By Jaketapper

Aug 17, 2008 1:46am

McCain at Saddleback: His Wise Men, and His Moral Failure

Three whose counsel Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., would seek: Gen. David Petraeus, “one of great military leaders in American history who took us from defeat to victory in Iraq”; civil rights hero Rep. John Lewis, D-Georgia, “who can teach us all a lot about the meanings of courage and commitment to causes greater than ourself”; and his economic adviser and eBay CEO Meg Whitman.

Asked his greatest moral failure, McCain said, with some emotion, “my greatest moral failing, and I have been a very imperfect person, is the failure of my first marriage.  It’s my greatest moral failure.”

America’s greatest failure, he said, is that “perhaps we have not devoted ourselves to causes greater than our self interest although we’ve been at the best at it of anybody in the world.”

- jpt

User Comments

Honest, motivated, maverick, hero, patriot.
McCain 08

Posted by: decentAmerican | August 17, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am

David Petraeus;logical first choice for a potential commander in chief, very good mccain. obama chose his grandma and michelle did someone say mccain was pandering to women? very funny.

Posted by: sonia trevino | August 17, 2008, 3:02 am 3:02 am

I’m shocked at the media reactions to McCain. All I hear is how clear and definitive he was and how well he did.
Evidently the bar was set REALLY low for him because all I heard was his stump speech and war, war and war.
We have very serious, very complicated problems facing this nation which deserve serious, thoughtful, intellectually curious leaders…not more kneejerk, simplistic, militaristic soundbite spouters.
Hopefully there are more thinking people in this nation that have learned from the last eight years than not. We won’t survive if we don’t.

Posted by: G Davis | August 17, 2008, 3:03 am 3:03 am

This is what I took away from McCain’s blustering performance tonight. More war, more tax breaks for the rich, with a little hope thrown in as a sop to the poor.

Posted by: Ted | August 17, 2008, 3:53 am 3:53 am

I loved McCain’s answers.
We now know the following:
1. He WILL if elected keep us in Iraq for at least five more years because he is concrete-headedly onvinced “winning” in Iraq (a term neither he nor the Bush administration can define) is the key to defeating al Qaida. The significant short and long term damage to our economy, which is essential to our national strength and security, is of no consequence to him.
McCain would no doubt try real hard to hunt evil down and rip its head off. But a shallow thinking admitted hothead as president is a scary prospect to all but the Chucklebuckles who are voting for him anyway.
2. He WILL if elected push for chump change tax cuts for the middle class and greatly expand the cuts for those “small business owners” making several hundred thousand a year, neglect investment in our infrastructure, and run up even bigger deficits than Bush to pay for these cuts as well as any new wars he decides to start.
McCain is lying about his claimed ability to pay for this nonsense through eliminating pork. Either that, or he’s incompetent because despite serving in the senate many years he has failed to produce a simple document itemizing the specific pork programs which he claims could be cut and save us the 100-200 billion a year we would need just to support his new tax cuts.
So, most lower and middle class voters now know if they didn’t already that McCain is conning them as to whom his programs would be designed to benefit.
3. McCain declared war on the Supreme Court tonight, apparently to make clear he will if elected find the most conservative justices he can to overturn Roe v. Wade.
Contrast that with Obama’s inserting into the DNC platform the goals of encouraging adoption and reducing unwanted pregnancies from occurring in the first place. One candidate is looking for common ground, the other offers four more years of bully boy smash mouth.

Posted by: Tom | August 17, 2008, 4:40 am 4:40 am

McCain showed his lack of depth and failure to grasp the complex issues facing his nation. He never once expanded on his views and continued to thump his war drum, his oil drum, and his empty headed belief that business should run the government. Of course those who lack the intellectual capabilities to probe any further than one liners and fail to understand the intricacies of a position will say he did well. Unfortunately, these are the majority in this country and will likely vote for him.
Obama refuses to be dumbed down because he refuses to believe that we are stupid enough to vote for more of the same failed policies and that we are capable of grasping the truth. In this regard I think he is being naive and should sloganeer, pander, lie and slime like McCain does. Too bad his morals get in the way.

