By Kate Barrett

Aug 29, 2008 7:27am

Obama’s Speech, By the Numbers

Uses of the word "America" or "American" — 52

Duration, in minutes — 44

Mentions of the word "work" — 35

Mentions of specific policy proposals — 35

Mentions of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., by name — 21

Mentions of George W. Bush — 8

Mentions of George W. Bush during John Kerry’s 2004 speech — 2

Mentions of George W. Bush during Al Gore’s 2000 speech — 0

Mentions of the word "change" — 16

Mentions of troops or veterans — 7

Allusions to Hurricane Katrina – 1

– Jake Tapper and Jonathan Greenberger

User Comments

It’s always about a speech for Obama, who is ridicously short on experience.He is full of rhetoric and good at readapting other candidates ideas. For his use of the term “American”, he spent 20 years in Jeremiah Wright’s church..The same place where they spawned hate-filled, Anti-American speech. Funny, that was not shown on his warm and fuzzy video last night.

Posted by: stan | August 29, 2008, 7:54 am 7:54 am

Great Speech …

Posted by: HC4BO | August 29, 2008, 7:55 am 7:55 am

As an American I could not have been more proud of this country. Despite all the predictions of doom and gloom the DNC has firmly put the ball in the GOP’s court. They were wrong about the DNC’s ability to come together, and they will be proven wrong about a president Obama.

Posted by: MIMS NJ | August 29, 2008, 7:55 am 7:55 am

Experience got us into the crap we are in right now …
It’s time for good judgment and temperament …
Democrats ’08 …

Posted by: HC4BO | August 29, 2008, 7:57 am 7:57 am

funny
to see repubs …actually and literally jealous.
lol
the first time in a long time we actually have someone who is making so much sense
and who speaks so much to the best character of our country running for President
and all they can do is make fun of it.
why don’t you just make fun of all of the American flags that stood flying in people’s hands last night.
or the fact that 40,000 of those people got registered to vote last night and had to promise to volunteer for a week just to get in.
lol
JUST FROM the swing state of COLORADO ALONE
and now it’s on the repub side it’s down to
The Trust Fund Baby ticket….
Mccain Romney
or
The Pray He Doesn’t Have a Heart Attack Ticket
Mccain Palin.

Posted by: dl | August 29, 2008, 8:01 am 8:01 am

Typical Obama speech – lots of rhetoric, no substance. Outlined a dozen things he is going to do, but not word ONE on how he plans to accomplish these goals. No specifics – the thing Hillary had in abundance. Loft rhetoric, typical class warfare drivel. I was not impressed. Still Carrie, Still a Dem, Still Voting McCain.

Posted by: Carrie | August 29, 2008, 8:11 am 8:11 am

We are not Republicans either. The DNC’s glitz and phony unity has not changed my mind about voting for McCain.

Posted by: stan | August 29, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am

People constantly make the experience argument, but actually the US is pretty good at electing inexperienced people. Carter had 1 term as Governor of Georgia- oh but President Carter was a failure. Ok Wilson had only served one term as Governor of New Jersey. But he didn’t do that much really, accept take the US into an unpopular war. Ok then FDR had only served one term as Governor of New York, and led the country through depression and war, and almost out the other side. But they are all Democrats. Ok Teddy Roosevelt had only served a term as Governor of New York, and barely a year as VP. Oh but they are all executive jobs. Ok then Abraham Lincoln served 1 term in the House of Representatives, 8 years in the Illinois state senate.
It really isn’t about experienced or inexperienced. Its about who has the best ideas to move the country forward. And that is Barack Obama.

Posted by: markymark | August 29, 2008, 8:16 am 8:16 am

While Barack Obama will talk about his plans to tax the ‘rich’ and cut taxes on the middle class, he will not say that his record includes voting for higher taxes 94 times and voting for a tax increase on those making just $42,000 per year.”

Posted by: rockthebleachers | August 29, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am

It really doesn’t matter to me who wins but I would hope that the new President would make every effort to ramp down the deficit spending. Both Bush and Congress share in the blame for this real threat to America’s survival.

Posted by: Bigguy | August 29, 2008, 8:24 am 8:24 am

So, if time spent in a Church of Christ has bad effects…
You must think time as a POW made McCain a twisted person with a very bad temper? Bad stuff happens in prison camps…you think?
j/k how utterly silly.

Posted by: Nina | August 29, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am

If experience got us where we are today, I’ll take a chance on the Obama. I’m not sure how much more Republican “expertise” this country can take.

Posted by: Leroy | August 29, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am

MarkyMark, you make a great point about experience with nice examples of past presidents. However, I still can’t apply that to Obama. Moving this country involves someone who is a true visionary. There is nothing in Obama’s political past that indicates he is such a person. Additionally, he has surrounded himself with the left-most wing of the party heads as Biden, Pelosi, Reid, Kennedy, Kerry and Company. So, how exactly will we move forward in this country if we “recycle” extreme liberal policies that have failed in the past?

