Aug 14, 2008 9:24pm

Rick Warren Would Have Serious Compunctions About Voting for an Adulterer, Says John Edwards Has Lost the Trust of America

I had the privilege of interviewing Rick Warren today, the best-selling author of The Purpose-Driven Life and the world-famous evangelical pastor.

We came out to his congregation, Saddleback Church, in Lake Forrest , Calif., in preparation for his candidate forum this Saturday evening, featuring Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Barack Obama, D-Illinois.

Part of our conversation aired on Good Morning America Friday. You can watch the segment below.

Most of of our conversation revolved around the candidates and the forum, but I asked him some other questions as well.

One of them went as follows.

TAPPER:  As a political observer and a Christian leader you must have had a personal response to the revelations about John Edwards’ personal life when he admitted he cheated on his wife. What do you think in a time like that? When you hear John Edwards tell Bob Woodruff that he’s right with his wife and he’s right with Jesus and he’s moved on, does that resonate with you or do you think, “That’s not enough, John?”

WARREN: You know, Jake there’s a difference is between forgiveness and trust. And I don’t think people understood this even as far back as, say, the Clinton scandals and things like that. The Bible teaches us that forgiveness must be instant and that we are to forgive people instantly when they sin because of three reasons: first, we’ve been forgiven by God; second, resentment makes you miserable; and third you’re going to need more forgiveness in the future.

“Forgive us our debts as we forgive those who’ve trespassed against us.” So forgiveness has to be immediate but trust has to be rebuilt. Forgiveness is by grace. Trust is by works. And so if a woman’s husband is beating her and he comes back to the door and says, “Will, you forgive me?” She has to forgive him. “Yes, I forgive you.” “Will you let me back into the house?” “No, that’s another matter.”

You have to earn that trust. All leadership is built on trust. It’s built on credibility. If you don’t have credibility, if you don’t have authenticity, if you don’t have trust, you’re not a leader even if you have the title. And the moment you lose the trust of the American public you’re no longer the leader. You may still have the title but you’re not it. It takes years to build trust and you can lose it instantly — and it takes even longer to rebuild.

John Edwards and others like him have lost the trust of America because they lied, and fundamentally beneath every affair it’s dishonesty, its deceit, its deception. They’re lying to God. They’re lying to themselves. They’re lying to their wives and they’re lying to the public. How do you trust someone who’s constantly lying? You can’t. That’s why it is a myth to say their personal life doesn’t matter. It does matter — all of leadership is built on credibility.

TAPPER: Would you have compunctions about voting for someone who had cheated on his wife?

WARREN: Absolutely I would. Absolutely I would. Because if you can’t keep your faith to your most sacred vow – “’til death do us part” — how in the world can I trust you to lead my family? My government? My nation?…Absolutely I would. I think people first need to ask forgiveness and then earn trust back over time Can trust be re-earned? Absolutely but it takes time.

- jpt

User Comments

So, I guess that means he won’t be voting for John McCain?

Posted by: Michele | August 14, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

john mccane cheated on his first wife with multiple women….rick warren cant support him. i respect that. i would never vote for a CHEATER either….
Obamacon

Posted by: ex republican | August 14, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

So I assume that means he is not voting for John McCain either, right ?

Posted by: Benjamin | August 14, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

Hahah Michele.
Great minds :)

Posted by: Benjamin | August 14, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

And… what’s Edwards running for again?

Posted by: Deep Release | August 14, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

Will the members of his church vote for McCain ?

Posted by: confused,s.c. | August 14, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

What a bunch of hypocritical baloney. The Jesus freaks are alive but not well.

Posted by: Janice | August 14, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

So, I guess he will be voting for Obama then. McCain got rid of his first wife, who was disabled, to marry the heiress trophy wife. What a jerk!!! And, after stealing another woman’s husband, that trophy wife turned out to be a drug thief and a plagiarizer to boot!!! Some scummy first lady she would make. No wonder, McCain had “no comment” when told about Edwards.

Posted by: Christimarie | August 14, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

So, the John McCain of 30 years ago is the same as the John McCain of today? Some Christians don’t beleive in Divorce and re-marriage and they consider it adultery if a divorce person re-marry. Having said that, does this disqualify individuals who are divorced?

Posted by: Tyrone | August 14, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

He makes a good point and that’s why I don’t like Michelle Obama. She lost my trust with those hate filled comments and has done absolutely nothing to earn back my trust.

Posted by: Susan | August 14, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Yes, we all know McCain cheated on his wife. For some reason, sex outside of marriage is supposed to have some kind of earth-shattering importance, but I dont get it. Yeah, I know that if McCain reneged on his marriage vows, we cant trust him to uphold his oath of office, big deal. There are so many other reasons not to trust McCain, that this just seems silly by comparison.

Posted by: Mike | August 14, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

No one listens to preachers and pastors anymore anyway. Most have their own dark demons they’re dealing with. From being hooked on internet porn, to adult=ery, drugs and alcohol abuse and a host of other “sins”. He who has not “sinned” PLEASE cast the first stone!

Posted by: Casting_StonesQ | August 14, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

He needs to ask Obama if he knows for sure that he has not had an affair on his wife. How can he be so sure when he was taking cocaine during part of the marriage. Crack is whack!

Posted by: Cory | August 14, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

Tyrone:
“Having said that, does this disqualify individuals who are divorced?”
___________
Not unless that’s what THEY believe!
None of us a perfect; each of us is guilty of a sin or two….
But, unfortunately, many of our great Presideints (Roosevelt, Clinton, Kennedy….. (Reagan(wasn’t great…..but he was OK ) had a problem with this issue.
YET IT DIDN’T INTERFERE WITH THEIR LEADERSHIP!

Posted by: eyes opening | August 14, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

I’ve never met a self-proclaimed “religious” person that could live up to the fictional characters they compare everyone else to. As it turns out, they are as flawed, if not MORE flawed, than those they presume to judge. I am not fooled.

Posted by: KittyBaby | August 14, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

Rather astonishing in this day and age to see the ugly kind of racism found in some of these comments – and race here is germane to nothing. The next time someone accuses Obama of playing the race card – remember how ugly some of these comments are – and the stupidity it represents.

Posted by: nh bob | August 14, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

Someone needs to remind Jake Tapper and Rick Warren that John Edwards is a private citizen who is not running for any political office. And Jake should ask Rick Warren straight out if that means he is not supporting John McCain for president. Go Obama, devout husband.

Posted by: Sean | August 14, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

If we can forgive Bill Clinton for lying and others can forgive John McCain… I’m sure we can forgive Edwards; his wife has done so, why can’t we?.

Posted by: Vanessa | August 14, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

As if every body who post here are lily white pure.

Posted by: orange cat | August 14, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

Another judgmental, pious, holier-than-thou so-called spiritual leader who is much more knowing of God, has ALL the answers and thinks he has a direct line with Him. Guess what preacher? I don’t trust YOU!

Posted by: hewhoiswithoutsincast.... | August 14, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Yes I would like to ask Tapper why he didnt ask that question “Rick Warren, are you voting for McCain, because he cheated on his wife”? these people are such hipocrites!

Posted by: Nicole | August 14, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Christimarie
So, I guess he will be voting for Obama then. McCain got rid of his first wife, who was disabled, to marry the heiress trophy wife. What a jerk!!! And, after stealing another woman’s husband, that trophy wife turned out to be a drug thief and a plagiarizer to boot!!! Some scummy first lady she would make. No wonder, McCain had “no comment” when told about Edwards
****************************************
I couldnt have said it any better!

Posted by: Nicole | August 14, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

If I waited to vote for a man who didn’t run around on his wife then I wouldn’t be voting at all.

Posted by: Kahtleen | August 14, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

Perhaps I’m suffering from temporary illiteracy, but:
where is the racist commentary in this article
and how can someone vote for Edwards when he’s not running for anything?

Posted by: Karen | August 14, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Ironic; but my brother Obama as a “believer” at heart himself will have no problem with having more wives or forgiving people that sin.
Obama 08

Posted by: Ali_Detroit | August 14, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

Would he vote for an admitted drug dealer – Reverend Obama?

Posted by: Jeffrey | August 14, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

Who cares? These preachers are no better than anyone else. We all have skeletons in our closets. By the time someone gets to be of age to be president of the USA, he/she certainly has made some mistakes. So what? These candidates are human beings for christsake!!!!! Get over it. They poop and pee the same way we all do! Obama ’08!

