgia unilaterally and start a pissing contest with Russia. Even though Russia sits on it doesn’t mean they are exempt from responsibility if they choose to veto a pressing issue. Their failure to abide by the UN charter would most certainly have bigger, and much more dire consequences.

Posted by: crackerjack | August 22, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

This is so ridiculous, there is no way it’ll get any traction. I know these sleezeball liars are hoping to inject this venom into the mainstream by getting a national media organization to post a story about it on their website. Forget it, nobody in the media is going to be that stupid.

Posted by: Mike | August 22, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Just a bunch of lovable, bumbling domestic terrorists. The kind of people that you seek out to help kick off your career in politics.–
good one.

Posted by: pls go away | August 22, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Please, tell Dr. Corsi, Freddoso, Penn, Morris, Barnes, Hannity, and MANY MANY others that they are unreliable (no, it is NOT just Dr. Corsi, but ALL of them)…
The only one that is UNRELIABLE and has Terrible JUDGEMENT for 15-20+ yrs is:
NObama !!!
McCAIN OR Hillary in ’08 !!

Posted by: CJB in CA | August 22, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

Some of the comments I am reading here from liberals are the reason why Obama is going to lose this election.
When you say:
1. The Weather Underground really wasn’t that bad
2. Georgia is the real aggressor
You are welcoming a McCain victory.
Keep it up guys. No one shares your skewed radical views.
I am still in disbelief that LIBERALS, who have been charging the US should NOT attack sovereign nations is NOW OK’ing it for RUSSIA>
Where do you people come from????

Posted by: JA | August 22, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

I always hear this BS from you right wingers so here:
FactCheck staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship. Claims that the document lacks a raised seal or a signature are false. We have posted high-resolution photographs of the document as “supporting documents” to this article. Our conclusion: Obama was born in the U.S.A. just as he has always said.

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

“To do this, Obama has to meet all the necessary political people in the neighborhood, among them, the (in)famous Bill Ayers,”

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 22, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

I’m amazed how often McCain can be linked to supporting and engaging with paramilitary groups. We already have Colombia in this thread, but there are also ties with paramilitary terrorists in Venezuela and in Haiti/Dominican Republic.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 22, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

JA, it is sad, that both points are true. Weather didn’t kill anyone because they didn’t try to. Whoever posted about them trying to blow up a officers dance is making stuff up. They always called ahead, and most of the 12 bombings ended up being scares.
Georgia was the agressor. That doesn’t excuse anything that Russia did, but it does make Georgia responsible as aggression is the ultimate war crime.

Posted by: Flash Override | August 22, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

“FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 22, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

It is sad that despite those two points being true, it only helps the right to point it out. Why? Because the truth does not comport with the dominant paradigm – it conflicts with what you hear on an hourly basis on the TV.

Posted by: Flash Override | August 22, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

About time somebody put a spotlight on his terrorist promoter Ayres.
‘-a guy who lives in his neighborhood’
Give me a break…

Posted by: sickofobamadrama | August 22, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Flash,
Please get your facts straight. The Weather Underground openly admits their intention to bomb Fort Dix. Sorry, go fact check if you want.
As far as Georgia, you can call them aggressors but if you knew ANYTHING about the situation there you’d know it’s too complex to call so easily like that. Both sides have accused the other of genocide, for instance.
But that’s beside the point. Russia attacked a sovereign nation. You guys have been railing on the US for years for attacking a sovereign nation. And yet you think that Russia was just as right or wrong as Georgia.
I’m sorry, but adopt a principle and stick with it. If you are against attacking sovereign nations, speak out against Russia and condemn them, don’t try to negotiate or side with them.

Posted by: JA | August 22, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

Newsbusters reports that Obama campaign admits that Obama lied about his vote against saving the life of a baby born alive after an abortion and the fact the media says nothing and instead makes a big deal about McCain and his so called house “gaffe”.

Posted by: tim | August 22, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

I think Russia has full right to attack Goregia. I think it was in the people of the souths best intrest. Just because you have a democracy doesn’t mean you have a just government. Besides I think the United States all ready esablished this move as fair game.

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

Obama’s mother lived her life as an atheist.
Obama’s father was buried “in the Muslim tradition”.
How is that radical?

Posted by: Karl | August 22, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

CJB in CA, a known Hillary-supporter, gets his or her ‘facts’ from Corsi, Freddoso, Penn, Morris, Barnes, Hannity.
Oh my, Oh my. How desperate do you have to be?
When Hillary had won the nomination, you would have posed as an Obama supporter voting for McCain.
You’re not kidding anybody.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 22, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

I agree with this Ayers intent to stop that war. However I don’t agree with his methods but with Nixon what do you do?

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Hi Karl, throwing the kitchen sink already? In August? Before the Conventions?
Don’t you know you will need the kitchen until November?