Posted by: stan | August 29, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am

He had no flesh to put on the bones. There were no economic speicifics.
He’ll get us off oil in ten years? Someone needs to tell him that he won’t be princess,er, President in ten years.

Posted by: drjohn | August 29, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am

Paid sick days for everyone?
If you own a business you know what colossally stupid and costly that is.

Posted by: drjohn | August 29, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am

and how is Obama going to eliminate our use of fossil fuel in 10 years? Dumb and dumber strike again.

Posted by: geevill | August 29, 2008, 8:36 am 8:36 am

WoW. I didn’t think Obama had it in him. It’s expected of Obama to always give a great sppech but last night it was more then just a speech.
He laid out his plan and vision for America on all the major the issues. He then went into specifics how he would bring about these solution. He struck a moderate tone when speaking of gay marriages, abortions, and guns. He took swipes at McCain without coming off negative. And then he gave his stump speech; rousing the group.
This was indeed Obama’s best speech. He exceeded expectations and possibly just won the presidency after last night.

Posted by: Vanessa | August 29, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am

Back in the primaries, people made fun of Hillary Clinton and her tedious, boring monologues on specific policy proposals and how she would go about achieving them. People loved Obama’s loft rhetoric and calls for Change! Now Change, change, change is getting old, old, old. Don’t tell me there isn’t some buyer’s remorse going on in Denver. I know better. The Democrats made the wrong choice, and they know it. But it’s too late now.

Posted by: JB in St. Louis | August 29, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am

Carrie go for it,you could not be more wrong…….If they get in remember who the hey you voted for when you bi— about the same ole crap…..

Posted by: indp voter | August 29, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am

The word is that McCain is going with some woman that is the Gov. of Alaska.
Talk about LAME.
This guy doesn’t stand a chance.

Posted by: Debra | August 29, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am

If you believe in Telecom immunity, If you think Roberts was a great choice for the supreme court, If you think the bankruptcy reform was needed, If you believe that the Cheney Energy bill was excellent…
the vote 4 Obama/Biden~

Posted by: trettion | August 29, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am

Bottom Line: Osama is in this for himself – not you, not me – HIM!
Now where do you think the money will come from to make him a hero as President when he starts giving paid sick days to all, feebies, giveaways, help to the poor and urban masses of unemployed?
Why from YOU, of course. You will be taxed to death and he will shine on for another term.

Posted by: Chadsford | August 29, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am

geevill-You would have said that about Kennedy when he had a bold vision to put a man on the moon in 10 years too. Was he “dumb?”

Posted by: JP | August 29, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am

Watching that speech last night made me wish I was 18 years old again. Obama promises free college tuition, free health care, free head start for my kids, robust Social Security for my parents, government investments in science projects, no more dependency on Middle East oil (notice he didn’t say foreign, since the vast majority of our oil imports come from Canada and Mexico), electric cars, great public schools, strengthened relations with friends and foes alike, nuclear disarmament and on and on.
Wow, what a list. I will admit this is the first time I’ve listened to any of his speeches in its entirety. I’ve never listed to a McCain speech in its entirety, either. All I can say is, who actually believes this stuff? There’s no such thing as a free lunch, someone is paying somewhere. And by the way, show me where in the Constitution it says any of these programs are the responsibility of the government, i.e. taxpayers? Who is going to pay?
Answer: Me. I’m in my mid 40′s and work hard, supporting a family of five. Doing OK for a guy who graduated high school with $100 and an 11 year old Ford Torino. I don’t believe for one second that my taxes won’t go up to pay for all this “change”, not to mention whether any of this stuff is good for America or not. I can understand why teenagers get swept away by this sort of unbridled idealism, but adults?
Jimmy Carter, part deux, here we come!

Posted by: Woody | August 29, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am

Obama said he knows the cave where Bid Laden is living. He attacked McCain for not going to the cave himself. Why doesn’t Obama go there if he knows?

Posted by: geevill | August 29, 2008, 8:48 am 8:48 am

I am waiting for Obama to make good on his promise to debate McCain “anytime, any place”.
He promised that during the primaries and backed out.
I say 1 town hall debate every week until the election.
no glitz, no glamor, no fire works, no bands……just real answers to the questions without all the double speak.
It is something I would like to see before I make up my mind.

Posted by: undecided voter | August 29, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am

Some Food for Thought
Obama has few credentials or qualifications to be President, however, the emotional investment in Barack Obama’s victory by the black community is overwhelming—they do not care if he is too inexperienced, a radical with dubious and uncertain associations and baggage. To question his core beliefs is offensive to those marching to his beat. But what happens if all the “hype” finally ends in disappointment? What if John McCain wins the Election? Most Americans want the most experienced person to run the country, not someone “green”. They know the dangers lurking to protect our “freedoms”. Obama stated in his speech – 8 years is enough, which is sort of ironic because it was the last 8 years that made him a millionaire. Michelle Obama stated in her speech “The American Dream endures” and yet the core belief of the Democratic Party is that America is broken and everything needs to be changed. So what happens when the “fizz” wears off and the American people reject Obama’s image of a broken America, an America that needs to apologize to the world for being so successful. Many believe there will be a deepening of racial division, maybe riots and that America’s racist past will surface and all the work and efforts of many like that of Martin L. King would be lost. Who will be held accountable? The Democratic Party did not find an experienced, knowledgeable or qualified candidate, and painted this image of “change”, and a broken America, an image that makes America look foolish and diminutive to the rest of the world. Or can the blame be put on the arrogant young inexperienced man who’s “reach for power” overshadowing judgment to protect a nation.

Posted by: Ann | August 29, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

@JP: It was Von Braun’s vision; it was Kennedy’s speech. It was America’s money.
Try not to rewrite history too much for the purpose of a candidacy. When a country loses its true history for political correctness, it gives up its one anchor to reality.

Posted by: len | August 29, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am

Once again Obama challenges McCain to debate anytime. (Just like he did with Clinton,but chicken out when called ou ton it). Obama the big talker when on stage in front of a rock concert crowd. Obama a gutless wimp when facing someone one to one.

Posted by: geevill | August 29, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am

JP, JFK would be considered too conservative to be part of today’s Democratic party. The space race was as much a military endeavor as a source of national pride, make no mistake about it. When Sputnik went up the US immediately fell behind in the communications and spying war. JFK knew a mission to the moon would by default place the US ahead of the USSR both militarily and nationalistically. One of the by-products of the moon missions was the development and refinement of ICBM’s.
Economincally, JFK would be villified today by the Dems. “A rising tide lifts all boats”, is a well know JFK quote he used to summarize his economic philosophy. This is known as “trickle down economics”, the idea that lower taxes on the business community will make American goods and services more competitive, creating jobs and wealth, and utlimately benefiting all Americans. Of course when Reagan stated the same thing he was lambasted as a pawn of corporate America. It’s all about perspective.

Posted by: Woody | August 29, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am

Woody is correct,
Todays far left liberal Democrats would not fund the space program. Instead they would propose another giveaway.

Posted by: geevill | August 29, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am

Why do we have the suppressed biography of Obama’s life, and his belated dumping of Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, Tony Rezko, and even teenage mentor Frank Davis. The “bitter clinger” sneer at Pennsylvanians. Smearing Bill Clinton as a racist. Trying to intimidate the Milt Rosenberg show on Chicago radio station WGN, just because the host was interviewing Stanley Kurtz about the Bill Ayers alliance.
Two nights ago Michelle O discovered her inner Jackie O, but not before revealing her entrenched anger for all to see. It was a great performance, but nobody who’s been paying attention to the lady believed it. When this campaign gets in trouble it becomes Stalinesque and starts to stamp on its critics.
we always get suckered by our elected leaders like George W. Bush — so now they will sucker us even better than ever before.

Posted by: Ms Independent | August 29, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am

Ann: Obama has more experience right now than Bush did, and he won.
I loved the convention last night. I thought Obama gave a brilliant speech, he broke it down so everyone understood where he stands for this country. And yes, he is right…. it is not about Dems, Repubs, Independents, Socialist, McCain, Obama or the Clintons…It is about us… We the people for the people. We need to take back our country, we need our country to work for us.

Posted by: beck | August 29, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am

How many times did Barrack say “I will”? To which one asks, with who’s money?
That was creepy. Short on specifics, long on promises, long on the same old promises, short on any inkling of how to deliver.
The Democratic candidates best qualified are Senator Clinton and Al Gore. What we saw last night was spectacle designed like a made for TV movie.
Let’s see what the next guys have.

Posted by: len | August 29, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am

You have several GENERALS (Like 20 or more) standing on stage, who gave a great speech about WHY THEY KNOW OBAMA WILL MAKE A COMMANDER IN CHEIF. That was good enough for me. They are the ones with experience, enough experience to know they want to serve under Obama and not McCain.

Posted by: beck | August 29, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am

Obama and Oprah want the government to provide free healthcare for all. Does the government then have a right to demand that Obama stop poisoning his lungs with cigarettes? Does the government have a right to demand that Oprah drag her fat as$ to Jenny Craig? There is no such thing as “free” healthcare for all. “Free” healthcare is another massive social program that will cost trillions. Increasing taxes on the so-called wealthy can’t cover the cost. How many rich people do you know? There aren’t that many of them out there. “Free” healthcare will be paid for by the people who pay for everything in this country – the MIDDLE CLASS.

Posted by: JB in St. Louis | August 29, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am

The Democrat Party policies are socialism and dependency on government programs.
I believe in the principles of hard work and personal responsibility to get ahead. The Democrats want to pay all of this with my tax money.

Posted by: Gracie | August 29, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

“But why, some say, the moon? Why choose this as our goal? And they may well ask why climb the highest mountain? Why, 35 years ago, fly the Atlantic? Why does Rice play Texas? We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win, and the others, too.”
Quoted by JFK
_______________________________________________
My point to the original poster, geevil, is if America has no vision, we can’t complain where we end up. Case and point – right now. Our energy crisis is a matter of national security and to propose a bold plan to reduce fossil fuels in 10 years is worthy of our attention.

Posted by: JP | August 29, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

When the temple comes down, the fireworks end and the words are over, the facts remain: Sen. Obama still has no record of bipartisanship, still opposes offshore drilling, still voted to raise taxes on those making just $42,000 per year and still voted against funds for American troops in harm’s way.
Obama told supporters, “As commander in chief, I will never hesitate to defend this nation, but I will only send our troops into harm’s way with a clear mission and a sacred commitment to give them the equipment they need in battle and the care and benefits they deserve when they come home.”
Sounds a little different when comparing to what he has ACTUALLY done! Looking to stick it the middle class!

Posted by: rockthebleachers | August 29, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am

If Obama wanted to invoke the image of JFK, he should have married a woman with some class. Jackie Kennedy went to France and spoke French to the people. Michelle will go to France and whine about her mean country.

Posted by: Andrea | August 29, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am

“Two nights ago Michelle O discovered her inner Jackie O, but not before revealing her entrenched anger for all to see.” That’s the impression I got, too. It seemed to me that the tone of her speech was “you owe us this.” The new make-up just can’t hide the real Michelle. She meant it when she said she thinks America is a mean country, our souls are broken, and she’s only recently became proud of her country. In the words of Ludacris, IF YOU SAID IT, YOU MEANT IT.

Posted by: Andrea | August 29, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

JP:
The costs alone guarantee we will reduce fossil fuel consumption. If Barack wants to take credit for that as he has taken credit for the legislation and hard work of those around him while he voted present or campaigned for a job to which he is ill suited, then fine.
But the reduction will not come from a vision. It will come from necessity and smart engineering. It will not come from another group of long-winded lawyers. It will come from our pocketbooks.
Let’s see who has the best plan for investing our money because that is what this is about.

Posted by: len | August 29, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

I think that media and Obama and his folks are forgetting that the entire country has been tuned in for the last nine months. We as voters have seen and heard and aware of everything about both candidates. The makeover last night is a little goofy, at this point. We can see right through the all the glitz and rhetoric.

Posted by: stan | August 29, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

How about these numbers…from ABC news
Personal incomes plunged in July while consumer spending slowed significantly as the impact of billions of dollars in government rebate checks began to wane.
Consumer spending edged up a modest 0.2 percent, in line with expectations, but far below June’s 0.6 percent rise. When the impact of rising prices was factored in, spending actually dropped by 0.4 percent in July, the weakest showing for inflation-adjusted spending in more than four years.

Posted by: rockthebleachers | August 29, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

From what I read about reaction to the Obama speech was that people were not overly impressed.
Obama supporters undoubtedly swooned and swayed with the rythym of the Obama cadence to socialism and expansion of government control.
McCain supporters seemed to view the speech as a rejection of American tradition and values for the imposition of Big Brother Obama.
However the speech was viewed, the overall attitude seemed to be either “He not really that bad,” or “He’s not really that good.”
After all the hype of a week (and I suspect the hype of the next week), the choice is still between bad and worse.

Posted by: Jayhawk | August 29, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

Obama and his liberals always say we can’t tap new domestic oil for at least 10 years. Our vision is to tap those plentiful oil deposits.

Posted by: geevill | August 29, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Only the most partisan Republicans had any problem with the speech.

Posted by: Mike | August 29, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Woody’s education level shows in his comments. First of all, he LIED about what Obama said during his speech. He never mentioned free college or free healthcare. He’s worrying about his taxes going up because of Obama’s proposal to help the working class, but he’s aparrently not concerned with his taxes going up due to this sensless war that’s costing a fortune right now, every day.That money will have to come from somewhere also. He (Woody) also mentioned the ” trickle down” economic theory as being a matter of prespective.
Well, any way you look at it, it’s not working because look at the state that we are in right now.

Posted by: Pete | August 29, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

PALIN

Posted by: drjohn | August 29, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

That’s a good one: mentions America 52 times in 44 minutes.

Posted by: hype bites | August 29, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

I dunno, considering the alternative (McBush) I still think Obama is clearly the lesser of the two evils!
Whistler
http://www

Posted by: the Whistler | August 29, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

First impression of last night -
Obama’s speech gave 80,000 supporters and millions of Democrats, Republicans, Independents watching TV their moment. When the 80,000 energized supporters started to yell”Yes we can!”, all of us watching TV across America hear their rally cry. Watch out relentless Republican Attack machine! You heard it too! Obama and 80,000 supporters inspired us all. That was the Democrats I grew up with! This is the Democrats I know!
Obama on stage we saw two warriors with heart and courage. Oamaba/Biden and Democrats are ready to rumble against Republican Attack Machine. But most important they are ready to court Republicans and Independents on the issues. Which voters care about. The Race has started!
Al Gore, Bill Richardson and Susan Eisenhower also inspired us! When Susan ended her great speech with “Yes we can!” We cheered!
Susan Eisenhower -”The history of free men is never really written by chance but by choice; their choice!” Dwight D. Eisenhower Quote
Obamacan’s – “The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry.”
William F. Buckley, Jr. quote
“Few will have the greatness to bend history itself; but each of us can work to change a small portion of events, and in the total; of all those acts will be written the history of this generation.” Robert Kennedy Quote
Vote Obama/Biden ’08

Posted by: Cooday | August 29, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

I don’t think Obama or McCain come down to the lesser of two evils. That’s the way Obama’s campaign strategy works: throw the bums out, and the bums are ALL Republicans.
A measured response is coming, but this much we know: Democrats controlled the spending. Obama voted for war expenditures. It is a Republican war but it is a Democratic economy.
Obama says he will go through the budget “line by line”. No President can do that and the last one who tried was Jimmy Carter when he famously took it away for a Camp David weekend. That kind of micro management will make very little sense in the business community as leader-like as it may appear in the made for TV movie we watched last night.
So maybe we should let our endorphin levels drop a bit from all the fireworks and step back and ask ourselves how we intend to pay for Obama’s rather generous proposals to spend tax dollars for votes.

Posted by: len | August 29, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Boy, Obama sure is blessed and higly favored. Not a drop of rain, pure sunshine, a beautiful sunset to the conclusion of an inspiring convention.
Many people left as inspired by the convention as they are motivated by the evilness in the hearts of those that are trying to roadblock change. Their impact will catapult VOTER REGISTRATION DRIVES ALL OVER THE COUNTRY.
This is a Movement, people.
And just as MLK lead a movement that were not deterred by the evilness of attack dogs, fire hoses, police dogs, whips, chains, arrests….the People’s Movement will not be stopped.
So all you George Wallaces, Strom Thurmonds, Trent Lotts, Jesse Helms David Dukes, who attempt stand in the way of Change and who speak with vile and hate, Move Mountain!

Posted by: The Peoples Movement | August 29, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

“I dunno, considering the alternative (McBush) I still think Obama is clearly the lesser of the two evils!”
McBush better than OWright, OFarrakhan, ORezko or OAyers.
The O in Obama stands for O accomplishment.

Posted by: drjohn | August 29, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

Wow – McCain picked Sarah Palin for VP – going to be a real fight.

Posted by: Lisa S | August 29, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am

I watched Obama’s speech last night and was considering voting for him (former Hillary supporter) but if McCain picks Sarah Palin the deals off the table and McCain gets my vote. Women for Palin!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Lauren | August 29, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

Hi Pete,
Thanks for the unprovoked personal attack. I’m sure you think it makes your argument stronger but in fact it has the opposite effect.
As with any speech you must read between the lines. I know I’m not as sophisticated as yourself but I will attempt to draw attention to what was said and what was meant. Now try to follow along.
“… if you commit to serving your community or your country, we will MAKE SURE you can AFFORD a college education.” Did he say “free college tuition”? No, like most of the time Obama is much more nuanced than that. How does a government MAKE SURE one can AFFORD a college education? By paying for it, of course. How else? Also, by saying “serving your community or your country” he’s drawing a moral equivalence between military service and the very vague notion of “serving your community”, whatever that means. Does that seem right to you?
“If you have health care, my plan will lower your premiums. If you don’t you’ll be able to get the same kind of coverage that members of Congress give themselves.” Um, if that’s true you will see every company in the country drop health care coverage simultaneously and/or massive opt-outs by individuals as soon as the inauguration is over. Woo-hoo! Congressional-level health coverage for all! Sounds free to me.
BTW Pete, I had no health coverage for many years of my adult life. It inspired me to put myself through college and get a good job so I could stand on my own two feet.
Reagan’s trickle-down policies have been systematically and slowly reversed over the years and Bush hasn’t exactly been a champion of them. This may come as a shock to you but I’m not particularly fond of W. But let me ask you, are you better off than you were four years ago? Or eight years ago? I am, mostly due to my choice to work hard and sacrifice my time to improve my lot in life. If you’re not, ask yourself “why” and then ask yourself what you can do about it.
“And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country.
My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man.” JFK – January 20th, 1961

Posted by: Woody | August 29, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Can someone please name just one of the 35 specific policy proposals? Please be specific.

