McCain Camp Embraces Biden’s Experience
The campaign of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. — instead of going after Sen. Barack Obama’s running mate Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., as a gaffe-prone also-ran — has chosen to embrace Biden as an experienced statesman better suited to be president the man at the top of the ticket.
"Just hours ago Senator Barack Obama announced he has chosen Senator Joe Biden as his running-mate, adding his own harshest critic to the Democratic ticket," McCain campaign manager Rick Davis wrote in a fundraising solicitation today.
"Senator Biden doesn’t believe that Senator Obama is ready to serve as president," Davis continued. "When asked about Senator Obama’s lack of experience he said, ‘The presidency is not something that lends itself to on-the-job training.’ The fact is, there has been no harsher critic of Senator Obama’s lack of readiness to serve than his new running-mate, Senator Joe Biden."
That’s not really true. Both McCain and Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., have been harsher critics. But Biden when he was running for president was indeed a critic
But Biden is also playing a similar role — as the McCain friend and colleague who disparages him, saying today, "These times require more than a good soldier. They require a wise leader."
"I’ll say straight up to you: John McCain — and the press knows this — is genuinely a friend of mine," Biden said. "I’ve known John for 35 years. He served our country with extraordinary courage and I know he wants to do right by America. But the harsh truth is, ladies and gentlemen, you can’t change America when you boast — and these are John’s words — ‘the most important issues of our day, I’ve been totally in agreement and support of President Bush.’"
It’s an interesting dynamic.
- jpt
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
Wait till McCain choses Romney as his running mate. The ads will be endless. McCain calling Romney a liberal. Romney calling McCain a liberal. Romney criticizing McCain on economics and having no vision for America. Oh man.I will sit back and laugh.
Posted by: Vanessa | August 23, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
hmmm…. Sounds like Biden changed his mind.
Posted by: Thinking | August 23, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
McSame has to understand that Biden is not McSame, but a honorable man who has carried Amercia’s interest in his mind and his heart for more than 3 decades. This is no time to divide and rule. McSames has another kind of experience (corruption with K5) and McSame is out of touch. He does not know how many houses he has from East Coast to West Coast.
Posted by: BKMC | August 23, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
I’m not sure McCain can pick Romney anymore. They are both too rich with multiple houses (if they can count them all). They are clueless on economics for middle class folks. Biden is catholic, Romney Mormon. Biden does flip flop and Romney and McCain do daily. Biden knows more about foreign affairs than Romney and McCain do combined. Things seem to be slipping away from the old guy now.
Posted by: CMSgt Gary Preston | August 23, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
I will sit back and laugh as well when McCain runs ads in Biden’s own voice saying that BO is inexperienced, praising McCain – the list goes on! That is what I like about Biden – he says what he thinks! BO’s pick only enforces that America needs an experienced Washington Politician.
Yes, Mc Can!
Posted by: Beckie | August 23, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
Politics is a blood sport. Biden checked out Obama’s chops with some one line zingers. Obama took the high road then and now reaps the reward by having his harshest critic get on board and join the ticket. Perhaps in time John McCain can come around to admitting he too admires Senator Obama’s judgement and apparant wisdom beyond his years.
Posted by: mims nj | August 23, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
I am nearing retirement age and I graduated from high school the same year Biden entered the Senate. Change we can believe in.
Posted by: cardinal | August 23, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
“Not the same old Wadhington politics”. Give me a break!
Posted by: cardinal | August 23, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
Obama the candidate of CHANGE chooses a Nixon Washington establishment candidate. Biden has been in Washington longer than McCain. And Obama wants us to belive Washington didn’t change Biden, Biden brought change to Washington. Wow that’s a Gem.
Posted by: Anon 1 | August 23, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
Biden rides the train to work everyday.
McCain skips work and takes a 9 limo motorcade to Starbucks for an espresso.
That about sums it up.
Posted by: Mike | August 23, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
Do you remember Wilbur Mills? Biden does.
Posted by: cardinal | August 23, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
As much as I believe Obama is an excellent candidate and also like Joe Biden, it is even more critical for this country that they be elected to draw the line between the politics of Bush/Rove that McCain 2000 detested and that McCain 2008 has adopted. They know their criticism of Obama isn’t valid and isn’t true, but doesn’t stop them. There are clear policy differences that should be the topic and we need to get back to them. The ministers are a wash, Rezko/Keating are a wash, Ayers is a swiftboat and for every other thing that can be raised about Obama the right wing nut jobs were even worse about McCain in 2000. Now for anybody on the right who is willing to talk issues and policy, stick to the economy, jobs, tax policy, Iraq/Afganistan and lets raise the level of discourse, because if the right continues to lead we won’t have a country and we won’t have any rights. Before you pounce, it’s the same if the left leads. It’s time for those of us who do love this country and stand for the freedom and rights upon which it was built to step forward. The best candidate this year is Obama, and if he doesn’t do a good job, hopefully in 4 years the Republicans will have recovered and can stand for something, other than name calling, again. The path is clear and it is non partisan and for this country. It is okay to be against the Iraq war and against abortion. It is okay to want a strong military and also a strong environmental policy.
Posted by: John | August 23, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
Biden just makes Obama look as grossly under-qualified as he really is.
Democrat for McCain
Posted by: Wake | August 23, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
John McCain could learn something from Joe Biden….. You’re never too old to come to your senses …..or are you ?
Posted by: Ron | August 23, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
This sucks, I was hoping for an Obama/Rezko ticket.
I love corruption, well I guess Obama is corrupt enough for he and Biden.
Posted by: Jason | August 23, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
Obama is damned if he does, damned if he doesn’t. If he were to pick someone like Kaine everyone would complain that he doesn’t have any experience. The main issues in this country are the war and the economy. So he choose someone with foreign policy experience. I think it was a great choice. I don’t know anyone better than Biden with foreign policy experience.
Posted by: erin | August 23, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
I’m just floored that anyone can still trust Obama after he has changed almost every position that he supposedly stood for during the primaries.
What happened to Obama accusing every other politician of being a part of the “same old politics”? Biden is exactly the kind of person that Obama has scared Americans into thinking was wrong for the country.
I will never vote for Obama the Arrogant! Dem 4 McCain!
Posted by: Albert | August 23, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
Clever strategy by the McCain camp. Although I’m not sure that embracing one’s “harshest critic” is a bad thing. It could also be interpreted as a sign of great leadership. Time will tell.
Posted by: El_Pajaro | August 23, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Erin,
You are right—Obama is damned if he does, damned if he doesn’t. He shouldn’t have tried to become president just because he is a celebrity with groupies. Why would someone so grossly under-qualified run for president. Obama is disgustingly arrogant and many Democrats can’t stand the site of him. He should have earned the job first.
Posted by: John25 | August 23, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
John I know millions may agree with you. But then again there are millions that don’t. And how exactly do you earn being pres since there is no job description. And I don’t think anyone is experienced enough. I think for the most part they all learn on the job.
Posted by: erin | August 23, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
MOst liberal Senator 2007
Obama #1
Biden #3
D’oh!
