By Natalie Gewargis

Aug 15, 2008 10:03am

Ooooh, That Smell. Can’t You Smell That Smell?

Democrats are pounding Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., on the August 18 Georgia fundraiser for his campaign where he will hang with Ralph Reed, the former head of the Christian Coalition and a figure in the Jack Abramoff sleaze-a-thon.

Indeed, the Dems even released this web video.

Reed earlier this month emailed friends and colleagues, saying he’d joined the "McCain Victory 2008" team, a joint fundraising effort between the McCain campaign and Republican National Committee, and writing, as reported in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, “Never in my career can I recall a starker contrast between two major-party nominees for President.”

Though the McCain campaign says Reed has no official role in the fundraier, Democrats have hammered McCain for the fact that he is taking money from Reed, whose PR firm took $4.2 million from Abramoff to gin up Christian opposition to casinos that would have competed with casinos run by the Native Americans whom Abramoff called clients.

Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean this week assailed "McCain’s decision to cozy up to one of the central figures in the Republican culture of corruption."

I would never compare the Jack Abramoff scandal with the John Edwards one. They are different in scope, sin, and criminality.

But as the Democrats ramp up their Reed rhetoric, there are also questions about a tangential financial supporter of Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, as well.

On Monday, we noted that Fred Baron — the chairman of Edwards’ campaign finance committees in both his 2004 and 2008 presidential campaigns — was not only sending thousands of dollars to Edwards’ mistress Rielle Hunter and others involved in the scandal, he is, according to the Dallas Morning News, "raising money for nominee-to-be Barack Obama."

I asked the Obama campaign if that’s appropriate. They have yet to respond.

The New York Times has a closer look at Baron today and how he may have played a role in the legal representation of both Hunter and Andrew Young, the Edwards staffer who claims he’s the father of Hunter’s baby daughter.

"After initially saying that he did not know how the lawyers were chosen to represent Ms. Hunter and Mr. Young, Mr. Baron acknowledged that he might have played a role," the Times writes. "The revelations of ties among the lawyers emerged through public records and interviews with people close to Mr. Edwards and Ms. Hunter, which suggested that their affair went on longer than Mr. Edwards admitted and that the effort to conceal it by Mr. Edwards’s inner circle was much more extensive than has been reported."

Does it matter to you if Baron raises money for Obama, or if Reed raises money for McCain?

– jpt

User Comments

Interesting. I think the Reed thing is potentially a big problem for McCain because it plays into the ‘two McCains’ theory, and the argument that McCain c2000 would not vote for McCain c2008. I think the Baron thing is different. If there was hard evidence linking him to paying Ms Hunter or Mr Young to be quiet, then I think Senator Obama needs to take action and severe links with Mr Baron, but until that happens then I think its all just media speculation.

Posted by: markymark | August 15, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

The libs are trying to create an issue with the Constitution, Lobbying is Constitutional and actually is one of the main things that separate us from Socialists.
A Lobbyist usually supports a candidate that already shares their views.
At Least Reed is not a terrorist or a racist or hates this country!!
Oh and by the way what happened to guilt by association!!

Posted by: spock | August 15, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

Ralph Reed is the only one I know of who actually out-conned Jack Abramoff. This is EXACTLY why we can’t elect McCain. We need to purge these corrupt authoritarions from our governement once and for all.

Posted by: jock59801 | August 15, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

spock: “Lobbying is Constitutional and actually is one of the main things that separate us from Socialists.”
Interesting. You are making this socialism thing sound better than I thought.

Posted by: jock59801 | August 15, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

The difference is that the Obama campaign can send all of Baron’s money to charity and that will be fine because they didn’t know about Edwards’ scandal if indeed Baron helped to raise money for Obama.
McCain’s issue is far worse because he knew BEFORE hand about Reed and still he is goin ahead with a fundraiser.
McCain, IMO, is in a far worse predicament than Obama is. Obama’s situation is easy to rectify and people will understand it. It is kind of like all the Senators who got money from Senator Stevens has returned ALL that money. The media didn’t really make a stink of it.

Posted by: Michelle | August 15, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

I think you will discover that unless the media hammers on it, the voters don’t care. They assume there is corruption on both sides with some insulation from the candidates.
The Corsi book will be a lot harder to squelch. It’s a money maker and that feeds the machine.
Quoting Lynard Skynard won’t get the attention of the blue collar voters, by the way. That song is connected to the crash that killed members of the band and has a very negative feel down south. Of course, if you are trying to create resonance with The Obama Scare and up the sympathy quotient, you may be overrating subtlety.

