Obama: McCain is the Celeb
As Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, cavorts in the Hawaiian sun this week while mulling his running mate, his campaign has prepared an attack ad painting his opponent, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.., as "Washington’s biggest celebrity."
"For decades, he’s been Washington’s biggest celebrity," intones the narrator. "And as Washington embraced him, John McCain hugged right back."
The ad shows McCain on Saturday Night Live and various talk shows, then quickly takes a turn to assailing him as a Bushie and a tool of lobbyists and the oil and pharmaceutical industries.
"Lurching to the right, then the left, the old Washington dance, whatever it takes," the narrator says. "John McCain. A Washington celebrity playing the same old Washington games."
On This Week yesterday, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson sounded as if he’d seen the ad’s script.
"Senator McCain is the Washington celebrity here," said the Democrat.
- jpt
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
I thought saying the candidates were celebrities was childish? Is this the best Obama’s campaign has to offer? Copying McCain yet again? Offshore drilling, Surge, condition based withdrawals from Iraq, Criticizing Russia (after criticizing McCain for criticizing Russia), now this.
Obama, no experience and no original thought.
Posted by: Zaggs | August 11, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am
McCain is a celebrity, at least to certain close friends:
His oil buddies keep him screaming for offshore drilling.
He loves the war machine as they employe residents of Arizona (Apache)
He has no solar or wind friends . . . .
The common “Joe American” is no friend either, I guess . . . .
Posted by: DAVID NH | August 11, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
“McCain is a celebrity” and Obama is a parrot without an original thought in his head. Even his hope and change mantra was lifted from someone else’s campaign.
Posted by: marylou | August 11, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
I never thought of it before but McCain is a big celebrity. It seems odd for him to attack someone else with that label.
Posted by: Marko | August 11, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
McCain has even appeared in some movies (Wedding Crashers) and in TV series 24. Comedy talk show regular. And he calls other people celebrity?
Posted by: Celebrity | August 11, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
Let’s just face it, McCain is nothing more than another Shrub-style oil puppet. And rather than run on issues, or present proposals that have real meaning to folks, McCain will just rattle on about Paris Hilton, tire gauges, and whatever else his handlers stick before his addled face.
McCain is the perfect metaphor for the GOP this year. Old, out of ideas, and flogging the same crap as last time.
Posted by: Nick Ellington | August 11, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
marko, McCain is famous his war service and for forging a 25-year career in Washington. Obama is famous for being famous. Big difference. But nice try on your part to confuse the two.
Posted by: marylou | August 11, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am
You all should stop drinking the kool-aid . . . Seriously, I agree with David NH on this. Obama had potential, before we knew anyhting about him, when you all sober up yous hould come to terms that he is a 1st term senator that wants to raise your taxes . . .
Posted by: George NJ | August 11, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am
CELEBRITY (dictionary definition):
“Somebody who is famous during his or her lifetime”
McCain = celebrity
Obama = celebrity
Posted by: DD | August 11, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am
From The Joker: McShame, McBushie, McCane….maybe he should audition for the role of “God” in the remake of George Burns’ last great movie. No wait, George was playing “Give Me MyCane.”
Posted by: The | August 11, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Not only is McCain a celebrity, but he lives like one. How many celebrities other than the most very famous can claim EIGHT homes? How does the MSM allow this man to go around claiming that his opponent is elitist when he’s flying across the country in his private jet to his EIGHT (that’s right, EIGHT) homes?
Posted by: The Zug | August 11, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
McCain … Obama … the campaigns. Name-calling and mediocrity. That’s where our consumer selves have put ourselves. We over indulge and bought ourselves a Hobson’s choice.
I guess the best hope is Obama’s inexperience. He may muddle it up enough to do a little house cleaning and make a few good decisions. The entrenced McCain has been around too long to do anything right, accidental or not.
Posted by: James in NC | August 11, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am
What a piece of work McCain is…sheesh he should try to get a role in the upcoming Star Trek movie as a shape shifter!
Posted by: kww | August 11, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am
This is all such stupidity.
The campaign managers on both sides have taken the most important process in our governmental system to the lowest of lows. If one did not know better one could plausibly come to the conclusion that we are attempting to elect a kindergarten hall monitor instead of a president of the country.
As an “old” FDR Democrat I find it completely unbelievable that Obama is the best the party has to offer. This young man is nothing more than a product of the “Chicago political machine” with absolutely no experience whatsoever. 144 days in the US Senate qualifies him for what?
The Republicans are just as bad – surely they have someone younger than McCain to represent their side. He is an honorable man but at 72 has no business taking on this task if elected.