Posted by: geevill | August 23, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
People vote for the top of the ticket.
Hillary supporter for John McCain… millions of us not changing our minds, even with Sen. Biden.
Posted by: Debra | August 23, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
“Ladies and gentlemen, your kitchen table is like mine. You sit there at night before you put the kids — after you put the kids to bed and you talk, you talk about what you need. You talk about how much you are worried about being able to pay the bills. Well, ladies and gentlemen, that’s not a worry John McCain has to worry about. It’s a pretty hard experience. He’ll have to figure out which of the seven kitchen tables to sit at” Biden
Brilliant.
Posted by: Vanessa | August 23, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
McCain considers his qualifications as being: he was skilled enough to get shot down in Vietnam, and was a P.O.W.
Don’t forget that he was a heavy drinker, and poor at academics. If you subtract the fact that he didn’t dodge military service, and you have another George W. Bush.
Posted by: Unfit | August 23, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
Hopefully at this juncture in the history of American politics, we can all vow to distance ourselves from the ignornant confines of the “flipflop” or at least define it to remove its cliche status.
We all change our minds. If there is new information that we receive and after careful deliberation we find our belief on an issue has changed, we should feel comfortable stating our new belief publically.
Our social conciousness has to evolve in order to bring about a better day. I want my leader to return to the drawing board as many times as he needs to get it right for our sakes. Life is a works in progress.
Posted by: clarity | August 23, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
Watching Obama’s speech today is funny. I think Obama still think an attack on him is an attack on America. He describes Biden’s stuttering as young man, saying “BBBBBBBBBiden”. We don’t have a problem with Obama stuttering. We have a problem with a stutterer who is an extreme hypocrite and a serial liar. Obama doesn’t get it.
Posted by: young_voter | August 23, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
If Romney is McGoo’s running mate I wonder how many kitchen tables that would be.
Posted by: oo | August 23, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
So glad there are so many sound bites from Biden and Hillary stating Obama is not ready to be President…..nothing like the truth from his own party.
How are all the kiddies going to like him throwing his CHANGE mantra under the bus with granny, Wright, Pfleger, Trinity and anything he has to to get elected. Wright said it best…he will say what he has to as a Politican.
CAN’T SOLVE HIS EXPERIENCE PROBLEM WITH SOMEONE ELSES EXPERIENCE! Never Obummer!
Posted by: Debra | August 23, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
Personally I think this is a disastrous choice for several reasons – it erases Obama’s claim to “new politics” as Biden is as partisan as they come, is fully entrenched in politics for decades, SUPPORTED the war and the surge, and, generally, is a gaffe machine.
The strategy is clear though: Obama’s going to continue his politics of schizophrenia. He’ll say, I have Joe Biden to help bolster my foreign policy. But when people point out negative things of Biden, he’ll say – it’s good to have people you don’t agree wtih around, and keep in mind I’m the Presidential candidate not Biden.
Truly a poor choice.
Posted by: JA | August 23, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
WOW, if mccain pick romney Biden is going to destroy him in the VP debate. romney will have that deer-in-the-headlights look that dan quayle had against Benson. Obama/Biden 2008!!!
Posted by: pt | August 23, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
When Biden goes up against the Mittster in the VP debate, it’s going be painful to watch.
Posted by: Patrick | August 23, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
It all comes down to whether or not you think we should continue the bush policies. If you think the war should continue indefinitely, while we spend $10,000,000,000 a month, and you think that bush has done well with the economy then mc-more-war is your man. If you think that it’s time we start to get out of iraq and do some positive things for the average American instead of just the top 1% then vote for Obama/Biden.
Posted by: pt | August 23, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
pt….newsflash….Condi was in Iraq last week and there are already plans to start bringing home troops next June and most out by 2011. Voters don’t care about the war as much as you do, in the polls it was 7th down, in line of importance.
Posted by: Debra | August 23, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
McCain will also be unable to throw the socalled ‘plagiarizing’ bit at Biden.
McCain lifted portions of his speech on Georgia from ….
Wikipedia
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 23, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
No matter what you think or say about McCain…Obama is worse. He never served his country and in his first term as senator he funneled money directly to his wife’s employer where she got a nice fat raise. Change!!??
Sounds like business as usual in D.C.
Obama is a loser and Biden won’t change that!
Posted by: Ed | August 23, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
>>>Vanessa | Aug 23, 2008 8:58:47 PM<<<
Jealous, Vanessa?
I'LL bet McCain would have given up his five years of living in the Hanoi Hilton for six or seven less houses.
And he could have….. but he was a hero… not a zero!
And he could have had an admiralship but he gave that up to serve his country
in the senate.
So give it up!
You're incapable of changing your mind about B O…
Just don't blame Hillary when he tanks!
Posted by: QUESTIONER.. | August 23, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
Debra,
Amazing isn’t it. Obama said that we need to talk to them, bush balked but then took his advice. Obama said we should have a “time-line”, then the bushies said we have a “time-horizon”. Amazing when you have a real leader giving advice to the “Worst-Pres. & WORST VP” ever. 01-20-09 “The END of an ERROR”
Posted by: pt | August 23, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
Do you really want a President who looks like he plays shuffleboard at the neigborhood senior citizen center?
Posted by: jim | August 23, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
Things are not as bad as some people would like to make them out to be. If they were then we would be asking for real change in Washington. (Not Obama’s B.S. either) Instead, we bicker over nonsense. When you have to watch your children go hungry (like my granmother did during the great depression), then you will have something to “whine” about!Until then, be more thankful and shut your cry baby mouths!
Posted by: Ed | August 23, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
I can’t believe all these hateful attacks on Biden. Have you no shame? This man has lost his wife and infant daughter in a car accident in 1972! His two young sons, Beau and Hunter, were seriously injured in the accident!
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 23, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
Every senator has a story about mc-more-war’s temper tantrums. Here are a few quotes from his own party:
Former New Hampshire Republican Senator Robert Smith publicly voiced his concerns, once saying McCain’s temper ‘ … would place this country at risk in international affairs, and the world perhaps in danger’.
That sentiment was echoed by Mississippi Republican Senator Thad Cochran, who told a Boston newspaper: ‘The thought of his being president sends a cold chill down my spine. He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and he worries me.’
mc-more-war needs to retire with his millionaire wife, the one he cheated with while married to his first wife after she was in a car wreck. What a JERK.
Posted by: pt | August 23, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
McCain’s coup de grace: Condi Rice VP choice.
Time for happy hour.
Posted by: hype bites supreme | August 23, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
OBAMA’S EXPERIENCE PROBLEM CAN’T BE FIXED WITH SOMEONE ELSES EXPERIENCE…..
No one votes for VP….only Prez candidates matter, after last weeks forum, McCain tied with Bozo in the polls.
Posted by: Debra | August 23, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
Just because mc-more-war was a pow does not mean he should be president. The guy used to have a spine but now is nothing but a flip-flopper and a panderer. He’s also OLD. The real straight-talker, John Murtha said that the Presidency is no place for an OLD man. There’s a reason they make pilots retire at age 60. mc-more-war needs to retire with his millionaire wife in one of their 8 houses. Obama/Biden 2008!!!