Posted by: len | August 15, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Reed has nothing to do with McCain.
Reed is raising money for the local state party.
McCain is the reason why Abramoff is in jail. At this time Obama was buying land from Rezko saving 300 grand on his house in a sweet heart deal.

Posted by: Wes | August 15, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

We’re not dumb Jack
Reed is a self proclaimed biggot
these two aren’t in the same league with scandalous ties, and don’t belong in the same blog

Posted by: watching | August 15, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

I’m more bothered by Scheunemann, lobbyist for Geogia until last March, now McCain’s foreign policy adviser. I think it is a huge conflict of interest.

Posted by: cincyr | August 15, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

“Never in my career can I recall a starker contrast between two major-party nominees for President.”
Right. “Contrast”. Ralphie’s callin’ the dogs.

Posted by: pedestrian | August 15, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am

Wow you are trying to compare Reed w/ Baron. I know you say that’s not what you’re trying to do, or that they’re not equal, but this is pretty down-right shameful. There’s absolutely no impropriety as far as laws are concerned with the Edwards’ affair thing. But Reed is an actual benefactor of one of the most corrupt individuals, which was Abramoff.

Posted by: David | August 15, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am

In all the “press” over this — the Times piece, in particular — there seems to be no mention of Mrs. Young, wife of Andrew Young, except to say that the Youngs’ living together didn’t work out.
This story stinks. Why was Druck/Hunter sitting on a hundred HOURS of videotape?

Posted by: Belle Starr | August 15, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

“I’m more bothered by Scheunemann, lobbyist for Geogia until last March, now McCain’s foreign policy adviser. I think it is a huge conflict of interest. ”
Just a little. So if Georgia starts a war, we can expect McCain to support them, even if they were wrong to start it.
Also reminds me of McCain’s budget, written by the guy who cause the Enron scandal, and then called us all whiners.
ALL OF MCCAIN’S EXPERIENCE COMES FROM ADVISORS WHO ARE BEING PAID TO TELL MCCAIN WHAT IS BEST FOR THEIR COMPANY.
NOT WHAT IS BEST FOR AMERICA OR AMERICANS.
Wake up people, McCain will only help you out by coincedence. If the gas prices drop at all from offshore drilling, it will be a bonus to creating billions of dollars of more revenue for the Big Oil industries. Don’t believe for a second that McCain wants to help you.

Posted by: Tim | August 15, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

I don’t understand the reference to the song by Lynyrd Skynyrd, probably because the song never made sense to me anyway. What does it have to do with John McCain versus the Religious Right?
The theocons are so dissatisfied with McCain that they’d rather elect a Socialist, which makes even less sense than the aforementioned song.

Posted by: Rhys | August 15, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

len:
That song had nothing to do with the crash unless they wrote it using a crystal ball.

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | August 15, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

jock59801 – Everytime you call or write your representative you are are lobbying.
funny here is Obama has more lobbyists on his staff then any other candidate in history! but nothing is said.
Wes you are correct
I find it funny that you libs finally agree on that Obama is a racist, hates America, is Islamic, supports terrorism, because you agree with guilt by association!!

Posted by: spock | August 15, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

The only items Obama voted for in either senate helped Rezko, Ayers, Rev Wright or his wife, so who is Obama beholden to?

Posted by: spock | August 15, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Reed has been in the public eye for many years. There is little documentation of scandal or misconduct. He seems to like winners and his decision to support McCain, who is behind in the polls, is unusual. It is amazing that McCain continues to do so well in the polls. The Republicans, who certainly underperformed in recent years, seem to have a number of winning issues (energy, national security, taxes etc). The Democrats, on the other hand, have only the damaged Republican brand as a rallying point (i.e., the third Bush term mantra). It just doesn’t seem to be working.

Posted by: independent | August 15, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Obama has hoodwinked his base – flip flopping on major issues AFTER he had their donations and became the presumptive nominee.
Kids are so easily duped by marketing!
“I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views.” – Obama, The Audacity of Hope
Dems for McCain – NO Hussein!

Posted by: JoseyJ | August 15, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

How come the DEMOCRATS are not allowing the FEC look into donations that Obama has raised and the bigger question is how come the MEDIA has not brought this up.

Posted by: puffer cone | August 15, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

One sleezeys republican hanging out with another sleezey republican…. NO WAY!!!

Posted by: Joe | August 15, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Nope doesn’t bother me. I am pretty jaded as are most. And if it did bother me what could I do about it? Nothing.
I know no one will read it but if you ever find one, how about profiling a good elected public servent…I hope that at least one exists.

Posted by: smith | August 15, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

I love how America taxes corporations more then any other nation in the world, be we receive some of the lowest actual revenue from it.
There are so many loopholes that a smart corporation can simply write off all their taxes. Many corporations PAY NO TAXES by the end of all the loopholes they use.
And McCain wants to lower their taxes more, without removing loopholes. Congrats on giving away another 100 billion dollars a year, and not paying for it.
What did GWB do to spend 800 billion dollars, take us from +500billion to -450 billion, in a matter of 8 years?
He spent money that he didn’t have, and he never cared to hide it. McCain wants to continue 95% of his plans.
Think about this and tell me why you want our country to be so far in debt that china will basicly have rights to the American brand.
Vote for McCain, vote for everything you hate about america.

Posted by: Tim | August 15, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

>>>>McCain is the reason why Abramoff is in jail. At this time Obama was buying land from Rezko saving 300 grand on his house in a sweet heart deal.
Exactly!! U.S. Sen. Obama engaged in a real estate transaction with a slum lord Obama KNEW was under federal investigation!
Not my idea of ‘good judgment.’

Posted by: JoseyJ | August 15, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Vote for Obama and your voting for JUST WORDS

Posted by: Tim | August 15, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am

jock59801, you wrote: “We need to purge these corrupt authoritarions from our governement once and for all.”
That’s why we need term limits. Our founding fathers never intended for Congress to be a career job. Yet we have Sen. Robert Byrd with 49+ years of service and Sen. Ted Kennedy with 46+ years of service in the Senate; and Rep. John Dingell with 52+ years of service in the House of Representatives.
I, personally, believe that 5 terms in the House (10 years) and 2 terms in the Senate (12 years) should be the limit.

Posted by: James Danley | August 15, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

I’m black and I won’t vote for Obama because he is not the black man that should run this country.

Posted by: Samantha | August 15, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

“Vote for Obama and your voting for JUST WORDS”
The constitution is just a bunch of words. Laws are just a bunch of words. Promises are just a bunch of words. Presidental policies are just a bunch of words.
Words are the things that start change.

Posted by: Tim | August 15, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

What a load of crap: equating what Baron is *suspected* of having done with what is known that Reed has done is like comparing a child nicking a candy bar, once, with a kleptomaniac.
Reed has a long, and I mean LONG!, history of scamming people and using highly questionable and disturbing actions during his entire life.
It started with *plagiarism* in 1983; he *rigged* the election of ally Sam Harben as his successor as president of the College Republicans at the University of Georgia; then went on with his buddies Abramoff and Grover Norquist to create their ‘triumvirate’;
he was *arrested* after bursting into the waiting room of the abortion clinics; his Christian Coalition “violated federal campaign finance laws during congressional elections in 1990, 1992 and 1994, and the presidential election in 1992″; Christian Coalition’s chief financial officer, Judy Liebert, “went to federal prosecutors with her suspicions of overbilling by Ben Hart, a direct-mail vendor with close ties to Ralph Reed, then the coalition’s executive director”. Realizing that his career was over in Virginia, he decided to make a ‘fresh’ start in Georgia. He became campaign leader for Skandalakis and ran a desastrous racist campaign, calling a black Mayor of Atlanta a “buffoon”. Skandalakis was heavily favored to win the election but thanks to his campaign manager Reed, he lost.
Reed is often blamed for running disastrous, racist and vicious campaigns for his clients.
The most disgusting part of McCain’s decision to associate himself with Reed is the following: Reed orchestrated the attacks on Senator John McCain in the 2000 South Carolina presidential primary, together with Roberta Combs, then head of the South Carolina Christian Coalition, who later took over the national Christian Coalition.
John McCain has lost every sense of self respect he might have once had when he is kissing up to the very man who orchestrated the attacks on his wife and his daughter.
Why should I respect McCain when he can’t even respect himself and his family?

