By Arnab Datta

Aug 31, 2008 12:37pm

McCain Says Palin a Better Leader than Obama

On Fox News Sunday this morning (watch HERE)  Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said that his new running mate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, has been a better leader than his opponent, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois.

"What this brings is a spirit of reform and change that is vital now in our nation’s capital," McCain said. "Eighty four percent of the American people think the country’s on the wrong track. In our Party, we have corruption. We have former members of Congress residing in federal prison, so it’s not surprising to me that we’ve seen an incredible invigoration around our Party and around the nation, not just Republicans, but Democrats. By the way, in the last day and a half or whatever it’s been, we have raised $4 million on the Internet. I wish I had taken her a month ago."

McCain said that Palin has "got the right judgment. She doesn’t think, like Senator Obama does, that Iran is a minor irritant," McCain said, stating something as fact that Obama never ever came close to saying.

"She knows that the surge worked and succeeded and she supported that," McCain continued. "Senator Obama still, still to this day, refuses to acknowledge that the surge has succeeded. She’s been commander-in-chief of the Alaska Guard that has served back and back. In fact, as you know, she’s got a son who’s getting ready to go. But she’s had the judgment on these issues that Senator Obama, he’s had all the wrong judgments. Governor Palin understands these issues, and she understands the challenges that we face."

"She’s had twelve years of elected office experience" — McCain said, including her 10 years as Mayor of Wasilla, an Anchorage suburb with less than 1/10th the population of the arena Obama spoke to Thursday night.

McCain said that Palin’s experience included "travelling to Kuwait, including being involved in these issues, and look, I’m so proud that she has displayed the kind of judgment and she has the experience and judgment as an executive. She’s run a huge economy up there in the state of Alaska. Twenty percent of our energy comes from the state of Alaska, and energy is obviously one of the key issues for our nation’s security."

McCain said that "as governor, she has had enormous responsibilities, none of which Senator Obama had. When she was in government, he was a community organizer. When she was taking tough positions against her own party, Senator Obama was voting present 130 times in the state legislature. On every tough issue, whatever it was, she was taking them on. That’s the kind of judgment that I’m confident that we need in Washington."

- jpt

User Comments

Wasilla? A small town with less than 5,000 people? OMG!!!!

Posted by: carl29 | August 31, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Platitudes.

Posted by: Danny | August 31, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Yes, Sarah has gotten things done. She’s actually accomplished change.
Obama is just hot air.

Posted by: John | August 31, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

To clarify–McCain is speaking platitudes.
He barely even knows Sarah Palin.

Posted by: Danny | August 31, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

And with each day, it becomes more obvious how ridiculous this choice was.
This goes right at the heart of McCain’s judgement. McCain looked into her eyes once and was sold?

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 31, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

As long as the Democrats and all you far left Liberal imbeciles (including the media swooning over Obama who continue to give him a free pass) continue to hammer Governor Palin’s outstanding record, her gubernatorial and executive experience and her successful accomplishments in her private life, and as long as you continue to compare the Republican’s No. 2 person to your No. 1, then the Republicans are in a much better position than they hoped to be.
What this scrutiny of Senator Palin highlights is the real shortcomings of the Democratic Presidential nominee (Obama not Biden!) who has been just one year in the Senate before running for President, but before then was plotting, scheming and outsmarting his opponents (including Hillary Clinton) in a calculating, devious manner like Chicago-style politics just like any other politician in Washington.
While Obama had lofty ambitions to run for President and made his entrance into politics for self-serving reasons and now hide behind a message of change and reform, Governor Palin has set out to quietly made a difference in the lives of her fellow Americans on many fronts as opposed to voting 130 times present in the Legislature – too afraid and too ambitious to leave a paper trail of his past records. Governor Palin is a proven reformer and change agent – not afraid to take on Big Oil, Big Business, and the Status Quo.
And here is a theory (but not far from realty) for all you die-hard Hillary supporters. Now is the time to get behind the McCain-Palin ticket. McCain knows that if he wins, there is a chance he will not run for a second term, and has paved the way for a presidential run for Hillary – after all, there are really good friends and he is a maverick.
Forget the issues for a moment – the Republicans are not going to overturn Roe v. Wade; McCain is committed to giving several thousands to each family for healthcare which will include every woman and child; he has the best education program and he knows a lot more about keeping the country safe. The enemy these days are not the army invasion kind that come wearing fatigues and boots but the terrorists that lurk in your own backyard – the ones you have to keep track of. You don’t want a President saying that Iran is just another irritant on a national stage.
Vote McCain for President!

Posted by: Jane | August 31, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

Can she even pick out the country of Iran on a map

Posted by: jim | August 31, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

McCain was half right, she would be a better leader than MCcAin.

Posted by: Debra | August 31, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Please correct: Sarah Palin did not serve as mayor of Wasilla for 10 years. She was a city council member for 4 years (1992-1996), then mayor for 6 years (1996-2002). She was defeated for lieutenant governor in 2002, then elected governor in 2006.

Posted by: TKD | August 31, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Enormous responsibilities as Governor? The Alsaksa National Guard is a big deal is it? Alaska’s economy is 47th by Gross State Product http://www.statemaster.com/graph/eco_gdp-gross-state-product-current-dollars
Its population is 47th biggest as well
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_population
I think McCain may have boxed himself into a bit of a corner on the whole experience thing here. I think he would be better off just not talking about it. It just pushes Obama onto the issues, and if that happens, the Dems win hands down I think.

Posted by: markymark | August 31, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

What experience is he talking
about?
Palin is a moose burger flipper.

Posted by: anon | August 31, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

Yea, Yea, I know, Alaska is next to Russia, and he was a POW

Posted by: Thinking | August 31, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

McCain has shown to the American people that he is about putting politics first instead of Country first.
He should have picked a more experienced person as his VP. The man is 72 years old with 2 bouts of serious skin cancer.

Posted by: vickie | August 31, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Yeah, she gets things done, she got her ex-brother-in-law fired during a custody suit.

Posted by: debra | August 31, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Let’s compare her judgement, her decisions, her spending, her mentors, her backbone, her friends to Obama’s for the past 20 years.
If Obama didn’t have money and the media he would still be a community organizer.
I’ll place my hope in a war hero and a small-town reformer any day rather than a shady Chicago lawyer and 35 year Washington insider.

Posted by: riley | August 31, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

What I love about her is that she is a very accomplished woman and it is ovbious that the family works as a team.
II was raised in the good ole days when kids had to work.I work in education-my kids think that if they have to go home and do 2 hours of homework it is abuse.
When I was a kid, my parents ran a business-I came home from school and babysat every day and on weekends.
I have never used drugs or alchohol, have always worked and am 60 years old and can outwork most 40 year old men. I am widowed and the mother of a disabled child. I own my home and have a peice of property almost paid off.
My cousins also had to work hard.Two of my mother’s sisters ran businesses along side their husbands. Not a one of cousins use drugs or have a alochol problem; they are all educated or have their own business-hmmm I think Palin is a great example and her children know that Palin and her husband work as a team. Most of us in this world have to work and I mean work to get the American dream-aint life grand!
She also wears skirts-she is a class act. Great example for my students

Posted by: sandie shuck | August 31, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Anyone curious why Governor Palin wasn’t making her own case on the morning shows today?

Posted by: rst | August 31, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Yes, but do you realize how many of those towns of 5 or 6,000 there are in this country who are going to find your insinuations rather offensive??
The Obama camp already did a good job of offending them the day McCain announced her selection.

Posted by: Lee | August 31, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

She wasn’t on the talk shows because she and McCain are on their way to the impending hurricane region to offer their support.
Any other questions?

Posted by: Lee | August 31, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Well, of course, you can SAY anything. The problem today is that the politicians, the media and apparently many voters think that saying it makes it true.

Posted by: Suzie | August 31, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

One thing for sure, he is going to have spend a lot of time selling her to the American public.
When we go to thr poll it is going to be difficult to find her name on the ballot, and the people will wondering who this McCain guy is.

Posted by: Thinking | August 31, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

“She’s actually accomplished change.”
Yeah, like firing people for personal reasons. Nice one.
She hasn’t ‘cleaned’ anything. She was more interested in getting rid of people she didn’t like. But not the people she SHOULD have gotten rid of in her OWN Party.
The Alaskan Republican Party is still invested with lots of corrupt legislators and offices: Stevens (Father and Son); Young; Murkowski; Clark; Weimar; Bobrick; Anderson; etc. etc. The list goes on and on.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 31, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

The one thing that has gone largely unnoticed about Gov. Palin’s pick is that she brings striking balance to the Republican ticket since her husband is a stay-at-home dad and John McCain is a kept man.

Posted by: Hmm... | August 31, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Looks like the Republican party is getting desperate…

Posted by: Jackson | August 31, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

A smart, tough, woman with sixteen years of experience in government, who has accomplished more in two years as governor than Joe Biden has in his entire career in the Senate, not to mention more than Barack Obama, who has accomplished exactly nothing, and she’s being attacked as totally lacking in experience? This kind of bigoted and sexist attack is going to backfire in a big way. As people see and hear Sarah Palin, and learn who she is and what she’s accomplished, they’re going to realize that she would make a better president than either of the men on the Democratic ticket. In fact, I think that, after one or two terms as vice president, she may just BE our first woman president.

Posted by: Vincent | August 31, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

I have never seen such idiotic comments in my life, for the love of God I hope that these comments are comming from children and not grown adults, first of all this woman has done more than Obama hands down, it’s on paper period, stop trying to diminish her accomplishments, it’s the same thing that corporate America does with women, they will hire the unqualified man and pay him more and try to downgrade the accomplishments of the woman with more credentials and experience, it’s ridiculous, she has had more time in elected office than he has, and for those of you with the small town comments, small town, big town whatever, they are all people and they are responsible for making serious decisions that affect peoples lives, they pass legislations, deal with budget issues, environmental issues, whether it’s a town of 3 million or a town of 3,000 you still have to make policies that will affect the lives of those constituance. All you have to do is look at her record and look at her accomplishments and you can see that she has had to make tough decisions, what type of decisions have Obama made, and it is telling when you are able to compare the bottom of the ticket person from the other team with the top of the ticket. As far as her being a heartbeat away from the presidency, Obama who is less qualified is trying to be the PRESIDENT, she is trying to be the VICE PRESIDENT, the person running for president has no foreign policy experience, so he picks Biden to help him out, McCain does not have great economic background so he chooses someone that will back him up, everyone refers to McCain’s Age, well how about Bidens age and his bout with an Anurism, if something happens to him the empty suit Obama would be on his own, what was your argument? You people lack basic common sense and it says a lot about our education system and why it needs to be revamped, these are things that can be easily research but yet you choose to spew lies and rhetoric instead of having a serious discussion of facts.

Posted by: Kim | August 31, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

History will show us that this was a poor choice McCain/Palin, what a JOKE!

Posted by: JD | August 31, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

that the odious one, the hopelessly corrupt Ted Stevens, counts her as his insider buddy is enough to make my skin crawl… he`s a rotten – to-the-core sybarite…any notion that she is tough on corruption and cleaning house is all blather and froth and none of it true…already we have abuse of office… pathetic.

Posted by: waggs | August 31, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Well, as one reader noted, you can SAY anything. But the proof is in the resume, and Palin v. Obama is a joke. Although she may be cute and charming–to gloss recent comments–she just doesn’t measure up.
I think the next 2 months will show where the truth lies, as long as readers look to the original sources themselves, i.e., Palin, Biden, McCain and Obama during the debates, and ignore all the pontificators in the media. If this country doesn’t elect the brilliant, forward-looking Obama-Biden ticket then I think our nation’s best days may be behind us.

Posted by: kushka53 | August 31, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

McCain is delusional. Palin is a right wing ideologue no more ready to lead a parade than the country.

Posted by: Mike | August 31, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Palin’s elevation is a bad thing for women. Unqualified women in positions of power make us all look bad.

Posted by: Jane | August 31, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

John McCain once again has showed he will say whatever Karl Rove tells him. The same Karl Rove who tanked his campaign in South Carolina 2000, remember the ‘race issue’. Well John you are going to have to get alot smarter than you and Karl are. Because the American people are tired of the same Rove antics, the same hype over substance, that has served to drive America into a recession, an endless war in Iraq, an OBL still on the loose after all these years. Indeed, Mr. McCain can’t you get alittle better, alittle smarter, in your mature years? Or do you always in the end sell out to the highest bidder or the highest vote getter? Even when your facts just aren’t true!

Posted by: HST | August 31, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

More amazing is how the Republicans are defending her with a straight face. Even if Obama’s experience has been less than most Presidential candidates, he has been on the political stage for the last year and beat Hillary in the primary, (quite an accomplishment). Nobody heard of this Governor until Friday. How much vetting could McCain and parties have done. It was an irrational decision that seems to be very politically motivated, perhaps as much as Mondale’s pick of Ferraro. I think most Republicans will vote with their pocketbook but can they compare this ticket with a Reagan/Bush or Bush/Cheney ticket with a straight face? If so, best of luck.

Posted by: Mark Treitel | August 31, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

is this the kind of people he is going to select to serve in an administration… something is seriously wrong with his judgement….

Posted by: tubette | August 31, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

I do not believe the statement could be true even if one doesn’t like Obama. Where did this right field choice came from? Was there a GOP move from within to make McCain have her on the ticket? I can’t believe he thought of this himself.

Posted by: Tom | August 31, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

I’m even more focused on making Obama our next president with this anti-female VP pick of McCain. She has nothing that I want for the women of America. NOTHING!
She may have some estrogen in her, but that’s it. She does not represent America’s women or families. Do we need more BIG OIL interests running this country? More rejection of the science re: global warming? Haven’t you people had enough.

Posted by: Cindy | August 31, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

OBAMA PALesIN COMPARISON
Biden should have picked a better running mate.

Posted by: legend | August 31, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

McCain is delusional. Palin is no more ready to lead a parade than the country.

Posted by: Mike | August 31, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

One more thing. Basically, McCain is running a “Change” platform. He’s basically reiterating the Democrats platform, every time he promotes change he will get the meme out there to get rid of Bush and therefore is actually campaigning against himself.

Posted by: Mark Treitel | August 31, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

If Palin is a better leader than Obama than McCain should quit the race and the Rebulican party should nominate Palin. What a joke.

Posted by: FHAshburn | August 31, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

Joe Biden might have the edge on Foreign Policy,
But I heard more than one commentator on the Sunday morning shows that Palin has the MOST experience of all four on the major party tickets in the areas of energy and oil.
Am I wrong, or isn’t oil and energy the biggest DOMESTIC issue facing our nation right now????????

Posted by: Lee | August 31, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

Wouldn’t you be very enthused about the pick too if your questionairre looked like this?
Do I consider her perfect on issues?
Do I consider anyone perfect on ?
Do I consider her qualified / trust her judgment on ?
Now, if only McBush would be honest enough to replace “Nation First” with “Ideology First” or “Political Expediency” first..

Posted by: ProudAmerican | August 31, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

SARA PALIN’S 18 MONTHS OF PUBLIC OFFICE DO MEET THE LAUGH TEST! Her duties as mayor of Nowhere, Alaska are not exactly relevant.
How can we trust John McCain after he made this choice? It is time to stop implying that John McCain is senile. It is now a fact.

Posted by: John's conscience | August 31, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

McCain’s decision in selecting Sarah Palin is questionable. While she has accomplishments, her credentials fall short for the position. Can you imagine with her background handling Iran and N. Korea? Carly Fiorina and Meg Whitman have more international and corporate goverance experience than Sarah has managing the state of Alaska.

Posted by: Tony | August 31, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

Concerned in OH
Actually, Sarah Palin just took down the ads she was appearing with Ted Stevens in. Check your facts!

Posted by: roxanne | August 31, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Obama said the threat from Iran was smaller than the threat from Russia–during the cold war. He didn’t say Iran was a tiny country. Not understanding geography is McCain’s thing!

Posted by: S. Williams | August 31, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Pl. don’t mind what he/McCain just said…He just lost another of his marble….Its a slow process…He has been loosing the marbles for quite sometime….He just few more left…We are trying our best make sure he doesn’t run out of them before election.

Posted by: McCain'sNurse | August 31, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

John McCain has chosen the least qualified major party VP candidate in American history. In doing so, he has acted recklessly and irresponsibly, and he has called his own judgment into serious question. Just last August, Sarah Palin confessed in an interview that she has never thought much about Iraq or the war or foreign affairs because she’s always been “too busy doing other things.” It’s not just that she has no experience. It’s that she’s never even thought seriously about this stuff. And now McCain wants her going toe-to-toe, on our behalf, with the leaders of Iran, Russia, China, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, and North Korea. This is an act of breathtaking malpractice on McCain’s part, and it would endanger us all.

Posted by: ElodieStClair | August 31, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Mac has really lost it. Is this the same guy I couldn’t wait to vote for in 2000? I think not. In 2000, I knew Mac would put “Country First.” Now I know he puts his ego first. The more I learn about this guy, the more I dislike him. This Palin judgment is scary. Does he really believe she is qualified? Is this what Mac judges to be in country’s best interest? Change the slogan, change the whole campaign re experience; it’s all a sad joke now.

Posted by: SD Sims | August 31, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Obama had one chance to listen to the people (dems) to create the dream ticket with Clinton and he blew it.
He did not listen to the millions of people then and there is no way he ever will.

Posted by: Rk | August 31, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

The palin selection by McCain is LUNACY at its HIGHEST because she is just a heartbeat away. but it show the sinister plan by the republican to use this woman in other ways , like having her steady talk and patrol her down syndrome kid.. and also use the other son thats off to iraq , Something you hardly hear Joe Biden talk about on his son who is also off to IRAQ.
HAD the Democrat convention been a complete FLOP no way mcCain selects Palin. this MOVE should offend and upset women because we know Miss palin was not selected on MERIT but more out of DESPERATION.
In the end it will not matter.. because the women that supported Hillary are democrats and firmly supports the rights of women , and when it comes a party that have the interest of women and childcare at hand thats the Democrat. look at the democrat platform when it comes to women and children issues its a mile long , good luck finding programs and issues for women and kids in the Republican platform. NOT so long ago Pres Bush VETO a child healthcare BILL …. need i say more.

Posted by: mary | August 31, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

How can you compete with someone who thinks they are a God?
Why would you want to.
Obama has made a three ring circus out of the Presidential Race.
It Is All about him.
I think his childhood was so distrubing and left deep scars. With His own father abandoning him. His Mother abandoning him. Has left way to much emotional upsets he still is trying to deal with.
In his desperately seeking Attention and love. Going Overboard with the need to feel like someone loves him and that he is accepted. He is running for President for all the wrong reasons.
He is still having Identify Crisis.
He is still trying to prove to himself he is better than his Dad.
He will do absolutely any thing, any thing at all to win, no matter what.
His needs are not the Countries Needs.
Nor Should the Country made to suffer or be part of his Crisis.
Follow his life and the paths it has taken him, from doing drugs to staying friends with some pretty despicable people. Shows his bad judgments and lack of identity and self worth.
There is so much he still has not come to terms with in his life.
Being the President of Our Country will not help with that, and could possibly have detrimental effects on him and the nation.
He might be a nice man, he might have an idea, But he should not be president until he has all the Ghost out of his closet.
Reality bites sometimes, but you can not argue with the truth.

Posted by: seah | August 31, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Of those 84% of people who think this country is on the wrong track, I wonder how many of them believe so primarily because of what we’re doing in the Middle East. It’s a hard sell to call yourself the spirit of reform when you intend to continue that failed course of action.

Posted by: Max | August 31, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

What a winning stategy from the left! They’re trying to poke holes in Gov. Palin because she’s the governor of the state with the 4th smallest number of residents. She has just as much executive experience as Sen. Obama has national legislative experience. From what I understand in studying government, it is much easier to go with the partisan flow as a legislator than to reform a state party system. Gov. Palin may have less “experiece” in the public arena, but knowing about what she has done in the state of Alaska puts Sen. Obama to shame.
Oh, and the objective journalism in this election is simply stunning…

Posted by: Drummerboy | August 31, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

I wonder what she’ll wear during the the VP debate? Heels, a one-piece bathing suit and a sash that says ‘Miss Vice President’! I hope she remembers to wear her hair down – she’ll get more Republican male votes!