Posted by: pt | August 23, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
Condi Rice is tied at the hip with Bush, lied about the war and is pro choice….Good luck with that one!!!!
Posted by: jim | August 23, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
McCain-experience, talent, service, nice guy
Obama-inexperience, no talent bum, egotistical elitist creep
Posted by: Ed | August 23, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
I’m from Ohio & absolutely no one I know will vote Obama, that includes the Dem’s too. Ohio will put McCain in the WhiteHouse. Everyone I know voted Hillary in the Prime. The DNC Blew it again!
Posted by: Voteing McCain | August 23, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
President Lincoln on winning the presidency (in a much more critical time in our history) packed his cabinet with his strongest rivals and political critics.
He learned from the broad spectrum of views they provided, and his presidency was strengthened by unifying the divergent voices in such a severe time.
Perhaps a similar idea crossed Obama’s mind when picked Biden.
Posted by: Kirk Goolsby | August 23, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
Hmmmmm……….did I get this right? at 3 AM Obama sends out his text message to his supporters first? But It was 12 midnite that I had heard on CNN Biden was his choice? so Obama again lies, or Flip Flops? No Change there!
Posted by: Voteing McCain | August 23, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
Voteing McCain,
Before Voting for McCain, vote for ur grandpa…and spell Voting right!
I lived in Ohio..don’t say they will all vote for your GrandPa!!
OBAMA08!! YES WE CAN!!
Posted by: RC | August 23, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
“Perhaps a similar idea crossed Obama’s mind when picked Biden.”
Picked by the DNC.
Posted by: Mack | August 23, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
I also live in Ohio (have lived in Ohio all my life), and I and many of my friends, coworkers, and relatives are voting for Obama. I voted for Bush twice and regret voting for him deeply. Also, I have a conservative evangelical background, but the hypocrisy on life issues shown by the Bush administration leads me to believe that their deepest consideration in public policy is guided by money and business, not what is good for their own people. I am pro-life, but the deaths of American citizens due to our lack of universal health care and death of Iraqui citizens is also morally egregious and you can’t be “pro-life” when it comes to abortion and not also try to protect the lives of those already born.
Posted by: Cynna | August 23, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
I think McCain needs the ex-Governor of PA, Tom Ridge, as his VP candidate. He was a two term Governor of PA and good on the economy, an ex-Vietnam vet , did six terms as a Congressman in PA (in fact he never lost an election in PA) , has a strong working class background and worked in construction to put himself through college. He was Colin Powell’s personal choice to be Secretary of Defense but the neo-cons thought he was too much of a “peacenik” and Cheney won that one and got Rumsfeld in. He was the first Director of Homeland Security and and ended up resigning because the Bush administration was making him do
unjustified terror alerts for reasons like Kerry happened to be doing his acceptance speech that night. He left in a huff like Powell did. Yes, he’s pro-choice but McCain can’t afford to give PA away. The Republican base wouldn’t be happy with the choice of Ridge but it would reinforce McCain’s independent and maverick image. I’m from MN and no way should McCain put Pawlenty on the ticket and have him go up against Biden. I have to admit I would love to see Lieberman and Biden have to debate one another, now that would be interesting and like nothing we’ve ever seen before.
Posted by: alpaig52 | August 23, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
Obama picking Biden may repeat the 1988 election with Michael Dukakis picking Lloyd Bentsen vs Bush-Quayle
wikipedia excerpt: “Bentsen was selected in large part to help win the large electoral vote of the state of Texas. Because of Bentsen’s status as an elder statesman, more experienced in elected politics, some Democrats believed that Dukakis’ selection of Bentsen as his running mate was a mistake; they noted that Bentsen, although only the vice-presidential candidate, appeared more “presidential” than did Dukakis.”
History may not repeat itself, but it does rhyme a lot!!
Posted by: Angel | August 23, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
alpaig, the only problem with Ridge is that he will lose the conservative base because he is prochoice. McCain needs them. And Lieberman would be a problem too. I think his only choice might be Romney.
Posted by: erin | August 23, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
A vote for McCain in 2008 is a vote for Hillary in 2012.
Democrats for McCain in 2008 and Hillary in 2012.
Posted by: al | August 23, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
Once again, I am sick and tired of Hillary supporters that are willing to vote for Sen. McCain because she lost to Sen. Obama. This is a question for Hillary supporters (Debra, Geevil, Al, Sonia Trevino) that are voting for Sen. McCain. Hillary and Obama have the same policies (90%) and McCain policies are 90 to 95% opposite of Hillary why would you want to vote for McCain when his policies are different from Hillary policies? Please do not say Obama is a fake, please give concrete answer. If you do not have any answer, please do us (true Democrats) a favor, Please SHUT UP!!!!! I am starting to believe that most of you on this blog are truly Republicans.
Posted by: Chris | August 23, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
I dont think a pro-choice VP will hurt McCain amoung the zealots. If they haven’t realized yet that someone who believes that life begins at conception yet supports embryonic stem cell research is pandering, there is nothing that is going to change their minds (sic).
Posted by: Mike | August 23, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
al a vote for McCainactually is a vote for Hillary losing her senate seat actually…
that’s not a threat go look at her numbers duh.
she didn’t win by a big enough margin in her senate race to take the hit of some of her stupidest supporters typing what you are typing which would ultimately and rightfully be blamed for a loss.
If obama loses than so does hillary…
and she would never be able to run again…
and again that is not a threat….
go look at her numbers…duh.
you are not only hurting women in general with your blather…you are hurting Hillary.
and maybe if you can step out of your being so selfishly emotional…
you would see clearly and maturely (sorry if it sounds condescending but you need to look at reality)
Hillary knows this… if she wants a career…Obama has to win.
and I would like to see her not be lost from the senate…
but if she did you better believe Caroline Kennedy has her eyes on running…and if New Yorkerds get wind that Kennedy is planning to either move to MA and run for her uncle’s seat or stay in NY if Hillary loses hers…
it will probably make it that much easier for them.
so please stop we need as many women (and I am a guy) in the Senate as we can…so next time the pool is bigger.
Posted by: dl | August 23, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
46 million people without health Insurance; thanks Hillary supporters.
No tax break for employers who provide Health Insurance; thanks Hillary supporters.
Expansion of the Iraq war to Iran, and Russia; thanks Hillary supporters.
Posted by: Thinking | August 23, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
There is no way Congress has any intention of passing Universal Health Care in the next four years – we can’t afford it. So that issue might as well be just taken off the table when making a decision about whom to vote for. On foreign policy, Obama stood on a podium in Berlin and asked our European allies to support us in our continuation of waging George W’s war on terror in Afghanistan. Where is the change in that ? We will take our troops and divert them to Afghanistan. That’s not new thinking rather that’s just a continuation of Bush’s policies on the parts of both Obama and McCain. There are terrorist cells in England and we don’t go and invade their Country. The threat of terrorism is real and everyone would welcome the capture of Bin Laden and having him brought to justice but the strategy George W came up with to fight terrorism in both Iraq and Afghanistan is remiss. We never for one minute invaded Iraq because of WMD’s, Bin Laden or evil Hussein it was clearly about protecting our national interests, oil. Bush implemented a strategy and failed, in attempting to stabilize that region and attempting to give a strong to message to Countries such as Iran. It ended up accomplishing exactly the opposite.