Posted by: Jeff | August 14, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

Does this mean that he didn’t vote for Reagan, our only divorced president. He wouldn’t have vote for more than half of past presidents? He, of course, would have voted for Hillary, who up held her vows!

Posted by: smudge | August 14, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

I thought Warren was supporting Obama…

Posted by: a dem | August 14, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

I take it he won’t be voting for John McCain then.

Posted by: Sandy | August 14, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

Does such an adulterer include a person by the name John McCain who is running for President? I would hope so!

Posted by: Dr. sam | August 14, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

I don’t know, but I follow the European model. I vote for a politician for his/her political expertise. As long as the candidate does not have a ax murderer rapist background, pedophilia record,..you get the idea, what they do privately is none of my business.
Who knows what the agreement is between John and Elizabeth Edwards…only they can tell us, but probably won’t. Without their honest input, the scenario is kind of ikky due to Elizabeth’s health. But really, the US is full of porno consumers who cry foul at someone else’s indiscretion. Such hypocrisy.

Posted by: hype bites | August 14, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

Rick Warren won’t be voting for Obama after he learned about who Obama’s pastor was for 20 years. Not to mention that Obama backs infanticide.
If he did vote for Obama, then I would have serious doubts about Rick being a Christian.

Posted by: Jo | August 14, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

And the McCains were seperated when he met Cindy. And Ronald Reagan had already split from Jane when he met Nancy.
So nice try but you lose on those.

Posted by: Jo | August 14, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

I wonder if Rick Warren knows that John McCain cheated on his first wife with Cindy McCain and even lived with her BEFORE he was divorced from his firs wife.
Also, I wonder if Rick Warren knows that John McCain even LIED about this affair in one of his books and the LA Times did an article that called him on it.
I wonder if the rest of America knows that John McCain is an adulterer.

Posted by: vickie | August 14, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

I don’t think the voters condone this sort of behavior but we’ve learned to tolerate it because if we didn’t there would be no one left in Washington.

Posted by: rigatoni | August 14, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

Obama probably only agreed to do the interview if Rick didn’t ask Obama’s views on abortion and how he voted to let babies die if there is a botched abortion (with no medical interventioned ordered).
No Christian could vote for that kind of man. Period.

Posted by: Jo | August 14, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

This is just the sort of grand stand play that generally precedes a fall from grace the likes of Swaggert, Baker and Falwell. Let em’ talk.

Posted by: foxisms | August 14, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

The question was a set up for the John McCain question. However, if you noticed, Rick Warren didnt say that someone who commits adultry can never be trusted again. He said it takes time to earn that trust back. I believe that McCain has done that. Why is it that all of the liberal newspapers were so quick to try and pin McCain on looking at a woman not long ago, but refuse to look into the Edwards issues? And liberals are so quick to point at McCain? I would like to see how many people could tolerate 5 1/2 years as a prisoner of war and make anything of their lives. Give the man some credit!

Posted by: Bud | August 14, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

Rick Warren wrote a letter in 2005 in which he told church pastors that he didn’t know anything about AIDS, his wife had to tell him … these are his words: Warren is a latecomer to the cause of social justice, as he confessed to about 500 church leaders in a hotel in Kigali, the Rwandan capital. “I have been so busy building my church that I have not cared about the poor,” Warren said. “I have sinned, and I am sorry.” He says much the same thing about AIDS. “I felt like anyone who was HIV-positive probably deserved to be ill,” he said.
…. Rick Warren is a politician’s dream … he speaks their language … from both sides of his mouth!

Posted by: Francisco Cardenas | August 14, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

It amazes me that so many think that an adulterer is no hindrance to being a leader. If someone was robbing money and lied to cover it up, wouldn’t you question their credibility in other areas? Why would someone only lie about cheating, but be believable about their abilities to lead our country? When they continue with the lies to cover-up their misdeeds, how can an apology or explanation be totally believed?
Rick Warren talks about using the Bible as a set of standards to be followed, and they are for our welfare, not chains to bind us. Besides, it is also common sense. Who wants cheating, lying, and so on to be acceptable behavior other than the offender himself?
I think that it is a great idea for Rev. Warren to have McCain and Obama come to his church for a forum so his congregation can assess both candidates.

Posted by: Ann | August 14, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

Obama/Edwards in ’08

Posted by: martha | August 14, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

Dear Pastor Warren–
Please take your susperstitious gibberish and go away. Far far far away.

Posted by: WarDog | August 14, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

Well, that rules out McCain.

Posted by: GRSMC | August 14, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

Cory,
No one listens to pastors any more? Give me a break Rick has over 20,000 attendees and has impacted tens of thousand of pastors who share his vision, faith and values. The reality is that no one listens to Cory. Sorry buddy but you know not what you speak of.

Posted by: Eugene | August 14, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Oh pleeeaaaase. McCain has made a career out of lies – cheating in both his business and personal life, he’s foul-mouthed, hot-tempered and does NOT practice good judgment. I actually agree with him on a few minor issues, but disagree with him on issues that I consider major….but even if I agreed, I’d never vote for him. He’s a crook to the bone. He’s had a sense of entitlement since birth and still throws temper tantrums when he doesn’t get what he wants. He’s self serving and could care less about the average American. Obama was not my first choice, but he’s a thousand times better than crazy, old McCain.
As for Edwards and his affair….come on, is anyone really surprised?

Posted by: Danya | August 14, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

Obama has picked the best in his pastor and other religious men of the cloth. Look at Rev. jesse Jackson, Fr. Pfleger and Rev. Wright. Where there’s smoke, there’s fire. Obama is batting 0 for 3.

Posted by: Bart | August 14, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

I was just thinking about John McCain and his situation. If you can’t trust a man who cheated on his wife and stayed with her, how can you trust a man who cheated on his wife and left her for someone younger and more attractive.

Posted by: david | August 14, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

After reading OBAMA NATION, McCain is looking darn good. I almost voted for slick. I urge everyone to read this book, it is very informative and uncovers the “real” Obama.

Posted by: abe | August 14, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

Guess Mr. Warren isn’t voting for McCheater.

Posted by: jb | August 14, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

I believe Obama and Edwards were working together, against Hillary. Both men have dirt to hide and hopefully, no more than one would get caught and the other gets the nomination. First, Edwards got caught and now, Obama is caught in the book, Obama Nation. Oops!!!

Posted by: Art in Dayton | August 14, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

So you think that means he will vote for O’liar instead.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | August 14, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

Vanessa,
Are you defending Obama’s good friend, Edwards? Didn’t the ego-centric Edwards throw all his support to the arrogant Obama?
=======================================
Pennsylvanians, stop clinging to your guns and your religion!
=======================================

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | August 14, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

When will we find out Warren has had a secret life?

Posted by: tww | August 14, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

By the way, that doesn’t rule Hillary out. We don’t know the whole story with Obama, though. McCain has a sordid past as well.
Perhaps delegates will take heed, and vote their conscience — I’d love to see Hillary pull the rug out from under these guys who think that another egotistical male will be running this country for the next four years.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | August 15, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

Warren said that he would ‘NOT’ vote for an adulterer.
Well there is no way I would vote for an adulterer either.I believe that the President and the First Lady should both be above that and never had any extramarital affairs.
But John McCain married his ‘MISTRESS’. There is no way I am going to vote for the man who MARRIED his MISTRESS.
That is an Insult and very DISRESPECTFUL to the Position of the ‘First-Lady’!

Posted by: lovinggrandma53 | August 15, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

“everybody is a critic and all the media live in fear of the moral right…”
and the moral left.

Posted by: hype bites | August 15, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Barrack is no doubt the best choice between several flawed human beings.
McCain is by far the most flawed, possibly a monster-in-waiting.

Posted by: Tim Welsh | August 15, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

Jake,
You say, “I had the privilege of interviewing Rick Warren today…”, but why didn’t you ask the obvious and key follow up question regarding whether Mr. Warren can trust and vote for Senator McCain?

Posted by: Victor Shrenzel | August 15, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am

Absolute rubbish! FDR was an adulterer and he led this nation (successfully) through the Depression and a World War. The fact is a fair number of our past presidents have been adulterers including Eisenhower! so let’s get off this hobby horse. I don’t condone the behavior, but it’s a fact a 1/3 of married of men cheat on their wives and those are just the ones who have admitted to it. We need to get our noses out of people’s sex lives and call them on their positions on issues that affect the lives of everyday citizens.

