By Ed O'Keefe

Aug 29, 2008 9:19am

Minnesota’s Pawlenty Gets Call: He’s Not McCain’s VP Pick

ABC News’ Jan Crawford Greenburg reports: Scratch another one from the McCain veepstakes list.  Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty has received a call from Sen. John McCain and has been told he’s not going to join the Republican contender on the GOP ticket.

McCain, R-Ariz., is in Dayton, Ohio, awaiting a high noon event at which the campaign has said the Republican contender will announce his running mate.

With Gov. Sarah Palin in Alaska, speculation is narrowing to an even smaller list:  former Govs. Mitt Romney and Tom Ridge, and Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn, the only  presumed contender who is actually in the Buckeye State at this hour.

But could the wily McCain be planning a surprise for his 72nd birthday?  It’s anyone’s guess (and, despite Barack Obama’s historic nomination acceptance speech last night, EVERYONE is guessing).

Stay tuned…

User Comments

Huh, I thought last night it was leaning Pawlenty’s way.
Pawlenty was the safe pick. So I guess McCain might be going for a long pass rather than a three-yards-and-a-cloud of dust play.

Posted by: Paul | August 29, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am

………It’s Hilary Clinton!………

Posted by: I Made You Laugh :) | August 29, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

CNN had it plastered across their BREAKING NEWS TICKER that McCain HAD selected PAWLENTY…….Now it has disappeared……hum?

Posted by: Attitude Dude | August 29, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

I personally feel McCain would be making a mistake by not picking Romney. Romney could have put Michigan safely on McCain’s column. He could have also put Colorado, Nevada and a series of other Western states in McCain’s column. He also would have sealed the deal in Florida, and taken care of McCain’s lack of economic experience!
If it’s not Romney, I just don’t see it working for McCain!
HE MAY HAVE BLOWN IT!

Posted by: OBAMAisFINISHED | August 29, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

………It’s Hilary Clinton!………
That would have sealed the deal..trust me!

Posted by: independent voter | August 29, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

I hope and pray it is not Palen or the e-bay lady–Romney would be my choice or Tom Ridge, but Palen??????!!!No, way–we don’t need a 44 year old with 5 kids as our veep!!!

Posted by: virginia | August 29, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

I hope its Romney. But I heard that Palin flew into Ohio last night

Posted by: janet | August 29, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Meg Whitman would be a mistake, Palin could make it interesting. Fox is now reporting it’s neither Pawlenty, Romney, or Huckabee. That leaves the pro choicers Tom Ridge or Joe Liberman (unlikely) or the two gals. I think Palin’s the best of the two. As a democrat, Meg Whitman would be wonderful. Whitman is also pro choice, which is why it would surpise me if it was her.. I do think Mac would put her in the cabinet though.

Posted by: a reader in georgia | August 29, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Mccain’s VP choice…
To use the words of our great present VP…
“SO”
Who cares? He is even having to rent busses to drive people in to fill up the 10,000 seat venue.
NO WONDER THE REPS SAY OBAMA IS A CELEBRITY…
THEY ARE JEALOUS!
HAHAHAHAhahahahahaha

Posted by: JUST JEALOUS | August 29, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Sub: G.T.V.Bharadwaja, Plot no. 72, Arunodaya colony, Hi tech city, Madapur, Hyderabad, Andhra pradesh state, India country, Pin-500081- Migration to sri lanka or Australia reg.
I, G.T.V.Bhardwaja interested to migrate to sri lanka or Australia to lead happy retired life, in a forest area along with my Indian and foreign wives.
Thus I request the all world countries such as USA, UK, China, Germany and remaining countries to pay my benefits and arrange girls as Yahoo is assumed to be accepted my demand for migration and to other country and at present based upon Australia.
I am allowing the all of the Asian powers to have the assets in India and in all world countries, which are built from 1975 onwards and in govt and private sectors and all of them are constructed by god powers from planets or USA, UK, and China.
I request the Asian powers to start having the above assets in their control, and at the same time, the god powers on earth will reduce their strength to smaller nos due to shortage of work.
I, request all Asian powers under the leader ship of China and Germany to pay my benefits through development credit bank ac no.04911100001670, and ATM card no. 4100280281619014. I also request countries USA, and UK to pay my benefits through icici bank ac no. 004001564109 and ATM card no. 5318040040203764.
Thus, I request the all foreign countries to pay the benefits by accounting the girls working, in two types, as from God side and from devil side and pay the benefits in the form of two deposits and total amount is rupees one billion only. Icici bank represents devil type of
action and development credit bank represents god type of action.
I request god powers from planets to have their work from India and in all world countries, in govt or private sectors, based upon my migration to Australia and sri lanka with immediate effect such that all world countries may Honor my enjoyment right in all respects.
I request the USA, UK, China and Germany to take active role for payment of my benefits.
Thank you,
Yours faithfully,
G.t.v.Bharadwaja