Posted by: mummblemouth | August 17, 2008, 5:00 am 5:00 am

So, Ebay’s Meg Whitman is one of McCain’s top three heroes?
Does anyone here Ebay? (Yes, it’s now a verb).
Sellers can no longer leave negative feedbacks. Only buyers can. This leaves sellers with no public recourse or protection against buyers who abscond with the goods, or who purchase and don’t pay, then unfairly malign the seller with impunity.
They can get something for nothing, and aren’t held accountable (sound familiar?) This is squeezing out the small, honest seller and fostering an environment where “power sellers” — who could care less about negative feedbacks, as long as they’re pushing their junk in mass quantities — are fast becoming Ebay’s preferred clients (sound even more familiar?).
Ebay’s the new Halliburton, and Meg Whitman is McCain’s Cheney.
I’d look for David Petraeus as Ebay’s next CEO.

Posted by: It Ain't Mebay | August 17, 2008, 5:59 am 5:59 am

Gen. David Petraeus, “one of great military leaders in American history who took us from defeat to victory in Iraq”
————————
McCain is still in self denial. We have achieved nothing like victory in Iraq and there is no way to do so. While we cannot be defeated, we also cannot be victorious. Why? Because we invaded a Muslim country for no good reason. Plus, the American people do not support the war. The reasons are many. This is the major flaw in McCain’s character. He does not know what victory is.

Posted by: Beto | August 17, 2008, 6:15 am 6:15 am

What a scary old man.
If you think the USA is becoming a police state for the world now, just wait til McCain cranks up his “causes greater than self interest”.
Remember that line in Apocalypse Now “I love the smell of napalm in the morning. It smells like victory” And the look in Robert Duvall’s eyes ..McCain looked like that tonight.

Posted by: doug | August 17, 2008, 6:23 am 6:23 am

Oh I am so glad there are people out there that see McCain for what he is. I was afraid that I was the only one out here that wants a thinker for a Pres., not some knee jerk one liner who thinks the American public expects instant gratification for the worlds problems. We now have a President who believes he is the American crusader for Christianity, and McCain is right along side of him hold the gun! God forgive us if McCain is elected. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice shame on ME!

Posted by: commonsensewins | August 17, 2008, 7:25 am 7:25 am

Well, as usual the media will say how thoughtful Obama was, how he ‘THINKS’ about his answers and tries to give us the truth. . . NOT A SOUNDBITE for a bumper sticker !!! McCain is OLD SCHOOL, caught up in the same politics of the past. . .speak in one-liners, and nobody will notice. The country is in Crisis, and he thinks we need more of the same. . . NO WE DON’T !!!! The GOP has lost this battle. . .and true conservatives should be ashamed of what this administration has done to this country !!!!!! NO MORE. STOP THE MADNESS.

Posted by: BJ | August 17, 2008, 7:46 am 7:46 am

Obama dodges an abortion question saying it’s above his “pay grade”.
Wow, Obama afriad to answer a question and views everything through how much money someone makes.

Posted by: geevill | August 17, 2008, 7:48 am 7:48 am

Obama’s three most wise men—-his wife, his grandmother in Hawaii and then he covered his bases by no names “several Democratic and Republican lawmakers”. He couldn’t even think on ONE NAME of someone that he would like to gain counsel from? Give him back his teleprompter and written speeches.

Posted by: Mike | August 17, 2008, 8:13 am 8:13 am

I thought this was one of McCAin’s weakest points. I thought Obama was good on this question, first of all looking for personal support from his family, then saying politically, he wanted to hear from as many people as possible, with different points of view. McCain throw out the nakes of people who fall into his political arguments and entourage.
[I think at some point Democrats are going to need to take McCain on on the surge. The surge was sold to Americans as the way to get American soldiers out of Iraq more quickly. McCain seems to be using it as an argument to keep American soldiers in Iraq.]
And on the American’s greatest moral failing question, I thought Obama gave the best answer of the evening, and McCain equivocated. ‘America’s worst failing is something we do better than every other country’ is a chest beating flag waving answer, not a moment of personal thought and introspection.

Posted by: markymark | August 17, 2008, 8:16 am 8:16 am

The most interesting comments are sometimes those not touched by the Media? On the topic of the millions of orphans in the world what might Obama do to solve the problem. Obama clearly stated that you need to collaborate and draw conclusions at what produces orphans and then work at the roots of the problems. Let’s see Mother Nature as in Volcanoes, Hurricanes, Tsunamis, Earthquakes, heat waves etc., are one huge cause of orphans in the world—Obama really plans to make BIG changes! On the other hand, John McCain spoke of their adopted daughter with pride on his face. In other words people have to step in and help out.