Our political process has sunk to the lowest of lows.
Posted by: dharper | August 11, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Lost: Issues
Last seen… a long time ago. Answers to anything thought provoking or insightful. Please return home as soon as possible!
Posted by: Brad | August 11, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am
McCain always invites a fight… but like Bush… he doesn’t have the facts, the cool, the stamina, or the intelligence to back it up. It’s like when he dared Obama to go to Iraq… and now the Iraqi government backs Obama’s plan! Or how the GOP wants to try to tar Obama with the Edwards affair (because everybody knows, but nobody really wants to talk about how the GOP ran multiple adulterers in the primary, but managed to pick the one who is actually married to the mistress he picked up while cheating on his sick wife.) The GOP is showing itself to be impulsive and foolish, valuing cheap points over the long game.
McCain slaps Obama with the crap celebrity ad. Obama waits, gives him a chance to reconsider, then nails him with a haymaker. This ad is so true! And it’s actually substantial.
The best thing about Obama is that he is a chess player. Bush and McCain are blustery hot heads, who love to pick fights that they cannot finish, that they want someone else to fight, that they have to run away from. Meanwhile, a guy like Obama, who isn’t ruled by his emotions, can wait, and then make the right move, when it counts.
McCain can be manipulated very easily, especially if he gets mad or starts feeling jealous. He makes mistakes. He loses control. He thinks things should go his way because he’s McCain.
I am so sick of having a teenage boy in the White House. And I can’t stand the thought of having another emotional adolescent (this time trapped in the body of an old man) calling the shots.
It is going to be great to have someone level-headed in the White House. Obama is really showing his strength in the campaign. No matter how hard McCain hectors him, Obama doesn’t get distracted. It’s great.
Posted by: blip | August 11, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am
This is a weak riposte to a very effective string of commercials. When image spinning, the cloth has to adhere to the surface organically. The ads against Obama were effective because he is humorless and he is a product of slick cynical marketing. Paris was effective but she heightened the sense of silliness and image crafting and that being Obama’s MO works against Obama. Thanks though. Nice swimsuit.
McCain is McCain. Blast away. You’re wasting your money.
Posted by: len | August 11, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am
McCain started calling Obama “celebrity” – I don’t see the point of it at all. Anyone in politics has celebrity status (name in news) and many crave it – especially the recent crop of Repubs (Gingrich, Lott, etc) except Cheney (though he got it when he shot his hunting buddy). Now Obama picks it up after Paris Hilton’s throwback at McCain – they’re all acting like children. Maybe this is the way their advisors think they can avoid having a negative campaign (by slingly diaper poop instead of mud). One has to vote for the lesser cornball too often these days and since McCain started this game, I’ll have to vote for Obama (actually I was going to vote against McCain/Bush before). Mostly I was surprised to see McCain, the POW survivor, act like a little brat instead of retired military personnel – it’s more than a flippant turnaround, the guy is disintegrating before our eyes.
Posted by: chris | August 11, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Blip—that was a very insightful post and it is also something that I have seen for my self. I couldn’t agree with you any more than I do right now.
Posted by: nathan | August 11, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Re: Zagg’s comment on Obama has no experience and no original thought. I agree w/the first but disagree w/the later. Haven’t you heard of his new method to announce his VP? “Sign up to be a member on the Obama’s website” and you’ll be one of the first to know before the announcement.”… “oh, and pass the news around to your friends and family to sign up to be the first”.
lol, I don’t know what everyone thinks, but I think it’s hilariously silly.
Obama = Hollywood politics as usual.
Posted by: Kim | August 11, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
i use to think McCain was a great Man but now he has Change he will do anything to win. Bush and McCain two con artist’s
that abuse their power they will try to sell you the George Washington Bridge how can any American go through another 4 years of lies.
Posted by: J from NJ | August 11, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Isn’t it lovely that Obama’s celebrity is so powerful that people have to “admit” to not supporting him, as if there is something wrong with that? This is the oppressive stuff “people’s revolutions” are built on. I hope America’s weathly are investing in safe-rooms, and the not-so wealth are prepared for lots and lots of govnmt cheese.
Posted by: RationalAmerican | August 11, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am
Blip said …
“The funniest thing: I live in a deep red county in the Midwest. Yet I have not seen a single McCain bumper sticker or yard sign. …So… the point… when you read pro-McCain stuff on the internet… you should understand that much of it is surely fake.”
OR b/c McCain supporters are quiet voters. Relative to Obama’s voters, we’re more conservative. We don’t wear our presidential vote on our sleeves. Just b/c Obama’s supporters are more flashy (similar to their candidate)… you can’t equate that to more Obama votes.
Further, I have Democrats calling Republicans all sort of name in person, why would any sane person want to engage in that type of hysteria? Better save my opinion for the voting booth.
Posted by: Kim | August 11, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
This story is not definitely news worthy! Why does the news media print such trash?
Whether you are a Liberal, Conservative, Republican, Democrat or some other denomination it does not really matter… Folks, are we are looking at the “best” candidates this country has to offer? Almost 300 million people and Obama and McCain represent the cream? I hope not… If this is the case, then it’s time to toss the cream out because it stinks.
Like many Americans, I am tired of the same ol’ deception and lies we are spoon fed by politicians claiming to be on our side when in fact they are in it for themselves. Why is it that when people enter politics they would be considered part of middle class but after a number of years in office they become millionaires? Answer: Shady investment deals, payoffs, incentives, campaign contributions, etc.
Obama is playing off the emotions of the people who want to see change in the government when in fact his is almost powerless to change anything without the consensus of the same congress that put us here in the first place. McCain may be closer to a “typical” politician. If you look at his voting record for yourself, you’ll see that he doesn’t really lean entirely one way or another. I don’t agree with him on some of the issues and as a result I do not find him an ideal candidate either.
I believe it is time for a change. The Republican and Democrat parties need to be disbanded. If they were companies our government would break them up and cite them as being monopolistic, however when they are part of the problem nothing will change.
No matter who is elected, four more years of the same thing.
Posted by: Ken R | August 11, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Rich people already invest in “safe rooms”. Why do you think they keep all their money in offshore accounts, vacation in superrich enclaves, rely heavily on “private contractors,” and send American jobs to third-world sweatshops. They know that the American middle class has been shrinking for decades. They know that real wages have fallen, while their salaries have multiplied many times over. They are already taking great care of themselves.
Either we vote for a candidate who promotes a continuation of this trajectory (McCain) or we vote for someone who can restore the middle class (Obama) and prevent things from getting really ugly.
History has proven that it was Roosevelt and his social programs that prevented a violent revolution in this country. Roosevelt gave everyone a reason to work hard and support the nation, because he restored hope and gave people real opportunities to improve their lives and make a better future for their kids.
Posted by: blip | August 11, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
“lol, I don’t know what everyone thinks, but I think it’s hilariously silly.”
Actually that is effective if you understand the goal. Pelosi’s Amazing Money Machine uses the Internet as one source of funding. After a number of cycles, it begins to dry up and it needs a massive infusion of new email addresses. This is a slick way to get people to give up a bit of anonymity for fifteen nanoseconds of being the first in the know, or so they believe. Actually, the press releases and the usual leaks to the loyal resources will be prepared before anyone is near the send button.
But it will work and it will increase the value of the mailing list. That list has more value post-election even if Obama loses given it can be sold to all down ticket campaigns or traded for favors.
It’s a smart use of his celebrity status.
Posted by: len | August 11, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am
Kim, I think that your theory is probably true. I think many of my neighbors are going to hold their nose and vote for McCain, while the Obama supporters are going to vote with pride and optimism.
But I think you raise a great point. Why is it that the typical McCain supporters are quiet and reserved and apparently scarce…
But then when you get on the internet, you see many McCain supporters. Few of them are reserved. They wear their votes on their sleeve. And, statistically, they are over-represented given the demographics of internet news readership!
It just kind of proves my point… many of the McCain supporters you read on the web are basically just spamming and trolling. It’s a phony grassroots campaign.
These things are commonly practiced by PR firms… so I am not surprised that a campaign would resort to these methods. I mean, McCain wants to get his message out… he doesn’t have the grassroots enthusiasm that Obama has… and he wants to make up the deficit by paying people to be “grassroots” McCainanites.
I just think it is hilarious. And, I think Obama supporters and independents should be aware that McCain’s support on the web is vastly, vastly overstated and does not match the real world enthusiasm or numbers of McCain supporters.
Posted by: blip | August 11, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am
Actually…what “history” clearly shows is that FDR’s policies made things much WORSE…and they will do the same in today’s world.
Posted by: RationalAmerican | August 11, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am
I’ve come to believe that the Obama camp has been holding back on McCain. 2 reasons, the first being this is August and why waste the good stuff when so few are paying attention. But more importantly they really don’t want to show all of their cards before McCain gets the nomination. The old dude is obviously a weak candidate for the GOP and if the Dems let him have it too early, the GOP could very well refuse top nominate McCain and replace him with someone a bit more vigorous and appealing.
I think our Republican friends should take close note of this ad. Because after McCain is officially nominated that philandering wishy washy old guy will be subjected to some of the most withering attack advertising this country has ever seen. And with a record such as his there is an almost infinite amount of material for these ads.
And let’s face it, if “celebrity,” “Paris Hilton,” and oil drilling is all McCain has, his campaign is belly up already.
Posted by: Paddy O'Shea | August 11, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
I am so sorry this is soooo funny. I can’t stop laughing. That music just made Panama Mac look so old. It’s almost mean. This could backfire on Obama as being mean and making fun of an old man. And the point of “lurching” like McCain lurches cause he is injured from war injuries? Damn I don’t even support Panama Mac over O’Bama but this is just wrong but sooo funny. Personaly the going back and forth between the right and the left is not the old washington game it is the game Obama says he wants to play to move things foward and has played by giving illegal wire tappers immunity and leveraging on the waste and the dangers of off-shore drilling. Stick to clean coal and nuclear energy if you want to go right. Stay out of our waves dude.
Posted by: Ad-Rock | August 11, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
FDR made things worse? For who?
My grandpa had great stories to tell about the depression… and certainly he and his family made great use of the WPA. Both my parents and grandparents benefitted enormously from Social Security. And, in general, banking reforms and infrastructure investments made America a very safe place to do business.
Right now, I think a lot of the business class sees China and is green with envy. In China, you can pay workers pennies on the dollar. You can make products out of whatever kind of poison you want to. You can prohibit free speech and free organization. And, you can get away with killing and maiming workers. It’s natural if you are an elitist and put money over people, you are going to want America to be more like Communist China. It is an industrial paradise if you are of a certain class.
I think that there might be something to your point. I’m sure FDR did hurt rich people a bit (The businessmen of the day even tried to have him overthrown and replaced with a fascist leader!) SO if you ask them, FDR sucked.
But I think, as a country, we were all helped by FDR’s leadership. And though the rich don’t often like to admit it… there are great things about living in a country where even poor people can improve themselves through hard work.
Posted by: blip | August 11, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Also, while it is true “middle class” numbers have shrunk since’ 80…you might also notice that poverty levels ALSO shrunk, and more people became “rich”. The point? People don’t need government cheese (Barakie) to improve their lives, and the “middle class squeeze” is a fear-mongering myth used to drive the production of more government cheese (i.e. Washington power ).
“In other words, if the middle class in America has shrunk, it is only because so many formerly middle-class households have moved to the upper-income brackets, while a significant number of households previously in the lower brackets have moved up to the middle class and beyond.
The solid economic growth of the past two decades has indeed lifted all kinds of household boats. By the most basic measure of real household income, a broad swathe of Americans are better off than they were 25 years ago—thanks to growth fueled in good measure by lower marginal tax rates, expanding trade, and a more flexible domestic economy.”
Posted by: RationalAmerican | August 11, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
“great things about living in a country where even poor people can improve themselves through hard work.” I could not agree more, the point is government isn’t needed to achieve that goal, and most of the time they only hamper it. The founding fathers understood this, and I do wish more modern politicians would as well.
Posted by: RationalAmerican | August 11, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am
Rational American: The greatest growth of our Federal Govt and resulting debt occurred during the 8 years GW Bush was in office. McCain, as a senior member of the Senate GOP majority for 6 of those 8 years, did nothing to stop any of it.
And this includes a 2009 deficit of half a trillion dollars.
The notion that somehow the GOP has held back both govt growth and spending is a laughable and discredited canard.
Nice that you’re covering the New Deal era here, but there are events of a far more recent date that should be paid attention to here as well.
Posted by: Jim | August 11, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
This ad has the feel of a desperate “Gee, let’s make a lot of confusing, misleading statements about M and hope the Americans are dumb enough to believe it” air about it. But with The One on vacation, the O-bots are “just following orders.” The star child seems to spend more time out of the country on vacations than actually working, and ya’ll are paying him to do it. LOL
Posted by: Emm | August 11, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Oh, I can’t argue against the GOP becoming fiscally irresponsible, and even anti-free-market (I really don’t like Bush or McCain much)….however, Barakie doesn’t offer anything other than the same irresponsibility colored with meaningless bromides like “Hope” and “Change”, and his economic policy prescriptions are simply worse.
Posted by: RationalAmerican | August 11, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
Blip…
“I think that your theory is probably true. I think many of my neighbors are going to hold their nose and vote for McCain, while the Obama supporters are going to vote with pride and optimism.”