Posted by: G.T.V.Bharadwaja | August 29, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

John McCain’s rules of engagement with women: Call them vulgar names such as c&nt. Cheat on them, then divorce and marry a rich, younger woman, one month later. Do not give them right to choose what to do with their own bodies.
Oppose equal pay for women, by avoiding to vote on the Fair Pay Act.
Women would have to be extremely dumb and self-loathing to support John “McNasty” McCain.

Posted by: J Michael | August 29, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

Palin would be an awesome pick. She will be practical and aggressive at finding solutions to problems and will focus on energy independence. 90% approval rating in Alaska. She will be a fresh voice in politics and will get the experience she needs from McCain’s 4 years.

Posted by: Sammy | August 29, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

Who cares? McCain sucks anyway.

Posted by: Waco Bob | August 29, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am

I like Huckabee but I believe too many think of him as a preacher. I like Romney but too many think of him as a Mormon. Gosh, ha ha…and if you comment against Air-Obama you’re a racist. I guess McCain will have to do like Obama…scour all 57 states. Even though a VP does little more than cast rare votes, cut ribbons and shoot people, he may be Pres one day.

Posted by: rktsci3127 | August 29, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

McCain is a RINO and he will pick another RINO just like him. I’m going fishing on Nov. 2. The hell with these fake conservatives!

Posted by: campbell | August 29, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Well the way I see it, if McCain picks especially Lieberman, but any pro choice guy, he is a dead duck waiting. The worst thing he could do right now is ignore his base. So if those 3 are the choice, if McCain doesn’t pick Romney he is in trouble.

Posted by: markymark | August 29, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am

He could NEVER, EVER move 200,000 people or even 84,000 to come out, STAND for hours and hear what he has to say.
Mccain is even having to rent busses to drive people in to fill up the “10,000″ seat venue.
NO WONDER THE REPS SAY OBAMA IS A CELEBRITY…
THEY ARE JEALOUS!
HAHAHAHAhahahahahaha

Posted by: Pathetic McInSane | August 29, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am

It would be a boon for the Dems if McCain picks neophyte Sarah Palin. It would be a foolish, transparent attempt to pander to conservatives. Reminds me, frankly, of Paul Celluci’s 1998 pick of Jane Swift for Lt. Governor in Massachusetts. She was young, relatively inexperienced, the mother of several young kids, and from a distant part of the state. Let’s just say, the strategy didn’t work well for him or for her, although I know she tried hard to succeed in a role that was over her head. If John McCain picks Sarah Palin, then he truly doesn’t want to be President.

Posted by: Lizk | August 29, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

i am a Christian woman and I believe in the sanctity of life and that life begins at conception. If John McCain picks a pro-choice candidate, I will NOT vote for him.

Posted by: Christ is King | August 29, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

I have personally met Obama… he is a fraud and arrogant pr–k. He is a smooth talker that has everyone fooled…

Posted by: mb | August 29, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

What about Bobby Jindal? He is dark-skinned, but not black enough that the Southern Republican racists will totally hate him.

Posted by: ascot | August 29, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

I have personally met mb… he is a fraud and arrogant pr–k. He is a smooth talker that has everyone fooled.

Posted by: Obama | August 29, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

I should also say that picking Gov Palin would be a transparent and ineffective attempt to pander to women.
And by the way, Christ is King, if God wanted people to have no choices in their lives, he wouldn’t have allowed free will. Freedom of choice is a very American concept, as well as an important Christian concept. In my opinion, every child born should be wanted, and every woman should be able to choose her destiny. No man will ever have to make the decision to keep a pregnancy, and no woman should be forced to bear a child she’s not prepared to bring into this world and love.

Posted by: Lizk | August 29, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

It will probably be Cheney… McSame = Bush’s third term.

Posted by: getcher roxoff | August 29, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

Lisk – I don’t care about earthly freedom. Abortion is murder. Stop murdering precious babies. Freedom is just an abstraction anyway. Precious little babies are real.