Posted by: Ann | August 17, 2008, 8:24 am 8:24 am

OBama without his teleprompter just fumbled and the paid liberal bloggers excuse it as “being thoughtful.”
Obama thinks Michelle is the wisest person from whom he will seek Presidential leadership adavice?
Where have we heard “two for One” before?
Obama shoould agree to non-moderated Town Hall debates with McCain so we can get a better understanding of how both men compare without distortion and bias of the highly edited pinko media.
McCain won hands down.

Posted by: Frank Lynch | August 17, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am

Obama has asked the public to vote for him because of his “judgment” and forget his experience. Last night on the forum regarding the 1996 Welfare Reform Bill which he strongly opposed believing it would have “disastrous results”—-well he now believes the law has been largely successful. Another example of his really outstanding judgment — nothing is a better teacher than experience and time!

Posted by: Anne | August 17, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am

Anyone with half a brain knows that McCain won tonight; so much so that the panels on CNN and MSNBC and even David Gergen were forced to admit it was McCain’s night.
Unfortunately, the Obama-crazed fringe who post here are so surly they can’t admit the truth, namely, that their candidate is sorely lacking. Obama is lacking the credentials, experience, and knowledge necessary for POTUS.
Obama is not ready nor is he worthy; his hubris has overpowered his judgement. He should have waited. He
is out of his league and should have worked in the Senate and garnered the necessary experience and knowledge before running.
I blame Brazile, Kennedy, Kerry, Dean, and Pelosi for this debacle. This was to be the Dems year and our chance for universal health-care, but they threw caution to the winds and crowned an unvetted, inexperienced candidate with questionable associates. I also blame the MSM and its corporate elite that have marketed Obama 24/7 in much the same way they did Bush.
The American people will speak loudly this election. McCain will win big against Obama, and he will be our next president. Country over party; character
over fluff.
God bless America, and save us from the political-hacks and “citizens of the world” that want to enslave our freedom-loving people!

Posted by: BRinChicago | August 17, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am

Obama is not good at thinking live on his feet. He doesn’t look that sharp without the teleprompter. His thinking process is extremely slow and unintelligent.
McCain, despite his age, shows unexpected candor, quickness, and an intellect that most people half his age would wish for.

Posted by: young_voter | August 17, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am

The greatest failing of either man will be to believe he has the best answer. He will fall short. To be sure that the right action is taken you must be prepared to look the the US Constitution, The Federalist Papers, and understand the core of your Parties values and policies found in their respective platforms. Then ask GOD, but once you have this in your hand and heart … you must act. This will not come from a teleprompter, if it does, you will have lost.
Michelle was caught up in the emotions of politics when she made her statement about how proud she was of this Country finally after all these years. Cindy was caught up in the emotion of her heart when she brought home a child as her own without considering how John would react. But this Nation should be proud to know how John responded when he was told! I am sadden when I think how Barack responded to the questions asked of Michelle and her thinking. He wanted her off-limits … as a christian and married we can never separate the one from the other. It is a reality of the two becoming one flesh, let no man put asunder that which GOD has put together. Sorry Barack … Michelle has to account for, of what and why she is!
Experience is not an immediate accomplishment. It is honed and earned each day and then brought into play. We see this everyday. You can not buy wise; you do need to know this first and foremost. There are many questions and just as many ways to answer it. This is why a wiseman has many advisers and expect none to need to answer for his decisions. Before GOD, family, and country; a leader must expect to be held accountable. Barack is not there and John McCain has many years into this point of light. John has paid a price in getting there. Barack will do well to learn from his role model, John F. Kennedy, and let time age his prospective for what it takes to lead this Nation in a time that is so … prophetic, revealing, destructive,… so human!

Posted by: washbasin | August 17, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

If you’re stupid enough to believe that John McCain considers John Lewis to be a “wise man” and plans to listen to him during his (not) administration, then you’re probably stupid enough to vote for McCain. It’s not that hard to see the his obvious pandering.

Posted by: pedestrian | August 17, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am

McCain is a demagogue. He keeps repeating phrases that he believes resonate with his audience, often without actually answering the question that was put to him. It makes little difference whether any of the facts back his statements. His responses included lengthy references to his “heroic” incarceration during the Vietnam war. We need a president who exhibits judgement, not one who caters to the lowest aspirations of false patriotism. I found his responses to questions characteristically mediocre and nonsensical.

