The Note: Kennedy Inspires, but Clinton Drama Continues
ABC News’ Rick Klein reports in Tuesday’s Note:
DENVER —
The narrative is (or isn’t) coming together, the family was glowing on stage, the schedule is holding tight, Teddy and Michelle hit them out of the park . . . and still, there are the Clintons.
For all those 18 million cracks in the highest glass ceiling, a frosty divide still needs chipping away, even as Obama is set to lose the “presumptive” from his title.
It comes to this for the rivalry for the ages: Neither Sen. Barack Obama nor Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton has any possible sane, rational reason for wanting tensions to continue.
They need each other, and they know it. If Clinton supporters don’t come to Obama’s side in greater (near-unanimous) numbers, he loses the presidency. If Clinton is seen as doing anything less than everything for the Obama-Biden ticket, she loses stature in the Democratic Party.
And yet . . . the relationship is complicated as ever. As Clinton prepares for her speech on night two of the Democratic National Convention (with Chelsea Clinton narrating an introductory tribute video, on a night where the theme is “Renewing America’s Promise”), those "Hillary" signs and pins dotting Denver carry a message — and Clinton and Obama carry (mixed) messages of their own.
Read the rest of The Note — and get all the latest on the 2008 election, Congress, the White House and the wide world of politics every day — from Rick Klein by bookmarking this link.
Did we need this reminder, this week of all weeks? “Remember: 18 million people voted for me — 18 million people, give or take, voted for Barack,” Clinton, D-N.Y., told reporters Monday, per ABC’s Eloise Harper. (Give or take?)
Then there’s the Clintons’ most recognizable surrogate/adviser, going on television Monday night to basically declare one-fourth of Obama’s convention a messaging disaster.
“Well, if this party has a message, it has done a hell of a job of hiding it tonight, I promise you that,” James Carville said on CNN Monday night, per ABC’s Jake Tapper. “I look at this and I am about to jump out of my chair.”
“The non primetime part was not particularly impressive,” Carville added Tuesday morning, on ABC’s "Good Morning America." "The other stuff was completely void of any message," adding that the Democrats’ streak of not bashing President Bush at Democratic National Conventions now stands at five nights.
(A night that was strong in the details was less so on the grand themes. This is an extremely damaging storyline that the Obama campaign needs to address immediately, now, pronto. If Democrats don’t start talking about McCain/Bush very quickly, they will all be talking about John Kerry shortly — and not in a good way.)
(Obama adviser Anita Dunn swings back in the campaign’s morning conference call: “Everyone else seems to have felt it was a very, very successful first night of the convention, so [Carville] seems to be out there in the minority.” And stay tuned: “Clearly, tonight, as we move toward the economy, you will see some very sharp contrast, because there is a real difference between him and John McCain,” Dunn added.)
Look for Clinton’s speech to take on Sen. John McCain in a way no one did Monday. “What you didn’t get last night, you’re going to get tonight from Hillary Clinton,” ABC’s George Stephanopoulos said on “Good Morning America” Tuesday.
Continue reading today’s Note by clicking HERE.
ABC News’ Hope Ditto and Amanda Temple contributed to this report.
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
HILLARY SUPPORTERS A VOTE FOR MCCAIN IS DISRESPECT FOR HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: angie | August 26, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am
Paul Begala may have hit it on the head of the nail this morning, talking about Hillary Clinton on the Imus show.
If Obama doesn’t win, she’s done in the party, and according to Begala (a Clinton supporter and close friend) she knows it.
That comment followed a friendly argument in which Imus accused Clinton of not wanting Obama to win. Begala responded that she did, because the issues were more important to her than personal ambitions. But, Begala added, even if Imus doesn’t believe that, consider this from the perspective of Clinton self interest. If Obama loses, she gets at least part of the blame.
Begala says Clinton fully recognizes this, and because of both her national interest and self interest will do everything she can to get Obama elected.
Posted by: Paul | August 26, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
Alice there are not 18 million Hillary supporters voting for McCain. But there are at least 18 million voting for Obama. Yes there is power in numbers.
Posted by: ? | August 26, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
Barack seems to have had a Senior (or Drug Addict) moment last night when he couldn’t remember what city he was in. THought he was in St Louis.
Posted by: JA | August 26, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
It is not Hillary Clinton’s job to unite the Dem Party … it is the nominee’s job … and if he can’t unite his own party … or have the good sense to pick a VP who received 18million votes … what makes anyone think he has the tenacity or good judgement to run the country! What was the big rush with the Dems .. the nominee should have been elected at the Convention … now we have a tie with the GOP candidate and the best Dem candidate for President for decades being forced to support someone she knows is not qualified for the job!
Posted by: Francisco Cardenas | August 26, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Latest polls show that 30% of Hillary supporters are voting for McCain. As CNN stated last night, if even 5% vote for McCain in November, McCain will win the Presidency. The way I see it, with this division in the Democratic party, which will not be unified by November, its a win-win situation for the Republicans and John McCain.
Posted by: david from texas | August 26, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Speaking from personal experience, 1 out of 3 people in my family who were Clinton supporters (and not die hard ones either) have switched to McCain.
It’s less about anger that Clinton wasn’t chosen, more about the unknown Obama.
Posted by: JA | August 26, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am
now we have a tie with the GOP candidate and the best Dem candidate for President for decades being forced to support someone she knows is not qualified for the job!
Posted by: Francisco Cardenas | Aug 26, 2008 11:02:47 AM
I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU, ONE OF THE BEST POSTS I HAVE SEEN. HILLARY WAS THE BEST CANDIDATE, HOWEVER, THE DNC TOTALLY MADE A MISTAKE. OBAMA KNOWS IT, BUT HE’S CAUGHT IN THE MIX. I AGREE, ITS OBAMA’S PLACE TO UNITE THE PARTY, NOT HILLARY’S. IF OBAMA CAN’T UNITE THE PARTY, THEN HE DOESN’T DESERVE TO BE PRESIDENT! ENOUGH OF THE HILLARY BASHING, ESPECIALLY BY OBAMABOTS!!!
Posted by: david from texas | August 26, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
HILLARY SUPPORTERS A VOTE FOR MCCAIN IS DISRESPECT FOR HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: angie | Aug 26, 2008
—-
We respect her, and we respect her decisions, but we do not blindly follow her, unlike you who are willing to accept a Nothingness.
Posted by: Olbermn3 | August 26, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
David from Texas
the problem is…the countries future lies in the balance… think about if we stay on this trajectory for 4 more years.
Where will this country be?
Imagine that…4 more years of this same structure and belief system …
the same decision makers (because Bush’s team McCain has already hired )
where do you think we will be.
whether it is Obama or Clinton we would be here…half the party would have lost…
now we have a choice…
4 more years on this downward direction…
or fulfilling the need of our anger.
Posted by: dl | August 26, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
Lovely 16 more years of a Republican White House. I wonder what the name of the new party will be and who will control it.
I am afraid that the Democratic Party brand is damaged beyond redemption.
Posted by: Thinking | August 26, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
David from Texas: “Latest polls show that 30% of Hillary supporters are voting for McCain. As CNN stated last night, if even 5% vote for McCain in November, McCain will win the Presidency.”
Not sure what CNN said, but that doesn’t sound true.
If right now 30 percent of Clinton supporters are planning to vote for McCain, then that’s reflected in current polling. In other words, if it stays at 30 percent, Obama still wins a close election.
If it drops to five percent (a 25 percent difference of 18 million, or 4.5 million) then that’s another few points out of a national percentage in Obama’s favor.
Posted by: Paul | August 26, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
I don’t think anyone really believes that Obama was a better candidate than Clinton in retrospect. Now that Obama’s “new politics” have been abandoned, you’re left with an empty suit.
Posted by: JA | August 26, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
JA: “I don’t think anyone really believes that Obama was a better candidate than Clinton in retrospect.”
Not that it really matters, but I suspect you are incorrect there. I for one supported Obama in the primaries and still think he’s a better candidate.
Posted by: Paul | August 26, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
All of this hoopla of voting for McSame is nonsense!! A true Democrat would never set aside their ideals out of spite!!
Posted by: Jennifer | August 26, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Why has the country elected only two Democrats as President in the last 40 years? It’s very simple. The majority of the country is middle of the road, maybe a little bit to the right. The Democrats keep nominating very liberal candidates, too liberal for many Democrats. That’s why they lose. Democrats like me vote as Democrats for the Senate, Governor, etc. and we wind up voting Republican for President. Evan Bayh, Indiana, has said that he didn’t run for President because he’s too much of a centrist, and the activists in the Party always work to elect a liberal. That’s too bad, because as boring as he is, he would make a good president. And there’s no doubt in my mind that he’d be elected. Ordinary Democrats are hungry for a Democrat in the White House, and a Democratic Congress. That isn’t going to happen this time. I simply don’t understand why the ultra liberal wing of the Democratic Party doesn’t understand this. Centrist Democrats have a history of deserting the Party in favor of Republican candidates. How many times do we have to do it before the Democratic Party gets the message? RUN A CENTRIST DEMOCRAT INSTEAD OF A LEFT-WING SOCIALIST WANNABE, AND MIDDLE OF THE ROAD DEMOCRATS WILL SUPPORT THE PARTY
Posted by: Reluctant McCain Dem | August 26, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Then there’s the Clintons’ most recognizable surrogate/adviser, going on television Monday night to basically declare one-fourth of Obama’s convention a messaging disaster.
—
Truths often hurts…. So few courageous people dare to say it. The only person on the democratic side who knows how to win is Carville. If Zero-bama campaign dismisses as minority, they got that right. He is the only one in more than half a century to help elect a two-term president for the dems. Minority indeed.
Posted by: lazy to think | August 26, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Paul is right david is wrong…
5% of Hillary voters voting for obama would be better than Bill Clinton did in 92 …Gore did in 2000 and Kerry did in 2004
so…considering Keery and Gore tied (I know Gore won)
your numbers are false.
also thiose 30% are already factored into the polls we have been seeing …they have to be duh.
so there is a lot better chance that Hillary voters the further they get away from the primaries the more obvious it is how different mccain is from Hillary and how similar Obama is.
so please use logic…not false spin.
Posted by: dl | August 26, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am
Paul,
Like I said, I don’t think anyone really believes it. Just diehard supporters fooling themselves.
Obama brought NOTHING to the table over Clinton other than rhetoric and a supposed “new politics”. Now that the new politics is abandoned, and the rhetoric has grown stale…….well, look at the polls. The 3 most current polls (Rasmussen, Gallup, CNN) show it all tied up. Clinton would have been ahead of McCain considerably.
Once again, Dems put forward a weak candidate.
Posted by: JA | August 26, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am
Jennifer,
Some people put their country before party. “True Democrat” – nonsense. You want people to blindly follow Obama into disaster?
Unlike you, some people THINK before making a decision, don’t let others tell them what to do.
Posted by: JA | August 26, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am
It’s less about anger that Clinton wasn’t chosen, more about the unknown Obama.
Posted by: JA | Aug 26, 2008
—-
You are damn right about it. If they switch Biden and Zero-bama, I’d be happily vote for Biden.
With Zero-bama, it does not matter Joe or HRC, he will not get this vote.
Posted by: lazy to think | August 26, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am
I CANNOT AND I WILL NOT FOR OBAMA…
…AND NOBODY WILL CHANGE MY MIND…
DNC MUST BE PUNISHED……….
I’M AN EX-DEMOCRAT VOTING FOR McCAIN…
Posted by: NICHOLAS | August 26, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
Plain and simple: Obama loses, he’s “sad” for a while…then he becomes the most powerful political figure in the world, and he doesn’t have to make good on any of the promises he made, because he’s not president…McSame wins and now we are in a “GREAT Depression” our sons and daughters are drafted into another war and roe v wade is challenged beyond compare and the Clintons are to blame,(her friend McCain have been putting out some great ads against her) at least that will be what the media and the Obamabots will claim and they have much bigger mouths and time and he has a very powerful ground base. He writes a few more books becomes a bizzionaire and the Clintons are ostrazied from the democratic party, perhaps she will start her own party. I am sure the 18 million will follow her there. The Demcratic party loses the young and black vote and never again get back into power. Gotta love those diehard hillary FANS!
Posted by: Paula | August 26, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
For every 1 Hillary supporter who admits they will vote for McCain – there are 3 more who won’t admit it, but are going to do it.
President McCain in a landslide! Get use to it!
Posted by: Jo | August 26, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Paul..Are you kidding..if Obama isn’t able to pull this off, dems will be kicking themselves for not putting in HRC aganist McCain. When it comes right down to it, voters will be thinking EXPERIENCE when they pull that lever especially with the remembrance of 09/11 coming up. HRC=Experience+New York. Me personally, I don’t have a dog in this fight..my guy Rudy didn’t even show and Rudy also has New York and has been tried and tested. Oh well there is always 2012 to look forward too..
Posted by: CuriousIndep | August 26, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am
Ja
the only reason any one who is not running would be ahead of McCain
is becasue they are not running duh.
the repubs are, in fact and it is a fact, not spin, even pumping up Clinton right now to hurt Obama
so please agin logic and facts…not bologne.
in a change election the flesh and blood candidate from the change party that is in the focus…is always going to run slightly less than the generic party.
That’s just common sense
and obama is the only one who could challenge Mccain because of his lack of history on the non partisan thing.
and no one could challenge mccain and win on an election that was on expereince outside Biden.
facts and logic…logic and facts.
otherwise you have a choice…
fantasy that will keep us on this road …and where will we be in 4 years on that road?
or logic and facts and you don’t vote for the guy who has hired the same team of people that put us here.
Posted by: dl | August 26, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
What is wrong with the Clinton supporters? Why can’t they let go? I do not get it all. They just look like bitter sore losers. They obviously do not care about this nation or about womens’ rights
Posted by: marie | August 26, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
I am a Hilary supporter…I will vote for either McCain or none of the above. Obama may win the presidency, but he will not have my vote. This is too bad because I love the Democratic party but Obama and his supporter is too noisy and egotistical…Go Democrat!
Posted by: BN | August 26, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
JA,
So you believe that voting for someone who voted with Bush (one of the worst presidents in history) 95% of the time is good for the country.
McCain wants to stay in Iraq indefinitely, and you think that’s good for the country?
McCain will continue the same economic policies, and you think this is good for the country?
McCain wants to privatize social security, and you think this is good for the country?
One of McCain’s top advisors was a lobbyist for Georgia, and you think this is good for the country?
JA admit it, you’re not voting for McCain because you support his policies, you’re claiming you’ll vote for him because you’re pissed Clinton didn’t win the nomination..
PUMA=Faux Democrat/Undercover Republican
Posted by: Jennifer | August 26, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Voting for McCain only disrespect everything Hillary is about and worked so hard for. It also disrespects your children and their future.
Posted by: beck | August 26, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Nicholas
“the DNC must be punished
you are also punishing Hillary, our kids, the country…and yourself.
ya ever here the phrase cut off your nose to spite your face from your parent when you were a child.
well pull that memory up if you have.
Posted by: dl | August 26, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Paula,
Drama Queen party of 1 – your table is now available.
Sheeesh.
Posted by: Jo | August 26, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
JA: “Clinton would have been ahead of McCain considerably.”
I have to disagree again. Her negatives make her unelectable – I think they reached 54 before the end of the primaries. Even when she started they were at 48, which is very tough.
Independents decide elections. The Republicans elected their candidate with the most popularity among independents.
Add in the Clinton supporters who are backing McCain (let’s say it is 30 percent, which equates to 5.4 million voters or roughly 4 percent of the electorate) and you see an 8-point swing for McCain.
In this environment, we should be asking why McCain isn’t doing better, even with the tarnished Republican brand.
If things stay as they are now, Obama wins, according to every electoral analysis I’ve seen. Two factors to watch over the next couple months. How many of those 5.4 million Clinton supporters switch to Obama, and how many independents change their favorable view of McCain.
Both trends are likely, though to unknown degrees. As a result, we’re seeing Obama with more to gain in the coming couple months.
Posted by: Paul | August 26, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Republicans that vote for Obama are not true republicans.
You can’t go from being a republican to voting for the most liberal senator on record. You just can’t.
Posted by: Jo | August 26, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Obama is a moron who just committed political suicide by not even pretending to consider Clinton for VP.
That’s all he had to do, just pretend to give her some serious thought!!
He may just as well have selected Kervokian as a Veep. At least then, he could have a peaceful, assisted suicide.
Posted by: Peg | August 26, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
marie: “What is wrong with the Clinton supporters? Why can’t they let go? I do not get it all.”
Simple, they know Clinton was cheated out of the nomination by the media and by Obama not being vetted re Wright until after he won the first nine primaries. After that it was nip-and-tuck and she almost won anyway.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Paul, nice try, but the question you really need to ask yourself is, in this year when democrats are set to take even MORE seats in congress & senate, why isn’t OBAMA comfortably ahead by now?
Even KERRY was way ahead by now. So please, spare us your spin.
So nice try trying to fool yourself, but you look foolish. LOL.
Posted by: Jo | August 26, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
Hillary supporters don’t understand… It is not about Hillary or Obama or even McCain… It is about their policies, their plans to get us out of this mess and make a stronger country again.
Stop being like a child…grow up. You know for a fact that McCain (even for 4 years) will take this country under. He has more than proven that to us this past 8 years. 95% he voted side by side Bush… what makes you think for a second because he is running to be president that he changed and will change. People please, think about what you are saying and doing, do not vote McCain in office.
