<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Pushes Back on GOP Tire Pressure Attack: &#8220;It&#8217;s Like These Guys Take Pride in Being Ignorant&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/08/obama-pushes-ba-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/08/obama-pushes-ba-2/</link>
	<description>The latest Politics news and blog posts from ABC News contributors and bloggers including Jake Tapper, George Stephanopoulos and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:23:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyre racking</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/08/obama-pushes-ba-2/#comment-679928</link>
		<dc:creator>tyre racking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/08/obama-pushes-ba-2/#comment-679928</guid>
		<description>A tire that is substantially under-inflated does not roll as smoothly or as easily as it was intended.This diminishes fuel efficiency because increased rolling resistance causes the vehicle to burn more fuel which increases both emissions and fuel costs.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A tire that is substantially under-inflated does not roll as smoothly or as easily as it was intended.This diminishes fuel efficiency because increased rolling resistance causes the vehicle to burn more fuel which increases both emissions and fuel costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyre changers</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/08/obama-pushes-ba-2/#comment-679927</link>
		<dc:creator>tyre changers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 05:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/08/obama-pushes-ba-2/#comment-679927</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure every person has something to do in conserving energy.There are many ways even in a little way to help and contribute.Yes,this is a serious matter that benefit the people today and next generation.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure every person has something to do in conserving energy.There are many ways even in a little way to help and contribute.Yes,this is a serious matter that benefit the people today and next generation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ironic Surrealism II</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/08/obama-pushes-ba-2/#comment-679932</link>
		<dc:creator>Ironic Surrealism II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/08/obama-pushes-ba-2/#comment-679932</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Tire Gauge Industry Inflates Obamas Campaign Coffers&lt;/strong&gt;

When Barack Obama made this statement was he simply offering an easy energy saving solution?
“There are things that you can do individually though to save energy; making sure your tires are properly inflated, simple thing, but we could save all the ...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Tire Gauge Industry Inflates Obamas Campaign Coffers</strong></p>
<p>When Barack Obama made this statement was he simply offering an easy energy saving solution?<br />
“There are things that you can do individually though to save energy; making sure your tires are properly inflated, simple thing, but we could save all the &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Danley</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/08/obama-pushes-ba-2/#comment-679924</link>
		<dc:creator>James Danley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/08/obama-pushes-ba-2/#comment-679924</guid>
		<description>Omar, you wrote:  &quot;When will republicans understand that conservation and alternative energy is the only way to become energy independent?&quot;
Even Sen. Obama and the Democrats acknowledge that it will take TWENTY YEARS for alternative energy sources to EXCEED (not eliminate) oil as our leading source for energy.  So even after 20 years oil will still be nearly half of our source for energy.
Oil is a natural resource.  Why do you Liberals hate oil so much?  You Liberals tout conservation...yet you want to increase our water usage in order to grow more corn in order to produce ethanol which when used as auto fuel emits almost as much carbon dioxide and MORE hydrocarbons, oxides of nitgrogen, and ozone than regular gasoline.  It take 3.5 to 6.0 gallons of water to produce just one gallon of ethanol.
Finally, you also wrote:  &quot;...and the oil companies already have land they haven&#039;t started drilling on.&quot;  The vast majority of the 68 million acres of leased land that you Liberals keep bringing up is on federal park and federal monument lands.  The Democrats and Liberals SAY that the oil companies should begin drilling on these lands, but as soon as they attempt to many of these same people are the ones going to court to block drilling on these lands.  Furthermore, these leases are for exploration of the land.  It take years to assess whether there is any oil, whether there is enough oil, and whether it is cost efficient enough to drill.  Upon determining that the land is worth drilling, then the oil companies have to go through all of the red tape in submitting environmental impact statements, obtaining drilling permits, undergoing years of litigation from lawsuits filed by environmentalists and nearby landowners.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omar, you wrote:  &#8220;When will republicans understand that conservation and alternative energy is the only way to become energy independent?&#8221;<br />
Even Sen. Obama and the Democrats acknowledge that it will take TWENTY YEARS for alternative energy sources to EXCEED (not eliminate) oil as our leading source for energy.  So even after 20 years oil will still be nearly half of our source for energy.<br />
Oil is a natural resource.  Why do you Liberals hate oil so much?  You Liberals tout conservation&#8230;yet you want to increase our water usage in order to grow more corn in order to produce ethanol which when used as auto fuel emits almost as much carbon dioxide and MORE hydrocarbons, oxides of nitgrogen, and ozone than regular gasoline.  It take 3.5 to 6.0 gallons of water to produce just one gallon of ethanol.<br />
Finally, you also wrote:  &#8220;&#8230;and the oil companies already have land they haven&#8217;t started drilling on.&#8221;  The vast majority of the 68 million acres of leased land that you Liberals keep bringing up is on federal park and federal monument lands.  The Democrats and Liberals SAY that the oil companies should begin drilling on these lands, but as soon as they attempt to many of these same people are the ones going to court to block drilling on these lands.  Furthermore, these leases are for exploration of the land.  It take years to assess whether there is any oil, whether there is enough oil, and whether it is cost efficient enough to drill.  Upon determining that the land is worth drilling, then the oil companies have to go through all of the red tape in submitting environmental impact statements, obtaining drilling permits, undergoing years of litigation from lawsuits filed by environmentalists and nearby landowners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Expose Reality</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/08/obama-pushes-ba-2/#comment-679918</link>
		<dc:creator>Expose Reality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/08/obama-pushes-ba-2/#comment-679918</guid>
		<description>Obama got it wrong. Again.
Experts say properly inflated tires will increase your gas mileage 3 to 4%. Of course this is assuming everyone is going around with very low air pressure in their tires.
It will not reduce our oil consumption by 3 to 4%. There are no &quot;experts&quot; stating this.
Big difference Obama.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama got it wrong. Again.<br />
Experts say properly inflated tires will increase your gas mileage 3 to 4%. Of course this is assuming everyone is going around with very low air pressure in their tires.<br />
It will not reduce our oil consumption by 3 to 4%. There are no &#8220;experts&#8221; stating this.<br />
Big difference Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1776_vol_2</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/08/obama-pushes-ba-2/#comment-679914</link>
		<dc:creator>1776_vol_2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/08/obama-pushes-ba-2/#comment-679914</guid>
		<description>Let me state first and foremost--our bi-partisan system of government sucks. What I find TRULY comical is the number of people pointing fingers at the GOP and their ignorance because of the time-frame required to bring drilling rigs online in ANWR. This is a true statement. What many are failing to mention is that we have NONE other to thank than the liberals and Slick Willie, who, if you recall, vetoed a bill back in 1995 to allow drilling in ANWR. Hmm...so if we do the math here, 10 years AFTER that fact would put us in 2005 and we probably wouldn&#039;t be seeing this mess. Contrary to popular opinion, we have enough resources in ANWR ALONE to sustain us at current usage for the next 250-300 years.
And the argument of &quot;Oh the poor earth can&#039;t take this abuse any longer&quot;....gimme a break. We have resources to use and we should be tapping them.  When all is said and done, the earth will shake us off like a bad case of fleas.