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 22, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

The Georgians invaded South Ossetia and Russia came to their defense. That was a major screw-up by Georgia and one for John McCain, when he decided unilaterally to come to the aid of the Georgians after this remark from President Saakashvili:
“Yesterday I heard Senator McCain say we are all Georgians. Well very nice … but of course it’s time to pass from words to deeds.”
What the media neglected to report was that Randy Scheunemann, a top McCain adviser, was a paid lobbyist for Georgia to the tune of $800,000. With that kind of money in the lurch of course Saakashvili wanted action. For McCain to try to turn the tables and point to Russia as the aggressor is asinine and inaccurate. Not to mention the extremely poor judgment he exercised in doing so by sending Lieberman and Graham to Georgia BEFORE the arrival of the actual diplomatic channels of this country via the State Department and Condoleeza Rice. What business did they have circumventing actual, official U.S. Government policy? That was very dangerous. Russia could respond with sickening swiftness and endanger many American interests abroad easily, and the rhetoric on the Russian side was understandably bellicose as a result. The broader question the media fails to ask is why does John McCain think that trying to reinstitute the Cold War is a good thing? Note also that McCain and his surrogate Joe Lieberman have gone on record as saying they want to kick Russia out of the G8 as punishment.
How does McCain’s response square up to the facts on the ground? It doesn’t. He’s a very dangerous man indeed.
When you’re bought and paid for by the president of Georgia via your adviser-onetime-lobbyist Scheunemann, and you’re actually proud of that influence peddling making its way into your pretend presidential policy toward Georgia, I think you are automatically disqualified from being a leader of a free republic.

Posted by: crackerjack | August 22, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

the ayres thing is a bologne story
the Keating thing is documented …over and over…
martinis jets, contracts, donations, senatorial introductions…etc
again just because a committee that “reprimanded” Larry Craig said John mccain shouldn’t be kicked out of the Senate or go to jail
doesn’t mean the long history of John mcCain’s friendship and constant accompaniment with Charles keating exactly when Keating was fleecing our country and taking America to the cleaners…
doesn’t mean it doesn’t smell like a giant pile of rotting fish… amongst those martinis they served at the Mccain households.
Keating Mccain makes any of these created scandals with Obama look like a boy scout scuffuffle…
Keating screwed America while Mccain was sitting in his planes right next to him and introducing him to his in-laws, other senators and committee chairs…
but atleast mccain got some vacation times out of it.

Posted by: dl | August 22, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Here is some more:
In fact, nobody died as a result of bombings in which Ayers said he participated as part of the Weather Underground, at the New York City Police Headquarters in 1970, in a men’s lavatory in the Capitol building in 1971 and in a women’s restroom in the Pentagon in 1972. The deaths to which Clinton referred were of three Weather Underground members who died when their own “bomb factory” exploded in a Greenwich Village townhouse on March 6, 1970. Ayers was not present. Also, two police officers were murdered in connection with the robbery of a Brinks armored car by Weather Underground members in 1981. That was about a year after Ayers had turned himself in and after all charges against him had been dropped.
Ayers did say ”I don’t regret setting bombs” and “I feel we didn’t do enough” regarding the group’s violent protests against the Vietnam War. That was in a New York Times interview that was published the morning of September 11, 2001. The interview had been conducted earlier, in connection with the publication of a memoir of the year Ayers spent as a fugitive with his wife and fellow Weather Underground member Bernardine Dohrn. Ayers is now a professor of education at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Obama and Ayers served together for a time on the board of an antipoverty charity, the Woods Fund of Chicago, from 1999 to 2002. Ayers also contributed $200 to Obama’s campaign for the Illinois state Senate on March 2, 2001.
When moderator George Stephanopoulos asked Obama about Ayers, the senator said he is “a guy who lives in my neighborhood … who I know and who I have not received some official endorsement from. He’s not somebody who I exchange ideas from on a regular basis.”

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

And still more, they are reaching for straws here:
Obama also correctly said that President Bill Clinton had pardoned or commuted the sentences of two Weather Underground members, who had, unlike Ayers, been convicted and sentenced to long prison terms. Bill Clinton indeed pardoned one and commuted the sentence of another.
Obama visited Ayer’s home in 1995 at the invitation of an Illinois state senator, according to a Feb. 22 story in Politico.com. But Politico concluded, “There’s no evidence their relationship is more than the casual friendship of two men who occupy overlapping Chicago political circles and who served together on the board of a Chicago foundation.” And while we by no means defend or condone bombings of any kind, Clinton strained the facts to make Ayers’ 1970s activities sound homicidal.

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

I thought we were all educated adults who went off facts. LMAO!!!! That will be the day!

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

They were blowing up toilets with cherry bombs. HAHAHA! This was a prank when my dad was in school not a “terrorist act” like it is now.

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

Obama needs to release all of the papers that the University of Illinois is holding, which will most likely document how closely Obama associated himself with the unrepentant terrorist. The truth is going to come out sooner or later anyway. Better now, than before he gets the chance to step foot in the White House, because once the country finds out how cozy Obama is with terrorists, they will turn away from him by the millions and he won’t be able to govern.