Posted by: S. Lukacs | August 17, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am

“Who are three wisest people you know in your life and who are you going to rely on heavily in your administration?”
Obama says his wife, Michelle because she is “somebody who can get up in your face and say you really screwed that one up.”
But HOW CAN THIS MAN WHO CLAIMS superior judgment have his wife tell him that he has “screwed up” be his number one answer?! Huh? Has Michelle been vetted as it appears she will be in charge…his number one answer!

Posted by: Mike | August 17, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

BRinChicago,
“Anyone with half a brain knows that McCain won tonight; so much so that the panels on CNN and MSNBC and even David Gergen were forced to admit it was McCain’s night.”
You’re kidding, right? Hillary Clinton won all the debates, too. Your point? The media has already shown us they collectively have poor judgement and that they are out of touch with the American public.
Obama 08!

Posted by: Common Sense | August 17, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am

Obama again threrw his spiritual leader of 20 years under the bus. No admiration to God Dm America Wright from his adopted son?
If Obama’s main advisors are his bitter wife and his white grandmother that suffers from dementia, America we are in trouble.
Honorable John Lewis, like McCain, has his scars as prove of his convictions and honor to his black people and country.
Obama has no experience, no knowledge, no sacrifice, no scars. NO Obama.

Posted by: Mrs.Phoenix | August 17, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

Obama said that he took drugs and drank because he was more interested in himself at the conference— but are we seeing more of this self-importance.
The Obama campaign is soliciting “soft money” from labor unions for contributions up to $1 million and he will give them stadium skyboxes to watch his acceptance speech and other perks. Obama needs big bucks now so he can perform a “show” at the convention using the teleprompters.

Posted by: Mike | August 17, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

McCain looked way too wired at the Saddleback forum. This is what worries most about him; he has a history of explosive tirades. That sort of temperament is not needed in todays political environment.

Posted by: Richard | August 17, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Frank Lynch:
Thats plum amazing analysis, however Obama got a point jump ahead of McCain in the Gallop poll after the show FYI, nice try no cigar.

Posted by: Retiree | August 17, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

Obama stutted and paused the entire time. The man is not a quick thinker like we need in Washington. He danced around most subjects, never really giving a concise answer other than the couple religious answers he had prepared due to presuming those would be questions.
I’ve never been more impressed with Senator McCain, who spoke with confidence, intelligence, without hesitation, friendliness, and an unwaivering position of protecting and loving our country.
McCain is a good, good man.
I hope everyone is intelligent enough to see that.
His answer to “what is rich” is spot on. How dare Obama determine what is enough money for someone? How dare he, over and over, say, “the rich people don’t need their money anyway?”
How dare he.
Those who earn it have the right to keep it, spend it, donate it WHERE they want and not where Obama deems necessary.
Think about it — even if everyone paid the same PERCENTAGE (which we don’t), the rich people pay far more than anyone else … dollar amount. Someone making $250k is likely paying at least $75k to $90k in taxes.
On top of that, they likely buy a more expensive car. Tag the sales tax on a $100k car, and there’s another $8k in taxes.
License tags on the expensive car? Likely another $2500 to $3500 a year in plates, yet another form of tax.
Likely their house is more expensive, so they’re probably paying $15k to $50k in property taxes, so all the “poor” people can drive around on well maintained streets.
There is absolutely NO need to burden the successful people in this country anymore.
As John McCain brilliantly said, I don’t see any reason to redistribute the wealth. I want EVERYONE to get rich.
EVERYONE has that opportunity because this is America. Obama had that opportunity, but this isn’t good enough?
Go John Go….. I look forward to meeting you as President John McCain.
AMEN.

Posted by: associate | August 17, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

Sen. Obama was VERY thoughtful in his answers. That’s because his answers came from his head–thinking about what was the most politically advantageous answers to give. Sen. McCain, on the other hand, answered from his heart and didn’t have to orate while coming up with answers.

Posted by: James Danley | August 17, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

associate: Those who mistake stuttering for either not being able to “think on your feet” or for hedging are doing just that – making a mistake. Very often stuttering occurs when one’s brain is working faster than one’s mouth. It’s a really ignorant(and cruel) person who uses stuttering as a reason to put down or to justify one’s dislike/distrust of another human being. If you don’t like Obama because of his policies or where he wants to take the country as president, that’s one thing. To criticize him for stuttering is just plain idiotic.

