McCain Energized on Energy

I really like McCain the more I Look at his Energy Policy. Obama is way off the mark. Obama will lead us into depression. McCain has the right answers to get the economy rolling again.
Energy is the basis of a strong economy. We need all the energy we can get as low priced as possible because we can make a profit on energy. McCain is the one for me.

McCain given a warm welcome by Americans at Stugis. Obama ditches American Soldiers to be with cheering Germans

Wasn’t the movie the “China Syndrome” based upon a nuclear accident at this nuclear power plant.
It almost DESTROYED Detroit.
Stupid move by McCain

Does McCain understand that you just can’t run out and build 45 nuclear power plants? It will take years to get through all the regulatory red tape and then, where do you put them? And where do put the nuclear waste? As the people in Nevada (Yucca Mountain) know, nuclear power sounds like a good idea but it also has risks. Obama understands this. He’s also for expanded nuclear power as long as we figure out how to safely dispose of the waste.

The Japanese leaked over 300 gallons of radioactive water into the Sea of Japan just last year following an earthquake.France found radioactive water leaking into their ground water and over 100 cases of employee exposure to radiation.The UK in 1995 did an extensive study on the cost effectiveness of nuclear power to decrease carbon emissions and found it least cost effective.The mining and shipping of uranium were at such a high cost that taxes would need to be increased and CO2 emissions would negate the gains of the plant due to the ongoing mining and shipment of uranium.

Riddle me this..
What does nuclear energy have to do with oil?
Second, I agree that all energy resources should be explored. And if you read the studies, nuclear is by far the most cost prohibitive.
Read up on the Rocky Mountain Institutes studies.

McCain, how on earth do you propose drilling off-shore right now? Current rig supply pushes any possibility for drilling to 2019. Research it folks. This is all politics. McAint and Hussien O. are one in the same. Get some smarts people and vote 3rd (2nd) party.

“With the cooling towers of the Enrico Fermi nuclear plant in the background”
The plant that had the first nuclear problem, the one that coined the phrase “china syndrome” was chosen by McCain to speak about nuclear safety, the only thing missing in this fantasy was Britany and Paris or maybe McCain is still looking for Moses.

Yeah… Which one of you McBush supporters wants the nuclear waste in YOUR back yard. McBush has resorted to baseless gimmicks as solutions. The problem is that the people who support him are so god awful stupid they can’t figure it out.
Oh, and by the way, Uranium is NOT a renewable resource. The only way out of this, you idiots, is solar and wind.

DR NoObama Isn’t as bright as I thought. He has hitched his star to those EVEN LEFT OF HIM and the American people are waking up to all of the gobbledygook, NOW, OBAMA HAS APPARENTLY PICKED UP MORE BAGGAGE WITH PELOSI AND REED!! HIS ENERGY POLICY (OR RATHER, LACK OF) WILL HURT BIGTIME IN NOV!!

http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/13039.htm

WAY TO GO, PRESIDENT MCCAIN!!!!

Riddle me this..
What does nuclear energy have to do with oil?
Posted by: PSC | Aug 5, 2008 6:42:52 PM
—-
In case your political Jesus did not tell you anything about it since he is a clueless Zero-bama, here is how nuclear energy has to do with oil:
You will have the energy in the form of electricity, which can be used to power your cars, which in turn will reduce your need for gasoline, which in turn will reduce your need for oil.
80% of electricity currently is produced by burning coals and natural gas, or fossil fuels, both pollute your clean air, just as when Zero-bama airs.
Zero-bama makes a hype of producing 1 million electric plug-in hybrids, but he has no clue that it does not do a dent on energy reduction nor oil-independence. 1 million cars constitute less than 0.77% of the CURRENT number of vehicles on the road, plus he will destroy all Al Gore’s hope of saving the planet because he will use electricity generated by coals to power the cars and because he proposes to build zero, nada, zero-bama nuclear plants.

Carolyn.
Do you really expect these leftwingnuts to read and understand an article from the National Review?

If you are talking about the Oct 1966 incident, that was more popularized by the book and song “We Almost Lost Detroit”. The real incident was a lot tamer; there were no contamination leakage and no injuries. That specific reactor operated for another 6 years and then it was decommissioned in 1972. Why don’t you READ about it, rather than listening to silly jingles and accepting movie clips as facts. Oh, I forgot, you zombied Democrats love doing that, following the masses and lapping up the info that is just spoon fed to you. Keep checking your tires everyday to make sure they are properly inflated!!!

It has become apparent that America is taking a good look at what Obama and friends (Pelosi and Reed) have in store for us and they are not pleased.
McCain/Romney 08

I think the air pressure gauge McCain gave out was right on target. Thats the only definite answer NoBama has given for the energy crisis.