Posted by: Christ is King | August 29, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

McCain could not pick his nose by himself!

Posted by: Mickey Mouse | August 29, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

Palin would be one of those picks that would attract lots of coverage today saying “look at the Republican ticket trying to be historic too, chasing Hillary women votes,”
But in the longer term it is a weak choice. Hillary women won’t like a woman who is not pro choice. It also allows a shot at McSame. McCain is 72 it allows the Dems to push back and say “if McSame dies is she ready,”.
She brings nothing to the table in terms of a swing state.
It is a pick that on the surface would look to shake things up but in reality is a bit of a dud.

Posted by: Pete | August 29, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

He needs to pick a dentist and some porcelain veneers to fix those yellow teeth.
THAT’S WHAT HE NEEDS TO PICK.

Posted by: Debra | August 29, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

Palin may be young, but she isn’t inexperienced. She took on her own corrupt party and rode that to the governorship. And if we’re going to talk about people inexperienced, then a certain junior senator from Illinois should be considered in that same breath. Palin is a masterful move that would make people forget what happened last night. Actually, all this speculation seems to have distracted people from Obama’s speech. There’s lots of great strategy going on here…and this comment is coming from someone who is a game theorist…

Posted by: DWT | August 29, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Who cares?? McCain and any VP would still be more of the same failed policies of the past 8 years. Wake up people, there is a reason Bush has a 30% approval rating! McCain has voted with Bush 95% of the time. This is a no-brainer unless you are one of the foxnews brainwashed GOP lemmings.
Obama ’08

Posted by: miles1967 | August 29, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Not that it matters, but on the question of whether Palin is attractive or not, based on pictures I just saw on Drudge, I’d have to side with those throwing around the MILF label.
I also agree with those who said it will, whether this is fair or not, look like a shallow attempt to court former Clinton supporters, and thus potentially hurt McCain as much as it helps him.
But who knows; I’ve been wrong before.

Posted by: Paul | August 29, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Look.All the regular options are losers (Mitt- McCain has publicly called him a liar, Droopy Dag Lieberman, boring known guy-Ridge, Boring unknown guy ?, polarizing lite weight Huckleberry. McCain best choice is the wild card we didn’t think of ..somebody like Madonna .

Posted by: Howard | August 29, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

I hope it’s Palin. The republican party is lagging strongly behind the Democratic party and need to renew itself.
It would also be very good for McCain, we’ve seen how he easily match Obama…Palin will do the same vis-a-vis Biden.

Posted by: Frank | August 29, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

If not Hillary then a woman is a very wise choice. A woman younger, fresher and more experienced – the Alaska governor will be an effective highlighter against Obama Biden.

Posted by: Obama-Yah-Wright | August 29, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

Regardless of who he picks, McCain doesn’t have the temperment to be president.
And while Republicans won’t admit it, they know it – they’re the ones who first told us about that problem eight years ago.
I thought it was all politics – just negative attacks on behalf of George Bush, especially before the South Carolina primary. But with just a little googling, anyone can quickly see what they were talking about.

Posted by: Paul | August 29, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

Did he vet Palin at that motorcycle rally?

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | August 29, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

I hope he picks Palen so we can say hello President Obama.
This woman was former runner up in Miss Alaska. She is younger than McCain’s own children. She has FIVE kids, including an infant. Women more than anyone will know you can’t run the country with FIVE freak’n kids.
I don’t care how pretty she is, and of course a former beauty queen is pretty, but she wipes out the Is He ready to lead argument – the only argument against Obama.

Posted by: merlisa | August 29, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

From a Feb 21, 2001 article in Newsweek:
Of the 55 republicans in the U.S. Senate, only four support John McCain for president… Why can’t McCain win the votes of his own colleagues?
To explain, a Republican senator tells this story: at a GOP meeting last fall, McCain erupted out of the blue at the respected Budget Committee chairman, Pete Domenici, saying, “Only an a–hole would put together a budget like this.” Offended, Domenici stood up and gave a dignified, restrained speech about how in all his years in the Senate, through many heated debates, no one had ever called him that.
Another senator might have taken the moment to check his temper. But McCain went on: “I wouldn’t call you an a–hole unless you really were an a–hole.”
The Republican senator witnessing the scene had considered supporting McCain for president, but changed his mind. “I decided,” the senator told NEWSWEEK, “I didn’t want this guy anywhere near a trigger.”