The war on terror is a farce and both candidates intend to continue on with it. I do give McCain credit though in that at one townhall he stood there and said that we need to deal with our foreign oil dependency once and for all so we never have to send our young men/women over to the Middle East ever again because of oil. He actually mentioned the pink elephant in the living room we all see but never speak of. Of course the next day the press was all over him and he backed off and went back to we were there for the war on terror. I’ve never even heard Obama have the guts so say that, he always sticks with the war on terror. McCain knew what he was saying the first time, he was being McCain of 2000 and the question is which McCain will govern? Statements like that and his admiration for Teddy Roosevelt, a Republican who took a sharp turn to the left once he got into office gives me some hope the McCain of 2000 still exists.
Posted by: alpaig52 | August 23, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
For the first time in my life, I plan on voting for a Republican. I enthusiastically voted in the Democratic primary. However, am totally disappointed in the outcome. The Democratic Party good ole boys including Caroline Kennedy hand-picked their puppets. So much for change!
Posted by: stan | August 23, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
Many Democrats seem to be under the mistaken impression that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama were interchangeable candidates except for their skin color and their gender. Hillary and Obama had very different policies on national security — Hillary promised a military response if Iran used nuclear weapons against Israel while Obama promised talk. John McCain is closer to Hillary on national security than Barack Obama. After all, he is only promising to win the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. He hasn’t promised to send US troops to aid in Darfur (and to get into an international fight with China over oil). Obama and Hillary also had very different tax policies. Yes, they both said they would raise the capital gains tax. Hillary planned to raise the tax to raise revenue for government programs. Obama plans to raise taxes — like the capital gains tax — to achieve a “fair” tax code even if it will not raise additional revenue for the government and even if it will hurt the economy. [You can go back and listen to the ABC debate and hear his exact words on the subject matter.]
Posted by: EnoughAlready | August 23, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
John McCain is promsing a $5000 refundable tax credit to purchase health insurance with instead of a one payer system. That is a far greater expansion of healthcare than we have seen since Hillary Clinton’s CHIP program (which Democrats have been unable to expand despite their control of Congress). Even if we don’t elect a Democrat president, the dream of universal healthcare is not dead.
Posted by: EnoughAlready | August 23, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
I think a real smart move by McCain would be to have Gov Palin of Alaska as his VP. She’d help pick up a chunk of the Hillary vote plus Biden, the attack dog, would be neutralized. he couldn’t get overly aggressive with her without coming off to the nation as a jerk. She, on the other hand, could take pot shots at his flip-flops on BHO, on his plagiarizing etc. It’s a win -win.
Posted by: Marty | August 23, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
“John McCain is promising a $5000 refundable tax credit to purchase health insurance with instead of a one payer system.”
hmmmm…..When you consider that just a good basic plan cost at least 8,000 a year you can see that those without Insurance will expand, and fall on public support at Emrg rooms.
Talk about an Elitist plan.
Posted by: Thinking | August 23, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
Biden has been making a 6-figure income for over 30 years with his Washington DC career and his net worth is around $150.000.00? He is obviously a moron on economics.
Hopey/Dopey 08
Posted by: Mr Hopey / Mr Dopey 08 | August 23, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
Giving tax credits to the middle class is elitist? Poor people are eligible for Medicaid — they don’t pay for their healthcare and they pay no income taxes. Most rich people get their healthcare as part of their compensation packages (after all, it is a deductible business expense) — but tax credits phase out at certain income levels so they don’t ever benefit from these giveaways in the tax code. That means the only people who could benefit from the credit is the middle class –the ones who need it the most given the state of the economy today.
Posted by: EnoughAlready | August 23, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
I am a supporter of Universal Health Care, which will not pass Congress these next four years because we can’t afford it, but I do have to agree that McCain had a point when he questioned whether we really want Government to run our health care? We have basically bankrupted Medicare, Social Security is in jeapordy and we keep borrowing from it for various other ventures , we spend money we don’t have and are trillions of dollars in debt (and that didn’t even include the Iraq War until recently because the war was not represented in the budget). I believe everyone should have access to health care (including mental and chemical health) and dental care but the degree that this Country has run some of it’s entitlement programs down to the ground
such as Social Security, does make one ponder that question.
Posted by: alpaig52 | August 23, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
alpaig52, I agree. No one in America should have to go without healthcare services. That said, they should not be run like the VA — God help our soldiers that are stuck in that system. It seems like when the government takes over all sense of accountability is lost.
Posted by: EnoughAlready | August 24, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am
The conservative base has too many restrictions on McCain’s choice of VP. He will lose votes for choosing Lieberman, a jewish liberal, and he will lose votes if he picks Romney because he’s mormon.
Posted by: Jack | August 24, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am
How many times did Biden say “Ladies and Gentleman” during his speech?
This is as annoying as McCain’s “my friends” and Obama’s uh,mmn,duh’s.
Posted by: susie | August 24, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am
Gov. Palin is a terrific in debates. She could hold her own against Biden.
Posted by: Gracie | August 24, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am
Enoughalready People attack McCain on issues pertaining to Veterans but I like his stance that vets should be able to have choices in regards to where they get their medical care. Where they would have a card not unlike
Medicaid and can go to the clinic or doctor of their choice. Whenever my dad used his VA benefits he had to drive 40-50 miles to the VA Hospital for services there. I also applaud McCain for having opposed Webb’s GI Bill because he wanted to see our servicemen/women have the ability to pass their educational benefits onto their children. As is , their spouse could use them but not the kids. This is a benefit that many in the service wanted. If they weren’t going to use their school benefits the ability to help with their child’s education was important. That piece is now in the GI Bill that was passed. McCain also opposed the initial bill (which I should mention the Dems sat on for a couple years until it was politically expedient) because he was concerned about if we give educational benefits too soon and for too much that we would have difficulty retaining people. For those of you out there who would oppose a draft and who keep trying to say McCain would implement a draft, I would think retainment of our volunteer servicemen/women would be of some importance to you and would just make common sense. I have heard McCain speak on the topic of the draft a number of times and each time he has been clear that he does not support a draft and has cited numerous reasons for such.
Posted by: alpaig52 | August 24, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am
Everyone should have free healthcare…
and while we are at it let’s have free gasoline and free food! In fact, let’s all draw a check from the government and nobody will have to work anymore. You liberals make me laugh! As a working American who served in the US Navy I am disgusted with the left wing quacks!
Posted by: Ed | August 24, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am
Susie…Biden also say “my friends”, and copied Hillary’s speech about being knocked down, you get back up.
