Aug 25, 2008 10:08pm

Obama Insists Clinton Was On Short List

When Senator Obama chose Senator Biden to be his running mate on Saturday – it confirmed the suspicions of many that his former rival, Sen. Clinton, would not be chosen.

But was Senator Clinton even on Obama’s short list?

“I’ve tried to not have long discussion about short lists, long lists,” Obama told reporters at a press avail in Moline, Illinois, “But I’ve said publicly before and I will repeat again that Sen. Clinton would have been on anybody’s short list and I took her very seriously.”

But was she on HIS short list?

“I think you can draw that conclusion,” Obama finished.

The Obama campaign has not said what – if any- new information had been requested from Clinton to gauge the intensity of her vetting process. It has been hinted at by the Clinton aides that no new information – not already in the public sphere – was requested by the Obama campaign.

Senator Obama on Thursday called Senator Evan Bayh and Gov. Tim Kaine – two men widely seen as on the short list – to inform them that they were not his VP choice. Senator Obama had a phone conversation on Friday with Senator Clinton – one that the Obama campaign has refused to characterize in similar ways, saying instead it was a “broad conversation” – not necessarily a courtesy call to inform her of his VP decision.

Senator Obama refused to speak further about the candidates he did not choose for Vice President, telling reporters today, “I answered a brief question. That’s all you’re going to get.”

So, who was on Obama’s short list?

The Obama campaign declined to define the size of Obama’s “short list” – but joked that Senator Biden – Obama’s eventual choice – definitely made the list.

- Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller

User Comments

Fence straddlin’ Obama still can’t answer a simple yes or no question without worrying about losing votes.

Posted by: Emm | August 25, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Just because obama says something does not mean it is true.
He has lied to the public how many times now.

Posted by: seah | August 25, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

With the acrimony, what else was he going to say?

Posted by: Sluggo | August 25, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

Of course she wasn’t on his list. Good grief, the man must think we’re all stupid.
And he made an idiotic mistake. I know personally of several people (OK, they’re family members) who would have voted for him WITH Hillary, but are now back to McCain b/c of the Biden pick.
Me? I live in Illinois, which is going Obama, so I’m writing in HRC. Obama is not nearly ready for prime time.

Posted by: beth | August 25, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

Senator Clinton asked the Obama campaign not to ask for a volume of information UNLESS she would be his pick…..
He complied….

Posted by: kp | August 25, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

Right. You also promised to vote against Bush’s spying bill, yet you voted for it.
Who cares if you had her on your short list, what is important is that you voted to take our constitutional rights away, giving it to Bush’s administration to spy on its citizens. This is the administration you equated to Bill Clinton’s. You do not deserve being here in Denver.

Posted by: Atom | August 25, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

Senator Clinton asked the Obama campaign not to ask for a volume of information UNLESS she would be his pick…..
He complied….

Posted by: kp | August 25, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Senator Clinton asked the Obama campaign not to ask for a volume of information UNLESS she would be his pick…..
He complied….
Posted by: kp | Aug 25, 2008
—-
Sure. He then taunted her by sending you bonehead-supporters by a 3 am message – what a childish, toothless phony in display.

Posted by: Atom | August 25, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

Remember what Big Papi Kennedy said:
“Ted Kennedy has gone on record as being against Hillary Clinton being picked as Barack Obama’s running mate. He said she shouldn’t be vice president because the job requires “real leadership.”
“I would hope that Obama would also give consideration to somebody that is in tune with his appeal for the nobler aspirations of the American people,” Kennedy said. “I think if we had real leadership – as we do with Barack Obama – in the number two spot as well, it’d be enormously helpful.”
VP pick chosen by Uncle Teddy. No way Ted was going to let another Clinton near the White House. The presidency belongs to Teddy — unfortunately he and his surrogates never win it.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | August 25, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

Major Mistake. Too many Democrats, like me, are tired of being patronized. We’re tired of the assumption that we will fall in line just as the Republican Sheep fall in line.
I would have been thrilled with Hillary as my Vice-President.
Now I am left empty–so empty that I will never give a dime to the Obama Campaign.
Good luck, Barack.

Posted by: Texas Dem | August 25, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

What I don’t get about Obama is this:
He’s complained for months that McCain’s judgment is flawed because he voted for the Iraq war.
Then what does Obama do? He chooses a VP who voted the exact same way as McCain.
What does this say about Obama’s judgment.

