By Nitya

Aug 11, 2008 8:45am

Shrum On Clinton Memos: An “Ugly” “Appeal to Stereotypes”

Bob Shrum, the chief adviser to both Al Gore and Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass, in their 2000 and 2004 presidential runs, had some harsh words for the internal Clinton campaign memos that discuss attacking Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, as something less than American, as reported by Josh Green in The Atlantic.

‘The notion that somehow or another that you could appeal to stereotypes like that — suggest Obama was un-American — would backfire in a general election and be absolutely lethal in a Democratic primary," Shrum told ABC News. "I think it was one of those memos that was written, looked at by the candidate and wisely discarded."

The memo, written by Sen. Hillary Clinton’s top strategist, Mark Penn, is "an appeal to stereotypes, it’s an appeal to prejudice," Shrum said. "I think it’s ugly and I think if Hillary Clinton had done that, she would have permanently besmirched her reputation, her legacy, and her place in American politics."

Of Penn’s March 2007 memo that correctly identified the coalition that brought her primary victories in states such as Pennsylvania and Ohio, Shrum says, "it’s interesting if somebody produces a memo that says we need to go after these invisibles: lower-income voters, women, blue collar voters; and then produces a strategy that all through the summer, and into the Fall and almost up to Iowa is cautious, calculating, triangulating, and is basically a replica of President Clinton’s 1996 reelection strategy when he had no competitive primaries.  I mean, it’s undeniable that she ran on inevitability, she ran as the candidate of the establishment, she ran as a quasi-incumbent in a year of change.  It was a terrible mistake.  So if Mark Penn understood what the targets were in March, maybe they should have come up with a strategy that would have reached those targets."

About the tremendous amount of infighting displayed in these memos — and indeed, in the very existence of the Green story itself — Shrum said, the Clinton "campaign it seems, from these memos, to have been at least as focused on the staff going after each other as they were on going after the nomination and getting past Barack Obama."

"By the way, one thing we shouldn’t ignore in all of this: they can all stand around pointing fingers at each other, they’re not pointing fingers at the one person who deserves the most blame for their defeat, and that is Barack Obama," Shrum added. "He was an extraordinary candidate who resonated with what America feels and felt, and what Democrats felt as he went through those primaries."

Is there anything Obama can learn from this story and these memos?

"There’s a certain strength in the sense of centeredness and almost the serenity that the Obama campaign has displayed," Shrum said. "They have a strategy, they’ve executed it consistently, they don’t get thrown off by day to day polls.  I remember last September, there were all these people who were saying Obama is behind Clinton. He’s got to go out and he’s got to attack her, he’s got to run negative ads.  And some of his own people and fundraising people said that, and he held a conference call and he said, ‘I’m not doing that.  I know what the strategy is, I know what I want to say.  I know how to reach people.’  Now I’ll tell you something: you’re a lot better off in a campaign with a strategy consistently adhered to, than with 20 people debating ten competing strategies moving day to day."

– Jake Tapper and Andy Miller

User Comments

Dear Clinton Dem,
With the convention just around the corner, it is imperative that Democrats all around the country understand that whether or not Hillary is nominated, we are in this for the long haul.
This primary has revealed DNC “leadership” to be corrupt, mean-spirited, and lacking respect for basic democratic principles. They have completely and effectively ceded the moral high ground to Republicans at this point.
• We have seen the race card played, with assistance from both Dean and Brazile.
• We have seen rampant sexism with no objection by the DNC.
• We have seen the superdelegates endorse as quid-pro-quo for campaign contributions.
• We have seen arm-twisting of the congressional delegates by “neutral” Nancy Pelosi to declare for Obama.
• We have seen an unabashed ageism campaign against John McCain, calling him “confused”, and that he has “lost his bearings”.
• We’ve seen a softening of support for the gay and lesbian community.
• We’ve seen caucus cheating.
• We’ve seen intimidation of Hillary supporters, hack attacks and coordinated threats against voters and media that dare to dissent.
• We’ve seen manipulation of the party nominating system and media to favor one candidate over another and the outright redistribution of votes cast for one Hillary and given to Obama.
This is now a democratic party in name only.
TAKE ACTION:
We need to get the word out.

Posted by: Al from NJ | August 11, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am

Al from NJ – you’re absolutely right. I’m one of those “quiet” Hillary supporters who will vote for McCain. I don’t belong to PUMA or any other organization. I just vote – in every single election. And I’m NEVER voting for Obama or for anyone who endorsed him.

Posted by: Jenny Berryman | August 11, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am

I have to agree with Al from NJ, and also Jenny Berryman. I will vote in this election, and I will vote for McCain. The Democratic Party revealed a lot that is ugly during this primary, and then swept it under the rug like it did not exist. Do you think we are stupid? I will vote like I always do … quietly and in the voting booth. Obama Supporters can shout all they want. It won’t change my vote.

Posted by: Susan from OH | August 11, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

A deciding factor for me was the Russian invasion of Georgia. The Cold War has started again (if it ever ended). I want a politician who is well versed in Cold War era politics. Putin will bait Obama the same way he did the smart Ivy League educated President of Georgia. This is no time for on-the-job training. If Obama is ready in 4 years or 8 years, I’ll vote for him then. At this point, I have to vote for the candidate who is most capable of dealing with the Russians. That candidate is NOT Obama. Does he even know what the Cold War is?

Posted by: Deciding Factor | August 11, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am

between these Mark Pen memos and Wolfson trying to spin the stuff that has happened to Elizabeth Edwards when everyone knows Obama would have finished even stronger in Iowa if Edwards had not run at all.
and then PUMA who raises money at the expense of the candidate that they say they are fighting for…
some people really need to take a look at their values and how off trck they have gotten.

Posted by: dl | August 11, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

As usual Shrum has his facts wrong, Obama did attack Hillary, how soon he forgets the “Harry&Louise” flyers the perfect Obama sent out. Shrum is an idiot, just ask Pres. Gore or Pres. Kerry.

Posted by: Ann | August 11, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am

Al from NJ……AMEN! I was a Hillary delegate up to the state level. It was a farce! No way, no how will I vote for Obama. This whole process has moved me to the “independant” column.

Posted by: itslyintimeagain | August 11, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am

So now Bob Shrum is continuing the attack on the Clintons. Amazing. He doesn’t complain about Obama and his surrogates painting the Clintons as racists, does he? He doesn’t have word one to say about Obama claiming McCain and the Republicans ARE GOING TO use racsism against him, does he? Unbelievable! The more I see of Obama and the more the Democratic bigwigs defend him, the sicker I get. I’ve voted in every single election since the early 1950s, and I’ve NEVER voted for a Republican. Now I will vote not only AGAINST Obama but AGAINST every single Democrat who endored him.

Posted by: Dottie Bailey | August 11, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am

Deciding Factor, the president of Georgia put his faith in the Republicans. Look what happened to him. On the other hand, the Georgian army was burning people alive and sawing them into pieces in South Ossetia. You don’t mean to say that you support Georgia do you?

Posted by: Mike | August 11, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am

Hey Al, I feel your pain brother but NJ will once again be in the blue. If you pack up quiclky you may be able to make a difference in PA. Good luck buddy.

Posted by: NJ home of the blues | August 11, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

So let’s see – what did Shrum expect from internal campaign memos ? Roses and love for Obama ? And what about Obama’s campaign memo that showd how they laid the “racist” trap for the Clintons ? Shrum is a loser much like his patron Kennedy – who – surprise – the Clintons saved during a contested election few years back.

Posted by: AG | August 11, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Remember in regard to georgia…this all even more convoluted because mccain has his lead foreign policy advisor a lobbyist for that screwed up georgia government and
Mccain’s policies rendering us inept now to be able to ask for a country whosays they are defending themselves to withdraw from occupation.
oy Mccain (and his lobbyists advisors) is very bad for this country.

Posted by: dl | August 11, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

The Obama campaign is just as guilty. These campaign tactics are nothing new or different than any other election. The Obama camp called Bill Clinton a racist for using the word “fairytale”. And the media jumped on every word of the Clinton campaign and twisted and turned them into “old politics”. They were no more devisive than the Obama campaign. And the Obama camp had the media to do their dirty work. This whole story is laughable. What’s the matter, are they trying to turn everyone against Clinton before the VP announcement? We don’t hear about her for a month and now all of the sudden…Maybe for once the dnc should pay attention to what the majority of the voters want…Obama/Clinton ’08

Posted by: Bea | August 11, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

Let’s give Clinton some credit for not following Mark Penn’s awful advice. Why don’t you focus on why the Obama campaign didn’t stand up and defend Bill and Hillary Clinton against racists charges. That’s the real story.

Posted by: rafraf | August 11, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am

The fact that Bob Shrum continues to attack Hillary, even when she is in “suspend campaign” mode underscores the notion that the Democrats are really, really freaked out that Obama is performing so poorly in the polls, and said performance is before the Republicans have even begun to go negative with Obama’s ties to Auchi, Rezko, Wright, etc, not to mention his energy and Iraq hypocrisy, and any vision on how to solve the housing and banking crisis.
Shrum, like all of the frauds at the DNC are in sweat mode because they know just how viable Hillary is, and as a more powerful, more likable contender for the nomination, Shrum et al have begun the attacks against her because they know full well there is a strong liklihood that Hillary will win the nomination once her name is entered into nomination.
Is this party unity, Shrum? Guess what, Hillary is going to the convention, and she’s going to win. You and your DNC cronies had your chance to rig the nomination, and it almost worked.
Thankfully, Americans are way smarter than you give them credit for. Hillary will win the biggest political upset in recent US history when she wins the Democratic nomination.

Posted by: Jbatterson | August 11, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

We didn’t need Hillary’s campaign to tell us Obama is a dirty politician,and out of touch with most Americans.
He did a great job of that himself by calling rural Americans bitter and by attending a racist, anti-American church for 20 years.
The Obama camp is delusional to claim they ran a clean campaign. To name a few dirty tactics: playing the race card for sympathy votes, using sexism and ageism, cyber bullying, and intimidation.

Posted by: riley | August 11, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

Sounds like most of you are going to vote for McCain. That means two certainties: you don’t care when or if we get our troops out of Iraq, and you don’t care if Roe v. Wade is overturned.

Posted by: sw | August 11, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

Bob Shrum is one of the most respected people in business. When he speaks we listen. I enjoy seeing him on the sunday talk shows. Thanks for the article Jake.

Posted by: Elizabeth | August 11, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

Al et al: McCain IS confused and HAS lost his bearings. There are 71 year olds who are younger than their physical age and there are 71 year olds who are losing it. McCain is losing it and heaven help us if he’s elected and we have to live with him as president when he’s 72, 73, 74 and 75. Scary thought. And, gays and lesbians DO deserve total equal rights and that includes the right to marry. It’s not our business what they do in their private lives and we shouldn’t have the right to tell them how to live. This is a matter of civil rights, not an issue the public has a right to vote on. It seems you people haven’t learned your lesson under the Bush administration’s past eight years and are looking for more punishment. This country is headed for total ruin under another republican administration.

Posted by: nomorerepublicans | August 11, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

Shots were not fired in the Cold War, nor did anybody engage nuclear weapons. Somebody who has Cold War experience? Certainly not the Republicans, GW Bush nor McCain. They would march headfirst into combat and leave diplomacy under the rug.
Cold War tendencies include Obama and we will be better for it.

Posted by: al from bluffton | August 11, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

Forgetting the content of the story for a moment, I think it’s hilarious that the media even reports something Shrum says. He’s the guy who lost not one, but TWO, presidential elections he should have won.
I’d be much more interested to hear his explanation of why Gore couldn’t even carry his home state of Tennessee! Or why, if he is so smart, Kerry got stomped worse than anyone in recent history.
This is a guy who should be giving political advice?

Posted by: observer | August 11, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Wow. Anyone who votes for McSame out of spite for Obama deserves exactly what they get. Unfortunately you gladly would drag the rest of us down with you just to achieve your shortsighted sense of justice. Do everyone a favor and just sit this one out before you make the situation even worse.