Posted by: beck | August 26, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
All of these people who claim that Obama supporters don’t appreciate Clinton’s stature in the Democratic party are wrong..
But also these hardcore Clinton supporters need to realize that there is too much at stake for this country to let another Republican screw everything up for another four years!!
These people claim they’re putting their country first, but if one is really committed to seeing this country go down a more productive and positive path, McCain/Bush’s policies will keep America in the same direction for 4 more years!!
Posted by: Jennifer | August 26, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
Jo not true. I do know several republicans that will vote for Obama including my sister. They hate both McCain and Obama but are trying to teach the GOP a lesson….listen to the conservatives. So I guess it works both ways. Both parties will cross lines.
Posted by: annie | August 26, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
Republicans that vote for Obama are not true republicans.
You can’t go from being a republican to voting for the most liberal senator on record. You just can’t.
______________________________________
The difference is that these Republicans are voting for Obama based on policy. Democrats who have claimed they’re voting for McCain are just angry.
Posted by: Jennifer | August 26, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
I don’t care if Hillary came to my door personally and begged me to vote for Obama. I will never, ever vote for him.
Obama represents all that is bad in the democratic party today. It has been hijacked by the extreme left wing and left us centrists scrambling for cover.
McCain represents the center this election. I will be voting for him.
Posted by: Hillary2012 | August 26, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
Jo – scroll up. I already explained that.
Sorry, but this stuff is a little complicated than a simple reading of which party has a tailwind.
Consider the differences between the presidency and Congress. Traditionally, there are independents who favor Democratic policies for Congress but who also perceive Republican strength in foreign policy and crime control, which causes them to favor Republican candidates for president.
That’s just fact from the previous four decades – though we can only guess to what degree its affecting this race.
Posted by: Paul | August 26, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Hillary 2012…so you do not care about a woman’s right to chose? Do you care is r v w gets overturned?
Posted by: marie | August 26, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Stop blaming the Clinton’s will ya? If Hillary and Bill were that powerful she’d be the nominee. It’s up to Obama to win this election, not Hillary. Stop forecasting excuses. Truth be told, Dem’s now realize in their heart of hearts, they’ve made another poor choice for the nominee.
Posted by: David Eubanks | August 26, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Any real Democrat knows they are voting for bearers of Democratic issues, not personalities.
Hillary, Obama… they are the same…. in essense.
That is the straight truth. We didn’t lose a daughter…we gained a son!
You faux posters/Republican shills think you can drive a wedge in with your “Dem party division” BS are just hopeful! Yes it will be a landslide… And no, not for McSame…
Any Dem who votes for McCain shoots themselves and other Dems in the foot… Really cry baby childish….
True Dems are smarter than that…
Sorry… no division to exploit here… move along…
Posted by: Billy | August 26, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am
BillW: You know what, yes Obama was vented with Wright… but you know what else… Hillary and Bill was great friends with Write also and other worse people than write. stop acting like Obama is this monster when in fact they all have their demons and the Clintons have a long long list of them. Do your homework before you throw stones. The Media in fact, was great with Hillary, they let her alone because we “were suppose to know all their demons” when in fact the young votes have not a clue and the older ones just want to forget. Its crap.
Hillary could not be chosen for VP because of Bills list of friends whom they would have to expose. Stop being soooo…….
Posted by: beck | August 26, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am
This convention is Hillary’s dream come true. Tuesday Hillary will sound as if she is supporting Obama, but internally she will be thinking about running against the republicans in 4 years. Bill will give a less enthusiastic speech tomorrow, thereby drowning the Obama campaign into more chaos. Already Bill managed to bring the race card against Obama, and Hillary has brought the gender card.
Posted by: Joan | August 26, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am
Experience doesn’t mean squat, so stop fooling yourself. If it did then you would not have had 8 years of George Bush. In politics, experience is synonymous with don’t rock the boat.
After 30 years in the Senate, McSame will surely live up to his name.
Btw, Hillary has been a left wing activist most of her adult life. She only played the centrist role because she thought it would win her the election.
Obama is an first inspirational leader in a generation. Haven’t you Boomers have screwed this country up enough? It’s time for you to step aside.
Posted by: Shocked | August 26, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am
HILLARY THE WOMAN OF STEEL IS NOT ONLY BE DISREPECTED BUT WOMAN AS A GROUP ARE BEING DISREPECTED..NO WAY THIS THIS CONVENTION IN DENVER SHOULD LEAVE DENVER HAVING CHOOSE OBAMA OVER HILLARY CLINTON.. WHAT A CLASS ACT FOR HILLARY TO PUT UP WITH AND KEEP ON KEEPING ON FOR AMERICANS. THIS GUY OBAMA IS A WEAK CANDIDATE AND HILLARY IS THE STRONG LEADER..THIS CONVENTION WILL TRY AND HIDE OBAMAS WEAKNESS WITH 75 THOUSAND PEOPLE SCREAMING IN A FOOTBALL STADIUM..THIS ALL SMOKE AND MIRROS. MADISON AVENUE WITH HOLYWOOD KICKED IN. JUST TERRIBLE. SINCERELY, JIMMIE W BECK
Posted by: JIMMIE W BECK | August 26, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Paula…There is NO MILITARY DRAFT….THEY SAID THE SAME THING ABOUT ROE VS. WADE WHEN BUSH TOOK THE ELECTION 8 YEARS AGO AND IT STILL STANDS. Don’t panic the world will not end if Obama or McCain become President..You are addressing adults and not children so the scare tactics do not work here. The dems will always have their base and the repubs will always have theirs..LIFE WILL GO ON IF OBAMA IS NOT ELECTED OR IF MCCAIN IS NOT ELECTED..BUT MOST IMPORTANTLY, WE LIVE IN A DEMOCRACY SO EVERY VOTER SHOULD HAVE THEIR SAY EVEN THE ONES YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH…HRC FANS ARE ENTITLED TO VOTE AS THEY CHOOSE JUST AS I AM ABLE TO WRITE IN MY CANDIDATE.
Posted by: CuriousIndep | August 26, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Pakistan, Russia, Iran, radicals, do you want to leave this with an on the job training president? Obama’s ego may not even listen to Biden! Economy is the #1 worry, unless we get hit again! National security, #1.
Posted by: casey | August 26, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am
It’s been a hard decision but I’m not against voting for McCain. At first, I wasn’t against Obama but now that I see that his lies and politics are nothing new (in fact, I think they’re worse than McCain’s), there’s no way I’d vote this child into office.
I don’t know what happened to the DNC but it’s foolish to think for a minute that Obama has what it takes to run this country. I was laughing last night as I watched CNN’s coverage of the convention. For these news anchors to say there is no divide between Obama and Hillary, and that Hillary supporters are quick to jump on Obama’s bandwagon, is simply foolish.
Posted by: highway | August 26, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am
Please don’t vote for McCain just to punish the DNC. You’ll also be voting against women’s reproductive rights. Vote for the person who is most likely to support the policies you agree with. Don’t vote for the person who is 100% behind Bush. Please. The future of the country depends on it. Please put aside your personal feelings and vote with your minds.
Posted by: Jen | August 26, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am
Jimmie. I am a woman. I am not being disrespected. Hillary is not being disrespected.
Posted by: marie | August 26, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am
People who are concerned about certain policies (Iraq war, women’s issues, the economy, Veterans, energy, education, foreign diplomacy, etc.) will vote for Obama…
People who are angry that Clinton did not get the nomination two and a half months ago will vote for McCain..
They claim country before party, but with so many crucial issues facing this election, it’s obviously the opposite. They’d rather have four more years of George Bush’s policies than fixing our economy or getting out of Iraq..
McCain=Bush
PUMA=Faux Democrat/Undercover Republican
Posted by: Jennifer | August 26, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
highway: “I don’t know what happened to the DNC but it’s foolish to think for a minute that Obama has what it takes to run this country.”
The president doesn’t run the country.
Hopefully at some point more school districts opt to put civics back in the elementary school curriculum.
Posted by: Paul | August 26, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Im a Hillary supporter voting for McCain in November. the DNC has pushed opromise on us and gave the nomination to him. DNC ignored FL’s delegates and now they want my support? My voting rights as in individual come first, party affiliation second. McCain 08! teach the dems what a democracy is and count peoples votes!
Posted by: mark | August 26, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Jennifer! Amen. You are exactly right!
Posted by: marie | August 26, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am
Just spent a bit of time reading many of these comments. I was disgusted by the hateful remarks about Obama & his beautiful, articulate wife.
I can’t help but wonder if these people weren’t late for their local KKK chapter meetings after posting their comments.
Posted by: M | August 26, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Marie:
RvW will never be overturned. That is just the standard scare tactics and lies the far left uses to hide their deceptive agendas.
Obama lied to the far left to get the nomination. Now he is lieing to the center to try and get us back from McCain.
It isn’t going to work. Most intelligent people have figured out who Obama is by now. They know he is nothing more than a pretty suit and a flowery speech. He has no substance, no core. He will say and do anything, even sell out his country, to become president.
Posted by: Hillary2012 | August 26, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Mark. It is Florida’s fault that their votes were not counted. They went against the rules. Let it go. You must love George Bush because that is basically who you are voting for when you vote for Mccain.
Posted by: marie | August 26, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am
at this point in the game we all should ask the question, what is best for we the people, 4 more years of what we have just been thru is enough. a war, and why couldn’t they find Bin Laden, economy in really bad shape, people losing their homes and homeless numbers increasing daily consisting of working class, so we should be making the choice of who will get us out of this mess, not the Republican, they support the rich, Obama should have taken Hillary as his VP, so now it becomes anyone’s race, we may find a lot more American’s becoming Canadian’s for the next 4 years.
Posted by: sable | August 26, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
I am a Hillary supporter and won’t vote for Obama because of his lack of experience. He is not like JFK (even tho JFK’s brother and daughter might think so) because JFK had the life experience of leading in war and being responsible for other’s lives. Obama doesn’t and I hate to say it at this point in time of history I would prefer someone with that experience. McCain is not my ideal candidate either, so I may just not even vote for the first time in my life! Hilary seemed to me to have the best grasp of world problems and that is one of the reasons I supported her.
Posted by: pam | August 26, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
casey: “Pakistan, Russia, Iran, radicals, do you want to leave this with an on the job training president?”
Casey, I’ll take Obama over someone who instinctively takes a billigerent tone with regard to foreign policy and national security.
I do wish the Republicans would get back to the conservative foreign policy that served us well during the Cold War years, and get past this cowboy “neo-conservative” view that continues to weaken us.
And make no mistake – McCain is more neo-conservative than Bush ever was. He was trying to make the case in October of 2001 (on David Letterman no less) that we needed to invade Iraq because that country was behind the anthrax attacks.
Posted by: Paul | August 26, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
Hillary2012…….counseling will help you a great deal with you denial issues. I just can not beleive you as a woman would want someone as a president who is not pro-choice.
Posted by: marie | August 26, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
I’m login this. The way I see it. If Obama lose, it will mean that there are a majority of ignorant and racist people in the USA. Mccain’s policies will send this country even further down the drain, which it will rightfully deserve. If Obama wins, he’ll be the first black president. This is truly a win, win situation. Either America gets it’s come uppins or it does what’s right.
Posted by: jimmy | August 26, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
Casey: Oh my Gosh! You want an ego that will not listen to people or anyone.. Have you not vented McCain yet?? What have you people been listening to and watching where you think this McCain guy is the answer to our problems… Oh my Gosh… McCain created the problems you are now crying about. He now wants you to believe he is going to rescue from them… McCains race is McCain vs. McCain. Get smart people.
Posted by: beck | August 26, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Reluctant McCain Dem wins the prize! That’s the key, folks. Dems keep losing because the left-wing extremist part of the party, with all the power and money, put forth leftist candidates. Pres. Clinton won his first term as a centrist. Had the DNC put forth a centrist during the current election cycle, it would have better chances in Nov. I’m a Republican voting for McCain, but I believe Hillary would have been a tougher opponent for McCain than Obama will be. She would had better chances to win, for sure. With McCain, you know who you are getting…with Obama, no one but Michelle really knows. He is not ready for the Presidency. I’m sure he’s a nice guy and means well, but he’s not ready. Period.
Posted by: Mike | August 26, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
“If Hillary is not on the ticket, I’m voting for McCain.” I’m so sick of reading this!! Then vote for McCain and all he stands for…bye! The war…thousand of innocent military men and women DEAD!!! For what, weapons that were never found! So support Bush’s fabricated war just because your poor little Hillary is not on the ticket. Stop crying and put on your McCain pin. Wear it with great pride. Then wait to see the results of your crying because Hillary didn’t convince the right people that she’s the better candidate.
Posted by: You | August 26, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
My goodness, are you people idiots or something? Do you really think that voting for McCain rather than Obama is a better thing? Did you all just fall asleep and forget what George Bush just did to your country? And you think McCain would be any different once the GOP machine kicks into full swing. Please you have to be more intelligent than this for the rest of the worlds sake…
Posted by: Alistair | August 26, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
There are some fairly pathetic Hillary supporters out there, and there willing to even support John McCain… who has vowed to overturn Rowe vs Wade, wants to start another war with Iran, doesn’t think the middle class and below needs tax relief, wants to authorize offshore drilling even though all oil (and it won’t be that much) goes into the world oil supply (it’s only ours if we outpay everyone else), and he’s the biggest flip-flopper in DC. He even flip-flopped on his commitment to his first wife! Cheated on her for 6 years!!! Now he plays the POW card at every chance, even saying he “Knows how to win wars” when he’s never won one.
Get over Hillary folks. Remember, when you are criticizing Obama for lack of experience, he has actually been in elected office LONGER than Hillary.
Personally, I think Hillary has her sights set on the Supreme Court as her next job. A lifetime appointment as a SCJ would probably suit her just fine.
Posted by: Doctor G | August 26, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Hillary2012, bullcrap! thats what they want you to believe. If it had been a state carried by Obama, you can bet they would have counted it. Im not letting anything go, people have the right to vote and be counted. if the dnc wants to punish a state you find other ways in doing so rather than taking away individual voters rights. thats called a dictatorship. not a democracy. Alot of people in FL are still angry at the DNC and will be voting McCain just to send a message to the Democratic party.
Posted by: mark | August 26, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am
Billy/Shocked….THIS IS A DE-MOC-RA-CY..LIVE WITH IT. PEOPLE WILL VOTE FOR WHOM THEY WANT AND DO NOT CARE HOW P.O.ed YOU GET..AS YOUR OPINION IS JUST THAT, ONE OF MANY MANY MANY THAT WILL BE QUICKLY FORGOTTEN…
Posted by: CuriousIndep | August 26, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am
Have any of you thought about what if Hillary did win? There would be just as many Obama supporters screaming and kicking just like you Hillary supporters and they would be whippin out the racist card on the Dem party.
Second, if you Hillary supporters are as loyal as you say you are, you would do what she asks and vote for Obama. Don’t take your frustrations out on the American people. We don’t need another 4 more years of Bush.
Posted by: Z | August 26, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
No Obama. No birth certificate – too many unknowns. When Michelle Obama mentioned Hillary in her speech lastnight that was so fake. YUCK.
And why did Biden get VP?? Why did Biden’s son put Larry Sinclair in jail after his Press Conference in DC. They are all a bunch of thugs. I will cross party lines and vote for McCain.
Posted by: Fae | August 26, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
Mike: “…with Obama, no one but Michelle really knows. He is not ready for the Presidency. I’m sure he’s a nice guy and means well, but he’s not ready.”
As for which is ready, the Georgian situation clearly demonstrated that McCain is in over his head, despite all that “experience.”
No thanks. After eight years of Bush, I’ve had enough of stupid foreign policy for a while.
Posted by: Paul | August 26, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
Pam… so you have not been paying attention. You are so upset about Hillary you can’t see past it. Just admit it and stay home. Stop trying to make this into something it is not. Obama has more than once proven he is for the middle class and below people of the US. Hillary only started proving it when she was running for president.
Posted by: beck | August 26, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Fae….see you are one of those who beleive the silly things like he does not have a birth certificate. Wise up…for the love of God.
Posted by: marie | August 26, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
There are but a scarce handful of politicians I actually like, the kind of people that get into politics are generally not nice people. I certainly don’t admire any of them, some support positions that are good for my country and some don’t, and that dictates my voting choices. Most of all, I can’t image being idolizing one so much that if they lost, I’d vote out of spite for someone who doesn’t understand economics, jokes about bombing Iran, and has serious anger management problems… for president.
Being a citizen in a democracy is a responsibility. Name calling and whining about not getting your way is pathetic and childish. Please grow up.
Posted by: TJ Weldy | August 26, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
You know, I used to be an ardent Hillary supporter when Bill was in the white house. I thought that the only reason people hated her and called her a “bitch” is because she was a powerful woman who was trying to get things done. “2 for the price of 1!” was my personal slogan.
Fast-forward a couple of years, and the “Hillary for prez” talk is sounding pretty good. She carpet-bags it to New York, and I’m delighted that she has chosen my state as the jumping-off point to her political career. The “Hillary ’08″ buzz sounds too good to be true! People say that she’s only doing this so she can become president, but I’m thinking she’ll do great things. I vote for her, I tell all my friends to vote for her. She gets elected!
Two years pass by, and not much out of her. I figure she’s learning the ropes. Sept.11, and then the Patriot Act is up for passage. She votes for it, and then we find out it takes away all our civil liberties. Why didn’t she oppose it?!?! Because she didn’t read it. What happened to her super-smarts, her toughness, her willingness to hold other people’s feet to the fire?
