Obama Told Clinton She Wasn’t Likely to Be VP, Give or Take
Our friend and travel companion Anne Kornblut takes a look in today’s Washington Post at how Sen. Barack Obama signaled early on to Sen. Hillary Clinton that she was unlikely to be his running mate.
Give or take.
(I love this "give or take" thing — I’m sure I’ll be annoying everyone on the Obama bus today with it.)
Writes Kornblut: "Obama told Clinton then it was unlikely he would choose her, people familiar with the conversation said. Obama did not want to lead her on and, after campaigning against her for more than a year, already had a sense that their pairing would not be the right fit."
He didn’t want to lead her on, a la Robert Palmer. What do you think? Reasonable decision?
Speaking of Clinton, she makes another appearance in a McCain campaign ad today. Essentially, McCain takes Clinton’s "3 AM" ad and says he approves of her message.
- jpt
Email
Santorum: Money Will Not Defeat Obama, Ideas Will
Rick Santorum's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
The VP is not the presidency… it is both someone who cans tep in …
but more importantly who will be most effective in the role as a VICE President to an Obama Presidency…and playing a second banana that would get the most done…and bring the most resource to the table…
Posted by: dl | August 26, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am
I haven’t heard the important debate of the “flower in the cake” story.
This is of critical importance to me, right along with Obama’s penchant for exotic teas, orange juice for breakfast, and arugula on his salads!
Yes, the loftiness of our debate this election season is right in line with elections past.
Posted by: ChrisNBama | August 26, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Obama and Clinton. Like oil
and water. Polar opposites.
Conspicuously different.
No give or take on that.
Posted by: anon | August 26, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
After hearing and watching all these McCain ads based on Hillary quotes/sayings I now have a better understanding why Obama choose Biden rather then Hillary.
She really went hard against him during the primary season. It’s too much amo for the Republicans. No wonder Sean Hannity, Karl Rove, Rush Limbaugh etc wanted Obama to pick Hillary.
Posted by: Vanessa | August 26, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Rasmussen tied today. Obama declines 3rd day in a row. Rasmussen says it is due to the Clinton snub. Biden negative bounce. The attakcs on McCain backfired too.
Posted by: geevill | August 26, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
REALITY CHECK
==============
The Obama nomination to lead the
party WAS DNC’s inside job…..
I’m an ex-democrat voting for McCain.
I left the democratic party the day
after Hillary drop-out…..
Posted by: NICHOLAS | August 26, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am
I tell you we could have a great team getting us out of this mess with Obama, Biden and Hillary Clinton as Sec of state taking on all our issues for us and our children and
the comments on here and Bill Clinton’s stupid comments showing he could really be truste to know what was going on inside the team…
makes it almost impossible for America to have that in their future.
doesn’t that stink that immaturity on the part of a few will cost the many.
Including Hillary …which I must say out of everything in this election ###### me off the most.
there is a new team just waiting to make us what we can be again…and idiocy and self-centered anger once again (just liek 2000 and 2004) is going to take us down.
Posted by: dl | August 26, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
Nicholas I hope you like the RNC’s opening night…
the speakers are D!ck Cheney and George W. Bush.
I am sure that will be uplifting for your selection.
Posted by: dl | August 26, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
“Bill Clinton knows a little bit of economy … he can speak a little bit about it on Wednesday” — 0-bama
—-
A little bit?! You phony Nothingness who thinks he is the same as George Bush. If Zero-bama knows or has 5% of the ability and knowledge on economy, he would have been 15% ahead of McCain who knows he did know much about economy.
At least McCain was honest. 0-bama only pretends something he was not to deceive voters. Deception can only get you so far, stealing a nomination by Affirmative Action in the demos primaries is one thing; now, this phony has to hope the Clintons to come to rescue in the Convention. You think his childish 3 am taunt will do the trick?
Posted by: fact check | August 26, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
I am getting the sense that Obama really needed Clinton on the ticket. He may still win, but he had a chance to put it away. Leading people on with the text thing and then going for Biden seems to have given McCain a bounce. It gives the GOP the chance to say it is the most liberal ticket ever assembled by the Dems – a Teddy Kennedy dream ticket.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | August 26, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
You people act as if Obama owns these networks are have any sort of control on what’s broacast.
You’re angered by a remark about a “pencil”?
What about the treats the Obama’s recieve everyday?
What about the man arrested yesterday plotting the assassination of Obama?
What about a pastor who appeared on Sean Hannity a few months ago calling Obama a nig*er and his mother wh*re?
And you’re mad about “pencil” comment?
Posted by: Vanessa | August 26, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am
The P.U.M.A.’s need to get over it. Obama and Clinton have almost IDENTICAL voting records in the Senate.
Voting for the Republican party simply out of spite is childish and short-sided. Why hold Obama responsible for how the media portrayed him? He ran a largely respectful campaign. Senator Clinton on the other hand, chose to throw her own party under the bus on the eve of the Texas and Ohio primaries just to get a few extra votes – and that was one of many similar incidents.
She was not chosen for VP simply because she CAN NOT play second fiddle. With Bill in the picture as well, how would you expect Obama to lead effectively? Joe Biden is an intelligent, caring man with 30+ years of experience under his belt. He is also one of the more savvy politicos when it comes to foreign policy.
It’s time for all Democrats to recognize that the party is endanger of being irreparably fractured. Don’t get caught up in all the bs- what’s done is done – vote on the issues…vote with your core values.
Posted by: Matt | August 26, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
So he treated her like an adult, told her up front that it wasn’t likely, and she and her supporters act like children.
Is there any wonder why he didn’t choose her?
Posted by: Thinking | August 26, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Obama I don’t want to lead you on. YOU DON”T GET MY VOTE!!
Posted by: fu | August 26, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
I have less respect for Joe Biden now than I once did, and far more respect for Mark Warner, Ted Strickland, and Jim Webb. Why did they turn down Obama? Because they didn’t want to be a part of a disastrous administration. Joe Biden is so hungry to get his foot in the White House that he’ll play second fiddle to an empty suit. How sleazy can you get?
Posted by: Claudia Jackstadt | August 26, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Clinton had good points and many bad points. The bottom line is she was a poor manager and that her campaign suffered from it. She couldn’t decide who was right and who was wrong, and make the tough decisions necessary. This registered Republican is sick to death of Republican policies that have undermined the country we love. Maybe in time, I’ll be just as sick of more liberal policies, but for now change is definitely needed. Obama/Biden 08
Posted by: fragan4 | August 26, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
Obama didn’t pick Hillary because he didn’t want to be outshined by her and he would be because he is as dumb as they come. He wanted someone that would run the country for him while he is the president in name only. And that wouldn’t work with Clinton. It will work with Biden because that’s exactly what Bident wants. He wants to be in charge and Obama doesn’t care as long as he has the title of president. The first night of the convention was a total disaster and I heard bad comments about it.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | August 26, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
There’s an upside and a downside to every VP choice. But the main thing you’ve got to do I think is juice things up and excite your base. Ferraro, Bentsen, Gore, Lieberman all did that for the nominee. As sound a choice as Biden was, it is decidely not exciting. I think that in itself produces a letdown.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | August 26, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
“The PUMAS need to get over it.” The PUMAS aren’t the only Democrats who refuse to support Barack Obama. Some of us are not, and never were, Hillary Clinton supporters. Some Democrats are simply unwilling to support a man who spent 20 years in a racist, white-hating, Jew-hating, America-hating church. The DNC can try to market the Obamas as the family next door all they want. Some of us aren’t buy.
Posted by: Claudia Jackstadt | August 26, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
It’s time for all Democrats to recognize that the party is endanger of being irreparably fractured.
Posted by: Matt | Aug 26, 2008
—
You are freeking right. Tell your congressmen/women, senators, mayors, delegates to vote for Clinton on Wednesday, and stop this phony madness of Affirmative Action.
Posted by: Olbermn3 | August 26, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am
I wish McCain waited all the time to declare his running mate, to see who 0-bama (zerobama) selects his. Now that 0-bama has selected someone who is on record saying that 0-bama is nothing but zero when it comes to become president and can not be allowed to have on the job training etc etc. McCain has an advantage of selecting a woman VP and take away 15% of dem’s unsatisifed women voters. Anyways Republicans were always ahead of democrates in giving rights to blacks or women. what say?
Posted by: nim | August 26, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am
As much as the media hates Clinton, they seem to do everything they can to make her the topic of news, even when there isn’t a story to tell. Its quite pathological.
Posted by: Mike | August 26, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am
Matt: I’m afraid you are placing too much faith in the American people. We got no brains, no brains at all. Our votes are based on anger, on piddly issues like the flag pin, or a name, or a (perceived but false) religion. We’re stupid people. And we get just what we deserve. I think McCain will be elected, the Clintons will pay a very dear price for their obviously lukewarm “support” of Obama, and the country will be stuck not only with the republicans for the next 4-8 years, but with the policies that further their conservative right-wing agenda and the supreme court justices that implement them, for decades to come. We lose. We’re a pathetic bunch, aren’t we? No brains at all.
Posted by: counting crows | August 26, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Amazing ad. LOL!!
Posted by: JA | August 26, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Another problem for McCain: Randy Scheunemann lobbied on behalf of terrorists getting guns.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 26, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
“He didn’t want to lead her on,”
Posted by: Belle Starr | August 26, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
Watch the mccain ads and you will see why obama choose biden if obama choose hillary LOOK AT THE MESS THE MCCAIN CAMPAIGN WOULD HAVE MADE OF THAT TICKET!!!!!!!!!!!!! I hope the hillary supporters will see how slimy mccain is to do that by mocking her and trying to tear up her party and the ads will BACKFIRE MCCAIN IS A SLIMEBALL!!!!!!!!!!!! HE IS NO MAVERICK HE LIED AND SAID HE WAS GONNA RUN A CLEAN CAMPAIGN BUT WHEN YOUR CAMPAIGN IS LOADED WITH BUSH AND KARL ROVE GOONS WHAT DO YOU EXPECT???????????
Posted by: angie | August 26, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am
It really cracks me up to listen to all the puppets on this board. I can’t decide which is more pathetic, those who pretend that there are any circumstances that they would vote for a Democratic candidate, or those who pretend that there are any circumstances under which they would vote for a black man. You 20% dead-enders ought to find some other hobby than politics, the rest of the nation has left you behind.
Posted by: Flash Override | August 26, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am
“Keep your friends close and enemies closer”
Obama blew it by not naming Hillary. Blew it big time. Blew it so big his judgement has to be questioned. If Hillary were on the ticket the race would be over.
Posted by: Sammy | August 26, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
Vanessa: Obama does not receive threats everyday and there were four people arrested with sniper rifles not one. I don’t know where you get your information from but its always wrong. And people interviewed on the network are not allowed to call candidates or their families the names you stated. Its not allowed.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | August 26, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
It is beginning to look like 16 more years of a Republican White house.
Posted by: Thinking | August 26, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Feb 2008, Good Morning America, Michele Obama says that he is not sure she will vote for Hillary clinton should she be the nominee.
How disgusting, how reprensible, how selfish.
Hillary should say the same thing about Michele’s husband. I know Hillary won’t do that, because she has so much class. I can not stand the thought of Michele as first lady, and her horrible husband in the white house. How embarassing for america.
Posted by: decentAmerican | August 26, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am
“The PUMAS aren’t the only Democrats who refuse to support Barack Obama. Some of us are not, and never were, Hillary Clinton supporters.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | August 26, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
More Clinton supporters will be outraged by Obama decision, knowing that Hillary wanted to be considered as VP. I assume the Obama camp excuse was “losing the independent voters”.
No surprisingly the latest Quinnipiac Polls in PA, OH, FL and CO show Barack Obama having troubles matching John Kerry 04 numbers(-XX)* among independent voters, and attracting Hillary Clinton supporters.
Pennsylvania: Obama 49% to McCain 42%
PA: Obama 48% (-10)* to McCain 38% among indep.
(PA: Kerry won 58% to 41% among indep.)
PA:Obama 60% to McCain 25% among Clinton supporters
Ohio: Obama 44 to McCain 43%
Ohio: Obama 42%(-17)* to McCain 38% among indep.
(OH: Kerry won 59% to 40 among indep.)
Ohio: Obama 63% to McCain 23% among Clinton supporters
Florida: McCain 47% to Obama 43%
Florida: Obama 39 (-18)* to McCain 47% among inde.
(FL: Kerry won 57% to 41% among indep.)
Florida: Obama 76% to McCain 14% among Clinton supporters
COLORADO: McCain 47% – Obama 46%
CO: Obama 46% (-6)* to McCain 44% among Independents
(CO: Kerry won 52% to 45% among indep.)
Losing more Hillary Clinton supporters after not picking her for VP, Barack Obama will have to match John Kerry numbers (-xx)* among independent voters to win in those states.
Posted by: Angel | August 26, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am
whine, Whine, WHINE.
This particular tool is not effective against superior political competition.
Haven’t you cynics figured it out yet?
First you say, he can’t beat Clinton in the primaries. HE DID
Then you say he won’t win the DNC nomination. HE DID
Now, they’re whining saying he won’t be POTUS. HE WILL.
A cynic never has anything of substance to say. Only rhetoric. With rhetoric as your only tool against substance, YOU WILL SURELY LOSE.
On top of that, cynics haven’t been right on anything for the past year and a half. Credibility is worth nothing more than a fleas test*****s. MINIMAL AT BEST.
POTUS OBAMA – ITS INEVITABLE
OBAMA/BIDEN- VICTORY IS INEVITABLE
Posted by: Nat Turner | August 26, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am
Well, PUMAs, if your gal had stolen the primary from the elected delegates, I wouldn’t be voting for her. No one I know would vote for her either. Including my GOP parents, who are voting for Obama (switched parties in the PA primary). So, I guess it’s all even-Steven, isn’t it? Luckily, we went with the one who the GOP didn’t salivate at the prospect of beating. Phew!
Posted by: squintz | August 26, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
“First you say, he can’t beat Clinton in the primaries. HE DID”
Posted by: Belle Starr | August 26, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am
It is up to Obama to make the case for his candidcay with Hillary Clinton’s supporters. Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden can’t do it for him. As an Illinois resident, I have had serious problems with his candicacy for a long time. He is the product of an increasingly corrupt democratic Chicago political system, and in all of his roles where he has been paid to display leadership, he simply never shows up = prefering instead to engage in activities that benefit him. Obama is not motivated at all to help any one other than himself and the details of his work history pretty much demonstrate that.
Posted by: Mary OK | August 26, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Sammy: You said it right. I am also mad because he didn’t pick Hillary but he doesn’t mind using her for his own benefit. He is the most underhanded, crooked candidate that this country ever had running for president. And he played dirty pool against the woman running against him for the senate, took her to court although he was wrong won the case. I sincerely hope McCain wins big against him and that the majority of Hillary’s voters for for McCain or write her name in on the ballot.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | August 26, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Anybody who believes Obama/Clinton would be a stronger ticket than Obama/Biden needs to seriously reconsider their assumption in light of the three ring media circus going on right now.
The Media is consumed by a Clinton not sitting on the front row – they have waited for this to happen since the mid 90s. They tried to break them in the mid 90s and they’re still not over it they failed. That after all their trumped up hysterics during the Lewinsky-saga, Bill Clinton’s approval rating actually went up instead of down. The media is not interested in reporting. The media is interested in creating soap opera’s.
The media have focussed their lasers on even the tiniest ray of light between Obama and Clinton as ‘proof’ of a huge ‘rift’ between them and in the DNC. This would not only have been THE focus of the entire presidential campaign reporting; this would have been their focus for their entire Administration.
Clinton wasn’t on Obama’s short-list, not because of Clinton, but because of the press.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 26, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
And he’s not likely to be President. So I guess they’re even.
Posted by: Mack | August 26, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Why has the country elected only two Democrats as President in the last 40 years? It’s very simple. The majority of the country is middle of the road, maybe a little bit to the right. The Democrats keep nominating very liberal candidates, too liberal for many Democrats. That’s why they lose. Democrats like me vote as Democrats for the Senate, Governor, etc. and we wind up voting Republican for President. Evan Bayh, Indiana, has said that he didn’t run for President because he’s too much of a centrist, and the activists in the Party always work to elect a liberal. That’s too bad, because as boring as he is, he would make a good president. And there’s no doubt in my mind that he’d be elected. Ordinary Democrats are hungry for a Democrat in the White House, and a Democratic Congress. That isn’t going to happen this time. I simply don’t understand why the ultra liberal wing of the Democratic Party doesn’t understand this. Centrist Democrats have a history of deserting the Party in favor of Republican candidates. How many times do we have to do it before the Democratic Party gets the message? RUN A CENTRIST DEMOCRAT INSTEAD OF A LEFT-WING SOCIALIST WANNABE, AND MIDDLE OF THE ROAD DEMOCRATS WILL SUPPORT THE PARTY.
Posted by: Reluctant McCain Dem | August 26, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am
OBAMA/BIDEN – ITS A LOCK
Posted by: Belle Starr | August 26, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am
And Clinton said not to vet her unless she was going to be VP.
Posted by: cincyr | August 26, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
Clearly the drama which dominates this election cycle is the Obama-Hillary thing. If Hillary got the VP nod that would be the big story. Because Hillary didn’t get the nod, that is the big story. Of those two story lines only one excites and unites. Obama went with the negative story line. The choice of Biden is dwarfed by the non-choice/snub of Hillary.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | August 26, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
I would like to ask the clinton supporters what foreign policy experience does she have that joe biden doesnt Biden has way more experience than hillary clinton he even has more than mccain
Posted by: angie | August 26, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Mary OK: You are so right. I live in Chicago, born and raised here and I know all about City Hall and its crooked politicians. He is a member of that group that’s why Daley endorsed him. It wouldn’t amaze me if their voting machines were rigged. I watched the convention last night and it was a total disaster. The sad story that Michele told about how she and Obama had to work their way thru. Give me a break. Obama’s grandmother put him thur college, he never had to work. She had a good job. His mother was never poor she had a good education. I read his BIO in the NYT months back and it told how he disliked his mother’s race from a young boy.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | August 26, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am
Jake-
Why is none of the Main Stream Media reporting on the fact that a high profile PA attorney Berg is suing Obama and the DNC, claiming that Obama cannot prove he was born in Hawaii and thus cannot be President? Seemingly, this is an important case, and I am wondering why it is hard to find some facts about it.
Posted by: Just Wondering | August 26, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am
It makes sense why Obama didn’t pick Clinton. If Obama picked Clinton he would have a problem, since many have seen those ad’s using Clintons words against Obama she could be viewed as hypocritical for being on the ticket of a person she so often criticized. Also several Clinton supporters may believe that if Clinton was good enough to be VP why isn’t she going to be President, after all people generally believe she is more qualified so why make the qualified person number two?
Basically, the talk about Clinton needs to end and the media is doing its fair share to make the democratic party look and possibly be more divided then it truly is. And for those angry Clinton supporters who say they will vote for John McCain. I ask you, why would you vote for the party that is the opposite what Hilary Clinton stood for? If you truly are fans and dir
Posted by: Dan | August 26, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
Had Hillary been handed the nomination by the SuperD’s (as Obama was) she would have been strongarmed by the DNC to put Obama in the VP slot. But then she wouldn’t have had to have been strongarmed – she’s smart enough to know that having him as the VP would have been the right move to make to unify the party and ensure a Democrat victory in November.
Obama continues to show poor judgment.
Posted by: marylou | August 26, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
It makes sense why Obama didn’t pick Clinton. If Obama picked Clinton he would have a problem, since many have seen those ad’s using Clintons words against Obama she could be viewed as hypocritical for being on the ticket of a person she so often criticized. Also several Clinton supporters may believe that if Clinton was good enough to be VP why isn’t she going to be President, after all people generally believe she is more qualified so why make the qualified person number two?
Basically, the talk about Clinton needs to end and the media is doing its fair share to make the democratic party look and possibly be more divided then it truly is. And for those angry Clinton supporters who say they will vote for John McCain. I ask you, why would you vote for the party that is the opposite what Hilary Clinton stood for? If you truly are fans and die hard supporters you won’t go against the beliefs and ideas that Hilary Clinton stands for.
Posted by: Dan | August 26, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
geevill, you’re exactly right – Gallop tied for second day and Rasmussen tied too. But I’m sure Obama isn’t worried, since he said of Hillary’s supporters, “They’ll get over it.” Maybe he should have done something to help with that – sending the VP text message at 3 a.m. was a typical Obama passive-agressive move – but didn’t do much to unify the party.
Posted by: marylou | August 26, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
dl: At least one thing is for sure Bush and Cheney do not use the speeches of other’s because they know what to say on the platform. No so with Obama, he used the speeches of RFK,JFK & MLK. He wants to make history like MLK so bad he can taste it. And the DNC is responsible for Hillary’s loss due to the fact that Nancy doublecrossed her with the superdelegates. That is fact based. Now they want MI and FL to be seated because he is the nominee. For Hillary they would not do it and gave some of her delegates to Obama so she would lose. I hope everthing backfires for all of them.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | August 26, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
Marianne you say you hope mcain wins and you claim to support hillary so i guess its ok mccain laughed when someone called hillary the B word its ok he joked about chelsea clinton being ugly thats ok with clinton supporters GOES TO SHOW YOU HAVE REAL RESPECT FOR HILLARY AND HER DAUGHTER!!!!!! SHAME ON YOU CLINTON SUPPORTERS!!
Posted by: angie | August 26, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
Nat Turner: Don’t be too sure. 47% of Hillary’s voters are not voting for Obama but for McCain. And if he doesn’t win those battleground states he is a loser. Many of the voters in those states may still be mad because he didn’t pick Hillary and I think Caroline Kennedy and Ted Kennedy had a lot to do with it along with Nancy Pelosi. I can’t wait until Obama and McCain start their campaigning.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | August 26, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
Russian tanks and an Iranian missile in the ad. Getting us ready for a McCain presidency?
Like Pat Buchanan said, John McCain “will make Cheney look like Gandhi”.
Posted by: cincyr | August 26, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am
Why do Obama supporters make the charge that Hillary voters who support McCain are doing so out of spite? We only have two choices:
A candidate with no experience or proven record who doesn’t do too well without a written speech and who makes vague promises of “change”.
Or a moderate straight-shooting proven leader of 25 years who has reached across the aisle many times on behalf of the American people.
I’m choosing the candidate who walks the walk over the one who simply talk, talk, talks!
Posted by: marylou | August 26, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am
Cynics your so worried about polls well your gramps mccain has been in senate 26 years very well known why tied with obama shouldnt he be blowing obama away at this point dont get too excited cynics!!!!
Posted by: angie | August 26, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
mccain better pick liberman for vp everyone knows hes dumb he needs someone to whisper in his ear since the man cant remember gets confused oh and Im hoping mccain does pick liberman maybe limbaugh will od
Posted by: angie | August 26, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am
“no respect” – remember these words?
hillary clinton is not fit to be president and here are the reasons why she dosent play fair she lies shes horrible with money shes fake she flip flops and the list goes on and dont get me wrong me being a woman i would love to see a woman president but not her not now not ever hillary is to weak
Posted by angie Jun 24, 2008 2:45:17 PM
am a woman who did not support hillary and im glad she did not win look at the example she set for woman making us look like sore losers having fits when we dont get our way she really did not set good examples for us woman not to mention shes horrible with money just think if she were president the debt we would be in
hillary will never get my vote and alot others in 2012 and you can all take that to the bank remember hill fans obama has alot of supporters too!!!
Posted by angie Jun 24, 2008 2:23:14 PM
PUMA!
Posted by: LeeLee07 | August 26, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
hopesprings52: you do know what the storyline would have been had Hillary been given the slot, do you? Or are you really that naive?
The storyline would have been: “Hillary strongarmed Obama in giving her the slot”; “Obama afraid of denying Hillary the slot”; “Who will be President? Barack? Or Hillary?”; “Hillary the new Cheney?”
It would have gone for days on end and Obama would have to answer questions for days and weeks and months and years on end about how they were getting along.
The rest of the campaign and the rest of the administration would have been ONE LONG MEDIA SOAP OPERA.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 26, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Hillary caused the current derangement among her supporters by pretending she had a chance after March, when Obama won 11 primaries in a row. In reality, the race was over by then, and only the superdelegates’ refusal to flood to Obama kept it close. So no, Hillary had no right to hope to be on the ticket after she caused so much dissension for her personal ambition. I hope all her supporters enjoy McCain’s replacement of Ginsberg and Stevens with more Scalia clones.
Posted by: Bill | August 26, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Angie: Lieberman can throw rings around Obama when it comes to common sense. Obama couldn’t even win a debate and failed on that interview with the forum for his dumb answers. And that first night convention was a total disaster. Highly disorganized. I hate to see the second and third night. Michele Obama is just a fair speaker. Obama tries to speak like MLK. Everything is copy work with Obama. When is he going to use his brains.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | August 26, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am
I don’t think so. The landslide will be Obama going over the side and trying to climb back up but falling again. For a Harvard graduate he is as dumb as they come. The only way he can get what he wants is to play dirty pool on someone else and he already that to the woman running against him. I saw the whote story on TV. He ruined that woman. We all know he is underhanded, rotten and uses people to get what he wants. You know it but don’t want to admit it.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | August 26, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am
Barack obama gets 85 percent of woman votes woman are not stupid they no mccain is a disgrace to woman WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU ABOUT THAT SLIME not to mention his wife beating jokes!!!!!!!!
Posted by: angie | August 26, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
Obama will never unify the democrat party because there will be a percentage of people that will not vote for him. The best thing to do is if all 100% of Hillary’s voters were to vote McCain Obama would lose big and send him back to the senate. I am hoping at least 60% vote McCain. Now, if New York, New Jersey, California, Texas and Arizona all vote for McCain and shun Obama McCain will have it made. Don’t go by the polls, voters make the choice. Some polls are inflated to make it looke like Obama is far ahead of McCain but that is not so. They are running 47 to 47%. They are tied. That’s the good news. Now all McCain has to do is go ahead of Obama.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | August 26, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Obama and Michelle look down at all of us including the Clintons. Only people they like are Ayers, Rev. Wright, etc.
Wake up people. I crossed over and will vote for McCain. I have a boy in Iraq. He told me I’d better not vote for Obama. He isn’t who people think he is.
Where is his real Birth Certificate by the way???
Posted by: Dean | August 26, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
marylou, 9/11 changed everything, remember?
McCain was a moderate before 9/11. After that he has become one of the scariest politicians around. He doesn’t give a crap about you or about any American for that matter, only about your vote. He only cares about getting even with the rest of the world for what ‘they’ have ‘done’ to him. He wants revenge.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 26, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Vanessa,
I guess you didn’t see those comments Biden made basically mocking Obama for being naive.
Trust me, they’ll come out the night Biden speaks.
Posted by: JA | August 26, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
Willem von Oranje,
Playing the politics of fear again. What else to expect from Obama supporters other than hypocrisy.
Posted by: JA | August 26, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
lee lee
so thats nothing compared to mccain laughing at the b word i just said i would not support her i didnt call he names and i didnt say anything about her daughter I spoke truth about the way she ran her campaign she ran a horrible one but mccains comments are a little more harsh but thats ok i guess that people like you dont care like i said REAL NICE SUPPORTERS SHE HAS!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: angie | August 26, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
Nat Turner: Just to show you how bad the convention was last night, all they needed was the elephants there because his convention is a three ring circus. The networks were talking about what a disaster it was. Of course he might win the election but he will be president in name only Biden will be running the country because he has more brains than Obama and is ten times smarter. The networks stated that Obama failed in poitics. A high school graduate knows more than he does. I certainly would like to see his grades. I believe they pushed him thru to get rid of him.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | August 26, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Obama has already conceded the presidency to Biden before he won the election.
Both arrogant and humble at the same time. LOL!!
Posted by: JA | August 26, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
PUMA! 9 million Voters and counting, coming to the polls with You!
Posted by: LeeLee07 | August 26, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Yeh, right, “did not want to lead her on”. More like, let her think she’s still a possibility so she’ll like me, adore me, worship me, like all the rest of my blind sheep.
Posted by: Emm | August 26, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Obama/Biden = Bush/Cheney in Dems’ version…
Posted by: S.O.S | August 26, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
The Democratic National Convention has convened to nominate Barack Obama. Can we move on here?
Posted by: Larry | August 26, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
The Democratic National Convention has convened to nominate Barack Obama. Can we move on here?
Posted by: Larry | August 26, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
Ignorance is bliss!! I guess your supposed to be struggling all of your life and not build wealth for your children’s lives to be easier, how dare I get good grades in school and go to college and get my degrees and work my way up the ladder and make wise investments and build a legacy for my children. How dare I leave that wealth to them and they grow it and pass it on to my Grandchildren and their future children. How dare I do that in the United States of America Land of the Free? How dare me, when there are others that chose other paths and did not succeed the way that I did. How dare I have these things when others don’t, how dare I be branded because I played the game right. How dare me be a rich person in the United States of America, how dare me!! It’s only the land of the free, the land that millions come to every year for an opportunity, the land where thousands die trying to get a small piece of the pie. How dare me be successful and leave a legacy for my family.
Posted by: Kim | August 26, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
HILLARY AT VP WOULD NOT WORK, HILLARY WANTED TO BE PRESIDENT. WHY WOULD SHE WANT TO BE THE 2ND BANANNA? I BELIEVE SHE WOULD BE MUCH MORE EFFECTIVE AS A SENATOR OR A CABINET MEMBER. AS DEMOCRAT’S, WE NEED TO STAND UNITED & WIN THIS ELECTION. ONLY THE RIDICULOUS SO-CALLED LIGHTWIEGHT DEMOCRATS WILL BE FOOLISH ENOUGH TO VOTE FOR MCCAIN AND KEEP OUR COUNTRY IN TOTAL DISPAIR FOR THE NEXT FOUR YEARS.
Posted by: NE MOM | August 26, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
Why is it the lower Obama’s numbers sink, the more desperate and hateful his supporters become? You’d think they were worried or something!
America will reject Barack Obama. He simply isn’t ready to lead.
Posted by: marylou | August 26, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Yes Kim. I know where you come from. It’s your own fault when one of your children gets stricken with disease and puts you out business because the insurance does not cover her healthcare costs. It’s that simpel is it? It’s your own fault, is it?
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 26, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Personally, I would have loved to have seen Hillary in the White Hosue, even as VP. Oh well, maybe next time.
Jen
Posted by: Jennifer West | August 26, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
Emm “More like, let her think she’s still a possibility so she’ll like me, adore me, worship me, like all the rest of my blind sheep.”
Ah, what lovely sentiments. And you are accusing Obama and his supporters of treating you badly?
Or are you one of the many republicans posing as democrats? Because, you know, when combining all these proclaimed Hillary-backers on these boards had actually voted or caucused for Hillary in the primaries, she should have won in a landslide?
But Hillary still has a chance to be VP. I hear McCain is vetting her.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 26, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
More bad news for Obama during his own convention after not picking Hillary Clinton as VP as per Gallup:
“Gallup Poll Daily tracking from Aug. 23-25, the first three-day period falling entirely after Obama’s Saturday morning vice presidential announcement, shows 46% of national registered voters backing John McCain and 44% supporting Obama, not appreciably different from the previous week’s standing for both candidates. This is the first time since Obama clinched the nomination in early June, though, that McCain has held any kind of advantage over Obama in Gallup Poll Daily tracking.”
Posted by: Angel | August 26, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
My favorite Hillary line–I’m paraphrasing.
I have experience, Senator McCain brings a lifetime of experience, and Obama gave a speech in 2002.
How true–Obama has absolutely nothing that qualifies him to be president.
Posted by: riley | August 26, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Obama’s rediculous self-serving Berlin speech was the beginning of his downfall in the polls.
America saw an egomaniac. And will see him again in front of 75,000 on Thursday.
Posted by: cindy in nc | August 26, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
So McCain is still intent on the tactic of siphoning off Democratic votes by using a Democrat to attack a Democrat. It would bother me more if it made sense.
Posted by: kat | August 26, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Hillary has been awesome in campaigning for Bozo. Had the tables been turned he’d be back home doing something for him….it’s all about HIM.
Hillary was campaigning for him when he was bodysurfing in Hawaii. Maybe he’ll ask her to clean his windows next.
MILLIONS OF US HILLARY SUPPORTRES FOR McCAIN!!!!! DEAL WITH IT. SEVERAL PUNDIDTS ON CABLE NEWS SAID IT WAS A BIG MISTAKE….ELECTION WOULD HAVE BEEN HIS IF HE PUT HILLARY ON AS VP. So glad he didn’t, couldn’t have voted for him even with my hero Hillary on boardd.
McCain ’08/Hillry ’12
Posted by: Debra | August 26, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
Americans don’t like politicans posing as rock stars with their rock star endorsements. Grown up will vote McCain!
Posted by: Debra | August 26, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
She D I D win in the primaries….. it was the crooked caucuses which did her dirty.
But, mr. tangerine, Obama’s set to tank….. and it won’t be long til the message rings true!
Posted by: be careful what you wish for | August 26, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
hillary ruined her chances for the presidency. she’ll never have the support among democrats. she would have to burn more bridges again. who else is left?
Posted by: kravitz | August 26, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
Hillary, the legitimate nominee. Why should she accept second place and who cares if he considered her, many of us are still not voting for someone who stole the election, period.
Obama better milk his current power trip, ’cause it’s not going to last very long. His political career is finished. He’s flash. A footnote for history books on the usurpation of power, maybe not even that.
Posted by: hype bites | August 26, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
The time for complaining about the primary process would have been before the process began, not after you come up short. Obama played by the established rules and won, nothing unfair or sinister to it, accept the facts.
Posted by: fool me once | August 26, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Willem:
Yes, I posted like 2 months ago, lol, that McCain’s fail safe bet would be to VP Hillary.
Posted by: Emm | August 26, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
Hillary was the next in line to be nominated for President of the Democratic party and Obama stepped out of line I dont care how you spin it he just did … he lied about the Clinton recoed… I know he did because I was there.. and Obama picked Biden because he would suck up to him and now Mccain is ahead of Obama go figure… I dont think she will do it but Clinton should consider being Mccains running mate…. alot has been said soley by Obamaphiles that will prevent the party from healing itself I say do away with the Democratic party… it doesnt reperesent 52 percent of its registrants now!
Posted by: thinkingdem | August 26, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
None of them have the expeince to be president.It is indeed a on the job training.But they surround themselves with the best whiz’s America can provide.Even a idiot can be president as Gerald Ford and Jimmt Carter have shown us .
Posted by: orangecat | August 26, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
A dozen or so of some of Hillary’s top supporters are not sticking around for Nobama’s speech Thurs. Can’t say I blame them. I hope Hill flys out of there too, right after Bill’s speech Wed.
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN!
Posted by: DLM | August 26, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
Why doesn’t anyone get when Hillary supporters feel a candidate is a threat to this great country….WE WILL NOT VOTE FOR HIM.
You do have to have some dues to pay on the way to the WH….just because of your skin color it shouldn’t be handed to you.
Gotta earn it!
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN!
Posted by: DLM | August 26, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
I cannot wait until Obama loses to McCain in the fall so that the Clintons and all of their supporters can say, I TOLD YOU SO! I will be so glad to see that Chicago thug go back to where he came from and I hope he never has a chance to run for a big office again. He has such an inflated ego about himself! However, the one great thing he did for the women voters, by bashing Hillary Clinton at every opportunity he had, was he ignited the fire. We are mobilized and are staying organized so that we will have our voices heard loud and clear from now on. We were a ragtag group initially but now count among us, corporate heads, black people, babyboomer women, blue collar workers, etc. and we are ready to go and will NEVER drop our guard again and expect the party that we ALWAYS have supported in the past, to protect us from within our own party. Everyone is suspect now, not just the other party, but our own Democrat party because of the abuse they allowed Hillary Clinton to withstand at the hands of that Illinois thug Obama! WE WILL NEVER FORGET THAT THEY ALLOWED THIS TO HAPPEN! They had to have given him the green light to bash the Clintons because no one stopped it, NO ONE!! Perhaps the next time a woman runs people will remember this election and will treat her the way they would want to be treated, fairly. What kind of a society do we live in when a woman can be bashed and insulted and many people, including my own kind;women, think there is nothing wrong with that. And, people simply blow it off and say, Hey, that’s politics. Yet, if we evened the playing field and allowed Hillary to say any kind of derrogatory comment she wanted about Obama’s race, WHICH SHE NEVER WOULD DO, she would be crucified. Talk about double standards! It is disgusting! And, I am ashamed of any woman who supports Obama and I am ashamed of my party for treating my gender like it was open season on it, and I am ashamed of the majority of delegates who happened to be women,who turned their backs on Hillary Clinton. I hope they are all happy now. I am so proud of the Clinton supporters! Hang tough and don’t give up and don’t give in!
Posted by: Mary Anne | August 26, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
I don’t care how passionate Hillary Clinton was this evening at the convention. WE WILL NEVER GIVE OUR VOTE TO BARRACK OBAMA! NEVER! Instead of saying we needed to unite she should have pointed her finger at the Democratic party who allowed Obama to bash her constantly during the primary season. They are the ones responsible for the disharmony and the disunity. We will be voting for John MCCain in November. I don’t know if they twisted her arm behind her back and/or dangled her future political career in front of her like a carrot, but it does not make any difference to us. We are voting for John McCain, campaigning for John McCain and will win with John McCain in November. I don’t understand how Senator Clinton, or anyone else for that matter, can say Obama is going to do this and he is going to that when he has such a small amount of history and accomplishments behind him. You wouldn’t have an inexperienced plumber work on your pipes, or an inexperienced electrician rewire your house, so why should we believe that this inexperienced man is capable of such lofty achievements? Tell it to Mother Goose because as far as we are concerned it is just another Obama fairytale! And, it is just another brick in the wall dividing this party. We were not in the campaign simply for Hillary Clinton. We were in the campaign for everything that she embodies and because of everything that Obama lacks in comparison to her. So, give us a break! We will vote for who we want to vote for and we don’t care what anyone says, etc. Good luck with the next 4 years of another Republican administration and remember to thank that thug Obama, his Obama zombies and the Democratic heads who are the biggest gasbags around. Go back to Illinois Senator Obama because you are not our President, will never be our President even if you are elected President, and will NEVER have the admiration and the respect that Bill and Hillary Clinton have in the USA.