Posted by: OxyCon | August 22, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Joe,
The US spent a year and a half in the UN working to get permission to invade Iraq. United Nations Resolution 1441, November 8, 2000,listed the many resolutions sent to and ignored by Saddam over the prior nine years and demanded that he be in full compliance with all the relevant council resolutions or face serious consequences
All members of the U.N. Security Council voted to enforce this resolution.
On October 7, 2002, Congress unanimously passed the “Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq”. Bush signed it. This act enumerated the many violations and implored the president to take whatever action necessary to force Saddam to abide by his cease-fire agreement.
Russia invaded Georgia under the cover of night without any discussion or approvals from the UN.Russia’s goal of invading Georgia was not to free the Georgian people, Georgia has a Democratically elected government. Saddam was one of the worse dictators in modern time responsible for the whole sale slaughter of over 2 million people. The fact you make a moral equivalence, like your hero Obama does, to Russia’s invasion of Georgia and the US invasion of Iraq, makes me want to throw up. God help us if Obama gets elected and people of your ilk ever get power. The US will be doomed.

Posted by: tom | August 22, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

So, genocide is a better reason than.. Ummmmm, uhhhh, WMD’S yea thats it even though my country soild them to him. It is one big lie that got us into Iraq

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Hey tom 3at3m!

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

This ad is a bigoted ridiculous rehash of an old story brought up months ago. The ad is an insult to a person’s intelligence as it invokes the logical fallacy of ‘guilt by association’. It is ‘red herring’ propoganda with no other purpose than to deceive the American voter’s into believing Obama has done something wrong. Obama has done nothing wrong! Barack Obama was 6 or 7 years old when this chapter in our nation’s history took place and he has stated he deplores these despicable acts which occured 40 years ago. Ayers was not punished by the government and it is hatemongering to try and blame Obama. This ad is merely more right-wing propaganda based on insinuation, the sole purpose of which is to deceive and distract the voters from the REAL issues of TODAY. This election the voters will not be fooled again, they will see thru the trickery!

Posted by: James Johnson | August 22, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Also tom show me were Obama makes that assertion. I speak for myself not Obama.

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

And when Bush is convicted of war crimes I’m going to laugh as well. HOw many people is he resbonsable for murdering? Hmmm? WE’ve killed alot of civillans. Crazy, eye for an eye right wing ideology, is going to be the end of the human race.

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

LEAVE JOHN ALONE! He was a POW so he can lie or say anything he wants. He deserves the WH because he was a POW, he got into the Senate because he was a POW and dang it, nobody will stop him cause he was a POW. Doesn’t matter how low in his class standing he was, how many planes he crashed, he was a POW. He has pictures of himself as a POW in one of his 10 houses. He can’t remember which house cause he was a POW.

Posted by: Katie | August 22, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

I know some POW’S and they are screwed up! Just a little unstable but they can still function and not all of them are the same. But agree I do think Mcain’t gets a free pass because of that status.

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Ok I’m out I posted the TRUTH down below…. I hope it sets you free!

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Tom, “in full compliance or face serious consequences”
Let’s see, what has history learned us:
By 2003, Iraq HAD been in full compliance with all the relevant council resolutions. They had gotten rid of all WMD’s, and had presented all their documentation to proof it.
However, the US was so intent on invading Iraq, that they fabricated intelligence to ‘proof’ that Iraq had ‘hidden’ their WMD’s. Rumsfeld and Cheney ‘knew’ were they were but they weren’t going to tell the inspectors.
Now we know they lied in front of the UN. The French and the Germans exposed their lies but he US still went in illegally and unilaterely, without a sanction from the UN. The UN inspectors were still working in Iraq to search for these socalled ‘hidden’ WMD’s.
The US was afraid the UN-route would proof to be unsuccesful so they pulled the inspectors out under the threat that the US was going in.
As we all know: No WMD’s were found. No ties to Al Qaeda were found.
France, Germany and the UN were right. Iraq HAD been in full compliance with all the relevant council resolutions. They had gotten rid of all WMD’s, and had presented all their documentation to proof it.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 22, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

I wonder if the GOP had there one shot with over done smears 4 years ago. I wonder if voters won’t be a bot more skeptical about what groups like this are saying. And by the way it would be good if the media could report Ayers comments on the report that is quoted in these ads, which he says ‘This is not a question of being misunderstood or “being taken out of context” but of a deliberate distortion.’

Posted by: markymark | August 22, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

NObana, with so little experience / exposure at the Federal / National level, is finally being fully investigated and VETTED – and it is by far more than just Dr. Corsi, Freddoso, Penn, Morris, Barnes, Hannity, and MANY MANY others!
As the vetting of NObama progressed – Hillary won 500K more votes than NObama in the final Democratic Primaries (based on NObama Elitist “bitter” remarks, et al) and, in a very recent poll Hillary is doing MUCH better than NObama vs McCAIN!!
NObama – BUYER’S REMORSE !!
NObama: NO Judgement to LEAD – esp. for US President
BTW, would have REALLY APPRECIATED the opportunity to chose between..
McCAIN or Hillary in ’08 !!