I just loved how he referred to bozo today and Barack America, and BO introduced Biden as the next President of the US.
McCain ’08/Hillary ’12
Posted by: Debra | August 24, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am
It is being reported that McCain is seriously considering Colin Powell as his VP. The neo-cons wouldn’t like that choice and neither would the far left, but so be it. I think it would pull many of the independents over.
Personally though, I think it’s a pipe dream on McCain’s part because I don’t think Powell has any interest in a VP position with anyone. There was also buzz a couple weeks ago that Powell was being considered by Obama and that Powell intended to endorse Obama. Powell and McCain are good friends and Powell has contributed to McCain’s campaign. It was rumored though that while Obama has sought input from Powell
(which supposedly has impressed Powell)
that Powell has felt that McCain has
somewhat snubbed him in that capacity
since winning the nomination. It’s
obvious though that both Obama and McCain would welcome an endorsement from Powell.
Posted by: alpaig52 | August 24, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am
This week better turn Obama’s numbers around….but the olive branch he offered the Clintons (DNC made him)by giving them 2 nights at the Convention is so transparent to all the Hillary supporters who KNOWS he never considered her, ever.
What a slight to the candidate who won popular vote.
So glad that the DNC is revamping the primary process, decreasing superdelegates, changing dates and getting rid of caucuses…..too late for Hillary this time.
McCain ’08/Hillary ’12
Posted by: Debra | August 24, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am
alpaig52, it’s interesting that you mention the draft. I read the Democratic Party Platform and it says they plan to expand the military. There was an effort to insert language reinstituting the draft — because the military is made up of a disproportionate amount of minorities –which ultimately was abandoned (I think it had 60% support, though, but not sure on the exact percentage.)
Posted by: EnoughAlready | August 24, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am
Ed, every other advanced industrial country has universal healthcare but the US is so tragically inept it wont work here? Bushwah!
The VA was ok until they started privatizing it, the only problem part of medicare is the hospital one. We can afford universal care – overhead in government programs is alot less than private. Private insurers are running in excess of 40% overhead. Only 60 cents of every health care dollar goes to health care!
McCain wants to eliminate the tax writeoff to businesses which provide health benefits. Bad, bad idea. Individuals have no leverage with insurers, so McCain is wrong when he says it will increase competition.
We should do what Cuba did – send every kid who is smart enough to med school for free. Watch how fast the price for health care comes down.
The US pays more and gets less in health care than any other industrialized country.
Posted by: Mike | August 24, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am
Powell said that he would not run for President because his wife suffers from depression and that the media attention would worsen her condition. I doubt that he would consider a VP spot either for the same reason, especially given how the Democrats are attacking Cindy McCain’s wealth and the Republicans are attacking Michelle’s “proud” and “mean” statements.
Posted by: EnoughAlready | August 24, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am
Thank God Obama has finally come to the conclusion that experience does count for something. His “hope and change” message had worn thin to the breaking point – it’s now officially broken. What a mess the Democrats are in having picked an unknown fledgling senator as their presidential nominee. Can this be salvaged? NOT looking good…
Posted by: petee | August 24, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am
Jim (“Do you really want a President who looks like he plays shuffleboard at the neighborhood senior citizen center?”),
Ageism is a way of looking at older people that stereotypes them, just as people of particular races are stereotyped as being smart, industrious, thrifty, lazy, or easy going, or when men and women are stereotyped as being strong, nurturing or sensitive because of their gender. Ageism is also part of attitudes where people believe that older adults can be treated in demeaning ways. Many people note that as they grow older and as they reach certain age milestones, (age 65 being one of them), others begin to treat them differently. In many cases, being treated differently means being treated as less—less valued, less capable etc. Or they are stereotyped. That is ageism. Ageism is also reflected when younger persons implicitly or explicitly act as if they are more entitled than older adults are. Negative attitudes towards older persons stem from myths about aging, the aging process, and being old. Ageism and discrimination are closely linked. Ageism is the negative attitude, discrimination is the negative behavior. Ageism, like racism and sexism, is a form of prejudice. How do we get past ageism? Recognize the myths about aging and negative attitudes about older adults. Start challenging the myths. Challenge the language. Among the many erroneous beliefs in our society is that older adults’ lives are less valuable and older adults are less deserving of having their rights respected. Speak up about ageism. The more ageism and age discrimination remain hidden, the more people believe it is acceptable to act this way.
Posted by: Tracy Lynn | August 24, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am
Ed No one necessarily said free health care. With the exception of children, adults on Medicaid in the State in which I live have co-payments they make.
There are number of people without insurance who do work hard but can’t afford $300-500 month insurance premiums through their employers. They opt then to go without. And believe me, there are many in the insurance and healthcare industry who are making a profit out there while people are struggling with astronomical family insurance premiums. When Clinton talked about Universal Health Care she was also talking about affordable health care. No one was proposing that those who have access to employer based insurance drop it and have the government pay for their health care instead but there was discussion about the insurance industry being only able to charge a certain percentage for those employer based insurance premiums
so even those hard working famlies out there would get a break from having to pay some of the astronomical premiums they now pay.
Posted by: alpaig52 | August 24, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am
This is starting to remind me of one of my all-time favorite movies – Titanic.
Posted by: petee | August 24, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am
Consider this – our major industries cannot compete in the world today because health care is more expensive here than in the competitors countries. It would be cheaper for them to pay for health care through taxes if the government instead of insurance companies is coordinating the care.
And believe me, the government is much more responsive than private companies.
Posted by: Mike | August 24, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am
How much of insurance company “overhead” is paid to the government in the form of taxes? I suspect most HMOs are corporations so about 35% of their net profits. If we wanted to lower the cost of healthcare, why not eliminate the corporate income tax for healthcare providers if they meet certain defined criteria (such as providing free services of a certain quality to a certain population over a certian time period). I am not saying that is the best plan but there are alot of ways to approach universal healthcare without using a single payer system.
Posted by: EnoughAlready | August 24, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am
Sarah Palin for VP -
Very pro-life and pro-family and she has taken down some very corrupt politicans, both Republican and Democrats in her own state.
Posted by: susie | August 24, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am
Enoughalready One of the reasons McCain has cited for opposing a draft is that there was a disproportionate amount of young men of color and poor and working class kids who ended up serving in VietNam while the wealthy were able to avoid the draft and he does not want to see that happen again.
He also believes the quality of the military is higher with a volunteer army. Now McCain would certainly like to see many/most volunteer for the armed services but he also places as much value in our young people volunteering for things like the Peace Corps or anything that is of service to the Country. Both McCain and now Biden have sons who will/have served in Iraq.
That’s a rarity among politician’s kids. There is no doubt our armed services is overextended and will continue to be so. It is not a good situation for those serving and has increased our vulnerability as a Nation in regards to National Security. I have no idea what the Dems are proposing but the only one I know who actually tried to put through a bill implementing a draft was a Democrat. Personally, I have no doubt that had there been a draft that the war in Iraq would not have been waged and had it been it wouldv’e been over by now. Does anyone believe for one second that Bush, Cheney or Rumsfeld would have problems with a draft? They have never even come close to proposing such despite the fact we have our military making 3-4 rotations back and forth from Iraq. They learned from Vietnam.