Posted by: Debbie | August 31, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

She makes good moose burgers,
man. Isn’t that enough to be
Vice President of the USA and
if necessary to be President?

Posted by: anon | August 31, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

Look at the executive and legislative experience on the combined ticket.
McCain/Palin – 20 years military leadership and executive experience, 10 years mayoral, 2 year gubanatorial. 2 year US house of Rep,. 22 years US Senate. Holy Cow!!!
Obama/Biden – 37 years combined US senate experience, 7 years Illinois state senate.
If you want a leader and a ticket that has made decisions and actually accomplished something – McCain/Palin is your choice.
If you want the debating, do-nothing, analysis-paralysis, same old same old and corruption of the legislature, then you vote for obama/biden.

Posted by: MG | August 31, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

As the NY Daily News reported today, not even Palin’s mother-in-law thinks she is qualified.

Posted by: Patrick | August 31, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

Obama keeps saying he is the man for change. His voting record tells us that he doesn’t vote against the party. McCain has a record of picking the idea that make the most sense, not just the Republican one. If you vote Obama, it will be 4 more years of the same for sure. He won’t have enough votes to push his agenda, which I must say I can’t see how he will pay for it.
Palin is a very intelligent woman that I think was a good choice.

Posted by: Tom | August 31, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Kim, under your analysis, the mayor of any small town in America is qualified to become president. I just think you should seriously contemplate the actual local politicians you know and whether you think they could effectively govern this country. I’ve been troubled about Obama’s lack of experience as well, but Palin’s is taking that next step in the inexperience direction. The whole thing has me wondering if everyone needs to go back to school and be re-educated about the very real impacts that politicians have on our lives – it’s not just games and advertising wars and what will sell better to the masses – it’s real. But, you’d never know it from the candidates and campaigns (and the ridiculous focus of the media analyses) that are going on in this election.

Posted by: Suzie | August 31, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

In Friday, when I first heard that McCain picked a young, inexperienced woman as VP, I was very disappointed. I thought I would just stay at home not vote in this election. I will not vote for Obama, but I will not vote for McCain either.
But since yesterday, after I read lots of news about Palin, I changed my mind. She is just that kind of woman I like, energetic, sports-loving, family oriented, kids-loving, hunnting, conservative..
The more news I read about her, the more I like her…
I’m ready to vote for McCain.

Posted by: golfgirlusa | August 31, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

bottom line huge lack of experience on both sides…Obama & Sarah…doesn’t matter if the person is #1 or #2…is this really the best that both parties have to offer???? really disgraceful!

Posted by: political neophyte | August 31, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

To all those of you who vote for a 72 year old McCain and a clearly well-media-spun “experienced” Palin – then you deserve what you get. more of the same… good luck to all of you all – the rest of the world has already moved on, you are no longer #1.
you can’t fix stupid.

Posted by: will | August 31, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

She didn’t have a passport until 2007.
What’s more amazing, though, is the flip-flopping the Fox-types have done on whether “experience” matters. Fred Barnes was saying “Abraham Lincoln didn’t have much experience before election, and it was no problem!”
Yet they all ripped on Obama as being inexperienced.

Posted by: Brian | August 31, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

I like and respected John McCain 2000 – remember the guy Bush & Rove successfully smeared out of the primaries?
John McCain 2008 is somebody different – first he employs the very fear/smear merchants that id him in 8 years ago, and now this ill-considered, irresponsible, transparent calculated decision.
Can’t even consider voting for John McCain ’08 version.

Posted by: Steve T. | August 31, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

The selection of Sarah Palin is reckless lunacy. There is no defending it.

Posted by: ElodieStClair | August 31, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

The most chilling part of this farce is that it’s an example of McCain’s “shoot-from-the-hip” decision-making. He is only looking at short-term gains. She could likely become president during the next four years. I don’t care how good of a hockey mom she is–she is not qualified to lead the nation.

Posted by: Roger | August 31, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

If Palin’s experience is as significant as portrayed , she’s better qualified than McCain, Obama, and Biden. He should step aside and place her at the top of the ticket for the good of the country.

Posted by: Bad Idea | August 31, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

McCain’s addled state becomes more apparent with every move he makes. Why would the United States want to accept Palin as a member of the White House a heartbeat away from the presidency considering McCain’s age and health. Since when do we want an extremist Christian Evangelist who believes in Creationism and has zero experience in serious politics, who has won her limited national fame by being a right-wing talk show heroine to run this, the most powerful government in the world? This is a ploy that even the American electorate won’t fall for. The mass media must get the truth out about the shallowness of this trick. We deserve better even from the Rove management team who organized this scam.

Posted by: jefflz | August 31, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

bottom line huge lack of experience on both sides…Obama & Sarah…doesn’t matter if the person is #1 or #2…is this really the best that both parties have to offer???? really disgraceful!
Posted by: political neophyte
It’s good that you are neutral but this blog is filled with people who have a position on both sides. Maybe you should move to Switerzerland!

Posted by: dana | August 31, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Yes, right now McCain/Palin are demonstrating their “leadership skills” by drawing precious emergency resources away from the hurricane evacuation and preparation effort by turning it into a campaign photo op. I’ll pass on that kind of leadership, thank you very much.

Posted by: Gretchen | August 31, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

We are so excited about Sarah Palin. She is more experienced than Obama. This is a great match for John McCain. His cancer is the type that does not have to be a threat when caught in time. My brother has had it 3 times and after 15 years is doing fantastic. If something were to happen to John McCain, I certainly still would rather see Sarah Palin as President than Obama or Biden. The McCain/Palin is more American than Barak Hussein Obama, which scares us. Can Barak be trusted? We know what kind of character Sarah Palin has. McCain has served his country well and loves this country. If Sarah Palin is a gamble, we believe it is a very smart gamble for America. She has our vote! She has our support. Vote McCain/Palin!

Posted by: Phyllis | August 31, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

McCain really doesn’t get it about Iraq. Every time I hear him say that the surge worked, I am reminded of Stephen Covey’s story about the guys hacking their way through the jungle. They keep at it day after day. Finally, the boss sends one of the guys up a tree to see how much farther they have to go. The guy shouts down from the top of the tree: “Wrong jungle.”
It doesn’t matter how effectively we’ve been hacking our way through Iraq. It’s the wrong jungle.

Posted by: Joel | August 31, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

And while we’re on the subject, how could John ’08 do this to all the responsible, thinking members of his own party.
Now they all have to put on a good face, spinning to reporters what a great person Sarah Palin is, how she does have experience, etc. when they know there were many other Republicans both more well-known and far more qualified.
How could he do that to his own fellow Republicans?
Speaks volumes about McCain ’08 – not even close to the man that was McCain POW or even McCain 2000.

Posted by: Steve T. | August 31, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

Does McCain think Sarah Palin is better qualified for VP than for instance Condi Rice?

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 31, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

A dubious war hero selects a
dubious VP.

Posted by: anon | August 31, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

as a woman i am offended that mccain and the rest of the republicans think i will vote for them now because palin and i share the same reproductive organs – keeping the republicans out of my reproductive organs is exactly why i am voting for obama!

Posted by: BJ | August 31, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

That being said by McCain, no one should have any doubt now, he’s nuts. I wouldn’t trust him as a dog-catcher much less as President and his pick as VP is PLAIN stupid.

Posted by: texmexborderjumper | August 31, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

McCain is a reckless radical. He is willing to risk the safety of the People of the United States for a political game of roulette. He is unfit to be President.

Posted by: intercontinentaldude | August 31, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Reposting as some phrases were cut off…
Wouldn’t you be very enthused about the pick too if your questionairre looked like this?
Do I consider her perfect on “certain hot button social” issues?
Do I consider anyone perfect on “certain hot button social issues”?
Do I consider her qualified / trust her judgment on “certain hot button social issues”?
Now, if only McBush would be honest enough to replace “Nation First” with “Ideology First” or “Political Expediency” first…

Posted by: ProudAmerican | August 31, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

“But since yesterday, after I read lots of news about Palin, I changed my mind. She is just that kind of woman I like, energetic, sports-loving, family oriented, kids-loving, hunnting, conservative..
The more news I read about her, the more I like her…”
Yeah, good enough reasons to have a beer with her. That was a really good criteria for picking Bush as well. As far as being POTUS, I would take Obama’s selection to head Harvard Law Review by itself as more relevant than everything you list.
Do you understand this is an election for President of The United States, not Miss Popularity?

Posted by: hmpierson | August 31, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Obama is right on judgement on every instance whether it is IRaq war or negociating with Iran. He has the intellectual and judgement to lead this great country. Lets not confuse about it.
Vote for Obama.

Posted by: Tom | August 31, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

John McCain is 72 years old and has endured a very hard life. Do we really want a small town mayor with 1 year 8 months experience as governor in a state with a smaller population than San Francisco?
McCain is too old to have such an inexperienced candidate as his VP, could you imagine if McCain croaked in his first term and we have some newbie running the country? This Choice is dangerous and insulting to the American people. Hillary Clinton had experience and wasnt a right wing wacko.
Sarah Palin is a newbie politician hack for the far right of the republican party. She is a dittohead with no experience.

Posted by: Robert | August 31, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

“But I heard more than one commentator on the Sunday morning shows that Palin has the MOST experience of all four on the major party tickets in the areas of energy and oil.”
Now that is a laugh! Oil pays for everything in Alaska. There are no taxes, Income, Sales, or Personal property. All Paid for by Oil. Now you don’t suppose that she might be for oil do you? Don’t think that oil might be her priority do you? Don’t think she might be in bed with the oil industry do you? Don’t think she might sell out the rest of the country for oil do you?

Posted by: Thinking | August 31, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Palin has been the VP nominee for barely 48 hours and the press and democratic party is going out of their way to discredit her credentials. Obama has been a candidate for 19 months yet no one is questioning his credentials. He has been a state legislator and spent 160 days as a US Senator. Thats it! Lets not forget Carter and Clinton were former State Governors. Thats experience worth voting for.

Posted by: David | August 31, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

McCain picked Ms. Palin as an insult to the election and the democratic process. His need to “one-up” the DNC. Ms. Palin, on the other hand, by accepting the Veep position demonstrates her judgement. An embrassing display of ego, when clearly she is not equipped for the number 2 position of our nation.
A public school principal must have a Master’s Degree to administer a school and educate your children. Ms. Palin has a Bachlors Degree in journalism. An education that does not qualify Ms. Palin to administer our nation.
Think clearly here folks! Sen. McCain is an older guy with health problems. Ms. Palin is way over her head. This is not the time to play “old man” 1980s politics.

Posted by: karen | August 31, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

She is exactly what that party is. I don’t believe in a lot of the Repubs policies and then there are policies of the Dems I don’t beleive in. She appears tome to be a good choice for their party.
Hillary 2012

Posted by: T | August 31, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Re: Jane
“Forget the issues for a moment”
Do some of you people even hear yourselves talk? For all the talk about McCain “putting country first,” the strategy to elect him this time around so Hillary can run again in 2012 is pretty deceitful. He talks about corruption in Washington, and then his supporters openly try to bribe the female vote. Disgusting.
The reason Palin is going to flop is because independents, Hillary supporters, and women in general are smart enough to see through a blatant political stunt and vote on issues rather than ovaries.
“Forget the issues…” honestly. This isn’t junior high student council. You might as well say “Vote for Palin because boys are gross!”

Posted by: Sophia | August 31, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Sorry, David, but BUSH was also a state governor – remember?
Pretty much explodes your argument…

Posted by: Steve T | August 31, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Is your son being shipped
to Iraq something to boast
about?
To do what there? To
participate in further
destruction of that country?
The fact is Bush is bringing
troops home and implementing
Obama’s plan.
McCain the old warmonger
stands alone on Iraq now.

Posted by: anon | August 31, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

Okay, now I see it — McCain is the tool of the oil industry as well . . .
Todd Palin [Sarah's husband] has been asked to champion an array of causes or institutions since his wife took office in December.
His favorite is steering young Alaskans toward stable jobs in the oil and gas industry. It’s a singular choice among his counterparts, whose pet issues include schools, public health, domestic violence, poverty or the arts.

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | August 31, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Gee Concerned on OH if you idiots in Ohio haden’t elected the Town Idiot from Crawford Texas as President we wouldn’t be so deep in debt nor at war.

Posted by: Saddlesablazing | August 31, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Obama is an egomaniac-so insecure he needs 200,000 Germans and 80,000 worshippers in Denver to validate how wonderful he is.
A man that constantly wants/needs that much power and attention does not need to be president. He is dangerous.
I don’t think Palin is the one America should be worrying about.

Posted by: riley | August 31, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Ethan:
Umm – What?

Posted by: Steve T | August 31, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

The city of San Francisco has a budget larger than the state of Alaska. Vice President Gavin Newsom? No. I don’t think so.
Executive experience is nice, but Alaska is essentially a city-state with most of its population managed by Anchorage’s Mayor Mark Begich, a Democrat.

Posted by: johnTX | August 31, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

I have been a loyal democrat for over 15 years. I am now a registered republican who will vote for McCain/Palin in November. Obama and Biden is a complete JOKE.

Posted by: Robert | August 31, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

McCain’s decision to select Palin is reckless. He needs to change his “Country First” slogan to “McCain First, Country Second” because that is what this decision amounts to. It is cold calculating politics to the core and I hope it backfires in a big way.
This country has been abused and misused by the Republican administration and their policies for 8 years and McCain was right there in line with the rest of his party. The maverick myth is just that, a myth.

Posted by: Angela | August 31, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

McCain is as confident about Sarah Palin’s judgment in much the same way that he was confident that iraq has WMD.

Posted by: Hail Mary | August 31, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Why doesn’t it bother Obama’s fanbase that he voted “present” so often instead of actually taking a position?
Leaders have to do more than just show up.

Posted by: Cartman | August 31, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Oh wow, can McCain be more stupid? hahahahahaha i just lmao everytime he speaks…. and hey remember… we are a nation of whiners!!!!!

Posted by: escamilla | August 31, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

It is about the oil.
McCain/Palin “Change we can line our pockets with.”

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | August 31, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

He meets this woman once, declares her to be his soul mate, then claims she’s a better leader than Obama. This guy is a bigger moron than Bush. There is no other conclusion to reach. McCain would be truly dangerous as President.

Posted by: James | August 31, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

I believe People should vote the leader who will do good for you not harm to you. Every single Mccain Policy will hurt you. He will raise taxes for middle class, continue the same health inurance which left you die once you become sick because insurance company will not cover you, no plan for renewable energy solutions. He only calls for more drilling that will not solve our energy dependence on foreign country.
People need to understand this election. Its not about just a single election about Obama or Mccain. Its the policy they are carrying which takes country in right or wrong direction.
Obama has a clear understanding of the problems Americans are facing and he has clear solutions to these problems.
So, lets not confuse or distracted by dirty politics by Mccain. Lets vote for Barack.

Posted by: tom | August 31, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

But Steve you obviously overlooked the Presidency of Carter. Love him or hate him, I’ll take Bush over Carter any day.

Posted by: David | August 31, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Thank you Republicans for the tremendous laugh you gave all of us.
POPEYE & OLIVE OIL
WHAT A JOKE

Posted by: Saddlesablazing | August 31, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Oh ya, He’s implementing Obama’s plan! What a JOKE! Obama never even stated a plan. He only repeated the timetable montra. What do you think the surge was for if not to add security and give the Iraqi army time to build. Now that the Iraqi’s are stronger we can think about bringing troop levels down. I dare you to state exactly any plan Obama has. Change! Change! No. I don’t have change for a dollar.

Posted by: Ethan | August 31, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Google this:
Todd Palin unique among nation’s 5 first husbands Associated Press

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | August 31, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

seah
Obama has been saying for months that it’s not about him! Weren’t you listening? It has been McCain who has tried to make this about Obama because McGeezer can’t talk about the polices of his party over the last 8 years. Obama has never called McCain a rockstar or compared him to Paris Hilton. You ignorant McCain supporters only hear what you want. Why don’t you try to explain why he passed over Kay Bailey Hutchinson, Condi Rice etc? These women would have been much more qualified. Do you suspose he has some sort of obession with beauty queens?

Posted by: roxanne | August 31, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

McCain and Obama. Is this the best America can offer? We are truly doomed. God help us all.

Posted by: Steve | August 31, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

I was a life long Republication. Looking
at the Mccain ticket and his policies,
I am voting for Democrats. McCain/Palin
ticket is JOKE

Posted by: Andy | August 31, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

Everything that Obama promises he will do Sarah Palin has already done!
Clean up government corruption, raise taxes on the oil industry, increase the state coffers, improved education & raised the standard of living for her constituents.
Everythig that Obama hopes to be Sarah Palin has already done while raising a family.
Obama camp will try to claim that she is agreeing with his platform. NO, she doesnt agree that talking about change brings change, she does change. She walks the walk while obama is still talking the talk.
BTW- she already has experience at commanding a real army of soldiers that respect her. She is the law enforcement official in charge of protecting a valuable oil producing propoerty located within the grasp of a world superpower intent on increasing its energy supply holdings. Sorry Putin, you are going to have to deal with Sarah Palin now.
Obama surrounds himself with world class brains while Palin gets in the trenches, rolls up her sleeves and gets it done. Bet she NEVER votes present.
Soon every world leader will be want to be in the presence of a world class person and the next vice president and mccains presidential successor. Brains, saavy and beauty. Hollywood will be swooning all over this ticket. Can we all say bye, bye, bye obama?

Posted by: unlending | August 31, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

Some facts about Wassila:
Public Water System serves 746 customers
Public Sewer System serves 523 customers
Police City Police Department: 21 officers including chief and communication officer
Fire/Rescue is run by the Borough
Ambulance is run by the Borough
Impressive.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 31, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

Caroll R: Bush was a governor.
Being a governor doesn’t necessarily trump anything.
Obama has been vetted (and supported) by MILLIONS of his countrymen. He is by now well known by all voters.
AND he ran the best orgainized and best-financed campaign in history. With the bulk of the money coming from millions of ordinary Americans, not corporations and PACs.
Palin does not hold a candle to him.

Posted by: Steve T | August 31, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

It is about the oil.
McCain/Palin “Change we can line our pockets with.”
Posted by: Mr. Coffee
Actually, we’ve already been doing that. Except that instead of lining our pockets, we’ve all been fleeced! It’s the oil companies who have lined their pockets!

Posted by: roxanne | August 31, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

POTUS is not a job for one
with a long resume with a
long laundry list.
It’s a job for a leader
who can inspire people to
execute his policies for
the good of all the citizens
as well as for future
generations.

Posted by: anon | August 31, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Glenda
We’re not running for President but if you’re scared you should buy a dog!

Posted by: dana | August 31, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

unlending: Palin has been governor of a state with a population 1/6th of CHICAGO’s for One and a half years!
The verdict on her is not near in yet.

Posted by: Steve T | August 31, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Great judgement on the part of Obama. It
took him more than 20 years for him to judge his pastor’s teachings. For every problem we have, Obama will come to realize about it after may be a couple of decades.Judgemnt is his forte.

Posted by: jasona | August 31, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

McCain/Palin – 20 years military leadership and executive experience, 10 years mayoral, 2 year gubanatorial. 2 year US house of Rep,. 22 years US Senate. Holy Cow!!!
Obama/Biden – 37 years combined US senate experience, 7 years Illinois state senate.
If you want a leader and a ticket that has made decisions and actually accomplished something – McCain/Palin is your choice
Posted by: MG | Aug 31, 2008 1:30:26 PM
________________________________________
This is about ISSUES and a NEW VISION for the country heading into the 21st century, what McCain and now Palin is doing is getting behind the WHEEL of the BUSH CAR that has been running on 4 FLAT TIRES for the PAST 8 years.
Mccain wants to take your tax dollars and waste it on war and continue to ruin our economy . Barcak wants to take that same money and actually take care of AMERCAS own backyard ,
that means building road /bridges. forwardinG money to states to fix school , healthcare, programs that creat jobs, the environment .. ETC..
THIS IS LESS ABOUT THE CANDIDATES AND MORE OF WHAT IS IN THEIR PLATFORM .

