Aug 3, 2008 8:52pm

Thought Congress had Adjourned? GOP Lawmakers to Return for Energy Debate

ABC News’ Viviana Hurtado Reports: House Republicans tell ABC News that at least 30 members of Congress, emboldened by Barack Obama’s "shift" on off shore drilling, are flying back to DC from their Districts today and tomorrow to attend a special debate on energy policy. This "session" is scheduled for Monday, August 4th beginning at 10 am ET. As expected, no Democrats will participate.

One House Republican says, "I’m a 25 year veteran of the U.S. Congress, and I’ve never seen anything like this."

GOP members say they would not be holding this debate tomorrow, if the Democratic nominee had not modified his position on off shore drilling.

They believe that with Obama and his Republican opponent John McCain, appearing to be in "agreement" about off shore drilling, then Speaker Nancy Pelosi should recall the Congress from recess, and put an energy bill on the floor in August.

They are expected to meet in the Old House Chamber where Lincoln worked.

If you didn’t get your fill of Congressional drama after Friday’s booing of the Democratic leadership when Congress adjourned, there’s a second chance tomorrow.

User Comments

Work that wedge issue GOP!!!!!

Posted by: Omentum | August 3, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

The Olympics are coming and no one is paying attention.
When Congress returns in September, I am sure a plan will be worked out where there is an energy plan that can be worked out that will be bipartisan.

Posted by: Sandy | August 3, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

I find it interesting that the liberal left seem mute on Obama’s change in positions over off shore drilling.
Have the enviromentalist all just suddenly decided this is good or is the media simply not covering their opposition to Obama’s new policy?

Posted by: Heather | August 3, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Pandering to folks who only read headlines. Senator Obama stated he might agree to off-shore drilling as part of a COMPROMISE. So what are they willing to budge on in return for him compromising his opposition to an economically risky resumption of offshore drilling. Economically risky since the “lowering of gas prices” is agreed to both be very small and many year out, while the economic hazards of a spill are well proven. Also politically risky for Obama since it will incite his left wing – he does not have a cult of personality who supports his every word, when he wanders off the left’s line (see FISA) he gets pilloried.
Or are the Republicans just planning to take his offer of compromise and arrogantly refuse to budge an inch on such issues as funding alternative energy research, protecting ANWR (for the elk or when our kids *really* need oil – take your pick), CAFE, fair royalty agreements with oil companies, etc.
“If we’ve got a plan on the table that I think meets the goals that America has to set and there are some things in there that I don’t like, then obviously that’s something that I would consider because that’s the nature of how we govern in a democracy.” Senator Obama

Posted by: jhw539 | August 3, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

Heather:”I find it interesting that the liberal left seem mute on Obama’s change in positions over off shore drilling.”
Many of the “liberal left” read beyond the headlines and don’t have a problem with his position yet. If offshore drilling ‘buys’ protection of ANWR and a Mahattan Project scale alternative energy push, bring on the rigs.
But thats the sort of adult “nuanced” shades of gray problem-solving the Republican Right can’t even comprehend.

Posted by: jhw539 | August 3, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Thanks Nancy Pelosi… Thanks for NOTHING!!! Go Cindy, now if we could only get Arnold to be, ahem… “recalled.”

Posted by: ick! | August 3, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

I am so sick of the do nothing democrats and republicans. Neither party deserves our vote, I am voting for Nader/Gonzalez.

Posted by: N/G | August 3, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

To encourage the Republicans, remember the stand of Democrat Senator Jim Webb. Sen. Jim Webb, D-Virginia, opened and then immediately gaveled the
Senate session to a close. He spent 57 seconds in the chamber.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, announced December 19 that he would keep the Senate open with a series of “pro forma” sessions through mid-January. This was done to stop the President of the United States, George W Bush, from making any recess appointments.

Posted by: waggdogg | August 3, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

Heather,
The vast majority of the liberal left agree with Obama. He is willing to compromise on a bipartisan energy bill to get things done in Washington which would include some limited off-shore drilling.
Interesting that the day after Obama praises the Gang of 10 in the Senate who are working on a comprehensive energy bill, McCain follows Obama’s lead.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/04/us/politics/04campaign.html

Posted by: Sandy | August 3, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

What, is Exxon holding a special succession of congress? That’s the only time the republicans pay attention.