Posted by: p0s3r | August 29, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

Alaska’s Governor now facing ethics-related probe
Submitted by crew on 24 July 2008 – 9:10am. Alaska Sarah Palin
It’s never a dull moment in Alaska. You may recall that all three members of Alaska’s Congressional Delegation, Senator Ted Stevens, Senator Lisa Murkowski and Rep. Don Young, made CREW’s list of the most corrupt members of Congress, Beyond DeLay.
Now, the relatively new Governor, Sarah Palin, is in hot water and may be facing a legislative investigation. Via the ever informative Anchorage Daily News:
Alaska Senate leaders want an investigation of whether Gov. Sarah Palin pressured and then fired the public safety commissioner because he wouldn’t get rid of a state trooper who had gone through a bitter divorce with Palin’s sister.

Posted by: Owen | August 29, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

The Maverick is Back!!!
Now THAT is the Change we (especially women) are looking for.
Obama chose the safe 35 year-Washington insider.
McCain chose a soccer mom with 5 kids.
A mom with a special needs child and an older son that joined the Army on Sept.11th 2007.
But best of all she has more executive experience than Obama or Biden.
Take that DNC, Pelosi, Dean–you never defended Hillary.
Come on Hillary supporters–This Is Our Moment, This is Our Time!
Obama is toast!

Posted by: cindy in nc | August 29, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

Obama’s speech was pure leftwing tofu.
McCain-Palin 2008!

Posted by: geevill | August 29, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Hillary was right. McCain has a lifetime of experience.
Obama just has a speech. Funny but once his speech ends–the emotion of it quickly dies out.
And now McCain has a woman VP choice.
The Change Women Wanted!!!

Posted by: riley | August 29, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

Under investigation for firing
But Palin’s seemingly bright future was clouded in late July when the state legislature voted to hire an independent investigator to find out whether she tried to have a state official fire her ex-brother-in-law from his job as a state trooper.
The allegation was made by former Department of Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan, whom Palin fired in mid-July.
“It is a governor’s prerogative, a right, to fill that cabinet with members whom she or he believes will do best for the people whom we are serving,” Palin told CNBC’s Larry Kudlow in an interview on Aug. 1. “So I look forward to any kind of investigation or questions being asked because I’ve got nothing to hide.”

Posted by: rockthebleachers | August 29, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

“This is a Movement, people.”
So the counter-culture is now the over-the-counter culture? Let Loose the Krakken!
I can’t wait to watch Biden use attack dog tactics on a mother of five with more executive experience than their Obamnibus.

Posted by: len | August 29, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

LOL.
Months making issue of Barack’s experience only to hire a governor in the 2nd year of her 1st term!
But I see its already been rationalized away by the duped masses

Posted by: Ryan C | August 29, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

MLK would be so proud of McCain’s pick.

Posted by: geevill | August 29, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

“…the duped masses”
You mean voters? You mean those bitter cynical clinging to their guns folks?
Dupes? Who talks like that in the 21st century?
Got a problem with women? Feeling sexist?
Oh you liberals. You’re such screamers!
I’ll be interested in Palin’s story and her positions. I’ve heard almost nothing about her except the bits about being a Mom, having a Downs syndrome child willingly, etc.

Posted by: len | August 29, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

cindy in nc- You are so totally uncool. You know good and well there are no soccer moms in Alaska! And McCain lost his maverick status when he chose not to cuss out Bush for smearing him back in 2000. Well he might have called him an —hole in the oval office (I know I would have). McCain needs a new image and marketing (he looked pretty cool with his sunglasses and cap). Because the “Crabby Ol’ Man” thing is just not working. We are in the 21st century so why should young people and women vote for someone stuck in the Cold War time warp?

Posted by: Tiff | August 29, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Sarah Palin is a marathoner and a hocky player.
Obama can’t even bowl!
Oh this is going to be fun…
Ladies we have our woman VP!!!!
It’s not Hillary but the next best thing!
McCain/Palin 08 Hillary 2012

Posted by: cindy in nc | August 29, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Apparently Dems think Palin doesn’t have enough experience to be VP. Yet she has more experience than Obama, who’s the top of their ticket. And more executive experience than their VP.
Odd.

Posted by: p0s3r | August 29, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Tiff
I’ll tell you what is cool..
A woman VP!!!
The 72 year old McCain had the guts to make a bold choice–a game changer.
Obama went with the typical Washington insider.
I’m sorry if you have a problem with srong women and “change”.
McCain/Palin08 Hillary 2012

Posted by: cindy in nc | August 29, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Parlin is not Hillary. Good luck selling her as such. She maybe she can be packaged as such I don’t know but right now it reeks of despiration. I mean who is this masked woman?? 67 days is not a whole lot of time to introduce a complete stranger who will be a heart beat away from leading this great nation. I don’t like it for McCain he should have picked better.

Posted by: Skeptic | August 29, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

Senator Obama’s speech rated a -3 out of a perfect 10. His ability to accomplish his promises and “I wills” is -1. His being elected by informed voters is is also -1. Good show, Rock Star Obama.
For a corrupt candidate from the most corrupt area of the country to claim he has the “Magic Wand” to fix everything is absolutely ludicrous. He has nothing but empty words and a transparent resume of accomplishments. Even former state senators who worked with him for 8 years hate the guy. The “Movement” will be as welcome as a 9.1 earthquake under Santa Barbara.

