By Nitya

Aug 4, 2008 11:32am

McCain Hits Obama on Energy with Gag Gift

ABC News’ Bret Hovell reports: Obama’s energy plan, as framed by the McCain campaign, can be summed up with one small giveaway to the press: a tire pressure gauge. McCain senior adviser Mark Salter came to the press section of McCain’s plane Monday morning to hand out the gag gifts: gauges that read "Obama’s Energy Plan", a reference to the presumptive Democratic nominee’s recommendation last week that Americans make sure the tires on their automobiles are properly inflated in order to maximize fuel efficiency.  Experts have heralded Obama’s suggestion — that Americans tune up their cars and fully inflate their tires — as one that could save up to 292,000,000 barrels of oil a year. "My friends, let’s do that, but do you think that’s enough to break our dependence on foreign oil?" McCain asked rhetorically at a town hall meeting in Wisconsin last week. As Obama unveils his energy policy this week, the McCain campaign maintains that Obama’s energy plan is not comprehensive. McCain’s campaign has spent some of the last few weeks making their political points without pulling any comedic punches. Last week they produced and released an online campaign advertisement comparing McCain’s rival Barack Obama to Moses, and calling him The One. McCain told reporters that they were "having some fun." And when Obama was traveling overseas, press aides handed out fake press credentials to McCain’s stateside reporters, which read "JV Squad: Left Behind to Report in America." As he was tossing them to reporters from the aisle of the plane, Salter was asked if the tire pressure gauges work. "They might," he said with a laugh. Clearly the efficacy of the gauge was not the point.

User Comments

That’s just dumb.
I take Obama’s hard hitting ad any day over McCain’s school yard antics.

Posted by: Sandy | August 4, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

At least Obama knows how to use a gas pressure gauge. It’s probably too technical for McCain to figure out. Of course, he’s never had to check his own tires because Cindy has plenty of money to pay people to do it for him.

Posted by: Mike | August 4, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am

Obama’s new ad is tough and the GOP knows it or else they wouldn’t be doing this junior high taunts.
McCain=Bush=Big Oil
Can’t get much uglier than that.
Good job Obama and Happy Birthday!!

Posted by: Wendy | August 4, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am

Obama, like Kerry, was for it before he was against it and people were confused because he was both for it and against it while his opponents were always taking the opposite viewpoint.
No wonder intelligent people are seeing through the hollow man.

Posted by: Max | August 4, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Max: At least Obama is making hard choices, he just is not out there making false promises like McCain. We all know McCain is only for himself. He has more than proved that the last 8 years. Wake up.

Posted by: becky | August 4, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Does anyone know where Obama stands on any thing? He won’t disown Rev. Wright then he does, He said Bill Clinton was a bad president now he says that he is one of the best we have had, he was against wire tapping and now he is for it, he didn’t want MI and FL fully seated and now he does… gun control…abortion?
You can’t become president on an ambiguous platform.
A democrat who is paying attention.

Posted by: AlbertMike | August 4, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Weak.
Naive.
Vague.
Arrogant.
Confused.
Dishonest.
Incompetent.
Inexperienced.
Will raise taxes.
Married to Michelle.
Will punish success.
Will expand government.
Will weaken national security.
No record of bipartisianship. Ever.
Longtime supporter of hard-left hate.
More popular in France than in America.
Clapping in Jeremiah’s pews for 20+ years.
Likes to play race games to paint himself a victim.
Loved by terrorists and dictators around the world.
Cancels visit with wounded soldiers to hang at Ritz Carlton.
Full of socialist ideas for change and ready to roll on day one.
Nobama ’08

Posted by: Jack | August 4, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

His only hard decison is to order icebergm romain, or rugala.

Posted by: char19145 | August 4, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

This is funny the only funny here is McCain that is all he has to run with….This OLD man needs to re thgink his ads.They are stupid.

Posted by: indp voter | August 4, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

Lord Obama
was copying Hillary Plan, then McCain Plan and now Boone Pickens Plan.
XEROX WE CAN BELIEVE IN

Posted by: tim | August 4, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Obama copied Hillary Plan then McCain Plan and now he wants to copy Boone Pickens Plan.
Great Leadership Skills

Posted by: tim | August 4, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

How can someone so old act so juvenile? Is this McCain’s second childhood or something?
I’m sorry, senator, but I don’t want my presidential campaigns to be this stuff. Now grow up please.

Posted by: Paul | August 4, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

It is sad to see this former maverick resorting to stupid tricks to make himself look good.
I guess he’d rather give money to the oil companies. This is what Bush did to stimulate new energy searches. We see how far that went.

Posted by: truthtell | August 4, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Obama is coming up with ideas and solutions while McCain comes up with gags and insults.

Posted by: Deep Release | August 4, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Did anyone catch BHO speech in Michigan that just ended? This was a fairy tale bigger than any I have every read my children. This man is going to say anything to win.

Posted by: William | August 4, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

At least, McCain has provided some substance, giving you a gag to measure your tire pressure.
What did the phony 0-bama have? Air.

Posted by: fact check | August 4, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

I think you’re all right. McCain is acting like a baby. Come on let’s talk real stuff. I want to know what you’re going to do ti stimulate the economy, where are oil prices going, will I be able to keep my house, can I afford my groceris the next few weeks?

Posted by: newvoter | August 4, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

deep …so true. I haven’t seen McCain saying anything about the economy. Of course, he has already said he knows nothing about it. So I guess he is the best person to run this country?

Posted by: militarymom | August 4, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

fact check – you consider this gag gift “some substance?”
Wow. I have no answer to that one.
But don’t get too confortable in your drilling position. Its been a few weeks since McCain flipped on that one. He’s due to flip back any day now.
Of course, when he does, we’ll just hear again how he doesn’t speak for the campaign.

Posted by: Paul | August 4, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

I think the tire gauges were funny and clever….

Posted by: yh120952 | August 4, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Welfare or warfare. Those are the two choices. One who chooses to tax us for unrealistic entitlement programs, and the other who wants to borrow money for fighting ongoing stupid nation-building wars and facilitate a new one in Iran. Go 3rd party, and send a message to the crooks who have brought our nation to the point of economic disaster.