Posted by: JR | August 3, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

What, is Exxon holding a special succession of congress? That’s the only time the republicans pay attention.

Posted by: JR | August 3, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

The dedication shown by the House Republicans to the oil lobbyists is remarkable. I mean what’s in it for them?
Oh, campaign donations.
Well I’m sure they would do the same thing for,say..the victims of Katrina.

Posted by: Doug White | August 3, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

Isn’t it amazing that McBush people think he shows “courage” when he says he will compromise, but when Obama says that, he’s just pandering to people. McBush=hypocrite, Republican=hypocrite.

Posted by: JR | August 3, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

***A computer expert-forensic investigator debunks Obama’s birth certificate as a FAKE:
http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/
WOW, this is getting interesting…

Posted by: Herb | August 3, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Drill the phony’s behind!
He needs a comprehensive nuclear energy strategy, putting 1 trillion dollars, all his proposed spending on other things, into nuclear energy technology.
Solve the oil-dependence energy problem once for all.
This phony’s inflating-your-tire policy is as much thin are as he airs.

Posted by: Jokerous | August 3, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

I boo the Republicans who are so narcisstic as to believe they can get drilling rights el pronto by reconvening. They are so narcisstic they are creating a side show. I’m not laughing, but they are really living in another demension. To have that many representative living in a delusion is scary!

Posted by: eyeonyour | August 3, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

–jhw539–You evidently don’t know what you are talking about in ANWAR. There are certainly no ELK there unless you don’t know the difference between an ELK and as POLAR BEAR. Study bit about the area, ok.

Posted by: Mary | August 3, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

What about leases the oil companies already hold, and apparently aren’t tapping? Do they really need new leases right now, or is this just the equivalent of a land grab? Interesting that it seems to follow a series of industry commercials on further exploiting domestic resources.
Why are certain politicians suggesting new leases are such an urgent issue when it could take a decade to bring new supplies online, and make a modest dent in worldwide demand? After all, petroleum is sold in a GLOBAL marketplace (there’s no strictly domestic market), in which American EXPORTS have actually increased while people complain about prices.
As a famous oil man recently noted, we can’t drill our way out of this situation. America consumes too much fuel (~388,000,000 gallons daily of gasoline alone), and too little comes from alternative sources.

Posted by: Alex J | August 3, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

The market forces will do more for us than these overpaid clowns. I could go for 5 weeks of vacation.

Posted by: Huh | August 3, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

The GOP figures it needs to do something after all their scandals and the complete disaster of the last 8 years. I still think they are all pretty much useless. Better if they make that vacation twice as long. Most of the laws they are making nowadays are an affront to our liberties anyways.

Posted by: Ben Straub | August 3, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

I wish those Repuglicans would get a clue.
Their boss, Gee Dubyah, has been in office for 7 years and the Repugs have been in control of Congress for most of the time since 1994. And, this whole mess goes back to the 1980′s, when Reagan destroyed the solar industry in the U.S. and set us up to be slaves to the OPEC countries. Sorry guys, now it looks like we are at Peak Oil, at which point, world production hits max and begins an inexorable decline. Some say the Peak happened in 2005.
The Repugs are pandering to the fear and desperation of the public, who haven’t a clue about the energy problem. Drilling these new offshore areas won’t add any new oil to the pipelines for many years, thus wouldn’t fix the problem even if there were gobs of oil to be found. But, there’s no way to know if there even is any oil to be had on those leases until after these areas are explored. What may be found won’t put a dent in the decline in world production, once it starts.
Wouldn’t it be a better to face reality and fashion a serious plan to stop using oil?

Posted by: E. Swanson | August 3, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

Mary: Thank for your clarification. The fact that the large deer species that inhabits ANWR is actually caribou not elk is relevant to my point or indeed the issue… how? As my nuanced phrasing was clearly too subtle: I don’t care about the cute fluffy things, but I personally feel strongly that the oil in ANWR is far more valuable as a resource for the future.