Next thing I know, Bush et. al are trying to get us into war. All of the Senate seems totally snowed by them. I’m thinking, unless everyone has some vital information I’m lacking, it’s kind of obvious they’re lying about the WMD’s. Chuck Schumer, the other NY senator, is one of 2 or so senators who stands up and demands some kind of debate or justification for the war. Hillary is NOT the other senator. In fact, she supports the war in what seems to me blatant pandering to appear strong on defense to help her presidential bid. I can’t believe what I see when she votes for the war. “She better have some information, or I’m campaigning against her in the future.” Well, turns out there is no other information; she was voting cynically to support her presidential bid, but it has backfired as the once popular war has become very unpopular.
I now know that her smarts, her toughness, and her huge drive are in service to one thing: her ambition. She has shown that she is willing to throw the country and the world under the bus in pursuit of her goal.
You can’t imagine how disappointed I am in her.
Posted by: Karen | August 26, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
Yea this Hillary Drama plays real well for Hillary. Let us pout our way to the Presidency.
You people have to get real.
Posted by: Thinking | August 26, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
It is funny because i voted for Obama. But guess what. If Hillary won (which she did not) i would have voted for her. i woulsd not have been bitter and held on to the fact the she COULD have won. I want a democrat for president.
Posted by: marie | August 26, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
Wow talk about cry babies. Give us what we want or we will try to ruin it for everyone! Yay for a bunch of adults acting like children. Are you sure you are not all Republicans anyway, it sure seems like it.
Posted by: Niko | August 26, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
beck: Your comments do not change the facts.
Clinton was cheated out of the nomination by Obama not being vetted re Wright until after he won the first nine primaries due to sexism against Clinton. After that the playing field was leveled, and it was nip-and-tuck and she almost won anyway.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
I used to be a huge Hillary supporter too, back in the day!
I still believe that most of the people who hated her at that time did so because of entrenched sexism, but I think the “bitch” rumors started with her dismissive attitude towards how to interact with others. She did not allow dissent in her camp, but this is exactly one of the things that is very wrong with the current administration!
She took a very “you’re either with me or you’re against me” attitude towards the entire staff, and left no room for discussion. Too close to Bush/Rove/Cheney attitude for me.
Posted by: cindy | August 26, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
Jennifer writes:
“So you believe that voting for someone who voted with Bush (one of the worst presidents in history) 95% of the time is good for the country.”
This is the worst type of non-critical thinking I’ve seen, and every Obama supporter seems to want to parrot it.
Voting with Bush 95% of the time – first of all, what does it mean? Bush isn’t in the Senate; he doesn’t vote on anything. If this is to imply that McCain voted for the position Bush supported 95% of the time, then so what? How is that proof that McCain favors the same policies and has the same priorities as Bush?
Last I checked, the Democrats controlled Congress, so it’s the Democrats’ legislative priorities that are being brought forward. So voting “with Bush” 95% of the time (if it’s even true) means that McCain agreed with Bush’s views on the legislative priorities of the Democrats 95% of the time. That’s practically a meaningless statistic. We don’t know what was in that 5% difference (how many/what kind of votes), and most importantly we don’t know how different Bush and McCain’s support would be on Republican-led or a President McCain-driven legislative agenda.
If it’s even true, then the statement that McCain voted “with Bush” 95% of the time is meaningless as a predictor of future behavior – they were just taking positions on what was being put in front of them by committees chaired by liberal Democrats, so it’s not surprising that their record of support would be similar. As a sitting President, there’s no indication that McCain would have the same priorities Bush has, and there’s a lot of evidence to the contrary.
Obama supporters seem to be very easily swayed by glib soundbytes and not care about the substance of what they mean, and are all too happy to repeat them – as if “voting with” Bush 95% of the time is somehow shorthand for “McCain is 95% like Bush”… the idea is insulting to people’s intelligence (not to mention intellectually lazy to try to reduce complex issues into campaign commercial-friendly talking points).
Posted by: Dan | August 26, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Am I the only Hillary supporter who sees that if we punish the DNC by voting for McCain, we will also be punishing Hillary. Many of my friends believe that if we support McCain, we can all stand the pain for four years while the DNC learns a valuable lesson and backs Hillary in 2012. The truth is that the DNC will learn nothing and instead hold Hillary responsible. In that case we wont see Hillary in 2012 or 2016, or ever again. She may not even hold onto her Senate seat. Like it or not, if McCain wins, Hillary loses.
Posted by: Dale | August 26, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Billw…seriously? Are you really going to claim sexism? please.
Posted by: marie | August 26, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
wow…and wowwwwww…I am an independent voter, and for sure as I am an American, i am not voting for a democrat candidate, not now..you guys are so blind, so inmature, so childish…
Posted by: RENATO | August 26, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Rick Klein sounds like a member of PUMA, the cloaked-Republican group whose intent is to steer Hillary supporters to John McCain. That, or maybe he’s just another mainstream media journalist who’s sold his soul to his corporate and government sponsors. Or perhaps tabloid journalism is all he’s got going.
Posted by: MediaWatch | August 26, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Hillary supporters – please don’t vote for McCain! Whether or not we like Obama or the DNC – would we genuinely rather have 4 more years of the Bush admin’s failed economic & foreign policy?
Hillary knows what’s right. She may not love Obama, but she knows America needs a Democratic administration – and she’ll have much more power to influence it from the senate than she ever would have as a VP. Don’t give the election – and America to McCain; ask yourself what would Hillary do – and she sure won’t be voting republican. That’s b/c for her AMERICA comes first
Posted by: Rob | August 26, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
“Give us what we want”
No, give Clinton what SHE deserves.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
You Hilary supporters are all really a bunch of confused idiots. If you were true Hilary supporters and true Democrats, you would vote for the Democratic candidate that was nominated and not betray the country by voting for McCain simply because you are sore losers and want “revenge” for Hilary. What a selfish and ignorant way to vote! The most qualified candidate to lead our country in the right direction is Obama, not McCain!
Posted by: slm | August 26, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
It’s a shame Republicans use mis-information and fear to manipulate you to vote. All the ads on TV for McCain have been proven lies. And this is what you want?
If you think anything positive will come from another 4 years of the political hell Republicans have dragged America through, then you are allowing yourself to be controlled instead of informed.
If you want to know all about Obama, simply hit his website. If you chose not too, then you are chosing ignorance in this political race. It’s so simple, you just have to think clearly.
Posted by: Tom | August 26, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
It is not about true Democrat or true Republican. I am just refusing to give my vote for the media. I think and believe that Obama is just an empty shell. He stole speeches, flip flaps, has no plan for change at all. I strongly believe Clinton was a strong candidate with better plan. I don’t like the way she has been treated by DNC and the media. I am proud black American who came to this country as an immigrant and worked my way up. Up until now I was a Democrat; in my good conscious I don’t plan to give my earned vote for Obabma just because his Democrat, black, and he comes from the same country that I came from.
Posted by: Yoseph | August 26, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
“seriously? Are you really going to claim sexism? please.”
Assert with a reason please. What other reason did she lose the first nine primaries?
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
I’ve been voting straight Republican all my life. If it was a perfect world, I’d see Ron Paul as the Republican nominee… but anyways… true conservatives get us out of wars where as true liberals tend to get us into wars… Mccain is no true conservative and Obama is no true liberal when you factor in something as important as the Iraq war… anti-war vote going to Obama… there are other candidates that are closer to Ron Paul’s platform, but I believe voting for Obama will be a step closer to ending the war in Iraq, which I think is priority #1 to fixing our economy. Good luck to all other Ron Paul supporters, sorry I gotta vote for Obama :O
Posted by: Ron Paul Republican | August 26, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Sorry jimmy but the race thing just doesn’t work today, you have got to be a “60′s throw back” to try to pull that one…Racism is an equal opportunity offense today. That’s a gate that swings both ways and you are turning off a lot of voters by “if you don’t vote Obama your a racist statement” LOL. Try another tactic like policy issues
Posted by: CuriousIndep | August 26, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
The fact that posters on this site are still questioning Obama’s brith certificate (which they’ve shown on CNN a gazillion times) is proof that these hardcare Clinton supporters aren’t concerened about real issues..
As far as hating the DNC over the Florida and Michigan votes, both of those states violated the rules by moving their primary states up too early. It had nothing to do about favoring Obama. All of the candiates agreed to not campaign in Michigan and Florida.
The Rules and Bylaws Committee came to a compromise and split the votes. So to claim that Obama cheated somehow, is just a flat out lie!!
Posted by: Jennifer | August 26, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Sitting here in astonishment but not surprised. This has to be the worst DNC convention on record when it comes to a clear path, or message.
Other than more “preaching to the choir” from expected sources, this has turned out to be a farewell address for Kennedy (yes he is dying and knows it)a takeover by HRC and her follower’s of this convention and more examples how BO cannot unite, command or control his own party.
James Carville is right, his party is in chaos and clueless in what to do.
Posted by: Gary | August 26, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
“Obama lied to the far left to get the nomination. Now he is lieing to the center to try and get us back from McCain.”
And now he picks Biden the antithesis of change. The joke is on the bots.
Posted by: Mack | August 26, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
I hope all you idiot Hillary supporters that will vote for McCain enjoy having your sons, brothers, and husbands sent to die in meaningless wars and your air quality destroyed (not to mention possible nuclear disasters). A vote for McCain is a vote for stupidity, especially when you know better.
Posted by: billy | August 26, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Only in John Mclame’s and his stooges minds. People have not forgotten how McShame and the Repukes villified the Clintons for years. ABC and other MSM should get back to unbiased reporting and not reporting to the whims of the Owners and editors prejudiced by all that is not in conformance with their constrained views. Change will come, the change that will let all Americans live out their potential. United We Stand.
Obama 08
Posted by: Elitist | August 26, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
I meant to say primary dates..
Posted by: Jennifer | August 26, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Mack: “And now he picks Biden”
Fine. It will cost him the election.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
I think it intersting that some of these so called democrats, on this posting have lost touch with the reality of what were witnessing. So Hillary didn’t win the nomination, now you aren’t supporting a democrat who will do the SAME job.
Who of you thinks that ANYONE is suited for the most difficult JOB in the WORLD on DAY ONE? I dare any of you to name one person who said “I got this.” It’s OJT, period. What you hoping for is insight, forward thinking, and guts. So from that perspective they can all do the job. To get the job done effectively they all become more “centrist.” Even Bush after 7.5 years is more centrist. I could go on but I think we all get the drift. If you don’t like Obama, fine vote for 4 more years of Bush. We as a nation love making the same mistakes again and again, b/c we know it’s always the same outcome.
Posted by: kevin | August 26, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
As an independent I’m glad to see that finally people have started to notice that Emperor Obama has no clothes on! The media keeps having that far away look in their eyes for Obammania and chose to see what they wanted to see and now it’s gone on too long and the words out. Now everyone is beginning to understand that Obama is a presidential wanna be with a mirage for an oasis of hope.
Posted by: Curtis | August 26, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Gary the only person who can bring this party together is Hillary and her “supporters.” As long as they are bitter this will not end.
Posted by: marie | August 26, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Some people are claiming to be Democrats who will vote McCain because they don’t like Obama. Some people are claiming to be Republicans who support Obama because of his “new politics” or whatever. The problem is: Democrats HAVE A HISTORY of crossing party lines to help vote in Republican presidents. Republicans occassionally cross over to vote Democratic, but not in large numbers. I do believe that most of the people claiming to be Democrats for McCain are real, because I’m one of them, and most of my Democratic family is voting for McCain. I laugh when someone posts that he’s a Republican supporting Obama. I’ve never known a Republican who would vote for someone who promises to raise taxes on capital gains, stock dividends, and inheritance taxes. It simply isn’t believable to me. Every time I hear the “I’m a Republican and I support Obama line,” I think one thing: PAID OBAMA BLOGGER.
Posted by: SwingStateVoter | August 26, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
“racists like you.”
Typical white person….
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
I’ve not voted before. But this election, I gladly made the effort to register. I will do everything I can to keep Obama out of the presidency. I cannot handle a smooth talking person that will not give an answer. All he does is dodge. You can’t be “yes”, and “no”, on all subjects. Does he want to be a LEADER or a PLEASER? Hillary would’ve been GREAT. How it came to this……????
Posted by: tingin | August 26, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Anyone who says they are voting for McCain is actually a Republican in disguise or delusional. McCain is no maverick – he is Bush warmed over. What is shocking is that McCain presumes that intelligent women can be so bitter about Clinton’s loss of the primary that they are willing to vote against their own personal interests. Even if they aren’t enthralled with Obama and feel cheated by the bizarre primary process, how can these women support a man who will overturn Roe v. Wade?, a man who has demonstrated his contempt for women through his coarse remarks even to his own wife? a man who promises to send their sons into more illegal wars? a man who has brought in Karl Rove the Cheney/Bush attack dog,, Ralph Reed the corrupt Christian Coalition leader and Phil Gramm of Texas/Enron fame to run his campaign?? Get real, recognize PUMA as a bunch of Rove stooges and move on -only Republicans could stomach a vote for McCain/Bush. It is simply the worst possible formula for the advancement of women’s causes.
Posted by: jefflz | August 26, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
All of you people who keep holding onto the “Bush got us into war under false pretenses, lies, etc.” line of thinking should wise up. All the intelligence at the time, from foreign countries even, pointed to the Pres. of Irag having WMDs. We couldn’t verify that he did not because of many, many years of the cat and mouse game, which Pres. Clinton played well, I might add. So, after 9/11, should we have assumed that Saddam had good intentions with his deceit, that WMDs, etc. would not fall into the wrong hands? The Dems would have you believe that, sure, containment would have worked, no problem… The world as we knew it changed on 9/11. We woke up to the threats we face in a shocking, terrible way. I’m from the NY area and I will never forget it. Republican, Democrat, whatever…if you don’t understand that national security is a top issue in this day and age, and you want to go back to the Clinton go-go ’90s, I’m afraid I have news for you. It isn’t going to happen. Again, I am a Republican, but I’m not blindly following Republicans. I think Bush screwed up in many ways, but the man didn’t start a war because there was no threat or he made it up. He did the best he could with the intelligence we ALL had at the time. I don’t like the Iraq war any better than you Obama/Hillary lovers. War is awful, just ask my cousin who served two tours in Iraq with the Marines. However, he and I believe that the intentions we’ve had in Iraq are noble ones. Sorry for the long post, but all of the fools that keep pining away about the good old days, before Bush, give me a break. It’s a new world and we need leaders tough on defense. Obama is not tough on defense. He can’t even muster a response to what has happened in Georgia. How would he handle an attack on US soil?
Posted by: Mike | August 26, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Well I guess Healthcare and the economy aren’t so important right now. I am weep for those people who were looking for this party to be unified so that we could accomplish these thing.
Posted by: al | August 26, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
It is obvious to me that most of the posts here are written by Republicans with the intent of engendering fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD)in hopes of causing disunity among Democrats. Reading these posts and taking it seriously would be a mistake. The so-called rift in the Dem Party is a media myth. Nobody wants the continued path of the last 8 years. Republicans don’t seem to be able to address issues so they attack persons, engage in name calling, oft repeated false claims, and of course FUD.
Posted by: David | August 26, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
You know what lost Hillary the nom. BILL. simple.
Posted by: marie | August 26, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
I am INCREDIBLY disappointed in this convention and the blatant disregard for Hillary and her supporters! As one delegate who moved on to the Convention told us at caucuses, he ABSOLUTELY would NOT change his vote. Yet, he has entered the convention as an “undecided!!!” I agree with many here. In Washington state, a 333 vote difference comparatively given the votesa cast nationally would have triggered an AUTOMATIC RECOUNT!!! 333 is not many votes!!! Hillary deserves better as the woman who has not only cracked the glass ceiling, but can break it!!! WHY ARE WE HAVING A FULL ON CONVENTION AND CHOOSING OUR CANDIDATE??? Would someone please answer that question???
Given the slight difference, there is room to CHOOSE!!! The one thing that all the Obama supporters seem to ignore, or aren’t aware of period, is the fact that we are losing our RIGHT TO CHOOSE!!! It does not state in the Constitution that a party must ACCEPT the “presumptive” nominee . . . we are SUPPOSED to be voting, persuading, and then voting again until such time as ONE CANDIDATE received the 2025 votes necessary!!!
Is no one paying attention that Obama is running neck and neck with McCain? I don’t support the statements about voting for McCain by Hillary’s supporters and past delegates. Remember People . . . WE HAVE THE RIGHT AND POWER TO WRITE IN A CANDIDATES NAME ON THE NOVEMBER BALLOT!!! A vote for McCain is not the way Hillary would want us to fight on! She would rather see us write Her name in; that is my viewpoint at any rate. And that is what I will do!!! I did not vote for Obama; and he’s not my Candidate until such time as we hold a true convention!!!
Our Founding Fathers have to be spinning in their graves over this falsely held convention!!! Why do we have two sets of delegates? Why is her name going to be on the roll call if it means absolutely NOTHING? It is NOT symbolism; and while I recognize the historicity of Obama’s bid, the truth is that we have just undergone 8 years of someone with NO EXPERIENCE!!! At least with Hillary we KNOW that she KNOWS how to take on the multiple situations we are facing as a Nation in the global world today.
Given all the wars (ours included) we are in deep, deep, trouble. And what we DON’T need is a President who is lacking in the experience necessary to take this issues on. Hillary has been doing so her ENTIRE life. Moreover, any Candidate who can say that climate change is “possibly” a threat to us is someone I don’t want in “charge” of our policies and country.