Posted by: peach | August 25, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

6 % of the Dem delgates wanted Biden, 28% wanted Hillary. No one was close to Hillary in terms of support. No other VP choice could potentially help you in 15 or 20 states and merge the Democratic base. It was an easy call if your goal was to win the election: You Pick Hillary. Remember what Obama put on his note in the Wailing Wall: “Lord protect me from pride and despair.” The pride of Obama and his clique runs a high risk of leading to despair.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | August 25, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

“I answered a brief question. That’s all you’re going to get.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 25, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

REALLY, WELL I GUESS NO ONE LISTENED TO TERRY MCCAULIFF ON A FOX NEWS INTERVIEW WHO SAID SHE WAS NOT VETTED. ALSO JAMES CARVILLE, AND LANNY DAVIS SAID THE SAME EXACT THINGS, ALL OF WHOM ARE VERY CLOSE TO THE CLINTONS.
OH, OBAMA DIDN’T CALL CLINTON TO TELL HER, HE HAD A FLUNKIE CALL HER.
OH, AND THE DNC CONVENTION….
YAWN……….HOW MANY MORE TIMES ARE WE GOING TO HEAR HE WAS RAISED BY A SINGLE MOTHER…WHAT HAS HE DONE FOR THIS COUNTRY????? NOTHING
HE’S A LOSER. AND NOVEMBER 4TH CAN’T COME SOON ENOUGH.
HILLARY 2012!!!

Posted by: NOBAMA | August 25, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

“We’re tired of the assumption that we will fall in line just as the Republican Sheep fall in line.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 25, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

Yes, the text message went out across a number of time zones. The one that counts here, though, is that it was 3:am at Clinton’s home. Either it was a deliberate and gratuitous slap in the face (for no apparent gain whatsoever but spite), or it was a mistake – another boneheaded mistake by a campaign that tries desperately to control its message but can’t seem to wait 30 more minutes to send out that message. I could have voted for him with her on the ticket, but there’s no trusting him on his own. I’ve rejected Biden in every primary in which his name has appeared for the past 20 years; why should I vote for him now? McCain it is, sadly…

Posted by: Victor Williams | August 25, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

I was on the fence as far as voting for Obama. However, after he totally dissed Hillary by overlooking her for vice president, he is no longer a choice. She won over 18 million votes and the good ole boys in the DNC instead chose Biden who dropped off in Round 1 of the primaries. Now, they expect her and the 18 million voters to get it together to vote for Obama. It’s a little too late…They can try to coerce peace and unity out the Clintons but it will be difficult to do that with the 18 million voters. Obama and his Chicago comrades did very little to unite the party during the Primaries.

Posted by: sue | August 25, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

“We’re tired of the assumption that we will fall in line”
We’re tired too. Nobody is denying you the right to vote against your own interests.
The threats of the Hillary-backers that they will not vote for Obama and hope that they will be able to have another chance in 2012 are seriously deluded. I have great respect for Hillary, but your actions are not helping Hillary at all. On the contrary. You are working very hard to torpedo her chances in the future.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 25, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

Yup, Obama and his campaign just couldn’t pass up a chance to pettily taunt the Clinton people by scheduling the VP phone call for 3am in a vicious satire about Hillary’s 3am phone call commerical. That is not the gracious actions of leaders in victory. The Obama team is so not ready for prime time. They lost focus on what they need to be doing, which is winning in November (most easily done by simply picking HRC for veep) and took extra time and effort instead to do petty victory taunting dances on HRC by scheduling the call for 3am. Oh yes, and at the same they are all time telling non Obama voters to get over it. Maybe Obama can simply get over not having our votes instead.

Posted by: CapC | August 25, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

Clinton spokespersons had been issuing statements at intervals for at least two months that she had not received vetting papers, so I don’t see how suspicions were confirmed within just the last few days. I don’t think Clinton herself ever said anything beyond she would be willing to be vp if asked. This is really all water under the bridge.

Posted by: kat | August 25, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

In her speech, Michelle Obama said, “Barack and I were raised with so many of the same values, like you work hard for what you want in life, that your word is your bond.”
Sooo… When Barack publicly and clearly said that he would aggressively pursue public funds for the general election while he was battling it out with Clinton, but completely abandoned that pledge simply for political expediency, he betrayed his bond? Barack had the option of keeping his word, and he said what the heck and made himself a liar, for MONEY and POLITICAL GAIN. So much for the word being the bond. So much for your word and bond being worth more than political expediency. So much for June Cleaver here trying to say how much she has in common with average Americans. If they have the same values, I want no part of her lies either.
What is most ironic is that by betraying this “bond,” Obama has made himself a bucket o’cash to use on TV commercials distorting and besmirching John McCain. With his lie, Obama bought himself a bottomless well of poison to blast at his more honorable opponent, who honored HIS pledge to using public funds.
Barack’s word may be his bond. He has demonstrated that neither is worth anything. Hey everybody making under 250k who thinks you’re getting a tax cut under Obama… do you think his word will be his bond when he is already in office and no longer has to beg for your votes?

Posted by: HawkTheSlayer | August 25, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

“6% of the Dem delgates wanted Biden, 28% wanted Hillary”.
I don’t think that’s a very high percentage, how many were against Hillary? 71%?
And how many of those 28% have said they were adamantly opposed to Obama/Biden and vote McCain?

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 25, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

“I have great respect for Hillary, but your actions are not helping Hillary at all. On the contrary. You are working very hard to torpedo her chances in the future. Posted by: Willem van Oranje”
Threatening Hillary over her political future in Democratic Party is meaningless especially since they have treated her very poorly. The whole world witnessed how she was taunted by the good ole boys in the party and the media (CNN, MSNBC). The party needs to apologize to her period.

Posted by: Sue | August 25, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

Come on folks – are you really ready for four more years of raping the national treasures our fathers fought so hard to build for us. I’m a HUGE Clinton supporter but she did not make it – for whatever the reason – but I’ll be da–ed if I vote for any Republican in any office or jurist position.

Posted by: John Caramanica | August 25, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

I really, really, REALLY wish Obama had picked Clinton as his running mate. It would have prevented further fracturing of the Democratic Party (and it would have made the political waters safer for Obama: having the Clintons gunning for you can’t be a comfortable position to be in!). It would also have given the Republican Party their favorite punching bag back.
However, I find it absolutely ridiculous how easy the American people are to distract. As long as the corporatocracy of America can keep throwing bright, shiny contentions in our way, we can’t seem to keep in mind that what’s at stake for us in an election. It isn’t Obama’s pride. It isn’t McCain’s houses, or age. It isn’t Clinton’s political ambitions.
It’s healthcare. It’s energy independence. It’s the economy. It’s shifting the burden of the massive war debt from the rich (who are benefitting most from this war) to the middle class. It’s having the agenda for the next four years set by the same people who set it for the last eight, or making a clear statement that the American people want to turn in a new direction.
If John McCain wins the Presidency it will prove once and for all that the American people have no idea how to resist manipulation, or how to look after their own interests.
I felt that Hilary Clinto would make a great President, and she still might some day. But her platform (and my interests) is more closely represented by Obama’s than by McCain’s. Why would I spite myself by voting AGAINST my interests in favor of Clinton’s? It doesn’t make sense.
To all those “Hilary 2012″ Democrats who won’t vote for Obama:
Be assured that the Republicans WILL come through for their party (if not for their best interests) no matter what they said about McCain before he got the nomination. And when President McCain names a Supreme Court Justice guaranteed to make the Court more right wing than it already is, I’ll be annoyed at Republicans, yes. But my anger and contempt will be reserved for YOU.

Posted by: Maargen | August 25, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

It’s not a question of “who is the lesser of the evil.” It’s more about how do you trust. So far, Obama has been about power. He has been flagellating on all issues. He has coming from very far left as opposed to the middle. So, we voters have very little choice at this point. Yes we need a change. McCain does have a history of being a maverick.

Posted by: sue | August 25, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

“6% of the Dem delgates wanted Biden, 28% wanted Hillary”.

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 25, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

What’s interesting to me in this article is that Obama didn’t definitively say that she (Clinton) was seriously considered for VP. He just danced around the questions. If the man stands for change he should’ve been honest and just said that he didn’t want her as VP and give his reasons. I’m sure there are good political reasons he could come up without being insulting.
I shouldn’t, but in a way I feel almost sorry for Hillary. But, if the shoe were on the other foot, I think she (or any politician in any party) would be doing the same stuff.
Any good up and coming third parties out there?

Posted by: Grand Old Party | August 25, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

Although I think she was treated shabbily by Obama, I’m just as glad that Hillary wasn’t asked to be his VP. I really think it would be an intolerable mismatch.

Posted by: RLamb | August 25, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Whatever show is put at the DNC, is not going to erase the chasm that the Primaries created. To achieve unity, both sides need to work on it. Obama’s recent actions in picking Biden shows his disregard of the will of 18 million voters.

Posted by: sue | August 25, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

Unity, Unity, Unity. That’s all Obama’s campaign has been talking about since the primaries finished. Uniting the Party and drawing in the Hillary supporters.
And everyone claims that Obama is so smart.
Well, if that were the case, certainly he would have realized that the only way the Democratic Party would truly be UNITED would be if he picked Hillary as his running mate.
As usual, Obama was once again just paying lip service to holding high ideals, and then his actions show what a master of deception he truly is.

Posted by: Lee | August 26, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

What a liar. By the way, Jake, are you going to write about his “mentor’s”(Emil Jones) latest “uncle Tom” comments? It’s all over the news here-well in Chicago that is.

Posted by: RL in Illinois | August 26, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

There was a lot of bad ‘blood’ on this campaign. Clinton and former President Clinton would not an effective working relationship in the White House because of all these negativity that the Clintons brought up. Obama made a wonderful decision in selecting Sen. Biden.
The Clinton supporters that won’t vote for Obama are people who have already made up their mind not to vote for Obama. It is interesting also to note that these people are not prepared to contribute to Hillary’s Campaign debts if they are genuine. Otherwise they are republiccans disguised as Democrats.
Go Obama

Posted by: Joseph | August 26, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

Instigated by HRC and her
campaign advisors, her bitter
and cranky supporters are trying
to throw a monkey wrench into
the works. Bad sore losers.

Posted by: anon | August 26, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

“I answered a brief question…and that’s all you’re going to get….”
Sounds like: “And that’s all I’ve got to say about that……………..”
-Forrest Obama/Barack Gump

Posted by: Lee | August 26, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

No wonder the party isn’t united. It’s pretty hard to unite the party when you dismiss someone who half the party wanted for president. He chose not to unite the party by leaving her off the ticket. That was clearly his choice.

Posted by: rafraf | August 26, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

Obama has a very difficult time making decisions, and an even worse time standing up for his decisions. America needs a leader – not a weak capitulator.

Posted by: marylou | August 26, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

And someone really should get Obama help for his immature passive-aggressive behaviors.
The 3 a.m. phone call is obvious even to the least observant.
Wonder which of America’s enemies he’d push over the edge with a get-even stunt on the world stage?

Posted by: marylou | August 26, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

MSM is devoid of any sense
of respect for privacy. The
VP selection process was
conducted in a confidential
manner. The media should
simply let it go at that and
stop asking BO at every press
avail whether HRC was on his
short list.

Posted by: anon | August 26, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

The Olympics was only the latest evidence that America is not as strong as she used to be. A communist country effectively used their rising middle-class to put on the greatest show ever AND win the most gold medals. There were just too few Moms and Dads like Michael Phelp’s or Shawn Johnson’s who’s sacrifice was enough to propel their kids to the top. The rest were too distracted by mortgage failures, medical expenses, gas prices and educational budget-cuts, all problems that grew during two+ decades of rising corporate tax-cuts and profits.
This election is possibly the last chance to save the working middle-class and everything it does for this country. It is unbelievable that many voters are still voting based on identity politics…”my vote will only go to such-and-such ‘woman’ or ‘war vet’ or “someone more like me” Wake-up America. The election is not a popularity contest. It is your future.

Posted by: Young Atheart | August 26, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am

That headline does not match the content of the post. “I think you can draw that conclusion” is NOT “yes.” Very carefully not “yes.” Very Clintonian, Mr. Obama. Congratulations.

Posted by: Judasmac | August 26, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am

Clinton was on Obama’s short list of non-candidates.
Clinton 18 million
Biden less than 10 thousand
do the math

Posted by: geevill | August 26, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am

The only people that “disrespected” Hillary are the voters. More of them voted for Obama. Period. She and Bill ran an ineffective campaign in the final analysis.

Posted by: Hoo-Ahh! | August 26, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

Ms. Clinton true to form is
once again at it – displaying
her divisive, polarizing and
sour grapes personality.
Her self-hating, self-defeating
and churlish supporters are
absorbing the negative vibrations
she emanates and have become
self-alienated and hostile.

Posted by: anon | August 26, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

I don’t believe that Clinton was ever on the short list! I think he is just lying to try and pull the women voting block in and it’s not going to happen. You are mistaken if you think this is just about sour grapes over Hillary not getting the nomination. Our party doesn’t have a theme or know what it stands for any longer. First, they went with prune face Kerry and he lost. Than they thought they’d go with an inexperienced black man because it was a novelty and what happened? They pandered to the right and now they pander to the middle. He is neck and neck with McCain. Oh yes, that was a great move! And, what about Biden? He has so many lobbyists money in his pockets that it isn’t funny. And, he gets money from the credit card companies. The very thing that Obama said he would reform. What a joke!

Posted by: Mary Anne | August 26, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Thanks for all this information, including the picture of a candidate on a platform in 2002 giving a speech in another country. More information will help me examine true/false and make the decision I need to make on that day I can’t wait to come. I will save my energy, no fuss, no fight, for that day I walk to the poll station. Obama vs McCain. Is McCain right? Is Obama right? Hilary never on short list. Who is fooling who. Is it a Kennedy club? Who decides for Obama? Who will run America? Stop telling the media who you will vote for. Lets give a big surprise and put America first.

Posted by: Information | August 26, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.