Posted by: CJB in CA | August 22, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Joe,
Based on your logic of using civilian casualties during a war as a reason not to go to war, WWII could not have been justified. Evil would prevail in the world and you Joe, would be speaking German today and shouting “heil Hitler”. In the case of the US invasion of Iraq, even Obama admits that Saddam was an evil guy. Records from Saddam’s files now shows he had every intention of restarting his WMD program as he did not think the US would invade Iraq. So if Obama had gotten his way Iran and Iraq would be or about to be in possession of nukes, Russia would be not only invading Georgia they would realize that Obama is all talk and be in the process of invading their other neighbors and the World would be in on the verge of WWWIII. Just ask your self if Obama had been in power when Hitler was on the rise, what would Obama do? I suspect Obama’s “golden” tongue would not have been enough to stop Hitler or any other sworn enemy of the US for that matter.

Posted by: gary | August 22, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

If there’s no damaging relationship between Obama and Ayers, why is the Annenburg Challenge refusing to release its records from the period when Obama served as Chairman of the Board to Ayers attempt to “revolutionize” education?

Posted by: marylou | August 22, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Obama supporters are so hypocritical. I’ll bet if McCain was chummy with Timothy McVeigh, you’d all think that was a big deal!

Posted by: marylou | August 22, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Looks like its time to take a look at the launch of McCain’s political career. It’s juicy … convicts and mob connections.
BTW … Obama was 6 years old when Ayers was leading weather underground.

Posted by: hesingswithfrogs | August 22, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Smear & Fear campaigns work on simple minds, show what the GOP is made up of.

Posted by: Ronaldraygun | August 22, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Bring it on. Let’s fight the sixties culture war all over again. Did we lose in Vietnam because America was unwilling to do everything possible to win or did we lose because (as McNamarra said) it was a mistake and we never should have gotten involved.
Some one who was in the Vietnam war should have known better than to support the invasion of Iraq. That’s not lack of patriotism, it’s lack of judgment. That’s why McCain is not Presidential material.

Posted by: thebob.bob | August 22, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

The truly scary candidate for President ot the U. S. is John McCain. This man is well known on Capitol Hill is a HOTHEAD who often loses his temper. Now this is TRULY SCARY: a senior citizen HOTHEAD running as a candidate for President of the United States!

Posted by: Carlson | August 22, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

“That’s not lack of patriotism, it’s lack of judgment. That’s why McCain is not Presidential material.’
__________
YOU weren’t there. YOU didn’t hear the information given to the members of our congress by Bush….. shortly after 9/11!
It is easy to “judge” in retrospect….. but who would have thought that our PRESIDENT would have lied to our legislators…..
I’m sure THEY didn’t! And “THEY” were both Democrats and Republicans!
Give it a rest!

Posted by: just thinking... | August 22, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Prediction: by October McCain will be leading by 15 points.

Posted by: dragonfly777 | August 22, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

BTW … Obama was 6 years old when Ayers was leading weather underground.
Posted by: hesingswithfrogs | Aug 22, 2008 1:20:46 PM
________________
BTW… that was THEN; this is NOW!.
And as recently as 9/11, Ayers stated that “he should have done more!” when talking about his bombings!
Nor is the relationship between Obama and Ayers just a casual one.
DO YOUR HOMEWORK!

Posted by: EYES WIDE OPEN | August 22, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Hey gary wasn’t the pres at that time a democrat also I think Hitler was a mor legitamate reason than mystery WMD’s that were LIED about and that our country SOLD sadam Hussien. Also if Saddam had allowed all this stuff and on an international stage said I have no WMD’s what do you think Iran’s response would have been? And how do you no the Russians aren’t stopping another Hitler?

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Not true eyeswide open he didn’t say that on 9/11 he said it earlier the story was published on 9/11 and Ayers wrote that in his memoiur, Jeeze republicans can’t or choose not to read I already posted all these facts on Ayers.

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

Ayers wasn’t convictede of anything ethier and there “relationship” is nothing more than serving on a board that delt with poverty in Southside Chicaggo if that makes obama an evil guy than I’d hate to see your definition of someone who is good.

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

The most risky person to be a President will be McCain. McCain must be asked to take an IQ Test and the results must be revealed to the public. I hope his blind followers will wake-up, then.

Posted by: Joseph | August 22, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Obama also correctly said that President Bill Clinton had pardoned or commuted the sentences of two Weather Underground members, who had, unlike Ayers, been convicted and sentenced to long prison terms. Bill Clinton indeed pardoned one and commuted the sentence of another.
Obama visited Ayer’s home in 1995 at the invitation of an Illinois state senator, according to a Feb. 22 story in Politico.com. But Politico concluded, “There’s no evidence their relationship is more than the casual friendship of two men who occupy overlapping Chicago political circles and who served together on the board of a Chicago foundation.” And while we by no means defend or condone bombings of any kind, Clinton strained the facts to make Ayers’ 1970s activities sound homicidal.