Posted by: Ben Straub | August 4, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

Ben…yes, and McCain is the worst of them. He has been in the Senate for 20 years pushing this crap through…

Posted by: militarymom | August 4, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

fact check – you may have missed the point a little. I’m happy enough with Obama, so there’s no “I wish we had Clinton” going on with me.
I’m not happy with McCain. No major party candidate for president should demean the office he seeks by campaigning like he is. You may not agree with that point, but wanted to be sure you understood it.

Posted by: Paul | August 4, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

McCain is just waiting to see what other good policies and plans Obama can come up with so they can steal and run with those also. McCain is an Empty Suite or leach just sucking the blood of others to survive.
Posted by: becky | Aug 4, 2008
===
becky, you are well-educated by the phony 0-bama, and learned well. You understand exactly his tactics. Fact is it was exactly what this phony did during the primaries, simply you CHANGE McCain by 0-bama.

Posted by: fact check | August 4, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

militarymom – Agreed. The only thing McCain has going is that he served heroically and his son is over there, but I dislike his militaristic approach to dealing with countries that have different philosophies. I would pull for Obama over McCain, although Ron Paul would have been my choice. Our finances are totally out of balance.

Posted by: Ben Straub | August 4, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

I’m sure to a Republican, there’s an equation between not having a sense of humor and supporting a “phony.” For the rest of us… the incredible logic of that one is lost.
Bottom line – McCain ain’t a serious candidate. We all thought he was, but he’s not.

Posted by: Paul | August 4, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Obama: World’s biggest phony baloney!

Posted by: Soetoro No | August 4, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

We have to reduce consumption and liquidate debt to save the dollar and balance the budget. I don’t believe either of these two candidates has a platform that addresses any of the financial problems root causes. Let them joke around. Ha, ha.

Posted by: antenian | August 4, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

Ben – though Ron Paul won’t be on the ballot, you do have a Libertarian candidate to choose, assuming Barr makes ballot access in your state.
I’d prefer having your vote for Obama, but then we’re into the lesser of evils thing. Maybe third party guys would have a shot if less people held their noses and voted for the major party candidate they dislike the least.

Posted by: Paul | August 4, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

Every candidate, since the beginning of Carter, has been using the “energy issue” as a campaign point. And every candidate, when elected, has ALWAYS put this problem on their to do list, save for later. Obama and McCain are no different..It is up to the market forces in that higher prices at the fuel pump, higher utilities, food etc. that the consumer begins to change their habits such as driving a hybrid, consumer demand will force auto companies to build them. Government not going to do it for us. They haven’t for years, they aren’t going to start now which is just as well. That is the price we pay to live in a free market economy.

Posted by: REPUB | August 4, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Regarding the budget, let’s look at what is feasible in the short term. Cutting spending means primarily one thing – cutting defense.
Defense is the lion’s share of discretionary spending. Doing anything else is just tinkering around the edges. And cutting defense spending means pursuing a foreign posture that allows us to reduce O&M (ops and maintenance) spending, as well as ammo procurement.
McCain isn’t going to do that. As counter-intuitive as it sounds, the budget for the next four years will most likely be bigger under the Republican nominee than under the Democrat.

Posted by: Paul | August 4, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

Paul – My hope is that Obama wins, and that 3rd party candidates get large support. I will probably go with Barr, but at this point I am not 100% sure. I hope Obama wins over McCain because of foreign policy, and an Obama win does speak to the diversity of this nation which can only be interpreted as a good thing.

Posted by: Ben Straub | August 4, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

“Obama’s Energy Plan”: New Engraved Tire Gauges!

Republicans to kick Obama’s tires from Political Punch reports that the RNC is handing out tire gauges to reporters and to attendees at an Obama event in Michigan. The gauges are engraved with Obama’s Energy Plan. McCain Hits Obama on

Posted by: PAXALLES | August 4, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

REPUB – You are correct that is the price we pay for living in a free market. The free market will also correct this huge amount of debt we have accumulated through a massive recession no matter what the Fed does to stave it off. I guess currently I am a pessimist. I am totally for the free market. It would be nice to hear these candidates get into some specifics of why we are in the mess we are in rather than preaching change or making silly jokes because of their basic lack of understanding.

Posted by: Ben Straub | August 4, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

REPUB: so what you are saying is “Do not look at economy issues, just look at foreign policy, and war… Well lets see McCain voted for the war got us into this mess, voted against our soldiers and any bill that will help them now and after. So let me see…. yes, that means that Obama and his good judgment is what we need. Thank you.

Posted by: beck | August 4, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

All of these lame jokes about Obama being full of hot air are in a sense lame. Just this morning Obama laid out a detailed energy plan including goals to limit our dependence on foreign oil.
What has McCain proposed? Political gimmicks that low-information voters fall for every time. Obama has the support of real economists and energy experts on his side.
Who does McCain have? A Karl Rove operative who chooses to sling mud everyday rather than focus on real issues.

Posted by: Jennifer | August 4, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Ben – I’m not sure the free market can fix the debt. Its rapidly reaching the point of threatening a currency collapse.
Maybe that’s the solution. We’ll allow the currency to devalue to being basically worthless, pay off the debt with the worthless dollars, and then roll-out a New Dollar; kind of like what Germany did once with its currency.
The only question is whether the country can survive something like that. Germany could because the Germans could live off their gardens for a couple years.

Posted by: Paul | August 4, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

I thought Mr. McCain is a man of character who will not play divisive and dirty politics, but he has played the celebrity card, the Messiah card, the inexperience card and the leftist card. On analysis of these Ads and given the history of this country, Mr. McCain has played a sophiscated racist card.

Posted by: Goodman Fredrick | August 4, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Dude…
There are a lot of bitter, angry people out there.
Why so much hate?
Yeah, things are lousy out there. but hate is unnecessary.
I intensely dislike the sophmoric behavior McCain’s campaign has taken since hiring Rove disciples, but I refuse to hate. If you plan on revenge, first dig two graves. if you plan on hate, build a small room for it in your heart, ’cause that’s where it will live.
It is a free country. Hate if you want to.
Frankly, McCain has been compelled to adopt Bush stances due to the Republican party’s high value on loyalty, and Bush’s disasters have left the right with little in the tank but bitterness, bile, and a never ending reserve of sophmoric cheap shots. I sort of feel bad for McCain – I’m from Arizona – and I used to respect him greatly. Now I just respect his past.
But I certainly wouldn’t store hate.
Oh. and that small room in your heart you make for hate? Remember it drows bigger every year until you tell it to move out or surrender to it.