Posted by: April Campbell | August 15, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

I am a Christian but I find it disheartening that Rick Warren or any other Pastor would use their position to cast a stone at a human being who is critically flawed. More rephrehensible to me is the idea that John Edwards ran for the Democratic nomination knowing that he had lied about his affair making him a “lame duck” so to speak. Then after withdrawing from the race, giving his support to Obama. I think that it was a conspiracy within the Democratic Party to keep the nomination from going to a woman. It was no accident that Obama was in Hawaii on vacation this week!
I have no respect for the political system that plays these kind of games with the American public and I have no respect for religion playing a part in politics.

Posted by: Janet | August 15, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

Did John Edwards really own up to the fact that his actions were morally wrong? Maybe he did, but it leaves me wondering when he only admitted to his actions when there was no other choice. Did he ever address the issue of lying, having previously called the allegations “tabloid trash”? Even now he doesn’t refer to it as “adultery” or “unfaithfulness,” or having an “affair.” He prefers the more refined word “liaison” to describe the relationship!

Posted by: Andy | August 15, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

ASharon,
I think Al was using the Bible as a reference for adultery. In the Bible, adultry is a man having sex with an engaged or married woman. I.e., Bill C. having sex with Monica would not be considered adultery.

Posted by: Dennis | August 15, 2008, 3:42 am 3:42 am

When weighing the 2 candidates both come up wanting and I am inclined to trust neither. The real issue becomes “who will better represent my beliefs” whatever their underlying motivations might be. I could care less who Rick Warren is voting for. I also could care less who anyone on this forum is voting for. I am angry that we have become a pseudo-democracy. These candidates were not chosen by the american people. The issues of national security, legal infanticide, fetal murder, fighting societal normalization of reproductive dysfunction… those are the real issues at hand and each of us must decide for ourselves which candidate is the lesser of two evils…

Posted by: theregoesthecountry | August 15, 2008, 3:46 am 3:46 am

It is true that Adultery is married persons having sex with someone who is not their wife. That is exactly what John McCain did when he took Cindy to wife. Each sexual act he has with her is an act of adultery, because she is not legally his wife in the sight of God. I would suggest both political parties read to their bible. John 8 records a woman caught in the act of adultery. Matt. 19 is what John McCain is guilty of_Adultery. In other words, for the biblically challenged, John McCain is living in Adultery every day for the past 30+ years. It is true that lots of politicans both democrat and republican are guilty of this act, but it doesn’t mean I have to vote for it. John McCain is an AULTERER.

Posted by: John | August 15, 2008, 3:49 am 3:49 am

John:
“It is true that Adultery is married persons having sex with someone who is not their wife.’
—-
That might be the dictionary meaning, but it not how the Bible defines it. Which is what Al was referring to.

Posted by: Dennis | August 15, 2008, 3:50 am 3:50 am

According to Matthew 19:9 and Matthew 5:32, John McCain is an ADULTERER. These are the words of Jesus, and the definition of Adultery he gave to all of us, and not the definition of dictionaries. And the way John McCain divorced his first wife was even more despicable than the act itself. If he could betray his first wife the way he did, he could betray America as well. I could never in all good conscience ever vote for an adulterer.

Posted by: Al | August 15, 2008, 4:12 am 4:12 am

Not for sure but believe there is a passage in the Bible where Christ, in defending a harlot, says to those who would stone her to death, “Ye who are without sin, cast the first stone.” Think that’s it. Anyway, almost every male and female cheats in or out of a marriage. Wondering if Obama has ever cheated even in his heart like Carter. If he is a man, and not the second coming of Christ, then betting he is just like the rest of us males and has cheated if only in his heart.

Posted by: Lawrence | August 15, 2008, 4:16 am 4:16 am

Al:
Jesus often spoke disparagingly of the self-righteous. You might want to be careful.

Posted by: Dennis | August 15, 2008, 4:19 am 4:19 am

BTW — Jesus words regarding adultry and guilt were:
M’t:5:27: Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery:
M’t:5:28: But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.
The standard is soooo high that no one can claim mastery… That does not mean that we just toss out the standard though… Those who seek to justify another’s sin only do so because of their own guilt and/or desires…
Forgiveness and trust are different and time IS a major factor in restoring trust but if anybody is looking for a perfect man they themself are foolish…
When weighing the 2 candidates both come up wanting and I am inclined to trust neither. The real issue becomes “who will better represent my beliefs” whatever their underlying motivations might be. I could care less who Rick Warren is voting for. I also could care less who anyone on this forum is voting for. I am angry that we have become a pseudo-democracy. These candidates were not chosen by the american people. The issues of national security, legal infanticide, fetal murder, fighting societal normalization of reproductive dysfunction… those are the real issues at hand and each of us must decide for ourselves which candidate is the lesser of two evils…

Posted by: theregoesthecountry | August 15, 2008, 4:23 am 4:23 am

So let me see Lawrence, if I get this straight, you would equate lusting with the act of Adultery? No where in the bible does it say one has the right to put away their spouse if they lust for another. Please don’t mix apples and oranges here. I agree Jesus had the power to forgive adultery, but never did he condone adultery. However you forget the last part of these verses in John 8 when he said, “Go and sin no more”. John McCain continues to live in sin and many will follow his act. What kind of example is that? We can’t get in the minds of hearts, but we who have eyes and ears and understanding surely can see what John McCain has done and continues to do_live in ADULTERY.

Posted by: Al | August 15, 2008, 4:30 am 4:30 am

” Those who seek to justify another’s sin only do so because of their own guilt and/or desires…”
Some of us do not care whether someone has an affair or not. And yes, fortunately I have plenty of desires for which I would never apologize. Some of us view the Bible as a fictional work of nonsense.
No Christian really believes what the NT says either, other than what they want to believe. If they did and they had lusted at least twice, they would have plucked out both eyes by now. More easily to follow, how many men would turn the cheek after being slapped by another man? Very few if unafraid.
But, yes, I understand that everything found inconvenient to follow comes under the heading of “Not to be taken literally”. Jesus was apparently misinformed on those matters.

Posted by: Dennis | August 15, 2008, 4:39 am 4:39 am

We have to remember to measure guilt or innocence by God’s standards and not the standard’s of any individual… Forgiveness and trust ARE different …as far as integrity… it’s a good quality… if you can find it in someone then vote for them…
In the words of Spongebob Squarepants “Good luck with that!”
Not that there are no men of integrity but you might be hard pressed to find one on the ballot in November.

Posted by: theregoesthecountry | August 15, 2008, 4:41 am 4:41 am

Al:
“I agree Jesus had the power to forgive adultery, but never did he condone adultery.”
You missed the point. You are not Jesus. He told you to not judge others. That is his business according to the Bible.

Posted by: Dennis | August 15, 2008, 4:42 am 4:42 am

I am merely speaking from my own perspective and I understand that not everyone holds my views. The only reason that religion was brought up by me was because of the unlearned and ill-applied logic of those who quote from or about things scriptural that they don’t even really espouse at all in the first place.

Posted by: theregoesthecountry | August 15, 2008, 4:49 am 4:49 am

Self righteous is not the message, and I am not running for any office nor am endorsing one party over another. Attack me if you will, but Adultery is Adultery no matter who states it, and John McCain is an ADULTERER. He needs to repent and come clean of his sin just like Edwards and Clinton. For the record, I am not a democrat, but an independent voter, and I call it as I see it. No adulterer can enter into the Kingdom of God. Gal 5:19-21. I am not on here for anyone, but God and His Word. Washington needs to clean up its act and that right soon. Democrats and Republicans and Independents need to take heed to the warnings of an evil nation. That’s not self righteousness, that’s the TRUTH.

Posted by: Al | August 15, 2008, 4:52 am 4:52 am

Anyone can accurately quote something whether they espouse it or not. As an atheist who spent my first 30+ years as an active Christian and church leader, I probably understand the Bible better than most Christians.