With a volunteer armed services the rest of this Country remains somewhat detached from this war. If everyone in this Country had to sacrifice their child/ren to serve in this war we would have had or would see protests comparable ,if not more extensive then, the one’s we saw over VietNam. It would be a public relations nightmare and don’t doubt that this administration didn’t take such into account. They had to sell this war to the American people to some degree and you’d have to do alot more selling if there was mandate that every man/woman had to enlist.
Posted by: alpaig52 | August 24, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am
Bravo Tracy Lynn – well said.
The jokes about age are as bad as the jokes about race. We are one of the few Nations that don’t give the older generation the respect they deserve.
Those young folks that make fun of “old age” — you will be part of that “old age” group some day and it happens faster than you think.
Posted by: Gracie | August 24, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am
This is taken directly from the Democratic Party Platform draft –
“40 Expand the Armed Forces
41 We support plans to increase the size of the Army by 65,000 troops and the Marines by
42 27,000 troops. Increasing our end strength will help units retrain and re-equip properly
43 between deployments and decrease the strain on military families.
44
45 Recruit and Retain
DRAFT – 08/07/08
29
1 A nation of 300 million people should not struggle to find additional qualified personnel
2 to serve. Recruiting and retention problems have been swept under the rug, including by
3 applying inconsistent standards and using the “Stop Loss” program to keep our
4 servicemen and women in the force after their enlistment has expired. We will reach out
5 to youth, as well as to the parents, teachers, coaches, and community and religious
6 leaders who influence them and make it an imperative to restore the ethic of public
7 service, whether it be serving their local communities in such roles as teachers or first
8 responders, or serving in the military and reserve forces or diplomatic corps that keep our
9 nation free and safe.”
Posted by: EnoughAlready | August 24, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am
The Medicare Advantage program has shown some promise:
“Part C is “Medicare Advantage” — in essence, privatized Medicare. HMOs and private insurers contract with Medicare to provide subsidized insurance that is often far more extensive than the usual A/B package. Those covered may then seek care from any provider who will take their Advantage plan. Those providers are reimbursed directly by the insurance provider, not the government, decreasing hassle and delay.
Advantage is the smallest part of Medicare, but hugely popular. Approximately 9 million Medicare beneficiaries, or about one in five, are enrolled in an Advantage plan. Preferred Provider Organizations and Private Fee for Service Plans, rather than Health Maintenance Organizations, enjoy the largest growth in enrollment.”
If the program was univesalized it might look something like this
“Medicare would establish a minimum set of benefit standards, especially including preventative medicine, that each contracted company would have to provide. Companies would then be free to offer additional benefits above and beyond the standard menu, such as dental or vision benefits or acupuncture. Medicare would ensure companies kept their promises and abided by the rules by routine monitoring, and serve as an appeals agency for problems that can’t be resolved by the contracting parties.
Then, everyone, citizens and legal immigrants, would be enrolled. The system would be financed in part by member payments made through income tax or Social Security withholding or quarterly tax payments, or direct monthly payments. The government would act as a reinsurance agent, covering shortfalls in the case of absolutely catastrophic claims against a company out of general revenues. Children would be covered by their parents or by general revenues, as necessary.”
Posted by: EnoughAlready | August 24, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am
Biden not only has his experience but that of all those who he has plagarised.
Posted by: Sluggo | August 24, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am
The republicans spend all of August on lies, lies and more lies. It seems like the American public is too stupid to understand this and the Democrats don’t have the nerves to fight. This is a down and dirty bar fight, and so far, Obama does not want to kick or hit anyone. I want to see Obama hit McCain where it hurts. He must attack him and the republicans where it hurts them. Show American how dirty republicans really are. We need to see some blood. I am tired of loosing the white house to a bunch of crooks because democrats act like a bunch of sissies. I am mad and I am not going to take it anymore! And Biden may be just the one to hit McCain and his bunch of lying thugs.
Posted by: The Unshrub | August 24, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am
EnoughAlready, thanks for pointing out my mistake, its administrative costs that are 40% of insurance company expenses. So that is seperate from taxes.
By the way in an average year, 2/3 of US and foreign companies operating in the US pay no corporate taxes. Their effective tax rate is 0% not 35%.
Posted by: Mike | August 24, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am
Very strong VP pick, Obama!
We secured 3 electoral votes from Delaware (yeah, I know they always go Dem anyway, but the way things look right now…)
Also, Biden got 1% of votes in the primaries, that can help too I guess.
Let me think, what else does he brings to the table…I’ll get back to you later!
Posted by: SickofObamaDrama | August 24, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am
Enough Already Their position doesn’t seem to be at all different from what I’ve heard McCain say verbally in regards to a draft. I didn’t see anything in that platform proposal though that indicated they were advocating a mandatory draft.
Since retainment is an issue I don’t understand why that wasn’t more of an issue when putting through Webb’s GI Bill.
Posted by: alpaig52 | August 24, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am
Biden has said that Obama is not ready to be President.
Biden has denounced Obama’s judgement on foreign policy.
Biden has said it would be an honor to run with or against McCain.
These statements were said in total honesty. Biden is under duress now. Anything he says about Obama or McCain now can not be believed.
Does Obama think we are idiots, that we are going to forget the clear criticisms Biden had of him before?
Case closed.
Posted by: decentAmerican | August 24, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am
The United States spends six times more per capita on the administration of the health care system than its peer Western European nations.
-McKinsey Global Institute. Accounting for the Cost in the United States. January 2007
Posted by: Mike | August 24, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am
I just cant belive that the same people who where fooled and voted for Bush twice could be fooled again and are now voting for Mc Cain. Have you not seen the damage that your president Bush has done? Can you not see how intelligence relates to making good decisions? Do you not know that both Bush and Mc cain finished in the bottom of their college class. Do you not understand that dumb is as dumb does. Do you really think you live better today than you did 8 years ago? We must learn from our past are be damn to watch it be repeated over and over again.
Come on people wake the hell up!
Posted by: 8yearsoffear | August 24, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am
The proposal to reinstate the draft was left out of the platform. That is the language that was included. The reason I posted it is because Obama is seen as the peace candidate and McCain as the war candidate when that is not true. It might take me a few minutes to find the proposal that wasn’t included but I will post it as soon as I do.
Posted by: EnoughAlready | August 24, 2008, 2:29 am 2:29 am
Bush had better grades than Kerry. Nobvody knows about Edwards, he was chasing girls.
Posted by: Sluggo | August 24, 2008, 2:34 am 2:34 am
Took me a minute — this was voted on but did not make it into the platform
7. Prevention of Unjust and Foolish Wars
The Democratic Party opposes all unjust and foolish wars. The key to preventing unjust and foolish wars is an informed electorate with a vested interest in the nation’s military policies who will hold Congress accountable. Relying on a volunteer military constituted of paid soldiers and contractors insulates the vast majority of Americans from the dangers and consequences of our nation’s military actions. The Democratic Party opposes any disproportionate impact such military composition has on individuals, families, and communities based on race, economic status, economic opportunity, or educational level.
Barack Obama has inspired young people everywhere to support him. The Democratic Party believes that these young people are the key to stopping unjust and foolish wars. Therefore, the Democratic Party supports the reinstatement of the draft as proposed by Congressman Charlie Rangel of New York.
AGREE 1776; 60.4% / DISAGREE 1162; 39.5%
Posted by: EnoughAlready | August 24, 2008, 2:34 am 2:34 am
The Dems have a great platform on oil drilling too-just kidding.
Posted by: Sluggo | August 24, 2008, 2:37 am 2:37 am
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
January 11, 2007
CONGRESSMAN RANGEL INTRODUCES NEW BILL TO REINSTATE THE MILITARY DRAFT
Legislation Would Require National Service for All U.S. Residents, Including Mandatory Military Service for Some During Wartime
WASHINGTON – I have reintroduced my bill to reinstate the draft, not because I support the war in Iraq or the President’s plan to escalate the conflict. The reason is my belief that if Americans are to be placed in harm’s way, all of us, from every income group and position in society, must share the burden of war.
Posted by: EnoughAlready | August 24, 2008, 2:40 am 2:40 am
I AM STILL SHOCKED AT BIDEN PICK. HOW COULD OBAMA DO THIS TO HIS BASE??? HOW IS HE GOING TO TALK ABOUT “CHANGE” AND “HOPE” ANYMORE?
ACTUALLY PICKING BIDEN IS MAKING OBAMA LOOK WEAKER..
Posted by: vana | August 24, 2008, 3:16 am 3:16 am
Great… Biden, another lawyer. That’s what we need more of in Washington, another lawyer.
Is he going to take up half the DNC convention with some rolling monologue that meanders here and there but goes nowhere, or will the Obama people turn him into a parrot “yes, we can… yes, we can! (squawk)… yes, we can, Biden want a cracker!”
If this is to shore up his 3am phone call creds, there’s a problem. The big miscalculation is that McCain can defer economic questions to policy experts, the treasury department, the Fed (as most presidents do)… Obama on the other hand can’t just turn over the Commander in Chief job to Biden.
Posted by: diamond lou | August 24, 2008, 3:39 am 3:39 am
Mike -
Your post:
The United States spends six times more per capita on the administration of the health care system than its peer Western European nations.
-McKinsey Global Institute. Accounting for the Cost in the United States. January 2007
We spend that much more because we have better health care. Hello? Why do you think wealthy citizens of other countries regularly travel to the US for serious health care issues?
Posted by: Peach | August 24, 2008, 5:30 am 5:30 am
This announcement of Biden was every bit as exciting as the announcement that Al Gore finally decided to give Barack Obama his endorsement; Golly Gee!!
But, hey, I wasn’t going to vote for him even if Hillary was the VP pick..
Posted by: Scott | August 24, 2008, 5:53 am 5:53 am
By choosing Biden, Obama has just acknowledged that he’s every bit as inexperienced and unprepared to lead as his critics say. He’s desperately trying to prop up his credentials by turning his back on everything his campaign has stood for. It’s apparent now that Obama’s vision of Change is a government run by Democratic insiders and old-timers.
We’ve already seen that kind of Change with 6 straight years of Republican rule. Turned out pretty abyssmally, didn’t it? Checks and balances, a moderate Republican president with a Democratic congress – that’s the ticket to navigating our country through the rough waters ahead.
Posted by: marylou | August 24, 2008, 6:31 am 6:31 am
Peach wrote:
“Why do you think wealthy citizens of other countries regularly travel to the US for serious health care issues?”
Because the US health care system is set up to address the issues of the wealthy. If I was wealthy I could also get that same health care.
Under McCain thew wealthy would get the tax break and the Health Care. I on the other hand would subsidies that health care for the wealthy, but not be able utilize it.
Posted by: Thinking | August 24, 2008, 7:12 am 7:12 am
For all of you who bring up McCain’s Naval Academy ranking.
While in law school, Biden received an “F” in a course because of plagiarism and was almost kicked out of Syracuse University College of Law.
Biden, who graduated from the law school in 1968, was 76th in a class of 85.
Then he was stupid enough to plagerise a speech when he ran for President in the 80′s.
Prior to law school while an undergradute at the University of Delaware, Biden’s first three semesters, his grades were C’s or D’s, with three exceptions: two A’s in physical education courses, a B in a course on ”Great English Writers” and an F in R.O.T.C.
No wonder he is intimidated by his wife’s PHD.
Posted by: Gracie | August 24, 2008, 7:22 am 7:22 am
Gracie – great post. Until yesterday I had not realized that Biden had committed plagiarism more than once. It seems to be a nasty habit of his.
And for those posters who think McCain is the warmonger, Biden wanted American boots on the ground in the Balkans.
Posted by: Peach | August 24, 2008, 7:30 am 7:30 am
EnoughAlready wrote:
“The Democratic Party believes that these young people are the key to stopping unjust and foolish wars. Therefore, the Democratic Party supports the reinstatement of the draft as proposed by Congressman Charlie Rangel of New York.
AGREE 1776; 60.4% / DISAGREE 1162; 39.5%”
There is no mention in the Deocratic Platform of a draft.
What continues to amaze me is how much you are opposed to the draft, seeing how you support the Republican war. How the Republican party can stand before the public and thump their chest and leave the fighting to someone else. How the Republican Party can claim to be the Leader of the Free world and yet is unwilling to pay the Taxes, serve in the Military and ask it citizens to have a stake in it’s continuance.
I find your stance to be weak, pathetic, and unpatriotic.
Posted by: Thinking | August 24, 2008, 7:42 am 7:42 am
Thinking -
Both the Pentagon and all branches of the military have addressed the matter of the draft. Entire books have been written about the subject and clearly you don’t know what you’re talking about.
The Pentagon much prefers a voluntary military because they get a higher educated and committed fighting force. Draft military men are less committed and less educated.
Posted by: Peach | August 24, 2008, 7:44 am 7:44 am
Thinking:
Members of the Congressional Black Caucus and Charlie Rangel are using the stunt about a draft to protest the war.
They have complained that blacks are cannon fodder in Iraq. The facts show (as of ’06) that only 5% of the troops in Iraq are black, while 14% of the population in the US is black.
Posted by: Peach | August 24, 2008, 7:51 am 7:51 am
Thinking -
Sid Francis, an African American and former Marine intelligence officer said of Rangel and his draft legislation:
“This is vintage Charlie Rangel. He’s adept at distortion and his proposed draft bill isn’t meant to improve the military but to create a Vietnam-era military of draftees. Anyone who knows anything about the military knows that conscriptions brings about negative results.”
Posted by: Peach | August 24, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am
Clearly Peach if one volunteers they are more committed, but as the last few years have indicated the Military has been unable to raise the number of troops to fight Inna two front war and it has undoubtedly protracted the length of the war.