Posted by: Tim B | August 11, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

The trouble in Georgia, should convince everyone tht we can not afford an on the job training President. What if hte Hillary memo had gotten out? I do believe tht Obama does not sharea my values. Think the preacher who says GD America.

Posted by: BARBANEL | August 11, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

My problem with Barack Obama is the fact that as president, he will name at least one and probably two Supreme Court justices. As much as I’d like to see abortion kept legal, I have a bigger concern. McCain promises to appoint judges who will decide cases based on the constitution and laws are they are written. Obama has said that he wants judges who are “more sympathetic” to people. To what people? Obama claims he does not favor affirmative action based on race or ethnicity. However, when Ward Connerly, a conservative black man in Michigan, tried to get laws passed to end affirmative action a couple of years ago, Obama taped radio ads opposing him and arguing for affirmative action. Obama also avoids the topic of reparations. However, his radical black church calls for reparations, and I believe Obama agrees with that position. Otherwise, why would he consistently avoid the subject when asked? As Rush Limbaugh says, people who support reparations want to take money from people who never owned slaves, and give it to people who never were slaves. For this reason, above all, I am voting Republican for the very first time in my life, not only for President but for every other office on the ballot. As a Democrat, I do not want to see my own party in power. The Democrats are unable to win a national election without the overwhelming support of the black community. If it takes more affirmative action, reparations, etc. to keep the black community onboard, the Democrats will do it, regardless of its effect on other groups. I am afraid I am done with the Democratic Party.

Posted by: Edith Lenore | August 11, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Bob Shrum never backed a winner yet. He’s a loser, but, the media still gives him a theater to speak from.

Posted by: Gerry Carter | August 11, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Many prior people who posted to this thread seem to not have read the same column I have.
Hillary Clinton ran a bad campaign, quite frankly, and had absolutely no control of her surrogates, while Obama ran a tightly disciplined primary race. That and her out-of-step stance on the Iraq war proved to be the deciding factor.
The extreme arrogance of Team Clinton lead to its undoing, but this is not surprising if one examines the cockiness of Clinton’s successful 1992 campaign. Watch the film “The War Room” for the fullest realization.
It’s been darkly amusing to see the Clintons cry foul in the same manner as the people they replaced sixteen years ago. Many comments on this thread are motivated by sour grapes and resorting to self-righteous hyperbole.

Posted by: Comrade Kevin | August 11, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am

Hillary and her followers ,the way they ran the campaign, they were, they are now and will always be are a bunch of maggots, she has only one purpose,to fake the support for Obama and run for president in 2012

Posted by: joseph | August 11, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

DEMS! DON’T YOU RECOGNIZE THESES ARE REPULICANS POSING AS DEMS AND INDEPENDNETS? DON’T BE FOOLED. DEVIDE AND CONCUR WON’T WORK THIS TIME AROUND BUSH-HEADS! YOU HAD YOUR TURN AND YOU SCREWED UP THE COUNTRY. LIKE OR NOT, DEMS WILL PREVAIL IN THE FALL.

Posted by: James from MA | August 11, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am

Clinton supporters were never going to vote for a black Man anway. If you can vote McCain and go for the same nonsense and lies that we suffer with Bush it’s a very sad day.

Posted by: J from NJ | August 11, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am

Reporting from the platform writing committee: the pro-choice plank is a strong as ever (in line with Obama, and unlike McCain). GLBT language is as strong as ever, plus inclusion of “gender identity” (in line with Obama, and unlike McCain). Universal Health Care language is in there as a goal (compatible with Obama, though he doesn’t go quite that far at this point, and–again–unlike McCain).
The idea that you have to have lived the last 70-some years of history to understand it makes no sense. A good president has to understand a couple of thousand years of human political interaction. So, do we want the guy who consistently came in last in his class (McCain) and did well in politics as a “man with money by marriage” or do we want the guy who exceeded all expectations in school and launched himself in politics by reading people astutely and working well with them?
We have never been totally removed from terrorism or the cold war, we just chose, instead, to focus on playing to America’s strengths. How about we do that again, regardless of whether or not we personally like Obama? He’s better trained, smarter, more mature and more morally grounded than most of the presidents in the last 3 decades.

Posted by: JFS | August 11, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am

Al honey…that’s politics…and of the roles were reversed…Hillary would be handing out the crying towel to Obama….She just needs to get over it and move on…and so do her supporters. IT’S OVER…if you dont’ like Obama stay home…

Posted by: thoughtful | August 11, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

New stories out of old crap.

Posted by: Thinking | August 11, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

The Democratic Party is still the party of Clinton and will remain the party of Clinton until another democrat comes along and wins the general election and is sworn in as President of the United States. I too have never voted Republican for President. And I don’t plan to this year either. I just plan on not voting & let the chips fall where they may. I can never pull the lever for either Obama or McCain.

Posted by: Gerry Carter | August 11, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am

Deciding Factor: I dont understand what your point is. You want to elect a president of the USA based on the strategy in Eastern Europe! Do you even read the news everyday. All the negatives happening here at home, you actually think voting for a president who promises to continue war in Iraq (A pointless war to begin with) is going to help. Look what happened when America chose GWBush for the second term just because no war time president was ever dethroned. Considering International strategies is only a part of the reason why you should choose your president, it should not be the entire reason. Bullying other nations or poking our noses into everybody’s business does not make friends and doesn’t profit anybody but the war mongers. I woulld’ve liked to see a better candidate than Obama, probably Ron Paul. But of the current lot, I am glad Obama won in the primaries and that he holds the advantage in the current polls, however minor it may be.

Posted by: Srikanth | August 11, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

And, BTW, most of the Obama supporters here (Pittsburgh) were very clear, thoughout the primary season, that if Hillary had not been in the race, they’d have been happy with one of the other candidates (Clinton very much included). And most of the Clinton supporters here were very clear, in the same way, that they’d be comfortable with Obama. One lady brought both Obama and Clinton signs to the polls, so that “everyone would feel wanted, respected and welcomed.” I don’t know what woodwork the “divisiveness” crew are oozing out from, but I didn’t meet many you while I was gathering signatures or working the polls. Maybe some of you were home not voting, or voting in the…OTHER…line. Sounds like it, anyway. (And yes, this article is a stupid non-story, mostly notable for the odd, “bloggers from mars” vitriol of the responses.

Posted by: JFS | August 11, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

As Obama continues to sink in the polls, and loses support for his shameless backing of George Bush’s FISA bill, the Bush-Cheney energy bill, and his increasingly pro-war stance, the left desert him.
Not only the left however, but also those middle of the road Obama supporters (and super delegates and pledged delegates) who like both Obama and Hillary, but during the primary season had a slightly higher preference for Obama. Now that it is increasingly evident that Obama cannot win a general election (evidenced by Hillary’s base who won’t vote for him, and that 48% of Americans are already sick of hearing about him, and his winning of States in the primaries that no matter how it is hyped by the Obama people will never go blue in November)those delegates, at least 20% will defect to Hillary on the floor of the convention. Despite what the media continues to say, that there is no way Hillary can win, millions of Hillary supporter, yes millions, know that she has a 50% chance of winning the nomination at the convention.
Remember, not all Obama delegates and supporters are true believers. Many had a slight preference for Obama but would vote for Hillary when she wins the nomination. Hillary’s base on the flip side of the coin is way more solid, and she has way less erosion from her support base than Obama does.
This is why Mr. Shrum smears Hillary in the press, who it must be noted has every right to enter her name into nomination, and has been doing everything the right way, campaigning and supporting Obama publicly. Mr. Shrum knows that Hillary is a way more popular choice for the nomination among the real base of the party.

Posted by: jbatterson@sbcglobal.net | August 11, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

This is off the topic of the article, but addresses the point about the potential reemergence of the cold war and how prepared our next president needs to be.
Those that support McCain for this reason are unable or unwilling to take a look at the next step or two using a historical perspective. McCain’s war mentality will effectively give the Russians the opportunity to use the same tactics on us, as we did to win the cold war in the 80s. I am referring to the bankruptcy that we imposed upon the USSR as they fought a war in the middle east (Afghanistan for those of you that don’t recall) through indirect and not so indirect support of what were then the rebels.
I believe that Obama has the intelligence, critical thought process, and reflective approach that may be able to avoid what is already three steps into the inevitability of history repeating itself.

Posted by: Wally | August 11, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Can we afford another Republican Administration? Need I say more? Think people, who got us in our present situation? Rising inflation, dollar losing value, high oil prices and wars for the next 100 years damn Americans wake up. You can’t expect the party that got us in this mess to get us out.

Posted by: Jim | August 11, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

This statement sums up why the two time loser Democratic party will shortly be a three time “it’s interesting if somebody produces a memo that says we need to go after these invisibles: lower-income voters, women, blue collar voters;,”,INVISIBLE
Step back from the imaginary Algonquin round table ,bring your nose out of the air and a little closer to the grind stone

Posted by: ken | August 11, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Someone managed to bring up Rev. Wright in one of these posts. Old news. That horse has been beaten to death. You will not get one more GOP vote with Rev. Wright. You won’t get one more pro-Hillary supporter to stay home or vote McCain off pushing Rev. Wright. You won’t get one more independent vote that you don’t already have.
If that’s all you have at this late stage…Obama will be president. Get something new and REAL to use.
You can’t paint Obama as anti-White, when he is half White. He would have to hate his mother, the grandparents who raised him, himself, and his children. White blood runs in and out of his veins all day long.
The reason some of you can’t get over Rev. Wright is because you look at Obama and only see what appears to be just another Black guy. His physical appearance lulls some of you into falling for stereotyping him as some kind of Black militant, so you go for the he’s anti-White and, therefore, anti-American rhetoric. Let the Wright issue rest in peace. It’s a done deal as far as votes. Anyone who wants to vote against Obama due to Wright has already decided to do so! Let it go!

Posted by: S Williams | August 11, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

[Sigh] that’s what I get for multitasking:
The post should, of course, read that most (90%+) of Pittsburgh’s Obama supporters have consistently and enthusiastically said that they’d have been out working for Hillary if Obama had not been there to excite them even more…and that most (85%+) of the Hillary supporters said the equivalent: they’d have been actively supportive of Obama in the primary, except that they were so thrilled to have Hillary.
A few people were admittedly still bitter about not getting a better chance at Edwards (but with hindsight, we’d be in a bad place now if he’d prevailed) and a few were dreaming of a Gore recap. But, by and large, the LaRouche fringe excepted, the vast majority of Democrats and progressive Independents seem to be pretty comfortable with Obama.

Posted by: JFS | August 11, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

The real shame is people are going on emotion and not on the facts on hand. So just because Obama is the candidate and Hilary isn’t, you won’t vote for Obama.
Shum has simply stated the obvious. It is no secret that Hilary’s campaign was disorganized and in shambles and that is why she lost. But you continue to find every excuse instead of acknowledging that your candidate was sloppy and made the mistake of thinking that she would win simply because she is Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton used to be the president.
These memos speak for themselves, they need no explanation. They couldn’t be clearer.
But Oh No, Hilary’s so-called supporters continue to be upset. And I call you so-called because there a lot of McCain supporters out there blogging furiously pretending to be Hilary supporters or PUMA members and fanning this fire to make it bigger then it is. And there are some stupid Hillary supporting taking it all in and believing the rubbish being spewed out.
If you’r a democrat act like one or move over to McCain’s party and stay there, but don’t use the excuse of being unhappy because your voices have not been heard and you don’t feel respected.
You wanna vote for McCain, vote for him and spare us all this drama and name calling. Obama will win without you.
YES WE CAN!

Posted by: Terri | August 11, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

This should of been the easiest election for Democrats to win the presidential election and Obama and Edwards messed it up along with the far left nut jobs

Posted by: randy | August 11, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

McCain was shot down in battle during the cold war being fought out over North Vietnam and spent five years in the Hanoi Hilton. He refused to leave the prison when offered but rather said that the other men their should be first released. McCain has experienced Combat and thus is much less likely to put people in harms way than a someone like Obama who feels like he must prove himself. Obama has never worn the uniform, not once.
McCain has honor and experience. Obama, heck we’re not even sure who he is. Changed his name, what three times? His birth certificate has information redacted out of it?
McCain is a long serving Senator. Obama was a “community organizer” – so are Girl Scouts. Obama didn’t serve even long enough in the senate to count.