Posted by: SonOfHistoryProf | August 4, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Wow. McCain is insulting the intelligence of Americans and the problem is, most Americans are too stupid to realize that they are being had. At a time when we have real, difficult problems that call for real, immediate solutions we get nothing but jokes and jabs from McCain. The auto industry and tire industry also suggest keeping your tires properly inflated. Guess they’re socialists. Or just silly. No, it’s better to suggest that the solution to all our problems is to drill more oil. Not to find alternative sources, but to drill offshore. Which is great, until there’s a hurricane. We don’t get those, right??? America deserves what it gets if it elects McCain. No less dependence on oil and big environment problems. Yeah McCain ’08. IDIOTS!

Posted by: Cris | August 4, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

I think the only thing any of us can do, those of us who are truly disgusted by both men, is to wait and see who they choose for Vice Presidential candidates. Sometimes the only way you can tell a person’s true personality is by the company they keep. The way I see it both candidates have one more chance to impress us or disgust us. So far disgust is all I feel for either one of them and the company they have chosen so far.

Posted by: kayfromCT | August 4, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

The Democratic presidential candidate said he wants to eliminate the need for oil from the Middle East and Venezuela within 10 years.
“To do this, we will invest $150 billion over the next decade … and leverage billions more in private capital to build a new energy economy that harnesses American energy and creates 5 million new American jobs,” he said.
Obama outlined three steps he’d take to meet that goal:
Build fuel-efficient cars and have one million 150 mile-per-gallon plug-in hybrids on the roads within six years
Require that 10 percent of the country’s energy come from renewable sources by the end of his first term
Call on businesses, government and the American people to meet the goal of reducing the demand for electricity 15 percent by the end of the next decade.
“So there is a real choice in this election — a choice about what kind of future we want for this country and this planet,” Obama said.

Posted by: beck | August 4, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Obama’s suggestion to make sure your tires are fully inflated and your car is tuned up will certainly save you more money on gas than McCain’s idea of suspending the gas tax, which would only put pennies into your pockets.
But I have dealt with people like McCain before, can’t come up with an intelligent response so try to make fun and hope no one notices what a moron you actually are.

Posted by: Jane Smith | August 4, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Somebody wrote: “America gets what it deserves if it elects McCain”
Can we afford that? Didn’t we just get two difficult doses of that?????????

Posted by: SonOfHistoryProf | August 4, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Cris – it really is a good point. Most people run around with underinflated tires. I’ve read that regularly checking tire pressure would get a lot of folks 5-10 percent better gas mileage.
Another point is to slow down, especially on the highway. Most cars are at peak efficiency somewhere between 55-60 mph. Over that, and wind resistence cuts down efficiency. I tried this myself with my Corolla – I used to drive to work at 70 mph or so, and have been going 60 mph for the past five tanks of gas. My mileage increased from 31.8 to 33.2 – nearly 5 percent better.
Also, don’t jackrabbit at lights, and consolidate errands as much as possible. And generally, pay attention and try to drive smarter. I’m always amazed when I see people rushing to get to a red light ahead.

Posted by: Paul | August 4, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Most gas station air pumps have pressure guages built into them.
I wish McCain wouldn’t mock personal responsibility. We all need to share in the solution to the current energy crisis, and not only depend on the government to make us feel better, while we shoot ourselves in the foot. That was the Bush strategy, and look where that got us…

Posted by: Cindy | August 4, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

GOVERNOR SCHWARZENEGGER: “Politicians have been throwing around all kinds of ideas in response to the skyrocketing energy crisis and energy prices, from rethinking nuclear power to pushing biofuels and more renewables and ending the ban on offshore drilling and it goes on and on, the list. But anyone who tells you that this will bring down our gas prices immediately or anytime soon, is blowing smoke.[...]
Let’s not always wait for government. We have the power. The same is when it comes to cutting down on your fuel costs. Politicians, like I said, promise you that, that they will have a way and policies and laws that will cut down the fuel costs right now. It is wrong, it is bogus. Who can cut it down is you, you, you and you. You can cut it down. Take your car, for instance. Go and get the perfect tire pressure. Tune up your engine. Drive slower.”
Those crazy Democrats…uh…Republicans. I guess ‘conservative’ is a meaningless label if any kind of ‘conserving’ at all is the subject of mockery by the GOP.

Posted by: joejoejoe | August 4, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Obama outlined three steps he’d take to meet that goal:
Build fuel-efficient cars and have one million 150 mile-per-gallon plug-in hybrids on the roads within six years
Require that 10 percent of the country’s energy come from renewable sources by the end of his first term
Call on businesses, government and the American people to meet the goal of reducing the demand for electricity 15 percent by the end of the next decade.
“So there is a real choice in this election — a choice about what kind of future we want for this country and this planet,” Obama said.
Posted by: beck | Aug 4, 2008 1:31:14 PM

Posted by: fact check | August 4, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

joejoejoe – Republicans aren’t against conserving. They’re just against losing.
When you come down to it, they really don’t believe in anything at all, I don’t think. Take abortion – they last two Republican presidents have been pro-choice. But the party just closes its eyes, pretends otherwise, and focuses on the real agenda, which is winning power.
I’ll bet in the quiet moments when no one is watching, they have nothing against conservation at all… so long as it doesn’t impede achieving power.

Posted by: Paul | August 4, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

it really is a good point. Most people run around with underinflated tires. I’ve read that regularly checking tire pressure would get a lot of folks 5-10 percent better gas mileage.
Posted by: Paul | Aug 4, 2008
—-
Paul, you need to go no further than checking Bush’s DOE website to find the exact average benefits of inflating your tires and tune-ups. 13 to 16 cents on the gallon!
Zero-bama is a good and fast learner – you have to admire that.

Posted by: fact check | August 4, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

fact check – careful… McCain also called for hybrids. Are you saying he also has no clue?

Posted by: Paul | August 4, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

fact check – careful… McCain also called for hybrids. Are you saying he also has no clue?
Posted by: Paul | Aug 4, 2008 1:54:13 PM
—-
First of all, I did not say I support McCain.
However, McCain does have a solution, better than Zero-bama. That solution, which is clean and unlimited, is nuclear energy. McCain will generate electricity to power hybrids, which no body is against provided you can afford it, by using nuclear power, which unlike 0bama does not pollute your clean air.