In 2007, McCain missed all 11 energy-related Senate votes considered key by the League of Conservation Voters, including votes related to automobile fuel economy, offshore Virginia drilling, refinery construction, renewable electricity mandates, energy efficiency, liquefied coal and support for biofuels. The absences prompted the League to give McCain a “zero” rating for the year.

Joaquin.
Common consensus seems to suggest the liberals tend to (think) with their feelings, and then dream up scenarios to justify their conclusions. kindasorta makes RATIONAL DIALOG, as on this site, PRETTY DIFFICULT!!

BYE, BYE. BAMA

President John McCain!
Has a nice ring to it!

Obama losing favor
Considering that McCain is running a lackluster campaign and that Obama just completed his “I am the world” tour, McCain should be seeing Obama’s taillights disappear over the horizon. Yet, Obama can’t seem to shake McCain.
The American people, or at least a very large population of people, are continuing to not find substance in Obama as the proverbial onion continues to be peeled. Remember, early on in a campaign the political types of both parties are paying attention, but as the campaign continues on, those non-political undecided voters begin to pay attention. These are the folks who Obama is not winning over, and McCain is becoming the default go to guy, for lack of anyone else being remotely viable.
http://brokengovernment.wordpress.com/2008/08/01/obama-losing-favor-energy-independence-act-ignored/

San Francisco Chronicle:
Sen. Barack Obama’s energy policy is offering more flip flops than a Lake Tahoe souvenir stand.
First the presumptive Democratic nominee opposes offshore oil drilling, but, wait, now he doesn’t. Second, he never suggested dipping into national petroleum reserves, and now he wants to open the spigot.
And remember how he hooted at suspending federal gas taxes as a primary-season stunt? Now, he wants $1,000 rebate checks mailed out to families, paid by a windfall profits tax on the oil industry that was tried and dumped in the 1980s.
The crushing power of $4-a-gallon gas lies behind these changes along with polls showing his modest lead is dwindling. Other polls, showing a slim majority of the country now favors coastal drilling, have made it easier to switch positions with little pain.
But the ideas that Obama is now embracing come loaded with flaws and offer the driving public only momentary relief at best.

Obama losing support among young, women POSTED August 5, 12:00 PM
International /Associated TV poll of 1,011 likely voters finds McCain leading Obama 42%-41% with Bob Barr (L) and Ralph Nader each taking 2%.
A July Zogby survey showed Obama leading by 46-36.
McClatchy Newspapers reports Obama has lost ground among some of his strongest bases of support, including young people, women, Democrats and independents, even African-Americans and Hispanics:
-Among voters aged 18-29, Obama lost 16 percent and McCain gained 20. Obama still leads, 49-38;
-Among women, McCain gained 10 percentage points. Obama now leads 43-38;
-Among independents, Obama lost an 11 point lead. They’re now tied;
-Among Democrats, Obama’s support dropped from 83 percent to 74 percent;
-Among Catholics, Obama lost the 11 point lead he had in July and now trails McCain by 15.
Zogby said Obama also lost ground among minorities.
The poll was conducted July 31-Aug 1 and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percent.

Just rhe HINT of new drill sites WILL drop the price of oil AS PAST HISTORY HAS CLEARLY SHOWN. DRILLING, ALONG WITH REQUIRING SPECULATORS TO PUT UP FIFTY ERCENT UP-FRONT WILL DO A LOT TO DROP THE PRICE OF OIL. THIS COUNTRY IS DROWNING IN OIL (200 YEARS) – ALL WE HAVE TO DO IS GO GET IT – WHICH LEFTWINGNUTS LIKE PELOSI, REED AND OBAMA WON’T LET US DO. AS FOR BIG OIL MAKING BILLIONS MORE – SO BE IT, AS LONG AS THEY DO US RIGHT – LET THEM MAKE AS MUCH AS POSSBLE.