Posted by: McCain Fought | August 11, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

“Is there anything Obama can learn from this story and these memos?”
That Hillary Clinton is one very tough smart politician and he isn’t.
With that much in-fighting and for all of his centeredness, she still beat him in popular vote and would have beaten him altogether if the media had outed his biography earlier.
In other words, he should understand that he is very beatable even when his opponent has one hand tied behind her back by her own party.

Posted by: len | August 11, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

“Shots were not fired in the Cold War”
Once again, Obama his people show their ignorance and show they are not ready to lead.
Shots most certainly were fired during the “Cold War”. Vietnam – proxy war between US and USSR. Korean Conflict – proxy war between US & North Korea. Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan – proxy war between US and USSR. Well over a million dead and wounded from those wars alone. Countless skirmishes and little known operations occurred where blood was split in locales around the globe in the conflict of ideologies between Communism and the West.
You can just hear Obama’s voice get shaky and unsure of himself when it comes to talking about conflicts.
Hillary is a much stronger leader. This ain’t over yet.

Posted by: Hillary's Revenge | August 11, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

What a bunch of sore losers.
I live in Iowa, at my caucus it was down to Hillary or Obama (Obama had over 100) Edwards people had to move to one or the other or leave and not vote. All of Edwards people moved to Obama. They all said the same thing, they did not want another Clinton in office. The want change in Washington and she is not that.

Posted by: beck | August 11, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

If the democrats had nominated a moderate democrat for president this election cycle they would win hands down due to the political climate. Instead apparently the leadership thought they could nominate a far left radical bordering on Marxist and then convince everyone he is a moderate.
No amount of spin can convince anyone of intelligence that Obama is not far left regardless of MSM spin. Obama made his character a centerpiece of his campaign with his repeating “change” “not a usual politician” etc., etc. then Obama gets mad when people judge him on his character and show he is a usual politician and a ruthless one at that. He himself admitted he wouldn’t have the experience to run in 2008.
Michelle goes out and makes bold political statements and is speaking at the convention then Obama tries lecturing everyone that they can’t criticize her. If presidential candidates want it that way they have to keep their spouses out of the campaign or expect criticism (this applies regardless of gender). I didn’t hear the same respect given to Bill Clinton. Then Obama thinks he is free to play the race card whenever it suits him and act haughty and indignant when he is called on the table for it. Fortunately not all of America has been brainwashed into thinking black racism is ok as any racism is wrong. I love Obama’s hypocrisy and many Obama supporters’ inability to see through it.

Posted by: Cryos | August 11, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Hillary signed and agreed to the rules in MI and FL just like everyone else did. Her signature is on the papers, papers have been shown, she is just as responsible for those states not voting as the others. She knows it also. I think that hurt her for the chance of winning. I was for her tell she started her cheating and telling her lies and acting like the victim. I do not want a president like her, we can do better.

Posted by: beck | August 11, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

So THAT is what Bob Shrum thinks. This certainly changes the dynamic.
What Loser A thinks of Loser B.

Posted by: Mark | August 11, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Hillary’s Revenge
Trust me! It’s over!

Posted by: Daunte | August 11, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Why are people still arguing about Hillary and Obama? This entire election will boil down to one factor – race. Like Bob Kerrey said, if Obama was a tall, skinny white guy named Paul Jones (the election) is a different story. Guess we’ll see if America is ready to step out from under the dark shadow of the past eight years or embrace the darkness and plod on while the rest of the world looks on in horror and amazement.

Posted by: 11thCavVet | August 11, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

len |
Clinton did not beat him in the popular vote and even if she had…repeat after me! The Democratic primaries are won by DELEGATES! NOT THE POPULAR VOTE! Got it?

Posted by: Daunte | August 11, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am

dl: I disagree with you. Obama would have lost in Iowa if the Edwards saga had come out earlier. But he media kept it quiet because they do not like Hillary. Well, let me go on record to say, Obama may not win the election because McCain is catching up in the polls and if Hillary is not the VP then all her voter’s should either write her name in or vote McCain. I may not vote at all or write Hillary’s name in. I also believe they should have a roll call at the convention even though Obama doesn’t want it. What is he afraid of. And the superdelegates can change their vote.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | August 11, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am

Al,
I agree with you, shame on the party for the people. Today, Obama wants money so we can be the first to learn who his VP will be. It is no longer about the people.

Posted by: Marie | August 11, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Obama is not centered and serene about polls.
He is hyper-defensive to the point of prissy about polls and criticism.
And don’t forget Obama barely squeaked by in the primary even with the help of the entire MSM bashing Clinton mercilessly day after day. Even with every resource [money, MSM, etc], this guy can’t get over the fence.
It’s so weird when the media writes pieces that gush over Obama – that transparently show their infatuation.
Obama must privately laugh to himself, “I’m pulling this ruse off! They’re buying it.”
And, fellas, why don’t you report on Obama’s ugly tactics. There were many, i.e. stirring up race issues when none existed and then disingenuously saying “hey let’s not make this a race issue”, calling the MSM about Ferraro’s forthright and right on commentary to stir up the African-American pop.
“Pieces” like this make us even less likely to vote Obama because they are so biased, so gushing.
Apparently America feels similarly because Obama should be ripping McCain [who hasn't had a strong campaign] but isn’t.

Posted by: Disgusted | August 11, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

“Obama changed his name”? Yeah, sometimes he went by “Bar,” sometimes by “Barry” and sometimes by “Barak” (as reported in Huffington post). Anyone out there currently go by Andrew, after using “Andy” in gradeschool and “Drew” in high school? Or maybe something goofy like “Drewster”?
Come ON guys, be real. You’d trust him more if he still wend by Bar instead of Barak? This is nuts. And the campaign has posted his birth certificate, if anyone wants to check it for themselves. Sheesh. At least be creative; don’t re-post stuff that’s already been debunked on Snopes, OK?

Posted by: JFS | August 11, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

Can we stop this ride I want to get off. I am so tired of people trying to demonize the clinton’s too bad they didnt go looking for this much stuff with Edwards and now Obama. We get it some people dislike the the last best democratic president we had and dislike one of the most vocal 1st lady’s we have had. Okay go vote for Obama and I hope you get what you want out of presidency. Also Hillary is not stating any of this and she never said Edwards affair cost her the election why continue reporting on what other people are saying?

Posted by: rachel | August 11, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

And don’t forget Obama barely squeaked by in the primary
The same could be said for the United States swim team last night…but they still won! It’s killing you all isn’t it? Ha Ha Ha!
Losers! Get use to it!

Posted by: roxanne | August 11, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Obuma could not close the deal THEN.
Obuma Can NOT CLOSE THE DEAL NOW!!
Say what?

Posted by: HP Boston | August 11, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

“Why are people still arguing about Hillary and Obama? This entire election will boil down to one factor – race. Like Bob Kerrey said, if Obama was a tall, skinny white guy named Paul Jones (the election) is a different story.”
You’re right if he was white he wouldn’t have made it past the first round as compared to the other white candidates he has a lot of baggage without much experience. However the MSM thought the race card and white guilt would trump reason and they were right for the primary. I don’t think it will happen in the general though. McCain has already nullified Obama’s race card which he depends on to combat attacks against him or for people that don’t vote for him, and not enough of America has been mentally oppressed from white guilt for it to work. In 4 years maybe it would have worked with 4 more years of PC but they popped the bubble too early and people are getting their self respect back.

Posted by: Cryos | August 11, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

It is funny to see what Obama’s supporters have to say because they are either in denial or they are hateful. There are many, many, many democrats who are voting for McCain that would have voted for Hillary. Sorry Obama followers but it is true.
If Obama was qualified and not corrupt then I’m sure more Democrats would be voting for him. But I’m not taking my chances on a the arrogant one who wants to pretend to be the president.
With Obama as president Russia would clobber the US in no time.

Posted by: Pete | August 11, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

There is nothing that a two time loser (Bob Shrum) can say that will make this former lifelong Democrat vote for anyone who thinks he is the messiah. I’ve never voted anything but a straight Democratic ticket but this time around I am voting AGAINST Obama and his wife, his pastor, his priest, his friend Ayers, his racism, his thin skin, his arrogance, his lies, called “change” and “hope”. Read his books and then compare them to the truth. Anyone who thinks he has anything to say about life when he is in his thirties has an ego too big for me. Also much of what he writes is simply made up. Didn’t he think anyone would fact check him. Go home Obama and take your wife with you.

Posted by: Sue | August 11, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Ha, ha, ha, ha…. Ha, Ha, ha, ha…. While all of you are arguing and ready to reap each other’s head off, “Atty in FL” wants the memo to be “obtained legally!” Only a lawyer from Florida will think that way. By the way “Atty in FL” what happened to the gut who went to court to assert his constitutional right to sleep (yes, exactly the way to think I mean it) with alligators?

Posted by: John Paul Telhomme | August 11, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

McCain is working on solving the problems in Georgia and Obama is on vacation.

Posted by: McGeorgia | August 11, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Cyros;
I disagree with your observation that Obama plays the race card. I think you ought to read his first book, Dreams From My Father. It is a thoughtful examination of a young man struggling to come to terms with his own mixed race and the way it impacted his life. It was written well before he went into politics and it was NOT ghost-written. Many whites are very uncomfortable about have to confront their own latent racism and labeling Obama is an easy out. Read the book and get back to me.

Posted by: 11thCavVet | August 11, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Dear Clinton Dem,
With the convention just around the corner, it is imperative that Democrats all around the country understand that whether or not Hillary is nominated, we are in this for the long haul.
This primary has revealed DNC “leadership” to be corrupt, mean-spirited, and lacking respect for basic democratic principles. They have completely and effectively ceded the moral high ground to Republicans at this point.
• We have seen the race card played, with assistance from both Dean and Brazile.
• We have seen rampant sexism with no objection by the DNC.
• We have seen the superdelegates endorse as quid-pro-quo for campaign contributions.
• We have seen arm-twisting of the congressional delegates by “neutral” Nancy Pelosi to declare for Obama.
• We have seen an unabashed ageism campaign against John McCain, calling him “confused”, and that he has “lost his bearings”.
• We’ve seen a softening of support for the gay and lesbian community.
• We’ve seen caucus cheating.
• We’ve seen intimidation of Hillary supporters, hack attacks and coordinated threats against voters and media that dare to dissent.
• We’ve seen manipulation of the party nominating system and media to favor one candidate over another and the outright redistribution of votes cast for one Hillary and given to Obama.
This is now a democratic party in name only.
TAKE ACTION:
We need to get the word out.
Posted by: Al from NJ | Aug 11, 2008 8:56:54 AM
**********************************
EXACTLY!!!!!
Obuma may be on vacation, but we are not………..

Posted by: HP Boston | August 11, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

The phrase “Ugly Sterotype” is just PC for “The Truth Hurts”.

Posted by: Hillary's Revenge | August 11, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Obama would be ripping McCain if the news media would do their jobs. McCain is and has never been for the people of the United States he has voted every time against us and only for Large Oil and large CEOs. Now to me this race is McCain vs. McCain. He is trying to lie his way into your hearts and mind and he is getting away with it because of the media. Do you homework, check out who he is friends with, check out does he go to church, what has he really voted for, why is it ok for McCain to have affairs on his wife but not ok for others. Ask yourself these questions, find your answers, do not wait for the media they are not going to play fair and be great at their jobs.