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

In fact, nobody died as a result of bombings in which Ayers said he participated as part of the Weather Underground, at the New York City Police Headquarters in 1970, in a men’s lavatory in the Capitol building in 1971 and in a women’s restroom in the Pentagon in 1972. The deaths to which Clinton referred were of three Weather Underground members who died when their own “bomb factory” exploded in a Greenwich Village townhouse on March 6, 1970. Ayers was not present. Also, two police officers were murdered in connection with the robbery of a Brinks armored car by Weather Underground members in 1981. That was about a year after Ayers had turned himself in and after all charges against him had been dropped.
Ayers did say ”I don’t regret setting bombs” and “I feel we didn’t do enough” regarding the group’s violent protests against the Vietnam War. That was in a New York Times interview that was published the morning of September 11, 2001. The interview had been conducted earlier, in connection with the publication of a memoir of the year Ayers spent as a fugitive with his wife and fellow Weather Underground member Bernardine Dohrn. Ayers is now a professor of education at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Obama and Ayers served together for a time on the board of an antipoverty charity, the Woods Fund of Chicago, from 1999 to 2002. Ayers also contributed $200 to Obama’s campaign for the Illinois state Senate on March 2, 2001.
When moderator George Stephanopoulos asked Obama about Ayers, the senator said he is “a guy who lives in my neighborhood … who I know and who I have not received some official endorsement from. He’s not somebody who I exchange ideas from on a regular basis.”

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

And thats homework eyes wide open!

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

“Obama also correctly said that President Bill Clinton had pardoned or commuted the sentences of two Weather Underground members,” …..
and, unlike Ayers later showed that they were repentent!

Posted by: EYES WIDE OPEN | August 22, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Imagine this calamity if you will: Senior citizen ‘HOTHEAD McCAIN’ commander-in-chief—President of the United States.

Posted by: Westy | August 22, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

good job, Joe…..
but you need to go to more than one source…..
I’ll give you a B!

Posted by: EYES WIDE OPEN | August 22, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

The polls all show that a lot of people are changing their minds about voting for Obama due to fear of what he’ll do to this counrty as President.
The fear is completely justified, because he would RUIN this country irrevocably.
If you think Bush was bad for the country, Obama would make changes to our country that will make what Bush has done to it pale in comparison.

Posted by: dsm_cal | August 22, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

So it’s okay if you are convicted and repentant but not okay if you weren’t convicted and unrepentant? This is a dumb argument with someone who just refuses to look at facts.. Or is it ok because Bill did it? I know how you really feel now.

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

I am not looking for a grade from someone who twist facts around because of blind support for someone who pardons terrorist. You like that assertion?

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

it seems that obama has been making too many defensive statements about his questionable friends……all these questionable characters do have one thing in common: obama

Posted by: chris | August 22, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

This is once again the dumbest argument I have ever been involved in with ####### who refuse to look at facts!

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Imagine Obama with Pelosi and Reid…
- Truly SCARY !!!!

Posted by: LBP | August 22, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

McCain is up to his eyeballs in the muck that is being flung about by his Karl Rove handlers. I agree that it is indeed time to remind people how corrupt McCain really is. Many younger voters do not remember the Keating Five Scandal – but John McCain was the greatest hypocrite amongst the lot. The amazing aspect of this story is that McCain was caught red-handed so there is no need to rump up a bunch of Swift Boat style lies – his dishonesty is a matter of record.

Posted by: jefflz | August 22, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Cracker, let me try to make this very simply so you can understand. Even obama came round and recognized Russia over reacted and was the aggressor. You cannot escape that fact no matter how many words you want to put on my keys.
Who said anything about militarily backing up Georgia? Not McCain. The difference is Obama could only think of the UN security council. Anything done there would be vetoed by Russia. Hell they met 5 times in 5 days and could not even issue a STATEMENT! But good to know what people in obama-land consider a good responce. In fact even to this day the UN STILL has yet to do anything.
McCain, on the other hand, called on the UN, the European Union (EU) and the Organization for Security and Co-operation (OSCE). Why those last two? Because McCain knew, unlike Obama who as usual is clueless in all things foreign, the the cease fire between Georgia and ossetia (its never been part of Russia, which makes one wonder how they got Russian passports) was brokered by and observed by the OSCE.
Also the EU could actually bring economic pressure onto Russia.
That is far from acting unilaterally and calls into question your knowledge of the basic facts of foreign policy and current events.

Posted by: Zaggs | August 22, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Look at the facts democratics are better at handling the economy as well. I would post that info as well but I think you guys can use the practice.