I also believe that these weak unpartiotic Republicans are hiding behind these studies, and are not enlisting.
They are all talk and no action. Clearly if they are not enlisting they are not commmitted to views they hold.
Posted by: Thinking | August 24, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am
Thinking -
This draft legislation you think should be passed — Charlie Rangel has brought it up twice and it was defeated each time. The first time Rangel submitted the legislation, even HE voted against it. LOL
Posted by: Peach | August 24, 2008, 8:00 am 8:00 am
Thinking -
I don’t know where you are getting your numbers but the military has repeatedly said they are meeting their goals.
You’re also wrong about Republicans not volunteering for service. Clearly and historically our military has voted Republican in huge majority numbers.
Try again.
Posted by: Peach | August 24, 2008, 8:02 am 8:02 am
Thinking – Apparently you’re unaware that more Congressional Republicans have kids or family serving in the military than Democrats.
But keep up those DNC talking points.
Posted by: Peach | August 24, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am
The Military are meeting their goals by using what is refered to is a back door draft. That is they are extending the enlistments to meet that goal
Posted by: Thinking | August 24, 2008, 8:21 am 8:21 am
One has to wonder how it is Obama will feel about lobbyists now that Biden is on his ticket. Biden is in the pocket of credit card companies. And lawyers adore him and have contributed heavily as well.
Posted by: Peach | August 24, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am
Yes the Draft brought about negative results for the Chicken Hawks in Congress.
After 58,000 deaths, years of protracted war, exlusion for the wealthy, the public becomming aware that their sons were dying, and more likely to be drafted, became engaged, and ended that war.
Negative results for whom?
Posted by: Thinking | August 24, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am
Thinking -
You might wish to quit while you’re behind. Apparently you are quite unaware just who started the Vietnam war.
Posted by: Peach | August 24, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am
All Republicans have to say to Biden when he attacks McCain is:
“Senator Biden, didn’t you try to push a Kerry/McCain ticket in 2004?”
McCain ads are ALREADY SAYING, said BO was “Not ready to serve,” didn’t have enough experience, but that he would “be honored to run with, or against John McCain.”
Biden, on a post-debate appearance on MSNBC, October 30, 2007:
“The only guy on the other side who’s qualified is John McCain.”
Biden appearing on The Daily Show, August 2, 2005:
“John McCain is a personal friend, a great friend, and I would be honored to run with or against John McCain, because I think the country would be better off, be well off no matter who…”
On Meet the Press, November 27, 2005:
“I’ve been calling for more troops for over two years, along with John McCain and others subsequent to my saying that.”
Posted by: Peach | August 24, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am
Biden has publicly said he would be honored to either serve with McCain on a presidential ticket or run against him. LOL
Posted by: Peach | August 24, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am
If I remember correctly there was a war of independence from France back in the early 50′s. This resulted in the split of Vietnam between communist controled north and the south. It was at this time that US committed to the South sending in troops to advise and train the south. Seems to me it was a Repuiblican Admin at the time, Ike
Posted by: Thinking | August 24, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am
Thinking — oh, so now advise and train is the same as fight. Got it. I keep forgetting those DNC talking points.
Posted by: Peach | August 24, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am
Peach,
You are using OLD quotes. The John McCain of today is NOTHING like the JMC of yestarday. I don’t even know who this guy is. I used to think I could vote for him, now I don’t want him anywhere near the White House.
Posted by: Llama in Pajama's | August 24, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am
Yes it is the same thing it is where it all starts, it is where the commttment begins. At the time, I was 11 years old or so there was some books by a Dr Tom Dooly ( Dooley?) he was a dr. in the Navy, I read those books, they were filled with touching stories about atrocities that the north was visiting upon the South, and was used by the Government as propaganda to continue the support for the south. 8 years latter I was there, after 3 of my brothers had served there.
I have never read those books as adult to see how slanted those views may have been.
Clearly our involvement and commitment was made then, and the war was escalated from there.
Posted by: Thinking | August 24, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am
llama -
Using a quote from 2007 is old? Yes, when one doesn’t like the message, attack the date, the source, etc.
Posted by: Peach | August 24, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Llama – As you said:
The John McCain of today is NOTHING like the JMC of yestarday. I don’t even know who this guy is. I used to think I could vote for him, now I don’t want him anywhere near the White House.
Sort of like how Obama has change, eh? First he was going to pull troops out immediately, then he’d wait, then he’d pull them out within 180 days of his presidency, etc. Who knows what Obama stands for? Obama doesn’t even know.
Posted by: Peach | August 24, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
Peach,
Sorry, doll, but Gramps has changed soo much in the last few months. I used to hink he was a decent guy. Now I see that was all an act and I am saddened by this.
And Yes, I like when a man can see things for what they are and act accordingly. Unlike Boosh, the “Deciderer in Chief”.
Posted by: Llama in Pajama's | August 24, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Thinking -
Because you served in Vietnam, I think you may enjoy this book:
Stolen Valor : How the Vietnam Generation Was Robbed of Its Heroes and Its History
If you haven’t heard of the book, you might want to go to Amazon and read the book reviews by both professionals and readers. I bought the book for my brother a few years ago and read it first (naturally!).
Posted by: Peach | August 24, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am
Joe Biden:
MR. RUSSERT: Let me show you what you said in Iowa last week. “If we do not change course in Iraq soon, you’re going to see, two years from now, helicopters hovering over our embassy in the Green Zone in Baghdad with people hanging” onto “the ladders just like Vietnam. Mark my words.”
SEN. BIDEN: Absolutely, positively, unequivocally, I believe that. Look, let me tell you, Tim, there is no possibility—no possibility—of a central government governing Iraq in any near term…
Biden was dead wrong on Iraq. That makes the ticket complete.
Posted by: drjohn | August 24, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
So Biden now thinks Obama is a wise leader?
Just a few months ago he said Obama was not ready to be president.
What made Obama so wise?
If he was wise then why make that rediculous self-serving Berlin speech? Would a wise man choose Rev Wright as his mentor for 20 years? Would a wise man take a sweetheart real-estate deal from a crook?
There’s nothing wise about Obama.
Posted by: riley | August 24, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am
Obama had to know all of these tapes about Biden would surface.
Obama is in a panic because he’s sinking in the polls and even other Dems are calling him a sissy for not attacking McCain.
Obama chose Biden because he is desperate.
Posted by: cindy in nc | August 24, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Do you all forget what we were told about John McCain by the members of his own party during the 2000 election?
Tom Delay, Karl Rove, G.W. Bush, all these guys all told us John McCain was not fit for the job of President, shouldn’t we listen to what they said as much as what Biden said about Obama?
Posted by: Fred | August 25, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
DeLay also took a shot at press coverage of McCain, who described him as a “darling of the media.”
“There’s nothing redeeming about John McCain,” DeLay said.
The Texas Republican added that McCain “does betray conservative principles.”
Posted by: fred | August 25, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am