Posted by: Dennis | August 15, 2008, 4:54 am 4:54 am

I’m not really into the whole Evangelical Christian movement that has become so trendy in America now, I consider myself to be spiritual however. But Rick Warren, who’s book I have read, is the only other person to say exactly what I’ve been thinking this year about voting for candidates who cheat on their spouses.
I’m not voting for McCain and if I’m really correctly I suppose that this means Rick Warren won’t be voting for McCain either….Finally, a man with a difference of opinion than mine who I can actually respect for standing my personal convictions over party

Posted by: jenny | August 15, 2008, 5:04 am 5:04 am

It is quite impossible for a non-believer to properly discern scripture without the aid of the Holy Spirit. You have to have the decoder ring or you are lost. Scriptures are to be rightly divided… which means that you have to understand that God discerns the heart more than the simple “letter of the law” and scriptures apply accordingly. You can accurately quote scripture all day long and entirely miss the real meaning… in other words swallow a camel and strain at a gnat… Only a fool would quote from things that they don’t believe in the first place… especially from a book that inherently requires enlightenment and spiritual discernment.

Posted by: theregoesthecountry | August 15, 2008, 5:07 am 5:07 am

I bet he has no problem voting for McCain who is also an adulterer. Funny how that works, isn’t it? Oh that’s right, I forgot, if you’re a Republican you just sinned and it is alright but if you’re a Democrat it means you’re evil and no good. What a bunch of garbage and who cares what this “enlightened”(lol) guy thinks?

Posted by: wirey-one | August 15, 2008, 6:28 am 6:28 am

For the record, I would have to assume after reading mosts of these posts that most of the writers did not bother reading the entire story before voicing their opinions. Warren states it takes years to rebuild trust. McCain cheating on his firt wife was 25+ years ago and has since been married faithfully to the same woman. Clinton cheated on his wife many years ago and has in time built up his good standing with the public again. Edwards cheated on his wife recently and no one does trust him at this point in time. Perhaps in time he can build that trust up again, or maybe not, only time will tell. No matter what posts I read it is covered with Obama leaches trying to turn every story (related to Obama..or not) into a pro-Obama, down with McCain story. For the record, I think both canidates suck…but this story isnt really about them, is it.

Posted by: sm | August 15, 2008, 6:41 am 6:41 am

What about their hero John McCain? a serial fornicator and adulterer

Posted by: Leo | August 15, 2008, 6:46 am 6:46 am

As it is said about Edwards, let’s not forget McCain’s outings, nor Bill Clinton’s extra marital affairs….

Posted by: jozy | August 15, 2008, 7:09 am 7:09 am

I thought it was finally time for Democrats to take the lead in correcting some of the things wrong with America. THEN COMES THE SICKENING STORY OF PROMINENT DEMOCRAT AND POTENTIAL VP JOHN EDWARDS! But even worse are the Democrat apologists who post on these message boards trying to minimize the damage to Obama. Well I have news for you, You’ve turned off this voter! THIS is change I can believe in”? CHANGE FOR THE WORSE IT SEEMS

Posted by: william | August 15, 2008, 7:10 am 7:10 am

While I do not condone adultery by any stretch of the imagination, I do not hold the opinion that an unfaithful husband is necessarily a poor president. Franklin D. Roosevelt, John F. Kennedy, and Lyndon Johnson were no angels in their married lives, but they were all good presidents. To assume that an adulter will “cheat” on the people he is elected to lead is false logic, a non sequitor.

Posted by: Ruth Brown | August 15, 2008, 7:14 am 7:14 am

after reading this article, John McCain, thinks to himself, “well, I guess he’ll plug for Obama.” He certainly must know about my first wife. . . . . .

Posted by: DAVID NH | August 15, 2008, 7:18 am 7:18 am

It amazes me how these self titled ‘christians’ always forget about ‘Let he who is without sin cast the first stone’.
Where was this guy when another self titled ‘christian leader’ was out buggering everyone?
What a load of crap these people are. These are the people we need to deport.

Posted by: Steve | August 15, 2008, 7:22 am 7:22 am

Edwards is an adulterer but John McCain is an Adulterer, a polygamist and an irresponsible father. But evangelicals have not yet said a word about his very specific and special situation as adulterer and polygamist. Ronald and Nancy Reagan have protested their firendship with McCain for that same reason. God save America from an adulterer and polygamist McCain.

Posted by: BKMC | August 15, 2008, 7:23 am 7:23 am

Why has the Communist Party America come out in support of Barack Obama? Do Democrats feel comfortable being on the same side as people who want to change America into a Marxist Totalitarian State?
Is THIS the “change” Mr. Obama has in mind?

Posted by: Frances | August 15, 2008, 7:25 am 7:25 am

Then I gues he won’t be voting for McCain then.

Posted by: Brian | August 15, 2008, 7:26 am 7:26 am

It Makes Me Sick When I hear All These Self Proclaimed Christian Guru’s! Aren’t There Two Sides To Every Story! ? Love To LOOK Deep In their Closets!

Posted by: Ken | August 15, 2008, 7:28 am 7:28 am

While comparing other past politicians affairs may be fair game, (even if they happened more than 20 years ago)for me it really wasn’t the affair that bothered me about this man who was a heartbeat away from either a VP or cabinet post. IT WAS THE USE OF CAMPAIGN FUNDS FOR THE CONTINUING COVER-UP

Posted by: Salvi | August 15, 2008, 7:30 am 7:30 am

Hmmm… I have one word to add here: David. Those of you who have read the Bible probably remember the fellow I am talking about — think “and Bathsheba.” As I remember the story, it would seem that one can overcome a history of adultery and become a successful leader.

Posted by: Ron | August 15, 2008, 7:36 am 7:36 am

And Jesus said, “Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery. But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.”
Per Jesus, it is no longer the person who has acted out adultery, it is all who think adultery in their hearts. So before we throw stones, consider if we are also adulterers according to our Lord’s words.

Posted by: Chuck | August 15, 2008, 7:52 am 7:52 am

Now that’s very interesting. John McCain is, of course, an adulterer, by his own admission. Like Edwards, he started an affair while his wife was sick — injured in a car wreck — carried it on for several months before he told his wife and served her with divorce papers. I don’t know why your interviewer didn’t ask about McCain, but if this pastor really means what he says, he ought to rule out voting for McCain as well, no?

Posted by: cervantes | August 15, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am

I suppose we can assume he is not voting for McCain?

Posted by: jenny | August 15, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am

>>>Hmmm… I have one word to add here: David. Those of you who have read the Bible probably remember the fellow I am talking about — think “and Bathsheba.” As I remember the story, it would seem that one can overcome a history of adultery and become a successful leader.<<<
Actually….. No, you are mistaken.
David was a great leader BEFORE the Bathsheba affair. It was the treachery and cover-up that led to his downfall and the curse on his son.

Posted by: willa | August 15, 2008, 8:02 am 8:02 am

Not exactly clear on how the fact that other politicians have also been adulterers somehow makes it ok for Edwards or somehow helps Obama?
So many of you seem to think that is important, im confused

Posted by: salvi | August 15, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am

Salvi, that would indeed be outrageous – if it were true. There was never any question about it though.

Posted by: Mike | August 15, 2008, 8:10 am 8:10 am

Even if Edwards didn’t cheat on his wife I don’t think he is qualified to be the VP for Obama. I think John Kerry was sorry later that he chose him. Edwards doesn’t belong in politics. The difference between Bill Clinton and Edwards is that Edwards was with that woman many times and paid her several thousands of dollars. I believe until proven otherwise that the baby is Edwards and it will be announced if Elizabeth passes away. I never knew the story on McCain until recently and Newt is another one who was having an affair while his wife was ill. I believe Obama’s has high morals regarding his marriage but I am not voting for him. I believe that if you are a true American of this country you do not attend a racist church that is against America and the white people living in it. Obama was a racist when he was younger and so was his wife Michele. That’s not the kind of person I would ever vote for even if Hillary was the VP. This is the greatest country in the world. McCain is a true American and would never belong to the same kind of church as Obama. Obama knew what kind of pastor Wright was and should have left immediately but he stayed because he was in his category. He doesn’t deserve to become president of this country because of that plus he is too arrogant. Maybe he needs God to bring him down to level and that just might happen.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | August 15, 2008, 8:13 am 8:13 am

So we now know he’s not voting for McCain…

Posted by: Soldier | August 15, 2008, 8:14 am 8:14 am

I get so sick and tired of the religion rearing it ugly head. I can care less what Rick Warren thinks. What John Edwards did was wrong, but who are we to judge? The President is not the pope, He/she is human, and is capable of makeing mistakes. That doesn’t make them a bad leader, in fact i feel it makes them more human. When I look at a candidate,I look at that person ideas for the country, not what they do in the bedroom, or how often they go to church. We need to stop this stupidity. I want someone who can provide a way to get jobs coming back, someone who will raise our image on the world stage to a level of respecablity that we havent had since WW2. Someone who will lower gas prices, and improve the countries infrastructure. Someone who can actually make us feel that we can acomplish anything if we work together as Americans. Thats what I look for in a presidental candidate. I don’t need a moral leader, I have my own morals that I follow. I want someone who can make it so that I can follow my own dreams. If we used that criteria in looking for our leaders that the first step in turning this country around.