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Ok zaggs. How do you explain Mccain’t's veiws that after 9/11 that we need to go after North korea Iran Iraq afganistan pakistan china and other nations. He basicaly calling for the United States to start WWIII. That is the hot head you people want in office. And Russia will attack Poland and agree with them for doing so.

Posted by: Joe | August 22, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

Obama is a FRAUD – he will Never be elected. He is an Arrogant, Radical, Fraud – he is NOT qualified due to his Radical, Questionable background – he is NOT fit to lead our country.

Posted by: Abby | August 22, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Thank goodness courageous people are putting the truth about Obama out. And clearly Obama has LIED about the relationship with Ayers! He makes it out to be casual, but Obama launched his campaign at Ayers home….you call that casual, someone who justlives in his neighborhood? Ayers has been Obama’s benefactor for years! Another exercise in poor poor judgement from Precious Obama.
Americans will come to know the Wrights and Ayers of Obama’s ways.

Posted by: decentAmerican | August 22, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Joe, McCain also called for unseating Saddam from the inside. he also said “But No. 2, these organizations could not flourish effectively unless they had the help and assistance and safe harbor of these nations. And it isn’t just Afghanistan — we’re talking about Syria, Iraq, Iran, perhaps North Korea, Libya and others.”. If you are accusing McCain over such statements of being quick to war, the same must also be said of Obama who said he would strike Pakistan if they did not go after terrorists as well. In fact did not Obama also state “There can be no safehaven for terrorists who threaten the American people.” (in fact its on his webpage). Whats the difference between the statements outside of McCain being more specific?

Posted by: Zaggs | August 22, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

” Many younger voters do not remember the Keating Five Scandal – but John McCain was the greatest hypocrite amongst the lot. ”
____________
EGADS!!!!
How many times must you be told… and told again…. that McCain was cleared of any complicity or guilt in this event which occurred more than twenty years ago and which you bring up like an after-dinner burp every time you run out of something to beef about!
Give it up!

Posted by: EYES WIDE OPEN | August 22, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

Joe,
I’m not arguing in behalf of Bill Clinton;
I was merely trying to show that Ayers, who is more than just an “associate” of Obama’s, put people in danger and never showed one ounce of remorse for his actions…. even after the bombings of the twin towers.
(On the other hand, imperfect though he was/is, Bill Clinton will go down in history as one of our greatest presidents!)

Posted by: EYES WIDE OPEN | August 22, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Eyes wide open, it just goes to show that McCain didn’t show good judgement when he got involved with the Keating 5. Is there a time limit on bad judgement.

Posted by: d | August 22, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Obama and Ayers–two radicals trying to brainwash naive young people.
What a coincidence.

Posted by: riley | August 22, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Eyes wide open, it just goes to show that McCain didn’t show good judgement when he got involved with the Keating 5. Is there a time limit on bad judgement.
Posted by: d | Aug 22, 2008 3:59:53 PM
____________
How far back should we go to forgive barack for HIS blunders?
Let’s see…… about twenty or so years ago, he was still into drugs…..
hmmmmmmmmm

Posted by: EYES WIDE OPEN | August 22, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Eyes, A lot of people in power have done drugs in their youth, among other things. This includes some of our presidents. And where are these scandals. There aren’t any because nobody, except for the older generation, cares if they did drugs.

Posted by: d | August 22, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

@Zaggs:
I stand by what I wrote. McCain had no business circumventing the State Department. Period. If they were slow to respond it’s because Condi Rice is an incompetent boob, just like the rest of the revolving door Bush administration.
Georgia attacked a small enclave of pro-Russian Georgian citizens within their borders. But these people also had Russian passports. What’s the only way you can get a Russian passport? By being a Russian citizen. End of story.
What happened in Georgia was an act of aggression of Georgia on Georgians. Only the South Ossetian Georgians are in fact Russian of some stripe. The Russians were dying to humiliate Saakashvili and give the West something to think about over the now-ratified U.S. missile shield in Poland, so they seized this opportunity to make their point. South Ossetia, Georgia, and in fact the whole region was part of the former Soviet Union; the same Soviet Union that produced KGB-agent Vladimir Putin. Perhaps it’s not water under the bridge.
Even the U.N. security council can see this is gamesmanship between the U.S. and Russia and chose to stay the hell out of it. Don’t be so naive.

Posted by: crackerjack | August 22, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

The only thing I said was that many powerful people have done drugs in their youth including presidents. It’s wasn’t scandalous because no one really cares.

Posted by: d | August 22, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

What is truely ironic is that Republicans like to portray them as ‘Real Christians’, and that Christianity is about forgiveness and not being judgemental because God is the only one who has the right to judge.
Yet, when they are confronted with Ayers who has been a bad man but who has turned his life around and has become a truely valuable and distinguished member for his community and society through his work and his charity work, all they can muster is hate.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 22, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

When will you people wake up and admit that you picked the wrong man – a Chicago-style, Washington-style politician? You all picked lousy the last 8 years – don’t repeat the mistake again! BO is not fit to be pres!