This is what we are facing with Obama.
Letter to the Editor from a Cuban . . .
A most interesting and foreboding letter.
From Richmond Times-Dispatch, Monday, July 7, 2008 ~
Dear Editor, Times-Dispatch:
‘Each year I get to celebrate Independence Day twice. On June 30 I celebrate my independence day, and on July 4 I celebrate America’s. This year is special, because it marks the 40th anniversary of my independence.
‘On June 30, 1968, I escaped Communist Cuba, and a few months later, I was in the United States to stay. That I happened to arrive in Richmond on Thanksgiving Day is just part of the story, but I digress.
‘I’ve thought a lot about the anniversary this year. The election-year rhetoric has made me think a lot about Cuba and what transpired there. In the late 1950s, most Cubans thought Cuba needed a change, and they were right. So when a young leader came along, every Cuban was at least receptive.
‘When the young leader spoke eloquently and passionately and denounced the old system, the press fell in love with him. They never questioned who his friends were or what he really believed in. When he said he would help the farmers and the poor and bring free medical care and education to all, everyone followed. When he said he would bring justice and equality to all, everyone said, ‘Praise the Lord.’ And when the young leader said, ‘I will be for change and I’ll bring you change,’ everyone yelled, ‘Viva Fidel!’
‘But nobody asked about the change, so by the time the executioner’s guns went silent, the people’s guns had been taken away. By the time everyone was equal, they were equally poor, hungry, and oppressed. By the time everyone received their free education, it was worth nothing. By the time the press noticed, it was too late, because they were now working for him. By the time the change was finally implemented, Cuba had been knocked down a couple of notches to Third-World status. By the time the change was over, more than a million people had taken to boats, rafts, and inner tubes. You can call those who made it ashore anywhere else in the world the most fortunate Cubans. And now I’m back to the beginning of my story.
‘Luckily, we would never fall in America for a young leader who promised change without asking, what change? How will you carry it out? What will it cost America ?
‘Would we?’
Manuel Alvarez, Jr.
——————————————————————————–
The Famous, the Infamous, the Lame – in your browser. Get the TMZ Toolbar Now!
——————————————————————————–
Looking for a car that’s sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL

Let’s get America back to some sense of seriousness, instead of the Obama ridiculous World Tour circus.

Obama ‘stooped to dishonesty’ with new ad POSTED August 4, 5:40 PM
Now that he is losing the energy issue to Senator McCain, Obama launched a negative and misleading ad attacking McCain. FactCheck calls Obama’s “Pocket” ad misleading:
In a new ad, Obama says, “I don’t take money from oil companies.” Technically, that’s true, since a law that has been on the books for more than a century prohibits corporations from giving money directly to any federal candidate. But that doesn’t distinguish Obama from his rivals in the race. We find the statement misleading:
Obama has accepted more than $213,000 from individuals who work for companies in the oil and gas industry and their spouses. Two of Obama’s bundlers are top executives at oil companies and are listed on his Web site as raising between $50,000 and $100,000 for the presidential hopeful.
This morning on CNN, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney said he was disappointed that the Democrats’ presumptuous nominee decided to approve the ad:
“That’s really sad,” Romney said. “I didn’t know that Obama had stooped to dishonesty.”

Timbo…You say McCaine makes you sleepy with his crap policies. Obama has no policies. He changes any plan he ever suggests on a daily basis. If you take a nap his plan will change. This is the kind of change he is talking about. He will change what he says to whatever you want to hear. What a guy!

Timbo…Don’t you ever wonder how Obama gets all those donations?
http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/13039.htm

To all of those that say we won’t realize any oil for years if we drill, if we never start drilling until the gas is 10 or 20 dollars a gallon then you’ll say the same thing? That is ridiculous. We must start now! To wait is stupid. These other countries at time will bring us to our knees for all. Get with the program. We need to do all we can. I live in Florida and I am for it!

The Democratic political machine of Chicago headed by Obama and Howard Dean will be full of these kind of lies. When Obama is confronted he will apologize and say he didn’t know anything about it. Right.
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/afl-cio_falsely_attacks_mccain.html

The American Automobile Association (AAA) says that for every pound of pressure your tires are under-inflated, you lose 2% of mileage on your car….And the United States Department of Transportation states that approximately 25% of all commuters are driving a few pounds short of full pressure. Do the math.
Anyone arguing against these facts IS truly “ignorant”. No wonder this country’s economy is in the condition it’s in. People can’t even see the truth when it’s staring them in their ignorant faces.

The accident at Fermi 1 in the 1960s did
NOT “almost destroy Detroit”. A total
of 4 fuel assemblies were partially
melted and ALL radioactivity was
contained. Some idiot named his book
“We almost lost Detroit”. It was a
VERY POOR / VERY FLAWED account of what
was essentially a non-event.
Don’t turn what was essentially a work
of fiction into a basis for energy policy.

For all those that are “upset” about the
“leaks” of radioactivity from nuclear
plants – COAL plants put MORE radioactivity
into the environment as a part of NORMAL
operation – about 14,000 TONS EACH YEAR.
From scientists at Oak Ridge National Lab:
http://www.ornl.gov/info/ornlreview/rev26-34/text/colmain.html
Coal puts out WAY MORE radioactivity than even these nuclear “leaks” – and
they do it in NORMAL operation.