Posted by: fact check | August 4, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

What’s interesting is the way McCain mocks Obama’s suggestion that people take matters into their own hands, to the degree they can.
Aren’t the Republicans the ones who (at least pretend to) believe in individual responsibility with less government hand-holding? Yet their nominee mocks his opponent’s advice to conserve fuel?
Ah, that’s right. Oil profits are at stake, and that trumps any discussion of principles.

Posted by: Paul | August 4, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Lets be real.
Why do they jump for grand leaps when the steps are already in place.
We can’t have Small euro cars because they are not “safe” enough but we can drive an unprotected motercycle?
The VW Lupo was made from 1998 to 2005
It consumed as little as 3 litres of fuel per 100 kilometres (78 miles per US gallon or 94 miles per Imperial gallon).
The next prototype the L1 Mini 2 seater
It is designed to use just 1 litre of fuel per 100 km[2] (equivalent to 235 miles per US gallon or 282 mpg Imperial)
But we play with a 30 MPG as a Great car. Something wrong with our expectations.
see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_Lupo

Posted by: Tom | August 4, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

Question: why do the candidates’ ads and speeches say what they do? Because candidates are human beings after all and therefore no different than all the people who have posted comments here. You can read the same rhetoric and ideas on these pages, which is after all what elections are about.
What does impress me to no end at this point in time is, that America seems to be very much inclined to elect a president who is NOT of the white race. Things have come a long way since the days of Martin Luther King. He would be proud of this country and rightfully so.

Posted by: amelie | August 4, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

fact check – “Zero-bama is a good and fast learner – you have to admire that.”
I do.
Posted by: Paul | Aug 4, 2008
===
Yup. Monkey see monkey do. Hopefully, 0bama will not learn from him spreading democracy throughout the mid-east.

Posted by: fact check | August 4, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

Beck…I believe the topic at hand is ENERGY…Please do not mis-interrupt my meaning. I am simply saying that if we are expecting the next candidate to bail us out of our present energy problems, DON’T COUNT ON IT. WE, the individual, need to focus on bailing ourselves out of our present situation based upon the free market economy. As far as foreign policy and geopolitical issues, we truly are at the mercy of our Congress, Senate and President: as well as the rest of the world. If you are turning your hopes on Obama so be it; however to be fair to McCain, I believe Obama was not included in the vote to go to war with Iraq and since I do not have a crystal ball, I cannot say with certainty that Obama would not have voted with a VERY LARGE PORTION on his democratic collegues. Senator Obama has said he plans to up troop levels in Afgan. though and since I have someone very close to me that has gone twice to that garden spot of the world, Iraq and Afgan. to me is not a whole lot of difference. Both are dangerous places that have some very bad people living there that need to be dealt with. And please do not thank me as I plan to vote Republican, so I guess we will just cancel each other out…

Posted by: REPUB | August 4, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

fact check – Obama signalled a willingness to consider nuclear long before I heard McCain say a word about it. It was one of the things the Clinton supporters used to criticize.

Posted by: Paul | August 4, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

Fact Check.
Most hybrids produced on the first wave had a window sticker of 50-60 mpg
Under real independent tests they proved to be about 35 mpg.
I would take the 2 seater l1 in a heartbeat. 10 gallons of gas for $40.00
would drive me 2350 miles.
What a savings across the US on what $45.00-$50.00?
We need to stop looking where they point us and make informed choices and not look at what smokescreen is better.

Posted by: Tom | August 4, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

fact checker – you want a president who is a slow learner?

Posted by: Paul | August 4, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

mccain acts like a ten year old child—-do you think this is the way for a presidental candidate to act—–just think what it would cost us if he got in office—a senile olg geser acting like a child—wow the world would really respect that.maybe someone should send mccain a pacifier and a bundle of diapers—which he probably could use.—-what a halfwit—-let him wetstart your airplane.

Posted by: rodney | August 4, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

tom
we had cars in the70s that got 40 to 50 mpg where are they now—–

Posted by: rodney | August 4, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

This will blow up in their faces. There are numbers out there that state drilling off shore will produce an extra 200,000 barrels of oil a day, while inflating your tires and tuning your engine nation wide would save 800,000 barrels a day. Which energy plan is immediate? and which will take 5 years

Posted by: beck | August 4, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

paul
romney was on tv today saying obama is against all these fuels—-wow i never thought he would be so undignified to outwardly lie–i will now label him as onother rove limbaugh nitwit.

Posted by: rodney | August 4, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Rodney – those were mostly diesel Volkswagons, I think. They used to make this pickup that had like zero tractive ability but was great for suburnites who needed a pickup bed. I wish it was still available.
I’m guessing one of the things we’ll see is a return to diesel as a transitory step, especially biodiesel, etc.

Posted by: Paul | August 4, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Oh come on, the gag was funny!
Was it silly and childish? Yeah. Most funny things are a little silly and childish.
Should candidates refrain from silly childish gags their opponent’s expense? Well, probably.
I suppose Mr. Heussein Obama will probably had out walkers at his next press conference. Not like he doesn’t have the cash for it.
If I were a rabid political party supporter (rather than an American) I’d probably whine about how childish Mcain was acting.
I supposed I’d also whine about how childish and silly Heussein’s week long European infomercial was as well.

Posted by: Bob | August 4, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

“tom
we had cars in the70s that got 40 to 50 mpg where are they now—–”
They were expendable whe gas was $0.65 a gallon.
But we all feel the $4.00
and it’s a big leap to 78 MPG or 235 mpg.
I know. Oil does not want them nor did government. every gallon out of the pump is another secondary tax drain on the wallet. Put a 235 MPG car out there
and you reduce expected gas revenue by
612% (235 mpg vs 33MPG)

Posted by: Tom | August 4, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

fact check – Obama signalled a willingness to consider nuclear long before I heard McCain say a word about it. It was one of the things the Clinton supporters used to criticize.
Posted by: Paul | Aug 4, 2008
—-
For your information, since you have missed: Obama was first against nuclear energy, then maybe (remember those lobbists of his backyard made him water down a bill), and then after hearing McCain proposed to build 45 nuclear power plants, he says he is in principle for nuclear energy now.
I do not mind this phony changelings’ change, but he still proposes to build zero nuclear power plants, spending zero dollars on technology, aired zero substance on the future of energy for your grandchildren (not yours nor your son’s).
If you had HRC, you would have a sure winner.