Tire pressure??  This is the new energy plan? Neither one of these presidential wanna-be&#039;s has a clear cut energy plan and both of their campaigns is hell-bent on flip-flopping to succumb to a different voter base. Either way, we&#039;re screwed! We have to use the resources we have now and we DO have rigs online and ready to go...now we just have to figure out a way to make the Sierra Club disappear.  Drill the hell out of ANWR!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me state first and foremost&#8211;our bi-partisan system of government sucks. What I find TRULY comical is the number of people pointing fingers at the GOP and their ignorance because of the time-frame required to bring drilling rigs online in ANWR. This is a true statement. What many are failing to mention is that we have NONE other to thank than the liberals and Slick Willie, who, if you recall, vetoed a bill back in 1995 to allow drilling in ANWR. Hmm&#8230;so if we do the math here, 10 years AFTER that fact would put us in 2005 and we probably wouldn&#8217;t be seeing this mess. Contrary to popular opinion, we have enough resources in ANWR ALONE to sustain us at current usage for the next 250-300 years.<br />
And the argument of &#8220;Oh the poor earth can&#8217;t take this abuse any longer&#8221;&#8230;.gimme a break. We have resources to use and we should be tapping them.  When all is said and done, the earth will shake us off like a bad case of fleas.<br />
Tire pressure??  This is the new energy plan? Neither one of these presidential wanna-be&#8217;s has a clear cut energy plan and both of their campaigns is hell-bent on flip-flopping to succumb to a different voter base. Either way, we&#8217;re screwed! We have to use the resources we have now and we DO have rigs online and ready to go&#8230;now we just have to figure out a way to make the Sierra Club disappear.  Drill the hell out of ANWR!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/08/obama-pushes-ba-2/#comment-679907</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 08:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/08/obama-pushes-ba-2/#comment-679907</guid>
		<description>The republicans are being disingenuous. Adding more land for offshore drilling won&#039;t do anything for 7 years, and the oil companies already have land they haven&#039;t started drilling on. They are pushing hard for this just so they can get their greedy hands on more land for future drilling. When will republicans understand that conservation and alternative energy is the only way to become energy independent?  Oil is a precious non renewable energy source that we shouldn&#039;t be burning up in our cars. Its insane to do waste it like that for so many years.
Obama didn&#039;t lie, he said inflating tires would probably be as much savings as drilling offshore...so he was wrong...big deal. That&#039;s not lying.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The republicans are being disingenuous. Adding more land for offshore drilling won&#8217;t do anything for 7 years, and the oil companies already have land they haven&#8217;t started drilling on. They are pushing hard for this just so they can get their greedy hands on more land for future drilling. When will republicans understand that conservation and alternative energy is the only way to become energy independent?  Oil is a precious non renewable energy source that we shouldn&#8217;t be burning up in our cars. Its insane to do waste it like that for so many years.<br />
Obama didn&#8217;t lie, he said inflating tires would probably be as much savings as drilling offshore&#8230;so he was wrong&#8230;big deal. That&#8217;s not lying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/08/obama-pushes-ba-2/#comment-679899</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 03:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/08/obama-pushes-ba-2/#comment-679899</guid>
		<description>&quot;...(Note: that&#039;s not accurate, as we fact-checked last week. But the larger point about energy savings is correct.)...&quot;huh?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;(Note: that&#8217;s not accurate, as we fact-checked last week. But the larger point about energy savings is correct.)&#8230;&#8221;huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/08/obama-pushes-ba-2/#comment-679897</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 01:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/08/obama-pushes-ba-2/#comment-679897</guid>
		<description>Tyler,
Offshore drilling will not save we Americans any money at the pump. When the price initially drops, demand will once again rise, and price will therefore rise once again. Conservation, and renewable resource development are the only ways to drop the price of oil. Also your &quot;70 percent&quot; of the country Obama stated as ignorant is more than a little exaggerated. There is no way the GOP makes up 70 percent of the country.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tyler,<br />
Offshore drilling will not save we Americans any money at the pump. When the price initially drops, demand will once again rise, and price will therefore rise once again. Conservation, and renewable resource development are the only ways to drop the price of oil. Also your &#8220;70 percent&#8221; of the country Obama stated as ignorant is more than a little exaggerated. There is no way the GOP makes up 70 percent of the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Paine</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/08/obama-pushes-ba-2/#comment-679895</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Paine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 01:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/08/obama-pushes-ba-2/#comment-679895</guid>
		<description>Obama lied about how much tire pressure will help us
The drive-by reporter of this story must be in the tank for Obama, because no where in the story does he reveal the truth of what Obama actually said. Instead, he tries to cover for Obama. What Obama actually said was that we could save as much by inflating tires and getting tuneups as we would gain by drilling for American oil offshore.
That statement is false.  No one would argue with the fact that tire pressure, avoiding jackrabbit starts and so on saves gas. Obama has a firm grasp of the obvious here. Obama’s problem is that he lied about the extent that tire pressure could help save gas, and he lied that we would save enough as we would gain by drilling offshore.
So Obama lied when he said simply inflating tires and getting regular tuneups would save just as much oil as the offshore drilling McCain is proposing.  The Obama campaign could not provide figures to back up his claim that inflating tires and getting tuneups would save just as much oil as could be produced by offshore drilling.  The reason Obama had to lie to avoid supporting drilling is that he is beholden to the radical environmentalist leftists who want America to fail.
John McCain wants to lift the ban on drilling and that would help Americans by reducing high gas prices.  Obama wants to keep the ban in place and keep us buying oil from over seas, which will keep the price high. Obama doesn’t care about the little guy and his gas bills.
Also, Obama assumes we as Americans are too stupid to know that we should keep our tires properly inflated.  Even if 90% of Americans were riding around with half-flat or overinflated tires, we STILL could not save much oil just by fixing that. And the reality is most people inflate their tires correctly, so any impact from a few more doing things right is MINIMAL!
I like John McCains “all of the above” approach.  Of course McCain is like all of us, he understands that maintaining proper tire pressure is a good thing that provides minimal benefits. But even if Obama’s lie WERE correct, if we actually COULD save enough by changing tire pressure to offset drilling offshore, wouldn&#039;t it be even better to do both? Because just think of how many gallons of gasoline we could have, how it would drive down the price of gasoline and a barrel of oil.  Why not combine both: the drilling of new oil here in the United States, the continental shelf; plus the proper inflation of tires, to double the effect of the oil that we are drilling?   Obama is for the weak “tire pressure” strategy while McCain is attacking the problem head on to lower our price at the pump, while agreeing that conservation and new sources are also important.
Besides, you cannot grow an economy like America’s with just conservation.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama lied about how much tire pressure will help us<br />
The drive-by reporter of this story must be in the tank for Obama, because no where in the story does he reveal the truth of what Obama actually said. Instead, he tries to cover for Obama. What Obama actually said was that we could save as much by inflating tires and getting tuneups as we would gain by drilling for American oil offshore.<br />
That statement is false.  No one would argue with the fact that tire pressure, avoiding jackrabbit starts and so on saves gas. Obama has a firm grasp of the obvious here. Obama’s problem is that he lied about the extent that tire pressure could help save gas, and he lied that we would save enough as we would gain by drilling offshore.<br />
So Obama lied when he said simply inflating tires and getting regular tuneups would save just as much oil as the offshore drilling McCain is proposing.  The Obama campaign could not provide figures to back up his claim that inflating tires and getting tuneups would save just as much oil as could be produced by offshore drilling.  The reason Obama had to lie to avoid supporting drilling is that he is beholden to the radical environmentalist leftists who want America to fail.<br />
John McCain wants to lift the ban on drilling and that would help Americans by reducing high gas prices.  Obama wants to keep the ban in place and keep us buying oil from over seas, which will keep the price high. Obama doesn’t care about the little guy and his gas bills.<br />
Also, Obama assumes we as Americans are too stupid to know that we should keep our tires properly inflated.  Even if 90% of Americans were riding around with half-flat or overinflated tires, we STILL could not save much oil just by fixing that. And the reality is most people inflate their tires correctly, so any impact from a few more doing things right is MINIMAL!<br />
I like John McCains “all of the above” approach.  Of course McCain is like all of us, he understands that maintaining proper tire pressure is a good thing that provides minimal benefits. But even if Obama’s lie WERE correct, if we actually COULD save enough by changing tire pressure to offset drilling offshore, wouldn&#8217;t it be even better to do both? Because just think of how many gallons of gasoline we could have, how it would drive down the price of gasoline and a barrel of oil.  Why not combine both: the drilling of new oil here in the United States, the continental shelf; plus the proper inflation of tires, to double the effect of the oil that we are drilling?   Obama is for the weak “tire pressure” strategy while McCain is attacking the problem head on to lower our price at the pump, while agreeing that conservation and new sources are also important.<br />
Besides, you cannot grow an economy like America’s with just conservation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>