You assume too much. Any way… nice to see you’re so passionate in keeping your anger against conservatives. Being as expressive as you are, I can feel your tession through your writing.
I could easily say a bunch of things about what I think of Obama voters… but the length of this election is taking a toll on me. Have fun being angry with those who don’t think like you. May be I can be back in October and see you voting for McCain :-)
Posted by: Kim | August 11, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
Get a clue. I’m voting for McCain and talking to everyone I know about him as well. I won’t put a bumper sticker for him on my Lexus; however, because I’ve personally seen how nasty Obama supporters can be – both on and offline – and don’t want to pay for a new paint job because of Obama’s attempt to create class warfare to get votes. Trust me; McCain will have plenty of votes come November; in fact, I’m sure he’ll have more than enough!
Posted by: marylou | August 11, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am
Obama’s celebrity is so powerful that people have to “admit” to not supporting him. This is the oppressive stuff “people’s revolutions” are built on. ~ “rational” american
Speaking strictly for my self here [and NOT as if to represent every Obama supporter]—as someone who leans toward being an Obama supporter my self—when I “admit” to thinking that Obama’s campaign strategy in one particular sense is not all that politically intelligent; it is an admission toward the inevitable critique that the conservative stagnation of this country would just love to grab a hold of and twist–like you just did. If the left in this country is guilty of putting pressure on individuals right about now, it is simply so that they will think for themselves and not cling to that false description of “patriotism” that has been the republican “ditto” [ala Rush Limbaugh and his minions]. This is quite a departure from the civic religion that has erupted from out of the gnashing teeth of the self absorbed and supposedly morally superior so-called “right”. Who hear all critical reasoning for the sake the average citizen as an affront to their “values”.
Posted by: nathan | August 11, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Well, it looks like Obama painted himself into another corner with this ad. Now there is no way for him to chose an experienced person for his running mate. He has to chose another novice with zero national experience, just like himself, at a time when the world is erupting in war. That’s not very good judgment, is it? Two rookies in office while Russia and China are invading their neighbors.
Also, Obama is a “Chicago Celebrity”, and Chicago politics are much worse than Washingtons.
Posted by: OxyCon | August 11, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
After the conventions when the people begin to pay attention, McCain and the Republicans are going to be overwhelmed like they never thought possible.
Posted by: jen | August 11, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am
McCain’s so confused he tried to portray Obama as the celebrity, despite the fact that it’s McCain that has the extensive IMDB page. McCain should just go back to Arizona and take a nap.
Posted by: Jim | August 11, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
LOL Obama is surrounded, advised, and supported by Washington “insiders” and pols who have been around as long or longer than McCain. They’re so stupid they never stopped to consider that Obama is campaigning against every single one of them as they come up for re-election. I “hope” the public supports “change” by voting Pelosi, Reid, Kennedy (if he runs), Kerry, Daschle and all the other Old Guard Dems out of office the first chance they get. The Democratic Party stinks and it’s time to clean out the barn!
Posted by: marylou | August 11, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
In a counrty where very little is needed to create celebrity, I consider it a compliment to both candidates that they are gaining celebrity, notoriety, and are being talking points… it would be very sad if we all went to the polls in November and had NOT been wanting to see the candidates and hear what they had to say.
Posted by: KZP | August 11, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
McCain isn’t the one that feels the need to give a self-serving, unAmerican speech in front of 200,000 Germans.
When McCain showed up at a Harley rally with 50,000 in attendance he didn’t pretend all of those people were there for him like Obama does.
Obama’s ego needs the huge adoring crowds cheering when he coughs or takes his jacket off. Just like John Edwards–Obama’s ego and narcissism will be his undoing.
Obama is writing a third book about his favorite subject–himself. He just can’t seem to get enough.
Posted by: riley | August 11, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
I think this ad is just going to remind people of Obamas friends and associates such as Rezko, Ayers, Wright and so on. Not to mention the fact that he himself has been on Ellen, the View, Tyra, all the late night talk shows as well as the tabloid talks like ET. I think it was a little dumb to put it out there and if McCain wanted to he could use the Friends theme and make one heck of a video about Obama.
Posted by: Maria | August 11, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
I’m glad to see the Obama camp fighting back the McCain attacks more vigorously.
Posted by: kat | August 11, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
Anyone read the “platform” of the Democrat’s. They are going to give money to everyone…..and I quote — they want to “Help those who have lost their way” …. so we all get GPS???
Where are they going to get all this money??? We become Socialists —- that’s how. No incentive to get ahead because BIG—BIG government will help you. How does a 50% tax rate sound??
Posted by: susie | August 11, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm