The Note: Obama Seeks Unity but Dem Drama Remains
ABC News’ Rick Klein reports in Friday’s Note: We wouldn’t have known what to do without you, really. You were with us from Iowa and New Hampshire to Pennsylvania and Indiana, at two dozen debates and inside umpteen FEC reports, through superdelegates and a supersized nomination season.
We suppose you were coming to Denver anyway, your ticket reserved by history, purchased by the media, and punched by a former president.
Now you’re coming to your biggest stage yet. Welcome, Clinton-Obama Drama — enjoy your stay.
Maybe it was better for the Obama campaign to invite you inside, since you would have made an ugly scene outside. Surely Sen. Barack Obama can afford to be gracious, even to you, since he’ll leave Denver with the only prize that counts.
But the decision to include Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton in a roll-call vote at the Democratic National Convention ensures that the nominee’s showcase event will be about something more than the nominee himself: A number approaching half of the delegates in the hall could cast a ballot for a candidate who is not Obama.
Read the rest of The Note — and get all the latest on the 2008 election, Congress, the White House and the wide world of politics every day — from Rick Klein by bookmarking this link.
(And, before we continue: *Did Obama get what he wanted* by having his first joint appearance with Sen. John McCain focus on the topic of religion?)
(Did Republicans get the pictures they were waiting for when Obama finally took his shirt off to go bodysurfing in Hawaii Thursday?)
Three of the four convention nights could very well be dominated by Clinton storylines (arrival, then back-to-back speech nights, and the Wednesday roll call itself), with so much of the fun stuff — not to mention the party’s lingering divisions — playing out in the open.
Savvy and gracious gesture that soothes tensions and unites the party while giving Clinton’s supporters something productive to cheer about? Or unnecessary and dangerous capitulation that only underscores questions about whether Obama is ready to lead? (If he can’t control his own convention . . . )
(As in so much in this race, might this be for two people named Clinton to determine?)
“With Mrs. Clinton scheduled to deliver a prime-time speech in Denver, a state-by-state roll call vote increases her time in the convention spotlight,” Jeff Zeleny writes in The New York Times. “The former rivals never spoke directly about the matter, but advisers said Mr. Obama encouraged Mrs. Clinton to agree to place her name into nomination as a nod to the historic nature of her candidacy.”
Continue reading today’s Note by clicking HERE.
ABC News’ Hope Ditto contributed to this report.
Email
Mitt Romney's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Romney Makes His Case to Conservatives at CPAC
I’m a conservative Democrat, and John McCain has my vote. His arrogance pales in comparison to Barack Obama. And he didn’t spend 20 years in a racist church, either. I still have a difficult time believing the Democrats are going to nominate a left-wing radical who had the audacity to say he didn’t think his church was particularly controversial. He must have been asleep during the many sermons when his minister preached his anti-Semitic, anti-white and anti-American garbage. It is inconceivable to me that the Democratic elite expects ordinary Democrats like myself to support this candidate. I would have reluctantly supported Hillary Clinton, although I think she is almost as much of a disaster as Obama. Had the Democrats selected a reasonable candidate like Joe Biden or Evan Bayh, they would have a landslide victory in November. My gut instinct tells me that we are going to have a Democratic Congress in November and a Republican president. That’s fine with me. John McCain will be a one-term president, and he can do only so much damage with a Democratic Senate and House. Our country can survive John McCain. I’m not sure it can survive Barack Obama.
Posted by: Ginny Jackson | August 15, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am
There will not be unity in this election, no matter what happens at the Convention. Many Democrats simply will not vote for Barack Obama, whether Clinton is on the ticket or not. He DOES NOT have the support of a majority of Democrats, and he never will. HE IS LIMPING TO THE NOMINATION. That is not a good sign.
Posted by: JB in St. Louis | August 15, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
Does the phrase “Divided we fall?” ring any bells?
Posted by: Keith | August 15, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
he following comment is typical of so many Obama supporters:
formerhillary said, “She makes me sick, because I KNOW if the roles were reversed she would NEVER be gracious enough to give this option to Obama.”
REALITY: I am really sick of the Obamabots attitude of let’s all pretend things like Bill is racist and Hillary would not treat Obama this well when everyone with IQ above 74 knows very well that if Hillary were nominated or even the presumed nominee that she would have instantly asked Obama to be VP. That is how an intelligent person gets to unity. As for anyone that thinks Bill Clinton or any Clinton is racist,…..they must have IQ below 70 or they are just lying to themselves.
VOTING Republican for the first time in my life in 2008 but voting Hillary 2012
Posted by: jill | August 15, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am
I hope Bill Clinton gets some revenge for being called a racist by the Obama campaign during his speech in the convention, that’d be awesome.
Obambia – NOT FIT FOR PRESIDENT!
Go McCain / Hillary !!
Posted by: Leslie | August 15, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am
Go John McCain!
Posted by: Jinx | August 15, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am
May the American people indeed take stock of Emperor Obama who, not endorsed by any majority of votes from the people, crowned himself.
How the nonsense of disavowing Michigan and Florida transpired, it’s simply another version of the machinations which flow in the wake of removing choice from the American people. The choice was really Hillary, and Bill in the background. The best American President of modern times, and in his foreign policy as well, which barely missed coming to fruition in the Middle East. If she came close to his skills,[and I believe although not so jovial she would exceed them] the USA would be fortunate to have her in the oval office. Certainly rather than a “presumptive” arrogant celebrant of himself who, if you notice, is more than happy to disenfranchise all voters before he is even started.
Posted by: Nancy Warren | August 15, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am
Obama is so gracious he is even allowing Florida and Michigan to have a voice, now that he has the nomination sewn up. Hear the rumors: oh, Obama could take Florida and Michigan in the general! All I can say is, dream on.
Posted by: FlaLady | August 15, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am
To say:
- Obama does not have the support of the majority of Democrats
- Hillary Clinton will be the Dem nominee in 2012 (or any future election)
- It would be preferable to have McCain as president over Obama
is complete and utter idiocy. Hillary people should compare the candidates on the issues – if they really think McCain would be better for the country than Obama, they aren’t really Democrats, or weren’t paying attention to Hillary’s message.
Posted by: sc | August 15, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am
This sad and the main reason why Mrs. Clinton should not get anything. Look past his color and try to listen to the man. I will not support Mrs. Clinton if she does what she has in her head to do. Just like you all are not voting for him don’t think that people will not vote for her. I think that we all know if the table was turned she would not do the same hence she has no class. Yes I have made it through Bush I will make it through another bad president (clinton, McCain). Obama O8 don’t you think it’s time for a change. Look who has been in the office for the past 8 years.
Posted by: M. Oliver | August 15, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
I hope the people in the know( how bad the democrats want to win) will be smart enough to put the one that can win in the #1 spot and it isn’t obama. Obama isn’t going to beat MCBUSH and we all know that so i hope the delegates realize it to.These so called republicans that turned democrat just who did they vote for in the primary. And now er have democrats that will vote for MCBUSH but may have voted for Hillary and not Obama. get smart delegates. Or your going to have a write in of a party member all on her own.
Posted by: Rose Szymanski | August 15, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
Having the support of the voters, and merely having the support of an oligarchy of “superdelegates” with notions of superiority over the national interest and popular choice are two very different scenarios. Where in the Constitution is an American President proposed to be elected by superdelegates? What version of American democracy is this type of hijacked nomination supposed to represent? At least George Bush’s strange route ascendancy is mentioned, if not anticipated, by America’s protective forefathers. It is not so critical who is the choice of the American people as it is that their choice is represented accurately.
Posted by: Nancy | August 15, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am
The blogs right now are a complete joke.
With McCain & the Republicans openly offering rewards for their talking points being posted & so many out of work what do we expect. I for one would expect a little more scrutiny by ABC instead of simply throwing gas on the fire with baited questions.
Despicable…
Posted by: Chapman | August 15, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am
I am a 61-year-old unemployed female with some college education. I am talking to you from under the Obama bus. Those of you who are supporting Obama don’t understand what this is like because Sen. Clinton never once told you that your vote was not necessary for her to win. I doubt that the DNC will allow anything to usurp the power of their favored candidate, but I can still hope. The saddest part of this whole campaign has been the unbelievable negativism flowing from the DNC, Obama’s campaign and the media. For the first time in 40 years, I will be voting for a Republican – not because I want to, but because I believe there is no other choice.
Posted by: Yolanda | August 15, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
So an inner party act of comity supported by both sides turns in to CHAOS???
Orwell would be proud.
Posted by: Turdgio | August 15, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Uhmmmm, no other choice? The choice is actually a Democrat who won the contest for nomination by having a superior campaign that predicted what was needed to win and executed the plan perfectly.
Hillary relied on old power and gender politics to steam her forward in the age of information and lost. I am sorry for that, since many ardent supporters were so inspired by her campaign, but that is the situation we are in. Refusing to accept this will lead to McCain, who has no campaign to speak of other than fear, smear and hate, to steal the election from the Democratic party.
Posted by: JMR | August 15, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am
Well, to me a true patriot smashes fascists and hate mongers, exposes cheap theatrics for the pomp they are and NEVER claims that someone who does not do what they do is NOT a patriot. Service members have died and shed blood so that we are free to express our patriotism however we damn well please!
Posted by: JMR | August 15, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Listen, you can hear the groans of the GOP wagon slowly crumbling…
Posted by: JMR | August 15, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am
What is the Constitutional basis for winning a party nomination by means of superdelegates, while imposing inner-party regulation that nominally disenfranchises millions of legitimate votes in Florida and Michigan? As I understand, not all of the legitimately elected Florida and Michigan delegates will be seated? In which case, no matter what sort of campaign Hillary Clinton ran, she is being cheated. The electoral college does nothing to remedy this gaping hole in elected democracy as it comes into play only during the general election. Who created this “wrinkle” in the Democratic Party proceedings — and to what purpose?
Posted by: Nancy | August 15, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am
while he was body surfing….
obuma was hoping that the conflict with Russia and Georgia would be over when his vacation is over….so he wouldn’t have to answer any questions about it…..
actually no more questions ever….just wanna eat my waffles, see my tutu, get some shaved ice, and do some body surfing….o-kaaay…sweetie—
Posted by: carpenter.nyc | August 15, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am
Ford…
Just an observation… there are U.S. citizens that do live overseas, and have every right to make donations. Thus, the simple fact of receiving a donation from Sydney does not mean that you are getting money from an Australian.
I would be interested to see the results of a similar investigation of Clinton’s and McCains contributions.
Posted by: FDGGFD | August 15, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am
This is where the bias is coming through. Hillary is doing what all presidential candidates in a close race have done. Think Ted Kennedy, Jesse Jackson. Come on talk about a double standard.
Report on the history of conventions and then decide if Hillary is not doing what she deserves and many in the democratic party want.
Posted by: rafraf | August 15, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Endorsing Ants at Obama’s Denver Party: Clintons, Edwards, Kilpatrick, Jackson – Who’s Next?
While the GOP has had its enthusiasm gap problem, the Democrats have their own problem – problematic people who will be at the convention and who will not. The list obviously begins with former presidential candidate John Edwards who has
Posted by: PAXALLES | August 15, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
dear Nancy;
Didn’t none other than the Democratic party under Howard Dean, a Clinton loyalist, come up with these rules to keep the sates in line? So that Hillary would win the nomination with little or no competition from those southern states that might have voted and given Edwards an early boost??
Posted by: MediaEmpyre | August 15, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Nancy- Yes, a real path to better elections is the US is through cleaning up the party system AND getting more parties involved, like through IRV.
In the end, the electoral college madness and popular vote problem is what it is, but if we can’t get good parties representing more faces, then we are an anemic democracy at best.
Posted by: JMR | August 15, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
lololololol Crash and burn Dems… way to go. Someone summed it up well above “Our country can survive John McCain. I’m not sure it can survive Barack Obama.”
I was supporting Ron Paul, and right now I don’t think I’m voting for anyone. McCain is a RINO and Obama is a Socialist. I just think this drama is hilarious because the DNC was saying it wouldn’t happen… and yet it is!!!!
XD
Posted by: GarrettMD | August 15, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
Surely Sen. Barack Obama can afford to be gracious, even to you, since he’ll leave Denver with the only prize that counts.
I can’t wait for his acceptance speech. It should be one for the ages. It’s destined to be one of those “remember where you were when it happened” moments. What a joy it will be to watch history being made. I’ll make darn certain my two little children are watching too.
Posted by: JimmyTMac | August 15, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am
Mr. Ford…
Can you do some reserch on Clintons and McCain too. It seems that you are very good at such research. Dont tell me those two does not have such record. I can be gracious enough to supply some more self inflecting document to you that you will be stop doing this kind of hatred so call research and spend your time on some more constructing research America will be benifitted.
Posted by: ranjan | August 15, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
I think, Obama, by inviting and allowing Clinton to speak at the Convention and having a roll call vote, shows his weakness. Clinton will headline Tuesday night with Chelsea, Bill Clinton headlines Wednesday night, and the roll call vote for Clinton is Thursday night. Call what you want, but this Convention is about Hillary Clinton. I don’t see the party unified, but actually, more divided. The Clinton supporters will take this and run with it and will never vote for Obama. This shows extreme weakness on Obama’s part and will hurt him in the GE. I don’t see Obama becoming the next POTUS.
Posted by: TJ | August 15, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
It is up to the Super Delegates to do their only job and nominate the “most electable” candidate…….Hillary is not only the “most electable” candidate, she is the only electable candidate. Super Delegates will be watching out for their own behinds with this nomination. I expect that those Super Delegates whom are elected with the help of many black voters will
vote Obama for fear of losing their own voters but most Super Delegates are elected by whites and hispanics and they will by majority lose their seats if they fail to nominate Hillary……and that is exactly as it should be. Watch John Kerry lose his Senate seat this year because he refused to follow the voters of MA and instead endorsed Obama. We voted Hillary overwhelmingly and we will vote NO JOHN KERRY over whelmingly.
The quote worth repeating, ” Evil triumphs when good men do nothing”
HILLARY 2008 and if she is not on the ballot then I and every one I know will be voting McCain
Posted by: jodi | August 15, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
I think it was wise of Obama’s people to insist on a vote. Nominating conventions typically do have a vote… it is the best way to make sure everybody gets a chance to voice their opinion.
Of course, it is sad that the media is desperate to find controversy on the Democrats’ side and Republicans are anxious to shift the focus away from McCain’s lackluster performance in polling when voters are asked to think about issues…
It’s kind of gross, especially when you can see that the manufactured negative coverage is a result of the McVain perpetual hissyfit over Obama’s charisma.
But, what do you expect. The Republicans and big business execs are worried that the economic troubles might spoil the free ride they have been getting on the back of the American middle class. If Obama is elected, privileges for the superrich will probably be reduced a small fraction. Instead of making like 500 billion dollars a day, Chevron will have to settle on 499 billion. Better stop Obama now, before this gets out of hand.
Posted by: Blip | August 15, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
There is a great point made in the note today. With the roll call, Hillary is put in a position where she is going to vote for Obama at the Convention. (Or seem like a bad loser and further split the party by voting for herslef.) The risk for Obama is slight, given that you would assume that most Super-Ds would now vote for Obama, I think if Clinton wants to make a fuss then fine, I think that the few Hillary delegates who want to make a fuss may well end up drowned out by Obama delegates (who everyone seems to have forgotten about in the fuss over Hillary!)
Posted by: markymark | August 15, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
By all means there should be a roll call. To often as of late the democratic party is doing all in their power to run through their ideas without a vote, both Congress and the presidential race. This is a democracy based on the idea that people debate and vote, even if your idea or position has no chance of winning a vote should be allowed.
Posted by: Nevada Pundit | August 15, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Nevada — fair enough. If this going to get them to shut up, let’s them vote and waste the people’s time on something that is pointless.
You know my grandfather told me once that: “Democracy is five wolves and two sheep debating over what is for dinner”.
Posted by: Young Patriot | August 15, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
jodi, since when does the popular vote determine the nominee. Besides the votes were split. Both received 18 million. So I see you’re dismissing those 18 mil that voted for Obama.
Posted by: annie | August 15, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am
I cannot help but think that all of this anti-Democratic rhetoric coming from the GOP these days did not play a role in the horrible attacks that happened in Tennesee and Arkansas.
At some point, the GOP needs to get its spin under control. I’m for free speech. But I do think that all these haters need to take responsibility for the climate of fear and violence they are creating.
Posted by: blip | August 15, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Or, rather, it did. Sorry about the typo.
Posted by: blip | August 15, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
annie – actually not split exactly evenly. Obama got more popular vote. And that’s not even counting the caucus states that didn’t report popular vote tallies.
Posted by: Paul | August 15, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
It amazes how some people think that young people don’t have a clue about what’s going on in this country or the world. And that they are somehow being used. They really have a lot of gall to think that they are somehow more informed and knowledgable just because they are older and presumably wiser. Thank god our future generation is getting involved.
Posted by: annie | August 15, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Observer,
I don’t think “being liked” is the essence of leadership. Making good decisions and policy on behalf of the people is more to the point. He has nearly singlehandedly run the country into recession and is living out his tenure as Prime Minister having thoroughly botched financial policy for his years as Chancellor. Mr. Brown from all I can tell is not liked by anyone. He is only “less disliked” than Bush because he stands for nothing, except perhaps financial and political disaster.
Posted by: Nancy | August 15, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
Oh,and the other apparent thing here is that civilised debate must dead in America. Of which apparently this abortive election storey is emminently demonstrative. Observer, my friend, neither of us likes Mr. Brown, and we can agree on this and also strongly disagree on other matters. I glad that at least in Britain we can discuss matters without calling names, pulling hair out of each other and suggesting prescriptions of medicine, therapy,and etc. What has happened to debate in America? It’s a series of unfortunate bumper stickers. Sad really.
Posted by: Nancy | August 15, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Nancy — I am enjoying this debate like you. As it allows us to learn from each other even though we may disagree on certain key points. I apologise if that last post seemed rather defensive of Brown. While I do not like him personally, I cannot take away from the man’s character and what he has achieved in his life.
Brown is now seeking to introduce an actual Bill of Rights for the British people, which I think will relase the strangle hold of Government Powers. I do however disagree with his position of expanding MP powers and in particular the act of declaring war without a full vote from parliament.
Like your man Barack Obama said, we can all disagree without being disagreeable.
Posted by: Observer | August 15, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
I think, Obama, by inviting and allowing Clinton to speak at the Convention and having a roll call vote, shows his weakness. Clinton will headline Tuesday night with Chelsea, Bill Clinton headlines Wednesday night, and the roll call vote for Clinton is Thursday night. Call what you want, but this Convention is about Hillary Clinton. I don’t see the party unified, but actually, more divided. The Clinton supporters will take this and run with it and will never vote for Obama. This shows extreme weakness on Obama’s part and will hurt him in the GE. I don’t see Obama becoming the next POTUS
Posted by: TJ | August 15, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Say what you want, but the fact remains that Clinton has Obama over a barrel right now. I agree, Obama showed a lot of weakness by inviting her to headline the Convention and to get a floor vote. I don’t think Clinton is after party “unity”, but rather, after the nomination. Obama is suffering from damned if you do and damned if you don’t syndrome. Regardless, the Democrats are divided beyond repair this year and McCain will win the Presidency!
Posted by: JackieO | August 15, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Obama took us through the gutter with his racist campaign.
I am a lifelong Democrat who is voting McCain. I can’t support a leader just because of appearance, whether it is a pretty smile, good looks, or “exciting” skin color.
Take a step back and you wonder how Obama could be in this position.. Oh, yeah, he played on racism and guilt.
Terrible. Hillary looks like a saint compared to Obama.
Posted by: juan | August 15, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Jodi- here is an idea. You and the other 18 million Clinton supporters, go pay off her debt.
Your argument is that she has the most supporters, and that the media is launching some hidden GOP campaign so that McCain can win. Help the rest of us understand this logic.
If Hillary ran a bad campaign, put herself in debt, how does she expect to run a country?
Or how about this, Why is it that PUMA only manage to rase a few hundred thousand dollars, since there are so many of you that don’t want Obama elected?
Posted by: Mike | August 15, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Observer: Enjoy your tea. Nice chatting.
I’d certainly be able to pay more attention to what young people, or any people, have to say on this forum if they spoke to each other with more respect. An important skill: manners. Which is about to become ever more — not less– important as the world gets closer.
Posted by: Nancy | August 15, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Being a well Educated person doesn’t play a role in politics, experience and common sense dose. It is as simple as being able to determine the truth, from half truths, from the mis-leading to the out right lies. Both political parties have a propaganda machine working 24/7 to point out inconsistencies of there adversaries to strengthen there position within there own party.
My opinion is that political parties are like cults. The naive followers will believe anything they are told. The party loyalist are without independent thought and are incapable making judgment calls or intelligent decisions on there own. It takes much less effort to demonstrate one’s civic resposibilities by voting a party line than it does to determine on there own what is a good public policy or who would be the best political leader.
McCain and Obama are the best that the two political cults have to offer. This is very disappointing and further demonstrates the deterioration of this nations talent. Again, this is a lesser of two evil election.
Posted by: Cole | August 15, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
The conversation has indeed been a pleasure. Hope we will meet on here again some time.
If I may say it, whoever prevails in this election we must every one of us give all we have to improving the natural world and human life. There is so much beautiful on this globe, and so much worthwhile in people, in every single person, and we should emphasize that every moment that we can and reduce in every possible way our perception of differences. What will change the future for the better isn’t politics, agendas nor money. It is love and acceptance. If I may recommend one thing I have learned through trial and much error, it is that idea.
Posted by: Nancy | August 15, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
See, you people say these things in all serious but you don’t realize that with just a twist, you look ridiculous.
Posted by: maria | August 15, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Will, do you believe all the books written about Bush.
Posted by: erin | August 15, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
Plenty of McCain points being racked up here I see. I can’t wait until the convention is over and the Republican sock puppets can stop peddling this tripe.
Posted by: Mike | August 15, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
Yeah- I can’t believe the audacity of these political types who stand in front of flags and talk into microphones and get large rallies together. I mean really, there is NO precedent for that in American politics! How self-centered!
Especially when running campaign, I mean Jeesh! What kind of way is that to get a message out. It woudl be better if the candidate just kind of thought of stuff and waited around until somebody walking by stopped and asked them what they were thinking of, and then if THAT person happened to be a member of the press, well then there you go- mission accomplished! That would be a much more sensible way to reach large groups of voters.
Posted by: JMR | August 16, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
What is wrong with the Americans and the media? Why aren’t Americans and the media continuing the investigation of Obama’s past policies, family whereabouts, radical associates and religious values.
The media should be making an issue about all of these issues. Obama is applying for the most challenging job in the “world”. When Americans learned about Reverend Wright, Black Liberation Theology and Obama’s other associations: Weatherman domestic terrorist, William Ayers; radical, anti American Priest, Father Pflaeger; criminal supporter, Tony Rezko, Americans were appalled and outraged.
Now their gone, evaporated, unimportant, irrelevant in this presidential race?
Thank God McCain has the courage to stand up for Americans with his ads.
Just examining one of the many issues or associates surrounding Obama is enough to question Obama’s character and values. And yes, it is scary.
Obama has minimal government experience, an anti American Pastor as a mentor, many co workers that are radical leaders, a non practicing Muslim father and an Atheist as a mother. Obama is a fast talker, flip flopper and an empty suit running for President: The media and the authorities should be reminding the public of his poor decision making on a constant basis. Rejecting and denouncing someone doesn’t eliminate Obama’s character.
Just knowing that Louis Farrakhan, an anti Semitic, radical, Nation of Islam leader supports Obama should be enough to make our hair stand up on end. Farrakhan held a rally with 20,000 Islam members in Chicago just a few months ago.
Watch Louis Farrakhan and his followers of the Nation of Islam on you tube.
Many questions need answering. One might be: If Obama’s father was a non practicing Muslim, how do the international Muslim nations view Obama?
Why is that an improper question to ask Obama? Obama is running for President, not American idol. I would ask the same of McCain.
Obama is risky and scary. The media should be investigating Obama’s relationships as much as they should be reporting about any nominee that was being supported by the KKK.
Posted by: Al from NJ | August 16, 2008, 6:22 am 6:22 am
McCain is like a Grumpy Elephant with no vision and a flip flopping memory! There is a reason this Elephant is silent on Jerome Corsi. His trainers are Rove & Schmidt at the circus! We know what to expect at the McCain’s convention a Grumpy Elephant entwining his trunk with 2 Rogue elephants in Bush/Cheney with two cheering trainers in Rove & Schmidt who are trying to sell the American People a 3 rd George Bush Term.
Posted by: RFK | August 16, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am
I’m in the “democrat voting for the first time in my life for a republican” category. McCain is in the center and that’s where I am. Obama (the most liberal voting senator) can act like he is more central all he wants, his actions and words have shown him otherwise. I’ll never get over the late term aborting of babies. Ever. I also plan on selling my house in the next couple years and do not want to give 28% of the profits to taxes. I’ve put too much blood, sweat and money into it.
Posted by: McCain gets the dem vote | August 16, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
Our country has only barely survived Bush. I think under McCain the economy will collapse altogether, and we’ll all be living in Katrinaland.
Obama is the only sane choice this year. He’s simply not a Republican, and that’s enough, at this point. We HAVE to change the palace guard if we don’t want to live in a smoldering ruin of a country.
Posted by: John | August 16, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
It’s amazing that ABC has deleted the comments by Young Patriot that were posted over the weekend.
So much for free speech.
ABC are you working for McCain now?
Posted by: observer | August 18, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Free xxx.
Free xxx.
Posted by: Free xxx. | January 19, 2009, 2:16 am 2:16 am