Posted by: fact check | August 4, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

Bob
thats exactly what I mean by novice. I heard on Sirus radio this mornign that Obama nor Mccain probably havent taken the car out to fill up with gas and used the debit card in years if ever the same with the grocery store so the lesser of two evils is still evil!

Posted by: staniam | August 4, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

beck
if the public falls for the drilling act we will be absolutely no better off–as big oil and opec go hand in hand the prices will continue to be controlled—-at best we will still be at a 60% dependence on foreighn oil—-
I WILL GIVE YOU ALL ANOTHER FACT—-right now we can produce biodiesel for approx 1.00 per gallon—nothing sophistcated about this fuel –anyone can produce it—the repub drill for oil freaks dont want you to know this.

Posted by: rodney | August 4, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

fact check
THE FIRST TIME I HAVE HEARD MCCAIN SAY 45 NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS WAS TODAY—-OBAMA HAS SAID THIS FOR MONTHS

Posted by: rodney | August 4, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

fact check – I remember Obama criticized by Clinton supporters for the nuclear energy option back in early 2007, so I have to think your fact checking leaves something to be desired.

Posted by: Paul | August 4, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

Obama’s campaign cites McCain people who agree with Obama about tire pressure savings:And while the McCain team is busy amusing themselves, the fact is that the idea they’re attacking is supported by, among others, top McCain surrogate Joe Lieberman, conference call host Mike Rogers, Governors Charlie Crist and Arnold Schwarzenegger, the Department of Energy, and NASCAR—all of whom have urged Americans to help save energy by minding tire pressure,” says spokesman Hari Sevugan in an email. “But hey, who ever let the facts—or supporters’ positions—get in the way of a political attack? Aboard the Low Road Express, that’s no problem at all.”

Posted by: bernadette | August 4, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

MCCAIN THE SUPER PARROT ATTACKS AGAIN

Posted by: rodney | August 4, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

Paul -
Besides, signaling is not enough. There ought be substance, which your phony political Jesus has none.
There ought be an urgency. China and India are growing at > 10% per year, with China for the past 20 years. You experts had said it was impossible, unprecedented. Yup, unprecedented alright. In 20 years, China and India will consume more oil than the US, which uses more than 25% of world oil output. At 100 miles per gallon, it’s not going to resolve this small inconvenience of life.
Does you phony candi have a clue, any capacity to understand it?
You should have supported someone else in the primaries, and you would have not be in such a mess.

Posted by: fact check | August 4, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

KEEP YOUR SPEED AT 55 MPH AND CHECK WHAT YOU SAVE

Posted by: rodney | August 4, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

Obama or McCain
Both out of touch
both Rich
Both with Government benifits for life
Both without the guts to hit where it counts because it woudl cause havoc in major parties. Obama may not be as involved with Oil but I bet if we had a read disclosure.. I wonder how many of the senators and congressmen have Mahor oil holding in the portfolio (or family) over the past 8 years.
And my last comment. it was the economic preasures that caused the soviet union to fall. Those who do not learn by history….

Posted by: tom | August 4, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

fact check – again, I question your fact checking. If you are new to watching this campaign cycle play out, you may have missed early 2007 when Obama was criticized for being too detailed too early.
I remember an August 2007 Washington Post article comparing the Democratic candidates’ health care proposals. It cited Obama’s as being out first, and compared it to Edwards’. It said it couldn’t compare Clinton’s because the details hadn’t been released as yet.
But somewhere along the line, the Clinton supporters started pushing this line about how Obama wasn’t substantive.
Quick quiz – name one substantive, metric laden proposal put out by any of the last four presidents while running for office? If you can think of one, you have a better memory than me.

Posted by: Paul | August 4, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Paul -
I do not know what Clinton supporters criticized 0bama on nuclear energy, but I do know 0bama was criticized for watering down a bill that regulates nuclear wastes. If that’s what you think what it was, it shows his change to his nuclear lobbists from his backyard.
If Clinton supporters do not support nuclear energy, they need be educated.

Posted by: fact check | August 4, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Can I just write in for Michael Moore as Pres with Ross Perot as Vice Pres.
We would have Odd state of the union adresses that would Graphed out in any possible way.

Posted by: Tom | August 4, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Paul,
Someone named Clinton, whose administration was accused of being the same as the GWBush administration by 0bama, proposed balancing the federal budget, spend as you pay, and then passed the legislation by 51-49 votes in the first year, which produced the unprecedented prosperity and time of peace in the history.

Posted by: fact check | August 4, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

McCain tries to imply he has experience and judgement and then resorts to childlish antics. The man is himself a joke of a politician…

Posted by: indy_voter | August 4, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