Posted by: Keith T.Gilbert | August 15, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am

Rick Warren’s circular logic and self-appointed expertise are of no interest to me, and should have no place in our political process. What idiot set up this debate?

Posted by: hey Scoob | August 15, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am

A year or two from now, Mr. Warren will likely be found committing the the same actions he condemns today. Those who condemn the loudest are frequently the biggest hippocrits – Swaggert, the Bakers,Haggard and many more. Politics taints religion. Religion has no place in politics.

Posted by: DaveM | August 15, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am

Tell me again who this Rick Warren is? I don’t think I’ve ever heard of him. We’ll probably learn that he’s got some horrible secret in his closet next month. His logic, by the way, is faulty. He does not make the case that forgiveness is immediate but trust is a longer take. And isn’t the trust issue between him and his wife? Who is this Rick to get in the middle of it? And if this is the case, let’s take a look at all the politicians (both red & blue) who’ve committed adultery. . . That being said I would rather have someone like Edwards in charge because his record on things like the economy and peace and helping the poor is far, far better than any Republican, ever. He’s not MY husband, and I’ll take my cue from his works.

Posted by: kcareymac | August 15, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am

Oh, and I’d be proud to have a classy, wholesome woman like Michelle in the White House rather than a reconstructed, emaciated socialite who knows all the right ‘words’ but has absolutely no depth of character. Didn’t she date a married man, lure him away from his wife, then marry him and pay off the ex for life? I have absolutely no respect for either of the McCains. I’d be horrified to have him lead, no matter how ‘aw shucks’ he sounds. His modesty is a facade. And I don’t care if he wears $500 shoes – he’s got her money, she doesn’t mind him spending it! So what? But their characters, or lack thereof (Talk about John Kerry’s flip-flops!) are more importatnt.

Posted by: kcareymac | August 15, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am

I simply cannot understand, politics aside, why so many of the people who comment say things like “everyone does it”, or “how can you be so critical?” Not everyone cheats on their spouse. I have been faithful to my only wife for 41 years. I am an atheist and have not seen the inside of a church in decades (except for weddings or funerals). It is not a matter of religion but one of honor and responsibilty. I don’t claim to be a wonderful person, but I have always managed to be true to the woman I love. I don’t criticize anyone who does fool around but I am offended by those who say no one has the standing to do so.

Posted by: Paul | August 15, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am

ex republican – Right! I’m sure you were EVER a Republican! Warren is right – why should we lower our standards and vote for someone who would cheat on his wife (who has cancer) and then deny, deny, deny?!? And there ARE good, faithful, righteous, honest, humble men out there who can run for office. They just can’t afford it because they have never cheated to become RICH!!!!

Posted by: M. Summer | August 15, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am

What the heck is a ‘true American’? That’s so silly. You’re making this up.

Posted by: kcareymac | August 15, 2008, 8:36 am 8:36 am

Mariann Pepitone What makes the Obamas racist? I hear the accusation bandered about, but I hear nothing specific. What did he/ she say or do that makes them racist to white people?

Posted by: Keith T.Gilbert | August 15, 2008, 8:36 am 8:36 am

I am not religious, but cheating does happen in relationships and is truely a reprehensible act. If you can’t keep it in your pants and resist temptation when you say “I do” then don’t get married in the first place. I think what upsets me most in the case of Edwards/Newt/McCain is that they cheated on a very sick spouse who needed their love and unconditional support. They did it at a time when their significant other was at their lowest low. McCain is now suddenly a good guy because he paid for his past wife’s medical bills? I think not. Does cheating happen? Yes. Does that mean we, as a nation, should normalize this activity? Nope.
Marriage is a microcosm for politics. America, while not in its lowest low, is having some hard times. We need someone strong on the policy to begin the process of bringing us out of deficit and stengthening this country from the ground up. How would we feel if a politician cheated on their promises for this country? Cheated on their oath to its people? We need someone dedicated who can uphold their commitment to the American people and be strong in the face of temptation and the easy road.
If I can’t look towards you to make it work in your personal life, I certainly don’t want you taking risks with mine.

Posted by: Suggestion | August 15, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am

Perhaps the good pastor should re-read John 8:1-12.

Posted by: Jimmny Cricket | August 15, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am

Ooooh, just read that Lawrence thinks that ‘almost every man and every woman cheats in and out of marriage’ – really? 31 years and still not cheated…. I also know that of all my woman friends, not one has cheated. My husband’s clean, too (I know, I only have what he says, but I trust HIM). I think you just need new friends!

Posted by: kcareymac | August 15, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am

OKAY, IF YOU WOULDN’T VOTE FOR AN ADULTERER, WHY VOTE FOR MCCAIN? IF YOU ALL REMEMBER, IN THE LATE 70′S MCCAIN LEFT HIS THEN WIFE AND HIS CHILDREN BEHIND TO BE WITH HIS NEW WIFE CINDY. IS THIS ADULTERY? I THINK THE ANSWER IS PLAIN AND CLEAR.

Posted by: RADIOHEDGE | August 15, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am

I’m also getting pretty tired of this whole Obama swift-boating effort. Black politicians in Chicago are of course going to be dealing with radical elements and fringe personalities, it’s part of the landscape. Most people understand that. And people- black, mostly- have also been making fun of these fringe personalities ever since Good Times and Sanford and Son went on the air. It’s a familiar part of our culture, like the hippy movement. Quaint, yes. Scary? Give me a break.

Posted by: hey Scoob | August 15, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am

And Rev. Wright is NOT Obama. He is another person. I’m a Catholic, but believe in a woman’s right to choose, as well as God’s love for all people, of all sexual orientations. So even though I listen to the homilies of priests, I do line line up rank and file with all of their opinions. Many are like me. Find someone who has heard or seen Obama speak, think or act in a racist way, stop trying to Swift Boat again!

Posted by: kcareymac | August 15, 2008, 8:48 am 8:48 am

John Mccain cheated on his first wife after she had an auto accident!

Posted by: Reason | August 15, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am

Evangelicals seem so ready to throw the first stone. This self-righeous pastor is labelling Edwards and adulterer. People in glass houses should not throw stones. What are we gonna find out about this guy? Maybe he has some skeletons in his closet.

Posted by: Bob | August 15, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am

Frances:
You mean this isn’t a Totalitarian state under GWB????

Posted by: Kitty Wilberforce | August 15, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am

Ask yourself this Rick Warren – Would you vote for someone that has no problem having a running mate that is “pro-choice”?

Posted by: steft | August 15, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

I hope Pastor Warren preaches that this weekend when the fellas are there to talk with the evangelicals. Senator McCain is another confessed adulterer. Is it different if you marry the girlfriend? I hope not. Given the conditions under which Senator McCain left his first wife (and the number of times he cheated on her), perhaps there will be mass evangelical movement away from McCain. Otherwise hypocrisy reigns in the land of evangelicals… just like I thought. Pastor Warren is right. I’ll forgive them, but not trust them. (Not trusting McCain has been second nature since he was a member of the Keating 5.)

Posted by: Obama Support | August 15, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am

Dennis Wrote: Anyone can accurately quote As an atheist who spent my first 30+ years as an active Christian and church leader, I probably understand the Bible better than most Christians.
Somehow I doubt that or you would have a little better understanding of the judgement and forgiveness process.

Posted by: Cberry | August 15, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am

What will Rick say at the judgement of the righteous about even granting Obama any type of venue?
Not even going into the fact that he supports abortion though the total pregancy; Obama has fought for and advocated the murdering of children born alive after an attempted abortion.
Or will that be the judgment where Jesus says “I never knew you”?

Posted by: ztormtra | August 15, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

He will not be voting for McCain then!!Not only is John an adulterer, he is a gigolo, as she supports him!Some guy he am.

Posted by: Carol | August 15, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

I agree completely. I will never vote for John Edwards or John McCain. They promised “… in sickness and in health, and forsaking all others, ’til death do us part” before God and the woman they supposedly loved most. Then they trampled all over those vows. All of McCain’s campaign promises mean about as much to him as his wedding vows.

Posted by: Robert | August 15, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am

I guess it looks like Warren will be voting for Obama, then….
McCain has cheated on his wife multiple times, and has admitted so in his book.

Posted by: TheOpinionGuy | August 15, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am

I am so happy to hear that he can not support McCain. I hope other evangelicals follow suit.

Posted by: JR | August 15, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

My fellow Evangelicals,
We cannot be hyporcrites. We cannot point our fingers at Bill Clinton and John Edwards then say nothing about John McCain.
We must support people who live according to scripture. We cannot in good faith support John McCain.

Posted by: Heaven | August 15, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Christian leaders need to be careful of what they say. Pride, as we all know goes before a fall. And denouncing your brother publicly invites others to be critical of you. So I hope Rev. Warren never steps out of line. Since no one is perfect, it’ll happen sometime.
I don’t like what Edwards did. But it IS difficult to be a man in power with women throwing themselves at you.
With a 50% divorce rate in the US, and a large portion of those due to unfaithful spouses, seems to me like there are a great many hypocrites out there crying foul. How many cheaters are FIRED from their jobs?
Even though he cheated on his wife, if he were running I’d vote for him tomorrow. A mistake doesn’t make you a ruined person. His wife forgave him, and he didn’t leave her. Newt Gingrich served his wife divorce papers in the hospital while she had cancer! He bit the bullet, told his wife, she forgave him, and that’s good enough for me.
Should be good enough for Rev. Warren too.

Posted by: Linda | August 15, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

I look into Rick Warren’s eyes and I see…D-E-V-I-L.

Posted by: The Real McCain | August 15, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

The man didn’t say he wouldn’t vote for Edwards. He said we would have a hard time voting for him. I’m sure if Edwards shared 90% of the same beliefs as Warren he probably could still support him. Why are so many of you attacking this man for stating his views on this situation. I don’t even know him but it’s not like he’s attacking Edwards. I’m not sure why some are calling him a hypocrite. Sad how many nasty, cynical people there are in this country. Edwards has other issues that make me sick, this being the least of them. It is dispicable that a man cheats on his wife, and even more so on his terminally ill wife. That being said i would much rather vote for a man that cheats than vote for a man that seriously dislikes his own country. I’ll let you determine who i mean.

Posted by: Doug | August 15, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

143 days??????????

Posted by: j | August 15, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

What ever happened to seperation of church and state? I am already tired of the canidates running around with their pandering. Let’s cover all issues that affect everyone and not just special interests.

Posted by: maryintampa | August 15, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Who cares what an evangelical pastor has to say? I just get sick and tired of their holier-than-thou attitude.

Posted by: Ted | August 15, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

John McCain and John Edwards both have something in common now. They are both adulterers. Let’s now forget McCain’s past! :-)

Posted by: JOE | August 15, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

Pastor Warren is absolutely correct in his statement once they are biblical, sorry if they are people out there that do not agree. A liar and adulterer in public office, makes good common sense,right.
When a nation doesn’t understand what is right from wrong, this nation is in deep trouble.

Posted by: John | August 15, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Then he can’t vote for McCain OR Obama.
He will have to vote for…
RON PAUL!

Posted by: Billy Graham | August 15, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Oh they all have something to hide. Even Obama. The guy is not a god and never will be. Neither is McCain. These people do not think like the rest of us. They think they can do anything and not get caught. Well they will and life goes on. Who cares? Lets talk about the issues and not what goes on in their personal lives.

Posted by: B | August 15, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am

Funny how the same people that are calling this man hypocritical are the same ones that defended Clinton. Whos’s the hypocrite?

Posted by: Doug | August 15, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

JMC is a cheater and he left his wife while she was in the hospital after she waited for him all those years….. So i take it this guy wont vote for him either, Right?

Posted by: BlueJersey | August 15, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am

There is no seperation of Church and State in the constitution. Check it out for yourselves.

Posted by: cenglund | August 15, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Exactly why this woman would never vote for McCain. His behavior towards his first wife was atrocious and he is on the record for being atrocious to the mistress he married too. gag

Posted by: Disgusted | August 15, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

What about McCain and his messy divorce?? He treated his ex-wife like a piece of disposable garbage.
I have no respect for the way he handled his ex-wife and family.
People will do anything for power and money. McCain is far from a role model in my opinion.

Posted by: Lou | August 15, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

We have a separation of church and state doctrine in our nation. The Bible is also clear on what is Cesar’s and what is God’s. Why are Evangelical leaders and kleig light mega church televangelists so intent on trying to make the two compatible – they are not, should not and will not be if this nation is to survive. And surprise, surprise Christianity is not the only religion in this nation. If “moral” issues were the determining factor of whether someone should be or remain as President we would never have had a single one for four years. If the good Rev has time on his hands – I can supply him and his congregation with a mind-boggling list of things to tend to in the vineyard, and a discussion of which one of the candidates is more acceptable to the flock wouldn’t come close to making it.

Posted by: OnTheGloryRoad | August 15, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

If Pastor Warren is true to his word, then he cannot vote for McCain, who, I believe, admitted he fooled around while married to his first wife. That sounds like adultery to me.

Posted by: bernadette | August 15, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

I am from NC and voted for Edwards for Senator and supported him for President. I also voted for Clinton twice. However, after learning the truth of their affairs I would (relunctantly) have hard time ever voting for either again. It is simply a matter of trust. How can trust thse guys to ever tell you the truth when they can’t even be truthful in their personal lives? Clinton and Edwards let us down and left many of their supporters heartbroken…..And before Republicans once again begin to gloat their leader’s (McCain’s) hands are not clean either….To me it is simply a matter of who can you trust…Unfortunately, in politics, the answer may be no one…

Posted by: indy_voter | August 15, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

I guess McCain is also out of the question too.

Posted by: antenian | August 15, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

I think this is an excellent answer. However, for Benjamin, he did say trust can be rebuilt. If McCain cheated on his first wife, that would have happened over 30 years ago. I think McCain has had ample time to rebuild some of that trust.
Not saying that I’m going to vote for him, but my reasons don’t include infidelity from 30 years in the past.

Posted by: Steve | August 15, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

I’m glad so many people know about McCain’s philandering because he certainly hasn’t been outed by the media the way Edwards or Clinton were.

Posted by: OSURubydoo | August 15, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

I wonder if Mr Warren would vote for someone who has remarried? In many peoples eyes that is adultery. Is this another case though of the religious right being hypocritical and viewing the left through different eyes as they do the right?

Posted by: markymark | August 15, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

I don’t know whats worse – pop star religous figures claiming to represent the humble and meek king Jesus or the unrepentant here who deny Gods rule over their lives and despise even the mercy He shows to such wicked sinners.

Posted by: Jim | August 15, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

I am not voting for Sen. McCain. It is not because of his past. It is clear to me that he’s caught in a time warp. He is technologically challenged.
I am a spiritual person and I will leave it up to my maker to forgive Sen. McCain for his transgression.
What I have a problem with is Sen. Obama has been politically active for almost 20 YEARS, as a community organizer, and as he worked his way through the city and state gov’t of
IL. I truly believe that if there were issues about his moral creditibility the CLINTON’s would have found them.
I have never expected my candidate to “Walk On Water”. The only misstep I have seen in regard to women was a remark to a reporter “sweetie” and thank the Lord, I hope we have gotten past it. I believe Sen Obama has shown a great deal of respect to Sen. Clinton & Sen. McCain for their respective careers.
This election is about the 21st Century and I truly do not believe that Sen. McCain has the ability to juggle all of the NEW and constantly changing circumstances.
I know this forum will be about faith.
Sen Obama has faith. He is a bi-racial child that has dealt with an absent father, a atep-father who took him out of the country, he spent time with his grandparents and went through some tough teens years, he went through college on scholarships and paid back his student loans and has watch his mother navigate the health insurnace system and die of cancer. He believe in hard work and he beileves in this country and that it can be better from the bottom up. What elese do you want to know? He is not a Rock Star. Whether he eat eggs or grapefruit or romaine or arugula I don’t care.
He has certainly called it inregard to the economic problem we are now facing because we INVADED another country. Afghastan asked for our help Iraq didn’t.
I am an American FIRST!!! not a rep or dem or a liberal or conservative.

Posted by: Lonestarkaty | August 15, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

OSURubydoo said: I’m glad so many people know about McCain’s philandering because he certainly hasn’t been outed by the media the way Edwards or Clinton were.
I think it’s because McCain’s infidelity was 30 years ago. Clinton cheated and lied to all of us on national TV while shaking his finger to protest his innocense. Edwards situation just came to light. I’m not condoning McCain’s actions but I would hope he has grown a bit since then. Hope that answers your question.

Posted by: Doug | August 15, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

If everyone wants to deal with adultery issues, then JOHN MCCAIN is fair game! I wish they would all say “it is none of anyone’s damn business” and stay focused on the real issues that plague us-Healthcare, Energy, War, etc. What a waste of time, but I guess the media has nothing better to do and the public is fixated on this nonsense. I wonder how people would respond if they were “outed” for things they do in their personal lives?

Posted by: gail lehmann | August 15, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

I understand that some might want to paint everyone with the same broad brush in that cheating is a trust issue. To say that one cannot vote for John Sydney McCain III because he cheated is in the hands of the voter. That this man Warren is so influential to evangelical voters may sow more doubt in their minds about McCain. This is another area where McCain has problems. No one under 55 trusts him so he has to run a negative campaign against Obama. His campaign has and will always be about what we should NOT do as opposed to what we CAN do together as a nation. That kind of tied old politics is not what the country needs. Forget that he cheated on his wife but remember the negativity spewing from his campaign.

Posted by: Tommy Thompson | August 15, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Ron Paul would be the only candidate that fits Pastor Warrens criteria, yet he was branded a nut, and did not appeal to the majority of Americans. Though not perfect the Dr/US Representative has is very intelligent, well read, honesty , integrity, Faithful to his spouse, has a great record of working for the people. I don’t think this is what America really wants or he would have at the very least been taken more seriously.

Posted by: Gina | August 15, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

Who the heck is Rick Warren and why should I care what he thinks?

Posted by: jock59801 | August 15, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

I totally agree with you, Gail, and I think Doug also makes a good point. I am much more concerned with how the country is going to be run than about who is sleeping with whom.

Posted by: OSURubydoo | August 15, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

For the atheists who don’t believe in God, you are in for one big surprise on judgment day. Also, for those of you bashing Rick Warren. This country was built on Christian principles. He is simply stating the obvious. Those without morals do not make good leaders.

Posted by: Ronda | August 15, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

Mary: your right, being a POW doesn’t justify cheating. But doesn’t it justify the man’s love for his country?

Posted by: Doug | August 15, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

I have some serious concerns about this story…
How can a person truly forgive without forgetting. Jesus said turn the other cheek. I am troubled by the Christian leaders who keep telling us fogive but don’t forget. Or forgive and wait for them to re-earn our trust. If that were trule the case we would all be forgiven but none of us would trust anyone else. Is this the Christian state Jesus ushered in with his resurrection? It seems to me a little bit on the hypocritical side, but who am I to judge, I guess I will leave that to the Christian leaders.
Jesus did say let those without sin cast the first stone.

Posted by: tigercub | August 15, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Funny… I wonder who he’d vote for if his choices were John Edwards, and Richard Nixon? Then, I’m left wondering who he might have cast his vote for in 1996 – could it have been Bill Clinton? By ’96 he was an adulterer.

Posted by: MM | August 15, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

tigercub: The Rev said we ask for forgiveness and then earn trust. He didn’t say don’t trust the ever again. Don’t you agree that people should earn trust once they have lost it? That’s they way i read his comments.

Posted by: Doug | August 15, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

Fact is, infidelity is a PRIVATE matter. It has absolutely NOTHING to do with how a person will effectively manage this country. It is a sad day when all people care about is infidelity in their candidate’s past, rather than where this person stands on issues common to your own personal interests. But then again, when they all lie and cheat and pander to the corporations who give them the most money, they leave us with no alternatives to judge them by. If you honestly think that Obama and McCain are listening to you… WISE UP. Wake up and smell the coffee. Every speech is nothing more than PANDERING to what you want to hear. In the end, they are going to do whatever their biggest corporate contributors want.

Posted by: MM | August 15, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am

I think Michele makes a good point here:
So, I guess that means he won’t be voting for John McCain?
Posted by: Michele | Aug 14, 2008 9:32:22 PM

Posted by: shalom | August 15, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

MM:
If you really believe what you just wrote, then maybe you should run for office……Do you think you would do any different or better?

Posted by: shalom | August 15, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Lonestarkaty,
My God, what a GREAT country we would have if it could be filled with more clear thinking, honest voters like you.
The saddest thing about this election is how many people are lying to themselves about themselves and justifying the stupidist rationales for voting or not voting for someone. If it had been Obama who had cheated on his wife 15 years ago I can just hear the chorus who would use it as just one more false justification.

Posted by: shelgirl | August 15, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

“He makes a good point and that’s why I don’t like Michelle Obama. She lost my trust with those hate filled comments and has done absolutely nothing to earn back my trust.” Susan
Come on Susan. You never liked Michelle Obama to begin with. Her remarks have nothing to do with your so called trust issues. Be honest!

Posted by: sunny | August 15, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

Those Christians always looking for perfection knowing it doesn’t exist.

Posted by: Ted | August 15, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

Doug: You wrote,”Mary: your right, being a POW doesn’t justify cheating. But doesn’t it justify the man’s love for his country?” Answer: No it does not. It isn’t like McCain volunteered to be a POW.

Posted by: wirey-one | August 15, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Since we Americans seem to be inordinately interested in the sex lives of politicians rather than, say, their actual record on governance–especially Americans who make a point of touting their Christianity (weird, huh?)–maybe we should try to look at this from a historical perspective. There is a long, inglorious history of sexual misconduct in American politics and it bridges parties equally: For every John Edwards (D) there is a David Vitter (R), for every Mark Foley (R) there is a Bill Clinton (D), for every Gary Hart (D) there is a Larry Craig (R), for every John McCain (R) there is John Kennedy (D),etc., etc. Neither side can claim to have the market cornered on morality and it is hypocritical in the extreme for all these “morally outraged” conservatives to try to do so in response to the John Edwards revelations. “Rafters in your own eyes” and all that, folks.
I distrust the judgment of educated, accomplished men and women, regardless of party affiliation, who seem to be unable to provide leadership for their own hormones, much less the country and who apparently have “consequence understanding disorder” and can’t figure out that, as public figures, there WILL be consequences to their philandering. That is why I would not vote for an adulterer–not because of their morality. That is between them, their spouse and their maker. But because you can safely assume that if they lack judgment in one major area of life, they lack it in others, as well. Living in Arizona, as I do, I won’t vote for McCain–. He won’t get my vote because he displays lack of judgment in other even more important areas. He honestly does not seem to recognize (or care) that his own state consistently ranks among the lowest in education and healthcare in the US and, despite having enormous wealth (all in private hands, naturally, the state is broke because they refuse to collect even moderate income tax–I paid $16 last year), lags embarrassingly in salaries and benefits for average Arizonan’s. I hear him sincerely brag about Arizona’s medical system, which is without a doubt one of the worst debacles I have run across in 20 years working in the industry and despair that this is his “vision” for America–a land of a small wealthy elite class as oblivious as he appears to be to the realities of normal people, supported by an under-educated and unhealthy majority. I think he is sincere and that is exactly the problem. He doesn’t know what he doesn’t know. He has been too long in DC and too long insulated from the real world by his wife’s enormous wealth. I used to really like the guy, but he demonstrated his willingness to be “just a politician” like the rest of them when he groveled to the current administration–an administration that had spread ugly lies and rumors about him and his famiy–to curry political favor. His own daughter told him that she had “never been more ashamed of him” than when he endorsed GWB, the man whose campaign had smeared his adopted daughter by false allegations that she was a secret love child. That is not the stance of a “maverick” or a man of integrity. That is the behavior of a typical sleazeball politician more interested in winning elections than in public service.
I’m not suggesting Obama is above all the ugliness. We simply haven’t heard all there is to hear about him yet, but I have no doubt there are some ugly skeletons in that closet, too. For me, at least right now, it comes down to a choice between someone with demonstrated bad judgment (McCain) and someone whose judgment is really an unknown quantity (Obama). I’m not overly comfortable with either choice, but can’t in good conscience vote for McCain after observing his less than stellar governance of the fair state of Arizona for the last three decades.
John Edwards is a non-entity in this election. His political career was pretty much in the toilet prior to this story. Why all the brouhaha?