Posted by: mike | August 31, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Good to see so many Obama bloggers out today. Many of your outrageous comments prove just how desperate the Democrats have become. This choice has blown them out of the water.
They have a ticket composed of a do-nothing and a 36-year Washington insider. One is ranked the #1 liberal in Congress, the other #3. They talk about change, but have absolutely no record of ever bucking their own party for the good of the people.
The other team is composed of a 25-year Washington maverick paired with a governor who has a proven record of change in her state – even when her own party blasted her for her actions. She’s even acted on behalf of the American taxpayers in that role by saying “no thanks” to Sen. Ted Stevens $400 million dollar bridge to nowhere that McCain tried to block in the Senate but was unable to.
Talk of Change versus Proven Change. I’ll go with the experienced team of McCain/Palin.

Posted by: marylou | August 31, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

If McCain had carefully interviewed her and talked about her views about national policy before choosing her, his comments would make a little sense. Fact is he hardly knows her. He only met her once before he chose her. McCain is just bluffing and bluffing about the qualifications of your vice presidential candidate when you yourself said that he/she should be the”person most prepared to take my place” is like swindling America.

Posted by: whatajoke | August 31, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

“Clean up government corruption”
She is currently being investigated for abuse of power.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 31, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

davie
Great post davie! I look at the two of them together and think EEEEEEEEEEEEEU!

Posted by: dana | August 31, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

From what I have always heard from local residents who have “summered” in Alaska, working six months on fishing ships, wages in Alaska have always been extremely high, as compared to the rest of the country, as is the cost of living there.
I would imagine Todd Palin’s $100,000 to $120,000/year salary would probably be the equivalent of a very middle class existence in the lower 48.

Posted by: Lee | August 31, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Willem If it comes out the brother-in-law was beating his wife and tasering his child as has been reported, it probably will bring her a few more voters then make her lose some.

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Hmmmm — last I looked, PTA experience didn’t count as “executive management.” Today, her mother-in-law was reported as not necessarily voting for her. Yes, she was a mayor…of a 7K-citizen village. Yes, she is the Governor…or a 700,000 citizen State. Let’s get real: Chicago has 3million people; Illinois has 13million people. Being the Senator from Illinois carries a bit more responsibility than an officer in the PTA. Times are serious — we don’t need someone second-in-command who’s claim to economic expertise is that she’s negotiating gas line rights to a CANADIAN firm!

Posted by: Alexandra | August 31, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

What happened was McCain was introduced to Palin six months ago and he got the hots for her. Now we’ll see some good old Republican philandering going on!!!!!

Posted by: Monster man | August 31, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

I didn’t trust her when she first came on the scene here in Alaska, because I jumped to the conclusion she was just a pretty face. But over the years, she’s won my respect. She has demonstrated more inspired, wise, energetic, principled, and genuine leadership than her short time in office suggests. I hope America manages to see this through the fog of politics.
What I especially like about her leadership is that she leads by doing, not just talking. Yet while she’s willing to stick her own neck out for what’s right, she’s also able to work with honest opponents to achieve pragmatic compromise. She’s the kind of leader a working democracy needs.
It’s clear to me, though, that Sarah is a Mom first, and a politician second. To me, that’s about the highest compliment I could ever pay any politician. Any caring Mom or Dad will understand my sentiment. Frankly, I want someone in office who cares more about people than politics. When I watched her choose to keep Trig (her Down’s syndrome child) that pretty much sealed my approval of Sarah. Whether you’re pro-life or not, it’s hard not to respect her stand. It’s one thing to say you’re pro-life. It’s another to live it out with personal sacrifice and grace.
She has my vote – AND my wife’s. Now, and when she runs for president in 2012.
P.S.: I saw her the other day when I was on my workout jog through the Glen Alps trailhead. She was doing a video shoot on the look-out over Anchorage, and we happened to be leaving at the same time. She walked right by me with a couple of her retinue, but I didn’t intrude. She drove herself down the mountain in a small sedan. I found myself just behind her in a three-car procession. Kind of cool.

Posted by: ttnewton | August 31, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

“by saying “no thanks” to Sen. Ted Stevens”
Bwahahaha. That was the very first lie she already told the American Public. On her first day!
When campaigning for Governer, she campaigned on a promise to build that very ‘Bridge to Nowhere’.
When the US Senate refused to allocate money for that ridiculous project, she tried to find money elsewhere. When that failed too, she had to shelve the project.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 31, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

So many Mccain supporters are dying today to bring the failed policies of past. America is far more better than McCain/Palin. Obama/Biden is far more superior ticket for presidency.
Democrats 08

Posted by: Megan | August 31, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Palin has the right executive experience and vision to lead this country.
Obama has done nothing for the country! Look at the shambles he has left his Chicago district in.
Obama is all talk, Palin is all actions.
Democrat for McCain/Palin 2008!

Posted by: Ben | August 31, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

“Clean up government corruption”
She is currently being investigated for abuse of power.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje
You’re right Willem but those idiot McCain supporters just don’t get it! I can’t wait to see these emails that bible betty sent to the guy she fired for not firing her ex brother in-law! By the way, this might seem petty but that voice of hers is god awful! I can barely listen to her talk.

Posted by: roxanne | August 31, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

Definition:
Hypocrite: One who criticizes someone running for office for inexperience and then puts someone inexperienced on their own ticket for office. See McCain.

Posted by: citizen | August 31, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

Democrats are such hypocrites. If they can put a candidate with no foreign policy on the top of the ticket, why can’t Republicans put one on the bottom of the ticket? The race is about Obama and McCain, not their running mates. Since when the VP become so important in a presidential race? People tearing Palin apart without even looking at her record are just desperate. And why do so many people assume McCain will die soon? I know a cancer surviver who lived to his 90s. The reality is, if Obama wins, the window for Hillary to run again will be closed. She’ll be too old in 2016.

Posted by: ocean 8 | August 31, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

Glenda: it’s fine if you want to be a vocal advocate for your candidate of choice but, please, get your facts straight. Obama said that Iran was a “tiny” country/threat in comparison to what the Soviet Union was to us during the Cold War. I don’t think anyone with a basic understanding of history (and geography) would dispute that. McCain has taken to distorting Obama’s comments about this (something I believe this blog has called him out for).

Posted by: Gretchen | August 31, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

Actually MO, Palin was not in favor of the bridge to nowhere.

Posted by: Ethan | August 31, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

Obama accomplished absolutely nothing in his 140 days in office–except to spend taxpayers money and vote present over 100 times.
I’m sure Palin as governor, made more decisions in one month than Obama made in 140 days.
His eye was always on the power of the presidency.
Palin was content to govern Alaska and did so with an 80% approval rating.

Posted by: cindy in nc | August 31, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

McCain (pre-Palin): “Experience matters!”
McCain (post-Palin): “Never mind.”

Posted by: Steve T | August 31, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Oh well, when Palin debates Biden she should acknowledge that it would be ridiculous to pretend she has the foreign policy experience of a politician entrenched in Washington for almost 30 years. He’d eat her alive and she knows it and we all know it. That’s why though Biden was brought on the Obama ticket though, to compensate for Obama’s lack of foreign policy experience and he knows it, she knows it and we all know it. Obama has Axelrod who’s had a couple years to make Obama look Presidential and Obama has 300 foreign policy advisors. I think Palin should point that she too could find herself a couple hundred foreign policy advisors and she too is on a ticket with someone who has almost 30 years in the Senate and vast foreign policy experience. She could also remind Biden that we have heard over and over from the Obama camp that it’s not experience but rather judgement.
While Obama has lots of promises he makes us, Palin can point out she has a record of reform and sticking up to the oil industry in Alaska and that she would put her judgement up against his and remind people that while Obama may be a symbol of change she has a record that shows she’s an agent of change, as does McCain. She should also point out that while she acknowledges she doesn’t have the experience of a Biden and McCain, as Obama does not either, that
she would not be so presumptous as to state that she doesn’t need to take into account the input from a Petreus if ever she were Commander in Chief because she would be President- as the equally inexperienced Obama has.

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Ocean8: “People tearing Palin apart without even looking at her record are just desperate.”
Bwahahaha. We ARE looking at her record: there’s just no there there.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 31, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Obama has the right judgement and vision to lead this country.
McCain has done nothing for the country except serving in POW! He is always stood against the middle-class families.
McCain is all talk, Obama will lead us to better future.
Republican for Obama/Biden 2008

Posted by: AnnMarie | August 31, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

Gretchen Well, thank god Obama doesn’t distort McCain’s comments or record. It works both ways Gretchen.
Your candidate hasn’t embraced new politics yet.

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

You guys just keep knocking small towns and all small town folks are going to get angry, not just the ones in Alaska. You keep talking about John McCain’s age and the biggest age demographic that votes, seniors, are going to get mighty angry that racism is disdained but ageism is apparently alive and well in the Democrat Party. Sure wouldn’t want to tick off that group of voters. You made this mistake with religious voters in previous elections and with women in this election cycle and where did it get you? You Dems shoot yourselves in the foot all the time. I think a lot of you have a problem relating to people who don’t live in big cities. This is perpetuated by the media who also can’t relate to people that don’t live in big cities. Then, you’re shocked and the media is shocked when you lose.

Posted by: LLC3 | August 31, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Suppose, just suppose, McCain somehow wins and then, a week before he’s to take office, dies.
Suddenly we have a President of the United States with NO National Policy experience, NO foreign policy experience, and a child still in diapers.
The President of the U.S. getting On-the-job training? No thanks.

Posted by: Steve T | August 31, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

AnnMarie Are you really that uninformed about these two candidates?
I totally respect your choice to support strongly Obama but at least when you make statements such as that you really need to do your homework first.

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

McCain has turned this race into a complete mockery. Sad. McCain, me first. This man doesn’t give a whit about our country.

Posted by: A slap in the face | August 31, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

If I lived in Wasilla I’d be scared because every time someone mentions the town the population drops. HAHA

Posted by: Cartman | August 31, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

On the job training! PERFECT! That is exactly what BIDEN said about Barrak Hussein Obama during the primaries! PERFECT!!!!

Posted by: Ethan | August 31, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

All the anti-Obama posts are being made by the very same people who voted for Bush not once but twice.
They’re the one’s now telling you fear Obama, he’s a terrorist, he’s inexperienced, he’s blah…blah…blah.
They’re the one’s Bush, Cheney and Karl Rove could lead them off any cliff by injecting fear and doubt into their feeble minds.
Bush supporters, anti-Obama posters are one and the same. Fools.

Posted by: Wayland | August 31, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

A supporter of Palin’s campaign for governor, Jim Whitaker, the Republican mayor of Fairbanks, also questioned Palin’s readiness to serve as vice president in a phone interview yesterday.
The REPUBLICAN state Senate leader in Alaska flatly said she was unqualified and thought she was being tiold a joke when she heard the announcement.
These are Alaska Republicans.
Not Democrats. Not from any other place. Alaska Republicans say she is unqualified for the office.

Posted by: Wilshire | August 31, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Isn’t this election about crossing aisles and bringing this country together? We can think about this, and bring ourselves together, while sorting issues and candidates!

Posted by: just a gardener | August 31, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Palin a better a leader than Obama? Really, on what basis. The Senator from Illinois…Last election Obama won the Senate with 70% of the vote and 3.5 million votiing (5 times the state of Alaska). In the primaries he has garnered 18 million votes while capturing the Democratic nomination. What has Palin led? A town of 9000 for 6 years and a state where she garnered only 114,000 last election. I understand that elections are not necessarily indications of leadership. But, what in her record indicates that is such a great leader after 2 years in office. Wasn’t GW being lauded as a great leader after 2 years and look where that went. McCain needs to be honest….he chose Palin simply because she was a woman who he thought good garner Hillary votes not because she was a great leader or was the best qualified to lead if something should happen to the president. I swear McCain is going senile….either that or he just playing a bad joke on this country. I cannot take his candidacy seriously…

Posted by: indy_voter | August 31, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

I like this headline: “Palin is McCain’s Bridge to Nowhere”

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 31, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

For all of you who keep pointing out all of Biden’s years of experience and foreign policy savvy, you very carefully navigate the waters around the fact that he is just a small handful of years behind McCain.
So, what is Obama going to do if, God forbid, something happens to Biden?????

Posted by: Lee | August 31, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

google Tom Palin BP and you will find out why the Republicans want her.
“He took leave of his job in oil because they were concerned about conflict of interest after she started negotiations with BP[his employer].” If he works in fishing it was because he had to leave his oil job.

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | August 31, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

Steve May I remind you that Carter, Reagan, Clinton and Bush Jr all came into office having been Governor’s and with little if any foreign policy experience. In fact the only recent Prsident who did was Bush Sr. Governor’s bring in executive experience
governing, they have dealt with budgets aand are running the show over those State Senators such as Obama was in Illinois. They also come in as the real Washington outsiders. Obama has 300 foreign policy advisors and needed to bring Biden on to compensate for his lack of foreign policy experience and has pointed out over and over that judgement not experience, is what is needed in foreign policy. Obama is at the top of the ticket and Palin at the bottom and unless McCain were to drop dead in Jan. of 2009, I think she will find a couple hundered of her own advisors and will be well versed in foreign policy plus having the experience as VP that Obama’s not coming in with. Remember the President generally doesn’t go it alone because there is a Secretary of Defense and State and Centcom. and various other
people who have their input. Unless of curse you’re the inexperienced Obama who doesn’t seem to think that Petreus’s input would be necessary because of course he would be President.
Now that’s scary.

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

She is so impressive that Mc Cain decided that she was the one, it in one meeting!
Oh now I am confused I thought Obama was the one
Oh but John says they are soul mates!
Soul Mates in one meeting?
This doesn’t sound like a political decision to me. What the hell is this?

Posted by: Thinking | August 31, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

I was Republican and voted for Bush in 2000. Republicans and Bush plunge this country to deep that I regret my vote.
Come’on folks, lets vote for Barack.
He is the leader of the century.
Republication for Obama/Biden 08

Posted by: Aaron | August 31, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

Patriot Ha.Ha. Biden was brought onto the ticket for his foreign policy experience and he supported going into Iraq and supported increasing our troop presence there and pretty much was marching right along with McCain.
We’re talking the same Biden who said he would be honored to run with or against McCain and who pointed out in 2005 that he along with McCain were supporting an increase in troops. Obama never supported setting timelines or withdrawals until he decided to run for Prez and he continued to vote for funding a war he supposedly did not support. Explain those apples.

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

Iris Bittencourt: Blacks are underrepresented??????? You do know that the people of the country elect their representatives. Not to mention that there are not that many people of color who even run for office…

Posted by: MidWest | August 31, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Accomplishments are the measure of experience. I never hear much at all about Obama’s accomplishments from him or any of his supporters. I didn’t see any non-family member of his, friend or politician, that stood up for him and vouches for him. The associates we do know about are not the kind of people you’d want vouching for you. Is any Obama supporter troubled by that? Or is the Kool-Aid that strong?

Posted by: JimF | August 31, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Advice for McCain: you don’t go to an area that is in the process of getting evacuated. Your presence and everybody who’s in your entourage, will only hamper efforts to get people out of harm’s way.
Chalk this up as another serious error in judgement.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 31, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Experience?? Bush was a Gov. of 2nd largest state in the union and a two term President. Look what that did for our Country. The surge worked???
Worked to do what??? Cost Americans another 150 billion dollars, 1000 more lives. They still don’t even have a Goverment and now they want us out of there as well……”You’re doin’ a heck of a job, “Dubya”

Posted by: billy | August 31, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

This time, McCain hit it out of the ball park….Saying that “Palin is a better leader than Obama” is the apex of stupidity. The “good soldier” is really out of his pond….If he keeps going at it, someone is going to suggest that the man’s head must be examined.

Posted by: R. Benoit | August 31, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

alpaig52:
With so little info on why she was chosen, it points to a big clue.
Obama is so documented in comparison, that you guys can find something.
Up in Northern Exposure, when there’s smoke there’s fire.
McCain Palin ’08 “Change oil can line its pockets with.”
McCain Palin ’08 “BP’s choice.”

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | August 31, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

When Biden attempts to point out that Palin comes from a State of 670,053 people then she needs to point out that Biden comes from a State of 843,524 people. If he minimizes her governing a State of such a population does that hold true of his representing a State of such? They are second in crude oil production , they have the 5th National per capita gross State product, they have the biggest land mass of any State
and more coastline then any State and so on. Unless Biden comes from New York, California, Texas or some other larger and more populous State I don’t think I’d go there.

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

McCain, are you serious? Palin has more than twelve years of elected office experience? She was a mayor of a town with a population less than 8,000 people. She has been governor for 1 year and 9 months and is under investigation for abuse of power. She ridiculed a cancer survivor and Senate president. You want this woman to run our country after that lump on your left cheek metastasizes? I VOTE NO!
I cannot wait until the debates. McCain cannot stand up to Obama and Palin is no match for Biden. Bad choice McCain. Maybe you should have chose someone you met more than 2 times in your lifetime.

Posted by: Avery | August 31, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Palin has said she welcomes the investigation regarding her brother-in-law; in fact, she wants to get it over with in order to clear herself.
As for Alaskan Republicans speaking against her – you bet some of them will, because she went up against her own party as often as not in order to clear out the corruption and Old Boys Club that had run things for years.
As for the bridge to nowhere, she did say no which upset Republicans who had been trying to get that for years. Her view was that Alaskans should take care of themselves instead of expecting the other 49 states to and she suggested upgrading the ferry at a cost far less than a bridge whose use wouldn’t justify its cost.
This country has got to get back to fiscal responsibility. Taxes aren’t the problem – spending is. (And in case you haven’t noticed, the Bush tax cuts expire in 2010 regardless of who’s President unless Congress votes to extend them.) McCain has vowed to cut earmarks and wasteful spending; Palin has a proven track record of fiscal conservancy.
McCain/Palin – Proven Change We Can See (as opposed to that other ticket that just talks change and asks us to believe – though they have absolutely no record of ever bucking their own party and tout the same old liberal tax-and-spend mantra).

Posted by: marylou | August 31, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Larry Did you see Acorn is one of the biggest beneficiaries of the housing bill that passed? You have to admit, the Dems, like the Repubs, take care of their special interests.

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

After reading McCain’s comments to the press, I can only conclude he is hoping that if he repeats these lines enough times, they just might be true. Sad that has come to this. But no matter how many times the talking points are repeated, nothing can take away from the truth that McCain made a risky and rash move to put himself, rather than the country, first.

Posted by: Annette | August 31, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

billy Yes, according to Obama if he has the judgement then that’s all he would need. It would help though is had been a community organizer. Let’s hope though he didn’t do as Obama did and walked into office like Obama did the US Senate and immediately put together an exploratory committee around a Presidential run and then spent the rest of the time campaigning for President. I would advise him if I were you that he should not squander any opportunity for experience he gets in his position, as Obama did, to run yet for President.

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

once the 24 hour shock wears off the facts of Ms Palin will need to be answered:
(a) her financial statement of 2007 shoes she is worth $10million. As she never held a job that would produce this kind of income and her family is not of means and her husband is a union member- where was this fortune amassed? (makes her net worth 2 1/2 time more than Sen Obama who wrote 2 best selling books)
(b) she wants creationism taught in schools
(c) she does not believe in Global Warming
(d) She is anti choice
(e) she is ot for equal pay for equal work
(f) she was FOR the Bridge for Nowhere – as matter of fact this was part of her platform in 2006 in running for governor.
She accepted the money from congress for her state. She then decided not to go ahead with the bridge but kept the money for other projects.
Reformer? I don’t think so
She is for a windfall profit tax on the oil companies which is a pillar of Obama’s campaign (and McCain is against)
She is for drilling in Anwr (which McCain is against)
John McCain – made a decision who would/could be a heartbeat away from the Presidency on a person he met ONCE and had ONE telephone call with
This is not the sign of a Maverick
This is RECKLESS and cynical
Stop with the talking points – this is the audition for the most powerful person in the world –
If he wanted to shake it up and have a female running mate – what about Condi Rice? Kay Bailey Hutchinson? Christy Whitman?
There are Republican women of substance – he didn’t pick one
The man is 72 years old and been through four bouts of cancerand this is putting Country First?
I think not – this is putting blind ambition first
John McCain doesn’t get it

Posted by: alison | August 31, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

“Often my haste is a mistake” but I still act faster than the other guy because if I stop to examine what it is that I’m doing I may become more confused than I already am………ie Maybe suggesting that a $5 million income was “middle class” might be subject to review…….duh

Posted by: billy | August 31, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Willem You forgot to mention the comments in that article where she said Palin is a quick study and that it was pointed out she’s not a friend of the oil industry and is more then capable of standing up to special interests.
The article is in Huffington Post if people want the non-edited and biased version. If her mother-in-law is the best Huffington has come up with so far.
It is possible though that something may come out about Palin that McCain and ourselves our unaware of and I have no doubt the Obama camp is looking in every corner and will ensure the Huffington or other media get the story.

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

“As for the bridge to nowhere, she did say no which upset Republicans who had been trying to get that for years.”
She didn’t say no. She was willing to spend taxpayers money on a ridiculous project. First she tried to milk your money, than she tried to milk Alaskan moeny. And when that failed too, she had to shelve the plan.
There is no record of her opposing the Bridge to Nowhere; there is ample evidence that she supported it and even campaigned on it when running for Governer.
Sarah already lied to you during the announcement.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 31, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

billy Anyone who watched Saddleback knows that was a joke and that McCain himself said he would expect that comment to be twisted and running in the media the next day. Watch Saddleback if people want the context of that comment.

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

“Whereas the Democratic Party relied on speeches in Denver, the Republican Party can now show that it is a party of action. ” ROTFLMAO!!! SINCE WHEN HAS THE REPUBLICAN PARTY EVER HAD ANY THOUGHTS WHATSOEVER FOR ANYONE WHO MAKES LESS THAN 1 MILLION PER YEAR? ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS AND WE AIN’T BUYING THE BS ANYMORE AFTER 8 YEARS OF BUSH. YOUR GOP AGENDA OF GREED AND OPPRESSING THE POOR HAS BEEN LAID BARE – NO INSURANCE FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS, JOBS SHIPPED OVERSEAS, TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH, HIGH GAS PRICES YET TAX CUTS FOR EXXON-MOBILE, PRIVATIZE OUR SOCIAL SECURITY. REPUBLICANS ARE THE PARTY OF THE RICH – PERIOD. THEY NEVER CARED ABOUT ANYONE ELSE, ESPECIALLY POOR MINORITIES IN NOLA (AS SEEN 3 YEARS AGO) EXCEPT WHEN IT MIGHT MAKE THEM LOOK BAD AND COST THEM VOTES IN AN ELECTION YEAR. THAT’S THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE FALSE CARING NOW VS 3 YEARS AGO – ELECTION YEAR.

Posted by: Jake | August 31, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

The virulence with which Obamabots are attacking Palin surprises me. Perhaps they are doing so in order to deflect attention from Obama’s average speech at the convention, the fact that Obama’s ‘bounce’ from the convention really only came with Hillary’s speech, and the fact that 1/4 of Hillary supporters now say they will back McCain. Dems, you have no one to blame but yourselves.

Posted by: Bitterly clingy | August 31, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Sonia It’s pretty hard for Biden, who represents Delaware , to attack Palin on Governing Alaska.

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Mc same should have waited to see if he were elected and then he could have nominated Palin to the Supreme Court. If she listened in an a small claims court case that’s all she needs

Posted by: billy | August 31, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

alpaig: when even her own family is baffled by McCain’s choice and have to search for answers *why* he might have chosen her, then you know McCain is in deep doodoo.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 31, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

Jake, how has the GOP oppressed the poor? Please tell me.

Posted by: Ethan | August 31, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

alison C’mon, Obama says you only need judgement not experience to be Commander in Chief remember. He has Biden now and Palin has McCain. Obama will be calling the shots whereas Palin won’t be. Obama has 300 foreign policy advisors and I bet Palin could get a couple hundred too. Granted she ran a City rather then did community organizing in a section of a City, granted she was an Executive over State Senators while Obama was State Senator.
The attacks on Palin’s lack of experience for Commander in Chief sheds light on Obama’s lack of. Also, neither Carter, Reagan, Clinton or Bush Jr come in with any real foreign policy experience because they were Governor’s.
Bush Sr is the only recent President who came with extensive foreign policy experience and in all honesty it showed, even Obama has said he wants to bring us back to the foreign policy traditions of Reagam and Bush Sr. Guess what? They were Republicans.

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

If the Country wants to elect this woman Vice President, then so be it. McCain opened the door. But it’s ultimately half of, or perhaps more, of American people he is reflecting.
If we go down, it won’t because of Russia, or because of Iran, or because of North Korea.
It will be because the American people would rather elect the person sitting next to them at a soccer game President than the real thing.
It’s happened twice now with Bush, if it happens again, I say so be it.
But years from now don’t say the Democrats didn’t try. God bless them.

Posted by: MJarvis | August 31, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

I’m still curious why Rick Warren didn’t ask about McCain’s 70 years of history as an Episcopalian.
Was he afraid it wouldn’t sit well with his Base? Afraid they would think McCain was pandering when he started to attend a Southern Baptist church last year?

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 31, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

It’s unbelievable that he would say that, he thinks people are stupid.

Posted by: Kathy | August 31, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

Excuse me!!!!!! He interviewed her for close to TWO HOURS.
By now he has known her for almost three days!!!!
All you Hillary supporters are expected to elect McSame on the basis of the gender of his running mate, and don’t you dare disappoint!!!!! As a man, you can consider that an order!
:)

Posted by: jh - Atlanta, GA | August 31, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Lisa I’m a supporter of universal health care but there is no way it will make it through Congress in the next four years or for that matter eight,
We can’t afford and Congress is not going to push it regardless of what the Dems are promising. Remember , we’re just taking our troops in Iraq and marching them over to Afghanistan.
We are trillions in debt and that didn’t even include the cost of the Iraq war up until recently. Universal health care is promise the Dems aren’t going to deliver nor intend to deliver anytime soon. I’ve been listening to Democratic rhetoric year after year after year and it’s the same old stuff and it still hasn’t happened. Pelosi and company have a 9% approval rating in comparison to Bush’s 30%. Bush deserves the rap for Iraq but the economy and energy is a culmination of bad policy and neglect by both the Democrats and Republicans over decades.
Clinton did no one any favors when he deregulated the banking industry in 1999 either and Bush’s neglect and Greenspan’s neglect over these past 8 years has been abysmal. I was a Democrat who is now an independent and I don’t think given the past 8 years the Republican deserve the White House but I also think the performance of Congress these past 4 years also means the Democrats don’t deserve the White House either.

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Avery: “As Illinois State Senator, Barack Obama has:
sponsored a law increasing tax credits for low-income workers, negotiated welfare reform, and promoted increased subsidies for childcare”…
Hmmm. Let’s see. increased subsidies = higher taxes, ‘welfare reform’ = greater number of beneficiaries = greater welfare payments = higher taxes, tax credits for low-income….THEY DONT PAY TAXES ANYWAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The lower you income, the less taxes you pay. Those who should be worried about taxes are the middle and upper class. That is it.

Posted by: MidWest | August 31, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

Concerned in OH,
Exactly. Control, control… Really, that is what taxes in general amount to. The control of our money and therefore, our actions.

Posted by: MidWest | August 31, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

Degrade her at your own risk. You will set the expectations so low that when people hear her speak, they will begin to think the democrats are condescending blowhards. As usual, the democrats will push the criticism too far and a huge backfire awaits.

Posted by: Carol | August 31, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

McCain think most Americans are dumb and stupid like the Bush supporters. The most corruption and waste of our national resources have occurred under the Republican administration. The only thing is trying to do is divide women and win the Clintons’ supporters. If Mrs. Palin, by virtue of being the Governor of Alaska for s a short period of time, has more prepared and because her executive experience, then she also has more experience than McCain in that department.
Examining Mrs. Palin’s education and background, one has to wonder what McCain had in mind in making this very important selection. I guess the most obvious is that she, like the second Mrs. McCain, is former beauty queen. See, true “celebrities” like to hang out with their same kind.

Posted by: Eddie Zalez | August 31, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

POPEY & OLIVE OIL
WHAT A JOKE

Posted by: ronnieraygun | August 31, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

McCain think most Americans are dumb and stupid like the Bush supporters. The most corruption and waste of our national resources have occurred under the Republican administration. The only thing is trying to do is divide women and win the Clintons’ supporters. If Mrs. Palin, by virtue of being the Governor of Alaska for s a short period of time, has more prepared and because her executive experience, then she also has more experience than McCain in that department.
Examining Mrs. Palin’s education and background, one has to wonder what McCain had in mind in making this very important selection. I guess the most obvious is that she, like the second Mrs. McCain, is former beauty queen. See, true “celebrities” like to hang out with their own kind.

Posted by: Eddie Zalez | August 31, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

Trickle Down Economics doesn’t work for the simple reason that all the money gets sucked up to the top.

Posted by: texmexborderjumper | August 31, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

He met her twice and all of a sudden she is McCain’s VP? He looked at her a year and a half record as Gov. of Alaska and decided she is the one for the job? That’s ridiculous.

Posted by: Kathy | August 31, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

Eddie Zalez – the sad thing is that McSame KNOWS the American people are dumb and stupid – at least enough to elect Bush TWICE (50% plus 1). He’s hoping for four more years!

Posted by: jh - Atlanta, GA | August 31, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Here is some secular irony that is incredibly appropriate for an ABC blog.
Anyone remember that melodrama Rod Lurie thrust upon television, “Commander in Chief”? The one that was supposed to serve as the weekly advertisement of the ordained future of Senator Rodham?
The idea was to show a lady president on TV, showing that she could balance her job and family life, that she could challenge the big boys, and that she could make decisions to defend the nation.
Well, the real life ironic twist here is that Mr Lurie’s little fantasy now has a different context – where the First woman to serve as President of the United States may actually be a Republican.
Oups – Damn those unintended consequences.

Posted by: Cynicism101 | August 31, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Oh, sure she is a wonderful person. Admirable. Just not qualified to be the leader of a country with 300 million people.
Here is the bulk of her experience.
10 largest cities (2005 est.): Anchorage, 275,043; Fairbanks, 31,324; Juneau, 30,987; Sitka, 8,986; ****Wasilla, 8,471****; Kenai, 7,464; Ketchikan, 7,410; Palmer, 6,920; Kodiak, 6,273; Bethel, 6,262;
A little town of eighty-five hundred is the FIFTH LARGEST CITY IN ALASKA.
Get a clue people.

Posted by: jh - Atlanta, GA | August 31, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

This was a political and dangerous pick by McCain, he met her only twice in hit life, once people find out that she was the mayor of a town with less than 7,000 people and governing for a year and a half, his credibility will go down. He chose her to rally his conservative base and gather some Hillary voters, and as far as that goes, Hillary is in her own league, Palin doesn’t even match up. She even called Hillary a whiner during the primaries, I’m not sure how they would feel about that. McCain can argue all day about Palin being more experienced than Obama, but the millions of people in America have chosen Obama to lead and believe he will be the better person for the job, I don’t think much people outside of Alaska know who she is.

Posted by: Kathy | August 31, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

The comments from the Obama’s supporters show their total hypocritical view of women’s right and equal opportunity. Me thinks, the Governor of Alaska has more on the ball and has already done more than Obama has. He say, “I will”, she says, “I have done.” Obama would not dare to go against any one criminal, corrupt democrat, she went against the strongest in her state party.
Her church and moral beliefs are more decent than Obama who sat in a hate-mongering, racist church with its crazy pastor as his mentor, his terrorist and criminal supporters who made his political career possible and his fully established agenda for social/communist reforms. The Democrats spewing hate against small towns and decent values is disgusting. Just because so many of us do not beg for money hand-outs and political favors does not make us less worthy.
Obama has always embellished and out-right lies about his achievements. Most of his former state senate colleagues hate him. At least 80% of the bills passed with Obama’s name on them were researched and written by other members before they were hijacked by Imel Jones and given to Obama. They certainly have not been on the campaign wagon with him.
Voters can vote for the corrupt ZERO or the experienced war HERO. Most will vote for the decent McCain/Palen ticket
Even the AA commentators on TV were saying her experience and achievements were excellent, but was surprised of her being picked. Guess they thought another Washington insider would do.

Posted by: Mary | August 31, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

all of you sure are quick to make judgements from what the media tells you. half of the information you are spatting out is probably false, first of all, and second, try opening your mind to something new for once. maybe that will get this country out of the mess it’s in.

Posted by: lisa | August 31, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

Those who are trying to claim Palin has more experience than Obama discount the fact that her education required no critical thinking. They stuff her resume with items such as a leadership position in the Fellowship of Christian Athletes in high school to offset Obama’s Harvard Law Magna Cum Laude and presidency of the Harvard Law Review. Only the flat earthers and those who profit from despoiling the environment can love Palin.

Posted by: Dave | August 31, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

What does it say about McCain when he thinks that Sarah Palin would be capable of being POTUS should something terrible happen to him?
At first, everybody was baffled but after it started to sink in, even sensitive conservatives were panicking. And rightly so.
And now sensitive people across the US will start wondering about McCain himself. What was he thinking? Is he really a maverick? Or just plain stupid? And can we afford to take such a risk?

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 31, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

What’s this about the McCain saying this morning they’ve raised 4 million on the internet since the last day and a half, or however long it’s been. He seems unsure in his orientation in time, Palin was announced as vp on Friday morning. It stretches my imagination that kind of money was raised on the internet after Palin’s nomination. Because for one, I thought McCain is using public financing, instead of raking it in on the internet like Obama. He sounds confused along with having a judgement impairment.

Posted by: kat | August 31, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

McCain’s choice of Palin has made me an Obama supporter. Can you see this inexperienced “hockey mom” negotiating with Putin? We’ll be the laughingstock of the world more than we already are.

Posted by: Karen | August 31, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Obama, made a major political mistake on not getting Hillary and bringing the whole party together, period!
McCain helped his campaign by picking another maverick and female who can stand up to anyone. Palin has as much experience as Obama on top of his ticket. Palin is a new inspiring pick the republicans need. She has 80 percent approval in Alaska and is the most popular Governor in America. She taxed oil companies and gave it all back to Alaska’s taxpayers at $1,200 each.
Obama is a smart inspiring speaker, but Palin’s actions speak louder than political words. She has fought corruption in both parties in Alaska. When she speaks she says it like it is, unlike polished career politicians. Some people can talk the talk, but Palin can walk the walk. Anyone with doubts about Palin should watch her interview with Maria Bartiromo on CNBC.
People are talking negatively about Palin without knowing all the facts about what she has achieved, including the media because they are in love with Obama. The media is saying McCain picked Palin because of Hillary not being picked and I love Hillary, but Sarah is the real deal for republicans and she gives them a new face that they need to reform their party. The Republican Party has always been for the rich and special interests, Sarah represents “we the people” and is against government waste and the good old boy network, this is just what republicans need to fix their image and direction.
Now the race is exciting and change is coming to both parties!

Posted by: abel | August 31, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

As a sucesful working & married mother of 3 I’m insulted by Mr McCain’s choice for VP. He seems to think that just because he picks a woman, any woman for that matter, all women will vote for him.
He seems to think women are stupid or something?
Even worse, Sara knows it and even talks about it openly. I’m I the only one who is o troubled by it?
Mr McCain based his first executive decision on politics only, the good of the people or nation had nothing to do with his pick. come on, there had to be much better VP picks within the GP.
He didn’t pick someone to help or counsel in case of international crisis or that could take office if something happens to the eldest elected president.
Mr McCain, i find your first executive decision reckless and sad.
Mr McCain, I can’t vote for you now.

Posted by: Gina | August 31, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Commenting on McCain’s choice of Palin as a running mate, a number of Republican strategists termed it “bold” (translation: “He’s out of his mind”). The Obama campaign, with Hillary’s help, has been restrained – waiting to see whether Palin will self destruct, or the media do it for her – but if she proves to be an asset, they will probably criticize her credentials more aggressively. So far, polls indicate she may be a liability with independent voters.
Ultimately, the contest will be between Obama and McCain, with Palin as a momentary distraction, but perhaps a slightly greater disavantage than ordinary because of McCain’s age – 72 now and 80 by the end of the next two presidential terms.

Posted by: Fred Moolten | August 31, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Wasilla has more moose than people.

Posted by: Omentum | August 31, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Typical female bashing just like Hillary. If Palin was a male people would be treating her differently and with more respect. How many governors really have foreign policy experience, none. I never hear anyone saying Biden is from a small tiny state Delaware home of the credit card companies that he helped author bankruptcy reform against its card holders. Palin is getting s*****d by the media and Obama Democrats just like Hillary. Hillary had more experience than Obama but he tossed her aside like many strong females.

Posted by: abe | August 31, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

I would never vote for McCain/Palin. What a joke on America. I guess Obama is right when he says that McCain has poor judgment. He’s senile!

Posted by: Susan | August 31, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

How can a person who favors dumping toxic mine waste into clean rivers that are vital to the fisheries that support much of Alaska’s population claim to be “pro-life”? Sounds more like “pro-death” to me. Third world countries make decisions like that. Do we need more years of that kind of leadership in the White House. The Republicans claim that government is bad so they do their best to provide bad governance. Palin is intelectually older than McCain. She has a 19th century outlook on life and the environment. Shooting apex predators such as wolves and bears from the air fits that pattern. Mining and drilling everywhere without regard for what it does to the environment that makes Alaska special also fits.

Posted by: Dave | August 31, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Ok – Attention Lefties/Liberals/Democrats.
You have two choices – you can either stop whining about the “evil Republican hate machine” and “Rovian tactics”, OR you can stop throwing unreferenced baseless comments into the blogosphere – such as what you’re trying now with the “Is that really *her* son”
For that party that’s SUPPOSEDLY about fairness, tolerance and equality – how ’bout you step-up and act like it?

Posted by: Cynicism101 | August 31, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Several questions:
Are you allowed to take an 8-hours flight when you are 8 months pregnant?
Are you allowed to board a plane for an 8-hours flight after your waters have broken, even if it’s just amniotic fluid?
For the administrators who are taking down posts about this subject: This has NOTHING to do with DS; and NOTHING to do with ‘that other’ (IMO fully unsubstantiated) rumor. But it has everything to do with acting recklessly and irresponsible.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 31, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

A community organizer in urban Chicago? OMG!!!!

Posted by: Carl30 | August 31, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

Mickey Mouse is a better leader than an Obama/Obiden regime…
Unless you are into full-scale, national socialism, that is…

Posted by: Jayhawk | August 31, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

As a woman, I was highly offended but not surprised by McCain’s VP choice. This may sound strange, but McCain has just played the biggest race card to date in this election. Race, you question. Yes, race. You see, the so-called women’s rights movement received a big boost in 1964 when a conservative Southern senator inserted the term “gender” in the Civil Rights Act. This simple inclusion had a profound racial impact: when given the choice between hiring their wife, sister, cousin, aunt, niece or that of one of their white colleagues or a black person of any gender, who do you think that racist white men would choose? What started as legislation meant to redress the harm caused by slavery was effectively hijacked and transformed into a means to increase the aggregate accumulation of wealth, power and other benefits within the white community. For example, African Americans currently make up about 13% of the US population, but have historically been underrepresented in Congress. Currently 42 members (9.5%) of the House (including two non-voting delegates) are black, while Barack Obama is the only African American member of the Senate. Only five African Americans have ever served in the Senate. To put this in perspective, there have been five Asian-American senators and six Hispanic-American senators, and there are currently 16 women in the Senate, the highest number in history, and 74 female representatives.
The experience in U.S. law firms is very similar. As aptly noted in an article comparing the progress of women and minorities in large law firms, “[a]s a general rule, the available literature tends to focus more on women than minorities in the legal profession.” Since 1975, the representation of women as professionals in large firms has increased by 179.9% from 14.4 percent in 1975 to 40.3 percent in 2002, whereas the representation of African Americans increased by 91.3% from 2.3 percent in 1975 to 4.4 percent in 2002. (Hispanics increased from 0.7 percent to 2.9 percent, and Asians increased from 0.5 percent to 5.3 percent over the same period). By 1982, the percent of women reported as legal professionals was nearly identical to the percent of women receiving law degrees in that year, and since then the employment of women in these firms has remained higher than in the more general work force. Conversely, law degrees earned by African Americans appear to consistently exceed the employment of African Americans as professionals in large private law firms and as lawyers in the general work force. Unlike the employment patterns for women, the proportion of African Americans employed as lawyers in the general labor market and as professionals in law firms as captured by the EEO-1 data is fairly consistent, and changes in the employment of African American professionals in private sector firms required to file EEO-1 reports lagged behind their increase as lawyers in the general work force and in their increased rate of receiving law degrees over the past twenty years. (Contrast this experience with Asians: the growth in Asian attorneys is so rapid that by 2002, the percentage of Asian professionals in Legal Services, 5.3 percent, as reported on the EEO-1 exceeds the percentage of African Americans, 4.4 percent. Degrees conferred to Asians also increases during the twenty year study period. In 1982 just 1.3 percent of all law degrees are awarded to Asians but by 2002, they earn 6.5 percent of all degrees. Over the past twenty years the rate of change for the percent of Asians reported as professional by Legal Service firms on their EEO-1 reports is 341 percent. The increase in law degrees earned by Asians is even higher at 400 percent.)
Based on these and other statistics, who were the true beneficiaries of the Civil Rights Act that blacks marched and died for? Somehow, we have gotten to a point in our history where white women, Hispanics, Asians, handicapped people and others are equated with black people in America. When were they slaves in America?
What were white women doing while black men and women were slaves? Were white women, like me, considered a protected class in society, with rights to inherit our husband’s wealth and to child support and alimony if the marriage did not work? How is my plight equal to that of the plight of the descendants of slaves? I could never understand that and reject it openly. When people talk about equal pay, they speak about equal pay for white women, because both black men and black women earn less than white men, and black women earn on average far less than white women. If you are a white woman in this country, you benefit from the Equal Pay Act, which requires a women to prove only that she received lower pay than a similarly situated male. If you are a black man (whose descendants worked for centuries for free and has always received less pay than whites), you have to prove both that you received lower pay and that the reason that you were paid less is because of racism (a nearly impossible task, as reflected in recent civil rights jurisprudence).
So, McCain is using old faithful: selecting a white woman provides coverage for other white women to vote against Obama due to racism. Listen to the white female voters who will not vote for Obama. Their arguments make no sense. It is not about differences in policy, it is simply that they cannot countenance a black man (as one PUMA stated “an unqualified, affirmative action black male”) going ahead of white women. You can see almost open references to this tight of thinking when people talk about how Obama jumped ahead in line or did not wait his turn. His so-called place is behind white America, male or female.
What separates these anti-Obama Democratic women from their racist male counterparts? It is sad that the press does not explore this issue. Again, I ask, how are women, Asians, Hispanics, handicapped, etc. suddenly equal to the descendants of slaves? Do we equate any of these groups to the suffering of the Jews? If Obama were Joe Lieberman, would women feel as strongly as they do against Obama? Be honest. This is a test for our country. Have we moved beyond racism? Time will tell.

Posted by: Iris Bittencourt | August 31, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Sarah Palin negotiated a gas pipe line that other politicians could not accomplish over the last 30 years. So every time you fill up your gas tank thank Palin for getting it done when other could not. I would rather has a politician that understands energy and take action versus Obama that tells me something I already know like “just inflate your tires” public.

Posted by: abel | August 31, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Willhelm,
Sarah was 7 months prego when she was on the flight, and every pediatrician that I have spoken with has said that there is nothing wrong with air travel during pregnancy at that stage.
But please, don’t let me put a dent in your hate-fest.

Posted by: Birch | August 31, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Gina: “I’m I the only one who is o troubled by it?”
No, you’re not the only one. I’m extremely troubled by it as well. As a male, I even think this is a disaster for women rights. It will reinforce the ugly smear that qualified women in power get there because they have a uterus, not because of their qualifications.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 31, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Correction: She was not mayor of Wasilla for ten years. She was the major for just six years–1996-2002. McCain is counting her experience as a city council member from 1992-1996.
She’s clearly very smart and sounds good at her job (although it’s hard for me to determine that since i don’t agree with her on the issues), but being good as the governor of a town with as many people as a mid-size liberal arts college and then governor of a state with less than 700,000 people is in no way preparation for president.
Obama has more experience than she does, and Hillary certainly did. And perhaps more importantly–since neither Obama nor Hillary were technically (in terms of elected years on the national stage) the most experienced candidates ever–Obama and Hillary have a knowledgeable view of the world as a whole, and they have spent years considering their positions on vital domestic and national issues. Palin, on the other hand, recently said that “she hasn’t given much thought to Iraq.”
Hillary’s candidacy excited me, although I was an Obama supporter, because I felt like if my candidate lost the primary, I’d still be able to vote for a very qualified woman for president.
Now, we’ve got a woman who, while clearly talented, is clearly not ready for this. She has not proved herself in the way that Hillary and Obama have. And therefore, what should feel like a triumph–a woman on one ticket, an African-American on the other–tastes sour. When a woman is chosen by a male candidate because he thinks that other woman are stupid enough to abandon their political positions in order to vote for a woman, that’s not progress.
For goodness’ sake,

Posted by: Jane | August 31, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

It must really take one heck of a lot of mental gyrations to think that having a female v.p. lowers standards for women. Congrats on the pretzel logic. You scored 100.

Posted by: Don | August 31, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

abel
The pipeline that Palin promoted has nothing to do with filling up your gas tank. It’s for natural gas.

Posted by: jock59801 | August 31, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Birch, Go back to the doctors and explain that her water broke and she was in labor. And them come back and explain why it wasn’t a problem.

Posted by: JPL | August 31, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

And, as we have witnessed, when the going gets tough, the Obama regime plays the race card…
When the going gets tougher, Obama supporters play the race card…
When all else fails, they play the race card again…
Just how many race cards are there in an Obama/OBiden deck?
Anybody But Obama…

Posted by: Jayhawk | August 31, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

No, Birch. Sarah was 8 months pregnant when she boarded that flight.
She’s telling the story herself that her waters broke while giving a speech in Dallas, Texas; she finished the speech and flew back to Alaska. That’s an 8 hours flight.
An obstetrician who is active in the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, said when a pregnant woman’s water breaks, she should go right to the hospital because of the risk of infection. That’s true even if the amniotic fluid simply leaks out, said Dr. Laurie Gregg.
Are there no hospitals in Dallas, Texas?

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 31, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

McCain is not playing the race card. Palin is a maverick just like him that just happens to be a woman who is a reformer that the republican party needs.
Although, I do assume many democratic black voters are only voting for Obama because he is Black versus experienced. If Obama was white he would not have had gotten the black vote because they would have voted for Hillary who has always supported them in the past.

Posted by: abel | August 31, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

Coming from the party that promotes and encourages infanticide, it’s really touching that you are sooooo concerned, Willy. I think I need a hanky.

Posted by: Don | August 31, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

“As governor, she has had enormous responsibilities, none of which Senator Obama has had.”
McCain, you do realize that you’re a Senator too, right? If Obama has never had responsibilities because he’s a Senator rather than a Governor, then neither did you, neither did Hillary, etc. Not a good way to go.
The Republicans attacked Bill Clinton in 1992 for being inexperienced, saying that he was the governor of Arkansas, which counted for nothing. And he’d been governor of Arkansas for more than ten years. And Arkansas is bigger than Alaska by a long shot. Even the best, most noble politicians are not immune to hypocrisy, but this is an unusually shameless example of it on McCain’s part.
And when will they drop the present thing? Illinois Planned Parenthood as stated many times that they requested Democratic Senators to vote present on abortion issues because it counts as a No without giving the Republicans fodder to run against them. Similar tactics were used on other issues. And sometimes Obama stood alone or with only one or two other people on the present votes because he felt the bill was unconstitutional or flawed in some way.
This line of attack is not credible. And McCain has missed more votes in the Senate than either Obama or Hillary. What was that again about glass houses and stone throwing?
We women are smarter than McCain gives us credit for. Hillary was a qualified woman. Obama is a qualified man. They both had excellent records on women’s rights. Some women will probably just vote gender, but I think (I could be wrong, but I don’t think so) most will not be swayed by the presence of a uterus.

Posted by: Jane | August 31, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Jayhawk: “Just how many race cards are there in an Obama/Biden deck?”
Maybe you should define what you mean by “race card,” because I haven’t seem any.

Posted by: jock59801 | August 31, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

For those of you who have decided that McCain’s choice of an inexperienced governor has made you become an Obama supporter: hypocrite. Obama and Palin both have zero foreign policy experience. At least Palin is on the bottom of the ticket instead of on the top like Obama. In addition, Palin has more executive experience than Obama, McCain, and Biden combined. That means that she has been forced to make quick decisions that will have an almost immediate effect on those that she governs. Also, lets go back to middle school studies. The white house makes up the executive branch of the United States and again the only person with executive experience is Palin. Those other three guys are in the legislative branch.

Posted by: Cecilia | August 31, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Alaska now has a rating of (Palin ranks Standard & Poor’s AA+, $5.2 billion in reserve of $17.2 billion tax revenues under Palin’s leadership.
She supports all of her schools, mentoring students and applauding their success – check them out they are several points higher than the natl average and only a few points off in two.
Palin serves as The Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission chairman.
Health care leader Governor Sarah Palin welcomes the visit of the People’s Republic of China Minister of Health Qiang Gao to observe the delivery of rural health care in Alaska acquaint China’s top ranking health official with Alaska models for rural health care delivery, both on site and through the use of telemedicine.
Palin is chair of the National Governors Association (NGA) Natural Resources Committee
Governors Palin leads and presses congress to fully fund the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007.
She has a record, not so Obama

Posted by: teacherindc | August 31, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Before you spread wild rumors, you really should question the source. Hint: Daily Kos isn’t impartial and has nothing to do with professional journalism. All who are questioning the Palin’s baby, might be interested to read this from the Anchorage Daily News:
http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:tSKBWIMMOSsJ:www.adn.com/news/alaska/story/382560.html+palin+downs+syndrome+baby&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=5&gl=us
The rabid left has proven exactly how worried they are that McCain/Palin will steal Obama’s thunder.

Posted by: marylou | August 31, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

AN ALASKAN MOOSE HAS MORE CREDIBILITY AND BETTER JUDGMENT THAN OBAMA. HE SAYS IT IS OK TO KILL BABIES BECAUSE THEY ARE AN INCONVENIENCE.
GO, SARAH PALEN.

Posted by: Martin | August 31, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Concerned in Ohio,
Your cynical comments are of great concern to me. The intention of my post was quite simple: to show McCain’s choice for what it is — a racist ploy. If you understand the thrust of my post, it is the exact opposite of your conclusion: white women like me should not simply vote for McCain because he put a white woman on the ticket. I also raised a secondary issue: somehow we have come to a point in America where the unique struggles of black people in this country are equated with issues facing other groups in society, including white women, Asians, Hispanics, etc. When viewed in a historical context, the election of an African American male is more significant than the election of a white woman.
As a woman, I support the idea of a female president. However, I am not fooled or taken in by some of my female colleagues in their attempt to equate our concerns with the concerns of the descendants of slaves. At the same time, I do not believe that you should vote for Obama because he is black. His blackness for me is a personal characteristic, like white hair is for John McCain. No, I (as I hope all intelligent white female voters) will base my vote on the issues and not on some cynical political ploy.
If you are truly concerned in Ohio, then please do the same.

Posted by: Iris Bittencourt | August 31, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

When you drill for oil you also get natural gas. The “Palin” Natural gas pipe line is part of the solution to our nations energy problem. Palin is the most experienced candidate on energy policy that also is proven to take on oil companies and tax them them return the money to each Alaska. When Alaskan’s voters said governor Palin “show me the money” she did at $1,200 each.

Posted by: abe | August 31, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

At least having attended the University of Idaho, Palin, unlike Dan Quayle, probably knows how to spell “potato.”
“Yup, yup,” she’s ready on Day 1. NOT.
Someone better explain to her before she takes up residency in the lower 48, that it is illegal down here to shoot wolves and bears from helipcopters and aircraft that she is so strongly an advocate of doing.
Also she better find a way to get Joe Lieberman to go along with her wishes to trash the Artic National Wildlife Refuge.
Not this time.

Posted by: Elizabeth Gilmore | August 31, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

No one should vote for Palin because she’s a woman. But voters who want true change in Washington will look far and wide before they find a better opportunity to change the way Washington works as proven by both McCain’s and Palin’s records. As for abortion and other wedge issues – Obama himself said that voters shouldn’t vote based on wedge issues. I agree with him on that. That’s why I’m voting for McCain/Palin.

Posted by: marylou | August 31, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

Senator McCain’s vice presidential pick has now almost vanquished any chance of me voting for him this year. It is so utterly hypocritical and politically motivated in my view, that I can barely take anything seriously the Republicans tell me from hence forth.
Their criticism of Obama is now worth nothing as the aged senator expects us to take him at his word that the potential that Governor Palin has displayed over the past year or so is reliable enough to entrust her with the presidency should he incapacitated or die during his next term. Which, btw, is not a long shot idea, seeing as McCain IS ONLY 5 YEARS AWAY FROM THE AVERAGE US LIFE EXPECTANCY!

Posted by: John Doe | August 31, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Jane,
Unlike Senators Biden and Obama, Senator McCain had a life before he entered professional politics.
You see, he was a military officer in the US Navy. During that time, he was the commanding officer of (at the time) the largest squadron within the Navy. Further, regardless of class standing, he’s an Annapolis grad. The primary objective of the service academies is to develop leaders, along the way they also receive a top-notch education. Thus, John McCain has leadership experience that far exceeds any of the other candidates, including the one who didn’t quite make the cut to participate, HRC…

Posted by: Cynicism101 | August 31, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

I find it very curious that the old man picked this neophyte hockey mom and big oil shill, after it has come out that she was a staunch advocate of Pat Buchanan, in the 2000 Presidential campaign. It got my attention.
Since becoming Governor she has spent much of her time traveling outside the state lobbying for drilling in ANWR. That and getting herself pregnant.

Posted by: Lydia Green | August 31, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Congratulations, Lydia! You’ve won the “how many lies are possible in one paragraph” Olympics! Yeeeehawwww!

Posted by: Glenn | August 31, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

One of Sarah’s underlying issues is that so, so many of the people who surround her view her as a sort of messiah: come to clean house and bring ethics and morality back to Alaska – and then, poof – to the nation (as V.P.) and one day as president. Earth to Died in the Wool Palin Supporters: We already have a Messiah – and He’s doing a fine job.

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | August 31, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

I don’t really care about McCain’s VP pick. What scares me more is his go-with-your-gut decision-making process. He did not even know her. Nobody did.
Compare this to the Obama vetting process. I would feel much safer with Obama as president.
McCain just sounds like more of the same. Like Bush who thought he could see into Putin’s soul.

Posted by: cincyr | August 31, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

carl29 -President McCain, Vice-President Palin. Get over it.

Posted by: geevill | August 31, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

I keep asking myself why would a governor who swore to uphold the Constitution while bringing honor and resposibilty back into State government squander that pledge by enabling and allowing immature and dysfunctional types such as Ivey Freye and Frank Bailey to play school-house games and pranks from within her office? They and Todd may have thougth it was all funny and empowering . . .

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | August 31, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Some person keeps taking down my blogs about the dangers of abortion on the mother’s health. I’m going to keep posting this so that people are informed.
DANGERS:
Hundreds of women in the U.S. have died from complications that are common from abortions and this is under doctors that may legally perform abortions.
Common side effects of abortion include ruptures in the uterus and cervical inflammation. Cervical inflammation may lead to Pelvic Inflammatory Disease and Cervical Cancer. Cervical Cancer is one of the more deadly cancers for women.
There is a 50% increase in chances of breast cancer for those who have had an abortion.
30% of women who have an abortion become infertile. The majority of these women want a child in the future just not at the present time.
There is a 200% increase in miscarriages.
There is a 400% increase in ectopic pregnancy.
This is information that the U.S. Supreme Court has deemed “not relevant to the woman’s decisions, and hat it may serve only to confuse and punish her and to heighten her anxiety.” That is why many of those who go in for abortions are unaware of the dangers. Their doctors don’t tell them because the Supreme Court does not want this information being known.

Posted by: Female | August 31, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Folks,
Her trail looks pretty well scrubbed but if you look up Todd Palin you find more about him and her–and I’m not talking about the baby or weird boy names they pick.

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | August 31, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

7yrs of backups??? don’t kid yourselves
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 2008-07-24 18:45.
I’m a systems administrator for the state, and I assure you it is not only possible, it’s sickeningly easy for one person with Exchange and Zantaz (the state’s email archiving system) Admin rights to delete any and all traces of any email. They use single instance storage, one right-click and delete then email in that mail store is deleted. Repeat for 6-12 times more for other mail stores said mail might exist and it’s done. Delete the Zantaz archive of the email, and even a legal search couldn’t turn it up. In addition they don’t have 7 months of backups of email much less 7 years. Also, think about it Annette Kreitzer, the commissioner of DOA controls the state’s email systems and archiving solution. She’s been fingered for involvement concerning efforts to get Monegan to wrongfully fire Wooten, she’s also known in the state as Sarah’s most furvent supporter. All it would take, is for her to demand Anand Dubey (ETS director, and consumate ‘yes-man’) to delete any trail and ‘poof’ it’s gone! Corruption in the state is nothing new…but you’re right, purposefully removing an email trail to cover-up dirty laundry is felonious, but I assert anonymously it’s happened many-many-many times before.

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | August 31, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

Watergate: “Follow the Money”- Troopergate: “Follow the Todd”
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 2008-07-24 07:03.
Thank you for writing about the undue influence Todd Palin and the rest of the Palin/Heath clan has on state government. I think you have touched the tip of the iceberg. What has been Todd’s involvement in setting policy? What has been Todd’s role in putting pressure on many members of the executive and legislative branch to do his bidding? That needs to be a specific focus of the special investigation. Connect the dots. Todd Palin….Ivy Frye…Frank Bailey…appointments to boards and commissions….jobs and appointments to buddies and friends…Mat maid…Ag Board….Game Board…etc

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | August 31, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

“Unlike Senators Biden and Obama, Senator McCain had a life before he entered professional politics. ”
Certainly did. Graduated at the bottom of his class at the Naval Academy, would have flunked out except for his family connections, went on to crash three airplanes, was a POW, returning to cheat on his wife, and have an affair with a beer distributor’s daughter. Was made a vice president of the company by her daddy, and put into office with her funds.
Went on to back Charles Keating in his 3.5 billion dollar Saving and Loan fraud, and then his biggest accomplishment- lobbying for the invasion of Iraq because of oil.
Yup, he had a life alright. Just not one that would make him a good President.
Not this time

Posted by: Elizabeth | August 31, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Jane It’s judgement not experience that counts remember? Certainly City Council and Mayor are as good of experience as community organizing?
Certainly being the Governor of a State is experience as valid as a Senator of a State? She’s been Governor 2 1/2 years and actually has acted, has accomplished, has done something .
Obama spent the first year in the US Senate setting up an exploratory committee for a Presidential run and the
rest of his first term (which he hasn’t even completed yet) campaigning for President. On his stewardship of the sub-committee of Foreign Affairs, he held not one meeting until just recently. A committee that looks at the role of NATO in Afghanistan and Iraq and yet he’s an expert? Where do you think Biden got his foreign policy experience? Committees like that and Obama squandered his opportunity to acquire experience to run for President.
Obama has missed votes because he’s running for President but McCain has almost 30 years in the Senate and this is his second run for the Presidential nomination and now President and so a Presidential nominee who has a poor voting record in the course of not even a first term ended is pretty bad. If Palin hired Axelrod a couple years ago like Obama did, he’d have her looking Presidential right now also. Obama has 200 foreign policy advisors and Biden to compensate for his lack of foreign policy experience and Palin has McCain and I’m sure she could find a couple foreign policy advisors of her own.

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

I am not surprised by the lack of responses to the substantive points that I made in my posts. The truth is sometimes hard to swallow. However, the McCain campaign itself has indicated that they expect Palin to help him among lower income female voters in states like Ohio and Pennsylvania. In addition, Palin herself made references to Hillary Clinton’s glass ceiling and to Ferraro (who herself during this campaign has called Obama an affirmative action candidate who is not qualified) in her initial speech. Get real folks. With this pick, McCain is calling lower income white women without a college education (a polite way of saying racist white trash) to a race war veiled in the tattered clothes of the white feminist movement. On what other basis are these traditional voters going to support Palin — her record?
Some have cynically asserted that black people support Obama because he is black. Early data from the election dislcaim that conclusion. Black support of Obama was slow to develop (perhaps that is why Bill Clinton campaigned so hard in the South as the “first black president”).
But even if this assertion were correct, is it then correct to equate white women’s support for Palin with blacks’ support of Obama? There are several reasons why the answer to that question is no, not the least of which is that blacks who support Obama AGREE with Obama’s policies and believe that an Obama presidency will help the plight of black people in America. Will the white female Democrats (life-long in many cases) who vote for McCain do it because they agree with his policies and believe that a McCain presidency will help the plight of women in America?

Posted by: Iris Bittencourt | August 31, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

“She’s not prepared to be governor; how can she be prepared to be vice president or president?” said state Senate President Lyda Green, a Wasilla Republican who told the Anchorage Daily News that she at first thought news of Palin’s selection was a joke.

Posted by: Chuck | August 31, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Help me get this straight. . .
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 2008-07-24 17:52.
The Governor used $50,000 plus of the people’s money on her public relations campaign nation-wide and she doesn’t have a handle on things here at home? Or was the $50,000 contract for PR for the Shadow Governor? Only the Shadow knows . . . . stay tuned for the next episode.

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | August 31, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

ABC News: My last comment was not spam and you know it. Seems like you’re on McCains payroll. What now we can’t disagree about Palin without being blocked. You guys are full of it, I’m leaving this racist website and take my views to MSNBC.

Posted by: pberry | August 31, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

The plot thickens…
Will Palin be able to survive this cataclismic revelation, or will she become DNC fodder?
“Tune in next week, same moon>bat time, same moon>bat channel.”

Posted by: Paul | August 31, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

This site is horrible because they take down information that is important, just because they do not agree with it

Posted by: Female | August 31, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

Jane Oh please, you’re right you can use and Planned Parenthood sanctions “present” votes- but 140 times? And the purpose of those “present” votes is to block bills
and to do so where you don’t need to take the political risk and vote up or down. What about the 6-7 times he mixed up the big green button vs. the big red button and said afterwards that he voted this but really meant to vote that and that he pushed the wrong button. Senators have been in office in Illinois alot longer then Obama who’ve never made that mistake once and he did 6-7 times? And where was Obama’s voice on the Senate floor those first two years in regards to Iraq? He said nothing and opposed setting timelines and withdrawal until he decided to run for President. He went out and campaigned for pro-war Lieberman over Lamont, he has a VP now who voted right along with McCain. Where was Obama while McCain was calling Rumsfeld the worst Secretary of Defense in American History? and when he called Cheney and idiot? When he attacked the Bush administration’s incompetence in waging a war that you and I would both agree shouldn’t have been waged in the first place? Why did he stand on the podium in Berlin as ask our Europen allies to support us as we wage George W’s war on terror in Afghanistan? The war moving to Afghanistan is still George W’s war on terror not Obama’s new thinking outside the box.

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

John McCain first big choice is to pick the best person in the country to lead if something was to happen to him. (Note he has bashed Obama over and over about experience). He claims Obama want to win at all cost. And he would put country first. He only met once with Gov Palin. What kind of judgment is this? People wake up; we have big problem but small ideals. I think he thinks we are all idiots.
ENOUGH!!!!!

Posted by: Erv | August 31, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

Chuck Considering Palin ousted a bunch of Republicans I don’t think I’d put too much stock in an Alaskan Republican Senator until you know her background.

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

Erv, with that logic, I’m sure that you’re going to vote for the far more experienced McCain over BHO, right?

Posted by: Don | August 31, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

“10 years as mayor, 8 years as
governor, 2 years as ambassador
add up to zero.”
And yet another child left behind. Darn that Bush!

Posted by: Paul | August 31, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Warsilla has 1/10th the population of the arena….was he the mayor of that arena?….nice try though

Posted by: Jim | August 31, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Brilliant pick by McCain to get Hillary voters. What Obama doesn’t realize is that women aren’t just about Roe vs. Wade – they make decisions with their heart, not based on just practical considerations like men. Women want another woman to make up for Hillary getting passed over by Obama, and this pick will even the score. Women will flock to the republican ticket now. Obama has shown himself to be a sexist, and women can see this and will punish him now.

Posted by: manny | August 31, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Ya know what’s funny? I’m sure it happens all of the time, but geez, ya get these democrat sock puppets that think that they’re fooling people by posting as “conservatives” and acting disgruntled by McCain’s pick of Palin. Truth is, she’s more conservative than him.
You guys really are making yourselves look foolish. Give it up. BHO is toast.

Posted by: Don | August 31, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

“She’s not prepared to be governor; how can she be prepared to be vice president or president?” said state Senate President Lyda Green, a Wasilla Republican who told the Anchorage Daily News that she at first thought news of Palin’s selection was a joke.

Posted by: Jack | August 31, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

The McCain camp has been looking at Palin for the past 7-8 months and she’s been in the mix of potential VP’s along other women and men for sometime now.
McCain wanted Lieberman, Lieberman was his first choice, but knew he would risk his Republican base and the conservative Republicans were threatening to oppose Lieberman/s nomination at the convention. After Biden was selected he had it down to Romney, Pawlenty, Palin, Ridge and Lieberman. He has met Palin at the beginning of the year at a Governor’s conference and was impressed with her committment to reform and her maverick
reputation. They bandied around all the pros and cons of each of those potential VP’s and McCain decided on Palin because she is representative of the McCain of 2000 which many would like know still exists within McCain.
For anyone who knows the McCain of 2000
(who was the hero of many in the far left and progressives) we’re talking about two Teddy Roosevelt Republicans here. McCain knows Palin’s being a social conservative won’t pull many CLinton supporters but Obama’s problem isn’t with women in general (because he
leads among women) rather it’s among older women and blue collar and rural voters regardless of gender. Obama joked about Hillary acting like Annie Oakley, well now his ticket is up against Annie Oakley. She’s probably driven a pick-up truck not just ridden in one. Now there may end up being things that come out about Palin which make this the worst choice ever (it won’t be a scandal about getting a woman beater who tased his child though
fired) but for all other purposes his judgement was very sound here, better then Obama’s to leave a door open after Clinton, who was winning rural and blue voters overwhelmingly over him, left the race and not choosing her. I love Biden but he’s a 30 year Washington insider on a ticket with a supposed change candidate. This choice has brought reinvigorated the McCain of 2000 where he is at his best. People have said over and over that to win the Presidency you need those blue collar and rural voters- well this hunting, fishing, snowmobiling gal who has no problem standing up to the oil industry in her own State just might fit the bill. If Obama loses this election the judgement question will go back on him and his belief that the blue collar, rural and disenchanted female Clinton supporters would just jump on board.
The judgement that he could just scramble the map and the African American and youth vote will get him in and that he didn’t need the more moderate and conservatice Democrats and the sexist notion that women are only single issue voters on reproductive rights. Obama is a symbol change whereas the agents of change are now the McCain/Palin ticket.

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

Mr./Ms. Moderator, why do you keep deleting this question; is there something you’re trying to hide? Again:
There is an interesting story floating around that Governor Palin’s daughter may be Trigs mother, along with photos. Is there any truth to this?

Posted by: D.D. | August 31, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

“What about the 6-7 times [Obama] mixed up the big green button vs. the big red button and said afterwards that he voted this but really meant to vote that and that he pushed the wrong button.”
—-
It’s hard to avoid the conclusion that Obama’s spent most of his official life trying to avoid leaving ANY kind of record with which ANYone can disagree.
Meanwhile, MoveOn — which last week tried to get its “members” to demand AP reporter Ron Fournier be fired — is acting as the hatchet-man on Palin (calling her “dangerous”, among other things), while the candidates exclaim over how cute she is.

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 31, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

“What about the 6-7 times [Obama] mixed up the big green button vs. the big red button and said afterwards that he voted this but really meant to vote that and that he pushed the wrong button.”
—-
It’s hard to avoid the conclusion that Obama’s spent most of his official life trying to avoid leaving ANY kind of record with which ANYone can disagree.
Meanwhile, MoveOn — which last week tried to get its “members” to demand AP reporter Ron Fournier be fired — is acting as the hatchet-man on Palin #calling her “dangerous”, among other things#, while the candidates exclaim over how cute she is.

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 31, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

anon Are we talking Obama who didn’t want timetables and wouldn’t committ to withdrawal until he ran for Prez?
Are we talking the ticket that has Biden on it who voted yes on the Iraq vote and supported more troops being put in Iraq along with McCain? Are we talking Obama who said nothing, not even once, about a war he so supposedly strongly opposed until he ran for Prez?
I opposed going into Iraq but I agreed with Powell that if you take it then you own it. And we owned it. To go into a Country and dismantle it’s infrastructure, dismantle it’s army and police force, set up conditions where we have basically a civil war evolving around us, where if we left we would be leaving Iraqis who had helped us out to certain death, where we couldn’t even get humanitarian aid in because of the violence – to leave and just say “see ya, we made a mistake here you’re on your own” is shameful. This Country looks bad have even gone in the first place to Iraq but would look worse just walking away. People like Powell said from the beginning if we were going to go in we needed more troops and Bush listened to Rumsfeld and Cheney. Until the surge we could not even get humanitarian aid into parts of that Country and now we can and now we can talk about withdrawal because of the improvements that have occurred as a result of strategy that should have been implemented in the first place if the axis of evil (Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld) were going to insist on carrying out this war in the first place. When Bush popped his head into a meeting that McCain was in and announced we were going into Iraq after he walked away McCain said to everyone
“Can you believe this guy is President of the United States?”. Bush and McCain hate each other and it’s been reported that McCain didn’t even vote for Bush. And Colin Powell, who was at the time one of the most trusted Americans, was the one who personally went to Senators such as Clinton and told them a vote yes on Iraq would avert war rather then lead to war. These Senators were given twisted intelligence to base their decisions on,
intelligence that Obama had no access to because he wasn’t in the Senate and he has acknowledged had he had access he wouldve’e perhaps voted differently.
Obama’s judgement to not go into Iraq was no different then the many AMerican who opposed it also and who had no vote and no access to intelligence or Powell nknocking on their door. His judgement about the surge was wrong and for you to imply he deserves credit for any withdrawal shows a lack of understanding about how this all played itself out.

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Belle My favorite is Obama’s not being able to make the Kyle Lieberman vote, the vote which would open the door to an aerial attack on Iran the equivalent of the Iraq vote. The vote that designated the Iranian national guard a terrorist group, which by the way Obama has publicly agreed with.
But Obama couldn’t show up that day to vote because he said he was at a rally
(which he wasn’t) and then he said he didn’t know they were going to vote on it that day. So now he’s put himself in a position where he has no vote cast to hold him accountable on and he will tell us all, if Bush were to involve us in an aerial attack on Iran, that his judgement was no on that vote. Everything he said prior would indicate a yes on that vote but I’ve already heard him and his camp when he was up against Clinton saying his judgement was right on Kyle and hers was wrong
(she voted yes and tried to pass a bill with Webb shortly after which would require Bush to get Congressional approval before a strike on Iran which guess who quietly squashed that bill?
Pelosi). At least a CLinton showed up, stood up, cast her vote and was willing to take the risk and the consequences of her vote which is more then can be said about Obama. Obama=symbol of change. McCain and Palin have records of change.

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

“once the 24 hour shock wears off the facts of Ms Palin will need to be answered:
(a) her financial statement of 2007 shoes she is worth $10million. As she never held a job that would produce this kind of income and her family is not of means and her husband is a union member- where was this fortune amassed? (makes her net worth 2 1/2 time more than Sen Obama who wrote 2 best selling books)
(b) she wants creationism taught in schools
(c) she does not believe in Global Warming
(d) She is anti choice
(e) she is ot for equal pay for equal work
(f) she was FOR the Bridge for Nowhere – as matter of fact this was part of her platform in 2006 in running for governor.
She accepted the money from congress for her state. She then decided not to go ahead with the bridge but kept the money for other projects.”
I haven’t read anything about income. Wouldn’t that have been mentioned by now?

Posted by: DD | August 31, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

How would McCain know what kind of leader Sarah Palin is since he barely vetted her! It’s quite apparent that McCain’s judgement fits into a thimble. P.S. Does McCain know what the VP does???? Howard Gallas, Reno, NV.

Posted by: Howard Gallas | August 31, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

So, let’s see. Anyone who is governor of a small populace state should be excluded from seeking the Presidency/Vice-Presidency? Let’s just ax Wyoming (good bye Cheney!!), Alaska, Montana, Idaho, Nevada, Utah, North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, etc. from the Union, since anyone from these states just doesn’t have it because there just aren’t enough people. What logic!! Alaska is a BIG player in international trade, is the northernmost defense for this country (what other governor has Russia 53 miles from its border), has a state budget larger than many, is the #1 energy state for this nation (not just oil), and is the size of the ENTIRE USA (imagine the difficulties and varied challenges of governing such a broad expanse with varied and difficult problems from almost third world conditions in our most remote areas to a huge influx of immigrants esp. from Pacific Rim area, Russia, Hmong, etc.). The population may seem small – the exposure to problems being faced as in other states is not, and neither is dealing with international issues. Sarah has accomplished much in such a short time with transparency and determination. By the way Green was part of the “big oil network” and didn’t even run in the last primary because she knew she was going to be beat soundly by a constituency whom have had enough!!

Posted by: Cindy | August 31, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

So – on the one hand we have Palin who took on coruption in Alaska – and on the other hand we have Biden – a person that is a demonstrated plagairizer. Palin wins. And then we have McCain – with a lifetime of service to his country, and Obama, who was “present” for the better part of 2 years. McCain wins. But just for fun, lets compare Palin and Obama. Palin lead a Ship of State for the same amount of time as Obama was “present” in the senate. Palin has more experience than him. Give it up. Obama/Biden are losers for losers. Don’t be a loser. Say yes to America and no to Obama.

Posted by: Don | August 31, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Whaaat??? Is Palin liberal Republican or conservative Democrat???
“Two weeks before she was tapped as the Republican vice presidential nominee, Sarah Palin compared herself to Barack Obama – and said she didn’t see eye-to-eye with John McCain on the Iraq war.
In an interview with The New Yorker, Palin said her gubernatorial campaign in Alaska had striking similarities to Obama’s since her theme was also “new energy.”
She said that the Democrat’s strong showing in Alaska had people in the traditionally Republican state “wigging out,” but not her.
“To me, that’s indicative, too. It’s the no-more-status quo, it’s change,” she told reporter Philip Gourevitch.
Palin went on to say that she is “hard-core Republican” on issues of gun control and abortion, but that she doesn’t consider herself overly partisan and doesn’t even speak to her state’s GOP leader.
She said McCain similarly has been “buttin’ heads with Republicans for years,” calling that a “healthy place to be.”
She was less enthusiastic when it came to his stance on the war in Iraq.
“I’m a mom, and my son is going to get deployed in September, and we better have a real clear plan for this war,” she said. “And it better not have to do with oil and dependence on foreign energy.” “

Posted by: OMG | August 31, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

Maybe if Democrats are nice they’ll ask Palin to replace Barack as presidential nominee. She has more balls, that’s for sure.

Posted by: JA | August 31, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

If a Governor of 2 years is not qualified then a Senator of three years sure isn’t. A Governor has to run a state not sit around and vote. Palin is a mother of 5, has worked the family fishing business. Palin has been a Mayor, a Governor, likes hunting and fishing. She sounds like a well rounded individual.
What has Obama really done? Not much except spend 20 years in a church with a bigot for a pastor. And Obama claims he didn’t know what his pastor was like. Obama is either lying or a fool.

Posted by: Tom | August 31, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Things that make you go hmmmm:
WASHINGTON – Cindy McCain said Sunday that Republican vice presidential pick Sarah Palin understands what’s at stake in national security issues in part because she is governor of Alaska, whose borders nearly touch Russia’s.
The wife of soon-to-be GOP presidential nominee Sen. John McCain also said she’s “offended” by Democrats calling her husband elitist because of the number of homes their family owns.
Asked about Palin’s credentials, Cindy McCain told ABC-TV’s “This Week:” “The experience that she comes from is with what she’s done in the government. And also, remember: Alaska is the closest part of our continent to Russia. So, it’s not as if she doesn’t understand what’s at stake here.”

Posted by: George | August 31, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Palin was Commander in Chief of the Alaskan Guard.

Posted by: JA | August 31, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

OOH Obama was a community organizer! How is Chicago doing these days? Gee how is Alaska doing these days? I’ll take the Governor of Alaska. Oops I forgot she is the # 2 on the ticket not # 1.
Obama is a joke. He should try running for dog catcher. I think he’s qualified.

Posted by: Tom | August 31, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Again like Rudy earlier I want what John is smokin’ he’s nuts and this remark just goes to show how far gone he really is here is what right wing pundit Andrew Sullivan had to say about how Mccains campaign was tryin to do to Obama and how it is NOT working !!! It was a deeply substantive speech, full of policy detail, full of people other than the candidate, centered overwhelmingly on domestic economic anxiety. It was a liberal speech, more unabashedly, unashamedly liberal than any Democratic acceptance speech since the great era of American liberalism. But it made the case for that liberalism – in the context of the decline of the American dream, and the rise of cynicism and the collapse of cultural unity. His ability to portray that liberalism as a patriotic, unifying, ennobling tradition makes him the most lethal and remarkable Democratic figure since John F Kennedy.
What he didn’t do was give an airy, abstract, dreamy confection of rhetoric. The McCain campaign set Obama up as a celebrity airhead, a Paris Hilton of wealth and elitism. And he let them portray him that way, and let them over-reach, and let them punch him again and again … and then he turned around and destroyed them. If the Rove Republicans thought they were playing with a patsy, they just got a reality check.
He took every assault on him and turned them around. He showed not just that he understood the experience of many middle class Americans, but that he understood how the Republicans have succeeded in smearing him. And he didn’t shrink from the personal charges; he rebutted them. Whoever else this was, it was not Adlai Stevenson. It was not Jimmy Carter. And it was less afraid and less calculating than Bill Clinton.
Above all, he took on national security – face on, full-throttle, enraged, as we should all be, at how disastrously American power has been handled these past eight years. He owned this issue in a way that no Democrat has owned it since Kennedy. That’s a transformative event. To my mind, it is vital that both parties get to own the war on Jihadist terror and that we escape this awful Rove-Morris trap that poisons the discourse into narrow and petty partisan abuse of patriotism. Obama did this tonight. We are in his debt.
Look: I’m biased at this point. I’m one of those people, deeply distressed at what has happened to America, deeply ashamed of my own misjudgments, who has shifted out of my ideological comfort zone because this man seems different to me, and this moment in history seems different to me. I’m not sure we have many more chances to get off the addiction to foreign oil, to prevent a calamitous terrorist attack, to restore constitutional balance in the hurricane of a terror war.
I’ve said it before – months and months ago. I should say it again tonight. This is a remarkable man at a vital moment. America would be crazy to throw this opportunity away. America must not throw this opportunity away.
Know hope.

Posted by: Dennis Fort Myers Fl | August 31, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

this woman only was a mayor for a town that is the size of a high school football field.i in charge of a navy platoon larger than that.

Posted by: david | August 31, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

OMG We have a Teddy Roosevelt Republican ticket here. I’m an independent who’s an ex-Clinton supporter and while I certainly don’t agree with this ticket on social issues,
I think Palin on the ticket reinvigorates the McCain of 2000 that I’ve been waiting to see and do see some occasional glimpes or hints of still. As Feingold (one of the more liberal and progressive in the Senate)
said that he supports Obama but doesn’t worry about a McCain Presidency because McCain really is an independent. McCain was the darling of the progressives and far left in 2000 and it’s well established that there is no olove between McCain and Bush for anyone who bother’s too look closely at
McCain. That’s why McCain was the Repubs strongest candidate because many of us remember the McCain who really is a reformist and bi-partisan but have been disappointed watching him pander to the Repubs to get the nomination.
But this is the same guy that called Cheney an idiot, said Rumsfeld was the worst Secretary of Defense in the history of this Country and said about Bush “Can you believe this guy is President of the United States?” and as Arianna Huffington has told us she knows for fact that McCain wouldn’t even vote for Bush. This is the guy who really is friends with Kennedy, Biden, Clinton, Lieberman, Daschle, Kerry, Dodd and so on. Daschle has even said about McCain’s voting 95% with Bush and betraying his independent streak, is what all politicians do and need to do to get elected. Hence Obama’s flip-flop on FISA, public financing, gun control,death penalty, NAFTA and so on. I would also like to remind that McCain was the one who stood up in a townhall this Spring and said that we need to finally get control of our oil dependency so we never, ever have to send our young men/women to the Middle East to ever fight a war about oil again. The next day the press was all over McCain’s “gaffe” and he backtracked and went back to talking the war on terror. I have never heard a statement like that come from Obama’s mouth-only from the progressives/far left. Obama was over in Berlin talking how we need their support to continue waging George W’s war on terror. McCain didn’t even support off-shore drilling until recently and he does not support drilling in ANWAR. McCain’s rhetoric is tough but he is not a war-monger and I would suggest you read the speech on foreign policy he gave in San Francisco. Also look at the McCain of 2000-2004 who even the Obama camp acknowledges was and independent and a maverick. When McCain came out and said the confederate flag was a symbol of racism and the party pressured him to backtrack on it, watch him read his statement off a piece of paper in disgust. Biden and Kerry didn’t try to talk McCain into being VP on the Kerrt ticket for nothing. The only one’s who trust McCain less on Supreme Court choices then either you or me is the far right. Palin, because of her strong pro-life stance, has now given McCain the solid support of the Repub party but she’s a reformer, an independent and a maverick (at least to date she has been) in the same mold of a McCain. You have Obama who makes promises with absolutely nothing to show in regards to being an agent of change whereas both McCain and Palin have records of independence and change and bi-partisan work. I was on the fence and there still may be more we don’t know about Palin again that could come up, but if she doesn’t screw up and her past is clean then I think we now have the real change ticket.

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

I will trust Sarah Palin, but i will never trust Obama.

Posted by: Francis | August 31, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

Dennis Why did we not see Obama on the Senate floor saying one thing about Iraq for almost two years until he decided to run for Prez? Why did he go out and campaign for Lieberman instead of anti-war Lamont? Why did he resist timelines and withdrawal until he decided to run for Prez? Why does he take money from British Petroleum, Exxon Mobil, Exelon, Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase, UBS and so on? When he attacked Phil Gramm as McCain’s economic advisor in his speech (and I hate Gramm) why didn’t he tell everyone his economic advisor, David Wolf, is Gramm’s boss and he’s head of UBS? Why if he doesn’t take lobbyist money take it instead from advisors to lobbyists or bundled money from lobbyists and all the other tricks one could get around not taking lobbyist money directly?
Why are you so worried about Palin when Obama himself says judgement is more important then experience to justify his own lack of experience?

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

OMG Your shock about Palin’s interview a couple weeks ago is only shocking because who you think McCain is , is most likely not the real McCain independents want to see more of and that the far right and the neo-cons hate.

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Although i am a democrat, i have to give it to Mccain, that was a clever idea to pick a women as vp, to try to get hillary women votes, especially her white women votes, and to get Obama white supporters. Well done Mccain on a idea that was poorly thought of!!! OBAMA BABY!!!!!

Posted by: Travis | August 31, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

And Obama has run something the size of an EMPTY football stadium…NADA experience -except as a professional candidate( no thanks I’ll take the lady!)

Posted by: Mary | August 31, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Governor Palin was a very smart choice for VP by McCain. She has executive EXPERIENCE – Obama doesn’t; she has proven accomplishments as an executive – Obama doesn’t; she is energy savvy – Obama isn’t; she is factual in her comments on what needs to be one to help solve our problems, especially in energy-Obama has promises with no explanation of how to pay for the promises. Biden? Give me a break. His loose lips will sink the ship.
I am a registered Democrat, but could NEVER vote for Obama and his lack of qualifications.

Posted by: Bob K | August 31, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

for crying out loud, i am so sick of the obama haters talking about his lack of experience. does anyone has any experience in the white house running this country? HELL NO! just because you’re a gov. doesnt mean you can run a country. doesn’t mean you will make an excellent president. hell bush sr. had a whole lot of white house experience and was a lousy president and so is his son who was the gov. of texas. this experience crap needs to stop NOW! if your educated, meet the requirements to become a president, and no prison record, then i say go for it.

Posted by: twisted | August 31, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

what scares me about palin is her lack of foriegn policy. she knows ZILCH! she even said it herself it was on her website lol! at least obama is on foreign committees and has some knowledge of what is going on. he is not dumb on foreign affairs. hell he is educated in international relations. he has enacted more peices of legislation (200 +) than john mccain. just read his wikipedia biography. at least obama has got his hands dirty working with people who has lost their jobs. hell you’re gonna down someone for trying to save jobs? for trying to help people? what was john mccain doing to help those people? NOTHING BUT SITTING ON HIS *** LIVING GOOD IN HIS MANY HOUSES. GIVE ME A BREAK PEOPLE!

Posted by: twisted | August 31, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

Palin is the most reckless, egotistical, over the top, downright irresponsible choice that McCain could have made. He’s had CANCER four times. He could croak anytime. This Palin has only been overseas once in her life. She is under investigation for corruption. She was mayor of a small town of 6500 until 1.5 years ago with her main responsiblity being to reside over the parade and beauty contest. She is far more radical right than even George Bush.
McCain proves with his vp pick that he is willing to put short term political gain in front of his country. He just right now on the news listed Palin being in the PTA as a reason why she’s ready to be President of the USA!!!!!
McCain needs a checkup from the neck up. I don’t want someone so completely unqualified to be so close to the nuclear trigger.
Imagine her sitting across from Putin? He’d talk to her for five minutes and invade Poland.

Posted by: ml_ramirez626 | August 31, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

McCain is joking right?
This is a change election and experience means nada here.
Proof:Palin is on his ticket.

Posted by: Left Center | August 31, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

Yes Elizabeth, Midshipman McCain finished 5th from the bottom at Annapolis. Do you know what they call the person who graduated at their class in medical school? I’ll give you a hint, it’s called “doctor.” Do you even know where your favorite physician was stack-ranked?
Further, do you understand the curricula within a service academy? Do you realize that things like cleanliness of room, serviceability of uniform, and strict adherence to orders, ANY legal order, no matter the function/applicability/or sense are part of what determine your class rank.
Do you understand that the service academies have the strictest honor codes known? Do you know that *plagiarism* at Annapolis would not get you a lower grade – it would get you expelled and a dishonorable discharge. I’ve no idea what the honor code is at UD or Syracuse Law, that said – I do know that it’s shallow to openly focus on John McCain’s class standing, given that the Dem VP selection has been routinely questioned about his familiarity with plagiarism – including in Law School. Thus, it’s entire conceivable that if Mr Biden where in a school that focused on “character” it would be questionable if he would have had ANY class standing.
And yes, the Keating 5, or what is really the Keating 3. Are you aware that the Dem led investigation cleared two of the falsely accused – Senators John McCain and John Glenn, a Democrat? Do you know that the three who were found complicit were ALL Democrats? Do you know that after the investigation, one of the three found complicit, DeConcini, was actually appointed by President Clinton to the board of directors for FreddieMac ??
Senators McCain and Glenn were accused of exhibiting poor judgment, though not unanimously by the Senate Ethics Committee. However, to correct that “judgment” Senator McCain reached across party lines and together drafted the McCain-Feingold Act, which defines all campaign financing regulations for federal elections.
I ask you please, cite me one reference of even *marginal* consequence where either Senators Obama or Biden have reached across the aisle to sponsor anything beyond “National Lawnmower Day,” or the like.
That sound of crickets chirping is not only in your head, it’s in the heads of all disciples of the Obamasiah.

Posted by: Cynicism101 | August 31, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

Anon, where the other 500 US Navy pilots shot down in Vietnam also mediocre combat pilots?

Posted by: Cynicism101 | August 31, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Obama in 2002 said that Iraq would devolve into a civil war and that Shia and Sunni wouldn’t be able to live together. (This is one Bush didn’t know the difference between the two. ) Obama said at the time, as he was running for Senate, “I’m not opposed to all war, I’m opposed to a dumb war.”
Obama passed the first major ethics reform in a generation in the U.S. Senate, being the reason candidates cannot take corporate jets for free.
Obama passed the nuclear non proliferation bill, to gather up rogue nukes in Eastern Europe. A landmark bill.
Obama was the first African America editor of the Harvard Law review, and turned down over 700 corporate job offers out of college to organize his community in Chicago and become a civil rights attorney.
He’s a well respected constitutional law professor at Columbia.
He’s devoted his life to helping those less fortunate than he.
Meanwhile, Sarah Palin graduated from Idaho State University with a C average in Journalism.
She was a beauty queen, second runner up.
She has expressed no interest in foriegn policy as mayor of her tiny town of 6500.
She’s never been on a national news broadcast like Meet The Press EVEN ONCE.
She is woefully unprepared to step in and take over for McCain if his skin cancer returns.

Posted by: ml_ramirez626 | August 31, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

The Republican paid hate and smear bloggers are certainly out in force this Sunday afternoon. They sound awfully shrill and desperate today- much more than usual.
Wake up, you fools. nobody believes the talking points that were distributed first to Rush Limbaugh, then to Sean Hannity, and then to any fool who would fall for their garbage.
The simple truth is that you have a pretty fast talking woman with no national or international experience, who the Anchorage Daily News states, “can look you in the eye and tell you black is white,” running for Vice President of the United States.
One of my friends is Mayor of a small nearby town here in Oregon. It is an unpaid position, and his duties consist of showing uyp once a week to hear the grievances of his neighbors such as- they didn’t pick up my garbage, and they are running stop signs on my block. It is not experience that lends itself to the second highest office in the land.
She has only been Governor in a mostly uninhabited state for about 18 months. Her vote count was 104,000- about the same number as vote in most city elections in urban areas.
Much of the 18 monthshas been spent either at home, ord traveling out of state lobbying for oil drilling in the Artic National Wildlife Refuge.
She knows nothing about the complex issues facing our nation today. Issues such as healthcare, the war in Iraq, the mortgage meltdown, social security underfunding, mending our relations with our allies. There is nothing there. She had no idea what the Vice Presiden’t duties were and that he/she is presiding officer of the United States Senate and casts tie breaking votes there.
She has no knowledge of Constitutional Law unlike Senators Obama and Biden, who actually taught the subject.
This is an attempted cruel hoax on the American people. The Rove clones think that we are stupid enough to believe their lies which they can hardly repeat with a straight face. This hockey mom needs to stay home and take care of her baby- not to be old man McCain’s “soulmate.” Ouch.
Not this time

Posted by: Rachel Morrison | August 31, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

“Miss Congeniality” aka “the Barracuda,” versus thirty years of foreign relations experience and chair of the United States Senate foreign relations committee.
A C- student from the University of Idaho, who was a part time sportscaster at a tiny radio station, a part time city council person in a tiny town, a part time Mayor in the same tiny town, and a part time newly elected Governor in an uninhabited state run by Exxon and BP versus a statesman who has run the Senate Judiciary committee, and the Foreign Relations committee for many years, and who is very well acquainted with the leaders of the world.
What was the old man thinking? His “soulmate,” is going to turn out to be his “bad dream.”
Please don’t do this to us, Mr Custer.
Please.

Posted by: Lisa | August 31, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

Obama sat in Wright’s church and heard him spew anger at whites for 20 years. Wright is a racist and Obama had as much ‘judgement’ as a First Lady that, decade after decade, has stayed with a cheating husband. Palin lack of experience only serves to highlight how little experience Obama has!

Posted by: Obiden | August 31, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

Lucas,
Please provide a reference to the statement he made about consequences of his actions?
I would suspect what he was saying is that he would not let the consequences he personally/politically/professionally may suffer cloud his judgment to make the correct choice. i.e., choosing based on ones convictions – not based on how carrying out those convictions may impact your career.
This is a stark contrast to one who chooses to abandon their convictions for the purpose of political expediency. Examples of which may be voting “present” on an amazing number of bills, more recently – abandoning your conviction to vote to approve the new FISA bill – irrespective of the ad nauseum diatribes of how you may be opposed and would never support.
As an officer, you know you know the type of man you would want to follow (or at least deity, I hope so) – the one looking out for what’s right for “him”, or the one looking out for what he believes is right for us.

Posted by: Cynicism101 | August 31, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

thanks to cindy’s dad and his political contacts, john mccain successfully won election in arizona. he’s never got his hands dirty working with real people. he’s done nothing to help those who lost jobs, healthcare, NOTHING! barack has. this man voted against raising the minimun wage for christ sake.

Posted by: twisted | August 31, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

McCain listed Palin’s executive experience: governor, council member, mayor, PTA. Make sure you get to the bottom of that PTA executive assignment!

Posted by: alindra | August 31, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

“As an officer, you know you know the type of man you would want to follow (or at least deity, I hope so) – the one looking out for what’s right for “him”, or the one looking out for what he believes is right for us.” cynicism 101
cynicism,
One of the first things that I learned as a combat pilot was to be able to successfully judge the character of who I wanted to be my flight leader, and who I wanted to have on my wing.
I can tell you that John McCain would not have been my choice to fly missions with. It has always been about “John” as evident by his training records, his life driving corvettes, heavy drinking, and one night stands. Later, in how he treated his disabled wife, had affairs, and married into big money “for himself.”
Senator Obama, after having been selected as President of the Harvard Law Review, and after graduating magna cum laude, could have had any high paying job in a large corporate law firm that he wanted. Instead he helped people get jobs and empowered them by getting them to register to vote. He worked with many community churches and their pastors helping people get the assistance that they required. It was not about “him.” It was about helping others.
McCain is still trying to please his father. He could not make Admiral so now wants to be President.
Not this time. We’ve had enough of Bush/Cheney fiascos- and don’t need them to be recycled by a stressed out old man and his “soulmate” beauty queen.

Posted by: Lucas Phillips | August 31, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Lisle,
Absolutely correct on the history of “The Pledge of Allegiance.” But you do accept the presence of the word “God” and “Creator” being present in “The Declaration of Independence.”
I believe the term “founding fathers” refers to those responsible for the declaration, those leading the battle, those who wrote “The Articles of Confederation”, and those who participated in The Philadelphia Convention.
Given this, Gov Palin is correct – whether she knew it or not. The use of the word “God” was acceptable to the founding fathers – at least for something thats a non-binding document – I wouldn’t argue that the Pledge is binding.
That said, Oaths are binding – and all I’m aware of in this country include the term “God” …whether I like it or not.

Posted by: Cynicism101 | August 31, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

Obama is the poster boy for “Empty Suits.” Palin’s experience is in the real world of business and governing. Obama has no experience at anything other than smiling and talking smack.
The RNC should send Palin to Iraq and Afghanistan for a couple of days each so she can smile and say her “foreign policy” experience meets and exceeds Obamas.
As for Biden, he’s been turned down and laughed out of more presidential bids than probably anyone in history. How many times does America have to tell him they don’t want him?

Posted by: James | August 31, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

There is a lot of interesting info that does not add up with Sarah Palin. There was a photo of Sarah Palin in front of the “family seaplane” in Vogue. Ok, then I go and look up who licensed pilots are in the FAA database at and I find that Sarah Palin’s husband is listed there with a designation for a Single Engine Land rating, not a Single Engine Sea rating as would be required for a seaplane. So what is it? Is the FAA’s database wrong or is Sarah Palin’s husband flying illegally?

Posted by: Bill | August 31, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

Alindra I’ve been a community organizer before in Mpls. and I know you don’t get anymore foreign policy experience there then the PTA or the City Council or as Mayor. You also don’t get foreign policy experience as a State Senator but you get Executive experience as a Governor. It’s also pretty hard to get foreign policy experience if you walk into the US Senate for the first time and almost immediately put together an exploratory committee for a Presidential bid and then spend the rest of your one and only term campaigning. Instead of acquiring the depth of knowledge, perspective and experience afforded him in the US Senate and on his Foreign Relations sub-committee, he squandered the opportunities to run for President.
Remember, it’s not experience it’s judgement that’s important in foreign policy right? Being a newcomer outside of Washington politics can bring perhaps and fresh and new perspective, right? Obama brought Biden on to compensate for his lack of foreign policy experience and Palin has McCain.
Obama has 300 foreign policy advisors, I think Palin can find a couple hundred herself. I bet if Palin hired David Axelrod he could make her look Presidential too despite her slim resume just like he has Obama. Carter, Reagan, Clinton and Bush Jr came in as ex-Governors with little if any foreign policy experience but with Executive experience. In fact the only recent President who came in with extensive foreign policy experience was Bush Sr.
and it showed. Both McCain and Biden have foreign policy experience, Palin has Executive experience and Obama has what?

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

Palin left her tiny city with $20 in debt, and pushed for the “bridge to nowhere”. She’s no fiscal conservative.
Can’t wait to see the “hockey mom” leader of the free world.

Posted by: jds | August 31, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

James Palin was in Germany and Kuwait on trips to connect with Alaska’s National Guard.

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

twisted What exactly has Obama done?
He spent the first year looking at a Presidential run and the rest of his not completed first term running for President. He’s spent his one and only US Senate term either prepping or running for President. So other then sitting in meetings with Axelrod and his team thinking of strategies to convince people such as yourself that he has a long list of accomplishments, what has he really done?

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Lisa I love Biden but he’s not running for President, the inexperienced guy is remember? Besides, Biden while a great guy, has spent the past almost 30 years inside the halls of Washington- so much for change and new politics. Besides, I thought experience was less important then judgement. Aren’t women capable of such? Palin was an Executive in her State while Obama was a State Senator.
She’s done more line vetoes then he’s ever introduced bills. Obama has 300 foreign policy advisors, don’t you think Palin could get a hundred or so too?

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Lucas,
Yes, I agree Senator Obama was a great “grass-roots” story. I agree that he did give-up a lot of money he would have earned at a big law firm. His community involvement is admirable and what I think is right with this country. That said, his long time involvement with the religious groups in Chi make his “I never knew Rv Wright said those things” defense more than a little suspect.
I think it’s when he was transitioning from the grass to the marble where he adopted the “me” focus. While I’m aware of no proof,
After that, records indicate calculation, and an aversion to professional risk.
His “present” voting record in the IL senate is difficult, if not impossible to interpret as being for the common good.
His caves on campaign finance reform and most especially FISA are impossible to interpret as someone with convictions. The former is bitter on multiple fronts – at Saddleback, Sen Obama listed his efforts to cross party lines to work on campaign finance legislation as his LONE example of bipartisanship.
Once he had effectively eliminated the competition of Sen Rodam, he wasted zero time returning to his partisan nature and backing out of his pledge. And his justification – too funny, that the current campaign finance laws were too ineffective.
Are we all supposed to believe that the Magna Cum Laude Harvard Law Review ^Constitutional Scholar^ was not aware that the campaign finance laws were *EXACTLY* the same when he broke his pledge as they were when he made it?
Once again, it benefited “Him” so he made the choice – irrespective of supposed convictions he claimed to hold.

Posted by: Cynicism101 | August 31, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

Rachel Oh please, there are 670,053 people in Alaska (in comparison to Biden’s 843,524 people in Delaware in which he represents)and are you telling me a Governor in Alaska doesn’t have to deal with healthcare? education? housing? food prices and energy costs?
corruption? local, State and the Federal government? State Senators (as Obama was) and representatives? budgets?
What kind of nonsense is that?

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

Lucas said -
“It has always been about “John” as evident by his training records, his life driving corvettes, heavy drinking, and one night stands.”
What you describe is the custom character definition of a fighter pilot.
Let’s look at the creme de la creme of fighter pilots from that era – those dashing fighter jockeys we call astronauts.
I know each of the original seven all drove vettes. I believe the same is true for the new nine and beyond.
While some certainly held to convictions of staying faithful and limiting the booze, many were cursed with zipper problems and a work hard/play hard lifestyle. Many also crashed in training and transport operations – some fatal.
Are you seriously telling me that because our Mercury/Gemini/Apollo astronauts exhibited many of the same traits that they were mediocre pilots and someone unfit to lead? Seriously?