In reference to McCain’s question, is this ..”enough to break our dependence on foreign oil?”, here is some basic data that he NEVER mentions and therefore either doesn’t know or purposely leaves out.
It is estimated that the US has 2% of the worlds oil reserves; we produce 9% of the world’s oil production per year, and, we use 26% of the world’s oil production per year. In order to eliminate our reliance on foreign oil, we would have to eliminate the gap between production (9%) and use (26%). To do this through increased production would require increasing our annual production to TRIPLE what it is now. Is there someone out there naive enough to believe that this is possible through increasing off-shore drilling efforts? Have you ever heard Chevron, Mobile, or any other oil company state that this is true? If they have, did they make guarantees or statements about the results, e.g., the price per gallon of oil?
The obvious answer to reducing the gap is to cut use. That is where we need to start for several reasons. One is to save money (it’s cheaper to cut use than to increase production). Another is because we can start doing that and start getting results immediately. While we should be working on getting new resources for oil, it will take years to start getting it and there doesn’t seem to be an end to escalating world demand. Why is it people think we can just lower the price of oil without reducing demand? Oil companies and Middle Eastern countries, including our allies, are realizing windfall profits and are clearly not willing to give them up.
If we have made a mistake by taking a food-based bio-fuel strategy, we should accept it and change our approach. We do not have the luxury of being a cruise boat in a sailing race. It seems that, not only are food-based bio-fuels inefficient to make, but they result in higher food prices.
Many people believe that renewable energy sources are inefficient but if you use investors as a measure, it has been decades since the private sector has invested in nuclear power plants while renewable resource energy technology is attracting a great deal of investment.
The oil companies have ad campaigns claiming that we have plenty of oil for all of our current and future needs, but what are they leaving out? If we have this oil, why are we dependent on foreign oil to a 2 to 1 ratio? That ad and those facts clearly are in conflict and the oil companies’ ad is clearly missing some explanation. Perhaps “mining” this oil would lead to $26 or $48 per gallon oil?
We have been in a similar, though not as severe, predicament before – for those old enough, you can remember this escalation of oil prices in the 1970′s. It’s time we became responsible for managing our situation instead of believing the fantasy that we don’t have to make any changes in order to solve this problem. How many times do we have to experience the big lie that everything can be free and/or painless before we recognize that, first, we need to recognize we’re in over our heads, second, we need to learn how to swim, and third, having learned, we have to swim. We started to adapt in the 70′s and then gave up in the 80′s. Now, we’re paying the price.
The politicians aren’t going to provide the reality therapy that we need. We need to educate ourselves and stop relying on people who are pushing a political and/or a profit agenda.
As to the subject of the article, JOKE GIFTS CONCERNING ISSUES CRITICAL TO OUR ECONOMIC SURVIVAL AS A COUNTRY ARE AN INSULT TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC. We need suggestions. We want to decide on the merits of the suggestions. We are tired of your politicking. We have had enough of your insincerity, your arrogance, your cynicism, your spinning the truth, and your outright lies. This is OUR FUTURE you are talking about and it is in a state of crisis. You had better come up with some well thought out solutions of your own that make sense and that deal with reality, not some selected, self-serving view of reality. You better be willing to make some compromises to reach solutions because we need solutions that deal with the problems of today’s world and that will work in the future, not mortgage it. We need authentic leadership not pretenders. If this were a business facing a problem like this and you its management, you would have been escorted out of the door by security by now.

Posted by: Paul F | August 4, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Fact Check
Absolutely! If Obama Obama wants to demean the Clintons its his perogative but he wil be like a LJB rather than an FDR or Kennedy.. there is no THERE THERE!

Posted by: staniam | August 4, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Odd. I have seen more polarized attacks back and forth on every issue.
I see personal stance vs personal stance and again I fail to see one thing.
Everyone is pointing the finger at the other person and no one is looking for a solution.
It’s a fight on a playground and it’s choosing the right side to be on.
Grow up.. both sides loose even if one wins.
This is the reason we fail to get real solutions. we respond to the wagging dog. we get involved in their plans without forcing them to go outside the box.
So whats Next? A Denture Cream with Offshore oil fix for Obama?
Funny but it won’t happen because it could offend the AARP.

Posted by: tom | August 4, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

fact check – Um, not to pick apart words, but Obama never said the Clinton Administration was just like the Bush Administration.

Posted by: Paul | August 4, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

hesingswithfrogs
you are wrong… History does have a precedent as far as chosing VPs but as usual Obamas people dont knew their history… Mccains people are just crewing around now… it is absoutely a prelude to a campaign like 1988! Just watch it… they will make Obama look 10 times worse than Dukkakis… if Obaamas base of younger people dont know anything about him they better do their research… I mean abotu that era in poltics

Posted by: staniam | August 4, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

well said Paul F.
The only change I would put in.. is
“If we have made a mistake by taking a food-based bio-fuel strategy, we should accept it and change our approach.”
We did not make a mistake in food based, it was the food choice. Corn is one of the least benificial for Bio-fuel and it’s why we have Corn Sugars in every product. Sunflower’s produce a LOT more per area.
I am not saying 100% bio is a solution but blended with High MPG Disel cars would go a long way at taking a first major step at weaning us as we develop more options.
Once again.. well said.

Posted by: Tom | August 4, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

paul f
i have tried for weeks to get this across to these people –in bits and pieces as sometimes too much at once is hard for them to understand–and trying to show them that they are being used by big oil does not help much—GAS WILL PROBABLY COME DOWN TO AROUND 3.00 OR EVEN LESS BEFORE ELECTIONS SO AS TO MAKE REPUBS LOOK LIKE THEY HAVE WON THE WAR—BUT IN FACT IT WILL INCREASE AGAIN.BUSH AND MCCAIN ARE PUPPETS FOR BIG OIL—-WE COUL START MAKING MORE BIODIESEL TOMORROW WHAT IS STOPPING IT —ANYONE CAN MAKE IT–I FULLY UNDERSTAND WHAT IS HAPPENING.

Posted by: rodney | August 4, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

TOM
C
I CANNOT UNDERSTAND WHY CORN IS USED—it is probably the most inefficient—-maybe a ploy to make oil drilling look better.we all have to think about that.
when making biodiesel what is left is super animal feed. we win both ways

Posted by: rodney | August 4, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

tom
i would not care about paying 5.00 per gallon for biodiesel, as we can produce cars to get 60 mpg on it–and best of all the money will stay in our economy.and stop the bankrupting of our country–all we need is someone not on the big oil take to make it happen–i guess the millions donated to mccain lets him out of it.

Posted by: rodney | August 4, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA IS DREAMING.
HE WILL NOT WIN.
AMERICA CANNOT BE FOOLED.
HE IS A CON ARTIST.

Posted by: DAR | August 4, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Jeff
Honestly, I have no idea whether party affiliation has anything to do with tire pressure. I suppose we could speculate all day long. I disagree though that Obama as “condemning” anyone with his encouragement to keep our tires properly inflated. So I don’t think the “obama energy policy” gag is funny on that basis.
To me, the “gag” was supposed to be funny because it was essentially saying … here’s Obama’s energy policy … tire pressure … that’s all he has … isn’t that stupid? What a retard!
In reality, Obama’s energy policy includes tax cuts to help offset the cost of energy, reducing energy speculation to help keep speculation from driving the prices up, increasing enforcement against energy market manipulation, requiring energy companies to more fully utilize the oil leases they have already, investment in alternative energies, investment in education geared towards assisting workers gain skills necessary to develop and produce alternative energy, and increasing our nation’s energy efficiency.
So, the premise of the “gag” … “this is Obama’s entire energy policy, isn’t that stupid” is a lie. It attempts to get people thinking … yeah tire gauges, that’s all Obama’s got, when in reality, Obama’s energy policy is much more substantive (this plays into the “all fluff” label they’re trying to put on Obama). It’s an invitation for people to create a false mental shorthand of what Obama’s energy policy really is. It’s a hope that people will use that false mental shorthand when evaluating Obama’s energy policy, and remain ignorant of what Obama’s energy policy really is. In short, rather than confronting Obama’s true energy policy, its an attempt to substitute something else … something that would be much easier to defeat .. a cartoon, a caricature, a straw man. In the end it is a deceitful, manipulative invitation of ignorance. The election of our President deserves more.