Posted by: counting crows | August 17, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

After now watching reruns of both candidates answers I am really leaning toward McCain.
Obama ‘sanswers to the questions posed were thoughtful and at times almost too religious for me. Saying I know god died for my sins…just made me grimace.
Not mentioning one nod to Osama bin Laden bothered me, and Mc Cain whether this was pandering seemed to be in sync with most americans/new yorkers on his capture and on the spiel GWB gave after 9/11.
Obama using above my payscale in his answer on when life begins was a little flip of an answer to a question which many wanted a direct answer .
I think the way the Obama campaign is being handled has a “star” quality that is contrary to what most americans equate with the highest office in the land.
When one gets emails from his campaign saying they have a chance to a back stage pass, when we see a “so called” presidential seal being flaunted, when we read how his campaign is wooing American designers to create “fab tees” for Obama 08, to me it has become too extreme.
And it does reek of self centeredness, he has to approve what his camp is doing.
I just don’t know about him but the more I read and watch, it is not making me feel very comfortable.
When you couple the above with his naming Michele and his GM as the wisest and Michele as who he would turn to for an honest answer that does not resonate to most Americans, If Hillary Clinton was asked the same question and gave Bill as the answer we would at least know he was wise, Michele has yet to be proven although she is smart not sure sure is wise, let alone the wisest.
His links to his trusted spiritual advisor and the other figures in his past, makes one uneasy.
If anymore controversy hits(if our MSM will report it instead of holding back on doing theri jobs, like the Edwards scenario) then I sadly think we will see Mc Cain win, and that may not be such a bad thing.
No matter life goes on and we can only hope for the best.
I read a very funny piece on the ads that thomas Jefferson had when he was running for the POTUS and it appears not much has changed over the years. He had someone not affiliated with his camp write horrific things about the sitting Pres. J Q Adams and this fellow was even put in prison for doing this. When Jeff won he released him.

Posted by: i am so I can!!!! | August 17, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Why is that the press go after Edwards for cheating on his wife, but nothing is ever said about McCain. Edwards isnt a Presidential nominee McCain is, but nothing is ever pointed to the fact that McCain cheated then left his first wife purely because she didnt come up to his standards any longer as the poster girl image he once had of her. Then he pubicly calls his second wife the most disgusting name any person could ever use.
What woman in her right mind would ever vote for such a pathetic nasty man that has absolutely no respest for any woman let alone his 2 wives.

Posted by: Mary | August 17, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

“Why is that the press go after Edwards for cheating on his wife, but nothing is ever said about McCain”
duh, maybe because Edward based his campaign on moral superiority, his wife has cancer, the truth only came out a week ago, McCain’s incident happened 25 years ago, and spending years being tortured in a prison camp might have an influence one’s actions post-release?
Just some thoughts.

Posted by: notafool | August 17, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

“Obama ‘sanswers to the questions posed were thoughtful and at times almost too religious for me.”
Who really believes Obama is religious? Like everything else, it’s a front.
If he was religious, it would bring the number of religious Harvard law graduates who are Saul Alinsky disciples up to 1. Maybe it is the compelling moral framework he received in Rev Wright’s congregation that saved him. Yeh, that’s the ticket.

Posted by: notafool | August 17, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

You can tell by watching the debate that McCain is clearly a more powerful communicator than the stammering Obama with his Ugh. Obama may have done some damage to some of his brain during his teen years, as he told us, for selfish reasons. It’s also clear that he’s still a very selfish person today.

Posted by: country voter | August 17, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Obama gave thoughtful answers that fully and completely answered the question asked. McCain gave what amounted to pandering stump speeches. McCain’s brusque angry tone proves he isn’t calm enough to manage a McDonald’s let alone the country. He is so focussed on vengeance and not-so-pent-up aggression we’re pretty much guaranteed to be at war in more than just Iraq and Afghanistan if he gets elected.

Posted by: KW | August 17, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

“we’re pretty much guaranteed to be at war in more than just Iraq and Afghanistan if he gets elected”
thank goodness liberals don’t try to scare us.

Posted by: notafool | August 17, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

The only thing I heard from McCain last night was 1 long 60 minute sound bite; nothing of substance except his negativity and confrontational attitude.

Posted by: pennycyn | August 17, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

war
what is it good for
absolutely noting
say it again
- Edwin Starr

Posted by: alison | August 17, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

It was clearly obvious that McCain hasn’t gone to a church for worship in a long time. He’s an adulterer, cheater, liar, and bigot.