Posted by: Mary Anne | August 26, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
“I Didn’t Mean To Turn You On” was a hit for Cherrelle, and produced by Jimmy Jam and Terry Lewis before it was ever a hit for Robert Palmer.
Like those blues songs covered by rock acts, I can understand why you phrased it this way though.
For the record, it was issued on Hillary Clinton supporter Clarence Avant’s Tabu Records. You recall the folks who were suing to make Hillary the nominee. He was one of those elitist millionaires.
FYI.
Posted by: kravitz | August 27, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am
oops. avant and friends were not suing the dnc. just withholding their donations if hillary was not the nom. may as well make that clearer.
Posted by: kravitz | August 27, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am
>>> Mary Anne | Aug 26, 2008 11:21:02 PM
_____—
Hear Hear!
What an amazing speech!
What an amazing woman!
And not ONE mistake in her magnificent presentation!
Quelle magnifique!
Posted by: hmmmmm | August 27, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am
A Hillary supporter’s vote for John McCain is a slap in the face… NO MATTER HOW YOU LOOK AT IT or what sort of twisted logic you use to back it up. If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck then it’s a duck… If you’d rather forego the issues at stake and place your vote for another four years of republican rule – well then simply stated – You’re an Idiot… and your voter’s registration card should be revoked on account of you being an idiot.
Posted by: So DISGUSTED | August 27, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am
I am a Jeffersonian Democrat. I am a centrist or perhaps even moderate to conservative democrat. There used to be a lot of us in the democratic party until the DNC ran us off. I believe in state rights, fiscal accountability and a strong military. I vote for democrats in local and state elections. I am a well-educated woman and Hillary supporter who will not be happy until the glass ceiling is busted. I will vote for McCain if he puts a woman or a pro-choicer on his ticket for VP. If I end up voting democrat as a last resort, it will not be because I support Obama. The fact is I just don’t like the guy and am not going to be bullied by liberal democrats to vote for him. How many elections do democrats have to lose for the party to realize all democrats are not left wing liberals.
Posted by: Penny | August 27, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
Actually over the past two nights with the Clinton’s speaking and something Hillary said :
Were you in it for me or were you in it for the lady who had cancer, the marine or the lady with the minimum wage job.
I may hold my nose and vote for Obama in November.
Posted by: J | August 28, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am
What a splendid strategy for garnering support amongst disaffected Clintonites: chastise them for being bitter and puerile as if they haven’t come to their conclusions based on REAL and SUBSTANTIVE reasons.
Maybe you can reach to new heights with the “transcendent” politics of change and employ some Chicago thuggery so we will all fall in line and buy a “Secret” DVD, “if you believe in it enough, it will come true!”
My party is populated by intellectual midgets, i.e. what has happened to American education when they nominate a man who has spent TWENTY YEARS and right up until the bitter end seeking advice from a hate monger?
Truly, I am ashamed of “my” party.
Posted by: jvsp | August 28, 2008, 5:18 am 5:18 am
Penny,
How much difference is there between Obama and Hillary on policies? On health care, HRC is a little more liberal since she wants a mandate. On Iraq, Obama is a little more liberal since he advocated a slightly faster withdrawal plan, but both of them were more conservative than the rest of the Dem field (cf. Edwards, Richardson, Kucinich) on this issue. On women’s issues, including abortion, eduction, etc., HRC takes typical liberal positions. On fiscal responsibility it’s unclear whether there would be much difference between them (but either would be much better than McCain, who intends to follow the same irresponsible policies of Bush that created the huge deficit in the first place). On free trade, HRC was more liberal and populist, and Obama just followed her lead to avoid losing votes in Ohio. They had the same opinions about immigration, too. The only other differences that I can recall were on Iran, where HRC was somehwat more bellicose and less diplomatic, and gas tax relief, a purely pandering move that is irrelevant to the presidency (since the proposal only would’ve applied to this year) and according to HRC would’ve been combined with a windprofits tax, a most decidely liberal idea. Oh, and HRC took the more liberal stance on telecom immunity this summer, too.
If you think Obama is too liberal, why on earth were you supporting Hillary?
Posted by: Malcolm | August 28, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am
I Admire Hillary and Bill. I don’t like Barak and Michelle. It is really that simple. The Farakhan, Weatherman, and Chicago mob connection are also of concern. I don’t feel Obama is as smart or as seasoned as Hillary. She is bright, articulate and she is not a quitter. Financially, I will fare much better under McCain. The only other republican presidential candidate I voted for was Reagan and I thought he was a GREAT President. I am not going to judge McCain because of the Bush/Cheney/Rumsfield/Rove Presidency. Things would have been differenct with James Baker, Brent Scrowcroft, McCain and other Republicans. The W. Legacy is about W. not the Republican Party. There are good people in both parties. And, after this election, I will have to re-examine why I am a registered democrat. The last hold out from a large family of traditional democrats. most of whom live in Oklahoma, Texas, and Colorado, that are now registered republicans. I have a Bachelor’s and Master’s in Political Science. I have worked in the federal government in both the military and law enforcement for 30 years. I have fought the glass ceiling my entire career and have earned the respect for my opinion. I understand why some will vote for Obama, but at this time I am not persuaded. I’d rather see what McCain, a war veteran whom I respect for serving his country, can do to clean up the W. mess. If he fails, which I imagine he will, Hillary or a more capable centrist democrat may be able to pull us out in 2012. I don’t expect Obama to win this election. I live in Maryland now and MD will go for OBAMA so, my vote won’t really matter. I think Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania and all of the south will fall to McCain. I think that will be enough electoral votes for McCain to win the nomination.
Posted by: Penny | August 28, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am