Posted by: hesingswithfrogs | August 4, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

McCain once said on the Letterman TV show, one night in 2001, in the run-up to the Iraq war, that a “SOURCE”had told him, McCain, that the ANTHRAX, a weapon of mass destruction (WMD!) which had been used to attack the Congress, and NBC, was the attack of IRAQI’s.
Now we learn it was actually the work of bio-terrorism experts of the US, working in a fort in Maryland.
WHO WAS McCain’s ‘SOURCE’?
Did you know that using “propaganda’,
such as a TV show,
to lead the US of A into a war,
on false pretenses,
is a crime? Yes it is. It is a crime to use false propaganda to draw the country into war.
And whom do you suppose is that “source”, whom McCain so far manages to keep a secret from even the FBI, the Congress, no less NBC, and you readers?
The way he hems and haws in the video, (check it out on the internet)
you get the feeling maybe old John has pre-knowledge
that this ‘info’ is really propaganda.
Ah well. Anyone else want the truth from our ‘war hero’ on how he was lead by a SOURCE to draw Congress and the people into war on a false premise? He should have his day in court before the Senate Intelligence committee, and right soon.
He may be the first Senator in memory to be expelled from that body for cause. It takes a lot.
Do tell, John McCain, who is that source, so well placeed you were willing to invoke the wrath of our nation upon a sovereign nation, to avenge the attack. You have some answering to do.
Would this be why Cheney is not invited to your nomination party?
Soon you too will be a celebrity, more like Osama, than like Obama, though.

Posted by: Bruce Becker | August 4, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

The answer to the oil question is technology.
90% of the oil of Pennsylvania and Oklahoma is still under the soil, because the greed driven people who put an oil well on every square inch of western Penn State and Oklahoma ruined the pressure and you cannot get it out with current technology.
As for price, any oil produced by the WTO is up for bid to the highest paying customer.
The answer to that, dear friends is that we stop selling our leases of our lands in the ocean. We must create sovereign corporations and yes, pray we can expect more efficient use of our tax dollars than past government agencies, but at least the result will be oil the USA owns entirely and at the cost of exploration and drilling and delivery and no bidding by whomever bids on current speculative markets.
One more thing: Steam engines just need boiling water. We can replace most uses of diesel engines with steam engines. The technology we will need to make that work in the long run is to reduce emissions from the fuel used to boil the water.
And the Stanley Steamer car went 150 MPH.
The problem was, and there was ONE, it required tinkering, in an age before electronics. Nowadays there are no impediments to starting a Stanley Steamer. None. The combination steam power with new technology can REPLACE gasoline for automobile use.

Posted by: Bruce Becker | August 4, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

I believe the whole point behind the “gag” was too show that a Senator with a Harvard degree who is running for President should be smart enough to give more concrete advice on energy policy that simply suggesting to inflate ones tires. That advice we can get from our neighborhood automobile mechanic. If that’s the best he can do, we are certainly in trouble. Whose he going to go for foreign policy advice? Not so funny!!

Posted by: REPUB | August 4, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

hesingswithfrogs…Inflating your tires will save you roughly 3.3 percent or 0.12 a gal. Now our Federal gas tax is 0.18. If Obama was really serious about helping out the common man he would suggest repealing this tax. But I have never met a democrat who did not like to raise taxes so chances are he would never do this..To put things in perspective, we use something like 81 million barrels every 2 days…inflating your tires is not real helpful when you are talking the nations supply nor is saving 12 cents a gal, big deal, when you are paying anywhere from 4.21-4.50 a gal as we are in California…GET REAL DRILL. Now if you follow the following instructions I might be able to help you find your manners..Place your left hand on your right ear and your right hand on your left ear..STAND BACK IF POSSIBLE because it may get messy, NOW PULL…That suction sound is the sound of freedom. Freedom from the binds that tie your manners………….Have a nice evening

Posted by: REPUB | August 4, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

“If Obama was really serious about helping out the common man he would suggest repealing this [federal gas] tax.” Repub
Repealing the federal gas tax won’t do much good. The oil industry will just pocket the difference and charge close to the same amount. Ask any economist and that’s the answer you’ll get. That’s why everyone made fun of McCain for proposing it. The common man would get very little benefit from a repeal of the federal gas tax.
Aside from it not doing any good, apart from lining the oil industry’s pockets, ending the federal gas tax would actually do more harm than good. The gas tax goes to pay for the upkeep of our highways, roads, and bridges. Unfortunately, our highways, roads, and bridges are in a poor state of repair in many areas. Bridges are collapsing. Highways are riddled with potholes and defects. Ending the gas tax will take away the funds needed to upkeep our roads, highways and bridges. Our roads will be less safe, and our transportation system will be less efficient (costing us more fuel).
Also, you need to check your figures. You’re comparing apples to oranges. You state that we use 80 million barrels per 2 days. We actually use half of that. You’re quoting the worldwide use, not the US use. Of 365 days of oil usage per year, Obama’s tire/tune proposal would save about 15 days worth of oil per year. That’s 35 Billion dollars a year and its just one proposal. Combine that with increased fuel efficiency, alternative energy, etc. and you’re making a large dent in our nation’s oil consumption. Obama is on the right track here with his common sense proposals. You can stick your fingers in your ears and pretend that there’s nothing more to Obama’s energy policy than inflating tires, but you’re just fooling yourself. Why on earth would you want to make your decisions based upon a lie?