Posted by: Cynicism101 | August 31, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

I’ve got to agree with McCain. Not only is Palin more qualified than Obama, anyone who can talk is more qualified than Obama. At least Palin has actually run a city and a state. I don’t think Obama has even run a gas station.

Posted by: S Adams | August 31, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Yup, yup, she really has the experience. Alaska is close to Russia, that really counts, got her first passport in 2007 to go to Kuwait to visit the Alaskan National Guard, PTA, City Council, Mayor of a small town and governor for less than two years. A republican state representative from Alaska said yesterday that she wasn’t even qualified to be governor, let alone VP. Pro-life, not even in case of rape or incest, doesn’t believe in birth control, doesn’t believe in evolution. Doesn’t know what the VP does, called Hillary a whiner, currently under investigation by her state legislature. Yup, yup, she’s a real winner!!

Posted by: Carolyn Grace | August 31, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Obama supporters freaked out by Palin, what’s the problem? Judgement remember is more important then experience.
Being a Washington outside or with less experience brings a new, fresh perspective to the table, remember?
Obama put Biden on the ticket to compensate for his lack of experience and Obama’s on the top of ticket and Palin’s the VP to the more experienced McCain, the problem is? Obama has 300 foreign policy advisors, don’t you think she can’t find a couple hundred?
While he was working as a community organizer (and I’ve done community organizing in the City before and don’t even go there that it provides foreign policy experience) while she was on the City Council and Mayor. He wasn’t doing community organizing in all of Chicago but rather the Southside of Chicago.
She was overseeing a City, regardless of size, and dealing with budgets and taxes and so on. He was a State Senator while she has been a Governor of a State and last I heard the Governor runs the show not the Senators.
She has acquired Executive experience while he hasn’t . He hasn’t even completed a first term in the Senate and has spent most all of it either exploring a Presidential bid or campaigning for President. She’s done more line vetoes then he’s put through legislation. He’s nothing more then a symbol of change while Palin has actually acted on change. The experience arguement doesn’t fly when you have the top of the Democratic ticket having the slim resume Obama does.

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 31, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

cynicism,
Senator Obama only agreed to limit himself to public campaign financing, if his opponent would agree to reign in the 527 smear machine that Republican groups used to slime John Kerry.
There is also a huge loophole in these laws that allow the RNC and DNC to spend as much as they want. Since the Republicans have huge access to large corporate lobby funds, the DNC is at a distinct disadvantage.
John McCain abandoned public financing after agreeing to it during the primaries. With his big corporate fat cats now on board sending millions to the RNC he can “afford” to take the tax payers money. He knew he would never be able to approach Senator Obama’s grass roots efforts so he did what he had to do- as did Senator Obama.

Posted by: Lucas Phillips | August 31, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

“are you telling me a Governor in Alaska doesn’t have to deal with healthcare? education? housing? food prices and energy costs?
corruption? local, State and the Federal government? State Senators (as Obama was) and representatives? budgets?
What kind of nonsense is that? alpaig
alpaig,
I agree that the Governor should be dealing with these issues- but in 18 months Palin has been in office, her focus has been on mainly oil issues. People close to her say that she has a blind eye on healthcare, infrastructure, and education. It’s all about drilling in the Artic national Wildlife Refuge and getting polar bears taken off the endangered species list.
She has hardly been in the Capitol, Juneau, at all- spending most of her time in Wasilla, or in traveling outside the state.
Name another Governor who has been elected in a mostly uncontested contest, from a mostly uninhabited state- served for 18 months and then been nominated for Vice President. She is a hockey mom, PTA member, part time mayor and tool for big oil. In addition she is under investigation for ethics violations.
Not this time.

Posted by: Ann | August 31, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

Choosing Palin was a cynical attempt at tricking people into thinking McCain is progressive. I voted for him in the 2000 primaries. Who he is now is a mystery, and Palin is bait on a hook. Let’s see which midwest housewives take the bait and think a choice for her is a feminist choice.
I’ll take a chance on Obama.

Posted by: Jay Kamins | August 31, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

I can’t believe that people aren’t worried about her being VP, her exact words were, “I’ve been so focused on state government, I haven’t really focused much on the war in Iraq.” and also considering the fact that McCain is 72 years old and has had cancer 4 times, she will be a heartbeat away from the presidency if he is elected. She doesn’t know much about national affairs, and who knows how she would handle the two wars.

Posted by: Kathy | August 31, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

ame another Governor who has been elected in a mostly uncontested contest, from a mostly uninhabited state- served for 18 months and then been nominated for Vice President. She is a hockey mom, PTA member, part time mayor and tool for big oil. In addition she is under investigation for ethics violations.
Not this time.
Posted by: Ann
Why don’t we ask he ex brother-in-law who
is being harassed by her and her husband.
Abusing her authority by using employees,
state money and time in getting him booted
off of the state police force.

Posted by: spacerook1 | August 31, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

Ann,
If Alaska is so “uninhabitable”, so “insignificant”, so trivial to govern – well, tell me again why we shouldn’t be drilling there?
You just stated there’s nothing there, what’s the big deal?

Posted by: Cynicism101 | August 31, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

McCain told a bold-faced lie that he should be called on. Palin became mayor in the late 90′s. Obama was elected to the state senate in the late 90′s. He was not an organizer while she was in office as McCain stated abv. Although he may have been an organizer while she was in the PTA.

Posted by: Stacey | August 31, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

Palin never said she supported the surge. In an interview when asked about the surge, she said she had not been paying attention to Iraq and had no opinion.

Posted by: stacey | August 31, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

McCain has been talking up
his choice of VP 24/7.
She must be a really poor
choice if he has to talk
her up so much.

Posted by: anon | August 31, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

Kathy said:
“I can’t believe that people aren’t worried about her being VP, her exact words were, “I’ve been so focused on state government, I haven’t really focused much on the war in Iraq.”"
Kathy, are you actually criticizing her for performing the duties she was elected to perform? I’ve never seen a job description for a US Senator, if such a thing exists. Still, I highly doubt that performing ones duties as a Senator is encompassed by spending the entire term planning and executing ones own Presidential Campaign.
And yes, my criticism there goes to all the candidates that currently hold an elected office. Still, McCain, Rodham, Biden – they were all around at least long enough to find the cafeteria before they started running – well, maybe not so much for Rodham.
But to this point – how about this for campaign reform. You’re allowed to campaign when your house is not in session – that’s all. Sure, it doesn’t benefit the news media/talk radio/blogsphere … but that makes it a good thing!

Posted by: Cynicism101 | September 1, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

From what I’ve read, there is still plenty of work for Governor Palin to do right there in Alaska:
In the 2008 Dept of Education report only 65.9% of Alaska’s public schools are making adequate yearly progress, and only 59.6% of the students are graduating.
Alaska’s unemployment rate is up to 6.9% as of July 2008 (which in 1.2% higher than the US average), and is up from the 6.2% it was in July 2007.
17% of the Alaskan population is uninsured.
And, the teen birth rate is 37 per 1000 of population.
Looks to me like that money she handed back to the people of Alaska might have given her a nifty approval rating; but, is she truly looking out for the welfare of her constituents?

Posted by: Amy T | September 1, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

This is serious to me -quote McCain: McCain replied, “Oh, yeah. She’s a partner and a soulmate.” There are many old men who would put a beautiful woman in office just to be around her. Soul mste????

Posted by: alan moore | September 1, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Sen McCain,
You are belittling Sen. Barrack Obama. He is the next President of the United States of America.

Posted by: franklin | September 1, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

McCain made excellent choice.
He found not gold. Palin is brilliant.
She is strong, intelligent.
Who is Obama? He is zero.Obama,Biden
and Clinton look like clowns. They hug
each other, but they hate each other.
Obama and his wife hate America.
Did you forget to what chirch they
belong? And you want Obama for president? People, wake up.
McCain/Palin is the best choice.

Posted by: Anna | September 1, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am

What about the judgement to SERVE the people who elected her RATHER than the people who are crooks . What about the judgement to take the risk of ending a career and do what is Right and moral . What about the judgement to stand up to the Big Old Boys for the small town people . Those are judgements that Obama does not have as his record show and those are judgements that only a person with STRONG SPINE has . I say these are judgements we need more than anything else . These judgements trumph experiences in a big way , and yes , this lady DOES have more executive experiences than Obama . What is the point of us electing someone who lines his pocket rather than works for us to make sure that Washington is Clean ? I say this lady gets the only kind of judgement that is required of a public servant , to SERVE THE PUBLIC AND NOT THAT PARTY !

Posted by: alohaone | September 1, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am

After reading her Bios, think those who criticize her need to take a step back and look at their motives . This lady has qualities that even most men do not have ,and I do not mean to say that women is in anyway less qualified than men , but we most of the time associate men with strength and gut and boys , this lady has the strength of heart and the courage that I am not sure if I want to face her in battle . So , obama and his supporters should watch out . I like Clinton and the way she ran her campaign with such braveness and determination to the end , but with Clinton , you always know that she is part of the system, a party follower and as much as I like to see a lady cracks that Glass Ceiling , Clinton was not spotless . But Mrs. Palin does not have mrs. clinton tarnishes and that make her choice even more satisfying . I am sure a lot of the people in this country want that Glass shattered ,too, but better yet , now it will be shattered to pieces by a squeakily clean hammer . It does not get better than this!

Posted by: alohaone | September 1, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

Amy T Gee, Pelosi and company did so well these past 4 years in Congress also. They have a 9% approval rate in comparison to Bush’s 30% approval rate
(which has gone up but was never 9%).
I kind of recall Obama is part of that waste called Congress. Actually I take that back, he missed most of his votes because he spent the first year doing exploratory committees to see about a Presidential bid and the rest of his first term campaigning for President.
His contribution was so extremely minimal in the Senate his first term that I guess we can give him some slack when partioning out blame.

Posted by: alpaig52 | September 1, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am

alohaone I think people should watch her on the CNBC interview where they’re talking to her about drilling and Alaska
and regardless of your position on drilling, she still comes off pretty impressive. Since Obama has his 300 foreign policy advisors, once Palin gets her hundred or so Policy advisorsi TI think she’ll do just fine. This gal may be pro-life and conservative on social issues but she clearly is more of an Independent. Since I’ve heard for how many months now, over and over and over how it’s judgement and not experience that counts when the Obama camp and his supporters justify his miminal foreign policy experience- well I guess I can take a risk on the bottom of the McCain ticket. All Palin would need to do is hire David Axelrod and he’d have people in this Country convinced she was Presidential material in no time- I worked for Obama.

Posted by: alpaig52 | September 1, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am

McCain assumes Americans are stupid.
Obama assumes Americans are intelligent.
Vote for how you would like to be viewed. Americans are not stupid, but they can, like all people, be deceived and misled. How? By people who appeal to their anger and fear, their animal and less rational side.

Posted by: Vincent | September 1, 2008, 4:57 am 4:57 am

Palin = Eva Peron in alaska version
Good for the third country
Drill Drill Drill,
Do whatever makes money.
Pro life, Pro gun, Put the Bear skin on the sofa…
She is really good for Alaska.
Please stay there.

Posted by: zen | September 1, 2008, 5:16 am 5:16 am

Maccain Country Last

Posted by: zen | September 1, 2008, 5:19 am 5:19 am

McCain seems to be arguing that Gov. Palin has more executive experience than Barack Obama because she has been governor of Alaska for less than two years and prior to that mayor of a small community. Some questions come to mind:
Is McCain arguing that Palin should be at the top of the GOP ticket now?
When comparing the presidential candidates does McCain have any more executive experience than Obama?
Also, time has not yet provided the opportunity to assess whether Palin’s executive governess of Alsska is lacking or impressive. Even if impressive, is she really qualified to take over the helm of the presidency?

Posted by: Catharina Summers | September 1, 2008, 6:50 am 6:50 am

As a woman Sarah Palin makes me very, very afraid. She does not understand one of the basic principles our country was founded on…separation of church and state. I truly believe she was forced on John McCain by the right wing conservative religious right of the Republican party. They would be thrilled if McCain got elected and then something happened to him. Nothing would make them happier than having a right wing nut running this country. She makes George Bush look like a liberal. As a woman and mother of a daughter I believe she would take the women’s movement back 40 years. No choice, no equal pay, be submissive to your husband, creationism in public schools. I have never so afraid of a candidate in my life. I think Abraham Lincoln would be appalled to see what today’s Republicans have done to his party.

Posted by: diane | September 1, 2008, 6:56 am 6:56 am

The Alaska State Senate President who is a woman and Republican said that when she heard that Sarah Palin was selected to be McCain’s VP she thought it was a joke. She said that Palin is not even qualified to be Governor of Alaska, never mind VP of the United States. So much for a vote of confidence from people familiar with all her “executive experience”.

Posted by: Mike | September 1, 2008, 7:00 am 7:00 am

Amy Said:
“Looks to me like that money she handed back to the people of Alaska might have given her a nifty approval rating; but, is she truly looking out for the welfare of her constituents?”
Yep – that is the quintessential ideology difference we are dealing with here. Where the left believes you are incapable of making any decision in your own best interest, and thus – Govt must do it for you.
Gov Palin decided that each individual can better make decisions for what is in their best interest.

Posted by: Cynicism101 | September 1, 2008, 7:16 am 7:16 am

Catharina -
Yes, Senator McCain does have more executive experience than any of the 5 candidates. He was a commanding officer in the US Navy – that is exec experience.

Posted by: Cynicism101 | September 1, 2008, 7:21 am 7:21 am

Cynicism101…the Republicans are so big on being “Pro-life”. Unfortunately once the babies are born they don’t want to help those mothers (or fathers)take care of those children. They are against equal pay for women, don’t want to raise the minimum wage, are against unions, don’t want to provide affordable healthcare, and don’t want to help them get an education. So as far as I’m concerned the Republican party should be called the Hippocrite Party. They want to condemn people morally but have no interest in truly helping people. If they really cared about children they wouldn’t have voted against every bill to help children have a better life.

Posted by: Mike | September 1, 2008, 7:33 am 7:33 am

I don’t think Obama denies or questions that the surge in troops in Iraq didn’t work…maybe he, like me, is questioning why we are there in the first place.

Posted by: allyana | September 1, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am

I’m amazed that American’s can be so easily duped in falling for McCain’s gimmick. Country first, please. People do your research….McCain has missed more votes in the Senate this year than anyone else. He hasn’t been in the Senate since Apri & he has zero executive experience. To argue that military service is “executive” is absurd. Palin’s outstanding record? What record? She has been Governor as long as Obama & McCain have been running for President. A 20 month “maverick”? Mayor of a little town of 8,700 people doesn’t qualify one to be VP. To qualify as VP one has to qualify to be president, period. Obviously Palin has no credentials to lead this country. This is not a liberal or conservative issue- its about the importance of preserving the integrity & competency of the Vice Presidency for the safety & success of America. Being a 72 year old heart beat away from being the leader of the free world is serious business. Adding an incompetant rookie to the ticket endangers us all & makes a mockery of the VP office.

Posted by: Jackson | September 1, 2008, 8:16 am 8:16 am

Palin has no Rezko deals. She cut budgets and lowered taxes. She fought her own party to rid it of corruption. She has worked with her hands. She built a business. Her pastor never said “God Damn America.” She has never socialized with domestic terrorists. Her husband is a union member. Her parents were teachers. She ran a small town. She was on a statewide board overseeing the oil & gas industry…which she has locked horns with and fought to get a better deal from them for the taxpayers.
ETC ETC ETC.
What has Obama REALLY DONE??? No real legislative accomplishments. No real bi-partisan break throughs. His VP pick, another liberal white guy to backstop his lack of experience.

Posted by: Kris in AL | September 1, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am

McCain is either out of his mind or loosing his mind and demented if he said Palin is a better leader. I have lost all respect for McCain. He is in his terminal stages of his political career and I am glad that he lost to Bush in 2000, because McCain would have been a worse President.

Posted by: gjkotw01 | September 1, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am

McCain is only trying to make cover for a poor pick. He picked Palin to secure his base, but to his peril. This pick will galvanize Clinton supporters for Obama and secure prochoice republicans and independents. Great pick McCain.

Posted by: william | September 1, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am

Some statements are so rediculous on their face that they need no respose. This is one of them.

Posted by: william | September 1, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

I judge Obama by his campaign. For the last two years, he has been chief executive of a presidential campaign that has reinvented campaign finance, beaten the Clinton machine, mobilized millions of volunteers, surrounded the candidate with smart dedicated people and executed its strategy with precision and without drama. McCain’s, by contrast, has been sputtering and lurching without message or direction, kept alive only because the Republican elite knows that he’s the only person in the party with a hope of convincing people that he’s not a Republican in the Bush mould.
Based on campaign performance, Obama will be your president, and a very good one.

Posted by: Michael | September 1, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

McCain and Palin have a son in the Army and Obama has a speech in 2002 , oops 2 speeches one in 2002 and one in 2008.
- A McCain Democrat from MA

Posted by: vs | September 1, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

Jackson,
Performing duties as a CO *not* qualifing as exec experience denotes a lack of understanding on your part.
As the exec his squadron, he was responsible making decisions necessary to meet the stated objectives for his group. This includes managing a budget, and responsible for all material and personnel under his purview.
Which incompetent rookie are you referring to? The one in the second chair on the Republican side, or the one in the first chair on the Dem side.
Remember, both the Dem runner-up and the running-mate constantly defined Senator Obama as being unqualified for the job during the primary process.
What achievements has he made in the last 4-6 months of campaigning that suddenly give him experience he didn’t have during the first 36 months of his campaign? Are we counting his cave on the FISA bill an achievement?
With Palin, a cardiac event is necessary to make her commander in chief. With Senator Obama, no cardiac event is necessary – Inexperience takes over immediately on Jan 20th…

Posted by: Cynicism101 | September 1, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

My daughter is the leader of her girls scout troop. That does not make her qualified to run the GSA National association. I find it amazing that people have such strong and convincing opinions on her qualifications when they no nothing about her. Stop being clones America! Repeating talking points on both sides does nothing to true debate in our country!

Posted by: Da Birdman | September 1, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

A 72years old man is losing his mind, somebody please call for help.

Posted by: dennis | September 1, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

And now Sen. McCain claims to be a mind-reader. Perhaps he needs remedial
mind-reading.
“Obama? thinks Iran? is a minor? irritant????” McCain declares!
Perhaps the reality is that Obama says what he thinks, and McCain thinks what he says.

Posted by: ash | September 1, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

As a Veteran of the U.S. Air Force who served my country proudly, I’d like give all the honor and respect to John McCain that he deserves…..”Thanks for serving John”. However, this 72 year old man on the verge of Senility, that has health issues, and is a COMPLETE WAR MONGER with an ATTITUDE, has no business leading the Strongest Nation in the free world into the 21st Century. As far as his VP is concerned, and I have LOVE for ALL Women, she has governed a “Wild Life Refuge” (ALASKA) for crying out loud. I grew up in one of the TOUGHEST Cities in America (one that has partaken in the 69 riots), and personally I don’t think she has the experience to run a City like the one I grew up in, let alone take on the responsibilities of Governing a WHOLE NATION with many cities that have these same problems. In other words, “If you ain’t never been to the Hood, you can’t un the Hood”.

Posted by: Marcus | September 1, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

McCain has recklessly chosen an unqualified clone and is either irresponsibly gambling with America’s future or too senile to grasp the enormity of his abysmal selection for Vice President. Seventy-two year old McCain President/Palin Vice President – Can anyone imagine a greater threat to our security and prosperity?

Posted by: Jack | September 1, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

You clarified everything else McCain stated, but didn’t take on his assertion that Palin was garnering executive experience while Obama was community organizing. This is not, in fact, true:

Posted by: Kristin | September 2, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

Obama’s twisted logic that merely running for office provides him with the qualifications, experience and credentials to perform in that office, is as laughable as his twisted logic that a whirlwind 9 day, six country, overseas photo op qualifies him as an expert on foreign policy. Obama is an empty suit who is obviously trying to create the illusion that he is something that he is not. If its a choice between an experienced mayor and Governor, with an approval rating of 80% for V.P. versus. a community organizer, and junior senator, who spent most of his time in office running for President … I choose Palin. No Wright, no Farrakahn, no Ayers, no Rezko, no mean Michelle, NOBAMA

Posted by: Howard | September 2, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.