Posted by: Mary | August 29, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

No one can name the specifics of none of the 35 specific policy proposals?

Posted by: p0s3r | August 29, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Are people here just stupid thinking she’s the next best thing to Hillary. She doesn’t even come close. Are you that desperate to have a women on the ticket.

Posted by: Samantha | August 29, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

“Also, by saying “serving your community or your country” he’s drawing a moral equivalence between military service and the very vague notion of “serving your community”, whatever that means. Does that seem right to you?”

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 29, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

“Sarah Palin is a marathoner and a hocky player.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 29, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

It was so great to hear Senator Obama say he was going to enforce our immigration laws and close the border to the illegal entries. Oh, you did not. Neither did I and that is one reason I will not vote for him. He will actually embrace the 14 to 20 million CRIMINALS living in our country, stealing our jobs and costing billions of tax dollars. It is a security and economic problem, Senator Obama. Send them home, enforce our laws, protect our citizens. PLEASE.

Posted by: Mary | August 29, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

An African-American presidential nominee – I think all of us in the US are little better because of this historic moment, whether you like Obama or not.

Posted by: GS | August 29, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

“…the duped masses”
You mean voters? You mean those bitter cynical clinging to their guns folks?”
No I mean the people hanging out on this blog. For months, their call has been that Obama has no experience then they celebrate Palin.
There’s a word for that and its called hypocrisy.

Posted by: Ryan C | August 29, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

After this speech, McCain will have his work cut out for himself. I was dissapointed about Obama’s outright support for Georgia against the Russians in his speeach when it was Georgia that was largely responsible. Oh well.

Posted by: Ben Straub | August 29, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

But Ryan, she isn’t running for President and he isn’t running for Vice President.
Although, had he done that, he would be winning and it would be a cakewalk to the White House. Now his only chance is if the Clinton’s put him there by taking Palin down. I don’t think that will be possible but it’s a thought.
The Obama camp is puzzling in the way it is reacting as if McCain has taken the cherry off their lollipops of last night. Yet wasn’t it Obama who used John Edwards and Bill Richardson to sail in front of Hillary’s spinnaker to take the wind out of her campaign at critical moments in the race?
Yes, as I recall, it was.
The announcements were expected. If you are having problems with the choice, you already made yours. Live with it, but McCain said today it would be back on after giving Obama his moment of Made for TV Movie spectacle. Now he has replied with a star of a series and it will run at least into November and possibly beyond.
Frankly, when she is on stage with Biden, I know which one I’ll be watching with the sound turned down.

Posted by: len | August 29, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

“Frankly, when she is on stage with Biden, I know which one I’ll be watching with the sound turned down.”
If this was an actual factor in voting for most people, Dennis Kucinich would be the nominee of the Democratic party.

Posted by: Ryan C | August 29, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Here is the new scenario: with two notable exceptions, presidents get two terms. The PUMAS want McCain. But now he has named a woman VP. So if he gets elected and serves two terms, Hillary faces a sitting woman VP in 2016! What are you going to do now, PUMAS? Hee-hee.

Posted by: DublBogey | August 29, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Mary, I do not agree with McCain on very much, but his immigration reform bill was excellent, in my opinion. Too bad it got shot down. It called for securing the borders first. The it got those workers that are here on the tax roles and with requirements to learn English and pay a fine to earn the right to stay here. Not amnesty but rather a way to earn the right to be here legitimately.

Posted by: DublBogey | August 29, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

“I was dissapointed about Obama’s outright support for Georgia against the Russians in his speeach when it was Georgia that was largely responsible.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 29, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

It was an AMAZING speech. I have never ever seen or heard an acceptance speech quite like Senator Obama’s. Now I can’t wait to hear Senator McCain’s acceptance speech.

Posted by: Why so negative JT | August 29, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Senator Obama’s speech had substance and was one of the most eloquent speeches I have ever heard. It was a perfect ending to a perfect night. My only regret is that I could not be there.

Posted by: No More Drama | August 29, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

Eighty-four thousand people filled the stadium. A Nobel Laureate spoke. It was simply amazing. And, OMG, Senator Obama’s speech was incredible. It was more a conversation than a speech. I loved it. It was magical and a great time to be a Democrat.

Posted by: he's a sidekick not a maverick | August 29, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

While somewhere in this country people have been evacuated from their homes to avoid hurricane, Dems gather 84,000 people to celebrate and listen to Obama’s speech.

Posted by: catleya | August 29, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

“While somewhere in this country people have been evacuated from their homes to avoid hurricane, Dems gather 84,000 people to celebrate and listen to Obama’s speech.”
Evacuations just started today actually the same day McCain chose to have a VP announcement party with 15,000 people.
I can’t believe a right winger has the gall to bring this up after how Bush and company handled Katrina.