Posted by: jhw539 | August 3, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

What makes Nancy Pelosi think she doesn’t have to listen to the American people when it comes to drilling? She said on “This Week” on ABC this morning.
…”What we have now is a failed energy policy by the Bush/Cheney two oilmen in the White House $4 a gallon gasoline at the pump”… If you will check you will see that from 2000 to 2007 the average retail price of regular gas was $1.91 per gallon http://www.eia.doe.gov/bookshelf/brochures/gasolinepricesprimer/ When the Democrat majority took control of Congress the price of regular gas was less than $2.20 per gallon http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/wrgp/mogas_home_page.html
Where I live the price is over $4 a gallon. Before President Bush lifted the executive ban on oil and gas drilling in the Outer Continental Shelf, it was over $4.50 a gallon.
You tell me who is standing in the way of lower gas prices. We need a comprehensive plan that will include drilling!!!

Posted by: Patty | August 4, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

I wonder if Obama will change his mind again by tomorrow. LOL
He has flip=flopped on so many items this week it is Hilarious, to see if he knows what he is doing.

Posted by: seah | August 4, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

As we all know, it is essential that we get drilling legislation passed this month so that we can get the first drops of oil 5-10 years from now. In the meantime, maybe turn up your thermostat a couple degrees, close your blinds at home, turn off the lights when you leave a room and carpool to work.
Obama talked about compromise to find a solution – if the GOP is willing to compromise then I’m all for them coming back. I’m just so tired of all the political stunts on both sides…

Posted by: MIguy | August 4, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

as usual, and im surprised its taken this long, but Obamas words are being completely misrepresented here, and by the national press.
He simply stated that he was open for any option to reduce Americas dependence on foreign oil, and if that includes offshore, than so be it.
He didnt say ” everybody run out and buy a boat, a few hundred feet of pipe and a drill rig so we can go shooting holes in the ocean floor”
Talk about desparate for a story, sheesh.
Unfortunately, the position being delivered to us by our politicians and the ever present oil money in this country have us beleiving we are so dependant on foreign oil, but we arent.And we could eliminate foreign oil from our country all together, but we (by virtue of a few bad votes for BUSH 1 and 2) decided it was better to sell our oil on the world market, more profitable and ever expanding.Well, here we are, and We the People are still subsidising oil exploration, and all sorts of other crap to the oil companys, while they put their profits in their respective pockets. How would you like a FEW BILLION DOLLARS to fall into your bank account over a few months time??
We The People should follow the only sane thing ive heard of coming out of south america for some time, reclaim our oil fields, nationalize the production fields, and then let the big oil companys squabble over who gets to refine it for us.If they dont like it, get out.Its our oil, from American soil. The only purpose for offshore drilling is to avoid regulation, and by-pass what few laws the USA has on oil pumped from our space, namely how the oil is declared by where it first makes land fall.
Ever wonder why all those island east of Florida have all the oil handling equipment on them and not Florida??why ship it a few hudred miles further when florida has all kinds of shoreland to process the crude??

Posted by: Bill | August 4, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Obama’s flip to support “drilling” is a trick.
Pelosi said today, again, there will be NO vote on drilling.
What this has done is give Obama both sides of the issue. He can SAY “drill with conditions” and appease the citizens who want drilling, then Pelosi takes it off the table so Obama doesn’t have to vote and PO the environmentalists. Nod, Nod, Wink, Wink, say no more, say no more.
The problem is, it hurts the Congress Democrats come November if there’s no vote before the next break 24 Sep. But it’s more important to get a Dem Pres than to gain amymore seats.
The problem with THAT is that Obama isn’t going to win, anyway.
I love it when a plan falls apart, and it’s about to go to hell as the American People are not as stupid as the Dems think they are. LOL

Posted by: RoBoTech | August 4, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Well, Patty, that shows how psychological this whole thing has become if Bush’s lifting of the moratorium is what caused prices to drop. Considering that it did nothing to affect the supply-demand picture. But oil traders are probably smart enough to know that it’ll be years before additional drilling makes any difference. I suspect it was a modest drop in demand, along with eased tensions with Iran, that caused prices to fall for now. Perhaps you give the recent political gyrations too much credit.

Posted by: Alex J | August 4, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am

Sandy What are you possibly talking about? McCain follows Obama’s lead on drilling? McCain has the comprehensive energy plan not Obama.
Even though McCain I guess did leave out tune-ups and inflating our tires in his plan. I suppose Obama is responsible for the success of the surge too? And Bush, who has been quite clear he could care what any of us think about his foreign policy decisions, I suppose is following Obama’s lead now on foreign policy?
The more Obama changes positions on drilling, FISA, NAFTA, gun control, death penalty, public campaign financing and so on, the more ridiculous the Obama supporters look while trying to justify his decisions or actions while compromising their own principles. Those Democrats opposed to off shore drilling want leadership not compromise unless of course they’re looking at the polls as Obama clearly did in this case.

Posted by: alpaig52 | August 4, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

It is VERY sad and disappointing that they adjourned without even a vote, and even more so that the dems are not coming back as well. From the price of gas, to the price of everything that is shipped, we need this NOW not later, or never in the dems case. We need all of the above, but drilling should be the first step until we come up with new widespread alternatives! Thank you GOP for trying, shame on the dems!

Posted by: Shadow | August 4, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am

glad to see they repubs wasting even more energy all flying back into washington for a PR stunt but it doesn’t matter to them since the US taxpayers are the ones footing the bill for their transportation costs

Posted by: Rich, Orlando | August 4, 2008, 2:17 am 2:17 am

Obama flip flopping again. Is there any policy this guy hasn’t change position on?

Posted by: ArrogantObama | August 4, 2008, 2:33 am 2:33 am

Flip flopping is an issue for you? Well – McCain was against off shore drilling before he was for it. He was for comprehensive immigration reform before he was against it. He was against the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy before he was for them. He was for a civil campaign on the issues before he was for the Britney ad – he was against lobbyists before he had them on his campaign committee – The straight talk express indeed.

Posted by: nh bob | August 4, 2008, 6:36 am 6:36 am

Isn’y it amazing how the Republican minority can whine when they have to. If you guys ever had to get a real job, you’d be in deep . . . .! You may want to polish up the resume. I’m thinking that you bums need to consider America first, not yourselves. We’re intelligent enough to see through you.

Posted by: DAVID NH | August 4, 2008, 7:25 am 7:25 am

T
The GOP House representatives are showing they care about the energy issue enough to stay and fight for us all. Speaker Pelosi should be ashamed of her power outage on this issue.

Posted by: PAXALLES | August 4, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Rep. Mike Pence With Laura Ingraham

Laura Ingraham hosted Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN), with a live report from the House floor/scene of the the Republican revolt. Pence said there were 20 Republicans speaking in the House to a full gallery, despite the House shutdown. He said

Posted by: PAXALLES | August 4, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

Stand your ground.Drill for oil NOW.
How dare anyone in cogress go on vacation when your average person can’t afford to go to the Zoo.
Pelosi and the gang are waiting for their socialist dream to come true(Obama) so they have a free pass to tax us into oblivion.Do we really want to turn the middle class into the worker class.

Posted by: will | August 4, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Do our politicians know anything about the economy? Who advises them? When Bush authorized drilling for oil the price dropped $20 a barrel in a week. If the house voted yes, the price would have dropped by $50 this week and not one drop of oil would have ever been taken from our offshore fields. Oil prices come from speculators and we need to give them something to speculate about. A yes vote could give us gas for under $3 a gallon by Fall even though it would take 5 years to actually get any oil. In that 5 years we could do a lot to reduce our dependence which would lower the price even more. Where is the House leadership? Oh thats right they went on a vacation because they can afford the gas. I say call them back or get rid of them.

Posted by: broke taxpayer | August 4, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

I am very concerned about the Democratic leadership not allowing debate or votes on crucial issues. These are tactics of dictators, not elected representatives. We need to hold these people accountable and remind them that they work for US not the other way around.

Posted by: free speech | August 4, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Congress voted for domestic drilling in 1992. Had we done so, we would have had more domestic oil flowing by 2002. President Clinton vetoed that law. Now the democrats insist on keeping us hostage to dictators sending more that $700 billion a year to other countries, many who are our enemies. This is more than the cost of the Iraq/Afghanistan war against terrorists who have vowed to do additional attacks against the U.S that will be worse than 9-11. Instead of allowing a vote, Nancy P. and Harry Reid gave congress on a 5 week vacation while we Americans struggle with high energy costs, loss of jobs, with airlines, retailers and car manufacturers incurring billions in losses big enough to put them out of business. It seems that the democrat energy strategy is to turn out the lights of congress and turn off the sound to silence dialogue and debate. They are in the “dark” on what is critical to our country and what is important to Americans. Replace them for playing politics or showing incompetence regarding our economy, national security and our future.