I also am extremely disappointed in the arrogance and hubris of Obama to not reach out to Hillary’s supporters!!! As another has stated (a delegate at convention) in this morning’s Post Intelligencer, it is NOT Hillary’s job to “gracefully” give Obama her delgates!!! It’s OBAMA’s job to appeal to us . . . not patronize us!!!
Aaarrrggghhh . . . democracy is NOT being practiced; it’s all for show. And we wonder why the world is so antagonistic towards us? It is not merely W-ya who has brought this upon us. It is everyone who thinks that “pretending” to vote and practice democracy is so hypocritical if our convention is nothing but show and “crowning”!!!
Posted by: Maureen Startin, MACS, CZMT Certified | August 26, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Gary: I agree… but I am not voting for a convention… I am voting for someone who’s policies and plans work for my future and my children’s future, and the future of the US.
Posted by: beck | August 26, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
And it came to pass that the national anthem was played and the ONE placed his hands over the wrong place. Some wanted to stone him, but his followers rose up and said “ye who have not fondled yourself, cast the first stone”. Thus he was spared and he traveled the land, speaking to the crowds while often raising his head heavenward, as tho getting cues. And yea tho he walketh in the shadow of Wright, his charisma is great, and he plodeth on to achieve stardom. So to speak.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
I haven’t heard so many sour grapes since the Rebels lost the civil war. If Hillary would have run a more organized campaign, she would have easily beaten a first term Senator. She got surprised because she underestimated Obama from the start.
Republicans talk a lot about the entitlement mentality when it comes to low income people. And it seems to be an entitlement mentality that we are hearing from the disgruntled Hillary supporters. “It’s my turn, so I’m entitled. Coronate me” This is America not a monarchy. We don’t pass the throne from Queen or King to prince or princess.
You get the nomination because you win the election. No one is entitled to it. Voters decide. It was a close election but the Democratic voters have decided. If Obama lost he and supporters would have been expected to support the party nominee.
Stop the whining and grow up. The country has suffered enough under this Republican administration. Under almost any measure, the country is suffering. If you stop drinking the juice that the spin meisters are serving, you would admit it.
As for those who say Obama is not qualified, I’d take my chances with someone who can think for themselves any day of the week than a bumbling idiot like George Bush.
Posted by: Lifelong Democrat | August 26, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
A lesson in logic:
1. You support Hillary Clinton, and believe her character is formidable enough for her to be president.
2. Such a character would not weakly support someone else out of political expediency–you cannot claim 1 AND 2.
3. Therefore you should, if you have fidelity to your own view, support the Candidate that she does. You would not doubt her word if you truly believe in her integrity.
4. If you do not, you are a hypocrite, a Republican liar or a racist hiding behind B.S.
Posted by: Desmond | August 26, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
ANYONE is a better candidate than the hot-dog pilot, Bush-hugging, oil soaked, business as usual, lying, flip flopping McCain. No hero, he.
Posted by: Rowland Scherman | August 26, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Some people are claiming to be Democrats who will vote McCain because they don’t like Obama. Some people are claiming to be Republicans who support Obama because of his “new politics” or whatever. The problem is: Democrats HAVE A HISTORY of crossing party lines to help vote in Republican presidents. Republicans occassionally cross over to vote Democratic, but not in large numbers. I do believe that most of the people claiming to be Democrats for McCain are real, because I’m one of them, and most of my Democratic family is voting for McCain. I laugh when someone posts that he’s a Republican supporting Obama. I’ve never known a Republican who would vote for someone who promises to raise taxes on capital gains, stock dividends, and inheritance taxes. It simply isn’t believable to me. Every time I hear the “I’m a Republican and I support Obama line,” I think one thing: PAID OBAMA BLOGGER.
Posted by: Swing State Voter | August 26, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
marie:
“You know what lost Hillary the nom. BILL.”
No. Bill was there befora AND after the first nine primaries. He was a constant factor all along. The playing field was leveled on March 13 by Wright.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
I’m sick of this, seriously. Roe v Wade cannot be overturned? Are you on something it sure can, the next SCJ to retire is on the “liberal” wing, this means that if McCain is president he’ll nominate a “conservative” judge thus making the court lean that way. Then all it takes is one of those “conservative” states to push a anti-abortion bill. Someone challenges and it goes to the supreme court where Roberts et al votes that the state has the right to make it illegal for whatever reason. It’s already happened with other cases. Remember the woman who sued because her company because she got payed less then the men but the court said she didn’t have a leg to stand on. Oh yeah add one more of them to the court and see how long Roe v Wade stays. Yes it’s a DNC scare tactic, but this time, it holds water…
Posted by: Zephus | August 26, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
I am so tired of some people talking about they dont know the Obamas. Do you know the McCains? Obama has been running for president, he has been on the news, he has participated in debates, he has represented the United States very well in Europe, and yet some here still state that they dont know him. Well that is a line of bull****. Everyone should take a long look at your lifes, for the past 8 years it has gone downhill. Gas is too high, groceries are high, the cost of anything and everything has increased, except your paycheck. The middle class is now poor and the poor are just screwed. The Bush administration has done a terrible job taking care of home. He has spent money that we dont have and we will now be responsible for paying that back and then some. The republicans have sold our future and the future of our children and grandchildren, and for what? I consider myself and independent, and this year will cast my vote for Obama. America needs a fresh point of view. We need to finally realize that we as a country need to lead the world and in order for you to lead you need a leader that will be respected and that way he will be followed. Who do you think is willing to follow the ex Maverick anywhere. I dont believe McCain can lead because he is now to busy following all people that help get Bush elected such as Rove. The Maverick from years ago is long gone, and we are left with this man that has changed so much to become the nominee that I am surprised if he recognizes himself in the morning.
Posted by: Kim | August 26, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
“Change will come, the change that will let all Americans live out their potential. United We Stand.”
The Change Express got a flat tire when it picked up Joe Biden.
Posted by: Mack | August 26, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
Go ahead and vote for McCain and kill your kids future by electing a person of war and tax-cuts for the rich…your sons and daughters will fighting wars like my generation did based on lies…Do you really think Hillary even cares about her supporters i dont think so…she just cares that she lost 20million dollars. Americans get real…If your thinking by voting McCain now and then in 4yrs you’ll vote for Clinton lmao….the DNC will not allow Clinton run for President ever again for causing this long process in the primary’s and acting like a soar loser at the end…trust me America when I say Hillary didn’t stay in the race till the end for you she did it for her…she stayed in the race for the Clinton name and for money…Clinton’s aren’t they just great.
Posted by: leo818 | August 26, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
McCain is the next President of the United States. Bottom line he has the experience the job takes. If the DNC would have been supportive of Clinton, she would have been our next president. Unfortunately, the DNC and the media took it upon themselves to tell us who would be the best Democrat for the ticket. They (the DNC and media) chose an inexperienced person with no message, no direction, just rhetoric. Anyone remember one of the most liberal of the news media, Chris Matthews, stating ‘afterall what do really know about Obama’ after Hiliary started winning the primaries again. Thanks Mr. Matthews….where was that comment at the beginning of the primaries. Hiliary would have been a great president. To the DNC.. please replace your leadership.
To the Media…you are to report facts remember..way too much personal opinion.
The power and arrogance most of you exude needs to be checked at the door before you face the camera.
Posted by: Kathleen | August 26, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Mccain couldn’t win a single GOP debate against Ron Paul and you’re gonna vote for him. People who claimed to support Hillary Clinton and think Barack Obama disrespected her should see how the GOP disrespected the Clintons over the years, including John McCain… Vote for McCain to stay in Iraq until “victory” whatever that means… you guys voting for McCain obviously don’t know a damn thing about him lol. Vote for Obama to end the Iraq War :)
Posted by: Ron Paul Republican | August 26, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
I have a friend that poses as a Hillary supporter on message boards saying she will vote McCain and not Obama!!!…First of all, it’s a guy and second, he’s a McCain supporter trying to drive a wedge between the party and get vots for McCain. The sad thing is Hillary supporters not only believe him (her) they go along with it…He just sits back and laughs — stating “SHEEEEP!”
Posted by: Tom | August 26, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
“I am so tired of some people talking about they dont know the Obamas.”
I do know that they were members of and supported a hate church for 20 years. And that is all I really need to know about them. Case closed.
Posted by: Mack | August 26, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
“I have a friend that poses as a Hillary supporter on message boards saying she will vote McCain and not Obama!”
Maybe you should find some new friends.
Posted by: Mack | August 26, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
ODE TO OBAMA OPUS 4
There once was a dude named Biden,
His foot and his mouth oft’ colidin’
When he opens his mouth,
Things often go south
So the trend toward McCain will widen.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
When you see “Hillary for McCain” you are likely looking at a cloaked,racist Republican, member of a group
called PUMA: “People United Means Action”/”Party Unity My A-S-S”.
When PUMA first showed up online I was all for it, because I admire Hillary Clinton, always will. But the
organization morphed into a mob of rabid protesters and strangely, Obama-haters. The talk became ugly and
threats were harsh. As many of us know, the group had been infiltrated by cloaked-Republican racist posing
as Democrats, whose main intent was to destroy Barack Obama and the DNC, and steer those hapless Hillary
supporters to John McCain. THE GOOD NEWS: in the last three weeks or so, many accredited sources have
been showing up on the internet with excellent debunks of PUMA, backed up with tons of verifiable data. It
turns out this group is small and isolated and has few legitimate backers other than extreme-right
Republicans and a handful of true Hillary supporters with feminist issues who have been sucked into their
scheme.
Less than two weeks ago, the founders of the two main organizations, PUMA and Just Say No Deal, made
the mistake of signing on for an interview on Hardball. Their organizations got a thorough debunking on
national television. See the video of the Hardball interview here:
PUMA defanged:
http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2008/08/15/puma-de-fanged-on-hardball/
news.aol.com/political-machine/2008/08/15/puma-de-fanged-on-hardball/
Posted by: MediaWatch | August 26, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
What everyone here totally ignores is this — if Hillary had been chosen as candidate for President, how many of the 18 million who voted against her (and thus for Obama) in the primaries would then vote for McCain? Thanks to those 18 million and a much more intelligently run campaign, we’ll never know, and we 18 million can sleep better knowing she and her machine will be kept out of the Administration.
Posted by: Jack | August 26, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
marie: that is not true… if he chose Hillary as VP most of his backers would not vote. Crazy as it might seem. So Hillary would lose just like Obama might.
Yes, the party was broken… Yes, I blame Hillary.
I was for her. But she lost, when you lose you step down, you do not act like a child throwing a fit, and try to cheat for a win.
If you want to bring MI and FL in to this. Hillary signed the same papers everyone else did. She wrote those people off just like everyone else did.
She ran a bad race and she lost… not because she is a woman, not because MI and FL could not vote..because she didn’t want to count anyones vote but a few states. Shame on her.
Posted by: beck | August 26, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
“seriously? Are you really going to claim sexism? please.”
Assert with a reason please. What other reason did she lose the first nine primaries?
Are you serious? Okay, easy:
* Hillary did no plan past super Tuesday. She assumed she would be the winner.
* Hillary did not take anyone else seriously, her strategy was to act like she would automatically win. She would not even acknowledge the possibility that she wouldn’t win.
* Hillary did not select people to run her campaign based on their skills but based on their loyalty – a fatal flaw of our current administration exhibits with running government agencies.
* Hillary did not admit that the vote for authorization of force in Iraq was a mistake. This is a hugely unpopular disaster for America and the unwillingness to admit error reminds people of Bush.
* Hillary’s approach to fund raising was targeted at large donations from wealthy people, Obama’s was modeled like Howard Dean’s fund raising with vast improvements. Hillary failed to see the future here.
* Hillary did not make good choices in using her husband’s legacy. She also let him have too much free reign and he didn’t do well in representing her.
What more do you want? I’m sure there is some sexism that plays into this, but its absurd to think that Hillary is just some helpless victim here. Please stop worshipping Hillary like some sort of deity. Voting is a strategy; its about logical decisions, not emotional attachments to your own projections of who you think people are.
Posted by: TJ Weldy | August 26, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Obama has a base support of moat all blacks, die-hard democrats, and the young who think he’s hip and cool.
However — he cannot expand beyond that…….
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
The selection of Biden made the “change” message obsolete.
Carter, Kennedy ,Michlee Obama. I would say the message was LIBERALS.
Mark Warner is giving his sppech to kick off his Warner in 2012 campaign. He is not going to carry the water for loser Obama.
Posted by: geevill | August 26, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
I will place a friendly wager with anyone on this board, that Obama/Biden (JOBAMA) win the election…anyone? You have my email address! Let’s see how much faith you have in McSame
Posted by: mieb9015@yahoo.com | August 26, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
If the supporters of Hillary Clinton want John McCain to be elected in order to validate Hillary’s loss…then they deserve what they will get: at least four more years of the Bush administration’s policies. These policies include the housing crisis, middle class poverty through rising gas, food and basic living prices, high unemployment, stagnant wages, the Iraq war, rising Medicare costs, no healthcare for the uninsured, precarious Social Security benefits, torture and Guantanamo Bay, politically manipulated hiring in the Attorney General’s office, loss of international respect for America, taxpayer funds allocated to save the rich failing banks of Wallstreet after they’ve precipitated in and benefited from the housing crisis (including Freddie and Fannie), providing funds for the reconstruction of a wealthy Iraq while allowing Iraq to keep the profits they receive from the rising gas prices they charge the American people, and, most likely, (given Mr. McCain’s interests), another war (which will once again divert taxpayer dollars to the Pentagon and their suppliers, instead of to programs that benefit the American people).
I’m sorry that the democrats who supported Hillary Clinton believe that they will be vindicated only if Barak Obama loses the nomination to John McCain. I supported Hillary Clinton, and I am a democrat, so I now support Barack Obama.
Posted by: Carla | August 26, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Great for all to express their democratic right to express themselves without thinking about the implications. Obama or Hillary is not whats at stake here – its the American dream. Many of the people here expressing their opinion don’t sound like democrats – they sound like republicans and make no apology for it – well hoorah for you all!!! wait until McCain is in his second year and see if you will be applauding. You have a chance here and now to make THE difference, NOW! Please please don’t make the same mistake again – the next time it may not be your children’s lives but yours – Bush has done an excellent job of putting America in the gutter. Would you let John McCain finish the job?
Support this DNC candidate to the Presidency and deal with those other issues later. SUPPORT YOUR DEMOCRATIC PARTY NOW!!!
Posted by: Rudi | August 26, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
To Lifelong Democrat,
If I understand your post, you are saying that Hillary ran a poor campaign and underestimated Obama. That’s pure balderdash!!! You’re correct, we are NOT a Monarchy!!! So someone need explain why we are “crowing” Obama, even though we have delegates for both candidates??? WHAT THE HECK IS WRONG WITH A COVENTION WHERE WE AGAIN BEGIN CHOOSING OUR CANDIDATE???
If you think that this is a valid (or a mandate for Obama) you are incorrect!!! The caucuses here in Washington state were a complete DISASTER!!! Having been a primary state for so many years, there was poor turnout, there was TOTAL disorganization . . . in my precinct alone, people were stuffed into a gymnasium at the start, the disorganization was putrid, and as a result, there was no “caucus!!!” One minute to change someone’s mind? That’s also baloney.
This is NOT about supporters who believe it was “her turn!!!” It’s about choosing a Candidate at the Convention. Otherwise, all the $$$ that’s being spent is for naught!!! It’s all for show. And if you don’t think the world is watching. . . well, then you are naive in your outlooks. Lifelong Democrat or not; this was a CLOSE RACE!!!
So, if you will, I would welcome an honest response as to WHY we can’t hold a TRUE CONVENTION and choose our party’s Candidate through votes and roll call. And if neither reaches the 2,025 at first, we continue to roll call, persuade, and vote again until one does!!! That’s the way it’s always been done until the horrible year of 1968. Since that time, with all due respect, it’s been nothing more than a “crowning” ceremony.
2008 is NOT the year to continue this!!! Obama talks all his “change;” then what’s wrong with true convention procedures (which DON’T violate the charter!!!)??? As I said, the Founding Fathers much be spinning their way to China at this point!!!
Posted by: Maureen Startin, MACS, CZMT Certified | August 26, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Mack–you made a typo: you said “Case closed,” when obviously you meant to say “Mind closed.”
Posted by: Desmond | August 26, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
You can see it now if you look at it, where this is taking us. Hyper-Feminism, mixed with that little touch of racism you’ve never dealt with, and we get four more years of Bush. I’ll thank all you “Hillary Is God dopes in advance. You all act as if you are standing on principle, but it is my belief that it is racism, pure and simple. They are not compatible, and Obama is smart enough to realize it, and strong enough to go the other way. Besides, Hillary is no Joe Biden. You don’t hear this from the young ones, it’s the 55-75 crowd that can’t get past it. Chew on that.
Posted by: thaink now | August 26, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Bottome line, the drama queens in the press are too lazy to dig into a “real” story, so we endure their hand-wringing over a very few “slighted” Hillary supporters, who are actually white upper class women who won’t admit they don’t want to vote for a black male. And the rest so blinded by childish bitterness that they can’t let go of the fact that, in an election, someone wins and someone loses. And they are actually willing to put up with McCain’s policies on war, tax releif for the rich, a broken health care system and another right wing seat in the Supreme Court. Unbelievable. But, of course, in the blog world, most of those posing as “jilted Hillary” supporters are Republican plants doing what they do best-lie and mislead. They wouldn’t know a fair fight if it bit ‘em on the butt. And don’t forget our lazy and gullible press only too willing to play along with “the burning controversy”.
Posted by: tdub | August 26, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
“if he chose Hillary as VP most of his backers would not vote.”
No, his base support of most all blacks, die-hard democrats, and the young who think he’s hip and cool will not flinch.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
“Hillary supporters” no matter how you slice it…you either will have Obama or McCain in office…A black guy you hate or another George Bush – either way, it’s not Hillary, so quit acting like little babies and grow up!
Posted by: Mandy | August 26, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
It was said that Zero-bama has a problem with working class people. He should “take” this for his next 70 days.
Unite Workers of the World!
Change We Can Believe In!
There is a Change of order in the first place, and there is a Change of Change from Revolution. So, they are not exactly plagiarism from Karl Marx and Mao Zedong.
Posted by: lazy to think | August 26, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
If Obama wanted to unite the Democratic Party, Hillary would be his choice for Vice President.
She was treated unfairly through this entire ordeal. I say Go Hilary supporters.
He ahd his chance to include her and did’nt
Posted by: Joyce | August 26, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
If Obama wanted to unite the Democratic Party, Hillary would be his choice for Vice President.
She was treated unfairly through this entire ordeal. I say Go Hilary supporters.
He ahd his chance to include her and did’nt
Posted by: Joyce | August 26, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
Democrats have acquired the habit of bashing somebody. This time the enemy is within.
Posted by: FloridaCounts | August 26, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
It’s sad that people keep focusing on the negative here when it comes to Obama. We have a candidate who is offering us a new way of doing things, new ideas, new perspectives. I too supported Hillary at one point, but the differences between want Hillary wanted do and what Obama wants to do are so minimal in comparison to John McCain. If you are upset about Hillary and want to pay her tribute, then why not go with what she is recommending…Obama. John McCain is trying to maintain the status quo. For all his experience in washington, what has he really changed, what has he made better for average Americans. His voting record is available for public views. The policies he is supporting means more money for foreign oil, a expensive war, less for services that we need as a country such as, health care, education, the enviornment. I think it’s shameful that the John McCain campaign is running ads about Hillary supports switching over, and pretending that all Hillary supporters are switching over. They are lying to us again, but this is the norm for the GOP, Bush, McCain, and the rest. It’s sad that McCain has sold his princples for this election. He was known as a Maverick, independent thinker in a certain issues, but just to win the election, he’s playing to the party and not to what is in the people’s best interest. As a young American who is hoping for the best possible future for myself and the rest of the generations above and below me, I support Barrack Obama. McCain’s had his time in the senate to create change, and he hasn’t. I’m ready to see change, and I see that in Barrack.
Posted by: Tracy | August 26, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
Mack over here obviously is very insightful… I can count the number of friends he lost in Iraq without talking to him = 0
Anyone who lost a loved 1 in Iraq will take a more serious consideration at these candidates and see who would be a better president. Unfortunately, Barack Obama is better then McCain. McCain will kill our economy by probably continuing the “war on terror” against Iran… which will be 100% worse then the Iraq war
Posted by: Ron Paul Supporter | August 26, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
“a friendly wager”
Just a friendly note, on-line betting is illegal.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
American’s have been waking up to a President these 8yrs and have seen every morning is harder to wake up to…life takes you down a road of sadness knowing that credit cards bills are waiting for you…foreclosure notices are waiting for you…car payment is waiting for you…gas prices are waiting for you…and finally your kids future looks harder and sadder everyday….if these are all bushes day in office…what do you except from McCain…through America away to China and big business…kill the middle class…lets just have really poor people and really rich people and America will be great…false…Americans are smart enough to know they’re playing with their kids future and every father and mother will do everything in their power to protect the future of their kids…Vote for McCain but then you would have to look in your kids eyes and tell them sorry we can’t afford that and sorry your not going to college…sorry that I voted for McCain.
Posted by: leo818 | August 26, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
“I have a friend that poses as a Hillary supporter on message boards saying she will vote McCain and not Obama!”
Maybe you should find some new friends.
“MACK” Whats wrong with having friends? you should look into it!!
Posted by: Tom | August 26, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
Rudi,
With all due respect, I am NOT electing a “party” to office!!! I am planning to elect a Candidate!!! In my view there is a big, big difference. And the Party has no right to make choices for me . . . which is precisely what’s been done here!!!
The fact is . . . the world is watching and laughing at the LACK OF PRACTICING democracy in the Country attempting to force it on the rest of the world (i.e., Iraq for instance!!!). It’s OBAMA and the PARTY that are losing this election for us, not Hillary or her supporters!!! Wake up man . . . we aren’t supposed to elect a party but a person!
I respect your position just as I do all others here. And those in the Democratic party are doing the same; particularly those who voted/caucuses for Hillary. As I said, 333 votes is a very NARROW margin. It did not give Obama the mandate . . . anymore than the stolen elections of Bush did!!!
Posted by: Maureen Startin, MACS, CZMT Certified | August 26, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
“If Obama wanted to unite the Democratic Party, Hillary would be his choice for Vice President.”
He was afraid Clinton would outshine him.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Puma Defanged – by Hardball!!!!! ROFLMAO!!!!
PUMA! 9 million Voters and counting, coming to the Polls With You!
Posted by: LeeLee07 | August 26, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
All of you Hillary supporters that are now supporting McCain sicken me. What is this a bitter sports rivalry? Who are you teaching this lesson to? Yourselves? Your children? Well, electing a guy who has no real respect for the rights of women sure oughta show ‘em. I don’t get it at all. You should all be ashamed.
Posted by: Donnie | August 26, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Obama was “selected” by the DNC…Hillary won the primaries but was strongarmed out of the nomination….GOP Dem
______________________________
That’s a flat out lie!! After Feb. 5 Obama kept his lead in pledged delegates all the way until the end. It was the superdelegates that helped him reach 2116. But Obama’s wins in the primaries and caucuses helped him achieve victory, not your shady conspiracy theories!!
Read a newspaper every once in awhile and learn a few facts before you spew lies!!
Posted by: Jennifer | August 26, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
“electing a guy who has no real respect for the rights of women”
Hi Sweetie…
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
I am a registered Democrat. I voted for Hillary. I contributed to her campaign — not once, but several times.
I watched the liberal left portion of the media trash distort and spin the race to Hillary’s detriment with growing amazement, concern, and finally bitterness.
I looked at Obama’s record, and found it wanting. As senator, Obama had a duty to the American people who elected him. He was made chairman of his senate committee on Afghanistan (which he now touts as the new focus of his foreign policy). He held no meetings and blew it off to run for president. He has shirked his sworn duty to his country. Our boys and girls in Iraq did their duty. Obama turned his back on his. He is not fit to be president.
Reluctantly, I am voting for McCain. I would have preferred to vote for Hillary. Obama is a national disaster in the making. He will never get my vote!
Posted by: Nevile | August 26, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
BILLW – A friendly wager involves no money being transferred…so are you in?
Posted by: Tom | August 26, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
Im a older bigger gal who has been a lifelong democrat. I cant vote for Obama because I am extremely petty and bitter about the way Obama treated hillary. I dont really like black people and I believe that white women should rule the world. Ive lived my whole life being oppressed for my sexual organs and the color of my skin. Hillary would have justified my bitterness and made me finally feel proud to be a white woman in America.
This is why Im voting for McCain. Because its better that we screw up the country than we let those color’d people have there day in the sun.
Im a bitter old unmarried white woman, and I approve this message.
Posted by: Mrs Manitee | August 26, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
Come on! Change!? Do you really believe the Democratic party is going to change anything? They’ve been in control of both houses for almost 2 years now. Where’s all the change?! Where’s the new sunset that was supposed to pop up when they were given the reins! Give me a break. That’s why I vote independent! Same ol, same ol. If you don’t believe it, just look at Obamas VP choice. Change?!
Posted by: Curtis | August 26, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Nevile; I agree totally. I am voting for McCain relunctantly too..
See my above post for comments similar to yours.
Posted by: Kathleen | August 26, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Hillaryland is now Neverland.
It’s over. Too bad.
All McCain voters will be working against their own interests. If Hillary supporters wish to join them, so be it.
Posted by: Henst | August 26, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Wow.
As a McCain supporter and proud conservative (newsflash – not all females are democrats, and not all conservatives are religious hardliners), I’m heartened to read this thread. If anyone wants to know why McCain won in 2008, they can refer back to this specific thread to tell the story.
.
Posted by: Cyclgrrl | August 26, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
“Mack–you made a typo: you said “Case closed,” when obviously you meant to say “Mind closed.”
Well I guess my mind is closed to racists. So be it.
Posted by: Mack | August 26, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Those of you who were Hillary supporters need to understand that if she is any less than 100% behind Obama, then her future in the party is over. You can forget about her ever becoming President if Obama goes down to defeat because of PUMAS and other childish, petulant whack-jobs that claim to be Dems but plan to vote for McSame. Is that what you want to have happen to Hillary? I’d like to see some of you brave enough to answer that question.
Posted by: Hoo-Ahh! | August 26, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Tom: “A friendly wager involves no money being transferred…so are you in?”
OK, I take Clinton if things should turn around in Denver, otherwise McCain.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
CHANGE???
Obama would need to change drawers if McCain took him up in a fighter plane.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
GOP Dem: You obviously don’t know Jack about McCain so maybe you should read up about his “history/experience” in Washington. Ron Paul was the best in the GOP presidential debates. McCain won 0 debates against Ron Paul. Just wait till he debates a man like Barack Obama… if he couldn’t win a single debate against Ron Paul, how the hell is he going to stand a chance against Obama! McCain is going to get beat real bad! May a true conservative win the nomination in 2012!
Posted by: Ron Paul Supporter | August 26, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
What is interesting is that Clinton supporters think they know what is right and correct.
They do not believe in democracy or election process. Clinton lost that nomination election. Obama won.
Now they say most Clinton supporters will choose McCain. SO be it. Stop your pathetic whimpering and go ahead and vote for McCain if you dare.
I know at least a few hundred of these closet Republicans who call themselves Democrats because they are ashamed of the last 8 year of Republican rule.
You are simply shocked that democrats dare to vote for a half black guy. You cannot accept the daring of democrats to choose a new guy and a nobody because these real democrats are sick and tired of the normal Washington politics.
Now the next stage is to find out which kind of people is more in America. Those who desire a change (even if not exactly the kind of changes wanted or needed) or those who desire the same old republican policies.
stop your whining and Let’s go to election and find out.
Posted by: VelShan | August 26, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
No, his base support of most all blacks, die-hard democrats, and the young who think he’s hip and cool will not flinch….BillW
_________________________________
That’s just not true..The only demographic where Obama doesn’t lead is white men.
Posted by: Jennifer | August 26, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Marvin,
that is creative Clinton math. It ignores the many caucus states that Obama won! He would have won even with FL and MI, which clearly chose to ignore the rules.
Posted by: Hoo-Ahh! | August 26, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Neville: Your logic makes good sense. Again, it’s the candidate and what he/she brings to the table, not the party. The DNC has done itself and the country a disservice. I will say one thing, it makes me proud that a woman and a black man got so far in the run for president (and Obama might still win as McCain has a lot of work to do). That says something about a country that has a storied and not so good past when it comes to race. Good for us, but I still don’t think Obama is fit to be president — black or white. Color makes no difference. I’m looking at experience, policies, substantive issues. Obama is not ready for the post he seeks.
Posted by: Mike | August 26, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
All the Republicans posing as outraged Hillary supporters on this blog never fail to amuse me.
Posted by: Tom in California | August 26, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Manitee. Good one! That was funny.
Posted by: marie | August 26, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
Most of you Clinton supporters who plan to vote for McCain are VERY politically naive. If you think she can waltz to the nomination in 2012 if McCain wins in 2008, you are whistling past the graveyard. If that happens, Hillary is done. As for me, I hope she is 100% behind Obama, he serves two terms, and she is a candidate in 2016.
Posted by: Hoo-Ahh! | August 26, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
Mack, you are a goof, you did it again!
You said “My mind is closed to racists,”–you should just stop at “closed.” Trust me on this.
Posted by: Desmond | August 26, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
Maureen,
Thank you for the kind words – apparently you do get it! And you will get more of it with that attitude at this time. The Party came to a concensus AFTER not BEFORE all the lobbying and voting. The Party did not let you down – the democratic process let you down and the results were not what you wanted. So, instead of accepting it – you find reasons to critize it and blame it on the outcome that was not favourable to you. Therefore my dearest Maureen my humble suggestion is to accept what is done and move on and support this candidate for a better american life under a democratic party and not a republican party. Please accept the fact that sometimes things don’t always go the way you wanted but the next best thing you can do is to look at the alternatives and make the right choice for a democratic candidate – Sorry my dear this is politics and party politics too.
Posted by: Rudi | August 26, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
All of the Clinton supporters who say that they are voting for McCain just do it! Stop making stupid excuses like, “no birth certificate”, “Rev. Wright”-who by the way was a friend of the Clinton’s also, “socialism”, or lack of experience. No one had less experience than George Bush, but he was elected, twice. Hillary Clinton supporters want to teach the DNC a lesson? Get real. Full voting rights have been restored to Florida and Michigan, or did you all bother to read that? Guess what? It made no difference in the delegate count. Thouse of you who say Clinton should have been vetted need to remember that she is the one who refused to release the information concerning Bill Clinton’s business associates, not Obama. As for McCain, he can’t even remember the names of the parties fighting in Iraq! He has also stated time and again that the economy is not his thing, but go ahead and vote for him. Four years from now, if McCain is elected, remember that you voted for him and proudly own up to it. Remember that you chose to “teach the DNC” a lesson by voting for a man who has stated that the middle class is over $200,000.00 a year. You deserve what you get.
By the way, those of you attacking Michelle Obama, where is your attack on Cindy McCain and her drug theft? Where is the concern over the fact that her company does not pay taxes like the rest of us? Where is your outrage over the fact that she lied about Mother Teresa? Oh, I get it. She gets a pass, it’s just Michelle Obama that you attack. Well I guess American values include drug addiction, stealing, lying, probation and not paying your full share of taxes.
If you Clinton supporters are so behind Hillary, why does she still have a campaign debt? $10.00 from each of you is $180 million dollars. That would have more than erased her campaign debt. Why not put your money where your mouth is? Or do you all just want to sit and complain?
Those of you who wish to destroy the Democratic party, just keep it up, you are doing a good job right now. What I am seeing is a bunch of whining and complaining from people who feel that their feelings are more important than the country and that their voices count more than any other voices. This attitude is destroying the Democratic party more than anything else. Be proud of yourselves, you have done more to destroy the Democrats than the Republicans ever could.
Posted by: Serena | August 26, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
Billw: I love your GOP posts here… that’s the substance we get with McCain’s experience and from his supporters like you :p Be warned… 2012 the true conservatives will leave the GOP because of idiots like you… a large portion have left already and for good reason… McCain and his neocons are ruining our country.
Posted by: Ron Paul Supporter | August 26, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
Good one, Tom in CA. I can’t wait for the GOP convention to start. I plan to get on the blogs and act like an outraged Republican upset with McCain! Mike Huckabee 2008! ;-)
Posted by: Hoo-Ahh! | August 26, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
“if he couldn’t win a single debate against Ron Paul, how the hell is he going to stand a chance against Obama!”
Have you seen Obama debate? Not too good without a teleprompter.
Posted by: Mack | August 26, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
Jennifer: “The only demographic where Obama doesn’t lead is white men.”
Sorry, not so. See Gallup under the different catagories.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
Billw:
“Obama would need to change drawers if McCain took him up in a fighter plane.”
Same reaction from experienced military. If McCain took anyone up, I’d be terrified–as some were his first time around. He lost five aircraft.
Posted by: Henst | August 26, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
Marvin,
What newspaper article are you citing where it states that Clinton was strong-armed from the primaries?? She was winning primaries toward the end, and she still did not have enough delegates to clinch the nomination!! What newspaper article states otherwise?
She lost fair and square..Even if Michigan and Florida were counted she still would’ve lost. You can do all of the shoulda/coulda/woulda you want, but all in all Obama won the nomination.
I would suggest you stop trying to create facts to fit your “I’m an angry Clinton supporter who’ll vote for McCain” narrative!!
Posted by: Jennifer | August 26, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
RE NAME-CALLING
Ron Paul Supporter:
“true conservatives will leave the GOP because of idiots like you”
Typical name-calling response by someone who cannot dispute facts.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Truth is that those HRC supporters dont trust Obama and use the “hes not ready” or “hes not qualified” to justify voting against their own interests. One of the GOPs objectives is to protect the wealthy. Outlaw family planning. Make abortion illegal even in case of rape. Do you really think a wealthy person won’t get an abortion in another country if they want it? Contras that against a victim who is raped and forced to have the rapist’s baby. Fear is a powerful thing. Those HRC supporters would rather let NAFTA stand, pay more for health care, continue to pay an unfair percentage of income tax, continue to mortgage our future for another four years because they are afraid of Obama. He not qualified? What does that really mean? Who’s qualified to be a president? Dont you have to be a president to say that you have experience to be one? It’s about judgment and character. Everyone loved the Clintons but lets face the fact that some of his policies hurt American job opportunities i.e. NAFTA
Posted by: FactOfTheMatter | August 26, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
There won’t be a Clinton allowed to run for President ever again…Hillary and Bill sealed their families faith…and Chelsie is an elitist like her mom. I use to be part of the 18million Hillary supports from California but switched on her because I notice she was so negative and she would say anything to get elected…especially the drinking part with blue collar workers did it for me…next thing you know shes on sunset asking for money.
Posted by: mike818 | August 26, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
I am not voting for Obama and no one could ever talk me into it. He isn’t qualified to be President. He lacks experience and good judgement. He can’t be trusted as President of our country.
It is up to him to win Hillary’s supporters. Its his own fault when he loses in November. He won’t take responsibility for anything. He is very immature. He blames everyone but himself for his failing candidacy. He needs to grow up.
He thought he could lie and sweet talk his way to the Presidency.
He may have fooled some people but the
truth always comes out. He is scared to give Hillary a real roll call vote because he is afraid he will lose. Hillary is entitled to a total roll call vote from all of the delegates at the convention. This is further alienating him from Hillary’s supporters.Obama just wants a few states to vote now and then have everyone throw their support for him before all the delegates vote. The delegates are required to vote for the candidate that the voters voted for during the primaries. He is trying to silence their vote. This is totally un democratic.
I’m voting for McCain.
Posted by: basil | August 26, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Henst: “He lost five aircraft”
Tough Dude, ain’t he?
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
“He isn’t qualified to be President. He lacks experience and good judgement. He can’t be trusted as President of our country.”
That about sums it up.
Posted by: Mack | August 26, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
“Tough Dude, ain’t he?”
Yes. He proved that in capitivity.
He wasn’t much of a pilot.
Posted by: Henst | August 26, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Henst: “Yes. He proved that in capitivity. He wasn’t much of a pilot.”
You have a point, however getting shot down was just bad luck. He had to be where he was to accomplish his assigned mission.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
Just when you thought that it would be impossible to elect a Republican in ’08, Hillary found a way to hobble the Democratic Party and insure victory for McCain. You go, girl!
Posted by: hamishdad | August 26, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
McCain “lost” 5 planes
McCain “lost” the nominating process in 2000
McCain “lost” track of his many houses
McCain “lost” his first wife to his own infidelity
McCain “lost” his right to call himself a maverick since he became a 95%submissive admirer of G.W. Bush
McCain is a loser. I repeat: McCain is a loser.
Posted by: Viv | August 26, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
viv:
“McCain “lost” 5 planes
McCain “lost” the nominating process in 2000
McCain “lost” track of his many houses
McCain “lost” his first wife to his own infidelity
McCain “lost” his right to call himself a maverick since he became a 95%submissive admirer of G.W. Bush”
Background stats?
Obama’s background is muslim.
He studied the koran for 2 years.
His relatives are muslim.
He is friends with the anti-American Wright.
He is friends with the terrorist Supporter Ayres.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
Bill W: I got your background stats right here, you asinine twerp.
Posted by: Viv | August 26, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
BillW, so what.
Posted by: ? | August 26, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Viv:
“I got your background stats right here, you asinine twerp.”
Hey!!! what you got there? Female?
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
HILLARY IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE NOTHINGNESS THAT IS OBAMA! WHEN WILL EVERYONE GET IT? SHE HAS WORKED HARDER THAN ANY MAN HAS FOR ANYOTHER MAN IN A DEMOCRATIC ELECTION…I wish she could tell them to all f off.
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN
SCREW UNITY…..BOZO SHOULD HAVE THOUGHT OF THAT 20 YEARS AGO IN CHOOSING A MORE UNIFIED MIXED RACE CHURCH!
Posted by: Debra | August 26, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
So the leadership at the convention is worried about what Clinton may or may not do…She may not be the winner for her Party…but definitely a player.
Posted by: Kathleen | August 26, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
?:
“BillW, so what.”
The ‘so what’ is your decision. I just gave facts.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Debra geeze, is your spandex too tight.
Posted by: oo | August 26, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
I read through all of these postings, and continue (for the most part) to be disappointed. *sigh* So, here are a few succinct points relative to my “choice” for President, and this Convention (just beginning), and the media, et cetera, in order to clarify that I am NOT whining about anything other than the lack of PRACTICING democracy!:
1. A “convention” is for the purpose (according to the Charter and the Constitution) of “choosing” a Candidate for that party. Plain, simple, period!;
2. I am NOT racist!!! Nor am I a GOP spy! Rather, I am a Cultural Anthropologist and Conflict Resolutionist. I welcome diversity–ETHNIC–and seek knowledge of other cultures and people for a living! So, that doesn’t “fly” if you will, relative to any of the remarks in that regard;
3. Those who OPPOSE a full convention which CHOOSES our candidate rather than accepting as ‘DONE’ a primary close enough to warrant a FULL convention and choosing of the Candidate. From my perspective, Sen. Obama nearly plageriazed Sen. Clinton’s “blueprint” for her campaign. By the standards of the graduate school I attended, it would be worth investigation!!! That aside, the process as it stands is UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!! And WE, THE PEOPLE, hhave allowed this to occur through apathy, to name but one reason; and
4. Anyone who cannot support a FULL CONVENTION wherein the Candidate is chosen, is essentially NOT supporting the practice of democracy as embodied in the Constitution of the United States of America! No one here can cite which part of the Constitution states that a Candidate chosen by it’s party is merely “crowned” at the end of the primary race!!! What happened here is outrageous . . . and totally UNDEMOCRATIC!
Beyond all of this, there is not much more to say. As a veteran’s spouse (from Enduring Freedom) I can assure you that when there are Americans fighting a war, the most important principle to be PRACTICING is democracy through its most important and foundational principle: CHOICE!!! The FREEDOM TO CHOOSE!!! That is what is embodied in the Constitution and what ALL Americans need practice. Any vote against that principle is a vote to dissolve this Once and Future Republic.
I would urge everyone here to consider Bejamin Franklin’s words in response to a female question relative to the Con stitutional Convention and what “they” (our Founding Fathers) had “created:”
His reported reply was “a Republic Madam, if you can KEEP it!” (Emphasis added) Apparently, we are unable to keep it, in my humble view.
I owe NO ONE a reason as for why I have chosen to support Hillary. However, she did not lose this primary; she ran a tight race where the final decision NEEDS TO BE MADE AT THE CONVENTION. She owe’s no one her delegates and she is not the demon!!!
As for equality? That which most escapes us–redundantly–in PRACTICE, is gender equality. The highest of glass ceilings. In my view, that is what American’s are yearning for!!! When a woman has the same qualifications for a position in the private or public sector, then she should receive the same pay for that position as a man!!! There is the true INEQUALITY!!! And our Founding Fathers listened to their women. And culturally, let us not forget the saying that “behind every great man there is a woman!” =D So, that equality must be addressed before the issue of ethnic equality is with regard to holding office or being the CEO of a major corporation.
As for all those who want to blame Bill for her supposed loss, BALDERDASH!!! I am sick and tired of people who want to go on about his philandering (an immoral and lousy action to be sure!). And I am sorry to see so many women wanting to go on about it; it’s a remaining embarrassment for the GOP relative to impeaching President Clinton for those actions and a Congress which has turned a blind eye to impeachment of THIS President, whose high crimes and misdemeanors will most likely not ever be known in their entirety!!! At the cost of precious American lives which are “hidden!”
When is Senator Obama going to declare that Americans will have a final good-bye moment for those who have given their lives in defense of the Constitution? And when will he declare that he will meet every single troop coming home for the last time at Dover Air Force Base in full view of the entire country? When someone speaks of “getting what we deserve” relative to the past 8 years, are they taking that into consideration as well? Senator Clinton has been, and always will be, a staunch ally to our troops and their families. Those who have made the greatest sacrifice of all will not remain in the dark as they have under this administration with Hillary; that is one thing as a military spouse I KNOW!!! Those who exist beyond the military families have no understanding of their plight. I can assure you all that when I watched a documentary between troops and the candidates during the primaries, it was Hillary who OBVIOUSLY understood their plight, was and continued to, fight for them; she also made sure the troops understood the scope of her powers as a Senator when it comes to each state’s National Guardsmen. How many here even know that they receive only 50% of their rank pay when they are activated under state orders? Every National Guard unit activated for Enduring Freedom or Iraqi Freedom goes through at least a three (3) month period under state activation before moving to “Title X,” or full active duty and full pay and “benefits?” Hillary does and did in the documentary. One thing was clear to me, Senator Obama did not understand their plight, their issues, or their experiences based on what I saw. Rather, he stumbled, and spoke campaign statements. That, in my view, was a debate which Hillary won hands down.
I could go on as to why I support Hillary. However, it seems that is to no avail except to encourage more attacks, or “get over it” remarks. That is not my goal.
So, my question remains to everyone here: WHAT IS WRONG WITH HOLDING A TRUE CONVENTION AND CHOOSING OUR CANDIDATE THIS WEEK IN DENVER?
FACTS: 333 votes separted Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama at the end of the primaries. That’s less than what Bush proclaimed his “MANDATE” with in 2004!!!
So, are you willing to give up your right to CHOOSE your candidate over that few votes? I’m not. I would rather uphold the Constitution!!!
Respectully submitted to all . . .
Maureen
Posted by: Maureen Startin, MACS, CZMT Certified | August 26, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
Jeeze….Hillary CANNOT personally go into the booth with her 18 million supporters and put their hand on the lever for Bozo.
IT WILL NOT BE HER FAULT WHEN HE LOSES AND THE ONLY ONES THAT WILL BLAME HER WILL BE THE BLACK COMMUNITY.
Speaking of…where is Wright, Farrakhan, Jessie, and Al….have they been told to lay low?
Posted by: Debra | August 26, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
all this bickering will not change the fact that what is needed is a third party. I am a Hillary supporter, and deeply disappointed that an immature candidate was too vindictive to choose her for the second spot. Instead, he and his minions are already preparing for a possible defeat by blaming Hillary. This is a responsible leader? It is not her job to win his election. she is doing what she has to do because she is a good Democrat. But to blame her for his numerous shortcomings–which Michelle’s praise is not going t erase–is ridiculous.
I am with Carville,–one of the few democrats who knows whereof he speaks. The Party is in disarray, and no sympathetic, tear-jerking, adoring appearnces are going to save it. Only mature leadership can do that, and democrats have shown immaturity–alas.
We desperately need a thrid party with members who are intekigent, can think clearly, and rise above their greed and personal ambitions (no–this is not an anti-Hillary remark. she represents the best of all possible worlds available at the moment. she could, if she were given the opportunity, help to make it better).
Accusing her of jettisoning the women’s cause if she “allows McCain to win” is ludicrous. where on god’s green earth are the deomocratic senators and congresspeople, not to mention the idiotic superdelegates who allowed this mess to happen?? and why are they so busy blaming for their own stupidity and for what MIGHT happen. Get busy and make it right people, although you have backed us into a corner.
Will 4 years of mcCain do more to damage this country than the spinelessness of the Democratic lawmakers? Or the vindictivness of Democrats (including Obama and perhaps more to pint, his “lovely wife?)who abandoned Hillary because of some perceived (perhaps real; don’t know) personal slights inflicted by the Clintons?
Hillary said negative things about Obama?
What about Biden?
What about his own pastor?
What about all of the negative things Obama said about Hillary? Different game?
and finally, when asked if Hillary won the nomination would Michelle support her, she responded sagely “Well, I would have to think about that”? Does Hillary have the right to the same response today?
Why? Ask yourselves in all honesty–why have the rules been changed. and ask about NICE Obama’s treatment of Hillary, or Alice Palmer in chicago.
Sadly–we do not have a choice in the 2008 election. either road is a disaster for which we could begin blaming “Baby Bush” and his insane politics, not to mention his supporters, those Americans who, in the words of some, “are not stupid”?
I have a bridge in alaska for sale for anyone who beleives thap.s.
Jen, and your kind: get real. Hillary lost because she is a woman, not because she could not accumulate enough votes.
Posted by: marian | August 26, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
all this bickering will not change the fact that what is needed is a third party. I am a Hillary supporter, and deeply disappointed that an immature candidate was too vindictive to choose her for the second spot. Instead, he and his minions are already preparing for a possible defeat by blaming Hillary. This is a responsible leader? It is not her job to win his election. she is doing what she has to do because she is a good Democrat. But to blame her for his numerous shortcomings–which Michelle’s praise is not going t erase–is ridiculous.
I am with Carville,–one of the few democrats who knows whereof he speaks. The Party is in disarray, and no sympathetic, tear-jerking, adoring appearnces are going to save it. Only mature leadership can do that, and democrats have shown immaturity–alas.
We desperately need a thrid party with members who are intekigent, can think clearly, and rise above their greed and personal ambitions (no–this is not an anti-Hillary remark. she represents the best of all possible worlds available at the moment. she could, if she were given the opportunity, help to make it better).
Accusing her of jettisoning the women’s cause if she “allows McCain to win” is ludicrous. where on god’s green earth are the deomocratic senators and congresspeople, not to mention the idiotic superdelegates who allowed this mess to happen?? and why are they so busy blaming for their own stupidity and for what MIGHT happen. Get busy and make it right people, although you have backed us into a corner.
Will 4 years of mcCain do more to damage this country than the spinelessness of the Democratic lawmakers? Or the vindictivness of Democrats (including Obama and perhaps more to pint, his “lovely wife?)who abandoned Hillary because of some perceived (perhaps real; don’t know) personal slights inflicted by the Clintons?
Hillary said negative things about Obama?
What about Biden?
What about his own pastor?
What about all of the negative things Obama said about Hillary? Different game?
and finally, when asked if Hillary won the nomination would Michelle support her, she responded sagely “Well, I would have to think about that”? Does Hillary have the right to the same response today?
Why? Ask yourselves in all honesty–why have the rules been changed. and ask about NICE Obama’s treatment of Hillary, or Alice Palmer in chicago.
Sadly–we do not have a choice in the 2008 election. either road is a disaster for which we could begin blaming “Baby Bush” and his insane politics, not to mention his supporters, those Americans who, in the words of some, “are not stupid”?
I have a bridge in alaska for sale for anyone who beleives thap.s.
Jen, and your kind: get real. Hillary lost because she is a woman, not because she could not accumulate enough votes.
Posted by: marian | August 26, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
Maureen..I just want to say I applaud you taking the time to submit a heartfelt post. I too am a Hillary supporter and apologize to no one.
As I said above, the media and the DNC gave us the wrong candidate for the ticket. Thanks again…Kathleen
Posted by: Kathleen | August 26, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
Greetings Kathleen,
You are most welcome. She’s not giving up, and neither need we! =D I appreciate your post very much.
Cheers! Maureen
Posted by: Maureen Startin, MACS, CZMT Certified | August 26, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Well said Marian. The sexism that still runs rampant in this country and and media is unbeilevable to me. We have more female doctors and more women in top positions in Fortune 500 companies, but the Affirmative Action nominee got pushed through the Democratic system. He was their weakest link and I will be a HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN ALL THE WAY.
NEVER SOCK PUPPET.
Posted by: Debra | August 26, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Debra where did you get the idea that all 18 mill of Hillary supporters will vote for McGoo.
Posted by: oo | August 26, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
McCain is the next President of the United States. Bottom line he has the experience the job takes. If the DNC would have been supportive of Clinton, she would have been our next president. Unfortunately, the DNC and the media took it upon themselves to tell us who would be the best Democrat for the ticket. They (the DNC and media) chose an inexperienced person with no message, no direction, just rhetoric. Anyone remember one of the most liberal of the news media, Chris Matthews, stating ‘afterall what do really know about Obama’ after Hiliary started winning the primaries again. Thanks Mr. Matthews….where was that comment at the beginning of the primaries. Hiliary would have been a great president. To the DNC.. please replace your leadership.
To the Media…you are to report facts remember..way too much personal opinion.
The power and arrogance most of you exude needs to be checked at the door before you face the camera
This is for Maureen…Kathleen
Posted by: Kathleen | August 26, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Debra:
“HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN ALL THE WAY.”
YEA!!! No poll bounce for Obama due to his VP selection, instead McCain now ahead in the Gallup poll. Cool.
GO MCCAIN!!!!
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Sorry but 18 million of us do not want Hillary and are supporting Obama.
Posted by: ? | August 26, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
The DNC and all the Florida Democrats who moved their primary up against the “rules” deserve what they got, and if Floridians don’t vote them all out, they’ll do it again. It’s a great example of inhibiting majority rule, and disenfranchising my preferred candidate HRC, leading me to resign from the Democratic party, the management of which has become so obviously incompetent and frustrating. And while no one else deserves the consequences of those foolish actions, we still have to live with them. Meanwhile the rest of the world keeps moving. So we linger in anger, paying less attention to where we are now and why than to the evil someone did last year & how we might fix that by sending some signal to a bunch of power-hungry democrats in a cone of silence. This election will choose a party & president that makes choices that affect us immediately, and set direction that we’ll have either to live with or work to change. Both parties and their backers will provide hundreds of knowledgeable consultants to present perspectives on critical issues to the new president. Which perspectives do you want heard and emphasized, and who do you want to make the call? If you can wait 4 years to make changes, you have more tolerance for this utter frustration than I do.
Posted by: Doug | August 26, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
Hillary supporters cry sexism in this country. Well you also have to acknowledge that racism is alive and well and isn’t going away anytime soon.
Posted by: Samantha | August 26, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
25% of Hillary supporters voting McCain, have already moved to him.
25% not decided……POSSIBLE 9 MILLION
VOTES GOING TO McCAIN…..really doesn’t look good and IT IS NOT HER JOB TO UNITE THE PARTY AS THEY KEEP TELLING HER IT IS. ROVE AND EVERYBODY SAID “HUGE MISTAKE NOT TO CHOOSE HER AS VP”. IT WILL COST HIM THE PRESIDENCY.
Posted by: Debra | August 26, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
ROTFLMAO I can’t believe you believe in these day to day polls. Many don’t have land lines and only use cell phones which aren’t polled. This polling needs to get with the times.
Posted by: puma what | August 26, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
So many, many American will vote for their country and never Obuma.
It is easy to always blame Hillary for Obumas lack of electability. 18 million and counting and you best count FORMER DEMS as we will all be declared INDEPENDENTS in NOVEMBER!
It will be awesome, so you MSM can cut the crap, we are not listening!!!
Posted by: HP Boston | August 26, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
?…good luck with all 18 million of you, you’re going to need more than the black vote, and the young and stupid.
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN!
Posted by: Debra | August 26, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Marian:
Just now read your “long” post. You and those of like kind are the only reason I hang around. If everyone had a sensible outlook like you, we would not have the political problems we have today.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Greetings Samantha,
I do acknowledge that ethnic divisiveness still exists in America! I have seen it first hand as a practicing Anthropologists and amongst my colleagues in the Conflict Analysis & Resolution masters program I attended. And it goes BOTH ways!!! I also agree that it’s a huge problem globally. Arguably, (apparently), none of the parties responsible for such social states want to fully acknowledge their contributions to the same. That is one of the first steps in resolving conflict.
Ultimately, our gender is determined at conception–as is our ethnicity. It’s rather like which came first, the chicken or the egg? (I am NOT attempting to simplify a major issue in the WORLD today). However, there were huge steps made in the ’60s as I was there and helped to ensure that they were passed (i.e., Civil Rights Act; Clean Water, Air, et cetera). There is a large part of history during that period and its immediate aftermath (including Nixon’s “impeachment through resignation!”) which is currently glossed over in public educational systems whilst those who fought for all those things are treated as outsiders because we were “Flower Children!” =)
Nevertheless, I agree that ethnic bigotry still exists and need be dealt with head on. I don’t believe that electing an African American for president who is not–in my view–ready for the job, is the answer to resolution of that issue. That’s going to take a full on conflict program wherein stakeholders represent all ethnicities and issues . . . and it results in a TRUE statement/practice of equality. That’s Utopian for many, I am confident; however, it represents that attitudes need change relative to ethnic bigotry.
On the other hand, gender equality rises to a higher priority for me. =) Thank you for your poignant response!
Cheers . . . Maureen
Posted by: Maureen Startin, MACS, CZMT Certified | August 26, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Thanks to Kathleen and Mike for your kind words, and also for your carefully considered arguments and thoughts.
It does not matter what Hillary does to support Obama, or how hard she works to get him elected. Despite her vigorous campaigning on his behalf, Obama’s rabid supporters will always paint her as a sore loser, and use her as a scapegoat to blame for his (hoped for)loss of the general election. They will never forgive her for having the temerity to oppose their Golden Idol in the primaries.
What I find particularly disconcerting about Obama’s supporters is their militancy and intolerance. In their eyes, to be opposed to Obama is to be a racist, a sore loser, and a closet Republican. It never occurs to them that our opposition to their favourite might be principled and sincere, and that we might want to put our country’s interests ahead of our own.
For years, the right wing media has appalled me (Don Imus and Rush Limbaugh in particular still do). But during the course of the primary campaign, the strident, blatant tilt towards Obama by MSNBC collectively (Pat Buchanan excepted), and selected commentators on CNN (Mc Cafferty in particular) began to really grate on me. It soon became apparent that the only media willing to give Hillary any semblance of a fair shake was that on the center and the right. It was an eye-opener. The mainstream media completely abdicated their role of assessing candidates critically in favour of the fawning, simpering approach that was so evident during Obama’s recent trip abroad. How ironic that the media I most suspected and trusted the least would have comported themselves in the most trustworthy manner of the campaign.
Posted by: Nevile | August 26, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Nevile re the media support of Obama:
“It was an eye-opener.”
And a justice killer. Too bad.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Nevile speaks the truth.
Posted by: geevill | August 26, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
I am an angry Clinton supporter.
I will not support Obama, He’s to dark for my liking.
His dark skin and black family scare me. I am a woman.
He thinks he’s better than me, eventhough I really dont have any proof of that, But hey if the media and the republicans say so, It must be true.
Hillary is our only hope, she’s the true messiah, sent from the heavens to save this party. The presidency was her destiny. Yet somehow she lost. I just dont understand, I prayed, I sold my 1st born’s soul to the devil, I sacrificed the family goat. I did everything i could, and she lost, I’m so distraught. I cant go on.
I’m voting for McCain, He says our economy is in good shape, and I agree.
Obama’s ears are to big, I dont like black looking men,they scare me.
He’s dangerous. He’s going to hurt me and my family.
I am a Hillary supporter, and eventhough she started off slow due to her cockiness, and she and her campaign managers didnt really take the time to understand the parties voting rules. and she didnt start to pick up steam, until after the Media had deemed Reverend Wright the devil.
I am a Hillary supporter, eventhough she didnt find her voice in time,she kept changing her message until she found one the voters could relate to.
I will continue to blame everyone, and I mean everyone for her many failures during the nomination process. everyone except Hillary Rodham Clinton, she is perfection, she makes no mistakes, she is the true master of the world, and the chosen one. The dems can burn in hell, before i will vote for Obama. He scares me. God where is the KKK when you need them, back when i was a young whipper snapper bouncing on the grand dragons lap, This would have never happened.
I’m am a bitter,hateful,delusional Hillary supporter and i will spew my venom to anyone who will listen. My voice will be heard, my voice and my vote is the only one that counts.
I hope he loses so the true messiah can run again in 2012, i just hope,pray,and burn crosses that a better candiate doesnt come along, and that the blacks remember there role next time and vote for HRC. I love you Hillary. Its all for you Hillary.
Posted by: No Republicans | August 26, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Reading “No Republicans” post, it is clear the Obama supporters have given up here, and are down to the dregs.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Greetings Kathleen,
Well stated and I concur!!! 300%!!! “Where have all the investigative reporters gone . . . long, long time ago,” to the tune of Peter, Paul and Mary’s song! LOL The media have taken over our politics in many respects (though having a page such as this relative to ABC or any other news organizations remains a tie to “corporate media” on the part of the people! *sigh*
Relative to everything you have said about the DNC, I also agree!!! If this type of “management, administration, and governing” is what Howard Dean represents, then we can be grateful to the media for having made such a “hoopla” about his victory yell. =P
As to the President that Hillary will make? (She will; either now or in 2012 . . . though I will be extremely disappointed if she does ‘release’ her delegates, gracefully or not!) I also agree. Anyone who has read her biography (admittedly, I haven’t; however, my 26 year old daughter has, and I trust her impressions emphatically and she remains a Hillary supporter planning to write her name in on the ballot [if it's NOT there]. I will be getting it within next few days! *blush*) KNOWS that she loves this country, the Constitution, and has dedicated her ENTIRE life to fighting for the issues she believes in, which includes health care, children, women, and . . . well, essentially the Democratic Platform!!! =P
I am disappointed in Matthews as well. Men remain intimidated by women, plain and simple! And before any men get their knickers in a twist over this, there are PLENTY of studies to support that. And they are based on SOUND science, not manipulated science.
I am sorry Hillary was unable to address the differences between herself and Senator Obama out of any perceived “racist,” what I prefer to call “ethnic bigotry” actually (Intellectual property relative to term! =D). Would that perhaps I could have been one of her speechwriters!!! *giggling* (Pardon the ego everyone, however we need be allowed to tout our personal strengths regardless of anything!!!) As is demonstrated in many posts here, that “Ethnic Bigotry” remains. Bigotry is bigotry; we needn’t continue to label things and people and all to death! In my view, that’s part of the problem which led to the smooth takeover of America through apathy on the part of Her People! Democracy requisites participation!!!
I absolutely don’t think Hillary supporters need be as extreme as voting for McCain. I would rather see them write her name in for President and Sen. Obama’s name in for Vice President!!! (Actually submitted a guest column to local paper on this very issue??? =D) For those who are able to reasonably discourse on politics without making it personal, there is an unofficial consensus that a “Clinton/Obama” ticket would be the absolute DREAM ticket, and unbeatable relative to McCain/???. Why isn’t the “Party” listening???
As for all those who desire to demonize Senator Clinton, or even ABC to characterize what is occurring “behind the scenes” as “drama” is disrespectful of her, as well as the process of choosing a Candidate, and their $$$ spent pushing/deciding the Candidate for us as you point out. Personally, were I in Hillary’s shoes, my anger and fight would derive from the fact that historically, when our country was forming under the Constitution, the one who got the MOST votes was President, and the one who obtained the second most votes would be Vice President. That is, after all, how John Adams became our first Vice President with George Washington. And the MAN whined about how useless the position was continuously; nevertheless Hillary and women in general, are EXPECTED to accept such treatment with “grace” or be demonized as “whiners.” Hhhmmmpppffff . . .
Thanks Kathleen for continuing a discourse on why this is an issue to begin with. =D Maureen
Posted by: Maureen Startin, MACS, CZMT Certified | August 26, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Nevile has it dead on but didn’t reference the media he/she trusts now. Said it was the one he/she was most suspect about, but during BO’s rock star world tour (which in the end hurt him with many voters), thouht it was the most trustworthy? Which network?
Posted by: Debra | August 26, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
ALL CABLE NEWS REPORTING NO BIDEN “BUMP”….speculation Hillary would have been a way to energize the ticket and go for a win.
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN!
Posted by: Debra | August 26, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
Maureen…..please don’t waste your vote by writing in Hillary. I love her too, but it will allow an inexperienced and lacking in judgement BO to inch closer. Make a clear decision between the two, but most of Hillary’s 18 million will not write in her name, because they know it is a throw away.
I REMAIN, A HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN!
Posted by: Debra | August 26, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
Maureen:
“Men remain intimidated by women”
Agreed, but note the reason is that most do not feel comfortable “confronting” a woman, thus the intimidation.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
Greetings Nevile,
I too put forth my thanks for your comments. I agree it was an “eye-opener” as well as Billw’s comment relative to being a “justice killer.” Thanks both for making points true to reasons we aren’t all immediately joining the “pre-determined” candidate by corporate America.
I may not have your “enemies,” Nevile, however I can certainly empathize. As I have stated elsewhere, my anger stems from the lack of the PRACTICE of democracy in all of this. I am not comfortable with a 333 vote difference as representing a “mandate.”
What’s extremely frustrating is that the delegate who won over myself and others who were just as qualifed to move on to Denver, went in as an “undecided.” He made a promise to “not change” his delegate pledge for Senator Clinton! That’s NOT representing me.
NO ONE HAS THE RIGHT TO TELL ANOTHER HOW THEY NEED CAST THEIR VOTE!!! THAT IS A SACRED RIGHT IN AMERICA THAT MANY SEEM OKAY WITH BEING STOLEN BY CORPORATE MEDIA AND PARTY “ELDERS.”
Personally, I am NOT okay with that!!! I cherish my right to vote as I choose! Again, this is about CHOICE in ALL things as Nevile, Kathleeen, and others have pointed out.
Sorry for the wee rant Nevile! =P
Posted by: Maureen Startin, MACS, CZMT Certified | August 26, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Maureen:
I considered doing just that (writing in HRC, or not voting at all), but the reality of American politics is that it would probably guarantee a win for Obama. The bivalent nature of our electoral process does not support success for a write-in movement. Such a move might leave the election results in doubt, and open the door to an Obama presidency, which I believe to be a disaster for this country.
On the other hand, a vote for McCain helps to ensure a loss by Obama. This is the real objective now. Obama must not win. It is his character that is flawed, and there is too much at stake. It transcends the very real issues you have raised about the treatment that Hillary received.
So please, hold your nose and vote for McCain.
Posted by: Nevile | August 26, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
Greetings Billw,
Agreed! However, that need not continue to be an obstacle if we are both (i.e., genders) willing to recognize and agree, yes? Even disagreeing is appropriate if we are truly to be “gender-blind” wouldn’t you concur? Much of the “divisiveness” is wrought in the way things are framed.
I am presuming that you meant “confronting” in the sense of the heightened awareness relative to domestic violence, and the enculturation of men that “confronting” a women, even if in debate, is inappropriate and unacceptable?
Posted by: Maureen Startin, MACS, CZMT Certified | August 26, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
With rights come responsibilities! You have the right to vote for whom ever you choose, but it is also your responsibility to look at what each candidate is proposing for your country. The President alone does not control the direction the country goes in. The responsibility is divided between the Legislative branch (the Senate and the House of Representatives), the Executive branch (The President and the Cabinet members) and the Judicial branch (the Supreme Court). A President alone has very little real power if the other 2 branches are controlled by the opposite political party. It is only when at least 2 of the branches of government are controlled by the same political party that an agenda will succeed. You can see this now, the Democrats are in charge of the legislative branch, the Republicans are in charge of the Executive branch and the Judicial branch is split and nothing is getting done. If you like McCain’s policies and agenda then vote Republican for the House, Senate, and the Presidency. If you like Obama’s policies and agenda then vote Democrat for the House, Senate and the Presidency. Other wise you get the more of what we have now, a stalled government. I personally like the Democrat’s policies and agenda more, so I will vote accordingly, and I don’t care if the candidate is Clinton or Obama. What I am voting for the policies and agenda of the Democrat party not a personality. If you vote out of anger, spite, personality traits or reasons other than the policies and agendas of the parties then you are not living up to your responsibilities as a voter.
Posted by: bcpchrnn1 | August 26, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
For the record, I am the father of three grown and cherished women.
Posted by: Nevile | August 26, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
hILLARY IS ON CABLE NEWS NOW DOING HER RUN THROUGH AND ALL EYES AND EARS ARE ON HER.
GOD, I LOVE HER. WHENEVER SHE SPOKE I HEARD EVERY WORD. When Bozo talks, I nod off, can’t stand watching and listening to him…hurts my ears.
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN, NO MATTER WHAT SHE SAYS IN SPEECH TONIGHT.
Posted by: Debra | August 26, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
Chelsea adores her mother and so do 18 million of us!
Never Barack Hussein
must now be John McCain!
Posted by: Debra | August 26, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
In the end democrats will put party before country and vote for the extreme liberal who will damage our economy and weaken our security.
Posted by: v racer | August 26, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
Kennedy advocates for universal health care, except for Mary Jo’s. He’s a political slime. He is an icon in the democrat party. They fit.
Posted by: v racer | August 26, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
“Agreed! However, that need not continue to be an obstacle if we are both (i.e., genders) willing to recognize and agree, yes? Even disagreeing is appropriate if we are truly to be “gender-blind” wouldn’t you concur? ”
Concerning the women I have known, respected most, and been happiest around, there was a natural sense of equality between us. A natural sense of complete acceptance at whatever level the relationship had progressed to.
“Much of the “divisiveness” is wrought in the way things are framed.”
As I said above.
“I am presuming that you meant “confronting” in the sense of the heightened awareness relative to domestic violence, and the enculturation of men that “confronting” a women, even if in debate, is inappropriate and unacceptable?”
Maybe a hangover from the “cave age”. The fact that most men are stronger than women and there is an unfairness in bullying. That sort of transferred automatically to the mental side.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
If Clinton’s so-called “supporters” defeat Obama, she is DONE for life. She will NEVER get another shot at the White House because she will be blamed for YOUR stupidity and petulance. So if you TRULY support Hillary Clinton, you will hold your nose and vote for Obama in November. If you don’t, you’ve destroyed the rest of her career and that’s a pretty despicable accomplishment on your part.
Posted by: windrider | August 26, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Greetings Nevile,
While you set forth many arguments for why you believe that an Obama presidency would be disastrous for this Country, I can not “hold my nose” and vote for McCain. That merely ensures that our military is “used” as though the precious lives defending our Constitution are “expendible.” (The attitude of the current administration!)
It remains only the 2nd day of the Convention, and a Superdelegate can change their vote right down to the last second. Whether one accepts current polling (and my MACS respresents an ability to present a poll; much of the results are based on HOW the question is presented) or not, that remains a fact; and many of those who are depending on ensuring a filibuster proof Democratic majority (such as Pelosi . . . whose speech last night was NOT in prime time coverage!!! =P) may look at those polls and say . . . whoops!!! I hope that 345 is the correct number of “Superdelegates?” That exceeds the 333 separation of the primaries!!! It also remains a fact that Hillary’s name will be in the roll call, and it does NOT require delegates to give a “symbolic” vote!
In that sense, I retain the “audacity of hope” that she will not release her delegastes, and that the vote will change in the first roll call! If those who support Obama are not happy with that, and if Senator Obama cannot “gracefully” accept such an outcome, then we have indeed LOST our democratic practice embodied in the Constitution.
If a write in attempt in November is unsuccessful, then “they,” whomever “they” are, can blame those who cast such votes. If there were enough cast in that vein rather that than a complete reversal in position for Hillary’s supporters (which truly makes no sense whatsoever), and a vote for McCain!!! Again, am unable to bring myself to “hold my nose” and vote in that manner.
I hold out the hope that such a “movement” as you characterize it, would be just the “change” we are seeking! =D And my, what a story for the media!!! LOL President Clinton wins by a landslide victory, Senator Obama takes Vice Presidential slot . . . I don’t think the electorate would be able to ignore that realistically. That’s the type of movement that Margaret Mead spoke of in her famous quote relative to doubt that a single individual/small group cannot produce change . . . indeed that is where it begins.
What say you Nevile?
Cheers, Maureen
Posted by: Maureen Startin, MACS, CZMT Certified | August 26, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
Nevile your posts are dead on. And for the poster who says you have to have party loyalty due to policies and platforms…. I SAY COUNTRY FIRST. Trust is a big factor and at the end of the day JUDGEMENT will be MAJOR.
FEAR is another, and many will not vote BO out of fear (and NOT because of his skin color)…..his lack of experience in anything other than community organization, and his complete lack of judgement in his associations. Anti-American doesn’t sit well with Americans.
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN
Posted by: Debra | August 26, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
One thing I would like to put forth in regards to Obama’s “disrespect” of Clinton by not selecting her as his potential VP or the (apparent) lack of serious consideration of her in the role is this:
Hilary asked not to be vetted unless she were going to be chosen.
How can you seriously consider someone as your running mate who will only provide information unless she is guaranteed that spot? That would just be ridiculous, and a foolhardy decision. If she had wanted to be seriously considered, she should have agreed to be vetted, plain and simple.
Posted by: P. Wolff | August 26, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Greetings Windrider,
Surely you jest??? Since when, and where or where in the Constitution, does it state that I either have to vote as ANYONE else dictates, or that I need take the blame for a “deceased” career on the part of Hillary???
Good grief!!! Only the individual, and the individual alone, is responsible for the failure/success of that individual’s career. And if you honestly think that Hillary would consider your perspective seriously, then me thinks you do not know Hillary as well as you think. She’s a fighter! She’s a Scorpio (the one sign that more President’s in America’s SHORT history have been than any other! LOL). And without doubt, Hillary and only Hillary takes responsibility for the successes/failures of her life!
Pppllleeezzzeee! With all due respect! Maureen
Posted by: Maureen Startin, MACS, CZMT Certified | August 26, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
windrider:
“If Clinton’s so-called “supporters” defeat Obama, she is DONE for life.”
Only Clinton herself can damage her future. She’s in an unfortunate and tough position, put there by the media and Obama’s “good luck” of not being vetted early on. Too bad.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Greetings P. Wolff,
Does the “P” stand for Peter? Just kidding!!! I presume you might get that occasionally and apologize if my presumption is incorrect! =)
That stated, what I saw and heard Hillary say is that “I was not asked.” Period. In other words, Senator Obama did not even ask her for the appropriate documentation if she were being considered for that spot. Until I “hear” that from her mouth (i.e., what you claim she stated), then I don’t believe it.
A good “media” point is, why would anyone NEED to “vett” Hillary Clinton? Nevertheless, from her mouth is merely “I was not asked.”
Posted by: Maureen Startin, MACS, CZMT Certified | August 26, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Maureen:
” I can not “hold my nose” and vote for McCain.”
Sorry to butt in, but please reconsider. One vote less for McCain is one more for Obama.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
I cant wait for Hillary to run again in 2012, and lose again in 2012. You people think that a vote aganist Obama means Hillary will win in 2012. Delusional.
You say you want vote for Obama. Well let me tell you this go ahead and do your worse, dont cry about it, be about it, You only hurt yourself in the end. And I promise you this if he loses in November, the media will blame Hillary, and in 2012 she will have an even harder time winning the so called unimportant black vote. I am one black woman, who will never give Clinton my vote, and i will do all that is in my power to make sure my fellow african american voters remember the ugly side shown to us by The clintons and their supporters during this process.
Our vote is the one you people say doesnt count, yet we are the most loyal group of voters the Dem’s have, We always vote Dem, But we will not vote for Clinton.
Posted by: The White Man World. | August 26, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Biden shed tears in front of press this morning and nothing, but when Hillary got emotional, not even bringing out the Kleenex like Biden did, SHE WAS REAMED BY OBOTS. Hillary owes these people nothing. I hope she takes a long vacation and quits going to every state for Bozo.
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN!
Posted by: Debra | August 26, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Billw:
“Sorry to butt in, but please reconsider. One vote less for McCain is one more for Obama.”
First, not “butting in;” it’s a public discussion board. =)
Second, I shall not reconsider. I retain my right to vote as I see fit and pursuant to the Constitution, which seems to be disappearing quickly across America. I vote my conscious and my beliefs or principles; what I believe best for America, and my daughter and her future. I have stated elsewhere, I am neither a “sore loser” nor a “wannabe” anything (though not with those words).
There was a time in America, not so very long ago, where it was an “accepted” social rule that one did not even ask as to how one was planning on casting a vote. It was that SACRED! There appears to be a de-Americanization taking place, socially and politically. That’s a frightening perspective as it decries the end of democracy and a regimist mentality! Egads!!!
=D
Posted by: Maureen Startin, MACS, CZMT Certified | August 26, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Obama won’t lose. This country is smarter than to vote for more of the Bush policies. Spin it all you like, McGoo won’t win.
Posted by: oo | August 26, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
Maureen:
“I vote my conscious and my beliefs or principles; what I believe best for America,”
I respect your right to vote as you choose. I served in the Marines and the 101′st Airbore during wartime to protect that. However…. if Clinton does not get the nomination in Denver, the choice will be McCain or Obama. No other candidate will have a chance. The choice then is which of THE TWO is (as you say) best for America, therefore I do not understand your logic.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Nah, the ‘P’ is for Pam, but I didn’t want to be confused with someone else. I am looking for the vetting reference. I can’t recall where I read it, but it was recent (within the past week), and not from an Obama source or a blog. But I wasn’t where I could tag it, so I apologize for the lack of source reference.
Posted by: P. Wolff | August 26, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Hey Maureen Startin
HRC lost. Get over it and move on. The founding fathers are no longer here (nor are they “spinning their way to China”). We have to solve our own problems. You like McCain, then vote for him.
You probably voted for Bush twice anyway. It’s time for a change. And McCain isn’t the answer.
You don’t like Obama and want McCain? That’s your privilege. Just remember, “You don’t always get what you pay for, but you always pay for what you get.”
We’ve paid trillions of dollars and thousands of lives under the recent path we’ve taken. We’re not respected around the world because we act like John Wayne or Roy Rogers. You prefer that approach? Go ahead – you’re “entitled.”
Posted by: Lifelong Democrat | August 26, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Thanks, Debra. I concur with your last remarks. The Obama deal killer for me was his admission that as committee chairman he had never held any hearings on Afghanistan because he was too busy running for president. What this indicated to me was that he put personal ambition above duty to his country. He was elected to do a job for his state and the nation. He chose instead to pursue his personal ambitions and use his considerable taxpayer paid salary to subsidize his personal quest. He has given the country no value for the money that it has invested in him. It tells me that he really doesnt give a damn about anyone but himself, and that he has no sense of duty. This selfish and self-centered attitude is not a desirable quality in a president – or a vice-president, for that matter. He is not fit to be president. Period.
Maureen: I share your wish that the DNC will come to its senses and nominate Hillary instead. But I sincerely doubt that that will happen. That leaves us with three alternatives:
A presidential write-in campaign (which U.S. history has shown to be an excersize in futility); voting for a third party candidate – again, a historically proven pointless endeavour; or a reluctant vote for John McCain.
So let me address some of your important concerns about John McCain: First, he is not George Bush. Unlike the latter, he is a man of honour. His military background and experience indicates to me that he will not vainly commit our troops willy nilly to military adventures. He understands from personal experience the human cost of going to war. He is against torture. He has a plan for energy independence. There are a number of issues that I disagree with him on, but for brevity’s sake I will not go into them. But what I have mentioned above give me reason to not just vote against Obama. I also have at least something and someone to vote for.
You may feel differently. That is your right. You have the right to be wrong.
Regards,
Nevile
Posted by: Nevile | August 26, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
Excellent Nevile. I am just sad that I know Hillary will be blamed for Obama’s losses and this woman has DONE MORE FOR ANY OTHER PRIMARY OPPONENT IN OUR HISTORY!
I love Hillary but I will have to work my fanny off to elect John Sydney McCain. In my local McCain offices, I will call and see if they need my volunteering to help then in any way.
I wish Obama was white and then I and many others wouldn’t be called racist, but if Obama were white with his resume….HE WOULDN’T BE IN THIS ELECTION!
Posted by: Debra | August 26, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Begala is wrong…If Obama loses it is because he failed to connect with enough of the electorate to get elected. It will not be the fault of Hillary or Bill Clinton…I never heard such nonsense.
Posted by: Eliot | August 26, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
A Hillary for McCain supporter just said Hillary was out campaigning for him while he was surfing in Hawaii…..what’s Obama going to do next, ask her to clean his windows?
She was great and said there are at least 3 million more like her out there…I’m one of them.
McCAIN ’08/HILLARY ’12
Posted by: Debra | August 26, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
Lifelong Democrat,
I don’t know where you draw your conclusions from, however I do not give my support to either McCain, Bush, or any other GOP Candidate and haven’t EVER!
No, I didn’t vote for Bush! Where you can conclude that is beyond me!!! Thus, everything you state is merely agitation and goading, in my view. Think I’ll pass.
Posted by: Maureen Startin, MACS, CZMT Certified | August 26, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
McCain’s now ahead at Gallup, thusly I present Ode to Obama no. 6:
Looks like the Obama’s goin’ down
His hopes are fading for the crown.
So for all his wrongs,
He’ll be where he belongs
Relegated to the role of a clown. :)
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
Nevile,
I appreciate your comments; and your perspectives. I give them the same that you have given me. However, that does not mean that I am “wrong,” rather in your view incorrect.
I believe that a write in campaign can work if enough people have the courage to make it so (Yes! We Can!); what or where is the difference between that call and a write in campaign. Regardless of whether it’s historically reduced to an “exercise in futility.”
Some will state (and have) that the fact that Obama is polling behind McCain now is evidence of the inability to “unite” the party. And Hillary has not even spoken nor has the roll call vote been taken. How many of those Superdelegates rely on polling and look at the current situation, with the lack of “bounce” from Biden’s announcement? I am merely raising points in the discussion.
Nevertheless, I will not vote for John McCain because all I have seen of the once and former “Maverick” is no longer discernable from George W. Bush. Bush and this administration have done more damage to our country than all the faux pas of past presidents in our short 200+ yr. history!
In the end, when we all enter the privacy of the “voting booth” it is between us, our conscious, and the Cosmic Force. As I watch the convention while I post here (a rarity), and listen to mainstream media report a “lack of unity” on the floor beyond what appears even here.
What is best for the country is what I think everyone need be thinking about given more serious responses from Russia, Iraq’s stalemate in negotiations for withdrawal that include allowing troops to be prosecuted in Iraq pursuant to Iraqi law, and a firm date for withdrawal. China may have just hosted the Olympics, however they are a greater threat in the world today.
With Russia, Bush & Co. have literally set us back to the days of the Cold War. If that’s the case, then I want someone experienced in the White House!!! Yes, McCain is a veteran, and knows the military; however Hillary is a former First Lady and has a spouse who remains HIGHLY RESPECTED around the world and is a great Statesman. That means something to me in the current global atmoshphere, particularly in light of the recent agreement with Poland and the situation in Georgia.
While I respect Senator Biden tremendously, I don’t think his VP position is going to be enough to govern in what appears to be a rapidly escalating conflict leading to WWIII!!!
I know you will most likely argue that’s reason to vote for McCain. However, for me it is not. And I shall remain ever hopeful that “the Party” such as it is, will recognize what is best for it and the Country! Split the ticket and make it Clinton/Obama and there will be no chance they can beat us in November!
Thanks for the discourse! =) Maureen
Posted by: Maureen Startin, MACS, CZMT Certified | August 26, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
P. Wolff,
No worries about the vetting comment! And quite frankly, I can believe it when I look at it in hindsight (i.e., I believe I heard something about it). Be that as it may be, she doesn’t have to accept it, nor do I blame her for not accepting it.
Nevertheless, it seems as though party members think that it’s still viable as is. Interestingly, a CNN commentator stated that the reason Hillary wasn’t considered for Vice President rested solely at the feet of Michelle Obama. NOT ME . . . NOT MY WORDS!!! =D
If that is the case, I am even more disappointed in this woman; she needs to remember that she got where she is because of people like Hillary!!! =P
Cheers! Maureen
Posted by: Maureen Startin, MACS, CZMT Certified | August 26, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
So Hillary supporters are willing to vote for John McCain, a man who
* calls his wife a c*nt
* makes jokes of physical appearance of the daughter of a political opponent (Chelsea Clinton)
* let his supporters call a politcal opponent a b*tch (Hillary Clinton)
Posted by: tchanta | August 26, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
I guess we both won’t get what we want because I will NEVER vote for a Clinton EVER AGAIN! Good luck Hillary fans, I hope Obama loses it’s going to be grheat picking the Clintons a part again, starting with Bill foundation contributors… I wonder if she will be able to get re-elected as a senator, I’m sure the dems will find someone to run against her maybe Obama…
Posted by: Paula | August 26, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Paula -
Listen … plink!, hear that? That’s the sound of the world’s smallest violin!:D
PUMA!
Posted by: LeeLee07 | August 26, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Billw,
My logic rests on the recognition that the Constitution states it is to be government “of the people, by the people, and for the people.” If the choice comes down to Obama vs. McCain, I will still vote my conscious. It’s still 3 mos. to November, and what takes place between now and then will have much to do with how I vote.
If I still believe that Hillary is best for the country, that’s what I will do; and that is my sacred right. I am seeing a rapid erosion of the Constitution which concerns me more than anything today. Article VI clearly states that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Period. Also known as the supremacy clause, I hold to the very principles as stated there.
The convention is to choose; my vote in the booth is sacred and private, and I shall vote my conscious. However, as I’ve stated elsewhere, I see no difference between McCain and Bush at this juncture. What that leaves for me in November is yet to be seen; many things can change in that time period. Given I am an independent minded individual, only time will tell.
However, I do not support new offshore drilling; that’s not going to solve our energy issues. We need to be investing all we can in alternative fuels or methods such as wind and solar power. People who care about their children and their children’s children, then we need someone who does not perceive climate change as a “possible” threat to our continued existence.
Those are the words I have heard Sen. Obama speak. As a scientist studying the top predator in the world’s oceans (killer whales), I view the endangermen t of the largest concentration of them on the planet as a HUGE indicator of the trouble we are in environmentally.
American ingenuity has solved issues in our history; that’s what made us great. We can do it again . . . however, it’s going to take strong leadership from both Congress and the White House. At this point, it’s anyone’s guess who that’s going to be. When the Democrats run from impeachment due to a possible perceived “vengence” on anyone’s part when Bush has created high crimes and misdemeanors that astound any reasonable person, means they are in jeopardy. Cindy Sheehan succeeded in obtaining the necessary signatures to appear on the ballot against Nancy Pelosi . . . what does that portend? Musn’t forget those “wacky” Californians!!! LOL (Of which I am one!!! hee hee)
Much can happen, as I said. As to any logic relative to whom I will vote for, believe me, I will give it serious consideration. However, given that McCain has gone as far as actually using Karl Rove’s “proteges,” that’s enough to steer me away from him. That and his feeble mind which seems ever more obvious as he travels campaigning. There is hubris in both parties! I might decide to vote the Independent or Green Party ticket! =D
Cheers,
Maureen
Posted by: Maureen Startin, MACS, CZMT Certified | August 26, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
Maureen Startin:
“Nevertheless, I will not vote for John McCain”
This is an example of “intimidation”. I give up and likely so will Nevile, but really it’s knowing when to fold them in a discussion with some women’s emotional decisions. However it is your right, whether or not it leads to your real goal. Unless that’s electing Obama, that is.
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
Maureen,
You’re being a trifle Orwellian here. Your objections to my choice of words are a bit of a quibble. “Wrong” and “Incorrect” are synonyms. They have overlapping connotations, although the one can have different connotations from the other. Stylistically, as a rhetorical phrase, “the right to be wrong” is pithier and has more impact than “the right to be incorrect”. A driver will react faster to the phrase “you are going the wrong way” than to the phrase “you are proceeding in an incorrect direction”.
Posted by: Nevile | August 26, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
Maureen:
Not to pile on, but a ps please:
It’s just the way we’re programed. The cave man when he sees a male approaching, looks to see if he has a club. The cave woman is more likely to check to see if he has a smile on his face.. :)
Posted by: Billw | August 26, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
DID YOU SEE THE IDIOT PUMAs on Hardball?
What a disgrace! Those women are straight-up lunatics, calling Barack a Muslim and spewing other garbage lies they have been fed by the Repuke-licans!
They lost all credibility, as their leaders are just bona fide KOOKS! And to think I thought they might be reasonable, but just misguided women before this…
Take a look:
http://www.you tube.com/watch?v=FVHZHuyVeio
(I had to split the address because apparently ABC doesn’t like that site!)
Then the PUMA protest march, WHAT A JOKE! There were only maybe 100-150 PUMAs there. Where were the one MILLION we were promised??
You Hillary PUMA sore losers are about to get sidelined by HILLARY herself in a couple of hours! She wants Obama, and the rest of us want Obama for president as well!
If after tonight if you are still posting your cr*p on these blogs, it is time to start calling you what you are -Republican spies trying to split the Democrat Party!
Because we all know with a candidate like McSenile, that is your only hope of winning in November!!!!
As far as McBush’s ads in the last couple of days playing Hillary against Obama… Can you say “BACKFIRE” you Repuke-lican idiots??
Obama/Biden ’08!!!!!!!! Hillary 2016!!
Posted by: Davis | August 26, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm