Obama Accuses Anti-Abortion Opponents of “Lying”

Whaaaa call Obama a Whambulance. What a cry baby. No thanks to a President Obama. He need about 8 more years to grow up.

Obama is trying to talk his way out of something again.
Does he actually think just because he says something it is true.
I think Obama told Jill at a hearing
why he would not pass the bill stopping live birth abortions.
something really stupid, like
The mothers should not have to suffer or something real close.

It’s about time someone started calling some of these charges (on both sides) for what they are…LIES.
This is one of the reasons for the across board support of Obama. If we don’t change our politics from who’s best at gotcha’s and smears, we are doomed for more government like we’ve seen the last eight years.
Will Obama be able to pull off changing the tenor of politics? Not by himself and maybe not at all. But my vote for him will be the only way I can register my deep desire to at least try.
What I’ve seen from what I thought was an honorable man is shameful in this campaign. If outside groups are lying about his opponent, he should call them out and he should get his Rove clone campaign under his honorable mantle.
Of course the media COULD go a long way toward stopping this sort of lying and smearing by simply reporting the facts rather than continually talking up the latest greatest *how bad is this* smear.
Neither is likely to happen, so it’s up to voters like me to at least try to clean up our system. I can only pray there are more of us than not as I doubt we’ll survive another admin like the one we have now.

tomorrow morning when this hits and the evidence comes out- Barack goes down 10 points in the polls.
I guess Barack missed the NRLC’s release showing he voted against the carbon copy of the federal bill that included the redundant “not encroaching on Roe v Wade” clause.
Barack came to a duel with a water gun in his pocket and the NRLC came with a cannon. its going to be fun watching him try to spin out of this.

I just did the research and think I understand what he is saying. He voted yes to the amendment to the bill that provides care to babies born after attempted abortion. He did, however, vote no to the bill because the language in it would have undermined Roe v Wade in that it said anything born with a beating heart would be considered human and thus could be used as justification to undermine a woman’s right to abort. So, he said that if the bill passes he wants to ensure that care is provided in the case of a failed abortion, but will not himself vote for the bill because its language undermines a woman’s rights. I understand and applaud his actions. If the advocates for this bill were concerned about providing care for partial births then they would have been willing to modify the questionable language. I do thank Jill Stanek for her footwork in this and applaud her efforts though I disagree with her position and think that she is misrepresenting the arguments made against the bill.

“Obama at the time said he took particular issue with the part of the bill that defined a “born alive” child as “every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.” ”
Once more Obama lies.
He is verbally voting “present” again.

Obviously, the point he’s making about the actual language and intent of this particular bill is too complex for many posters here to comprehend. Few will take the time to read the bill and will instead take the word of others (many of which are questionable sources) to do the thinking for them. That’s how many were roped into thinking that a war in Iraq was justified. That’s also how we ended up with a completely incompetent president.

In the Illinois Senate – Obama voted for a gas tax suspension.
In fact, he said he wanted his name on every gas pump!
But when Hillary and McCain proposed a gas tax suspension – Obama said it was a gimmick!
Obama flip flops with the wind…

Majority of American’s disagree with the Anti-Abortion Opponents. Anther wedge issue tailored made for Rove/Schmit who want to store up their base. Its clear that we are seeing the Republican attack machine version of the kitchen sink the last few weeks – Throw as many attacks at Obama at once and hope one sticks. The Republican kitchen sink attack will last right to election day. The problem with the Republican Kitchen sink concept is that McCain has no uplifting message for the Voter. Are the Republicans throwing all their eggs in one basket with negative ads and wedge issues?

Obama is the one who is not being truthful about the reason he voted against saving a life of a baby born alive after an abortion. Here are the facts. Obama claimed that the reason he voted against the bill in Illinois to protect infants born alive after an abortion was because it lacked a pre-birth neutrality provision. However Obama has just been caught in another lie. The National Rights Life Committee (NRLC) tracked the bill through its entire path and and discovered that the bill did have the codicil neutrality provision attached. Not only that then state Senator Obama presided over the Health and Human Services Commitee that was responsible for attaching the neutraliby revision, verbatim from the Federal Bill plus Obama voted in support of adding the amendment Immediately after voting for this provision, however, Obama voted against the revised bill with the neutrality clause included.
Clearly, Obama lied about his position. It’s no small rhetorical matter, either. Obama’s vote against this bill puts him on the extreme end of the pro-abortion camp,. Obama is so extreme on this issue that not a single member of Congress would follow his example. Obama voted to allow Christ Hospital and other facilities performing abortions to allow live children to die.
By the way when Obama stated that answering a question about when an unborn baby should be afforded human rights “is above his pay grade”, what he really meant is that the office of the President of the US “is above his paygrade”.

Elisabeth, Are you in favor of saving the life of a baby born alive after an abortion? The majority of people would answer yes. Obama voted against a bill that would save a baby born alive after an abortion making him an extremist when it comes to being pro abortion and out of sync with the majority of Americans, I would say even you. As to abortion being a “wedge issue” Obama’s extremists views on abortion tells you a lot about Obama’s moral code and judgment. Personally speaking, I do not one someone in the White House who appears to be in favor of infanticide than lies about his position in favor of this.

MOVEON.ORG loved Obama’s very pro Abortion stance so much they endorsed him and they never have endorsed anyone.

Obama’s statements on PREVENTING abortions from happening can’t be any more plain. Abortion may never have come to reality if the extreme fanatical so-called religious people would not have condemned and ostracized the unwed mothers in the past and even to this day.

If Senator Obama doesnt have any idea when life begin.Then why he approve of a law who terminate the life of a baby in any stage of development.We all should look in the mirror and said,yes we are those babies too, but luckier.

Look who is talking. The compulsive liar is accusing others in the audocity of hope that he can mislead intelligent Americans.

Well, this is interesting. A case where both sides are right, from a certain point of view.
The purpose of BAIPA at the Illinois state level, was to undermine Roe. That is beyond dispute. There were already laws on the books protecting infants born alive.
However, it is also correct that the federal BAIPA language (IL Senate Amendment 1 for the 93rd Session) mirrored the neutrality language (language expressly protecting Roe and not expanding rights or definitions for the fetus) was included in SB 1082 BAIPA for the 93rd Session in IL.
Obama voted for the amendments inclusion, than torpedoed the bill. I don’t know why.
It seems Obama maybe overreacted, considering his pending run for the Senate, I don’t know, but he is fibbing about this to some extent.
From a larger perspective, Obama is right–rules on the books protected infants, and this bill was clearly designed to undermine Roe. However, once the neutralization clause was included, Obama still voted against it.
Interesting. Of course, It doesn’t change my support for Obama :-) But the right to lifers now have their wedge issue du jour.

“Obviously, the point he’s making about the actual language and intent of this particular bill is too complex for many posters here to comprehend. Few will take the time to read the bill and will instead take the word of others ”
Mary, obviously it is too difficult for you to comprehend that the language of the Illinois bill contained the EXACT SAME language as the Senate bill that passed 98-0 – he voted for the amendment, but voted against the bill. Get your facts straight.

(RENO, Nev.) Democrat Barack Obama met Sunday with Texas oil baron and longtime conservative activist T. Boone Pickens to discuss strategies for developing alternative energy.
The presidential hopeful praised Pickens as a “legendary entrepreneur” and deflected a question about the billionaire’s role in helping to fund a television ad campaign that undermined John Kerry, the 2004 Democratic nominee.
Newsweek
Anti-Christ Obama will do or say anything to get elected.

The purpose of BAIPA – Illinois was to protect innocent life post-birth. The reason the legislation came about is that a concerned nurse revealed that in the process of performing an abortion the baby was born alive. The staff in charge in no way cared for the baby nor allowed anyone else to take care of the baby. The baby eventually died. Many babies are born early and even those that are born full term need care – they are babies. Obama says there were already laws on the books protecting infants born alive. If that is the case then why was this baby not protected? Was the hospital staff prosecuted?

Obama is the master prevaricator. It is the one skill he has that is unmatched by any other politician. Every word that comes out of his mouth is a distortion. God help us all if the American people are suckered in to electing this slick affectatious arrogant elitist creep.