Posted by: Beckie | August 22, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

Obama says Americans should know better but in all reality their are way too many ignorant Americans and their are some that just want to believe these lies as gospel.

Posted by: con me not | August 22, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

Finally, someone is getting on this Ayers story. Bloggers have known about this story for 1.5 years. And then mainstream media wonders why their profits are down. LOL

Posted by: Peach | August 22, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

Apparently Barry never learned that we are known by our associations. And his are doozies.
But we shouldn’t be surprised. He admits in one of his biographies (the first one, I think) that his favorite professors were Marxists. I can see he hasn’t changed or grown through the years either. Pity.

Posted by: Peach | August 22, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

William -
Ayers hasn’t turned his life around. He said in 2001 that he regretted not setting more bombs and doing more harm to government installations and civilians.

Posted by: Peach | August 22, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

Zaggs -
Good memory about Obama wanting to go after Pakistan. I’d forgotten that. He’s a little quick on the trigger with some things and then a little slow on the update with others — like the crisis in Georgia/Russia.

Posted by: Peach | August 22, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

EYES WIDE OPEN, McCain was dead center deep in the Keating 5 scandal, but a Republican congress gave him a mere slap on the hand. Obama’s crew has ALL the documents on Keating, and if blowhard McCain wants to be so incredibly stupid to throw the tired old Retzo crap out again, Obama’s camp is going to clean McCreep’s clock.

Posted by: GlovesAreOff | August 22, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

McCain got away with just a slap on the wrist in the Keating Five scandal was by

I’m sure you can guess it
….
Correct. Raising the POW card.
Take for instance his supporter Senator Bob Dole back then: “He has been held hostage before under very difficult circumstances. So let us not keep him hostage here in the Senate,”
Source: New York Times, October 23, 1990.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 22, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

Silly McCain has been signaling to Osama bin Laden where to hide: he likes to say that he would follow OBL to the ‘Gates of Hell’.
But not Pakistan.
OBL is in Pakistan

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 22, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

Let’s try it this way.
Peach: Ayers did not target civilians, he targeted objects. Do you believe that destroying (government) property is *always* bad? Even when you believe that you are doing it for a greater cause?
What’s your opinion on the Gaspée Affair and the Boston Tea ‘Party’?
To refresh your memory: in the first, insurgents destroyed a warship from their government; in the second terrorists destroyed property owned by a government-friendly company worth roughly $1,2 million (in 2008 dollars).

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 22, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

According to conservative commentator and former presidential candidate Pat Buchanan, Sen. John McCain’s chief foreign policy adviser Randy Scheunemann is a ‘dual loyalist,’ ‘neocon warmonger’ involved in activities that ‘none dare call treason.’
Scheunemann’s former employer, Orion Strategies, is a lobbying firm with strong ties to Mikheil Saakashvili’s administration in Georgia.
Since Georgia attempted to retake South Ossetia by force, triggering a sharp, violent rebuke by Russian forces, Sen. McCain has been by far the most strident advocate of US support for the former Soviet state. And his top adviser, says Buchanan, may well be the next Henry Kissinger or Zbigniew Brzezinski.
“He is a dual loyalist, a foreign agent whose assignment is to get America committed to spilling the blood of her sons for client regimes who have made this moral mercenary a rich man,” he wrote.
In his recent history, Scheunemann was a key member of the Project for a New American Century (PNAC), which lobbied President Clinton for war with Iraq for years before the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. He was also a signatory on a letter to President George W. Bush, just days after the terrorist attacks, demanding an invasion of Iraq and threatening political consequences if the president did not comply.
In addition, Scheunemann served as executive director of Ahmad Chalabi’s group, “The Committee for Liberation of Iraq,” a pro-war organization formed in 2002. Chalabi, once dubbed the “George Washington of Iraq,” has since been accused of providing false information to US authorities and is currently under investigation.
“Most important, Scheunemann’s former lobbying firm, Orion Strategies, received at lest $800,000 from the government of Georgia between 2004 and May 15, 2008, when Scheunemann finally severed his ties — officially, at least — to the firm,” notes The Nation. “Before that, between January 1, 2007, and May 15, 2008, Scheunemann was officially on the payroll as both Georgia’s lobbyist and McCain’s top adviser, during which time Georgia paid Orion and $290,000 and McCain paid him $70,000.”
While the Bush administration has conceded that the Russian response to Georgia’s aggression is not grounds for starting another war, Scheunemann and Orion Strategies have succeeded in making Georgian membership in NATO a popular position. Sens. McCain and Obama, along with the Bush administration, are all pushing to have the embattled nation inducted into the alliance, bringing a pact of war along with it should Russian forces again cross into the country.
“Others who were once uneasy about the influence of conservatives on Mr. McCain say that their worries have not been realized, even as Mr. McCain has taken conservative positions,” writes Elizabeth Bumiller in the New York Times.
“This is the situation in which the interventionists have placed our country: committed to go to war for countries and causes that do not justify war, against a Russia that is re-emerging as a great power only to find NATO squatting on her doorstep,” said Buchanan.
“[T]here doesn’t seem to be any momentum either for a direct legal challenge or a congressional investigation, which could subpoena the players and get sworn testimony,” reported Robert Dreyfuss for The Nation.
McCain staff have called the criticism of Scheunemann’s ties to Georgia “disgraceful,” and even alleged that Democrats are parroting claims injected into Western media by a Russian public relations firm.