Posted by: Paul | August 29, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

- Palin said she’ll be in Alaska at the state fair
- Pawlenty said he’ll be at the MN state fair
- Lieberman says it’s not him
- Ridge was reported taking out his trash in DC with no travel plans
- Huckabee says he won’t be at the rally
- Romney will be at the rally (says Mccain’s camp)
I believe Mitt will be it. M&M get my vote for sure.

Posted by: ChrisB | August 29, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

Why do the dyed-in-the wool Dems think they are running against W? Haven’t they figured out the 22nd Amendment yet? And, as low as W’s positives are, look at the Congress’s ratings at less than 10%. Now, we’re about to elect a guy from one of the houses of Congress. Obama even picked another one of those guys to run with him. McCain ought to do something different. Change is every third word out of Obama’s mouth, and yet we get the same people that have been in positions of power and given us nothing. Time for change? Pick someone from outside the Beltway.

Posted by: Bob | August 29, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

If McCain chooses a pro abortion VP, Republicans will vote for Ron Paul.

Posted by: James | August 29, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

-I Made You Laugh :)- I got a chuckle the other day when that wild thought came to mind. But there would be some credibility issues since she called for party unity behing Obama. I think a strong female Republican would be a real stunning selection that would break the DNC momentum.

Posted by: MBell_TX | August 29, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Secrectary of State Condloleezza Rice.
Execpt for Former General & Secrectary of State Colin Powell, that would be the best vice-president canditate that Senator John McCain could pick.
Secrectary of State Condoleezza Rice.

Posted by: Benst | August 29, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

I love the Palin pick for VP. I hope it’s true.

Posted by: John | August 29, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

Debra, since your comments are sort of un-educated and trailer-trashed, I only can say is : How’s about some CLOROX instead ?

Posted by: mtr2311 | August 29, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

miles1967…SO?? McCain is a Republican, Obama is a Democrat, explains why Obama voted 97% of the time with follow Democrats…McCain 26 years vs. Obama 6 years
“I think that I have a lifetime of experience that I will bring to the White House. I know Senator McCain has a lifetime of experience to the White House. And Senator Obama has a speech he gave in 2002 (2008.) HRC 04/2008

Posted by: CuriousIndep | August 29, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

The sexist comments about Palin from Obama fans says it all, they fear her.
What’s wrong with her husband taking the main responsibility for raising the children?
It would be understandable if she chose not to be a VP candidate, but everything about her suggests that she would be more than able to combine the job and family.
The ‘progressive’ Obama fans never ask whether Obama would be able to combine the job as a President and family life….

Posted by: Frank | August 29, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Palin? I will not vote in the election of it’s someone whom I have never heard of and who has no practical experience in foreign affairs. I would be absolutely terrified to have this woman as president if something happened to McCain. I am a registered republican but am changing my affiliation and registering as an independent because I have no faith in either party.
I hate the idea of having Obama as president, but I have much more faith in Biden.
I am so disappointed in Mr. McCain. I think I want to be sick.

Posted by: cameron banks | August 29, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

CuriousIndep – and McCain’s lifetime of experience convinced at least some of his GOP colleagues they “didn’t want this guy anywhere near a trigger.”

Posted by: Paul | August 29, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Frank: “The sexist comments about Palin from Obama fans says it all, they fear her.”
Maybe you want to re-read the posts, or to be fair, maybe I missed some of the above, but seems to me all of the sexist remarks about Palin came from McCain supporters.

Posted by: Paul | August 29, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Debra said – He needs to pick a dentist and some porcelain veneers to fix those yellow teeth.
THAT’S WHAT HE NEEDS TO PICK.
********************
That is Sooooo TRUE. I can’t stand to look at him and those YELLOW BOTTOM TEETH that are the only one’s that show unless he’s doing that “SLIMY” GRINCH smile after a bad joke or a dishonest jab at Obama.
Glad I’m not the only one to notice that

Posted by: Crest Whitestrips NEEDED! | August 29, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

I read the same undertones of chauvenism here, that caused the democrats to choose obama over hillary.
Wake up guys!!! By ruling out women for office you’re eliminating half of the viable choices in this world.
Why don’t you talk about how many kids any of the male candidates have (in or out of their marriages!)or why don’t you rate hoe handsome or not they are?Double standard in 2008! Duh, didn’t think of that, did you?