Posted by: d. jones | August 17, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

The best that Obamanation can do is call McCain a liar? Please. Obama opens his mouth and he “nuances” and “parses” so that no matter what he says no one can pin anything on him. It is called “lawyer-speak.” That is why Obama underperformed last night. How about if Obama takes one position, states it clearly and succinctly, and sticks to it?
McCain came out the winner. McCain was energized, positive, and spoke with conviction. Whether you agree with McCain or not, at least you know where he stands. And that is why McCain is preferred over Obama by huge margins in the category of experience and values, whereas Obama skyrockets in the “risky choice” category. One just does not know who this character really is once one looks and listens past his “inspiring” rhetoric.

Posted by: Nickyle | August 17, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

I’m surprised McCain didn’t appoint Joel Olsteen as one of his wise men. McCain stated within the last several weeks that he admired him as an evangelist. At this juncture in time, he’s best known as Mr. Victoria Olsteen, due to his wife’s recent contentious interaction with a stewardess. Anyway, Olsteen, like Rick Warren, has his own church and books reeking in the millions. Olsteen really plays up the prosperity gospel, as if God is Santa Claus dispensing with cash if you’re good enough and aligned with His will. It’s a good justification for McCain marrying into money, I guess. It’s going on 2 and a half months since Obama became the presumptive nominee and no serious debate has emerged. Why can’t the two have a traditional sort of debate with a sterling journalist like Lehrer or Leslie Stahl moderating? Oh, to dream the impossible dream . . . Anyway, this has been too long of an election year. Goodnight and wake me up when it’s over.

Posted by: kat | August 18, 2008, 2:49 am 2:49 am

All of these Pro Mac comments re: his “stellar” Saddleback performance are truly overrated and most importantly inaccurate after Rick Sanchez’s interview with Warren on CNN on Sun., 8/18. Mac was “on” because he listened to 30 minutes of the questions Rick Warren posed to Obama. Cone of silence– there wasn’t ANY
Speaking of religious values, let’s start with honesty. “I was trying to listen through the wall”– what bunch of crap!

Posted by: clarity | August 18, 2008, 3:50 am 3:50 am

I have read Obamas Book..The Audacity of Hope and found it to be full of history, charity and contemplation of the past and present problems facing the world. Obama is obviously then a very well educated, intelligent and thoughtful person who could bring America back to the fold. McCain in start contrast is basically a hand thumping simplistic jingoistic richkid, pandering to a poorly educated, bigoted and hateful brainwashed mass of mid-American humanity that finds itself without a job and without an idea about how and what to do about an America that is increasingly marginalised and unable to call the shots on the world stage, unless its to ‘shoot it in the head’.
Americans who vote for McCain are assured in the knowledge that the worlds citizens will continue to find American attitudes to its own people and people of the world abhorrent… That the ‘stay until we win argument’ (win what?)a foothold in the middle east so you can plunder the last of the worlds oil reserves so you can continue ‘running the show’ does not cut it anymore. The GOP is broken. American hegemony based on moral superiority is over. Get used to it. Retrain…educate yourself…develop new technology for good not evil. Find a way forward that doesn’t require theft of another countries resources or the sale of weapons systems.
America should Get a Life.

Posted by: Michael Flynn | August 18, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

I as a Navyman DID vote for Obama but now question some of his actions, however, I find this anti-Obama attitude a bit reprehensible. President Bush II initiated the 2nd Iraqi War then later admitted that his actions were based on false intelligence. If our present leader had done such a thing, he would be forced out of the Whitehouse. The level of animosity directed at Obama is scary. I have never seen this level of bitterness directed at any president regardless of thier level of competence or……incompetence..but then they were all white……Our Republican leaders have stumped most of President Obama’s attempts to govern and then blamed him for much of the countrys problems. Yes I am saying it…..this countrys level of tolerance for people of color is still very limited. As in all other areas of American society, non-whites, especially blacks, must perform twice as good as their white counterparts to begin to be accepted. President Bush had EIGHT years to “get it right” yet left America in one hell of a mess…yet we expected President Obama to “fix it” in under two years…..its idiotic to expect so much from anyone in so short a period of time. The rest of the world is watching and laughing at a country that CLAIMS to have tolerance and justice for all but instead holds two different standards for performance in society based on race.

Posted by: jasper mcmillan | October 23, 2010, 10:29 am 10:29 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.