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 15, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

I would be interested in knowing when Baron started raising money for Obama. Was it when he became the nominee, when Edwards dropped out, or when Edwards endorsed Obama?

Posted by: MayBee | August 15, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

I’m white, and I’m voting for Obama because he IS the black man we need to lead this country, and the free world for that matter.

Posted by: Josh | August 15, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

is it just me or does it seem politics of late have turned into a giant sleaze fest? I mean really? What a joke. No wonder the US has become the laughing stalk of the world!

Posted by: Jim McDish | August 15, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

“Reed has been in the public eye for many years. There is little documentation of scandal or misconduct.”
Reed has a list of scandals and misconduct going back to 1983, when he was just a student.
You want to know how bad Reed is?
“[Reed] is a bad version of us! No more money for him.” – Jack Abramoff to Michael Scanlon in an email message dated January 4, 2002

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | August 15, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

JUST WORDS. But behind them words were actions. Obama learned his words in college and stolen speeches

Posted by: Tim | August 15, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

McCain’s association with anti-abortionist bigot Ralph Reed fits perfectly with his management by the Karl Rove team of the Big Lie ans Smear. These handlers have muzzled McCain so he can no longer make a fool of himself in front of reporter on his bus. they have cut way back on his favorite platform, the Town Hall, because he can’t answer the questions. Having Reed on board cements him with the religious right and provides another reactionary mouthpiece for his ugly campaign. Maverick? Straight-talker? – what a joke! He is nothing more than addled old hack who has turned over his campaign to the worst elements in US politics. Why? Because he is incompetent.

Posted by: jefflz | August 15, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

“McCain has at least 134 Lobbyists running his campaign and raising money for him”
And Barry has 300 close advisors to help load the teleprompter.

Posted by: Mack | August 15, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

The attempts to make these two situations parallel is more than a little, ridiculous, no?
McCain is a hypocrite, claiming to renounce lobbyists while letting them run his campaign.
That’s the problem.
The Baron thing is a media manufactured distraction.

Posted by: Nobodys fool | August 15, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Mack,
Please stop skirting the issue, and explaing to me why McCain has 134 Lobbyists that are advisors.
Then I will explain why Obama has 300 advisors. I asked first.

Posted by: Tim | August 15, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

“That song had nothing to do with the crash unless they wrote it using a crystal ball.”
I didn’t say it did. It is associated with it because it came out soon before the crash and there was an album cover (quickly withdrawn) of the band standing flames. It weirded people out for the timing which was superstitious but creepy.
The song was by Ronnie Van Zant and Allen Collins who were pissed at Gary Rossington for his substance abuse problems screwing up the start of the 77 tour. He crashed a car into a tree. The plane crashed a few days into the tour.
By 77 most of us in that generation knew the party was getting the better of us. This song resonated with that. I’m not sure where JT is going with this because I don’t think he is that old.

Posted by: len | August 15, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Like George Bush, John McCain has demonstrated himself to be a muddle-headed sycophant. In terms of deeply felt moral principles, a solid life ethic and organizational skills he is a ship without a rudder. In most respects his is a record of paltry accomplishments as a citizen, senator and husband. If Americans fail to grasp and vote for Barack Obama’s unique qualities as an original thinker, organizer, motivator and courageous leader, we will deserve what we get: another term of George Bush and a further American decline in most every category imaginable. We need an extraordinary president for these extraordinary times, and John McCain is not the man to choose.

Posted by: Jerome Thomas | August 15, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Get smark and vote McCain….Obama is a sleeper.

Posted by: Jeri | August 15, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Ever hear the phrase garbage in garbage out? I don’t want a president that has to hear and sift through information from 300 advisors before he can make a decision. Why not just elect those 301(including George Looney) advisors? We are electing a president based on his qualifications and ability to lead. I guess with Barry we would just be getting a empty figure head.
BTW – are Ayers and mentor Wright included within that 301?

Posted by: Mack | August 15, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

“Ever hear the phrase garbage in garbage out? I don’t want a president that has to hear and sift through information from 300 advisors before he can make a decision. Why not just elect those 301(including George Looney) advisors? We are electing a president based on his qualifications and ability to lead. I guess with Barry we would just be getting a empty figure head.
BTW – are Ayers and mentor Wright included within that 301?”
Of course a McCain fan wants a president who has less information to help him make decisions.
If Bush had 300 advisors, he would have known that Iraq had no WMD’s and we would be 400 billion in debt.
I know the day he said that he was planning to invade Iraq, that he was using 9/11, and all the people that suffered and died, as a stepping stone for his personal war gains.
But I guess that was a good idea to you.