Posted by: hesingswithfrogs | August 4, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

Obama was not truthful about McCain and the contributions he got from oil as per Jack Tapper’s column here on this site. Also, Obama has also taken money from oil companies. Another thing that makes me question Obama’s character and integrity is Obama’s relationship with the convicted felon Rezco.
Per a Human Events article here:
“Liberals and conservatives had come together and had the Cook County, Illinois machine on the ropes but Sen. Obama did not help them. In fact, he ended up endorsing the machine candidate that year in the competitive general election and called him a good progressive Democrat. In this case he didn’t support the reformer, because to support the reformer in that election, he would have upset all the allies of the machine politician. That would have been against the interests of now-convicted developer Tony Rezko, who was tied closely to the Stroger family. He would have upset Mayor Daley, he would have to upset Emil Jones. So he played along like a good machine politician.”
My conclusion is Obama cannot be trusted and can be swayed by the highest bidder including the convicted felon Rezco.

Posted by: terry | August 5, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

If the experts quoted in this article are correct, McCain is chiding Obama for suggesting that proper tire inflation would save the USA 292,000,000 barrels of oil per year. At a cost of $120 a barrel, that’s $35 Billion dollars worth of energy savings.
SO HERE’S THE PROPOSAL: These are rough estimates. Let’s provide a $1500 tax credit to service stations/tire dealers who install nitrogen compressor’s for use by or for customers and encourage their use.
THE DETAILS:
If 67,000 nitrogen gas compressors are placed across the country (there are about 200,000 gas stations in the US), a $1,500 tax credit for each would cost $100,500,000 in tax credits.
Nitrogen gas is cheap and plentiful. It is nonflammable (safer around gas pumps)and most importantly, seeps from tires more slowly that standard air. Tires stay at the right pressure longer. Tread life is increased (some manufacturers claim up to 25% increase in tread life). Greater fuel economy is enjoyed.
If we can get those 67,000 service stations and tire dealers to get everyone on nitrogen and maintained at the right tire pressure, we will reap benefits of $35 Billion dollars in reduced oil consumption in addition to the benefits of increased tread life. The cost in tax credits per citizen would be about 33 cents. The oil savings savings per citizen would be about $116.23 per year. I’ll take that kind of return any day.

Posted by: hesingswithfrogs | August 5, 2008, 2:33 am 2:33 am

Obama the Flip Flopper with a degree from Harvard has a great idea on how preclude America from drilling for oil offshore: keep your tires inflated. As you can see he is a person of real substance and credibility. Harvard has turned out a complete idiot when they graduated Obama. He is a socialist and a Marist follower. I would rather vote for Vladimir Putin then this terrorist advocate.

Posted by: Neil Hatch | August 5, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am

Hobama’s tune CHANGEs daily. He’ll say anything to anyone at any time. One can HOPE that he’ll actually stand for someting by election day, but if he takes a clear stong position on anything, he loses the power of double talk on that issue. 174 days in the US Senate doesn’t even qualify him to shine McCain’s boots. I like McCain’s campaign and his injection of humor aimed that the clown Hobama. If McCain can make liberal girlymen take hissy fits, he’s definately doing something right. I’ll take 50,000 harleys over screaming throngs of metrosexual germans every time.

Posted by: Starman | August 5, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Another line that Obama has stolen, and tried to make it his own. What does this Kenyan, Hawaiian, Chicagoan, person, have for any core beliefs? The manuals in your gloves boxes tell yopu this. If you want to be Obamas’ children; good for you. He’ll treat you and talk to you like a child. Grow up America. Kick some butt, and throw “all” the bumbs out and let’s take back this country while we still have the chance. Unless you like losing your freedoms? I bet you Democrats and lazy Repubs do! Waiting for thr Messiah? Go to church. That’s the only real Messiah there is. Not some Marxist hack from Chicago, that couldn’t find the tire size on a car if he tried.

Posted by: mulder | August 5, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

McCain is consumate liar. He was actually against the Bush tax cuts before he was for them.
They were actually unfair and favored the rich over the middle class in good conscience couldn’t vote for them before he opposed really because they didn’t contain enough spending cuts.
You want more, there’s a couple dozen whoppers he’s put out.
All you Nobama people must be making 250k a year, that’s where Nobama begins raising taxes, middle class gets the largest break.
Any of you Nobama’s old enough to remember the Deficit Clinton inherited?
How about the 93 Budget Deficit Reduction Act. It raised taxes on the top 1 percent and cut them for the middle class, PayGO was enacted.
We went from deficit to surplus, lots of jobs.
Nobama plan is similar. McSame makes the Bush cuts permanent, trickle down to the middle class. Of course he and his wife save 400k per year in taxes with his plan.

Posted by: Tom. Tescher | August 5, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Handing out tire gauges symbolizes the juvenile thinking that more air in our tires will save more oil than can be gained from taping the continental shelve. Does Obama really believe that inflation makes us less dependent on foreign oil? All it will do is reduce our traction. Recommending overinflated tires just might possibly lead to a blowout.

Posted by: Mike | August 5, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

Not to stray from the article, I think that the air gages were were a good one time stunt that did its purpose on highlighting Obama’s statement about having all Americans check their tires to keep up fuel efficiently as showing that Obama thinks the majority of Americans are idiots. And reminds me a little of another dumb statement “Let them eat cake”. Which I hope ends similarly with Obama being voted No for President and a return to a more republican government.

Posted by: Okie | August 5, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

The American Automobile Association (AAA) says that for every pound of pressure your tires are under-inflated, you lose 2% of mileage on your car….And the United States Department of Transportation states that approximately 25% of all commuters are driving a few pounds short of full pressure. Do the math.
Anyone arguing against these facts IS truly “ignorant”. No wonder this country’s economy is in the condition it’s in. People can’t even see the truth when it’s staring them in their ignorant faces.

Posted by: Do your homework | August 5, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

You gotta check this out. Perfect for the election! The “NO BO” sticker. :)
http://noBOsticker.com

Posted by: Alex | August 5, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

As far as technical no how: I think someone who survived boot camp and them became a fighter pilot has far more eptitude than a free riding person who has never worked a day in their life!

Posted by: freedom | August 5, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

As far as technical no how: I think someone who survived boot camp and them became a fighter pilot has far more eptitude than a free riding person who has never worked a day in their life!

Posted by: freedom | August 5, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.