Posted by: Slingshot12 | August 15, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

This is not about a normal evangelic man who can only think around earning the bread and sharing it. The person in question ‘President of USA’ has some minimum standards to maintain in their lives and the standards set by Evagelics are high and only who get closer to those standards can win their trust and respect to lead the country, period.

Posted by: chimp | August 15, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Infidelity may be “personal”, but if a Presidential candidate’s spouse was the victim of his/her lies and sneaking, what makes anyone believe without any personal evidence that said candidate, upon becoming President, wouldn’t also victimize the American people?
Of course cheaters in the public spotlight want to browbeat others about “privacy”. A reason has been brought to light that they are not trustworthy stewards of serious, solemn commitments that call them to think of other people besides themselves.
Meanwhile, most folks I have met or talked with who support cheaters yet have their own “personal” problems with a cheater tell *anyone* who will listen about what an untrustworthy, lying, mean, heartless, selfish rat the cheater is without any regard to their own “private, personal” issues that really should be “no-one else’s business”.
These people unfortunately are quite hypocritical in that they are selective about whose warts they feel should be publicized and discussed.

Posted by: PETRA | August 15, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

A serial adulterer like John McCain admitted to being doesn’t just all of a sudden stop.

Posted by: Jonze | August 15, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Will Rick Warren be asking John McCain about his adultery at Saturday’s forum? Will he make it very direct like “Senator McCain, did you cheat on your first wife?”?

Posted by: Michael | August 15, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

In thinking about Rick Warren’s comments I am saddened. His comments suggest a legalistic view of the Christian walk. The Bible says that no sin is greater than another sin. Sin is sin. So how does Rick Warren view a man or woman who is divorced and remarried or a man or woman who engages in pornography when the lights are out? Within his comments, where is the Grace that Jesus lived and spoke of?
It is my personal viewpoint that the person who has been tested and has risen above the test is one to be respected. We are all tested by life in different areas of our lives. It is what we do with the test and after we are tested that is valuable for use in service to others.
It would be far more insightful for others if Rick Warren would talk about his personal failings, what he learned from them, how his key learnings helped prepare him for leadership and how those key learnings are sustaining him in leadership. If he has never failed as a human being, then he has no voice with which to speak to others. Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton have a voice for me because they were tested in the public eye both as individuals, as a married couple and as a family. They have remained committed to public life including daughter Chelsea. They demonstrate that Human failing even in a moral sense can be redeemed and used for the public good.
We know of McCain’s personal marriage history because it has been exposed to the public. We know of his POW experiences. Does his personal experience set him apart from the “business as usual” Republican Party history of experience? Barak Obama is a man untested in the public eye. We do not know of Obama’s personal failings because we do not know Obama. How will he react to pressure that he has not known before? What will he do when he has to compromise with Congress ,the Senate and other political leaders who wield tremendous power both visible and invisible to the public eye? How will he handle the expectations of the minority communities as the first African American President of the United States?
I do not endorse either candidate. I have not made a decision regarding my vote, but those questions concern me, not the marriage history of the candidates or past candidates. It also concerns me that we have one more religious leader who is seeking a personal platform on a national level. I do not know Rick Warren’s motivations, but I question anyone who has not fallen or who does not have some failing in their walk with God.
This blog is a wonderful exchange. I appreciate the opportunity to share my views.

Posted by: Janet | August 15, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Warren did not say he could not vote for McCain because of his adultery.
Warren said:
“I think people first need to ask forgiveness and then earn trust back over time. Can trust be re-earned? Absolutely but it takes time.”
McCain has said he was wrong for committing adultery. I think Warren would be far more concerned about McCain’s non-stop lies in his Obama attack ads. The ads reflect McCain’s current character.
Jesus forgave people that committed adultery and every other sin. McCain sins every time he lies, which is in the attack ads and every Town Hall meeting where he lies and distorts his and Obama’s tax plan.

Posted by: Julie | August 15, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Isn’t it a sad state of affairs that we have no one to vote for this fall, and not because they did or didn’t cheat on their wives? We want to be altruistic but we don’t want to give our country away. We want to defend out country but we don’t want to send our young men to war because we think we know how their country should be run. Please note that we have not been attacked since 9/11. Are we doing something right? The economy is in deplorable shape. Which of our candidates is going to improve that? I would hope those in government are smarter that I, but am becoming more doubtful by the hour. If someone had a good idea, rather than rooting for the candidate of their party and tearing down the other, I would be more interested in reading these comments.

Posted by: Alice | August 16, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

How about asking McCain if he cheated on both of his wifes, not just the first one. The scuttlebutt here in Arizona is that he “steps out” on Cindy too (or once did before he got too old), hence her battle with drug addiction. I would like to see the interview that Sam Donaldson did with the New Times reporter that he never aired because it put McCain in a bad light. Or, the interview that 60 minutes did that again wasn’t aired because it would be seen as negative to McCain. See, the media addresses what they want to cover, not what is truthful.

Posted by: judesuper | August 16, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

For all you folks talking about John McCain’s past…I would like to remind you of David and how sinned, was forgiven and loved and served God until his death.
Obama does not have a heart for Israel as he called them ‘an inflexiable people’. Please remember where we are because of our love for Israel and McCain said he would always protect this country. Obama has given them very little mention but has given favorable remarks to the Palistinians and Hamas.

Posted by: Sandra | August 16, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Posted:
Obama supports Israel. Period.
Barack Obama’s big speech on Israel is now over, and as expected, the candidate made no secret of his support and dedication to the special relationship between the U.S. and Israel. “My view is that the United States’ special relationship with Israel obligates us to be helpful to them in the search for credible partners with whom they can make peace, while also supporting Israel in defending itself against enemies sworn to its destruction,” were Obama’s words to Haaretz last week. Today, he sounded as strong as Clinton, as supportive as Bush, as friendly as Giuliani. At least rhetorically, Obama passed any test anyone might have wanted him to pass. So, he is pro-Israel. Period.

Posted by: Helen | August 16, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

So… I guess he’s saying he can’t vote for John McCain, right?

Posted by: sfsj | August 16, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

All of your comments are so interesting to me.
I really never thought to hold Warren to his comment about adultery. Not my style. I only found myself hoping that conservative Americans might be willing to listen with an open mind to Obama. Somehow it felt as if the deck was stacked against him in the interview….as the crowd and Pastor Rick Warren laughed seemed so automatically receptive to McCain. I do think there is real decency in Obama and a personality about which we might all be proud. I am otherwise very concerned about our status in the world. I wish conservative America could imagine extending their decency and acceptance to Obama.

Posted by: Kel | August 16, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

I watched last nite as Pastor Warren made things difficult for Obama and had given the questions to McCain as it was obvious as he was answering before they were asked. And another thing. I thought we went to church to learn not to discriminate but I was wrong as it is obvious by Pastors question regards the governement monies if he wanted to hire his own people>>> I thought that was discriminating Am I wrong???I don’t think so. McCain acted like a little chiild that had to rush to say something for fear he’d get into trouble and what I find amusing is the majority of the people went for the fist pounding yelling when the man didn’t even know what he was talking about. He came in with the same dumb stories and all else a quick answwer that showed being well rehersed. Shame on You Pastor Warren. You don’t belong behind the pulpit.

Posted by: Jean K Worthington | August 17, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

I am getting tired of listening to Christian Women who say they are Christian but yet are also Pro-Choice. They say that no one has the right to tell them how to use T H E I R bodies. Remember, women, Y O U R ‘so called’ bodies aren’t yours, they’re G O D S!!!

Posted by: Mark | October 16, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

Leslie McFall has an interesting way to deal with the so-called exception clause in Matthew 19:9 that appears to allow for divorce and remarriage for marriage unfaithfulness.
He has written a 43 page paper that reviews the changes in the Greek made by Erasmus that effect the way Matthew 19:9 has been translated. I reviewed McFall’s paper at
I would love to hear some feedback on this position.

Posted by: More Christ Like | November 23, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.