Posted by: Tim | August 15, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

Reed is dirty as they come and McCain going near him shows you just how far McCain has strayed from any moral standings he once had.
McCain cosying up to Reed could be a boon for Barr Barr in Georgia come Nov. 4th.

Posted by: Jonze | August 15, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Mack,
The only arguement is that Obama has SO MUCH INFORMATION that he has to sift through it all?
You would rather have the president make decisions based on a few scraps of information?
Besides, as editor of Harvard Law Newspaper, while getting his degree, I’m sure he found a way to balance alot of work and decision making.
On the other hand, 300 advisors for McCain would probably cause him to have a stoke. He would have trouble remembering names let alone understanding what they are all talking about.

Posted by: Tim | August 15, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

I think that Obama can plausibly claim to not know what Baron was up to until now.
It’s harder for McCain to claim that he doesn’t know Reed’s well-covered background.

Posted by: BBpd | August 15, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Did John McCain try to cover up his numerous affairs on his first wife? Did he lie to his first wife when he was running around with Cindy while still living in the same house with his first wife?
These are the questions that the McCain camp would be faced with if they push the Baron story to counter the Reed fund raiser (assuming they are comparable in the first place – which they are not. Reed betrayed the public trust, Edwards is a private citizen and it would have only been news if he won the party nomination, which he did not).

Posted by: Jonze | August 15, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Stepping back to look at the Big Picture, it’s hard to reconcile the difference between Campaign Finance McCain, and Completely Reliant on Lobbyists McCain.
I don’t think he’s been put on the hot seat enough over this glaring contridiction in his values now and just a few years ago.
And his chief advisors monetary ties to Georgia is not some small matter. It needs to be aired and discussed. But the media won’t of course….

Posted by: BBpd | August 15, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

In Oct 2007, Obama held a fundraiser at the offices of Greenberg Traurig, Abramoff’s former firm.
Was that bad?

Posted by: MayBee | August 15, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Thank you, thank you, thank you for bringing this to the attention of the world that the Democratic party is beginning to act just like the Republican party. The Republicans had K street and the Dems now have Obama street. He is getting so much money from so many big wash gasbags contributor’s lists, so he is no better than the republicans with K street and that scandal. This is why women are so angry with the Democratic party. It is not just about HIllary being mistreated and abandoned and stabbed inthe back. It is about the demise of the party that we grew up and always loved. Our party was supposed to be above this kind of behavior and tactics. This is what we are so angry about. This is why we are voting for John McCain. Because we now feel there is no Democratic party, just two Republican parties, because they are all acting the same way. So, what difference does it really make with regards to who you vote for in November? We are sending the Dems a message they will lose us forever, not just in this election, if they don’t clean up their act and stop trying to mimick the Bush and Reagan Republicans and K Street.

Posted by: Mary Anne | August 15, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

This is another example of what the right wing really thinks of their supporters. After learning about the Reed/Abramof scam, can anyone really argue that they dont think their followers are rubes and suckers?

Posted by: Mike | August 15, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

It just proves that Obama is just another politician. Nothing new about him, maybe even worse with all his lies, false certificates, flip-flops, shady Chicago connections, and vile campaign practices.
It was obvious during the primary season that Edwards was in the tank for Obama. Why wouldn’t they share the same corrupt ways and means.

Posted by: hype bites | August 15, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

One serious question, does McCain have the lobbyist in his pocket or does the lobbyist have McCain in theirs. McCain is not only tainted with the unehtical practices, he knee deep in influence peddling. “One hand washes the other” or two peas in a pod. With McCain can you be sure that he would choose what is best for America or what his lobbyist friends demand in reapyment?
Obama 08

Posted by: Elitist | August 16, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am

Sounds a quick response time. Both campaigns have to mult-task faster. For example as soon as the Edward scandel hit the media. Does the Obama quick response team throw its resources at this or deal with Jerry Corsi, McCain Attack ads or Georgia & Russia.
McCain doesn’t worry about this as we can see hes trying keep the Republican Base and Ralph Reed is still important to him.

Posted by: Tongassberry | August 16, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.