Posted by: Ryan C | August 29, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

“And, OMG, Senator Obama’s speech was incredible.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 29, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Here’s the text of the Charles Babington article that soooo upset Keith Olbermann, and which seems to have been disappeared from everywhere…
[begin quoted AP article by Charles Babington:]
“Barack Obama, whose campaign theme is “change we can believe in,” promised Thursday to “spell out exactly what that change would mean.”
“But instead of dwelling on specifics, he laced the crowning speech of his long campaign with the type of rhetorical flourishes that Republicans mock and the attacks on John McCain that Democrats cheer. The country saw a candidate confident in his existing campaign formula: tie McCain tightly to President Bush, and remind voters why they are unhappy with the incumbent.
“Of course, no candidate can outline every initiative in a 35-minute speech — especially one that also must inspire voters, acknowledge key friends, and toss in some autobiography for the newly-interested. And Obama did touch on nitty-gritty subjects, such as the capital gains tax and biofuel investments.
“He said he would “find ways to safely harness nuclear power,” a somewhat more receptive phrase than he typically uses for that subject.
“But most of his address echoed and amplified the theme that dominated the four-day Democratic nominating convention here: George Bush.
“John McCain has voted with George Bush 90 percent of the time,” Obama said. “I’m not ready to take a 10 percent chance on change.”
“Some of his comments about McCain were unusually sharp. “I’ve got news for you, John McCain,” Obama said, defying anyone to challenge his patriotism. “We all put our country first.”
“Obama’s aides have long complained that he gets too little credit for including detailed proposals in his stump speeches, because listeners seem to remember only his stage presence and lofty rhetoric. Obama, who earlier had promised a “workmanlike” speech in Denver, seemed to acknowledge the problem, saying he would fill in the blanks.
“Mostly, however, he touched on major issues quickly and lightly. It’s an approach that may intrigue and satisfy millions of viewers just starting to tune in to the campaign seriously. The crowd at Invesco Field cheered deliriously, but Republicans almost surely will decry the lack of specifics.
“For instance, Obama said it’s time “to protect Social Security for future generations.” But he didn’t mention his main proposal, which is to add a new Social Security payroll tax to incomes above $250,000 a year.
“He said he would “cut taxes for 95 percent of all working families,” but did not say how.
“He briefly mentioned abortion, gun rights, gay rights and other hot-button issues without delving into their sticky details. “Passions fly on immigration,” Obama said, “but I don’t know anyone who benefits when a mother is separated from her infant child or an employer undercuts American wages by hiring illegal workers.”
“On a few topics, he was a bit more specific. “I will eliminate capital gains taxes for the small businesses and the start-ups that will create the high-wage, high-tech jobs of tomorrow,” he said.
“Even if Obama had talked for three hours, of course, he could not have detailed enough proposals to quiet all his critics. But that’s not the strategy.
“Allies such as Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano will doubtlessly defend his approach. A few hours before the speech, she said: “What he should not do is what he will be criticized for not doing: Give a detailed policy speech. This is not the place for that.”
“She said Republicans will criticize him no matter what. They will argue that his lofty speeches lack substance and details, she said, and a detailed speech that scrimps on soaring rhetoric will prove “he has lost his gift.”
“They will try to Catch-22 his speech,” Napolitano said.
“Obama seemed to say, Bring it on, we’re sticking to our theme: McCain equals Bush.”
[end quoted AP article by Charles Babington]
It’s a better article than the speech it recounts. Who-all pays the MSNBC guys to campaign for Obama? Or are they dealing with some kind of threat?
It is a shameful subversion of the press, which was pretty subverted to begin with.

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 29, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

I couldn’t hear the whole speech as I was picking the lint off my sweaters, but I did hear the bit about his mother laying in bed dying of cancer.
HE FORGOT TO MENTION IN THAT HOSPITAL SHE DIED IN, HE NEVER VISITED, AND THEY WEREN’T ON SPEAKING TERMS FOR 2 YEARS BEFORE SHE DIED. WE DON’T KNOW THESE THINGS, CAUSE GRANNY IS LOCKED UP AND MICHELLE IS THE ONLY ONE WHO SPEAKS FOR HIM. SAW HALF SISTER ONCE SPEAK ON HIS BEHALF, BUT WHERE ARE HIS COLLEAGUES, FAMILY, FRIENDS THAT HAVE KNOWN HIM FOR YEARS AND CAN BE CHARACTER WITNESSES?
I know he can’t use Rev. Wright and their close friendship of the past 20 uears, but seriously….who does he have besides Michelle?
NEVER OBAMA, McCAIN/PALIN ALL THE WAY!

Posted by: Debra | August 30, 2008, 4:16 am 4:16 am

“seriously….who does he have besides Michelle?”

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 30, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.