Posted by: karen | August 29, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

It’s Palin.
Hahaha
No Problem…
Go Obama/Biden

Posted by: It's Palin | August 29, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

I am convinced the 84,000 who showed up at the Obama rally were the percent of people who think Congress is doing a good job. They would probably all stand in line for hours to get Pelosi’s autograph. From the little I’ve heard from him, I think Ron Paul is an interesting guy. Any thoughts on him for VP?

Posted by: rktsci3127 | August 29, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

Come now Paul…cite your sources. Throwing out accusations without, the offending, GOP names does me no good…Do you seriously expect me to take the word of a Obama pundit for reliable information…Give me a name and year this statement was made…..
Independents read the contract before buying unlike most other political parties

Posted by: CuriousIndep | August 29, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

It’s Karl Rove! He’s going to run the McCain administration just like Cheney is in charge in the Bush administration.

Posted by: Porter Rockwell | August 29, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

TO OBAMA: Posted by: Obama | Aug 29, 2008 9:58:40 AM
I agree that God gave us free choice, but your logic is weak. Just because we can choose does not mean we should. Make sense?
Please check out an awesome website: Abort73.com and educate yourself.
With love,
JP

Posted by: abort73.com | August 29, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

Palin has just been confirmed as the VP pick and next VPOTUS. Well done on your investigative journalism there Radar. Well done as usual for ABC news.

Posted by: s.b. | August 29, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

But let’s put all this in perspective. How much does the president matter?
The president sets direction for the Executive Branch, which is important. And of course the Executive Branch puts forth its budget requests, which are also important. The president also has to hold people accountable, to ensure the Executive Branch executes somewhat efficiently.
But usually we’re wrapped up in the commander and chief reactive decisions, or as Clinton put it, the 3 a.m. phone calls.
Let’s say McCain is elected and then has to turn over the office to Palin for whatever reason. Would she simply fall in on an already established core of advisors and a functioning bureaucracy? Sure. And would those individuals ensure she stayed within certain boundaries? Sure.
Take 9-11. I’d bet that we took out the Taliban and went after al Qaeda regardless of which person from which party was president at the time. Al Gore would have done the same; Bill Bradley would have done the same; Elizabeth Dole (yeah I know she was in ’96) would have done the same.
The execution might have been different with a different SecDef. And of course no one other than Bush and McCain are likely to see a need to invade Iraq in response to al Qaeda – so the direction set by presidents does matter. But the initial military action in Afghanistan would have happened with anyone there.
Its not the reactive decisions I worry about so much. Its the proactive ones… like Iraq. And for that we need a president with judgment and suitable temperment.
In all honesty, knowing nothing about Palin, I’d take her over McCain right now.

Posted by: Paul | August 29, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Didn’t you hear me???!!!
It’s Palin.
Mccain = more PAIN

Posted by: It's Palin. | August 29, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

CuriousIndep – sources for what?
You mean the Newsweek article? I did cite that. That’s where the Republican senator is quoted saying he didn’t want McCain near any triggers.
If not that one, which?

Posted by: Paul | August 29, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

As an Obama “fan” or as I like to call myself, “die hard supporter since day one”, I don’t fear Palin, Romney, Huckabee, Pawlenty, Ridge, Lieberman or anyone else you can name. McCain can pick a woman, that’s not going to be a game changer for him as he’s got an abyssmal record on women’s issues. Any woman who sees McCaveman’s record (most recently his rejection of the Lily Lebetter act which would have guaranteed equal pay for equal work because in his words, women just need to have more training and education to be as qualified as their male counterparts), will see his picking a woman as yet another in a long series of pandering moves.
The way I see it, no matter who McCain picks, he’s going to have a hard sell on his hands, because he’s trying to be two people. He needs to convince the Republican base that he’s a true conservative. Shifting from his 2000 “maverick” stance on many issues to his 2007 voting record (95% with Bush) and his 2008 voting record (the votes he’s actually showed up for so far have been 100% lock step with Bush) is a good start. But if he picks Lieberman or any pro-choice or less than ultraconservative person, the base isn’t going to be happy. Yet, he’s managed so far to keep his “maverick” image in tact with independents who don’t pay a lot of attention to things like voting records, by not allowing this election to become about the issues, but by focusing on attacking his opponent’s personality. If he picks a hard core conservative, that’s going to be symbolic to the low info independent voters that maybe he’s not the “maverick” he claims to be.
No matter what choice he makes, he’s going to have to alienate some of his voters. The way I see it, only Huckabee would be conservative enough for most of the base (being a pro-life evangelical and all), while signalling a “maverick” attitude to independents (as Huckabee seems to genuinely care about issues like poverty). All I can say is, after Obama’s brilliant speech last night, it’s going to be a LOT harder for McCain to paint Obama as dangerous, out of touch and lacking in substance, even to the idiots who don’t pay any attention to the issues.