Posted by: Battle for Truth | August 4, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

From reading all these opinions, i have come to realize why i am not a Democrat. Most of them do not seem to be real intelligent and it starts from the top such as Nancy. Most of the left are looking for a handout somewhere and not wanting to work for it. It is scary what the Democrats are trying to do to this country.

Posted by: william | August 4, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

i’m not surprised energy prices are high. The US has not invested much in developing domestic energy sources in over 30 yrs.
1980 US oil produced was ~ 10 million bpd
1980 US oil consumption was ~ 14 million bpd.
2007 US oil produced ~ 4.5 million bpd
2007 US oil consumed ~ 21.5 million bpd
If our leaders in Wash continue not to be serious developing all sources (oil, nat gas, wind, solar, nuclear, etc) for intermediate and long term, as well as push conservation & efficiency (use less, better mileage cars, hybrids, light rail subway, etc) in short term till renewable technologies can be developed, then other countries will surpass us economically.
You have to start someplace & sometime, even if it takes 10 years to bring sources online. Otherwise, the country will continue to be where we are today, which is at the control of foreign sources.
i hope it doesn’t take a real disaster before our leaders act.

Posted by: george | August 4, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

I don’t know about the rest of the country but here in the democrat state of New Mexico there are many oil and gas leases that are just sitting because in Rio Ariba county the county commission imposed a moritorium on drilling and the state enacted new drilling regulations that even with the price of oil make it too expensive to drill new wells. Our rig counts are down and many rigs are moving out of the state to other states that don’t have anti-drilling regulations. Talk about biting the hand that feeds you the state gets the vast majority of it’s revenue from oil & gas.

Posted by: Bob | August 4, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

As far as the politicians go, it is simply a matter of who gives whom the most and highest campaign contributations, not hippocracy, in both and each party. You give the most money and the politicians will fall all over themselves doing your bidding.
As for evergy independance, we need to work together, not fight over who is to blame for the mess we’re in, which is, after all, largely our own faults. WE are the ones who use the gas,and there is no getting around it.

Posted by: Brian | August 5, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am

Democrats are not wih it. Where can you find a better way to stimulate the economy? They should encourage the oil companys to drill off shore. This is great way to dilute big BIG OIL PROFITS.
It is amazing to see what variety of devices and supplies are needed to support and operate a rig. Were aware of diesel engines, generators, pipes and electric motors. Think of bed sheets, pots, pans,bunks and all the jobs created to supply these items long before drilling starts. Approval should be on condition that items be made in the USA even if at a premium.

Posted by: daniel | August 5, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

Who do these politicians work for??? Last time I checked they worked for the country and I don’t remember approving any paid vacations…

Posted by: Mike | August 5, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

trying to swiftboat Obama…no they are trying to swiftboard the entire democratic base who are poised to become a veto proof Congress in 2009. At the same time GOP lawmakers are making a fool of themseleves returning to Washington in a low budget theatrical production, GOP’er up for re-election have been told by party leaders to skip the RNC Convention to work on their stump speeches. yeah right, “Don’t be seen with McCain since he might lose and then the avalanche will begin in the loss of congressional seats.” Is more likely the belief.
Even Cheney has been asked not to attend. This is laughable. The Republicans are trying to save face and ass.

Posted by: clarity | August 5, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Wow, what great theater, Republicans!
Expensive for us, and big oil, too.
You guys are a laugh riot. Really desperate looking – are the big oil guys who’s money you pocket by the hand fulls holding your feet to the fire? I smell the fat burning now. Sorry, not buying this stunt.
Just stay on vacation – till November, please.

Posted by: wontonpe | August 5, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

Say what you like.
EVERYONE is overlooking the fact that, if Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz oil could jump to $300 per barrel.
You do the math to figure that you can’t afford gas or food when that happens!!
And, it could very well happen!
How shortsighted can you get?!?!?!
The Democrats or any Republicans who worked hard to pass National Watermelon Month, and voted to recognize dirt as a natural resource,,and then went on vacation while the rest of the country struggles,,,out to have their butts chapped in the next election, or be recalled.

Posted by: JMKC | August 5, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

would LOVE to have 5 weeks vacation–I think it is awful that anyone would try to interrupt this well deserved time off for Nancy and Harry. They have done so much for us.

Posted by: Joe | August 6, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.