Posted by: beck | August 11, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

John McCain has said many times over the years that he would rather lose an election than win a war. He backed up his words by challenging George Bush on his execution of the war in Iraq, and alienating his own Party. McCain has alienated his own party on several issues over the years. That is the difference between Obama and McCain. I can pretty much predict what McCain is going to do. I have no idea what Obama stands for. He says one thing, changes his mind, and then changes it back again, depending on the way the wind blows. I have no idea who this man really is. He reminds me of an onion. Peel away the layers, and there’s nothing at the core. I don’t always agree with John McCain, but I’m pretty sure I know where he stands on most issues. At least that gives me some level of comfort. From day to day, I don’t know where Obama stands on anything. In one day, he said THREE different things about Iraq – he’d get the troops out in 16 months, then he’d keep troops in Iraq depending on conditions on the ground, and then he went back to his commitment to get the troops out in 16 months. It’s clear to me that this man is willing to say anything to get elected. The question is, what does he really believe and what will he really do?

Posted by: FOB | August 11, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Mariann: are you from Iowa? I am, Obama won this state and he will win again.

Posted by: beck | August 11, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

“It was written well before he went into politics and it was NOT ghost-written. Many whites are very uncomfortable about have to confront their own latent racism and labeling Obama is an easy out. Read the book and get back to me. ”
I’ve read sections of it but don’t care to read the whole thing and probably never will. In my mind blatent racism and trying to use race to your advantage like Obama is will not be justified by his thoughts and feelings in a book. Sorry I don’t subscribe to racism regardless of the source. Obama using racism is no better than the ignorant people who judge him according to race. When “Typical white person” and things like that come out it makes planned book entries more of a moot point.
Do you honestly believe Obama didn’t plan on going into politics when he wrote the book? I hope not since that would be pretty naive.

Posted by: Cryos | August 11, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

I voted for Kerry in 2004 but there is no way I am voting for Obama. When his campaign put out that Keith Olbermann video talking about Hillary and assassination of Obama, that was the last straw for me.
It is unbelievable to me that, as soon as he became a Senator, he started planning a presidential campaign. He didn’t even spend time on Senate matters — he spent his time writing a self-promotional ‘memoir.’ He didn’t even hold a single hearing of his subcommittee.
The Democratic party should get its head on straight and nominate Hillary at the convention.

Posted by: 57 states and counting | August 11, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Is it any wonder why Bill said what he said? After all, Penn was his paid adviser and consultant for so many years and that was exactly the type of game he played. Only this time it did not work!! It is now clear that the “race” card was always in the works, depending on who the opponents were, and regardless of denials, it is absolutely true that they would play the race card if they could get one over the other side. Others who are thinking of using Penn to help them in the future should be aware that in reality, he is a racist and will not hesitate to use it to his advantage if he thinks it would help. ONly this time it really did backfire and the Clintons have lost the support of many due to this mistake. Banish Penn!!!

Posted by: Karen | August 11, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Americans need to ask themselves honestly who and what the Clintons represent. Why are the Clintons and their surrogates still talking about the primaries rather than uniting behind the Democratic Nominee? Why? I will tell you why. The Clinton’s are John McCain’s Neocon Wingmen. They have to appear to party insiders, including delegates and the fundraising apparatus to be working on behalf of the choice of the party. But the underbelly of all of this is the groundwork and the seeds of discontent that the Clinton’s preyed up in exploiting and manipulating voters in Appalachia. John McCain’s campaign is focused on where Hillary left off. It’s as if she has handed him drove a wedge in the Democratic Party and handed the baton (white lower- income, women and blue collar voters) to McCain. As Shrum says, “it’s interesting if somebody produces a memo that says we need to go after these invisibles: lower-income voters, women, blue collar voters…”– My theory is very simple, Hillary Clinton is DINO, a Democrat in Name Only who has courted favor with the Neocons. She is courting favor with the Neocons by indirectly helping the McCain campaign. Make no mistake, the Clintons “never” say anything by mistake.

Posted by: Christopher London | August 11, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Isn’t Bob Shrum the guy who ran the Kerry campaign? Talk about a bad campaign.
Maybe people living in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones at other people. He is a long-standing Clinton-hater.
Not that I don’t think it was an extremely poorly run campaign, but Bob Shrum should shut up.

Posted by: Joan | August 11, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

A deciding factor for me was the Russian invasion of Georgia. The Cold War has started again (if it ever ended). I want a politician who is well versed in Cold War era politics. Putin will bait Obama the same way he did the smart Ivy League educated President of Georgia. This is no time for on-the-job training. If Obama is ready in 4 years or 8 years, I’ll vote for him then. At this point, I have to vote for the candidate who is most capable of dealing with the Russians. That candidate is NOT Obama. Does he even know what the Cold War is?
Posted by: Deciding Factor
—————————-
Deciding Factor, I have to laugh at your posting. John McCain doesn’t even know which country Putin represents!! Last I heard, McCain BELIEVES PUTIN IS THE PRESIDENT OF GERMANY!! He also believes Pakistan borders Iraq, when in fact Pakistan borders Afghanistan. McCain believes he will be able to help Chechoslovakia, a country which NO LONGER EXISTS, a country which split into The Chech Republic and Slovakia!! McCain cannot tell the difference between the differenct factions in Iraq. McCain has great difficulty keeping track of what is what and who is who in foreign countries and even here at home! Stupidity or dementia, which is it??

Posted by: NinaK | August 11, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

nomorerepublicans – you bring up the gay issues but when it comes down to it gays should be given equal rights under the law but please put a stop there. Gays should be allowed to “unite” with the same protection given to married heterosexual couples but don’t call it marriage. Marriage is and should remain between a man and woman…Period That I must agree with Republicans on. As for this article, I don’t even know why MSM is bringing this up now. Hillary fought a tough battle, made mistakes that cost the nomination but we should all move on to look at the candidates that are our choices. We have McCain aka McSame for some and Obama Hussein aka “The guy who makes great speeches but is he for real? So flip the coin and regardless of the outcome, the results will be the same. Slim picking

Posted by: simplysaid | August 11, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

“Clinton did not beat him in the popular vote”
Counting Florida and Michigan, Clinton won the polular votes. She would have won the nomination itself had Obama been vetted re Wright before March 13. She lost the first 11 primaries due to sexism. The playing field was leveled after March 13.

Posted by: Al Johnson | August 11, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

This was so on the money:
Americans need to ask themselves honestly who and what the Clintons represent. Why are the Clintons and their surrogates still talking about the primaries rather than uniting behind the Democratic Nominee? Why? I will tell you why. The Clinton’s are John McCain’s Neocon Wingmen. They have to appear to party insiders, including delegates and the fundraising apparatus to be working on behalf of the choice of the party. But the underbelly of all of this is the groundwork and the seeds of discontent that the Clinton’s preyed up in exploiting and manipulating voters in Appalachia. John McCain’s campaign is focused on where Hillary left off. It’s as if she has handed him drove a wedge in the Democratic Party and handed the baton (white lower- income, women and blue collar voters) to McCain. As Shrum says, “it’s interesting if somebody produces a memo that says we need to go after these invisibles: lower-income voters, women, blue collar voters…”– My theory is very simple, Hillary Clinton is DINO, a Democrat in Name Only who has courted favor with the Neocons. She is courting favor with the Neocons by indirectly helping the McCain campaign. Make no mistake, the Clintons “never” say anything by mistake.

Posted by: chris | August 11, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

simplysaid:
“Hillary fought a tough battle, made mistakes that cost the nomination”
I disagree. She lost because Obama was not vetted re Wright until after the first 11 primaries. It was nip and tuck for Obama after that.

Posted by: Al Johnson | August 11, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

“it took the race card to defeat the Clintons. And they resent the hell out of it.”
And rightly so. The race card topped it off for Obama in the finals.

Posted by: Al Johnson | August 11, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

More like a skunk. Who needs the smell of managing two losing campaigns that should have been sure wins?! Go away and hide, taking Kerry with you.

Posted by: Atom | August 11, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

are you from Iowa? I am, Obama won this state and he will win again.
Posted by: beck | Aug 11, 2008 11:23:36 AM
===
That’s why they call you “I-Owe-the_World-an-Apology”.

Posted by: Atom | August 11, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

Hillary will rule the world someday. Lose the battle win the war. It’s Hillary’s world. god bless america

Posted by: Nija | August 11, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

“She lost the first 11 primaries due to sexism.”
Yeah, I’m sure that’s the only reason…
Have Hilary supporters ever supported candidates before? Nearly every candidate I want fails to win the primaries but I don’t go nuts about it. She came close but didn’t win. It’s ridiculous to count votes from states in which she herself said wouldn’t count.
This is the definition of a sore loser. If you don’t believe in Democrat principles that’s one thing, but if you do you’re doing yourself and the country a disservice by voting for McCain.
It’s only a vote out of spite.

Posted by: Gary | August 11, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

After reading everyone’s comments,it is really a pity that in 2008 the people of America who has freedom of speech are actually spreading so much hate for one another when WE have all races and ethnic background fighting a war in our name “AMERICA.” Let’s deal with the issues and leave your personal bias opinion aside for awhile. Remember, if you feel that constant bickering is what you want in your UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, then go right ahead and attack either candidate that eventually one will be representing YOU. It is up to you to chose a candidate that has your interest in mind.
THINK FOR YOURSELF AMERICA…..

Posted by: A. Winston | August 11, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

with Mcbush
Women will loose it all
LOL
to all who vote for him

Posted by: dee | August 11, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

You go girl, Hillary

Posted by: asiangirl | August 11, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

McCain immediately grasped the severity and repercussions of the Russia/Georgia conflict and issued a firm statement with regards to it.
Obama initially said that the two “need to talk” and skipped on his merry way – failing to realize exactly what had happened and why the U.S.A. should care. Of course, he later parroted what McCain had said (shades of the old “I agree with Hillary” from the debates).
Obama is unqualified to be POTUS.

Posted by: marylou | August 11, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

I don’t think its all about racism. People are generally afraid of change. With McCain you pretty much know that the war will continue, gas and food prices will continue to go up and nothing will change because he has a lot of the same policies as Bush. With Obama he is not only looking to change things in Washington, he is making America more responsible for changing. His ideas mean that we have to change along with his message or nothing will get done. Some people are afraid of that. Its easier to let the country keep spiraling than to stand up and say enough. Let’s change things. The truth is I don’t know what’s going to happen when Obama is President and that’s what excites me. He gives me hope that we can wipe the slate clean with the old Bush policies of the past and begin a new chapter for America.

Posted by: Carol | August 11, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

“”She lost the first 11 primaries due to sexism.”"
“Yeah, I’m sure that’s the only “reason…
Well, name another.

Posted by: Al Johnson | August 11, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Barack Obama while on vacation still managed to handle the crisis between Russia and Georgia better than trigger happy McCain. John McCain was ready to wage war with Russia because he thought that they attacked Atlanta. If he had any soldiers in his army after his brilliant surge in Iraq, he could send them to fight Russia.

Posted by: Ron | August 11, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Well maybe Hillary lost because people are tired of the Clintons and the 2 dynasties that have been running this country.

Posted by: erin | August 11, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Al Johnson,
Those primaries he won were before his scandals (Wright, Rezko, Larry Sinclair, Ayers, etc). Had he been vetted well by teh media, he couldn’t have gone that far. Those 18 millions that voted for him have had buyers’ remorse….Still, the media are still dancing with the wolf….

Posted by: neil1785 | August 11, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Erin,
Bill Clinton was the best President we ever had in the past 40 years. Hillary Clinton is the best Senator we have today. The problem is, no matter how good you are, or how intelligent you are, there’s a thing in politics called jealousy, that’s out to destroy you. Considering he’s the best President this country has had for the last 40 years, as any sane and reasonable person knows, it is no surprise he will be speaking at the convention…Bill Clinton is one of the greatest minds and President’s that our country has ever had. If he could run again I would vote for him over anyone. Anything that he done in his private life is his family and his own business! Bill Clinton was a great President. Granted his little scandals were unfortunate, and he should have focused more on how they would affect the reputation of the office, but he also did some really great things while in office. Look back through history and you will not find one president who has not brought disgrace to the office in one way or the other. The current president is the worst of the lot, with his bully tactics around the world. He may not have had sexual encounters in the Oval Office, that we know of, but his scandals I think, are a lot worse!

Posted by: neil1785 | August 11, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Now that John McCain has announced that he will only serve one term as President, It plays right into the hands of Hillary Clinton for 2012. John McCain may be an old fool, but YEAH he’s an old fool.

Posted by: Ron | August 11, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

Neil, I was answering the question of why, other than sexism, did she lose.

Posted by: erin | August 11, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

“Barack Obama while on vacation still managed to handle the crisis between Russia and Georgia better than trigger happy McCain. John McCain was ready to wage war with Russia because he thought that they attacked Atlanta. If he had any soldiers in his army after his brilliant surge in Iraq, he could send them to fight Russia.”
Barry and his 300 advisors are no match for Putin. He’d spin the junior senator like a top and play him like a fiddle.

Posted by: Mack | August 11, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

Senator Clinton ran an ugly & incompetent campaign, which began with a sense of entitlement and ended in a shock of recognition. Hillary lost the nomination because she deserved to loose. Then she opposed rules that she would have supported had they supported her; thus demonstrating zero integrity. Her supporters continue that canard, to the embarrassment of everyone involved.
Senator Obama, on the other hand, has run a brilliant campaign ; he’s managed that achievement that with relative humility — all in the face of slurs and slanders, from the retro-racist-book-of-tricks. Now is the time for him to seal the deal with clear policies and courageous positions. This would eviscerate a befuddled John McCain candidacy which so obviously stands for nothing clear that it clearly stands for nothing.
The choice is not between Hillary and anything. Our choice is between very bright young man who seeks to inspire hope and change and an old warrior, who is tied to the most corrupt and corrupting forces in our history, which promises more of the same.
This is not a risk-free decision. However, with Senator Obama we have the possibility of better decisions leading to more effective governance while the retro-presidency of Senator McCain proffers certain failure.

Posted by: Joey Tranchina | August 11, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Bob Shrum is better then that senseless Bob Brooks on the talk shows. Thanks for telling it like it is Bob. Look forward to the fall and don’t let those Republican talking heads fool the voters on the Talk shows. We are counting on you!!!

Posted by: Jud | August 11, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

The primaries is to pick the best candidate not the marketing package that was presented like the one in Obama’s publicity tour of Europe..Obama would best serve Amercia as a preacher rather then lead America …Obama rep what little there is is not really good shows how he back Industry (particularly when they provided funding to his campaign and pays political favors…votes for gun control…votes against people rights when it comes ease dropping…yea that is the President I want ..little on experience a lot of BS

Posted by: SLS | August 11, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

The Republicans are really nervous about Barack Obama! Look at all the negative posts!! Go embrace your useless nominee, McCain, he will need you guys to hold him up come November.
As for HRC – get over it! She lost the race and she has no one to blame but the people she surrounded herself with. What a pathetic bunch of losers!! Now, the are trying to blame Obama for winning and are not willing to admit that they (PENN and the rest) that caused her to lose!

Posted by: TRUE DEM | August 11, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Mack said
“Barry and his 300 advisors are no match for Putin. He’d spin the junior senator like a top and play him like a fiddle.”
seems that is what he did to Bush, Cheney, the repubs and all Mccain’s advisers.

Posted by: dl | August 11, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Can any of you Obamaniacs name one thing that your candidate has accomplished in the Il. senate or the US senate? Hillary has been vetted to the point of exhaustion, a known quantity.

Posted by: Gary in SC | August 11, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Obama is the one that consistently plays the race card.
He criticizes the AA community for acting like victims, but uses the race card for pity votes.

Posted by: riley | August 11, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

SLS WROTE:
The primaries is to pick the best candidate not the marketing package that was presented like the one in Obama’s publicity tour of Europe..
—————-
Wake up SLS, presidential campaigns have always been about about marketing. You don’t think the McCain crafts his image away from his age, health or relationship with Bush? Or Clinton as the youthful saxophone player back in the 90s? Dislike Obama for real reasons, not because he’s got a crack marketing team.

Posted by: Kate | August 11, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

The Democrats are really nervous about John McCain! Look at all the negative posts!! Go embrace your useless nominee, Obama and his creep sidekick Edwards. He will need you guys to hold him up come November.

Posted by: NoBamer | August 11, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

NoBamer:
Anyone can post a negative comment. Look at the candidates ads and you will find McCain has about 10 to 1 more negative ads then Obama. Now who is running scared?

Posted by: The Unshrub | August 11, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Quick note the my fellow democrats. Obama’s platform is MUCH more similar to Hillary’s than McCain’s. Voting for McCain will just be a futile protest. Ang anger vote. Don’t waste your vote by throwing it away for 8 more years of Bush/McCain.

Posted by: Ross | August 11, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

DONT YOU ALL SOUND LIKE OBAMA BEAT CLINTON… SHE BEAT HIM WHERE IT COUNTED..SUPERDELEGATES PLOTTED–
HIS STRATEGY IS TO DO NOTHING???
THE REPUBS WILL HAVE A FIELD DAY

Posted by: TJ | August 11, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

Gary from SC,
Can you name one thing Senator Clinton has done in the good state of New York, as a senator or for the US?
As a New Yorker I can tell you she spent the majority of her time running for the Presidency. Many New Yorkers will tell you she used New York as her launch pad to the Presidency. Her win in the primary was not by significant margins, but a win nonetheless. I supported Senator Clinton and I now support the party’s choice. I do not know what she’s done for the country but before you cast stones double check the facts.
She has not been vetted as everyone presumes. She’s not as qualified as everyone thinks; none of the candidates are.
Pick a candidate and cast your voice.

Posted by: MitchNY | August 11, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Clinton definitely took the high road. There was a lot she could have said, but she didn’t because she didn’t want to hurt the party. After hearing about Edwards however, I have a feeling Obama used some of what he knew about Edwards (and apparently the Clinton camp knew as well) to get Edwards’ support. I also heard Edwards talk about his being young and knew to politics when he hit the national spotlight and how he became narcissistic and full of himself and wondered if he wasn’t somehow putting out a dig at Obama. Just wondering.

Posted by: Susan | August 11, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

I am sick and tired of people saying McCain will keep us in Iraq for 100 years, it is simply not true. After slamming Obama as being dangerously naive on this topic for months now McCain has endorsed Obama’s plan to withdraw troops from Iraq in OBAMA”s 16 month timetable, so has Bush and Maliki.

Posted by: JR | August 11, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Well, this Shrum guy has been a real success. He worked both Gore & Kerry Campaigns……BIG LOSER FOR THE BIG LOSERS!!!
Hillary should be the nominee and she still might be after they find out the Barack Obama is not his real name according to his birth certificate.

Posted by: The Biased Media | August 11, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Barack Obama is a quibbling, rhetoric spewing politician that is not qualified for the job. This is like a high school student graduating and going straight into medical school surgery rounds.

Posted by: SouthernFarmer | August 11, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

Obama’s platform is MUCH more similar to Hillary’s than McCain’s. Voting for McCain will just be a futile protest.+++++++++++++++++++++Well this democrat is just going to have to go futile, no way I could ever cast a vote for Obama, he is worst than four years of McCain, Obama is a liar and a major flip-flopper,

Posted by: thereisonlyoneGod | August 11, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

Would somebody please put a muzzle on Grandpa McCain, we sure don’t need his imput on the Geogia/Russia conflict. This old man is an idiot just like George W. Bush. They both just need to keep their mouth shut.
Somebody said that McCain was addressing the issues in Georgia while Obama is on vacation, well where’s our current President??? He’s on vacation with most of his family, wife, daughter, neice, daddy, sister….etc. in China instead of taking care of business. Of course we are probably better off that he’s away because just as everything else he’s been involved with it will be a disaster if he and Cheney get involved.

Posted by: The Biased Media | August 11, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

By the way, Bush is the Best President since Jefferson Davis. However, I do understand that liberals won’t be happy until we have a President that surrenders to our enemies, raises taxes, penalizes success, slanders America traditions and values and authorizes the taking of the lives of the unborn.

Posted by: SouthernFarmer | August 11, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

McCain has no foreign policy experience and he is lying about the Russians. These people that the Russians are defending have been getting attacked and massacred for years by the Georgians because they want to be independent and the Georgians have refused. The Russians have had to sit back for years and watch their brothers get wiped out by the Georgians. That is why we are seeing the Russians react this way towards the Georgians. McCain is owned lock, stock, and barrel by the Georgians. This Cowboy diplomacy has got to stop before we end up in a war we will all regret. The Russians and the Chinese have been supporting us with Iran and were a great help in getting the North Koreans to come around. How can we expect to continue to have Russian support when we have leaders like McCain making these idiotic threats that everyone in the room knows he can not back up. Obama’s more even approach is the type of diplomacy that shows he will do well in foreign policy working with other nations to achieve many things. McCain seems too intent on war that leads to famine, disease, and other horrors. By the way McCain is no war hero. According to other POWs that were there with him McCain was known as the song bird because he would not stop talking because he did not want to be tortured. He made something like 32 Jane Fonda anti-American propaganda films for the North Vietnamese. In them he said we bombed hospitals and schools deliberately and we were all war criminals along with a lot of stuff like that. His injuries were the result of failing to follow proper procedures for ejecting. Then there is the USS Forrestal tragedy that cost 134 servicemen their lives and lost 72 million in military hardware. His Daddy Admiral got him out of that one and returned him to active flight duty when he should have been court martialed. Of course there is the Keating 5 savings and loan scandal that cost the tax payers millions of dollars that should have gotten McCain kicked out of the Senate and put in jail. But he did not steal as much as Cranston so I guess that excused him. His support of veterans and women is deplorable. In fact McCain has not accomplished a thing in all 26 years he has been in Washington. That makes him part of the problem because he has no solutions.

Posted by: Jake | August 11, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

That makes him part of the problem because he has no solutions._____________Neither one Obama or McCain has any answers, so we don’t vote on experience alone, we vote on who the person is, and Obama is a racist liar , who will say and do any thing to get what he wants, he is clueless on what it takes to run this country, there are a lot of black people out there that has what it takes to be a leader but Obama is not one of them,

Posted by: thereisonlyoneGod | August 11, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

LOOK PEOPLE HILLARY LOST BECAUSE SHE WASNOT READY ON DAY ONE{OF THE PRIMARIES} TO HANDLE HER BUSINESS,SHE SURROUNDED HERSELF WITH THE SO CALLED CREME DE CREME OF BELTWAY POLITICS.BUT ALAS THESE WOULD BE QUEENMAKERS AND PARTY INSIDERS WERE MORE INTERRESTED IN JOCKEYING FOR POSITIONS IN HER majesty’s SOON TO BE ROYAL COURT SO RATHER THAN WORRYING ABOUT WOEING THE PEASANTS{SINCE IN THEIR MINDS IT WAS ALL OVER EXCEPT FOR THE CORONATION} THEY FOUGHT,BICKERED&BACKSTABBED THEIR WAY FROM THE TOP OF THE TICKET TO THE BUTT OF JOKES IN THE TABLOIDS AND ON LATE NITE TALK SHOWS.THEIR FEELING OF ENTITLEMENT CAUSED THEM TO COMMITTED ALL SORTS OF INTRIGUE{ MAKING FALSE AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS,PLAY ACTING THE PERILS OF PAULINE[FAKE TEARS OPTIONAL]AND THE MOST DAMNABLE OF ALL.. TRADING WHAT WAS LEFT OF HER SOUL TO SIMON BAR SINISTER R.M.FOR SHORT.. FOR AIR TIME ON FAUX NEWS } WHEN IT HAD BECOME APPARENT THAT SHE HAD NOT BEEN PREPARED FOR THE WHAT IF’S OF POLITICS AND IT WAS COSTING HER DEARLY BECAUSE THE PEASANTS WERE REVOLTING AND SHOUTING A DIFFERENT BATTLE CRY.. ONE FILLED WITH HOPE AND FUELED BY THE DESIRE FOR CHANGE AND A WILLINGNESS TO {MUCH LIKE THOSE ECHOED BY OUR FOUNDING FATHER’S} CHART THEIR OWN PATH INTO THE FUTURE

Posted by: brkdckdwg | August 11, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

I thought this story is about the Clintons and how they play the race card?
Guess its forgive and forget again! They calim to be for the people. Problem is which people? Sure does not appear to be all of us? But thats OK, The minorities will soon forget again and be brain washed into the DEMs party.
By the way’ Obama has no clue what country he is running for pesident in. His plane landed overseas and he kept on campaining and taking donations from foreign interests.

Posted by: Jim Rod | August 11, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

LOOK PEOPLE HILLARY LOST BECAUSE SHE WASNOT READY ON DAY ONE{OF THE PRIMARIES}____________________Lets be honest first she didn’t lose, she won the vote of the people, Because she don’t play with the DNC {teddy} it was stolen from her. The DNC cares nothing for the voters they only care about power, and greed, they cheat, lie and steal to get what they want, and they need a puppet in power , so that is what we are doing with the likes of Obama,

Posted by: thereisonlyoneGod | August 11, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

I think Bob Shurm needs to shut up. He ran a terrible and a losing campign aganist George W Bush in 2004. Clinton is a fairminded person and she did not use race of nationalism aganist obama. In the end, Obama will be defeat becuase he’s soft and unprincipled politician. Think campign finance, death penalty for child rapists, FISA, oil drilling, Iraq..u name it..

Posted by: Mel | August 11, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

republicans hating obama should grow up and look at the reality that has been the last 8 years. one-party incompetence now in our deepest hole since the depression. so by what right do y’all have in saying that ya’ got anything other than the same ol’ one-liners and fear-baiting to say that’s worth listening.
face it – y’all are simpletons stuck in the same right wing bubble that you were 10 years ago, oblivious to the real world and the concrete evidence of america crumbling. stop your yelling. after years and years of it, us folks in the real world are tone deaf to it already and just glaze over your disconnected sentimental ramblings.
no more excuses – neoconservatives have screwed up royally. enough already.

Posted by: theo | August 11, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

What all these stories about the clinton’s popping up again is they are afraid she is going to put her name in the ring at the convention and they are trying to trash her again before hand, DNC and their dirty little games, They know the voters want her and that she can put obama in the dirt, I for one prays she put her name in the hat,

Posted by: thereisonlyoneGod | August 11, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

theo, if you think the neo-cons have screwed things up, just wait to you see what the uber-liberals do.
That’s why a moderate like McCain with a Democratic-controlled Congress is the perfect match that America needs now.
McCain intends to upright this train wreck by getting our country back to fiscal conservancy.
Obama intends to pile on even more debt by turning our country into one big nanny state.

Posted by: marylou | August 11, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

This year will be about the issues, such as gas prices, jobs and how to keep your homes. __________________If we are voting on Issues then Obama loses hands down, First off he wants on more drilling, he want to make all the illegals legals give them good jobs, he wants to open the borders, and he said he thinks the price of gas should be 5 dollars a gallon, cause it help out people in other fields when the prices go up,

Posted by: thereisonlyoneGod | August 11, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

thereisonlyoneGod and it’s not Hillary Clinton! I hope she puts her name in the hat so she can lose again. Then we can get on with the business of talking about real issues and beating McCain.

Posted by: Orlando B. Fremont Ohio | August 11, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Shrum’s spot on and it’s to Senator Clinton credit that she didn’t follow his advice. McCain/Rove, on the other hand, have no such scruples. The “celebrity” ads were the beginning of their effort to demonstrate that Obama’s “not one of us” and “he’s an elitist.”
It’s a hypocritical approach from the son of an Admiral who lives off the beer millions inherited by his second wife. It’s not that much different from the son and grandson of aristocratic Connecticut WASPs pretending to be a Texas good ole boy.
The Obamas, on the other hand, have worked hard for everything they have. That’s what most Americans have to do. In that regard, they’re more “like us” than McCain and Bush will ever be.

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | August 11, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Bottom line is she ran; she lost; he won. Get over it. Anyone saying that they will vote for McCain is not and was never a democrat. Liking a candidate doesn’t make you a dem or repub; adherance to the partys core values and platform does.

Posted by: Ken from Atlanta | August 11, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

Why are Obama supporters releasing these intercepted emails? To discredit Clinton right before the convention.
The thing is, Clinton did NOT use the nuclear option against Obama. It seems to me that Clinton played more fair than everyone gave her credit for.

Posted by: Sandra | August 11, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

The media refuses to point out that for all his talk of wanting to get away from “politics as usual” Obama has been its biggest supporter. Throughout this campaign Obama has levied false charges against Clinton, using tactics that can only be compared to those used by Karl Rove against democrats during the last two elections. He has lied about his own record, and lied about Hillary’s.

Posted by: amazed08 | August 11, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

You McCain folks are the pot calling the kettle black. Obama addresses an enormous crowd in Germany, meets with world leaders and is received overwhelmingly positive, and you all call him presumptive and acting presidential. What the *#&/% do you think ole’ McCain is trying to appear like? McCain, keep following Obama’s lead. You might learn something. Your pal, Bushie-Boy has and still is. . .

Posted by: 2008TooLate | August 11, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

Put me in the category of a Democrat who will vote McCain. No way in hell I will vote for Obama. The poster who tries to dismiss althose who claim to be Dems voting for McCain as posers from the Republican party – THINK AGAIN – Obama supporters really have no clue as to how close Obama is to losing it all.

Posted by: Anthony | August 11, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

How about the pic of Obama in the kenyan garb, which was meant to send the signal that Obama is muslim?
How about Clinton long pregnant pause when asked if Obama was a muslim?
How about the ‘kitchen sink’ strategy?
How about Hilary’s comment about regular working Americans, white Americans”?
How about the Clintons playing the race card and NOW DENYING IT?
As if the world does not know the Clintons to be LIARS!
Fact is Clintons DID try to make Obama seem like he’s not American.

Posted by: Patriot | August 11, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

“The Obamas, on the other hand, have worked hard for everything they have. That’s what most Americans have to do. In that regard, they’re more “like us” than McCain and Bush will ever be.” Brooklyn, sorry we others did not lie like Obama lied when Obama said he would filibuster against FISA but Obama voted for FISA instead. We others didn’t lie like Obama lied about his uncle saving Jews from Auschwitz. We others lie like Obama lied when he signed a pledge to use public financing for the general but then broke his pledge. We do not condone lies so we are not like Barack Obama. VOTE NO to bigoted Obama Supporters!

Posted by: Jeff | August 11, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

This democrat, who had always voted for democrats and never once voted for a republican, will not vote for Obama this November. Obama is an overly ambitious man, who has not made any meaningful contribution to the Democratic Party or to this country, and is undeserving of the Presidency.

Posted by: tom | August 11, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

Shrum is also quoted as saying, Hillary wisely discarded it away. As for Middle Class in Middle America; it’s in her memoirs and speeches long before she ran for Pres. Penn was a waste of money.

Posted by: irma | August 11, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Not everything that was circulated came from the Clinton campaign or its supporters. You should see some of the stuff still being circulated about Obama. Also, I am still unclear why we can’t mention Obama’s middle name (it is his name after all) – I mean it would be different if we made up his name. Also, he took a picture in the garb – no one made that up. Why is it being negative when it is true? That just goes to show how controlling and senstive Obama and his supporters truly are.

Posted by: Susan | August 11, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

What an ugly and fractured mess has become the Democratic party.

Posted by: Lisa Again | August 11, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

If you listen to the American public, if you read any blog these days, you will see a real “house divided.” Like or not, if Barack Obama is elected President, the hidden racism in this country is going to be legion and further divide this country. That’s just the nature of the beast, so to speak. Let’s face it, the only reason Hillary got her 18 million is because so many of her voters do not want a black president. Ugly, but true. Don’t say you weren’t warned.

Posted by: Lisa Again | August 11, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

So if McCain claims he will only serve one term, is the election then about his VP? Why bother with him at all? Besides when did a republican ever tell the truth? NEVER……

Posted by: JR | August 11, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

“Obama’s platform is MUCH more similar to Hillary’s than McCain’s.” Oh really? Hillary’s platform didn’t include Obama’s lies about voting against FISA but actually Obama voted for FISA. Obama lied about his uncle saving Jews from Auschwitz. How about the bigoted, racist Obama supporters who slandered Hillary, claiming she wanted Obama assassinated due to her RFK remarks? How about the bigoted, racist Obama supporters who slandered Hillary when she said the President can grant civil rights, which is TRUE; all the marching won’t give you civil rights or otherwise we gays would have equality, marriage and civil rights! Obama’s platform is nothing like Hillary’s as Obama spent 20 years in Rev. Wright’s church where Wright spewed racist, bigoted remarks in the sermons. ANYONE who actually lives in Chicago knows that Rev. Wright has been spewing racist, bigoted remarks for over 20 years. It is digusting for Obama to expose his innocent daughters to this church full of hateful, racist and bigoted remarks in Rev. Wright’s church. How about Obama calling people, “Typical White People”? How about Obama playing the race card lately, lying again that people will say Obama doesn’t look like the people on the dollar bills? VOTE NO TO RACIST, BIGOTED Obama supporters!

Posted by: Jeff | August 11, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

Lisa Again , I agree with most of what you say except when you get to the Hillary stuff. I supported Hillary and now support Obama. I think if you substitute McCain’s, you would be correct.

Posted by: JR | August 11, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Obama and some of his vocal supporters still don’t get it. A lot of us democrats (a democrat for life until 2 mos. ago) thought Hillary was the best candidate and thought Bill Clinton was a good president and didn’t think Obama was qualified or had the judgment to be President of the United States. For one thing, he isn’t a great leader. He waits for everyone else to come out with a position or statement before he speaks and then most of the time he just restates the others’ positions with a little personal touch. I am getting tired of hearing him say: “This isn’t the person I knew.” Any way, Hillary got the votes and if Obama had allowed FL and MI to be counted at the time, she probably would have won the superdelegates over too.

Posted by: Susan | August 11, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Of course Obama’s platform is more similar to Hillary’s. They are both democrats and Obama has adopted most of Hillary’s positions in his attempt to appear more centrist.

Posted by: Susan | August 11, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

The US is going to die due to an uneducated electorate. Elections are now based on internet rumors, loose facts and the repetition of non-truths until the non-truths become facts in the minds of the voters. We’re screwed. It’s been nice knowing you. But, this country is going down the tubes.

Posted by: plantain11 | August 11, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

What EVERY major politician says about their opponents includes unethical below-the-belt things and outright lies and distortions meant to fool, not inform the voters. When I see someone worried about preserving a politicians “legacy” for high character I just shake my head.

Posted by: Mickey | August 11, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Shrum is the greatest scumbag to ever exist in the world of political consulting. His badmouhing Edwards and now Clinton after he took dollars from both is disgusting. He snatched defeat from the jaws of victory for Kerry. When will this nincompoop be exposed for the a hole that he is.The Joseph Goebbels of the 21st centuty.

Posted by: anderson | August 11, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Why is this coming out now by the MSM?
I smell a big rat.
Obama does not want a roll call – so his MSM buds start discrediting Hillary – just in case??????????

Posted by: disgusted in Illinois | August 11, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Of course it was a Rovian proposal, with attracting bigots in mind. But as much as I detest Hillary, I have seen nothing to indicate she approved of it.
It does indicate that she, like all candidates, has some reprehensible associates. Which is going to happen. I have a few myself.

Posted by: Dennis | August 11, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

This democrat, who had always voted for democrats and never once voted for a republican, will not vote for Obama this November. Obama is an overly ambitious man, who has not made any meaningful contribution to the Democratic Party or to this country, and is undeserving of the Presidency.

Posted by: tom | August 11, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

JR – I’m pleased you think someone would hire me to write this stuff. That makes my day!!
I just happen to be a well-informed, critical thinker (well I try) who majored in sociology. Yes, I was a college-educated democrat who didn’t and won’t support Obama.

Posted by: Susan | August 11, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Well Tom, you can vote for whomever you want. Then again, I don’t have to look at the kids and tell them that we are at war with Iran, or the trees are all dead, or the rivers are all polluted, or they’re living in a tent and eating refuse from a dump because I voted for four more years of Bush.

Posted by: algwriter | August 11, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

If Bama Bahy so Desperate That he is continuing Attacts agaisnt Hillary.
It seems he is out to Destory the Democratic Party.
Does he not get it. People who did not want him before, still do not want him. Not matter what he does.
Obama is a con man. Buying the Presidency. Money, marketing and PR.
He has done nothing for this country or the People in all his years as a senator in Illinois and the US Senator.
His Chicago Style politics, The Eliminator. Evil, vile and smear techniques is all he has.
His presuasive, motivational repetitive speeches, using mind control and mind manipulation is his major tool on getting followers.
Using his slogans, catch phrases as reinforcements to keep that brainwashing working.
Are Americans going to let, Money, Marketing and Brainwashing Buy America?
HeII No!
He does not want to serve the country. He wants the country to serve him.
Please Keep America Free.

Posted by: seah | August 11, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Hillary lost because she was not the stronger candidate and ran an inferior overall campaign. Please, for the love of all that is decent, stop whining about it. You are embarrassing yourselves, your party, and your former candidate. It’s over. Obama is the nominee. Vote for him, don’t vote for him, I really could care less. Just stop the incessant whining.

Posted by: Tom G | August 11, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

THIS IS COMING FROM BOB SHRUM, THE GUY WHO LOST THE DEMOCRATS TWO PRESIDENCIES THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN WON!!!!!!1

Posted by: tom | August 11, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Obama does not want a roll call – so his MSM buds start discrediting Hillary – just in case??????????
Posted by: disgusted in Illinois | Aug 11, 2008 5:57:22 PM
**********
why would obama care? Hillary will lose a second time by a larger margin. {Yawn} Whatever!
But then again, Hillary DID stay with Bill, so she must be a glutton for punishment!

Posted by: jmc663 | August 11, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

The Clintons, both of them, have proved that they would try any tack at all as long as it appeared to insure a victory.

Posted by: rhbate | August 11, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

disgusted in Illinois…………….do you realize that Hillary won’t win the presidency even if she could some way steal the nomination? Minorities will never vote for her now or ever again Obama loses because of her or if the democrats lose because of her. She will certainly end her career.
BTW, All his voters will still vote for him plus all the superdelegates would have to vote for him which means he will get the nominations by hundreds of votes. This came out because the Clinton campaign put out the dirt on John Edwards who was supposed to be the vice president nomination, in order to force Obama to pick Hillary.
This story is meant to show the divisiveness of Hillary and the reason why Obama will not pick her as his vice president running mate. He or his campaign will not be forced to do that.

Posted by: roy | August 11, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

The Clintons are snake in the grass losers. If it wasn’t for bill clinton and his white house bimbo, monica lewinski the democrats could have still been in control. But because of him and his lack of self control to allow a intern to play the skin flute of a president.

Posted by: artaxxx1 | August 11, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

“This came out because the Clinton campaign put out the dirt on John Edwards who was supposed to be the vice president nomination, in order to force Obama to pick Hillary.” Wow, Roy, you managed to still be wearing that tin foil hat? You take the cake on lunatic conspiracy theories.

Posted by: Jim | August 11, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

I truly enjoy how so many Obama supporters don’t appreciate just how close it was between Hillary and Obama, even when Obama and the news media said he was the winner for the last two months of the primaries she continued to win. Just keep acting like Obama doesn’t need any of us to win and see how he does this Fall. Just a question for you to think about: Why do you think both Bill and Hillary got big speaking spots at the convention?

Posted by: Susan | August 11, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

So, let me get this straight, an internal memo, that made a suggestion that was never used and ignored by Hillary is somehow a smoking gun? Who cares? The fact is that Obama is not a lock here. It’s insulting to Clinton supporters to assume that we’ll just all get on board but that Obama’s fans wouldn’t have gotten behind her. Like her or not, Hillary was QUALIFIED. Obama is not. It will be extremely hard for me to vote for him. I’ll never vote republican, but I might just not vote. Obama got where he is because of a bandwagon affect which waned after 2 months. The fact that Hillary was kicking his ### down the stretch showed that the voters actually were coming to their senses and realizing that he is a candidate of all flash and no substance. The fact that we are still so divided as a party is NOT hillary’s fault and I’m sick and tired of the Obama supporters blaming her. It is their arrogance, their negativity, their candidate’s ego that alienates us. Unless he chooses Hillary as his running mate he will lose a huge chunk of voters. I agree with one of the previous posters that Hillary might not have gotten the minority votes that he will get, because those voters apparently are only voting because he’s black, not because he’s qualified to be president. We’re in trouble here folks and you can talk about how wonderful Obama is, and how inspirational he is until you’re blue in the face. He won’t carry florida, he won’t carry Ohio and the dems will lose again.

Posted by: Wendy | August 11, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

Campaign is nothing to say about how a person can govern — Just look at Bush. He ran the most successful campaign, raised the most money until Obama surpassed it. Obama is still an empty suit — he and his strategists happened to be smart enough to find a good campaign strategy. I am not impressed by his own qualification, and I know there are many people felt the same way. I will still vote for Hillary if there is a chance. But for this election year, I will sit out.

Posted by: Amy | August 11, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

If fact, I don’t think there is anything wrong with a strategy — this is about play into people’s psychology. Why is it OK for Obama to paint Hillary as the “most secretive’, dishonest, flawed, deceptive, person, but it is unacceptable for Clinton’s advisers to even point out Obama’s exotic background — which is so obvious to many people. It the MSM that want people to accept anything Obama does, but interpret anything the Clinton camp did in evil ways. Obama is not electable — I believe there are many people feel this way. He will lose 100%.

Posted by: amy | August 11, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

How is McCain so much more ready to be in command than Obama.He deserves respect for his time served in the military and his being held prisoner of war but that doesn’t make him anymore ready to lead this country than Obama there is no school for presidency,so whomever gets the presidency will have to be ready to take that three o’clock in the morn.call.McCain has made gaffe after gaffe and they are not made to much about but when it comes down to reality have someone that will be able to state who is fighting who and be able to state a persons name of who he is addressing.

Posted by: damehen | August 11, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

…….
Just a question for you to think about: Why do you think both Bill and Hillary got big speaking spots at the convention?
Posted by: Susan | Aug 11, 2008 6:53:09 PM
===============
To convince Hillary Supporters like you who are still in denial to get a grip.
I am a Hillary supporter who has “gotten over it”. Try it. It is not that hard. Live goes on. You don’t have to wait for Bill and Hillary to convince you during the Convention. What will they say that you haven’t heard.
Why is it so hard for people who pretend to be democrats to accept a loss. To this day I still see some of you who claim “Al Gore won” and my retort “then why isn’t he President?”

Posted by: Steve_NJ | August 11, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

Mark Penn is a disgrace and one has to wonder why he was leading a presidential campaign. We keep hearing how politically savvy Bill Clinton is. But who picked Penn? Maybe Bill Clinton really didn’t want his wife to be president wanting that honor only for himself in his family. If Hillary stuck with Penn for so long, imagine who she might have nominated to the Supreme Court? Frightening.

Posted by: Nick | August 11, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Even if Hillary doesn’t win the roll call at the Convention, she will have the luxury of waiting the four years through a McCain presidency; during which time she will continue to increase her support base, work on legislation, and build her own political identity (separate from her husband’s). Smart strategy from a smart woman!
Hillary ’12

Posted by: Virginia Independent | August 11, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

Virginia Independent – “she will have the luxury of waiting the four years through a McCain presidency” – You do realize that if Senator McCain wins in November that both Senator Obama and Senator Clintons’ political career is done, right?

Posted by: jmengate | August 11, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

amy – “Obama is not electable” – Are you going to be upset when an unelectable candidate wins the Presidency?

Posted by: jmengate | August 11, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

The Clinton campaign was exercising reasonable caution and appropriate ethics to negative ads, unlike McCain and his camaign. There’s a Time analysis on the McCain camp video, The One. Anyway, the analysis points out anti-Christ imagery in the video. There is a multitude of other similar trash, from Obama anti-Christ bumper stickers to the e-mails and Google hits. I watched the video and it indeed had sinister undertones far beyond mocking Oprah’s declaration, which I’ve done myself.

Posted by: kat | August 11, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Shrum is a hypocrite! Pity he wasn’t outraged at the B0′s Campaign for the memo they circulated about playing the race card against Hillary and Bill! I can’t wait till it is his turn to be thrown under the B0 bus!

Posted by: Beckie | August 11, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

The one thing Barack Obama’s candidacy has done is make this country confront its issues with race. That’s a good thing. The sad thing is that the discourse proves that we are far, far away from the ideal notion of equality and justice for all. Whether or not Barack Obama becomes President will be decided by White people. So whether or not he’s elected will say more about Whites than it ever will about the minority populations in this country. This is your world; we just live in it. Barack Obama is one of the best and brightest–in this country. He’s as qualified to be President as anybody who threw their hat in the ring this election year because no incumbent is running.

Posted by: SYL | August 11, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

I don’t have to get over it. You see I supported Hillary mainly as an anti-Obama person. I don’t believe Obama is qualified to be president and yes, I am angry that Hillary wasn’t the candidate as she is much more qualified than he. Lastly, I think this is still America and I can be just as angry as I want and I don’t have to get over it just because some Obama supporter thinks I should. I used to vote the party line, but not any more. I think Pelosi and Reid are weak leaders for the party. I didn’t like the way MI and FL were handled. So get over yourself! It is quite liberating to now be an independent.

Posted by: Susan | August 11, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

B0 is divisive, inexperienced, egotistical, narcissistic – would make a great Rock Star, though!

Posted by: Beckie | August 11, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

Why is it that Obama supporters think that somebody who doesn’t support Obama is a racist? I am so sick of hearing that excuse. That is just tacky and weak. Why can’t you just accept the fact that we don’t like Obama because of his apparent judgment, inexperience, glibness, lack of leadership, pretensions, machiavellian, etc. I suppose you don’t like Hillary because you hate women. How juvenile do you think we are or, more importantly, what’s your problem?

Posted by: Susan | August 11, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

I will definitly vote for Obama this country needs change from the olsd status quo and washington insiders. Yes there will be people that will smear him to keep the status quo Mccain doesn’t have a plan of getting out of this recession ,energy independence,Iraq just stay there for another 100 years.Look at the suspreme court god help us if he selection far right juctices.All you women out there just see what happens with Roe V Wade just wait.t

Posted by: mommapac | August 11, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

AL from NJ–Great post–keep the message going–
Dear Clinton Dem,
With the convention just around the corner, it is imperative that Democrats all around the country understand that whether or not Hillary is nominated, we are in this for the long haul.
This primary has revealed DNC “leadership” to be corrupt, mean-spirited, and lacking respect for basic democratic principles. They have completely and effectively ceded the moral high ground to Republicans at this point.
• We have seen the race card played, with assistance from both Dean and Brazile.
• We have seen rampant sexism with no objection by the DNC.
• We have seen the superdelegates endorse as quid-pro-quo for campaign contributions.
• We have seen arm-twisting of the congressional delegates by “neutral” Nancy Pelosi to declare for Obama.
• We have seen an unabashed ageism campaign against John McCain, calling him “confused”, and that he has “lost his bearings”.
• We’ve seen a softening of support for the gay and lesbian community.
• We’ve seen caucus cheating.
• We’ve seen intimidation of Hillary supporters, hack attacks and coordinated threats against voters and media that dare to dissent.
• We’ve seen manipulation of the party nominating system and media to favor one candidate over another and the outright redistribution of votes cast for one Hillary and given to Obama.
This is now a democratic party in name only.
TAKE ACTION:
We need to get the word out.

Posted by: amazed08 | August 11, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

It is more important to say the truth than it is to worry whether someone will characterize those truthful statements as “ugly…sterotyping.” It is time to begin calling a spade a spade.

Posted by: GroversCorners | August 11, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

this was posted elsewhere on ABC by someone else. Do we need a ruling by the US Supreme Court on the eligibility of BO. I hope there is a ruling if needed before the election and not after the election.
*******************************
The DNC is a joke. Barry was an adult citizenship of Indonesia proven by his using an Indonesian passport used to travel to Pakistan in 1981, his own operatives rummaging around in state department files to try to purge the docs on their ineligible POTUS candidate, makes Nixon erasing the tapes look like a sweetheart picnic. He’s off in Hawaii trying to mop up his Barry Soetero birth certificate mess, a little strong arming, a little hush up advisements to some key relatives. What he’s got to do is unseal his original birth certificate to try to make it look like he was never a citizen of Indonesia, which he was (is still?). But he was adopted by Lolo Soetoro and moved to Indonesia and became a citizen knowingly into adulthood. He also never legally changed his name to Barack Obama. Man! What an Article II unconstitutional mess! These people can’t even run a good con job, I mean if you’re going to perpetrate the biggest con on the American public since the inception of the United States of America, you probably should do a really good job of it. If the DNC is a joke, all its candidates are a joke too. Notice the focus of attacks is back on Hillary? Go to it and see who owns barrysoetoro.com too! It’s a riot!
PullmanHerb 4:09 PM

Posted by: DemocratNoMore2 | August 11, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

The reality is that the Obama rate increases would hit millions of Americans who make well under $200,000. In 2005, 47% of all tax returns reporting capital gains were from households with incomes below $50,000, and 79% came from households with incomes below $100,000.
By the way, a higher capital gains tax rate isn’t the only middle-class tax increase that Mr. Obama is proposing. He also wants to lift the cap on wages subject to the payroll tax. … Ignoring the no-tax pledge he had made five minutes earlier, Mr. Obama explained that such a tax increase was nevertheless necessary.
In other words he dodged the question, as he so often does with impunity. But thanks to Charlie Gibson’s persistence, on 90 minutes, Mr. Obama didn’t get away with it. The voters learned a lot about Mr. Obama, who needs to learn a lot more about taxes and revenue.

Posted by: ann | August 11, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

I couldn’t be happier that Hillary Clinton lost. I am estactic that McCain is using her campaign tactics and he will also lose. Mccain is an idiot. All we know about him is that, due to his own incompentence, he was shot down and was a POW for 5.5 years. That qualifies you for military disability payments – not for President. He has done NOTHING in the Senate but plot for the presidency. Let’s not forget that he has had several mistresses and married the one who could finance his senate career. John McCain isn’t fit to shine Obama’s shoes. He is so jealous of Obama’s brilliance, he can sit still. His commercials are like him – downright stupid. Oh I forgot – he did graduate at the bottom of his class (5th from the botton) dumbass!

Posted by: julescator | August 11, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

Amy – McCain is an empty head. the guy is stupid. He can’t remember his lines. No way will he lead this great nation! Start crying now!

Posted by: julescator | August 11, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

the funny thing about racists – they don’t know they are racists! lol Unless you are an American Indian – you are not an American either. the funny thing is that John mcCain was born in Panama and obama was born in the United states. Who’s the outsider? What a bunch of dumb americans.

Posted by: julescator | August 11, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

There’s a lot of talk about Obama not being qualified and not enough talk about McCain’s unqualifications. He’s definitely too old and showing signs of his age almost every day. He doesn’t strike me as being terribly sharp anymore. This isn’t his fault but he’s clearly lost a few steps since 2000. His whole stature just isn’t presidential. And don’t even get me started on his temperment. Experienced or not, you have to worry about how a deteriorating mind will hold up under the pressured of being president. That’s a legitimate concern for the man’s health. You guys can vote for gramps if you want but I just don’t think he’s up for the gig.

Posted by: JimmyTMac | August 11, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

The dirty little secret is that the media has been complicit in nominating a flawed candidate and now they’re blaming the Clinton camp or anyone else they can think of! They know that Obama is nothing more than a puppet. Big international interests are the ones who will be pulling the strings. And guess what, kiddies – they are anti-American!

Posted by: Jan | August 11, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

according to current poll projections – Obama can count on 141 solid electoral college votes with another 97 leaning his way. McCain has 99 solid and 64 leaning. 270 are needed to win.
source – realclearpolitics.com

Posted by: nh bob | August 11, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

Fortunately people are tired of being lied to – they are tired of hearing the name calling and bogus issues like a jewelry based system of patriotism. I accessorise therefore I am. Obama has spent his life walking the walk – working as a community organizer to make life better for those most in need – doing the hard tedious work of state government – and reaching across the aisle in the senate. Name calling and invented issues won’t win the day this time around.

Posted by: nh bob | August 11, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Obama is a career corrupt Chi-town politican…they typically do “community service” as a way to round up voters for themselves. Why any insist on trying to make this into something admirable is beyond me.

Posted by: chattyway | August 11, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

Just love how the democrats and their publicity apparatus (the alphabets) listen with baited breath to the musings of the sainted Bob Shrum. He has been zero for the last century on presidential campaigns. Keep it up. If the GOP hadn’t “stolen” all those elections Bob would have won ‘em all.

Posted by: ShermansSam | August 11, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Yawwwnnnn….is it November yet?

Posted by: JJ | August 11, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Hillary is a DOG

Posted by: spoon2456 | August 11, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

Senator Obama needs to worry less about McCain and his moronathon and a lot more about Senator Clinton and her Machiavellian husband who are fully prepared to do whathever they have too to take the nomination away from him in Denver. One need only read the current accounts of the overt and invariably covert manipulations of the nominating process by her minions and surrogates demanding their “right” to vote for her at the convention. Ther is no doubt in my mind that the Clintonistas will do whatever it takes to put themselves back in the Whitehouse even if it means sacrificing the best presidential candidate this country has seen in three decades. Her “suspending” her campaign and tepidly endorsing the true nominee was simply a means by which to regroup her forces and conserve her funds until the real showdown in Denver. I am far more afraid of the CLintons than I will ever be of John McCain. If they are willing to sacrifice our party and our nation to satify their insatiable lust for power, howm any of the rest of us and our sons and daughters will they be willing to sacrifice to retain it?

Posted by: NebraskanforObama | August 12, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

she played the game she lost, but i dont think she will walk away gracefully not when she has convinced so many people that she would have won had this happened or that happened and just like anytime she doesnt get what she wants she claims some one cheated her out of it or is out to get her..
if Edwards had been shown to be a cheater she would have won – well if clinton was shown to be a cheater he would have lost… she had no problem hiding that for himso she cant cry foul now!

Posted by: melissa | August 12, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

I realize that we all have our own opinions on who’s more qualified for the job as President. In the end we will have a new President come Nov. I just wish who ever it is God Speed. What we all should do is stop all the hate blogging in the end it doesn’t Accomplish anything Vote for who ever you want to be in the white House just don’t let Color or Age cloud your judgment

Posted by: C.J | August 12, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am

Looks like more mud-slinging, courtesy of the poopular Obama campaign, is being drug up to muddy the campaign waters. Does anyone notice that whatever he has accused his opponents of doing – THAT is exactly what he IS and has been doing!?! Bob Shrum needs to reveal his sources for where he got information on the alleged Mark Penn’s memos, because Shrum was a supporter of Kerry, Edwards, and Ted Kennedy campaigns who all support her opponent. Why didn’t Obama stand up against the false accusations his campaign made against Hillary and her supporters, and why no apology from him during his speech in Philadelphia? This event would have been the perfect opportunity for him to rewind the false attacks his campaign made on his key DNC opponent and her family members.

Posted by: Jilly | August 12, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am

It’s extremely unlikely that Shrum who is very closely aligned with Obama supporter’s team would be privy to his opponent’s campaign materials. Unless, of course, Obama staff were all along were spying and hacking into her campaign, and if his campaign did so, that would be an even bigger story. This story and Shrum do not appear credible.

Posted by: Chuck | August 12, 2008, 2:12 am 2:12 am

Shrum said. “I think it’s ugly and I think if Hillary Clinton had done that, she would have permanently besmirched her reputation, her legacy, and her place in American politics.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hillary did EVERYTHING mentioned above and more. And continues to. I’m SERIOUSLY hoping for a 3rd party in the future. And I’m hoping to see Obama in that party. Since the DNC continues to let Hillary and Bill get away with all types of ugliness, and continue to pull the party apart, it’s obvious the DNC is pretty useless. Hillary ran a terrible campaign DEEPLY in debt. That’s exactly how she’d run the country. The Clintons are SO OVER for most of us. But since the DNC continues to coddle them, many of us are looking for something BETTER.

Posted by: ByTheSea | August 12, 2008, 2:48 am 2:48 am

Can anyone cite a single Obama smear against any of his opponents? Or can anyone explain how Clinton and McCain’s attempts to divide the country to create constituencies is Obama’s fault. PUMA and Co. make a lot of claims, but having followed this campaign from the beginning (originally supporting Clinton – though switching as soon as I realized there was another choice – sorry guys), I fail to see how any of these claims are valid and in fact they seem to better represent the tactics used against Obama than used by him. Is this sour grapes, racism, sexism, RNC shills; what’s going on? Obama isn’t perfect, but he seems to stand head and shoulders above the competition. Please don’t abuse me, but I hear a lot of noise, but see little substance in these claims and claimed corollaries.

Posted by: mummblemouth | August 12, 2008, 3:46 am 3:46 am

The Clinton memo’s shows she was advised to go negative, painting Obama foreign. She didn’t.
If anything they show why Clinton won (if not for 352 superdelegates). She should win, because when you have essentially a tie with Obama (even if she won the popular vote) the price should go to the most experienced with the most character.
Clinton beats Obama on issues, merits and character.

Posted by: Sylvia Johnsen | August 12, 2008, 5:04 am 5:04 am

To mummblemouth | Aug 12, 2008 3:46:13 AM: Obama painted Clinton as untrustworthy. He did it by publishing his taxes – one year at the time – and suggesting Clinton’s taxes for the final years were mared with scandales. She continued to run on issues, only publishing her taxes at a later date, as she had stated the whole time. When we got them all they showed was they made a lot of money and gave a lot to charity. Media didn’t write much about that.
Then it was the shameful exploitation of Clinton’s RFK-remark which didn’t go well and he back away from that.

Posted by: Sylvia Johnsen | August 12, 2008, 5:09 am 5:09 am

The Obama supporters keep bringing up the age issue with McCain, then I quess the race issue with Obama is fair game?
You can’t keep using that lame label without casting your own candidate in the same light. You have called all of McCains supporters or Clintons, racist, while being aghast if the word even comes up for your candidate.
Age, sexism and race have no bearing in this election, so keep it on point.

Posted by: Independent minded | August 12, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am

Rationale For Super-Delegates:
Super-delegates are designed to act as a check on ideologically extreme or inexperienced candidates. The super-delegate system has been called a safety-value.
It has been 30 years since the Democratic Party has had a cliffhanger going into the Convention. If there is no clear winner after state primaries and caucuses, then the super-delegates — who are bound only by their consciences — will decide the nominee.
Based on the rules of the DNC and history of previous conventions, Hillary’s name should and must be on the ballot in order that super delegates can vote their conscience.
Hillary for President

Posted by: Phyllis/ PA | August 12, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

of course there should be a floor vote at the convention!!there always has regardless of the number of delegates the candiate had. At this time, neither bho or hillary have the number of delegates needed to cinch the nomination. the clincher will be the super-delegates and they do not come into play until the states delegates are at an impasse.
bho is afraid for a floor vote, as he may loose…….or, realize hillary’s supporters have not “just gotten over it…”

Posted by: pp | August 12, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

why can’t we all see that Hillary is a brilliant woman who deserved the nomination? she was cheated. Scorned. Lied to.
But she is the one who comes out on top. Every time. This is Hillary’s world. That is if she wants it.
god bless america.

Posted by: Nija | August 12, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Sylvia Johnsen…….sweety, you don’t win by loosing. This the problem to with HRC and here supporters, no grasp of reality.

Posted by: Ken from Atlanta | August 12, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

McCain has a plan for creating new jobs…. its called the draft.

Posted by: ALYKATMA | August 23, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.