Posted by: Dale Petrie | August 29, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

I support Obama and I would LOVE it if he picked Pailin. McCain has it totally wrong – no way Hillary supporters would help any other woman but Hillary make history. No Way in Heck will they help to get Pailin into the White House with McCain. They want Hillary to be the first woman elected president – if Pailin gets in with McCain at his age you can bet seeing her run and win in 2012. Hillary supporters are not dumb – obviously McCain has a very narrow view of women! Love the pick John – way to go!! Now Hillary is going to campaign her behind off for Obama!!

Posted by: Robyn | August 29, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

If anything is certain this past week HRC supporters were NOT HAPPY..I will give credit to McCain he listened to HRC supporters when their own party ignored them………….I have done research on McCain. Obama and Biden policies and voting record and now I will look into Palin..So far she is the only one out of all four who has some executive experience as opposed to legislative experience but she is a conservative and I am a moderate…but we are voting for the President…

Posted by: CuriousIndep | August 29, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

As a 29 year old die hard Hillary supporter who, until now, was unsure whether to vote for Obama, couldn’t thank John McCain enough for picking a female candidate and making it easy for me to vote for the McCain/Palin ticket in November.

Posted by: Megan | August 29, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

“I have done research on McCain. Obama and Biden policies and voting record and now I will look into Palin.”
That really is the way to do it.
The one comment I have is that looking at voting records is tough, unless you dig deep to find all that was said about every bill.
Because so much gets lumped together into one bill, its hard to tell what each is voting for or against.
For example, imagine a bill that included emergency spending for more MRAPs and also public financing of abortions at overseas military hospitals. If Bush approves the bill, he’s voting for abortion. If he uses his veto authority, he’s not supporting the troops.
Every season we see these simplistic statements about how such n such voted for this or against that. And most of the time we see the simplistic statements are misleading.

Posted by: Paul | August 29, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am

It’s Palin! I just cried my eyelashes off!!!

Posted by: John | August 29, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

Paul you mean Newsliberal err Newsweek..Look, if your looking to bolster your argument to Repubs DON’T REFER TO NEWSLIBERAL ERR NEWSWEEK as a reliable and no spin news source..That would be like a Repub citing The National Review..I am still waiting for the name of your GOP…Again, if you want credit for your comment give me the name of article, the date of the article and the author of the article….OTHERWISE IT IS JUST HERE SAY AND RUMOR.

Posted by: CuriousIndep | August 29, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am

Palin?
Well, McCain destroyed the Celeb meme that they spent all summer trying to create with his inability to remember how many houses he owns.
Now he destroys the “Experience is vital” narrative with his Palin choice.
What does he have left to run on?
Maybe there are more POW PUMAs out there than I think but why does this remind me more of a Ferraro “just because she’s a woman” pick than anything else?
Maybe he’s trying to recreate the Mondale electoral success!

Posted by: The Other Ed | August 29, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

McCain’s teeth are a well earned yellow. Got them that way sitting a POW prison while doing his duty for his country. Democrats and liberals are a a uncomplimentary shade of yellow too.

Posted by: v racer | August 29, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Gov Palin’s big claims to fame:
1. She can play basketball
2. She is willing to tell the truth.
Down-side
ZERO exposure to foreign policy.
Only two years as governor.
Actually the two years as governor is the longest possible for a Republican governor.
After that they get in trouble. That’s why Bobby JIndal and Gov Palin were considered.
They have no big negatives, because there is no
THERE THERE.

Posted by: bruce Becker | August 29, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

Gov Palin’s big positive:
SHE is a woman. The liberated HRC women are now supposed to vote against their issues so a woman can be VP.
I doubt it.

Posted by: bruce Becker | August 29, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am

CuriousIndep: “DON’T REFER TO NEWSLIBERAL ERR NEWSWEEK as a reliable and no spin news source..That would be like a Repub citing The National Review…”
Maybe Newsweek doesn’t do it for you, but seems to me they report facts okay. This senator didn’t give his or her name for obvious reasons, and while Republicans might not be swayed by any opinion that Newsweek offers, I never heard one suggesting the magazine makes up quotes out of thin air.
Same with Democrats and the National Review.
So, I’d say its a valid quote, and we’ve all seen similar things about McCain from elsewhere. The South Carolina primary eight years ago was awash in Republicans advising other Republicans not to vote for McCain because of his temperment.
As that Republican senator said, even his own party knows there’s a danger allowing McCain near any triggers.

Posted by: Paul | August 29, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am

But CuriousIndep, if it makes you feel any better, I found a bunch of stuff on McCain’s temperment from BusinessWeek. Want to hear them?
For that matter, just google “senator hothead,” and you’ll see stuff about just one guy. Why is that?

Posted by: Paul | August 29, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Bruce: “Down-side – ZERO exposure to foreign policy. Only two years as governor.”
Actually I think her biggest downside is being a beauty contestant, and with a husband who works for British Petroleum.
The beauty pageant thing kind of reinforces this notion of McCain’s obsession with beauty and celebrity.

Posted by: Paul | August 29, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Truth be known bruce becker..out of all 4 participants, Palin is the only one who has executive experience and the office of President is an executive office…Say what you will about HRC voters, they were ignored by their own party whereas McCain has offered a liberated woman to the second highest office of the land; a republican yes, but he did listened to women voters of both sides…Geraldine Ferraro, “I am pleased the Republican’s have reached out to a woman nominee.”
Please insert African-American in your last statement instead of HRC women…sounds pretty stupid does it not??

Posted by: CuriousIndep | August 29, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Sarah Palin is a cynical pick. Republicans wanted a feminine face to pull in the Hillary people. She’s a 2 year governor who was mayor of a town of 6000 before that. She’s from a state so beholden to Big Oil that they don’t pay taxes. Big Oil owns them all. Energy independence. No way. No McCain.

Posted by: Nancy Osborne | August 29, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

Paul..using “unnamed sources” doesn’t quit do it for me when we are talking about voting in the next President, probably the most important election of our time….BTW..I do do my research and did your research for you, found that Newsweek article dated February 21, 2000, written by Evan Thomas entitled Senator Hothead..Please not the comment by Senator Kerry in defense of McCain..but I am betting you won’t read it….
Evan Thomas when interviewed by Gordon Petersen of Friday’s Edition of Inside Washington aired on PBS station WETA…02/2007:
Gorden Petersen: what do you think Evan? Are the mainstream media bashing the President (Bush) unfairly?
Evan Thomas responds, “Well our job is to bash the President (Bush.)
That is why anyone of independent mind does not turn to rags like Newsweek and the National Review..its writers are either ultra liberal or right winged conservative this is NOT NEWS……….

Posted by: CuriousIndep | August 29, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Nancy – not only that, but her husband works for BP. So it is the big oil ticket.
Given the mood over rising gas prices, that may not be the negative it was a year earlier, but the GOP might as well change that acronym to mean Gushers of Petroleum.

Posted by: Paul | August 29, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Rats! I was looking forward to seeing Harland Williams impersonate T.P. on SNL.

Posted by: citizen | August 29, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Or even, Growing Oil Profits.

Posted by: Paul | August 29, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

CuriousIndep – again I guess this is the eyes of the beholder, but I’d say a magazine quoting a Republican senator saying he doesn’t want McCain near a trigger is newsworthy.
Apparently Newsweek thought so as well, though they couldn’t get the senator to agree to attribution.
And again, I’ve never heard of anyone charging Newsweek with making up quotes like this.
So, by all means, choose to not believe it if that’s your inclination. But I think down deep inside, we all know its true.

Posted by: Paul | August 29, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Look at his reaction to the Georgian situation. Sorry, but there is a temperment issue.
McCain’s comments even caught the Bush Administration by surprise, and they certainly didn’t help the situation. Even the Georgians were asking where is the deeds to go along with McCain’s words?
Why would they say that? Because they never considered that McCain, from the president’s party, would say something like “we are all Georgians” if the administration wasn’t prepared to back it up.
Now, after the fact, they probably have a different impression of McCain. One his own party has had for years – an unstable guy who isn’t in control of his emotions.