Posted by: STILTON | August 24, 2008, 4:28 am 4:28 am

Willem van Oranje: Haven’t you been up todate with politics lately? Of course McCain can’t find Osama bin Laden in Pakastan because that country will not permit us to look for him there. Get a grip and read more. If he is in Pakastan they will not release him to us. Obama is not interested in Osama bin Laden and never will be. That was just one of his false statements made as usual. Bush didn’t even look for Bin Laden. Its too much trouble and a waste of time for us when the soldiers should be coming home instead. And we don’t want trouble with Pakastan we have enough being in Iraq.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | August 25, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Beckie: You are so right. Obama doesn’t have the intelligence, capabilities or experience to run this country. Biden will be running it from behind the scenes while Obama is president in name only. Obama has the worst background of any candidate that ran for president of this country. His association with several crooks alone especially Ayers. And he cannot say he wasn’t good friends with him, because Ayers was a racist, anti-american like Obama was in his younger years. Obama had a book published called The Audacity Of Hope but the words in that book were from pastor Wright because that’s what he was preaching that day. Obama took those words and had it published making over a million dollars when Wright should have been given half that money. Obama cannot form words for his speeches so he has to use the speeches of RFK, JFK and MLK. For a Harvard graduate he is really dumb. I would love to know what kind of grades he got. And does he have a legal birth certificate. Investigation on him reported he was born in Kenya because his mother was refused passage on a plane to Hawaii and had to leave later. When she came to Hawaii she registered him there. What he has in the US is a Registration of Birth only. What happened to his birth certificate. Is Kenya covering up those facts?

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | August 25, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Peter: Yes, you do have to make 5 million per year to be rich. How far do you think a million goes. There are houses and condo’s selling for a million or more. And for your information Biden was for the war like McCain and Obama said he was against it but he wasn’t in the senate when the vote was decided. He is wishy washy, a liar and fake. Get a grip. He doesn’t even have the intelligence to run this country that’s why he picked Biden. Obama if elected will be president in name only Biden will be running the country.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | August 25, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

Willem van Oranje: Let’s go on record to say true American’s stand for American and don’t set bombs off like Ayers did. Don’t defend Ayers actions. Obama knew Ayers well, received donations from him and had dinners with him. He has close ties to Ayers and everyone knows it. Why try to hide it. Obama spent his younger days with crooks and the public is well aware of it. I am hoping McCain beats him out. Its too bad Rice won’t accept being his running mate because McCain would win in a landslide.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | August 25, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

Fact check: Why wasn’t the original birth certificate shown on TV and I don’t mean the registration of birth. I mean the words birth certificate. Who is kidding who.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | August 25, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Peach: Whatever is in the dark about Obama will come to the light eventually. We all know his background but many people just don’t want to face it that’s why they will vote for him. In my time he wouldn’t even be a candidate running for the presidency. He is underhanded and crooked like the DNC especially Nancy Pelosi. I am hoping the republicans take back the house. She is a snake in the woods. Because of her Hillary didn’t get the nomination. She pressured the superdelegates that wanted to wait until the convention for their vote but she didn’t want that so Obama got the votes. I don’t believe he will win in the general election because no matter what the news media states most of Hillary’s voters will elect McCain. Then all we will need is a republican house speaker.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | August 25, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

con me not: I love those true comments. And you are absolutely right. Most of the American public believes whatever Obama says because they think he is going to change the world. The only change he knows is what is in his pocket. I know that Bill and Hillary Clinton know him like a book without the cover. The only reason Hillary is supporting him is because she will run for the senate again and the democrats would turn against her. Many democrats are turncoats. They are like a bunch of cry babies. Its either or with them. Kennedy, Kerry, Carter and three turncoats that turned their back on Hillary. I don’t like any of them. And to show how crooked the DNC is they now want to seat all the MI and FL delegates but when Hillary wanted that they wouldn’t do it for her. Hillary should never endorsed Obama or campaigned for him she just should have supported him. He is making a fool out of her and she don’t realize it but I hope Hillary’s voters are smart enough to all vote McCain and leave Obama in the dust.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | August 25, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

Ri;ey: All I can say is I love your statement. When are the American people going to wake up before its too late. Don’t they know that Obama will not be running the country Biden will behind the scenes if Obama is elected. Are we that stupid?

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | August 25, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.