Posted by: Paul | August 29, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Oh, McCain, so stupid choice of VP. I’m die hard Hillary supporter, I will definitely not vote for Obama. But you picked such a young, inexperienced, non-famous woman as VP, that makes not vote for you either. I may just sit at home this time, I’m very disappointed. Why do you think if you pick a woman as VP can attract women’s votes??? Defintely wrong. Who is Hillary, she is such a brilliant woman, she has been in my heart for many years, I prepared to vote for her years ago, no other woman can replace her. People say you are old, that means, if some bad thing happens on you, then the VP will become president, I don’t want to see THAT woman to become president so easily. economy is the #1 issue, why don’t you pick Tim P. as VP, he has solid accomplishments, he is inspring, he is attractive, he can distract people from Obama, he can assist you with economy. Why you made such a bad choice of VP?

Posted by: golfgirlusa | August 29, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

golfgirlusa…Palin more exectuive experience than either Obama, Mccain, and Biden put together…Eighty percent approval rating in Alaska for the job she has done so far..Husband a union member etc…can’t make this stuff up…Dem Repub Indep women voters maybe it’s time the women had a hand in our government..the guys haven’t done such a great job…everyone knows the VP is just a stone throw away from being the next President in future elections….The biggest mistake would be for the Dems to under estimate her..look what they did to HRC….

Posted by: CuriousIndep | August 29, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Paul..If you are limiting your reading material to rags like Newsweek you really need to expand your horizon..It is no wonder that you have not heard “anyone” critique Newsweek’s liberal stance..you need take off the “Dem’s rose colored glasses” and read other views…I do. If you don’t how can you make a intelligent informed decision…
In one of your previous comments, I believe you alluded to GOP as Petro Gushers..Did you know that one of Obama’s largest contributors is UBS, which 10 of it’s largest equity funds have major holdings in British Petro (BP) and Exxon…
or that the last major Energy Bill, 2005 #213, was a bill VP Cheney help draft, Obama voted for and McCain did not. The bill included billions in subsidies for oil and natural gas production…McCain objected the bill on grounds it included billions in unnecessary tax breaks for the oil industry…www.senate.gov Voting records of your candidates

Posted by: CuriousIndep | August 29, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Curious – try keeping up. I offered you some stuff from BusinessWeek as well. So its not just Newsweek.
How about the Washingtonian? Is that one too liberal for you?
Or how about the primary Phoenix newspaper? It also has had articles questioning McCain’s temperment. Too liberal and biased for you?
And let’s talk more about Newsweek. Is it liberal? Sure.
But are you saying it made up the quote from a Republican senator who said he didn’t want McCain anywhere near a trigger? That’s further out there than the anti-media stuff we hear from Hannity and Limbaugh.

Posted by: Paul | August 29, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

But Curious, we’ll just have to leave it to everyone to make up their own minds, as is always the case.
Newsweek quotes a Republican senator in a passage that goes like this:
But McCain went on: “I wouldn’t call you an a–hole unless you really were an a–hole.” The Republican senator witnessing the scene had considered supporting McCain for president, but changed his mind. “I decided,” the senator told NEWSWEEK, “I didn’t want this guy anywhere near a trigger.”
So its up to each of us to decide whether Newsweek completely concocted this story out of thin air.

Posted by: Paul | August 29, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Paul…Sen Domenci was according to Evan Thomas, the object of that “a–hole” quote; however you failed to complete the entire response by Domenci, like most one-sided liberals, “Domenici softened the story, denying that McCain has use the “a–hole.”
WARNING
DON’T TRUST COMMENTS FROM “PAUL” UNLESS YOU HAVE THE TIME TO RESEARCH FOR HIM AND GET THE TRUE SCOPE….

Posted by: CuriousIndep | August 29, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Yeah, but Curious, you’re using information from Newsweek, which you previously said can’t be trusted, lol.
You never did answer the question from earlier – do you think Newsweek made up the quote from a Republican senator, saying he didn’t support McCain for president because he doesn’t want McCain near a trigger?
And furthermore, you also left out the next line or two in the article:
Domenici softened the story, denying that McCain had used the word “a–hole.” But one of McCain’s own aides ruefully said with a laugh, “He may have used stronger language.” McCain’s reputation as a hothead in the Senate is well established.
But I don’t feel the need to warn everyone not to trust your posts, lol.

Posted by: Paul | August 29, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Free incest rape stories.

Incest sex stories. True incest stories. Incest stories.

Posted by: Incestgrrls free incest stories incestgrrl s. | December 22, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.